9-20-25 DailyBriefs.info archive  GoogleExplainer.com  

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Hua Bin’s "Delete USA"

The US tech and trade wars with China prompted Beijing to pursue a comprehensive decoupling strategy, motivated by concerns for national security and economic competitiveness1. In a textbook example of coercive policy backfiring, Beijing banned its large technology companies from purchasing Nvidia H20 and RTX 6000D chips1. Nvidia had specifically developed these two GPU AI accelerator chips for the Chinese market to comply with US bans on advanced AI chips1. The source argues that Beijing’s technocrats demonstrated superior intelligence in outsmarting the short-sighted political functionaries in Washington1.

The US regime began escalating the technological containment of China during Trump’s first term by banning US chip sales to Huawei, an attempt to destroy the telecom and mobile phone giant that failed miserably2. During the Biden administration, this tech war was further escalated by banning AI chips, software, and even lithography machines for the entire Chinese market, explicitly aiming to halt China’s progress in AI development2. Nvidia, holding a global monopoly on AI chips, designed the H20 chip to comply with the Biden export control, hoping to continue profiting from Chinese demand and locking developers into its CUDA software ecosystem, while withholding its latest chips3.

However, the world recognized that Chinese AI engineers were able to develop world-class AI models even with less powerful accelerator chips after a little-known firm, DeepSeek, launched its R1 large language model in January 20254. DeepSeek achieved this breakthrough using reinforcement learning, allowing its LLM to develop reasoning through self-evolution, thus requiring less compute and circumventing the chip moat Nvidia sought to build4.

The second Trump regime reacted by immediately banning the sale of even these watered-down H20 chips to Chinese firms, forcing Nvidia to write off $5.5 billion worth of unsold inventory5. This lack of access to advanced Western AI chips convinced Beijing that the only path forward for China’s AI industry was total self-reliance across every stage of the semiconductor value chain5. Chinese tech giants, including Huawei, Cambricon, and Alibaba, subsequently announced the production of AI accelerator chips that are only one generation behind Nvidia’s most powerful products5.

The Trump H20 ban inadvertently opened a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, previously monopolized by Nvidia, wide open for domestic Chinese producers6. Recognizing the risk of losing the largest single chip market to Chinese competitors, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Trump’s “AI Czar” David Sachs lobbied the Trump White House to loosen the ban, arguing it was in the US interest to keep Chinese companies dependent on Nvidia products, just not the best ones6. The ban was subsequently lifted, and Trump’s Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, boasted that the US would maintain control of the Chinese chip market by selling second-rate products7.

Beijing, whose leadership is generally trained as engineers rather than US bankers and lawyers, identified this as a clear ploy7. Instead of allowing the H20 back, Beijing launched an investigation into potential security issues, citing concerns over possible back doors and remote shutdown kill-switches7. Washington itself provided the basis for this suspicion, as US congressmen had openly requested that US chip producers embed geo-fencing functions into their products8. China's Cyber Administration officially requested major tech firms, such as Tencent and ByteDance, to stop testing and cancel orders for Nvidia's new China-only RTX 6000D chips8. Furthermore, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce launched an anti-monopoly investigation against Nvidia for failing to adhere to agreements made when Beijing approved its 2020 acquisition of Mellanox Technologies9.

It is evident that China has decided to forgo Nvidia and intends to build its AI industry completely separate from US technologies9. China is now undertaking a full-spectrum nationwide “Delete USA” strategy for its technological development10. Local Chinese AI chip makers like Huawei and Cambricon have already achieved performance parity with Nvidia’s China-specific chips10. Huawei is utilizing superior networking to change the competition paradigm by linking more chips to create greater scale and better performance at the rack level, developing powerful AI compute super-nodes like CloudMatrix 38411. China also holds a competitive edge in the AI war due to its far superior power generation capacity, allowing it to outbuild the electricity-hungry AI data centers needed, compared to the US11.

Beijing is also investing heavily in advanced semiconductor technologies, including photonic chips and third-generation semiconductors based on materials like indium selenide (InSe), which holds potential to displace traditional silicon chips12. Researchers at Peking University and Remin University recently announced breakthroughs in producing InSe wafers12. Five years prior, breaking Nvidia's dominance, rooted in its superior chips and CUDA software ecosystem, seemed unlikely1213. However, the malicious intent of the US regime to choke China's technological development inadvertently broke this chokehold by incentivizing all Chinese tech companies to seek alternatives and reduce dependence on US technology13.

Chinese companies such as Huawei and Cambricon are now providing alternative AI accelerators and breaking developers away from Nvidia’s CUDA network; Huawei has introduced the open-source CANN architecture14. The inevitable outcome is that Nvidia will be locked out of the Chinese chip market, the world’s largest, which will then belong solely to Chinese domestic producers14. China is establishing a completely separate and parallel AI system that currently might lag in compute performance but maintains zero dependence on the US15. This aggressive move by the US undermined its own tech champion15.

Historically, US belligerence toward China has repeatedly backfired16. The Wolf Act, which blocked China from the International Space Station (ISS) in 2011, resulted in China building its own Tiangong Space Station16. When the US shut down GPS signals to harass China’s Yinhe cargo ship in 1993, it spurred Beijing to develop the Beidou satellite navigation system, which is now considered more advanced than the aging GPS system16. Furthermore, US intervention in the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1996 motivated China to develop a full Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2AD) strategy, including anti-ship hypersonic missiles capable of keeping US ships away from Chinese shores16. As the US pursues an adversarial relationship, Beijing is actively implementing a full-speed “Delete USA” strategy through various means: pursuing full tech self-sufficiency (especially in AI), winding down trade (cutting purchases of US farm products, coal, and LNG), selling off US debt, and making US education less appealing to Chinese students17. China refuses to succumb to Washington’s coercion and has met its rival18.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analyzing Paul Dragu’s "Massie Accuses Former Banking CEO of Being an Epstein Client; Hints at 19 Others"

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is determined to reveal the powerful individuals to whom Jeffrey Epstein allegedly trafficked minors19. This effort stands in stark contrast to FBI Director Kash Patel, who has received criticism for failing to expose these individuals1920. Patel has stated that Epstein trafficked minors only for his own gratification and that no client list exists1921. This position contradicts numerous hours of sworn victim testimony and thousands of pages of investigative findings19.

Patel defended the lack of further disclosure by citing the constraints of the original 2006 Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida, claiming the agreement sealed investigatory material and barred future prosecutions for those involved at that time21. Massie refuted this, stating that those constraints applied exclusively to the Southern District of Florida22. Massie confirmed that ample information exists elsewhere, particularly within the FBI’s possession, sourced from the 2019 sex trafficking indictment handled by the Southern District of New York (SDNY)22.

These FBI documents reportedly contain information on at least 20 men to whom Epstein trafficked victims, including minors22. Massie explicitly named Jes Staley, the former CEO of Barclays and a major investor at J.P. Morgan, as one of the alleged assaulters22. Massie further indicated that the identities of 19 other suspected pedophiles are contained in FBI files under Patel's control23. This group includes specific high-profile individuals: one Hollywood producer, one royal prince, one high-profile individual in the music industry, one prominent banker, one high-profile government official, one former politician, one owner of an Italian car company, one rock star, one magician, and at least six billionaires, including one from Canada23.

When questioned on why no investigations had been launched into the people identified by victims, Patel stated that his FBI agents had reviewed the files and concluded that there was no credible information sufficient to launch a new indictment24. Patel emphasized that two different U.S. Attorney’s offices across three administrations had reached the same conclusion24.

Massie also introduced news articles into the record suggesting Epstein was linked to intelligence operations25. One article noted that former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta claimed he was instructed to “leave it alone” because Epstein belonged to intelligence25. Other sources indicated Epstein had CIA connections and met with Barack Obama's CIA chief25. Furthermore, Epstein’s calendar showed he met with Ehud Barak, former Israeli prime minister and intelligence head, 36 times25. Independent investigative journalists have linked Epstein to the CIA and Mossad26.

Regarding Jes Staley, court documents linked him to Epstein years prior26. The Virgin Islands sued J.P. Morgan, Staley’s previous employer, accusing Staley himself of funneling Epstein’s funds26. Emails detailed in the lawsuit suggested Staley may have been involved in the sex-trafficking operation, including discussions that seemed to use Disney characters as code, such as "Snow White" and "Beauty and the Beast"27. Staley described his relationship with Epstein as “profound”28. Although never charged with sexual crimes, Staley was forced out of Barclays in 2021 due to an investigation launched by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority regarding allegations that he misled regulators about his dealings with Epstein28. Staley testified that he was unaware of Epstein’s pedophilia but admitted to having consensual sex with one of Epstein’s assistants, though the assistant's age was not disclosed in reports29. J.P. Morgan, accused of facilitating and ignoring Epstein's sex-trafficking, eventually reached a $75 million settlement with the Virgin Islands to prevent discovery2930.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Examining Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has stirred immense speculation and turmoil in and around Washington31. Among the ensuing chaos, Republican conservatives, including those in the Trump cabinet, have called for a crackdown on the political left, despite a lack of clarity on whether any identifiable left-of-center group was involved in the killing31.

A serious suggestion gaining traction is that Israel may have carried out Kirk's killing, possessing both the motive and the means, given its unmatched international record of political assassinations and the customary political cover it receives from the United States32. The immediate public statements by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describing his affection for Kirk, were cited as suspicious32. This suspicion stems from the reported disagreement between Israelis and their allies in the US and Kirk regarding his growing concern over Israel's influence on both President Trump and US policy32.

Further unexplained circumstances involve a private jet, owned by a wealthy Jewish supporter of Chabad Lubavich Utah, departing from a nearby airport with its Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) deliberately deactivated33. This strongly suggests the actual assassin may have been removed from the scene by air33. The police investigation was complicated by George Zinn, identified by some as Jewish or Mormon-Zionist, who falsely shouted that he was the shooter, creating a diversion33. If the investigation ultimately points to Israel, a guaranteed government cover-up is anticipated, following historical patterns seen in the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, the JFK assassination, and the final report on 9/1133.

In the absence of a clear target for retribution over Kirk's death, the government investigation has instead begun attacking the First Amendment guarantee of free speech34. Several employees have been sanctioned or fired from their workplaces for comments expressing dislike of Kirk due to his controversial political stances34. This includes late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel34.

The Trump administration’s crackdown has involved the State Department threatening to identify non-citizens who praise, rationalize, or make light of the assassination on social media, potentially leading to visa revocation or deportation35. Attorney General Pam Bondi has also threatened ordinary American citizens with prosecution for “hate speech”35. Bondi appears to confuse criticism of Israel, labeling it "antisemitism," with "hate speech" that must be criminalized, despite the First Amendment lacking a hate speech clause35.

In Congress, the "Israel Firsters" have been highly active36. Congressman Brian Mast, a former Israeli Army serviceman, introduced a bill that would have allowed the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of Americans providing “material support” to "terrorists," implicitly targeting Palestinian resistance groups like Hamas, though he withdrew the bill after severe backlash from civil liberties groups36. Meanwhile, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik presented legislation to protect Benjamin Netanyahu from arrest by New York City officials during his US visits37. This proposal is in response to New York State Representative Zohran Mamdani, the leading Democratic nominee for NYC mayor, who has condemned the ongoing genocide, supports an international boycott of Israel, and suggested he would serve the active International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Netanyahu38.

Recent diplomatic actions underscore this political alignment, as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Israel and demonstrated deference to the Jewish state's government and America’s Israel Lobby39.

In a particularly striking development, Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s extreme right-wing finance minister, revealed plans for the post-conflict redevelopment of Gaza, which he termed a "Real Estate Bonanza"40. Smotrich indicated that Israel is engaged in discussions with the United States regarding dividing Gaza's land between the two nations, noting the plan is currently "on President Trump’s desk"40. Reports suggest Jared Kushner has been actively involved in pursuing development projects in Israel and several Gulf Arab States40.

Finally, President Trump has engaged in personal litigation against news outlets he feels have insulted him, having recently announced a $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit against The New York Times, following earlier lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal ($10 billion) and ABC and CBS News41. Trump asserts that as president, “he can do whatever he wants to do”41.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Addressing Rhoda Wilson’s "New paper detailing evidence of DNA contamination in covid vaccines is under threat of being retracted"

A new peer-reviewed study has validated previous warnings by independent researchers, confirming that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain substantial amounts of foreign DNA42. This finding directly contradicts previous assurances from US federal health agencies, including the CDC, FDA, and HHS, that the vaccines were DNA-free42.

The paper, titled ‘Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA covid-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada’, was published on September 6, 2025, but faced immediate threat of retraction from the publishing journal just eleven days later4344. Dr. Jessica Rose, one of the authors, insisted that the public download, read, and share the work immediately, anticipating attempts to suppress the critical findings45.

Despite scientific evidence to the contrary, the CDC continues to claim that the vaccine material remains confined to the arm muscle cells and poses no DNA integration risk46. The claim of limited biodistribution is fundamentally false, as the functioning principle (modus operandi) of Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) involves broad distribution throughout the body46. The assurance against DNA integration is also categorized as false, given the lack of scientific support and the reproducible findings of DNA contamination by multiple independent laboratories47. Furthermore, Moderna's own patent from 2018 recognized the danger of introducing foreign DNA, noting the potential for “alterations and/or damage to host cell genomic DNA”47.

The study, which examined 32 vials across 16 unique lots of Pfizer and Moderna products, used two measurement methods (qPCR and fluorometry) and successfully confirmed DNA presence with both4849. DNA was detected in all tested lots50. Crucially, the measured DNA levels exceeded the regulatory guideline set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA of 10 ng/dose by massive margins, ranging from 36 to 627-fold5051. The regulatory thresholds themselves are considered inadequate because they were established for naked DNA, failing to account for the highly efficient delivery mechanism provided by LNP-encapsulated DNA5052.

The study revealed the presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences in the Pfizer vials53. This SV40 component, not the full virus, is a known gene therapy tool used to transport material into the cell nucleus5354. When a cell is dividing, the nuclear membrane breaks down, providing a hypothetical opportunity for foreign DNA like SV40 to access and potentially integrate into the host cell genome54. Moreover, foreign DNA contamination, such as SV40, only needs to enter the cell’s interior to potentially cause damage, including activating cancer pathways like cGas-STING54. The SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences are specifically known to interact with the p53 protein, the vital tumor suppressor, raising concerns that this interaction could impair p53’s function and contribute to the observed rise in cancers55.

The DNA contamination likely resulted from manufacturers switching production methods from Process 1 (used for clinical trials) to the plasmid/E. coli Process 2 system for mass commercial scaling5657. While Process 2 is highly cost-efficient and rapid, relying on bacterial replication to produce large amounts of DNA, inadequate purification risks DNA impurities and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination57. LPS injection can cause anaphylactic shock, which is reported in thousands of cases in VAERS57. Safety testing on products generated by the rushed Process 2 materials was inadequate54. The paper concluded that regulators must establish clear guidelines for quantifying mRNA and residual plasmid DNA, and stressed the need for replication of these forensic findings, urging that guidelines be revised to account for cumulative dosing and highly efficient DNA transfection5152.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analyzing Rhoda Wilson’s "Physical injuries rewire our brains, affecting our response to future stresses"

Physical injuries do more than leave external scars; they fundamentally rewire the brain’s stress system, resulting in a state where even ordinary, safe situations feel disproportionately threatening5859. This lingering sensitivity explains why chronic pain and anxiety often persist long after physical healing6061. Stress hormones effectively act as fuel, keeping the responses of fear and pain locked in place60.

Studies using mouse models compared healthy animals with those who had previous painful injuries, exposing both groups to a strong psychological stressor (a predator odor)6162. Previously injured mice demonstrated significantly exaggerated fear responses, such as freezing for much longer, and developed pain sensitivity even in uninjured paws, persisting for over six months61. This illustrates how the memory of trauma remodels the entire nervous system to heighten future overreactions61.

Corticosterone, the main stress hormone in rodents (analogous to cortisol in humans), spiked during stress exposure in the injured mice63. Blocking the production of this hormone prevented the exaggerated freezing behavior and reduced the prolonged pain sensitivity, showing that the hormone sustains the stress response engine even when danger is absent6364. Researchers also identified a “wasabi sensor” receptor that amplified the body’s alarm system63. Blocking this sensor stopped the exaggerated fear response, but did not eliminate the prolonged pain sensitivity, leading to the insight that fear and pain, while linked, follow distinct biological pathways requiring targeted therapies6365.

In human trauma survivors, researchers found that the subjects struggled with “discrimination learning,” meaning they overgeneralized fear and reacted to safe cues as if they were dangerous6667. Individuals exposed to trauma who developed psychiatric issues showed reduced adaptation in key brain networks: the salience network (threat detection) and the executive control network (response management)6768. Conversely, resilient participants successfully refined their fear responses and avoided overgeneralization through stronger engagement and flexibility of the right executive control network68.

The research indicates that the key to recovery involves addressing the rewired circuits and hormones64. Recommended strategies include lowering cortisol levels through improved sleep, avoiding constant digital stimulation at night, consuming adequate healthy carbohydrates, and potentially using natural progesterone6469. Retraining the brain involves practicing structured, safe exposure to triggers, allowing the brain to gradually dissociate these cues from danger69. Strengthening cellular energy is critical, requiring sufficient carbohydrate intake—about 250 grams daily for most adults—which fuels mitochondria and shifts biology toward calm70.

Additionally, utilizing morning sunlight exposure helps reset the body’s daily rhythm and lowers stress hormone spikes7071. Boosting brain energy with creatine, sourced from grass-fed red meat or supplements, is also linked to stronger recovery from traumatic stress by providing necessary energy reserves in the brain’s stress-control region71....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detailing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk generated extreme emotional reactions, which the author contends the government is exploiting to advance a specific agenda7475. Following the event, there was a visible, massive campaign on social media demanding that the full power of the federal government, including militarized law enforcement and Palantir, be deployed against "the left"76.

Attorney General Pam Bondi escalated the situation significantly by announcing the forthcoming enforcement of new "hate speech" laws in America77. This move is highly unusual, as conservatives have historically rejected the concept of "hate speech" (a phrase coined by the ADL), and the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that no such concept exists in US law77. While Bondi later provided clarification, claiming she meant prosecuting violent threats (which are already illegal if imminent), she explicitly stated that celebrating Kirk's death was classified as illegal "hate speech"78. The author views Bondi as a functionary reading a script derived from people behind the scenes79.

President Trump gave his tacit approval to Bondi's move, suggesting that Kirk, despite having opposed hate speech laws during his life, would now support them in death79. The author argues the term "hate speech" is being improperly applied because the traditional definition refers to criticism based on protected characteristics like race, religion, or sexual orientation, not political criticism, which would be the only way to apply it to Kirk's death80. This scenario is interpreted as the Israel lobby’s attempt to push through laws prohibiting criticism of Jews and Israel (and other protected groups) under the pretense of responding to the Kirk assassination81.

The narrative shifted to focus on internal threats, such as "trannies," which the author dismisses as presenting less than one percent of the threat posed by the US government, which is perceived as being controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley8283. Figures like Nick Fuentes, who is currently being promoted by mainstream influencers and groomed as the apparent successor to Charlie Kirk, are pushing for aggressive state action and "hate speech" laws8485. Fuentes’s calls for the government to punish people for their speech, specifically advocating for the arrest of those who celebrated Kirk's death, is described as the most extreme call for government tyranny ever heard from an influencer86.... Fuentes's new rhetoric includes promoting Russian bot conspiracies and shifting the focus onto the tranny menace, diverting attention from Israel and Palantir83.

In contrast, Tucker Carlson provided a measured response, unequivocally stating that Americans must not tolerate any form of restriction on speech resulting from this event89. Carlson suggested that people should oppose Trump if he attempts to implement these restrictions89. The author also noted that Prime Minister Netanyahu has been making daily announcements denying any involvement in Kirk's assassination90. The aggressive political and media exploitation of the event has led the author to increasingly doubt the official lone shooter theory, finding the theory that Israel was involved more compelling9192.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Covering Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is characterized as perhaps the most politically significant killing in recent memory, heavily influencing the current news cycle93. The resulting controversy, dubbed “Joke-gate,” involved the suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel94. Kimmel had triggered a substantial backlash after airing a monologue where he incorrectly alleged that Kirk’s assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative94.

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr suggested that the agency might need to get involved following the joke94. Kimmel was ultimately suspended indefinitely by Disney CEO Bob Iger, a decision influenced by several factors, including widespread sponsor panic and fury from ABC’s two largest affiliates, Nexstar and Sinclair9495. The affiliates, having already unplugged Kimmel’s show, were demanding stronger action95. Furthermore, Kimmel had planned to double down on his position during his next show, which Disney executives feared would escalate the backlash94. Kimmel's joke was technically justifiable for a warning under existing FCC regulations concerning "false information concerning a crime or catastrophe"95.

A growing "free speech" panic ensued, with liberals framing Kimmel's suspension as the beginning of "the dark night of fascism descending on Hollywood"9697. The author argues this is a false debate, asserting that censorship has historically been pushed by Democrats for decades, and conservatives must now retaliate by making censorship a problem for Democrats to solve98. President Trump reinforced this strategy by defiantly stating that one-sided broadcasters should lose their licenses98.

The strategy appears effective, as Democrats suddenly announced plans to introduce the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill, claiming they wish to protect speech targeted by Trump99100. Representative Greg Casar claimed the country faced its biggest free speech crisis since the McCarthy era99. The proposed NOPE bill aims to bolster legal protections for those targeted by the government and would enable citizens to sue federal officials over speech suppression, crucially including the right to recover attorney’s fees100101. This unexpected Democratic move, despite their historical support for censorship, is wholly contingent upon the shift in power102103. The author notes that Democrats previously argued the First Amendment was obsolete and that new laws were needed to regulate speech104.

In a separate consequence of Kirk's death, Melbourne Mayor Paul Alfrey suggested renaming a section of Cypress Avenue after Charlie Kirk105. This street is located outside Lamb & Co. Fishmongers, whose owner had tweeted something widely criticized about Kirk's killing105. The owner, Kaili Lamb, later apologized publicly, acknowledging that her business serves customers across the political spectrum106.

In public health news, the CDC’s new ACIP vaccine committee voted to add a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before administering covid mRNA shots to anyone under 65 or outside a ‘high-risk’ category, effectively limiting the scope of vaccine recommendation107. The meeting was detrimental for mRNA shots, as drugmakers like Pfizer and Moderna declined to answer direct questions from committee members108. A newly formed Vaccine Working Group presented numerous growing questions and problems regarding the jabs108. These included findings of biodistribution, showing the material spreads throughout the body, including the brain109. Other issues presented were frameshifting (creation of random, 'nonsense' proteins) and highly implausible levels of DNA contamination, including SV40 components, especially in the Pfizer shot109. The CDC officially publicized a critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning the drugmakers’ claims of efficacy since no agreed-upon measurement (correlates of protection) reliably predicts whether a person is protected from COVID-19110111. Furthermore, the CDC also republished a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi asserting that sub-clinical myocarditis is proven to cause death, a risk currently not discussed with patients111. The Committee is believed to be carefully constructing a detailed scientific record before proceeding to withdraw authorization for the shots112.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Presenting Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

President Trump enacted two major executive orders yesterday that significantly reform the US immigration system without requiring Congressional action113114. Pundits described the move as "absolutely massive" and "punishing" for certain sectors115.

The first executive order radically overhauled the H-1B visa program116. H-1B visas, typically granted to skilled foreign professionals primarily from India and China, have historically been misused by tech employers and others as a "cheat code" to hire cheaper, more loyal labor for jobs Americans could perform115.... The order dramatically increased the H-1B application fee one hundred-fold, from $1,000 to $100,000 annually116119. This massive fee hike is intended to make skilled foreign workers more expensive than American workers119. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick explicitly urged employers to “train Americans. Stop bringing in people to take our jobs”119. Critics hailed the move as ending the H-1B visa "scam" that disenfranchised American workers, cementing the Republican Party's position as champions of rank-and-file American workers119120.

The second executive order initiated “Phase One” of Trump's "Gold Card" fast-track visa program, described as a potentially historic immigration reform121122. This program offers expedited green card processing for anyone who gifts the U.S. government $1–2 million123. This strategy ensures that financially stable immigrants, who are more likely to invest in or contribute to the economy, can bypass the typical years-long queue, and that their expedited entry is funded by the immigrants themselves, rather than taxpayers123. Trump noted that the primary purpose is to attract "great people coming in and they're going to be paying"123. A "Corporate Card" is also available, allowing employers to pay $2 million (plus an annual maintenance fee) to fast-track green cards for critical workers123124. Trump bypassed Congress entirely by exploiting his control over executive agencies to direct the order of visa review, selling bureaucratic efficiency without changing any underlying laws114124. The program still requires applicants to satisfy all standard vetting and applicable immigration laws124. A $5 million "Platinum Card" leading to citizenship is still conceptual but awaits Congressional authorization125.

In related public health news, the ACIP committee continued restricting the covid mRNA shots107. During the second day of the committee meeting, it was characterized as a "bloodbath" for the jabs108. A committee member, Dr. Kirk Milhoan, roasted the FDA for its failure to pull the covid jabs following revelations of problems107. The Vaccine Working Group detailed growing issues, including findings that the shots cause biodistribution to the brain, frameshifting (producing random 'nonsense' proteins), and high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of the monkey virus SV40, particularly in the Pfizer shot109.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Considering Miles Mathis’ "The Rise of Conspiracy Physics"

The author of this piece challenges the scientific establishment, asserting that a recent Wall Street Journal article titled “The Rise of Conspiracy Physics” represents a strategy by the Phoenicians—the term used by the author for the elite controlling class—to frame and manage the opposition126127. The author believes he is the central figure in a scientific revolution that the mainstream media purposefully refuses to name127.

The establishment, according to the author, attempts to focus the public’s attention on figures like Sabine Hossenfelder and Eric Weinstein, suggesting they represent the limits of the physics critique127. The author dismisses these individuals, arguing they have never produced any real physics and thus pose no genuine threat to the field128. The author contrasts their minimal contributions with his own extensive body of work, claiming to have published over 40 books covering new physics—approximately 14,000 book pages—which includes hundreds of major discoveries such as unifying the quantum particles, rewriting the equations of Relativity, diagramming the atomic nucleus, solving the Bode problem, and predicting Solar Cycles accurately for the first time in history128.

The author contends that physics is in collapse and that the establishment uses tools like major search engines delisting his work and utilizing "Operation Mockingbird stooges" in the mainstream press to protect itself from him129. The mainstream physics community is portrayed as desperate, begging mainstream writers to defend them129. This is further compounded by figures like Sean Carroll, who serve as tote-boys for their paymasters, insisting that all problems in physics are already solved130.

The orchestrated debates between figures like Weinstein and Carroll are seen as a distraction, designed to make the audience believe that this superficial exchange constitutes the entire revolution131. The author suggests that once Weinstein is neutralized, mainstream physics plans to silently adopt all of the author's discoveries over the next century while arranging for their grandchildren to receive the credit131.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analyzing Joachim Bartoll’s "“Insulin Resistance” (Cellular Damage) From Carbohydrates Surging Among Children And Adolescents"

The author critiques typical nutritional studies that focus too narrowly on specific food items, such as "sugar-sweetened beverages," while ignoring the root cause of metabolic issues132133. The core argument is that damage to the human body relates to all carbohydrates134. Humans are asserted to be obligate hyper carnivores designed to operate on a fat metabolism (ketosis), naturally manufacturing precise, necessary amounts of glucose through gluconeogenesis132135.

Any introduction of exogenous carbohydrates disrupts this natural equilibrium, raising blood glucose above safe and normal levels132. This elevated glucose causes cellular damage, particularly in soft tissues and organs, and leads to glycation—a process that destroys amino acids and fatty acids present in the blood, making them toxic and increasing the risk of plaque formation132. The condition often referred to as "insulin resistance" is actually cellular damage that renders cells incapable of storing glucose as glycogen136.

A recent meta-analysis examining 22,713 children and adolescents associated the highest consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages with a measurably worse HOMA-IR score (+0.21)137138. This seemingly small change is highlighted as clinically significant, particularly in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18139. Since children should typically be healthy and undamaged, this increase predicts a higher future risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and metabolic diseases in early adulthood139.

The modern environment exacerbates this issue, as ultra-processed foods drastically increase the absorption of toxic carbohydrates by removing fiber and destroying antinutrients that naturally bind them in unprocessed plant-based foods140. The author warns that feeding children any processed or plant-based foods is toxic140. The damage caused by carbohydrates is intensified when consumed simultaneously with seed or vegetable oils, which are highly detrimental to the cardiovascular system134.

The author concludes that simply being able to consume carbohydrates without immediate death does not mean they are beneficial or necessary135. The persistent emphasis on blaming only specific items like "sugar-sweetened beverages," instead of acknowledging all carbohydrates as the culprit, is viewed as part of an agenda designed to keep humanity malnourished, weak, diseased, and therefore dependent upon the system for drugs and treatments133.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Royal treatment Trump.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Hua Bin’s "Delete USA"

This source details the escalating US tech and trade wars with China, which prompted Beijing to adopt a full decoupling strategy driven by concerns for national security and economic competition1. The source emphasizes this is happening now, citing Beijing's ban on its major technology companies from purchasing Nvidia H20 and RTX 6000D chips1. These chips were specifically developed by Nvidia for the Chinese market to comply with US bans on advanced AI chips1. The author views this as a textbook instance of ill-conceived coercive policy backfiring on the perpetrator, suggesting that the technocrats in Beijing have proven far more intelligent than the short-sighted political functionaries in Washington1.

The technological containment effort was initiated during Trump's first term with a ban on US chip sales to Huawei, which was intended to destroy the company but failed miserably23. The Biden administration subsequently escalated this conflict by banning AI chips, software, and lithography machines for the entire Chinese market with the goal of halting China’s AI development2. Nvidia, holding a global monopoly on AI chips, created the H20 chip to comply with the Biden export control, hoping to continue profiting from Chinese demand and locking developers into its CUDA software ecosystem while withholding its latest chips45.

A little-known Chinese AI firm, DeepSeek, launched its R1 large language model in January 2025 using reinforcement learning that allowed the LLM to develop reasoning through self-evolution, demonstrating that Chinese AI engineers could develop world-class models even with less powerful accelerator chips, thus circumventing the chip moat built by Nvidia6. In response, the second Trump regime immediately banned the sale of even these watered-down H20 chips to Chinese firms, forcing Nvidia to write off $5.5 billion worth of unsold inventory7. This lack of access to Western AI chips convinced Beijing that the only way forward was total self-reliance across the entire semiconductor value chain7. Chinese tech giants like Huawei, Cambricon, and Alibaba subsequently announced the production of AI accelerator chips that are only one generation behind Nvidia’s most powerful offerings78.

This unintended consequence of the Trump H20 ban created a hundred-billion-dollar market wide open for domestic Chinese producers, which had previously been monopolized by Nvidia9. Recognizing this risk, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Trump’s “AI Czar” David Sachs successfully lobbied the Trump White House to loosen the ban, arguing that it was in the US interest to keep Chinese companies reliant on Nvidia products, just not the best ones9. Trump lifted the ban, and his Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, publicly boasted that the US would maintain control of the Chinese chip market by selling second-rate products10.

Beijing, led by engineers rather than US bankers and lawyers, recognized this as a transparent ploy10. Instead of allowing the H20 back, Beijing initiated a security investigation, citing concerns over potential back doors and remote shutdown kill-switches10. Washington fueled these suspicions when US congressmen openly requested that US chip producers embed geo-fencing functions into their products11. China's Cyber Administration officially requested major tech firms, such as Tencent and ByteDance, to halt testing and cancel orders for Nvidia's new China-only RTX 6000D chips11. Additionally, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce launched an anti-monopoly investigation against Nvidia for failing to adhere to agreements made during Beijing's approval of its 2020 acquisition of Mellanox Technologies3.

The source confirms that China has decided to move forward without Nvidia, building its AI industry completely separate from US technologies3. China is now implementing a full-spectrum nationwide “Delete USA” strategy for its technological development8. Local Chinese AI chip makers like Huawei and Cambricon have achieved performance parity with Nvidia’s China-specific chips8. Huawei is actively working to change the competition paradigm not solely through chip performance but by linking more chips via superior networking to create greater scale and better performance at the rack level, developing powerful AI compute super-nodes like CloudMatrix 384812. China also has a competitive advantage in the AI war due to its far superior power generation capacity, which allows it to outbuild the electricity-hungry AI data centers needed, compared to the US12.

Beijing is making significant investments in advanced semiconductor technologies, including photonic chips and third-generation semiconductors based on materials like indium selenide (InSe), which show potential to replace traditional silicon chips12. Researchers at Peking University and Remin University recently announced breakthroughs in producing InSe wafers5. The malicious intent of the US regime to choke China's technological development inadvertently broke the market chokehold previously held by Nvidia, by incentivizing all Chinese tech companies to seek alternatives and reduce dependency on US technology13.

Chinese companies such as Huawei and Cambricon are now offering alternative AI accelerators and working to break developers away from Nvidia’s CUDA network, with Huawei introducing the open-source CANN architecture14. The inevitable outcome is that Nvidia will be locked out of the world’s largest chip market, which will then belong solely to Chinese domestic producers14. China is establishing a completely separate and parallel AI system that, despite potential current lags in compute performance, maintains zero dependence on the US15. This aggressive move by the US ultimately undermined its own tech champion15.

Historically, US belligerence toward China has consistently backfired16. The 2011 Wolf Act, which blocked China from the International Space Station (ISS), led to China building its own Tiangong Space Station16. Similarly, the US shutting down GPS signals to harass China’s Yinhe cargo ship in 1993 spurred Beijing to develop the Beidou satellite navigation system, now considered more advanced than GPS16. US intervention in the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1996 motivated China to develop a full Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2AD) strategy, including anti-ship hypersonic missiles capable of keeping US ships away from Chinese shores16. As the US pursues an adversarial relationship, Beijing is actively implementing a full-speed “Delete USA” strategy by pursuing full tech self-sufficiency (especially in AI), winding down trade (cutting purchases of US farm products, coal, and LNG), selling off US debt, and making US education less appealing to Chinese students17. China refuses to succumb to Washington’s coercion and has met its rival head-on18.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analyzing Paul Dragu’s "Massie Accuses Former Banking CEO of Being an Epstein Client; Hints at 19 Others"

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky has taken a determined stance to expose the powerful individuals allegedly involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking of minors, contrasting sharply with the actions of FBI Director Kash Patel, who has faced criticism for failing to disclose these individuals1920. Patel maintains that Epstein trafficked minors solely for his own gratification and insists that no client list exists2021. This assertion is contradicted by numerous hours of sworn victim testimony and thousands of pages of investigative findings20.

Patel attempted to justify the lack of disclosure by pointing to the constraints of the original 2006 Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida, claiming the agreement sealed investigatory material and barred future prosecutions for those involved at that time21. Massie countered this, arguing that those constraints applied exclusively to the Southern District of Florida22. Massie confirmed that ample information exists elsewhere, particularly within the FBI’s possession from the 2019 sex trafficking indictment handled by the Southern District of New York (SDNY)22.

These FBI documents reportedly contain information on at least 20 men to whom Epstein trafficked victims, including minors22. Massie publicly named Jes Staley, the former CEO of Barclays and a major investor at J.P. Morgan, as one of the alleged assaulters22. Massie then hinted that the identities of 19 other suspected pedophiles are in FBI files controlled by Patel23. This list of high-profile individuals allegedly includes a Hollywood producer, a royal prince, a high-profile individual in the music industry, a prominent banker, a high-profile government official, a former politician, an owner of an Italian car company, a rock star, a magician, and at least six billionaires, including one from Canada23.

When questioned on why no investigations had been launched against these individuals identified by victims, Patel stated that his FBI agents had reviewed the files and concluded there was no credible information sufficient to launch a new indictment24. Patel stressed that two different U.S. Attorney’s offices across three administrations reached the same conclusion regarding the documents24. Massie asked Patel if he had reviewed the documents himself, and Patel responded that he had not, but the FBI had24.

Massie also introduced news articles suggesting Epstein was connected to intelligence operations25. One article noted that former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta claimed he was instructed to “leave it alone” because Epstein belonged to intelligence25. Other sources indicated Epstein had CIA connections and met with Barack Obama's CIA chief25. Furthermore, Epstein’s calendar showed he met with Ehud Barak, former Israeli prime minister and intelligence head, 36 times25. Independent investigative journalists have linked Epstein to the CIA and Mossad26.

Regarding Jes Staley, court documents linked him to Epstein years prior26. The Virgin Islands sued J.P. Morgan, Staley’s previous employer, accusing Staley of funneling Epstein’s funds26. Emails detailed in the lawsuit suggested Staley may have been involved in the sex-trafficking operation, including discussions that seemed to use Disney characters as code, such as "Snow White" and "Beauty and the Beast"27. Staley described his relationship with Epstein as “profound”28. Staley was never charged with sexual crimes but was forced out of Barclays in 2021 due to a UK investigation into allegations that he misled regulators about his dealings with Epstein28. Staley testified that he was unaware of Epstein’s pedophilia but admitted to having consensual sex with one of Epstein’s assistants, though the assistant's age was not revealed in reports29. J.P. Morgan, accused of facilitating and ignoring Epstein's sex-trafficking, eventually reached a $75 million settlement with the Virgin Islands to prevent discovery30.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Examining Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has created significant turmoil and speculation in and around Washington31. In the ensuing chaos, Republican conservatives, including those in the Trump cabinet, have called for a crackdown on the political left, despite the lack of clarity regarding any involvement of an identifiable left-of-center group in the killing31.

A serious suggestion gaining traction is that Israel may have carried out Kirk's assassination, possessing both the motive and the means32. Israel has an unmatched international record of political assassinations and consistently receives political cover from the United States when it kills someone32. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's immediate public statements expressing his affection for Kirk were cited as suspicious, stemming from the reported disagreement between Israelis and their US allies and Kirk regarding his growing concern over Israel's influence on President Trump and US policy32.

Further unexplained circumstances include a private jet, owned by Derek Maxfield, a wealthy Jewish supporter of Chabad Lubavich Utah, departing from a nearby airport with its Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) deliberately turned off, strongly suggesting the assassin may have been removed from the scene by air33. The police investigation was disrupted by one George Zinn, identified as Jewish or Mormon-Zionist, who falsely shouted that he was the shooter, potentially allowing the actual killer to escape33. If the investigation ultimately points to Israel, a guaranteed government cover-up is anticipated, following historical patterns seen in the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, the JFK assassination, and the final report on 9/1133.

In the absence of a clear target for retribution over Kirk's death, the government investigation has instead attacked the First Amendment guarantee of free speech34. Several employees have been sanctioned or fired from their workplaces for comments expressing dislike of Kirk due to his controversial political stances, including late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel34.

The Trump administration’s crackdown includes the State Department threatening to identify non-citizens who praise, rationalize, or make light of the assassination on social media, potentially leading to visa revocation or deportation35. Attorney General Pam Bondi has also threatened ordinary American citizens with prosecution for “hate speech,” despite the First Amendment lacking a hate speech clause35. Bondi appears to confuse criticism of Israel, which she labels "antisemitism," with criminal "hate speech"35.

In Congress, the "Israel Firsters" have been highly active36. Congressman Brian Mast, a former Israeli Army serviceman, introduced a bill that would have allowed the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of Americans providing “material support” to "terrorists," implicitly targeting Palestinian resistance groups like Hamas36. Mast withdrew the bill after severe backlash from civil liberties groups warning it endangered the right to travel and granted the Secretary of State "thought police" power36. Congresswoman Elise Stefanik presented legislation to protect Benjamin Netanyahu from arrest by New York City officials during his US visits37. This proposal is in response to New York State Representative Zohran Mamdani, the leading Democratic nominee for NYC mayor, who supports an international boycott of Israel, has condemned the ongoing genocide, and suggested he would serve the active International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Netanyahu38.

Recent diplomatic actions emphasize this political alignment, as Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Israel and demonstrated deference to the Jewish state's government and America’s Israel Lobby39. Rubio and Huckabee donned their kippah small hats and showed their obedience to a higher power, which is clearly the Jewish state's government and America's domestic Israel Lobby39.

In a particularly striking development, Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s extreme right-wing finance minister, revealed plans for the post-conflict redevelopment of Gaza, which he termed a "Real Estate Bonanza"40. Smotrich indicated that Israel is discussing dividing Gaza's land between the two nations with the United States, noting the plan is currently "on President Trump’s desk"40. Reports suggest Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner has been actively involved in pursuing development projects in Israel and several Gulf Arab States40.

Finally, President Trump has initiated personal litigation against news outlets he feels have insulted him, having recently announced a $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit against The New York Times41. This follows earlier successful lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal ($10 billion) and ABC and CBS news, both of which settled41. Trump asserts that as president, “he can do whatever he wants to do,” a claim many Americans might disagree with41.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Addressing Rhoda Wilson’s "New paper detailing evidence of DNA contamination in covid vaccines is under threat of being retracted"

A new peer-reviewed study has validated previous warnings from independent researchers by confirming that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain substantial amounts of foreign DNA42. This finding directly contradicts previous assurances from US federal health agencies, including the CDC, FDA, and HHS, that the vaccines were DNA-free4243. Due to its critical findings, the paper detailing the study is under immediate threat of retraction by the publishing journal4445. Dr. Jessica Rose, one of the authors, anticipated attempts to suppress the critical findings and urged the public to download, read, and share the work immediately4647.

The paper, titled ‘Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA covid-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada’, was published on September 6, 2025, but faced an email notification of an investigation and temporary notice of preliminary take-down just eleven days later on September 17, 20254548.

Despite the scientific evidence, the CDC website, as of September 15, 2025, continues to falsely claim that the vaccine material remains confined to the arm muscle cells (no biodistribution) and that there are no DNA integration issues4950. The claim of limited biodistribution is fundamentally false because Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) rely on broad distribution throughout the body; in fact, LNPs are often designed to traffick to specific locations, such as the liver49. The assurance against DNA integration is also false, given the reproducible findings of DNA contamination by multiple independent laboratories50. Notably, Moderna's own patent from 2018 acknowledged the danger of foreign DNA introduction due to the potential for “alterations and/or damage to host cell genomic DNA”5051.

The study examined 32 vials across 16 unique lots of Pfizer and Moderna products51. Researchers confirmed the presence of DNA using both quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and fluorometry methods51. DNA was detected in all tested lots52. Crucially, the measured DNA levels exceeded the regulatory guideline set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA of 10 ng/dose by massive margins, ranging from 36 to 627-fold5253. The existing regulatory thresholds are considered inadequate because they were established for naked DNA, failing to account for the highly efficient delivery mechanism provided by LNP-encapsulated DNA5254.

The study specifically revealed the presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences in the Pfizer vials55. This SV40 component, which is not the full virus, is a known gene therapy tool used to transport material into the cell nucleus5556. When a cell is dividing, the nuclear membrane breaks down, providing a hypothetical opportunity for foreign DNA like SV40 to access and potentially integrate into the host cell genome56. Moreover, foreign DNA contamination, such as SV40, only needs to enter the cell’s interior to potentially cause damage, including activating cancer pathways like cGas-STING56. The SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences are particularly concerning because they are known to interact with the vital p53 protein, the tumor suppressor, raising concerns that this interaction could impair p53’s function and contribute to the observed rise in cancers57.

The DNA contamination likely resulted from manufacturers switching production methods58. Process 1, used for clinical trials, involved amplifying DNA using PCR, but Process 2, used for mass commercial scaling, utilized a plasmid/E. coli system5859. Process 2 is highly cost-efficient and rapid, but inadequate purification risks DNA impurities and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination, the latter of which can cause anaphylactic shock (with 10,911 reports in VAERS)59. The safety testing performed on the rushed Process 2 materials was noted as inadequate56. The paper concluded that regulators must establish clear and consistent guidelines for quantifying mRNA and residual plasmid DNA and stressed the need for replication of these forensic findings54.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Examining Rhoda Wilson’s "Physical injuries rewire our brains, affecting our response to future stresses"

Physical injuries create internal, enduring changes that rewire the brain’s stress system, leading to a state where even ordinary, safe situations feel disproportionately threatening6061. This sustained sensitivity is cited as the explanation for why chronic pain and anxiety often persist long after physical healing has occurred6263. The source states that stress hormones function like fuel that keeps the fear and pain responses locked in place6264.

Studies using mouse models compared healthy animals with those who had experienced prior painful injuries, exposing both groups to a strong psychological stressor (a predator odor)6365. The previously injured mice showed significantly exaggerated fear responses, such as freezing for much longer, and developed pain sensitivity even in uninjured paws, a hypersensitivity that lasted for over six months63. This demonstrates how the memory of trauma remodels the entire nervous system to heighten future overreactions63.

Corticosterone, the main stress hormone in rodents (analogous to cortisol in humans), spiked during stress exposure in the injured mice64. Blocking the production of this hormone prevented the exaggerated freezing and reduced the prolonged pain sensitivity, showing that the hormone sustains the stress response even when danger is absent64. Researchers also identified a “wasabi sensor” receptor that amplified the body’s alarm system64. Blocking this sensor stopped the exaggerated fear response, but did not eliminate the prolonged pain sensitivity, which suggests that fear and pain follow distinct biological pathways requiring targeted therapies66.

In human trauma survivors, researchers found that participants struggled with “discrimination learning,” meaning they overgeneralized fear and reacted to safe cues as if they were dangerous6768. Individuals exposed to trauma who developed psychiatric issues (such as PTSD or anxiety) showed reduced adaptation in key brain networks: the salience network (threat detection) and the executive control network (response management)6869. Conversely, resilient participants successfully refined their fear responses and avoided overgeneralization through stronger engagement and flexibility of the right executive control network69.

The research indicates that recovery hinges on addressing these rewired circuits and hormones70. Recommended strategies include lowering cortisol levels through improved sleep, avoiding constant digital stimulation at night, consuming adequate healthy carbohydrates, and potentially using natural progesterone7071. Retraining the brain involves practicing structured, safe exposure to triggers, allowing the brain to gradually dissociate these cues from danger71. Strengthening cellular energy is crucial, requiring sufficient carbohydrate intake (about 250 grams daily), which fuels mitochondria and shifts biology toward calm72.

Additionally, utilizing morning sunlight exposure helps reset the body’s daily rhythm and lowers stress hormone spikes73. Boosting brain energy with creatine, sourced from grass-fed red meat or supplements, is also linked to stronger recovery from traumatic stress by providing necessary energy reserves in the brain’s stress-control region7374.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detailing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk triggered intense emotional reactions, which the author claims the government is exploiting to advance a specific agenda7576. Following the event, there was a visible, massive campaign on social media demanding the full power of the federal government, including militarized law enforcement and Palantir, be "unleashed" on "the left"76. The author warned that emotional reactions often lead people to call for the very government overreach (like new spying and policing powers) that works against their interests7778.

Attorney General Pam Bondi significantly escalated the situation by announcing the imminent enforcement of new "hate speech" laws in America79. This move is considered extreme, given that conservatives have historically rejected the ADL-coined concept of "hate speech," and the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that no such concept exists in US law79. Although Bondi later clarified that she meant prosecuting violent threats (which are already illegal if imminent), she explicitly stated that celebrating Kirk's death was classified as illegal "hate speech" even in the clarification80. The author views Bondi as a functionary reading a script derived from people behind the scenes81.

President Trump gave tacit approval to Bondi's move, suggesting that Kirk, despite opposing hate speech laws during his life, would support them now that he is dead81. The implication is that these laws would have prevented Kirk’s assassination, which the author says makes no sense82. The author believes that the Israel lobby is using the assassination pretext to push through laws prohibiting criticism of Jews and Israel (and other protected groups) under the familiar banner of "hate speech"83.

The narrative is being deliberately shifted away from profound threats, such as the US government being controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, toward internal threats like "trannies," which the author dismisses as presenting less than one percent of the threat posed by the government8485. Figures like Nick Fuentes are being promoted as the apparent successor to Charlie Kirk and are pushing for aggressive state action and "hate speech" laws8687. Fuentes’s rhetoric includes calling for the arrest of people who celebrated Kirk’s death and demanding the government punish speech, which the author describes as the most extreme call for government tyranny ever heard from an influencer8889.

Fuentes is also accused of promoting Russian bot conspiracies and diverting attention from Israel and Palantir onto the "tranny menace"8590. The author is increasingly driven to the "Israel did it" side due to the aggressive exploitation of the event by the government and shills like Fuentes, noting that Prime Minister Netanyahu has been making daily announcements denying any involvement in Kirk's assassination9091.

In contrast, Tucker Carlson provided a measured response, unequivocally stating that Americans must not tolerate any form of restriction on speech resulting from this event92. Carlson suggested that people should oppose Trump if he attempts to implement these restrictions92. Carlson also hinted that Kirk had been turning against Israel in the months before his death93.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Covering Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is characterized as perhaps the most politically significant killing in recent memory, heavily shaping the current news cycle94. The resulting controversy, dubbed “Joke-gate,” involved the indefinite suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel by Disney CEO Bob Iger9495. Kimmel triggered substantial backlash after airing a monologue where he incorrectly alleged that Kirk’s assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative9697.

The suspension was influenced by multiple factors9899. After Kimmel's joke, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr suggested the agency might get involved9697. Simultaneously, multiple ABC station owners called Disney to complain, and the host remained defiant, planning to "double down" on his position during his next show97. Sponsor panic ensued, and ABC’s two largest affiliates, Nexstar and Sinclair, publicly announced they would unplug Kimmel’s show99. Disney CEO Bob Iger made the decision to suspend the show to prevent Kimmel from pouring "more gas on the flames"99. Existing FCC regulations concerning “false information concerning a crime or catastrophe” technically justified Carr’s warning99.

The author argues that the ensuing "free speech" panic is based on a false premise, asserting there is no constitutional crisis because the network could sue the FCC to enforce its rights100. Furthermore, the author contends that censorship has historically been pushed by Democrats for decades, and conservatives must now retaliate by making censorship a problem for Democrats to solve101. President Trump reinforced this strategy by defiantly stating that one-sided broadcasters should lose their licenses101.

The strategy appears effective, as Democrats surprisingly announced plans to introduce the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill102103. Representative Greg Casar claimed the country faced its biggest free speech crisis since the McCarthy era102. The proposed NOPE bill aims to bolster legal protections for those targeted by the government and would enable citizens to sue federal officials over speech suppression, crucially including the right to recover attorney’s fees103104. This unexpected Democratic move, despite their historical support for censorship, is wholly contingent upon the shift in power, as they suddenly embrace the Constitution when censorship targets them105. Trump's success in forcing Democrats to adopt his position is highlighted as a "Trump miracle"95106.

In public health news, the CDC’s new ACIP vaccine committee voted to add a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before administering covid mRNA shots to anyone under 65 or outside a ‘high-risk’ category107. The meeting was characterized as a "bloodbath" for the jabs108. A newly formed Vaccine Working Group presented numerous growing questions and problems, including findings of biodistribution (material spreads throughout the body, including the brain), frameshifting (creation of random proteins), and implausibly high levels of DNA contamination, including SV40 components, especially in the Pfizer shot109. The CDC officially publicized a critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning the drugmakers’ claims of efficacy since no agreed-upon measurement reliably predicts whether a person is protected from COVID-19110111. The CDC also republished a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi asserting that sub-clinical myocarditis is proven to cause death, a risk currently not discussed with patients111.

In political news, the Senate confirmed 48 Trump nominees in a single vote after Republicans changed the rules to allow low-level nominees to be confirmed ‘en bloc’112113. Additionally, Melbourne Mayor Paul Alfrey suggested renaming a section of Cypress Avenue after Charlie Kirk, located outside Lamb & Co. Fishmongers, whose owner had tweeted something widely criticized about Kirk's killing113114.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Presenting Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

President Trump enacted two major executive orders that significantly reform the US immigration system without requiring Congressional action115. Pundits described the move as "absolutely massive" and "punishing" for certain sectors116.

The first executive order radically overhauled the H-1B visa program, which is typically used for skilled foreign professionals, primarily from India and China116. The source details that these visas were often misused by tech employers to hire cheaper, more loyal, job-locked labor for jobs Americans could perform, noting that H-1B workers faced deportation if fired, providing an intense incentive to work hard117118. Critics called the H-1B system a "scam" that disenfranchised American workers119120. The order dramatically increased the H-1B application fee one hundred-fold, from $1,000 to $100,000 annually121. This massive fee hike is intended to make skilled foreign workers more expensive than American workers119121. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick urged employers to “train Americans. Stop bringing in people to take our jobs”119. The move is seen as cementing the Republican Party's position as champions of rank-and-file American workers122.

The second executive order initiated “Phase One” of Trump's "Gold Card" fast-track visa program, described as potentially historic immigration reform123124. This program offers expedited green card processing for anyone who gifts the U.S. government $1–2 million125. This strategy ensures that financially stable immigrants, who are more likely to invest in or contribute to the economy, can bypass the typical years-long queue125. Trump noted that the primary purpose is to attract "great people coming in and they're going to be paying"125. A "Corporate Card" is also available, allowing employers to pay $2 million (plus an annual maintenance fee) to fast-track green cards for critical workers126. Trump bypassed Congress entirely by exploiting his control over executive agencies to direct the order of visa review, essentially selling bureaucratic efficiency without changing any underlying laws126127. The program still requires applicants to satisfy all standard vetting and applicable immigration laws126. A $5 million "Platinum Card" leading to citizenship is still conceptual but awaits Congressional authorization128.

In related public health news, the ACIP committee continued restricting the covid mRNA shots129. During the second day of the committee meeting, it was characterized as a "bloodbath" for the jabs108. The Vaccine Working Group detailed growing issues, including findings that the shots cause biodistribution to the brain, frameshifting (producing random 'nonsense' proteins), and high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of the monkey virus SV40, particularly in the Pfizer shot109.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Considering Miles Mathis’ "The Rise of Conspiracy Physics"

The author of this piece challenges the scientific establishment and particularly criticizes a recent Wall Street Journal article titled “The Rise of Conspiracy Physics”130. The author believes this article represents a strategy by the "Phoenicians"—the term used for the elite controlling class—to frame and manage the opposition130. The author sees himself as the true central figure in a scientific revolution that the mainstream media purposefully refuses to name131.

The establishment attempts to focus the public’s attention on figures like Sabine Hossenfelder and Eric Weinstein, suggesting they represent the limits of the physics critique131. The author dismisses these individuals, arguing they have never produced any real physics and thus pose no genuine threat to the field132. The author contrasts their minimal contributions with his own extensive body of work, claiming to have published over 40 books of new physics, totaling around 14,000 book pages132. This body of work includes hundreds of major discoveries such as unifying the quantum particles, rewriting the equations of Relativity, diagramming the atomic nucleus, and accurately predicting Solar Cycles for the first time132.

The author contends that physics is in collapse and that the establishment uses tactics like major search engines delisting his work and utilizing "Operation Mockingbird stooges" in the mainstream press to protect itself133. The mainstream physics community is portrayed as desperate, begging mainstream writers to defend them133. Figures like Sean Carroll, who serves as a "tote-boy" for his paymasters, insist that all problems in physics are already solved134.

The orchestrated debates between figures like Weinstein and Carroll are viewed as a distraction, designed to make the audience believe that this superficial exchange constitutes the entire revolution135. The author suggests that once Weinstein is neutralized, mainstream physics plans to silently adopt all of the author's discoveries over the next century while arranging for their grandchildren to receive the credit135.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analyzing Joachim Bartoll’s "“Insulin Resistance” (Cellular Damage) From Carbohydrates Surging Among Children And Adolescents"

The author critiques typical nutritional studies for narrowly focusing on specific food items like "sugar-sweetened beverages," while failing to address the fundamental issue: all carbohydrates cause metabolic damage136137. The core argument posits that humans are obligate hyper carnivores naturally designed to operate on a fat metabolism (ketosis), generating precise amounts of glucose internally through gluconeogenesis137138.

Any introduction of exogenous carbohydrates disrupts this natural equilibrium, elevating blood glucose above safe and normal levels137. This elevated glucose causes cellular damage, particularly in soft tissues and organs, and leads to glycation, a process that destroys amino acids and fatty acids in the blood, making them toxic and increasing the risk of plaque formation137139. The condition commonly mislabeled as "insulin resistance" is actually this cellular damage that prevents cells from storing glucose as glycogen139.

The author discusses a recent meta-analysis of 22,713 children and adolescents (ages 6–18) that linked the highest consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages to a statistically worse HOMA-IR score (+0.21), a measure of insulin resistance136140. This seemingly small change is identified as clinically significant and alarming, especially in children and adolescents who should be healthy and undamaged, as it predicts a higher future risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and metabolic diseases in early adulthood141. The current regulatory thresholds for HOMA-IR were established in adults, often on medication, making the result in children far more concerning141.

The modern environment exacerbates this issue because ultra-processed foods drastically increase the absorption of toxic carbohydrates by removing fiber and destroying antinutrients that typically bind them in unprocessed plant-based foods142. The author states that feeding children any processed or plant-based foods is toxic and should be a crime142143. The damage caused by carbohydrates is intensified when consumed simultaneously with seed or vegetable oils, which are highly detrimental to the cardiovascular system144.

The author concludes that simply being able to consume carbohydrates without immediate death does not mean they are beneficial or necessary138. The persistence in blaming only specific items like "sugar-sweetened beverages," instead of acknowledging all carbohydrates as the culprit, is viewed as part of an agenda designed to keep humanity malnourished, weak, diseased, and therefore dependent upon the system for drugs and treatments145.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

This source focuses extensively on the "Royal Treatment" received by President Donald J. Trump during his visit to Great Britain146147.

The UK unveiled the "unreserved might of its royal pomp and pageantry" in wooing the US President147. The entire world noticed this extravagant display, which was likely the point148. Trump received the "Royal Treatment," including horse-drawn carriage rides, noisy jet flyovers with red, white, and blue chemtrails, endless encounters with titled personages, royal banquets, and hours of face time with the King himself147. This spectacle was deemed "unprecedented" by commentators like Piers Morgan148. Trump’s second visit made his first one look minor in comparison, and the display was described as "one of the biggest shows of royal power in decades"148.

The intensive flattery was viewed as a "love spell" designed to capture the heart of the President149. CNN ran a story headlined, “How kings and queens and Churchill’s ghost are working their magic on Trump,” and concluded that "there’s never been a US president so susceptible to royal buttering up"149.

The underlying motive for this majestic treatment was clear: "His Majesty’s government wants shielding from Trump’s most mercurial instincts"150. Specifically, the UK desired a better tariff rate, investment for its slow-growth economy, cash to build a new artificial intelligence powerhouse, and, "most of all," hoped to "persuade Trump not to abandon Ukraine"150. Essentially, the UK wanted to return to its role as America’s "girlfriend" and wanted America to fight Russia for them150.

The CNN story noted that this "obsequious spectacle" was unflattering, concluding that the new strategy of conciliation was the world’s reaction to tame Trump's "bullying ways" by appealing to his vanity151152. The author argues that regardless of whether it's called "appealing to his vanity" or "placating him," the truth is that world leaders are afraid of Trump152153. Trump is seen as having ascended to the world's "Alpha position so fast" by smashing all the unwritten rules, ignoring entrenched interests (and edging out all the middlemen), leading with an America First policy, staying unpredictable, and piling up successes153.... These factors are noted as asymmetric advantages against foreign leaders crippled by adherence to "rules-based orders" and fear of appearing unpredictable156. The British royal treatment proved that "bullying works"152. It is also noted that President Trump did not bow to King Charles; he only shook his hand156.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Kimmel show canceled.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The controversy surrounding late-night host Jimmy Kimmel's suspension has escalated into what the source dubs “Joke-gate”1. Kimmel was suspended indefinitely after facing intense backlash for a joke made during his Monday night monologue regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk12. Kimmel had incorrectly alleged that Kirk's homosexual assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative3. In his monologue, Kimmel stated that the "MAGA gang" was desperately trying to characterize the killer as anything other than "one of them" and attempting to score political points from the assassination, which the source characterized as Kimmel "hitting a new low"3.

The reaction to the joke was swift and intense, igniting a "pungent social media s—storm"1. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr added to the pressure by suggesting the agency "might" need to get involved and warned that without changes in conduct regarding Kimmel, there would be "additional work for the F.C.C. ahead"13. Carr noted that Kimmel's joke was technically justifiable for a warning under existing FCC regulations concerning "false information concerning a crime or catastrophe"2.

However, the definitive action came from Disney, which owns ABC4. The suspension was announced by Disney CEO Bob Iger24. Leaked details suggested that Iger and Disney executive Dana Walden conferred with Kimmel, only to learn that the comedian remained defiant and planned to "double down" on his position in his next show rather than "kowtowing" to the outrage, which Disney executives feared "would fan the flames"15.

Further intensifying the situation was a widespread sponsor panic and decisive action from ABC's affiliates25. Two of ABC's largest affiliates, Nexstar and Sinclair, publicly announced plans to unplug Jimmy Kimmel Live2. Nexstar, operating 32 stations, issued an announcement, while Sinclair defied Carr’s warning and called for stronger action by the FCC, noting its 24 stations would air a Charlie Kirk memorial instead46. By the time Disney made the final decision to indefinitely suspend the show, 66 of the approximately 200 affiliate stations had already stated they would not carry the upcoming episode2.

Following the indefinite suspension, a growing "free speech" panic erupted among liberals, who described the situation as "the dark night of fascism descending on Hollywood"47. Democrat Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the move "outrageous," and Governor Gavin Newsom claimed it was "a coordinated effort to control the media"4. The source suggests this "free speech" panic is a false debate, arguing that ABC profits from government regulation of the public broadcast spectrum, and that censorship has been historically pushed by Democrats for generations8.... President Trump responded positively to the news from Windsor Castle, calling it "Great News for America," while Commissioner Carr tweeted it was an important "turning point"8.

The source argues that the frenzy surrounding Kimmel's suspension is misleading, as the move cannot be pinned solely on Carr's implied threats1213. Iger had multiple reasons to suspend the show, including Kimmel's lagging ratings, the vast public ire, and the fury of ABC’s largest affiliates13. The source concludes there is "no constitutional crisis"14, suggesting the proper conservative strategy is to retaliate by making censorship a problem for Democrats to solve, forcing them to introduce laws protecting free speech11.

Discussing Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has led to various actions against individuals perceived as critical of Kirk or his politics, which the source describes as those in charge of the government investigation venting their anger against the First Amendment guarantee of free speech15. Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel is named as perhaps the most prominent individual sanctioned15. Kimmel was among a growing number of people across the US who were fired or sanctioned at their workplaces for making comments deemed offensive about Kirk’s politics15. Kimmel's comments, some of which were considered "over the top," led to his punishment15.

Discussing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The emotional fallout from the Charlie Kirk assassination included Kimmel's show being affected16. The source briefly mentions that late-night host Jimmy Kimmel was sanctioned15, which prompted a "free speech" panic among liberals who argued that this signaled "the dark night of fascism descending on Hollywood"4. This narrative is described as a false debate, since the source believes censorship has historically been pushed by Democrats for decades10. The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, who the source refers to as a "washed-up lunatic on late-night TV," prompted the Democrats to introduce the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill, which aims to protect speech targeted by Trump14.... Comedian Ted Rall argued that Jimmy Kimmel enabled censorship19.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Antifa terrorism debate.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

In the turmoil following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the government investigation, lacking a clear target for revenge, has been venting its anger against the First Amendment guarantee of free speech1. Republican conservatives within the Trump administration have called for a crackdown on the left, despite the absence of clarity on whether any identifiable left-of-center group was implicated in the killing2.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has threatened ordinary American citizens with prosecution for posting the "wrong thing" on social media, specifically saying the Justice Department would prosecute "hate speech"3. This attempt to criminalize speech is questionable because Bondi and other "Trumpsters" swore to uphold the First Amendment, which does not include any “hate speech” clause3. Bondi may be confusing criticism of Israel, which she labels as "antisemitism," with "hate speech" that must be combatted and criminalized3.

In Congress, the "Israel Firsters" have been active4. Congressman Brian Mast, a former Israeli Army serviceman, introduced a bill that would authorize the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of any American deemed to have provided “material support” to "terrorists"4. These "terrorists" are implicitly Hamas and other Palestinian resistance groups, meaning anyone writing something on social media defending the Gazans could have their passport taken away4. Mast withdrew the bill only after powerful backlash from civil liberties groups warned that the measure endangered the right to travel freely and effectively granted the Secretary of State "thought police" power4.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detailing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order is Coming Into View"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk generated extreme emotional reactions, which the author contends the government is exploiting to advance a specific agenda5. Following the event, a massive campaign on social media demanded the full power of the federal government, including militarized law enforcement and Palantir, be "unleashed" on "the left"6. The author notes that this mirrors the government's actions after 9/11 and questions whether giving intelligence agencies and paramilitary law enforcement the ability to "hunt down domestic terrorists" will result in a good outcome78.

Attorney General Pam Bondi significantly escalated the situation by announcing the imminent enforcement of new "hate speech" laws in America9. The author highlights this as a highly unusual move because conservatives have historically rejected the concept of "hate speech," which the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled does not exist in US law9. The author views Bondi as a functionary reading a script derived from people behind the scenes10. While Bondi partially walked this back, claiming she meant prosecuting violent threats (which are already illegal if imminent), she explicitly categorized celebrating Kirk's death as illegal "hate speech" even in her clarification11.

The author states that President Trump gave tacit approval to Bondi’s move, suggesting that Kirk, despite being against hate speech laws in life, would support them in death1012. The apparent implication is that hate speech laws would have prevented Kirk’s assassination, which the author says makes no sense12. It is argued that the term "hate speech" is being improperly applied, as its traditional definition relates to criticism based on protected characteristics like race, religion, or sexual orientation, not political criticism, which would be the only way to apply it to Kirk's death1314. This entire scenario is interpreted as the Israel lobby's attempt to push through laws prohibiting criticism of Jews and Israel (and other protected groups) under the pretense of responding to the Kirk assassination14.

The author suggests that the immediate focus is being deliberately shifted onto internal threats like "trannies," dismissing them as presenting less than one percent of the threat posed by the US government, which is perceived as controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley1516.

Figures like Nick Fuentes, who the author characterizes as being promoted by mainstream influencers and groomed as the apparent successor to Charlie Kirk, have been aggressively calling for aggressive state action and new "hate speech" laws1718. Fuentes openly called for punishing people for their speech and demanded the arrest of those who celebrated Kirk's death, which the author describes as the most extreme call for government tyranny ever heard from an influencer1920. Fuentes's new rhetoric includes promoting Russian bot conspiracies and shifting the focus onto the tranny menace, thereby diverting attention from Israel and Palantir2122. The author is driven to increasingly doubt the lone shooter theory, finding the theory that Israel was involved more compelling given how aggressively the "whole machine is using this event"2223.

In contrast, Tucker Carlson provided a measured response, stating that Americans must not tolerate any form of restriction on speech resulting from this event24. Carlson basically said people should rise up if Trump attempts to push these restrictions through24.

The author notes that this push to arrest people and the new "hate speech" laws, championed by Trump, Bondi, and newly prominent influencers like Fuentes who are tagging the FBI to arrest people for legal speech, is "all new" and far beyond what the left had previously attempted, which mostly involved getting people banned or sued25.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Covering Jeff Childers’ "ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, President Trump created controversy by posting an encouraging Truth Social message that targeted the terrorist group Antifa, leading to overreaction from both the left and some on the right26. Reuters ran a story headlined, “Trump targets antifa movement as 'terrorist organization'”26. This was not the first time Trump has designated Antifa as a terrorist organization; he signed a proclamation calling them such in May 2020 during the "Summer of Protest," and he did so again in a Truth Social post26.

The law prohibits the government from banning domestic organizations like Antifa due to the First Amendment rights to free speech and free assembly27. Trump’s Truth Social post did not change this27.

Antifa is described as a violent, radical, and well-organized movement that rejects all mainstream conservative and most centrist positions27. Antifans view the word "fascist" as meaning any political ideology except the far-left27. Law enforcement sometimes refers to it as a "terrorist organization" or, at minimum, an ideological network engaged in coordinated violence and criminality28. Antifa intentionally uses a loose, secretive structure organized into autonomous “cells” to make it hard to capture or counter28.

Independent journalist Andy Ngo leaked an Antifa memo from Corvallis, Oregon, advising chapters to "stand down" publicly in the wake of Kirk's killing due to "bad optics"29. However, this chapter also advised Antifa militants to engage in "false flags" by “driving wedges between” conservatives30. The source warns conservatives not to get tricked by crazy conspiracy theories circulating about Kirk’s assassination, stating that Antifa uses social media accounts disguised as conservative to create wedge issues30.

Those sympathetic to Antifa, such as Reuters and the Washington Post, deny that it exists as an organization, arguing it is merely a "politics of revolutionary opposition to the far right"31. These critics use the lowercase "a" in "antifa" because they view it as a loose coalition, denying evidence such as Soros funding, intricate preparation for protest events, and local prosecution evidence31.

The source criticizes the logic of Antifa sympathizers, noting that if Antifa doesn’t exist, there is no reason to worry about Trump declaring the non-existent group as "terrorists"32. Trump’s post said he "would be" (future tense) designating Antifa as a major terrorist organization, meaning it was just a hypothetical statement that still provoked hysteria among some conservatives concerning Constitutional issues32. The source suggests Americans should wait to see if Trump’s team finds creative legal ways to increase pressure and attention on Antifa before concluding this is a "brown-shirted takeover of government"33. Trump’s focus on the issue is viewed as positive, suggesting Antifa should be called terrorists if they act as such34.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Trump world alpha.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The sources indicate that President Trump has successfully ascended to an "Alpha position" among world leaders12. This status was overtly demonstrated during his visit to Great Britain, where the Royal Family employed the "unreserved might of its royal pomp and pageantry" in an effort to woo him3. The source emphasizes that the entire world noticed this spectacle4.

Trump received “the Royal Treatment,” which was deemed “unprecedented” by awed commentators and British pundit Piers Morgan34. His second visit to the UK reportedly made his first visit look insignificant4. The lavish events included horse-drawn carriage rides, noisy jet flyovers with red, white, and blue chemtrails, endless encounters with titled personages, Royal Banquets using the good silver, castle visits, musical performances, and hours of face time with King Charles3. The spectacle was described as “one of the biggest shows of royal power in decades”4.

The source suggests this embarrassingly over-the-top display of flattery was intended as a “love spell” designed to capture the President’s heart5. One CNN story noted that the British monarchy has practiced the art of the deal long before Trump was born and that “there’s never been a US president so susceptible to royal buttering up”5.

The UK’s primary objectives for this majestic flattery included seeking shielding from Trump’s “most mercurial instincts,” gaining a better tariff rate, securing investment for its slow-growth economy, acquiring cash to build a new artificial intelligence powerhouse, and most critically, hoping to persuade Trump “not to abandon Ukraine”6. Essentially, the UK wants to be America’s girlfriend again and wants America to fight Russia for them6. They also desperately seek forgiveness for previous perceived betrayals, such as arranging RussiaGate and sending pro-Kamala activists during the election6.

The source highlights the unflattering aspect of this diplomatic strategy, noting that diplomacy is often distasteful7. The astonishing level of conciliation was described as the world deciding that “the only way to tame his bullying ways is to appeal to his vanity”7.

The source argues that this reaction, perceived by others as merely appealing to his vanity, is fundamentally driven by fear; world leaders are now “afraid of him”28. They mask their cowardice with the flattering fiction of “appealing to his vanity,” but the new strategy of conciliation is a reaction to “bullying,” which teaches Trump that “bullying works”28. The conclusion is drawn that no major world leader is now willing to directly confront or even criticize President Trump8.

Trump achieved this Alpha position rapidly by defying conventional foreign policy practices2:

• Smashing All the Unwritten Rules: He ignores “norms” and “customs,” readily insults allies, threatens tariffs, and praises rivals29.

• Ignoring the Entrenched Interests: He brought the permanent class of diplomats, media luminaries, generals, and bureaucrats under control, forcing foreign leaders to negotiate with Trump personally rather than “the system”9.

• Leading With America First: Trump bluntly frames everything by asking “what does America get out of it?”9. This clarity cuts through dense diplomatic red tape9.

• Staying Unpredictable: Trump has proven he will “quickly retaliate” against uncooperative allies and embrace cooperating enemies, allowing him to wield uncertainty as a weapon10. Allies and adversaries now believe he might actually walk away from NATO or rip up deals10.

• Piling Up Successes: Leaders have watched him successfully extract concessions, making resistance more expensive than deference10.

The source notes that these tactics provide Trump with asymmetric advantages over foreign leaders who are crippled by their need to adhere to “rules-based orders” and are “terrified” of appearing unpredictable11. Furthermore, the source explicitly states that President Trump did “not bow to King Charles,” but merely shook his hand11.

Examining Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

The source discusses the deference shown to the Jewish state by the Trump regime12. Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Israel and demonstrated this deference12. They reportedly donned their kippah small hats during a prayer session at the so-called wailing wall, symbolizing their “obedience to a higher power, which is clearly the Jewish state’s government and America’s domestic Israel Lobby”12.

In terms of personal enrichment, the source suggests that Israel is rewarding Trump, whom Netanyahu calls his country’s “best friend ever among the US presidents”13. Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s extreme right-wing finance minister, revealed plans for the post-conflict redevelopment of Gaza, which he called a “Real Estate Bonanza.” Smotrich indicated that Israel is negotiating with the United States regarding dividing Gaza’s land between the two countries, noting that the reconstruction plan is “on President Trump’s desk”13. There have been reports of Jared Kushner being active in Israel and Gulf Arab States, pursuing development projects, suggesting that the “Trump Riviera dream is becoming a reality”13.

The source also highlights Trump’s approach to legal matters, asserting that Trump plays fast and loose with enriching his family while serving as president14. Trump has initiated personal lawsuits against news outlets he feels have insulted him, including a $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit against The New York Times, following earlier lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal ($10 billion) and settlements with ABC and CBS News14. Trump’s justification for this behavior is his declaration that as president “he can do whatever he wants to do”14.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussing Hua Bin’s "Delete USA"

The US technological containment of China began during Trump's first term when the regime banned US chip sales to Huawei, an attempt that failed miserably15. Later, the second Trump regime escalated this by immediately banning the sale of even the watered-down H20 chips to Chinese tech firms, forcing Nvidia to write off $5.5 billion worth of unsold chips16. This action, taken by Trump's administration, inadvertently opened up a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, previously monopolized by Nvidia, to Chinese domestic producers17.

Recognizing the risk of losing this massive market, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and David Sachs, Trump's “AI Czar,” lobbied the Trump White House to loosen the ban17. They argued it was in the US interest to keep Chinese companies dependent on Nvidia products, just not the best ones17. Trump subsequently lifted the ban18. His Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, boasted that the US would maintain control by selling second-rate products18. The Chinese leadership, trained as engineers rather than bankers and lawyers like those in the US, saw through this ploy18.

The source argues that the "short-sighted belligerence of the US regime" successfully undermined the dominance of its own tech champion, Nvidia, providing the opposite story of how Beijing groomed China’s dominance in the rare earth industry19. The US regime's pursuit of a zero-sum adversarial relationship with China is met by Beijing implementing a full-speed “Delete USA” strategy20. This decoupling includes winding down trade, selling off US debt, and making US education less attractive to Chinese students20.

The author contends that the arrogant and ignorant Washington operatives, specifically mentioning Trump's "charm"21 and Washington’s coercion22, assume their belligerence will not be reciprocated, but China refuses to succumb and has met its rival2122.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Charlie Kirk assassination.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

The murder of Charlie Kirk has generated intense speculation and turmoil in and around Washington1. In the chaos following his death, Republican conservatives, including members of the Trump cabinet, have publicly called for a crackdown on the left1. This call occurred despite the sources noting that it is "by no means clear" that any identifiable left-of-center group was implicated in the killing1.

A highly prominent and circulating suggestion is that Israel may have carried out Kirk's assassination, based on the belief that Israel possessed both the motive and the means2. Israel is described as having an international record for political assassinations that is "second to none," always receiving political cover from the United States when it kills someone2. The instant public statements by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describing his affection for Kirk, were cited as extremely suspicious2. This suspicion arises from the report that Israelis and their US allies were at odds with Kirk over his growing concerns regarding the "Jewish state’s control over both Trump and US policy"2.

Further unexplained circumstances complicate the official narrative, including the mysterious departure of a private jet from a nearby airport with its Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) deliberately turned off3. This plane is owned by Derek Maxfield, identified as a wealthy Jewish supporter of Chabad Lubavich Utah3. This suggests that the actual assassin may have been removed from the scene by air3. A bizarre distraction occurred at the site when one George Zinn, identified as Jewish or Mormon-Zionist, falsely shouted that he was the shooter, disrupting the police investigation and possibly allowing the actual killer to escape3. Additionally, surveillance video has raised questions about the whereabouts and status of the rifle allegedly used in the killing when the arrested suspect was believed to be fleeing3. The source confidently states that if the investigation points to Israel, a guaranteed government cover-up is anticipated, drawing parallels to historical events like the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, the JFK assassination, and the final report on 9/113.

Lacking a genuine target for retribution for Kirk's death, the government investigation has instead begun attacking the First Amendment guarantee of free speech4. Several employees have been sanctioned or fired for comments expressing dislike of Kirk due to his controversial political positions4. Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel is mentioned as the most prominent individual sanctioned4. The Trump administration is further cracking down, with the State Department threatening to identify non-citizens on social media who praise, rationalize, or make light of the assassination, potentially leading to visa revocation or deportation5. Attorney General Pam Bondi threatened ordinary American citizens with prosecution for “hate speech,” despite the First Amendment having no "hate speech" clause5. Bondi is accused of confusing criticism of Israel, which she labels "antisemitism," with criminal "hate speech"5.

The assassination also spurred action in Congress by "Israel Firsters"6. Congressman Brian Mast, a former Israeli Army serviceman, introduced a bill to allow the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of Americans who provide “material support” to "terrorists" (implicitly Palestinian resistance groups), meaning social media posts defending Gazans could lead to passport removal6. Mast withdrew the bill due to backlash from civil liberties groups6. Meanwhile, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik presented legislation to protect Benjamin Netanyahu from arrest by New York City officials during his US visits, in response to the leading Democratic nominee for NYC mayor, Zohran Mamdani, who supports serving the active International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Netanyahu78.

The resulting furor has led to political actions that "border on insanity"9. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Israel, demonstrating deference to the Jewish state's government and America’s Israel Lobby9. Furthermore, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich described plans for the post-conflict redevelopment of Gaza, terming it a "Real Estate Bonanza," and stated that Israel is in talks with the United States regarding dividing Gaza’s land between the two nations, noting the reconstruction plan is "on President Trump’s desk"10.

Discussing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The author argues that the assassination of Charlie Kirk generated extreme emotional reactions that the government is exploiting to push an agenda1112. The day after the death, a massive campaign was observed on social media, demanding the full power of the federal government, including militarized law enforcement and Palantir, be “unleashed” on “the left”1213. The author warned that giving intelligence agencies and paramilitary law enforcement the ability to "hunt down domestic terrorists" could be "the worst possible thing imaginable"14.

The political response was immediate and extreme15. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the rollout of new "hate speech" laws in America to be enforced against certain speech16. This was noted as "wild" and much more extreme than previously expected15. Bondi later clarified that she meant prosecuting violent threats (which are already illegal if imminent), but still explicitly classified celebrating Charlie’s death as illegal "hate speech" even in the clarification17. The source argues that Bondi is merely a functionary, reading a script from people behind the scenes15. President Trump gave tacit approval to Bondi's move, suggesting that Kirk, who had opposed hate speech laws, would now support them since he is dead18. The underlying implication is that the assassination could have been prevented by hate speech laws, which the author calls illogical18.

The source suggests that the term "hate speech" is being improperly applied, as it traditionally refers to criticism based on protected characteristics like race, religion, or sexual orientation, not political criticism related to Kirk's death1920. The true purpose is believed to be the Israel lobby's attempt to push through laws prohibiting criticism of Jews and Israel (and other protected groups) under the pretense of responding to the Kirk assassination20.

The author states that while the assassination is technically possible as a lone act by a "tranny" or "far leftist," the current exploitation of the event makes the lone shooter theory less likely2122. The author is "coming around to the theory that the Jews did it" (meaning Israel) due to the aggressive exploitation of the event by the "whole machine"21.... The response from Prime Minister Netanyahu, who is making daily announcements denying any involvement in the assassination, is specifically mentioned as driving the author toward the "Israel did it" side2425.

The author highlights how some conservative figures are pushing the government crackdown, specifically criticizing influencer Nick Fuentes for aggressively calling for state action and new "hate speech" laws26. Fuentes is accused of openly advocating for the arrest of people who celebrated Kirk’s death27. Fuentes’s calls for punishing people for legal speech are described as the "most extreme call for government tyranny" ever heard from an influencer2728. Fuentes is presented as being groomed as the "heir apparent" to Charlie Kirk and is shifting the focus onto the internal threats of "trannies" and "Russia" to divert attention away from Israel and Palantir, the government entities believed to be the real threats24....

In contrast, Tucker Carlson provided a measured and reasonable response, unequivocally stating that Americans must not tolerate any form of restriction on speech resulting from the event31. Carlson suggested that people should oppose Trump if he attempts to push these restrictions31. Carlson also conveyed that Kirk was turning against Israel in the months before his death, which the author found convincing32.

The overall reaction to the assassination is characterized as mass hysteria, exploited by the same bad actors seen during the coronavirus event33. The push by Trump, Bondi, and influencers like Fuentes to arrest people and enforce "hate speech" laws is noted as being "all new" and going far beyond what the left previously attempted, which mostly involved getting people banned or sued28.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The Charlie Kirk assassination is characterized as "perhaps the most significant political killing in our lifetimes," heavily shaping the news cycle34. The immediate fallout included a widespread controversy triggered by late-night host Jimmy Kimmel3435.

The immediate controversy, dubbed "Joke-gate," erupted after Kimmel aired a monologue claiming that Kirk’s "homosexual assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative," and accused the "MAGA gang" of trying to score political points by characterizing the killer as anything other than "one of them"3536. This injudicious joke, made amid the highly emotional public climate, resulted in a swift and widespread backlash3536.

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr suggested the agency "might" need to get involved following the joke, warning of "additional work for the F.C.C. ahead" if action wasn't taken on Kimmel36.

The suspension was ultimately triggered by a combination of factors:

• Widespread Sponsor Panic and complaints from ABC station owners to Disney3537.

• The defiance of Kimmel, who, after consulting with Disney CEO Bob Iger and executive Dana Walden, planned to "double down" on his position on his next show rather than "kowtowing" to the outrage3538. Disney executives feared this defiance "would fan the flames"3738.

• Affiliate Action: ABC’s two biggest affiliates, Nexstar (32 stations) and Sinclair (24 stations), publicly announced plans to unplug Kimmel’s show3739. Sinclair further defied Carr’s implicit warning by stating its stations would run a Charlie Kirk memorial instead39. By the time Disney made the decision to suspend the show indefinitely, 66 of the approximately 200 affiliate stations had already stated they would not carry the upcoming episode37.

Disney CEO Bob Iger announced the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live, a decision made before the show's taping, as Iger had solid reasons apart from anything FCC Commissioner Carr had stated37. However, existing FCC regulations governing "false information concerning a crime or catastrophe" were cited as fully justifying Carr’s warning40.

The source argues that the ensuing "free speech" panic among liberals, who framed the suspension as "the dark night of fascism descending on Hollywood," is a false debate41.... The controversy successfully led Democrats to announce an "astonishing" plan to introduce the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill to "bolster legal protections for people targeted by President Trump"4445. This unexpected bill, which would allow citizens to sue federal officials over speech suppression and recover attorney’s fees, is seen as a potential major victory for free speech, driven entirely by Democrats' self-interest amid a shift in political power46....

In a separate consequence of the assassination, Melbourne Mayor Paul Alfrey suggested renaming a section of Cypress Avenue after Charlie Kirk4950. This street is located outside Lamb & Co. Fishmongers, whose owner, Kaili Lamb, had tweeted something considered "horrible" after hearing about Kirk's death, prompting a massive backlash and a public apology from the owner4951.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The source discusses the assassination in relation to President Trump's political actions and the fallout regarding free speech and Antifa52....

The assassination generated controversy surrounding late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who claimed in his monologue that Kirk’s "homosexual assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative," and accused the "MAGA gang" of trying to score political points36. This joke led to a "wild backlash"36. In response, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr suggested that the FCC "might" need to get involved, and large ABC affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair subsequently announced they would pre-empt the show, with Sinclair saying its 24 stations would run a Charlie Kirk memorial instead3639. Ultimately, Disney CEO Bob Iger indefinitely suspended Jimmy Kimmel Live41. President Trump called this suspension "Great News for America," and Commissioner Carr tweeted it was an important "turning point"42.

Following the assassination, President Trump posted an encouraging Truth Social message targeted at the terrorist group Antifa54. Reuters ran a story headlined, “Trump targets antifa movement as 'terrorist organization,’” which the source calls a "propaganda-laced story"54. Trump had previously signed a proclamation calling Antifa a terrorist organization in May 2020 and repeated the designation in the Truth Social post54. The source notes that the law forbids banning domestic organizations due to the First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly55.

An Antifa memo from Corvallis, Oregon, was leaked, advising chapters to "stand down" publicly due to "bad optics" following Charlie's killing5657. The memo also advised using "false flags" to create "wedges between" conservatives, using social media accounts disguised as conservative accounts57. The source urges readers not to be tricked by "crazy conspiracy theories circulating about Charlie Kirk’s assassination" created by Antifa, while simultaneously encouraging people to "explore (and question) everything"57.

Discussing Hua Bin’s "Delete USA"

The assassination is mentioned in the broader context of political discourse surrounding foreign relations and technology, though the article primarily focuses on US-China relations58. The column by Hua Bin is introduced immediately after a mention of the question "Why Is Charlie Kirk a Big Deal?"58.

Discussing The Expose’s "Tommy Robinson: Unite the Kingdom protest proved the establishment has lost its power to silence the majority"

The source includes a chapter and timestamp for a discussion of the "Reaction to Charlie Kirk" within an interview featuring Tommy Robinson and Patrick Bet-David5960.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Kimmel suspension controversy.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The controversy surrounding late-night host Jimmy Kimmel's suspension has been labeled “Joke-gate”1 and is seen as heavily shaping the current news cycle following Charlie Kirk’s assassination2. Kimmel was suspended indefinitely by Disney CEO Bob Iger, an event described as perhaps the “most significant political killing in our lifetimes” being the cause of the news cycle23. The controversy began late on Monday night when Kimmel aired an "injudicious ‘joke’"1 in his monologue, incorrectly alleging that Kirk’s assassin was a “far-right MAGA conservative”4. Kimmel accused the “MAGA gang” of desperately trying to characterize the killer as anything other than “one of them” to score political points45.

The joke ignited a "pungent social media s—storm"1. The situation escalated when FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr chimed in, suggesting the agency might get involved15. Carr warned that without changes in conduct regarding Kimmel, there would be “additional work for the F.C.C. ahead”5. The source notes that Kimmel’s joke was technically justifiable for a warning under existing FCC regulations concerning “false information concerning a crime or catastrophe”4.

The actual suspension decision by Disney CEO Bob Iger was influenced by multiple factors46. Leaked details revealed that Kimmel had conferred with Disney executives Iger and Dana Walden and learned that he “remained defiant” and planned to “double down” on his position in his next show34. Disney feared this defiance “would fan the flames” or “pour more gas on the flames”34. Simultaneously, the “advertiser calls began to roll in”4, signaling sponsor panic3. Crucially, ABC’s two biggest affiliates, Nexstar and Sinclair, publicly announced plans to unplug Kimmel’s show46. Sinclair defiantly stated that its 24 stations would air a Charlie Kirk memorial instead7. By the time Iger made the fast call to suspend the show indefinitely, 66 of the roughly 200 affiliate stations had already said they would not carry the upcoming episode4. The source notes Iger had solid reasons for the suspension, “lots of them, and apart from anything Carr said”4.

The suspension led to “complete hysteria” and a growing “free speech” panic among liberals89. Democrat Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the suspension “outrageous,” and Governor Gavin Newsom complained it was “a coordinated effort to control the media”8. The media narrative, described as a “tired, old chestnut,” claimed that “the dark night of fascism is descending on Hollywood!”810. The source argues that this is a “false debate,” as censorship has been historically pushed by Democrats for generations10....

The suspension, however, was immediately framed by President Trump, who posted from Windsor Castle calling it “Great News for America,” while Commissioner Carr tweeted, “This is an important turning point”11. The political fallout resulted in Democrats surprisingly announcing plans to introduce the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill1415. The bill is intended to bolster legal protections for people targeted by President Trump16. Representative Greg Casar claimed the country faced its “biggest free speech crisis this country has faced since the McCarthy era”14. The source views this potential bill positively, noting that it aims to enable citizens to sue federal officials over speech suppression and crucially includes the right to recover attorney’s fees1617. The unexpected move is viewed as a “Trump miracle”3, where Trump’s willingness to “play the same game” as Democrats18 (by threatening that one-sided broadcasters should lose their licenses12) forced Democrats to adopt his position of protecting free speech, albeit motivated by being out of power1819.

Discussing Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

In the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk murder, the government investigation, lacking a clear target for revenge, was "venting their anger against... the First Amendment guarantee of free speech"20. Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel is cited as the "most prominent" individual among a growing number of people across the US who were "fired or sanctioned at their workplaces for comments deemed offensive" regarding Kirk's politics20.

Detailing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The emotional fallout from the assassination included Kimmel's show being affected21. The author notes that following the event, the establishment right, particularly Attorney General Pam Bondi, began rolling out new "hate speech" laws22. The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, alongside these actions, prompted a "free speech" panic among liberals2324. The source suggests that this panic is part of a "false debate," asserting that censorship has historically been pushed by Democrats for decades23. The suspension of Kimmel led Democrats to suddenly announce plans for the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill23. Ted Rall is noted as arguing that Jimmy Kimmel enabled censorship25. Some observers noted that they do not feel bad that "POS Jimmy Kimmel got smacked" for telling "outright LIES to his audience"24.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The article discusses the controversy surrounding Kimmel’s show being axed, leading to a "faux First Amendment panic"26. The New York Times ran a story headlined, “ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Off Air for Charlie Kirk Comments After F.C.C. Pressure”27. Reactions from conservatives ranged from asking “what took so long?” to cautioning “we mustn’t embrace cancel culture”27. Kimmel, described as a “skinny ‘Late Night’ show host” and “not that funny,” was criticized for being “just another raving, left-wing lunatic”27.

The controversy began when Kimmel, in his Monday night monologue, claimed that “Charlie Kirk’s homosexual assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative,” unironically achieving a “new low” while stating that “the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them”5.

In response, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr “lashed forwards,” saying that ABC could “find ways to change conduct and take action on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the F.C.C. ahead”528. This was followed by two large ABC affiliates, Nexstar and Sinclair, announcing they would pre-empt Jimmy Kimmel Live7. Sinclair, whose stations would run a Charlie Kirk memorial instead, subsequently called for stronger action by the FCC7.

The climax was reached when Disney’s CEO Bob Iger announced the network would indefinitely suspend Jimmy Kimmel Live8. This decision prompted “complete hysteria” among liberals8. Democrat Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it “outrageous,” and Governor Gavin Newsom complained it was “a coordinated effort to control the media”8.

The source dismisses the argument among conservatives and libertarians that the government violated ABC’s First Amendment rights through veiled threats, calling it a “false debate”11. The primary evidence against government coercion is that Carr never threatened specific government action28, only “more work” for the FCC28. Furthermore, the cancellation cannot be solely pinned on Carr, as Iger was facing “vast public ire” against Kimmel (whose ratings lagged Bob the Builder reruns) and was dealing with “furious” affiliates who were demanding more6. Iger suspending the show avoided declaring war against ABC’s biggest affiliates and prevented a new political headache for Disney6. The source concludes there “is no constitutional crisis here,” and argues that the network could have sued the FCC if necessary29. President Trump, posting from Windsor Castle, called the suspension “Great News for America,” and Commissioner Carr tweeted, “This is an important turning point”11.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Free speech legislation.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

In the chaos that followed the assassination of Charlie Kirk, those in charge of the government investigation have channeled their anger into an attack against the First Amendment guarantee of free speech1. Attorney General Pam Bondi has threatened ordinary American citizens who post the "wrong thing" on social media, claiming that the Justice Department would prosecute “hate speech”2. This threat is presented despite the fundamental fact that the First Amendment, which Trump administration officials swore to uphold, does not include any “hate speech” clause2. Bondi is accused of confusing criticism of Israel, which she labels as "antisemitism," with criminal “hate speech” that must be fought and criminalized2.

Furthermore, the Trump administration’s State Department threatened to identify non-citizens who use social media to praise, rationalize, or make light of the assassination, potentially leading to visa revocation, refusal, or deportation if they are already in the US2.

In Congress, the "Israel Firsters" have been highly active in trying to advance measures that restrict speech and action. Congressman Brian Mast, who previously served in the Israeli Army, introduced a bill that would have authorized the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of any American deemed to have provided “material support” to "terrorists"3. This designation implicitly targets Palestinian resistance groups, meaning that anyone writing something on social media defending Gazans could have their passport taken away3. Mast ultimately withdrew the bill after a strong response from civil liberties groups warned that it endangered the right to travel freely and granted the Secretary of State “thought police” power3.

Separately, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik proposed legislation aimed at protecting Benjamin Netanyahu from arrest by New York City officials during his US visits4. This legislative effort stems from the fact that Zohran Mamdani, the leading Democratic nominee for NYC mayor, supports serving the active International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant against Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and genocide5. Stefanik described her bill as necessary to “protect American sovereignty and prohibit radicals like Zohran Mamdani from illegally arresting the leader of our democratic ally Israel”4.

Detailing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The author argues that the assassination of Charlie Kirk is being exploited by the government to advance an agenda, evidenced by the immediate push for major restrictions on speech67. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the rollout of new "hate speech" laws in America, which the author found "wild" and much more extreme than anticipated89. The phrase “Hate speech is not free speech” is described as an ADL-coined phrase that was previously considered "anathema" to conservatives, who generally believe the Supreme Court has ruled that no such concept exists in the United States8.

Bondi partially walked back her initial statement, saying she meant prosecuting violent threats (which are already illegal if imminent), but she explicitly stated that celebrating Charlie’s death was classified as illegal “hate speech”—even in her clarification10. The author suggests Bondi is merely reading a script for those "behind the scenes"9.

President Trump gave tacit approval to Bondi's push for new hate speech laws, suggesting that Charlie Kirk, who had opposed such laws, would support them now that he is dead11. The implication being that such laws would have prevented Kirk’s assassination, which the author calls illogical11.

The source argues that this push for censorship is inappropriate because traditional “hate speech” laws relate to protected groups based on race, religion, or sexual orientation12. Applying it to political criticism related to Kirk’s death makes no sense1213. The true reason for this legislative push is likely the Israel lobby's desire to push through laws prohibiting criticism of Jews and Israel (as well as blacks, trannies, and immigrants) under the pretense of responding to Kirk's assassination13.

The source notes that influential figures on the right, such as Nick Fuentes, have been openly supporting these restrictive measures. Fuentes was observed aggressively calling for some form of “hate speech” laws and demanding that people be punished for their speech14. Fuentes even openly called for the arrest of people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death15, which the author considers the most extreme call for government tyranny ever heard from an influencer15. Fuentes went so far as to tweet at the FBI, calling on them to arrest Jackson Hinkle for legal speech16. The author emphasizes that this push to arrest people and enforce new "hate speech" laws, championed by Trump, Bondi, and influencers like Fuentes, is “all new” and goes far beyond the previous tactics of the left, which mainly focused on getting people banned or sued17.

In stark contrast to this position, Tucker Carlson provided a measured response, unequivocally stating that Americans must not tolerate any form of restriction on speech resulting from this event18. Carlson suggested that people should oppose Trump if he attempts to implement these restrictions18.

Covering Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The controversy surrounding Jimmy Kimmel's suspension led to a widespread "free speech" panic19. The author refers to this panic, especially among liberals, as a false debate20.

However, the political climate spurred action toward new legislation. The source notes the Democrats surprisingly announced plans to introduce the NOPE (No Official Policy of Censorship Act) bill2122. Representative Greg Casar claimed that the country was facing its “biggest free speech crisis... since the McCarthy era”21.

The proposed bill, which the author states "actually sounds terrific," aims to “bolster legal protections for people targeted by President Trump”22. The core component of the bill is that it would provide a viable way for ordinary citizens to sue the government over speech suppression and crucially, includes the right to recover attorney’s fees2223. The ability to recover attorney's fees is considered the "secret sauce," as it would allow public interest lawyers to take on these difficult cases23. The bill would combat the firmament of “sovereign immunity” which typically shields the government from lawsuits by citizens23.

The Democrats' sudden embrace of free speech rhetoric is noted as being wholly contingent upon them being out of power and facing threats from Trump24. This move is seen as successful for President Trump’s strategy, as he has forced the Democrats to adopt his position by making censorship a problem for them2425.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, there was immediate political pressure to restrict speech. The source documents that Attorney General Pam Bondi “threatened ordinary American citizens” who posted the “wrong thing” on social media, by saying the Justice Department would prosecute “hate speech”26. The source reminds listeners that the Constitution forbids the government from banning domestic organizations due to the First Amendment rights to free speech and free assembly27.

President Trump contributed to the situation by defiantly telling reporters that one-sided broadcasters “should lose their licenses”28. The author frames this conservative strategy as retaliation against censorship historically pushed by Democrats, arguing the best way to fix the problem is by making censorship into “their problem”28.

The controversy over Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension was described as triggering a "faux First Amendment panic"29. While the FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr suggested the agency "might" need to get involved following Kimmel's joke, the author dismisses this as the cause for Kimmel's suspension, arguing that there is “no constitutional crisis” because the network could have sued the FCC to enforce its rights, and because the suspension was primarily due to sponsor panic and furious affiliates2030. The author argues that the public should “not buy into the whole ‘free speech’ thing” surrounding Kimmel, calling it a false premise30.

Discussing Hua Bin’s "Delete USA"

The Chinese government is pursuing a strategy of technological decoupling with the US and implementing a full-speed “Delete USA” strategy31. This comprehensive strategy includes making US education less appealing to Chinese students31. This is mentioned in the context of avoiding Washington’s coercion31.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss CDC vaccine changes.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The CDC’s new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) vaccine committee recently voted to implement changes regarding the administration of some vaccines and continued its meetings to evaluate the COVID-19 mRNA shots1....

The committee voted on the MMRV vaccine, a four-in-one combination shot for measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox (varicella)3. The MMRV vaccine combines four shots for convenience, primarily for pediatricians, and to increase compliance3. After hearing evidence that the risks of adverse events increased when the shots are combined, but were lower when the shots were given separately, the committee voted 8-3 to “not recommend” the combo MMRV shot3. Instead, the committee voted to “recommend” separate shots, but only for children aged four or under3. One committee member who voted "no" noted that the disadvantage of this decision is that compliance typically falls, as the advantage of combination vaccines is that children and adults are more likely to complete the requirements if the shot is administered as a single dose4.

The ACIP committee was also scheduled to vote on the Hep-B and covid vaccines4.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The ACIP committee continued its meetings, which were described as “delicately chipping away at the mRNA guidelines with archeological tools,” but later referred to the most recent meeting as firing up the “jackhammer”56.

The committee voted to further limit the COVID mRNA shots by adding a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before administering the shots to anyone under 65 or not in a ‘high-risk’ group6. The committee came close to requiring a prescription for the shots, but that vote failed by a small margin6. The meeting overall was characterized as a “bloodbath” for the jabs7.

The ACIP committee was forced to sit through several lengthy presentations by the newly formed “Vaccine Working Group” concerning the growing questions and problems associated with the jabs7. These issues were framed as “important questions for ongoing research and and safety monitoring”8. The Workgroup discussed findings including:

• Long-lasting shifts in cytokine profiles, with elevated inflammatory cytokine persistence for months, which may contribute to an increased risk of recurrent infection in some individuals8.

• Biodistribution, meaning the vaccine material spreads all over the body, including into the brain8.

• Frameshifting, which refers to the creation of random ‘nonsense’ proteins8.

• Implausibly high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of the monkey virus SV40, especially in the Pfizer shot8.

Following the meeting, the CDC itself published a very critical comment from Dr. Malone, who questioned how drugmakers can even claim the shots work910. Dr. Malone’s point was that there is no agreed-upon measurement (or correlate of protection), like a specific antibody level, that reliably predicts whether a person is protected from COVID-19, either from infection or severe disease910. Malone argued that pharmaceutical companies’ claims of efficacy were based only on large-group statistical conclusions, rather than a measurable biological effect, in contrast to most other vaccines which have established correlates of protection10. This critical comment was re-published by the official US government Twitter account for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention10.

The CDC also published a string of clips, including one of Dr. Retsef Levi, who stated that “Sub-clinical myocarditis can cause death. It’s proven. It’s not questionable,” and yet this risk is currently not being discussed with patients10.

The source suggests that despite the evident problems, the committee did not withdraw authorization altogether because they appear to be “carefully building an unassailable scientific record before pulling the plug”11. A committee member, Dr. Kirk Milhoan, reportedly “roasted” the FDA for its failure to pull the COVID jabs following the problems discovered6.

Addressing Rhoda Wilson’s "New paper detailing evidence of DNA contamination in covid vaccines is under threat of being retracted"

A new peer-reviewed study co-authored by Dr. Jessica Rose, titled ‘Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA covid-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada’, has confirmed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain significant amounts of foreign DNA12.... This finding contradicts claims made by US federal health agencies, including the CDC, FDA, and HHS, that the vaccines are DNA-free1215.

The source notes that as of September 15, 2025, the CDC website still maintains the false claims that the vaccine material stays only in the arm muscle cells (no biodistribution) and that there are no DNA integration issues16. The claim of limited biodistribution is fundamentally false because the basic operating principle (modus operandi) of Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) is broad distribution throughout the body16. The claim of no DNA integration issues is also deemed false given that multiple independent laboratories have identified DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna vials, and Moderna’s own 2018 patent recognized the danger of foreign DNA introduction causing potential “alterations and/or damage to host cell genomic DNA”17.

The study, which tested 32 vials across 16 unique lots of Pfizer and Moderna products using two methods (qPCR and fluorometry), detected DNA in all tested lots1819. The measured DNA levels massively exceeded the regulatory guideline set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA of 10 ng/dose by 36 to 627-fold1920. The researchers consider these regulatory thresholds to be inadequate because they were established for naked DNA, failing to account for the highly efficient delivery mechanism provided by LNP-encapsulated DNA1921.

The study specifically found SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences in the Pfizer vials2022. This SV40 component, which is a known gene therapy tool used to traffic material to the cell nucleus, was not found in the Moderna vials22. The presence of foreign DNA contamination, particularly SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences, is concerning because they are known to interact with the p53 protein, the vital tumor suppressor, potentially impairing its function and raising concerns about the observed rise in cancers23. Foreign DNA only needs to enter the cell’s interior to potentially cause damage, such as activating cancer pathways like cGas-STING24.

The contamination is suspected to have resulted from manufacturers switching production from Process 1 (used for clinical trials, involving PCR) to Process 2 (used for mass commercial scaling, using a plasmid/E. coli system)2526. Process 2 is highly cost-efficient and rapid but risks DNA impurities and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination if purification is inadequate26. The source notes that safety testing on products from Process 2 materials was inadequate24. The paper concluded that regulators must establish clear guidelines for quantifying mRNA and residual plasmid DNA and urged that the work be replicated under forensic conditions2021.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Trump nominees confirmed.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The source reports that the Senate confirmed 48 Trump nominees in a single vote1. This swift confirmation process followed Senate Republicans changing the rules to allow low-level nominees to be confirmed ‘en bloc’ (all at once), which effectively overrode months of Democrat stonewalling1. The first block of 48 nominations, consisting of various ambassadors and under-secretaries, subsequently "sailed through" the confirmation process1.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Charlie Kirk memorial.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The assassination of Charlie Kirk was characterized as "perhaps the most significant political killing in our lifetimes," and the subsequent news cycle was heavily shaped by it1. As a response to the intense public controversy, or "Joke-gate," surrounding the suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, ABC affiliate Sinclair defiantly announced that its 24 stations would run a Charlie Kirk memorial instead of carrying the Jimmy Kimmel Live episode23. This affiliate action was a significant factor leading to Disney CEO Bob Iger's decision to indefinitely suspend Kimmel's show34.

In a separate move to honor Kirk, Melbourne Mayor Paul Alfrey suggested naming a section of Cypress Avenue after Charlie Kirk5. This street is located outside Lamb & Co. Fishmongers, whose owner, Kaili Lamb, had previously tweeted something inappropriate about Kirk's killing56. Mayor Alfrey’s measure to rename the street is scheduled for a vote by the Melbourne City Council on September 24th, at 6:30 pm7.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The source mentions the planned memorial service while discussing the profound public grief following the assassination. A commenter details a prayer intended to protect those involved in the upcoming ceremony8.

One comment addresses a prayer, stating that Lord, they ask that you command your angels to guard every event and render powerless those who seek further destruction, and to surround Charlie’s family and friends, our leaders, and every attendee with fearsome warriors9. Specifically, the prayer requests that as thousands plan to gather on September 21, 2025, in Glendale, Arizona for the formal memorial service, that God would build a wall of warriors around the city that is impenetrable by evil8. The commenter hopes that every word spoken reflects truth, every chorus sung proclaims praise, and every prayer rises as holy incense8.

Discussing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The emotional fallout from the assassination is discussed, including the role of the memorial. The author notes that Tucker Carlson provided a measured and reasonable response to the assassination, which was described as touching1011. Carlson hosted an Orthodox priest who advised that the dead should be allowed to rest for forty days before any judgments are made about the meaning of their death11.

The widespread desire to capitalize on the event is also noted in the discussion of memorialization. The Alex Jones Store is selling merchandise, including “What Would Charlie Do?” and “We Are All Charlie Kirk” tee shirts, with 25% of the profits going to TPUSA12.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Immigration reform.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

President Trump enacted two major executive orders that significantly reformed the US immigration system without requiring Congressional action12. Pundits described the moves as "absolutely massive" and "absolutely punishing" for certain sectors1.

The first executive order radically overhauled the H-1B visa program3. H-1B visas are specialized skilled-worker visas typically granted to foreign professionals, primarily from India (71%) and China (12%), intended to fill talent gaps in US tech and innovation sectors3. Critics had noted that tech employers and others misused these special visas as "cheat codes" to hire cheaper, job-locked labor for positions Americans could handle34. H-1B workers are cheaper, more loyal, job-locked (making it difficult to swap employers), and face deportation if fired, providing an "intense incentive to work hard"4. This widespread use of H-1Bs allegedly discourages young Americans from science and technology careers and pressures American workers into accepting lower salaries5.

Trump’s executive order radically changed this system by dramatically increasing the H-1B application fee one hundred-fold, from $1,000 to $100,000 annually6. The order automatically expires in one year but may be extended6. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick emphasized that this $100,000 rate is intended to be an annual fee6. The order also requires Secretary Lutnick to "revise" a schedule of minimum H-1B salaries, presumably to ensure skilled foreign workers are more expensive than American workers7. The explicit goal is to encourage employers to “train Americans. Stop bringing in people to take our jobs,” according to Secretary Lutnick7. Critics hailed the move as ending the H-1B visa "scam" that disenfranchised American workers and cementing the Republican Party's position as champions of rank-and-file American workers78. The move is viewed as making foreign workers only financially viable when companies truly need rare, hard-to-find skills, such as AI engineers9. This executive order brought the out-of-whack incentives back to where they should be9.

The second executive order initiated “Phase One” of Trump's "Gold Card" fast-track visa program, described as potentially historic immigration reform1011. This program offers expedited green card processing for anyone who gifts the U.S. government $1–2 million12. This strategy ensures that financially stable immigrants, who are more likely to invest in or contribute to the economy, can bypass the typical years-long queue12. Trump noted that the primary purpose is to attract "great people coming in and they're going to be paying"12.

A "Corporate Card" is also available, allowing employers to pay $2 million (plus an annual maintenance fee) to fast-track green cards for critical workers12. The intention is that employers will now have more incentive to bring foreign workers here to train Americans rather than replace departments with cheaper foreign nationals13. The expedited processing is secured via a gift, allowing Trump to bypass Congress by exploiting his control over executive agencies to direct the order of visa review, essentially selling bureaucratic efficiency without changing any underlying laws213. Applicants must still satisfy all standard vetting and applicable immigration laws13. This reform is summarized as importing "prosperity" instead of "pet-gobbling poverty— and getting paid to do it"14.

A higher-priced $5 million "Platinum Card" leading to citizenship still exists in concept, but that program awaits Congressional authorization14.

Discussing Philip Giraldi’s "More Turmoil from Washington"

In Congress, the immediate turmoil following the Charlie Kirk assassination prompted action from the "Israel Firsters" attempting to advance immigration and travel restrictions15. Congressman Brian Mast, who served in the Israeli Army, introduced a bill that would have allowed the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of any American deemed to have provided “material support” to "terrorists" (implicitly Hamas and other Palestinian groups)15. This means writing something on social media defending Gazans could lead to passport removal15. However, Mast withdrew the bill due to a powerful backlash from civil liberties groups15.

The source also mentions the context of current immigration debates by noting the State Department's threat to identify non-citizens on social media who praise, rationalize, or make light of the Kirk assassination, and subsequently deport them if they are already in the US or refuse or revoke their visas16.

Discussing Andrew Anglin’s "Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View"

The emotional fallout from the Charlie Kirk assassination led to calls for extreme government action, including leveraging technology like Palantir to be "unleashed" on illegal immigrants17. The source warns that the "invasion of the illegals" is one of the groups introduced in the last decade, alongside Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and LGBQT, all done on purpose to keep people angry and divided while the elites remain in control18.

The author criticizes a focus on internal threats, stating that immigrants are seen as less of a military threat than the "far left," yet Andrew Anglin is noted as having made a career out of "verbally attacking immigrants"19. The author points out the hypocrisy of figures like Nick Fuentes, who, despite promoting policies against immigration, is a "bloated Mexican individual"20. The claim is made that the controllers of America “don’t hate all Christians, just straight White Christians,” and that “Mexican Tranny killers are in America to kill the Gringos”21.

In a comment within the source, it is noted that Trump, in an action described as "taking ‘solid anti-pajeet action’," added a $100,000 fee to H-1B visa applications instead of signing an executive order to end H-1B and other visas22.

Discussing Tommy Robinson’s "Unite the Kingdom protest proved the establishment has lost its power to silence the majority"

Tommy Robinson discusses immigration in the UK, stating that for 20 years, the establishment instilled fear and had the population whispering about the replacement of the British people and culture using mass migration23. The massive turnout at the "Unite the Kingdom" rally proved that the establishment's power "has gone"23. Robinson stated that the millions participating were letting the establishment know: “We’re not being replaced and staying silent anymore. You’re not having uncontrolled mass immigration endangering our daughters, endangering our wives, whilst then beating us down with your racist labels, your fascist labels or your Islamophobic labels. It doesn’t wash anymore,”24. Another excerpt mentions Trump urging Starmer to "Use Military, Stop Illegal Immigration"25.

Discussing Hua Bin’s "Delete USA"

The source discusses China's "Delete USA" strategy, which includes making US education less appealing to Chinese students26. This is mentioned in the context of China actively working to end its dependence on the US and refusing to succumb to Washington's coercion26. A comment also raises the issue of legal immigration only for those with advanced tech skills27.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss H-1B visa changes.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

President Trump enacted a major executive order that radically overhauled the H-1B visa program, a move described by pundits as "absolutely massive" and "absolutely punishing" for certain sectors12. This reform was executed without requiring Congressional action13.

The H-1B visa is a specialized skilled-worker visa intended for foreign professionals, such as software engineers, scientists, and researchers, usually from India (71%) or China (12%), to fill talent gaps in US tech and innovation sectors2. However, critics asserted that tech employers and others misused these visas as "cheat codes" to hire cheaper, more loyal labor for less demanding jobs that Americans could handle24.

The source elaborates on the advantages for employers using H-1B workers:

• The foreign workers were cheaper4.

• The rules allowed companies to fire American workers while simultaneously hiring H-1B workers4.

• H-1B workers are job-locked, making it nearly impossible to swap employers, which contributes to lower turnover4.

• They often come without distractions like families or social lives, allowing them to work 20 hours a day for the same low price4.

• The immense incentive to work hard stems from the threat of deportation if fired4.

This system reportedly discouraged young Americans from careers in science and technology and pressured American workers into accepting lower salaries5. Governor DeSantis called the widespread use of H-1B visas a "total scam" that disenfranchised American workers and prioritized foreigners6.

The executive order enacted a radical change by increasing the H-1B application fee one hundred-fold, from $1,000 to $100,000 annually7. This massive fee hike is intended to make skilled foreign workers more expensive than American workers67. The order automatically expires in one year but may be extended7. Additionally, the order requires Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to "revise" a schedule of minimum H-1B salaries to further ensure foreign workers are more expensive than Americans6.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick explicitly advised employers to “train Americans. Stop bringing in people to take our jobs”6. The era of cheap immigrant labor is considered officially over6.

Reactions to the change were mixed:

• Critics hailed the move, arguing that when high-tech companies genuinely need rare skills (like AI engineers), paying the increased fee will be worth it, but it no longer makes sense for ordinary positions8. Representative Brandon Gill tweeted that "America is a nation, not a jobs program for foreign workers"6.

• Tech Bros were "unamused"9. Deedy Das, a venture capitalist, warned that if the U.S. ceases to attract the best talent, it will drastically reduce its ability to innovate and grow the economy9. Far-left activist Neera Tanden expressed concern about the political optics for Indian Americans9.

The source frames this executive action as a move that was perfectly aligned with “America First,” cementing the Republican Party's position as the champions of rank-and-file American workers810.

As part of the second executive order initiating the "Gold Card" fast-track visa program, employers can now pay $2 million (plus an annual maintenance fee) to speed-run green cards for truly critical workers, which serves as an alternative for unique jobs like AI engineers and chip designers1112. This new incentive aims to encourage employers to bring foreign workers here to train Americans, rather than simply replacing the whole department with cheaper foreign nationals12.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

Another source briefly mentions the change in a commenter's argument about Trump's policies. One commenter notes that instead of signing an executive order ending H1-Bs and other visas, Trump only added a stunning $100k fee to visa applications, which they interpret as Trump "dumping on unemployed Americans yet again"13.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Gold Card program.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

President Trump enacted a major executive order that initiated “Phase One” of his "Gold Card" fast-track visa program1. This program is described as a potentially historic immigration reform that is meaningful, productive, and "simplest" in a generation12. This overhaul was achieved without requiring any specific legislative action from Congress34.

The Gold Card program is designed to reform an immigration system previously known for long wait times, mystifying rules, and invisible border enforcement for legal applicants1. The program offers expedited green card processing for anyone who can gift the U.S. government $1–2 million5.

The strategy ensures that financially stable immigrants—those who are most likely to invest in or contribute to the economy—can jump to the front of the application queue5. President Trump explained that the main purpose is to attract "great people coming in and they're going to be paying"5. The program is summarized as importing "prosperity" instead of "pet-gobbling poverty" and getting paid to do it6.

In addition to individual applicants, a "Corporate Card" is also available5. This allows employers to pay $2 million (plus an annual maintenance fee) to fast-track green cards for critical workers57. This provides an alternative for unique jobs, such as AI engineers and chip designers, now that H-1B visas have become much more expensive78. The aim is that employers will now have more incentive to bring foreign workers here to train Americans rather than replacing departments with cheaper foreign nationals7.

The program works because applicants are required to provide a "gift" instead of a payment, and applicants must still satisfy all standard background vetting and applicable immigration law47. The Gold Card only provides a fast pass to the front of the reviewing line7. Trump was able to bypass Congress entirely by exploiting his control over executive agencies to direct the order of visa review, essentially selling bureaucratic efficiency without changing any underlying laws4. Trump even launched a website that resembles a credit card site, optimistically headed “unlock life in America”2.

A higher-priced $5 million "Platinum Card" was conceptually teased earlier, and this path would lead to citizenship instead of just a green card6. However, this Platinum Card program "will require Congress", and for now, the website only invites applicants to join a waiting list6.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Vaccine committee decisions.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing Rhoda Wilson’s "New paper detailing evidence of DNA contamination in covid vaccines is under threat of being retracted"

A new peer-reviewed study, titled ‘Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA covid-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada’, has confirmed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are contaminated with significant amounts of foreign DNA1.... This finding directly contradicts previous claims by US federal health agencies, including the CDC, FDA, and HHS, that the vaccines do not contain DNA14.

The paper, published on September 6, 202523, faced an immediate threat of suppression and retraction by the publishing journal1.... Dr. Jessica Rose, one of the authors, anticipated attempts to bury the findings and urged the public to download, read, and share the work quickly7. Just eleven days after publication, on September 17, 2025, the journal notified the authors of an investigation into concerns raised about the article and issued a "temporary notice of preliminary take-down"6.

Despite the scientific evidence presented in this and multiple other studies from non-conflicted labs that identified DNA in the vials, the CDC website still claimed as of September 15, 2025, that the vaccine material stays in the arm muscle cells (no biodistribution) and that there are no DNA integration issues89. The claim of limited biodistribution is fundamentally false, as the function (modus operandi) of Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) is broad distribution throughout the body, sometimes specifically trafficked to organs like the liver8. The assurance against DNA integration is also deemed false given the reproducible DNA contamination findings9.

The study, which tested 32 vials across 16 unique lots of Pfizer and Moderna products10, found DNA using both quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and fluorometry methods10. DNA was detected in all lots tested11. The measured DNA levels exceeded the regulatory guideline set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA of 10 ng/dose by a massive margin, ranging from 36 to 627-fold1112. These existing regulatory thresholds are considered inadequate because they were established for "naked DNA," failing to account for the highly efficient delivery mechanism provided by LNP-encapsulated DNA1113.

Crucially, the study revealed the presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences in the Pfizer vials14. This SV40 component is a known gene therapy tool used to traffic material into the cell nucleus1415. The concern is that if a cell is dividing, the breakdown of its nuclear membrane could allow foreign DNA like SV40 to hypothetically gain access for integration15. Even without integration, foreign DNA such as SV40 can enter the cell’s interior and cause damage by activating cancer pathways like cGas-STING15. The SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences are particularly worrisome because they are known to interact with the p53 protein, the vital tumor suppressor, potentially impairing its function and raising concerns about the observed rise in cancers16.

The contamination is suspected to have occurred because manufacturers switched from Process 1 (used for clinical trials, involving PCR) to Process 2 (used for commercial scaling, utilizing a plasmid/E. coli system)1718. Process 2 is rapid and cost-efficient for making large amounts of DNA, but inadequate purification risks DNA impurities and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination18. The authors emphasize that safety testing on products generated by the rushed Process 2 materials was inadequate15. The paper concluded that regulators must establish clear and consistent guidelines for quantifying mRNA and residual plasmid DNA, and stressed the need for replication of these findings1213. The findings were submitted as evidence on the congressional record by Senator Ron Johnson319.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The CDC’s new ACIP vaccine committee held meetings and made decisions regarding immunization schedules2021.

Specifically, the committee voted on the MMRV vaccine, a combined four-in-one shot for measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox (varicella)20. The committee heard evidence that the risks of adverse events increased when the shots are combined, but were lower when the shots were administered separately20. Consequently, the committee voted 8-3 to "not recommend" the combo MMRV shot, choosing instead to "recommend" separate shots, but limiting this recommendation only to children aged four or under20. One committee member who voted against this noted that compliance usually falls when combination shots are not recommended, as single doses typically lead to higher compliance rates21.

The committee was scheduled to vote on the Hep-B and COVID vaccines later that day21.

Discussing Jeff Childers’ "UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

The ACIP committee held its second full day of meetings, which was characterized as a "bloodbath" for the mRNA jabs2223.

The committee voted to further limit the COVID mRNA shots by adding a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before administering the shots to anyone under 65 or not in a ‘high-risk’ group22. The committee nearly voted to require a prescription for the shots, but that vote failed by a small margin22.

The committee was forced to listen to lengthy presentations from the newly formed “Vaccine Working Group” detailing growing questions and problems with the jabs23. These issues included:

• Long-lasting shifts in cytokine profiles, leading to elevated inflammatory cytokine persistence for months, which may increase the risk of recurrent infection in some individuals24.

• Biodistribution, meaning the material spreads throughout the body, including into the brain24.

• Frameshifting, which produces random ‘nonsense’ proteins24.

• Implausibly high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of the monkey virus SV40, especially found in the Pfizer shot24.

The meeting also highlighted pharmaceutical company failures:

• Drugmakers like Pfizer and Moderna declined to respond to a direct question from a committee member23.

• ACIP member Dr. Kirk Milhoan “roasted” the FDA for failing to pull the COVID jabs after the discovery of problems22.

Following the meeting, the CDC itself published a critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning how drugmakers can claim the shots work, given that there is no agreed-upon measurement (or correlate of protection) that reliably predicts whether a person is protected from COVID-192526. The CDC also republished a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi stating that “Sub-clinical myocarditis can cause death. It’s proven. It’s not questionable,” but noted this risk is currently not discussed with patients26.

Despite the evident problems, the committee did not withdraw authorization altogether; the source suggests the Committee is “carefully building an unassailable scientific record before pulling the plug”27.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Covid shot restrictions.

** welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series**

Discussing CDC Vaccine Changes and Restrictions

The CDC’s new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) vaccine committee has recently taken actions that further limit the recommended use of COVID-19 mRNA shots and highlight significant problems associated with them1.

ACIP Decision on COVID-19 mRNA Shots

The ACIP committee met for a second full day and ultimately voted to **further restrict46].

ACIP Decision on COVID-19 mRNA Shots

The ACIP committee met for a second full day and ultimately voted to further restrict the COVID mRNA shots1. This restriction involves adding a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before administering the shots to anyone under 65 or not in a “high-risk” group1. The meeting was characterized as a “bloodbath” for the jabs12. The committee reportedly nearly voted to require a prescription for the shots, but that vote failed by a small margin1.

One ACIP member, Dr. Kirk Milhoan, reportedly “roasted” the FDA for failing to pull the COVID jabs following the problems discovered13. Despite the evident problems, the Committee did not withdraw authorization altogether, but appeared to be “carefully building an unassailable scientific record before pulling the plug”3.

Vaccine Working Group Findings

During the ACIP meeting, the committee was forced to listen to lengthy presentations from the newly formed “Vaccine Working Group” concerning the growing questions and problems over the jabs24. These issues, framed as “important questions for ongoing research and safety monitoring”4, included4:

• Biodistribution: The vaccine material spreads all over the body, including into the brain4.

• Frameshifting: This refers to the creation of random ‘nonsense’ proteins4.

• Long-lasting shifts in cytokine profiles, with elevated inflammatory cytokine persistence for months, which may contribute to an increased risk of recurrent infection in some individuals4.

• Implausibly high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of the monkey virus SV40, especially in the Pfizer shot4.

CDC’s Public Disclosures and Warnings

Following the ACIP meeting, the CDC itself published critical information, seemingly prying the Overton Window open "inch by inch"35:

• The CDC tweeted a critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning how drugmakers can even claim the shots work6. Malone argued that there is no agreed-upon measurement (correlate of protection) that reliably predicts whether a person is protected from COVID-196. Pharma’s efficacy claims are based on large-group statistical conclusions rather than a measurable biological effect, unlike most other vaccines which have established correlates of protection5.

• The CDC also published a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi, who asserted that “Sub-clinical myocarditis can cause death. It’s proven. It’s not questionable,” but noted that this risk is currently not being discussed with patients5.

Independent Research on DNA Contamination

Independent peer-reviewed research supports the concerns raised at the ACIP meeting, although this research is under threat of suppression78. A study published on September 6, 2025, confirmed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain significant amounts of foreign DNA, which directly contradicts claims by the CDC, FDA, and HHS that the vaccines do not contain DNA910.

• Suppression: The paper, titled ‘Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA covid-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada’, received a “temporary notice of preliminary take-down” just eleven days after publication8. One of the authors predicted they would “try to retract our work” due to the importance of the findings11....

• False Claims: The CDC website, as of September 15, 2025, still falsely claimed there was no biodistribution (that the material stays in the arm muscle cells) and no DNA integration issues14. The source notes the claim of no biodistribution is false because Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs), the delivery mechanism, rely on broad distribution throughout the body14.

• Contamination Levels and SV40: The study tested 32 vials across 16 unique lots and found DNA in all lots tested1516. The DNA levels exceeded the regulatory guideline of 10 ng/dose by 36 to 627-fold1718. Furthermore, SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences were found in the Pfizer vials1819. This component is a known gene therapy tool used to traffic material to the cell nucleus and is a concern due to its potential to interact with the vital p53 protein (tumor suppressor)19.... The contamination is likely due to manufacturers switching production to the plasmid/E. coli Process 2 system for mass commercial scaling, a process that risks DNA impurities if purification is inadequate22.

ACIP Decision on MMRV Vaccine

In a separate move, the ACIP committee addressed the MMRV vaccine (a four-in-one combination shot). After reviewing evidence that the risks of adverse events increased when the shots are combined compared to giving them separately, the committee voted 8-3 to “not recommend” the combo MMRV shot, but instead to “recommend” separate shots, specifically for children aged four or under23. A dissenting committee member noted that the disadvantage of this decision is the typical fall in patient compliance24.

** thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info**

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

12 sources

send

Who allegedly assaulted minors?

What are H-1B visas for?

What is the "Gold Card" program?

1. The Charlie Kirk Assassination and its Political Aftermath

The assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk has unleashed a wave of political and social repercussions, dominating the national discourse and triggering aggressive actions by the Trump administration aimed at controlling political speech and narratives.

1.1. Conflicting Narratives and Speculation

While the official narrative appears to center on a lone shooter, speculation about the motives and actors involved is rampant.

• Official Allegations: The individual identified as the shooter is characterized in media reports as a "homosexual assassin" and a "far-right MAGA conservative," a narrative pushed by figures like late-night host Jimmy Kimmel.

• Israel-Involvement Theory: A prominent counter-narrative suggests the assassination was carried out by Israel. Proponents point to Israel's history of political assassinations, its motive to silence Kirk over his growing criticism of Israeli influence on US policy, and suspicious events surrounding the killing. These include a private jet owned by a wealthy supporter of Chabad Lubavich Utah departing a nearby airport with its transponder turned off, and daily denials of involvement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which are seen as highly suspicious. Tucker Carlson is reported to have stated that Kirk was turning against Israel in the months before his death.

1.2. The Trump Administration's Crackdown on Speech

The Trump administration has seized upon the assassination to justify an unprecedented push to regulate and prosecute speech deemed unacceptable.

• "Hate Speech" Prosecution: Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Justice Department would prosecute "hate speech," classifying commentary celebrating Kirk's death as illegal. This move was tacitly endorsed by President Donald Trump, who suggested Kirk would have supported such laws.

• Visa Revocations: The State Department announced it would identify non-citizens who praise or rationalize the event on social media and take action, including refusing or revoking visas and deportation.

• Targeting Antifa: President Trump used Truth Social to announce his intention to designate Antifa as a "major terrorist organization." A leaked memo from an Antifa chapter in Corvallis, Oregon, warns members to "stand down" publicly due to "bad optics" and suggests using false flags to drive wedges between conservatives.

1.3. The Jimmy Kimmel Controversy and the Free Speech Debate

The suspension of a major media figure has ignited a fierce debate over free speech, censorship, and the role of government.

• Suspension and Backlash: ABC host Jimmy Kimmel was suspended after he claimed Kirk's assassin was "one of them," referring to the "MAGA gang." The suspension followed immense public backlash, pressure from major ABC affiliates Nexstar and Sinclair (which dropped the show), and calls from advertisers. Kimmel reportedly planned to "double down" rather than apologize, prompting Disney CEO Bob Iger to suspend the show indefinitely.

• FCC Involvement: Trump's FCC Commissioner, Brendan Carr, stated that networks could "take action on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the F.C.C. ahead," citing regulations against broadcasting "false information concerning a crime or catastrophe." This has been framed by critics as government coercion.

• Democratic Legislative Response: In response to the Kimmel situation and Trump's rhetoric, a group of congressional Democrats announced plans to introduce a bill to "bolster legal protections for people targeted by President Trump." The proposed "No Officials Preventing Expression" (NOPE) Act would allow citizens to sue federal officials for censorship and recover attorney's fees.

1.4. Influencer Realignment and Controlled Opposition

The events have caused a shakeup among political influencers, with some being accused of acting as controlled opposition to channel public anger in government-approved directions.

• Nick Fuentes: The streamer has been widely promoted by mainstream influencers following the assassination. He has aggressively called for government action, including arresting individuals who celebrated Kirk's death, and has tweeted at the FBI to investigate other commentators. He has pivoted to promoting theories that Russia is behind anti-Israel sentiment and that the primary threat to America is "trannies," not the government.

• Tucker Carlson: Positioned as a voice of reason, Carlson has argued against any restrictions on speech resulting from the event and has strongly hinted that Israel was behind the assassination.

• Sam Hyde: The comedian had a widely circulated emotional video reaction, crying and calling for an "Ultra Double Patriot Act" to stop the "tranny" threat.

2. Major US Policy Shifts

Concurrent with the Kirk fallout, the Trump administration has enacted sweeping changes to immigration policy and has further deepened its alignment with Israel.

2.1. Immigration System Overhaul

President Trump has signed two executive orders dramatically reshaping the legal immigration framework without congressional action.

• H-1B Visa Crackdown: A new executive order imposes a $100,000 annual fee for new H-1B visa applications, a hundred-fold increase from the previous $1,000 fee. The order also directs the Commerce Secretary to revise minimum salary schedules to ensure foreign workers are more expensive than American counterparts, effectively ending the use of the program for cheaper labor.

• The "Gold Card" Program: A second executive order establishes a fast-track visa program.

    ◦ Individual Gold Card: Offers expedited green card processing for individuals who make a $1 million to $2 million "gift" to the U.S. government.

    ◦ Corporate Card: Allows employers to pay $2 million for fast-tracked green cards for critical foreign workers, plus an "annual maintenance fee."

    ◦ Platinum Card: A conceptual higher tier leading to citizenship for a $5 million gift is mentioned but will require congressional action.

2.2. Intensified Pro-Israel Alignment

The administration and its congressional allies have taken multiple steps to shield Israel from international criticism and legal consequences.

• Gaza "Real Estate Bonanza": Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich revealed that plans are underway with the US to divide Gaza's land between the two countries for redevelopment after it is "cleansed of Palestinians." He described the reconstruction plan as being "on President Trump's desk," with reports that Jared Kushner is pursuing related development projects.

• Protecting Netanyahu: Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) has introduced legislation to block state and local law enforcement in New York City from arresting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has an active arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for war crimes. The bill targets NYC mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, who has stated he would serve the warrant.

• Penalizing Critics: Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL), who has served in the Israeli Army, introduced a bill to authorize the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of Americans deemed to have provided "material support" to Palestinian resistance groups. The bill was withdrawn after backlash from civil liberties groups.

3. US-China Relations: The "Delete USA" Strategy

China has launched a comprehensive strategy to achieve full technological independence in response to escalating US sanctions, a policy that is argued to be backfiring on American tech dominance.

3.1. Catalyst: US Tech Embargoes

The tech and trade wars initiated by the Trump administration and continued by the Biden administration aimed to contain China's technological rise by banning the sale of advanced AI chips, software, and lithography machines. To maintain profits, US firms like Nvidia developed watered-down, compliant chips (e.g., H20, RTX 6000D) specifically for the Chinese market.

3.2. China's Counter-Offensive: Technological Self-Reliance

Beijing has responded by aggressively pursuing a full-spectrum decoupling from American technology.

• Banning US Chips: Beijing has banned its major tech companies from purchasing Nvidia's watered-down H20 and RTX 6000D chips, citing security concerns over potential backdoors and remote kill-switches.

• Domestic Development: Chinese tech companies, including Huawei, Cambricon, and Alibaba, are now producing their own AI accelerator chips that are only one generation behind Nvidia's most powerful offerings. Huawei is also developing superior networking solutions (e.g., CloudMatrix 384) to achieve greater AI compute power at the rack level.

• New Ecosystems: To break the dominance of Nvidia's CUDA software, Huawei has launched the open-source CANN architecture, incentivizing developers to move away from the US ecosystem.

• Future Tech Investment: China is heavily investing in next-generation technologies, such as photonic chips and third-generation semiconductors based on materials like indium selenide (InSe).

3.3. The Backfire Thesis: Unintended Consequences for the US

The US policy of "chokeholding" China's tech sector is described as having inadvertently broken that chokehold. By cutting off access to Western chips, the US has forced Chinese companies to find alternatives, leaving a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars wide open for domestic Chinese producers and ensuring Nvidia will be locked out long-term. This parallels historical instances where US actions spurred superior Chinese innovation:

• Space Station: The 2011 Wolf Act blocking China from the ISS led to China building its own advanced Tiangong Space Station.

• GPS: The US shutting down GPS signals to a Chinese cargo ship in 1993 spurred the development of the more advanced Beidou satellite navigation system.

• Military: US intervention in the 1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis led China to develop its A2AD strategy and hypersonic anti-ship missiles.

4. High-Profile Investigations and Controversies

Scrutiny of the FBI's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and emerging scientific challenges to the safety of COVID-19 vaccines are fueling public distrust in major institutions.

4.1. The Epstein Case: Congressional Scrutiny of the FBI

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) confronted FBI Director Kash Patel over the agency's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

• Suppressed Client List: Massie alleged the FBI possesses unreleased documents from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) investigation containing the names of at least 20 men to whom Epstein trafficked minors.

• Named and Unnamed Individuals: Massie publicly named Jes Staley, former CEO of Barclays and a top J.P. Morgan investor, as one of the men. He further described the list as including:

    ◦ One Hollywood producer worth hundreds of millions

    ◦ One royal prince

    ◦ One high-profile individual in the music industry

    ◦ One very prominent banker

    ◦ One high-profile government official and one former politician

    ◦ One owner of an Italian car company

    ◦ One rock star and one magician

    ◦ At least six billionaires, including one from Canada

• FBI Response: Director Patel claimed his agents had reviewed the files and found no "credible information" for new indictments. He admitted he had not personally reviewed the documents in question.

• Intelligence Links: Massie introduced into the record articles linking Epstein to intelligence agencies, including the CIA and Mossad, and noting his 36 meetings with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

4.2. Scientific Integrity and COVID-19 Vaccine Safety

A new peer-reviewed study and proceedings from a CDC advisory committee have raised significant questions about the safety and manufacturing of mRNA vaccines.

• DNA Contamination Study: A paper published on September 6, 2025, in the journal Autoimmunity by David J. Speicher, Jessica Rose, and Kevin McKernan detailed findings from 32 vials of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

    ◦ Findings: The study found "billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose," with levels exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 36 to 627-fold.

    ◦ SV40 Sequences: The Pfizer vials were found to contain SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences, a component known as a gene therapy tool used to traffic material to a cell's nucleus.

    ◦ Threat of Retraction: Eleven days after publication, the journal issued a notice that it was investigating "concerns raised about the article," a move the authors predict will lead to a retraction.

• CDC's ACIP Committee Reassessment: The CDC’s vaccine advisory committee (ACIP) has taken steps to limit vaccine recommendations.

    ◦ The committee voted 8-3 to recommend against the combined MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella) shot for children under four, favoring separate shots due to increased adverse event risks.

    ◦ During a session on COVID-19 vaccines, the committee heard presentations from its "Vaccine Working Group" about major safety issues, including biodistribution to the brain, protein "frameshifting," and DNA contamination.

    ◦ The CDC's official Twitter account subsequently posted clips of Dr. Robert Malone questioning how the shots' efficacy can be proven without established correlates of protection, and Dr. Retsef Levi stating that sub-clinical myocarditis "can cause death."

5. Other Noteworthy Developments

5.1. Health and Nutrition Research

• Insulin Resistance in Children: A meta-analysis of 11 studies covering over 22,000 children and adolescents found that high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with higher insulin resistance. One analysis argues this is indicative of a broader problem with all dietary carbohydrates, which elevate blood glucose and lead to cellular damage (glycation) over time.

• Brain Rewiring After Trauma: Research in Current Biology shows that physical injuries can rewire the brain's stress system, causing exaggerated fear and prolonged pain in response to future stressors. Strategies suggested to reset these circuits include improving sleep, morning sunlight exposure, and nutritional support with healthy carbohydrates and creatine.

5.2. The "Conspiracy Physics" Debate

• Physicist Miles Mathis claims that a Wall Street Journal article on the "Rise of Conspiracy Physics" is part of a controlled opposition campaign. He argues that figures like Sabine Hossenfelder and Eric Weinstein are promoted as "fake" critics to distract from his own work, which he describes as a genuine revolution in the field.

thumb_upGood report

thumb_downBad report

I. DELETE USA, BY HUA BIN

1. China is pursuing a full decoupling strategy from the US, branded as "Delete USA," for national security and economic reasons.
   
   

   • Since Trump and Biden launched the tech and trade wars with China, the author has argued that Beijing should pursue a full decoupling with the US for national security and economic competitiveness reasons.

   • Now China is embracing a full-spectrum nationwide “Delete USA” from its technological development.

2. Beijing banned Nvidia chips (H20 and RTX 6000D) that were specifically designed to comply with US sanctions.
   
   

   • Beijing just banned its big tech companies from buying the Nvidia H20 and RTX 6000D chips.

   • Nvidia developed these two GPU AI accelerator chips specifically for the Chinese market in compliance with the US ban of advanced AI chips to China.

3. The US coercive policies intended to stifle China’s technological rise have ultimately been counterproductive, blowing up in the face of the perpetrator.
   
   

   • This is a textbook example of how an ill-conceived coercive policy blows up in the face of the perpetrator.

   • The malicious move by the US regime to chokehold China’s technological development has inadvertently broken the chokehold.

4. Chinese AI firms achieved significant breakthroughs using less powerful accelerator chips, undercutting the effectiveness of US export controls.
   
   

   • A little-known Chinese AI firm, DeepSeek, shocked the tech world with the launch of its DeepSeek R1 large language model in January 2025.

   • DeepSeek achieved the breakthrough by using reinforcement learning and successfully circumvented the chip moat Nvidia tried to build around its most sophisticated products.

5. The US ban on H20 chips created a massive market opportunity for Chinese domestic producers, eroding Nvidia's dominance.
   
   

   • Trump’s H20 ban has left a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, that used to be monopolized by Nividia, wide open for Chinese domestic producers.

   • Chinese tech companies started to invest heavily in the AI chip stack from design, manufacturing, to software architecture, leading to production of AI accelerator chips that are only one generation behind Nvidia’s most powerful chips.

6. China leveraged concerns over possible espionage functions to justify banning US-developed chips.
   
   

   • Beijing has started an investigation on potential security issues with the H20 chips by raising concerns over possible back doors and remote shutdown kill-switches.

   • Washington itself supplied the ammunition for China’s suspicion, as US congressmen openly requested US chip producers to embed geo-fencing functions in their chips.

7. China is committed to developing a completely separate and parallel AI system with zero dependence on the US.
   
   

   • It is clear Beijing has decided it will do without Nvidia and China will build its AI industry completely in separation from US technologies.

   • The China system may still lag in compute performance for now but has zero dependence on the US.

8. Past US aggressive actions have consistently spurred China toward technological self-sufficiency and superior geopolitical capabilities.
   
   

   • After the US congress passed the Wolf Act to block China from the International Space Station (ISS) in 2011, China built its own Tiangong Space Station.

   • The US shutting down the GPS signal to harass China’s Yinhe cargo ship in 1993 spurred Beijing to build the Beidou satellite navigation system, which is now more advanced than the aging GPS system.

9. The full "Delete USA" strategy encompasses widespread economic and social decoupling beyond technology.
   
   

   • This includes winding down trade relationships by cutting off all purchase of US farm products and energy products such as coal and LNG.

   • The strategy also involves selling off US debt and making US education less attractive to Chinese students, with more jobs becoming off limits to those with a US degree.

II. MASSIE ACCUSES FORMER BANKING CEO OF BEING AN EPSTEIN CLIENT; HINTS AT 19 OTHERS, BY PAUL DRAGU

1. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie publicly identified former banking CEO Jes Staley as an alleged Epstein client during a House hearing.
   
   

   • Massie Accuses Former Banking CEO of Being an Epstein Client; Hints at 19 Others, by Paul Dragu

   • Massie dropped the name of one alleged Epstein client, Jes Staley (formerly CEO of Barclays and a top investor at J.P. Morgan), during the House Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the FBI.

2. Massie claims FBI files stemming from the 2019 SDNY sex trafficking indictment contain the names of at least 20 men Epstein trafficked victims to.
   
   

   • Massie emphasized to FBI Director Kash Patel that the bureau has documents in its possession listing at least 20 men, including minors, who Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims to.

   • He explicitly stated that the confidentiality constraints cited by the FBI only applied to the original 2006 Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida, not the materials collected by the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

3. The congressman hinted at the high-profile identities of 19 other suspected pedophiles allegedly listed in the FBI files.
   
   

   • The list includes figures such as one royal prince, one high-profile government official, and one high-profile former politician.

   • Also listed are a Hollywood producer, one prominent banker, one owner of a car company in Italy, one rock star, one magician, and at least six billionaires, including one from Canada.

4. FBI Director Kash Patel discounted victim testimonies and asserted that the FBI found no credible information to launch new investigations.
   
   

   • Patel stated he asked agents to review the Epstein files but that "There have been no new materials brought to me launching a new indictment".

   • Patel’s posture aligns with the June 7 FBI memo which claimed there is no client list, Epstein never blackmailed anyone, and he committed suicide, claims Massie says are an "audacious gaslighting campaign".

5. Court documents revealed a “profound” and suspicious relationship between Jes Staley and Epstein.
   
   

   • Staley and Epstein exchanged about 1,200 emails, and Staley called his relationship with the pedophile “profound”.

   • Emails between them suggested coded language, referencing Disney characters like "Snow White" and "Beauty and the Beast," after Epstein shared photos of young women with Staley.

6. Jes Staley was forced out of Barclays in 2021 due to an investigation into whether he misled regulators about his dealings with Epstein.
   
   

   • Staley was “forced out at Barclays in 2021 as the Financial Conduct Authority... launched an investigation into allegations that Staley misled the agency and the Barclays board about his dealings with Epstein”.

   • Staley admitted to having sex with one of Epstein’s assistants, claiming it was consensual, but the age of the assistant was not disclosed.

7. The broader case has links pointing to intelligence agency involvement with Epstein.
   
   

   • Massie introduced news articles into the record suggesting Epstein had CIA connections.

   • Independent investigative journalists have linked Epstein to intelligence agencies, specifically mentioning the CIA and Mossad.

III. MORE TURMOIL FROM WASHINGTON, BY PHILIP GIRALDI

1. The assassination of Charlie Kirk is suspected by some sources to be the work of Israel, given Israel’s history of assassinations and motive.
   
   

   • More Turmoil from Washington, by Philip Giraldi

   • More likely perhaps, is the suggestion that Kirk might have been killed by Israel, which had both motive and means to carry out the assassination.

2. Suspicious activities occurred immediately after the assassination, including an untracked private jet departure and a diversion at the crime scene.
   
   

   • A private jet owned by a wealthy Jewish supporter left a nearby airport with its Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) deliberately turned off.

   • One George Zinn shouted out falsely that he was the shooter, which disrupted the police investigation and may have allowed the actual killer to escape.

3. The Trump administration is using Kirk’s murder to justify a crackdown on free speech, specifically targeting "hate speech."
   
   

   • Attorney General Pam Bondi has threatened that the Justice Department would prosecute “hate speech” posted by ordinary American citizens on social media.

   • Bondi has perhaps become confused by her constant citation of “antisemitism,” which includes any criticism of Israel, as “hate speech” which must be combatted and criminalized.

4. The political response included attempts to sanction and punish those who celebrated or spoke negatively about Kirk’s death.
   
   

   • Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel was fired or sanctioned for comments deemed offensive regarding Kirk’s politics.

   • The State Department is threatening to revoke visas and deport non-citizens found “praising, rationalizing, or making light of the event” on social media.

5. Congress is attempting to protect Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from legal action in the US.
   
   

   • Congresswoman Elise Stefanik presented legislation intended to prevent future New York City officials from arresting Benjamin Netanyahu when he visits the US.

   • This is a response to New York state representative Zohran Mamdani, who supports an international boycott of Israel and suggested he would serve an International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Netanyahu.

6. Israel’s finance minister revealed plans for the post-conflict redevelopment of Gaza involving the US.
   
   

   • Bezalel Smotrich described the plans for the redevelopment of Gaza, once Palestinians are removed, as a “Real Estate Bonanza”.

   • The Jewish state is reportedly in talks with the United States regarding dividing Gaza’s land between the two countries, with the reconstruction plan being “on President Trump’s desk”.

7. Senior US officials have demonstrated extreme deference and allegiance to Israel following the assassination.
   
   

   • Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio was in Israel "crawling in front of Netanyahu" to “guarantee” Israel’s security.

   • The US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee demonstrated obedience by donning a kippah and stating his faith owed a debt of obligation to the Jewish people.

IV. NEW PAPER DETAILING EVIDENCE OF DNA CONTAMINATION IN COVID VACCINES IS UNDER THREAT OF BEING RETRACTED, BY RHODA WILSON

1. A new peer-reviewed study confirms mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain significant amounts of foreign DNA, contradicting official claims.
   
   

   • New paper detailing evidence of DNA contamination in covid vaccines is under threat of being retracted, by Rhoda Wilson

   • The study confirmed what independent researchers have been warning about for over two years, running counter to claims by the CDC, FDA and HHS that the vaccines do not contain DNA.

2. The paper detailing the study’s important findings is under threat of retraction shortly after its online publication.
   
   

   • The paper, published on September 6, 2025, received an email from the journal Autoimmunity on September 17, 2025, stating that an investigation into concerns had been raised.

   • Dr. Jessica Rose predicted that there would be an attempt to bury the findings and urged people to download, read, and share the work quickly.

3. The study found that the DNA levels in all tested vaccine lots exceeded established regulatory limits by dozens or hundreds of times.
   
   

   • All products tested exceeded the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 36–627-fold.

   • The researchers found DNA in ALL lots tested and the DNA levels were all above pre-designated European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) thresholds of 10 ng/dose.

4. The Pfizer vials specifically contained SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences, a known gene therapy tool.
   
   

   • The researchers found SV40 promoter/enhancers in the Pfizer vials, although they did not find them in the Moderna vials.

   • SV40 is a component used on the bench to traffic material to the nucleus of cells, raising concerns about host cell genomic damage.

5. The presence of SV40 and foreign DNA raises concerns about host cell genomic damage and cancer pathway activation.
   
   

   • Moderna acknowledged in its own 2018 patent that foreign DNA introduction is problematic due to the potential for “alterations and/or damage to host cell genomic DNA”.

   • Foreign DNA like SV40 only needs to find its way to a cell's interior to "wreak havoc" by potentially activating cancer pathways (like the cGas-STING pathway).

6. The contamination is attributed to the manufacturer's switch to the cheaper, faster Process 2 method for commercial production.
   
   

   • The manufacturers switched from the clinical trial process (Process 1) to Process 2, which involves using a plasmid/ E. coli system to rapidly produce large amounts of DNA.

   • The only explanation for the DNA in the vials is the failure of the final purification step for the nucleoside-modified RNA.

7. The official position of US health agencies remains that the vaccine material stays in the arm and poses no DNA integration risk.
   
   

   • As of September 15, 2025, the CDC website continues to claim "no biodistribution" (that the stuff stays in the muscle cells of the arm).

   • The CDC is also "STILL claiming no DNA integration issues," making a point of placing this claim in bold type.

V. PHYSICAL INJURIES REWIRE OUR BRAINS, AFFECTING OUR RESPONSE TO FUTURE STRESSES, BY RHODA WILSON

1. Old injuries fundamentally rewire the brain’s stress system, causing lingering hypersensitivity to threats long after physical healing.
   
   

   • Physical injuries rewire our brains, affecting our response to future stresses, by Rhoda Wilson

   • This lingering sensitivity reflects real changes in how the nervous system processes threats, leading to feeling stress, fear or pain more sharply than before.

2. Trauma primes stress circuits, causing the brain to treat harmless signals as dangerous cues, potentially leading to chronic disorders.
   
   

   • The body starts treating harmless cues as if they’re dangerous, meaning everyday situations trigger disproportionate reactions.

   • This constant state of high alert sets the stage for chronic pain, anxiety or even depression.

3. Stress hormones, such as cortisol, act as fuel that keeps the fear and pain responses locked in place.
   
   

   • Researchers found that corticosterone, the main stress hormone in rodents, surged during predator exposure in previously injured mice.

   • Blocking this hormone prevented the exaggerated freezing and reduced prolonged pain sensitivity, illustrating that the hormone keeps the stress response engine running.

4. Individuals who recover better after trauma demonstrate superior discrimination learning by efficiently using brain networks.
   
   

   • Trauma survivors who did not develop psychiatric problems showed stronger engagement of the right executive control network, helping them refine fear responses.

   • This ability allows resilient participants to separate safe cues from real danger, avoiding overgeneralization of fear.

5. Targeting stress hormones by adjusting lifestyle habits can help reset stress circuits.
   
   

   • To lower cortisol (the human equivalent of corticosterone), one should reduce triggers such as poor sleep and constant digital stimulation at night.

   • Consuming enough healthy carbs is also recommended for lowering cortisol, alongside addressing overall stress levels or using natural progesterone.

6. Brain resilience can be strengthened through nutrient support, specifically adequate carbohydrate intake and creatine supplementation.
   
   

   • Eating enough carbohydrates (about 250 grams daily for most adults) provides mitochondria with fuel to prevent stress pathways from dominating.

   • Creatine, found in grass-fed red meat or supplements, boosts brain energy reserves and has been linked to stronger recovery from traumatic stress.

7. Establishing predictable biological rhythms through morning sunlight exposure helps calm the brain's hypervigilance pattern.
   
   

   • Morning sun exposure sets the body’s daily rhythm, lowers stress hormone spikes, and helps mitochondria produce energy more efficiently.

   • This teaches the brain and body to feel safe in predictable cycles, which is exactly what helps break the pattern of hypervigilance.

VI. TEN DAYS AFTER THE ASSASSINATION OF CHARLIE KIRK, A NEW WORLD ORDER IS COMING INTO VIEW, BY ANDREW ANGLIN

1. The emotional reaction surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination is being leveraged by the government to advance an agenda of increased tyranny and surveillance.
   
   

   • Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order Is Coming Into View, by Andrew Anglin

   • The author states that all the emotionalism means the government is going to use this event to push an agenda, such as calling for a Super Patriot Act.

   • The political reaction involves demands for the federal government, including militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be "unleashed" on "the left".

2. Attorney General Pam Bondi introduced new "hate speech" laws, claiming they are necessary following Kirk's death, despite constitutional conflict.
   
   

   • Bondi announced that there are now new hate speech laws in America, which she is going to enforce against offensive speech.

   • This move is characterized as "way beyond" what was expected and is viewed as an effort by the Israel lobby to push through laws that make criticism of Jews and Israel illegal.

3. President Trump endorsed the concept of the new "hate speech" restrictions, claiming Kirk would support them post-mortem.
   
   

   • Trump gave tacit approval to Bondi’s rollout of new “hate speech” laws, saying that Charlie, who was against them, would support these laws now that he is dead.

   • The apparent implication is that hate speech laws would have prevented Kirk’s assassination, which the author states "obviously makes no sense".

4. The political right's sudden focus on the "tranny menace" is viewed as a major distraction from the true threats posed by the government, Israel, and Silicon Valley.
   
   

   • The argument is that radical trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat that the US government, which is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, presents to the American people.

   • The author argues that the push is designed to convince people that "the real threat is trannies," requiring citizens to give up their rights to the government to stop them.

5. Nick Fuentes is criticized for being groomed as the new conservative influencer who champions massive government expansion of surveillance and censorship.
   
   

   • Fuentes, now being promoted by all mainstream influencers, appears to be the heir apparent to Charlie Kirk's throne.

   • He openly called for aggressive government action, including arresting people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death, which is seen as "the most extreme call for government tyranny".

6. Fuentes further demonstrated alignment with establishment interests by promoting "Russian bot conspiracies" against those questioning the official narrative.
   
   

   • This influencer is promoting Russian bot conspiracies, specifically claiming that anyone questioning the official assassination story is a RUSSIAN!.

   • The author notes that Russia, like “hate speech,” is a Democrat talking point that Fuentes and others have adopted.

7. The aggressive, coordinated exploitation of the event pushes the author toward believing the assassination was orchestrated by Israel rather than a lone attacker.
   
   

   • The extent to which this whole machine is using the event makes the author lean toward the “Israel did it” side.

   • The author notes that Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly recording daily videos denying his involvement in the assassination.

8. Tucker Carlson acted as a measured voice of reason by condemning any new restrictions on speech.
   
   

   • Carlson explicitly said that "we cannot tolerate any form of restrictions on speech as a result of this event".

   • His response also hinted that Charlie Kirk had been turning against Israel in the last few months before his death.

VII. THE RISE OF CONSPIRACY PHYSICS, BY MILES MATHIS

1. The concept of "Conspiracy Physics," as discussed by the mainstream, is seen as a deliberate attempt to manage and suppress legitimate scientific dissent.
   
   

   • The Rise of Conspiracy Physics, by Miles Mathis

   • The author interprets the Wall Street Journal article on the topic as being "all about framing and controlling the opposition, trying to keep eyes off me".

2. The author asserts he is the actual force behind the revolution in physics and is intentionally excluded from the mainstream discussion.
   
   

   • He claims that everyone inside and outside of the field knows he is the real center of this revolution.

   • The author remains the one who "cannot be named" by the mainstream and the Wall Street Journal.

3. Other high-profile critics of establishment physics, such as Sabine Hossenfelder and Eric Weinstein, are dismissed as fake opposition.
   
   

   • The author states that Hossenfelder and Weinstein are "not doing any real physics" and are just "mouths running".

   • Weinstein is called a hedgefund millionaire who tried to buy his way into theoretical physics and is now performing in "canned debates".

4. The author claims credit for numerous foundational achievements in physics that span multiple fields.
   
   

   • He claims to have achieved unification, diagrammed the atomic nucleus, and rewritten all the equations of Relativity from the ground up.

   • His asserted achievements also include explaining the Solar Cycles (with the first accurate prediction), unifying all the quantum particles, and rewriting core theory and molecular bonding.

5. The mainstream physics community is portrayed as "dead" and desperately relying on established media for protection.
   
   

   • Physics is currently considered "so dead you could carbon date it".

   • The mainstream media writers are referred to as "Operation Mockingbird stooges" called in to protect physicists after search engines failed to fully delist the author.

6. Established physicists maintain that all major problems in the field are solved, thereby discouraging new inquiry.
   
   

   • Sean Carroll, a mainstream figure, asserts that physicists already know everything, so there are no problems left to solve.

   • Carroll and his paymasters aim for the public to "shut up and calculate," or just "shut up," while allowing the same people to collect the prizes and make the money.

VIII. “INSULIN RESISTANCE” (CELLULAR DAMAGE) FROM CARBOHYDRATES SURGING AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS, BY JOACHIM BARTOLL

1. A study linking sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to insulin resistance is criticized for intentionally focusing on SSBs rather than admitting all carbohydrates cause damage.
   
   

   • “Insulin Resistance” (Cellular Damage) From Carbohydrates Surging Among Children And Adolescents, by Joachim Bartoll

   • The author views the study as misdirected or used to "cover up the real truth" that all carbohydrates are the culprit.

2. All carbohydrates convert to glucose, which the author asserts is toxic in larger quantities, necessitating its precise production via gluconeogenesis.
   
   

   • All carbohydrates end up the same way in the human body—as glucose—an immediate energy source.

   • Humans naturally manufacture glucose in precise amounts via gluconeogenesis due to its toxicity in larger quantities.

3. Exogenous carbohydrate consumption causes elevated blood glucose levels, leading to cellular damage and destructive glycation.
   
   

   • Eating anything with carbs will increase blood glucose above natural normal and safe levels.

   • This leads to cellular damage, particularly in soft tissues and organs, and causes glycation, destroying amino acids and fatty acids.

4. The measured increase in insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in children is highly concerning despite the relatively short duration of SSB consumption.
   
   

   • Most children in the study had not been consuming SSBs for six years, yet they showed an average increase of HOMA-IR by 0.21.

   • An increase of 0.21 is of clinical significance in children and may predict a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and metabolic diseases in early adulthood.

5. Processed and ultra-processed foods are considered extremely toxic because they increase the absorption of damaging carbohydrates.
   
   

   • In unprocessed plant-based foods, fiber and antinutrients render 25% to 50% of the carbohydrate content totally useless as it passes right through you.

   • Processed food removes much of the fiber, increasing the absorption of toxic carbs along with the addition of man-made chemicals.

6. The persistent misdirection of blame toward specific foods is part of an agenda to keep the population unhealthy and subservient.
   
   

   • The agenda is designed to keep humanity malnourished, unhealthy, weak, and diseased so people remain "obedient little slaves to the system" fully dependent on drugs and treatments.

   • The true underlying biochemistry and physiology of carbohydrate toxicity are documented in thousands of studies, making the blaming of specific items a deceptive tactic.

7. Humans are physiologically categorized as obligate hyper carnivores designed to operate on fat metabolism (ketosis).
   
   

   • The author states that it is simple biology and common sense, as humans are obligate hyper carnivores and are designed to run on a fat metabolism, being in ketosis.

   • The ability to consume carbohydrates without immediate death does not mean they are good or necessary; rather, the opposite is true.

IX. ☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, BY JEFF CHILDERS

1. President Trump received an "unprecedented" level of royal treatment from Great Britain during his second visit.
   
   

   • ☕️ ALPHA WOLF ☙ Thursday, September 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, by Jeff Childers

   • The spectacle included horse-drawn carriage rides, noisy jet flyovers, royal banquets, and "endless encounters with titled personages," deemed one of the biggest shows of royal power in decades.

2. The elaborate diplomatic effort was a strategic maneuver intended to placate Trump and secure specific national interests for the UK.
   
   

   • The over-the-top flattery was described as a “love spell” designed to appeal to Trump's vanity and capture his heart.

   • The UK seeks shielding from Trump’s mercurial instincts, a better tariff rate, investment for a new artificial intelligence powerhouse, and persuasion not to abandon Ukraine.

3. Trump is perceived as having ascended to the "Alpha position" among world leaders by deploying asymmetric advantages like unpredictability and ignoring norms.
   
   

   • The author notes that no major world leader is currently willing to directly confront or criticize President Trump.

   • Trump ignored entrenched interests, quickly insults allies, threatens tariffs, and wields uncertainty itself as a weapon, making resistance expensive.

4. ABC indefinitely suspended late-night host Jimmy Kimmel following massive backlash over his comments about Charlie Kirk's assassin.
   
   

   • Kimmel claimed in his monologue that Kirk’s homosexual assassin was a far-right MAGA conservative, igniting a “social media s—storm”.

   • Disney CEO Bob Iger suspended Jimmy Kimmel Live indefinitely after learning the defiant host planned to defend his injudicious joke.

5. Kimmel's suspension was primarily a corporate reaction driven by advertiser panic and fury from ABC affiliates, not government coercion.
   
   

   • Around the time the FCC Chair chimed in, "multiple ABC station owners" were already calling Disney to complain, and subsequently, 66 of the roughly 200 affiliate stations announced they would not carry the show.

   • The author argues there is no constitutional crisis, as Kimmel's suspension had solid corporate reasons apart from anything the FCC chairman said.

6. President Trump’s post targeting Antifa as a "terrorist organization" caused controversy among both the left and some conservatives.
   
   

   • Trump’s post on Truth Social stated he would be “designating Antifa as a major terrorist organization,” leading to hysteria.

   • Antifa is described as a violent, radical, and well-organized movement that rejects all mainstream conservative politics.

7. Antifa is employing internal strategies, including false flags, to deal with the assassination's bad optics and sow division among opponents.
   
   

   • A leaked Antifa memo warned chapters to "stand down" publicly in the wake of Charlie's killing due to "bad optics".

   • The memo, however, advised chapters to employ “false flags” by “driving wedges between” conservatives.

X. ☕️ GONE FISHING ☙ FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, BY JEFF CHILDERS

1. Democrats, motivated by opposition to President Trump, proposed a bill intended to protect free speech rights from federal overreach.
   
   

   • ☕️ GONE FISHING ☙ Friday, September 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, by Jeff Childers

   • A group of Senate and House Democrats announced a sudden and unexpected plan to introduce a bill to “bolster legal protections for people targeted by President Trump”.

2. The proposed NOPE bill would allow citizens to sue federal officials over speech suppression and potentially recover attorney's fees.
   
   

   • The bill is described as offering a viable way for ordinary citizens to sue the government over speech suppression.

   • Crucially, including the right to recover attorney’s fees would enable public interest lawyers to take difficult cases for clients who are broke.

3. Democrats' sudden championing of free speech is hypocritical, contrasting sharply with their previous endorsement of censorship and regulation.
   
   

   • Democrats' current embrace of free speech rhetoric stands in stark contrast to their previous shrugs when censorship involved agencies controlled by their own party.

   • In 2022, Democrat think-tanks published Orwellian papers arguing that the First Amendment was obsolete and new laws regulating speech were needed to “protect democracy”.

4. Trump’s assertive posture forced Democrats to propose a solution to a problem conservatives had been complaining about for decades.
   
   

   • The author notes that Trump’s strategy is working, having forced the Democrats to adopt his position.

   • Democrats' sudden self-interest in free speech is wholly contingent on them being out of power.

5. The CDC’s ACIP committee voted to limit the use of the MMRV combination vaccine for young children due to increased risk of adverse events.
   
   

   • The committee voted 8-3 to recommend separate shots for measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox (MMRV) instead of the combo shot, but only for kids aged four or under.

   • The decision was based on evidence that risks of adverse events increased when the shots were combined, but were lower when given separately.

6. The ACIP committee further restricted the mRNA COVID-19 shots by requiring "shared clinical decision-making" for most adults.
   
   

   • The committee voted to limit the covid mRNA shots by adding a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before anyone under 65 or not in a ‘high-risk’ group can get the shots.

   • The meeting was described as a “bloodbath” for the jabs, with Pfizer and Moderna declining to respond to a direct question from a committee member.

7. The CDC officially published critical safety concerns about the COVID-19 jabs, including high levels of DNA contamination.
   
   

   • The Vaccine Working Group presented problems including biodistribution (spreading all over the body, including into the brain), frameshifting (creating ‘nonsense’ proteins), and implausibly high levels of DNA contamination.

   • The CDC itself tweeted a critical comment from Dr. Malone questioning how the drugmakers can even tell if the shots work, given the lack of an agreed-upon measurement that reliably predicts immunity.

XI. ☕️ UNPRESCRIBED ☙ SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, BY JEFF CHILDERS

1. President Trump implemented a massive annual fee increase for H-1B visas via executive order, dramatically ending the era of cheap immigrant labor.
   
   

   • ☕️ UNPRESCRIBED ☙ Saturday, September 20, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, by Jeff Childers

   • The application fee for new H-1B visas was increased a hundred-fold, from $1,000 to $100,000 per year.

2. The H-1B reform aims to protect American workers and aligns with the "America First" agenda.
   
   

   • Commerce Secretary Lutnick advised employers to “train Americans” and stop bringing in people to take US jobs.

   • The order requires revising the minimum H-1B salaries to presumably ensure skilled foreign workers are more expensive than Americans, making it less economical to hire ordinary programmers from overseas.

3. The widespread use of H-1B visas had previously disadvantaged American workers.
   
   

   • The rules let companies fire American workers in vast piles of pink slips while simultaneously hiring Indians instead.

   • Studies suggest the use of H-1Bs discourages young Americans from careers in science and technology and pressures those who remain to accept lower salaries.

4. Trump launched "Phase One" of the "Gold Card" immigration program through executive judo, allowing wealthy individuals to fast-track their green card applications.
   
   

   • The new program offers expedited processing for anyone who gifts the U.S. government $1–2 million.

   • Since Trump controls the review order of visa applications, he was able to implement this historic change without changing any laws.

5. The Gold Card program is designed to import prosperity by incentivizing high-value contributions to the US economy.
   
   

   • Trump explained that the main thing is having "great people coming in and they're going to be paying".

   • Employers can also pay $2 million for a "Corporate Card" to fast-track green cards for critical workers, encouraging them to bring foreign workers to train Americans rather than replace entire departments.

6. The ACIP committee meeting revealed significant scientific challenges regarding the COVID-19 jabs, described as a "bloodbath" for mRNA makers.
   
   

   • The newly formed “Vaccine Working Group” presented several lengthy presentations about growing questions and problems over the jabs.

   • Issues discussed included biodistribution (spreading into the brain), frameshifting (creating random ‘nonsense’ proteins), and DNA contamination, including parts of the monkey virus SV40 in the Pfizer shot.

STRATEGIC RISK ASSESSMENT: GLOBAL INSTABILITY AND THE EROSION OF WESTERN HEGEMONY

A Report Prepared for Executive Stakeholders on Converging Geopolitical, Technological, and Domestic Crises

Report Title

Strategic Risk Assessment: Global Instability and the Erosion of Western Hegemony

Date

September 20, 2025

Prepared By

Confidential Analysis Team (Drawing exclusively on open-source intelligence)

Pages

10

Page 1

Page 2: Executive Summary

This report synthesizes evidence of accelerating geopolitical decoupling, severe domestic political fragility, potential failures in elite accountability, and emerging biological integrity risks, indicating a significant and rapid decline in the stability and credibility of the Western political and technological order.

Key Findings

1. Technological Decoupling ("Delete USA"): US sanctions against China have backfired spectacularly, unintentionally forcing China into complete technological self-reliance, particularly in the critical Artificial Intelligence (AI) sector. China is now deliberately banning US-developed, compliance-focused chips (Nvidia H20 and RTX 6000D), locking US monopolies out of the world’s largest chip market.

2. Domestic Political Exploitation and Censorship: The assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk has been weaponized by the Trump Administration and affiliated political actors (e.g., Attorney General Pam Bondi) to push for unprecedented "hate speech" laws and crackdowns on domestic political opponents, overriding fundamental constitutional rights, and raising concerns about state-sponsored censorship.

3. Elite Accountability Crisis (Epstein Files): FBI Director Kash Patel faces intense scrutiny for allegedly withholding documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network, which purportedly names at least 20 powerful individuals, including prominent bankers, a royal prince, high-profile government officials, and at least six billionaires. The ongoing cover-up threatens the credibility of the Trump administration.

4. Public Health Integrity Failure: Peer-reviewed research confirms that Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines are contaminated with significant residual plasmid DNA, with concentrations exceeding international regulatory limits (EMA/FDA/WHO thresholds) by 36 to 627-fold in tested samples. Furthermore, Pfizer vials contain SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences, a gene therapy tool known to interact with the p53 tumor suppressor protein and traffic material to the cell nucleus.

Strategic Implications and Recommendations

The convergence of these findings suggests that the United States is rapidly forfeiting its global technological leadership, eroding civil liberties at home through selective enforcement of "hate speech", and facing a potential political crisis if information linking powerful financial and political elites to criminal conduct is revealed.

Immediate strategic reassessment is required in three areas:

1. AI Strategy: The US must recognize that coercive export policy has failed and China is now building a separate, parallel, and self-reliant AI system.

2. Rule of Law: Immediate disclosure of all relevant Epstein files is necessary to restore trust in the Justice Department and eliminate the appearance of protecting politically connected individuals.

3. Public Health: Regulatory bodies must urgently revise guidelines for residual DNA contamination to account for highly efficient transfection methods (Lipid Nanoparticles) and cumulative dosing, recommending forensic replication of contamination findings.

Page 3: Section I: Geopolitical and Technological Decoupling – The "Delete USA" Strategy

I. A. The Blowback of Coercive US Chip Policy

Since the Trump and Biden administrations initiated tech and trade wars against China, policies were enacted to contain China's technological rise, starting with banning chip sales to Huawei. The explicit aim during the Biden administration was to halt China's progress toward achieving parity with the US in AI development.

The Nvidia Dilemma and Self-Inflicted Wounds

The US policy aimed to maintain profitability by allowing the sale of chips one or two generations behind the cutting edge. Nvidia, the dominant global AI chip supplier, designed specific chips like the H20 for the Chinese market to comply with export controls and lock Chinese AI developers into its CUDA software ecosystem.

However, the policy proved strategically short-sighted:

• Circumvention by Innovation: In January 2025, the Chinese AI firm DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek R1 large language model, demonstrating that Chinese engineers could develop world-class AI models using less powerful accelerator chips through innovative training methods like reinforcement learning. This successfully circumvented the "chip moat" Nvidia attempted to build.

• Escalation and Market Loss: The subsequent second Trump regime banned even the sales of the watered-down H20 chips, forcing Nvidia to write off $5.5 billion in unsold inventory. This move inadvertently created a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, previously monopolized by Nvidia, and left it wide open for Chinese domestic producers.

• Beijing's Response: After lobbying by Nvidia's CEO and Trump's "AI Czar" David Sachs led to the ban being lifted, Beijing retaliated by initiating an investigation into the H20 and RTX 6000D chips over concerns regarding potential security issues, including back doors and remote shutdown kill-switches. The Cyber Administration of China requested major tech firms like Tencent and ByteDance to halt testing and cancel orders for the new China-only chips.

I. B. China's Full-Spectrum Decoupling Mandate

Beijing has determined that total self-reliance across every stage of the semiconductor value chain is the only path forward for its AI industry. This comprehensive strategy is termed "Delete USA," mirroring a secret Huawei project launched in 2018 for self-protection against sanctions.

Pillars of the "Delete USA" Strategy (Economic and Technological)

The shift is evident across several critical sectors:

• Tech Self-Sufficiency: Heavy investment in the AI chip stack from design, manufacturing, and software architecture. Local Chinese makers like Huawei and Cambricon have already developed accelerators achieving performance parity with Nvidia's China-specific products.

• Networking Innovation: Huawei is competing not merely on individual chip performance, but by changing the game at the rack level, linking more chips through superior networking to build more powerful AI compute super-nodes (e.g., CloudMatrix 384 based on Ascend 910C).

• Infrastructure Advantage: China possesses superior power generation capacity, enabling it to outbuild the electricity-hungry AI data centers, granting it an ultimate competitive advantage in the AI war.

• Next-Generation Technologies: Beijing is heavily investing in technologies such as photonic chips and third-generation semiconductors based on indium selenide (InSe), a 2D material with potential to disrupt silicon chips entirely.

• Software Ecosystem Breakaway: Chinese companies like Huawei are launching open-source architectures (CANN) to draw developers away from Nvidia’s locking CUDA software network.

Page 4: Section I (Continued)

I. C. Geopolitical Retaliation and Parallel Systems Development

China's accelerated decoupling is a direct response to US belligerence. The sources list historical examples of US coercive actions backfiring and spurring China to develop superior, independent systems.

Case Studies in US Policy Blowback

US Coercive Action

China's Response and Outcome

Wolf Act (2011): Blocked China from the International Space Station (ISS)

China built its own Tiangong Space Station, which is expanding as the ISS is slated for retirement with no replacement

GPS Shutdown (1993): Harassment of China’s Yinhe cargo ship in the Red Sea

Spurred Beijing to build the Beidou satellite navigation system, now described as more advanced than the aging GPS system

Taiwan Strait Crisis (1996): US intervention

Led China to develop a full A2AD (Anti-Access/Area Denial) strategy, focusing on anti-ship hypersonic missiles (DF and YJ families) capable of neutralizing US carrier fleets

Broad Economic Decoupling

China is simultaneously pursuing broader economic decoupling:

• Trade Reductions: Winding down trade relationships, including cutting off all purchases of US farm products and energy products such as coal and LNG.

• Financial Strategy: Selling off US debt holdings.

• Cultural Pushback: Making US education less attractive for Chinese students; many high-level jobs in government, state-owned enterprises, and private tech firms are now inaccessible to students with US degrees. US businesses operating in China (e.g., Starbucks, Nike) face consumer pushback.

The ultimate result is that China is poised to build a completely separate and parallel AI system from the US. While this system may currently lag in compute performance, it maintains zero dependence on the US. Once scaled and matured at the application level, Chinese AI is expected to compete globally, similar to the Chinese Electric Vehicle (EV) industry today. The short-sighted belligerence of the US regime has successfully undermined the dominance of its own technological champions.

Page 5: Section II: Domestic Political Turmoil and Erosion of Civil Liberties

II. A. The Exploitation of the Charlie Kirk Assassination

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has catalyzed a push by the Trump administration and conservative influencers to introduce sweeping censorship measures under the guise of protecting public order.

The Rise of "Hate Speech" Laws

The immediate aftermath saw an intense emotional reaction, which has been leveraged by the government to advance a restrictive agenda:

• Attorney General Bondi’s Initiative: Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the introduction of new "hate speech" laws in America, which she declared she would enforce. This contradicts multiple Supreme Court rulings and established conservative principles that reject the concept of "hate speech" in the US.

• Israel Lobby Influence: Bondi's attempts to conflate criticism of Israel ("antisemitism") with prosecutable "hate speech" suggest the policy is driven by the desire of Israel Firsters to criminalize criticism of the Jewish state and its actions (e.g., the Gaza genocide). Bondi herself may be confused, relying on constant citation of "antisemitism".

• Trump's Endorsement: President Trump gave tacit approval to Bondi's rollout of these new laws, implying that such laws could have prevented Kirk's assassination. This signals that the push for censorship is occurring at the highest levels of the administration.

Professional Hit Allegations and Cover-Up Concerns

Significant speculation exists that the assassination was not a random act by a lone individual (a "tranny") but a professional hit orchestrated by foreign intelligence.

• Suspicion of Israeli Involvement: Israel is suggested as having both the motive and the means to carry out the assassination, given its international record for political killings and Kirk's rumored turn against Israeli control over Trump and US policy. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s public, instantly after-the-fact babbling about loving Kirk is cited as suspicious.

• Suspicious Circumstances: Allegations include:

  • An unaccounted-for private jet, owned by a wealthy Jewish supporter of Chabad Lubavich, departing a nearby airport with its transponder (ADS-B) deliberately turned off.

  • A disruptive distraction at the crime scene caused by a man (George Zinn, identified as Jewish or Mormon-Zionist) falsely shouting that he was the shooter.

  • Questionable surveillance video concerning the location and status of the rifle used.

  • The shot to the neck is characterized by some as the signature of a professional hit, symbolically silencing someone who had been speaking too much.

If the investigation implicates Israel, an organized government cover-up is anticipated, similar to those related to the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty (1967), the JFK assassination, and the 9/11 final report.

Page 6: Section II (Continued)

II. B. Escalating Federal Overreach and Suppression of Dissent

The political fallout from the Kirk assassination is resulting in severe punitive actions against citizens and media personnel who express dissenting views.

Punitive Actions and Censorship

• Targeting Citizens and Media: Employees have been punished, fired, or sanctioned for expressing dislike of Kirk’s politics. Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel was suspended indefinitely by Disney’s CEO Bob Iger after pressure from FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr and advertiser panic, following Kimmel’s comments alleging Kirk’s assassin was a MAGA conservative.

• State Department Threats: Trump’s State Department has threatened to identify non-citizens praising or making light of the event on social media and take action, including revoking visas or deporting them.

• "Crush Left-Wing Terrorism" Campaign: Influencers like Nick Fuentes, positioned as the "heir apparent" to Kirk’s influence, have aggressively called for the government to be "unleashed" on "the left" and demanded the arrest of individuals who celebrated Kirk’s death. This type of advocacy represents an extreme call for government tyranny and the suppression of legal speech.

II. C. Geopolitical Alignment and Financial Dealings

The turmoil in Washington is linked to US geopolitical alignment, particularly concerning Israel.

• Subservience to Israel: High-ranking US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, have openly demonstrated obedience to the Jewish state's government and America’s domestic Israel Lobby. Huckabee stated that the US foundation of morality and decency is owed to the Jewish people.

• Gaza Redevelopment Planning: Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich revealed plans for the redevelopment of Gaza—described as a "Real Estate Bonanza" once cleansed of Palestinians—in negotiation with the US. The reconstruction plan, following the "demolition phase," is reportedly "on President Trump’s desk". Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has been active in Israel and Gulf Arab States pursuing development projects linked to this plan.

• Trump's Personal Litigation: President Trump has initiated massive personal defamation lawsuits ($15 billion against The New York Times, $10 billion against The Wall Street Journal) while in office, raising questions about whether a head of state should engage in such litigation, as Trump has declared that as president "he can do whatever he wants to do".

Page 7: Section III: High-Profile Scandals and Elite Accountability Failures

III. A. The Jeffrey Epstein Files and Unreleased Names

The issue of elite accountability remains sharply focused on the unreleased files related to Jeffrey Epstein, which Thomas Massie, Republican Rep. of Kentucky, addressed during a House Judiciary Committee hearing.

Congressional Scrutiny of the FBI Director

Massie challenged FBI Director Kash Patel, arguing that the FBI is running an "audacious gaslighting campaign" by claiming Epstein only trafficked minors for himself and committed suicide, flying in the face of victim testimony and thousands of investigative findings. Patel had aligned public comments with a June 7 FBI memo asserting no client list exists and no blackmail occurred.

List of Alleged High-Profile Clients

Massie stated that the FBI possesses documents (FD-302s) from the 2019 New York sex trafficking indictment listing at least 20 powerful men to whom Epstein trafficked victims, including minors.

The list of alleged perpetrators hinted at by Massie includes:

• Jes Staley, former CEO of Barclays and top investor at J.P. Morgan.

• One Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars.

• One royal prince.

• One high-profile individual in the music industry.

• One very prominent banker.

• One high-profile government official.

• One high-profile former politician.

• One owner of an Italian car company.

• One rock star.

• One magician.

• At least six billionaires, including one from Canada.

Massie emphasized that these names are in FBI files "that you control," and pressed Patel on whether investigations had been launched against them. Patel essentially dismissed the testimonies as not "credible information" and confirmed no new indictments had arisen.

III. B. Financial and Intelligence Linkages

The controversy surrounding Epstein is compounded by his connections to major financial institutions and global intelligence operations.

Banking Complicity

Jes Staley has been linked to Epstein in court documents; the Virgin Islands sued J.P. Morgan, alleging the bank facilitated and turned a blind eye to Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation, knowingly providing the levers through which victims were paid.

• Coded Communication: Emails between Staley and Epstein suggested potential involvement in the trafficking operation, notably discussions appearing to use Disney characters as code (e.g., "Say hi to Snow White," replied to with "Beauty and the Beast").

• Forced Departure: Staley was forced out of Barclays in 2021 after a UK investigation into whether he misled the Barclays board about his dealings with Epstein.

• Settlement: J.P. Morgan ultimately reached a $75 million settlement with the Virgin Islands to avoid discovery, though the terms of the bank's settlement with Staley remain secret.

Intelligence Connections

Epstein has been linked by independent investigative journalists to intelligence agencies. Massie introduced evidence into the Congressional Record suggesting these ties:

• A former US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alex Acosta, was reportedly told that Epstein belonged to intelligence and to "leave it alone".

• Articles insinuated Epstein had CIA connections.

• Epstein's calendar indicated meetings with Barack Obama’s CIA chief.

• Epstein met with former Israeli prime minister and intelligence head Ehud Barak 36 times.

Page 8: Section IV: Critical Health and Biological Integrity Risks

IV. A. Verified DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines

A new peer-reviewed study, 'Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada,' authored by Speicher, Rose, and McKernan, has confirmed significant foreign DNA contamination in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Key Findings on Contamination

The findings directly contradict claims by the CDC, FDA, and HHS that the vaccines do not contain DNA and that there are no DNA integration issues.

• Exceeding Regulatory Limits: The study demonstrated the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose. Using fluorometry, all products tested exceeded the DNA guidelines of 10 ng/dose set by the FDA and WHO by 36–627-fold.

• SV40 Promoter Presence: SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences were found in the Pfizer vials. This component, known as a gene therapy tool, is used to traffic material to the nucleus of cells and is known to interact with the quintessential p53 tumor suppressor protein (the guardian of the genome).

• Manufacturing Shift Risk: The contamination is suspected to have resulted from the shift from Process 1 (used for clinical trials) to the larger-scale, cost-efficient Process 2, which utilizes a plasmid/E. coli system to produce massive quantities of DNA. If the final purification step failed, DNA impurities and potentially LPS contamination (which can cause anaphylactic shock) could result.

• Censorship and Retraction Threat: Due to the importance of these findings, the paper is currently under threat of being retracted by the publishing journal, Autoimmunity, following "concerns" raised just 11 days after online publication.

The authors emphasize that regulatory thresholds established previously were for "naked DNA," not the highly efficient lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated DNA, meaning the existing guidelines are likely too high and must be urgently revised.

IV. B. Psychological and Physiological Trauma Responses

Understanding human stress response is crucial for managing societal and individual resilience following trauma and crisis.

The Physiological Impact of Trauma

Physical injuries and trauma can lead to lasting, non-physical damage by rewiring the stress system, making everyday situations feel more threatening.

• Priming the System: Old injuries "prime" the nervous system to remain in defense mode. In animal models, a history of injury led to exaggerated fear (prolonged freezing) and pain sensitivity lasting over six months, even in previously uninjured areas.

• The Role of Stress Hormones: Stress hormones, specifically corticosterone (the rodent equivalent of cortisol), act as "fuel" that keeps fear and pain responses heightened long after the danger has passed. Blocking this hormone can prevent exaggerated fear responses.

• Neurological Fingerprints: Trauma exposure leaves unique fingerprints in the brain, impacting the ability to separate safe from unsafe cues. Individuals who recover better (resilient participants) maintain stronger engagement of the right executive control network, allowing them to refine fear responses and avoid overgeneralization.

Steps for Restoring Resilience

Strategies for recalibrating the nervous system focus on reducing cortisol and retraining brain circuits:

• Hormonal Control: Lowering cortisol through adequate consumption of healthy carbohydrates, addressing stress, and potentially using natural progesterone is recommended.

• Behavioral Retraining: Gradual, safe exposure to triggers helps the brain separate real threats from harmless signals, thus rewiring circuits away from hypervigilance.

• Cellular Energy Support: Eating sufficient healthy carbohydrates (around 250g/day for most adults) fuels mitochondria and prevents stress pathways from dominating. Creatine supplementation, found in grass-fed red meat, also boosts brain energy reserves and is linked to better recovery after traumatic stress.

Page 9: Conclusion and Synthesis of Interconnected Risks (Page 1 of 2)

V. Strategic Synthesis: The Global Architecture of Distrust and Decline

The diverse crises identified in this report—ranging from technological attrition to domestic political repression and bio-security failures—point toward a systemic collapse of confidence in US institutions and leadership.

Interdependence of Failures

The sources reveal a critical connection between these apparently separate events:

1. Weaponized Technology and Censorship: While US political functionaries fail in geopolitical strategy (losing the AI market due to short-sighted bans), they simultaneously pursue the weaponization of domestic crises (Kirk assassination) to introduce oppressive "hate speech" regimes. The very technology the US sought to deny its rival (advanced AI systems) is being simultaneously leveraged domestically to create a national surveillance and censorship apparatus.

2. Elite Immunity: The resistance by high-ranking officials to release critical documents regarding Jeffrey Epstein occurs alongside highly public evidence of corruption and self-dealing, such as Trump’s family benefiting from proposed Gaza redevelopment following aggressive geopolitical moves. This suggests an entrenched system where financial and political elites operate with near-total impunity.

3. Health Policy and Deception: The confirmed existence of DNA contamination and cancer-linked SV40 elements in globally administered vaccines undermines public trust in the CDC, FDA, and HHS. This deception, when coupled with the massive societal stress and trauma (which measurably rewires the brain towards chronic high alert), exacerbates widespread vulnerability and distrust, making the population more susceptible to manipulation and political crises.

The overall picture is one of accelerating national self-destruction within the US, providing external rivals like China the strategic advantage of time and focus.

Page 10: Conclusion and Synthesis of Interconnected Risks (Page 2 of 2)

V. Continued: The New Global Order

China’s emergence as a fully independent technological power, coupled with its disciplined approach to long-term planning (led by "technocrats in Beijing" versus "short-sighted political functionaries in Washington"), positions it as a formidable rival capable of successfully implementing a full-speed "Delete USA" strategy.

Key Risks to US Hegemony

Risk Category

Key Observations from Sources

Technological Isolation

The US has been locked out of the world’s largest chip market. China is actively developing parallel, zero-dependence AI and next-generation chip technology (InSe).

Domestic Political Legitimacy

The government is attempting to violate the First Amendment to criminalize political dissent using "hate speech" laws, following the Kirk assassination, which many speculate was orchestrated or exploited by deep-state or foreign interests (Israel).

Moral Authority

Elite cover-ups concerning the Epstein network, featuring high-profile politicians, bankers, and royalty, severely compromise US claims to moral global leadership.

Bio-Security & Public Trust

Regulatory bodies are exposed for failing to ensure vaccine purity, allowing high levels of foreign DNA and viral components (SV40 promoter) into public health products, directly contradicting safety claims.

The sources collectively suggest that the US is meeting a capable rival in China, which "won't succumb to Washington's coercion," but rather "will hit the delete button". Meanwhile, domestic actions by the US regime indicate a rapid erosion of the constitutional principles and accountability required for a functional, resilient civilization.