(Delvaux + 2005)

Title: Physicians’ communication with cancer patient and a relative: A randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops.

DOI or Website Link:

Publication: Cancer. 2005;103(11):2397–411.

Authors: Delvaux N, Merckaert I, Marchal S, et al.

Date: 2005;

Affiliation(s):

Citation:

Delvaux N, Merckaert I, Marchal S, et al. Physicians’ communication with cancer patient and a relative: A randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2397–411.

View Article PubMed Google Scholar

Delvaux N, Merckaert I, Marchal S, Libert Y, Conradt S, Boniver J, Etienne AM, Fontaine O, Janne P, Klastersky J, Melot C, Reynaert C, Scalliet P, Slachmuylder JL, Razavi D: Physicians’ communication with a cancer patient and a relative: a randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops. Cancer. 2005, 103: 2397-2411. 10.1002/cncr.21093.

Google Scholar

Comments:

Reviewed in Healthcare Meta-study (VASSILIOS + 2016)*
- Reviewed in Meta-study (KELM+ 2014)*

Abstract:

Quotes: (Any pithy quotes)

Topic Area: (In which field / sector / perspective was this study conducted?)

Definition: (How was empathy defined?)

Benefits: (Were any benefits of empathy mentioned?)

Criticisms (Were any criticisms, negative effects or risks of empathy mentioned?)

Methods: (What were the methods used to train empathy?)

Target Group: (Who participated in this study / training?)

Measurements: (About the assessment: How was the change in empathy measured before/after the intervention/method?)

Result: (What was the result?)

Posted By:

Notes: (Any other relevant information)

References: