William de Baguley

Events 

Date of Birth: unknown.

Place of Birth: unknown.

Date of Death: unknown.

Place of Death: unknown.

Relationships

Father: Ralph de Baguley.

This relationship is given by Leycester (p. 230).

Mother: unknown.

Spouse: Clemence de Chedle.

This relationship is given by Leycester (p. 230). See Clemence’s page for evidence.

Children: 

(Complete source citations for facts about the children on this page are currently outside of the scope of this project.)

Robert

Joan

Isabel de Baguley (died about 1349) married Sir Thomas Danyers.

Evidence

from Leycester (p. 230):

At last the two Daughters and Co-heirs of Sir Roger de Chedle divided the whole Inheritance, 1 Edw. 3. 1327. Clemence the elder Daughter married William Son of Raufe Baggiley; she had Clifton, and divers Lands in Chedle and Hulme. Agnes the younger Daughter married Richard Son of Robert de Buckley; she had the Capital Messuage of Chedill, and the Advowson of the Church of Chedill, and divers Homages, Rents, and Services. Lib. C. fol. 150. l.

from the Calendars of Close Rolls:

1322, October 24. York.

To Roger de Waltham, keeper of. certain lands of the rebels in co. Stafford. Order to restore to Nicholas de Langeford, knight, his lands, which were taken into the king's hands because he was a rebel, as he has made ransom with the king for his life and lands, and has found mainpernors for his good behaviour and security for payment of his ransom, to wit William de Baggeleye and John de Ardern, knights of co. Chester, Richard de Hoyland, knight, of co. Lancaster, and Thomas de Barynton, of CO. St

1325, November 26. Westminster.

To Geoffrey le Scrop and his fellows, justices to hear pleas before the king. Order not to permit William de Baggeleye, Robert de Preiers, Hamo de Asshelegh, Richard Starky, the elder, Richard Starky, the younger, John de Legh, Geoffrey de Werberton, William de Chetelton, Hamo de Massy, Thomas de Chedul, Robert de Wenyngton, Robert Stronghogh, John de Karynton, John de Wennebury, and Richard de Lanton to be aggrieved or molested at the suit of the king or of others by reason of the goods of the rebels and their adherents taken and occupied by them whilst in the king's company in the pursuit of the rebels, as the king has granted that those who were in his company in pursuit of the rebels shall not be molested or aggrieved at his suit or the suit of others by reason of the rebels' goods taken and occupied by them in the said pursuit between 17 October, in the 15th year of his reign, and 5 April following.

1326. August 31.  Porchester.

To the sheriff of Lancaster. Whereas the king ordained that those who were in his service to pursue certain of his rebels should not be molested or aggrieved at his suit or at the suit of any other concerning gooils of the rebels and their adherents taken and occupied by them between 17 October, in the 1 5th year of the king's reign, and 5 April following, and he now learns from the complaint of Hamo de Macy, Geoffrey da VVerberton, William de Baggelegh, Robert de Prayers, Hamo atte Asshelegh, Richard his brother, Thomas de Chedel, John his brother, Richard del Brome, Robert de Wewyngton, John his brother, John de Legh, William his brother, Robert Strongbogh and Thomas his brother of Carynton, William de Coudray of Bronichai, Peter de Werberton, John de Werberton, Hugh de Werberton, John de Wrennobury, Thomas de Bamvill, Richard Starky, the elder, Richard Starky, the younger, William son of William de Brerton, and Adam de Altryncheham that although John de Radeclyve was one of the rebels at the said time, and afterwards made fine with the king for his life by reason of the premises before Geoffrey le Scrop and his fellows, justices to hold pleas before the king, for which reason they ought not to be aggrieved or molested by reason of any trespass committed upon the said John in carrying away his goods during the said pursuit, nevertheless, by pretext of a plea moved against them in the king's court by John concerning certain of his goods taken and carried away by them at the time of the said pursuit, the sheriff of Lancaster is ordered by the king's writ of judgment, returnable before the king in the octaves of Michaelmas next, to exact them until they be outlawed unless they appear to satisfy the king for their ransom in this behalf, and they are now thus put in exigent and are shortly to be outlawed, although the said John de Radeclyve made fine with the king for his rebellion, as they are prepared to verify by the rolls and memoranda before the king ; wherefore they pray the king to provide a remedy : the king, as the rolls and memoranda aforesaid are in the custody of the said Geoffrey and not before him, and as he wishes to aid them, orders the sheriff to receive them if they will render themselves to prison in that county, and to cause them to be delivered from prison and the exaction to be superseded upon their finding mainprise to have them before the king at the said day.

References

A Descriptive Catalogue of Ancient Deeds: Volume 4. (His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1902).

Leycester, Peter, Sir. Historical antiquities, in two books the first treating in general of Great-Brettain and Ireland : the second containing particular remarks concerning Cheshire / faithfully collected out of authentick histories, old deeds, records, and evidences, by Sir Peter Leycester, Baronet ; whereunto is annexed a transcript of Doomsday-book, so far as it concerneth Cheshire, taken out of the original record. (1673) 

Ormerod, George; Peter Leycester; William Smith; William Webb; and Thomas Helsby. The history of the county palatine and city of Chester: compiled from original evidences in public offices, the Harleian and Cottonian mss., parochial registers, private muniments, unpublished ms. collections of successive Cheshire antiquaries, and a personal survey of every township in the county, incorporated with a republication of King's Vale royal and Leycester's Cheshire antiquities. (London: G. Routledge, 1882).

Wrottesley, G. Pedigrees from the Plea Rolls. (1905).