Rollover funds were previously discussed in Chapter 14. It is important to understand the limitations of maintenance funding and to be aware of key important factors pertaining to maintenance funding.
Maintenance funds lapse every state fiscal year on June 30th. This deadline needs to be taken into account for all maintenance stations as it can impact their ability to fund projects, order equipment and materials. Currently, when using maintenance funds all work completed before June 30th is able to be charged to the current fiscal year. If the labor, materials, and/or equipment does not arrive or is not in place by June 30th, it will have to be placed on the next fiscal year's budget. (See UDOT Year End Expenditure Training on the UDOT Learning Portal).
Situation: A maintenance station is self-performing the install of roadside fencing. As of June 30th, the maintenance station has received and installed all the necessary posts for the project, but they have only received 50% of the necessary mesh for the fencing project.
Resolution: The maintenance station receives the remaining fencing mesh on July 8th. All fencing materials that were received by the maintenance station on or before June 30th are charged to the prior fiscal year. 50% of fencing mesh received on July 8th will be charged to the current fiscal year's budget.
As year’s end approaches, it is important that the district engineers, maintenance engineers, area supervisors, maintenance analysts, and station supervisors are visiting regularly to account for projects, the status of said projects, and other work being performed. Having contingency plans and/or projects that are ready to go will help to ensure no funding is lost. Any funding not used by the end of the fiscal year is lost and will not be available to be used by the individual maintenance stations.
The current snow year has been lighter than expected and a particular maintenance station did not use all of their snow budget. The maintenance station identified a fencing project as a priority the previous year and received bids for the materials needed. The maintenance station (with permission from the area supervisor and district engineer) is able to use the remaining snow funds to purchase and install the fencing to protect the state's ROW.
It is also important to note that the UDOT can only rollover (funds that are allowed to be carried over from one fiscal year to the next) or “reclaim” a total of $2.0M statewide from the operation line item (this includes maintenance). If UDOT’s remaining funds exceed $2.0 M, the difference will go back into the General Transportation Fund which may not be returned to maintenance. Even though UDOT is allowed to rollover $2.0M within the operations line item budget, senior leadership has the discretion to determine where those funds will be spent. There is no guarantee that rollover funds will automatically come back to Central Maintenance for redistribution to the regions.
Another factor that can impact maintenance station’s budgets is the time frame needed to transfer funds between units within the operations line item. Currently the process requires approval from the senior leaders, budget officer, and the director of finance. This process takes approximately 30 days to complete these types of transfers.
A maintenance station has overrun their budget due to employees working overtime on a construction project. Transferring funds from construction to maintenance will take approximately 30 days to complete and will need to be done before June 30th.
Where can Maintenance funds be spent?
Maintenance funds are made up entirely of state funds that are very flexible and can be used for labor, equipment, and/or materials on state routes. However, there are constraints inherent to these funds; maintenance funds must be expended by June 30th of each year or they lapse at the end of the fiscal year. These funds cannot be transferred into a traditional UDOT construction project that is funded by the construction line item and set up by a PIN.
Another unique aspect of maintenance funds is that there is a limitation on what can be spent by state forces per maintenance construction projects; ie. resurfacing (labor and materials only) as determined by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Click for Current Fiscal Year bid limit (Under the Construction and Maintenance Bid Limit Tab). There are exceptions in special cases (as described in 72-6-109 for emergencies) where you can go over the bid limit. For the exact determination of how this amount is calculated, please refer to: 72-6-109 Class B & C Roads - Construction and Maintenance - Definitions -- Estimates Lower than bids -- Accountability.
Maintenance funds can also be used for the purchase or rental of equipment (following procurement rules for small purchases). Coordinate all equipment purchases with the UDOT Equipment Division to ensure equipment has been accounted for and proper documentation is in place. Procurement rules must be followed for ALL purchases and not just for equipment. If equipment is desired to be purchased that exceeds the small purchase amount please work directly with the Equipment Division as they can assist you in making the purchase.
Another purchase that is often made by maintenance is for materials that are used to maintain the transportation system. Such as, but not limited to: hot mix asphalt, concrete, delineators, guardrails, aggregate products, fencing, signs, and signposts. When purchasing these items, please work through your region contract specialist to ensure the products are either on contract or purchased through a procurement contract. It is also important to note that these items, if purchased on inventory, will remain on inventory until they are placed, installed, or used and charged off by the maintenance station(s).
What is a dedicated credit, how do they work, how they are established, and why are they important?
A dedicated credit is a type of estimated "loan" within the maintenance budget. As maintenance forces and vendors repair UDOT assets damaged during crashes, UDOT attempts to collect reimbursement of repair expenditures from the responsible driver or their insurance. Bills sent out by UDOT are considered "revenue" and go towards paying back the dedicated credit amount each year. Revenue typically exceeds the dedicated credit amount, and continues to reimburse repair expenditures. Dedicated credit estimates can fluctuate from year to year, and should be watched closely as part of the region's maintenance budget. If there are any questions regarding “Dedicated Credits”contact the financial manager in Central Maintenance or the comptroller's office.
Asset damage costs caused by third parties are recoverable (referred to as Recoverable Crash Costs,7M03’s). UDOT will seek reimbursement for the damaged items (as allowed under Utah State Code 72-7-301). These crashes have an incident report (police report) that has been filled out and filed by local law enforcement. It is important to note that all costs to clean up, repair, or replace the damaged assets is recoverable. Costs such as equipment, labor, materials, and traffic control are all eligible recoverable costs.
When a crash occurs within a station boundary and an incident report is filed with local law enforcement (that crash is cross referenced to an “A number” provided by the region accounting group, that is used to track the crash recovery process), it is important that the maintenance station track all costs associated with the response, cleanup, repair or replacement of the damaged assets. Costs associated with these crashes are filed with the UDOT region accounting groups to seek reimbursement.
It is also important to note that when these recoverable crash costs are filed by the region accounting group, the amount of the repair costs does not come out of the station's budget but rather the dedicated credit. If the region accounting group and the collection agent is unsuccessful in collecting crash costs, then the funds will come out of the region maintenance budget. This process can vary by region, so check with your region maintenance analyst.
UDOT can be reimbursed for the cost to bring the item(s) up to the current standard. If UDOT would like to install an item or make a repair that is above the current standard, the additional cost would need to be covered by UDOT.
An outdated barrier attenuator is hit. UDOT can recover the cost to replace/repair to the latest standard.
The following Utah Codes and Administrative rule provides guidance on eligible costs for crashes; as per Utah Code 41-6A-409, Utah Administrative Code R907-63-3, and Utah Code 72-7-301. UDOT does not factor in depreciation when estimating cost for repairs due to crashes. UDOT uses the current cost of the asset in order to repair and or replace the damages.
During the course of the fiscal year all the recoverable crash costs are tracked by each region to determine if they will meet their dedicated credit. It is important to note that a region is allowed to collect and use up to 100% of their dedicated credit limit. If a region does go over 100%, regions will need to coordinate with the comptroller's office to determine how these excess funds will be allocated.
Currently, Central Maintenance, the region maintenance analysts, the comptroller's office, and other divisions who influence the operations budget meet once a month to discuss factors that can affect the budget bottom line. Items of discussion include the current and projected balance of the dedicated credits, and the Federal Earned Revenue.
If a particular region exceeds their dedicated credit, they are able to use up to 125% of the dedicated credit for revenue with approval from the comptroller’s office. In the case that costs exceed the dedicated credit excess limit one of two things can occur: funds can either be transferred from other regions to make up the difference, or the region will have to cover the difference with other funds from maintenance.
If a region has a dedicated credit of $500K for recoverable crashes and through the course of the year they recover $650K, they may be able to use $125K for revenue–the additional $25K goes back into the general transportation fund.
These funds must be used in the same fiscal year as the crash. At the end of the fiscal year, there are adjustments made to the budgets to keep the crashes and revenue in the same fiscal year. This adjustment affects the current and the coming fiscal year.
Examples of recoverable crashes and reimbursement process (7M03)
CRASH CUSHION:
Situation: A crash cushion is damaged by an errant vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed. The crash cushion is destroyed and must be replaced. The Highway Patrol creates an incident report. UDOT seeks out the incident report to collect damage reimbursement against the insured vehicle. This incident report will be combined with a UDOT “A-Number” used to track the crash through the reimbursement process. The damaged crash cushion replacement cost is $65,000. The maintenance station gets an invoice that includes all materials, labor, equipment, and necessary traffic control for the repair/replacement of the crash cushion. The maintenance station works with region accounting to provide all necessary invoices that were required to replace the crash cushion.
Resolution: The region accounting office pays the invoices (referencing the A-Number that was assigned to the crash cushion). Once all of the repairs are complete, a bill is created in FINET which is sent by UDOT to the responsible party or their insurance for the total cost of the repairs. The $65,000 will be attributed to the region’s dedicated credit amount.
CRASH CUSHION (cont.):
Assume the Crash Cushion scenario above is the same except that UDOT is only able to recover $35,000.00. In this case, $65,000.00 goes against the dedicated credit amount. When the funds are received from the insurance company UDOT must find the additional $30,000 to cover the total costs of the accident. These funds most likely will come out of the region’s budget. This is an important element that needs to be tracked and the timing needs to be monitored for when UDOT will settle the claim.
VEHICLE FIRE:
Situation: A vehicle traveling on UDOT’s highways catches fire and causes extensive damage to the roadway asphalt pavement. The following costs are eligible to seek for reimbursement from the insured motorists who caused the fire: incident response, repair, and clean up of an accident that damages the highway or highway features.
Resolution: The maintenance station requests an A-Number from the region accounting office to track all associated costs and estimates required to address all response and repair costs caused by the fire.The maintenance station creates an estimate that includes: 1) actual costs charged for the response and clean up of the fire, and 2) actual costs for the repair of the pavement damage caused by the fire. This includes UDOT costs as well as contractor costs. Working with the region maintenance analyst, the maintenance station arrives at a cost of $17,000 for the response and clean up of the fire. The maintenance station works with the region materials lab to assess the extent of the damage and arrives at a cost invoice to repair the damaged asphalt pavement at $125,000. The invoice includes all the materials, equipment, labor and traffic control needed to remove and replace the damaged asphalt pavement. Once all repairs are complete and paid for, the maintenance station notifies the region accounting office so they can process the bill to the appropriate party. UDOT can only bill for the exact amount of the repairs. The region will charge off the $142,000 towards the dedicated credit amount. UDOT is successful in recovering all the $142,000 from the vehicle who caught fire.The $142,000 will be used to offset the charges caused by the vehicle fire.
Sometimes crashes occur where there is no physical damage to UDOT’s assets, however maintenance crews are called out to provide clean up services to help open the road back to traffic (7M07’s). These costs are also recoverable. In this case, the response time and effort needed to re-open the highway is billable against the accident (UDOT Policy 06A-39). Work with the region maintenance analyst and the accounting group to ensure that all associated costs are accounted for.
Example: No Damage Crash Response (7M07's)
A MULTI CAR ACCIDENT WHERE NO DAMAGE IS CAUSED TO UDOT’S ASSETS
A multi car crash occurs on I-15 and the local maintenance station is called out to provide traffic control and clear debris from the wreckage. The maintenance station charges and tracks all labor, equipment, and materials needed to provide assistance in re-opening I-15. The maintenance station will provide all the necessary information to the region accounting office to seek reimbursement for the total expenses incurred in the efforts needed to re-open I-15.
Earlier in this chapter it was noted that station supervisors should be aware of the history and dollars amounts needed to cover non-recoverable crashes within their station boundaries and be aware of any changes that could increase or decrease this number. Crashes that are non-billable include crashes or incidents that have caused property damage with no police report or witness to provide an account of the party at fault, leaving UDOT to cover the costs of the damages (hit-and-runs) Depending upon the situation, the station supervisor may request assistance from the maintenance analyst and district engineers to cover the cost of the repairs with other maintenance funds. This information is being tracked in the maintenance management system so the data is available to back up the station supervisors information.
ONE CRASH ATTENUATOR IS DAMAGED IN A HIT-AND-RUN.
A crash attenuator is found to be damaged in the maintenance stations daily drive through. No accident report has been filed and it appears that whatever hit the attenuator has left the scene of the accident. In this case the damaged attenuator will need to be replaced and will be done using the funds from the maintenance station. These repair costs are not eligible for reimbursement since there is no third party to seek reimbursement from.
Each region has an accountant that creates bills for each crash. These bills are then passed to the centralized collection agent for UDOT who then attempts to recoup all costs associated with these bills. In some cases, UDOT is unable to collect a claim or need to settle for a lesser amount than what was paid. Any expenses UDOT is unable to collect become bad debt for the region at which point the maintenance analyst will need to review and properly budget for these unexpected expenditures.
When UDOT is unable to collect the full amount or reaches a settlement, the claim is either sent on to the Office of State Debt Collection as a write-off for further review or the delta of a settlement is reduced on our end.
Examples of Non-Collectable Claims
A bill was created 18 months after the incident occurred and no initial claim was filed with the insurance for UDOT at the time of the crash. When the collection agent contacted the insurance, we were informed a group settlement had already been issued, there were no funds left to cover for our damages, and the driver had filed for bankruptcy. With no avenue to collect on funds, these expenses will be sent on to OSDC where it will likely become bad debt.
The driver at the time of the accident had no insurance policy. All attempts to reach the driver have failed and the claim is now past 120 days outstanding. The bill will be turned over to OSDC where they may be able to track the driver and garnish their wages or tax returns. If they are unable to also reach the driver, this will become bad debt.
A crash occurred on one of our urban routes that resulted in a few local shops being damaged as well as pavement and signal damage. UDOT’s total cost for repair is $48,500. The insurance has a state limit on their insured of $35,000. After negotiations with all victims of the incident, UDOT was able to get $10,000 with the remainder of the insurance limit being paid out to the shops and other victims. The remaining $38,500 is now bad debt for UDOT and will need to be expensed against the region maintenance budget.
A landslide pushed several vehicles into delineator posts and signs. Catastrophic damages will be handled at the maintenance admin level and other tools will be used to track expenses for these damages.
UDOT uses an accrual based accounting system, this means that all expenses, revenues, debts, etc. are recognized and recorded in the year that it happens. For damage claims, there are multiple steps and processes needed in order to recognize all elements of this process in the year in which they occurred.
Monthly, the comptroller's office prepares a forecast for the potential accrual amount for the Damage Claim Dedicated Credit and shares it with the maintenance analysts (example of the accrual forecast). This forecast consists of a few different calculated items. These items are the unbilled, pending write-offs, and receivables 120 days past due. All of these items are then formulated together and are then applied against the revenue to determine the total year end budget impacts. In some cases, this will boost current year revenue or could potentially decrease as well.
The Unbilled are all expenses paid out for a claim that have yet to become a bill. This could be a claim that takes a few months in order to repair. For example, some expenses have already been posted for payroll, but the contractor invoice is a few months out. These expenses need to be recognized in the year in which they occurred. The unbilled are monitored through reports searching for charges against 7M03 & 7M07.
Examples of Unbilled
A crash in December took out a sign that will need to wait for spring in order to repair. The sheds bill for their time out at the damaged location which totals $450, but they are still expecting a contractor to come out in July to finish the repair. On the year end accrual, the comptroller's office will increase the current year revenue by $450 to recognize the expenditures in the correct year. The contracted amount will be billed in the new year.
When UDOT is unable to collect the claim for whatever reason, UDOT is obligated to then create a Write-Off (WO) and send the claim over to OSDC (State Office of Debt Collection) so they can try other methods to collect on UDOT claims for a fee.
These WO’s have two paths: either OSDC immediately approves the WO which then creates bad debt to the region budget (this would normally include claims under $10K) or, if the claim is greater than $10K, then OSDC will keep the claim pending approval until they are satisfied they have exhausted all options to collect on it. Claims can sit in WO status for up to 18 months in some circumstances.
The UDOT collection agent was unable to make contact with an uninsured driver for a claim of $13,750. After discussing with the region, it is decided to create a WO and move the claim to OSDC. OSDC 18mos later was unsuccessful at collecting the claim and will now approve the WO.
After a bill is created, the UDOT collection agent has 120 days to collect on this by policy (UDOT Policy 02-61). When the initial bill is created, artificial revenue is generated and posted to region budgets. If the claim is 120 days past due, UDOT needs to consider these claims as potentially bad debt, imaginably becoming write-offs in the next few weeks. Until then, UDOT needs to manually adjust it out of revenue. There are some exceptions to this–payment plans to UDOT can span years, or the claim may be deep in litigation which can take a few years to settle and collect on. In those circumstances, we do not yet consider those bad debts.
With these three categories (Unbilled, Pending Write-Offs, Over 120 Days), an amount is calculated for total effect to the current year budget.
The three accrual adjustments resulted in a total effect of +$20,000 to the current year budget.
This could look like this:
Current Revenue: $100,000
Unbilled: $60,000
Pending WO: -$15,000
Over 120: -$25,000
Total Current Adjusted Revenue: $120,000
An accrual is a manual adjustment in order to reflect the proper amounts in the correct fiscal year. Continuing on with the example above, when the bills are finally created in the next fiscal year it would then increase the next fiscal year's revenue again. Which would then double the revenue overall since it was recognized in the previous year.
To offset the accrual from the previous fiscal year, an adjustment will be created in the new fiscal year to prevent this. So in our example, the old FY had a total adjustment of +$20,000, so to offset it in the new fiscal year the budget will start with a -$20,000.
Figure 15.2.1 - Year End Accrual Process
This accrual transaction is something that is done during the last week of the fiscal year, but can be calculated at any time.
Year end write-offs and adjustments (journal entries) are used to describe the process of when the state has tried to recover the costs of a crash/incident and has been unsuccessful or when the expense crosses fiscal years. These year end write-offs and adjustments will come back and be charged or credited against the region where the crash/incident occurred. It is important that the maintenance analyst and the comptroller's office are working hand-in-hand as write-offs can occur any time during a three year period from the date of the crash/incident. These write-offs and adjustments can have a large impact on regions depending upon the size and the amount of the write-offs and adjustments. It is important that the region has an idea of the status of when a certain crash may either be recovered or written-off as a loss. Currently, crashes estimated as less than $10,000 in damages are generally written-off as a loss.
If the state is unable to receive reimbursement for recoverable crash costs, UDOT may write these costs off as a loss. These losses come out of the region’s maintenance funds, which could be an unexpected cost if these crashes are not being tracked. This process typically does not occur in the same fiscal year as when the crash occurred. This would also result in a year end adjustment for damage claims.
Every year, UDOT uses federal dollars to construct, rehabilitate, or preserve our transportation system. When working on federally funded construction projects, UDOT gets reimbursed for the hours charged against these projects by UDOT employees. Much like recoverable crashes, the comptroller’s office–along with input from the region accounting and program management group–propose an amount to the state legislature that each region should achieve by staffing federally funded construction projects. Currently, the use of consultants is not an eligible charge that counts towards the dedicated credit on these projects.
The district engineers, resident engineers, and project managers must work together to determine a staffing plan that provides UDOT with the best opportunity to adequately staff all the construction projects while achieving the Federal Fund Earned Revenue amount. Similar to the recoverable crashes, if the region(s) fall short of reaching their allotted goal then 1) other regions who have exceeded their limit may transfer dollars to cover the shortage or 2) the region’s maintenance funds will need to be used to cover the shortfall. When a region is short of reaching the Federal Fund Earned Revenue, it is important to coordinate with Central Maintenance and the comptroller’s office to determine the appropriate action for years-end.
The 125% limit applies to the Federal Fund Earned Revenue as well: any earned credit above that amount can be used to assist other regions or goes back into the general transportation fund.
Every year materials and items are purchased by various divisions and departments.
Maintenance uses deicing materials and plow blades, Construction uses signal poles, and the Traffic Management Division purchases signal controller cabinets. These items are purchased and placed into inventory to assist UDOT with having these items readily available for use and to have a stockpile on hand as there can be long lead times associated with some of these items.
The inventory fund operates in the following manner: cash is spent from the inventory fund when items are purchased, and cash is returned to the fund when inventory items are used by UDOT employees or construction projects.
Another example of the inventory fund is the State Furnished Materials. Materials are ordered that are common to construction projects (such as light poles, signal poles and mast arms, controller cabinets) these items tend to have long lead items and UDOT purchases these items to have them available for contractors to use on UDOT construction projects. All these materials and items are placed into inventory and are not paid for by the project until the contractor takes possession of these items. This can create an issue if projects get delayed and items are left on inventory that were planned to go to construction.
It is also important for the Maintenance Stations to have a strategic plan for ordering and using materials through the year. If materials are ordered and not used they will continue to stay on inventory until they are used or they are deemed unusable and written off. Either way this has an impact on the inventory fund. Please verify as materials or items are being charged off from inventory that the correct coding is being used. If you have questions please contact your region maintenance analyst for assistance.
There is a gray area in regards to when something should be run through inventory; within financial policy, there isn't a hard and fast rule. When working with region offices, there are however some guiding principles that should be followed:
Things like paper towels, toilet paper, hard hats, safety vests, etc. are inventoried items at the central and regional warehouses, but do not need to be inventoried at the shed level. These are standard overhead purchases–there's no need to track/report that usage beyond overhead. An expenditure is created at the time of purchase.
Considering when the item will be used might be the most important distinction, especially if it’s been determined the item is not a consumable. If a case of windshield washer fluid or a stop sign from the warehouse are purchased and put on the road within a couple of weeks, they can be expensed at the shed level and not inventoried. However, if 500 flexible delineator posts are purchased with the idea that they will be used sometime over the next four to five months, those should be inventoried. Another way of putting this is anything that is not consumable and could be in the shed when counting inventory in April should be placed into inventory.
To figure out if items need to be reported beyond being overhead, put the items into FINET inventory and then charge all usage through the Maintenance Management System (ATOM) to the correct piece of equipment.
Providing a dollar amount of the items really doesn't necessarily determine whether to inventory or not. Relatively inexpensive items may require additional reporting beyond being put into inventory.
Example (Vehicle Expenditures)
The oil being put into maintenance vehicles, how many blades are being used annually per truck, etc. should be reported.
Items or activities that are reported by route and milepost also fall into this category. For example, the above mentioned 500 delineators are likely not being installed in the same continuous location. If simply expensed at the time of purchase, you can list one SR/MP, but you're not accurately assigning those costs to each specific location. Put the items into FINET inventory, and as they are installed those costs can be assigned to the activity and SR/MP through the Maintenance Management System. This part seems even more crucial with the Maintenance Management System being asset based.
Understanding how equipment costs can impact and affect a maintenance station budget is critical in being able to balance the overall maintenance station budget. There are two main terms used when discussing equipment costs:
Fixed Costs: Fixed costs can be thought of as the monthly payment to own these vehicles. These are costs that are charged to the maintenance station for the equipment that resides within their maintenance station (org/unit). These costs can vary by the piece of equipment and by the year depending upon the age and the type of equipment. The fixed rate can be adjusted through the comptroller’s office depending on vehicle usage and repair costs.
Usage Costs: The usage cost per vehicle rarely fluctuates during the fiscal year–this allows the maintenance station to calculate the total cost for the usage they have on a piece of equipment per project or activity. Even though the usage costs rarely change per vehicle, the fixed rate can be adjusted and must be taken into account throughout the year. This ensures that changes to the fixed rate will not have a negative impact on the maintenance stations or region’s maintenance budget.
The goal of fixed and usage costs combined is to fund equipment operations (depreciation, new purchases, repairs, shop labor, licensing, etc.). The fixed and usage costs function both independently to cover the specific costs in each category and together to cover equipment recovery. They are both revaluated each fiscal year based on expenditure projections, and both can change during the fiscal year.
Example (Fixed vs. Usage Cost)
The State receives above average snowfall throughout the winter season across all regions. Thus, UDOT Maintenance must operate their equipment more frequently than anticipated to provide the level of service on UDOT highways. Because equipment was being used more frequently, additional equipment repairs were needed to keep the fleet operational.
Because the equipment usage costs throughout the year were higher than anticipated, UDOT needed to make an adjustment on the FIXED rate to balance the usage vs. the FIXED rate. In this case, UDOT may elect to lower the FIXED rate through the remainder of the fiscal year to offset the additional usage charges.
Additional information has been provided in Chapter 7 Equipment.