83。《灵心城堡》的作者大德兰(Teresa of Avila)是假师傅

作者:Tim Charlies 译者:小草

译序2014年加拿大一教会的牧师 Tim Challies 就发表了一篇文章,指出《灵心城堡》(The Interior Castle)的作者大德兰是位假师傅。华人教会里有些人在推荐《灵心城堡》,比如王志勇,还以为是灵修的佳作,这实是误人害己的事。此文是节译自 Tim Challies 的《The False Teachers: Teresa of Avila May 15, 2014》(假师傅:大德兰》,不是对原文的逐句和完整的翻译,只是做选择性的、概要性的翻译。目的就是提醒基督徒要小心防备和分辩,不要因为有人(甚至是牧者传道)推荐说好,就以为真的是对灵命有益。现在的谎言和谬论泛滥,小心中毒被误导,以致走进歧途而犯罪得罪神!

亚维拉的德兰(Teresa of Avila)又被称为是大德兰,于1515年3月28日出生于西班牙。大德兰是神秘主义的错误教导的代表者。大德兰的母亲在1529年去世。大德兰在20岁时进入西班牙阿维拉本地的加尔默罗会修院(the Carmelite Convent of the Incarnation)。很快的她遭遇了健康的问题,在这期间她有了对祷告的喜爱。然而,当她身体恢复健康后,很快地她对祷告的喜爱就消落了。

1554年,当大德兰将近40岁时,当她站在受伤的基督像前,她经历了强烈的宗教体验。她感觉基督在她里面,她完全被基督所淹没。这样的体验越来越常发生,基督向她显现对她变得习以为常,但这连与她在一起的修女和神父都觉得可疑。实际上,在圣经正典完成之后,任何人宣称从神那里得到特别的启示都是可疑的。

1582年10月4日,大德兰死于癌症。40年之后,她被封圣。大德兰留下了相当数量的书籍,其中有《完美之途》,《灵心城堡》,还有一些诗和信件。

大德兰是位神秘主义者,她教导的中心是如何提升灵魂到与神有甜蜜和不间断的神秘相交。她描述了这种提升灵魂的四个步骤:

1. 精神祷告 :静思和专心

2. 寂静祷告: 在经历基督的同在中让心灵安静下来

3. 联合的奉献 :超然的,狂喜的状态,理性被淹没,经历有意识的被提

4. 狂喜或被提的奉献: 被提的状态,肉身消失。感觉、想像、和记忆全被淹没。有时身体被提到空中。这是神秘体验的高峰,会产生精神恍惚的状态,据说大德兰不止一次被看到被提离地。

大德兰不仅影响了她那时代的人,也影响了后人,特别是她被封圣之后。现在她对基督新教的影响也开始出现,特别是在基督教里出现了对静观祷告的兴趣。大德兰对灵魂的提升和与神的神秘相交的教导,也影响了那些着迷于神秘感的人,比如曼宁,傅士德,和倪柝声。

神秘主义的中心就是超出圣经的体验。神秘主义者追寻直接的经历神,而不是通过对圣经的默想。对每个时代的基督徒来说,我们应该思想的是:圣经是不是充足的?我们是不是确认圣经的充足性-- 圣经是我们生活和教义所需的一切?还是我们需要神用别的方式,比如神秘的被提,来向我们启示?

基督新教一直都持守唯独圣经的教义。大德兰的书写于反宗教改革时期,当时罗马天主教面对新教的教义而反对宗教改革。唯独圣经,而不是任何个人的经历或一些人的传统是我们最终的权威。圣经才是我们最终的权威,因为圣经是神所说的。唯独圣经就是在一切有关信仰和基督徒的生活上,圣经是最终极的属灵权威。同时,圣经对我们灵性的教导也是充足的,圣经不仅足以教导我们认识神,也足以教导我们如何认识神。当我们理解了圣经的独特性,我们也就能理解神秘主义的危险。

节译自:The False Teachers: Teresa of Avila

Tim Challies 《The False Teachers: Teresa of Avila May 15, 2014》的原文:

A few weeks ago I set out on a series of articles through which I am scanning the history of the church—from its earliest days all the way to the present time—to examine some of Christianity’s most notable false teachers and to examine the false doctrine each of them represents. Along the way we have visited such figures as Joseph Smith (Mormonism), Ellen G. White (Adventism), Norman Vincent Peale (Positive Thinking) and Benny Hinn (Faith Healing). Today we turn to a post-Reformation nun whose mysticism has remained influential through the centuries. She represents the false teaching of mysticism.

Teresa of Avila

Teresa of Avila was born on March 28, 1515, to a family that would soon number twelve. Sadly, Teresa’s mother died in 1529 and against her father’s wishes, she entered the Carmelite Convent of the Incarnation at Avil. Very quickly she encountered significant health concerns and was rendered an invalid for three years. It was during this time that she discovered and developed a love for prayer. However, once her health was recovered, this dedication to prayer soon waned. At that time, and in that area, the Carmelites were a relaxed order and living as a nun was easy, respectable, and could even be glamorous at times.

In 1554, when she was almost 40, Teresa had an intense religious experience while she was before an image of the wounded Christ in the convent’s private chapel. She felt that Christ “was within me, or that I was totally engulfed by him.” Such experiences became more common and she became accustomed to Christ appearing to her and engulfing her in his love, though this was regarded with suspicion by her fellow nuns and by her priest confessors. There was suspicion toward anyone who claimed to be receiving special illumination or revelation from God.

In 1558, increasingly concerned with the laxity of Carmelite life, Teresa began to consider reform. This reform would require Carmelite nuns to completely withdraw from society around them so they could dedicate their time and attention to prayer, and through a life of repentance and penance, do works of reparation for the sins of mankind. Pope Pius IV authorized this reform and in 1562 she founded a new convent, insisting that the nuns survive only through receiving public alms. She would give the rest of her life to establishing and growing sixteen of these convents through Spain. Though it all, she would have ongoing and increasing mystical experiences.

She left behind a significant number of books including The Way of Perfection (1583), and The Interior Castle (1588), which many regard as a masterpiece of spiritual autobiography alongside Augustin’s Confessions. Beside her books, she left behind some 31 poems and 458 letters.

Teresa died of cancer on October 4, 1582. It was said that she died in a state of ecstasy and that as she died, any object she had touched sent forth a sweet odor. Forty years later she was canonized by Pope Gregory XV and thereafter named a Doctor of the Church by Pope Paul VI, the first female to be so honored.

False Teaching – Mysticism

Teresa was a mystic. Donald Whitney says mysticism refers to “those forms of Christian spirituality which attempt direct or unmediated access to God.” Mystics are those who expect to experience “a direct inner realization of the Divine” and an “unmediated link to an absolute.”

At the heart of Teresa’s teaching was the ascent of the soul into sweet and unbroken mystical communion with God. She described four progressive stages in this ascent.

  1. Mental Prayer. The first is mental prayer, devout contemplation and concentration, through which the soul withdraws from everything physical around it. This happens especially during penitence and during times of observing Christ in his suffering and death.

  2. Prayer of Quiet. In prayer of quiet, the human will becomes lost in God’s will in a kind of supernatural state. Faculties such as memory, reason and imagination have not yet been quieted from outside distraction, but the mind and will are quiet in a growing experience of Christ’s presence.

  3. Devotion of Union. The devotion of union is a supernatural, ecstatic state in which human reason has become absorbed in God and only memory and imagination remain unclaimed. This is a state of bliss and peace where the higher faculties experience a sweet rest and the devotee experiences conscious rapture in God’s love.

  4. Devotion of Ecstasy or Rapture. This is a passive state in which the feeling of having a physical body disappears. Sense, memory and imagination are all absorbed in God. “Body and spirit are in the throes of a sweet, happy pain, alternating between a fearful fiery glow, a complete impotence and unconsciousness, and a spell of strangulation, sometimes by such an ecstatic flight that the body is literally lifted into space . This after half an hour is followed by a reactionary relaxation of a few hours in a swoon-like weakness, attended by a negation of all the faculties in the union with God. The subject awakens From this in tears; it is the climax of mystical experience, producing a trance. Indeed, she was said to have been observed levitating during Mass on more than one occasion.”1

Followers & Modern Adherents

Despite significant opposition to her experiences and reform, Teresa gained a substantial following in her day and was influential on her generation of fellow Carmelite nuns and on other mystics such as John of the Cross. Her influence has only widened in the centuries since, and especially after her canonization. Her books have been the primary means of disseminating her ideas.

In days past her many admirers have seen her in many different lights. “George Eliot, who cast Teresa as patron saint of the frustrated bluestocking Dorothea Brooke in Middlemarch ; Vita Sackville–West, who made Teresa into a twentieth century free spirit with (but of course) lesbian proclivities; and a range of feminist theorists, from Simone de Beauvoir in The Second Sex to the tenured denizens of numerous women’s studies departments. To them, Teresa was a postmodern “subversive” against patriarchal power structures both secular and ecclesial, androcentric metanarrative, and whatever else is currently deemed oppressive to the female sex.”2

In recent days her influence among Christians has grown, and especially during a resurgence of interest in contemplative prayer. Her doctrine of asceticism is considered a classic explanation and exposition of the contemplative life. Teresa’s understanding of the soul’s ascent and the mystical communion with God through contemplative prayer has been influential to the likes of those who have a fascination with mysticism including Brennan Manning, Richard Foster, and Watchman Nee, along with many who were (or are) associated with Emerging Christianity. We can also spot her direct or indirect influence in the works of bestselling authors like Sarah Young (Jesus Calling) and Ann Voskamp (One Thousand Gifts).

What the Bible Says

At the heart of mysticism is the primacy of experience over Scripture. Mystics seek to experience God directly rather than through the mediation of the Bible. Scripture demands for itself a unique place in the Christian life and church and mysticism threatens to supplant it. One of the great challenges before every Christian and every generation of Christians is this: Will the Bible be enough? Will we affirm the sufficiency of Scripture—that the Bible is all we need for life and doctrine—or will we demand that God reveal himself to us in other ways, such as mystical raptures?

Protestants have long held to the doctrine of sola scripture—Scripture alone. Teresa wrote during the Counter-Reformation, the period of time in which Rome was responding to the challenge of these Protestant doctrines. Donald Whitney says, “the Scriptures alone—and not anyone’s individual experience nor the collected and distilled corporate tradition of the church—are our final authority. And the Scriptures are our final authority because the Scriptures are what God says. In this context sola scriptura means that the Bible is the ultimate authority in all matters of faith and Christian living, and thus the ultimate authority in spirituality.” The Bible is also “a sufficient guide for our spirituality. In other words, the authority for our spirituality claims its sufficiency as the director of our spirituality.” The Bible will guide us not only in what we know of God but also in how we know God.

Whitney offers two ways we cross this boundary of sola scriptura. The first is whenever

we seek an experience with Him in a way not found in Scripture. In one sense it is difficult to think of an example of an encounter with God for which there is nothing remotely similar in the Bible. Yet in another sense mankind seems to have a unlimited capacity to invent ways to “get in touch with God.” And all these have in common the presumption of the ability to experience God apart from the forms He has selected, and/or the presumption of the ability to experience Him immediately, that is, unmediated by God’s ordained means of revealing Himself to us.

A second way to cross the boundary of sola scriptura is

seeking to experience God in a way not inaugurated, guided, or interpreted by Scripture. Scripture should inaugurate many of our experiences with God, for the Scriptures are the clearest revelation of God. This is why He gave His Word to us, so that we would experience Him. And in a real sense we might say that all true experiences with God are ultimately inaugurated by Scripture.

When we understand the unique position Scripture demands for itself, we also understand the danger inherent in mysticism.

网址:https://www.challies.com/articles/the-false-teachers-teresa-of-avila/