10-01-2017

Deres Majestæt!

Your Holiness Pope Francis

Dear Mosaisk Troessamfund

Dear Muslimsk Trossamfund

Dear STATSMINISTER, Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen

Dear Secretary of Justice Søren Pape Poulsen

Dear Secretary of Culture and Church Mette Bock

Dear Bishops, deans and pastors in Denmark

Dear President of USA Barack Obama

Dear President Elect ​Donald Trump

Dear Prime Minister of Great Britain Theresa May

Dear Bundeskanzlerin of Germany Angela Merkel

Dear Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu

Dear Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea Peter Charles Paire O'Neill

Dear Prime Minister of New Zealand John Key

Dear Prime Minister of Australia Hon Malcolm Turnbull

I dag har vi sendt følgende til juridisk konsulent Camilla Holst Petersen, Sydøstjyllands politi.

Today we have sent the following message to legal advisor Camilla Holst Petersen.

Vedr. Journalnummer 3700-00170-00068-18.

Daniela Skov har modtaget et brev i dag, dateret den 5. januar, hvor De bedømmer os ud fra en afgørelse af 23 april 2013. Vi har adskillige gange påklaget til politiet, at det brev vi modtog fra Statsadvokaten i Viborg ved Senioranklager Margrethe Sanning den 7. juli 2015, ikke er blevet efterkommet, sådan at vi har fået en partshøring. Heri skriver Margrethe Sanning, at hun videresender vores henvendelse til Midt- og Vestjyllands Politi om den manglende partshøring "til videre foranstaltning".

Daniela Skov har ringet og indtalt et svar på Deres telefonsvarer. I går sendte vi en mail til Sydøstjyllands politi og til Midt- og Vestjyllands politi og Justitsministeriet om netop denne partshøring, vi ikke har fået.

I denne mail skrev vi følgende:

7. juli 2015 fik vi nedenstående svar fra Statsadvokaten i Viborg, Senioranklager Margrethe Sanning, som svar på en af vore mange henvendelser. Midt- og Vestjyllands politi lyttede imidlertid ikke til Statsadvokaten.

Det er vildt provokerende, at Sydøstjyllands politi og Midt- og Vestjyllands politi ikke gør brug af aktindsigt hos hinanden. I stedet for at vi skal igennem en så langstrakt, tung og unødvendigt sagsgang. Det at vi har lighed for loven, er kommet op som en vigtig del af Danmarkskanonen, men det er en illusion. Det er forkasteligt, at politimesteren ved Midt- og Vestjyllands Politi står over GRUNDLOVEN og OVER LEGALITETSPRINCIPPET, og han står over hvad STATSADVOKATEN i Viborg skriver om vores manglende partshøring, som politidirektøren skal tage sig af, idet hun sender vores e-mail videre "til videre foranstaltning". (Se nedenstående brev af 7. juli 2015).

Vi må helt klart formode, at Sydøstjyllands Politi intet ved om dette tiltag fra Senioranklager Margrethe Sanning.

Med venlig hilsen Daniela Skov og Lars Skov Krøgholt.

ENGLISH

For legal adviser Camilla Holst Petersen, Southeastjylland police.

Concerning File number 3700-00170-00068-18.

Daniela Skov has received a letter today, dated the 5 January, where you valuate us per a decision from 23 April 2013. We have several times complained to the police that the message we received from the Public Prosecutor by Senior prosecutor Margrethe Sanning the 7 July 2015 has not been complied with, so that we would get a hearing of parties. In this letter, Margrethe Sanning writes that she forwards our enquiry to the Mid and WestJylland police about the wanted hearing of the parties for further provision.

Daniela Skov has called and left an answer on your answerphone. Yesterday we sent out a mail for SoutheastJylland Police, for Mid and Westjylland Police and for Ministry of Justice about just this hearing of the parties which we have not gotten.

In this mail, we wrote as follows:

On 7 July 2015 we received below answer from The Public Prosecutor in Viborg, Senior Prosecutor Margrethe Sanning, as an answer to one of our many letters. The Mid- and Westjylland's Police though did not listen to the Public Prosecutor.

It is wildly provocative that South East Jylland's Police and Mid- and West Jylland's Police do not make a use of access to each other's documents. Instead we are going through such long winded, heavy and unnescessary processing of the case. The matter that we have an equality before the law has come up as an important part of the newly published "Denmark Canon", but it is an illusion. It is reprehensible that the Chief Constable at Mid- and West Jylland's Police is above THE CONSTITUTION and ABOVE THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY, and he is above what THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR in Viborg writes about the lack of hearing of the parties (US), which the Chief Constable should deal with, as to the forwarding by the Public Prosecutor of our e-mail for further steps. (See below letter of 7 July 2015).

We must clearly suppose that Southeastjylland's Police does not know of this initiative by Senior Prosecutor Margrethe Sanning.

Kind regards Daniela Skov and Lars Skov Krøgholt​