Questions to the Police in the city of Holstebro.
At a hearing the 13th of June we were presented for a document which the prosecuter was in possession of, in which Jonas Serner-Pedersen should have commented on us whom he had got a restraining order against (i.e. we were not to contact him). We addressed the court in order to gain access to this document and received this answer:
The court has on the 2nd of August received a mail from you in which you ask for access to a document which the prosecuter was in possession of during the hearing on the 13th of June 2013. It is indicated in your mail that you at the hearing did not get permission to see the document in question. This is the decision of the prosecution and if you have further questions you may contact the Police (Midt- og Vestjyllands Politi).
As a consequence of this I now ask which statutory authority decides that we may not have access to this document. Does anybody have an interest in that we do not get the knowledge of the contents of the document?
Jonas Serner-Pedersen has deluded the police into that he does not know us was the impression that Daniela Skov had when she was called by the police on the 19th September 2012.
Another thing is that difficult to comprehend and accept is that Daniela was called by a female employee at the police by the name of Hanne Nielsen, who said that she was charged. She was asked to comment which she would like to, but she wanted to have her doctor with her because she suffers from PTSD. Anyway in the police records it says that she did not want to comment. Daniela is furthermore referenced to tell that she suffers form ADHD, which she has never said.
Suppose that we were to attend a funeral or a wedding which Jonas Serner-Pedersen would be in charge of as a pastor. Then we would have to go to the police and ask if we could be allowed to go. Provided the police would want to talk with us.
But Jonas anyway reckons me to be of so little danger that he could enter my workplace in Kolding to partake in a meeting.
We have several times again and again encouraged him to come and talk with us, and we have suggested that he could bring another person if he did not like to come on his own. It might for instance have been his bishop Karsten Nissen in Viborg.
Bishop Karsten Nissen says that the fact that Jonas Serner-Pedersen does not want to communicate with us does not apply to his jurisdiction as a bishop. But Jonas was actually employed as a pastor in Hjerm under Karsten Nissen as bishop at the time when he went to the police and got the restraining order on us.
The church is being used by Jonas Serner-Pedersen as a cloak for intrigues, concealments and double messages. As citizens we are powerless. We have seen no other option than send in a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights. It is heavily abusive and way beyond our borders that we have to send a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights. No one have helped us.
We cannot lift off thoughts that Jonas Serner-Pedersen has solved his problems in a very inappropriate way. He is an official in the Danish state church. It is customary that you communicate in a workplace. Why have nobody spoken with Jonas and asked him to behave as expected in a workplace? He has been controlling with help from the police; and he has not taken ownership over his actions and their consequences.
He could just as well have said no. Then he would be free of being bound to us for five years.
He has been scheming and he can go about without knowledge of what consequences it all has had. Jonas refused saying yes or no to writing a recommendation to us and he would not even confirm that he would get rid of us. He himself has said that he had problems with administrative work, and this we have become victims of. Everyone is drawn down by Jonas’ lacking ability to do a simple task.
Jonas Serner-Pedersen is a leader for children and adolescents. A leader is a role model; he is leading with his life. How can anybody accept leadership with a lack of transparency and a lacking will for reconciliation? Not to speak about that he, being a pastor is expected to mirror biblical values in his conduct of life. I see no biblical values in keeping on being silent, in not to react when his neighbours directly express that she and he are in distress because of him, and in giving a neighbour over to the police. He does not want reconciliation; he does not reach out to us and asks for forgiveness. I do not expect perfectionism – none of us can deliver that – but we can at least try to take the lesson to heart that we should be towards others the way we want them to be towards us.
Jonas starts Alpha course in September; a course having its base in the personal relation to the message of the bible. How may his teaching express truth when he in central aspects neglects to live out biblical values?