The effect of using standardized patients or peer role play on ratings of undergraduate communication training: a randomized controlled trial.
DOI or Website Link: Google Scholar 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.007.
Publication: Patient Educ Couns. 2012, 87: 300-306.
Authors: Bosse HM, Schultz JH, Nickel M, Lutz T, Möltner A, Jünger J, Huwendiek S, Nikendei C:
Date: 2012
Affiliation(s):
Citation:
Bosse HM, Schultz JH, Nickel M, Lutz T, Möltner A, Jünger J, Huwendiek S, Nikendei C: The effect of using standardized patients or peer role play on ratings of undergraduate communication training: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2012, 87: 300-306. 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.007.
Comments:
Reviewed in Meta-study (KELM+ 2014)*
Abstract:
Quotes: (Any pithy quotes)
Topic Area: (In which field / sector / perspective was this study conducted?)
Definition: (How was empathy defined?)
Benefits: (Were any benefits of empathy mentioned?)
Criticisms (Were any criticisms, negative effects or risks of empathy mentioned?)
Methods: (What were the methods used to train empathy?)
Target Group: (Who participated in this study / training?)
Measurements: (About the assessment: How was the change in empathy measured before/after the intervention/method?)
Result: (What was the result?)
Posted By:
Notes: (Any other relevant information)