Syllabus
PHILOSOPHY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
(taught in English)
Course Description
This course enables students to understand philosophical dimensions of international relations and their ethical challenges. Moreover, this discipline enhances students' ability to apply critical thinking and argumentation skills in the context of international relations.
Contact information
Instructor: Dr. Oleksandr Kulyk
Office: Gagarin ave, 72, 813
Email: prof.kulyk@gmail.com
Course Webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/kuliktexts/en/courses/pir
Required texts
Burchill S., Linklater A., Devetak R. (2005). Theories of International Relations. Third edition. Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith K.E., Light M. (Eds) (2004). Ethics and Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Nicolo Machiavelli, The Prince
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan
John Locke, Two Treatises of Government
Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man
Student Learning Outcomes
Upon successfully completing this course, students will develop their understanding of philosophical aspects of international relations. By the end of this course, students will be able to:
• analyze philosophical basis of main theories of IR
• address critically controversial ethical problems of IR
• argue their own views in the area of international relations with using philosophical argumentation.
Evaluation
Grades will be based on a 100-point scale distributed as follows:
Requirement
Participation (20%) – 20 points
Essays (20%) – 20 points
Debates (20%) - 20 points
Exam (40%) – 40 points
Final grade
А 90–100 points
В 82–89 points
С 75–81 points
D 64–74 points
Е 60–63 points
F 0–59 points
Course Requirements
Participation
To participate is to come to class and regularly contribute to discussions throughout the semester. This includes discussions in class and with the instructor during office hours.
Essays
Each student has to write two response essays. They are asked to critique the assigned texts based on a provided set of criteria in their response essays. The criteria focus on the validity of the assertions made and their relevance and applicability. The first text is the chapter XVIII of The Prince by Nicolo Machiavelli. The second text consists of passages from John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government.
Debates
Taking part in debates on the philosophy of international relations topics, students have to show their skills in critical thinking and logical arguing.
Exam
There will be a final exam in which students will respond to two questions about the material covered. The format will be an essay. In the first question students are asked to analyze a case from modern international relations by means of ethics. The second question will be about differences between the theories of international relations which are results of differences in their philosophical background. Students are expected to demonstrate in their answers that they have thought about the issues in an informed, thoughtful, and articulate way.
Tentative Timeline
September
Lecture:
Introduction to the Philosophy of International Relations
Lecture:
Philosophical Foundations of Realism Doctrine
Seminar:
Nicolo Machiavelli, the passages from The Prince
Seminar:
Thomas Hobbes, the passages from Leviathan
Lecture:
Philosophical Foundations of Liberalism Doctrine
Seminar:
John Locke, the passages from Two Treatises of Government
October
Seminar:
Francis Fukuyama, the passages from The End of History and the Last Man
Lecture:
The Philosophical Foundations of Marxism
Seminar:
The Philosophical Foundations of the English School
Lecture:
The Philosophical Foundations of Critical Theory
Seminar:
The Philosophical Foundations of Constructivism
Lecture:
The Philosophical Foundations of Green Politics Theory
November
Lecture
Morality and Foreign Policy
Case Study
Ethical Problems of War and Peace
Case Study
Ethics and Good Foreign Policy Leadership
Case Study
Ethical Foreign Policies and Human Rights
Workshop
Constructing an Ethical Foreign Policy.
Lecture
Differences between the Theories of International Relations in the Context of Ethics
December
Debates
Debates
Debates
Debates
Revision
Revision
January
Consultation
Exam