If the evolution of the human species is
entirely a matter of the environment
and the modification of genes,
chromosomes, and so forth, then there
really isn’t place for Karma at all. It
simply wouldn’t fit because all the
effects would presumably be entirely
accounted for by their physical
constituents. However, cells evolve to
become more and more complex
and then later evolve into human
beings. There are many options, some
seventy trillion, that one human
could become, based on the assortment
of the parental genes. Yet just one
option is taken, and if the question is
asked – why? Then Karma
is directly related
to this question.
如果人類的進化完全取決於
環境變遷和基因的改變, 染色體等等,
就沒有 ”業報” 存在的位置.
因為若所有的結果都可以
由他們的組成成分來推測,
業報說法就明顯的不合宜了.
但是, 細胞越來越複雜的演變最後轉變成人.
而根據父母親基因的分類,
一個人能成為什麼樣子有許多的選擇,
大約七十兆種的可能性.
其中只有一個會被選上,
只要我們質疑 -- 為什麼選上這個?
這個問題就和 ”業報” 有直接關係了.