Subsidies

Introduction

This page focuses on Subsidies because the most harmful of them affect every living thing on the planet. Reforming these could have the greatest impact towards saving the planet with the least effort from humanity.


Subsidies

"Subsidies are intended to protect consumers by keeping prices low, but they come at a substantial cost. Subsidies have sizable fiscal consequences (leading to higher taxes/borrowing or lower spending), promote inefficient allocation of an economy’s resources (hindering growth), encourage pollution (contributing to climate change and premature deaths from local air pollution), and are not well targeted at the poor (mostly benefiting higher income households). Removing subsidies and using the revenue gain for better targeted social spending, reductions in inefficient taxes, and productive investments can promote sustainable and equitable outcomes. Fossil fuel subsidy removal would also reduce energy security concerns related to volatile fossil fuel supplies." - International Monetary Fund

Fossil Fuel Subsidies

"Internationally, governments provide at least $775 billion to $1 trillion annually in subsidies, not including other costs of fossil fuels related to climate change, environmental impacts, military conflicts and spending, and health impacts. This figure varies each year based on oil prices, but it is consistently in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Greater transparency in reporting would allow for more precise figures.


When externalities are included, as in a 2015 study by the International Monetary Fund, the unpaid costs of fossil fuels are upward of $5.3 trillion annually – which works out to a staggering $10 million per minute.


Oil Change International’s most recent reporting looks at money for fossil fuel production only (including exploration, and extraction, and development) in the G20 governments – which includes many of the world’s most developed countries. These governments are providing support to oil, gas, and coal companies to the tune of $444 billion per year, between direct national subsidies, domestic and international finance, and state-owned enterprise investment. See the More Info: Worst of the Worst section below for more detail.


You can find more information on the breakdown of global subsidies and international finance at our interactive website: energyfinance.org"

Global Fossil Fuel Production Subsidies: 

$444 billion per year

Global Public Subsidies for Renewables: 

$121 billion per year

More Info

If you want to learn more and love graphs, check out:

Farming Subsidies

Current Subsidies Hurt Farmers

Current farming subsidies unfairly prop up mega corporations, monocrop livestock feed production, factory farms, and livestock facilities such as feed lots, meat processors, as well as the largest dairy operators. This means that smaller family farms, and farms producing the healthier herbs, fruits, nuts, and vegetables aren't getting a fair share. Smaller farms are suffering the consequences of climate change and poor political policies, with many farmers going bankrupt, losing their historical family homes, or even committing suicide.

Too Much Milk in Europe (Documentary)

This documentary discusses how out-of-control European dairy subsidies have been hurting European dairy farmers, who now produce record amounts of dairy products, for increasingly little profit. As a result European govornments have been scrambling to find buyers for all the excess milk, which has resulted in them dumping severely underpriced dairy products onto poorer countries in the guise of "nutritional aid". The documentary then moves to Africa, where cattle farmers are being pushed out of business, because they can't compete with the imported subsidized products now filling African shop shelves. In the long run, pushing local farmers out of business, sets these poorer countries up for higher chances of famine in the future as farmers can no longer make a profit.

Current Subsidies Hurt Human Health

The pyramids in this link show the vast difference between the recommended healthy diet, vs what the US government actually subsidizes instead.

"The first study, conducted by researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Emory University, found that “current federal agricultural subsidies focus on financing production of food commodities, a large portion of which are converted into high-fat meat and dairy products” and other items that increase the risk for cardiometabolic risks in American adults.

Researchers followed 10,308 American participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and measured the percentage of calories consumed from subsidized foods, body weight, blood pressure, inflammation measures, and cholesterol levels. Those who consumed the most subsidized foods, including high-fat meat and dairy products, were 41 percent and 21 percent more likely to be overweight and have elevated blood sugars, respectively.

It gets worse. Subsidized meat and dairy products can also lead to early death. In a related study, Harvard researchers found that eating more saturated fat—found primarily in animal products—was associated with increased risk of death.

Children’s health also pays a toll when meat and dairy producers profit. Last summer, our report “Who’s Making Money from Overweight Kids?” took a look at subsidies in school lunches. 

We found that in 2013, the U.S. Department of Agriculture paid more than $500 million to 62 meat and dairy producers for beef, chicken, turkey, pork, fish, dairy, eggs, and lamb that ended up in school meals.

So where are the subsidies for disease-fighting fruits and vegetable? They receive just a fraction of what goes to meat and dairy products. Maybe that’s why new USDA findings show that Americans are eating fewer fruits and vegetables than they were a decade ago." - The Physician's Committee for Responsible Medicine

Current Subsidies Hurt the Planet

...

Resources for Reforming Farm Subsidies

Airline Industry Subsidies

"Climate pollution from aircraft is often overlooked, but if aviation were a country, it would be among the top 10 greenhouse gas emitters." - Environmental Defense Fund

"Air travel contributes to 2.5% of global CO2 emissions and is the fastest-growing source of transport-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. According to the European Environment Agency, rail travel accounts for 14 grams of CO2 emissions per passenger mile, which is far less than the 285 grams generated by air travel.

The Greenpeace report, called ‘Ticket prices of planes vs trains – a Europe-wide analysis’, shows that travelling by train is on average twice as expensive as by plane in Europe, with some rail routes costing up to 30 times as much as their corresponding flights." - Railway-Technology

"new information also reveals the extent to which airlines do not pay for most of their pollution, as flights starting or ending outside Europe are currently exempt from the EU carbon market. In the case of Lufthansa, British Airways and Air France, the airlines do not pay anything for 77%, 86% and 83% of their emissions respectively. The Irish airline Ryanair is the biggest emitter on flights within Europe, but that means it has a much higher share of its emissions subjected to carbon trading (over 80%)." - Biggest Airline Polluters Received the Biggest Bailouts, New Data Shows

Europe

North America

Oceana

Fishing Industry Subsidies

Most subsidies go towards ship fuels so that fishing fleets can go further out to sea than their poorer competitors. Currently subsidies support a fishing fleet 3 times greater than what is physically sustainable for fish populations to recover and reproduce.

Subsidies disproportionately go to richer instead of poorer recipients, which increases hunger instead of alleviating the problem.

Europe

The UK government continues to fund the fishing industry including goals of "Boosting the demand for English seafood and accessing new markets" despite scientists and conservationists struggling to get much needed protections for our endangered and badly trawled reefs.

Solutions

Grants for Schools & Teachers

To learn more about funding available for schools, teachers, and educational programs, check out our Grants for Schools & Teachers page.

Active Transport vs Passive Transport

Active transport options including walking, bike riding, skateboarding, canoeing, or any other mode that uses your own energy to move. These have been scientifically linked to better health (mental and physical), money saving for movers/increased spending for areas with safer/slower travel routes, reduced crime, reduced pollution, reduced wear on roadways, and stronger/safer communities.

Passive transport tends to cost more than passive options, cause health problems due to increasing sedentary living habits, and creates higher maintenance fees for surrounding communities, meaning higher taxes. When a fast moving road cuts through a community, this can cause irreparable harm both by physically dividing healthy communities, and by increasing health problems from fumes, collisions, as well as noise and light pollution.

Tools & Trackers

Europe

Airlines

Organizations

International

Asia

Europe

UK

North America

Canada

USA

Grants, Funding, & Reparations

International

Asia

North America

Canada


Oceana

Australia