SREL Reprint #1913

Human nature and peer review: An argument for anonymity

Vincent J. Burke

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802, USA

Introduction: I read with interest Wilson and McCranie's (1993) critique of the anonymous peer review system. Clearly, their experience with the peer review system is considerable, given their extensive publication histories and editorial experience. I have reviewed six manuscripts for three herpetology journals and one general science journal and have published seven peer-reviewed articles during the six years I have been actively engaged in research. Although admittedly less experienced than Wilson and McCranie, I hope my views will bring the perspective of a less established researcher in to the discussion on the merits of anonymity.

SREL Reprint #1913

Burke, V.J. 1994. Human nature and peer review: An argument for anonymity. Herpetological Review 25:157-158. 

This information was provided by the University of Georgia's Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (srel.uga.edu).