TIMSS
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study
The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) assesses U.S. students in 4th and 8th grade on science content aligned closely with school curricula. Unlike PISA, TIMSS emphasizes what students know and can do within the classroom, making it especially useful for evaluating instructional effectiveness and curriculum coverage.
Countries like Singapore and Estonia outperform the U.S. because they treat science education as a coherent, cumulative, and equitable system—not a collection of disconnected courses and local decisions. TIMSS shows they teach science deeply; PISA shows they teach students to use it.
U.S. students generally score above the international average in science at both 4th and 8th grades.
However, they lag behind top-performing systems (e.g., Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan).
Performance has been largely flat over time, with modest gains followed by recent declines.
U.S. 4th graders outperform 8th graders relative to international peers.
This pattern suggests:
Strong early science exposure
A loss of momentum in middle school science instruction
The middle grades appear to be a critical weakness in the U.S. science pipeline.
U.S. students perform relatively well in:
Life science topics
Basic factual and conceptual knowledge
They perform less well in:
Physical science (especially physics and chemistry concepts)
Earth science at higher cognitive levels
This indicates uneven curriculum depth and coherence.
The U.S. has fewer students reaching the advanced benchmark compared with leading countries.
While many students achieve basic and intermediate proficiency, excellence is less common.
Top-performing systems combine broad proficiency with a larger share of advanced students.
TIMSS shows substantial disparities in science achievement by:
Socioeconomic status
Race and ethnicity
These gaps appear early and widen over time, especially by 8th grade.
The U.S. combines relatively strong averages with weak equity outcomes.
U.S. students spend less instructional time on science, particularly in elementary grades, compared with top-performing countries.
Science instruction is often:
Fragmented
Crowded out by reading and math accountability pressures
Teachers report lower confidence in teaching physical science, especially in earlier grades.
TIMSS findings suggest that improving U.S. science outcomes requires:
Sustaining strong early science instruction through the middle grades
Increasing instructional time and coherence in science
Strengthening preparation for teaching physical and earth sciences
Expanding access to high-level science learning, not just basic proficiency
Addressing persistent inequities that compound over time