Atlantis and the NWO Connection
Atlantis and the NWO Connection
By
Gary Primo
June 2, 1019
The story of Atlantis is one that historians have argued about for centuries. Supposedly, some 9,000 years ago Atlantis slid into the sea and disappeared (or so they claim) but as we all know the age of man is less than 6,000 years and this claim places the event before the creation. We also know that modern science and their carbon dating techniques are all off. I lean towards Dr. Dino’s theory that because there was more oxygen in the atmosphere before the flood, men and dinosaurs lived longer and grew larger. Remember that lizards never stop growing for as long as they are alive; that is why they grew so big. And, of course, the Scriptures tell us that just about everyone before the flood lived to almost a thousand years. Dr. Dino also provides proof that man and dinosaurs lived on the earth at the same time. We also know that it did not rain until the salvation of Noah. Certainly the atmosphere had to have been much different before the flood. And, such an atmospheric change would certainly throw their carbon dating out the window for any time other than after the flood.
Atlantis supposedly disappeared overnight into the sea; never to be found again. However, modern day explorers, with the help of satellite imaging think they may have located it. Their main pieces of evidence are 7 huge stone anchors found on the ocean floor, almost exactly where Plato described the island being. These stone anchors were very large and very old. Plato wrote about it in 369 B.C. But as the following indicates he was not the first to write about it (though his writings are the most well know).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantis
Timaeus
A fifteenth-century Latin translation of Plato's Timaeus
Main article: Timaeus (dialogue)
The only primary sources for Atlantis are Plato's dialogues Timaeus and Critias; all other mentions of the island are based on them. The dialogues claim to quote Solon, who visited Egypt between 590 and 580 BC; they state that he translated Egyptian records of Atlantis.[20] Written in 360 BC, Plato introduced Atlantis in Timaeus:
The main gist of the story is that Atlantis had huge sailing ships and used them to control sea traffic around the Mediterranean and conquered all the coastal lands, forcing all to pay tribute. The story goes that Atlantis was an island off the coast of Gibraltar. It was divided into 10 kingdoms ruled over by 10 kings; and the 10 kings were ruled over by the pagan messiah, Atlas (type of Antichrist). The ten kings had an alliance that they would never go to war against each other; but in times of war against anyone else, they all went together.
My interest in this story is that I know the NWO elite plan to collapse all borders and redraw the global map into 10 nations ruled by 10 Kings. I also know that the Book of Revelation (17) talks of 10 kings ruling with the Beast in the last days. I also know that the elite are using Plato’s playbook (whether they believe it to be true or not) in forming the government of the NWO after that of Atlantis. What I don’t know is if there is a connection between the 3. And that is what we are about to find out.
Rev. 17:9 - And here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sits.
I believe this is talking of Rome, but Istanbul and Jerusalem also sit on 7 hills. I have heard some argue that it is Jerusalem; and they may be right. The term “woman” is sometimes used in Scriptural prophesy to represent a city. So this might mean that the “city” of the Beast (Vatican City) sits on 7 hills.
I also found it interesting that Istanbul sat on 7 hills too. As we know, Constantine moved his headquarters there from Rome. I wonder if that fact influenced Constantine’s decision to relocate there. It also was closer to Jerusalem. And, if as I repeatedly claim, Constantine was the Antichrist described in Daniel, he would certainly wish to be closer to Jerusalem (one would think).
And, since we know that in the last days, Israel is going into captivity one last time, and that the alter is yet again going to be desecrated, it could be Jerusalem also. But what is the old saying, “All roads lead to Rome”.
10 - And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he comes, he must continue a short space.
I am not sure if the seven kings necessarily served in succession or not, But I think the last two represent Constantine and the end-time Antichrist (Constantine being the first). The last part of the sentence is definitely speaking of the end-time Antichrist and his short rule.
11 - And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goes into perdition.
The following is what Jaimison, Fuacett and Brown has to say on verses 10 and 11.
https://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/jamieson-fausset-brown/revelation/revelation-17.html
10. there are--Translate, "they (the seven heads) are seven kings."
five . . . one--Greek, "the five . . . the one"; the first five of the seven are fallen (a word applicable not to forms of government passing away, but to the fall of once powerful empires: Egypt, Ezekiel 29:1-30:26'; Assyria and Nineveh, Nahum 3:1-19 ; Babylon, Revelation 18:2'Jeremiah 50:1-51:64'; Medo-Persia, Daniel 8:3-7 Daniel 8:20-22 , 10:13 , 11:2 ; Greece, Daniel 11:4 ). Rome was "the one" existing in John's days. "Kings" is the Scripture phrase for kingdoms, because these kingdoms are generally represented in character by some one prominent head, as Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, Medo-Persia by Cyrus, Greece by Alexander, &c.
the other is not yet come--not as ALFORD, inaccurately representing AUBERLEN, the Christian empire beginning with Constantine; but, the Germanic-Slavonic empire beginning and continuing in its beast-like, that is, HEATHEN Antichristian character for only "a short space." The time when it is said of it, "it is not" ( Revelation 17:11 ), is the time during which it is "wounded to death," and has the "deadly wound" ( Revelation 13:3 ). The external Christianization of the migrating hordes from the North which descended on Rome, is the wound to the beast answering to the earth swallowing up the flood (heathen tribes) sent by the dragon, Satan, to drown the woman, the Church. The emphasis palpably is on "a short space," which therefore comes first in the Greek, not on "he must continue," as if his continuance for some [considerable] time were implied, as ALFORD wrongly thinks. The time of external Christianization (while the beast's wound continues) has lasted for centuries, ever since Constantine. Rome and the Greek Church have partially healed the wound by image worship.
11. beast that . . . is not--his beastly character being kept down by outward Christianization of the state until he starts up to life again as "the eighth" king, his "wound being healed" ( Revelation 13:3 ), Antichrist manifested in fullest and most intense opposition to God. The "he" is emphatic in the Greek. He, peculiarly and pre-eminently: answering to "the little horn" with eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things, before whom three of the ten horns were plucked up by the roots, and to whom the whole ten "give their power and strength" ( Revelation 17:12 Revelation 17:13Revelation 17:17 ). That a personal Antichrist will stand at the head of the Antichristian kingdom, is likely from the analogy of Antiochus Epiphanes, the Old Testament Antichrist, "the little horn" inDaniel 8:9-12 ; also, "the man of sin, son of perdition" ( 2 Thessalonians 2:3-8 ), answers here to "goeth into perdition," and is applied to an individual, namely, Judas, in the only other passage where the phrase occurs ( John 17:12 ). He is essentially a child of destruction, and hence he has but a little time ascended out of the bottomless pit, when he "goes into perdition" ( Revelation 17:8Revelation 17:11 ). "While the Church passes through death of the flesh to glory of the Spirit, the beast passes through the glory of the flesh to death" [AUBERLEN].
is of the seven--rather "springs out of the seven." The eighth is not merely one of the seven restored, but a new power or person proceeding out of the seven, and at the same time embodying all the God-opposed features of the previous seven concentrated and consummated; for which reason there are said to be not eight, but only seven heads, for the eighth is the embodiment of all the seven. In the birth-pangs which prepare the "regeneration" there are wars, earthquakes, and disturbances [AUBERLEN], wherein Antichrist takes his rise ("sea," Revelation 13:1 , 13:8 , Luke 21:9-11 ). He does not fall like the other seven ( Revelation 17:10 ), but is destroyed, going to his own perdition, by the Lord in person.
I had always thought of Rome being the fourth great global ruling empire, but apparently it is the 7th. Then this all makes sense. As far as the world is concerned, Rome fell in the 6th century A.D. However, that is not entirely true. A number of Roman generals disguised themselves as priests and escaped death from the barbarian hordes within the Vatican; and, they have ruled the world from within that organization ever since. And, that is how the Roman Empire (now the Holy Roman Empire) survived to this very day and now rules from both the Vatican and America, although I believe Donald Trump has thrown them a curve ball, judging from the fact that he is the first US president since Roosevelt to not bow the knee before “His Eminence”
Constantine did create the RCC but Rome did not fall (the wound) until almost 200 years later. The wound will not be fully healed until the RCC finally reveals itself as the religion of the Antichrist and openly worships the beast (end-time Antichrist).
In case you are not sure what perdition is, I looked it up for you and the best explanation I found goes as follows:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perdition
Did You Know?
Perdition began life as a word meaning "utter destruction"; that sense is now archaic, but it provides a clue about the origins of the word. "Perdition" was borrowed into English in the 14th century from Anglo-French perdiciun and ultimately derives from the Latin verb perdere, meaning "to destroy." "Perdere" was formed by combining the prefix per- ("through") and "dare" ("to give"). Other descendants of that Latin dare in English include "date," "edition," "render," and "traitor."
The following is the modern definition:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/perdition
perdition
[ per-dish-uh n ]
noun
a state of final spiritual ruin; loss of the soul; damnation.
the future state of the wicked.
utter destruction or ruin.
Obsolete. loss.
There is no “place” such as hell or perdition. When the Father finally comes to dwell with His creation, all that remains corruptible will be burnt up “with fervent heat” as He approaches.
How about the claim, “not merely one of the seven restored, but a new power or person proceeding out of the seven”. This can only be Rome. Almost every US citizen believes their nation was founded on some sense of religious freedom. However, as Chris Tyson reveals in his (terrific) book, “Ameroca’s One World Order”, the US has been nothing more than a RCC/Freemason/Illuminati enclave since its inception. The majority of the signing members of the Declaration of Independence were Freemasons. The RCC had claimed all of the New World as belonging to Rome since the day Christopher Columbus discovered America (even though it truly belonged to the natives). The RCC does not give up any territory without a fight. And, they have fought against the Protestants of America for a very long time. What the Vatican does not gain by truth, they gain by stealth.
The RCC Oath of induction reveals this fact quite clearly. Here is a sample of what I am talking about:
http://www.knollwoodchurch.org/yr2000/a08_allegiance.html
“Therefore, to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and his holiness' right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or protestant authority whatsoever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and the pretended authority and churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of the same now established in Ireland and on the continent of America and elsewhere, and all adherents in regard that they by usurped and heretical opposing the sacred mother church of Rome.”
Clearly, the Roman Catholic Church is and always has been at war with all other religions. There is actually proof that they are taking over America in the form of current TV shows. We almost never see a Protestant minister any more being portrayed; it is almost always a Catholic priest spouting Catholic rhetoric. The average person does not even know the difference between Catholic and Protestant. And, in reality, there is not much difference. Both worship Constantine and all his Roman gods. Any other differences are irrelevant.
Another statement by this author that I believe is true, is that this last Antichrist will be different in the manor of His death. He will be the only one brought to his death by Yahushua when he returns.
12 - And the ten horns which you saw are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 - These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
The Beast can have no power unless we give it to him. These 10 kings willingly give themselves over to and under the Beast. They will be of one mind and one purpose (like the Globalists today). The might of their military will be formidable.
Rev. 13:4 - And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?
In any revolution, only about 20% of the population are usually involved. The rest are the sheep. We cab wager that at least 80% of the population will lie down with the beast.
Rom. 17:16 - And the ten horns which you saw upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
17 - For Elohim has put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of Elohim shall be fulfilled.
The ten kings will ultimately turn against “the whore”/church and destroy her. The reason is not made exactly clear. I would suppose (knowing the RCC as I do) that the church may try to overpower the ten kings; however, they would not dare make such a move without authorization from the Beast.
https://www.aquiziam.com/atlantis-real-or-myth/
A society that ultimately collapsed because it failed to adhere to its moral and founding principles. But … intriguingly, there is more to this story than some skeptics would have people believe.
“Thereupon one of the (Egyptian) priests, who was of a very great age, said: “O Solon, Solon, you Hellenes are never anything but children, and there is not an old man among you.”
Solon in return asked him what he meant.
“I mean to say”, he replied, “that in mind you are all young; there is no old opinion handed down among you by ancient tradition, nor any science which is hoary with age. And I will tell you why. There have been, and will be again, many destructions of mankind arising out of many causes; the greatest have been brought about by the agencies of fire and water, and other lesser ones by innumerable other causes.” (Plato – 360 BC -Translated by Benjamin Jowett)
Anyone studying the history of global empires knows that mostly all started off as highly moral; and, that before their demise, they turned highly immoral. It sounds like this is similar as to what happened to Atlantis.
Plato’s description of Atlantis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantis
Plato
“For it is related in our records how once upon a time your State stayed the course of a mighty host, which, starting from a distant point in the Atlantic ocean, was insolently advancing to attack the whole of Europe, and Asia to boot. For the ocean there was at that time navigable; for in front of the mouth which you Greeks call, as you say, 'the pillars of Heracles,' there lay an island which was larger than Libya and Asia together; and it was possible for the travelers of that time to cross from it to the other islands, and from the islands to the whole of the continent over against them which encompasses that veritable ocean. For all that we have here, lying within the mouth of which we speak, is evidently a haven having a narrow entrance; but that yonder is a real ocean, and the land surrounding it may most rightly be called, in the fullest and truest sense, a continent. Now in this island of Atlantis there existed a confederation of kings, of great and marvelous power, which held sway over all the island, and over many other islands also and parts of the continent.”[21]
According to Critias
But afterwards there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune all your warlike men in a body sank into the earth, and the island of Atlantis in like manner disappeared in the depths of the sea. For which reason the sea in those parts is impassable and impenetrable, because there is a shoal of mud in the way; and this was caused by the subsidence of the island.[25]
Proclus wrote:
As for the whole of this account of the Atlanteans, some say that it is unadorned history, such as Crantor, the first commentator on Plato. Crantor also says that Plato's contemporaries used to criticize him jokingly for not being the inventor of his Republic but copying the institutions of the Egyptians. Plato took these critics seriously enough to assign to the Egyptians this story about the Athenians and Atlanteans, so as to make them say that the Athenians really once lived according to that system.
"Timaeus" gives a description of the geography of Atlantis:
That an island of such nature and size once existed is evident from what is said by certain authors who investigated the things around the outer sea. For according to them, there were seven islands in that sea in their time, sacred to Persephone, and also three others of enormous size, one of which was sacred to Hades, another to Ammon, and another one between them to Poseidon, the extent of which was a thousand stadia [200 km]; and the inhabitants of it—they add—preserved the remembrance from their ancestors of the immeasurably large island of Atlantis which had really existed there and which for many ages had reigned over all islands in the Atlantic sea and which itself had like-wise been sacred to Poseidon. Now these things Marcellus has written in his Aethiopica.[
Jewish and Christian
During the early first century, the Hellenistic Jewish philosopher Philo wrote about the destruction of Atlantis in his On the Eternity of the World, xxvi. 141, in a longer passage allegedly citing Aristotle's successor Theophrastus:[41]
... And the island of Atalantes [translator's spelling; original: "Ἀτλαντίς"] which was greater than Africa and Asia, as Plato says in the Timaeus, in one day and night was overwhelmed beneath the sea in consequence of an extraordinary earthquake and inundation and suddenly disappeared, becoming sea, not indeed navigable, but full of gulfs and eddies.[42]
... In like manner the philosopher Timaeus also describes this Earth as surrounded by the Ocean, and the Ocean as surrounded by the more remote earth. For he supposes that there is to westward an island, Atlantis, lying out in the Ocean, in the direction of Gadeira (Cadiz), of an enormous magnitude, and relates that the ten kings having procured mercenaries from the nations in this island came from the earth far away, and conquered Europe and Asia, but were afterwards conquered by the Athenians, while that island itself was submerged by God under the sea. Both Plato and Aristotle praise this philosopher, and Proclus has written a commentary on him. He himself expresses views similar to our own with some modifications, transferring the scene of the events from the east to the west. Moreover he mentions those ten generations as well as that earth which lies beyond the Ocean. And in a word it is evident that all of them borrow from Moses, and publish his statements as their own.[48]
Edgar Cayce
Edgar Cayce was a man from humble upbringings in Kentucky who allegedly possessed psychic abilities, which were performed from a trance-like state. In addition to allegedly healing the sick from this state, he also spoke frequently on the topic of Atlantis. In his "life readings," he purportedly revealed that many of his subjects were reincarnations of people who had lived on Atlantis. By tapping into their collective consciousness, the "Akashic Records" (a term borrowed from Theosophy),[67] he declared that he was able to give detailed descriptions of the lost continent.[68] He also asserted that Atlantis would "rise" again in the 1960s (sparking much popularity of the myth in that decade) and that there is a "Hall of Records" beneath the Egyptian Sphinx, which holds the historical texts of Atlantis.
Recent times
As continental drift became widely accepted during the 1960s, and the increased understanding of plate tectonics demonstrated the impossibility of a lost continent in the geologically recent past,[69] most "Lost Continent" theories of Atlantis began to wane in popularity.
Plato scholar Julia Annas, Regents Professor of Philosophy at the University of Arizona, had this to say on the matter:
The continuing industry of discovering Atlantis illustrates the dangers of reading Plato. For he is clearly using what has become a standard device of fiction—stressing the historicity of an event (and the discovery of hitherto unknown authorities) as an indication that what follows is fiction. The idea is that we should use the story to examine our ideas of government and power. We have missed the point if instead of thinking about these issues we go off exploring the sea bed. The continuing misunderstanding of Plato as historian here enables us to see why his distrust of imaginative writing is sometimes justified.[70]
Well, as we can see, many different authors had differing ideas on Atlantis. Some believed it to be accurate, historical fact and some believed it merely a myth. This last author believed it to be a waste of time searching the sea bed.
The next report contradicts the highlighted portion.
Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4172388/Has-Lost-City-Atlantis-last.html
Are we closer to finding Atlantis?
New documentary suggests the mythical city WAS real and that large ships docked there in the Bronze Age
'Atlantis Rising' documentary records the search for the Lost City of Atlantis
Stone anchors believed to be from Atlantis were found in the Strait of Gibraltar
Experts discuss how a site in Southern Spain may have been the city's location
But they believe the civilisation could have spread across the Mediterranean
Many scholars believe the legendary city wasn't real, but used as an allegory by Plato to hint at how Athenians should live at the time he was writing
Well, some people definitely believe that the sea floor is worth searching and had made some gains in proving the myth might just be fact.
Plato’s Atlantis
https://ascendingpassage.com/plato-atlantis-timaeus.htm
This one is a fairly long read, but very interesting, none-the-less. For the sake of expediency I have extracted the passages that pertain to the 10 Kings
“He also begat and brought up five pairs of male children, dividing the island of Atlantis into ten portions: he gave to the first-born of the eldest pair his mother's dwelling and the surrounding allotment, which was the largest and best, and made him king over the rest; the others he made princes, and gave them rule over many men and a large territory.”
“There were also in the interior of the temple other images which had been dedicated by private individuals. And around the temple on the outside were placed statues of gold of all the ten kings and of their wives; and there were many other great offerings, both of kings and of private individuals, coming both from the city itself and the foreign cities over which they held sway. There was an altar, too, which in size and workmanship corresponded to the rest of the work, and there were palaces in like manner which answered to the greatness of the kingdom and the glory of the temple.”
"And of the inhabitants of the mountains and of the rest of the country there was also a vast multitude having leaders, to whom they were assigned according to their dwellings and villages. The leader was required to furnish for the war the sixth portion of a war-chariot, so as to make up a total of ten thousand chariots; also two horses and riders upon them, and a light chariot without a seat, accompanied by a fighting man on foot carrying a small shield, and having a charioteer mounted to guide the horses; also, he was bound to furnish two heavy-armed men, two archers, two slingers, three stone-shooters, and three javelin men, who were skirmishers, and four sailors to make up a complement of twelve hundred ships.”
“Such was the order of war in the royal city--that of the other nine governments was different in each of them, and would be wearisome to narrate. As to offices and honors, the following was the arrangement from the first: Each of the ten kings, in his own division and in his own city, had the absolute control of the citizens, and in many cases of the laws, punishing and slaying whomsoever he would.”
“There were many special laws which the several kings had inscribed about the temples, but the most important was the following: That they were not to take up arms against one another, and they were all to come to the rescue if anyone in any city attempted to over throw the royal house. Like their ancestors, they were to deliberate in common about war and other matters, giving the supremacy to the family of Atlas; and the king was not to have the power of life and death over any of his kinsmen, unless he had the assent of the majority of the ten kings.”
"Such was the vast power which the god settled in the lost island of Atlantis; and this he afterward directed against our land on the following pretext, as traditions tell: For many generations, as long as the divine nature lasted in them, they were obedient to the laws, and well-affectioned toward the gods, who were their kinsmen; for they possessed true and in every way great spirits, practicing gentleness and wisdom in the various chances of life, and in their intercourse with one another.”
Whether real or imagined, it is the idea of such a utopian paradise that captures the imagination of most. It most certainly captured the imagination of Global Elite! These Elitists have been around almost since the age of Nimrod. I am convinced that they have access to vast amounts of ancient knowledge that the average person does not.
We also know how (in the case of worldly religions) tradition (somehow), over the years, has a tendency to become fact. Therefore, it is no easy task to separate fact from tradition, in the cases of such ancient knowledge. However, I believe that in every lie, there must be a small element of truth to make the lie believable, such as the lying ministers have done with traditional Christianity.
Every idea has an origin that it models itself after.
Eccl. 1:4 - One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but the earth abides forever.
5 - The sun also rises, and the sun goes down, and hastens to his place where he arose.
6 - The wind goes toward the south, and turns about unto the north; it whirls about continually, and the wind returns again according to his circuits.
7 - All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from where the rivers come, thither they return again.
8 - All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing.
9 - The thing that has been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
10 - Is there anything whereof it may be said, See, this is new? It has been already of old time, which was before us.
11 - There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.
The wisdom of old King Solomon is rarely questioned. Even monarchs from across the globe came to him and sought his wisdom. He is absolutely right in this case – there is nothing new under the sun. Therefore, I believe in the possibility that Atlantis and its model of government did exist.
If we call to mind how many “worldly” scholars claim that the Scriptures are a work of fiction, we may lean more towards the possibility that they are wrong about the existence of a real nation of Atlantis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_%28politics%29
New world order (politics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
This article is about the use of the term "new world order" in international politics. For its use in conspiracy theory, see New World Order (conspiracy theory). For other uses, see New World Order (disambiguation).
The term "new world order" has been used to refer to any new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. Despite various interpretations of this term, it is primarily associated with the ideological notion of global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve.
In other words, any one nation does not fully grasp the problems facing this world; nor do they possess the means to “make things right”. We need the Global Elite to do that for us (like we are just kindergarten children).
The phrase "new world order" or similar language was used in the period toward the end of the First World War in relation to Woodrow Wilson's vision for international peace;[a]Wilson called for a League of Nations to prevent aggression and conflict. The phrase was used sparingly at the end of World War II when describing the plans for the United Nationsand the Bretton Woods system partly because of its negative associations with the failed League of Nations. However, many commentators have applied the term retroactively to the order put in place by the World War II victors as a "new world order."
Many may think Wilson’s proposal well intended, but I am sure he was as much a globalist as the rest. The League of Nations was formed after WW1, but failed to stop WW2. And, from the conduct of the UN these days, I am confident that they will not stop a third world war from coming, either.
The most widely discussed application of the phrase of recent times came at the end of the Cold War. Presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and George H. W. Bush used the term to try to define the nature of the post-Cold War era and the spirit of great power cooperation that they hoped might materialize. Gorbachev's initial formulation was wide-ranging and idealistic, but his ability to press for it was severely limited by the internal crisis of the Soviet system. In comparison, Bush's vision was not less circumscribed: "A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor.
The concept of a one ruling power over all the earth has been the goal of every dominant empire that has ever existed. All, so far, have failed, because they could not overcome the overwhelming spirit and resistance of the common people. While the Elite struggled to bring their plan to fruition, many wars ensued. Peace through war is their motto. If they cannot persuade us by reason, they will kill us.
Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known".[1] However, given the new unipolar status of the United States, Bush's vision was realistic in saying that "there is no substitute for American leadership".[1] The Gulf War of 1991 was regarded as the first test of the new world order: "Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. [...] The Gulf war put this new world to its first test"
I disagree with this author’s last statement here, since the Freemasons formulated a plan that included 3 world wars way back in 1871. In the following post, 32 degree Freemason, Albert Pike laid out the blue print for their plan. So far, world wars 1 and 2 have gone off without a hitch. We can be confident that they will have their WW3 as well. In fact, we are witnessing the prelude to WW3 today – wars all over the map, racial, religious and social tensions are everywhere,
http://libertyforlife.com/nwo/albert_pike.htm
Albert Pike's letter to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871:
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions."
"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained. physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
“True light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer”? Are you kidding me? The only doctrine Lucifer upholds is that of the total and absolute destruction of mankind. I think the riches of the Elite have made them mad. No wonder it is easier for a rich man to fit though eye of a needle than make into the Kingdom of Elohim.
A third and final war is necessary to complete their plan of total global domination. Judging from the weapons available to them today, WW3 will be as devastating as the asteroid that wiped all life off the earth, whenever that was. They have some very interesting animated videos out depicting what presumably took place. Watching that video made me think of how fragile our lives are here on Earth and how if Yahuwah did not love us so much, he could make it all vanish with a single word.
Pike makes no mention of the 10 kings in this letter, so I presume they will make their debut after WW3; when the land is divided into ten regions. Between Russia and the USA, they have enough nukes to destroy all life on the planet 20 times over. Vladimir Putin has already stated in a press conference that if Russia is attacked they will unleash its entire nuclear arsenal; and also, Russia has enough underground shelters for its entire population. What I want to know is what the heck do they expect to be left worth ruling over. Sick, sick people! And the saddest part is that the people they want to destroy are the ones that got the monsters elected.
Conclusion
So, what have we found that ties these three narratives together? Obviously, we have 10 kings and 10 kingdoms. How about the ones who rule over the ten kings? In the first case, Atlantis, it is Atlas. In the second case, the Book of Revelation, it is the Beast. With the third, the Global Elite, it is supposedly a human who is very high in the pecking order. All are types of Antichrists. As with the birth and life of Yahushua, the Elite Global rulers wish to control the narrative to stoke their god-egos. They produced false messiahs like rabbits to try to obscure and render useless the True Messiah’s coming. Now they are trying to bring about the end-time prophesies by their own means, in an attempt to steal glory from Yahuwah. That idea began with King Nimrod also, that in building the tower, he planned to reach Yahuwah’s throne room and kill Elohim. He desired to have everyone worship him in place of Yahuwah. And, every pagan dynasty since Nimrod has followed the same course.
I believe that there was such a place as Atlantis. I do not believe the date for the existence and destruction of Atlantis. I used to wonder if it was actually North and South America and not an island at all (before the separation of the Americas and Europe). If one puts together the East coast of the Americas with the West coast of Europe and Africa, it is almost a perfect fit. Could the tectonic plates have shifted and moved two whole continents overnight? Who can limit Elohim’s power? However, the way the geography of Atlantis is described, it was way too small.
Like all Empires, Atlantis was interested in and seeking total world domination. I don’t know if they really knew how big the world was. Efforts to mimic Yahuwah plan have always been the goal of all such Emperors. And, of course, this is also what HaSatan seeks. I am sure that HaSatan knew full well what Yahuwah’s plan was from the beginning; and so, he created multiple religions and multiple Messiahs. Why? To create mass confusion!
This type of mass confusion is what the Elites are doing today. All around the globe, they are pitting conservatives against liberals, abortionists against anti-abortionists, straights against gays, one religion against another, whites against just about everybody. Where is it all going to end – WW3. And after that, with the human race so exhausted from the horrors of war, that they will be begging the Elite to establish their plan for world peace – one global government, police force, military, economic system, education system, no more borders, etc, etc. It is all in Scriptural prophesy. It is as sure to come as the sun will rise tomorrow morning.
If Atlantis was a myth, an unproven system, why would the Elite be modelling their One World Order after it? I believe that the Elite, especially the Vatican, have huge stores of hidden knowledge from the past, in their possession. They know what has worked and what hasn’t. They can put all the experience from the past into their model. No matter how one looks at it, it is demonic in every form. And I am sure that HaSatan will be rubbing his hands together in anticipation of a very great victory. Boy, does Yahuwah have a huge surprise for him.
Yahuwah Bless
G.P.