copy of40min-CV19 mRNA Vaccines Were Meant to Kill People – Dr. Michael Palmer

show notes

About The Guest(s): 

Dr. Michael Palmer is an MD and a professor of biochemistry who was employed at the University of Waterloo in Canada. He was fired for refusing to take the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and has since written a book titled "mRNA Vaccine Toxicity: The mRNA is the Poison" to expose the dangers of mRNA vaccine technology.

Summary:

Dr. Michael Palmer discusses the dangers of mRNA vaccines and the deliberate harm they cause. He explains that the mRNA in these vaccines instructs our body cells to produce the spike protein, which is recognized as a foreign antigen by the immune system. This leads to the immune system attacking our own cells, causing severe damage to organs such as the heart, lungs, and brain. Dr. Palmer believes that the mRNA vaccines are a deliberate attempt to harm and kill people, as evidenced by the disastrous safety record and the relentless coercion and censorship surrounding the vaccines. He warns against future mRNA vaccines and urges people to refuse them.

Key Takeaways:

The mRNA in COVID-19 vaccines causes our body cells to produce the spike protein, which is recognized as a foreign antigen by the immune system.

The immune system attacks our own cells that produce the spike protein, leading to severe damage to organs such as the heart, lungs, and brain.

The mRNA vaccines have a disastrous safety record, with thousands of deaths and severe adverse events reported.

The ongoing vaccination campaign and coercion to get vaccinated cannot be explained as honest mistakes or incompetence, but rather as a deliberate policy to harm and kill.

Future mRNA vaccines against other infectious agents are likely to have similar toxic effects and should be avoided.

Quotes:

"The mRNA vaccines are a deliberate attempt to harm and kill." - Dr. Michael Palmer

"The poison is the principle of sneaking the genes for the spike protein into our own body cells." - Dr. Michael Palmer

"The entire gene-based vaccine agenda is an agenda of deliberate poisoning and killing." - Dr. Michael Palmer

[SUMMARY]:

Dr. Michael Palmer, a former professor of biochemistry, discusses the dangers of mRNA vaccines in a recent interview. He argues that the mRNA technology used in these vaccines is fundamentally flawed and can cause the body to attack itself, leading to severe organ damage and even death. Dr. Palmer believes that the push for mRNA vaccines is part of a deliberate agenda to harm and kill people. He warns against future mRNA vaccines and urges people to refuse them. Autopsy pictures presented in the interview show evidence of heart, lung, and brain damage caused by the vaccines.

B-(0:07:49)

  "This must be a deliberate policy and there must be a clear intent to harm and kill. There is no other rational explanation."

B-(0:08:35)

  "The poison is the principle of sneaking the genes for the spike protein into our own body cells."

B-(0:12:32)

  "It's the mRNA that will cause the body to attack itself no matter what mRNA vaccine delivery system. It's the mRNA that will cause the body to attack itself."

B-(0:15:23)

  "I think it is designed, it has been designed to kill people, yes, while also providing a cover story that it is actually beneficial and protective, but in effect, yes, the main effect is to harm and kill."

B-(0:17:47)

  "So future vaccines against other infectious agents will be just as bad. And don't let yourself be injected. Don't let your children be injected. You just have to defend yourself from these vaccines."

B-(0:19:08)

  "Because the entire technology is fundamentally flawed. It will always produce the outcome that the body will begin destroying itself."

B-(0:20:13)

  "Yes, their heart can be damaged. It can be outright destroyed, and it just simply refused to work at all."

B-(0:22:27)

  "So the lymphocytes are destroying the blood vessel, the blood vessel wall."

B-(0:28:06)

  "So these occurrences will recur. They will keep coming for the next couple of years, I would expect."

B-(0:35:57)

  "I think they will have to live with it. The question is, if they stop vaccinating, is the damage going to progress or is it going to stay where it is?"

0:00:00

People waking up to the dangers of the mRNA vaccine.

0:01:07

Dr. Michael Palmer fired for refusing the vaccine.

0:02:01

No need for emergency approvals, effective treatments available.

0:03:57

Adverse events and deaths reported, severe underreporting factor.

0:05:26

Deliberate attempt to harm and kill, not honest mistakes.

0:08:35

mRNA causes body to attack itself, regardless of virus.

0:12:32

mRNA leads to body killing itself, seen in autopsies.

0:14:04

mRNA technology might have a place in inducing body's own proteins.

0:15:23

mRNA vaccines designed to harm and kill, not protect.

0:15:49

Anthony Fauci receiving award for saving people, misleading narrative.

0:15:49

Fauci receiving Nobel Prize, skepticism towards awards

0:16:47

mRNA vaccines and concerns about future vaccines

0:18:55

mRNA vaccines are fundamentally flawed and toxic

0:19:08

Stop all mRNA vaccines, cumulative toxicity and destruction

0:22:03

Vaccination agenda is deliberate murder

0:25:02

Autopsy pictures showing heart muscle destruction

0:27:22

Myocarditis and scar tissue in the heart

0:28:16

Risk of cardiac arrhythmias and future deaths

0:29:05

Lymphocyte invasion and destruction in lung tissue

0:29:57

Lung tissue damage and destruction

0:30:13

Severity of lung tissue damage in other samples

0:30:40

Lymphocytes attacking thyroid gland tissue

0:31:26

Brain damage and difficulty reversing it

0:32:08

Heart vessels and blood clot damage

0:34:19

Brain changes the essence of who you are

0:35:13

Brain damage may not completely go away

0:36:22

High vaccination rates in America and Canada

0:36:50

Effects of disabilities may last a lifetime

0:37:41

Risk of turbo cancer and cancer reappearance

0:38:47

mRNA vaccines lower immune system capacity

[TRANSCRIPT]

0:00:00 - (A): I'm Greg Hunter. Welcome to USAWatchdog.com. One of the things I've been hearing from people say, oh, people will never wake up to the nightmare of the CV 19 mRNA vaccine. Well, they are waking up to it. You're finding out now that the uptake on the brand new shot that you're supposed to get is less than what, 3%, 2%, very small uptake. And it's, and it's, it's, it's not just happening in America, it's happening all over the world. People are waking up to it.

0:00:29 - (A): And the people that blew the whistle basically have been fired, they have been punished, they have been persecuted, they have been attacked online and even physically. And I have a brand new guest who's talking about the mRNA vaccines and he wrote a book about it. It's just out, just for last couple of months. It's mRNA vaccine toxicity. It's the mRNA is the poison. Here's the COVID of the book. He's got some really good people on helping with this, including Susharette Bhakti and Mark Skidmore and Katherine Austin Fitz and others. His name is Michael Palmer. Dr.

0:01:07 - (A): Michael Palmer dr. Michael Palmer is also an MD. He is a professor of biochemistry. He was employed at University of Waterloo in Kennedy, which has 35,000 students. It's as big as just about any big university here in America. And he was basically summarily dismissed, fired because he refused to take the CV 19 vaccine. Dr. Palmer, thanks for joining us today on USA Watchdog to talk about this important book about mRNA vaccine technology.

0:01:40 - (A): Thanks for joining us today on USAWatchdog.com.

0:01:43 - (B): Thank you very much for having me.

0:01:45 - (A): Crack, just a brief thing about your firing. I mean, this happened in 21. They got around to getting rid of you finally in 22. But you just said no on the mRNA vaccine. Why?

0:02:01 - (B): Well, it was pretty clear from the very beginning, even before the first injections were applied, it was clear that this technology was fundamentally flawed. There was also never a need for these emergency approvals for these vaccines because we already knew in 2021 that the infection mortality rate, right. So the likelihood to die of COVID once you had contracted it was no higher than the infection fatality rate of influenza. And there were some very solid papers that already published this.

0:02:33 - (B): Also, it was clear that there were effective treatments. So this was all clear going in. And very shortly after the vaccination campaign started, the adverse events database, the VAERS vares in the United States, the CDC adverse events database, it sort of lit up with lots of reports of adverse events, severe disease and even death. And by the time that the vaccine mandates were instituted in the institutions of education in United States and Canada, which began in summer and fall 2021, it was already clear that the safety record of these vaccines was just simply disastrous. There were already several thousand deaths that had been reported to the various database and we know that there is a severe, very significant underreporting factor. The factor by which the real deaths exceed the reported ones must be something between ten and 50 times greater than the actually reported events. And that estimate actually lines up with the representative survey that Marks Gitmore carried out. Right.

0:03:57 - (B): So it was clear that we had a very disastrous safety record at the time. Already before the vaccine mandates came into force, I had tried to alert the administration of my university to these problems and I never got a reply from them. But it was clear that something was very severely off and there was really no hesitation on my part. It was clear to me that this was not a defensible reasonable measure in the interest of public health, and there was no choice but to clearly refuse it.

0:04:33 - (A): In your book, you told me in the pre interview you've got 1000 hours of research on the COVID mRNA vaccines.

0:04:43 - (B): Yeah. So I think I spent about 1000 hours actually working on this book. But the research that went into it before was actually longer. Right. So I spent actually most of my time since I have been fired and even before on investigating and understanding and explaining the dangers of this genetic vaccine technology.

0:05:07 - (A): In a pre interview, you said, I don't mean to put words, just what you told me. And I said, Why do you think this happened? Some people call it a murder program. Absolutely. Explain.

0:05:20 - (B): Yes.

0:05:21 - (A): So in your research, you say it was an intentional murder program. Explain.

0:05:26 - (B): Well, it was already clear in 2020 that the risks that were being taken were completely unreasonable. Right. I mean, it normally takes many years until a vaccine is developed from the development in the laboratory through initial animal experiments and then clinical preclinical trials, clinical trials and so on. These years were condensed into just a few months. Right. And on top of that, the choice was made, and remarkably by all four Western manufacturers at the same time, to use a genetic, a gene based experimental technology that has never been applied before in any sort of clinically applied vaccine.

0:06:15 - (B): So if you combine this, if you combine the radical shortening of time permitted for testing that already on its own creates a huge risk. And if you combine this with a new unproven technology, that means the risk is completely incalculable. So this is completely irresponsible. And so even if one were inclined to pass this off as honest mistakes or incompetence or whatever at the very latest, after the adverse events kept piling up and the deaths kept piling up after the beginning of the vaccination campaign, then things should have been stopped. Right? So the ongoing vaccination campaign and the escalating coercion with which everybody was pressured into getting the vaccine, that cannot be explained as an honest mistake or incompetence. This must be deliberate.

0:07:17 - (B): This must be deliberate. At the very least, after the beginning of the vaccination campaign. After the first few weeks of that and the disastrous results it would have been necessary to immediately stop this vaccination campaign. And what we have seen instead is relentless coercion, relentless censorship, relentless lying by the authorities about the safety and the effectiveness and the necessity for these vaccines.

0:07:49 - (B): This must be a deliberate policy and there must be a clear intent to harm and kill. There is no other rational explanation.

0:08:02 - (A): I'm writing this down. I'm going to use that as part of the title. I mean it's just a deliberate attempt to harm Me and kill. I mean that's what it is. That's what your book lays out in this. Some of the stories that you got in the book. Why is mRNA some people say it's the spike proteins. You're saying the mRNA is the poison? Is that what you're saying? Tell me, what is the poison in these CV 19 shots?

0:08:35 - (B): Well, the poison is the principle of sneaking the genes for the spike protein into our own body cells. Our own body cells then are instructed to convert the information on the gene into the actual spike protein. This spike protein produced by our cells appears on our cell surfaces and that is recognized by the immune system as a foreign antigen. The immune system then responds to this foreign antigen as it would also in case of a virus infection. Right. With virus infections something similar happens.

0:09:19 - (B): The virus infects the cell, the nucleic acid of the virus is released into the cell and the cell then starts making the proteins of the virus. And these proteins are the triggers for the immune system to recognize the virus infection and then to kill off the cells. So this is what happens.

0:09:42 - (A): It's the mRNA. So what is the trigger? It's the actual mRNA is the poison.

0:09:52 - (B): The mRNA, it acts poisonous because it causes the formation of the spike protein. So it's the spike protein that actually gets recognized by the immune system. But the important point is it's not the very specific properties of this spike protein that causes the immune system to attack but simply the foreign nature of the spike protein. Right. The fundamental function of the immune system, of the specific immune system is to discriminate between self antigens the body's own proteins which are to be left alone. Right. Cells that produce the body's own proteins from the body's own nucleic acids they are to be left in peace.

0:10:47 - (B): But cells which happen to express proteins which don't belong to the body, which are foreign they should be attacked by the immune system and they should be destroyed. Right. This is how the immune system defends the body against any and all viruses. It's a very generic approach. The immune system fundamentally discriminates between self and non self proteins. And these mRNAs, in these mRNA vaccines they induce the synthesis of a non self protein. That is in the case of the COVID vaccines, the spike protein.

0:11:25 - (B): But it's not important that it is a spike protein. It is only important that it's a foreign protein now. And that is an important message because the same must be expected to happen with any and all future mRNA vaccines against other viruses or other infectious agents don't have to be viruses if they want to use an mRNA vaccine against a bacterial antigen. The problem will be the same. We will have the same sort of consequence.

0:11:57 - (B): The foreign proteins will be produced inside our body cells. They will be taken to the cell surface. The immune system will see them and will attack the cells that have produced these foreign antigens. So that is a generic, generic problem.

0:12:16 - (A): When you say generic problem, I'm sorry, the mRNA, no matter what virus or whatever it's using to get an immunoresponse, the mRNA will cause your body to attack itself and ultimately kill itself off. Is that right?

0:12:32 - (B): That's correct. That's correct.

0:12:37 - (A): Explain that. The mRNA will cause the body to attack itself no matter what mRNA vaccine delivery system. It's the mRNA that will cause the body to attack itself.

0:12:49 - (B): And any mRNA that is taken up by our body cells and which causes these body cells to produce a foreign antigen will thereby cause the immune system to attack this cell and kill it off.

0:13:05 - (A): And thus you could have your own system killing your own body.

0:13:09 - (B): That's correct, yes. So this is what we're seeing in the autopsy materials. That's what we see. We see the immune system, which is on the march and attacks just about any organ that you could name. Right? It differs a bit from patient to patient. The distribution or the focus of the inflammation differs a bit from patient to patient. But in very many cases one sees attacks on the blood vessels. And also in quite a few cases you see myocarditis. It's actually quite common in autopsies.

0:13:43 - (B): You see severe lung damage and this is all abundantly documented. Now, some of that is shown in the book, but it needs to be more carefully documented in the future, actually.

0:13:56 - (A): What about the immunotherapies? Are they putting mRNA in immunotherapies or not yet?

0:14:04 - (B): Well, mRNA, I think there might be a place for mRNA technology if you use it to induce the expression of the body's own proteins. Right? If you induce the expression of the body's own proteins in greater measure or you induce the expression of an intact version of the body's own protein in a person who has only a deficient version, a functionally deficient version, then this might actually work. In theory, I am not particularly convinced that this will be a viable approach for long term treatment.

0:14:50 - (A): But my question is there mRNA in immunotherapy now? Are they putting mRNA in immunotherapy now?

0:14:58 - (B): No, there's nothing I'm aware of that has been clinically approved yet. No.

0:15:02 - (A): Good. And here's the problem with your book. Here's what you're saying. So we already know the mRNA vaccines are a disaster they attack and kill your organs and kill off people you are injecting something that'll kill people am I right? That's correct it's designed to kill people.

0:15:23 - (B): I think it is designed it has been designed to kill people yes while also providing a cover story that it is actually beneficial and protective but in effect yes the main effect is to harm and kill. That's what these vaccines really are doing they are not protecting anyone from any disease they are just harming and.

0:15:49 - (A): You know that Anthony Fauci is getting an award he saved millions of people they gave a Nobel prize for Mr what do you say about that? Anthony Fauci is getting award for quote saving millions of people mr and technology got a Nobel prize what do you say about that?

0:16:09 - (B): I say that the Nobel prize has apparently now been captured just as many other institutions have been captured and is now subservient to the same agenda of total world tyranny and control that some powerful interested parties have been pursuing for a long term for a long time. I mean just remember the Peace Nobel Prize for Obama even before he had actually done anything right? Had he even been inaugurated or was it even before that?

0:16:40 - (B): I forget so then he started his.

0:16:43 - (A): Drone killing program he said quote I'm good at killing people.

0:16:47 - (B): Yes this scientific Nobel prize is now no longer to be taken any more seriously than the Peace Nobel prize has been for a long time already.

0:17:01 - (A): So let's fast forward do you think they want to put this in everything? This is why. What's so alarming about the vaccine technology and what you've discovered with your book. And there is a free PDF for you. Folks out there want to get it. But you can also support Dr. Palmer, who was fired for standing up this. I'm sure you're not winning any points with the Dark Power deep state globalist community by putting this out.

0:17:29 - (A): But you can buy a hard copy of the book. I'll put that at the end but you're worried about the future not just what we're going to be living with with these mRNA vaccines that have already done with the CV 19 bioweapon vaccine you're worried about future vaccines why?

0:17:47 - (B): Because it seems that there's a big push underway for converting even established vaccines to mRNA technology right replacing conventional vaccines which have their own problems with these new mRNA vaccines which we must expect will be similarly toxic as these COVID vaccines right? And you will have cumulative toxicity across all these vaccinations right? Each single one will contribute to causing your body to attack itself and the cumulative effect will just be disastrous. So I can only say don't touch any mRNA vaccines no matter who tells you what they will not be any better than the COVID vaccines which demonstrably have killed hundreds of thousands if not millions of people.

0:18:40 - (B): So future vaccines against other infectious agents will be just as bad. And don't let yourself be injected. Don't let your children be injected. You just have to defend yourself from these vaccines.

0:18:55 - (A): Wow, that's a stunning statement. You think we should stop all mRNA vaccines?

0:19:02 - (B): Oh, absolutely.

0:19:04 - (A): Explain why we should stop all mRNA vaccines.

0:19:08 - (B): Because the entire technology is fundamentally flawed. It will always produce the outcome that the body will begin destroying itself. This was predictable. It was in fact, predicted. And my pharma boss suchrat bhakti predicted in particularly lucid detail that the blood vessels would be the first target of the attack. And we indeed see as the most common manifestation what's called vasculitis inflammation and destruction of the blood vessels.

0:19:42 - (B): This then also causes blood clots and so on. Right. So if you have a focus of destruction at the inner surface of a blood vessel, then this whole set of blood clotting and then you get strokes and heart attacks and this sort of thing.

0:19:57 - (A): You looked at a lot of autopsies. You found this in your book. And I want to go back to this. Right. You got way more than 1000 hours and you looked at all these autopsies and you saw the same pattern blood vessel damage, strokes. Right.

0:20:11 - (B): So I need to clarify. I didn't personally look at the autopsies. I looked at the pictures of autopsies and these were prepared by some German pathologists, mostly. There's also some of that in the literature. But the most comprehensive case series that was examined was done by German pathologists Anna Bokart and Walter Lang, both of them emeritus professors of pathology. And they looked at close to 100 autopsies in as much detail as they could. They looked at every tissue sample that they could get hold of and they produced a fairly impressive body of work there. I can actually show you some pictures if that's of interest to you. Yes.

0:20:55 - (B): Okay. Should we get into it now?

0:20:57 - (A): Yes, show me some pictures. I love pictures. Before you start, while you're doing that, while you're hooking this up, I just want to say here's a 16 year old kid dies at the finish line. You know, he was vaxxed and they're all baffling. Here's another one.

0:21:10 - (B): This woman here just aged very baffling.

0:21:12 - (A): She looks like she's 24, she's 44, she's dead. She just lived eight and drank health and has five kids murdered. Would you say all these deaths are murders or am I being over the top?

0:21:29 - (B): No, I think it's justified. It's in a deliberate agenda of killing. I mean, not necessarily by the person who applied the shot. They may be honestly deceived, but by its murder, by the people who conceived this entire vaccine vaccination agenda and instituted the mandates that coerced people into getting vaccinated. These people, I think, are guilty of murder. There's no need for beating about the bush. How else would you refer to it? It's deliberate.

0:22:03 - (B): The consequences were perfectly to be expected. And even after the consequences had become manifest this agenda was even accelerated. It was kept up and accelerated. So of course there is no other interpretation in my mind than that this is deliberate murder, deliberate killing. The entire gene based vaccine agenda is an agenda of deliberate poisoning and killing.

0:22:33 - (A): Let's see some of your pictures. I'd love to see what you got. That's just a profound statement. Nobody's come on and said quite like that. And you've done a lot of research on this but go ahead.

0:22:46 - (B): Let's see. Right. So I have done some research and this makes me quite content that I have good reason to state it plainly as I did. Okay. So before I get into the pictures just one.

0:23:04 - (A): There you go.

0:23:05 - (B): Okay good. So I don't see it quite yet. The image. There it is. Okay very good. So I will show you some autopsy pictures in a minute. This is just a cartoon illustration of what the mRNA vaccines do. Right? So we start at the top left with an mRNA lipid nanoparticles. The lipid molecules are synthetic. They encase the mRNA and they also facilitate its uptake into the cell. So once the mRNA has been taken up into the cell right, this gray box at the bottom the mRNA molecules bind to the cell's little protein factories. These are the gray little blobs and then they produce several copies of the spike protein. And one pathway of the spike protein in the cell is to undergo fragmentation.

0:23:56 - (B): These fragments are then again taken to the cell surface in conjunction with a specific carrier molecule which is known as MHC one. And this complex of the foreign protein fragment and this carrier molecule is recognized by what is known as a cytotoxic T lymphocyte or also as a T killer cell. And a T killer cell that recognizes this complex, this foreign peptide essentially this foreign protein fragment will then use several tools at this disposal, several weapons in order to kill off the cell.

0:24:30 - (B): So this is in a nutshell what these mRNA vaccines do on the right hand side at high power, high power magnification of a lymphocyte. Normally the lymphocytes belong to the white blood cells but in microscopic work we typically stain them so that they appear deep blue. All right? So just remember that the lymphocytes are small, round and dark blue. Okay? So that is it. So now we get into the pathology and here's a sample.

0:25:02 - (B): So here we have an example of a little myocarditis. On the left hand side you see some nice healthy heart muscle fibers right? All running in parallel. On the right hand side you see heart muscle which has been invaded by all these small little blue lymphocytes. This is heart muscle which is under attack and undergoing destruction by lymphocytes. You still see some heart muscle fibers and red. You also see these pale areas, these pale stained areas and these are actually scars.

0:25:33 - (B): Okay, so what probably happened in this case is we have two phases of inflammation. The first has already quieted down. It has resulted in the destruction of some heart muscle tissue and its conversion into scar tissue. And now we have, after the second injection, this patient indeed received second injection before he died. We see a renewed attack by the second wave of the lymphocytes. Okay? So you don't even have to be a professor of pathology to see that something is wrong, very wrong here with this tissue.

0:26:09 - (A): They're destroying the heart.

0:26:11 - (B): They are absolutely destroying the heart. And this is most likely the cause of death. And with this particular patient. Now, if you survive this, you will still retain these scars in your heart. And these scars in your heart, they can actually interfere with the proper function of the heart. Right. It is very important for the heart that all the muscle cells not only contract, but they also propagate the wave of electrical excitation.

0:26:39 - (B): Right? So the heart needs to undergo electrical excitation in a very orderly way. All the muscle cells in the heart ventricles, they must contract at the same time, and they must relax at the same time. If there are scars in this tissue, then this orderly occurrence of this wave of excitation can be upset. And this risk is the greatest if you have a fast heartbeat, as, for example, during intense exercise.

0:27:13 - (B): And this is the most likely explanation for all these sudden cardiac deaths which we are seeing in the sports arenas and so on.

0:27:22 - (A): People wait, hold on. This just happened this week. You mean people like this, running his best time ever, falls down at the finish line and dies?

0:27:32 - (B): Yes, that's right.

0:27:34 - (A): You're saying you suspect his heart?

0:27:36 - (B): I suspect his heart, and I suspect that he actually did suffer some myocarditis, which he may not even have noticed at the time, and that this myocarditis left behind is scar, as is seen here in this picture. Right. So all this pale tissue is scar tissue on the right panel. And this scar tissue forms a roadblock, if you will, for the orderly propagation of the excitation wave that occurs in every heartbeat.

0:28:06 - (A): This first, for example, somebody who looks like they're in fantastic shape on the outside, on the inside, their heart may be just destroyed.

0:28:16 - (B): Yes, their heart can be damaged. It can be outright destroyed, and it just simply refused to work at all. That's one way. But it is also possible that the damage is local and circumscribed, and the heart can still contract. But these scars will always pose a risk of a severe cardiac arrhythmia down the road. Okay, so I don't think we have seen the last of these cardiac deaths. Right? So even long after the myocarditis such is over, the scars will stay with you, and these scars will pose a risk of arrhythmia down the road.

0:28:57 - (B): So these occurrences will recur. They will keep coming for the next couple of years, I would expect.

0:29:05 - (A): Wow. Do you have any more slides?

0:29:09 - (B): Yes, I do. And so just see, right, you have seen all the lymphocytes here. And now here we see the same in lung, in the specimen of lung tissue. Again, on the left hand side, sample of healthy lung tissue. What you see here is lots of white space. These are the airfield spaces. And these airfield spaces are separated by these thin layers of tissue. These are the lung alveoli, right? The little lung vesicles where the gas exchange occurs. And again, on the right hand side, you see spread inside sorry. You see this big cluster of lymphocyte, right? All these little dark blue dots, these are invading lymphocytes, which are attacking and destroying the lung tissue. In this case.

0:29:57 - (B): And I can assure you that this is not the worst picture by far, which I could pick. I picked one in which the lung tissue was still recognizable as such. But there are samples in which there's practically no airfield space left.

0:30:13 - (A): Wow.

0:30:13 - (B): Okay. Yes. So the lungs are also frequently destroyed, so this is fairly common. And then here we have a sample of thyroid gland tissue. Very nice organ. I'm going to discuss that. You see the clear difference. And again, on the right hand side, you see an army of lymphocytes attacking. And without going into details, you see that the normal tissue structure which is seen on the left is completely unrecognizable.

0:30:40 - (B): And then we have blood vessels here. We have two small blood vessels in the brain cross sections. You see again these dark blue, round cells, lymphocytes, which are these are both bad. Yes, they are both bad. You're right. Yes, exactly. So they are both bad. You see in both cases, lymphocytes nibbling away at the vessel walls here. And you also see in the right hand side the blood clot which has formed in the center of the blood vessel. And this cannot happen only in small blood vessels. But okay, while we are on the topic of the brain, right, so it seems to be quite common that the small blood vessels in the brain are damaged in this way, and this will give rise to some diffuse secondary brain damage. Right?

0:31:26 - (B): There's no fixing this.

0:31:28 - (A): You can't reverse this.

0:31:29 - (B): No, you cannot reverse this. The damage is done. I mean, by the time it becomes clinically manifest, even if it were immediately diagnosed, which it mostly won't be, right? Nobody, very few physicians are actually even open right now to the idea of diagnosing vaccine damage as such and treating it as such. But in the brain, it's particularly difficult to reverse the situation as it is in the heart. Also, there are other organs who are more tolerant and more forgiving to abuse. For example, the liver, that has a fairly good capacity to regenerate and so on.

0:32:08 - (B): But heart and brain, that's a difficult story. And here we see some larger heart vessels sorry, larger vessels on the left hand side, a normal arterial wall. Right. So the arteries are the blood vessels, which can withstand the high blood pressure.

0:32:27 - (A): Right.

0:32:27 - (B): The oxygen rich blood pressure. Sorry, the oxygen rich blood, which is highly pressurized. And so you see a nice regular structure of the vessel wall. And without going into too much detail, you see this moth eaten appearance in the middle, again, invaded with lymphocytes. So the lymphocytes are destroying the blood vessel, the blood vessel wall. And on the right hand side, you see a blood clot, which is formed within a damaged blood vessel.

0:32:54 - (A): Blue dots are all these lymphocytes that.

0:32:57 - (B): Are these blue dots are all these lymphocytes. And that is really just striking. I mean, you can look at case after case and you will see these lymphocytes on the march. They will attack the blood vessels. The blood vessels are probably the most commonly affected, but damage to the heart and to the lungs and to the brain is also fairly common. And other organs are not spared either. So I think this is actually it. I don't think I have any further pictures. No, that's already it.

0:33:28 - (B): So I can stop sharing my screen here.

0:33:34 - (A): Okay. I wanted to come back on the brain thing. I had Sushi Bhakti on, who you worked with for years, who's one of the most brilliant guy. They tried to get him on charges of anti Semitism. That didn't work out. How dare he speak out against his awful killing that they're doing? The brain is the final frontier. Bhakti said that changes the very essence dr. Bhakti, I'm sorry. Changes the very essence of who you are. Is this why there are so many screw ups? This is why Ed Dowd is saying we lost 30% of the workforce. Either they're dead or they can't work. Or they're working. Chronically Ill lost 30% in 2022. He thinks we'll lose the same or more in 2023. Ed Dowd is a form of BlackRock number of country. He's brilliant.

0:34:19 - (A): And you think we're going to get more debilitating effects on the brain, if not the heart and all everything else but the brain. If we just talk about that, we're going to get more debilitating effects from these vaccines on the brain.

0:34:36 - (B): Yeah. That's actually difficult to estimate to what extent this might still be progressing. I mean, there are also people who believe that not only is there vascular damage, as shown in the pictures I just presented, but also Alzheimer like brain damage. And that might actually be progredient, might be progressive, but I haven't really seen any clear cut evidence in the pathology materials that I have looked at, but I cannot claim that I have looked at everything. There might be people who have better evidence than I have seen so far.

0:35:13 - (A): How many years is this going to go on?

0:35:16 - (B): Yeah, I think the brain damage that. Has occurred and has stayed with the patient in question for a couple of months is unlikely to completely go away. So I think they will have to live with it. The question is, if they stop vaccinating, is the damage going to progress or is it going to stay where it is? That's the question on my mind and I hope it will just stay where it is, essentially. And we cannot exclude the possibility that it will actually progress further.

0:35:53 - (B): Yes, that is an open question at this point.

0:35:57 - (A): The CDC, their original vaccination, they talked about number of injections they had 676,000,000. And I guess you add this latest uptake, which was poor, but there's probably 20 million and so 700 million in America alone. In Canada, I heard the number was 90%. The official number 90%. You don't think the official numbers are correct? But there's still a lot of numbers.

0:36:22 - (B): There's still big amounts, I think in Canada, as far as I can tell, certainly the majority of people has gotten vaccinated. It's probably a bit higher than in the United States.

0:36:33 - (A): Wow. And you think this is going to be with us for some people say it's going to be with us the rest of our lives. This is not going to be over. The effects of this are going to keep happening. The deaths, the disabilities?

0:36:50 - (B): Yes, but yes, the disability. I think the disability people who have been disabled and who have remained disabled for several months, I mean I think they would have to be very lucky to significantly improve after that. Simply going by experiences from stroke or something like else or other forms of organic brain damage. Right. There typically is a period of improvement after a stroke, but the function that hasn't been regained after several months is unlikely to return.

0:37:20 - (A): Wow.

0:37:25 - (B): I think that's a fair estimate. On top of that, even if we assume that the damage done by the acute inflammation is sort of stagnant, then we still have the risk of cancer.

0:37:41 - (A): Right?

0:37:41 - (B): I mean one hears increasingly concerns or observations even of turbo cancer, cancer that had been cured or has been considered cured for years or decades, which all of a sudden makes a reappearance after vaccination new cancers, even some strange ones, and particular the fast growing cancers and so on. The mechanism of that, I don't think it's completely understood at this point. So I think we understand quite well the mechanism of these inflammatory diseases, autoimmune like diseases, if you will, that is quite well understood for cancer. There are several plausible explanations as to why it might be happening, but I have not really seen at this point clear cut evidence that would strongly support one or the other mechanism.

0:38:39 - (A): Do the mRNA vaccines clearly destroy the immune system, lower the capacity of the immune system?

0:38:47 - (B): Yes, that's a fair assessment in various ways. One is simply that the bandwidth of the immune system, so to speak, is limited, right. The immune system.

0:39:00 - (A): That's why you get these Turmo cancers.

0:39:01 - (B): Because exactly, that's quite possible. So the immune system is kept busy with attacking their own body, the regular body cells, and it is then simply not paying attention anymore to cancer cells or it is also not as paying as much attention to other infections. For example, it's quite well documented and has been from the very beginning that persistent viruses will break out again in vaccinated patients. Right.

0:39:32 - (B): You may know that the viruses of the herpes group, such as for example, the virus which causes chickenpox, they actually stay in the human body for life. So you experience the infection as a child and the infection has an acute phase chickenpox in that particular case. But that abates after some three weeks and then you are over it, but the virus stays inside your body. And the renewed outbreak of that virus is known as.

The Dangers of mRNA Vaccines: A Deliberate Attempt to Harm and Kill

By Greg Hunter

One of the most controversial topics of our time is the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. While some people believe it is a necessary tool in the fight against the pandemic, others are waking up to the potential dangers and questioning its efficacy. Dr. Michael Palmer, a professor of biochemistry and author of the book "mRNA Vaccine Toxicity: The mRNA is the Poison," is one of those individuals who has been sounding the alarm about the risks associated with this new vaccine technology.

In a recent interview on USA Watchdog, Dr. Palmer discussed his concerns about the mRNA vaccines and the deliberate attempt to harm and kill people. He explained that the mRNA in these vaccines acts as a poison by instructing our body cells to produce the spike protein of the virus. This spike protein is then recognized by the immune system as a foreign antigen, leading to an immune response that can attack and destroy our own cells.

Dr. Palmer emphasized that it is not the specific properties of the spike protein that cause the immune system to attack, but rather the foreign nature of the protein. He warned that this problem is not limited to the COVID-19 vaccines, but can be expected with any future mRNA vaccines against other viruses or infectious agents. The production of foreign proteins inside our body cells will always trigger an immune response that can harm and kill.

When asked about the intention behind the mRNA vaccine rollout, Dr. Palmer did not mince words. He stated that the accelerated development and deployment of these vaccines, along with the suppression of adverse event reports and the relentless coercion and censorship, point to a deliberate policy of harm and killing. He argued that the risks associated with the mRNA technology were known from the beginning, and the ongoing vaccination campaign despite the disastrous results can only be explained as intentional.

Dr. Palmer's research on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines spans over 1,000 hours, and he has analyzed numerous autopsy materials to understand the extent of the damage caused by these vaccines. He shared images of heart muscle tissue invaded by lymphocytes, lung tissue destroyed by inflammation, and blood vessels attacked by the immune system. These pictures paint a grim picture of the consequences of the mRNA vaccines, with the potential for long-term disabilities and even death.

The implications of Dr. Palmer's findings are profound. If the mRNA vaccines are indeed a deliberate attempt to harm and kill, as he suggests, then the future of vaccine technology is in question. He warns against the conversion of established vaccines to mRNA technology, as the cumulative toxicity across multiple vaccinations could be disastrous. The risks of autoimmune diseases, organ damage, and even cancer are real and should not be ignored.

The current vaccination numbers are staggering, with hundreds of millions of people already receiving the mRNA vaccines in the United States and Canada alone. Dr. Palmer acknowledges that reversing the damage caused by these vaccines is unlikely, and the disability and death toll will continue to rise. He also raises concerns about the impact on the immune system, the potential for future outbreaks of persistent viruses, and the risk of turbo cancer.

In conclusion, the dangers of mRNA vaccines cannot be ignored. Dr. Palmer's research and analysis provide compelling evidence that these vaccines are not only ineffective in protecting against disease but also pose a significant risk to our health and well-being. The deliberate attempt to harm and kill, as he suggests, raises serious questions about the motives behind the vaccine rollout. It is crucial that we critically examine the evidence and make informed decisions about our health and the health of future generations. The future of vaccine technology hangs in the balance, and it is up to us to demand transparency, accountability, and the prioritization of public health over profit.