SREL Reprint #3439

Effects of vulture exclusion on carrion consumption by facultative scavengers

Jacob E. Hill1, Travis L. DeVault2, James C. Beasley3,4, Olin E. Rhodes Jr.3,5, and Jerrold L. Belant1

1Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research Center,
Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA
2Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sandusky, OH, USA
3Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, USA
4Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
5Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

Abstract: Vultures provide an essential ecosystem service through removal of carrion, but globally, many populations are collapsing and several species are threatened with extinction. Widespread declines in vulture populations could increase the availability of carrion to other organisms, but the ways facultative scavengers might respond to this increase have not been thoroughly explored. We aimed to determine whether facultative scavengers increase carrion consumption in the absence of vulture competition and whether they are capable of functionally replacing vultures in the removal of carrion biomass from the landscape. We experimentally excluded 65 rabbit carcasses from vultures during daylight hours and placed an additional 65 carcasses that were accessible to vultures in forested habitat in South Carolina, USA during summer (June–August). We used motion-activated cameras to compare carrion use by facultative scavenging species between the experimental and control carcasses. Scavenging by facultative scavengers did not increase in the absence of competition with vultures. We found no difference in scavenger presence between control carcasses and those from which vultures were excluded. Eighty percent of carcasses from which vultures were excluded were not scavenged by vertebrates, compared to 5% of carcasses that were accessible to vultures. At the end of the 7-day trials, there was a 10.1-fold increase in the number of experimental carcasses that were not fully scavenged compared to controls. Facultative scavengers did not functionally replace vultures during summer in our study. This finding may have been influenced by the time of the year in which the study took place, the duration of the trials, and the spacing of carcass sites. Our results suggest that under the warm and humid conditions of our study, facultative scavengers would not compensate for loss of vultures. Carcasses would persist longer in the environment and consumption of carrion would likely shift from vertebrates to decomposers. Such changes could have substantial implications for disease transmission, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem functioning.

Keywords: Cathartes aura, competition, scavenging

SREL Reprint #3439

Hill, J. E., T. L. DeVault, J. C. Beasley, O. E. Rhodes Jr., and J. L. Belant. 2018. Effects of vulture exclusion on carrion consumption by facultative scavengers. Ecology and Evolution 8(5): 2518-2526.

This information was provided by the University of Georgia's Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (srel.uga.edu).