Who is Daniel Boyd? Wiki, Biography, Age, Family, Charged, Investigation

Daniel Boyd Wiki - Daniel Boyd Biography

A lawyer who also served as a judge for the juvenile court is suspected of forging a client's signature on divorce documents while the lawyer was representing the client in court.The 47-year-old Daniel Boyd is accused of forgery and bribery, the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation reported on Tuesday. Prosecutors claim that TBI detectives found evidence that Boyd had fabricated a divorce papers for one of his clients.

According to the TBI statement, "agents discovered during the investigation that Boyd, while working as an attorney, provided a client with a default judgment declaring her divorce to be finalized." "The 3rd Judicial District Chancellor appears to have signed the document. Further research found that the matter was never submitted and that there was no paperwork in the Clerk and Master's Office.

Daniel Boyd Age

Daniel Boyd is 42 years old.

Daniel Boyd Incident Detail

The suspected criminal acts, according to the local news website Rogersville Review, happened in 2022. According to the website, Boyd's 2011 appointment as a juvenile judge was not a full-time position. According to the TBI, the investigation also showed that Boyd's client offered to retract her complaint in exchange for payment when she submitted it.

At the 3rd Judicial District attorney general's request, the TBI started looking into Boyd in May.Boyd is accused of forgery on three counts, criminal simulation on one count, and bribery on one count. On a $25,000 bond, he was taken into custody on Tuesday at the Hawkins County Jail. Boyd has a history of being disciplined for his legal practice, according to state records.

He was barred from the practice of law for three years in 2018, following an inquiry that revealed he had mislead two clients—the daughters of one of whom he had made similar claims—into thinking he was acting on their behalf when, in fact, he wasn't. Additionally, he received a public reprimand in 2019 for failing to "diligently represent his clients in a boundary line dispute" and for not communicating with them effectively.