10,555 views  Streamed live on Jan 24, 2024  #CovidVaccines #COVID19 #covid

Discussion about the relevance of "Spike Protein Detox", is it even relevant and when should it occur.

Dr. Robin Rose, CEO and Founder of Terrain Health and Chief Medical Officer of MediCoreRx, is a double board-certified specialist in Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, specializing in precision, functional medicine.

Dr Shankara Chetty is an internationally recognised family physician who used innovative techniques to protect his community from severe COVID-19.

Joachim Gerlach is co-founder of Vedicinals, focused on Research, Development and Production of novel therapeutics for infectious diseases as well as environmentally caused chronic illnesses.

Latest news, research and updates about COVID-19 and health.

HE PANDEMIC TRUTH: Learn how Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Tedros Ghebreyesus, Christian Drosten, Alex Azar, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Klaus Schwab, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, BlackRock along with governments and politicians used a false Pandemic to declare war on humanity.


The Pandemic was planned years in advance to achieve many objectives. Through live pandemic exercises such as Event 201 they would be able in lockstep to create a fraudulent pandemic worldwide in every country on earth.


The pandemic was never about public health, it was about achieving several goals. Though the virus was dangerous, it was no more dangerous than the flu and could be treated with safe early treatments such as Ivermectin, vitamin D, C, Zinc and other early treatment methods.


Our governments around the world are not acting in the best interest of the people, but are under the control of global corporations such as Pfizer, BlackRock and NGO's such as the (WHO) World Health Organization and (WEF) World Economic Forum which combined will be known as "Mr. Global." 


They are using WEF trained politicians to achieve their goals such as Emmanuel Macron, Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Arden, Ursula von der Leyen and others.


They changed the definition of a Pandemic so it would not have to include severe illness and death worldwide, but only worldwide cases or disease. To achieve the cases they needed to declare the Pandemic they used a fraudulent PCR test that was never designed to be used as a diagnostic test.


Through fear, propaganda and 97% false PCR cases they declared a Pandemic and ordered lockdowns, social distancing, masking all of which were never based on scientific data, but were instruments to instill fear and control the populations. Climate Change is now being used in the same way.


Covid-19 was engineered in the U.S. after receiving an infectious clone WIV1-CoV Spike protein from Wuhan China. It was then released intentionally on the world. Anthony Fauci willfully funded this Gain of Function when it was illegal to do so. Ralph S. Baric created SARS-CoV-2 in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and lied to the world.


The WHO is controlled by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation along GAVI which is the largest vaccine distributor in the world. 


There was no excess mortality anywhere in the world. It was medical malpractice that caused unnecessary deaths. Patients were put on ventilators and given the deadly drug Remdesivir for profits and to create more deaths and fear.


Before the Pandemic U.S. Patents show SARS-CoV-2 and the Covid vaccines were already created and ready to be deployed on the world.


Using fear, control and blocking safe early treatments they injected billions of unsuspecting innocent people with gene therapeutic experiments never giving them true legal informed consent which is a criminal violation of the Nuremberg Code.  


Every invasive medical intervention is a bodily injury or criminal battery unless the patient explicitly consents to it and his consent is invalid without having true informed consent.


There was never a need for these lethal vaccines, we had safe early treatments and there was never a Pandemic, only a PCR test Pandemic.


The vaccines are completely ineffective and highly dangerous. Through a whistleblower in the U.S. the number of deaths after vaccination in the U.S. is over 500,000 and growing everyday since the vaccine rollouts. Worldwide over 20 million.


There are also serious side effects such as neurological disorders, thrombosis, myocarditis and autoimmune disease. The vaccines damage the immune system. The CDC knew the vaccines caused death and serious side effects and hid this from the world.


The Pandemic was used to dramatically reduce the world's population and to enact a one world government under the United Nations with digital ID and digital currency for everyone. They are using wars, pandemics and climate change to achieve these goals unless we unite and stop them now 

CLICK HERE FOR VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST

CLICK HERE FOR VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST

[131] Immune System protection from Flu and Covid and vaccine spike proteins

4000 IU of Vitamin D3 in pill form every day, and upon coughing gargle with a mouthwash containing Cetyl pyridinium chloride (such as Aquafresh).

https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/spike-protein-detox-guide/
https://onedaymd.com/2021/12/world-council-for-health-reveals-spike.html
https://vaxxfacts.substack.com/p/how-to-detox-your-body-from-the-spike
https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/i-recover/ 

Here's the Dr Peter McCullough, Brian Proctor, Cade Wynn protocol for removing spike proteins, published in the Amercian Journal of Physicians and Surgeons Vol 28 Number 23, fall 2023

• Nattokinase: 2000 fibrin units (100 milligrams) orally twice a day without food
• Bromelain: 500 milligrams orally once a day without food
• Curcumin: 500 milligrams orally twice a day (nano, liposomal, or with piperine additive suggested)

https://jpands.org/vol28no3/mccullough.pdf 


Notes fromt  the 152 MIN Dr. Brian Artis INTERVIEW -THE ANTIDOTE The Explosive Truth, Origin, And Antidote For Covid 19 SEPT 2023 

THE VENOM SPIKE PROTEIN THAS HAS CAUSE THE COVID AND VACCINE RELATED INJURIES AND FATALITIES HAS BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY GENETICALLY TRACED TO SNAKES AND IS A BIO-WEAPON DESIGNED TO GENOCIDE THE MASSES.

The venom snake spike protein is synthetically manufactured and inserted into a plasmid, a small circular piece of DNA. They  make a ring of DNA and they can insert any payload they want into that plasmid. And this plasmid is little and it gets absorbed into bacteria, into yeast, into your mammal cells. The instruction of a plasmid is to tell whatever cell it gets into to manufacture whatever the Spike protein gene is. They are putting these plasmids into the vaccines and injecting them inside of you.

The way they actually created the COVID-19 pandemic was to spray these plasmids through the air, in your water and in your food. They are manufacturing tons of these plasmids around the world to create pandemics.  So I actually came out with a documentary called Watch the Water.  We only pay the government to deliver one thing into all of our houses in every industrialized nation around the world.  Water.  Snake venom is water soluble. Venom of snakes be absorbed through your skin like in a shower and in a bathtub.  They are conducting studies all over the world for decades.  They know they can get you to drink it. They know they can inject it. They know it'll get absorbed right through your skin, through water. They publish it that they've been doing this. 

Forever has been there's a flu season. You've all been exposed to the flu. In order to protect you from this new variant of the flu, we need to give you this vaccine. We're going to put a little bit of the flu in you. So that your immunity can create some reaction to that flu virus that we gave you in the shot. So that when you're exposed to the flu in the future, you already have immunity ready. They just told you they didn't put SARS CoV two in these virus in these vaccines. They only put DNA plasmids inside of them to protect you from COVID . There is a mass genocide going on. The government in the United States is now putting these plasmids through everybody's water system.  

The whole world was getting sick basically simultaneously. This was something globally beyond just the United States government. How did they orchestrate something like that?  Through the water systems.  This is actually an agenda that started out in the Nazi Holocaust concentration camps. They had two things they discovered in Nazi Germany that they could actually control their people inside of those actual camps. They knew they had to control their water systems and they had to control the vaccines injections into them. They were experimenting with metals to see if they could control and subdue their actual resistance and then they could poison them and subdue them through their water systems. We brought all over the Nazi war crime people put them into the CIA and NASA. Just a few years later the water treatment systems of America were built. This is when the vaccine agenda in America took off. 

They are using the water delivery systems to create pandemics. And there was a warning written in 2007. There's a paper written titled Water and Terrorism and it goes through all major industrialized nations in the whole world where the weaknesses are inside their treatment systems for water that would allow any terrorist organization, group, country, you name it to put anything they wanted into the water, deliver it to any communities or villages, create a pandemic, weaken those individuals and be able to take them over with war or by military force.  So it's basically weaponizing our water system. They list in 2007, they actually put in the document what can be put in your water systems to create these pandemics, done and performed and orchestrated by what he calls terrorists. And he lists things like this weaponized E. Coli bacteria, weaponized yeast. You can put in the water and suspend it. You can put defense toxins from animals in the water and make people sick. 

Defense toxins from animals are venoms. They go so far as to tell you how to manipulate and allow those toxins. Poisons, anthrax included diphtheria, toxin included, ricin. In the document, it tells you how to make those deadly toxins, poisons, and pathogens, how to get them to die with a certain amount of chlorine, and how to reduce the chlorine to let it live. You could create an outbreak in your town or in your city in New York City. You could create an epicenter outbreak in New York, take just a few skyscrapers and put venom in that water, send it up those actual apartments, and you can make thousands of people sick overnight by taking showers, bathing in it, drinking the water they're going to drink, the venom. They're going to break out with what's called respiratory failure or arrest. They're going to end up in your New York hospitals. They're going to pump you full of remdesivir, throw a whole bunch of dead people who died from acute kidney failure from a drug, and set the stage for a global pandemic using America's media conglomerates. 

Clinical Rationale for SARS-CoV-2 Base Spike Protein Detoxification in Post COVID-19 and Vaccine Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 28 Number3 Fall 2023 Peter A. McCullough, M.D., M.P.H.

Cade Wynn Brian C. Procter, M.D. Injury Syndromes

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein as a Therapeutic Target The majority of the global population has contracted COVID-19 and/or taken one of the many COVID-19 vaccines.

As a result, the injurious SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been an antigenic exposure to most in the world. Provided the infection was treated early and limited to the nasopharynx without invasive disease, the infection was self-limited without sequelae. Mucosal immunity with IgA, T-cells, B-cells, and natural killer cells handles the coronavirus and defends the body against systemic illness." However, in the setting of invasive disease with COVID-19 pneumonia, viremia, cytokine storm, thrombosis, and end-organ injury, there is evidence of widespread residual replicating SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in tissues for months, and the S1 segment within CD16 monocytes for more than one year.”

Repeated administrations of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the mRNA or adenoviral DNA products, deliver the genetic code for the spike protein, which is produced by a wide array of cells in tissues, resulting in an uncontrolled duration and cumulative doses of spike protein. The rise in IgG against the spike protein is many fold greater after vaccination than from the natural infection. This is a proxy for considerably greater exposure to the spike protein after immunization than after infection. Anti-spike IgG levels are associated with post-COVID-19 symptoms. Yonker et al.

have recently shown that some individuals do not develop neutralizing antibodies against the spike protein, and as a result develop organ injury, particularly myocarditis in children and young adults.* Free circulating soluble and extracellular vesicle-linked spike protein is associated with persistent symptoms."

The spike protein is responsible for the pathogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and drives the development of adverse events, injuries, disabilities, and death after vaccination through immunologic and thrombotic mechanisms. The spike protein has been found in the brain, heart, liver, kidneys, ovaries, testicles and other vital organs at autopsy in cases of death after vaccination.®? In the case of vaccine-induced thrombotic injury, the spike protein has been found within the blood clot itself."° Thus, there is strong rationale for considering residual SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a treatment target in post COVID-19 and vaccine injury syndromes. The spike protein participates directly in pathophysiology, incites inflammation, and propels thrombosis. Thus, overlapping coverage for these domains would be desirable in a combination approach. While specific syndromes (cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, thrombotic, immunological) will require additional therapies, we will focus the remaining discussion on degrading the spike protein and antagonizing its effects in tissues and organs.

Proteolytic Degradation of Spike Protein

Nattokinase

The spike protein has been found free, bound by antibodies, and also encased within lysosomes or exosomes both inside and outside of cells. Patterson et al. have found these, both after infection and after vaccination, likely worsened by repeated exposures (Figure 1). This shows that the spike protein can persist in the human body for a very long time (months to years), probably because it is resistant to proteolytic cleavage and disposal."

Proteolytic cleavage of spike appears to be an important mechanism to initiate clearance of the protein by the reticuloendothelial system. Nattokinase is a naturally occurring proteolytic enzyme with thrombolytic properties derived from the fermentation of soy beans by Bacillus subtilis natto.'"2 The organism is a probiotic gram-positive spore-forming bacterium with veterinary and human applications." Nattokinase has been widely used as a cardiovascular supplement in Japan for its antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic properties.4 It has undergone safety testing in doses up to 80,000 fibrinolytic units (FU) daily. Kurosawa and colleagues have shown in humans that D-dimer concentrations at six and eight 8 hours, and blood fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products at four hours after administration of a single oral dose of 2,000 FU (100 mg) were elevated significantly (p <0.05, respectively).

Thus, an empiric starting dose could be 2,000 FU twice a day.

Full pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have not been completed, but several years of market use as an over-the-counter supplement suggests that nattokinase is safe, with the main caveat being excessive bleeding. Caution is needed with concurrent antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs."

Oba and colleagues performed a series of experiments with various concentrations of nattokinase in preclinical models. They found that nattokinase effectively stopped SARS-CoV-2 and bovine herpes virus type 1 infection ofhuman cells in culture, and that the proteolytic effect of nattokinase was heat sensitive.’ Tanikawa et al. examined the effect of nattokinase on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. In the first experiment they demonstrated that spike was degraded in a time and dose-dependent manner in a cell lysate preparation that could be analogous to a vaccine recipient. The second experiment demonstrated that nattokinase degraded the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. This reproduced a similar study done by Oba and colleagues." Because of the risk of bleeding, patients must be strongly cautioned to seek medical supervision with combining this nutraceutical with concurrent antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. Additionally, allergic reactions can occur, especially in patients who have known soy allergies. There is insufficient information for the use of nattokinase in children or pregnant or lactating women.

Bromelain

Bromelain is a family of cysteine proteases, isolated from the pineapple stem (Ananas comosus).'* Traditionally, it has been used for its antiinflammatory and healing effects in cases of arthritis and injury, while it has been approved in Europe for the debridement of burn wounds. Experimental studies have demonstrated that bromelain presents unique immunomodulatory actions: 1) downregulation of the proinflammatory prostaglandin PGE-2 through inhibition of NF-kB and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2); 2) upregulation of the antiinflammatory PGE-1 (Figure 1); 3) activation of inflammatory mediators (interleukin 1b, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a, and interferon-g) as an acute response to cellular stress, but also inhibition of inflammatory mediators in states of overt cytokine production; 4) modulation of T-cell responses in vitro and in vivo; and 5) enhancement of T-celldependent antigen-specific B-cell antibody responses.

Importantly, bromelain exerts dose-dependent

anticoagulant effects: 1) downregulation of PGE-2 and thromboxane A2 (TXA2), thus leading to relative excess of prostacyclin in platelets, and 2) promotion of fibrinolysis by stimulating the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin and prevention of platelet aggregation (Figure 1).

All orally administered empirically for 3-12 months or longer Figure 1. Venn Diagram of Mechanisms of Action of Proposed Agents that Target the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Bromelain also hydrolyzes bradykinin and reduces kininogen and bradykinin levels in serum and tissues, improving inflammation and edema as shown in animal studies.’® Notably, the latter action supports a potential role of bromelain in alleviating COVID-19 symptoms such as cough, fever, and pain, and the more serious implications of inflammation, thrombosis, and edema. The effect of bromelain on PGE-2 inhibition exceeds that of prednisone and aspirin, presenting very low toxicity and no major side effects.

Additionally, a recent experimental study demonstrated that bromelain inhibits infection of VeroE6 cells by SARS-CoV-2 through blocking the virus binding and entry into cells by downregulation of ACE-2 and TMPRSS2 expression, and cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, presenting a novel and promising therapeutic option, which warrants further investigation.”

Bromelain increases the prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time and can thus increase bleeding risk. It can cause gastrointestinal upset. Severe allergic reactions can occur?! Bromelain may increase the absorption of medications—including antibiotics (such as tetracycline and amoxicillin), chemotherapeutic agents (such as 5-fluorouracil and vincristine), ACE inhibitors (such as captopril and lisinopril), benzodiazepines, certain antidepressants, opioids, and barbiturates. Physician supervision is advised. A standard dose of bromelain for human use is 500 mg orally per day.

Inhibition of Spike and Its Fragments in Tissues Curcumin Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is derived from turmeric (Curcuma longa), a member of the ginger family of plants.

Curcumin is a polyphenol and modulates inflammation in the setting of viral infections via inhibition of cytokines through multiple transcription factors. Additionally, curcumin inhibits angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), modulating angiotensin Il synthesis, and promotes fibrinolysis and the anticoagulation process (see Figures 1 and 2).

The antiviral actions of curcumin against multiple viruses (influenza and hepatitis viruses, herpes viruses, human papilloma virus, human immunodeficiency virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and other coronaviruses), bacteria, and fungi have been suggested in prior mechanistic studies.”? In silico studies have demonstrated that curcumin prevents SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells by blocking the spike protein binding sites and the cell ligands (ACE-2 receptors and TMPRSS-2), and by that mechanism reduces viral replication.”

The minimal absorption of curcumin following oral administration has been overcome with nanoparticle technology. Randomized trials have consistently showed reductions in hs-CRP and other inflammatory markers in the setting of spike protein mediated infection/injury.?*?5 The World Health Organization (WHO) has determined 0-3 mg per kilogram of body weight to be an acceptable daily dietary intake, about 250 mg. At higher therapeutic doses there can be gastrointestinal adverse events including peptic ulcer disease. Nano or liposomal curcumin is available as an oral supplement with better absorption dosed at 500 mg twice a day and has been shown to be safe without liver or serious gastrointestinal toxicity.” Alternatively, curcumin can be combined with piperine (black pepper extract), at about 10 mg/1000 mg, to significantly increase absorption.

There are, however, published studies showing that curcumin supplements decrease effectiveness of prescription hormones thyroid and estradiol, so patients on these prescription medicines need to be monitored by their physicians to avoid being destabilized by the addition of curcumin. The same caution applies to turmeric supplements.

Other Compounds

There is a host of other compounds that have supportive mechanistic and clinical data that could additionally play roles in a multidrug regimen. A notable supplement is augmented N-acetylcysteine, which can be given in a dose range of 400 to 1,000 mg per day. Other hopeful products in a long list include: ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, selenium, Irish sea moss, green tea extract (Camillia sinensis), Nigella sativa (black cumin), dandelion extract (Taraxacum officinale), glutathione, and many more. We have chosen to focus on nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin as a manageable triad that has a well-characterized safety profile and sufficient information on dosing in clinical practice.

Laboratory and Clinical Monitoring

Laboratory monitoring can be helpful in guiding the response to treatment. A reasonable battery of commercially available assays above and beyond routine testing can include:

hs-CRP, D-dimer, antinuclear antibody (ANA), qualitative antibodies for the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid, and quantitative antibodies for the spike protein. Advanced panels at baseline and after treatment can be extended to reflect cytokines including: cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-13, IL-2, GM-CSF, sCD40L, CCL5 (RANTES), CCL3 (MIP-1alpha), IL-6, IL-10, IFN-gamma, VEGF, IL-8, CCL4(MIP-1beta). Cellular measurements include WBC CD4%, CD8%, and CD4/CD8 ratio, and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 S1 spike protein-containing monocytes, available from Radiance Diagnostics, Naperville, III.?7 Discussion Triple therapy with nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin is suggested as a generally safe detoxification foundation upon which other drug and nutraceutical treatment strategies can be developed for the amelioration of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteindriven syndromes affecting those who have recovered from COVID-19 and/or received one or more injections of a COVID vaccine (Figure 2). Unfortunately, most individuals around the globe have had both exposures and with multiple occurrences.

The duration of therapy and the impact on clinical outcomes such as quality of life, symptom scores, hospitalization, and death are unknown. Thus, no therapeutic claims can be made until large prospective randomized double-blind placebocontrolled trials are completed. A check of clinicaltrials.gov indicates that no such trials yet have been registered. In the meantime, based on signals of benefit and acceptable safety, the triad of nattokinase 2,000 FU (100 mg) twice daily, bromelain 500 mg a day, and nano-curcumin 500 mg twice daily for at least 3 months with continuation for a year or more, as a base detoxification regimen upon which additional agents can be added, is a reasonable empiric strategy for those suffering with post COVID-19 or vaccine-associated symptoms.

Clinicians should recognize this combination has significant anticoagulant effects that will be potentially counterbalanced by the pro-coagulant effects of spike protein. Patients should be counseled and monitored for bleeding complications including easy bruising, nasal mucosal bleeding, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Conclusion

Chronic disabling symptoms from “long COVID” and following mRNA injections are an increasingly prevalent problem. The symptomatic presentation has many common features, which might be explained by the spike protein of the virus, which is also manufactured by the vaccinee’s own cells. There is no accepted protocol for treatment. Based on their mechanisms of action, a combination of nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin should be considered. Patients need close monitoring because of anticoagulant effects. Formal clinical trials are urgently needed.

Peter A. McCullough, M.D., M.P.H., an internist and cardiologist, is president of the McCullough Foundation; Cade Wynn works as an assistant with McKinney Family Medicine; Brian C. Procter, M.D., founder of McKinney Family Medicine, is a family physician practicing in McKinney, Texas. Contact: peteramccullough@ gmail.com.

Disclosures: Dr. McCullough receives partial salary support and holds an equity position in The Wellness Company, Boca Raton, Fla. The Wellness Company markets dietary supplements, including Spike Support, which contains nattokinase among multiple ingredients.

Steve Kirsch - GAME OVER

https://ia601603.us.archive.org/28/items/number-of-days-died-after-dose-2/Number%20of%20days%20died%20after%20dose%20%232.png     Steve Kirsch--GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your chance of dying


This is why the CDC has NEVER used the Medicare data to prove the vaccines are safe. And this is why NOBODY in mainstream medicine wants you to see this data. EVER. They ALL want it hidden. FOREVER.


https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/game-over-medicare-data-shows-the 



Last night, I got a USB drive in my mailbox with the Medicare data that links deaths and vaccination dates. Finally! This is the data that nobody wants to talk or even ask about.    I PUT EXEL FILE HERE :   https://archive.org/download/number-of-days-died-after-dose-2/steve%20kirsh-2-1-23%20Medicare%20data%20shows%20the%20COVID%20vaccines%20increase%20your%20chance%20of%20dying.xls x    FULL ARTICLE HERE:  https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/game-over-medicare-data-shows-the   PRINTABLE ARCHIVED ARTICLE HERE:  https://archive.org/details/22-game-over-medicare-data-shows-the-covid-vaccines-increase-your-risk-of-dying/10GAME%20OVER-%20Medicare%20data%20shows%20the%20COVID%20vaccines%20increase%20your%20risk%20of%20dying/ 


https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/game-over-medicare-data-shows-the 


GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your risk of dying


This may well be the most important article I’ll write in 2023.


In this article, I publicly reveal record-level vax-death data from the “gold standard” Medicare database that proves that:


The vaccines are making it more likely that the elderly will die prematurely, not less likely


The risk of death remains elevated for an unknown period of time after you get the shot (we didn’t see it return to normal)


The CDC lied to the American people about the safety of these vaccines. They had access to this data the entire time and kept it hidden and said nothing.


If there is one article for you to share with your social network, this is the one.


Isn’t it a shame that none of the world’s governments make the vaccination-death records publicly available? My claim is that if they did that, it would end the debate instantly and prove to the world that the vaccines are unsafe. So that’s why they keep it locked up.


But apparently there is one whistleblower who is interested in data transparency.


Last night, I got a USB drive in my mailbox with the Medicare data that links deaths and vaccination dates. Finally! This is the data that nobody wants to talk or even ask about.


I was able to authenticate the data by matching it with records I already had. And the analysis that I did on the data I received matches up with other analyses I have received previously.


The nice thing about this Medicare data is that nobody can claim that it is “unreliable.” Medicare is the unassailable “gold-standard” database. It’s the database that the CDC never wants us to see for some reason. They never even mention it. They pretend it doesn’t exist. So you know it is important.


Do you want to know what it shows?


It shows that these shots increase your risk of dying and once you get shot, your risk of dying remains elevated for an unknown amount of time. And that’s in the very population it is supposed to help the most!


Now you know why the CDC, which has always had access to the Medicare records, has never made them publicly available for anyone to analyze to prove that the vaccines are safe. Because the records show the opposite. That’s why they keep the data hidden from view and it’s why they NEVER talk about it.


Today, in this article, you will finally get to see what nobody outside the HHS has ever seen before: the “gold standard” Medicare records, i.e., the truth. You can analyze it yourself.


This is a great quote. Unfortunately, the "Truth is like a lion" quotation attributed to St Augustine was never penned by him, nor by any notable philosopher, sage or theologian before the twenty first century.


You’ll soon see for yourself why the CDC will never release this data and why the mainstream press is NEVER EVER going to ask to see the data: because it would reveal they lied to people and killed over 500,000 Americans by recommending they take an unsafe “vaccine.”


The bottom line is this:


When there is no data transparency, there is a high chance that the government is lying to you.


After all, if the data supported their narrative, they’d be tripping all over themselves to release the data. When it doesn’t support the narrative, they simply never talk about it and pretend it doesn’t exist and tell the press never to ask about it.


So you already know how this is going to end. Very badly. For Biden, the CDC, the FDA, the mainstream medical community, the mainstream press, and Congress. They all will have egg on their face because they never asked to see the data.


The “misinformation spreaders” will have been proven right with the government’s own “gold standard” database. It’s payback time.


I had Clare Craig of the HART Group look this over for any flaws. She liked it.


Professor Norman Fenton had a look as well and he didn’t find anything amiss either.


This doesn’t mean there aren’t any flaws, but it just means that there aren’t any obvious flaws. If you find a mistake, let me know in the comments.


If nobody can explain how the “slope goes the wrong way,” then this should be GAME OVER for the vaccination program because we are using their own “gold standard” database to prove that the vaccines are not safe and that they lied to us.


Unless I made a serious error, there is no rock big enough for them to hide under on this one. No excuses. No attacks. It’s basically bulletproof. The results simply cannot be explained if the vaccines are safe. And the numbers are huge. You don’t need a peer reviewed study on this one.


It’s in Excel, there are over 114,000 records, and you can download it here.


While I would have liked to receive the merge of all death records and vaccination records of everyone in the US, the data I did receive, when properly analyzed, is sufficient to prove the point that the vaccines are increasing your risk of death.


LIMITATIONS


Be sure to read the About tab for caveats about the data. It will help if you read and understand this article before you look at the records.


MEDICARE DATA NOTA BENE


Note that the scatter plots below were produced from a much larger set of Medicare records than the ones you can download. The plots from the records I received are included in the Excel spreadsheet and are consistent with the plots in this article which are the higher quality plots (and which contain dose 2 and 3 plots).


Because we only have vax-death records of people who have died (rather than the full set of records that any truly honest government would supply), we have to analyze the data in a certain way to understand what is going on.


This is a new way to look at the data so let me give you the bird’s eye overview first.


The main thing is that in Jan 2021 we have a double whammy of death: from COVID and seasonality (older people die more in winter).


Figure 0. Days to death from Dec 15, 2020 for everyone in Medicare in Connecticut (vaxxed and unvaxxed). Each bar is a 5 day period. The point of this graph is to show that the COVID outbreak exacerbated the slope since you are seeing effects of seasonality PLUS the waning part of a COVID outbreak. This is why there is a 40% drop from peak values.


So if the vaccine does absolutely nothing, we’ll see the slope of the histogram of the deaths per day curve go dramatically down in the first quarter as COVID and seasonality effects diminish. Then it will flatline for a time until seasonality picks up again in winter or there is another big COVID outbreak. The drop could be as much as 40% from the peak value (e.g., from 536 to 324) in Figure 0.


If the vaccine is PERFECT, we’ll see the same slope go down, but not as much because we’ll just see seasonality effects going down (since nobody is dying from COVID). It will then remain perfectly flat until it picks up again in winter. See Figure 1 below for what the “deaths per week” curve should look like for a perfect vaccine.


The main point is this: if the vaccine isn’t causing harm, the slope will go down and remain flat.


What I will be doing below is calculating the days until death from shot #1 if and only if shot #1 was given in Q1 of 2021. So that histogram should look very similar to Figure 1. It’s going to be smoothed somewhat since the shot was given over a quarter (rather than on a single day), but since most of the vaccine in Q1 was delivered in the first half of January, the curve will be pretty similar to Figure 1, but it will start to flatline a couple of weeks sooner.


Once you understand these concepts, you are ready for the details.


For the elderly, there is a strong seasonality of deaths. They are high in the winter and low in the summer. The difference between peaks and troughs is around 20%. This data is from the CDC for ages 65-84:


Figure 1. This is the weekly death counts from 2015-2019 summed over all US states for ages 65-84. This was created using a visualization on the CDC website using this dataset. Epidemiologists are very familiar with this effect. There are no surprises here. The peak is 256K, the trough is 213, so there is a 17% seasonality drop in deaths from the peak.


What this means is if you got the shot in Q1 of 2021, and you look at the days until death, if the vaccines are safe, you should find that it will go lower in time and then turn upwards.


But what we find is the opposite.


Figure 2 shows the deaths by week in 2021 for all states ages 65-84. Note that the rates drop for the first 11 weeks and stabilize.


In 2021, there is a steeper drop than normal because of COVID adding to the drop:


Figure 2. This is the weekly death counts summed over all US states for 2021. This is essentially the control graph. This was created using a visualization on the CDC website using this dataset. Epidemiologists are very familiar with this effect. There are no surprises here. The deaths drop for the first 11 weeks of the year then stabilize. The peak is 81K, the trough is 50K so there is a 39% combined drop from peak to trough.


The vaccine program was initiated on Dec 14, 2020, and peaked in the third week of Jan 2021 for people in this age group:


Figure 3. Connecticut vax rollout schedule for <80 Medicare participants peaked in weeks 3 and 4 of 2021. Each bar is a week


This means that if we limit our “days from shot #1 to death” analysis to people who got their first vaccine in Q1 of 2021, if the shot is harmless, we should see the rate of deaths dropping for at least 9 weeks after the shot, and then remaining flat for the next 15 weeks before turning upward. This is because about half the shots got delivered before week #3 (11-2=9)


As we noted in the previous section, if the first shot is given in Q1, the number of days after the shot until you die should go down for at least 9 weeks and then stabilize for the next 15 weeks per the seasonality described in the previous section. So a safe vaccine would look like Figure 2


But it doesn’t. It goes up! That’s the problem.


Figure 4. This shows days until death from Shot #1 where shot #1 was given in Q1 2021 to Medicare recipients under 80. What is supposed to happen is the line is supposed to slope DOWNWARD due to seasonality. The slope goes the wrong way. Note that the increase in risk is still present after 2 years from the initial value at day 50, but at least it’s not getting any worse over time. NB: The graph drops off starting at 660 days out because we run out of months to die (since the shot is given in Q1 and the person must die before Feb 1, 2023).


Similarly, if we restrict our analysis to the first shot given in Q2 (most of which would have been given in April), we see the same problem. The slope should be flat for around the first 15 weeks after the shot is given (we are starting in a flat period (week 13) and we have about 15 weeks of flat deaths after that. Yet the slope is going up when it is supposed to be flat.


Figure 5. Same as Fig. 4 except we restrict shot #1 to be given in Q2. Not that the peak shifts since seasonality does not move. The drop off is now starting at 570 since we are now giving the shot a quarter later.


The same problem happens with the second shot. About 75% of the people in Medicare were injected with shot #2 prior to April 15, 2021.


Here’s what the shot #2 injection schedule looked like in Connecticut:


Figure 6. Shots 1 and 2 were quickly rolled out to the Medicare community with most everyone getting fully vaccinated in Q1 of 2021. This is from Medicare data from Connecticut.


Therefore, we should have seen a downward slope in the beginning and we are seeing the opposite again.


Figure 7. This chart is days till death from Shot #2 given that shot #2 was delivered in 2021. Since most of the shot #2 were delivered in Q1 2021, you should see a strong downward slope here as well. You don’t. The slope goes the wrong way for shot #2 too. That’s inexplicable.


Most people in Medicare got shot #3 in October, 2021. So we should see an upward trend for about 60 days (due to seasonality and another COVID wave), and then it should fall dramatically.


It doesn’t. It remains flat. That’s problematic. It suggests that if you lived until shot #3, it will still increase your risk of dying, just not as much as the earlier shots.


This chart would have been more useful had the Dose 3 vax window been narrowly restricted. Stay tuned…


Figure 8. Shot #3 delivered in 2021. Most people in Medicare got their booster in October 2021, so we’d expect the slope to go down after 60 days. That doesn’t happen. The slop remains flat which is problematic.


Figure 9. Number of days died after dose #2 if you just got dose #2. So there is a rapid fall off at Day 200 which is people opting for Dose #3 and beyond. But I realized later that fewer than 50% opted for >2 shots. So we can raise the baseline by 2X and get a conservative estimate of steady state. This allows us to clearly see that the shots elevated your risk of death by around 50% for at least the first 200 days after the shot. This is a DISASTER and it’s also going to be impossible for the CDC to explain away.


This is a chart of people who just got two shots and no more. At first, I dismissed it because if you got 3 or more shots, you’d leave the group so the flat part starting at day 400 isn’t a valid steady state number because the size of the cohort changes due to the “no other shots” criteria.


But then I did a calculation using the Connecticut data and found that when there were 23,259 deaths from Dose #2, there were only 10,557 deaths from Doses #3 onwards. So this suggests to me that fewer than half the people in Medicare opted for the jabs.


Then I confirmed in USA FACTS that fewer than half the people who got shot #2 got any of the boosters (68% vs. 33%).


So if we simply take our 200 deaths per day flatline number from the chart above and adjust it for the people who left the cohort (i.e., double it to 400 steady state deaths per day), we can see that the first 200 days, we had a 50% increase in the rate of death (600 per day) vs. the 400 per day rate after 1 year (which itself might be elevated from normal).


This is a complete disaster no matter how you look at it.


The good news here is that it shows if you stop the shots, it appears your risk lowers after a year.


As you can see from this chart, if you keep on with the shots, as half the people did, your risk of death remains elevated!


Figure 10. This is the same as Figure 9, but here we do NOT have the restriction that you didn’t get any more shots. The number of deaths remains elevated due to the fact that half the people opted for subsequent shots. If nobody opted for any more shots after shot #2, we would have expected the curve to flatline at around 400 deaths / day.


People in Medicare got up to 7 total shots. That’s really stunning.


For example, in Connecticut, the numbers are: 31170, 23259, 8902, 1428, 217, 9, 1. So only 1 person got a 7th shot.


Here’s the graph for people who got Shot #4:


Figure 11. The fourth shot increases your risk of death too. People get the fourth shot late in 2022 so it drops off after day 100.


So people got shot #4 in 2022 which is why the graph falls quickly after day 200 (you simply run out of time to die). But you can see the same elevation in risk happening after this shot as well.


James Surowiecki said was confused by this article because I didn’t include the unvaccinated.


I purposely didn’t include that chart because it would be confusing.


But if James was confused because I didn’t include it, I’ll include it with a big caveat.


The problem with the Medicare data is that the unvaccinated are a mix of people with vaccination and no vaccination so it is not pure. This is because Medicare patients went to a pharmacy to get their free vax and it wasn’t recorded in the Medicare records. This is why half the Medicare records don’t have any vax info at all. For Connecticut for example, there were 57,297 records of people in Medicare who died since Dec 14, 2020 and 26,092 had no vaccine records.


Also, people migrate from the unvaccinated group to the vaccinated group at an unknown rate (even Medicare doesn’t know the rate) which makes it problematic to use. That’s why I didn’t include it.


But since James was confused about this, I’ve now added the unvaccinated Medicare records from CT to the excel file (since those are the only unvaxxed records I have right now).


The plot is below. As you can see, the slope is downwards, just like you’d expect. No surprises.


Hopefully, James is less confused now.


Figure 13. The death curve for the unvaxxed in CT. This was added to the dataset you can download. This shows the deaths per day since Dec 15, 2020 for people in CT with no vax records who are in Medicare and < 80. Compare this with Figure 0 above (Figure 0 is ALL deaths whereas this is just the unvaxxed deaths).


Below is a graph of people with an ICD10 code of I2xxx to I5xxx, showing the number of days from the date of the COVID vax to the time of the cardiac event.


This is NOT normal. This should be a flat line. There is no way they can explain this way.


Here are the percentages of the total number of events over 365 days that occurred on day 0 through day 7 after the shot: 4.5% 2.8% 2.4% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.3% 2.1%.


More importantly, why isn’t the CDC releasing this data? It’s in Medicare and they can easily pull it. What is wrong with them? It seems as if they are protecting the vaccine instead of the American people, doesn’t it?


Figure 12. Cardiovascular events (ICD10 codes I2xxx-I5xxx) should occur evenly over time if the vaccines are safe. The fact that this graph is not flat is a HUGE problem. NOBODY can explain that. This graph is standalone self-explanatory. No control group needed on that one. The y value at x=365 is .037%. So all events over 365 days were normalized to a percentage for this plot. Sp 4.5% of the total number of cardiac events in the ICD10 categories above within 365 days of a jab occurred on the day of the injection.


You can play with the data here thanks to Albert Benavides.


See my newly updated article on the UK data, which now includes US Mortality’s latest analysis:


Basically, even the flawed UK data still has a huge signal they couldn’t hide: there is a bigger killer than COVID and NOBODY can figure out what it is! Isn’t that odd?


Joel Smalley’s analysis of the UK data is superb as well. Even with the flaws relative to the unvaccinated, by focusing on the vaccinated, he can show they are dying at a disproportionately high rate.


The US data is looking really bad. For example, this tweet shows the more a state vaccinates, the greater the number of COVID deaths. Whoops!!! I thought it was supposed to reduce the number of COVID deaths!


Ed Dowd’s data, beautifully presented in his book “Cause Unknown,” is also hard for anyone to refute. How are working people 18-64 suddenly dying at a higher rate than non-working people in America right after the vaccine mandates hit? Nobody can explain that one.


Ed’s conclusions are the same as mine. So now you have two very powerful, but completely different datasets that are easy to explain if the vaccines are dangerous and impossible to explain using any other hypothesis.


And of course my favorite example is the VAERS excess deaths. How can there possibly be over 16,000 reported in VAERS if nothing is going on? The only vaccine with excess deaths is the COVID vaccine. All the other vaccines show the same number of excess deaths as in prior years. The argument that the COVID vaccines were rolled out to 100X more people than a normal vaccine is ridiculous. For example, the flu vaccine was given to at least 33% of the Medicare recipients so maybe you can argue a factor of 3X at most. So there is no way to explain the excess deaths which are effectively over 640,000 for a 41 underreporting factor.


The 640,000 number for the first two years of the vax rollout was validated in Mark Skidmore’s paper (which was published in a peer-reviewed journal) along with personal communications with Mark. Mark used polling and found a large number of deaths in 2021. Note that people are trying to get Mark’s paper retracted because they said it is unethical to ask people about vaccine deaths. Apparently, it’s OK to ask about COVID deaths, but it’s unethical to ask the exact same question about vaccine deaths. Also, they objected to the statement about who funded the study and wanted a complete bio of the funder. Mark has written over 70 papers published in the scientific literature and he’s never seen anything like these objections. The paper could easily note these, but they seem more interested in having the paper retracted because they don’t like the result. This is how science works. You can watch my interview with Mark Skidmore here so you can see first hand how science is manipulated with ridiculous objections when they don’t like what you find. I just learned that his university is now also investigating him. His crime? He reported survey results that go against the narrative.


No. I replicated the shot #1 charts myself and you can see them yourself in the Excel charts (which are drawn from the record-level data).


Not that I’m aware of.


I’d like to see someone try though. It would be fun to see the attempts.


Of course, you could interpret the upward slope as “See, the vaccine is saving COVID lives in the short term, that’s why the slope goes up over time as it wears off” but that is simply preposterous.


Nobody has ever claimed the vaccine reduces all cause mortality below baseline. There is no clinical trial showing that and there is no known mechanism of action whereby introducing a pathogen into your body will reduce all-cause mortality.


The only claim they make now is that the vaccine reduces COVID deaths. Fine. Let’s say that the vax is perfect and reduces every single COVID death, then the slope must still be downwards due to seasonality as we said before. But it’s not.


That is why all these pro-vaccine people are upset about this data: because they can’t explain it. So they will have to ignore it and hope that nobody reads my article.


So if you share this article, you won’t let them get away with it.


Jeffrey Morris wrote “temporal HVE” on Twitter:


But this is simply a hand-waving dismissal of all this work with no evidentiary support whatsoever. HVE refers to the “healthy vaccinee effect.” His “theory” is that the healthiest people get the vaccine first and since those people aren’t likely to die soon, it causes the slope to go upwards. The second part of the effect is that if you are dying from terminal cancer and will be dead in 3 days, you’re unlikely to want to get a COVID shot to protect you from dying from COVID. So people “self-select” out of the vax program if they know they are going to die.


But in our case, there was a mass vaccination effort for all Medicare patients and they were all vaccinated ASAP come December.


What Professor Morris can’t explain is why the slope is even more distinct for people who got their shots in March 2021. Those would be the “stragglers” and thus less healthy, yet the upward slope is even more pronounced than in January. So his “explanation” just doesn’t fit the data. Nice try, no cigar.


Furthermore, here are the days to death numbers for the flu and pneumococcal shots in Medicare patients. Nobody has ever seen these charts before either.


See how the lines are all FLAT for the same study on these vaccines??


If you look closely, you can see that there is a slight rise in the slope for a few days after the shot only. That’s the HVE effect. It’s small and very short lived. It is NOTHING like what we see for the COVID vaccines.


Also note that anyone taking these shots isn’t planning on dying the day of the shot (why take the shot if you are going to die?).


Yet they do die on the same day of the shot, in massive numbers. Why is that? Because these “safe vaccines” kill people; that’s why there is a huge spike on Day 0.


This is another reason why the CDC never shows you the Medicare data: it would reveal that other vaccines are deadly as well (and kill more than 1 person per million which is the threshold for safety).


On February 26, I sent Professor Morris an email. He needs either to believe the Medicare data or discredit it. If he wants to discredit it, it would imply that all US government data on COVID is bogus. If he believes it, then he has to accept what it says, which is that the vaccines are increasing your risk of death.


I said he can’t have it both ways. Which path will he take?


I’ll update this article if I hear back.


We need to stop holding the data hostage.


If the CDC wants to prove I’m wrong, the best way to do that is to publicly release all the data as specified in this article. That would be in the public interest.


Will they do that? No way. Never. They will come up with excuse after excuse why they can’t do this.


And that tells you EVERYTHING you need to know.


The record-level vax-death Medicare data I received is now publicly available. Now, for the very first time, you can analyze it yourself.


It shows the vaccines increase the risk of death for the elderly and that these risks appear to remain persistently elevated. It’s anyone’s guess for how long.


So now you know why the CDC never showed us the Medicare data. And now you know why the medical community and mainstream media never asked to see it and never will. They had it the whole time and kept it from public view so they wouldn’t create “vaccine hesitancy.”


If you think public health officials don’t hide the data, you should read this tweet from Chris Martenson where the Australian health authorities admit that they covered up vaccine deaths because they “didn’t want to undermine public confidence” in the vaccine. Get it?


If you think public health officials in the US want to see all the safety data even for just themselves, you should watch my video of Stanford Professor Grace Lee calling the Palo Alto Police on me when I tried to ask her if she wanted to see the safety data from the Israeli Ministry of Health.


Basically, the health authorities in the US run the other way when you try to confront them with data showing they are wrong. The proof is on that video. I tried to show the top CDC outside official world-class data collected by top scientists hand-picked by the Israeli health authorities. And her response to my offer to see the data was to call the cops.


Finally, if your doctor still tells you to take the shot, ask her to first explain to you why the slope in the Medicare data goes the wrong way before you get the shot. Have her explain to you why all these charts in this article are “normal.” And let us all know what she says in the comments.


Share




Post

See new posts

Conversation

Dr Shankara Chetty reposted

Dr David Cartland

@CartlandDavid

“I gathered all vaccine ingredients into a list and contacted Poison Control. After intros and such, and asking to speak with someone tenured and knowledgeable, this is the gist of that conversation.


Me: My question to you is how are these ingredients categorized? As benign or poison? (I ran a few ingredients, formaldehyde, Tween 80, mercury, aluminum, phenoxyethanol, potassium phosphate, sodium phosphate, sorbitol, etc.)


He: Well, that's quite a list... But I'd have to easily say that they're all toxic to humans... Used in fertilizers... Pesticides... To stop the heart... To preserve a dead body... They're registered with us in different categories, but pretty much poisons. Why?


Me: If I were deliberately to feed or inject my child with these ingredients often, as a schedule, obviously I'd put my daughter in harm's way... But what would legally happen to me?


He: Odd question... But you'd likely be charged with criminal negligence... perhaps with intent to kill... and of course child abuse... Your child would be taken away from you... Do you know of someone's who's doing this to their child? This is criminal...


Me: An industry... These are the ingredients used in vaccines... With binding agents to make sure the body won't flush these out... To keep the antibody levels up indefinitely...


The man was beside himself. He asked if I would email him all this information. He wanted to share it with his adult kids who are parents. He was horrified and felt awful he didn't know... his kids are vaccinated and they have health issues...”


~  By  Iris Figueroa 


Here are just SOME vaccine ingredients present in routine vaccines:


◾️Formaldehyde/Formalin - Highly toxic systematic poison and carcinogen.


◾️Betapropiolactone - Toxic chemical and carcinogen. May cause death/permanant injury after very short exposure to small quantities. Corrosive chemical.


◾️Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide - May cause damage to the liver, cardiovascular system, and central nervous system. May cause reproductive effects and birth defects.


◾️Aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, and aluminum salts - Neurotoxin. Carries risk for long term brain inflammation/swelling, neurological disorders, autoimmune disease, Alzheimer's, dementia, and autism. It penetrates the brain where it persists indefinitely.


◾️Thimerosal (mercury) - Neurotoxin. Induces cellular damage, reduces oxidation-reduction activity, cellular degeneration, and cell death. Linked to neurological disorders, Alzheimer's, dementia, and autism.


◾️Polysorbate 80 & 20 - Trespasses the Blood-Brain Barrier and carries with it aluminum, thimerosal, and viruses; allowing it to enter the brain.


◾️Glutaraldehyde - Toxic chemical used as a disinfectant for heat sensitive medical equipment.


◾️Fetal Bovine Serum - Harvested from bovine (cow) fetuses taken from pregnant cows before slaughter.


◾️Human Diploid Fibroblast Cells - aborted fetal cells. Foreign DNA has the ability to interact with our own.


◾️African Green Monkey Kidney Cells - Can carry the SV-40 cancer-causing virus that has already tainted about 30 million Americans.


◾️Acetone - Can cause kidney, liver, and nerve damage.


◾️E.Coli - Yes, you read that right.


◾️DNA from porcine (pig) Circovirus type-1


◾️Human embryonic lung cell cultures (from aborted fetuses)


You can view all of these ingredients on the CDCs website.


https://cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf


https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

I discovered some brilliant people like the Kiwi couple Dr Sam Bailey MD and Dr Mark Bailey MD, Mike Stone and his brilliant viroLIEgy website, Dr Thomas Cowan MD, Dr Andrew Kaufman MD, Christine Massey MSc, Dr Stefano Scoglio PhD. There are many others too (see the signatories to the virus challenge further down). I quickly came to recognise that virology is a fraudulent pseudoscience and that there is no good evidence for the existence of pathogenic human viruses.   

https://www.truebiblecode.com/ 

[30] Why are the Government so desperate to vaccinate us all?

1. The economic answer is that the Health Service has now been 100% corrupted by the Pharmaceutical Industry with a lot of help from Fauci Gates Collins etc. A doctor with 10 years of training and 20 years of full on clinical experience is no longer permitted to decide how to treat their patients based upon that training and experience. No. Instead they must follow the treatment protocol prescribed by the relevant regulatory agency, which agency is funded by assorted Billionaires acting as agents for Big Pharma. This becomes the perfect business model for the drugs companies. The perfect customer for Big Pharma has absolutely no immune system at all. I mean what does the human immune system do? Really what does it do? IT REDUCES THE PROFITS  OF BIG PHARMA.

So the more successful drugs companies, having won the battle against the less successful ones, realised that their true enemy was now your immune system. If they could destroy that then you would have absolutely no choice but to be a very regular and very lucrative customer of theirs. Hence the vaccines destroy your immune system with a new form of VAIDS. They are a man made disease sold as a cure for a man made disease. 

2. Politicians are not interested in your health. The Lords Witnesses run an orphanage in Africa and one of the kids their was left at our gates suffering from AIDS (his mother having died of HIV). We have to pay for HIV drugs for him. They are not free. If we fail to give Moses the AIDS medication he dies. But nobody has made AIDS medication compulsory. There is no HIV medication mandate. There are no HIV Passports and HIV has killed way more people the Covid will ever kill. The government does not care if you live or die from AIDS which kills so many young people but we are to believe that they do care if you live of die from a far less lethal souped up flu that mainly takes out people at the end of their life who are obese or suffer from comorbidities? And if they really cared about your health or about the NHS would they be sacking highly qualified medical specialists who know more about immunology and virology than any politician ever will and are perhaps the only people in the entire country in a position to give or to refuse an informed consent for a 3 year out of date vaccine with a negative effectiveness? Would they be sacking them in circumstances where the NHS has a huge backlog of cancer and cardiovascular cases?

Rather than sacking Doctors who have made an informed decision to refuse vaccination knowing the risk to their employment future, we should be interviewing them and learning from their expertise and following their example until a full public debate has been heard.

Politicians do not beg you to fix your health. They beg you for your vote. Your vote is what they are interested and it is all that they are interested in. Every vaccination is a vote for the global 4th Reich.

3.  Every castle has several walls for defence and the castle of the demons is no different. Every wall is a deception which people cannot get their minds over. So here is the inner wall of the castle of the demons and may God give your mind the power to scale it. Come on Neo take the Red pill. Escape from the final prison for your mind and body.

Here is the Key question: Why did every single one of the vaccine companies make a vaccine from the spike protein (1/8th of the virus)? Why did nobody make one from the other 87.5% of the pathogen? What are the chances of half a dozen companies choosing the same 12.5% of the virus from which to make a vaccine? If the process was random the chances would be 1 in 8x8x8x8x8x8 = 1 in 262,144. But it was not random. The WHO provided the 1273 Amino acid spike protein and they all used that. But WHY? Well the largest funder of the WHO is a certain Software Billionaire. Here is the WHO funding for 2018-2019

D. J. Trump pulled out in 2020 leaving Bill Gates controlling  9.4% and 6.6% of their funding.

“Second only to the USA, the BMGF is one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization (WHO) and paid it more than $200 million in 2018 – more than Germany, France and Sweden combined in the same period. But this is not the only way in which the WHO is financed by Gates. GAVI, formerly known as the “Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization”, provided the WHO with an additional $150 million in 2018. One of GAVI’s main donors is again the BMGF, with $1.5 billion in 2016, for example.”

“It can therefore be said that the BMGF and thus the Gates family and Warren Buffett are the main source of income for the WHO through direct and indirect channels, which raises questions about its independence from these sources of finance. In addition, the BMGF also provided funding for the establishment of the “Coalition for Epidemic Prevention Innovation” (CEPI), which is concerned with the research and development of vaccines, amounting to around $100 million in 2017.”

“In addition, the Foundation regularly supports non-governmental organizations such as PATH, which are involved in the development of vaccination technologies, with millions of dollars in funding. The list of BMGF’s beneficiaries also includes the largest global pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Aventis. The comprehensive influence of the BMGF in the vaccination sector is therefore obvious.”

“In the Corona crisis, it is striking that institutions that currently play an important role are likewise supported by the BMGF. For example, Johns Hopkins University which maintains the worldwide corona statistics that are disseminated in all media, regularly receives large donations. In the last ten years only, more than $200 million have been transferred to the university by the Gates Foundation. The purpose of the donations was family planning programs.” -  https://www.weblyf.com/2020/05/how-bill-gates-funds-the-who-and-other-organizations/ 

So a decision was made through the WHO to make a vaccine from the most pathogenic part of the virus, the protein spike. This decision was not made on health grounds quite obviously. One reason for this decision was immune destruction as we have discussed above.

But there is another reason which is far more lethal and far more insidious than immune system destruction. You may have noticed that governments are acting as if they OWN your body. They are denying you the right to decide what to do with it. They wish to prescribe for you whom you can socialise with. They wish to be the ones who determine whether you visit your parents or your grand parents when they are sick and in need. They wish to decide who can see your face and whose face you are permitted to see. They wish decide what medical treatments you should have and what pharmaceutical products should be put into your body. Your body - their body is the position they are taking worldwide.

Now if they take that position in legislation, do you think they are not trying to take it in genetics as well? These vaccines change your genetic code to make you something God never intended you to be. They make you into something that is owned by the demons who have taken over most national governments today. They make you into the property of the government, the property of the demons. They change your genes from being a son of Adam and a son of God, to being a son of the demons. These people want to own you. They are serious about that desire. You can see it in government legislation and in main stream media propaganda. They want to own your children and they want to own you as a slave. Slaves do not own their children. The smart way to achieve that is to own your genes and your children's genes, In order to do that they have to change your genes. THAT is what these vaccines are all about.

The demons are genetically appropriating you and your children under the pretext of a flu shot. 

The final 42 month lease given over mankind, over Adam, to the Dragon (Satan's demonic administration), lasted for 42 months of Revelation 13. That lease expired on 2022Shebat14 (2023February9/10). From that point forwards the demons of the dragon had absolutely no divine authority at all over Adam. So they had to find some way to regaining the authority that they had lost (being extremely sick control freaks). The only other form of authority recognised by God is patriarchal authority. So they had to make mankind into their children rather than the children of God. That had to adopt them genetically. Because God, unlike today's social services, has total respect for parental rights over children. So they had to find a way to persuade us all to permit them to change our genes from being adamic, to being the seed of the serpent of Genesis 3:15, which seed was Cain. They had to convert our genes from Adamic to Cainian.

14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou [art] cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: (KJV)
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise/ambush thy head, and thou shalt bruise/ambush his heel. (Genesis 3 KJV)

Do not be sacred of this symbolism. Genesis 3:15 describes the final battle between good and evil in this world which determines whose seed you become spiritually. The Kingdom of God is the next administration of the world. It is the next government of the next group of nations of man. But that man will no longer be ageing Adam in that system. We  will be actually be half speed ageing Abraham at first (he had 240 year max lifespan body and lived for 180 years). So God is trying to take us out of Adam into Abraham in order to begin the process of ending age and adamic death. But Satan is not prepared to let God have a clear run at that. So he is trying to beat him to the punch and take us out of Adam and into Cain in order to keep his control over us and deny us our non ageing salvation that Jesus died for.

Cain means spear or spike in Hebrew. Strong's has:   qayin, kah´-yin; from 6969  in the orig. sense of fixity; a lance (as striking fast):—spear.

So vaccinated people are spikian, spearian, lancian, Cainian, the seed of the Serpent. The vaccines are the snake bite. And the vaccines had to take out parts of your immune system in order to prevent your genes from fixing themselves when they are forcibly changed out of Adam.

SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro - https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056/htm
by Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei
Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden and Department of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden

Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV–2) has led to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic, severely affecting public health and the global economy. Adaptive immunity plays a crucial role in fighting against SARS–CoV–2 infection and directly influences the clinical outcomes of patients. Clinical studies have indicated that patients with severe COVID–19 exhibit delayed and weak adaptive immune responses; however, the mechanism by which SARS–CoV–2 impedes adaptive immunity remains unclear. Here, by using an in vitro cell line, we report that the SARS–CoV–2 spike protein significantly inhibits DNA damage repair, which is required for effective V(D)J recombination in adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines. 

The problem with this study is not merely that mRNA vaccines prevent your DNA from repairing itself which will cause immunological disorders, cancer and premature ageing. The problem is that the mRNA is going into your cell nuclei. That is straight gene therapy not vaccination. mRNA should go directly to the protein assembly plants in your cells called ribosomes, which it should instruct to manufacture the spike protein. It should not be going anywhere near the cell nucleus. Entering the cell nucleus means it is performing or effectively performing reverse transcription and making itself a part of, or an addition to, your genetic code. 

The faithful and the loving among mankind are the heal of the seed of the woman, the end times born agains (angelically and non adamically). The woman is the means by which we are born again. She is Jesus' wife, the 3rd Holy Spirit - not Eve. For God is trying to change our genes out of Adam and into non adamic Abraham, this being the start of our edenic restoration. 

But if you are vaxxed then your genes are being raped by genetic vaccines. You are losing your genetic integrity. Your immune system is fighting to maintain it.  But you are dishonouring your own body and more importantly you are dishonouring God who gave you it. For more see U917

The Pope on 2022January10 calls vaccination a moral obligation during his annual speech to ambassadors at the Vatican: The Pope has given his strongest backing yet to the Covid vaccine, siding with the Vatican’s coronavirus advisory board and calling it a “moral obligation,” urging people to show “respect for the health” of others. - https://www.rt.com/news/545689-pope-covid-vaccine-moral-obligation/  

Pope Francis has therefore made himself into a worthy successor to Pope Urban VI who ordered the exhumation and burning of Wycliffe's body.

[31] The 1NC, HLC and 2NC Marriages


https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/embalmer-meets-pathologist-cause 

https://ia800500.us.archive.org/33/items/68min-dr-chetty-snake-venom-embalmer-meets-pathologist-cause-of-mystery-clot/68min-dr%20chetty%20SNAKE%20VENOM%20Embalmer%20Meets%20Pathologist%20-%20Cause%20of%20Mystery%20Clot.mp3 

https://ia800500.us.archive.org/33/items/68min-dr-chetty-snake-venom-embalmer-meets-pathologist-cause-of-mystery-clot/68min-dr%20chetty%20SNAKE%20VENOM%20Embalmer%20Meets%20Pathologist%20-%20Cause%20of%20Mystery%20Clot.mp4 

 Embalmer Meets Pathologist - Cause of Mystery Clots?


17:00 Why would pathologists not notice these clots (Dr Donnellan)

21:10 Could the clots be elsewhere in the body? (Dr Chetty)

24:50 What do the clots look like (NOT for the Squeamish!)

28:32 Observations from live blood work (Dr Chetty)

33:50 Where did the idea of snake venom come from?

38:18 Characteristics of patients with clots

40:20 Why should the vaccine be a consideration?

44:30 Why is there so little interest in these clots? (Richard Hirschm 

For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! 


---------Transcript----------- 


We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. 


"With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." 


Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. 


Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. 


This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. 


In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. 


Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? 


Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? 


That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern.


Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. 


However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? 


The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. 


"I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." 


The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. 


Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. 


So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. 


The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. 


But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. 


Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. 


However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report.