1991 - Conferencia de Paz de Madrid (30 oct-3 nov)
Resumen
Fuente:
Desde el Tratado de Paz con Egipto (1979), hubo diversas iniciativas de Israel y otros para avanzar en el proceso de paz en el Oriente Medio. Estos esfuerzos acabaron llevando a la Conferencia de Madrid (30 oct - 1 nov 1991).
Tras la Guerra del Golfo, el Presidente Bush presionó a las partes hasta que se acordó reunir una conferencia de paz con la participación de Egipto, Líbano, Siria, una comisión conjunta de jordanos y palestinos bajo los auspicios y la mediación de los Estados Unidos y Rusia.
En Madrid se reunieron los equipos diplomáticos de los países árabes, representados por los Ministros de Relaciones Exteriores, y la comitiva israelí representada por el premier Itzjak Shamir.
Las negociaciones serían bilaterales y directas. Los jordanos y los palestinos se presentarían como una comitiva conjunta aunque en el momento de negociar se reunirían en dos cuartos contiguos.
La reunión en Madrid no concluyó en acuerdos concretos aunque fue el puntapié inicial para un proceso de paz en el Medio Oriente. The formal proceedings were followed by bilateral negotiations between the parties and by multilateral talks addressing regional concerns.
Dos meses después del primer encuentro en Madrid, las comisiones bilaterales se volvieron a reunir en Washington. Allí se logró cierto avance en las negociaciones entre Israel y el Líbano. Se decidió que Israel se retiraría de la franja de seguridad una vez se acordara el ente responsable de dividir las fuerzas militares. Este paso valía muy poco sin contar con el consentimiento de Siria, el patrón del Líbano.
Marco de Trabajo
Las negociaciones de paz en Oriente Medio hoy se llevan a cabo en el Marco de Trabajo fijado en la Conferencia de Madrid, descrito en la carta de invitación a la Conferencia, que está formado por los tres elementos básicos siguientes:
1. The Opening Conference
The Madrid invitation called for the convening of an opening conference, in order to inaugurate two separate yet parallel negotiating tracks : the bilateral track and the multilateral track.
The conference was designed to serve as a opening forum for all the participants, having no power to impose solutions or veto agreements.
The opening addresses by hosts (España), co-sponsors (EEUU y Rusia) and participating delegations reflect the aspirations of each.
This conference may only be reconvened with the agreement of all participants.
2. The Bilateral Track
The bilateral negotiations are meant to resolve the conflicts of the past.
The first-ever direct talks between Israel and her immediate Arab neighbors opened in Madrid on November 3, 1991, immediately following the Madrid Conference. Over a dozen formal rounds of bilateral talks were subsequently hosted by the US Department of State in Washington.
These talks are, in fact, four separate sets of bilateral negotiations:
Israel-Jordan
Israel-Palestinians
Israel-Syria
Israel-Lebanon
While the talks with the three Arab states are aimed at achieving peace treaties, the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians are based on a two-stage formula: 5-year interim self-government arrangements, to be followed by negotiations on the permanent status issues.
Israel-Palestinos
Israel and the Palestinians: Following months of intensive behind-the-scenes contacts in Oslo between negotiators for Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), aDeclaration of Principles (DOP) was formulated outlining self-government arrangements of the Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Its signing, on 13 September 1993, was preceded by an exchange of letters between PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, in which the PLO renounced the use of terrorism, pledged to invalidate those articles in its covenant which deny Israel's right to exist, and committed itself to a peaceful resolution of the decades-long conflict. In response, Israel recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people.
The DOP contained a set of mutually agreed general principles regarding a five-year interim period of Palestinian self-rule and a framework for the various stages of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. The arrangements for Palestinian self-rule in the Gaza Strip and the Jericho area were implemented in May 1994; transfer of powers and responsibilities in the West Bank in the spheres of education and culture, health, social welfare, direct taxation, and tourism was implemented three months later. The DOP and other agreements signed by Israel and the Palestinians culminated in the signing of the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement of September 1995.
This agreement included a broadening of Palestinian self-government by the means of an elected self-governing authority, the Palestinian Council (elected in January 1996), and continued redeployment of the IDF in the West Bank. The agreement also set out the mechanism governing Israeli-Palestinian relations that would lead to a Final Status Agreement. Under the Interim Agreement, the West Bank was divided into three types of areas:
Area A - comprising the main cities of the West Bank: full Palestinian Council responsibility for internal security and public order, as well as full responsibility for civil affairs. (The city of Hebron was subject to special arrangements set out in the Interim Agreement; the protocol concerning the redeployment in Hebron was signed in January 1997.)
Area B - comprising small towns and villages in the West Bank: Palestinian Council responsibility for civil affairs (as in Area A) and maintenance of public order, while Israel retained overriding security responsibility to safeguard its citizens and to combat terrorism.
Area C - comprising all Jewish settlements, areas of strategic importance to Israel, and largely unpopulated areas of the West Bank: full Israeli responsibility for security and public order, as well as civil responsibilities related to territory (planning and zoning, archeology, etc.). The Palestinian Council assumes responsibility with regard to all other civil spheres of the Palestinian population.
The timetable for the implementation of further redeployment phases, as specified in the Interim Agreement, was revised on a number of occasions by the two sides, most notably in the Wye River Memorandum of October 1998. Following these agreed revisions, Israel completed the first and second phases of the Further Redeployment (FRD) process in March 2000. As a result of the redeployments, over 18% of the West Bank was designated Area A and over 21% was designated Area B, with 98% of the Palestinian population of the West Bank under Palestinian authority.
Final Status negotiations between the parties, to determine the nature of the permanent settlement between Israel and the Palestinian entity, began as scheduled in May 1996. Suicide bomb attacks, perpetrated by Hamas terrorists in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv during 1996, darkened Israel's view of the peace process. A hiatus of three years followed and Final Status talks were resumed only after the Sharm el-Sheikh Memorandum(September 1999). Issues to be dealt with included: refugees, settlements, security matters, borders, Jerusalem, and more.
At the invitation of US President Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat attended a summit at Camp David in July 2000 to resume negotiations. The summit ended without an agreement being reached due to PA Chairman Arafat's refusal to accept the generous proposal. However, a trilateral statement was issued, defining the agreed principles to guide further negotiations.
In September 2000, the Palestinians initiated an Intifada, acampaign of indiscriminate terror and violence, causing heavy loss of life and suffering to both sides. Numerous efforts to end the violent confrontation and renew the peace process failed due to the ongoing Palestinian terrorism.
Israel accepted the vision presented in the speech by U.S. President George W. Bush on June 24, 2002 for ending Palestinian terrorism, to be followed by the final settlement of all issues and peace.
On May 25, 2003, Israel accepted the Roadmap, accompanied by comments that Israel considers integral to its implementation and a U.S. commitment to address these comments. However, the Palestinians have yet to live up to their obligations under the first phase of the Roadmap, primarily the unconditional cessation of terrorism and end to incitement. Among the measures taken by Israel against terrorism has been the construction of an anti-terrorist fence.
In August 2005, Israel disengagedfrom the Gaza Strip and from four settlements in northern Samaria (the West Bank) in an effort to end the stalemate in the peace process following five years of Palestinian terrorism.
However, Palestinian terrorism continued, following the election of the Hamas government, including Kassam missile attacks from the Gaza Strip on the northern Negev and the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier, necessitating Israeli military action.
Israel-Siria
Israel and Syria: Within the framework of the Madrid formula, talks between Israeli and Syrian delegations began in Washington and were held from time to time at ambassadorial level, with the involvement of high-ranking American officials.
Two rounds of Syrian-Israeli peace talks (December 1995, January 1996) focused on security and other key issues. Highly detailed and comprehensive in scope, the talks identified important areas of conceptual agreement and convergence for future discussion and consideration. Negotiations between Israel and Syria were renewed in January 2000 in Shepherdstown, US, after a standstill of more than three years. However, these negotiations did not bring about a breakthrough, nor did the meeting between President Clinton and President Hafez Assad in Geneva (March 2000) lead to renewed talks.
Syria, along with Iran, backs the most violent and dangerous terrorist organizations, such as Hizbullah and the various Palestinian terrorist groups.
Israel-Líbano
Israel and Lebanon: On May 23, 2000, Israel completed withdrawal of all military forces from the Security Zone in Southern Lebanon, in accordance with the Israeli government's decision to implement UN Security Council resolution 425. Lebanon, unfortunately, has yet to comply fully with UNSC Resolution 425, as well as with UNSC Resolution 1559 (which calls for the dismantling of Hizbullah and the deployment of Lebanon's army in southern Lebanon).
Violence again erupted, following the abduction of two Israel soldiers and the bombardment of Israel’s northern cities by the Hizbullah on 12 July 2006. Israel was forced to act to remove the entrenched Hizbullah terrorist presence in Southern Lebanon, which included tens of thousands of heavy artillery rockets provided by Iran and Syria and aimed at millions of Israeli civilians.
In the ensuing conflict, which later become known as the Second Lebanon War, over 4,000 rockets were fired at civilian targets within Israel, causing 44 civilian casualties and extensive damage to civilian infrastructure and property. 119 Israel soldiers were also killed in the conflict during military operations. The fighting concluded with the adoption on 11 August 2006 of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which calls for calls for the unconditional release of the abducted soldiers, calls upon Lebanon and the new UNIFIL to together deploy throughout southern Lebanon and establishes an embargo of weapons to Lebanese groups other than the government of Lebanon.
Israel-Jordania
3. The Multilateral Track
The multilateral negotiations are meant to build the Middle East of the future, while building confidence among the regional parties.
These talks, which opened in Moscow in January 1992, include five separate forums attended by delegations from countries in the region as well as representatives of the international community.
The negotiations focus on key issues that concern the entire Middle East -- water, environment, arms control, refugees and economic development.
The talks have taken place in working groups which meet periodically in venues throughout the world, including the Middle East.
The multilateral talks were constituted as an integral part of the peace process, aimed at finding solutions for key regional problems, while serving as a confidence-building measure to promote development of normalized relations among the Middle East nations.
Following the Moscow Multilateral Middle East Conference (January 1992), with the participation of 36 countries and international organizations, the delegations broke up into five working groups dealing with specific areas of common regional concern (environment, arms control and regional security, refugees, water resources, and economic development) which meet from time to time in various venues in the region.
The Steering Committee, comprised of representatives of key delegations and chaired by the US and Russia, coordinates the multilateral talks.
Since the outbreak of Palestinian violence in September 2000, most of the activities in the multilateral track have been frozen.
Documentos
Fuente: Embajada de EEUU en Israel
Documentos selectos relevantes
Fuente:
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon announced the Disengagement Plan, Dec 2003 (GPO/Moshe Milner)