Subject: Nationwide Kristeligt Dagblad: " Atheists made me return to join the State Church. Ateisterne fik mig tilbage i folkekirken. "
Deres Majestæt!
Your Holiness Pope Francis!
Kære Mosaisk Troessamfund
Kære Muslimsk Trossamfund
Kære Justistminister Søren Pind
Kære Kultur- og Kirkeminister Bertel Haarder
Kære Pressenævnet
Kære Marlene Borst Hansen (Radikale Venstre)
Kære Pressechef hos Yngre Læger Henrik Winther
Kære Kommunikationschef Sidse Nexmand Jacobsen
Kære Formand for Yngre Lægers Bestyrelse Camilla Noelle Rathcke
Kære Journalist Stephanie Hollender
Kære Chefredaktør for Kristeligt Dagblad Erik Bjerager
News Media in Denmark and in the Nations
Kære Biskopper, provster og præster
Atheists made me return to join the State Church.
Ateisterne fik mig tilbage i folkekirken.
http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/kirke-tro/ateister-fik-mig-tilbage-i-folkekirken
Henrik Winther told to Stephanie Hollender.
May 4 2016
While a recent campaign by the Atheistic Society led many to opt out of the church, it had the opposite effect on the 59-year-old Henrik Winther, press officer for Young Physicians. After a 40-year- break, he joined again. You can actually say thanks to the atheists, ip after 40 years they made me join as a member of the church again.
One can actually say thanks to the atheists, because after 40 years they got me to become member of the church again. When I saw the campaign from Atheistic Society, breathed the air of some of the embers that had been simmering in me long. My lack of membership of the State church.
At the same time, I thought the campaign was both stupid and unintelligent. Since if there were no believers, being an atheist would not make any sense.
In that way the atheists are playing with faith. Why should they encourage people to opt out if people are ok in their belief? Conversely, I do not ask atheists to join the Church.
My father was Catholic and my mother was Protestant. They chose that I should be Protestant, while at the same time I was in the catholic school in Aarhus (City). That is why the State Church was a natural part of my upbringing. But as I was around 19, and my sisters to have her Confirmation, I became very upset by the manner, I thought, Church was shanghaing the young people.
It was too early to ask people to make a decision, and that was why I chose to opt out. The pastor also asked me what would happen then, when I was to be buried, but I did not think much about that at the age of 19.
20 years ago I returned to my faith, when I started attending church every Sunday. But that did not mean that I joined the State church again. I thought about whether it was freewheeling when I attended church, but for me the membership of the church had nothing to do with faith.
It was more administratively and culturally. It took some time before I realized that especially the last one was very important. The State church is part of the Danish culture and the foundation upon which society rests.
Then as atheists so actively intervened and got people to opt out their membership of the church, I saw it as an invitation to opt out of a very important bastion in the Danish culture. We need some foundations in society, which is almost immoveable, and where people gather.
This is what the national church provides, and unless our parents have taken an early opt-out on our behalf, then embrace the State Church embraces all of us. There are not very many left of such strong communities and I thought when there were so many who opted out there had also better be somebody who joined. I would come clean to the Danish culture and the Christian faith. And it was just such a relief afterwards.
http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/Y_L/Presse
TITLES IN ENGLISH ‼
http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/Servicemenu/ENGLISH/TITLES_IN_ENGLISH
http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/Y_L/Yngre%20L%C3%A6ger%20mener
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/15-04-2016
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/23-04-2016
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/24-04-2016
Henrik Winther, Press Officer to Young Physicians has not been in the position to take his stand concerning his membership of the STATE CHURCH from a thoroughly INFORMED position. The daily News Magazine that promotes itself as CHRISTIAN ( KRISTELIGT DAGBLAD that PRESS OFFICER HENRIK WINTHER tells his story to REFRAINS FROM TELLING HIM ABOUT the FACT that they have issued JUDGEMENT EVENTHOUGH THEY ARE NOT THE JURIDICIAL POWER IN DENMARK. THAT POWER BELONGS TO THE COURT SYSTEM!‼BUT KRISTELIG DAGBLAD HAS MADE THE CHOICE TO JUDGE FROM A POINT OF VIEW AGREEMENT WITH A DANISH BISHOP AND A PASTOR IN HJERM THAT TWO CITIZENS ARE HARRASSING A PASTOR since 2012 AND THEY HAVE NOT BEEN CRITICAL IN ANY WAY TO THE STATEMENTS FROM PASTOR AND BISHOP. Just as judgemental and coloring the entire story : Chief editor Erik Bjerager allowing The newspapers VERDICT on us FROM HIS OPTHICAL VIEW that we are operating from a position of being DERANGED.‼‼‼‼
Wondering if Henrik Winther would judge the Atheists to be stupid and unintelligent if he realized they provided a most NEEDED CRITICAL EYE ON THE STATE CHURCH'S behaviour fromENTITLEMENT OF HAVING SUCH POWERFUL HOLD ON PEOPLE AND OUR MONEY.
CHRISTIAN MEDIA HAS A case in Denmark where they choose not to bring into light more than what please the BISHOPS AND especially PASTOR JONAS SERNER- PEDERSEN's : "WE MUST PROTECT THE CHURCH. NEW BELIEVERS (baptized?) CANNOT KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON HERE. THEN THEY WON'T ATTEND!"
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/24-04-2016
It was more administratively and culturally. It took some time before I realized that especially the last one was very important. The State church is part of the Danish culture and the foundation upon which society rests.
So far Henrik Winther.
CHRISTIAN MEDIA HAS A case in Denmark where they choose not to bring into light more than what please the BISHOPS AND especially PASTOR JONAS SERNER- PEDERSEN's : "WE MUST PROTECT THE CHURCH. NEW BELIEVERS (baptized?) CANNOT KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON HERE. THEN THEY WON'T ATTEND!”
If the Danish Culture in Church was transparency, accountability neighbouring love, and capaciousness the truth about the people on the West Indian Islands, who were enslaved and oppressed in 175- 200 years, as well as the truth about the oppresive ways we have treated the people of Greenland during colonisation years, would not be a hidden and severely twisted part of our history. We believe that we were not really the cruel and mean slave owners, we were in reality and the truth about the free colored, makes us lie to ourselves as if they were just bought free. Our nice version is a lie! Human beings were capital and the wealth of Denmark, a huge percentage of the GDP in Denmark was founded on lucreative slave Industry .
If the Danish culture in Church was transparency, accountability, neighbouring love, and capaciousness - not just TALK AS IF THIS IS CHURCH! people at the West Indies would be acknowledged that the apology from our so proud Danish State, that they have asked of, they certainly do have a just claim for !!!!!-
Slavery was an industry. Rum and sugar cane was an industry. BIG money and slavery founded a large part of the WEALTH in Denmark and Copenhagen 2-300 years ago. The slavery itself was very very lucrative for Denmark. These islands produced from 1/3 to 3/4 of Denmark's GDP for a period of 200 YEARS IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY, that we keep mainly in the dark.
Beyond sugar and the rum and sugar cane and the molasses and the importation the sale and auctioning of slaves. It was VERY lucrative INDUSTRY, PEOPLE WERE CAPITAL. According to Shelley Moorhead, Consultant, USVI's Guvernor. ( DR K tv "Kald mig bare brun" tv programme ( just call me brown) in English language though from april 27 2016 produced in 2015. !!!
Kind Regards,
Daniela Skov, Lars Skov Krøgholt
‼️
HENRIK WINTHER FORTALT TIL STEPHANIE HOLLENDER.
4 maj 2016
Mens en nylig kampagne fra Ateistisk Selskab fik mange til at melde sig ud af folkekirken, havde det den modsatte effekt på 59-årige Henrik Winther, pressechef for Yngre Læger. Efter 40 års pause blev han medlem igen
Man kan faktisk sige tak til ateisterne, for efter 40 år fik de mig til at blive medlem af folkekirken igen. Da jeg så kampagnen fra Ateistisk Selskab, pustede det luft til nogle af de gløder, der havde ulmet i mig længe. Nemlig mit manglende medlemskab af folkekirken.
Samtidig synes jeg, at kampagnen var både dum og ubegavet. For hvis der ikke var nogen troende, ville der heller ikke være nogen mening i at være ateist. På den måde spiller ateisterne bold op ad troen. Hvorfor skal de opfordre folk til at melde sig ud, hvis folk har det godt i den tro? Omvendt vil jeg heller ikke bede ateisterne om at melde sig ind i folkekirken.
Min far var katolik, og min mor var protestant. De valgte, at jeg skulle være protestant, samtidig med at jeg gik i den katolske skole i Aarhus. Derfor var folkekirken en naturlig del af min opvækst. Men da jeg blev omkring 19 år, og min søster skulle konfirmeres, blev jeg meget fortørnet over den måde, jeg synes, folkekirken shanghajede de unge.
‼️
Det var for tidligt at bede folk om at tage stilling, og derfor valgte jeg at melde mig ud. Præsten spurgte mig også, hvad der så skulle ske, når jeg skulle begraves, men det tænkte jeg ikke så meget over som 19-årig.
For 20 år siden fandt jeg tilbage til min tro, hvor jeg begyndte at gå i kirke hver søndag. Men det betød ikke, at jeg meldte mig ind i folkekirken igen. Jeg tænkte over, om det var at køre på fribillet, når jeg nu kom i kirken, men for mig havde medlemskabet af folkekirken ikke noget at gøre med tro.
Det var mere administrativt og kulturelt. Der gik noget tid, før jeg indså, at især det sidste var meget væsentligt. At folkekirken er en del af den danske kultur og det fundament, som samfundet hviler på.
Da ateisterne så gik aktivt ind og fik folk til at droppe deres medlemskab af folkekirken, oplevede jeg det som en opfordring til at melde sig ud af en meget væsentlig bastion i den danske kultur. Vi har brug for nogle fundamenter i samfundet, som nærmest er urokkelige, og hvor mennesker mødes.
Det er det, folkekirken kan, og med mindre ens forældre har truffet et tidligt fravalg på vores vegne, så favner folkekirken os alle. Der er ikke særlig mange af den slags stærke fællesskaber tilbage, og jeg tænkte, at når der var så mange, der meldte sig ud, måtte der også hellere være nogen, der meldte sig ind. Jeg ville bekende kulør til den danske kultur og den kristne tro. Og det var simpelthen sådan en lettelse bagefter.
returned
http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/Y_L/Presse
TITLES IN ENGLISH ‼
http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/Servicemenu/ENGLISH/TITLES_IN_ENGLISH
http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/Y_L/Yngre%20L%C3%A6ger%20mener
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/15-04-2016
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/23-04-2016
Henrik Winther, Yngre Lægers pressechef, har ikke været i stand til at tage grundigt, informeret stilling til sit medlemskab af folkekirken. Det dagblad, som kalder sig selv kristent, Kristeligt Dagblad, som pressechef Henrik Winther fortæller sin historie til, afstår fra at fortælle ham om det faktum, at de har udstedt en dom, selv om de ikke har en juridisk magt i Danmark. Den magt tilhører retssystemet!!! Men Kristeligt Dagblad har taget det valg at dømme ud fra et standpunkt af enighed med en dansk biskop og en præst i Hjerm, om at to borgere har chikaneret en præst siden 2012, og de har ikke på nogen måde været kritiske over for udtalelserne fra præsten og biskoppen. Ligesom det dømmer og farver hele historien: Chefredaktør Erik Bjerager tillader avisens dom over os ud fra hans optik, nemlig at vi arbejder ud fra en sindsforvirret tilstand. Gad vide, om Henrik Winther ville bedømme ateisterne til at være dumme og uintelligente, hvis han indså, at de giver et yderst tiltrængt kritisk øje på statskirkens opførsel som de er berettigede til at have et så magtfuldt tag i mennesker og vores penge.
Det var mere administrativt og kulturelt. Der gik noget tid, før jeg indså, at især det sidste var meget væsentligt. At folkekirken er en del af den danske kultur og det fundament, som samfundet hviler på.
Så vidt Henrik Winther.
Kristne medier har en sag i Danmark, hvor de vælger ikke at bringe frem i lyset mere, end hvad biskopperne synes om, og specielt pastor Jonas Serner-Pedersens: ”VI SKAL BESKYTTE KIRKEN. NYE TROENDE (DØBTE?) MÅ IKKE VIDE, HVAD DER FOREGÅR HER. ELLERS VIL DE IKKE KOMME!”
Hvis den danske kultur i kirken var gennemsigtighed, ansvarlighed, næstekærlighed og rummelighed, ville sandheden om mennesker på De Vestindiske Øer, som var slaver og undertrykte i 175-200 år, lige såvel som sandheden om det grønlandske folk under kolonialseringen, ikke være en skjult og stærkt fordrejet del af vores historie. Vi tror, at vi ikke var de virkelig grusomme og onde slaveejere, som vi var i realiteten og sandheden om de frikulørte, får os til at lyve for os selv som om de bare blev købt fri. Vor rare udgave er en løgn!! Mennesker var kapital og Danmarks velstand, Danmarks høje BNP blev for en stor del grundlagt på slaveri.
Hvis den danske kultur i kirken var gennemsigtighed, ansvarlighed, næstekærlighed og rummelighed, IKKE BARE SNAK SOM OM DET ER HVAD KIRKEN ER! ville det for mennesker på De Vestindiske Øer blive anerkendt, at den undskyldning fra vor stolte danske stat, som de har bedt om, den har de i sandhed et fuldt berettiget krav på.
Slaveri var en industri. Rom og sukkerrør var en industri. STORE penge og slaveri var grundlaget for en stor del af velstanden i Danmark og København for 200-300 år siden. Velstanden i det 18. århundrede i København og Danmark. Slaveriet i sig selv var meget, meget lukrativt for Danmark. Disse øer producerede fra 1/3 til ¾ af Danmarks BNP i en 200 års periode i vores lands historie, som vi hovedsageligt henlægger i mørke. Rom og sukkerrør og sirup og import og salg / auktioner på slaver, ifølge Shelley Moorhead, konsulent, USVI’s guvernør (DR K TV ”Kald mig bare brun”), på engelsk fra 27. april 2016, produceret i 2015!!
Med venlig hilsen Daniela Skov og Lars Skov Krøgholt.
Tidligere udsendt – Previously sent out
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2016/april/24-04-2016
Deres Majestæt!
Your Holiness Pope Francis!
Kære Mosaisk Troessamfund
Kære Muslimsk Trossamfund
Kære Justistminister Søren Pind
Kære Kirkeminister Bertel Haarder
Denne mail sendes også separat til Justitsministeren og Kirkeministeren.
Vi løber konstant panden mod en mur, når det drejer sig om politiets værdige og retfærdige behandling af os.
(Vi fik aldrig lov af politiet til at komme i forhør. Ingen partshøring. Kun Jonas Serner- Pedersen har været inde til interview / forhør. Det blev læst op for os ved RETTEN i HOLSTEBRO. Det er blevet nægtet os på trods af Statsadvokat i Viborg, Margrethe Sanning har sendt vor mail til Midt- og Vestjyllands Politi til videre foranstaltning. VI ER I HELE SAGENS NU 4 ÅRIGE UDSTRÆKNING ALENE DØMT UDEN FORUDGÅENDE FORHØR OG PARTSFORKLARING / PARTSHØRING. Det er overtrædelse af LEGALITETSPRINCIPPET og det trækker Danmark NED under en RETSSTATS niveau og sikkerhed for vi borgere får en retfærdig retssag og dom.
En politibetjent i Midt- og Vestjyllands Politi i Holstebro ringede os op på Sognepræst Jonas Serner-Pedersens vegne 19-09-2012. Han har holdt sin identitet skjult indtil nu, hvilket betyder at vi har mistet vores lovmæssige retssikkerhed i Danmark, og det er måske også derfor politiet har nægtet os partshøring på trods af Statsadvokatens besked til dem. En politibetjent vist nok en Jesper Andersen – vi har udskrift af forhøret - har været i forhør hos politiet, men de havde valgt at forhøre pågældende betjent om en forkerte dato.
Vi kunne ikke komme i forhør, og klagede til Statsadvokaten. Herfra fik vi denne besked, som nedenfor er gengivet i engelsk oversættelse:
Daniela Skov blev ringet op af Midt- og Vestjyllands politi den 19 september 2012 af en mandlig politibetjent, som behandlede hende groft. Han sagde, at hun var sigtet. Hele den behandling og det chok har forårsaget, at hun har fået PTSD, hvilket er meget alvorligt for hende. Vi har aldrig fået navnet på den betjent, som startede vores sag. Han har nægtet at afsløre sin identitet, til trods for at Jonas Serner-Pedersen jo må vide, hvem den politimand er. Vi har mistet vores retssikkerhed fordi han ikke vil tilkendegive sin identitet. Vi har klaget flere gange over dette til politiet, statsadvokaten og Justitsministeriet og Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed. Men vi er bare blevet ignoreret. Det er alvorligt at miste sin retssikkerhed i Danmark. Da vi klagede til Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed, blev vi ualmindelig dårligt behandlet. En politibetjent Jesper Andersen var i forhør, men om den forkerte dato. De ignorerede bevidst, at vi spurgte efter netop den dato. Hvordan kan politiet have råd til at bruge deres begrænsede tidsressourcer og statsfinanser på den måde mod borgere i Danmark?
Link til forhøret af betjenten: https://goo.gl/8Jrz1J
https://sites.google.com/site/ytrings/2015/oktober/07-10-2015
Grunden til at vi var i retten i Holstebro den 13. juni 2013:
Forudgående havde vi søgt råd hos Kolding retshjælp vedr. bøder, vi havde fået for overtrædelse af polititilholdet. Advokaten der rådede os til at nægte at betale bøderne, for så ville vi blive hørt af en retslig instans. Det skulle vi skrive på politiets papirer, når de kom. Vi havde aldrig fået nogen partshøring og fair behandling, så vi var meget alene, og Daniela havde fået PTSD, og det har været ret forfærdeligt.
I går sendte vi dette ud:
I Dagbladet Information for i går http://www.information.dk/547395 er FORSIDEN viet til temaet at politiet lyver. Det er ikke godt for os borgere og det er magtovergreb, at deres biskop er ligeglad med at han og Jonas benytter sig af politiløgn, så Jonas ikke skal tale med os om sin forfatningsstridige indmeldelse af os i statsreligionen og statskirken som vi udtrykkeligt ikke ønskede at være meldt ind i!
Og vi oplever det meget respektløst mod os og mod borgerne i HJERM at de ikke tager hånd om at få fjernet polititilhold og tager alvorligt, at politiet lyver og nægter os borgere PARTSHØRING på trods af henstilling fra Statsadvokat i VIBORG, Senioranklager Merete Sanning‼
Det falder tilbage på byens kommune, når dens biskop er direkte involveret og holder hånden over politi løgne fra den præst, som det er hans ansvar at føre tilsyn med.
Hvis de frasiger sig at de er en del af politik og samfund, så bliver vi andre bare legetøj for dem. Måske er det derfor de ikke mener de behøver at tage ansvar for de konsekvenser deres liv har i deres medborgeres liv. Det er en total misforståelse. Biskoppen lyver for sig selv om sin og kirkens rolle i politik. Ingen kan holde sig uden for politik. Det er ansvarsfralæggelse, at de tror de kan melde sig ud af samfundet og sige vi har ikke noget med politik at gøre. Indgår vi ikke alle i det politiske liv i vores samfund, blot i egenskab af at være borgere i vort land? Når sognepræst Jonas Serner-Pedersen og biskop Henrik Stubkjær er involveret sammen med politiet i at nægte os partshøring, og i at vi har MISTET vores retssikkerhed som borgere i Danmark, så står biskoppen og sognepræsten ikke som nogen der blander sig uden om politik, men de står som KIRKENS repræsentanter for LOVLØSHED OG ANARKI!!!
Venlig Hilsen Daniela Skov og Lars Skov Krøgholt
ENGLISH TRANSLATION
We are constantly running into a brick wall, when it comes to police dignified and fair treatment of us.
Daniela Skov was called up by Mid and Western Jutland police on 19 September 2012 by a male police officer who treated her roughly. He said she was charged. That whole treatment and the shock has caused that she has got PTSD, which is very serious for her. We have never been given the name of the officer, who started our case. He has refused to reveal his identity, despite the fact that Jonas Serner-Pedersen must know who the policeman is. We have lost our legal rights because he will not give his identity. We have complained several times about this to the police, the public prosecutor and the Ministry of Justice and the Independent Office of Complaints Over Police. But we have just been ignored. It is serious to lose our legal rights in Denmark. When we complained to the Independent Office of Complaints Over Police, we were particularly badly treated. A police officer Jesper Andersen was in interrogation, but on the wrong date. They deliberately ignored, that we asked for just that date. How can police afford to use their limited time resources and state finances in that way against citizens in Denmark?
A police officer in Central and Western Jutland Police in Holstebro rang us up on Vicar Jonas Serner-Pedersen's behalf, 19-09-2012. He has kept his identity hidden until now, which means that we have lost our legal certainty in Denmark, and it is perhaps also, why police has denied us-party consultation in spite of State Attorney's message to them. A police officer Jesper Andersen was in interrogation with the police, but they had chosen to interrogate concerned the PC on a wrong date.
We were never allowed by the police to be interrogated. No evidence by one of the parties. Only Jonas Serner-Pedersen were in for interview/ interrogation. We had this interrogation read to us at the Court in HOLSTEBRO. It was denied us despite that State Attorney in Viborg, Margrethe Sanning has sent our email to the Mid- and West Jutland's police for further measure.
EVIDENCE BY ONE OF THE INTERESTED PARTIES. It is the principle of legality and it decreases Denmark beneath a LEGAL STATE level and security for we citizens receive a fair trial and judgment. WE ARE ALL THESE NOW 4 YEAR EXTENT ONLY JUDGED WITHOUT PRIOR CONSULT AND PART EXPLANATION / CONSULTATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES. It is the principle of legality and it pulls Denmark DOWN during a LEGAL STATE level and BELOW the security that we Danish citizens receive a fair trial and judgment.
The reason why we were in court meeting in Holstebro the 13 June 2013:
Before that we had sought advice from Legal Aid in Kolding concerning fines we had got for violation of the Police Restraint. The layer there advised us to deny paying the fines, then we would be heard by a legal court. This we should write on the police papers when they arrived. We had never been interrogated or had any fair treatment from the police, so we were very much alone. Daniela had got PTSD, and that has been rather terrible.
Kind Regards, Daniela Skov and Lars Skov Krøgholt.
Yesterday we sent out this:
In the newspaper “Information” for yesterday the FRONT PAGE is devoted to the theme that the police is lying. It is not good for us citizens and it is abusive that their Bishop does not care that he and Jonas take advantage of police lie so Jonas shall not speak with us about his unconstitutional enrolment of us in the State religion and State Church as we expressly did not want to be enrolled in! And we are experiencing it very disrespectful against us and against the citizens of Hjerm that they do not take care of the removal of police restraining order and take it seriously that the police are lying and denying us citizens-PARTY CONSULTATION despite the recommendation of the public prosecutor in VIBORG, Senior Prosecutor Merete Sanning ‼ It falls back on the city's municipality, when its Bishop is directly involved and keeps the hand of police lies from the pastor, as it is his responsibility to supervise. If they disclaim that they are part of politics and society, then the rest of us are just toys for them. Maybe that is why they do not believe they need to take responsibility for the impact their lives have in their fellow citizens ' lives. It is a total misconception that they can sign up out of society and say that we have nothing to do with politics. We are not all included in the political life of our society, just as to be citizens in our country? When the parish pastor Jonas Serner-Pedersen and Bishop Henry Stubkjær is involved together with the police in to deny us the consultation of interested parties, and in that we have lost our legal security as citizens in Denmark, so says the Bishop and the parish priest not as someone who stay out of politics, but they stand as CHURCH representatives of LAWLESSNESS and ANARCHY!!!
With best regards Daniela Skov and Lars Skov Krøgholt
The State Attorney wrote this to us when we complained we had still not been called in for interrogation
STATE ATTORNEY
in VIBORG.
date 07-07-2015
Journal nr.
SAV-2015-42-0601
I have received your email of July 4-20 15, in which you write, that you will
"Continue to complain that police have chosen not to take us in for interrogation in connection to that we were presented with a warning not to contact Jonas Serner-Pedersen."
I have in my decision of July 3-2015 to you among other written the following:
" If you wish to complain about lacking evidence hearing by your part in connection to the Police RESTRAINT order that you received at November 07-2012 , you are asked to contact the Mid- and West Jutland Police, since complains about police dispositions in cases concerning RESTRAINT are treated by the Police Director in 1. Instance. "
I understand your email such that you will complain about that, you were not heard in a hearing of you giving evidence in the case that you got a restraining order in November 2012.
On this background and referring to my decision of July 3-2015, I have sent your email to Mid-and West Jutland Police for further measure.
I'm doing no further on occasion of your inquiry.
Kind Regards,
Margrethe Sanning
Senior Prosecutor
The English translastion is done by Daniela Skov and not from the Senior Prosecutor's Secretary.
--
Lars Skov Krøgholt
Knud Hansens Vej 12,2.tv.
6000 Kolding
Denmark
Tel: +45 5047 3645
Chat Skype: lars.krogholt
Contact Me