What's with this rejection of paraphlytic groups as unnatural by the intellectual mainstream (the Big Media Scientist Club)?

By that definition I would be the same individual as my Mom, since otherwise my Mom would be a Paraphlytic group.

And what about a SPECIES I'm descended from?* Are they either Homo Sapiens or not a real Species? Cause I'm descended from something like Dimetrodon if you go back far enough.

*(Cause God's way of creating species is Evolution)

If you don't understand any of this, thank your lucky stars. It's just false science based on a massive misinterpretation of the Theory of Evolution being forced on real scientists by the Big Media Scientist Club.

+Since one website I found gives a different answer, here is the generally accepted definition of

'paraphlytic': descended from a common ancestor, but not including ALL descendents of

the group. Really, though, if you didn't know that, don't worry- this message is not for

you. You don't need a fancy scientific name to use common sense.

#And now they won't even TEACH us about creatures if they're only members of paraphlytic groups!

They're withholding information from us!!!!!

We have a right to know!!!!! WE HAVE A RIGHT TO LEARN SCIENCE!!!!!!!!

YOU HEAR THAT, BIG MEDIA SCIENTIST CLUB? WE HAVE A RIGHT TO LEARN SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!

But we can't. Not anymore. Fuck.

Good thing I completed 'Before the Dinosaurs' when I still could!

('Life in the Temperate Rainforests' is different. They haven't got to tree science yet.)