No Fraud in Philly: Ballot-counters and Election Observers Reflect
David Dunlop (12-1)
Photo courtesy of Jay Sand
Philadelphia danced itself into the national spotlight again this year, as videos circulated around the country, showing that Beyoncé’s voice will thunder over crowds even during a pandemic. Jay Sand, a 48-year-old West Philadelphia resident, spent this year’s election week working as a “Data Services Clerk.” Sand first moved to Philadelphia in 1990 to attend the University of Pennsylvania. In 2009 Sand founded “All Around This World”, where he teaches multicultural music to children ages 0-9 and their families. While most of his time at the Convention Center was spent holed up in a room that “felt like a factory,” Sand managed to briefly enjoy the crowd’s atmosphere on his way in and out of his mail-in ballot processing shifts. “It didn't feel like there was standoff tension. It just felt like a party.”
Once inside, Sand and his fellow volunteers weren’t exposed to crowds again until they left. They were audibly, visually, and technologically cut off from the outside (there was a very strict no phone policy). According to Sand, the labor requirement could be described as “unlimited amount of hours needed.” The staggering piles of ballots that needed sorting, flattening, and counting were daunting and mundane, but that fortunately helped Sand fall into an almost mechanical rhythm. Sand described occasional breaks in the monotony, spotting some small things that would add a personal touch to the process. Sand would get a small grin out of finding the name of a friend or neighbor while alphabetizing ballots, but his most memorable experience was discovering the ballot of a 100-year old-woman. While inspiring, that discovery came with a pang
of sadness for Sand. The only reason that he knew her age was because she had filled in her birthday instead of the date she mailed her ballot in, which could have potentially disqualified her vote (Sand isn’t sure what happened to it, as it was put aside for an official to look over). “We were all trying our best and I really wanted to get it right, and not from the fear of getting on the news, but because of the idea that people cared so much, especially about this election. You definitely wanted these people to be able to say what they wanted to say. Those old ladies also put their names on their card. They care about their issues.”
As well as people’s votes being voided due to errors, Sand also had a front row seat to see all of the lawyers (from both parties) involved in observing and maintaining the integrity of the ballot counting. So when the allegations of fraud—especially in Philadelphia—began to appear, Sand had a strong hunch that they couldn’t be justified, not with all the legal scrutiny he was seeing around him.
While Sand wasn’t actually a lawyer overseeing the counting, Sarah Tarlow, Associate Attorney at Spear Wilderman, is—and she fully agrees with him. This year, Tarlow was observing canvassing (mail in ballot counting) in Montgomery County, as well as working in “the Boiler Room” in Delaware County. While it isn’t actually a specific room, let alone one with a boiler, the Boiler Room that Tarlow was working in is still enough to make a person sweat. It’s a job that entails constant phone calls from poll watchers needing an attorney to give them advice or to solve problems. Are there on-duty police present? They can only be there in limited exceptions. Are there enough provisional ballots? Is there electioneering (advocating for or against a candidate/party), ten feet from the polling location? What even constitutes a polling location? “I knew that it
Photo courtesy of Sarah Tarlow
would be busy. I got there at around 6:30 in the morning, and my phone started going off ten, minutes later. I didn’t even open my lunchbag to take out a hardboiled egg until 9:20 in the morning. It was overwhelming but also exciting at the same time, because there were so many people out in line getting out early to vote.” At the mail-in ballot counting location, an observation space was reserved for observers from both political parties as well as a separate overflow room for any extra observers on site. “I was hearing reports [about voter fraud] and I was so incensed. Specifically because I was there and I was thinking that this couldn't be further from the truth. At one point, there were more Republicans in the overflow room than Democrats.” Tarlow has been involved with election observing since 2004, shortly after graduating law school, when she observed an election in West Philadelphia. “Helping people vote who wouldn’t have been able to [navigate the voting process on their own] was very profound and left this mark… I don’t really know the right word to describe it, but ever since I have always tried to work as an election protection legal observer.” Tarlow has strived to always uphold this decision. Even though she had given birth six days earlier, she was still committed to working the 2016 Election Day. “I got up, nursed, put on my ‘Election Protection’ t-shirt, and headed out.” Her work has also included working as an election protection hotline volunteer taking calls before the primary elections last May until a shift the morning after Election Day. This included assisting and guiding callers as they navigated sweeping changes to the State’s election laws, some without computers as they eagerly wanted to request mail in ballots. “You help them, educate them, and teach them how to be their best voter advocate, and then they take that back to their friends, family, and communities, and it creates a domino effect.”
Both Sand and Tarlow care about protecting their communities and loved ones, and they both understand the importance of organizing during elections to do this. According to Tarlow, “I would only say this—taking care of my 7 day old infant son [feeding him] and poll watching were equally important to me for my son's benefit. By protecting democracy, I'm ensuring both of my children's future.” This election was one of the most important times to do that, and so they are both happy that it’s integrity was maintained. Sand expressed his doubt of wide-scale fraud. “It’s a massive system [getting] 340 million people to vote, that on one hand you could say that someone could play with that, but on the other hand it’s so decentralized, and [there are] so many differences between city to city, counties to counties, minute to minute being made. He noted that during his time working as a cog in this massive election process, “it seemed like it was going to be a part of history, and it was.”