(Keena + 2017)

Empathy-Focused Learning: Teaching Criminal Justice Students to Care

DOI or Website Link: DOI: 10.1007/s12103-017-9385-7

Publication: American Journal of Criminal Justice pp 1–22

Authors:

  • Linda Keena

  • Laura Krieger-Sample

Date: 11 January 2017

Affiliation(s):

Citation:

Comments:

Abstract:

Today’s students show very little appreciation for the importance of empathy in community-based correctional treatment. This descriptive mixed-method study reports on a pilot program designed to examine how and to what extent a criminal justice education program enhanced or fostered empathy. Over a period of 7 years (2007–2014), 52 students participated in an intervention class, while 97 attended a controlled course.

The study utilized a two-stage measurement technique involving a pencil and paper test of empathy and actual interviews with students. A phenomenological analysis was conducted to investigate how students understand and transform experiences into perceptions both individually and as shared meaning. A Paired Two Sample for Means t-test was computed on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) pre- and posttest data to analyze change in the students’ perceived empathy.

The intervention group scores from pretest to posttest indicated a statistically significant change in students’ empathy levels in all seven subscales. This program should serve as a model curriculum for criminal justice students.

Quotes: (Any pithy quotes)

Topic Area: (In which field / sector / perspective was this study conducted?)

Definition: (How was empathy defined?)

Benefits: (Were any benefits of empathy mentioned?)

(Altmann 2015)

Criticisms (Were any criticisms, negative effects or risks of empathy mentioned?)

Methods: (What were the methods used to train empathy?)

Target Group: (Who participated in this study / training?)

Measurements: (About the assessment: How was the change in empathy measured before/after the intervention/method?)

Result: (What was the result?)

Posted By:

Notes: (Any other relevant information)

References:

    • Archer, R., Foushee, H. C., Davis, M. H., & Aderman, D. (1979). Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: A person-situation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 275–291.

    • Bachman, R., & Schutt, R. K. (2014). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice. Los Angeles: Sage.

    • Batson, C. D., & Ahmad, N. Y. (2009). Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3(1), 141–177.

    • Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666.

    • Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    • Birzer, M. L. (2008). What makes a good police officer? Phenomenological reflections from the African-American community. Police Practice and Research, 9(3), 199–212.

    • Block, S. (1994). Policing an increasing diverse America. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 63(6), 24–27.

    • Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. New York: Harper Collins.

    • Boag, E. M., & Wilson, D. (2014). Inside experience: Engagement empathy and prejudice towards prisoners. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 4(1), 33–43.

    • Burke, A. S., & Bush, M. D. (2013). Service learning and criminal justice: An exploratory study of student perceptions. Educational Review, 65(1), 56–69.

    • Campbell, M. W., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2011). Ingroup-outgroup bias in contagious yawning by chimpanzees supports link to empathy. PloS One, 6(4), 1–4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018283.

    • Carkhuff, R. (1969). Helping and human relations: A primer for lay and professional helpers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    • Chenault, S., Martin, J., & Matusiak, R. E. (2016). The ripple effect: Empathy statements of participants of an impact of crime on victim’s class. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 1(3), 196–214. doi:10.1080/23774657.2016.1210994.

    • Compton, M. T., Broussard, B., Hankerson-Dyson, D., Krishan, S., & Stewart-Hutto, T. (2011). Do empathy and psychological mindedness affect police officers’ decision to enter crisis intervention team training? Psychiatric Services, 6(62), 632–638. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.62.6.632.

    • Courtright, K. E., Mackey, D. A., & Packard, S. H. (2005). Empathy among college students and criminal justice majors: Identifying predispositional traits and the role of education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16(1), 125–144.

    • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    • Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4), 1–17.

    • Davis, M. (1983). Measuring individual in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.

    • De Corte, K., et al. (2007). Measuring empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Psychologica Belgica, 47(4), 235–260. doi:10.5334/pb-47-4-235.

    • de Vos, B., van Zomeren, M., Gordijn, M. H., & Postmes, T. (2013). The communication of “pure” group-based anger reduces tendencies toward intergroup conflict because it increases out-group empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1043–1052. doi:10.1177/0146167213489140.

    • Deitz, S., & Byrnes, L. (1981). Attribution of responsibility for sexual assaults: The influence of observer empathy and criminal occupation and attractiveness. Journal of Psychology, 108, 17–29.

    • Denzin, N. K. (1998). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 313–344). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    • Eisenberg, N. (1995). Prosocial development: A multifaceted model. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwitz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 401–429). Needham Heights: Prentice Hall.

    • Engel, S. (2003). Teaching literature in the criminal justice curriculum. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14(2), 345–354.

    • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    • Fried, J. (2012). Transformative learning through engagement: Student affairs practice as experiential pedagogy. Sterling: Stylus.

    • Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A., & Segal, E. A. (2011). Measuring empathy in the twenty-first century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83–93.

    • Giovannoni, J., McCoy, K. Y., Mays, M., & Watson, J. (2015). Probation officers reduce their stress by cultivating the practice of loving-kindness with self and other. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 8(2), 325–332.

    • Grant, L. (2014). Hearts and minds: Aspects of empathy and wellbeing in social work students. Social Work Education, 33(3), 338–352. doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.805191.

    • Greenleaf, R. K. (1991). The servant as leader. Indianapolis: The Robert K. Greenleaf Center.

    • Harper, M., & Cole, P. (2012). Member checking: Can benefits be gained similar to group therapy? The Qualitative Report, 17(2), 510–517.

    • Hatcher, S. L., Nadeau, M. S., Walsh, L. K., Reynolds, M., Galean, J., & Marz, K. (1994). The teaching of empathy for high school and college students: Testing Rogerian methods with the interpersonal reactivity index. Adolescence, 29(115), 961–974.

    • Hurwitz, J., Peffley, M., & Mondak, J. (2015). Linked fate and outgroup perceptions: Blacks, Latinos, and the U.S. criminal justice system. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 505–520. doi:10.1177/1065912915589597.

    • Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (1991). Women’s growth in connection: Writings from the stone center. New York: Guilford.

    • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of self. New York: International Universities Press.

    • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    • Kremer, J. F., & Dietzen, L. L. (1991). Two approaches to teaching accurate empathy to undergraduates: Teacher-intensive and self- directed. Journal of College Student Development, 32(1), 62–74.

    • Lennon, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1987). Gender and age differences in sympathy and empathy. New York: Cambridge and University Press.

    • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    • Manning, P. K., & Cullum-Swan, B. N. (1998). Narrative, content and semiotic analysis. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 246–275). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    • McNeil, F. (2000). Defining effective probation: Frontline perspectives. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 382–398.

    • Myrick, R., & Erney, T. (1985). Youth helping youth: Becoming a peer facilitator. Minneapolis: Educational Media Corp.

    • NameVoyager (2016). NameVoyager wizard. Retrieved from https://blog.mozilla.org/ux/2012/05/picking-pseudonyms-for-your-research-participants/.

    • Oxley, J. (2011). Moral dimensions of empathy: Limits and applications in ethical theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Parra, A. (2013). Cognitive and emotional empathy in relation to five paranormal/anomalous experiences. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 405–612.

    • Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe: Free Press.

    • Poorman, P. B. (2002). Biography and role playing: Fostering empathy in abnormal psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 32–36.

    • Posick, C., Rocque, M., & Rafter, N. (2014). More than a feeling: Integrating empathy into the study of lawmaking, lawbreaking, and reactions to lawbreaking. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(1), 5–26.

    • Richards, L., & Richards, T. (1994). From filing cabinet to computer. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 146–172). London: Routledge.

    • Roberts, J. W. (2012). Beyond learning by doing: Theoretical currents in experiential education. New York: Routledge.

    • Robinson, E. V., & Roger, R. (2015). Empathy faking in psychopathic offenders: The vulnerability of empathy measures. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37(4), 545–552. doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9479-9.

    • Shanafelt, T. D., West, C., Zhao, X., Kolars, P. N., Habermann, T., & Sloan, J. (2005). Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(7), 559–564.

    • Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855–863.

    • Spears, L. C. (2004). The understanding and practice of servant-leadership. In L. C. Spears & M. Lawrence (Eds.), Practicing servant-leadership: Succeeding through trust, bravery, and forgiveness (pp. 2–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    • Spiro, H. (1992). What is empathy and can it be taught? Annals of Internal Medicine, 116(10), 843–860.

    • Stinchcomb, J. B. (2002). Prisons of the mind: Lessons learned from home confinement. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13(2), 463–478.

    • Taub, D. E. (1991). Strengthening the social within social psychology: An experiential learning approach. Teaching Sociology, 19, 186–192.

    • Tsoudis, O. (2002). The influence of empathy in mock jury criminal cases: Adding to the affect control model. Western Criminology Review, 4(1), 55–67.

    • Wegener, S. T. (1999). The rehabilitation and ethic ethics. In R. P. Marinelli & A. E. Dell Otto (Eds.), The psychosocial impact of disability (pp. 43–54). New York: Springer.

    • Yeo, L., Ang, R. P., Loh, S., Fu, K. J., & Karre, J. K. (2011). The role of affective and cognitive empathy in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression of a Singaporean sample of boys. Journal of Psychology, 145(4), 313–330. doi:10.1080/00223980.2011.568986.