8-30-25 DailyBriefs.info archive  GoogleExplainer.com 

welcome to the lenny and Maria sanchez PODCAST AND VIDEO show.

Discussion of "Bring Back Asylums: It’s Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue in America - LewRockwell"

This article posits that transgenderism is not a civil rights movement but a social engineering experiment, viewing the LGBT movement as a covert war for political control by radical zealots. These zealots, according to the author, are "hellbent on the destruction of their enemies," including those who believe in logic, objective reality, biological science, and moral imperative. A primary strategy of this movement is the indoctrination of children, as they rarely have their own and seek to "groom future generations" to their cause, even resorting to violence against children if indoctrination fails. The author argues that debate is ineffective against such zealots, suggesting that "brutality over debate" may be necessary for some conflicts.

The article points to a pattern of the political left engaging in destabilization and targeted violence when losing influence. The recent shooting at a Catholic school and church in Minneapolis by "Robin Westman" (Robert Westman), resulting in the murder of two children and injuries to 17 others, is presented as an example of "trans terrorism". The author explicitly states that transgender activism and ideology were the "core influence" in Westman's actions, citing his writings and videos that revealed violent fantasies, hatred of Christians, conservatives, and Donald Trump. The claim is made that such expressions are "normal within the transgender community" which argues for violence against conservatives. Attempts by corporate media and Democrats to separate Westman’s actions from his beliefs or portray him as right-wing are dismissed as "bullshit" or a "fake out".

Furthermore, the author asserts that transgender ideology serves as a "convenient facade for the mentally ill," with mainstream media perpetuating the "fallacy that people can choose their gender". Westman's manifesto is quoted to support this, where he reportedly confessed his transition efforts were a mistake and that he wished he had never "brainwashed himself". The author believes that the "vast majority of trans people are frauds," donning an activist "costume" because they are "rebels desperate for any cause". This ideology, according to the article, was "weaponized by globalists and governments" and appeals to individuals with pre-existing emotional disturbances and narcissists who gravitate towards "moral and scientific relativism". The author concludes that the solution is clear: "bring back the asylums and lock up the crazies," arguing that crime plunged during America's asylum era. The time for discourse, compromise, and compassion is declared over, calling for "brutal ignominy" and the shunning and erasure of all aspects of trans activism from society.

Discussion of "Diet and Nutrition Archives - Joachim Bartoll Official"

This source, authored by Joachim Bartoll, expresses a strong critique of contemporary "nutritional science," labeling it as "dysfunctional and backwards" and an "ideology" designed to obscure the "real human species-appropriate natural diet". Bartoll emphatically states that eating meat is our "natural species-appropriate food" and that humans are "biologically classified as obligate hyper carnivores". He argues that consuming animal-sourced protein offers "protective benefits," potentially even against cancer-related mortality.

In contrast, anything plant-based, including vegan protein powders, is condemned as "full of toxins and contaminants" and "extremely toxic and unhealthy," noting their underperformance in muscle building. Bartoll asserts that the modern plant-based and processed diet is the root cause of weight gain, declining health, and emerging diseases. He extends this criticism to "ultra-processed foods," which, while harmful, are seen as a "smokescreen" for the broader issue of toxic plant-based garbage, implying that most diets, including children's, are largely unhealthy due to these foods. The author also deems all fortified supplements and foods as "toxic," containing "fake toxic inorganic compounds," and suggests they are pushed by the "pathetic medical establishment" instead of advocating for "real animal-based foods" with "bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients".

Bartoll also takes aim at scientific theories regarding "human evolution" that link apes to humans, dismissing them as "retarded theories" and "science fiction," and connecting their origins to Ivy League universities and "Skull and Bones Freemasonry". The author, Joachim Bartoll, identifies himself as a "truth-seeker at heart" and an "observer of the occult," whose views are based on his experiences, knowledge, and observations. He details his extensive background as a writer, editor, trainer, and nutritionist, highlighting his experience as an "animal-based nutritionist since 2018" and crediting this approach with helping him heal his own cancer, failing organs, asthma, and allergies.

Discussion of "Ron Paul Talks With Mike Adams About Trump Tariffs, Currency Printing, Flag Burning and Wars - LewRockwell"

This source from LewRockwell.com presents a discussion between Mike Adams and Ron Paul. The key focus of their conversation is on several prominent topics, including Trump tariffs, currency printing, flag burning, and various wars. The title itself serves as the primary summary of the article's content, indicating that these subjects are the central points of the dialogue between the two authors.

Discussion of "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy? - The Expose"

This article defines Technocracy as the "science of social engineering" aiming to control the entire system of producing and distributing goods and services, while simultaneously eliminating private property, politics, and finance. Originating in the 1930s at Columbia University, the concept reasoned that private property was unnecessary and sought to place all assets into a "global common trust" for administrators to decide each citizen's share of continental wealth. The article warns that the same Technocratic plan is being implemented today, critically empowered by new technologies like AI.

A central feature of this modern Technocratic plan is the transition from a supply-and-demand economic system to an "energy credit-based system," which is intricately linked with a "universal basic income" (UBI). This UBI, however, is not a simple handout but is described as "conditionally based" on a "social credit score," similar to the system in China. Elon Musk is highlighted as a figure promoting Technocracy, with mentions of his grandfather being the head of Technocracy Inc. in Canada. Musk is cited for promoting UBI and energy credits, and his platform X is described as forming "the basis for the Chinese social credit system" by integrating an identity system, payments platform (potentially stablecoin or CBDC), and a social credit system. The panellists at the Technocracy Roundtable emphasize that this agenda represents a "battle between good and evil," which cannot be ignored. This system, they argue, would strip individuals of their "God-given rights, strengths [and] abilities," reminiscent of Marxism.

Discussion of "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation? - The Expose"

This article delves into tokenization as a "central feature of Technocracy," defining it as the process of converting assets, rights, or identities into digital tokens on blockchain or similar systems. This mechanism is crucial for creating a "control grid" that facilitates surveillance, behavioral control, and elite dominance, ultimately leading to a "loss of freedom and equity". The core concern lies in the centralized control, programmability, trackability, and censurability of these digital tokens, whether they are central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) or regulated stablecoins. This control extends beyond money to "every asset on Earth," meaning authorities could restrict the use or movement of any asset if an individual's behavior is deemed unacceptable.

The article explains that the legal groundwork for this control, including the GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act, has been laid over "several decades," establishing regulatory frameworks for these centralized digital assets. While financial surveillance is already widespread, tokenization is seen as an escalation, providing more "instantaneous control over all of our assets". A significant consequence highlighted is the elimination of equity that people currently leverage for small businesses, which would be devastating and aligns with plans to consolidate power into large corporations and public-private partnerships. The discussion suggests that a coming "sovereign debt crisis" could trigger the implosion of the current system, allowing Technocrats, with their existing databases, to seize control in a "free-for-all". As a counter-measure, the panellists advocate for bringing control back to the local level, ensuring privacy, and embracing philosophical truths about "God-given rights". Solutions proposed include privacy-backed stablecoins, global peer-to-peer healthcare marketplaces, and local/global online farmer marketplaces. The article specifically warns against Bitcoin, claiming it was "hobbled and intentionally hijacked" by individuals with ties to traditional finance, intelligence agencies, and groups like the Bilderberg group.

Discussion of "The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure – and it’s because of covid injections - The Expose"

This source reports that the biotechnology industry, valued at $1.74 trillion, is confronting failure and widespread criticism due to the high rate of adverse effects and excess deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 injections. Japan is cited as a prime example, having the highest rate of mRNA vaccine uptake globally and consequently the highest rate of excess deaths. The initial claims of mRNA vaccines saving millions of lives have been "debunked" or significantly questioned.

To avert collapse, the biotech industry is depicted as seeking to bypass crucial safety testing and regulation, while simultaneously exploiting lightly regulated sectors such as animal veterinary care and biotechnology food processing for profit. It is also undertaking a "fightback" through opinion pieces in corporate media to protect its markets. The article raises a stark warning against the deregulation of biotechnology experimentation, specifically highlighting the New Zealand Gene Technology Bill. Such legislation is criticized for promoting the "false principle that biotechnology is inherently safe and equivalent to natural processes" and for including provisions for emergency authorization of biotech medicines without adequate labelling. The author also cautions against the "mass gene editing of millions of life forms under AI computer control," emphasizing that "this is computers deciding how to edit humans" and poses a "gravest peril to civilisation".

The source asserts that the COVID-19 virus itself "emerged from biotechnology experimentation" and that the subsequent vaccinations were products of a biotech industry driven by "hype and hope that was not founded in reality". It argues that known adverse mutagenic effects from pre-pandemic years were "swept under the carpet". The "missing piece" in the faulty biotech paradigm of life is identified as the absence of a foundation in consciousness, treating humans as "insentient machines". The recommended solution involves rejecting the Gene Technology Bill, demanding upgraded safety testing and labelling rules, protecting consumer choice, and outlawing biotechnology experimentation on germlines and "gain-of-function research".

Discussion of "Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate, by Alastair Crooke - The Unz Review"

This article from Alastair Crooke suggests that Donald Trump's political career has transcended "politics as usual" and ascended to a "Mythic" status, making it difficult for rationalists to comprehend. He is portrayed as a figure who consistently overcomes attempts to destroy him, embodying what Carl Jung called "the Shadow". The author notes that Russia, and particularly President Putin, appears to understand this "mythic" quality.

During a summit in Anchorage, Trump reportedly treated Putin with "huge deference and respect," perceiving him as a "mythic peer," which contrasts sharply with his "disdainful treatment of the Euros". This respectful interaction is seen as having "exploded the West’s radical demonisation of Russia and the cordon sanitaire erected versus all things Russian," effectively recognizing Russia as a "peer global power". The article indicates a "pivot" in Trump's approach, where he decided to "no longer stand in the way of a Russian-imposed solution for Ukraine". However, Trump is depicted as facing significant internal pressures, including the Epstein affair, the "Israeli slaughter" in Gaza, the threat of "more war," and economic blowback from tariffs, which could erode his MAGA base.

The article posits that the European elite intends to ensure Trump’s peace outreach to Putin fails by feigning cooperation while imposing conditionalities to prevent an agreement, thereby "impelling American escalation". Despite these complexities, the outcome of the Anchorage summit is presented as Russia successfully finding "an exit out from the imposed western cordon sanitaire," with Ukraine's future to be settled "on the battlefield".

Discussion of "Unmasking CDC Corruption: RFK's Battle To Reform Public Health - LewRockwell"

This article asserts that since RFK Jr. assumed the role of HHS Secretary, the CDC has been the primary government agency actively "sabotaging attempts to Make America Healthy Again". Recent leadership changes at the CDC, including the firing of its director and resignations of several top officials, are interpreted as part of RFK Jr.'s reform efforts, which have sparked a "media uproar". The author questions whether the negative events are due to "secretive groups of bad actors" or naturally emergent phenomena, but leans towards deliberate "conspiracy" given the coordinated and predictable nature of policy enactments.

A key point is that CDC corruption is "pervasive" and "effectively legalized". This is attributed to a 1983 law permitting the CDC to accept "unconditional" gifts and the establishment of the National CDC Foundation in 1992, which "mobilize[s] philanthropic and private-sector resources". The CDC Foundation has allegedly received nearly $1 billion from corporate "donors" and has been accused of "professional money-laundering," with specific examples like Coca-Cola influencing public health efforts and pharmaceutical companies shaping "impartial" guidelines for treatments. Anonymous CDC employees reportedly complained in 2016 about their mission being "influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests" and staff being "intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right".

Beyond financial corruption, the article highlights an "ideological fixation" within the CDC and the broader medical community that all vaccines are "safe and effective," instilled as a "core belief". This bias, it argues, leads to filtering out or dismissing evidence of vaccine harm, making a balanced assessment of risks and benefits challenging. Consequently, the author claims that "many vaccines are on the market where their risks clearly and unambiguously outweigh their benefits," singling out COVID and HPV vaccines as "much more dangerous and unnecessary than many others". The article suggests that while lower-level personnel may adhere to dominant narratives to protect their careers, higher-ranking leaders are "consciously aware of what they are complicit in" but perpetuate it to maintain their power.

Discussion of "Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving - LewRockwell"

This article forcefully argues that "Western civilization is not worth saving," labeling it an "indefensible disaster" and a "train wreck of a society". The author dismisses the conservative rhetoric about protecting Western civilization from outside forces like immigrants or "the trans agenda," stating that such arguments begin with a flawed premise that this society is worth preserving at all.

The current state of Western civilization is described in highly critical terms: "genocidal. Ecocidal. Omnicidal. Imperialist. Racist. Dehumanizing. Degrading. Dystopian. Emotionally stunted. Culturally vapid. Spiritually impoverished. Intellectually enslaved". The author contends that "these things should not exist" and "we should not be the way that we are". The core message is that we do not need to rescue Western civilization from external threats, but rather "we need to rescue ourselves from western civilization". The imperative is to "radically transform it from the murderous, tyrannical and oppressive nightmare that it has always been," asserting that the "western way of life doesn't need to be preserved, it needs to end". The article emphasizes the need for evolution, as "everything we were doing before wound up bringing us to this terrible point". The situation in Gaza is presented as a "mirror," reflecting "what we are. What we have always been".

Discussion of "https://mileswmathis.com/mush.pdf"

This source makes the provocative claim that Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket footage, specifically a Starship landing and splashdown, is "CGI fake footage" designed for public amusement on X (formerly Twitter). The author, identifying as a professional artist, cites friends in the CGI industry who allegedly "laugh at this SpaceX con," suggesting that the imagery is not even "top-shelf" and that Musk might be hiring less experienced individuals to save money.

Furthermore, the article asserts that SpaceX and Elon Musk have benefited from "billions in subsidies," meaning that the public is unknowingly "paying for this fraud with your taxdollars". This financial support is expected to continue, with hundreds of billions siphoned from the treasury to "fake the next Moon landing" through projects like Artemis. The author argues that public displays such as yard signs proclaiming "Science is Real" serve as evidence that the "new science isn't" genuine. The reasoning provided is that true realities, like trees or a blue sky, do not require such public promotion, implying that only things that "aren't real," such as "new science" or certain "political candidates," need such advocacy.

Discussion of "☕️ INSECURE ☙ Saturday, August 30, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠"

This article reports on the corporate media's "sneering" at RFK Jr.'s new acting CDC director, Jim O'Neill, due to his lack of a medical degree, past criticisms of the CDC during the COVID pandemic, and promotion of treatments like ivermectin. The media is portrayed as lamenting the "transgression" of the CDC's "traditional institutional independence," which the author argues is non-existent legally. The article contends that the CDC lost its "scientific neutrality" and public trust during the pandemic by "carrying water for mandates, school closures, and shifting narratives," thereby enabling RFK Jr. to appoint critical leaders.

A "radical suggestion" is made to nominate Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to the Supreme Court (SCOTUS), highlighting his Harvard law degree, Navy JAG experience, and unique perspective from governing a complex state through various crises. Such an appointment, though likely to be met with progressive opposition over "broken norms," is presented as beneficial for bringing a practical understanding of law's impact on real people to the Court. The article also covers a federal appellate court's decision to uphold a ruling striking down most of Trump's tariffs, based on the court's judgment that his declared "emergency" did not constitute an "actual" emergency and exceeded his authority. This is framed as the courts now being "in his head," though the decision is likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Another point of contention is Trump's cancellation of Kamala Harris's Secret Service detail extension, which was granted by an undisclosed Biden order beyond the statutory six-month period. This action, which provoked "liberal fury" and claims of "revenge," is contextualized by the fact that former Vice President Mike Pence did not receive a similar extension. Finally, the article describes an "educational revolution" in Florida, where new "parent's rights" laws are shifting public school funding to alternative educational paths. This has led to a "freefall" in enrollment in "woke public-school" counties, with shrinking public schools and "exploding" private schools, effectively exposing the "politicization of public schools".

thank you for listening to another session of the lenny and Maria sanchez PODCAST AND VIDEO show produced and archived at the website notebooklmvideos.com

I. The Threat of Technocracy and Globalist Control

A central and pervasive theme across multiple sources is the idea of an overarching "Technocracy" aiming to establish total societal control.

• Definition and Aims of Technocracy:

• "Technocracy is the science of social engineering, aiming to control the entire system of producing and distributing goods and services. It also aims to eliminate private property, politics and finance." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?")

• This system, devised in the 1930s, is described as seeking to "abscond with all private property and put it into like a global common trust" and determine "what your share of the continental wealth would be." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?")

• The difference today is the availability of technology, especially AI, to implement these plans, which include "an energy credit-based system and a universal basic income, which is conditional on a social credit score." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?")

• Role of Elon Musk:

• Elon Musk is highlighted as a proponent of Technocracy, with his grandfather, Josh Haldeman, having been the head of Technocracy Inc. in Canada. (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?")

• Musk is seen as "clearly pushing Technocracy" through advocating for universal basic income (UBI) and energy credits, and building X (formerly Twitter) as "essentially the basis for the Chinese social credit system," an "everything app" with an identity system, payment platform, and social credit system. (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?")

• Tokenization as a Control Mechanism:

• "Tokenisation, a central feature of Technocracy, is the process of converting assets, rights or identities into digital tokens on blockchain or similar systems, which can be used to create a control grid and enable surveillance, behavioural control and elite dominance." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation?")

• This will lead to a "loss of freedom and equity" as assets can be "centrally controlled, programmed, tracked and censored." If individuals "behave in a way that is not permitted," they could be "stopped from using their assets." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation?")

• The implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and regulated stablecoins are seen as platforms for Technocracy, allowing "more instantaneous control over all of our assets." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation?")

• The article also notes legislative groundwork being laid for this, citing the GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act in the US. (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation?")

• Counteracting Technocracy:

• Solutions proposed include bringing control back to the local level, promoting privacy-backed stablecoins (like "Freedom Dollar"), and developing global peer-to-peer healthcare and farmer marketplaces outside of existing systems. (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation?")

• Bitcoin is explicitly not considered a solution, as it is believed to have been "hobbled and intentionally hijacked between 2015 and 2017" by individuals with "ties to the Bilderberg group, had ties to traditional finance, had ties to the intelligence agencies and MIT, which had funding from Jeffrey Epstein." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation?")

II. Critique of Western Civilization and Political Landscape

Several sources express deep dissatisfaction with the current state of Western society and its political systems, often through a lens of conservative or libertarian critique.

• "Transgender Fatigue" and Societal Collapse:

• The article "Bring Back Asylums: It’s Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue in America" argues that "Transgenderism is not a civil rights movement; it’s a social engineering experiment" and "a covert war for political control." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• It frames trans-activists as "radical zealots hellbent on the destruction of their enemies," including those who "believe in logic, objective reality, biological science and moral imperative." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• The article alleges indoctrination of children and willingness to "murder our kids" if indoctrination fails, citing a shooting by a "leftist transgender activist named 'Robin Westman'" as "trans terrorism." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• It dismisses claims of Westman being "right wing" and argues that "trans ideology equipped Robert Westman with the excuses to rationalize the killing of helpless kids." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• The author states that "the vast majority of trans people are frauds" using activism as a "costume" and suggests that "mental illness in general is common in America today," with transgender ideology being "weaponized by globalists and governments." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• The article's suggested solution is to "bring back the asylums and lock up the crazies" and to "shunned and erased" trans activism from society, with those expressing violence being "locked up." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• "Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving":

• A contrasting but equally critical view states, "Western civilization is not worth saving. I think that’s been pretty well established by now." (LewRockwell, "Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving")

• It argues that the current society is an "indefensible disaster," being "genocidal. Ecocidal. Omnicidal. Imperialist. Racist. Dehumanizing. Degrading. Dystopian. Emotionally stunted. Culturally vapid. Spiritually impoverished. Intellectually enslaved." (LewRockwell, "Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving")

• The author asserts that "We don’t need to rescue western civilization from outside forces, we need to rescue ourselves from western civilization" and "radically transform it from the murderous, tyrannical and oppressive nightmare that it has always been." (LewRockwell, "Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving")

• Gaza is presented as a "mirror" reflecting "what we are. What we have always been." (LewRockwell, "Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving")

• Trump's "Mythic" Status and Geopolitical Maneuvers:

• Donald Trump is described as having achieved a "Mythic" status, not as a man, but as a "story" that "never happens but always are," giving him an "extraordinary grip on the collective imagination." (The Unz Review, "Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate")

• His political career is seen as defying "prosaic terms of ‘politics as usual’," as he "comes back literally from everything thrown to destroy him." (The Unz Review, "Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate")

• The article discusses a recent "Alaska summit" where Trump and Putin met, interpreting it as a "pivot" away from the "imposed western cordon sanitaire" against Russia, acknowledging Russia as a "peer global power." (The Unz Review, "Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate")

• It suggests Trump faces pressures from the Epstein Affair, the Gaza conflict ("Israeli slaughter"), and economic blowback from tariffs, which threaten his MAGA base. (The Unz Review, "Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate")

• Trump's objective in the meeting is portrayed as allowing Russia to "bring" the EU and Zelensky to a "negotiated ‘peace’ – through force," while Trump manages "the European ruling strata" and "American hawks." (The Unz Review, "Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate")

• US Political Developments (August 2025):

• CDC Reorganization: RFK Jr. (as HHS Secretary) is described as enacting controversial changes at the CDC, leading to the firing of the CDC director and resignations of top officials. This is framed as a battle to "Make America Healthy Again" against "CDC’s pervasive corruption." (LewRockwell, "Unmasking CDC Corruption"; Coffee & Covid 2025, "INSECURE")

• Judicial Overreach on Tariffs: A federal appellate court upheld a ruling striking down most of Trump's tariffs, arguing his "reasoning" for an "emergency" did not constitute an "actual" emergency. This is seen as judges "in his head now" and substituting their own assessments. (Coffee & Covid 2025, "INSECURE")

• Kamala Harris Secret Service: Trump cancelled an extended Secret Service detail for Kamala Harris, sparking "liberal fury" and accusations of "revenge" and "two-tiered justice," while the cancellation is framed as upholding legal limits. (Coffee & Covid 2025, "INSECURE")

• Florida Educational Revolution: Florida's laws shifting money from public schools to parents choosing alternative education, and expediting private school approvals, are causing "freefall in Broward school enrollment" and other districts. This is celebrated as a "revolution in education," with "woke school boards" being the common factor in declining public school enrollment. (Coffee & Covid 2025, "INSECURE")

III. Scientific and Health Disinformation/Corruption

A strong theme is the rejection of mainstream scientific and health narratives, often positing a deliberate concealment of truth.

• Critique of Biotechnology and COVID Injections:

• The "trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure" due to "high rate of adverse effects and excess deaths associated with mRNA covid-19 injections." (The Expose, "The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure")

• Japan is cited as having the "highest rate of excess deaths in the world" after high mRNA vaccination uptake. The claim that vaccines saved millions of lives is "debunked." (The Expose, "The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure")

• The industry is accused of "trying to bypass safety testing and regulation" and "unethically reaping what profits they can by applying exotic mRNA gene therapies to the lightly regulated animal veterinary sector, polluting the food chain." (The Expose, "The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure")

• "Corporate biotechnology is also aligning itself with AI in an effort to tap into the current tsunami of AI investment," which is feared to lead to "novel damaging illness" through "mass gene editing of millions of life forms under AI computer control." (The Expose, "The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure")

• The article connects the "covid-19 virus" to "biotechnology experimentation" and blames "Incomplete science, along with a disregard for safety testing and public health on the part of multinational food, pharmacy and biotech companies and their owners and principal investors," for "30 million lives lost during the pandemic." (The Expose, "The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure")

• CDC Corruption and Vaccine Ideology:

• The CDC's "pervasive corruption" is deemed "effectively legalized" through laws allowing it to accept "unconditional" gifts and the establishment of the CDC Foundation, which has received "nearly 1 billion dollars from corporate 'donors'." (LewRockwell, "Unmasking CDC Corruption")

• Examples of corruption include funding from pesticide companies for safety studies, Coca-Cola donations influencing WHO lobbying efforts, and Roche contributions to flu campaigns promoting Tamiflu (an "ineffective drug"). (LewRockwell, "Unmasking CDC Corruption")

• This "climate of disregard" means staff are "often directed to do things we know are not right," and Congress's intent for domestic funding is allegedly diverted for "global health research." (LewRockwell, "Unmasking CDC Corruption")

• Beyond financial corruption, a "zealous adherence to all vaccines being 'safe and effective' tends to be ideological in nature," instilled as a core belief for those in "science" or "medicine." This ideological bias leads to filtering out evidence of harm. (LewRockwell, "Unmasking CDC Corruption")

• The article concludes that "many vaccines are on the market where their risks clearly and unambiguously outweigh their benefits." (LewRockwell, "Unmasking CDC Corruption")

• Nutrition Science as "Ideology" and the Natural Diet:

• "Nutrition Science is Nutrition Ideology," and current "nutritional science" is described as "dysfunctional and backwards." (Joachim Bartoll Official, "Diet and Nutrition Archives")

• A central tenet is that humans are "biologically classified as obligate hyper carnivores" and "Eating Meat Will 'Protect' Against Anything, As It Is Our Natural Species-Appropriate Food." (Joachim Bartoll Official, "Eating Meat Will 'Protect' Against Anything")

• Conversely, "Anything Plant-Based Is Full Of Toxins And Contaminants," including vegan protein powders. (Joachim Bartoll Official, "Not Just Vegan Protein Powders")

• Ultra-processed foods are harmful, but they are "Only A Smokescreen For The Real Problem" because "anything processed and even unprocessed plant-based is not far off in comparison, and some might even be worse." (Joachim Bartoll Official, "While Ultra-Processed Foods Are Extremely Harmful"; "More Than Half The Food US Kids Consume Are Ultraprocessed Foods")

• The "modern plant-based and processed diet" is identified as the "common causes of weight gain, declining health and emerging diseases." (Joachim Bartoll Official, "Cysteine Depletion Triggers Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis And Fat Loss")

• All "Fortified Supplements/Foods Are Toxic And Will NOT Support Any Kind Of Recovery," advocating for "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients." (Joachim Bartoll Official, "All Fortified Supplements/Foods Are Toxic")

• Mainstream theories about "human evolution" linking humans to apes are rejected as "retarded theories" and "propaganda." (Joachim Bartoll Official, "When 'Science' Goes Full Retard")

IV. Disinformation and Skepticism of Mainstream Narratives

A recurring thread throughout the sources is an explicit distrust of mainstream media, government, and established institutions, often accusing them of deliberate deception.

• CGI and Fake Narratives:

• Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket footage is dismissed as "newest CGI fake footage," with the author, a "professional artist," claiming friends in CGI "just laugh at this SpaceX con." (Untitled document, "MUSH")

• SpaceX is accused of being "a private company" that has "benefitted from billions in subsidies," making the public "paying for this fraud with your taxdollars." (Untitled document, "MUSH")

• The statement "Science is Real" on yard signs is interpreted as evidence that "this new science isn't" real, because "You only need yard signs promoting things that aren't real. Like new science and, say, political candidates." (Untitled document, "MUSH")

• Censorship and Manipulation:

• The Expose explicitly states, "Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs." (The Expose, "Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?" and others)

• The "political left" is characterized by "destabilization efforts when they don’t get what they want" and "revert to directed exponential disruption and violence." (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

• Mainstream media responses to the Minneapolis school shooting are criticized as "Bullshit," with accusations that they "try to distance themselves while still defending the person’s motives" and plant "fake out" narratives. (LewRockwell, "Bring Back Asylums")

convert_to_textConvert to source

This August 30, 2025, edition of "Coffee & Covid" provides a conservative-leaning commentary on recent political and social developments. The author, Jeff Childers, critiques what he perceives as the corporate media's bias, particularly in its reaction to Kennedy's controversial appointment of Jim O'Neill as acting CDC director, and the agency's diminished public trust post-pandemic. The article also floats a "radical suggestion" of nominating Governor Ron DeSantis to the Supreme Court, critiques a federal appellate court's decision against Trump's tariffs, and lambasts the cancellation of Kamala Harris's extended Secret Service protection. Finally, it highlights a "revolution in education" in Florida, where "woke" public schools in blue counties are facing declining enrollment and potential closures due to parental choice and the shifting of state funds to alternative educational paths. 

Discuss CDC controversies.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) faces numerous controversies related to its leadership, funding, scientific integrity, and public trust, as highlighted in the sources.

Political Influence and Loss of Trust:

• Health Secretary RFK Jr. views the CDC as a primary government agency that has been sabotaging attempts to "Make America Healthy Again"1.

• Recently, the CDC's director was fired a month into her job, briefly refused to leave, and four other top CDC officials resigned, in addition to five earlier retirements, resulting in a loss of about a quarter of the CDC's senior leadership1. These actions triggered a media uproar and led to a scheduled hearing to "hold RFK accountable"1.

• The CDC's former director and some officials are considered responsible for "mass gaslighting against the vaccine-injured"2.

• During the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC reportedly "traded away its carefully cultivated aura of scientific neutrality" for "short-term political utility," actively supporting mandates, school closures, and shifting narratives, which significantly eroded its credibility3.

• A new law, passed by President Biden in January, now requires Senate confirmation for all future CDC director nominees, a measure perceived as an attempt to frustrate President Trump4.

• A "majority of pandemic-fatigued Americans" are suggested to hope for the CDC to be "put out of its misery"5.

Corruption and Financial Conflicts of Interest:

• CDC corruption is described as "pervasive" and "effectively legalized"6.

• A 1983 law permits the CDC to accept "unconditional" gifts, and the establishment of the National CDC Foundation in 1992 further facilitates the mobilization of philanthropic and private-sector resources6.

• The CDC Foundation has received nearly $1 billion from corporate "donors" and has been accused of "egregious conduct," with one investigation referring to it as a "professional money-laundering facility"7.

• Specific examples of alleged influence include:

    ◦ A firm conducting research for the pesticide industry giving $60,000 to the CDC Foundation for a study to prove pesticide safety7.

    ◦ Coca-Cola contributing over $1 million to the CDC Foundation between 2010 and 2015, and in return, receiving benefits such as collaborative meetings and advice from a top CDC staffer on how to lobby the World Health Organization to reduce efforts against added sugars8.

    ◦ Roche's contributions to the CDC Foundation's "Take 3 flu campaign," which encouraged the use of antiviral medicine, despite Roche manufacturing Tamiflu, a drug described as ineffective8.

• These "donations" are believed to often shape the "impartial" guidelines issued by the CDC9.

• Key funders of the CDC Foundation include Democratic political advocacy groups, vaccine organizations (such as GAVI and the Gates Foundation), major vaccine manufacturers (e.g., Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, and J&J), and tech companies (like Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and PayPal)9.

• In 2016, anonymous CDC employees complained that their mission was being influenced by "outside parties and rogue interests," with some senior management allegedly aware of and condoning these behaviors, and staff being "intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right"10.

• In February 2019, two Democrat Congresswomen requested a formal investigation into the CDC's interactions with Coca-Cola and its broader corruption, but this issue was "swept under the rug" due to the politicization surrounding COVID-1911.

Scientific Misconduct and Ideological Bias:

• The CDC is accused of routinely hyping "inconsequential pandemics" annually to secure more funding, and its need to maintain funding leads it to repeat "risk-free narratives" to avoid offending sponsors12.

• Examples of "industry canards" include promoting water fluoridation as a significant public health achievement, stating that chronic Lyme disease does not exist, and asserting that all vaccines are "1000% safe and effective," which contributes to the public's distrust12.

• The National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), a branch of the CDC, was implicated in a "cover up" of inaccurate screening data for the Wise Woman Program, where numbers were misrepresented to Congress, definitions were changed, and data was "cooked" to improve results, with an internal review being suppressed13.

• The NCCDPHP also allegedly diverted domestic funding meant for public programs to "expensive [global health] research" that may not benefit the American public14.

• A significant criticism points to an "ideological fixation" within the CDC and broader medical fields, particularly a "zealous adherence to all vaccines being 'safe and effective'," which is described as a core belief for those affiliated with "science" or "medicine"11. This bias can lead to filtering out evidence that challenges predetermined conclusions1516.

• This ideological stance may result in many vaccines remaining on the market despite their risks potentially outweighing their benefits, and a tendency to view all vaccines as a "homogenous entity" regardless of individual dangers, such as those associated with COVID or HPV vaccines17.

• It is suggested that higher-ranking public health leaders within the CDC are "consciously aware" of their complicity but perpetuate it to protect their power base, while lower-ranking staff comply to avoid career repercussions17.

• The new acting CDC director, Jim O'Neill, has been criticized for not being a physician and for advocating "treatments that are not supported by scientific research, like ivermectin"18.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Political appointments.

Political appointments are discussed in the sources, particularly in the context of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and a hypothetical Supreme Court nomination.

Changes at the CDC under RFK Jr. as HHS Secretary: Upon RFK Jr. becoming the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary, the CDC, which is a branch of the HHS, has been identified by contacts as the primary government agency sabotaging efforts to "Make America Healthy Again"1. Following these developments, the CDC's director was fired a month into her job, and four other top CDC officials resigned. These departures, coupled with five earlier retirements in March, resulted in a loss of about a quarter of the CDC’s senior leadership1. This situation led to a media uproar and a scheduled hearing to "hold RFK accountable"1.

Specific CDC Director Appointments:

• Jim O'Neill: Axios reported on Jim O'Neill as the new acting CDC director2. Critics, particularly corporate media, sneered at this choice because O'Neill is not a physician and is an ally of Health Secretary Kennedy2. He is seen as someone who could help implement the "Make America Healthy Again" agenda2. O'Neill has publicly criticized the CDC during the COVID pandemic and supported treatments like ivermectin, which are not backed by scientific research according to Axios2. The media viewed Kennedy's installation of O'Neill as a "transgression" of the CDC's "traditional institutional independence"2. However, the sources argue that the CDC lacks legal independence, unlike the Federal Reserve or the judiciary, and that the agency lost public trust by engaging in politics during the pandemic3. O'Neill's acting service period could last up to 210 days, potentially longer if a permanent nomination is submitted, causing "progressives to freak out"4.

• Rochelle Walensky and Susan Monarez: Historically, the CDC director, appointed by the President, did not require Senate confirmation5. For instance, President Biden appointed Rochelle Walensky without a Senate vote5. However, a new law passed by Biden in January now requires all future CDC nominees to be confirmed by the Senate4. This change was reportedly made to frustrate President Trump, with support from Republicans4. Susan Monarez was the first nominee to require this confirmation4.

• Dr. Joe Ladapo (Potential Nominee): Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo is mentioned as a possibility for a permanent CDC Director6. He possesses Ivy League credentials and "MAHA bona fides"6. In his role in Florida, he has worked against mandates, removed fluoride, questioned COVID shots, opposed mercury fillings, and advocated for raw milk6. Governor DeSantis reportedly lobbied for Dr. Ladapo after Trump's election, but Kennedy was "politically boxed into hiring Susan Monarez instead"6.

Suggestion for a Supreme Court Appointment: A "radical suggestion" proposed is for President Trump to nominate Governor Ron DeSantis to the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)7. DeSantis is described as a Harvard-trained lawyer and former Navy JAG7. His career involves navigating law, politics, and executive power, particularly through his experience governing Florida during challenging times like hurricane seasons, pandemics, and "pitched cultural battles"7. The argument for his nomination suggests that his experience with the "consequences of constitutional theory in the political Thunderdome" could be precisely what the Court needs7. Detractors might criticize his lack of judicial experience, but the Constitution does not require it, only "judgment." Notable past justices, such as Earl Warren and William Rehnquist, also joined the bench without prior judicial roles7.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Tariffs upheld.

Regarding the tariffs, a federal appellate court upheld a ruling that struck down President Trump's tariffs12. This decision came after the Court of International Trade had initially ruled in late May that the President lacked the authority to impose these tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)2.

Key details from the sources include:

• In late July, a federal appellate court had initially stayed the ruling from the Court of International Trade2.

• However, in a 7-4 ruling, the same appellate court then stated that President Trump's reasoning for declaring an emergency did not constitute an "actual" emergency, and thus he exceeded his authority23.

• The term "emergency" is not defined by statute, and the appellate judges "substituted their own assessments" regarding whether the national debt and money flowing to other countries constituted a "real" emergency3.

• The four dissenting judges, including Chief Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore, disagreed, arguing that the IEEPA did permit tariffs and that the president did have appropriate legal authority3.

• The order to strike down the tariffs is stayed for two weeks to allow the Administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court, which is considered "practically certain"4.

Beyond the legal challenges, the sources also discuss the broader implications and perceptions of Trump's tariffs:

• An article by Alastair Crooke mentions "economic blowback from the ‘Shock and Awe’ tariff attack to fracture BRICS" and that Trump's pursuit of dollar hegemony, along with his tariffs, is becoming problematic as the American 'bubble economy' unravels56.

• A commenter suggested that Trump's tariffs could push "about the same number of Americans into either poverty or misery" as Putin lifted out of poverty7.

• Ron Paul has participated in discussions about Trump's tariffs8.

• The Unz Review has published an article titled "History as Farce with Donald Trump's Tariff Policies"7.

• It is also noted that tariffs were not mentioned as part of the long-term peace plan at an Alaska summit between Trump and Putin9.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Secret Service.

The Secret Service is discussed in the context of the protection provided to former Vice Presidents1.

Specifically, the sources mention:

• Kamala Harris's Secret Service Detail: President Trump reportedly canceled Kamala Harris's Secret Service detail, which had been extended by an undisclosed order from President Biden12.

• Standard Protection Period: By law, Vice Presidents are typically entitled to six months of Secret Service protection following the end of their terms1.

• Harris's Extension: Kamala Harris's protection officially expired in July, meaning she had already received an extra month of protection beyond the standard period1. However, President Biden had signed a secret, previously undisclosed order granting her a year's extension3. The reason for this extension was not stated in the memo, and a Biden spokesperson declined to comment on it3.

• Media Justification and Omissions: CNN reportedly attempted to justify the extension by citing Harris's identity as the "first woman and first Black woman in the role"3. However, the sources note that CNN did not mention that all successful presidential assassination victims and serious attempts in U.S. history have targeted white males, and Vice Presidents, regardless of race or gender, have faced almost no serious assassination attempts4.

• Comparison to Mike Pence: Former Vice President Mike Pence, despite receiving death threats "from his own side," was not given any extended Secret Service protection beyond the standard six-month period after leaving office; his security detail ended promptly as required by law4.

• Reactions to the Cancellation: Progressives reacted with "liberal fury" to the cancellation, calling it unfair and an "act of revenge"15. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, a Black woman, described it as "another act of revenge following a long list of political retaliation"5. Governor Gavin Newsom of California hinted that the state might cover the cost of her security5. The sources characterize this as "more Democrat two-tiered justice"6.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Education revolution.

An "educational revolution" is currently underway in Florida, driven by new state laws that have significantly impacted school enrollment and funding1.

Key aspects of this revolution include:

• Shift in Funding to Parents: A first-in-the-nation law in Florida has begun shifting money away from public schools to parents who choose alternative educational paths, such as homeschooling1.

• Expedited Private School Approvals: The state also expedited approvals for new private schools, particularly those opening in buildings previously used as libraries, museums, performing arts venues, theaters, cinemas, or churches within the past five years1.

• Impact on Public School Enrollment:

    ◦ "Blue" (Democrat-leaning) counties in Florida are experiencing a "freefall" in public school enrollment. For example, Broward County and Orange County have seen significant drops, with Broward considering closing thirty-four schools23.

    ◦ These budget gaps, previously masked by federal COVID funding which has now ended, are profound4. Schools are even resorting to hiring "sales consultants" at $1,000 per re-enlisted student to try and recruit families back, though success is not reported4.

    ◦ The source attributes this decline in blue counties to "woke school boards", a factor that articles on the issue reportedly do not mention35.

• Growth in "Red" (Republican-leaning) Counties and Private Schools:

    ◦ In contrast, "red" counties are seeing "positive educational news" and public schools are "re-tooling"56.

    ◦ Private schools are "exploding" in growth. The Diocese of St. Petersburg, for instance, is building a new parochial school for the first time in a decade56.

    ◦ Examples of changes include Hillsborough County school board members skipping official recognition of Pride Month and Miami-Dade reactivating classroom cameras in special-needs classes, a parental preference opposed by teachers' unions6.

This shift is viewed as a revolution in education that forces blue public schools to compete with alternatives, ultimately helping students. It is seen as exposing the politicization of public schools and is described as "terrific news"57.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

11 sources

send

chevron_right

How does this author challenge established scientific and nutritional paradigms?

Joachim Bartoll Official's "Diet and Nutrition Archives" is a comprehensive online resource offering a highly critical perspective on modern nutritional science and dietary trends. The central argument posits that humans thrive on a "species-appropriate natural diet" that is animal-based, with meat acting as a protective food source. Bartoll's work strongly condemns plant-based diets, including veganism and most plant-based supplements, labeling them as toxic and detrimental to health. He also dismisses mainstream nutritional advice, ultra-processed foods, and fortified supplements as misinformed or intentionally misleading, advocating instead for a return to fundamental animal-based nutrition for overall well-being and disease prevention. 

Discuss Natural Diet.

The sources discuss the concept of a "natural diet" primarily through the perspective of Joachim Bartoll, who describes himself as an animal-based nutritionist12.

According to these sources:

• Modern "nutritional science" is portrayed as dysfunctional and backward, designed to conceal the "real human species-appropriate natural diet"3.

• Eating meat is considered our "natural species-appropriate food" and is believed to offer protective benefits against various ailments, including cancer-related mortality4. Humans are biologically classified as obligate hyper carnivores4.

• Any plant-based food, including vegan protein powders, is described as being "full of toxins and contaminants" and "extremely toxic and unhealthy"5.

• While ultra-processed foods are acknowledged as "extremely harmful," the sources argue that anything processed, and even unprocessed plant-based foods, are also toxic and unhealthy, sometimes even worse than ultra-processed items36. The author suggests that a significant portion of what people and children consume, possibly close to 90%, is toxic6.

• All fortified supplements and foods are deemed "toxic" and are not believed to support recovery. Instead, the consumption of "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients" is advocated7.

• The common causes of weight gain, declining health, and emerging diseases are attributed to the "modern plant-based and processed diet"8.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Nutrition Science.

Based on the sources, "Nutrition Science" is presented as a "Nutrition Ideology" and is heavily criticized for being "dysfunctional and backwards"12. The author, Joachim Bartoll, asserts that those working within this field are "clueless morons" and that the current state of nutritional science is "all by design to gatekeep the secret of the real human species-appropriate natural diet"2.

Key criticisms and alternative perspectives on nutrition from the sources include:

• Critique of Modern Nutritional Science The author believes that today's "nutritional science" is backwards and deliberately hides the truth about the natural human diet2. There's a strong rejection of what is commonly accepted, with the author stating that "science goes full retard" when discussing theories like human evolution linked to apes3.

• Emphasis on an Animal-Based Diet The sources strongly advocate for an animal-based diet, stating that eating meat is "our Natural Species-Appropriate Food" and can offer protective benefits against health issues like cancer-related mortality4. Joachim Bartoll, the author, identifies as an "Animal-based nutritionist since 2018"5.

• Rejection of Plant-Based Foods and Supplements

    ◦ Plant-based products, including vegan protein powders, are described as "full of toxins and contaminants"6.

    ◦ The modern plant-based and processed diet is identified as a "common cause[] of weight gain, declining health and emerging diseases"7.

    ◦ It is argued that anything processed, or even unprocessed plant-based foods, can be toxic, with "likely close to 90% of what [people] eat" being unhealthy8.

    ◦ All fortified supplements and foods are deemed "toxic" and ineffective for recovery, with a preference for "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients" over "artificial supplements with fake toxic inorganic compounds"9.

• Critique of Weight Loss Strategies Research focused on weight loss strategies like cysteine restriction is seen as "totally backwards," as it fails to address the root causes of weight gain, which the author attributes to modern plant-based and processed diets7.

• Personal Experience and Alternative Studies Joachim Bartoll shares that he "wasted 17 years of studies in Western 'Modern' Medicine and Pharmacology" before becoming an animal-based nutritionist5. He attributes healing his own cancer, failing organs, asthma, and allergies since 2018 to studying Biology, Microbiology, Biochemistry, The Terrain Theory, and German New Medicine5. He emphasizes that the content on his website represents his "thoughts, views and speculations based on [his] experiences, knowledge and what [he] see[s] daily"10.

In summary, the sources present a highly critical view of conventional "nutrition science," framing it as an ideological tool rather than a neutral scientific pursuit, and strongly promoting an animal-based diet while condemning plant-based, processed, and fortified foods.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Weight Management.

Joachim Bartoll, an animal-based nutritionist, addresses weight management by identifying the "modern plant-based and processed diet" as the common cause of weight gain, declining health, and emerging diseases1. He views the obsession with weight loss, rather than addressing these root causes, as "totally backwards"1.

From Bartoll's perspective, effective weight management is intrinsically linked to consuming a "natural species-appropriate food"2. Key points related to weight management include:

• Critique of Modern Diet: Bartoll asserts that current "nutritional science" is dysfunctional and designed to conceal the "real human species-appropriate natural diet"3. He believes that while ultra-processed foods are "extremely harmful," they serve as a "smokescreen for the real problem"23. He contends that anything processed, and even unprocessed plant-based foods, are toxic and unhealthy, sometimes more so than ultra-processed items, suggesting that up to 90% of what people and children consume is toxic4.

• Emphasis on Meat: Eating meat is considered the "natural species-appropriate food" for humans, who are biologically classified as obligate hyper carnivores2. It is believed to offer protective benefits against various ailments, including cancer-related mortality2.

• Rejection of Plant-Based Foods and Supplements: All plant-based foods, including vegan protein powders, are described as "full of toxins and contaminants" and "extremely toxic and unhealthy"56. Similarly, all fortified supplements and foods are deemed "toxic" and are not believed to support recovery. Instead, he advocates for the consumption of "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients"7.

• Cysteine Restriction: While acknowledging "cysteine restriction" as one of the latest proposed strategies in "weight-loss," Bartoll dismisses it as backwards, stating that people are obsessed with weight loss instead of addressing the fundamental issue of the "modern plant-based and processed diet"1.

In summary, for Joachim Bartoll, weight management is achieved by adopting an animal-based diet and avoiding all forms of plant-based and processed foods, which he considers toxic and the primary drivers of weight gain and ill health1.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Supplements.

Based on the sources, Joachim Bartoll, an animal-based nutritionist, holds a strongly negative view of most supplements. He asserts that "All Fortified Supplements/Foods Are Toxic And Will NOT Support Any Kind Of Recovery"1.

His criticisms and views on supplements include:

• Toxicity of Fortified and Artificial Supplements: Bartoll argues that the "pathetic medical establishment and 'researchers'" promote "artificial supplements with fake toxic inorganic compounds"1. He contrasts these with the "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients" that he advocates for1.

• Specific Criticism of Plant-Based Powders: He explicitly states that "vegan protein powders" are "extremely toxic and unhealthy"2. This aligns with his broader belief that "Anything Plant-Based Is Full Of Toxins And Contaminants"2.

• Lack of Support for Recovery: According to Bartoll, these toxic supplements are not effective in supporting any kind of recovery1.

• Natural Diet as an Alternative: Instead of relying on supplements, he promotes the consumption of "Our Species-Appropriate, Species-Specific Natural Diet," which is an animal-based diet34. He believes that addressing the common causes of declining health and diseases involves moving away from the "modern plant-based and processed diet"5.

In summary, from the perspective presented in the sources, supplements are generally deemed harmful and ineffective, with a strong recommendation for animal-based whole foods as the proper source of nutrition1.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Processed Foods.

Based on the sources, processed foods, particularly ultra-processed foods, are considered "extremely harmful"12. However, Joachim Bartoll, an animal-based nutritionist, asserts that they are merely a "smokescreen for the real problem"1.

Bartoll's perspective on processed foods includes:

• Widespread Toxicity: He argues that anything processed, and even unprocessed plant-based foods, are toxic and unhealthy, sometimes even worse than ultra-processed items2. He estimates that "likely close to 90% of what people’s and children’s diets" consist of is toxic and unhealthy2.

• Cause of Health Issues: The "modern plant-based and processed diet" is identified as a common cause of weight gain, declining health, and emerging diseases3.

• Fortified Foods are Toxic: All fortified supplements and foods are deemed "toxic" and are not believed to support recovery4. Instead, he advocates for "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients" over "artificial supplements with fake toxic inorganic compounds"4.

• Critique of Nutritional Science: The discussion of ultra-processed diets in modern "nutritional science" is seen as a prime example of how dysfunctional and backward the field is, designed to "gatekeep the secret of the real human species-appropriate natural diet"1.

In essence, while ultra-processed foods are acknowledged as very detrimental, the sources broaden this criticism to encompass virtually all processed and even unprocessed plant-based foods, positioning them as fundamental threats to human health and the primary drivers of modern diseases, in stark contrast to an animal-based diet1....

keep_pinSave to note

The provided text, titled "MUSH," asserts that SpaceX's Starship launches and landings, including Flight 10, are entirely fabricated using computer-generated imagery (CGI). The author, claiming expertise as a professional artist with connections in the CGI industry, suggests that the visuals are not even high-quality and imply that Elon Musk is defrauding the public. Furthermore, the author claims that these endeavors are not privately funded, but rather subsidized by billions in taxpayer dollars, which they believe will also fund a "fake" future Moon landing. The piece concludes by suggesting that public campaigns like "Science is Real" signs are evidence of a widespread deception, as real things do not require such validation.

Key Topics

Starship Landing

CGI Hoax

SpaceX Subsidies

Fake Science

Moon Landing

Discuss Starship Landing.

According to one of the sources, Elon Musk posted what is described as "CGI fake footage" of a Starship landing for amusement on X1. The author of this source, identifying as a professional artist with friends in CGI, claims that this imagery is not "top-shelf" and suggests that Musk is hiring less experienced individuals to save money on what they consider to be a "con"1.

The footage in question reportedly showed:

• Starship's landing burn and splashdown on Flight 101.

• The vessel going through reentry with intentionally missing tiles1.

• Completing maneuvers designed to stress its flaps1.

• Executing a flip and landing burn that positioned it approximately 3 meters from its targeted splashdown point1.

The author also notes that SpaceX and Elon Musk have received billions in government subsidies, meaning that taxpayers are effectively funding this perceived "fraud"2. They further suggest that taxpayers will contribute hundreds of billions to fake a future Moon landing through projects like Artemis, which is already in progress2. The author argues that phrases like "Science is Real" on yard signs indicate that "this new science isn't" real, as such signs are only needed for things that are not genuinely real, unlike readily accepted truths such as "trees are real" or "the sky is blue"3.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss CGI Hoax.

The concept of a "CGI hoax" is directly addressed in one of the sources concerning Elon Musk and SpaceX. According to this source, Elon Musk posted what is described as "CGI fake footage" of a Starship landing on X for amusement1. The author, who identifies as a professional artist with friends in CGI, asserts that this imagery is not "top-shelf" and suggests that Musk is hiring less experienced individuals "just out of school" or "cousins" to save money on what they deem a "SpaceX con"1. This footage reportedly depicted Starship's landing burn and splashdown on Flight 101. The author uses this as an example of "new science" being a "total in-your-stupid-face conjob," arguing that the need for yard signs promoting "Science is Real" indicates that this "new science isn't" real2. Furthermore, the source claims that SpaceX has received billions in subsidies, meaning that taxpayers are "paying for this fraud with your taxdollars," and predicts that "hundreds of billions" will be siphoned from the treasury to "fake the next Moon landing" as part of the Artemis project3. Bezos is also mentioned as wanting "some of that action"2.

Beyond the specific claim of a CGI hoax, the sources discuss broader forms of deception and social engineering that can be interpreted as hoaxes:

• Technocracy and Social Engineering: One source defines "Technocracy" as the "science of social engineering, aiming to control the entire system of producing and distributing goods and services," and to "eliminate private property, politics and finance"4. It suggests that the same Technocratic plan from the 1930s is being implemented today, leveraging modern technology like AI5. Elon Musk is identified as actively "pushing Technocracy," with his grandfather, Josh Haldeman, having been the head of Technocracy Inc. in Canada6. Musk has promoted universal basic income (UBI), which he calls "high universal income," and has spoken about Mars being a technocracy and the importance of "energy credits"67. His platform X is described as potentially forming the basis for a Chinese social credit system, which would involve an identity system, payments, and a social credit system all integrated7. UBI is explained as being "conditionally based" on social credit, meaning access to tokens, services, and places would depend on compliance with "laws, programmes and social rules"8. This entire system is presented as a "control grid" enabling surveillance, behavioral control, and "elite dominance," which could be seen as a large-scale societal hoax910.

• CDC Corruption and Deception: Another source discusses how the CDC's "scientific neutrality" was "traded away" for "short-term political utility," describing it as "carrying water for mandates, school closures, and shifting narratives" during the COVID pandemic11. This "credibility capital was burned like dry tinder, on purpose, to achieve short-term political objectives"11. The source also notes a "mass gaslighting against the vaccine-injured"12. It posits that "many Federal agencies depend on obtaining congressional funding and, therefore, will engage in stunts to ensure that funding is allocated to them," citing the CDC's routine hyping of "inconsequential 'pandemics'" to secure more funding13. This need for funding allegedly forces the CDC to "repeat the same (risk-free) narratives ad-nauseam so they do not offend their sponsors," including "habitually repeat industry canards" such as the claim that "all vaccines are 1000% safe and effective"13. This behavior is described as a "deliberate 'conspiracy' by a specific group of bad actors"14.

• Transgenderism as Social Engineering: One article characterizes "Transgenderism" not as a civil rights movement, but as a "social engineering experiment"15. It further claims that the LGBT movement is a "covert war for political control," driven by "radical zealots hellbent on the destruction of their enemies"15. The article suggests that a "prime strategy of the trans movement is the indoctrination of our children," as they "rarely have any children of their own and in order to perpetuate their numbers they must groom future generations to their cause"16. This narrative paints the movement itself as a deceptive maneuver or "hoax" for political and social control.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss SpaceX Subsidies.

According to one source, Elon Musk and SpaceX have received billions in government subsidies1. The author of this source argues that taxpayers are therefore paying for what they perceive as a "fraud"1.

Furthermore, the source states that taxpayers will also be funding hundreds of billions of dollars for a future Moon landing, through projects like Artemis, which are already in progress1. The author encourages readers to keep this in mind when considering their daily work and the "fake world" it supposedly supports1.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Fake Science.

The sources discuss various aspects of what they categorize as "fake science" or a departure from genuine scientific practice, attributing it to deception, financial incentives, ideological fixation, and social engineering.

Here's a breakdown of the perspectives on "fake science" presented:

1. CGI and "Fake Footage" in Space Exploration: One source alleges that Elon Musk posts "CGI fake footage" of Starship landings on X for amusement1. The author, identifying as a professional artist, dismisses the imagery as not "top-shelf," suggesting that Musk employs less experienced individuals to save money on what is considered a "con" or "theater"1. This type of imagery is described as an example of "fake footage and CGI" that the public should learn to recognize, as it is predicted to be used for a future "return to the Moon"1. The author connects the need for "Science is Real" yard signs to this phenomenon, arguing that such signs are only necessary for concepts that are "not real," unlike universally accepted truths such as "trees are real" or "the sky is blue"2. Furthermore, this "fraud" is stated to be funded by billions in government subsidies, with taxpayers also expected to fund hundreds of billions for a "fake Moon landing" through projects like Artemis3.

2. Dysfunction and Ideology in Nutrition and Health Science: Another source criticizes contemporary "nutritional science" as "dysfunctional and backwards" and those working in the field as "clueless morons"4. This is presented as a deliberate design to conceal "the secret of the real human species-appropriate natural diet" while perpetuating misleading information4. The source also refers to "Science Daily" as a "propaganda website" for promoting a "retarded theory" of human evolution5. There's also a critique of the "pathetic medical establishment and 'researchers' pushing for artificial supplements with fake toxic inorganic compounds" instead of promoting natural, animal-based foods with bioavailable nutrients6.

3. Biotechnology Industry and Medical "Misunderstanding": The biotechnology industry, valued at $1.74 trillion, is depicted as "facing failure" due to adverse effects and excess deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 injections7. This industry is accused of attempting to bypass safety testing and regulation, instead profiting from lightly regulated areas like animal veterinary care and biotechnology food processing89. Corporate media is seen as part of a "fightback" to protect the industry's markets through opinion pieces10. The mRNA vaccination is explicitly called a "failure" and "deadly," with initial claims of saving millions of lives being "debunked" and significantly downgraded11.

The source argues that the COVID-19 virus itself "emerged from biotechnology experimentation" and that vaccinations were based on a "biotech world of hype and hope that was not founded in reality"12. It alleges that "incomplete science," coupled with a "disregard for safety testing and public health" by multinational companies, led to 30 million lives lost during the pandemic13. The "biotech faulty paradigm of life" is described as having been constructed "without a foundation in consciousness," treating humans as "insentient machines"13. The New Zealand Gene Technology Bill is cited as an example of "deregulation of biotechnology experimentation" and the acceptance of a "false principle that biotechnology is inherently safe and equivalent to natural processes"14. The lack of labeling requirements is attributed to intense lobbying by the biotechnology sector, which is aware of public suspicion regarding gene editing, making this approach "anti-science, anti-safety and anti-life"14.

4. CDC Corruption and Ideological Fixation: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is described as having "traded away its carefully cultivated aura of scientific neutrality" for "short-term political utility" during the pandemic, supporting mandates, school closures, and "shifting narratives"15. This action is said to have "burned like dry tinder" its credibility to achieve political objectives15. The CDC's "traditional institutional independence" is dismissed as mere "whining about 'norms and customs'" since it lacks legal independence16.

The author frequently suspects that policies are the result of deliberate "conspiracies" by specific bad actors17. The CDC is accused of regularly exaggerating "inconsequential 'pandemics'" to secure funding and maintaining "risk-free" narratives to avoid offending its public and private sponsors18. This leads to the agency habitually repeating "industry canards," such as claims about water fluoridation or vaccine safety, which causes public distrust18. "CDC corruption is so pervasive, it’s effectively been legalized," with its foundation accepting billions from corporate "donors" and being labeled a "money-laundering facility," with these donations influencing "impartial" guidelines19.... Internal complaints from 2016 reveal that the CDC's mission was allegedly influenced by "outside parties and rogue interests," with staff pressured to act against their better judgment22. There were also reports of a "cover up" of inaccurate data and data manipulation to present more favorable results23.

The adherence to the idea that all vaccines are "safe and effective" is considered an "ideological fixation"24. This bias, initially subtle, grows over time, leading to a worldview where "all 'the evidence' supports their position," while contradictory evidence is "dismissed and filtered away"2526. This results in many vaccines remaining on the market despite their risks potentially outweighing their benefits27. The source suggests that higher-ranking leaders within public health are "consciously aware of what they are complicit in" but continue to perpetuate these actions to protect their power27.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Moon Landing.

Based on the sources, the discussion around the Moon Landing centers primarily on skepticism and allegations of it being a hoax.

Here's a breakdown of the points raised:

• Future "Fake" Moon Landings and CGI Footage One source claims that future Moon landings are anticipated to be "faked" using CGI. The author, who identifies as a professional artist, suggests that this "fake footage and CGI" will be used for an eventual "return to the Moon in a few years"1. This is linked to the earlier discussion about "CGI fake footage" allegedly posted by Elon Musk regarding a Starship landing, which the author deemed not "top-shelf" and part of a "SpaceX con" [207, previous conversation].

• Taxpayer Funding for Alleged Hoaxes The source explicitly states that taxpayers will be funding "hundreds of billions" of dollars to "fake the next Moon landing"1. This is presented in the context of Elon Musk and SpaceX already having received "billions in government subsidies," leading the author to conclude that taxpayers are "paying for this fraud with your taxdollars" [207, previous conversation].

• The Artemis Project The Artemis project is specifically identified as being "already going" and implicated in siphoning "hundreds of billions" from the treasury to "fake the next Moon landing"1.

• General Skepticism and "New Science" The author argues that phrases like "Science is Real" on yard signs are necessary because "this new science isn't" real, calling it a "total in-your-stupid-face conjob" [207, previous conversation]. This perspective extends to the idea of Moon landings.

• "Moon Landing Hoax Articles" Category Another source, The Unz Review, includes a category for "Moon Landing Hoax Articles" and lists an article titled "The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind?"2. This indicates a broader theme of skepticism regarding Moon landings within the provided material.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

I. Bring Back Asylums: It’s Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue in America By Brandon Smith 1. Transgenderism and the LGBT movement are presented as a social engineering experiment and a covert war for political control.

   Transgenderism is not a civil rights movement; it’s a social engineering experiment.

    The LGBT movement is not a struggle for equal rights; it’s a covert war for political control.

2.  **The trans movement is accused of indoctrinating and grooming future generations to perpetuate their numbers.**

    A prime strategy of the trans movement is the indoctrination of our children.

    They rarely have any children of their own and in order to perpetuate their numbers they must groom future generations to their cause.

3.  **Debate and reason are considered ineffective against zealots, suggesting that some conflicts require a more brutal approach.**

    Many conservatives and libertarians today put endless stock into the power of debate, but after fighting this fight for so long you start to realize that debate rarely changes the minds of zealots.

    In the end, there is something to be said for brutality over debate.

4.  **The political left is predicted to become increasingly unstable and resort to targeted violence upon losing government influence.**

    For the past couple years I have been predicting that the political left was going to take a nose dive (globally) in terms of government influence, but I also predicted that they would grow increasingly unstable and revert to targeted violence over their loss of power.

    In every case where the political left had influence over social conditions and then lost that power, they revert to directed exponential disruption and violence from riots to assassination.

5.  **A recent attack by a leftist transgender activist is categorized as "trans terrorism" directly influenced by transgender ideology.**

    The latest attack involves a leftist transgender activist named “Robin Westman” (originally Robert Westman, a man pretending to be a woman) murdering two children and injuring 17 others at a Catholic school and church in Minneapolis, then killing himself.

    Robert Westman’s attack was trans terrorism, pure and simple, and there are many others out there like him.

6.  **Trans ideology is blamed for providing excuses to rationalize violence, driven by a perceived hatred of Christians, conservatives, and Donald Trump.**

    It is the trans ideology that equipped Robert Westman with the excuses to rationalize the killing of helpless kids.

    His writings display a clear hatred of Christians, conservatives and Donald Trump.

7.  **Mainstream media narratives attempting to distance violent acts from the political left are dismissed as "bullshit."**

    Democrat leaders say that Westman’s actions are separate from his beliefs and that conservatives are “trying to make the shooting political”. Bullshit.

    This has been the go-to media narrative after almost every leftist act of violence; they try to distance themselves while still defending the person’s motives.

8.  **The author posits that mentions of conservative figures in the shooter's writings were "planted" to deflect blame from leftist cultism.**

    My theory? I think the Herrera mentions have been planted as a way to distract from Westman’s full bore leftist cultism, offering the woke movement deniability.

    In other words, it’s a fake out that doesn’t match with any other evidence presented on the man’s background.

9.  **Transgender ideology is characterized as a "convenient facade" for the mentally ill, with mainstream media's validation enabling problematic behavior.**

    Transgender Ideology Is A Convenient Facade For The Mentally Ill.

    This behavior is enabling these mentally ill bottom feeders to act the way they do.

10. **The author claims that most trans people are "frauds" and rebels seeking a cause, citing Westman's manifesto where he admitted his transition was a mistake.**

    Westman in his manifesto confesses that his transition efforts were a mistake and that he wished he had never “brainwashed himself”.

    The vast majority of trans people are frauds.

11. **The rise in trans identification is attributed to the weaponization of trans ideology by globalists and governments, appealing to emotional disturbances and narcissism.**

    The trans ideology was weaponized by globalists and governments over the course of the last decade.

    The philosophy appeals to people with preexisting emotional disturbances and it is especially attractive to narcissists who gravitate to the moral and scientific relativism inherent in gender fluid thinking.

12. **The proposed solution to "transgender fatigue" is to "bring back the asylums" and lock up the "crazies," along with shunning all trans activism.**

    I think the solution is obvious: It’s time to bring back the asylums and lock up the crazies.

    Every aspect of trans activism needs to be shunned and erased from our society.

13. **Asylums are presented as a historically effective method for reducing crime, leading to calls for their reintroduction.**

    During the peak of America’s asylum era crime plunged to all time lows.

    If asylums are coupled with extended prison time for repeat offenders, crime nearly disappears.

14. **The author declares an end to discourse, compromise, and compassion, advocating for "brutal ignominy" and the removal or expulsion of "leftist political militants."**

    The time for discourse is over.

    The time for compromise and compassion is over.

II. Diet and Nutrition Archives By Joachim Bartoll 1. Modern "nutritional science" is criticized as dysfunctional, backwards, and a deliberate smokescreen to conceal the true human species-appropriate natural diet.

   It is a perfect example of how dysfunctional and backwards today’s “nutritional science” is and how clueless these morons are that actually get paid to work within that field.

    While Ultra-Processed Foods Are Extremely Harmful, They’re Only A Smokescreen For The Real Problem.

2.  **Eating animal-sourced protein is asserted to be the natural, species-appropriate food for humans, offering protective benefits against mortality including cancer.**

    Eating Meat Will “Protect” Against Anything, As It Is Our Natural Species-Appropriate Food.

    A new study published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, came to the conclusion that eating animal-sourced protein foods is not linked to a higher risk of death and may even offer protective benefits against cancer-related mortality.

3.  **All plant-based foods, especially vegan protein powders, are declared to be toxic and contaminated.**

    Not Just Vegan Protein Powders: Anything Plant-Based Is Full Of Toxins And Contaminants.

    Let’s see what they had to say about the extremely toxic and unhealthy vegan protein powders.

4.  **The "Viking/Nordic Diet" is deemed misunderstood and bastardized by social and "lamestream" media.**

    The Viking/Nordic Diet Bastardized — And What You Really Should Eat.

    During the last months I’ve noticed a new silly and misled trend emerging on social media and now the lamestream media is catching up.

5.  **Researchers and scientists are critiqued for obsessing over weight loss strategies, such as cysteine restriction, instead of addressing the root causes of health issues like modern plant-based diets.**

    For some reason, researchers, “scientists,” and people in general are obsessed with weight loss instead of simply addressing the common causes of weight gain, declining health and emerging diseases — that of the modern plant-based and processed diet.

    It’s totally backwards, but that is the retarded society we unfortunately live in today.

6.  **While ultra-processed foods are acknowledged as harmful, processed and even unprocessed plant-based foods are considered comparably or potentially more toxic.**

    While Ultraprocessed foods are really bad and unhealthy, anything processed and even unprocessed plant-based is not far off in comparison, and some might even be worse — and that means that most of people’s and children’s diets, as in likely close to 90% of what they eat.

    The fact that about 62% of the energy consumed by children in the US are from ultraprocessed foods might sound alarming.

7.  **All fortified supplements and foods are branded as toxic and ineffective, with a strong recommendation for consuming real animal-based foods instead.**

    All Fortified Supplements/Foods Are Toxic And Will NOT Support Any Kind Of Recovery.

    Here we go again with the pathetic medical establishment and “researchers” pushing for artificial supplements with fake toxic inorganic compounds instead of actually consuming real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients.

8.  **The scientific theory of human evolution linking humans to apes is dismissed as "science fiction" and "retarded theories" from Ivy League institutions, which are connected to "Skull and Bones Freemasonry."**

    When “Science” Goes Full Retard. Apes Has Nothing To Do With Humans As A Species.

    Of course, the bollocks oozed out of Dartmouth College, a private Ivy League research university in Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.

9.  **Joachim Bartoll, the author, is described as a truth-seeker, observer of the occult, and founder of an uncensored online community called Ungovernable.**

    Joachim is a truth-seeker at heart, an observer of the occult (know your enemy,) and with a contact network all over our world.

    He is also the founder of the uncensored online-community Ungovernable — the one-stop website for anyone interested in seeking the truth — where he writes and answer questions daily.

10. **The author offers online coaching and consulting services focused on animal-based (carnivore) nutrition for health, fat loss, and body transformation.**

    Online-Coaching and Consulting.

    Animal-based (carnivore) educational coaching, fat loss coaching, and consulting services on health and nutrition.

III. Ron Paul Talks With Mike Adams About Trump Tariffs, Currency Printing, Flag Burning and Wars By Mike Adams and Ron Paul 1. Ron Paul and Mike Adams engage in a discussion covering Trump's tariffs, currency printing, flag burning, and wars.

   **_Ron Paul Talks With Mike Adams About Trump Tariffs, Currency Printing, Flag Burning and Wars_**.

    **_By Mike Adams and Ron Paul_**.

2.  **The article is featured on LewRockwell.com, a platform identifying itself as "ANTI-STATE • ANTI-WAR • PRO-MARKET."**

    LewRockwell .comANTI-STATE *•* ANTI-WAR *•* PRO-MARKET.

    The site also offers sections for authors, a blog, books & resources, political theatre, podcasts, store, about, contact, donate, and advertise.

3.  **The piece was published on August 30, 2025, and encourages donations to support the website.**

    August 30, 2025.

    Donate.

4.  **The article includes a comments section and links to various books for purchase.**

    Comments open on Brighteon.

    The Iron Curtain Over ...Beaty, John Best Price: $10.66 Buy New $9.00 (as of 03:06 UTC - Details ).

5.  **Content on the "Political Theatre" section of the website includes topics such as "Trans Ideology, Alienation, and Dissociation."**

    Political Theatre.

    Trans Ideology, Alienation, and Dissociation.

6.  **The "LRC Blog" features articles on ending the Federal Reserve, RFK Jr.'s efforts to address globalists in the CDC, and "Another Trans Shooter."**

    End The Scandal Ridden Fed.

    Is RFK, Jr. Cleaning Globalists Out Of The CDC?.

IV. Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy? By Rhoda Wilson 1. Technocracy is defined as the science of social engineering, aiming to control the entire system of producing and distributing goods and services, while eliminating private property, politics, and finance.

   Technocracy is the science of social engineering, aiming to control the entire system of producing and distributing goods and services.

    It also aims to eliminate private property, politics and finance.

2.  **The Technocratic plan from the 1930s is being implemented today, now empowered by technologies like AI, energy credits, and a social-credit-conditional universal basic income.**

    The same Technocratic plan devised in the 1930s is being implemented today.

    The difference is that now, the Technocrats have the technology, such as AI, to implement their plans, which include an energy credit-based system and a universal basic income, which is conditional on a social credit score.

3.  **Technocracy was initially developed by scientists and engineers at Columbia University in the 1930s, who proposed abolishing private property and centralizing wealth.**

    Technocracy was first created in the 1930s at Columbia University by scientists and engineers.

    They reasoned that we did not need private property at all.

4.  **The American public rejected the original technocratic system because they recognized it would lead to the collapse of free markets and capitalism.**

    And the American people saw through this, and they said, ‘We’re not going to go for this. So, you guys just go home and take your bags with you’.

    It would have been the collapse of everything we had up at that point.

5.  **Elon Musk is identified as a proponent of Technocracy, actively promoting universal basic income (UBI) and energy credits, consistent with his grandfather's role in Technocracy Inc.**

    Elon Musk, whose grandfather, Josh Haldeman, was the head of Technocracy Inc. in Canada, is clearly pushing Technocracy.

    In a recent Tweet, Musk promoted universal basic income (“UBI”), which he is calling “high universal income”.

6.  **Musk's platform X is described as a foundation for a Chinese-style social credit system, integrating identity, payments, and social credit.**

    If you look at what X is, it is essentially the basis for the Chinese social credit system.

    He’s building it as an everything app, which will have an identity system.

7.  **Universal Basic Income (UBI) under Technocracy is explained as being conditional on a social credit score, determining access to tokens and services based on compliance.**

    “[UBI is] going to be conditionally based – social credit.

    Meaning, if you comply with all of their laws, their programmes and their social rules, then you might get your tokens and access to services and places.

8.  **Technocracy is likened to Marxism, aiming to strip individuals of their "God-given rights" and abilities, driven by a belief in a superior group that should control everything.**

    This is really like Marxism, “where they’re taking away your God-given rights, your God-given strengths [and] your God-given abilities”.

    In other words, the Technocrats believe they are superior to everyone else and so they should decide for everyone and control everything and everyone.

9.  **The spiritual aspect is considered a crucial element of the Technocratic agenda, framed within a "battle between good and evil."**

    Turner agreed with Wenclewicz that there is a battle between good and evil.

    She believes the spiritual aspect is an integral component of the agenda.

10. **The Exposé seeks public financial support to counter government and Big Tech censorship and continue its "honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism."**

    Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs.

    The Exposé relies solely on your support.

V. Technocracy Roundtable: What is tokenisation? By Rhoda Wilson 1. Tokenisation is identified as a core component of Technocracy, involving the conversion of assets, rights, or identities into digital tokens to establish a control grid, surveillance, and elite dominance.

   Tokenisation, a central feature of Technocracy, is the process of converting assets, rights or identities into digital tokens on blockchain or similar systems, which can be used to create a control grid and enable surveillance, behavioural control and elite dominance.

2.  **The implementation of tokenisation is predicted to result in a loss of freedom and equity, as assets become centrally controllable, programmable, traceable, and censorable.**

    The implementation of tokenisation by Technocrats will lead to a loss of freedom and equity, as assets can be centrally controlled, programmed, tracked and censored.

    People will be stopped from using their assets if they behave in a way that is not permitted.

3.  **Digital tokens like CBDCs and stablecoins are highlighted as alarming due to their features of central control, programmability, tracking, and censorship.**

    But in the technocratic version of this, there are some features about these tokens that are alarming.

    They can be centrally controlled and issued. They can be programmed. They can be tracked. And they can be censored.

4.  **Technocrats are aiming to tokenize all global assets, including stocks, bonds, and commodities, to expand their control beyond just money.**

    But [the Technocrats are] not just stopping at tokenising money.

    They literally want to tokenise every asset on Earth.

5.  **Combined with a social credit system, tokenisation could enable authorities to restrict the use of money or other assets based on an individual's behavior.**

    Combined with a social credit system, this would mean that not only can they stop you from using your money if you behave in such a way that they do not permit.

    But “they can actually stop you from moving any of your assets or even potentially using your assets”.

6.  **Recent US legislative acts, such as the GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act, are interpreted as establishing regulatory frameworks for centralized digital assets, forming a platform for Technocracy.**

    The GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act establish stablecoins and digital assets that are centralised versions of tokens which are controlled and managed by third parties, Day explained.

    So, it is really the platform by which they implement technocracy.

7.  **Existing financial systems already involve significant surveillance, and tokenisation will intensify this by providing more instantaneous control over assets.**

    People don’t realise how much financial surveillance we already have.

    And now they’re applying all of that to digital tokens, which is going to give them more instantaneous control over all of our assets.

8.  **Tokenisation is projected to eliminate equity, thereby devastating small businesses that rely on leveraging assets like home ownership.**

    Currently, Turner explained, “There’s still equity. Equity that people can leverage.

    If you take away that ability to have leverage for equity, you’re going to eliminate most of the small business capacity in this country.

9.  **The implosion of the current system, possibly through a sovereign debt crisis, is seen as a desired outcome for Technocrats to seize control.**

    As soon as we move away from this situation where we have a currency [such as the US dollar] that represents a boundary or a culture or a geographic productivity of a people, then all of a sudden, we tear down all the boundaries, and it’s a free-for-all.

    They want to implode the system and then they get a free-for-all because then everything’s up for grabs.

10. **Counteracting tyranny requires bringing control back to the local level, ensuring privacy, and understanding fundamental philosophical truths like God-given rights.**

    You’ve got to bring it back to local because if you let this stay at the top level, federal level, global level, whatever, it’s going to unravel and it’s going to be a free-for-all.

    Turner added that she believes being able to self-govern is a defence against tyranny.

11. **Solutions to Technocracy include incubating projects like privacy-backed stablecoins (e.g., Freedom Dollar) and global peer-to-peer healthcare marketplaces.**

    What’s the counter? Something like Freedom Dollar, which is a privacy-backed stablecoin.

    What is the counter? A global P2P [peer-to-peer] healthcare marketplace where people outside of insurance, outside of the entire system, essentially a global medical tourism marketplace that’s completely private.

12. **Bitcoin is not considered a viable solution, as it was reportedly "hobbled and intentionally hijacked" by entities connected to traditional finance and intelligence agencies.**

    Bitcoin isn’t one of the solutions.

    [Bitcoin was] hobbled and intentionally hijacked between 2015 and 2017 … there was kind of a technocratic takeover of Bitcoin.

13. **The Exposé relies entirely on public support for its "honest, reliable, investigative journalism" to counter government and Big Tech censorship.**

    The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help….

    Your Government & Big Tech organisations try to silence & shut down The Expose.

VI. The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure – and it’s because of covid injections By Rhoda Wilson 1. The $1.74 trillion biotechnology industry is experiencing failure and criticism due to the high rates of adverse effects and excess deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 injections.

   The biotechnology industry, valued at $1.74 trillion, is facing failure and criticism due to the high rate of adverse effects and excess deaths associated with mRNA covid-19 injections.

2.  **To mitigate its failure, the biotech industry is attempting to bypass safety testing and regulation, profiting from lightly regulated sectors like animal veterinary care and food processing.**

    In an effort to save themselves, the industry is trying to bypass safety testing and regulation.

    It is profiting from lightly regulated areas such as animal veterinary care and biotechnology food processing.

3.  **Japan, which had the highest uptake of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines globally, is now reported to have the highest rate of excess deaths.**

    A Japanese study entitled ‘Significant Increase in Excess Deaths after Repeated covid-19 Vaccination in Japan’ provides some further background on the nation with the highest uptake of covid-19 mRNA vaccines in the world.

    As we have previously reported in our article ‘The Unthinking Faith in Biotechnology and AI’, Japan now has the highest rate of excess deaths in the world.

4.  **mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is unequivocally described as a "deadly" failure, with initial claims of saving millions of lives being debunked.**

    mRNA covid-19 vaccination was the flagship product of the vast biotechnology industry designed to cement a biotechnology era of novel medicines, long life and new channels to gain economic prosperity.

    mRNA vaccination was not just a failure; it was deadly.

5.  **Leading biotech companies are failing, evidenced by significant workforce layoffs, particularly impacting cell and gene therapy research.**

    Flagship Biotech Companies Are Failing.

    In March of this year, Arena laid off 10% of its workforce; two days ago, a further 30% were laid off.

6.  **Corporate biotech is initiating a "fightback" through opinion pieces in corporate media to protect its markets and counter calls for stricter safety regulation.**

    Corporate Biotech is Launching A Fightback, Trying To Protect Its Markets By Placing Opinion Pieces in The Legacy Media.

    On 19 August, *The Wall Street Journal* opinion column headlined ‘RFK Jr.’s Misguided War on mRNA’ misdescribed more careful safety regulation as an effort “to tarnish a promising technology, a move that could damage US innovation”.

7.  **The biotech industry is aligning with AI to conduct "mass gene editing of millions of life forms under AI computer control," raising concerns about novel illnesses and ethical implications.**

    Corporate biotechnology is also aligning itself with AI in an effort to tap into the current tsunami of AI investment.

    This is computers deciding how to edit humans.

8.  **Biotech companies are exploiting the food sector by introducing bio-edited synthetic ingredients and processing aids without robust safety testing, relying on industry-certified "Generally Recognised As Safe" principles.**

    Meanwhile, in the food sector, biotechnology companies are flying under the radar, profiting through the introduction of biotechnology food processing aids and additives, along with bio-edited synthetic copies of natural ingredients where any real requirement for safety testing has been removed.

    They have convinced regulators that industry-certified GRAS (Generally Recognised As Safe) principles will be sufficient in the food processing sector.

9.  **The New Zealand Gene Technology Bill is criticized for deregulating biotechnology experimentation, promoting the false principle of inherent safety, and lacking essential labelling requirements due to industry lobbying.**

    The direction being promoted by the New Zealand Gene Technology Bill amounts to the deregulation of biotechnology experimentation, along with acceptance of the false principle that biotechnology is inherently safe and equivalent to natural processes.

    The absence of labelling requirements in the Bill is the result of intense lobbying by the biotechnology sector.

10. **The pandemic's failures are attributed to biotechnology experimentation and a disregard for public health and safety testing by multinational food, pharmacy, and biotech companies.**

    The covid-19 virus emerged from biotechnology experimentation and covid-19 vaccinations emerged from a biotech world of hype and hope that was not founded in reality.

    Incomplete science, along with a disregard for safety testing and public health on the part of multinational food, pharmacy and biotech companies and their owners and principal investors, bear the main burden of responsibility for the 30 million lives lost during the pandemic.

11. **Rejecting the Gene Technology Bill would allow New Zealand to position itself as a leader in the global market for healthy natural products and maintain its "clean green image."**

    By rejecting the Gene Technology Bill, we will be cementing a leading place for New Zealand in the rapidly growing global market for healthy natural foods, cosmetics and medicines.

    We will continue to stand apart from the crowded world stage and chart our own course of health, self-sufficiency and common sense.

12. **The New Zealand Bill of Rights should be strengthened, consumer choice protected, and experimentation on living organisms' germlines, including gain-of-function research, should be outlawed.**

    The New Zealand Bill of Rights should be elevated to a constitutional principle along with appropriate clauses protecting consumer choice.

    Biotechnology experimentation on the germlines of living organisms needs to be outlawed.

13. **The Exposé emphasizes its reliance on reader support to provide "honest, reliable, investigative journalism" in the face of government and Big Tech attempts to silence it.**

    The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help….

    Your Government & Big Tech organisations try to silence & shut down The Expose.

VII. Trump as ‘Myth’ is understood in Moscow. They reciprocate By Alastair Crooke 1. Trump's political career is described as having a "Mythic" quality, making it difficult to understand through conventional political terms.

   **_Trump as ‘Myth’ Is Understood in Moscow. They Reciprocate_**.

    **_By Alastair Crooke_**.

    Trump’s ascent to a portion of the ‘Mythic’ has become only too evident.

    It’s becoming difficult even for the most dyed-in-the-wool rationalist to go on believing that Trump’s political career can be understood in the prosaic terms of ‘politics as usual’.

2.  **John Greer and Carl Jung are cited to explain Trump's "extraordinary grip on the collective imagination," linking it to archetypes like 'the Shadow' and the ancient god Wotan.**

    This latter dimension that gives Trump “ *his extraordinary grip on the collective imagination of our time* ”, Greer suggests.

    Jung pointed out in his prescient 1936 essay Wotan, that much of Hitler’s power over the collective mind of Europe came boiling up out of the realms of myth and archetype.

3.  **Putin reportedly gave careful consideration to the psychology behind Trump's meeting request, treating him with significant deference and respect at the Anchorage summit.**

    Putin seemingly paid due attention to the *psychology* underlying Trump’s sudden request to meet.

    The Russians treated Trump in a very respectful, courteous and friendly fashion.

4.  **Trump is perceived as recognizing a "mythic peer" in Putin, contrasting with his disdainful treatment of European leaders.**

    Less noticed perhaps – but psychologically crucial – is that Trump seems to recognise in Putin a ‘mythic peer’.

    How unlike Trump’s disdainful treatment of the Euros.

5.  **Trump's respectful interaction with Putin is seen as having shattered the West's intense demonization of Russia and the "cordon sanitaire" against it.**

    Trump’s respectful conduct towards Putin has exploded the West’s radical demonisation of Russia and the cordon sanitaire erected *versus* all things Russian.

    There is no coming back from this *other turning point moment* – “the optics simply cannot be redeemed”.

6.  **Trump's shift on Ukraine is characterized as a pivot away from the "frozen conflict paradigm" towards Putin's long-term peace plan, with tariffs unmentioned.**

    What was it all about? A pivot: Kellogg’s frozen conflict paradigm is out; the Putin long-term peace plan is in; and tariffs are nowhere mentioned.

    What is clear is that Trump has decided – after some reluctance – that he has to do “do Ukraine”.

7.  **Trump faces substantial internal pressures from issues like the Epstein Affair, the Gaza massacre, and the threat of more war, which are unsettling his MAGA base and younger voters.**

    The Epstein Affair stubbornly refuses to fade away.

    These dynamics – and the economic blowback from the ‘Shock and Awe’ tariff attack to fracture BRICS – together threaten Trump’s MAGA base more directly.

8.  **The author suggests that without his base's support, Trump is likely to lose the Midterm Congressional elections.**

    Without the base behind him, Trump likely will lose the Midterm Congressional elections.

    Ultra rich donors pay, but cannot substitute.

9.  **Trump's "meagre intellectual framework" indicates he will not negotiate an end to the Ukraine war but will instead allow a Russian-imposed solution.**

    What emerged from Anchorage therefore is a meagre intellectual framework.

    Trump minimally decided to no longer stand in the way of a Russian-imposed solution for Ukraine, which is, in any case, really the only solution there can be.

10. **Trump is portrayed as a "committed Israeli Firster" and a supporter of dollar hegemony, with his pivot allowing Russia to "force" a negotiated peace in Europe to his advantage.**

    Well it was *not* because he has had some ‘Damascene conversion’.

    It is to Trump’s advantage (for now) to let Russia to ‘bring’ the EU and Zelensky to some negotiated ‘peace’ – through force.

11. **European elites are believed to be planning to sabotage Trump’s peace efforts with Putin by imposing conditionalities that ensure no agreement materializes.**

    In Europe, the élite believe that Trump’s peace outreach to Putin will fail.

    Their plan is to *ensure it fails* by playing along, whilst ensuring through their conditionalities, that no such agreement materialises.

12. **Putin is also facing internal pressures from Russians who fear an "interim Minsk 3-type outcome" instead of a decisive victory, potentially leading to future conflict.**

    Putin too, faces internal pressures: From Russians convinced that ultimately he will be forced to enter into some form of interim Minsk 3-type outcome (a series of limited ceasefires that would only exacerbate the conflict) rather than achieve ‘victory’.

    Some Russians fear that the blood that has been spent so far may prove to be but a down-payment on more blood to be expended in a few years ahead, as the West rearms Ukraine.

13. **Trump's understanding of his relationship with Putin is described as limited by a "New York real estate ‘lense’," failing to grasp geo-strategic security concerns.**

    Trump viewing his relationship with him through narrow New York real estate ‘lense’.

    He still does not seem to understand that the key question is *not* so much Ukrainian territories as it is about geo-strategic security.

14. **Putin is assessed to have successfully broken through the Western "cordon sanitaire," with Russia now recognized as a peer global power.**

    It seems however, that Putin has indeed succeeded in finding an exit out from the imposed western *cordon sanitaire*.

    Russia is acknowledged as a great power again, and Ukraine will be settled on the battlefield.

15. **There is a question of whether Netanyahu's future "genocidal rampage in Gaza" could undermine Trump's relationship with his MAGA base.**

    Will Netanyahu’s next genocidal rampage in Gaza explode the Trump ‘cope’ vis-à-vis MAGA?.

    Very possibly, yes.

VIII. Unmasking CDC Corruption: RFK's Battle To Reform Public Health By A Midwestern Doctor 1. The CDC is identified as the primary government agency undermining efforts to "Make America Healthy Again" since RFK Jr. became HHS Secretary.

   **_Unmasking CDC Corruption: RFK's Battle To Reform Public Health_**.

    **_By A Midwestern Doctor_**.

    Since RFK Jr. became H.H.S. Secretary, my contacts have shared that the CDC (one branch of the H.H.S.) has been the primary government agency sabotaging attempts to Make America Healthy Again.

2.  **Recent leadership changes at the CDC, including the firing of its director and resignations of top officials, indicate significant internal upheaval.**

    Yesterday, that all came to a head as the CDC’s director was fired a month into her job, briefly refused to leave, four other top CDC officials resigned (which coupled with five earlier retirements in March comprised a loss of about a quarter of the CDC’s senior leadership).

3.  **The author frequently suspects a "deliberate conspiracy" behind coordinated policy enactments that lead to predictable outcomes across institutions.**

    On one hand, I frequently see policies be enacted in a coordinated fashion that lead to a clear outcome, and then watch as the years play out, that every institution works in unison to ensure that outcome eventually comes to pass.

    As such, given how repetitive (and hence predictable) this process is, I tend to suspect each one is a deliberate “conspiracy” by a specific group of bad actors.

4.  **Federal agencies like the CDC are motivated to exaggerate "inconsequential pandemics" to secure increased congressional funding.**

    For example, the CDC will routinely hype up inconsequential “pandemics” each year, as this nationwide drama allows them to obtain more funding.

    The need to maintain a guaranteed stream of public **and private** funding also boxes the CDC into repeating the same (risk-free) narratives ad-nauseam so they do not offend their sponsors.

5.  **CDC corruption is described as pervasive and effectively legalized, facilitated by laws allowing it to accept unconditional gifts and the establishment of the CDC Foundation.**

    In reality, CDC corruption is so pervasive, it’s effectively been legalized.

    For example, a 1983 law authorized the CDC to accept gifts “made unconditionally…for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its function,” and in 1992 Congress established A National CDC Foundation which was quickly incorporated to “mobilize philanthropic and private-sector resources”.

6.  **The CDC Foundation, having received nearly $1 billion from corporate "donors," is accused of "money-laundering" and egregious conduct, as criticized by medical journals.**

    Since inception, the CDC Foundation has been accused of egregious conduct and has received nearly 1 billion dollars from corporate “donors”.

    “We have a professional money-laundering facility at the CDC Foundation….They accept projects from anyone on the outside”.

7.  **Corporate "donations" to the CDC Foundation are alleged to influence "impartial" guidelines, citing examples where industry funding impacted pesticide research and hepatitis C treatment recommendations.**

    These “donations” in turn often shape the “impartial” guidelines we are expected to follow.

    In 2010 the CDC foundation created a coalition which received over $26 million from major pharmaceutical companies producing hepatitis C treatments.

8.  **Anonymous CDC employees in 2016 reported that their mission was being influenced by "outside parties and rogue interests" and that staff were pressured to engage in "unacceptable behavior."**

    It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests…What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.

    Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.

9.  **The National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) was implicated in a "cover up" involving the manipulation of screening data for the Wise Woman (WW) Program.**

    Recently, the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) has been implicated in a “cover up” of inaccurate screening data for the Wise Woman (WW) Program.

    Data were clearly manipulated in irregular ways.

10. **The "zealous adherence" to vaccines being "safe and effective" is largely ideological, rooted in core beliefs within the scientific and medical communities.**

    In the case of vaccines, while clear financial conflicts of interest can be shown in certain cases (e.g., the CDC Foundation), I find the zealous adherence to all vaccines being “safe and effective” tends to be ideological in nature, as believing in vaccines has been instilled as a core belief of anyone affiliated with “science” or “medicine”.

11. **Evaluating vaccine risks and benefits is a complex task, with most relevant factors often overlooked in vaccine recommendations.**

    Each of these, let alone all of them, is quite a task to figure out, and as a result most of the relevant points for each of the above simply are not taken into account when deciding upon a vaccine recommendation.

    Instead, a few marketable points are highlighted and the assessment of the vaccine’s risks and benefits are seen through their lens.

12. **Many vaccines currently on the market are believed to have risks that clearly outweigh their benefits, and vaccines are erroneously viewed as a homogenous group.**

    As a result, many vaccines are on the market where their risks clearly and unambiguously outweigh their benefits.

    In parallel, vaccines are viewed as a homogenous entity despite some (e.g., COVID or the HPV vaccines) being much more dangerous and unnecessary than many others.

13. **The author suggests that higher-ranking public health leaders are consciously complicit in perpetuating harmful policies to protect their power, unlike lower-level staff who comply to save their careers.**

    My sense is that as one goes higher in the hierarchy, the more leaders within the public health field (e.g., the CDC) are consciously aware of what they are complicit in, but nonetheless perpetuate it to protect their power base.

    Whereas those lower in the power structure accede to the dominant narrative as doing anything else often ends careers.

IX. Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving By Caitlin Johnstone 1. Western civilization is explicitly stated as not being worth saving, challenging the assumption that society should be preserved.

   **_Western Civilization Is Not Worth Saving_**.

    **_By Caitlin Johnstone_**.

    Western civilization is not worth saving.

    I think that’s been pretty well established by now.

2.  **The author argues that Western civilization, as it currently exists with its systems and social structures, is an "indefensible disaster."**

    I am saying that this civilization, as it actually exists, is an indefensible disaster.

    Clearly.

3.  **Western civilization is condemned as genocidal, ecocidal, omnicidal, imperialist, racist, dehumanizing, degrading, dystopian, emotionally stunted, culturally vapid, and spiritually impoverished.**

    This civilization is genocidal.

    Ecocidal. Omnicidal. Imperialist. Racist. Dehumanizing. Degrading. Dystopian. Emotionally stunted. Culturally vapid. Spiritually impoverished.

4.  **Instead of protecting Western civilization from external forces, the author advocates for rescuing ourselves from it through radical transformation.**

    We don’t need to rescue western civilization from outside forces, we need to rescue ourselves from western civilization.

    The call isn’t to save western civilization from corruption by foreign cultures or new ways of thinking, but to radically transform it from the murderous, tyrannical and oppressive nightmare that it has always been.

5.  **The "western way of life" needs to end, and society must evolve away from its "McGenocide ideology" to avoid a dark future.**

    The western way of life doesn’t need to be preserved, it needs to end.

    We cannot keep poisoning our planet, our minds, our hearts and our souls with the McGenocide ideology of the western empire.

6.  **The current societal problems are seen as a direct consequence of past approaches, necessitating a complete departure from old ways.**

    Nothing about our old way of doing things has worked out for us.

    Everything we were doing before wound up bringing us to this terrible point.

7.  **The situation in Gaza is presented as a "mirror" reflecting the inherent nature and reality of Western civilization.**

    Gaza is a mirror.

    It’s showing us what we are.

8.  **The author's work is entirely reader-supported and explicitly offered for free use, including bootlegging, republishing, and translation.**

    My work is *entirely reader-supported*.

    All my work is *free to bootleg and use* in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want.

X. MUSH By Miles Mathis 1. Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket footage, particularly from Flight 10, is alleged to be "CGI fake" and not "top-shelf imagery," suggesting it's created by inexperienced staff.

   **_MUSH_**.

    Elon Mush has just posted the newest CGI fake footage of his rockets for your amusement at X.

    They tell me it isn't even top-shelf imagery, so Mush must be hiring kids just out of school to save money, like they are doing with DOGE and people like “Big Balls”.

2.  **The author, identifying as a professional artist, encourages careful examination of the footage to help identify future "fake footage and CGI" in events like a "return to the Moon."**

    I am telling you this as a professional artist.

    I encourage you to study these closely, so that you know exactly what fake footage and CGI looks like for later, when they inevitably use it for the return to the Moon in a few years.

3.  **SpaceX and Elon Musk are accused of benefiting from billions in taxpayer subsidies, making the public unknowingly fund this alleged "fraud."**

    Mush and SpaceX have benefitted from billions in subsidies, so you are paying for this fraud with your taxdollars.

    And you will be paying the hundreds of billions they siphon from the treasury to fake the next Moon landing, and already are since the Artemis project is already going.

4.  **The proliferation of "Science is Real" yard signs is interpreted as evidence that the "new science" being promoted is not genuine.**

    This is why they have to make yard signs that say “Science is Real”.

    You only need yard signs promoting things that aren't real.

XI. ☕️ INSECURE ☙ Saturday, August 30, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 By Jeff Childers 1. Corporate media is criticized for its negative reaction to Health Secretary Kennedy's appointment of Jim O'Neill as acting CDC director and the agency's reorganization.

   **_☕️ INSECURE ☙ Saturday, August 30, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠_**.

    **_By Jeff Childers_**.

    Corporate media sneers at Kennedy’s CDC pick and weeps over reorg.

    Axios ran a story headlined, “What to know about Jim O'Neill, new acting CDC director”.

2.  **Jim O'Neill, the new acting CDC director, is characterized as an ally of RFK Jr. who criticized the CDC during COVID and advocated for treatments like ivermectin.**

    O'Neill, who is not a physician, is an ally of Health Secretary Kennedy and could help him enact the Make America Health Again agenda.

    O'Neill publicly criticized the CDC during the COVID pandemic, and has pushed treatments that are not supported by scientific research, like ivermectin.

3.  **The CDC is seen as having lost its "scientific neutrality" and public trust by engaging in politics during the pandemic, thereby becoming vulnerable to political appointments.**

    During the pandemic, the CDC traded away its carefully cultivated aura of *scientific neutrality* in exchange for short-term political utility, carrying water for mandates, school closures, and shifting narratives.

    The CDC has lost whatever reserve of public trust that could have successfully insulated it.

4.  **A new law requiring Senate confirmation for future CDC directors, passed by Biden, is interpreted as an attempt to impede President Trump's future appointments.**

    But in January, a new law (passed by Biden) required all *future* CDC nominees to be confirmed.

    Undoubtedly, this was done to frustrate President Trump, helped by Republicans furious about Biden’s CDC directors.

5.  **Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo, known for his "MAHA bona fides" and Ivy League credentials, is suggested as a potential permanent CDC Director.**

    One possibility for a permanent CDC Director making the gossip rounds this week is standout Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo, who’s packed to the gills with both Ivy League credentials and MAHA bona fides.

    While serving here, he’s beaten back mandates, nixed flouride, withered covid shots, assaulted mercury fillings, and advocated for raw milk.

6.  **Governor DeSantis is proposed as a radical choice for a Supreme Court nomination by President Trump, leveraging his legal background and political experience.**

    If President Trump really wanted to rattle the rafters of the marble palace, he could *nominate Ron DeSantis to SCOTUS*.

    DeSantis is a Harvard-trained lawyer and former Navy JAG.

7.  **A federal appellate court's decision to strike down Trump's tariffs, based on its assessment that his "reasoning" did not constitute an "actual" emergency, is criticized as judicial overreach.**

    A federal appellate court upholds ruling striking down Trump's tariffs.

    President Trump’s *reasoning* did not constitute an *actual* emergency and thus exceeded his authority.

8.  **The appellate judges are criticized for imposing their own interpretation of "emergency" despite the lack of statutory definition and the prolonged nature of past "emergencies."**

    The appellate judges substituted their own assessments of whether our $32 trillion debt and the money flowing like greased water to most other countries constitutes a “real” emergency.

    Although “emergency” is undefined by statute, and, given the pandemic experience, emergencies can last forever.

9.  **Trump's cancellation of Kamala Harris's extended Secret Service detail is portrayed as an act of "liberal fury" and evidence of "Democrat two-tiered justice."**

    Trump cancels Kamala Harris’ Secret Service detail that was extended by undisclosed Biden order.

    In other words, it’s all just more Democrat *two-tiered justice*.

10. **The undisclosed nature of Biden's order extending Harris's Secret Service protection is highlighted, and CNN's justification based on her race and gender is dismissed.**

    The complication seems to be that, at some unknown time, Biden’s busy autopen signed a secret (“previously undisclosed”) order giving Kamala a year’s extension.

    CNN struggled for itself to justify the secret extension, lamely landing on the excuse that “she was the first woman and first Black woman in the role”.

11. **Florida's educational reforms, which reallocated public school funding to parents choosing alternative education, are credited with causing a "freefall" in public school enrollment in "woke" counties.**

    During the pandemic, Florida led an educational revolution.

    It passed a first-in-the-nation law shifting money away from public schools to parents who chose alternative educational paths, including homeschooling.

12. **"Woke school boards" in Broward and Orange counties are implicitly blamed for significant drops in student enrollment, leading to considerations of school closures.**

    Broward County is one of the biggest blue counties in the Sunshine State, and its primary school registrations are in *freefall*.

    For some reason, neither article considered the common factor between Orange and Broward counties: *woke school boards*.

13. **The exodus of students from public schools results in lost state funding, forcing districts to consider closing schools and hire consultants to "recruit families back."**

    Under the state’s new “parent’s rights” laws, when students leave public school, they take their state funding with them.

    Broward, for instance, is considering closing *thirty-four* schools.

14. **The "revolution in education" in Florida is characterized by shrinking "blue public schools," re-tooling "red public schools," and exploding private school enrollment.**

    Blue public schools are shrinking, red public schools are re-tooling, and private schools are exploding.

    It is nothing less than a revolution in education.

15. **School funding gaps resulting from student flight are viewed as "terrific news" that promotes competition and exposes the politicization of public schools.**

    In short, these school funding gaps aren’t disasters, they’re terrific news.

    The politicization of public schools has been exposed.

This report synthesizes critical perspectives on contemporary societal, economic, health, and geopolitical issues, drawing directly from the provided sources. It adopts a structured, detailed, and comprehensive approach, akin to a McKinsey-type analysis, to present the multifaceted critiques and proposed solutions found within the sources.

Assessment of Contemporary Societal and Geopolitical Dynamics: A Critical Perspective

Executive Summary

This report provides a critical synthesis of various challenges impacting contemporary society, ranging from social and cultural movements to global economic control, public health integrity, and geopolitical dynamics. Key themes identified across the sources include the perception of transgenderism as a social engineering experiment and a component of a "woke" agenda aimed at political control and the destruction of perceived enemies. The sources also extensively detail the alleged rise of Technocracy, described as a scientific operation for social engineering to control production and distribution, eliminate private property, and implement systems like energy credits and conditional universal basic income tied to social credit scores. This system is further enabled by tokenization, which converts assets into digital tokens, allowing for centralized control, tracking, and censorship.

In the realm of public health, the report highlights widespread corruption within institutions like the CDC, attributed to financial ties with bio-pharmaceutical companies and an ideological fixation on certain narratives, particularly regarding vaccines. The biotechnology industry is depicted as facing failure due to adverse effects from mRNA COVID-19 injections, with attempts to bypass safety testing and profit from lightly regulated sectors. Geopolitically, the sources examine the "mythic" political influence of Donald Trump in international relations, particularly concerning the Ukraine conflict and tariffs. Finally, a fundamental critique of Western Civilization itself is presented, viewing it as an "indefensible disaster" requiring radical transformation rather than preservation. The report concludes by underscoring the urgent need for critical awareness, local control, and a re-evaluation of current systems to counter these perceived threats to freedom and well-being.

1. Introduction

The current societal and geopolitical landscape is characterized by a complex interplay of emerging social movements, technological advancements with profound implications for individual liberties, challenges to established public health paradigms, and shifting international power dynamics. This report aims to dissect these critical areas by drawing on a collection of contemporary analyses, primarily from alternative media sources. The intent is to provide an extended, detailed, and comprehensive overview of the concerns articulated within these sources, offering insights into their interpretations of ongoing global and domestic shifts. The analysis will delve into perceived agendas, the mechanisms of their implementation, their societal impacts, and the various counter-narratives and proposed solutions.

2. Critical Analysis of Social and Cultural Movements

2.1 Transgenderism and the "Woke" Agenda

The sources present a strong critique of contemporary transgender activism, characterizing it not as a civil rights movement but as a "social engineering experiment" and a "covert war for political control". The individuals involved in trans-activism are labeled as "radical zealots hellbent on the destruction of their enemies," with anyone believing in logic, objective reality, biological science, and moral imperative being considered an enemy. This perspective frames the LGBT movement as less about equal rights and more about political dominance.

2.2 Indoctrination and Political Control

A central strategy attributed to the trans movement is the "indoctrination of our children". It is argued that because activists "rarely have any children of their own," they "must groom future generations to their cause" to perpetuate their numbers. The sources claim that if indoctrination fails, there is a willingness to engage in violence against children. Furthermore, efforts by conservatives to prevent children from receiving puberty blockers or "body parts mutilated" are seen by the transgender community as akin to "extermination" or "genocide". This narrative suggests a profound ideological conflict, where opposing viewpoints are framed as existential threats.

2.3 Perceived Ideological Violence and "Trans Terrorism"

The concept of "transgender fatigue" is introduced, stemming from events such as the alleged attack by a "leftist transgender activist named 'Robin Westman' (originally Robert Westman, a man pretending to be a woman)" who reportedly murdered two children and injured 17 others at a Catholic school and church in Minneapolis before killing himself. This event is explicitly labeled as "trans terrorism, pure and simple," with the assertion that transgender activism is the "core influence" in such shootings. The attacker's writings, which allegedly reveal "violent fantasies about killing children" and a "clear hatred of Christians, conservatives and Donald Trump," are cited as evidence that "trans ideology...equipped Robert Westman with the excuses to rationalize the killing of helpless kids". The sources dismiss claims by "Democrat leaders" that such actions are separate from beliefs, arguing that "these expressions are normal within the transgender community; they argue in favor of violence against conservatives on a regular basis". Attempts by media to frame Westman as "right-wing" due to alleged antisemitism or mentions of "guntuber Brandon Herrera" are dismissed as "fake out[s]" designed to distract from "Westman's full bore leftist cultism".

2.4 Proposed Solutions: Reintroducing Asylums and Social Shunning

The sources contend that "transgender ideology is a convenient facade for the mentally ill". It is argued that "the vast majority of trans people are frauds," donning an "activist costume" due to being "rebels desperate for any cause to latch onto," with "legitimate gender dysphoria" being "exceedingly rare". This ideology is seen as "weaponized by globalists and governments" since 2018, appealing to individuals with "preexisting emotional disturbances" and narcissists drawn to "moral and scientific relativism".

The proposed solution to these perceived problems is explicit and drastic: "It’s time to bring back the asylums and lock up the crazies". This is not presented as a novel idea but as a "mantra for many people in 2025," citing previous discussions on the advantages of asylums in reducing crime. The sources declare that "the time for discourse is over. The time for compromise and compassion is over. The time for brutal ignominy is at hand". It is suggested that "these people need to be laughed at, mocked and shamed out of existence," and "every aspect of trans activism needs to be shunned and erased from our society". Those who express clear threats of violence should be "locked up as they would have been 70 years ago". Ultimately, the "cancer of wokeness" is expected to disappear, but the immediate threat requires direct action: either "throw them up in padded rooms or we boot them from the country".

3. The Emerging Threat of Technocracy and Digital Control

3.1 Definition and Historical Context of Technocracy

Technocracy is defined as "the science of social engineering, aiming to control the entire system of producing and distributing goods and services". Its core tenets include the elimination of private property, politics, and finance. This concept was first devised in the 1930s at Columbia University by scientists and engineers, who believed that private property was unnecessary and advocated for a global common trust for goods and services, with technocrats deciding each citizen's share of continental wealth. Although the public rejected this system in the past, it is asserted that the "same Technocratic plan devised in the 1930s is being implemented today," now facilitated by advanced technology like AI.

3.2 Mechanisms of Control: AI, Energy Credits, UBI, and Social Credit Systems

The contemporary implementation of technocracy leverages AI as a "basic tool". A key aspect of this plan is a shift from a supply-and-demand economic system to an "energy credit-based system". This system is closely linked to Universal Basic Income (UBI), which Elon Musk (whose grandfather was head of Technocracy Inc. in Canada) is said to promote as "high universal income". However, UBI is presented as conditional and tied to a social credit score, similar to China's system. This means that compliance with "laws, programmes and social rules" would determine access to "tokens and access to services and places," with non-compliance leading to "demerits".

3.3 The Role of Tokenization in Centralized Control

A central feature of technocracy is tokenization, defined as "the process of converting assets, rights or identities into digital tokens on blockchain or similar systems". This process is deemed crucial for creating a "control grid" that enables "surveillance, behavioural control and elite dominance". Experts argue that tokenization, particularly through Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and regulated stablecoins, allows for assets to be "centrally controlled and issued," "programmed," "tracked," and "censored". The ambition is to tokenise "every asset on Earth," including stocks, bonds, and commodities, giving technocrats the power to prevent individuals from using or moving their assets if their behavior is not permitted. An example given is the remote shutdown of an electric car if it were tokenized. This shift is seen as leading to a loss of freedom and equity, as tokenization eliminates the ability to leverage equity, which would be devastating for small businesses and is aligned with plans to consolidate power in "big corporations, the conglomerates, the public-private partnerships with the NGOs".

3.4 Legal Frameworks and Financial Surveillance

The groundwork for technocracy has been laid legally over several decades. Recent legislative actions in the US, such as the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act) and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, establish regulatory frameworks for stablecoins and digital assets that are centralized and managed by third parties. While the CBDC Anti-Surveillance Act prohibits Federal Reserve banks from offering CBDCs directly to individuals, the overall trend is seen as an expansion of existing financial surveillance. It is noted that "our money is already digital" and "already programmable and censorable," but tokenization "just adds more to this," providing "more instantaneous control over all of our assets". The implosion of the current system, potentially initiated by a sovereign debt crisis, is anticipated to create a "free-for-all" that technocrats, with their existing databases and monitoring capabilities, are prepared to exploit.

3.5 Counter-Strategies: Localism and Alternative Digital Solutions

To counter this looming threat, the sources advocate for bringing control back to the local level, emphasizing privacy and trustworthy transactions with alternative forms of currency. The ability to self-govern is presented as a defense against tyranny, rooted in an understanding of philosophical truths like God-given inalienable rights. Solutions are envisioned as a variety of "incubate[d]...projects" that can be used locally and globally, such as a "privacy-backed stablecoin" like "Freedom Dollar" and a "global P2P [peer-to-peer] healthcare marketplace". Bitcoin is explicitly rejected as a solution, due to an alleged "technocratic takeover of Bitcoin" between 2015 and 2017, with its current functionality likened to carbon credits and its proponents tied to groups like the Bilderberg group, traditional finance, intelligence agencies, and MIT (with funding from Jeffrey Epstein). Personal strategies include minimizing online activity, refusing cryptocurrencies, keeping a low digital footprint, and avoiding facial recognition technology.

4. Scrutiny of Public Health and the Biotechnology Industry

4.1 Critiques of Modern Nutritional Science and Dietary Recommendations

The sources express profound skepticism towards modern "nutritional science," labeling it as "nutrition ideology" that is "dysfunctional and backwards". This field is accused of being clueless and designed to "gatekeep the secret of the real human species-appropriate natural diet". A central argument is that "eating meat will 'protect' against anything, as it is our natural species-appropriate food," with humans classified as "obligate hyper carnivores". Conversely, "anything plant-based is full of toxins and contaminants," including vegan protein powders, which are described as "extremely toxic and unhealthy" and underperforming in muscle building. Ultra-processed foods are acknowledged as "extremely harmful," but are seen as a "smokescreen for the real problem," which is that "anything processed and even unprocessed plant-based is not far off in comparison, and some might even be worse". The modern plant-based and processed diet is blamed for weight gain, declining health, and emerging diseases. Furthermore, "all fortified supplements/foods are toxic" and will "not support any kind of recovery," with artificial supplements containing "fake toxic inorganic compounds" being pushed by the "pathetic medical establishment" instead of "real animal-based foods with bioavailable, organic and bioactive nutrients". Critiques also extend to "science" venturing into "science fiction" regarding human evolution, particularly regarding apes. The author, Joachim Bartoll, recounts healing his own cancer, life-long asthma, and allergies since 2018 through an animal-based diet and studying alternative medical theories like The Terrain Theory and German New Medicine.

4.2 The "Failure" of the Biotech Industry and mRNA Injections

The "trillion-dollar biotech industry" is declared to be "facing failure" primarily "because of covid injections". The industry, valued at US$1.74 trillion, is criticized for the "high rate of adverse effects and excess deaths associated with mRNA covid-19 injections". It is argued that the "mRNA covid-19 vaccination was the flagship product" designed to usher in a "biotechnology era," but it "did not stop the spread of covid-19 infection and its administration has been accompanied by a rate of reported adverse effects unprecedented in history". Initial claims of "saving millions of lives" have been "debunked" and "robustly questioned". As a result, flagship biotech companies are reportedly failing, with companies like Arena Bioworks experiencing significant layoffs, particularly in cell and gene therapy work, which was their "flagship programme". The covid-19 virus itself is suggested to have "emerged from biotechnology experimentation".

4.3 Allegations of CDC Corruption and Industry Influence

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is depicted as suffering from "pervasive corruption" that has been "effectively legalized". A 1983 law allowing the CDC to accept "unconditional gifts" and the establishment of a National CDC Foundation in 1992, which mobilizes "philanthropic and private-sector resources," are cited as mechanisms for this corruption. The CDC Foundation is accused of being a "professional money-laundering facility," having received nearly $1 billion from corporate "donors". Examples of alleged influence include a firm performing research for the pesticide industry funding a study to prove pesticide safety, Coca-Cola contributing over $1 million while receiving advice on lobbying the WHO to curtail efforts against added sugars, and Roche contributing to a flu campaign promoting antiviral medicine (Tamiflu, manufactured by Roche). These "donations" are said to "often shape the 'impartial' guidelines we are expected to follow," as seen in the development of hepatitis C treatment recommendations by a committee with ties to pharmaceutical companies. Key funders of the CDC Foundation reportedly include major vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, J&J), tech companies (Facebook, Google, Microsoft, PayPal), and vaccine organizations like GAVI and the Gates Foundation. In 2016, CDC employees anonymously complained of their mission being "influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests" and being "intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right". Specific examples include misrepresentation of screening data for the Wise Woman (WW) Program and diversion of domestic funding for global health research.

4.4 The Ideological Fixation within Public Health

Beyond corruption, there is an "ideological fixation" on the belief that "all vaccines are 'safe and effective'" within the public health field. This belief is described as a "core belief of anyone affiliated with 'science' or 'medicine'". This bias is said to lead to a worldview where "all 'the evidence' supports their position, even if a great deal of it does not". The complex task of evaluating vaccine risks and benefits (including infection rates, illness severity, vaccine effectiveness, duration, resistance, population-wide mutations, alternatives, acute/chronic reactions, and at-risk populations) is often oversimplified. Instead, a "few marketable points are highlighted," and "pieces of evidence which challenge the predetermined conclusion (e.g., evidence of vaccine harm) are dismissed and filtered away". Consequently, it is argued that "many vaccines are on the market where their risks clearly and unambiguously outweigh their benefits," with some (like COVID or HPV vaccines) deemed "much more dangerous and unnecessary than many others". While those lower in the hierarchy may adhere to dominant narratives to protect their careers, "leaders within the public health field (e.g., the CDC) are consciously aware of what they are complicit in, but nonetheless perpetuate it to protect their power base".

4.5 Call for Enhanced Safety and Regulation

The biotech industry is accused of "trying to bypass safety testing and regulation" and is "profiting from lightly regulated areas such as animal veterinary care and biotechnology food processing". This includes applying "exotic mRNA gene therapies to the lightly regulated animal veterinary sector, polluting the food chain," and introducing "biotechnology food processing aids and additives" and "bio-edited synthetic copies of natural ingredients" under "industry-certified GRAS (Generally Recognised As Safe) principles," which assert these methods are safe by definition. It is feared that novel damaging illnesses will arise from "mass gene editing of millions of life forms under AI computer control".

The New Zealand Gene Technology Bill is criticized for promoting "deregulation of biotechnology experimentation" and accepting the "false principle that biotechnology is inherently safe and equivalent to natural processes," including provisions for emergency authorization of biotech medicines. The absence of labeling requirements in the Bill is attributed to intense lobbying, as the public is "rightly suspicious of gene editing". The Bill is seen as "anti-science, anti-safety and anti-life" and ignoring harm to public health. The sources advocate for rejecting such legislation, requiring "upgraded safety testing and labelling rules," outlawing "biotechnology experimentation on the germlines of living organisms," and prohibiting "gain-of-function research or editing traditional food sources".

5. Geopolitical Landscape and Domestic Political Dynamics

5.1 The "Mythic" Presidency of Donald Trump and International Relations

Donald Trump's political career is described as having ascended to a "portion of the 'Mythic'," suggesting that it cannot be understood in "prosaic terms of 'politics as usual'". He is depicted as having an "extraordinary grip on the collective imagination" due to his ability to "come back literally from everything thrown to destroy him". Trump is seen as recognizing a "mythic peer" in Vladimir Putin, treating him with "huge deference and respect," unlike his "disdainful treatment of the Euros". This respectful conduct is said to have "exploded the West’s radical demonisation of Russia and the cordon sanitaire erected versus all things Russian," acknowledging Russia as a "peer global power". The sources suggest a "pivot" away from Kellogg's "frozen conflict paradigm" towards a "Putin long-term peace plan" regarding Ukraine.

5.2 Foreign Policy: Ukraine, Russia, Gaza, and Economic Pressures

Despite this perceived pivot, Trump faces "huge pressures". He is seen as having "to do 'do Ukraine'," while being "trapped...into supporting the Israeli slaughter" in Gaza, which is causing revulsion among younger voters. Economic blowback from "Shock and Awe' tariff attack to fracture BRICS" also threatens Trump's MAGA base. The article from LewRockwell.com discusses Trump's tariffs on various goods, as he talks with Mike Adams about currency printing, flag burning, and wars. The "meagre intellectual framework" from a recent summit is seen as Trump minimally agreeing "to no longer stand in the way of a Russian-imposed solution for Ukraine". His "pivot" is not attributed to a "Damascene conversion," as he remains a "committed Israeli Firster" and pursues "dollar hegemony" amidst an "American ‘bubble economy’ begins to unravel". Trump's strategy is seen as letting Russia "bring" the EU and Zelensky to "negotiated 'peace' – through force". His part of the bargain with Putin reportedly involves "managing the European ruling strata (mainly by flooding the info-sphere with contradictory noise)" and "containing the American hawks (by pretending he is wooing Russia away from China)".

5.3 Domestic Political Conflicts: Judicial Overreach and Executive Power

Domestically, the sources highlight ongoing political battles. Trump's tariffs have been challenged by federal appellate courts, with a ruling striking them down because the court disagreed with his "rationale for the emergency," stating it did not constitute an "actual" emergency. This is interpreted as judges being "in his head now," substituting their own assessments of what constitutes an emergency, despite the undefined nature of "emergency" in statute and the recent experience of long-lasting "pandemics".

Another instance of political conflict involves Trump's decision to cancel Kamala Harris’s Secret Service detail, which had been "extended by undisclosed Biden order". This move, which progressive critics deemed "unfair" and an "act of revenge," is framed as Trump upholding the law, as vice presidents are legally entitled to only six months of protection after their terms. The previous extension by President Biden's "secret ('previously undisclosed') order" for Kamala Harris, reportedly without stated reason, is contrasted with the fact that former Vice President Mike Pence received no such extension, despite facing threats. This is labeled as "Democrat two-tiered justice".

5.4 Media Narratives and "Two-Tiered Justice"

A recurring theme is the critique of the media. Corporate media is accused of "sneer[ing]" at Kennedy's CDC pick and "weep[ing] over reorg". The media's portrayal of the CDC's "traditional institutional independence" is dismissed as "whining about 'norms and customs'," especially since the CDC "traded away its carefully cultivated aura of scientific neutrality in exchange for short-term political utility" during the pandemic. The media is also accused of using "fake footage and CGI" for events like SpaceX rocket launches, claiming it's "not even top-shelf imagery," suggesting a deliberate "conjob" funded by taxpayers. This aligns with a broader distrust of "mainstream media disinformation".

5.5 Educational Shift: "Woke" Boards and Parental Choice

An "educational revolution" is reported in Florida, driven by a law that shifts money from public schools to parents choosing alternative educational paths, including homeschooling. This has led to a "freefall in Broward school enrollment" and significant drops in Orange County, attributed to "woke school boards". These enrollment declines, exacerbated by the end of federal COVID funding, are creating "budget gaps" and forcing school boards to consider closing multiple schools. In contrast, "red counties" are experiencing "positive educational news," with some school boards skipping official recognition of Pride Month and new parochial schools being built. The "politicization of public schools has been exposed," and the competition fostered by parental choice is seen as beneficial.

6. Fundamental Critique of Western Civilization

6.1 Identification of Systemic Failures

One source presents a stark, fundamental critique of Western Civilization, asserting that it "is not worth saving" and has been "pretty well established by now" as an "indefensible disaster". The focus is not on external threats but on the inherent flaws within the civilization itself. Western society is characterized as:

• Genocidal

• Ecocidal

• Omnicidal

• Imperialist

• Racist

• Dehumanizing

• Degrading

• Dystopian

• Emotionally stunted

• Culturally vapid

• Spiritually impoverished

• Intellectually enslaved

The way Westerners live, treat each other, and treat people on other continents, along with "all the systems and social structures that give rise to the way things are," are deemed unacceptable and in need of fundamental change. The situation in Gaza is presented as a "mirror," reflecting "what we are. What we have always been".

6.2 The Need for Radical Transformation

The argument is that "we don’t need to rescue western civilization from outside forces, we need to rescue ourselves from western civilization". The call is not to preserve "our way of life" from immigrants or "the trans agenda" but to "radically transform it from the murderous, tyrannical and oppressive nightmare that it has always been". The "western way of life doesn’t need to be preserved, it needs to end" because "everything we were doing before wound up bringing us to this terrible point". The assertion is that "we cannot keep poisoning our planet, our minds, our hearts and our souls with the McGenocide ideology of the western empire" and that instead of going backwards or staying still, "we need to evolve".

7. Conclusion and Outlook

The comprehensive review of the provided sources reveals a prevailing sentiment of deep dissatisfaction and alarm regarding the current trajectory of global and domestic affairs. A common thread across these diverse critiques is the identification of powerful, often concealed, forces acting to reshape society and control individuals, whether through social engineering (transgenderism/wokeness), economic manipulation (technocracy, tokenization, CBDCs), or institutional corruption (CDC, biotech industry). These forces are frequently depicted as being driven by "radical zealots" or "globalists".

The sources advocate for a radical shift in perspective and action. This includes a rejection of mainstream narratives and scientific consensus, particularly in public health and nutrition, in favor of alternative viewpoints that often emphasize natural, animal-based diets and skepticism towards modern medical interventions. There is a strong call for increased local control, individual autonomy, and a return to what are perceived as fundamental truths and values. The proposed solutions, such as reintroducing asylums, shunning "woke" activism, rejecting biotech legislation, and fostering local economic and social structures, are often drastic and reflect a belief that traditional methods of discourse and compromise are no longer viable.

The collective outlook from these sources is one of imminent peril for existing societal structures and freedoms, necessitating urgent and decisive action to resist what is portrayed as an encroaching, totalitarian control system. This system is seen as fundamentally at odds with individual liberty, objective reality, and even the natural order of life itself. The future, as presented in these sources, hinges on whether individuals and communities can "wake up," organize, and implement counter-strategies to dismantle these perceived control mechanisms and reclaim agency over their lives and societies.