Nmr Experiment Nomenclature v2 (2011)

Data model for experiment description

Nmr Experiment Prototypes are described in the ccp.nmr.NmrExpPrototype package of the data model. For details and diagrams please follow the link.

Experiment descriptions are organised in NmrExpPrototypes that each describes a magnetisation transfer pathway and the NMR experiments that use it. The nuclei involved in the magnetisation transfer are described by AtomSites, with information like isotope, allowed chemical shift ranges, and multiplicities. ExpMeasurements describe the quantities measured in the experiments. In most cases there is a single ExpMeasurement for each AtomSite, which corresponds to the chemical shift. Other possibilities include coupling constants, relaxation times, or multiple quantum shifts. The magnetisation flow in the experiment is described by the ExpGraph and associated objects. ExpTransfer objects show which kinds of magnetisation transfer link the AtomSites, while the sequence of ExpSteps show the flow of magnetisation during the experiment. There can be more than one ExpGraph for experiments that include more than one magnetisation flow. An example is the HCBCACONNH experiment, where magnetisation may start on either Hβ or Hα. The recognised transfer types are: 'onebond' ,'Jcoupling', 'Jmultibond', 'relayed', 'through-space', and 'relayed-alternate' . The RefExperiment and associated objects describes the number of dimensions in the actual experiment, which quantities are measured, and how the measurements map onto the experiment axes. There can be more than one measurement per axis for projection experiments, or for experiments that measure e.g. 13C and 15N evolution in parallel on a single axis. RefExperiments where the magnetisation flow is reversed are part of the same NmrExpPrototype – e.g. HcanHA and HncaHA are both included in the HNCAHA NmrExpPrototype.

Experiment descriptions are meant to reflect the possible assignments for peaks and must ultimately be chosen by the spectroscopist. The appropriate description cannot be deduced from the pulse sequence alone. For instance choosing the CC reference experiment implies that only peaks between directly bound carbons are possible in the specific experiment. In this context it is irrelevant whether the pulse sequence might have given rise to other kinds of peaks with a different choice of mixing time, or if applied to a different sample.

Nmr Experiment Nomenclature

NMR experiment names are built on the corresponding description in the CCPN data model. As such they are unambiguous and reflect the network of nuclei and the flow of magnetisation between them, but not the physical transfer processes involved. The naming system has been chosen to conform to the common naming style for experiments to the extent allowed by these requirements.

Naming Rules