Carl Wieman, Nobel Prize winner in physics; STEM Education reformer
“Teaching should be approached with the same rigor as scientific research, using evidence and experimentation to determine what works best for student learning.” — Carl Wieman
STEM instruction should be guided by research on how people learn — not tradition, intuition, or how the professor was taught.
Use findings from cognitive science.
Test instructional approaches.
Measure learning outcomes.
Core idea: Teaching should be treated like science — hypothesis, evidence, refinement.
Students learn science by doing and thinking, not by passively listening.
Peer instruction
Clicker questions
Problem-based learning
Frequent formative assessment
Principle: Deep understanding requires cognitive engagement.
Coverage of content is less important than mastery of fundamental concepts and scientific thinking.
Emphasize core principles.
Reduce superficial breadth.
Develop expert-like thinking patterns.
Shift: From memorization → to conceptual reasoning.
Courses should specify what students should be able to do, not just what topics are covered.
Use learning objectives.
Align assessments with goals.
Measure performance meaningfully.
Principle: If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it.
Exams should test conceptual understanding and problem-solving, not rote recall.
Use research-validated instruments.
Design assessments that reveal misconceptions.
Evaluate higher-order thinking.
Reform cannot rely on individual “hero instructors.”
Departments must redesign courses collaboratively.
Provide support through science education specialists.
Make reform systemic, not optional.
This was the foundation of the Science Education Initiative (SEI).
Teaching is a skill that improves through training, feedback, and practice.
Faculty development matters.
Teaching should be professionalized.
Prestige should not substitute for pedagogy.