What is wrong with Evolution?

Version 1A

By Mark Farquharson

Evolution is a theory which gets reported as fact. When a fossil is found that no one knows anything about, it suddenly becomes a missing link. However no one knows it is a missing link, no one can prove it is a missing link. They don’t know who it’s parents were, or it’s offspring, so how do they know it is a missing link? The fact of the matter is they don’t know. They know nothing, they were not there, and there is no test that can prove that it is a missing link. A number of times after reporting that something is a missing link, a new study will come along, that states that it is not a missing link. The truth final comes out, it was a bird all along, and not a link between dinosaurs and birds. It was a ape all along, it was a man all along. In other cases it is a fraud, someone has added bones, to the fossil that don’t belong to it. This comes out later, but the media don’t like it when a fossil is no long a missing link. The new discovery that it is no long a missing link, does not usual receive the same coverage.

In 2003 fossil remains were labelled a new hominid species, Homo floresiensis. In 2006 researchers suggest that these same remains were in fact Homo sapiens with microcephaly, that is they had an abnormally small head. Well which is it?

The Brontosaurus was a mistake, the wrong head was put on the dinosaur, this mistake lasted until 1975. http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/brontosaurus.html

There have been carbon dating tests on Dinosaur bones one with a date of only 16,120 years. Not that the people doing the test knew they were Dinosaur bones. http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/15

Carbon dating also has problems, the dates cannot be trusted.

Dinosaurs did walk with man, there is evidence of this, and the bible also tells us that dinosaurs walked with man. Refer to the article: Dinosaurs hidden in the bible?

Unless someone could go back in time, and watch evolution in progress, there is no way to prove it.

But surely the planet is billions of years old? No there is no evidence that the planet is that old. No rock dating does not prove it.

The Earth according to scientists is evidently billions of years old, but according to these same scientists all matter in the universe came from nothing, which of course is a scientific impossibility!

The earth is not evidently billions of years old. A test by a scientist might give an age of 100s of millions of years or billions of years on some rock or something, but that does not prove that is that old. Before you can test a rock or something you have to know the test works over that period. How do we know the test is correct. The correct way is to test something that you know what the age is, this is how you confirm you are getting the right results. Then you can move on and test something else. However you only know it is correct over that period, not some extended time that is way out in the past. To correctly know that the results are correct over that period, you would have to know for sure when a certain bunch of rocks were made. Since there is no records that are billions of years old, and since no one is alive that was around back then, the tests can not be verified. All rock dating is totally meaningless. We have no knowledge that rates of decay stay the same over thousands of years, so how do we know that they stay the same over billions of years? Please show me the proof that they stay the same. In fact there is evidence of faster rates of decay.

But surely the stars are billions of years old?

No we do not know the stars are that old, yes I know about the speed of light, question was it the same speed 1000 years ago? Again we have no knowledge that the speed of light has been the same over that period, we have no readings from back then, so how do we know it has been the same over billions of years, we don’t. We don’t know how God create the stars, but scientists like to give out theories that don’t even involve God.

The fact of the matter is no one was there when God created the stars, so please tell me how we know?

The universe was actually created on day two of the Genesis 1 account:

Genesis 1:6 And God said, Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it be a means of dividing, between waters and waters,

1:7 And God made the expanse, and it divided between the waters that were under the expanse and the waters that were above the expanse. And it was so.

1:8 And God called the expanse, heavens. So it was evening—and it was morning, a, second day. {REB}

The expanse was placed between the waters that were on the earth. This was called heavens. These heavens are the sky and the universe, space.

Genesis 1:16 And God made the two great luminaries,—the greater luminary to rule the day, and the lesser luminary to rule the night, also the stars.

1:17 And God set them in the expanse of the heavens,—to give light on the earth;

1:18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good.

1:19 So it was evening—and it was morning, a fourth day. {REB}

The scriptures inform us that the stars were placed in the expanse that was created on day two, the expanse that was called the heavens. Therefore they could not be older than the earth, for they were made after the earth on day four, being place in the expanse that was created on day two. Since the present earth is only about 6000 years old, the stars are only this old as well.

God warns us about this very thing, in the bible:

Job 38:4 Where wast thou, when I founded the earth? Tell, if thou knowest understanding! REB

No clearly you, like Job, was not there…. Where were the scientists, when God founded the earth? They had not been born yet, should I agree with a bunch of scientists that were not even there, or should I believe the bible.

Darwin lived in the 1800’s, before that there was none of this evolution claptrap. Evolution is an unproven theory, that people take as fact. It is a theory that can never be proven, and is totally untrue.

You do know that this stuff leads people away from God, as people now believe that everything happened by random chance and that there is no God. They believe that it could have all just happened, which of course is impossible. If something is leading people away from God there is a good chance that it is not true. Who is it that wants to lead people away from God?

Creation-Recreation

Articles