(Razavi + 2002)
Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study.
DOI or Website Link: CrossRef | PubMed |Web of Science® Times Cited: 32
Publication:British Journal of Cancer Nursing 87: 1–7.
Authors: Razavi D, N Delvaux, S Marchal, J Durieux, C Farvacques, L Dubus and R Hogenraad.
Date: 2002.
Affiliation(s):
Citation:
Razavi D, N Delvaux, S Marchal, J Durieux, C Farvacques, L Dubus and R Hogenraad. 2002. Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study. British Journal of Cancer Nursing 87: 1–7.
CrossRef | PubMed |Web of Science® Times Cited: 32
Comments:
Reviewed in Meta-study (BRUNERO + 2010)*
Abstract:
Quotes: (Any pithy quotes)
Topic Area: (In which field / sector / perspective was this study conducted?)
Definition: (How was empathy defined?)
Benefits: (Were any benefits of empathy mentioned?)
Criticisms (Were any criticisms, negative effects or risks of empathy mentioned?)
Methods: (What were the methods used to train empathy?)
Target Group: (Who participated in this study / training?)
Measurements: (About the assessment: How was the change in empathy measured before/after the intervention/method?)
Result: (What was the result?)
Posted By:
Notes: (Any other relevant information)
References: