Conduct research in order to gather, interpret, and embed academic articles which support a thesis in a literary analysis.
E4.21(A) follow the research plan to gather evidence from experts on the topic and texts written for informed audiences in the field, distinguishing between reliable and unreliable sources and avoiding over‐reliance on one source
E4.21(B) systematically organize relevant and accurate information to support central ideas, concepts, and themes, outline ideas into conceptual maps/timelines, and separate factual data from complex inferences
E4.21(C) paraphrase, summarize, quote, and accurately cite all researched information according to a standard format (e.g., author, title, page number), differentiating among primary, secondary, and other sources
E4.23(A) synthesize the research into an extended written or an oral presentation that provides an analysis that supports and develops personal opinions, as opposed to simply restating existing information
E4.20(A) brainstorm, consult with others, decide upon a topic, and formulate a major research question to address the major research topic
E4.20(B) formulate a plan for engaging in research on a complex, multifaceted topic
E4.9(A) [Readiness] summarize a text in a manner that captures the author’s viewpoint, its main ideas, and its elements without taking a position or expressing an opinion
E4.9(B) [Supporting] explain how authors writing on the same issue reached different conclusions because of differences in assumptions, evidence, reasoning, and viewpoints
E4.9(C) [Readiness] make and defend subtle inferences and complex conclusions about the ideas in text and their organizational patterns
E4.9(D) [Supporting] synthesize ideas and make logical connections (e.g., thematic links, author
analysis) among multiple texts representing similar or different genres and
technical sources and support those findings with textual evidence
E4.22(A) modify the major research question as necessary to refocus the research plan
E4.22(B) differentiate between theories and the evidence that supports them and determine whether the evidence found is weak or strong and how that evidence helps create a cogent argument
E4.22(C) critique the research process at each step to implement changes as the need occurs and is identified
E4.23(B) uses a variety of formats and rhetorical strategies to argue for the thesis
E4.23(C) develops an argument that incorporates the complexities of and discrepancies in information from multiple sources and perspectives while anticipating and refuting counter‐arguments
E4.23(D) uses a style manual (e.g., Modern Language Association, Chicago Manual of Style) to document sources and format written materials
E4.23(E) is of sufficient length and complexity to address the topic
Adopted Textbook: Texas Treasures - British Literature, McGraw-Hill
If you have questions or comments about the Panther Curriculum, please feel free to leave feedback for us.