TM4T Background 1.1 - Task Analysis - Types of Work

There is a devil in the detail of time-management, which can confuse even the best-organised teacher.

The devilish part is a paradox - here's the puzzle: the tricks and techniques involved in time-management are in most cases simple, even trivial: ticklists and diaries, routines and roles. Anyone could do it.

Yet some people - obviously successful people - report astonishing results which have transformed their lives. And, even more puzzling: some people who seem to use pretty much the same techniques gain no benefit whatsoever; other people find that the techniques seem to work one day, but don't work the next day. Why? What's going on? How can such simple tools produce such astounding - though apparently contradictory and inconsistent - results?

The answer is that you need to use the right combination of tricks and techniques in the right situation. The techniques are each simple in isolation, but powerful if combined in the right mix, in the right sequence, in the right situation. You must, though, choose your tools correctly: you don't hammer nails with a screwdriver, and you don't tighten screws with a saw.

It follows therefore that we need to know and understand three things:

a) a range of tricks and techniques

b) the different types of work we do

c) which tricks and techiques apply to which types of work.

Simple really. This website is all about the the tricks and techniques of TM4T, but they will be of no use to you unless you're clear about the three types of work.

Everything that teachers do - apart from teaching itself - will fall under one of three headings. We will call these three types of work operations, projects, and disruptions; here is how we distinguish them:

So: teachers do three different kinds of work - how does that help us in time-management?

The first point we need to make clear is that these categories are not fixed in stone or predetermined - there is a subjective decision involved. We can frequently choose whether to treat a particular event as an operation, or a project, or a disruption. Let's take an example: an Ofsted inspection. For many teachers, this is a disruption. They are given two days notice of a possible inspection, and at the same time they are given a set of preparatory tasks by their school management - tasks which they are expected to do immediately, thank you very much. In a well-run school, however, many aspects of Ofsted preparation are either treated as operations - the actions are pre-defined, pre-planned and pre-prepared at the beginning of the school year - or are managed as projects: when the inspection is announced, an agreed schedule of events and actions is put into action.

The principle here is clear: operations are better than projects, and both of them are better than disruptions; 'better' in terms of efficiency, in terms of effectiveness and in terms of stress-free working.

We should therefore choose to standardise as much of our work as possible and make it into routine, planned-in-advance operations. This is something we will do at the beginning of the school year and tweak between terms.

We should definitely avoid disruptions as much as possible, and treat as much other work - work which appears magically during the term - as a project. We will set up processes (yes, these will be classed as operations) so we can handle projects easily during term.