5-13-25 DailyBriefs.info   PODCAST
Surprise Surprise Bibi Discovers Secret Iranian Nuclear Weapons Facility in Iran by Mike Whitney

1. Iran is reportedly using its influence to de-escalate regional conflicts to improve chances of a nuclear deal with the Trump administration. Two Iranian officials indicated that Tehran encouraged the Houthis to stop targeting U.S. assets, aligning with Iran’s interest in de-escalating tensions to advance nuclear negotiations. This move is seen as an effort by Iran to reduce fighting and open critical shipping lanes, hoping it will improve the chances of striking a deal with Trump on the nuclear issue.

2. Israel is perceived as needing to sabotage US-Iran nuclear negotiations to maintain its regional power ambitions. If Trump makes a deal with Iran, Israel’s dream of defeating Iran and emerging as the dominant power in the region becomes impossible. Therefore, Israel must preemptively sabotage the nuclear negotiations to ensure US support in any future conflict with Iran.

3. Recent suspicious incidents are suggested to be Israeli attempts to derail the nuclear talks. Less than 48 hours after Trump made a deal with the Houthis, two incidents occurred: the arrest of eight Iranian men in the UK suspected of plotting an attack, and a Fox News report on an alleged undisclosed Iranian nuclear facility. These events are presented as lacking verifiable facts and aimed at portraying Iranians negatively to undermine trust in them regarding nuclear energy.

4. The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which reported the alleged secret nuclear facility, is described as an untrustworthy entity. The MEK, the leading faction of NCRI, is a group that was on the U.S. State Department’s list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations until 2012, and the author states that nothing they say can be trusted. This context is provided to question the credibility of the claims about the new nuclear facility.

5. US intelligence agencies and the IAEA have consistently stated that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program and has complied with the NPT. Iran has played by the rules from the very beginning and has remained strictly in compliance with its treaty obligations, being transparent and cooperative throughout. This contrasts with the allegations of a secret weapons facility.

6. The Iranian Foreign Minister anticipates "false flag" operations or sabotage attempts by Israel to provoke a response and derail diplomacy. Seyed Abbas Araghchi stated that their security services are on high alert due to past instances of attempted sabotage and assassination operations designed to provoke a legitimate response. He also mentioned that those seeking to manipulate public opinion might come up with fantastical claims and props like scary-looking satellite images.

Exposed: The multi-Billion-Dollar Illusion of 'HIV' by Neville Hodgkinson

1. A group of scientists, for nearly 40 years, has challenged the theory that HIV causes AIDS, and even questioned the existence of HIV itself. Their critique goes beyond questioning HIV as the cause of Aids, asserting that ‘HIV’ has never even been proved to exist. This perspective has been largely silenced, similar to how critics of Covid-19 narratives were treated.

2. The author, a former medical correspondent, initially promulgated the HIV/AIDS narrative but later came to believe it was a mishandled and exploited crisis. He describes his painful journey of discovery and how he faced condemnation for reporting on scientific challenges to the HIV theory in the 1990s. His book on the controversy became an early victim of 'cancel culture'.

3. Biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos developed a theory that AIDS is caused by oxidative stress from various toxins, not a virus. Her theory implicated a variety of toxins, all known to be powerful oxidants, such as injected drugs, nitrite inhalants, repeated infections, and anally deposited sperm, as the cause of immune deficiency. She argued that biochemical phenomena arising from this oxidative process were misinterpreted as evidence of a new virus.

4. The HIV test was never validated for diagnostic purposes against purified virus particles and detects antibodies to proteins not definitively proven to belong to HIV. The test kits were initially licensed to protect blood supplies by screening for abnormalities, but their use expanded despite lacking validation for diagnosing HIV infection. People test positive because they have antibodies to proteins falsely designated ‘HIV’ antigens, a designation made based on the misinterpretation of reverse transcriptase activity.

5. The claim of sequencing a full-length HIV genome is also questioned, as the genetic material was not distinguished from other cellular genetic material originating from retroviral particles. Genetic sequences taken to be the virus’s genome were of a type called messenger RNA (mRNA) which is non-specific and found in cells, not necessarily from a distinct retrovirus. The Perth group argues that nowhere in scientific literature is there proof of the HIV genome based on extraction of RNA from purified retroviral particles.

6. The author draws parallels between the handling of HIV/AIDS and the COVID-19 crisis, citing fear, financial interests, and suppression of dissenting scientific views in both cases. In both instances, misinformation by powerful agencies, huge grants from Big Pharma, and the influence of "philanthropic" foundations fueled illusions and stifled dissent. The author suggests that understanding the alleged mistakes in the HIV/AIDS narrative can provide insights into the mishandling of COVID-19.

US GOVERNMENT BUYS OFFICE OF POPE WITH TAXPAYERS’ DOLLARS | Senator Phogbound

1. The article satirically suggests a clandestine deal between the US Vice President and the previous Pope. The fictional conversation implies that the US government, under President Trump, discovered the Catholic Church received $3 Billion in PPP loans under false pretenses. This discovery is used as leverage over the Pope.

2. The Pope is portrayed as offering to step down and ensure an American successor in exchange for avoiding extradition and fraud charges. In the satirical exchange, the Pope suggests turning off his respirator and arranging for the next Pope to be an American to save the Church from embarrassment. This implies a quid pro quo where the US government influences the papal succession.

3. The PPP loans are highlighted as a point of contention, with the Catholic Church accused of fraudulently obtaining them. The Vice President, in the fictional dialogue, states that the loans were meant for small businesses, and the Roman Catholic Church, being the largest business in the world, was not eligible. The Pope is depicted as claiming immunity due to his holy status.

4. The article humorously critiques President Trump's alleged lack of attention to governmental details and his vanity. Vice President Vance is quoted saying the President doesn't get into details much because he spends a lot of time looking in the mirror and worrying about bad hair days. This is a jab at Trump's perceived priorities.

5. A specific request is made for the new Pope to adopt the name "Leo," referencing Pope Leo X's alleged statement about the profitability of the "fable of Christ." The Vice President supposedly asks for this favor because Pope Leo X is his favorite for "telling the truth" about the financial benefits of Christianity to the Church. This serves as a cynical commentary on religious institutions and their motivations.

6. The piece is a satirical commentary on perceived corruption, political maneuvering, and the intersection of religion and state power. Through its fictional narrative, the article critiques the US government's actions, the Catholic Church's financial dealings, and the process of papal selection, suggesting they are driven by self-interest and power plays rather than piety or public good.

Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf

1. A significant conflict exists among MAHA activists regarding Casey Means' nomination for Surgeon General, replacing Dr. Janette Nesheiwat. The announcement on May 7, 2025, that "wellness influencer" Casey Means would be the nominee sparked outrage, particularly as Dr. Nesheiwat was found to have misrepresented her medical credentials. Nicole Shanahan expressed surprise that a prior assurance from RFK Jr. about the Means siblings not serving in HHS was disregarded.

2. Dr. Naomi Wolf argues that Casey and Calley Means represent Silicon Valley's interests, specifically the desire to exploit valuable government-held private medical data. She states that the Means siblings appear to be tasked with representing Big Tech’s interests in the rush to exploit the gold mine that is pristine, valuable data, especially private medical data, currently held securely by the US Government. This aligns with her earlier warnings about Silicon Valley oligarchs targeting this data.

3. Casey Means' company, Levels.com, is presented as a vehicle for Silicon Valley to harvest biometric data, with its high valuation and funding from major tech players being suspicious. Levels.com, which tracks glucose levels via an under-skin filament, received substantial funding from entities like Andreessen Horowitz, Google, and SpaceX founders, despite Casey Means having no prior tech startup success. Wolf questions the $313 million valuation for a company with seemingly low US user engagement and no groundbreaking proprietary technology.

4. Dr. Wolf highlights a pattern of the Trump administration potentially being manipulated by Silicon Valley, risking national security and data privacy. She points to incidents like Elon Musk's access to government data and the Signal scandal as examples where the administration seemed unaware of or unable to prevent significant security breaches. The firing or resignation of US Digital Service tech experts who could have warned against such risks is also noted.

5. The business models of both Casey and Calley Means' companies are based on data accumulation, particularly biometric and health data. Calley Means’ company Truemed sells apps for mental and sleep tracking and gut microbiome analysis, while Casey Means’ Levels.com secures glucose and food tracking data. Wolf sees their sudden emergence as grassroots medical freedom activists as a facade for these data-harvesting objectives.

6. Dr. Wolf expresses dismay that the MAHA movement is being told to accept a nominee whose narrative and company background raise serious questions and appear to serve Big Tech interests. She is upset that the concerns of the MAHA base are being dismissed and that they are expected to support a nominee whose company's valuation and user demographics suggest artificial inflation and alignment with powerful Silicon Valley entities aiming to monetize private data.

Would Americans Trade Liberty for Security? by Jacob G. Hornberger

1. Americans have already traded essential liberty for temporary safety in numerous areas. The author argues that this trade-off has been ongoing, citing the government's powers of assassination and indefinite detention, the war on drugs, and welfare programs as examples. For the first 150 years of America's existence, the federal government lacked such extensive powers.

2. Fear has been the primary motivator for Americans to cede their liberties. Fear of communists led to the rise of the national-security state, fear of drug addiction led to drug prohibition and loss of privacy, and fear of destitution led to the welfare state and income tax. Similarly, fear of terrorists after 9/11 led to further erosion of liberty through acts like the USA Patriot Act.

3. The establishment of a national-security state with powers like assassination and indefinite detention signifies a fundamental loss of freedom. Even if these powers are not widely exercised, the mere fact that the government wields them is enough to nullify freedom. This is a stark contrast to the limited government envisioned by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

4. The "war on drugs" and immigration controls are further examples of sacrificing liberty for perceived safety, resulting in diminished civil liberties and a militarized police state. Americans accepted drug prohibition, which destroyed civil liberties and privacy, and a militarized immigration system due to fear of addiction and "scary entities" crossing borders.

5. Welfare state programs, funded by income tax, represent a departure from the principle of individuals keeping what they earn. Historically, Americans understood liberty to include the right to control their earnings, but fear of widespread poverty led to the acceptance of mandatory "charity" through government programs.

6. The author concludes that trading liberty for safety is a losing proposition, ultimately resulting in neither and making the government itself the biggest threat. He modifies Benjamin Franklin's quote to state, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety and will inevitably end up with neither," emphasizing that Americans have failed to secure safety from their own government.

Will Trump Follow Nixon’s IRS Road to Ruin? by James Bovard

1. President Trump has publicly called for revoking Harvard University's tax-exempt status, a move reminiscent of President Nixon's politicization of the IRS. Trump stated, "We are going to be taking away Harvard’s Tax Exempt Status," and his Treasury Department formally requested the IRS to do so. This action is compared to Nixon's use of the IRS to target political enemies.

2. Historically, the IRS has been used by various administrations (Kennedy, Nixon, Clinton, Obama) to target individuals and organizations based on their political beliefs. The article details instances like JFK's Ideological Organizations Audit Project, Nixon's Special Services Staff targeting over 10,000 entities, and the Obama IRS scandal involving conservative groups. This suggests a recurring pattern of abusing IRS power for political ends.

3. Allowing a president to control the tax status of individuals or organizations is described as a "recipe for tyranny" and a breach of IRS independence. The New York Times is quoted stating that even an attempt to change Harvard's tax status would be a drastic breach of IRS independence. The author argues that such power nullifies limits on presidential authority.

4. Trump's rationale for targeting Harvard involves its perceived "Radical Left Indoctrination" and support for "terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’," with Trump positioning himself as the arbiter of the "PUBLIC INTEREST." He claims Harvard teaches "Hate and Stupidity" and that its tax-exempt status is contingent on acting in the public interest, which he implies he has the sole prerogative to define.

5. The article warns that Trump's actions could set dangerous precedents for academic freedom and could backfire, similar to how Nixon's IRS abuses contributed to his downfall. Nixon's impeachment articles included charges of discriminatory tax audits, which swayed public opinion against him. The author suggests that "woke" ideology is not a grave enough peril to justify such overreach.

6. A distinction is made between curtailing federal funding for colleges across-the-board and politically targeting specific institutions' tax status. While ending all federal subsidies to universities might be a defensible policy, selectively revoking tax-exempt status based on ideology is presented as a violation of rights and an abuse of power.

Who Killed the Rockers and the Comedians? by Donald Jeffries

1. The author laments the decline of authentic rock and roll music from its vibrant beginnings to its current perceived state of demise. He fondly recalls the evolution of rock music from early pioneers and the British Invasion through the singer-songwriter era and New Wave, contrasting it with today's music scene. He questions whether later, more critically acclaimed music was truly more memorable than the earlier, more pop-oriented hits.

2. "Cancel culture" and changing societal norms have made it impossible for artists to create or perform songs with controversial lyrics that were acceptable in the past. The author cites examples like Randy Newman’s "Short People" and John Lennon’s "Woman is the N****r of the World," which would be universally condemned today. Elvis Costello’s "Oliver’s Army" is also mentioned as a song that can no longer be performed due to its lyrical content.

3. The author observes a significant lack of prominent white musical artists in contemporary popular music, with the field largely ceded to "DEI Black performers." He notes that other than a few exceptions like Taylor Swift, Pink, and Miley Cyrus, white artists are scarce in mainstream music, and suggests that even Grammys may now be predominantly awarded to Black artists. This is presented as a cultural shift away from the rock and roll era.

4. The author expresses disillusionment with artists who align themselves with political figures he disapproves of, citing Bruce Springsteen's association with Barack Obama. He cringes when Springsteen's songs come on now, imagining Obama playing saxophone, and states that jamming with Obama makes an artist lose credibility. This reflects a broader sentiment about the intersection of music and politics.

5. Personal taste in music is subjective and should be respected, akin to food preferences, and is related to free speech. The author emphasizes that there's no "right" or "wrong" in musical taste, and if someone prefers one artist over another, that's their prerogative. He connects this idea to the broader concept of freedom of expression.

6. The article suggests that rock and roll, once a powerful and rebellious cultural force, has effectively been "assassinated" or "outlawed," leaving a void in the current musical landscape. The author questions who the rock and rollers are today, implying that the genre's vibrancy and cultural impact have significantly diminished. He contrasts the current state with the rich history and diverse artists he admired.

Israel’s Fires: a Precursor to Sodom and Gomorrah? by Chuck Baldwin

1. Unprecedented and devastating wildfires are raging in Israel, forcing mass evacuations and causing significant destruction, with some international aid reportedly refused. Flames surged across Highway 1, impacting at least 10 villages near Jerusalem, consuming over 17 square kilometers of land, and leading to a state of national emergency. While Italy and Croatia sent aid, Greece and Cyprus reportedly refused to send firefighting planes.

2. The author posits that these fires could be a divine judgment on modern Israel, which he describes as a "cesspool of debauchery, corruption and criminality" comparable to Sodom and Gomorrah. He argues that Israel is the "abortion capital," "sodomite capital," "pornographic capital," and "genocidal capital of the world," and suggests that if God spares Zionist Israel, He would need to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.

3. The planting of hundreds of millions of non-native, highly combustible plants by the Zionist state since 1948 is cited as a contributing factor to increased wildfire disasters. This contrasts with the less combustible native vegetation of Palestine and suggests a man-made element to the heightened fire risk.

4. The author heavily criticizes Christian Zionists in America for their enthusiastic support of Israel's actions, particularly the "genocide in Gaza." He asserts that Palestinian Christians exhibit a more Christ-like spirit than American "Christians," who, by supporting Israel, are proving themselves to be "heathens." He also criticizes prominent evangelical leaders like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress.

5. The article emphasizes that God is "no respecter of persons" or nations, drawing parallels between the destruction of ancient Canaanite nations, biblical Israel, and potentially modern Israel. Just as God used Israel to destroy the Canaanites and later used other empires to destroy Israel for its iniquities, the author implies modern Israel will face similar divine justice for its actions.

6. The author urges readers to become informed about the historical context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically recommending Ilan Pappe's book "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine." He states that without reading this book, one remains ignorant of the reality of the conflict, including the events in Gaza and the West Bank.

Going Around . . . Coming Back Around by James Howard Kunstler

1. The attempt to block Ed Martin's nomination as US Attorney for DC is seen as a futile effort by "Jacobins" to evade accountability for alleged corruption and sedition. Despite Martin not being confirmed, he was immediately appointed to three DOJ positions not requiring Senate confirmation, allowing him to continue investigating the same issues. The author suggests that numerous other patriotic lawyers are capable of taking on the US Attorney role.

2. The article implies that Ed Martin has already gathered significant evidence of wrongdoing, particularly concerning the January 6th events and the subsequent cover-up. During his time as Interim US Attorney, Martin is believed to have assembled a portfolio of evidence against "blob officials" and "lawfare stormtroopers" involved in what the author terms the "J-6 / 2021 blob operation."

3. The appointment of Jeanine Pirro as Interim US Attorney for DC ensures the continuation of investigations into alleged Swamp corruption. Pirro, a former judge and District Attorney, can serve for 120 days, and the President can theoretically keep appointing interim US Attorneys, maintaining the momentum of ongoing cases. This signals that the efforts to investigate are not dependent on a single individual.

4. The investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud is highlighted as the beginning of a new trend where those who pursued "malicious and false prosecutions" will themselves face scrutiny. James, who campaigned on "getting" Donald Trump, is now under formal investigation following a referral from the Federal Housing Authority. This is presented as a turning of the tables.

5. The author believes that a long period of "hustles and hoaxes" without accountability since 2017 is coming to an end. The investigation into Letitia James is seen as just the start, with the focus of action expected to shift from New York to Washington D.C. ("the main Okefenokee-on-the-Potomac").

6. The article frames the ongoing legal and political battles as a struggle against an "organized assault on the law itself" represented by "lawfare." The efforts to investigate and prosecute alleged wrongdoing are portrayed as a necessary fight to restore legal integrity against those who have manipulated the system for political ends.

Glaucoma, Rats, And Vitamin Supplement Nonsense by Joachim Bartoll

1. The author argues that glaucoma is primarily caused by an inappropriate diet high in carbohydrates and seed/vegetable oils, rather than unknown factors as mainstream medical science suggests. He points to the higher prevalence of glaucoma in populations with obesity, diabetes, and among Black people, linking it to diets rich in processed, plant-based foods. This diet, he claims, damages nerves and eyes directly.

2. Elevated homocysteine levels are presented as an indicator of prolonged damage and nutrient deficiencies (specifically B vitamins), not a direct driver of glaucoma. Homocysteine is a consequence of inadequate enzyme activity and deficiencies in vitamins B12, B6, and folate, which are best obtained from animal-based foods. These deficiencies hinder the body's ability to repair damage caused by a poor diet.

3. The author criticizes the use of animal studies (rats and mice) to draw conclusions for human health, particularly regarding vitamin supplementation, due to fundamental physiological differences. Humans are described as obligate hypercarnivores, inefficient at converting inorganic compounds from supplements, while rodents are more omnivorous/herbivorous and can better utilize such compounds. Therefore, benefits seen in rodents from artificial vitamin supplements may not translate to humans.

4. True healing and prevention of glaucoma, according to the author, require removing dietary toxins (carbohydrates, seed oils, plant-based toxins) and adopting a species-appropriate animal-based diet. This approach provides necessary nutrients in their bioactive forms and allows the body to repair damage. Simply increasing intake of specific vitamins through supplements is deemed insufficient without addressing the root dietary causes.

5. The study reviewed, while correctly identifying homocysteine as a bystander and noting the importance of B vitamins and choline for eye health, is criticized for promoting vitamin supplements instead of whole, natural animal-based foods. The author asserts that nutrients should come from meat, organ meats, and eggs, as supplements are artificial, inorganic, and potentially toxic for humans.

6. The author dismisses mainstream medical treatments for glaucoma (eye drops, laser, surgery) as merely addressing symptoms (high eye pressure) without tackling the underlying dietary cause. He emphasizes that "diseases" like glaucoma do not occur in animals following their species-appropriate diet in nature, and similarly, humans on their natural diet would not develop such conditions.