Welfare & Wealth Redistribution

Introduction


Welfare and Wealth Redistribution

Take From the Rich

Rerouting CorporateSubsidies

Subsidies are a form of corporate welfare that is often advertised to the public as "supporting family farms" but when the money is followed, we find the majority instead ends up going mostly to major corporations and their CEOs, missing the worker that these corporations profit off.

By rerouting much of this money instead to sustainable practices and sectors, we could undo much of the current damage to our planet, while ensuring fair pay to those who are currently being forgotten by our financial systems.

Click the Subsidies button to learn how tax payer money supports the most destructive industries on our planet including

Taxing Polluters

Taxing industries that produce the most pollution, use the most resources, and do the most destruction can help curb the behaviors of these antagonists.

By rerouting existing money to green efforts we can curb their dangerous activities, while providing sustainable funding for ecological repair and social justice.

Click the Tax button to learn more about topics including

Types of Welfare

Negative Income Tax (NIT)

"In economics, a negative income tax (NIT) is a system which reverses the direction in which tax is paid for incomes below a certain level; in other words, earners above that level pay money to the state while earners below it receive money, as shown by the blue arrows in the diagram. NIT was proposed by Juliet Rhys-Williams while working on the Beveridge Report in the early 1940s and popularized by Milton Friedman in the 1960s as a system in which the state makes payments to the poor when their income falls below a threshold, while taxing them on income above that threshold. Together with Friedman, supporters of NIT also included James Tobin, Joseph A. Pechman, and Peter M. Mieszkowski, and even then-President Richard Nixon, who suggested implementation of modified NIT in his Family Assistance Plan. After the increase in popularity of NIT, an experiment sponsored by the US government was conducted between 1968 and 1982 on effects of NIT on labour supply, income, and substitution effects.[1]" - Wikipedia: Negative Income Tax

Universal Basic Income (UBI)

"Universal basic income (UBI)[note 1] is a social welfare proposal in which all citizens of a given population regularly receive a minimum income in the form of an unconditional transfer payment, i.e., without a means test or need to work.[2][3][4]" - Wikipedia: Universal Basic Income

Guaranteed Minimum Income

"In contrast a guaranteed minimum income is paid only to those who do not already receive an income that is enough to live on. A UBI would be received independently of any other income." - Wikipedia: Universal Basic Income

Full Basic Income

"If the level is sufficient to meet a person's basic needs (i.e., at or above the poverty line), it is sometimes called a full basic income; if it is less than that amount, it may be called a partial basic income.[5]" - Wikipedia: Universal Basic Income

Arguments For & Against UBI

"Critics claim that a basic income at an appropriate level for all citizens is not financially feasible, fear that the introduction of a basic income would lead to fewer people working, and/or consider it socially unjust that everyone should receive the same amount of money regardless of their individual need."

"Proponents say it is indeed financeable, arguing that such a system, instead of many individual means-tested social benefits, would eliminate much expensive social administration and bureaucratic efforts, and expect that unattractive jobs would have to be better paid and their working conditions improved because there would have to be an incentive to do them when already receiving an income, which would increase the willingness to work. Advocates also argue that a basic income is fair because it ensures that everyone has a sufficient financial basis to build on and less financial pressure, thus allowing people to find work that suits their interests and strengths.[11]" - Wikipedia: Universal Basic Income

"No country has yet introduced either, although there have been numerous pilot projects and the idea is discussed in many countries. Some have labelled UBI as utopian due to its historical origin.[6][7][8]" - Wikipedia: Universal Basic Income

Reparations & Annuities

Around the world indigenous and human right groups have been calling for colonial governments to repay the damages done over generations of conquest, forced evictions, kidnappings, and enslavement. These financial reimbursement

Australia

"Australia said ... it will offer payments of 75,000 Australian dollars ($55,000) to some members of its Indigenous population who were forcibly removed from their families as children.

More than 100,000 Indigenous children were taken from their families and communities between the early 1900s and about 1970, described by former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd as a "great stain on our nation's soul" during a formal apology to the so-called 'Stolen Generation' in 2008.

Amid mounting criticism and moves to seek compensation through the courts, Australia said eligible survivors would be entitled to a one-off payment of 75,000 Australian dollars for the harm caused by their forced removal, and a further 7,000 Australian dollars to support their healing."

...

"The reparations will cover people who are still alive and were under 18 and removed from their families while living in the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory. Most Australian states have their own compensation schemes." - Australia Pledges Hundreds Millions Reparations to Indigenous Stolen Generation

Canada

These payments are generally $4 per person per year up to $5 per year, while others are $5 per person every 2 years.

USA

Iowa

Des Moines

For Education

Grants for Schools & Teachers

To learn more about funding available for schools, teachers, and educational programs, check out our Grants for Schools & Teachers page.

Universal Public Healthcare

Free Public Transit

Some countries and regions already offer this, though some only offer free rides for seniors and students.

Private vs Public

Private vehicle ownership (cars and pick up trucks for example), are not only a massive waste of resources, and source of pollution, but they're also terrible for your wallet. We're supposed to pay thousands for a the vehicle itself, then yearly maintenance, license fees, insurance, with some places charging extra to drive in certain places and of course our tax money paying for all the damage these vehicles do to our roadways and bridges.

Public transportation on the other hand may charge a fee, but it is generally more efficient (more so when there are more riders and particularly so when public transport is renewably powered), and is almost always more affordable than private vehicle ownership.

Active Transport vs Passive Transport

Active transport options including walking, bike riding, skateboarding, canoeing, or any other mode that uses your own energy to move. These have been scientifically linked to better health (mental and physical), money saving for movers/increased spending for areas with safer/slower travel routes, reduced crime, reduced pollution, reduced wear on roadways, and stronger/safer communities.

Passive transport tends to cost more than passive options, cause health problems due to increasing sedentary living habits, and creates higher maintenance fees for surrounding communities, meaning higher taxes. When a fast moving road cuts through a community, this can cause irreparable harm both by physically dividing healthy communities, and by increasing health problems from fumes, collisions, as well as noise and light pollution.

Tools & Trackers

Europe

Airlines

Organizations

International


Asia

Europe

UK

North America

Canada

USA

Grants, Funding, & Reparations

International

Asia

North America

Canada

Oceana

Australia