CoronaHoax.info PandemicLie.com


PROOF THE CORONAVIRUS DOES NOT SCIENTIFICALLY EXIST


The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.


The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.


Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”


The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”


Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.


A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.


Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.


NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.


THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS... https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/10/ghana-presdent-confirmed-world-lockdown-plot.html

Ghana President Exposed Permanent World Lockdown Plot

October 20, 2020

Listen to this 14-min speech. https://archive.org/details/ghana-president-exposed-permanent-world-lockdown-plot

In June, Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo basically outlined what is now happening in October, and confirms the Ottawa World Lockdown Leak posted here. This pandemic, which is designed to destroy the world economy. was planned years ago down to the last detail. Remember "The Great Depression"? Think that was an accident? They create economic crises to advance political goals. We have been fast-tracked for tyranny.




by Henry Makow PhD

(henrymakow.com)


On June 21, Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo went public with the plan to destroy the world economy and enslave mankind. He said he was reading from a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation document but it must have been another Rockefeller "Operation Lockstep" document. (Can a reader help me identify his source?)


Nevertheless, beginning on page 18, the aforementioned RF document describes the Operation Lockstep scenario in some detail: "A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."


Remember this scenario is from 2010: "Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers."


Here is a brief outline of Akuufo-Addo's main points which confirm our worst fears. This pandemic was planned ten years ago down to the last detail.


1. Create a low mortality virus at Fort Detrick, NJ.


2. Create a weaponized high-mortality version as a backup to be used if needed.


3. For "added deniability" have it transferred to the bioweapon lab in Winnipeg where it will be stolen by Chinese scientists and smuggled out to Wuhan.


4. Make its spread seem like an accident. Blame the wet market in Wuhan.


5. Do a real-world simulation in Oct 2019. This is Event 201.


6. Plan to vaccinate the human race, enforced by a digital ID and "heath passports." (This is ID 2020.)


7. Allow human to human contact to enable the strain to spread before lockdowns begin.


8. Expand lockdowns.


9. "Hype" the number of deaths in order to spread fear. Attribute all deaths to Covid 19.


10. Keep lockdowns as long as possible in order to destroy the economy, break supply chains and create social disruption.


11. Relieve lockdowns for a short time, and then blame "increase" in cases on this respite. Blame increase on protesters. "We told you so."


dees-mand-vax.jpg

12. Quell outrage with brutal force and depict dissenters as "public enemies." Army checkpoints.


13. Roll out vaccinations and passports. People will not be able to participate in society without both.


14. If the majority wakes up to this conspiracy, release a new virus with a 30% mortality rate and say, "We told you so."


I urge you to listen to the video. It may be the most important 14 minutes of your life.


Related- Grace Van Berkum - We are Being Played --------2010 Operation Lockstep Coming to Life


BBC Tries to Discredit this Report


Rockefeller 2010 Report Envisions Police State


Plandemic 201 Highlight Reel


First Comment from Tony B


If you have the means to quickly move to Mexico or South America, I suggest you do it - now!


This destruction of life as God intended it is NOT a test or trial, this is the end game for those satanic Talmudists and their myrmidons who have planned for centuries to have this world for themselves alone. They have not been coy about all of it, saying publicly for decades now that they wish to reduce the world's population by 85% to 95%. That means, with today's technology, they feel that they only need a percentage of between 5% - 15% of those of us living today as their abject slaves.


The rest of us they intend to kill, the mass slaughters of the soviet and red China were the test, this time their plot is actually to murder most of the world. If that sounds too insane to believe, yes it is insanity at its most satanically twisted, but you had better believe it and act upon it if you expect any chance whatsoever of you or your family's survival. This insanity has been proven over and over through the centuries to care not about ANY LIVES, your women and children will NOT be excepted.


It really seems that the English speaking populations, as well as the Europeans in general, are too far down the tube of constant satanic brainwashing and pagan living to defend themselves and their families, a better stand will be made in South American or Africa. Or possibly, as Paquita de Shishmareff (L. Fry authoress of "Waters Flowing Eastward") used to tell me, Russia's Siberia may be the last stand of the white man.

https://principia-scientific.com/lockdown-biggest-mistake-made-in-history-of-the-world/

Lockdown: ‘Biggest Mistake Made In History Of The World’

Published on September 11, 2020

Written by www.iceagenow.info

“Stop panicking – it’s over.”

Doctor predicts an IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) of somewhere around 0.1% (one in a thousand), “about the same as severe flu pandemics we have had in the past.”

(Don’t overlook the point! Point one percent is ten times less than one percent.

“I look at your blog every day, good job!” says reader Leifur Arnason in Iceland.

“You also blog about the covid, lockdowns and such. Therefore I would like to point out Dr Malcolm Kendrick’s blog.”

The importance of understanding the difference of CASE FATALITY RATE (CFR) vs INFECTION FATALITY RATE (IFR). I think it is a bombshell.


Dr Kendrick: “ I had not spotted it. He did. All credit is his.” ( he refers to Ronald B. Brown and his report nr 6 on the page) “I am simply drawing your attention to what has simply been – probably the biggest single mistake that has ever been made in the history of the world.”

drmalcolmkendrick.org


Here are some quotes from the above referenced article:

The best place to estimate where we may finally end up with COVID, is with the country that has tested the most people, per head of population. This is Iceland. To quote the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine once more:

‘In Iceland, where the most testing per capita has occurred, the IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) lies somewhere between 0.03% and 0.28%.’ 3

Sitting in the middle of 0.03% and 0.28% is 0.16%. As you can see, Iceland, having tested more people than anywhere else, has the lowest IFR of all. This is not a coincidence. This is an inevitable result of testing more people.

I am going to make a prediction that, in the end, we will end up with an IFR of somewhere around 0.1%. Which is about the same as severe flu pandemics we have had in the past. Remember that figure. It is one in a thousand.

It may surprise you to know that I am not the only person to have made this exact same prediction. On the 28th February, yes that far back, the New England Journal of Medicine published a report by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (A.S.F., H.C.L.); and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. 4

In this paper ‘Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted’ they stated the following:

‘On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%. In another article in the Journal, Guan et al. report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate (my underline) may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.’

A case fatality rate considerably less than 1%. Their words, not mine. As they also added,

‘the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.’

At this point, you may well be asking. Why the hell did we lockdown if COVID was believed to be no more serious than influenza? Right from the start by the most influential infectious disease organisations in the World.

It is because of the mad mathematical modellers. The academic epidemiologists. Neil Ferguson, and others of his ilk. When they were guessing (sorry estimating, sorry modelling) the impact of COVID they used a figure of approximately one per cent as the infection fatality rate. Not the case fatality rate. In so doing, they overestimated the likely impact of COVID by, at the very least, ten-fold.

How could this possibly have happened?

When they put their carefully constructed model together on the 16th of March, if they had been reading the research, they must have been aware that they were looking at a maximum case fatality rate of just over 1% in China, right at the start, where the figures are always at their highest.

Which means that, unless COVID was going to turn out nearly 100% fatal, we could never get anywhere near 1%, for the infection fatality rate. Even Ebola only kills 50%.

But they went with it, they went with 1%. Actually, Imperial College reduced it slightly to 0.9%, for reasons that are opaque.

From this, all else flowed.

If the INFECTION fatality rate truly were 0.9%, and 80% of the population of the UK became infected, there would have been/could have been, around 500,000 deaths.

0.9% x 80% x 67million = 482,000

LOCKDOWN

However, if the case fatality rate is around 1%, then the infection fatality rate will be about one tenth of this, maybe less. So, we would see around 50,000 deaths, about the same as was seen in previous bad flu pandemics.

DO NOT LOCKDOWN

What Imperial College London did was to use a model that overestimated the infection fatality rate by a factor of ten.

We now know, as the IFR rates of various countries falls and falls, that the Imperial College estimated IFR was completely wrong. The UK, for example, has seen 42,000 deaths so far, which is 0.074% of population. The US has seen about 200,000 deaths 0.053%. Sweden, which did not lockdown down, has seen about 6,000 deaths, which is an infection fatality rate of 0.06%. All three countries are opening up and opening up. Whilst the ‘cases’ are rising and rising, the deaths continue to fall. They are, to all intents and purposes, flatlining.

In Iceland it is around 0.16% and falling. In other words…

Stop panicking – it’s over

Whilst everyone is panicking about the ever-increasing number of cases, we should be celebrating them. They are demonstrating, very clearly, that COVID is far, far, less deadly then was feared. The Infection Fatality Rate is most likely going to end up around 0.1%, not 1%.

So yes, it does seem that ‘the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.’

Thanks to Leifur Arnason in Iceland for this info and link

Read more at www.iceagenow.info


PSI Editor’s note:

What is the difference between Case Fatality rate (CFR) and Infection Fatality rate(IFR)?

In epidemiology, a case fatality rate (CFR) — sometimes called case fatality risk or case-fatality ratio — is the proportion of deaths from a certain disease compared to the total number of people diagnosed with the disease for a particular period. A CFR can only be considered final when all the cases have been resolved (either died or recovered).

On the other hand, while the term infection fatality rate (IFR) also applies to infectious disease outbreaks, this represents the proportion of deaths among all infected individuals, including all asymptomatic and undiagnosed subjects. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_fatality_rate


http://mileswmathis.com/logic.pdf

The CDC all but admits Covid is Fake

by Miles Mathis

First published August 30, 2020

On August 26, the CDC updated its site with a co-morbidities section, where they admit only about 6%

of the reported deaths by Covid in the US in 2020 were due to Covid alone. The other 94% of deaths

included an average of 2.6 other causes—although we still aren't told which cause was primary. Most

of these deaths were among the elderly, which means we can include one other co-morbidity: OLD

AGE.

This reduces the death-by-Covid number from 185,000 to about 11,000. That is not a Covid pandemic,

since 11,000 is a pretty small number for an 8-month period. In the same period, about 30,000 people

died in car wrecks. In fact, according to mainstream numbers, about 37,000 people die of the regular

flu in every 8-month period. So Covid is more than three times less dangerous than the old flu.

And if we continue to study the CDC's own published numbers, we find that young people are almost

untouched. In the first third of the chart, we are given deaths due to influenza + pneumonia, and a total

of about 64,000 deaths. About 86% are over 60 years old, so the odds as well as logic tell us those

people were about to die anyway. Only 634 of those are under 35, and only 102 are under 25. But

remember, only 6% of those are Covid-only deaths, so the under-35 number is actually 38 and the

under-25 number is actually. . . 6. Yep, only 6 of 64,000 deaths were due to Covid-alone in those

under 25. That is less than .00009, just so you know. Less than 1 in 10,000. Since there are about 100

million people under 25 in the US, the fraction goes even lower, to .0000002. Your odds of dying of

Covid in an 8-month period in the US are about 2 in ten million. Over a lifetime, that would be about

1 in 50,000. You are about as likely to die from a bee or wasp sting. About ten times more likely to

die in a plane crash, 14 times as likely to choke on food, 33 times as likely to die in a fire, 77 times as

likely to get run over, and 440 times as likely to die in a car. So do you go around in a panic about

those things all the time? Have we bankrupted large parts of the world for any of those things?

You will say, “Sure, but that is just for the under-25 people”. Yes, but the numbers are similar if you

are middle age, 45-54. In that case, the number is 3,710 out of 64,000. But Covid-only brings that

number down to 223. So, still only .0035, or 1 in 287. There are about 40 million people in that age

group in the US, so .000017 is our fraction. Your odds of dying of Covid in an 8-month period in the

US are about 1 in 50,000, or over a lifetime about 1 in 500. About the same as getting run over. You

are about twice as likely to get killed by a gun. You are 4 times more likely to die by falling, 4 times

more likely to die in a car, 4 times more likely to die of poisoning, 4 times more likely to die of suicide,

18 times as likely to die of chronic lower respiratory disease, and 70 times as likely to die of heart

disease or cancer.

I yellowed chronic lower respiratory disease for a reason. It is because that is one of the main comorbidities listed for Covid. That is very important, and you should dwell on it. In general, chronic

lower respiratory disease is the second most common cause of death, as you see in that last link to the

National Safety Council. So you should find it strange to see it listed as a cause of death along with

Covid. The second section at the CDC is about 13,000 deaths listed as chronic lower respiratory

disease. “Chronic” means it didn't just arrive: it has been around a while in the individual. Chronic

lower respiratory disease isn't caused by influenza, since influenza is an acute reaction, not a chronic

one. It is caused by smoking, long-term environmental or work exposure, and things of that nature. So

that answers my question above about which of the 4 or 5 co-morbidities was primary. With people

over 50, the primary causes of death among several listed would be chronic lower respiratory disease or

old age, not the flu. In all those instances, Covid would be a sidelight at best.

Another 52,000 are listed as “respiratory failure”, and another 3,000 as “respiratory arrest”. I'm sorry,

what's the difference, exactly? We can see we are still being jerked here, since neither respiratory

failure nor respiratory arrest are causes of death. They are results of some underlying cause, which

then causes death. Is that underlying cause the common cold or is it smoking three packs a day for 40

years? You decide.

Another 33,000 are listed as hypertensive diseases, which would include heart attack. So they are

admitting that they assigned at least 33,000 heart attacks to Covid. But the next 56,000 are also

assigned to heart failure or cardiac arrest, etc., so we are up to 89,000 heart failures assigned to the

common cold. That's about half the total, by the way.

Another 24,000 are listed as diabetes, and Covid does not give you diabetes.

Another 13,000 are listed as sepsis, which means being in the hospital killed them.

Another 5,000 are listed as obese, and Covid does not make you obese. Nor does it target fat people.

Another 5,000 are listed as dying of Alzheimers.

73,500 are listed as “all other causes”. That's 40% of the total of 185,000, which is a huge amount of

fudge. But I guess OLD AGE fits into this category. It also means they are admitting they don't know

why most of these people died, only that they did. But if they don't know why these people died, then

they can't know that they died of Covid, right? Logic

COVID-19: Closer to the Truth: Tests and Immunity

By Dr. Pascal Sacré

Global Research, August 07, 2020

Mondialisation.ca

Url of this article:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-closer-to-the-truth-tests-and-immunity/5720160


The number of positive RT-PCR tests, which diagnose the presence of pieces [fragments] of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is equated in the press and government reports with the number of new COVID-19 cases. This is not entirely true. This is misleading. It suggests a resurgence of the disease. COVID-19 is the name of the disease.


The RT-PCR test is just a means of detecting SARS-CoV-2, and that test is unreliable. Some people are asymptomatic, or with mild symptoms. Testing positive, which is already subject to interpretation, does not mean “sick”. Other doctors, including virologists, say so and warn of the current danger of this confusion maintained by official bodies.


The tests (screening, diagnosis, immunity) symbolize the blind and total belief in the omnipotence of technical medicine and technology. This illusion is maintained by industry, by some doctors and by the media.


As in the case of vaccination, there is an oversimplification on this subject which is a breeding ground for the manipulation of public opinion.


An example of oversimplification is to summarize human immunity to antibodies or to make people believe that a positive RT-PCR test is synonymous with COVID-19 disease.


RT-PCR


A positive RT-PCR test [1] is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease.


Today, as authorities test more people, there are bound to be more positive RT-PCR tests. This does not mean that COVID-19 is coming back, or that the epidemic is moving in waves. There are more people being tested, that’s all.


Are these tests reliable? [2].


Beware of false positives [3]. This weakness of the PCR test in virus testing has been known for years [4]. For Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR technique which enabled him to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993, this test was above all qualitative and intended to answer the question: is the element there, yes or no, not at all to be quantified?


Moreover, these tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.


In an attempt to quantify the viral load, these sequences are then amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject to errors, sterility errors and contamination [5-6].


Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health to confirm its value [reliability] [7].


The media frighten everyone with new positive PCR tests, without any nuance or context, wrongly assimilating this information with a second wave of COVID-19.


Serologies and immunities


Serology is the determination of protein in the blood. In COVID-19, we look for antibodies (immunoglobulins or Ig) specific to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.


In this case, IgG.


Each test can look for a particular type of antibody. Antibodies are produced after recovery and can be directed against hundreds of virus antigens, which explains the inconsistent results depending on the type of antibody chosen for the test.


The first thing you need to know, in order to know what you are talking about, is the type of antibody that the test is measuring.


The RT-PCR test, a molecular technology based on a sample of cells from the upper respiratory tract, tries to detect the presence of viruses.


Serological tests look to see if the person has developed humoral (antibody-based) immunity (protection) to the virus.


Indirectly, a positive serology would confirm that the person, at some point, has been in contact with the virus.


That’s not entirely true.


The reality is neither so simple nor so obvious!


Many doctors themselves do not know how human antiviral immunity works.


Cross-immunity, non-specific innate immunity and cell specific immunity are not measured by serology. Yet they are essential.


In immunopathology, the notion of field (patient’s condition) conditions the body’s response to COVID-19 [8].


“In this era of astounding progress in the field of lymphocyte molecular and cellular biology, it is easy to forget that our perception of immunology at the systemic level is still at an embryonic stage. Modern immunology has only a very limited understanding of the myriad complex physiological events that, in vivo, constitute the immune response, whether protective or pathological.”


[Fundamentals Immunology, 1600 pages, Louis J Picker & Mark H. Siegelmen, Pathologists, University of Texas.]


Summarizing it all down to SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies alone is a dangerous lure, a dramatic simplification that distorts all reasoning and therefore any future policy blinded by an obsession with a vaccine.


CROSS-IMMUNITY


SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus related to other coronaviruses, most of which, in humans, cause only “common” colds. Most of us have developed good immunity to these coronaviruses since childhood. It is this cross-immunity that may have protected most of us from SARS-CoV-2 before any vaccine was developed.


Cross-immunity between cold coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-1 has already been demonstrated. This is cell-based immunity (not antibody-based).


This protection by natural cell-based immunity persists much longer (> 10 years) than antibody-mediated humoral immunity (< 3 years).


Cellular immunity uses a type of cell, T-lymphocytes, the best known of which are called CD4+ and CD8+. This T-cell immune response plays a major role in the defence against infection.


Cross-immunity between common cold coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 is highly likely, mediated by this T-cell immunity, directed against antigens common to all coronaviruses.


Dosing for antibodies (Ig immunoglobulins) specific to a particular SARS-CoV-2 antigen misses out on this immunity, which is nevertheless very present and very effective.


INNER IMMUNITY


Innate immunity is non-specific, not antibody-mediated.


It is the first response to an infection; it destroys the infectious agent.


It is an important anti-viral barrier that IgG serologies do not detect either. This innate immunity is capable of defending us against a virus without the need for specific immunity, provided we are healthy.


It has probably contributed to the low incidence of COVID-19 disease in young and healthy older individuals. This innate immunity destroys the virus very quickly. It does not need to develop antibodies to manage the infection, at least not enough for a test to detect them. Instead, it activates a cellular response to T-cells. This innate immunity persists throughout life, unlike humoral (memory) specific immunity, which declines with age.


It is possible to be immunized against COVID-19 through our innate immunity and these memory T cells, even in the absence of neutralizing antibodies.


A Swedish study reported that individuals affected by COVID-19 developed a cellular T cell immune response in the absence of detectable antibodies [9]. It is therefore highly likely that this T-cell immune response is sufficient to protect against a new SARS-CoV-2 infection.


However, none of this is demonstrated by current serological tests!


COVID-19 acts as an indicator of our state of health.


Health status is not only related to our standard of living or the quality of our health care services, far from it. Rather, they tend to mask poor health.


Good health is linked to the quality of our diet, our physical activity and, above all, our state of mind.


The importance of good mental health is paramount in our quality of life and in our ability to cope with illness.


Fear, total confinement, social distancing, constant wearing of a mask, all contribute to a serious deterioration of our mental health.


The relationship between psychology and the endocrine (hormones), nervous and immune systems has been proven for a long time [9].


The media, their daily anxiety-provoking announcements, the total confinement and the deadly atmosphere have stressed populations to the point of astonishing and lasting damage to their health.


It is paradoxical to advocate life-saving measures while ignoring the catastrophic consequences of such measures.


The relationship between stress and immunity is well demonstrated [10-11-12].


The field (state of health) is a fundamental notion in immunopathology.


The severity of an infection, of COVID-19 in particular, is determined by the terrain, by the state of health of the patient.


This relationship is not only due to the presence of one or more co-morbidities that weaken the organism.


It involves the decline (with age) of specific acquired immunity (of which humoral antibody immunity is a part).


In unhealthy individuals, the normal protective immune defence is diverted to an inadequate, deleterious overreaction through the production of antibodies that facilitate infection and a Th2 (inflammatory cytokine storm) rather than a protective Th1 (T-cell) response [8].


This is why the sickest people suffer from the most severe forms of the disease, especially if they are older (ageing of specific immunity): because of an inadequate immune response.


Healthy young people and adults are protected because their immune ground is healthy.


This is what people should be told rather than using fear to better prepare them to accept a hastily prepared vaccine.


The innate cellular immunity of most people is competent and sufficient.


In the case of SARS-CoV-2, a coronavirus of the cold virus family, T-cell cross-immunity is effective as well.


That’s all kinds of solid scientific information that will reassure most people.


Why do the media prefer to continue to frighten and misinform?


This information tells us that a large part of the population will be protected from an infection like COVID-19 without having to wait for a vaccine or maintain measures whose deleterious effects eventually outweigh any benefits (such as the continued wearing of a mask).


Instead, authorities and mainstream media continue to perpetuate the psychosis and do not fully inform people.


They incorrectly translate “positive RT-PCR tests” into “new COVID-19 cases”.


They wrongly propagate the dogma that immunity is only antibodies.


They incorrectly suggest that PCR tests and serologies help to separate “infected” and “uninfected”.


They falsely claim that only a vaccine can save us.


The fear is terrible!


Not only does it astound (paralyze) our immune system, it also freezes our analytical and thinking abilities.


In conclusion, keep in mind that human technologies are limited, sometimes sources of error. The precision of words in science, in medicine, is crucial. The RT-PCR technique can give false positives and a positive RT-PCR test is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease. More than the number of positive tests, the actual hospitalization rate remains the indicator of choice for a resurgence of disease.


What matters is the presence or absence of signs, symptoms (cough-fever-respiratory difficulties-impaired taste or smell) that should lead you to stay home, be quarantined, or even see a doctor if these symptoms worsen.


If you have to go out, respect the social distance and wash your hands. Many RT-PCR-positive people will have no symptoms, they must trust their healthy innate and cross immunity.


As for serologies, keep in mind that they only measure a specific neutralizing type of antibody and that the absence of this antibody (negative or low serology) does not mean that you have not been in contact with SARS-CoV-2.


Without even noticing or barely noticing it, you may have been able to eliminate this virus by using your innate immunity, cross-immunity to other cold coronaviruses, and/or T-type cellular immunity, without having to produce antibodies.


Dr. Pascal Sacré, physician specialized in critical care, author and renowned public health analyst based in Charleroi, Belgium. Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)


Translation by Maya, Global Research


Notes:


[1] Reverse-Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction, Réaction polymérase en chaîne utilisant une transcriptase inverse pour produire de l’ADN à partir de l’ARN viral.


[2] Les tests: talon d’Achille du château de cartes COVID-19, 28 mai 2020, Mondialisation.ca


[3] Tests du covid-19, attention aux faux positifs !, 5 mai 2020, Pryska Ducoeurjoly


[4] Incidence of and Factors Associated with False Positives in Laboratory Diagnosis of Norovirus Infection by Amplification of the RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Gene, 29 septembre 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109876


[5] Détection et quantification des acides nucléiques en infectiologie : utilité, certitudes et limites, Revue Médicale Suisse, 2005


[6] The Inconsistences of Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Diagnostics Microbiology Acta Scientific Microbiology Vol 1 Issue 2 February 2018


[7] PCR en microbiologie : de l’amplification de l’ADN à l’interprétation du résultat, Revue Médicale Suisse, RMS 106, 2007, Vol 3


[8] Covid19: immunité croisée avec les autres coronavirus, phénomènes immunopathologiques, Hélène Banoun, Pharmacienne biologiste, ancienne Chargée de Recherches INSERM, ancienne Interne des Hôpitaux de Paris.


[9] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.29.174888v1

Sekine et al. 29 juin 2020. Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 : Our collective dataset shows that SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust memory T cell responses akin to those observed in the context of successful vaccines, suggesting that natural exposure or infection may prevent recurrent episodes of severe COVID-19 also in seronegative individuals.


[9] Psycho-neuro-endocrino-immunologie, les fondamentaux scientifiques de la relation corps-esprit ou les bases rationnelles de la médecine intégrée, Francesco Bottaccioli, Editions Résurgence, 2011, 664 pages.


[10] Stress, immunité et physiologie du système nerveux


[11] Coronavirus : attention au stress, il affaiblit les défenses immunitaires


[12] Quand le stress affaiblit les défenses immunitaires



The original source of this article is Mondialisatio

The Rothschild19 Virus - A Synopsis

August 16, 2020



(left, Dr. Fuzzy)


THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG... THE CDC, THE WHO, AND ALL THE SO-CALLED EXPERTS LIED TO YOU!!!


⚠️ EVERYONE IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY NEEDS TO READ THIS AND ABSORB IT... THOSE STILL ASLEEP, YOU BETTER WAKE UP BECAUSE THIS SHAM/DRESS REHEARSAL WILL CERTAINLY BE THE LAST CHANCE; THOSE CHOOSING TO REMAIN IN DENIAL, GIVING THE FINGER TO REALITY, YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN ...

FEEL "FREE" TO FACT CHECK EACH OF THESE, PLEASE!



(Seen on Facebook)


🔺"CDC admitted they screwed up COVID19 infection counts and intentionally misled the public and have apologized, clarifying that the amount of people truly infected is much lower than what was originally reported -- an error so egregious it made the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute say "how could the CDC make this mistake? This is a mess."


🔺The American Coronavirus Task Force also admitted to fudging the National COVID19 death count when Dr. Birx said the deaths are people who died "with" COVID19 not "from" COVID19, thus making the real death count much lower than what is currently being reported.


🔺Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted masks won't help against the virus and mask manufacturers are now including warnings that their products do not deter COVID19.


🔺Fauci also said that continuing to close the country could cause irreparable damage.


🔺CDC backtracked their initial claim that led governors to shutdown their states & clarified that COVID19 does not spread easily on surfaces.


🔺Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo confirmed a recent health study showing that 70% of new infections actually originate at home, thus making stay-at-home orders one of the most dangerous mandates currently in place.


🔺Trump stopped funding the WHO and threatened to cut off money permanently until they can prove they are no longer corruptly influenced by communist China after they lied to our country about human to human transmission of COVID19 in January.


🔺The curve is flattened, the CDC, WHO, Dr. Fauci, our governors, and many more were completely wrong about the potential threat of this virus.


🔺If you are still living in fear, Don't be. The media, global organizations, the government, and its agencies "mislead" the public.


🔺People called those of us who knew this all along conspiracy theorists, but it turns out we were just following the facts!


🔺Open up your businesses, churches, and homes. Don't fall for the lies any longer. If you fell for the lies this time, wake up and join the army of truth-seekers fighting on the front lines.


🔺 Florida has just admitted to miscalculations on some that received positive COVID-19 results but never got tested and many others have been incorrectly identified as positive in the state's system.


🔺 WHO has just admitted that transmission of the virus from an asymptomatic carrier - the whole reason for the lockdown, is rare!! ie you could not spread it before showing any symptoms!!


⚠️ The CDC just confirmed a .4 to .26% death-rate for COVID 19. The death rate for the flu shot is .6. Twice as high as COVID!


For that, we have:


• Added nearly 6 trillion to the national debt

• Laid-off or furloughed 50 million workers

• Placed 60 million on food stamps

• Gone from 3.5%to 14.7% unemployment

• Crippled the petroleum industry

• Ruined the tourism industry

• Bankrupted the service industry

• Caused an impending meat and protein crisis

• Threatened, fined, and arrested church leaders

• Exacerbated mental health problems

• Shut down schools and colleges

• Given unbridled power to unelected officials

• Increased suicides higher than COVID deaths

• Delayed surgeries and treatments for profound illnesses

• Infringed upon countless important civil liberties

• Placed 300 million Americans on house arrest



Bill Gates has placed himself in such a position of influence by heavily funding all corners to make this lie happen.


We need to start treating it as the lie it is.


Seriously our whole way of life is at stake, and they have plans to make it much worse now introducing it as "the grand reset", "the beginning of the 4th revolution" (ie a surveillance state of control, where everyone lives in what is essentially a strick open-air prison where you are tracked, nothing is private, and everything is decided for you, and you have no rights whatsoever, and there can be no resistance.


Welcome to their "new world order"


Critical Thinking Exposes The ScamDemic 5min Must see! https://archive.org/details/critical-thinking-exposes-the-scam-demic

The coronahoax is enacted to enable mandatory vaccination and hide the criminal acts of the PTB while they verify the obedience of their global flunkies who's aim is to have the CORONA EDICTS obeyed by the masses of the world - with any disobedience duly noted (ONE LIE FITS ALL). It is a DRY RUN in preparation for CoronaHoax 2.0. All dissent on the web will be duly noted and dealt with prior to CoronaHoax 2.0

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/lockdowns-great-reset

From Lockdowns To "The Great Reset"

Profile picture for user Tyler Durden

by Tyler Durden

Sun, 08/02/2020 - 22:00

TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint

Authored by Anthony Mueller via The Mises Institute,

The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order. Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), global policymakers are advocating for a “Great Reset” with the intent of creating a global technocracy. It is not by coincidence that on October 18, 2019, in New York City the WEF participated in “Event 201” at the “high-level” pandemic exercise organized by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.

This coming technocracy involves close cooperation between the heads of the digital industry and of governments. With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all, the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice.

The truth, however, is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system. The People’s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals, corporations, and sociopolitical entities.

For the individual, one’s identity is reduced to an app or chip that registers almost any personal activity. In order to gain a few individual rights, and be it only to travel to a certain place, a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “good behavior” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment. For example, during a pandemic, this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for a job or to travel.

It is, in short, a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development. Like the mechanical engineer with a machine, the social engineer—or technocrat—treats society as an object. Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times, the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design. For this purpose, the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer follows the laws of nature. Behavioral theory has reached a stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible. The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force, but subtly by nudge.

Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset, the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state. "The experts know better" is the justification.

The Agenda

The plan for an overhaul of the world is the brainchild of an elite group of businessmen, politicians, and their intellectual entourage that used to meet in Davos, Switzerland, in January each year. Brought into existence in 1971, the World Economic Forum has become a megaglobal event since then. More than three thousand leaders from all over the world attended the meeting in 2020.

Under the guidance of the WEF, the agenda of the Great Reset says that the completion of the current industrial transformation requires a thorough overhaul of the economy, politics, and society. Such a comprehensive transformation requires the alteration of human behavior, and thus "transhumanism" is part of the program.

The Great Reset will be the theme of the fifty-first meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2021. Its agenda is the commitment to move the world economy toward “a more fair, sustainable and resilient future.” The program calls for “a new social contract” that is centered on racial equality, social justice, and the protection of the nature. Climate change requires us “to decarbonize the economy” and to bring human thinking and behavior “into harmony with nature.” The aim is to build “more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies.” This new world order must be “urgently” implemented, the promotors of the WEF claim, and they point out that the pandemic “has laid bare the unsustainability of our system,” which lacks “social cohesion.”

The WEF’s great reset project is social engineering at the highest level. Advocates of the reset contend that the UN failed to establish order in the world and could not advance forcefully its agenda of sustainable development—known as Agenda 2030—because of its bureaucratic, slow, and contradictory way of working. In contrast, the actions of the organizational committee of the World Economic Forum are swift and smart. When a consensus has been formed, it can be implemented by the global elite all over the world.

Social Engineering

The ideology of the World Economic Forum is neither left nor right, nor progressive or conservative, it is also not fascist or communist, but outright technocratic. As such, it includes many elements of earlier collectivist ideologies.

In recent decades, the consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution, and that reforms have taken too long. The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice. The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on. The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it.

The basic idea of the Great Reset is the same principle that guided the radical transformations from the French to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions. It is the idea of constructivist rationalism incorporated in the state. But projects like the Great Reset leave unanswered the question of who rules the state. The state itself does not rule. It is an instrument of power. It is not the abstract state that decides, but the leaders of specific political parties and of certain social groups.

Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power. Now, with the help of new technologies, it is believed, dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized. The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable.

The 2020 lockdowns possibly offer a preview of how this system works. The lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated—and perhaps it was. As if following a single command, the leaders of big and small nations—and of different stages of economic development—implemented almost identical measures. Not only did many governments act in unison, they also applied these measures with little regard for the horrific consequences of a global lockdown.

Months of economic stillstand have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families. Together with social distancing, the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves. First, governments destroyed the livelihood, then the politicians showed up as the savior. The demand for social assistance is no longer limited to specific groups, but has become a need of the masses.

Once, war was the health of the state. Now it is fear of disease. What lies ahead is not the apparent coziness of a benevolent comprehensive welfare state with a guaranteed minimum income and healthcare and education for all. The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come: a permanent state of fear, strict behavioral control, massive loss of jobs, and growing dependence on the state.

With the measures taken in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, a big step to reset the global economy has been made. Without popular resistance, the end of the pandemic will not mean the end of the lockdown and social distancing. At the moment, however, the opponents of the new world order of digital tyranny still have access to the media and platforms to dissent. Yet the time is running out. The perpetrators of the new world order have smelled blood. Declaring the coronavirus a pandemic has come in handy to promote the agenda of their Great Reset. Only massive opposition can slow down and finally stop the extension of the power grip of the tyrannical technocracy that is on the rise

THE CORONHOAX AS FALSE REALITY

In the lightning flash of a crack in the curtain of the magician’s chamber, we have Minister of Propaganda himself, Karl Rove, chiding a pesky reporter (Ron Susskind):

"We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do".

“No one has died from the coronavirus”Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association

Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett

Ahigh-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

He added that:

What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

Another revelation of his is that:

“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)

Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.

Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.

We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”

In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.

Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”

We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:

We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.

Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?

We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.

It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)

Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly

Where is the ACLU? While I was writing this paper, a judge in Illinois threw out the Governor's covid orders as unconstitutional. See addendum for more. http://mileswmathis.com/aclu.pdf

"That's what this Corona test was about, remember? The Phoenicians wanted to see just how far gone

you are. So they decided to manufacture a huge fiction, then hit you with a bunch of ridiculous orders

to accompany it. It was like the one-dollar bet in Trading Places. One old rich guy bet another one

that he could get everyone in the world to wear a surgeon's mask, without even passing a law. He

would just order the governors to tell people to do it. And they did. With no law passed, no coercion,

no gun to anyone's head, no troops on the streets.


It reminds me of the old “If someone told you to jump off a cliff, would you do it?” The Phoenicians

are testing how close they are to having that power. Because a whole lot of people have just jumped

off that cliff, with little or no coercion. That cliff is personal bankruptcy, and millions of people just

jumped, with no gun to their head, no law passed, no fine accessed, no cop at the door, no troops on the

streets. The entire world has just been robbed in broad daylight, and the victim just handed over his

purse with no struggle, no questions asked, and no use of force. All the victim had to do was say no,

but he wasn't up to it".


Addendum July 3: "As it turns out, even as I was writing this, a court ruling was being reported in the

mainstream press in Illinois, where a Circuit Court has thrown out the Governor's executive orders on

Covid as null and void, and also as grossly unconstitutional. Confirming what I say about Covid

above. The ACLU was not involved in the suit. It was brought by State Representative Darren Bailey,

but applies to all citizens of Illinois. Despite that, the Chicago Tribune and other mainstream media

outlets are reporting today that all these voided orders will be enforced during the July 4 holiday. In

other words, the fascists are simply ignoring this judge's ruling, pretending it didn't just happen. Which

is again grossly illegal and unconstitutional. The Tribune says, Mayor [of Chicago] Lori Lightfoot had a sharp

warning for bars and restaurants that do not follow the guidelines. “If you squander this opportunity, we will shut

you down and you will not reopen anytime soon,” the mayor told holders of liquor licenses during a conference call

this week.


Like Governor Pritzker, this Mayor Lightfoot seems to have a poor understanding of the law, and of the

English language. She apparently can't read a simple ruling from a judge. Her threat is null and void,

and she has just opened herself up to a lawsuit for harassment and Civil Right violations, as has the

Chicago Tribune. Citizens of Illinois should not only mob the parks and beaches, ignoring all social

distancing rules, all businesses should immediately reopen, including bars. Anyone arrested or hassled

in any way by police should sue the city, the state, and the Chicago Tribune. Harassing citizens with

illegal orders by spreading fear is highly illegal itself, being the very definition of Civil Rights

violations. Your primary right as a US citizen is to be free of illegal orders. The government

threatening you with bankruptcy or other violence is harassment, pure and simple, and whether or not

you are actually arrested is beside the point. You have already been harassed simply by listening to

these empty threats from the Governor, the Mayor, and the media. Just by reading the newspaper or

the story on the internet, you have standing for a lawsuit, since you have thereby been harassed by your

government.


Actually, on closer reading, it appears the Mayor's “sharp warning” came before the court ruling, which

may mean it is only the Chicago Tribune spreading confusion, fear, and misinformation on purpose.

That paper is publishing this sharp warning after they have published the court ruling, so they should

know the sharp warning is null. But they are pretending not to know that, and hoping you don't notice.

As more indication of that, we see that the paper has lifted the paywall on this article, hoping it will be

read by as many as possible, and that they will mistakenly believe Mayor Lightfoot's sharp warning is

still in effect".

Virology is a carefully cloaked, sophisticated pseudoscience that covers the poisonous tracks of industry and modern medicine by turning their toxic legacy into the fiction of infectious disease. Nature is to blame.

By Bionic Mosquito

May 8, 2020

  • We know that the original model from Neil Ferguson of Imperial College was wildly wrong.

  • We know that the number of deaths in Sweden were an infinitesimal fraction of what the model would have predicted given Sweden’s relative do-nothing policy

  • We know that models from Neil Ferguson in the past were also always wildly wrong.

  • We know that massive funding from the Gates Foundation goes to Imperial College.

  • We know that original estimates of the number of deaths that would be attributable to the corona were greatly overstated.

  • We know that even the reported number of deaths (the numerator) attributed to the corona are overstated – my guess from what I have read, by a factor of two or three. This is because people who die with the corona (and even for this, they can’t or don’t really test) is not the same thing as people who die due to the corona. Yet all are counted as victims of the corona.

  • We know that the number infected (the denominator) is wildly understated – some estimates, by as much as 50 to 80 times, maybe more.

  • We therefore know that much more of the population has already been exposed, with no meaningful or debilitating symptoms.

  • We know that there were many in the medical community that were making such points as the above before all of the hysteria. This isn’t a matter of 20/20 hindsight.

  • We know that a large portion of global medical funding comes from the Gates Foundation, which stands to profit substantially from disease-induced panic.

  • We also know that the initial reaction of many medical experts was that this corona would present something a little more or a little less than another cold and flu season.

  • We know that something caused them to change their minds.

  • We know that the “reaction” to this corona has offered a pretext to bail out the financial system – with efforts that dwarf what was done in 2008.

  • We know that now that these floodgates have been opened, only collapse will bring the current system to its just end.

  • We know this will harm the innocent, not the guilty.

  • We know that there is some meaningful portion of the population that isn’t buying any of this: witness the beaches and other public spaces being occupied for leisure.

  • We don’t know how large or small this portion is.

Conclusion

None really. Maybe show your disdain in any way that works for you.

Maybe, come November, assuming that there is an election, vote for any candidate from any party other than the republicans or democrats. I mean any party. And don’t vote for any republican or democrat. None.

It won’t really matter, but it might be fun.

Reprinted with permission from Bionic Mosquito.


They named it COVID19. Our leaders of world health predicted millions would die. The National Guard was deployed. Makeshift hospitals were erected to care for a massive overflow of patients. Mass graves were dug. Terrifying news reports had people everywhere seeking shelter to avoid contact. The plan was unfolding with diabolical precision, but the masters of the Pandemic underestimated one thing… the people. Medical professionals and every-day citizens are sharing critical information online. The overlords of big tech have ordered all dissenting voices to be silenced and banned, but they are too late. The slumbering masses are awake and aware that something is not right. Quarantine has provided the missing element: time. Suddenly, our overworked citizenry has ample time to research and investigate for themselves. Once you see, you can’t unsee.

laurencesaid:May 12, 2020 at 1:54 pm CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEFOG.COM

Miles is wrong.

The challenge was not to steal our money, although they took the opportunity to milk the cash cow by the way, but to migrate our data to giant data centers. And that required shutting down global production systems. Because a data migration requires a shutdown of the Production system.


Bigdata is an ANNUAL market of $ 5,000,000,000,000, it is a recurring market and for a merchant, a recurring market is the best market possible …


And « data is new oil » … it’s funny that all of you refuse to see that …


So, I make a last attempt to open your eyes and present to you the last colossus (from Rhodes)

http://kolos.com/

Kolos, a young American-Norwegian shoot, is building what is presented as the largest datacenter in the world in Ballangen, a small town located in northern Norway, beyond the Arctic Circle, at 68 ° latitude.

The installation will span 600,000 m2 distributed in four buildings built on the edge of a lake. Once completed, the site will exceed the size and capacity of the Langfang (China) data center, which totals 585,289 m2.


And I remind you that in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed are kings … hence the endless winks of celebrities …



C Staytonsaid:May 13, 2020 at 2:08 pm CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEFOG.COM

I’ve heard many dismiss the claim that Covid is primarily about the bankers raiding the treasury, saying “the Fed can just print as much money for themselves as they want.” This isn’t really true. Yes, they have the monopoly on money creation, both print and digital, but they are still bound by nature’s laws, including economic laws. Wealth creation cannot occur ex nihilo. If they whipped up $50 trillion on their own electronic ledgers and funneled it directly into their personal accounts, it wouldn’t make a difference, because there simply aren’t enough goods and services in the world for them to buy. Even if there were, there are only so many mansions and yachts you can own before it gets tiresome. And if they somehow managed to spend that $50 trillion, the cost of everything would steadily rise, because prices rise with demand, and they would find they couldn’t buy much more with their $50 trillion than they could with their $1 trillion. Meanwhile, the massive inflation they would cause by flooding the market with that much money would completely crush the working class, since it would massively devalue the currency. The working class would go bankrupt trying to buy a loaf of bread. By the way, this kind of uncontrollable inflationary spiral happened in many countries during the Great Depression and afterwards, but the governments have always intervened, usually through a period of rationing. Why? Because the rulers know letting the value of currency drop to zero would be cutting off their own legs, not to mention it’s a surefire way to start a revolution.


Put another way, the financial economy (banking credit and interest) is always dependent on the real economy (production of goods and services). The bankers know their relationship to the real economy is parasitic. If the host dies, they die.


That said, having the most money puts them at the top of the pyramid, and they are addicted to being at the top. They are addicted to the power. These engineered booms and busts and the resulting “fiscal stimulus” are the bankers’ way of draining all the wealth that got created in the real economy since the last bust. What we will see is a massive seizure of smaller businesses by large corporations (owned by the banks) or the banks themselves. This comes straight from the horse’s mouth: Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, predicts that half of U.S. small businesses will go bankrupt as a result of the shutdowns:


https://www.investmentweek.co.uk/news/4014933/larry-fink-tells-investors-expect-cascade-bankruptcies-reports


In other words, there will be a massive consolidation of global assets and labor into the hands of the few who already own most of the world. The control wielded through vaccines and big data are a shadow of the control they will gain by simply wiping out 14 million businesses in six months. And that’s just in the U.S.


They drain the wealth not because they need it, but simply to protect their place at the top. The group they are most afraid of is the educated, self-starting upper-middle-class. They can easily deceive and disempower the uneducated lower classes, but if you have God-given talent and intellect and a few million dollars, and are part of a network of like people, you are the “natural aristocracy” that the bankers hate and fear. The bankers have tools instead of talent and cunning instead of intellect, and they can’t suffer being reminded that the genuine “nobility” are the wisest and ablest, not the richest. Beyond this, they truly are afraid of revolution, and a revolution can only ever be led by the educated gentry.

Morally Bankrupt Culture

May 13, 2020 by IWB

by Charles Hugh-Smith

What was “normal” for the past two decades was to turn a blind eye to the moral and financial bankruptcy of the American culture, the rot at the heart of its social, political and economic orders. The pandemic has shredded the putrid facade and revealed the rot, much to the dismay of the multitude of minions tasked with sanitizing the rot behind narratives promoting the normalization of predation, fraud and exploitation.

What’s been absolutely verboten is to call legalized pillage and predation what they really are: evil. We’ve normalized exploitation and predation by the usual means: denial, legal justifications, making excuses for the predators and the system that defends predation, and by erasing the memory of a time when moral bankruptcy, predation and institutionalized fraud were not yet normalized.

People have always been self-absorbed and greedy, so goes the excuse; or, greed is good because that’s the magic of the invisible hand at work.

By stripping fraud and predation of moral consequence, we’ve covered the putrid rot with a thoroughly modern amorality which we can summarize as anything goes and winner takes all. Monopoly, quasi-monopoly and cartels (i.e. Warren Buffett’s entire portfolio) are presented as the natural order of things rather than an evil construct of predation and exploitation that benefits the few at the expense of the many.

Nothing outrages the apologists and the lackeys enriching themselves in the dens of thieves more than accusations of evil, or indeed, anything smacking of moral standards or judgments. Anything goes not just for individual choices, but for capital’s choices as well, and so it’s simply not PC to question the morality of capital’s predations.

As for winner takes all, this legalized looting is presented as a form of economic Darwinism that is nothing but the healthy manifestation of a free market. This is the Devil’s handiwork, of course, presenting legalized looting that only benefits the few as the inevitable result of open markets.

The greater the outrage of the technocrats and monopolists at being called what they are–evil–the greater the confirmation that the accusation is spot-on. The predators, looters and exploiters must strip away any moral assessment of their actions, as even the smallest shred of moral or karmic justice threatens their empires. And so economics has been reduced to bloodless quantifications of profits, costs and sales and obfuscatory mathematics designed to drain the risk of moral consequences from the parasitic pillage.

THE DOG BILL OF RIGHTS If you take your dog to the vet to have him vaccinated (or worst) you do not need the dog’s consent. That is because under the law the dog is PERSONAL property Mandatory vaccination goes under the same property rights. Ownership of humans took place during the system of slavery. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT MANDATORY VACCINATION MEANS. Slavery was MADE ILLEGAL ON January 31, 1865

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/05/jon-rappoport/the-pandemic-pattern-how-the-illusion-is-built/

The Pandemic Pattern—How the Illusion Is Built

By Jon Rappoport

May 30, 2020

This article is based on my study and investigation of so-called epidemics over the past 30 years.

In the case of COVID-19, I’ve written at least one piece covering, in detail, each main element of the illusion. Here, I’m laying out the pattern. It is the same for each fake epidemic.

ONE: A structure is in place to promote and launch the IDEA of an epidemic. World Health Organization, CDC, influential public health officials attached to governments around the world, etc.

TWO: There is a purported incident. An outbreak. The most obvious cause is intentionally overlooked. For example, horrendous air pollution, or the grotesque feces and urine pollution on a giant commercial pig factory-farm. Instead, the world is told a new virus has been found. Local researchers, if any, are augmented by researchers from CDC, WHO.

THREE: There is no air-tight chain of evidence explaining exactly how the purported new virus was discovered. From details released, there is no proof of discovery by convincing methods, no proper unified study of MANY supposed epidemic patients.

FOUR: But WHO/CDC tells the world this is an epidemic in the making, caused by the new virus. The promotion and propaganda/media apparatus moves into high gear. Ominous pronouncements.

FIVE: Diagnostic tests for the unproven new virus are rolled out. They spit out false “proof” of “infection” like coins from a jackpot slot machine.

SIX: Thus, all case numbers and death numbers, which are based on the tests, are rendered meaningless. And…they were already meaningless, because the supposed new virus “being tested for” was never properly discovered in the first place.

SEVEN: Nevertheless, these tests (plus useless eyeball diagnosis) are used to build official reports on case numbers. For the duration of the “epidemic,” reports keep coming, and escalating numbers are trumpeted. Within the basically meaningless structure of these reports, there is fiddling with totals, to make them even more impressive and frightening.

EIGHT: Real people are really getting sick and dying, but for the most part, they are people who are dying from traditional and long-standing conditions—flu-like illness, pneumonia, other lung infections, etc. These people are “re-packaged” under the new epidemic label—Swine Flu, COVID, etc. The official description of the “new epidemic disease”—the clinical symptoms—is sufficiently general to easily allow this re-packaging.

NINE: If there is new illness, it can be explained by causes having nothing to do with the purported new virus. For example, a toxic vaccine campaign. A highly destructive drug. Highly toxic pesticides.

TEN: Over time, the definition of the epidemic is arbitrarily widened to include more symptoms and clinical features, in order to inflate case numbers.

ELEVEN: Control of information about the “epidemic” is hardened at the top. The talking heads, from the press and public health agencies, know as much about actual science as rabbits know about drone strikes. But they are “in charge.” Dissident information is attacked and censored.

TWELVE: Medical drugs used to treat patients are toxic. If a vaccine is rolled out, it, too, is toxic. Illness and death resulting from these and other medical attacks are counted as “epidemic cases caused by the virus.”

THIRTEEN: ABOVE ALL OTHER ILLUSIONS, the main deception is: “the epidemic is one disease or syndrome caused by one germ.” This is sold with unceasing propaganda. Most people fall for it. They will even argue among themselves about which “it” is the single cause of the “it” disease. There is no “it” cause or disease.

FOURTEEN: The public is sold lie after lie about contagion and the “spread” of the “it.”

FIFTEEN: The public chants (as if no one has ever died before), “People are dying, it must be the virus.”

SIXTEEN: The virus fairy tale always functions as a cover story for government or corporate or medical crimes. It obscures and hides these crimes. For example, a large factory is spewing horrendous pollution into the ground and water of an area, and people are getting sick and dying? No, the cause is actually a new virus no one has ever seen before.

As I wrote at the outset of the COVID illusion, the only difference this time, in 2020, is the weight of the lies—because they led to the lockdowns and the economic devastation. This is West Nile, SARS, Swine Flu, Zika, writ large.

Needless to say, the persons and groups responsible for launching these illusion-operations must hide their crimes.

The criminals have their weapons, of course. Among their most powerful: control of the press, and arcane technical language which pretends to relevance. This language is so dense, the uninitiated stand no chance of penetrating it.

For instance, researchers can babble for hours about their vaunted diagnostic test, the PCR. However, the simple truth is, a crucial piece of the test has never been vetted. The test has never been tested in the real world outside the lab.

I have written about this extensively. Using a little guideline called SCIENCE, you would “test the test” by lining up, say, a thousand patients, some healthy, some sick from a supposed virus. Any virus. Tissue samples would be taken from each patient.

PCR mavens would run these samples through their equipment, reporting which patients show what they call high “viral load.”

This means: these particular patients have millions and millions of virus actively replicating in their bodies, and they will be unmistakably and visibly sick.

The PCR princes would then announce, “Patients 3,45,65,76,132…are all definitely sick.”

Now we un-blind the study and see what’s what and who’s who. Are these designated patients ill or are they running marathons? That’s called simple scientific method. Not technical gobbledygook.

This chunk of research has never been done. It never will be done. It’s too real. Too naked. Proponents of the PCR would have too much to lose, if their assessments of who are healthy and who are sick turned out to be absurdly wrong, and their arcane technical rhetoric about the PCR ended up being useless gibberish.

I include this illustration to indicate there are, indeed, ways of exposing professional liars, if you change the venue on them, if you use common sense, if you stand outside their self-appointed temples of mystical horseshit and observe what their lies look like when you boil them down to human terms…

TRUTH AND LIES ABOUT TV VIRUS DUBBED COVID-19

https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2020/05/17/truth-and-lies-about-tv-virus-dubbed-covid-19/

Posted on 17/05/2020 by Vexman

In the world of science, following logic is an absolute mandatory. In fact, logic ought to be applied and used in every second of one’s life and thought process, not just in the field of science, but in general. I find such excercise amusing and it forces me to evaluate all different angles before choosing one I am about to follow. You may be wondering why I am writing any of this since we all know that. So here it is, in short: what happened to people that forced them to drop logic and critical thinking process? Was it because of fear? Or was it anxiety that appeared as that tickling sensation within their skulls, giving them a feeling their brains have just demonstrated signs of true intelligence, so they swore never to use logic again? Or was it, perhaps, due to the ugly truth discovered which caused cognitive dissonance so strong, it forced them to swear never to think hard again, no matter what? The definite answer is beyond my understanding, which is driving me to try grasp it as a general phenomenon of human society.

So let’s take a closer look at the most recent panic, driven into another mass psychosis and dubbed Covid-19. Here is the most important question you need to ask yourself before you choose to accept another belief: what is the basic procedure or method of identifying a new virus?

RULE #1: If you want to be sure what is in your test tube, you need to isolate and purify your sample. Why? So such sample would contain only what you are looking at. How else would you know what is being observed? Keep in mind all of world’s scientists agree on this simple rule, all of them.

Was this rule ever applied to Covid-19? No, it was never applied to it. No one in this world claims to have isolated and purified the virus dubbed Covid-19. Not a single person has managed to do it. Let that sink in really well. The very same goes for the HIV virus – it was never purified and isolated, which is even admitted by HIV’s “discoverer” Luc Montagnier. The very same is true in the case commonly known as measles virus, proven in Germany’s court of law as not scientifically proven, i.e. it doesn’t exist in the form it was sold to us. You can research and read about it yourself, as much as I did, with many posts written here at my blog containing numerous links for further reading and insightful comments from other informed readers.

Therefore, all claims saying to have identified Covid-19 in humans and/or animals are lies, that those pushing them know are lies. You might wonder what do their tests actually identify, but it does not matter, since rule #1 was never applied to their test tubes, which renders all their results and conclusions meaningless.

You don’t have to be an expert in molecular biology or virology to be able to grasp the above mentioned rule. They have set it themselves and named it “the gold standard”, yet they have failed in applying it to their own identification procedures. What it means is this: they are spreading false information about everything – the new virus, its characteristics, deaths related to it, number of cases, treatments, vaccines and everything else related.

All this poses a few important questions: if PTB are lying about all of this, what else are they lying about? How come they are not affraid of us since they know we know they are lying through their teeth?

An answer to this, which makes sense, is that they are not worried about people who are incapable of a rational thought, who are unable to use logic and think critically. They have been working for centuries to provide education based on flawed scientific theories and consequently miseducating people, thus driving people into poverty in order to limit the number of “thinkers” so strongly that, apparently, the remaining thinkers do not pose a threat.

That could be a depressing conclusion, but do not let it overwhelm your thoughts. If you are one of those individuals able to use logic and critical thinking process to see through the lies, you have no time to let dispair into your life. There is an important task you need to start or keep doing – talk to your closest family members and friends and try to open their eyes and minds to rational thought. Disobey distancing rules and stop wearing a mask until they see reason in it. It will be hard and you will be met with strong feelings, but don’t let it stop you. The muses of all the good spirits are with you in this and it is important not to succumb to dispair or hopelessness. Unity of the common people, armed with real knowledge, is their worst nightmare.


The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine

May 27, 2020


"What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." ~ William Shakespeare


By Catherine Austin Fitts


I am not a scientist. I am not a doctor. I am not a biotech engineer. I am not an attorney. However, I read, listen, appreciate, and try to understand those who are.


I was an investment banker until politics made it impossible to continue to practice my art. I was trained as a portfolio strategist—so I map my world by watching the financial flows and allocation of resources. I was also trained as a conspiracy generator and foot soldier—conspiracies being the fundamental organizing principle of how things get done in our world. It was not until I left the establishment that I learned that those not in the club had been trained to disparage and avoid conspiracies—a clever trick that sabotages their efforts to gather power.


My response to living at war with agencies of the U.S. government for a time was to answer the questions of people who were sufficiently courageous and curious to solicit my opinion. Over many years, that response transformed into two businesses. One was The Solari Report, which continues to grow as a global intelligence network—we seek to help each other understand and navigate what is happening and contribute to positive outcomes. The other was serving as an investment advisor to individuals and families through Solari Investment Advisory Services. After ten years, I converted that business to doing an ESG screen. What those who use it want—that is not otherwise readily available in the retail market—is a screen that reflects knowledge of financial and political corruption. Tracking the metastasizing corruption is an art, not a science.


When you help a family with their finances, it is imperative to understand all their risk issues. Their financial success depends on successful mitigation of all the risks—whether financial or non-financial—that they encounter in their daily lives. Non-financial risks can have a major impact on the allocation of family resources, including attention, time, assets, and money.


Many of my clients and their children had been devastated and drained by health care failures and corruption—and the most common catalyst for this devastation was vaccine death and injury. After their lengthy and horrendous experiences with the health care establishment, they would invariably ask, "If the corruption is this bad in medicine, food, and health, what is going on in the financial world?" Chilled by the thought, they would search out a financial professional who was schooled in U.S. government and financial corruption. And they would find me.


The result of this flow of bright, educated people blessed with the resources to pay for my time was that, for ten years, I got quite an education about the disabilities and death inflicted on our children by what I now call "the great poisoning." I had the opportunity to repeatedly price out the human damage to all concerned—not just the affected children but their parents, siblings, and future generations—mapping the financial costs of vaccine injury again and again and again. These cases were not as unusual as you might expect. Studies indicate that 54% of American children have one or more chronic diseases. Doctors who I trust tell me that number is actually much higher, as many children and their families cannot afford the care and testing necessary to properly diagnose what ails them.


One of the mothers featured in VAXXED—a must-watch documentary for any awake citizen, as is its sequel VAXXED II: The People's Truth—estimated that a heavily autistic child would cost present value $5MM to raise and care for over a lifetime. When my clients who were grandparents insisted that they would not interfere with their children's vaccine choices because it was "none of their business," I would say, "Really? Who has the $5MM? You or your kids? When your kids need the $5MM to raise their vaccine-injured child, are you going to refuse them? You are the banker, and it is your money that is at risk here, so it is your business. Do you want to spend that $5MM on growing a strong family through the generations or on managing a disabled child who did not have to be disabled?" Often, that $5MM in expenditures also translates into divorce, depression, and lost opportunities for siblings.


My clients helped me find the best resources—books, documentaries, articles—on vaccines. You will find many of them linked or reviewed at The Solari Report, including in our Library.


Of all the questions that I had, the one that I spent the most time researching and thinking about was why. Why was the medical establishment intentionally poisoning generations of children? Many of the writers who researched and wrote about vaccine injury and death assumed it was an aberration—resulting from the orthodoxy of a medical establishment that could not face or deal with its mistakes and liabilities. That never made sense to me. Writings by Forrest Maready, Jon Rappoport, Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Arthur Firstenberg have helped me understand the role of vaccines in the con man trick of saving money for insurance companies and the legally liable.


Here is one example of how the trick may play out. A toxin creates a disease. The toxin might be pesticides or industrial pollution or wireless technology radiation. The toxin damages millions of people and their communities. Companies or their insurance provider may be liable for civil or criminal violations. Then a virus is blamed. A "cure" is found in a "vaccine." The pesticide or other toxic exposure is halted just as the vaccine is introduced, and presto, the sickness goes away. The vaccine is declared a success, and the inventor is declared a hero. A potential financial catastrophe has been converted to a profit, including for investors and pension funds. As a portfolio strategist, I admit it has been a brilliant trick and likely has protected the insurance industry from the bankrupting losses it would experience if it had to fairly compensate the people and families destroyed.


Thanks to the work of Robert Kennedy and Mary Holland of Children's Health Defense, I now understand the enormous profits generated by so-called "vaccines" subsequent to the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—a federal no-fault mechanism for compensating vaccine-related injuries or deaths by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters. Call a drug or biotech cocktail a "vaccine," and pharmaceutical and biotech companies are free from any liabilities—the taxpayer pays. Unfortunately, this system has become an open invitation to make billions from "injectibles," particularly where government regulations and laws can be used to create a guaranteed market through mandates. As government agencies and legislators as well as the corporate media have developed various schemes to participate in the billions of profits, significant conflicts of interest have resulted.


The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA or the PREP Act) became law in 2005, adding to corporate freedoms from liability. The Act "is a controversial tort liability shield intended to protect vaccine manufacturers from financial risk in the event of a declared public health emergency. The act specifically affords to drug makers immunity from potential financial liability for clinical trials of . . . vaccine at the discretion of the Executive branch of government. PREPA strengthens and consolidates the oversight of litigation against pharmaceutical companies under the purview of the secretary of Health and Human Services." (~ Wikipedia)


Over time, this has evolved to the engineering of epidemics—the medical version of false flags. In theory, these can be "psyops" or events engineered with chemical warfare, biowarfare, or wireless technology. If this sounds strange, dive into all the writings of the "Targeted Individuals."


I learned about this first-hand when I was litigating with the Department of Justice and was experiencing significant physical harassment. I tried to hire several security firms; they would check my references and then decline the work, saying it was too dangerous. The last one took pity and warned me not to worry about electronic weaponry, letting me know that my main problem would be low-grade biowarfare. This biowarfare expert predicted that the opposing team would drill holes in the wall of my house and inject the "invisible enemy." Sure enough, that is exactly what happened. I sold my house and left town. That journey began a long process of learning how poisoning and nonlethal weapons are used—whether to move people out of rent-controlled apartments, sicken the elderly to move them to more expensive government-subsidized housing, gangstalk political or business targets, or weaken or kill litigants—and the list goes on. Poisoning turned out to be a much more common tactic in the game of political and economic warfare in America than I had previously understood.


After I finished my litigation, I spent several years detoxing from heavy metal toxicity—including from lead, arsenic, and aluminum. As I drove around America, I realized it was not just me. Americans increasingly looked like a people struggling with high loads of heavy metals toxicity. In the process of significantly decreasing my unusually high levels of heavy metals, I learned what a difference the toxic load had made to my outlook, my energy, and my ability to handle complex information.


This brings me to the question of what exactly a vaccine is and what exactly is in the concoctions being injected into people today as well as the witches' brews currently under development.


In 2017, Italian researchers reviewed the ingredients of 44 types of so-called "vaccines." They discovered heavy metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine they tested. The researchers stated, "The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us." They then drew the obvious conclusion, namely, that because the micro- and nanocontaminants were "neither biocompatible nor biodegradable," they were "biopersistent" and could cause inflammatory effects right away—or later (http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf)


Aborted fetal tissue, animal tissue, aluminum, mercury, genetically altered materials—and what else?


Whatever the ingredients of vaccines have been to date, nothing is more bizarre and unsettling than the proposals of what might be included in them in the future. Strategies—already well-funded and well on the way—include brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, and technology with an expiration date that can be managed and turned off remotely. One report indicates that the Danish government and U.S. Navy had been paying a tech company in Denmark to make an injectible chip that would be compatible with one of the leading cryptocurrencies.


I was recently reading Mary Holland's excellent 2012 review of U.S. vaccine court decisions ("Compulsory vaccination, the Constitution, and the hepatitis B mandate for infants and young children," Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics) and I froze and thought, "Why are we calling the injectibles that Bill Gates and his colleagues are promoting 'vaccines'? Are they really vaccines?"


Most people are familiar with how Bill Gates made and kept his fortune. He acquired an operating system that was loaded into your computer. It was widely rumored that the U.S. intelligence agencies had a back door. The simultaneous and sudden explosion of computer viruses then made it necessary to regularly update your operating system, allowing Gates and his associates to regularly add whatever they wanted into your software. One of my more knowledgeable software developers once said to me in the 1990s—when Microsoft really took off—"Microsoft makes really sh***y software." But of course, the software was not really their business. Their business was accessing and aggregating all of your data. Surveillance capitalism was underway.


The Department of Justice launched an antitrust case against Microsoft in 1998, just as the $21 trillion started to disappear from the U.S. government—no doubt with the help of specially designed software and IT systems. During the settlement negotiations that permitted Gates to keep his fortune, he started the Gates Foundation and his new philanthropy career. I laughed the other day when my tweet of one of Robert Kennedy Jr.'s articles from Children's Health Defense—describing the gruesome technology Gates is hoping to roll out through "injectibles"—inspired a response: "Well, I guess he is finally fulfilling his side of his antitrust settlement."


If you look at what is being created and proposed in the way of injectibles, it looks to me like these technological developments are organized around several potential goals.


The first and most important goal is the replacement of the existing U.S. dollar currency system used by the general population with a digital transaction system that can be combined with digital identification and tracking. The goal is to end currencies as we know them and replace them with an embedded credit card system that can be integrated with various forms of control, potentially including mind control. "De-dollarization" is threatening the dollar global reserve system. The M1 and M2 money supply have increased in the double digits over the last year as a result of a new round of quantitative easing by the Fed. The reason we have not entered into hyperinflation is because of the dramatic drop in money velocity occasioned by converting Covid-19 into an engineered shutdown of significant economic activity and the bankrupting of millions of small and medium-sized businesses. The managers of the dollar system are under urgent pressure to use new technology to centralize economic flows and preserve their control of the financial system.


Just as Gates installed an operating system in our computers, now the vision is to install an operating system in our bodies and use "viruses" to mandate an initial installation followed by regular updates.


Now I appreciate why Gates and his colleagues want to call these technologies "vaccines." If they can persuade the body politic that injectible credit cards or injectible surveillance trackers or injectable brain-machine interface nanotechnologies are "vaccines," then they can enjoy the protection of a century or more of legal decisions and laws that support their efforts to mandate what they want to do. As well, they can insist that U.S. taxpayers fund, through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the damages for which they would otherwise be liable as a result of their experiments—and violations of the Nuremberg Code and numerous civil and criminal laws—on the general population. The scheme is quite clever. Get the general population to go along with defining their new injectible high-tech concoctions as "vaccines," and they can slip them right into the vaccine pipeline. No need to worry about the disease and death that will result from something this unnatural delivered this quickly. The freedom from liability guaranteed by the PREP Act through the declaration of an emergency—and the ability to keep the emergency going through contact tracing—can protect them from liability for thousands if not millions of deaths and disabilities likely to follow such human experimentation. Ideally, they can just blame the deaths on a virus.


A colleague once told me how Webster's Dictionary came about. Webster said that the way the evildoers would change the Constitution was not by amending it but by changing the definitions—a legal sneak attack.


I believe that Gates and the pharma and biotech industries are literally reaching to create a global control grid by installing digital interface components and hooking us up to Microsoft's new $10 billion JEDI cloud at the Department of Defense as well as Amazon's multibillion cloud contract for the CIA that is shared with all U.S. intelligence agencies. Why do you think President Trump has the military organizing to stockpile syringes for vaccines? It is likely because the military is installing the roaming operating system for integration into their cloud. Remember—the winner in the AI superpower race is the AI system with access to the most data. Accessing your body and my body on a 24/7 basis generates a lot of data. If the Chinese do it, the Americans will want to do it, too. In fact, the rollout of human "operating systems" may be one of the reasons why the competition around Huawei and 5G telecommunications has become so fractious. As Frank Clegg, former President of Microsoft Canada has warned us, 5G was developed by the Israelis for crowd control.


In the face of global "de-dollarization," this is how the dollar syndicate can assert the central control it needs to maintain and extend its global reserve currency financial power. This includes protecting its leadership from the civil and criminal liability related to explosive levels of financial and health care fraud in recent decades.


Which brings me back to you and me. Why are we calling these formulations "vaccines"? If I understand the history of case law, vaccines, in legal terms, are medicine. Intentional heavy metal poisoning is not medicine. Injectible surveillance components are not medicine. Injectible credit cards are not medicine. An injectible brain-machine interface is not a medicine. Legal and financial immunity for insurance companies does not create human immunity from disease.


We need to stop allowing these concoctions to be referred to by a word that the courts and the general population define and treat as medicine and protect from legal and financial liability.


The perpetrators of this fraud are trying a very neat trick—one that will help them go much faster and cancel out a lot of risk—at our expense. I understand why they are doing it.


What I don't understand is why we are helping them. Why are we acquiescing in calling these bizarre and deeply dangerous concoctions "vaccines"? Whatever they are, they are not medicine.


So, what shall our naming convention be? What name shall we give to the relevant poisons, neurologically damaging metals, and digital shackles?


Whatever we call them, I know one thing. THEY ARE NOT MEDICINE, WHICH MEANS THEY SURE ARE NOT VACCINES.

Sloppy virology https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/05/25/sloppy-virology/#more-86102

Beneath the fold is a transcription of a video by Dr. Andy Kaufman that I thought important enough to pass on to readers. It is called “The Rooster in the River of Rats,” a string of words that will get you to the video even if YouTube censors it. I have faithfully recorded the words, eliminating interjections and speech habits that we all have that distract from the message. What follows is, in my opinion, faithful to his thoughts.


The most important part of this transcription is the last part in which he analyzes the manner in which the original SARS-CoV (2003) was(n’t) purified before gene sequencing, so that whatever was sequenced could be anything. It was helpful in analyzing a paper forwarded to me by a bacteriologist.


The paper, by Kim, Chung et al called Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with Covid-19 was presented to me has having “isolated, purified, and sequenced” the virus. It’s a short paper, mercifully, and mostly accessible to non-scientists. In it I found no evidence that they did anything more than isolate and sequence a virus, no purification, no proof of filterability.* They then found that the sequence matched the SARS-CoV-2 virus to the degree of 99.5%. They noted that the same RNA was obtained at the end of the process that they had put in at the beginning, but in greater quantity.” (See footnote 1.) (By the way, the virus said to be flying around today is labeled SARS-CoV-2. “Covid-19” is the disease it is said to cause.)


However, I invite more scientifically grounded opinions. (Seek and ye shall find. See footnote 1.) I am, after all, but a retired CPA. (I also note that they used the RT-PCR to amplify their results X40, perhaps 3-5 levels above the normal use of the machine. There is a level of magnification where 100% of the population might have the sequence they are looking for.


*Thomas Rivers in 1937 attempted to modify Koch’s Postulates to accommodate viruses, making them six instead of four, which are: isolate, cultivate, prove filterability, replicate in host, re-isolate, detect specific immune response. These postulates were further modified in the 1960s, adding what are in effect weasel words.


Henceforth, Dr. Andy Kaufman.



“Words are very important because the influence people in certain ways. Even the word virus itself comes from the Latin which means a poison or noxious substance. Just using that word itself says is something sinister and something that will damage us. So if you are thinking about it in those terms it could be something potentially very scary. Most of the procedures that have been mandated by public health officials and governments have added to the fear and concern, like all of this personal protective equipment that’s required, asking people to wear personal face and mouth covering masks out in public and to be afraid of each other, all stimulates and amplifies the fear and concern of getting sick by people. That is part of this campaign.


Koch’s Postulates were basically formulated in the late 1800s, and it is basically the proponents of germ theory – it’s their own rules for how you prove a microorganism causes a disease. They are quite common sense, they’re quite simple, there are four of them.


The first rule is that there should be a consistent set of symptoms that define the disease, and that the organism should be present in the people who have these symptoms, and not with people who are healthy.

The second rule is that they should be able to isolate that infectious agent in its pure form from people who are afflicted with the illness in question. If it’s bacteria it should be grown in a pure culture, but this may not be possible for viruses.

Number three is that you should be able to take that isolated and purified infectious agent and put it in a healthy host, and that healthy host should then come down with the same disease as the initial person that you isolated the organism from.

And then he would be able to step four isolate and purify infectious agents from hosted that you infected and made sick.


It seems in the world of viruses that they generally tend not to pay too much attention [to Koch’s Postulates]. There are variations to Koch’s Postulates that have been applied to viruses. They adapted a paper from [Thomas] Rivers from 1937. He basically said that Koch’s Postulates were too difficult to prove in viruses so that we should make them easier so that we can prove those in viruses. … I think this is something that can be easily ignored if you want to merely say that an infectious organism is causing a disease, but if you want to prove it I don’t see how you can ignore those. For instance, how could a disease be caused by a microorganism if that microorganism is present in people who are both healthy and sick?


[About the PCR and amplification] … I think an easy way to understand that is just go to your stereo and turn the volume way way up. What you’ll notice is you’ll start hearing some noise in the signal. What you’re doing is increasing the amplification, and when you increase the amplification you’re also increasing the signal and also the noise. If you amplify it enough you could misinterpret the noise for a signal.


But I don’t think that’s the most important problem with the test. What I think is most problematic is how they obtained the genetic sequence in the first place. What they did was, they had some people who seem to have a respiratory illness. They did a procedure where they put a fiber optic scope down their throats into their lung into the bronchi … and a squirt some fluid in there and they stirred it around and suck it back up. It’s going to have a mixture of many things. It’s going to have cells from your lung, cells from your immune system, cells from the microorganisms that normally live in your body such as bacteria and fungi. It’s also going to have free genetic material that’s been shown to be present in lung RNA, and there may be, if the person has the disease, exosomes. These are small particles that your cells secrete, more so during an acute infectious process. They have a signaling and other functions that actually help you fight the disease.


With all those sources of genetic material, the way they prepared the sample – they just took that lung fluid. They didn’t do any purification steps. They mixed it with an enzyme to dissolve the membrane so that anything inside of a cell membrane would be released. Then they had various probes and did genetic assays, including PCR. They found a sequence and then they sequenced that, and then what they did to say that it was a coronavirus was to compare the sequence of SARS-Cov-1, the 2003 virus.


And by the way, [SARS-Cov-2 was] actually found out by the same exact procedure. So in order to determine that these two were related, they said there was 79.6% sequence identity between the two samples. Just for frame of reference, between humans and chimpanzees, there is 96% sequence identity. So we are more closely related to chimpanzees than these two sequences are related to each other. And it is more pronounced than that. These sequences only have a few tens of thousands of base pairs. The amount of base pairs in human genomes is orders of magnitude higher. So we are talking about two sequences that you cannot really even say are related and that you don’t even know what the source of the RNA was.


So developing a test for the RNA, you really have no idea what you testing for even if the test is 100% accurate.”


Footnote 1: Seek and ye shall find. This is a summary of the findings of this very paper from David Crowe in a chapter titled Isolation Versus Purification. In summarizing the chapter, virologists are lying when they say they have “isolated” a virus, that is, they are not being honest. Their intention is confuse terminology, as “isolation” and “purification” certainly sound like the same thing to the average non-scientist.


Here is Crowe on the specific paper I mentioned above, Identification of a Coronavirus Isolated From a Patient in Korea with COVID-19. These guys just flat-out lie.


“In a paper claiming isolation of COVID-19 virus from a patient in Korea:


Impure materials were obtained (nose and throat swabs), antibiotics were added, and then the material was cultured in vero cells with various growth stimulating substances.

Isolation was defined as “cytopathic effects” (i.e. some cells in the cell culture died).

They noted that the same RNA was obtained at the end of the process that they had put in at the beginning, but in greater quantity. However, because RT-qPCR is not reliably quantitative, this is not a supportable statement, and cannot be used as proof that a virus was replicating.

USSA CENTRAL BANKERS STOLE $7 TRILLION AFTER GOVERNMENT LOCKED PEOPLE DOWN

Mac Slavo

June 22nd, 2020

SHTFplan.com

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ussa-central-bankers-stole-7-trillion-after-government-locked-people-down_06222020


While the mainstream media focuses on which senile sycophant will be the bankers’ puppet for the next four years, the central banks are destroying what’s left of the economy and sovereignty to usher in the New World Order. The election is all just a distraction from the real enemy; the banking cabal that runs the world and has already selected the next president.


The mainstream media seems to be part of a propaganda operation that is trying to change the conversation right now from what really matters, which is that the most powerful banking cabal in the world – the people who essentially own and operate the government of the United States, the West, and most of the world. And if anyone dares to point out the New World Order is being forced on us right in front of our eyes while Donald Trump, who swore he’d “drain the swamp” is still occupying the White House, the cognitive dissonance rears its ugly head.


The truth is that Trump has only helped enrich the bankers and the elitists with the constant passage of more stimulus to cover for the central bank’s collapse. Those central bankers stole at least $7 trillion, primarily from poor people during the government-forced COVID-19 lockdown which destroyed small businesses all over the world. Poor people all over this planet are now starving while the fat cats in Washington rest easy after the printing of unlimited money for the world’s biggest wealthiest bankers. It bailed them out of their debt crisis and gave them the right to give themselves and their friends as much money as they want by printing it out of thin air and they are doing that even as we speak.


It will also be convenient to repossess all the land and building when those payments to the banks are not made later this year. The fact that people cannot see that the New World Order is progressing at a rapid rate and Donald Trump isn’t even putting speed bumps in the way is alarming, in and of itself.


This is the biggest robbery in the history of the world, and ordinary people are suffering horribly. They were locked down and they felt like they couldn’t breathe. Their economic lives have been destroyed. They feel like they couldn’t breathe.


And so then suddenly, just at the moment when they should have risen up and revolt and stormed Wall Street, stormed Washington, DC and overthrown these thieves who just conducted the biggest robbery in the history of the world, suddenly this conversation changes to race, and the ordinary working white people and black people are being turned against each other, talking about race, rather than this robbery, conducted under the premeditated pretext of a COVID pandemic which was almost certainly manufactured in a biological warfare lab, under the direction of the very bankers who have stolen six, seven or more trillion dollars based on this pandemic which they obviously plotted out in great detail ahead of time, as part of an effort for them to centralize their wealth and power to stop the rise of China by blowing up the globalized world economy that is the engine of China’s rise and to allow them to impose a top-down police state on the people of the West so they can be ready to continue to centralize and strengthen their control of the West and the world. That’s what COVID really was. And they’ve changed the conversation to race so that we don’t notice it. –ALWAGHT News


Wake up while you still can! I’ve been saying since the beginning of this nonsense that the only way to stop it is to disobey the immoral orders of government (which, at this point, is almost every single order and law passed) and make every preparation you can to leave the system. The system they set up of centralized control and power over everyone requires you to have faith in it and participate. It cannot work when people remove their compliance and leave their Matrix.


Manipulating The Masses: Edward Bernays & Why The System Needs Your Compliance


Robert Kiyosaki: What The Elites Don’t Want You To Know


They do not want you to know that all you have to do, is refuse to be ruled and refuse to participate in their scam. Will they keep trying to manufacture your compliance with fear? Yes. They could use food as a weapon, and any number of “waves” of the scamdemic to try to make you comply. But once you realize you don’t have any moral obligation to be owned or ruled, the power of the elites dwindles. Self-reliance is going to be a powerful skill in the upcoming months, and years. The more you can do on your own outside of their system, the better off you are going be.


This is a tough concept for those who have grown up in this system, and there will be others that will fight tooth and nail to protect it because they don’t know what it would be like to live a truly free life. Once you get rid of the mental barriers in the mind, however difficult it may be, you’ll see just how enslaved most Americans have allowed themselves to become.




The government is not coming to save you. They are in on it. You must realize you are the one who needs to save yourself. This is a war for your mind

Benjaminsaid:

July 3, 2020 at 4:38 am

“Most people don’t operate on raw reason or facts, but mostly on emotion and appeals to authority.”

The unfortunate truth. The other big hurdles are ego, and relationships. Think of how many friends and family members have passionate arguments about this political topic or that, about this news item or that. They will have to admit they’ve been wrong their whole life. Moreover, taking the third door will potentially alienate them from social groups. Moreover, a great many will have employment linking them either directly or indirectly to government and/or major corporations. You don’t have to be a spook to do that. To give it all up will prove an inconvenience too great for most. It takes a real independent streak to be able to recognise the facts for what they are and change your life accordingly. Being somewhat young, independent, and not politically inclined (never liked the stench) it was quite easy for me to accept the evidence, but most will have difficulty. It is not easy getting people to side with me, but good luck to you, and good on you for trying. If your mum continues to watch TV you’re really up against it. You have to first convince her the media lies constantly. So you will have to show her how. To do that she will need the patience to read a few Miles papers. Famous subjects like the Titanic paper are a good place to start. If she resists maybe try the appeal to emotion, “This means a lot to me, I’m your son/daughter, do this for me” or some such. It can be hard just to get people to read.

Main points from the Covid paper:

1) There is evidence it was planned in advance

2) It is stated by many officials from many countries that deaths can be classified as covid based on assumptions only, and/or that people dying of other conditions can be listed as covid deaths so long they were diagnosed with covid

3) Diagnosis for covid is BS, because the test cannot isolate the virus, cannot determine viral load, returns many false positives and inconsistencies, and covid itself has no unique symptoms

4) Countries in lockdown had far more cases and deaths per population than those not in lockdown, showing lockdown achieved nothing. Wealthy countries also had more cases and deaths than poor countries, showing improved medical facilities achieve nothing.


Orsen Cartesaid:

July 3, 2020 at 1:48 pm

@Philip Cox — * “I usually don’t go heavy with facts ” *

That is the correct approach. To quote Yuri Bezmenov’s observations taken from the Edward Griffin Interview in the early ’80s on ideological subversion:

“..as I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures….he will refuse to believe it. ….. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.” ………………

“They are contaminated; they are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their minds, even if you expose them to authentic information, even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words.. the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible”

Full transcript here:

https://www.eurochicago.com/2011/07/interview-with-yuri-bezmenov/

For the video, just search for “Bezmenov Interview”

Philip Coxsaid:

July 4, 2020 at 1:51 am

I remember Yuri. He got me going on the fact that the spooks main job is to lie all the time, including him here.

Yes in certain contexts the truth doesn’t matter, but the truth DOES matter at the end of the day. Plus that’s a very insidious idea he is spreading. These spooks can lie to themselves all they want but it doesn’t change reality. The process of demoralization isn’t complete nor irreversible. I’m walking proof of that.

Did you notice he is conflating truth with demoralization, while he is simultaneously trying to demoralize us?. These spook babies are all the same.


The Fake Revolution http://mileswmathis.com/blm2.pdf

by Miles Mathis

First published July 5, 2020

Things are getting so weird I thought I should pop on this page to talk you down from the tree again. I

have told you most of these things before, but they need repeating.

To prep myself for this paper, I watched a number of recent Tucker Carlson episodes, so that we have

both sides of the current manufactured uprising in our sights. We are seeing many politicians from

both parties and all levels bowing before Black Lives Matter, as well as FBI agents and police. All this

is very prominent in the news, and I don't need to list examples. If you are awake you know of it,

probably better than I do (I don't even bother to watch it, because I know it is fake). On the other side

we have a few people like Carlson, framing this as a Democrat v. Republican issue. Some of what he

is telling you is true, but mainly he is playing the other side, making sure white people are properly

astonished and threatened and diverted.

I will give you a few examples of how Carlson is spinning. As part of his job to frame this as

Democrat v. Republican, or liberal v. conservative, see his segment on how Chris Cuomo got into Yale.

It is clever in parts, and mostly true, except for one thing. He says that these rich kids of Democratic

politicians are getting byes into Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Georgetown, which is true. But it is also

true of Republican politicians. Remember George Bush, Jr.? He went to Yale, you know. Was he a

liberal Democrat? Not last time I checked. Was he a top student? You have to be kidding me. Same

for Trump, who got a bye into Wharton.** The truth is, it is the Republican party that was for decades

the party of greatest privilege, and that hasn't changed. What has changed is that the Democratic party

is now just as privileged. They are both parties of privilege, wealth, and incredible lies. They

sometimes tell the truth about one another, but they never tell the truth about themselves.

In the current blow-up, Carlson is against BLM, but that is not his main function. His main function is

to be sure the race wars are properly salted in. This will cause you to go out and buy more guns,

enriching the usual billionaire suspects in both parties, who bought out all the gun companies after 911.

It will cause you to fear your neighbors even more, giving you yet another reason to stay in the house

and make no alliances. But mostly, it will keep your eyes off the real things going on just beyond your

line of sight.

That's right, I repeat again that all these riots are being manufactured by the CIA and other agents, as a

huge diversion. Job one right now for the billionaires and trillionaires is keeping your attention away

from the gargantuan theft from the treasury that took place this spring—a theft so large it makes the

previous largest theft in 2007-8 look like a 7-11 burglary. The fake Covid scare was manufactured as

the primary cover for that theft, since they wanted you so worried about the health of yourself and your

children and old parents or grandparents you forgot to notice you had just been robbed blind again by

the same people as before. But they soon discovered they had miscalculated. Many people saw

through both scams, and the governors realized there was some danger of a real uprising against both

the theft from the treasury and the Covid hoax. So they ordered a large percentage of their agents

worldwide to drop the Covid hoax for a few weeks, and to switch to a massive fake uprising on race.

They have long had these race wars waiting in the wings for just such a time. They knew that if things

began to get testy for the bankers, they could always hide behind manufactured race wars. They have

done it many times before. That's one reason J. Edgar Hoover wanted to keep Africans here rather than

sending them back to Africa in the 1920s and 30s. Yes, he wanted to use them as cheap labor, but he

also wanted them here as a card he could always play, as now. The CIA learned from him and took

over most of his tricks in the 1960s and 70s.

Therefore, anyone not pushing your attention back to the theft from the treasury right now is

misdirecting you. Period. Anyone trying to scare you with some other storyline is diverting you. END

OF STORY. Anyone pushing BLM or Covid or #Metoo or Qanon or pedophiles or 5G or aliens or

anything else is either an agent or an idiot, and probably the former.

So you should ask yourself if this whole BLM storyline makes any sense. Why would blacks choose

this time of all times to riot in the streets? Were racial tensions especially high last year or in the early

part of this year? No. They were remarkably low. Does a pandemic lockdown seem like a good time

for the Black movement to come alive? No. Just the reverse. So the timing of this should look very

suspicious to you. Just when the governors most needed a diversion, the Black movement was there to

provide it. That's very convenient, don't you think?

Also convenient are the BLM leaders' top talking points. Why would the Black movement lead with

defunding police departments? Does that make any sense? No, none of this makes any sense, either

from the position of blacks or whites. Why would they lead with tearing down statues? Statues!? Do

you really think statues would be a top priority for blacks? If I were black and was pushing for change,

about the last thing I would be worried about is statues.

If you can't figure it out, I will tell you. This is all a script written by superwealthy whites, and it is

written to push certain buttons in the white majority. It is all about creating fear and division, and they

know what scares you and maddens you. They need easy visuals, and a Columbus statue with red paint

thrown on it is perfect for that. George Washington and Abe Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt taking a big

tumble into a vat of acid is perfect for that.

Same goes for defunding the police. No real blacks want that, since they rely on police protection as

much as you do, or more. But they need people to be afraid we are devolving into chaos, since nothing

gets the blood pumping more than that. Nothing will get your mind off the trillions they just stole from

the treasury and the shredding of the Constitution during the lockdown like the fear of race wars with

no police.

But I assure you none of that is going to happen. It is all a bluff. The chance of police being defunded

is. . . absolute zero. If anything, they will use this to increase funding of police and military. You will

be so scared by this near miss you will demand more police and more military. Just watch and see.

Nor will they outlaw guns of any kind. They always say they will, but they never do. Why? Because

this isn't about taking your guns. It is about selling you more.

I repeat, it is all fiction. You are watching a scripted and heavily funded movie. They have hired

literally tens of thousands of paid actors to fill the streets, and that includes all these BLM people, the

Antifa people, the fake cops in fake uniforms, and the thousands of CIA and FBI agents, many of them

in disguise. It includes the politicians and media people, who are just actors themselves, including

governors, mayors, congresspeople, and the talking heads on the news. It includes both Chris Cuomo

and Tucker Carlson. It includes Jacob Frey reading from scripts on the street in Minneapolis, Nancy

Pelosi kneeling in Washington, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez emoting on youtube or facebook, DC Mayor

Muriel Bowser renaming streets there, and Stacy Abrams* creating division in Atlanta. It even

includes Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and President Trump, who are also actors. They weren't

elected, they were installed by the CIA, to fill their roles. You have nothing to fear, because none of it

is real.

You will say, what do you mean it isn't real? I have seen it with my own eyes! These people are doing

things! What isn't real about it?

Well, you also saw Star Wars with your own eyes. And yes, real things were happening. Real actors

were on real sets running around and doing a lot of things. They said real words and were paid real

money (mostly). Things exploded and burned. There were crashes and loud noises. So the current

events are real in that sense. They aren't CGI (for the most part) and they aren't in front of green

screens (for the most part). They are burning down a few buildings and toppling a few statues.

But as an artist, I have news for you: a lot of those statues they are destroying aren't real. In some cases

they have brought in duplicates or fakes. It is easy to make a duplicate: you just make a mold and then

paint it to look like bronze. They do it for movies all the time. And besides, you can't harm bronze

with a little red paint or by kicking it. The paint washes right off, and this is metal: you would have to

melt it down. That isn't being done. So they can easily reinstall the statues later. They may be using

these fake events to steal the statues, but they certainly aren't destroying them. You can be sure the

bankers won't allow anything of real value to be destroyed.

So, ironically, what you most have to fear is not black people stealing your Downton Abbey collection

or your golf clubs. It is not dying of some new plague invented by Bill Gates. It is not that the police

will no longer be there to tell you bicycles don't belong on the street or to try to steal your car for

unpaid parking tickets. What you have most to fear is that you can no longer tell reality from fiction, or

a lie from the truth. And that you therefore no longer have any basis for saying no.

*Don't you find it curious this black lady's name is Abrams? That is a top Jewish name, you know. Tucker

Carlson even gives you the hint in his segment on her, joking that she will start “the world's 4th great Abrahamic

faith.”

**Wikipedia now admits it was erroneously reported in the New York Times that Trump graduated first in class

from Wharton, when in fact he didn't even make the honor roll. In 2015, Trump's attorneys threatened legal

action if either Fordham University or the New York Military Academy released his transcripts. Do you think

they would have done that if the transcripts were glowing?

Asymptomatic patients not infectious says WHO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzLHb20dFiA


https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/bam-covid-19-infection-rate-may-be-440-higher-among-children-who-received-flu-shots/

BAM! – Covid-19 infection rate may be 440% higher among children who received FLU SHOTS

July 13, 2020 by IWB

FacebookTwitterRedditEmailRSS FeedNewsletterDonate

by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) A new study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases finds that children who received inactivated influenza vaccines were 440% more likely (relative risk: 4.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-14.8) to acquire infections of respiratory viral pathogens which are not influenza. With the aggressive push for influenza immunizations now under way, the medical establishment may be setting up children to be extremely vulnerable to coronavirus infections.


Titled, “Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine,” the study is found at this link at the National Library of Medicine:

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/


The study finds that flu shots quite literally inactivate parts of the human immune system, rendering the child more vulnerable to coronavirus infections. “Being protected against influenza, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine recipients may lack temporary non-specific immunity that protected against other respiratory viruses,” the study authors write.

The study authors explain that the influenza vaccine works to prevent influenza virus infections, but at the same time it makes children more susceptible to other respiratory infections. Since the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for seasonal influenza is so low (around 0.024%, which is not a typo), and the Infection Fatality Rate of covid-19 infections is at least one order of magnitude higher, it raises the obvious question:


Would it save more lives of children to avoid administering flu shots this year and therefore reduce their vulnerability to covid-19, which has a far higher fatality rate?

The study, which was conducted in 2009, observed the outcomes of 115 children aged 6 – 16 years. The study also used a placebo group and found that placebo made “no statistically significant difference” in the risk of acute respiratory infection risk.

But children who received influenza vaccines had a much higher risk of respiratory infections.

Even more shockingly, the study also found no difference in the risk of seasonal influenza infections between those children who were vaccinated vs. those who weren’t. In other words, the influenza vaccine offered no protection against the flu, but it created increased vulnerability to other respiratory infections. (No benefits, just increased risks.) “There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of confirmed seasonal influenza infection between recipients of TIV or placebo,” the study explains.

You can see the increased number of respiratory infections in this chart. Note the “TIV” column means those children who were vaccinated with an influenza vaccine:

The conclusion is that influenza vaccines make children more susceptible to other respiratory viral infections. From the study, which took place more than a decade before the arrival of the covid-19 pandemic:

We identified a statistically significant increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infection among TIV recipients (Table 3), including significant increases in the risk of rhinovirus and coxsackie/echovirus infection, which were most frequently detected in March 2009, immediately after the peak in seasonal influenza activity in February 2009

–Faked numbers

–Media blackout of skeptics

–scientific consensus

–Insults of skeptics

–change of subject

Apparently they put the program on hyperdrive this time. In only a few months we had lies about numbers of how many people would die, Youtube and others taking down videos of people who went against WHO, governments all agreeing lockdown was the only solution (consensus), insulting of mask skeptics (with no mention of pandemic skeptics at all, which in my opinion changes the subject considerably. It always gets diverted to masks, no sides who question the reality of the pandemic given any airtime whatsoever.), and changing the subject from the virus and the lockdowns to the masks.




iftwilpsaid:

July 21, 2020 at 1:32 pm

If you go to IMDb and find the tags on a movie about viruses, for example Inferno or Contagion, you can get a chronological list of movies with a tag of “virus.” They hide the tag section completely on the mobile version of the site, but if you visit it on a computer or switch your mobile browser to view the desktop version of the site (usually a checkbox), you can find it.

When I viewed it chronologically, I found a definite increase over time of movies with a virus plot. Exponential probably, although I didn’t run the numbers. Just keep clicking through the pages. From 2000 – now, there are dozens and dozens, less in the 90s, some in the 80s, and before the 80s almost none. That proves to me in no way “official” documents ever could that Intelligence has been ramping up to this project for a while.

I was feeling generous so I made it easy for you, this link should do it:

“””—https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=virus&ref_=kw_ref_typ&sort=release_date,desc&mode=detail&page=1&title_type=movie—“””

(Remove quotes and dashes.)

The most recent 100 titles in the feature films category (not including all the other categories including straight to video releases and anything relating to television or TV movies) relating to the keyword “virus” came out since 2015 alone. That’s out of 342 listed “feature film” titles with those keywords.

100 out of 342 in the last 5 years alone. That’s almost 30%.

The next 150 titles chronologically backwards span from 2015 to about the end of 2001.

So that’s 250 out of 342, about 73.1% in the last 20 years alone.

For comparison, the next 50 titles span from 2001 all the way back to 1988, still with more weight towards the late 90s than the early 90s.

The final 42 titles span the years from 1988 back to 1931, less than 1 per year, the first one being a film called Arrowsmith, from 1931, directed by John Ford, starring Helen Hayes (who’s name I’m familiar with because of a hospital sharing the same name), with this description:

“A medical researcher is sent to a plague outbreak, where he has to decide priorities for the use of a vaccine.”

I don’t know what else to say other than picture a graph starting off low at the left in the early years, and spiking on the right at “now”. It’s not the spread of a virus, but the spread of virus-related fiction, which I dubbed in an earlier comment “infiction.”

Call it predictive programming or whatever you want. I don’t care that zombie movies are left in because zombie movies are basically related to infiction in that it makes people fear a pathogen.


https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=virus&ref_=kw_ref_typ&sort=release_date,desc&mode=detail&page=1&title_type=movie

Amanda Vollmer explains the facts and fiction behind the V word


Had it not been for the mass selling of vaccines, Pasteur’s germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity.” — E. Douglas Hume

“We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur’s vaccine, as did uncounted people later on….Only one thing is sure: ever since Pasteur developed his “vaccine,” the cases of death from rabies have increased, not diminished.” — Hans Ruesch

“In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that “Pasteur had created a new form of disease.” — The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory by Tim O’Shea

The following 6 quotations are from the book ‘Good-Bye Germ Theory’, by Dr William B Trebing:

“I have been a regular practitioner of medicine in Boston for 33 years. I have studied the question of vaccination conscientiously for 45 years. As for vaccinations as a preventative of disease, there is not a scrap of evidence in its’ favor. Injection of virus into the pure blood stream of the people does not prevent disease. Rather, it tends to increase epidemic and make the disease it is attempting to annihilate more deadly. Of this we have indisputable proof. In America cancer cancer mortality has increased from 9 cases per 100,000 to 80 cases per 100,000 or a 90% increase over the last 50 years. No conceivable thing could have caused this but the universal blood poisoning now existing in the form of vaccines…” — Dr Charles E Paser of Boston University 1989, The Poisoned Needle by Eleanor Mcbean

“…the chief, if not sole cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccinations…”

— Dr Robert Bell – Cancer specialist of the British Medical Hospital – President of the Medical Association for the Reduction and Prevention of Cancer – Vice president of the International Society of Cancer Research, member of the American Society of Progressive Physicians

“There has never been a single vaccine in this country [the USA] that has ever been submitted to a controlled scientific study. They never took a group of 100 people who were candidates for a vaccine, gave 50 of them a vaccine and left the other 50 alone to measure the outcome. And since that hasn’t been done, that means that if you want to be kind, you will call vaccines an unproven remedy. If you want to be accurate, you’ll call people who give vaccines ‘quacks’.”— Robert Mendelsohn, MD

“The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination is a disaster to the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illness and brain damage. We are changing our genetic code through vaccination.”

— Guylain Lanctot, MD – author of Medical Mafia.

“I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics you will realize that this is not so.”

— Archie Kalokerinos, MD, medical researcher

“There is a great deal of evidence to prove that vaccination of children does far more harm than good.”

— J. Anthony Morris, Ph. D (chief vaccine control officer for the FDA who was fired the day after he made this public statement in the early 1970s

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110706-Exosomes/page2

A new paper published in the Journal of Biological Regulators & Homeostatic Agents posits there may be a unique, causally connected relationship between 5G millimeter wave exposure and coronavirus — an idea which, though widely discussed early on in the global COVID crisis, was eventually dismissed as “conspiracy theory” by the mainstream media and government officials, resulting in widespread censorship on social media platforms.


The new study, titled “5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells,” authored by an international collaboration of scientists from Italy, the U.S. and Russia, suggests that 5G radiation may be absorbed by dermatologic cells that act like antennas,* thereby transferring its effects to other cells, including activating DNA-based biosynthetic processes within the nucleus of the cell, possibly resulting in the de novo synthesis of coronaviruses in biological cells.


The authors describe how this may work as follows:

“DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source.


These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus.


To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells.”

The idea that one of the causes of illness associated with the coronavirus crisis derives from non-native electromagnetic radiation exposure, including from 5G millimeter waves, was proposed by Dr. Thomas Cowan in the highly controversial presentation below. This has been labeled as “false and harmful” information on a variety of social media and global mainstream media platforms.

According to Cowan, 5G millimeter waves may induce cell damage that results in the excretion of cellular contents, which include nucleic acids and exosomes (virus-like nanoparticles produced within cells as natural forms of intercellular communication).


This debris, which he describes as part of the detoxification of the damaged cells ("cellular pooping"), may be mistakenly identified as exogenous viruses such as coronavirus and may result in false positives on RT-PCR tests, which are notoriously ineffective at positively distinguishing specific strains of viruses and identifying them with any certainty.


While this idea differs slightly from the one proposed by the study authors, they overlap in significant ways. In both explanations, 5G associated radiation induces cell changes that are identified as being caused by "COVID virus."


Whether or not there is a de novo synthesis of coronaviruses as a result of 5G radiation exposure, or whether or not the damage to the cell produces debris containing COVID virus like nucleic acid, remains to be determined. But in both scenarios, what is perceived as a COVID illness from the outside in may in fact be the byproduct of cellular changes resulting from EMF exposure and not an exogenous viral infection, as commonly assumed.


Dr. Andrew Kaufman has also explored this topic and discovered that what the global mainstream medical establishment and media are identifying as “COVID-19” is likely our own exosomes being secreted by either healthy or damaged cells.


I highly recommend viewing his presentation below, and you can obtain more presentations of this kind in section two of QuestioningCovid.com, titled, Questioning Germ Theory, Contagion and Viral Testing.

My take on it, which I explore in the video below — “COVID-19 -- is it really about a virus?” — is that exosomal processes within the body and between bodies simulate infectious processes, but rather than being simply a sign of pathology and imminent morbidity and mortality are designed to support the collective health of a group of individuals or species, or even between species.


In this view, what is commonly understood to be infection and contagion is actually a surface misunderstanding of a process of horizontal information exchange designed to facilitate enhanced detoxification, xenohormesis and the activation of resiliency pathways within a species, and is the very origin of what is known as “herd immunity.”

This latest paper opens back up an important topic that has been all but suppressed and censored today, namely, that health problems associated with infections such as coronavirus involve a wide range of factors, including foremost the role of the so-called “bioterrain” of the cell in determining susceptibility to infection and illness.


Viruses do not exist in a vacuum and don’t simply attack helpless bodies. When the cellular terrain is healthy and resilient infections tend not to take hold, or even have effects that confer lasting health benefits.


Moreover, the discovery of the human microbiome (and the total set of viruses or viral-like components of the microbiome known as the human virome) reveals that classical germ theory is bankrupt, and that what we once believed were invisible viral threats “out there” are surprisingly similar, if not identical, to endogenous viral-like elements within our cells known as exosomes, and often cannot be distinguished from them.


For example, the widespread use of RT-PCR tests to identify “COVID” may simply be identifying our bodies’ own viral or exosomal contents, and thereby generating “false positives,” which justify the continual implementation of allopathic approaches that result in profound iatrogenic damage to the body, falsely described as “caused by COVID.”


I highly recommend that those interested in understanding the true nature of viruses and their indispensable role in establishing immunological self-tolerance, homeostasis, and ultimately health, watch distinguished National Institutes of Health speaker and virome expert Dr. Herbert Virgin's presentation:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyMT5HR7Ds0&feature=emb_logo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=KGGd7-vvd9Y&feature=emb_logo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1860&v=rp4wXSku8Ik&feature=emb_logo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7I5LzLgNSI&feature=youtu.be NewsBreak 81: CONFIRMED: COVID-19 Plandemic a Known, Live “Training & Simulation Exercise” under WHO the entire COVID-19 world-shutdown is part of a live training and simulation exercise run by the WHO and U.N.per their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board's annual 2019 report and the International Health Regulations treaty of 2005 which establishes a Global Government (of the WHO &U.N.along with their sponsors, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, & others. https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf

https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2020/05/17/truth-and-lies-about-tv-virus-dubbed-covid-19/


TRUTH AND LIES ABOUT TV VIRUS DUBBED COVID-19

Posted on 17/05/2020 by Vexman

In the world of science, following logic is an absolute mandatory. In fact, logic ought to be applied and used in every second of one’s life and thought process, not just in the field of science, but in general. I find such excercise amusing and it forces me to evaluate all different angles before choosing one I am about to follow. You may be wondering why I am writing any of this since we all know that. So here it is, in short: what happened to people that forced them to drop logic and critical thinking process? Was it because of fear? Or was it anxiety that appeared as that tickling sensation within their skulls, giving them a feeling their brains have just demonstrated signs of true intelligence, so they swore never to use logic again? Or was it, perhaps, due to the ugly truth discovered which caused cognitive dissonance so strong, it forced them to swear never to think hard again, no matter what? The definite answer is beyond my understanding, which is driving me to try grasp it as a general phenomenon of human society.


So let’s take a closer look at the most recent panic, driven into another mass psychosis and dubbed Covid-19. Here is the most important question you need to ask yourself before you choose to accept another belief: what is the basic procedure or method of identifying a new virus?


RULE #1: If you want to be sure what is in your test tube, you need to isolate and purify your sample. Why? So such sample would contain only what you are looking at. How else would you know what is being observed? Keep in mind all of world’s scientists agree on this simple rule, all of them.


Was this rule ever applied to Covid-19? No, it was never applied to it. No one in this world claims to have isolated and purified the virus dubbed Covid-19. Not a single person has managed to do it. Let that sink in really well. The very same goes for the HIV virus – it was never purified and isolated, which is even admitted by HIV’s “discoverer” Luc Montagnier. The very same is true in the case commonly known as measles virus, proven in Germany’s court of law as not scientifically proven, i.e. it doesn’t exist in the form it was sold to us. You can research and read about it yourself, as much as I did, with many posts written here at my blog containing numerous links for further reading and insightful comments from other informed readers.



REPORT THIS AD


REPORT THIS AD


Therefore, all claims saying to have identified Covid-19 in humans and/or animals are lies, that those pushing them know are lies. You might wonder what do their tests actually identify, but it does not matter, since rule #1 was never applied to their test tubes, which renders all their results and conclusions meaningless.


You don’t have to be an expert in molecular biology or virology to be able to grasp the above mentioned rule. They have set it themselves and named it “the gold standard”, yet they have failed in applying it to their own identification procedures. What it means is this: they are spreading false information about everything – the new virus, its characteristics, deaths related to it, number of cases, treatments, vaccines and everything else related.


All this poses a few important questions: if PTB are lying about all of this, what else are they lying about? How come they are not affraid of us since they know we know they are lying through their teeth?


An answer to this, which makes sense, is that they are not worried about people who are incapable of a rational thought, who are unable to use logic and think critically. They have been working for centuries to provide education based on flawed scientific theories and consequently miseducating people, thus driving people into poverty in order to limit the number of “thinkers” so strongly that, apparently, the remaining thinkers do not pose a threat.


That could be a depressing conclusion, but do not let it overwhelm your thoughts. If you are one of those individuals able to use logic and critical thinking process to see through the lies, you have no time to let dispair into your life. There is an important task you need to start or keep doing – talk to your closest family members and friends and try to open their eyes and minds to rational thought. Disobey distancing rules and stop wearing a mask until they see reason in it. It will be hard and you will be met with strong feelings, but don’t let it stop you. The muses of all the good spirits are with you in this and it is important not to succumb to dispair or hopelessness. Unity of the common people, armed with real knowledge, is their worst nightmare

COVID: Is the Virus Real?

By Jon Rappoport


Jon Rappoport’s blog


August 11, 2020


donate FacebookTwitterShare


SARS-CoV-2. The woo-woo virus.


People who can think and follow a line of reasoning should have a shot at considering the questions:


Did researchers actually discover the virus?


Did their proof fall short?


DID RESEARCHERS DO ENOUGH TO PROVE THE CORONAVIRUS EXISTS IN THE FIRST PLACE?



Vaccine Whistleblower:...

Barry, Kevin

Buy New $12.94

(as of 04:05 EDT - Details)


If someone says that, during the full moon three weeks ago, the moon suddenly turned gold, and then a strange squadron of giants passed across it, on their way to the ocean, do you think it might be a good idea to find out whether, three weeks ago, there was a full moon? Might that be a basic starting point?


That’s what I’m doing. Checking up to see whether there was a full moon.


A rational researcher, at the CDC, if one actually existed, would say, upon hearing of a possible outbreak in the city of Wuhan: “Let’s see the proof that a new virus is responsible, is the causative agent.”


What kind of proof would he be asking for?


First, he would want to know, “Do researchers there have an actual biological specimen of this new virus? Do they have the real thing?”


And if the answer came back yes, he would reply, “We’re sending in one of our Wuhan people so he can confirm that.”


But how would the confirmation work? You can’t just lay a specimen of a virus on a table and shine a light on it.


There is a traditional method of observation. It’s called an electron microscope photograph (an EM). Certain established procedures exist for obtaining an EM from a patient’s tissue sample. The CDC scientist would want to make sure the Chinese scientists had carried out this process correctly.


Rough sketch: From a patient’s tissue sample, you take a small bit and spin it in a centrifuge. The material settles out in layers. Knowing which layer (by density) you’re looking for, you remove a bit from that layer, look at it under an electron microscope and photograph it. If you’ve found a new virus, you should see many identical particles of it in the photo—and, obviously, it should be something you’ve never seen before.


AIDS Inc.

Rappoport, Jon

Best Price: $33.29

Buy New $18.89

(as of 03:34 EDT - Details)



The rational CDC scientist—if one actually existed—would say, “Let’s have a look at the Chinese EM.” He wants to confirm there are many identical particles of the new virus in the EM.


But there is more. And here is where the rubber meets the road and the failure factor is very high. I need to back up a bit to explain.


When a clinical trial of a new drug is done (and here I’ll make a gigantic leap and assume it’s done correctly), is it carried out on one patient?


Is the result of giving the drug to a single patient then extrapolated to mean everyone will react the way this one person did? Of course not. That would be absurd. In clinical trials, sooner or later, researchers are dealing with a large number of volunteers. A thousand or more.


So, in the case of a new coronavirus, in China, the rational CDC scientist would say: “I want to see electron microscope photographs derived from a thousand patients who have been diagnosed with the new epidemic disease. I want to see those photos side by side. I want to see whether many particles of this same new virus are in all the photos.”


I myself ask, where are these photographs? Where are the completely necessary photographs? Because the Chinese scientist would tell his CDC counterpart, “Oh, we didn’t carry out the EM procedure on a thousand patients. We carried it out on one. Two. Maybe three. I’m not sure.”


At which point, this fantasy rational CDC scientist would blow his stack. He would say, “You’re declaring a new global epidemic based on two or three photographs from two or three patients??”


Consider this potential scenario—which explains why researchers only did the EMs on two or three of the patients. If someone actually performed the electron microscope work on 1000 patients diagnosed with the new disease, he might find a maybe/possible indication, in the photographs, of a new coronavirus in four patients. AND IN NONE OF THE OTHER 997 PATIENTS.


Murder by Injection

Mullins, Eustace Clarence

Best Price: $37.99

Buy New $25.00

(as of 08:21 EDT - Details)



At which point, in Wuhan, they would shrug and say, “Well, wow, that didn’t work out. What a flop. Our hypothesis of a new disease based on a new coronavirus collapsed. We should have been able to see lots of the same new virus in the photos from ALL 1000 patients, or at least the overwhelming percentage of them. And we didn’t. Back to the drawing board. Let’s see. What’s the primary sign of the new disease? Pneumonia? Come to think of it, about 300,000 people in China die of pneumonia every year. How about we look at some studies on the air quality here in Wuhan? I think my colleague down the block has a pile of them. Let’s walk over there. Anybody have a searchlight so we can see the street through the fog of deadly pollution? Let me get my oxygen tank and breathing helmet.”


And that would be the end of that.


Back in Atlanta, the fantasy rational CDC scientist would say to his colleagues, “That Chinese outbreak wasn’t a virus. How about we spend the afternoon going through some of our own studies on vaccines? I know the fraud is rampant. Let’s get it out in the open.”


Sure. Happens every day over at the CDC.


Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe someone has done electron microscope photographs CORRECTLY derived from 1000 patients diagnosed with the new epidemic disease, in ONE LARGE COHERENT HONEST STUDY. LET’S SEE THE PHOTOS. SHOW THEM TO ME. We’ll have a few non-conflicted experts analyze them. Then we’ll demand another complete and honest study of 1000 patients, as confirmation.


Otherwise, don’t talk about science. There is no science going on.


Talk about fakery. And liability. And prison.


I write this piece for those who ordinarily have their heads on straight, when it comes to understanding the basics of HEALTH—but now, because of the “coronavirus epidemic,” are drifting back into the medical model: FIXATION ON GERMS.


Good-Bye Germ Theory: ...

Trebing, Dr. William P

Best Price: $36.69

Buy New $14.00

(as of 04:04 EDT - Details)



A correct reading of suppressed medical history reveals that the hypothesis of “one disease, one germ” is a modern con, moving down a blind alley at midnight. And when you add “one vaccine” to the formula, you get an even greater degree of lunacy.


But you also get a trillion-dollar commercial success.


I don’t care how many contemporary molecular biologists are working in labs, amplifying invisible slivers of who knows what molecules into view, and calling them viruses; it’s a con. They’re all working in the dark, massaging RNA or partial decaying microbes or cellular debris or exosomes or pieces of random genetic sequences or whatever…


The history of human health shows that upgrades in public sanitation, hygiene, and improved nutrition have done more for people than all the laboratory voodoo and “germ-fighting” pharmaceutical interventions ever invented laid end to end.


You want germs? No one knows how many there are. From various estimates, we could be talking about thousands of trillions to the thousandth power. Maybe more. If an infinitesimal fraction of the critters caused serious disease no-matter-what, we’d not only all be dead, we’d be dead on dead on dead.


To begin to understand how overblown all these modern epidemic duds are, let’s go to the animals. Farm animals. Pigs. A headline blares: A MILLION PIGS SLAUGHTERED. African Swine Fever Virus was discovered, and in order to stop the contagion, death was rained down on the pigs. On the farm. On the giant factory farm. So a question arises:


Do you seriously think humans sat down next to each of the million pigs and tested him/her for the Virus? Drew a blood or tissue sample?


Twenty pigs “tested positive” and they killed the rest as matter of course. They always do.


But wait. What are the conditions on this massive million-pig factory farm? Let’s see. Pigs living in their own urine and feces, crowded next to one another, nose to butt, sprayed with toxic chemicals, eating chemical-laced feed—under high stress, never living the kind of existence they were designed for. Think they’re going to get sick? Think some kind of minimally reliable test might find a virus or two living and replicating in their bodies? Do you seriously think those viruses matter, contrasted against the OBVIOUS immunosuppressive ENVIRONMENT?


As the number one germ hunter of all time, Louis Pasteur, was reported to have confessed on his deathbed: it’s not the germ, it’s the terrain—meaning, it’s the body and its strength and vitality and resiliency—THAT should be the central focus of the healing profession. Building up health.


One problem. There’s no money in it. There’s no control over the population in i

By Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in the life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/498007-covid-19-myths-lies-exposed/


The coronavirus misinformation that scientists, politicians and media have fed to the public has been shocking. Take a tour through the bizarre, contradictory and downright ludicrous myths that have done more damage than Covid.

TRIGGER WARNING! Do not read this if you are a loyal member of the Branch Covidians, cravenly awaiting the pleasure-pain prick of the Covid vaccine before you will appear in your own garden without a face nappy.


Or rather, do read it, but don’t expect to like it. There is no place for assumptions here—only logical thought from first principles. The only aim is to debunk the biggest myths that the media and political establishment have propagated.


And if you can hear me out then I salute you; there are few of us left who hold open minds.


Myth 1: Slowing the spread of the virus is a good idea

This is the fundamental premise of the world’s ‘response’ to Covid, from which all else springs. But it has never been established that we should be trying to slow the virus down, not even from the blinkered point of view of just saving lives in the short term.


Slowing the spread of the virus was initially sold to us as a way of protecting health services: if everyone gets sick at once, the hospitals will fill to bursting point and people will die on gurneys in car parks outside. Remember ‘flatten the curve’? Since Covid infections are inevitable, spreading them out through time will indirectly save lives by ensuring that everyone who can be saved by medical interventions - oxygen masks and ventilators - will be.


A noble idea, but as it happened, a misguided one. Most hospitals spent the months of the outbreak as good as empty. All other medical treatments were postponed in order to prepare for the onslaught of Covid patients coughing their lungs up—an onslaught that never arrived. Even intensive care units rarely reached full capacity, and it quickly became apparent that for the people most at risk from Covid, ventilator and intensive care treatment is unsuitable. Only a tiny minority of those who have died actually died in intensive care—old people with many co-morbidities are best kept in ordinary wards.


ALSO ON RT.COM

More evidence emerges of inflated Covid-19 fatality rates – are we being intimidated?

So ‘flatten the curve’ was a dead duck, but doesn’t it make sense to slow the spread of the virus anyway? Well, only if you think that those who would die of Covid if they caught it can evade the virus until a vaccine is developed. If vulnerable people who believe that they have not caught the virus (they may be asymptomatic) want to wait for a putative vaccine, then they should be more upfront about their intentions. Because if they can’t, then there is no point to any of this.


In addition, there is at least one theory why you could be doing someone a favour by giving them the virus. Evolutionary theory tells us that as a respiratory virus spreads, it loses potency. A successful virus is a mild one, which does not kill its host before they can spread it. This is how herd immunity really works in this context: it’s about the changes to the virus itself. In contrast, when we locked down, the virus had nowhere to go. Instead of getting milder, all of the most dangerous strains came together in the only places where sick people gathered: nursing homes and hospitals. This is why I greeted news that the virus was becoming more contagious with jubilation—it is better that the virus spread freely, at least among the healthy.


Myth 2: Lockdowns slow the spread

But let’s pretend for a while that it isn’t better. Because without the fundamental assumption that spreading = bad, the rest of the discussion is flipped on its head. ‘Spikes’ become cause for relief, not concern. Masks, if they work, would become counter-productive. I am not claiming this as truth—only that it is at least as likely as the classical model.


But if you can suspend your disbelief for long enough to imagine that hindering the spread of the virus is worthwhile, then you might be forgiven for assuming that lockdowns are the way to do it. There is, however, no suggestion, let alone evidence, that lockdowns would pose a problem for a wily virus.


ALSO ON RT.COM

The problem of false positives from Covid-19 tests means UK is inflating its numbers – and taking wrong decisions

If lockdowns played any part at all, we would expect to see a correlation between the different forms of lockdowns enforced by various regions or countries, and the shape of the death curves there. But we do not—the correlation is zero. Belgium, the UK, New York: strict lockdowns; lots of deaths. Sweden, Japan, Uruguay: light or no lockdowns; few deaths. You can point to opposite examples, but that’s just the point—there is no consistency. And before you try to explain away individual countries with hand waving about ‘different cultures’ or ‘better testing’, there is no correlation with any of those things either.


Simply put, there is nothing that can be easily pointed at to suggest that any measure taken by any government in the world to block the virus has worked. Lockdowns may be the biggest tools in the shed, but they are still faulty.


Myth 3: Contact tracing is the answer

Early in the outbreak, there seemed to be a connection between those countries with impressive track and trace capabilities, like Germany and South Korea, and their ability to cope. Of course, the tracking and tracing itself could not have been ‘curing’ the population of Covid. No one knew why there seemed to be a positive effect from comprehensive testing. Months later, still no one knows.


But that has not stopped western governments from pathetic attempts to emulate the conformist East Asian societies with contact tracing apps and programmes. Despite a not inconsiderable propaganda campaign, they have all failed miserably. This is largely because not enough people even have any symptoms anymore, months after the virus peaked.


Trying to ramp up contact tracing in August goes beyond locking the barn door after the horse has bolted. This horse bolted so long ago that now herds of its descendants roam the countryside. Meanwhile, the farmer ruins his homestead in order to pour his resources into increasingly elaborate and expensive door locking contraptions.


ALSO ON RT.COM

Trust the experts and take your pills, citizen! Meet the nerd who wants to force-feed you ‘morality pills’ to beat Covid

Myth 4: BAME people are more at risk

For BAME, insert whatever ethnic or other minority you have read is worst affected by the virus outbreak. Of course, the virus is racist—everything else is. Factoids like this come from dividing the sick or the dead into their Woke groupings and then comparing the proportions to the population as a whole. And no doubt, BAME people are ‘over represented’ in such statistics.


But the risk is at the population level, and is almost entirely explained by mediating factors like obesity, diabetes and other co-morbidities, more prevalent in some populations than in others. If you are in your eighties, overweight and sickly, then you should be worried about catching the virus regardless of your race. Similarly, if you are fit and under 60 you are more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by the virus, regardless of your race. There has been a suggestion, but only a suggestion, that lower Vitamin D levels in black people could play a part, but that is not behind the disparities.


This basic statistical point makes ridiculous the notion that some professional athletes were worried about returning to their sport. I actually feel sorry for the likes of Troy Deeney (not just because he’s been relegated with Watford) but because he has been understandably frightened by poor scientific communication. As a healthy young BAME man, there is no reason to suspect that he himself is at an increased risk. But he has been persuaded that he is by a regime that distils power from fear.


Myth 5: For schools to open, pubs must close

What utter rot this is. The individual who came up with this false trade-off would have a bright career in board game design, if they were not earning so much as a public servant. This is simply a fabrication, and as such somewhat difficult to disprove, rather like the existence of invisible fairies.


You could just, you know, leave the pubs open and then open the schools too? But I suppose then there would be a ‘second wave’ in deaths two weeks later. You know, like the second wave that was warned of in May. And then June. And then July. Only in the past two weeks did the WHO finally give up the dream and change its story to ‘One Big Wave’, which doesn’t have the same ring to it. But the second wave fiction has not yet been memory holed—it can be trotted out on demand to force through any further assaults on our remaining freedoms.


ALSO ON RT.COM

As Russia announces coronavirus vaccine, mainstream media suddenly discovers the meaning of skepticism

All I can do is predict that a second wave in deaths will never materialise, and every day since April I have been proven right. The establishment, in contrast, makes wrong predictions again and again, and are never held to account. They just change the prediction, and hope everyone forgets about what they said a week ago. Don’t wear masks. Don’t go to work. Go to work, but don’t take public transport. But if you do, wear a mask. Do not be fooled into thinking that the confusion is incidental. It is part of the plan—confused people are easier to control.


The bigger the lie

It may have been Joseph Goebbels who said: ‘’If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.’’ It seems this is an evergreen statement; not only is there no limit to the size of the lie, there seems to be no limit on the number of lies either.


Hypotheses make predictions, and if they are consistently proven right, eventually they become theory. Einstein is heralded because he made predictions about black holes that are only being proven true almost a century later. Many fine minds have put their necks out to make predictions about the nature of this outbreak, despite slime and slander from the cheerleaders of the elite. But when they are vindicated, the cheerleaders just drown them out.


In contrast, Neil Ferguson is rolled out again and the second wavers just keep saying ‘wait another two weeks’. When will this end? Never. Not until we have a complete rethink. Logic and reason have not worked. It’s time for a new approach.


Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!


The statements, views and opinions express

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/belarusian-president-claims-imf-world-bank-offered-him-a-bribe-to-impose-covid-restrictions/


Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus:

• imposed “extreme lockdown on his people”

• force them to wear face masks

• impose very strict curfews

• impose a police state

• crash the economy

Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko REFUSED the offer and stated that he could not accept such an offer and would put his people above the needs of the IMF and World Bank. This is NOT a conspiracy. You may research this yourself. He actually said this!

Now IMF and World Bank are bailing out failing airlines with billions of dollars, and in exchange, they are FORCING airline CEOs to implement VERY STRICT POLICIES such as FORCED face masks covers on EVERYONE, including SMALL CHILDREN, whose health will suffer as a result of these policies.

And if it is true for Belarus, then it is true for the rest of the world! The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation’s infrastructure at cents on the dollar!



What the Covid-19 Agenda is Designed to Achieve


By Jens Jerndal, ex Diplomat

(abridged by henrymakow.com)



We now know that in some countries, especially Italy and America, the health authorities have ordered doctors and hospitals to declare Covid-19 to be the cause of death of patients, even if it was obvious that they died from another cause.


It's important to understand that the tests used are simple Antibody or PCR tests with an acknowledged error margin of up to 80%. The test will react to a previous, overcome infection with Covid-19, and it will also react to many infectious agents other than the Covid-19 virus. In other words, the tests are useless for identifying Covid-19 from other similar infections.


In the US, hospitals and physicians have even been paid large amounts of money for just writing Covid-19 on the death certificate. And yet, even with this documented massive over-reporting, the actual death figures this year for all causes have turned out to be within the same low range as most previous annual flu seasons, when no panic was created, and no lockdown, nor any other disruptive measures were undertaken.


Do you really believe those who ordered the world closed down, did it to postpone the death of a few very old and very sick people for a matter of months or even years? - As if they could care less! -They want most of us dead anyway. And the fact is that the lockdown is causing far more deaths than the virus ever could. Now you see it, now you don´t. It's called "sleight of hand" - or simply deceit!


No, they have a very different motive for imposing lockdown during this monumental scam. It's a kind of rehearsal or test balloon to see how far they can go, and how easily the world population can be manipulated and made to obey even the most absurd commands. You've got to admit they´ve been successful beyond belief!


They want to furtively introduce a global technological-military dictatorship known as the New World Order (NWO). And trick us all into accepting being 100% controlled and under the boot of this new class of global overlords.


How can we explain that nearly every so-called sovereign country - most claiming to be democracies - obeyed the command to lock down the entire country at the drop of a word from an international health agency, or on cue from another country, just imitating it? - Without consulting its own population or making its own research and deliberations about the tremendous long-term consequences and mind-blowing costs that they are causing. Is that proof that we already have a covert world government, and WE THE PEOPLE haven´t even noticed it?


AGENDAS


The original plan was to launch the New World Order via the UN Agenda 21, introduced at the UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. That conference was organized on the initiative of David Rockefeller by Canadian oil magnate and UN diplomat Maurice Strong often referred to as David Rockefeller´s "right hand".


Agenda 21 was followed in 2015 by Agenda 2030, and the Global Warming scare. However, it seems they haven´t been making sufficiently fast progress, so now they are using fake global pandemics as a more compelling scenario to impress the need for a global government with far-reaching powers. To be complemented with vaccines, electronic communication implants, and the new microwave communication technology called 5G.


The NWO promoters have practiced for many years now, launching maybe a dozen fake and mostly failed "pandemics" since the first one I know of, the HIV scam, launched in 1984. The HIV Holocaust is estimated to have caused some 30 million deaths, about 5 times as many as the much-lamented Nazi holocaust during WW2.


The vast majority of deaths attributed to AIDS were in fact directly caused by the psychological terror whipped up, combined with the lethal AZT drug pushed on those tricked into taking a totally fraudulent test yielding masses of false positives. That was the first and so far most successful exercise in selective reduction of the world population, presided over by the very same Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is today busy pushing the lockdown and trying to stop and outlaw any remedies that actually work.


Today the strategy is to first put enough fear into us to make the entire world population accept a fake "vaccine" as a second step. The purpose of that vaccine is to genetically modify us and implant electromagnetic nano technology into every one of us.


The third step of this strategy is none other than 5G, sold us with promises of faster downloads of movies, self-driving cars, and the Internet of Things (IoT). While hiding the devastating long-term effects on all life that 5G will have, and which the CIA and the military have had knowledge of for several decades but kept secret.


With this combination, they will control the life, death, health, and mind of every man, woman and child on the planet, 100%.


Do you trust Big Tech, Big Pharma, the CIA, and your politicians enough to give them full control over your body, mind, health, life, and death? - I am not exaggerating - that´s what it comes to.


If the NWO people get away with this, it's likely to result in a drastic reduction of the population, and the enslavement and robotization of the few remaining people our rulers consider useful. And please note that there is nothing theoretical about this. This plan has been amply, if piecemeal, documented since more than half a century by many of the most powerful and influential political figures in the USA, belonging to what we now call "the Deep State". This documentation consists of very many bits and pieces of information from different related sources over time, and for the consistent picture to emerge in all clarity, it's necessary to connect a number of dots. It's therefore impossible to offer a comprehensive list of references in this article. But I assure you that the picture is clear enough.


5G microwave technology has been known and tested secretly by the military for several decades. It can be used for crowd control and to paralyze or kill an enemy. To claim that there is no evidence for its negative effects on human health is a gross lie. And it's not only humans who are affected. This radiation is a mortal threat to ALL life on our planet.


An important aspect to keep in mind is the ecological one. For instance, how the entire "Plant Kingdom" that forms the basis of the food cycle for all animal life, depends on bees and insects for reproduction and survival. Bees and other pollinators are not only vulnerable to toxic chemicals but also to electromagnetic radiation...


Furthermore, any mention of 5G, or of the dangers of vaccines, or even the name of certain truth-tellers or whistle-blowers, is now automatically removed from the Internet by algorithms. They are afraid that enough people will wake up before they have succeeded in tricking the rest of us into an electronic, physical, and mental straight-jacket from which there is no escape.


From now on, all who allow themselves to be vaccinated, are giving up their physical and mental integrity. They can no longer remain independent conscious individuals with a free will and a tolerably dignified existence. Provided they even survive.


The Coronavirus by itself is no threat to human lives. 5G is, by itself, and especially in combination with the virus. Influenzas and colds are an inevitable part of normal human life, and actually a symptom of our bodies detoxifying. Treated properly, they even strengthen our immune system, long term.


The first thing to do in order to protect and strengthen the immune system is to avoid all vaccines and poisonous drugs masquerading as remedies. Also, all kinds of pesticides and other poisonous chemicals. These, along with unhealthy industrially produced foods, are the main reasons why the immune system of most people today has lost its ability to protect us against health hazards of all kinds, and why so many people now suffer auto-immune diseases.


IMMUNE SYSTEM


Precisely during the Covid-19 "plandemic" it has turned out that those who fared worst and were the first to die, were the oldest people in nursing homes routinely prescribed a collection of synthetic pharmaceutical drugs, including statins, that destroy every bit they may have had left of a normal immune system.


The immune system is actually our only effective defense against illness, especially viruses and cancer. It so happens that all microwave radiation has a destructive effect on our immune system, and 5G far more so than previous generations of the technology.


A weakened immune system makes us extremely vulnerable to health problems of all kinds. Projected at specific frequencies, 5G can cause illness, and also directly kill us, for instance by making it impossible for the blood of targeted individuals to absorb enough oxygen from the air. And this is exactly what some doctors have noticed happening with victims of Covid-19, both in China, in Italy and in the US. 5G is a weapon system invented to control the enemy or violent crowds.


There are several effective treatments that have been used in Asia to cure Covid-19, and even by a few independent doctors in Europe and the USA, but WHO, the US Health authorities under Dr. Fauci, and Big Pharma are working around the clock to prohibit and stop the use of such treatments. Even publishing fake studies pretending they are dangerous. They want to establish the credo that there is no cure, and the only solution is a vaccine.


The truth is there is no need for a real normal vaccine for Covid-19. It would not even be meaningful, because the virus is believed to mutate very fast, & the vaccine when available would no longer be able to target the virus circulating by then. Remember, the flu vaccine has to be changed every year, and even so, it may only be effective on a third or so of those who are getting it. While at the same time a considerable number of those vaccinated experience serious adverse events, that often permanently ruin their lives.


As for the effect of already existing (non-GMO) vaccines, it was found that in Italy those who had been vaccinated against the seasonal flu with the latest vaccine during a recent mandatory mass vaccination, made up a disproportionately large part of the deaths, attributed to Covid-19. These vaccinations have been identified as one of the main reasons Italy experienced so many deaths, not that Covid-19 as such is particularly contagious or deadly....


According to the prominent independent Italian doctor Antoinetta Gatti, the present Italian government has sold the country to Big Pharma, passing unconstitutional laws mandating no less than ten compulsory vaccinations for every child. She is pleading for help from other countries, to help the Italian people escape this politically imposed death trap. This also fits in with Italy being the first western country to close its borders and shut down the entire economy, soon to be followed by most other countries.


CONCLUSION


The literally blood-curdling Corona Conspiracy is by far the most impacting and dangerous one ever set in motion in the history of Humanity. But the virus as such is the least dangerous part. It is the combination of a GMO-vaccine and 5G radiation, that has the potential to change our DNA, and even end all life on Earth. Obviously, the instigators are fully aware of this, and have the means to protect themselves from the impact. Whether they have understood the consequences of this impact on our natural environment, and what that means for the prospects of long-term human survival is more doubtful. They may likely unwittingly cut off the branch they are themselves sitting on.


Therefore, if we don't put a stop to this mad conspiracy right now, our beautiful planet may well soon become a lifeless barren planet, like the Moon or Mars. It may be reduced to a cosmic memorial to the megalomaniac madness of our too technically brilliant, psychopathic self-appointed leaders, who fatally lack emotional intelligence, wisdom, and love for the human condition.


Three crucial questions remain:


1) Are you aware that the Law and the justice system in most countries have long since been hijacked by the deep state racketeers? Who have now proved in country after country that they will impose dictatorial mandates overnight, erasing every letter of legal protection, even laws supposed to protect our innate irrevocable human rights, such as bodily integrity and basic freedom of expression. And they have done it at the drop of a word from the WHO, or a US health agency run by Big Pharma. How´s that for Democracy?


2) Do you realize that right now you are just like a brainwashed frog in a pan with slowly heating water?


3) Do you realize that your only chance of surviving with some kind of dignity and freedom is to jump out of that water NOW, before it reaches its boiling point, which is already VERY close?


In other words, it's HIGH time we all join forces and take decisive action, leaving no-one in doubt that WE THE PEOPLE are sovereigns of our own lives and fates. We are not pawns of the handful of psychopath technocrats, billionaires and politicians who have robbed us of our power with their fraudulent de-mock-racy! And who plan to cook us all for dinner!


What's at stake here is your life, & the lives and future of your near & dear, not just your job & your money! It's about the possibility of your children & grandchildren to survive and evolve as free, healthy, conscious and happy individuals.


Remember the Nazi holocaust, and the Fascist and Soviet terror regimes? - They are back, in a new version with the difference that the perpetrators now have vastly more advanced and subtle technology at their disposal.


So what are you waiting for? - Contact everyone you know, share this with them and get organized! - Then try and find other conscious groups, and recruit key people in local and middle government, media, healthcare, local politics, trade, the industrial workforce, distribution, communication, the police force, defence etc.


Make sure they understand what´s at stake, and ask them to forward this call for massive passive resistance to everybody they know!


Remember No 5G and no vaccinations.


From now on, anyone vaccinated risks being inactivated or eliminated. Don't worry - nobody needs vaccinations if properly nourished and cared for. Everything you hear about vaccinations from the medical system is just untrue dangerous propaganda, based on fake science and endless greed.


Remember, this is about your own survival and your children's future! - And you need to take action NOW!

----

“What is the fundamental lie? That there is no such thing as a corona virus?”…

That says it perfectly. Agreeing with Philip here, this is controlled opp.

“From personal experience, I know there are pathogens…that made me sick.”

How do you know that pathogens made you sick? Who told you that story? Was the medical industry responsible for that narrative, say, for the last hundred plus years?…before you accepted the story that you are supposed to believe, did you carefully consider and then choose to eliminate toxicity as the probable cause of your sickness? It is easy to link the flu to toxicity, the first link below is one example.

The “industry” has clear motive for spinning that story. First, it makes them the controllers of your health, as only they can define disease, and only they can ‘save’ you from it. Second, it gives them immense power, and you are seeing that power on display right now. Without their disease narrative, this could not be happening.

Show me a disease that is purported to be spread person-to-person, and I will show you the toxicity responsible. Or do the research yourself, others have exposed the ‘story’.

Relative to covid specifically, see this writeup detailing toxicity as cause in the “endemic” areas.

https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/04/COVID2020.html.

Relative to that other famous ‘coronavirus’, sars, see this:

https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/environmental-toxins/the-sars-epidemic-are-viruses-taking-the-rap-for-industrial-poisons/.