10-11-2016

‼ACCORDING TO SOURCES IT IS NOT TRUE THAT DONALD TRUMP STATED THIS ABOUT REPUBLICANS. I WISH IT IS NOT TRUE. To mock the Office of President in the US like this is despicable. BUT THIS STORY WILL NOT DIE. I TAKE IT IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT DONALD TRUMP SAYS ONE THING AND NEXT MINUTE THE NEXT ABOUT MANY MANY ISSUES. Then trustworthiness, integrity and credibility is not present. That is a serious character flaw. And it is down to Donald Trump to proof himself to be a President of integrity and WORTHY to the voter’s trust in him. Kind Regards Daniela Skov‼

Now this! If Republicans CHOOSE TO IGNORE THIS THEY LIVE UP TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMPS (possible) OWN OUTSPOKEN OPINION ON REPUBLICANS IN PEOPLE MAGAZINE 1998!

THIS MAKES ME REALLY REALLY ANGRY. He is mocking The Office Of President as well as every one ! Kind Regards Daniela Skov.

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/trump-fake-people-quote/

Inboxes, they decided to investigate.

They found no record of a People interview with Trump in 1998. Sure, the celebrity lifestyle magazine had covered him as a high-profile businessman in the 1980s and 1990s, but it mainly looked at his marriage troubles.

A spokeswoman from the People told FactCheck, another myth-busting site, “We combed through every Trump story in our archive. We couldn’t find anything remotely like this quote – and no interview at all in 1998.”

While sites like Snopes and Gawker fully discredited the quote this time last year, it's refused to die. High-profile and respectable academics and public figures continue to circulate it, including, for example, this senior fellow at Harvard Business School:

Report Advertisement

That's why it's important to check your sources—even if it totally affirms your angst or outrage.

Donald Trump

Election 2016

People Magazine

A really kind hearted Republican, Greg Rickard wrote Daniela:

Hi, Daniela. I thought that I'd IM you rather than respond publicly, since I respect your feelings and understand how much you've been hurt by some people who aren't happy unless they're putting others down. I admire you for sticking up for your beliefs and being undaunted by those kind of folks. Yes, it's hurtful to be called names and seen as a bad person for your beliefs and actions. But please know that you are in the right, and they are the ones who will ultimately answer for what they've said and done. Much love to you.

NYTimes: Where the U.S. Is a Rival, Trump Election Is Greeted With a Smile

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/world/trump-putin-xi-america.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share

KOTOR, Montenegro — Just over an hour after Donald J. Trump secured

his stunning triumph, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia

congratulated the victor and looked forward to “constructive

dialogue.” China’s president, Xi Jinping, waited a little longer,

sending Mr. Trump a similarly measured message of hope and appealing

for “cooperation for mutual gain.”

But perhaps even more revealing was Momcilo Krivokapic, a bearded

Orthodox priest who was ecstatic over the upset result.

Seated in the dark at Saint Nikola Church because of a power failure,

the 71-year-old priest gloated at “the defeat of satanic forces” in

the West bent on strengthening NATO, expanding gay rights and

championing Western notions of tolerance.

“God has reached out his hand and touched the United States to help us

all,” said Father Krivokapic, a bitter foe of the American-led

military alliance and of the values that American power has brought to

the far corners of the world, even to Kotor, an ancient fortified town

on the Adriatic coast of Montenegro.

The election of Mr. Trump on Tuesday has presented an unexpected gift

to leaders — political, spiritual and ideological — who resent the

encroachment of the West and now rejoice at a result that in their

eyes shows how liberal democracy produces nothing but an angry

populace and wild unpredictability.

Mr. Trump has openly questioned some of the basic tenets of America’s

role in the world. Now his election has stirred confidence in

America’s biggest rivals, Russia and China, that they will have more

room to assert their own strategic interests, whether in Ukraine, the

Baltics or the South China Sea.

“A weakened and disorganized West like this will surely bring many

more additional strategic opportunities for China,” said Shi Yinhong,

professor of international relations at Renmin University. Mr. Xi, who

has been the strongest foreign policy president for China, will be

further emboldened, Mr. Shi said, and will be “even less prudent” in

his foreign policy.

But beyond that, the election is being viewed as a comeuppance for a

country that lectures others about the superiority of American values.

Mr. Trump’s election is a “victory for Putin by which he gains a very

strong case to be made about the crisis of traditional Western

democracy and its institutions,” wrote Tatyana Stanovaya, an analyst

for the Center for Political Technologies, a Russian research group.

While Mr. Putin and his Kremlin aides were restrained in their initial

public response to the result, “undoubtedly, they are drinking

Champagne,” said Gleb O. Pavlovsky, a political consultant who once

worked for the Kremlin.

This, Mr. Pavlovsky said, is “for two reasons: one political, the

other psychological.”

For Russia, the triumph of Mr. Trump, just five months after Britain’s

shock vote to leave the European Union, accelerates an unraveling of

the Western order, a trend that the Kremlin has worked tirelessly to

promote through disinformation and the funding of anti-establishment

parties like the National Front in France.

China, far more dependent on economic ties to the West than Russia is,

has avoided trying to stoke turbulent populist sentiments in Western

countries but, with a shared hostility toward liberal democracy, has

moved increasingly close to Russia to form a united authoritarian

front.

Russian politicians and analysts cheered Mr. Trump’s victory as an

opportunity for Russia to extend its global influence and, possibly,

shed economic sanctions imposed by the United States and Europe over

Crimea and Ukraine.

Mr. Putin, speaking to ambassadors presenting their credentials in the

Kremlin, sought to play down any expectations in Russia of a sudden

warming of now ice-cold relations with Washington. “We understand and

are aware that it will be a difficult path, in view of the degradation

that U.S.-Russian relations have unfortunately suffered,” Mr. Putin

said.

But more important for Russia than any quick gains was a feeling that

after years of enduring criticism from Washington over its steady

retreat from Western-style democracy, Russia can now point a finger at

the United States.

Even before Election Day, Russian state-owned news media hammered the

same simple message, said Maria Lipman, editor of Counterpoint, a

journal published by the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian

Studies, George Washington University: “‘Our democracy might not be

perfect, but look at theirs. It stinks.’”

The result — the victory of a businessman who delighted in shredding

the conventions of political decorum and of an America-led Western

order in place since the end of World War II, has “proved Russia

right,” Ms. Lipman added, and shown that the United States is “no

shining city on a hill.”

Russia, meanwhile, has been busy building its own alternative city, a

beacon for all those who long for a more secure, illiberal world

rooted in faith and traditional values. At the center of this effort

has been Patriarch Kirill, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church and

a close ally of Mr. Putin.

On Wednesday, the patriarch said he was praying for divine assistance

for Mr. Trump, adding, “There’s now hope for good changes both

domestically and internationally.”

Like Russia, China has long bridled at American complaints about its

illiberal ways, rejecting the idea that human rights and free speech

are universal values and insisting that China has found its own

political model rooted in uniquely Chinese values that put stability

above all else.

In the days before the election, the Chinese government, eager to

point out to its citizens the advantages of one-party rule by the

Communist Party, used the nastiness of the Trump vs. Clinton contest

to warn about the evils of American democracy.

“America is terribly ill,” wrote Yuan Peng, the vice president of a

state-run research center, the China Institutes of Contemporary

International Relations. His article in The People’s Daily, the

flagship newspaper of the Communist Party, said the election would be

remembered as a “page of ‘dirty, chaotic and poor performance.’”

President Xi, the head of the Communist Party, avoided mockery in his

congratulatory message to Mr. Trump and emphasized that “I place great

importance on the China-U.S. relationship,” while quietly advising him

in coded language to stay out of China’s way. Mr. Xi, Chinese state

television reported, said he had told the president-elect that he

hoped “to strive with you to uphold the principles of not engaging in

conflict or confrontation, and of cooperation for mutual gain.”

Although Mr. Trump’s intentions remained unclear, the very

uncertainties of his victory have given the Chinese leader an

opportunity to pursue a number of strategic advantages across Asia,

analysts said.

“The general line from China will be: ‘The United States is

unreliable. You have to accommodate us,’” said Peter Jennings, the

director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in Canberra.

If Mr. Trump delivers on his promise to downgrade America’s

traditional alliances in Asia, China will almost certainly capitalize

on an American retreat by trying to push the United States aside in a

region Beijing considers its natural sphere of influence. At the same

time, China is hoping that he reneges on his pledges to take on China

over trade and slap hefty tariffs on its exports to the United States.

With his growing Navy, Mr. Xi may now feel emboldened to pursue more

control of the South China Sea, the major waterway that carries

trillions of dollars of the world’s trade, and that he insists belongs

to China. He will almost certainly use increasingly big financial

inducements to pick off smaller countries like the Philippines and

Malaysia that were already moving closer to Beijing, and midsize

American allies like Australia that are moving closer to China’s

economic order.

The outcome of the American election, however, may not be all positive

for China. Feeling abandoned by the United States, and vulnerable to

an emboldened and increasingly assertive China, Japan and South Korea

could both decide to develop their own nuclear arsenals.

In South Korea, where there is a powerful lobby for the country to

become a nuclear power, there is about a 50 percent chance of going

nuclear, said Andray Abrahamian, associate research director of Choson

Exchange.

The Japanese government called an emergency meeting Wednesday night,

to consider its options. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe faced questions

about the future shape of the military alliance, but also recognized

that the Obama administration’s trade pact, the Trans-Pacific

Partnership, was dead. Mr. Abe had taken big political risks at home

to win concessions for the trade deal, which Mr. Trump has vilified.

The Trump triumph could also hold peril for Russia, where state media

has for weeks presented the billionaire as a much-needed break from

the supposedly Russophobic attitudes of President Obama and Hillary

Clinton. In a Facebook post, Andrey Loshak, a Russian journalist,

predicted that Mr. Trump’s entry to the White House would deprive the

Kremlin of what has become one of its most potent political tools:

blaming the Obama administration for all of Russia’s troubles.

“The worldview planted into Russians’ minds that America is to blame

for all and every ill, including urine-stained porches and alcoholic

neighbors, crumbles. Who is to be hated now?” Mr. Loshak wrote. “You

can’t do without a specter of a good, high-quality enemy these days.”

Andrew Higgins reported from Kotor, Neil MacFarquhar from Moscow, and

Jane Perlez from Yangon, Myanmar. Chris Buckley contributed reporting

from Beijing and Ivan Nechepurenko from Moscow. Yufan Huang

contributed research from Beijing.

On 5 November New York Times wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/05/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-electoral-college.html?_r=0

"WASHINGTON — If all goes smoothly, the American people will choose a new president on Tuesday, the Electoral College will affirm the election next month and either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump will take the oath of office on Jan. 20.

But why assume everything will go smoothly in an election year that already has seen more than its share of surprises. What, for example, if some electors refuse to vote for the candidate who won their state? What if the winner is sitting in a courtroom instead of parading in Washington?

The FBI is investigating newly discovered emails that might be related to the dormant probe into Clinton's use of a private email server. The future of that investigation is uncertain, and there could be developments after the election.

On the Republican side, Trump faces unresolved cases in New York and California related to Trump University, as well as numerous other civil suits. He also has threatened to sue The New York Times over its publication of details regarding his taxes.

Electors who go rogue — called faithless electors — are rare and have never changed the result of an election. (..)"

And on 9 November New York Post wrote

http://nypost.com/2016/11/09/the-one-scenario-that-could-still-get-hillary-into-the-white-house/

"(...) Though Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 200,000, Trump has won the minimum of 270 electoral votes necessary to be elected president. As of late Wednesday, he had 290 to Clinton’s 228.

According to the Constitution, chosen electors of the Electoral College are the real people who will vote for president, when they meet on Dec. 19 in their respective state capitals.

However, there is nothing stopping any of the electors from refusing to support the candidate to whom they were bound or abstaining from voting.

There’s even a name for it: becoming a “faithless elector.” (...)"

Control is an illusion

I henhold til forskellige kilder, er det ikke sandt at Donald Trump udtalte dette om Republikanerne. Jeg ville ønske det ikke er sandt. At gøre nar ad Præsident Embedet i USA på denne måde, er usselt. Men denne historie vil ikke dø. Jeg tror det skyldes at Donald Trump siger en ting, og i det næste minut en anden om mange mange emner. Så er pålidelighed, integritet og troværdighed ikke til stede. Det er en alvorlig karakterbrist. Og det er Donald Trumps sag at vise sig som en Præsident i integritet og værdig til vælgernes tillid til ham. Med venlig hilsen Daniela Skov

" Hvis jeg skulle opstilles ville jeg stille op som en Republikaner. De er den dummeste gruppe vælgere i landet. De tror på alt på Fox News. Jeg kunne lyve og de ville stadig æde det råt! I vil vædde på mine tal ville blive fantastiske." – sagt til People Magazine i 1998.

I henhold til forskellige kilder, er det ikke sandt at Donald Trump udtalte dette om Republikanerne. Jeg ville ønske det ikke er sandt. At gøre nar ad Præsident Embedet i USA på denne måde, er usselt. Men denne historie vil ikke dø. Jeg tror det skyldes at Donald Trump siger en ting, og i det næste minut en anden om mange mange emner. Så er pålidelighed, integritet og troværdighed ikke til stede. Det er en alvorlig karakterbrist. Og det er Donald Trumps sag at vise sig som en Præsident i integritet og værdig til vælgernes tillid til ham. Med venlig hilsen Daniela Skov

Nu dette! Hvis republikanerne vælger at ignorere dette, lever de op til PRÆSIDENT Donald Trumps (mulige) EGEN åbenhjertige UDTALELSE OM Republikanerne i PEOPLE MAGAZINE 1998! " Hvis jeg skulle opstilles ville jeg stille op som en Republikaner. De er den dummeste gruppe vælgere i landet. De tror på alt på Fox News. Jeg kunne lyve og de ville stadig æde det råt! I vil vædde på mine tal ville blive fantastiske."

Det her gør mig virkelig virkelig vred.

http://www.bt.dk/udland/ikke-alt-haab-er-ude-for-hillary-her-er-den-ene-mulighed-der-stadig-kan-goere-hende

"(...) 'Faithless electors'

De valgmænd, der tirsdag blev fordelt i de forskellige stater og som udgør det såkaldte Electoral College, har nemlig en helt særlig magt. Ifølge den amerikanske konstitution er forsamlingen af valgmænd nemlig de 'rigtige' mennesker, der skal stemme om, hvem landets præsident skal være, når de mødes den 19. december i deres respektive stater.

Torsdag morgen dansk tid har Hillary Clinton 228 valgmænd mod Donald Trumps 279. Fire stater mangler endnu i det endelige regnskab, men da Trump kom over den magiske grænse på 270 valgmænd, som udgør mere end halvdelen af de 538 valgmænd, der stemmes om fordelt på alle stater i USA, blev han erklæret som valgvinder.

Men. Der er ikke noget, der kan stoppe valgmændene fra at nægte at støtte den kandidat, de ellers er knyttet til, eller helt at lade være med at stemme.

Så selvom Donald Trump fik flest stemmer i for eksempel staten Florida, hvilket gav ham alle de 29 valgmænd der, kan de godt gå imod ham, på trods af at de 29 valgmænd alle er republikanske.

Hvis nogle af de republikanske valgmænd vælger at gå imod ham eller nægte at stemme, bliver de det, der kaldes en 'faithless elector'. En troløs.(...)"

Kontrol er en illusion

שליטה היא אשליה! דונלד טראמפ שתושביו בפראות התנגדו העובדה כי אובמה נולד באמריקה. דונלד טראמפ סירב בזעם לכבות מסמכי הגירה של גברת מלאניה דונלד טראמפ. ובכל זאת הוא היה יריב לעולים לדוגמה ממקסיקו באים אל אמריקה. אדם שזרע כל הזמן טענות רבות כלפי אנשים אחרים, איך הוא מצפה לא לקצור מה הוא זורע?

לנשימה על פי מקורות זה לא נכון כי דונלד טראמפ כאמור זה על הרפובליקנים. . הלוואי שזה לא נכון. כדי ללעוג את משכן הנשיא בארה ב כמו זה הוא בזוי. אבל הסיפור הזה לא ימות . אני לוקח זה בשל העובדה כי דונלד טראמפ אומר אחד, הדבר הבא ברגע הבא על נושאים רבים רבים. ואז אמינות, יושרה ואמינות אינו נוכח. . זה פגם באופי רציני... . ומי דונלד טראמפ להגהת את עצמו כדי להיות נשיא של שלמות ראוי כדי בו אמון הבוחר. בברכה דניאלה Skovלנשימה

,,,,,

לנשימה על פי מקורות זה לא נכון כי דונלד טראמפ כאמור זה על הרפובליקנים. . הלוואי שזה לא נכון. כדי ללעוג את משכן הנשיא בארה ב כמו זה הוא בזוי. אבל הסיפור הזה לא ימות . אני לוקח זה בשל העובדה כי דונלד טראמפ אומר אחד, הדבר הבא ברגע הבא על נושאים רבים רבים. ואז אמינות, יושרה ואמינות אינו נוכח. . זה פגם באופי רציני... . ומי דונלד טראמפ להגהת את עצמו כדי להיות נשיא של שלמות ראוי כדי בו אמון הבוחר. בברכה דניאלה Skovלנשימה

ועכשיו זה! אם הרפובליקנים אל בחר להתעלם זו THEY LIVE למעלה אל הנשיא דונלד גובר (אפשרי) עצמו החכמות והגלויות חוות דעת על הרפובליקנים ב אנשים מגזין 1998!

זה גורם לי ממש ממש כועס. הוא לועג את משכן הנשיא, כמו גם כל אחד! בברכה דניאלה Skov.

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/trump-fake-people-quote/

תיבות דואר נכנס, הם החליטו לחקור.

הם מצאו שום תיעוד ראיון אנשים עם טראמפ בשנת 1998. מגזין סגנון סלבריטי היה מכוסה אותו כאיש עסקים בעלי פרופיל גבוה של שנות השמונים והתשעים, אבל זה בעיקר הביט הצרות הנישואים שלו.

דוברת מן העם אמר FactCheck, אתר קורע מיתוס נוסף, "סרקנו דרך כל סיפור טראמפ בארכיון. לא מצאנו שום דבר מרחוק כמו הצעת מחיר זו – וראיון אין בכלל בשנת 1998."

בעוד אתרים כמו Snopes Gawker אמון מלא הציטוט בשנה האחרונה, הוא סירב למות. פרופיל גבוה ומכובד אקדמיה ואנשי ציבור ממשיכים לזרום, כולל, לדוגמה, הבחור בכיר בבית הספר למנהל עסקים של הרווארד:

פרסום דו ח

לכן חשוב לבדוק את המקורות שלך — אפילו אם זה לגמרי מאשרת את חרדה או זעם.

דונלד טראמפ

הבחירות 2016

מגזין people

נשלח ע י דניאלה

. היי, דניאלה. . חשבתי שיש לי אים אתה מאשר להגיב בפומבי, מאז אני מכבד את הרגשות שלך ולהבין עד כמה הייתה נפגעת על ידי אנשים שלא מרוצים. אלא אם כן הם שמים אחרים. אני מעריץ אותך על שהגנת על האמונות שלך, להיות ללא מורא על ידי כאלה אנשים. . כן, זה כואב להיות קרא שמות, נחשב רע על אמונותיו ומעשיו שלך אבל לידיעתך, כי אתה צודק, הם אלה שבסופו של דבר יענה על מה הם שאמרת ועשית. הרבה אהבה לך.

. משהו הרפובליקנית לב כתב דניאלה

שליטה היא אשליה

عنصر التحكم هو الوهم! دونالد ترامب عارضت بشدة حقيقة أن أوباما ولدت في أمريكا. ورفضت دونالد ترامب شراسة لإخماد أوراق الهجرة السيدة ميﻻنيا ترامب. وكان بعد خصم الشرس للمهاجرين من المكسيك على سبيل المثال القادمة إلى أمريكا. رجل الذي يزرع باستمرار الادعاءات العديدة تجاه الآخرين، كيف يمكن أنه يتوقع عدم حصاد ما أنه يبذر؟

‼ وذكرت مصادر أنه ليس صحيحاً أن دونالد ترامب ذكر هذا عن الجمهوريين. وأود أن هذا ليس صحيحاً. يسخر من "مكتب الرئيس" في الولايات المتحدة مثل هذا الحقير. ولكن لن تموت هذه القصة. وأنا أخذ يرجع ذلك إلى حقيقة أن دونالد ترامب يقول أحد شيء والتالي دقيقة المقبلة حول العديد من القضايا العديدة. ثم الجدارة بالثقة والنزاهة والمصداقية غير موجودة. وهذا عيب طابع خطير. ووصولا إلى دونالد ترامب لإثبات نفسه ليكون رئيسا للنزاهة وجديرة بالثقة للناخبين له. النوع تعتبر سكوف دانييلا‼

,,,,,

‼ وذكرت مصادر أنه ليس صحيحاً أن دونالد ترامب ذكر هذا عن الجمهوريين. وأود أن هذا ليس صحيحاً. يسخر من "مكتب الرئيس" في الولايات المتحدة مثل هذا الحقير. ولكن لن تموت هذه القصة. وأنا أخذ يرجع ذلك إلى حقيقة أن دونالد ترامب يقول أحد شيء والتالي دقيقة المقبلة حول العديد من القضايا العديدة. ثم الجدارة بالثقة والنزاهة والمصداقية غير موجودة. وهذا عيب طابع خطير. ووصولا إلى دونالد ترامب لإثبات نفسه ليكون رئيسا للنزاهة وجديرة بالثقة للناخبين له. النوع تعتبر سكوف دانييلا‼

هذا الآن! إذا كان الجمهوريون إلى اختيار تجاهل هذا أنها حية تصل إلى الرئيس الأميركي دونالد ينسخ (ممكن) الخاصة صراحة الرأي على الجمهوريين في الناس مجلة عام 1998!

وهذا ما يجعلني غاضبا حقاً حقاً. أنه هو اﻻستهزاء "مكتب الرئيس" وكذلك كل واحد! وبالنسبة لنوع دانييلا سكوف.

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/trump-fake-people-quote/

علب الوارد، وقرروا للتحقيق.

أنهم العثور على أي سجل من حديث الناس مع ورقة رابحة في عام 1998. بالتأكيد، قد غطت مجلة نمط الحياة المشاهير له كرجل أعمال بارزة في الثمانينات وفي التسعينات، ولكن بدأ أساسا في مشاكله الزواج.

وقال المتحدثة باسم الشعب فاكتشيك، موقع أسطورة خرق آخر، "نحن تمشيط من خلال كل قصة ورقة رابحة في ارشيفنا. لا يمكن أن نجد أي شيء عن بعد مثل هذا الاقتباس – ولا حديث على الإطلاق في عام 1998.

بينما مواقع مثل سنوبس والأخرق تماما فقدت مصداقيتها الاقتباس هذا الوقت من العام الماضي، إلا أنها رفضت أن تموت. رفيعة ومحترمة الأكاديميين والشخصيات العامة الاستمرار في تعميمها، بما في ذلك، على سبيل المثال، هذا زميل أقدم في مدرسة هارفارد للأعمال:

إعلان التقرير

وهذا هو السبب من المهم التحقق من المصادر الخاصة بك — حتى لو أنها تؤكد تماما الخاص بك هموم أو الغضب.

دونالد ترامب

انتخاب عام 2016

مجلة الشعب

أرسلت إلى دانييلا

مرحبا، دانييلا. ظننت أنني قد إيم لك بدلاً من الاستجابة علنا، منذ ذلك الحين احترم مشاعرك ونفهم كم لقد تم يضر ببعض الناس الذين ليسوا سعداء إلا أنهم يضعون الآخرين إلى أسفل. أنا معجب بك الشائكة للمعتقدات الخاصة بك والتي تثبط من هذا النوع من الناس. نعم، أنها مؤذية تسمى أسماء وينظر إليه كشخص سيئ للمعتقدات والإجراءات الخاصة بك. ولكن أرجو أن تعلم أن كنت على حق، وأنهم هم الذين سوف الإجابة في نهاية المطاف لما قد يقال ويفعل. الكثير من الحب لك.

الطيبة حقاً القلب الجمهوري كتب دانييلا

عنصر التحكم هو الوهم

--

Lars Skov Krøgholt

Knud Hansens Vej 12,2.tv.

6000 Kolding

Denmark

Chat

Skype: lars.krogholt

Contact Me