The Big Bang is a Fizz - James Webb Telescope
07/28/2020

07/25/2022

With the advent of even the first James Webb images, scientists readily find a spiral galaxy consisting of billions of stars a mere 300 million years from the origin of the supposed Big Bang. It places the galaxy in what cosmologists call the “Dark Ages” A realm occupied by supposedly newly formed primordial particles where even dust motes are not yet to be found.

Three hundred million years sounds like a long time, but on a cosmic time-scale, even on a geological time-scale, this is akin to a snapshot in time.

Putting it into perspective, our planet Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. That makes this galaxy 1/15th the age of our Earth. For such rapid growth of a full fledged galaxy, one needs to suspend disbelief or invoke the efforts of a deity to obtain this speed of galactic creation.

Judging from this instant find, as time passes the James Webb Telescope is highly likely to find innumerable more galaxies in this realm, and it may be that when one allows for the dust, gas and distance, we will have to conclude that this formally mysterious realm resolves into an intergalactic garden variety environment not unlike our local galactic group.

If this is so, there are two ways cosmology can branch.

The first - and cowardly way - is to persistently move the Big Bang goal posts further into the event horizon, thus shrouding and obscuring the deficit until even more powerful telescopes reveal that we are just looking further and further into a never-ending red fog, until galaxies themselves cannot be visible by any instrument; a convenient dead end not unlike the adherence to a geocentric mindset.

The other bolder and braver approach is to realize that since the evidence for the Big Bang will have disappeared together with the cosmic redshift upon which this logic is founded, is this not an invite to consider common sense alternatives?

For instance, what if the cosmic redshift is not what we think it is, but instead that we exist in a ‘lens’, a universal bending of space that gives us the illusion of cosmic distance?

This would explain why locally we see blue doppler shifts as galaxies approach us, and red shifts as they recede, that superimposed upon this, the very nature of space acts as a distorting lens. Like looking through a telescope the wrong way around, creating the illusion that on a cosmic scale, objects are moving faster and faster away from us?

Isn’t it time we looked at the Universe through new eyes?

7/27/2022
Webb Telescope news update! It was only a week ago that galaxy GLASS-z13 was found to be a mere 300 Light years from the event horizon (also called the Big Bang)

Preliminary results now show a new galaxy, a mere 180 million years from the event horizon (the supposed Big Bang.
That’s 120 million years closer to the event horizon than the previous record holder, GLASS-z13).
Even more urgently, it begs the question: How does one create a galaxy in such a short time?

As I mentioned earlier, If it turns out that the "Dark Ages" does not exist, then likely the Big Bang does not exist.
Since the Big Bang rests on the cosmic red shift time scale and this has now shown itself to be faulty, then using to the cosmic redshift as a time-distance cornerstone no longer makes any sense.
One can't cherry-pick arguments from the redshift cherry three if there is no redshift cherry tree to pick from.
*********

(07/29/22
I'll stick my head out again at the risk of tarnishing my reputation by making another prediction as to what is going to be forthcoming down the road:

As the James Webb Telescope continues to gather deep field data, finding more and more galaxies in what the Big Bang theory describes as the "Dark Ages", an image will slowly emerge that this distant environment is typical galactically garden variety, in other words, similar to our own local galactic group.

How does one verify this?

Imagine you are standing on the other side of the Hudson River looking at New York on a foggy day. You can only discern a hint of the brightest lights pointed at you.

OK, that's a comparison to Hubble resolution. Now here comes the JWT and it penetrates the fog (Event Horizon background) and sharpens things up - not perfectly, but significantly. Then compare that data with an artificial fog that mimics the Event Horizon, placed in front of our garden variety local Galaxy group. If the images are comparable, then you can be pretty sure that what is going on in the supposed "Dark Ages" is similar to what is happening in our local galactic neighborhood.

If it turns out that the Big Bang is not there, then cosmic redshift is not an evolutionary yardstick.

And those that want to cling on to the Big Bang? They’ll conveniently move the goalposts further into the event horizon haze where no human made instrument can never prove that it’s not hiding somewhere in there, demoting the Big Bang to a tenuous hypothesis bordering on faith.
**********

SMA Rotary Club rests upon a foundation of compassion and science, so it too gets a heads up from SciTechNature.

********