INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
The US economy and financial system is the leader globally in laundering dirty money. I said to this wonderful group, let's pretend there's a big red button up here on the lectern, and if you push that button, you can stop all hard narcotics trafficking tomorrow. Who here will push the button? And out of a hundred people dedicated to evolving our society spiritually, guess how many would push the button? I don't know.
One. You suggested the control grid is in part designed to manage the population. So if you wanna move people to a much lower economic footprint, having complete control is obviously very convenient. So the bottom line is the majority is about to get a lot poorer. So the question is where is all this money going?
And one of the things I've looked at is the underground base and city infrastructure and transportation system that's been built. What would be the purpose? I think if you're worried about a near extinction event. So thank you for doing this. You get I know you worked on this for years, but you get the sense if you're just a sort of aware person that there is a concerted attempt by governments around the world to digitize commerce and to digitize currency and to basically control people through money.
Correct. That's correct. Okay. So that was my first question. Is this happening?
Am I imagining it? It's absolutely happening. And what's important to understand, it's been happening for a long time. In other words, this is like a, an invisible corral that's that they've been building around you for a long, long time because the you know, how do a few sneak up on the many? Well, you have to do it very quietly and visibly before you throw the trap.
Smart. So so, essentially, what they're building because it's converting a currency system into a control system. So it's really the end of currency. And and what they're doing is they've been building the different digital pieces. And when it integrates and comes together, then you literally have a digital concentration camp.
It's complete and utter control. Otherwise known as the world. It's here's the thing to understand. We you and I grew up in a world where there was mass media, where you were pitching stories, you know, so you had 57 varieties of ice cream, and you're pitching them to 57 different niches, but you're still pitching to mass audiences. What we're talking about is a system where you can surveil, control, and influence one person at a time.
And with AI and software, each person can have their custom surveillance, influence, nudging, and control system. And punishment. Yes. Enforcement. Because, ultimately, if you control money, you can starve people to death.
You can kill them. Right. So go back and think of the pandemic. So if I say you can't go more than a mile from your home, and I say you can't you have to be mandated a pharmaceutical, then if you don't take the pharmaceutical, I can turn off your money. If you go more than a mile away from your home, your money and your credit cards won't work.
So if you know, whatever rules I lay down, there's a wonderful, wonderful example. The head of the Bank of International Settlements is the Central Bank of Central Banks, and it's been running the process to implement basically an all digital monetary system. And they have innovation hubs all over the world. They've been running this process for a long time. And in 2020, when the pandemic start or it was October 2020, so the pandemic was underway.
The general manager of the Bank of International Settlements was on a on an IMF panel. And in one minute it's the first time in my life I ever saw a central banker tell the truth, I fell off my chair. And he said, you know, the beauty of this is we can set the rules on how your money works, and we have the technology to enforce them. And what he was saying is literally from one place in, you know, anywhere in the world where the technology exists, you can track each person individually. You can set a complex list of rules, you know, like legislation, regulation, and administrative policy, and you can enforce them all with the technology with AI and software.
So have you ever seen there's a wonderful movie called the, the lives of others about the German Stasi and surveillance. It's about a group of artists and sort of creative talented people who are under surveillance by the German Stasi. And you see what it's like to be under surveillance for twenty four seven. Think of each one of us. We're all under surveillance, not just by governments, but by corporations who are trying to do something, and it may not be anything nefarious.
So 80 different companies are trying to sell you something or 80 different companies are trying to get your data for some reason. And and so they have AI and software bots that track you and follow you and learn from you and try and influence what you do because they're trying to extract some kind of value from you. And literally, think of, you know, being attacked by a swarm of bees. We're surrounded now by a swarm of AI software bots all trying to learn from us, extract something from us, or get us to do something. Now, when you go to an all digital system, then there's no escape, and then they can start literally to enforce rules.
They do now. So So what are the, manifestations of this that maybe we're not paying attention to or don't perceive for what they are? So look at what they did to the Canadian truckers. We don't like what you're doing. We cut off your money, and we cut off your friend's money.
And if people help you, we cut off their money too. So I've had I've known so many different people around the country who've been debanked. We just got legislation passed in Tennessee that a bank over a certain size couldn't debank someone for political or religious reasons. You know? And and you're you're one of the things that's happened.
There's no such federal law. Not that I know of, but I haven't looked. I've been working with the states because, ultimately, the the one power currently under the constitution in The United States that can stop this, the powers not delegated to the federal government by the states are reserved to the states. In other words, the states are technically more powerful than the federal government. And under the constitution, they have the power to override the federal government on many different issues, including health care.
And so one of the tensions we see in America is more and more there is a debate between the feds and and the states about who has what power. So we've seen a lot of the conservative AGs and, treasurers pushing back in a in a wonderful way, in a marvelous way. The challenge they have is this, and this was said to me by a senator in Northern Ohio. Northern Ohio has one of the best groups of sort of freedom fighting legislators in the country. And as you probably know, because you know Montana, it's very beautiful.
And, So what? Montana? Idaho. Idaho. So so but it's right, you know, it's right next to Montana.
So one of the Idaho senators said to me, he said, my problem, every time I fight to implement the constitution, he said, what I learn is the every year, we send a dollar to Washington, and every year, Washington sends back a dollar and 19¢. And when I say I wanna implement the constitution, my constituents say to me, I'd rather have the 19¢. Yeah. So what we've been watching literally since World War two is the federal government and a very, you know, largest, both monetary and fiscal policy, buying people out of the constitution and buying the whole federal I mean, the federal government is right now so operating so far outside the law. It's you know, you know how unbelievable it is.
So that's the challenge before us. If we wanna be free, you know, we're gonna have to decide we're not gonna let ourselves be. You know, it's it's like being, sort of walked into the slaughterhouse. We're not gonna walk into the slaughterhouse. And But you don't even I I guess what bothers me about it, there's something wonderfully straightforward, horrifying, but wonderfully straightforward about just a conventional invasion where people show up with guns and tell you what to do because at least you know who the enemy is.
But there's something very scary in an insidious way about being lulled into slavery. Right. And the thing to understand about the lulling is the lulling. The marketing plan works one person at a time. In other words, you know, you I buy with money.
Your friend, I buy by knocking them off or the other you know, your other friend, I I get a control file on. So there are thousands of different ways of nudging, buying carrots and sticks to get everybody into the control and into the trap. And and what is so insidious about this is much of the marketing plan is invisible, and it's and it really is crafted one by one. The odds seem overwhelming against the average person in a system that you just described. So, how far are we from not being able to exercise constitutional freedoms?
So I don't know how many years. They're clearly pushing to have this done by 2030. And, you know, what I do have to say is if you look at what it takes to stop it, I believe they're gonna fail. Now what I don't underestimate is how much damage they could do, and the, you know, the failure may not come in time to save America. So If we could just stop and define terms, who's they?
I the central bankers. Yes. Right. So we have a democratic republic, or we have a republic and use this democratic process. What happened in 1913 is the bankers took control of monetary policy.
What they're trying to do now is take control of fiscal policy. Once they get control of fiscal policy, it's gonna be much harder to reverse it. Can you, I'm gonna ask a series of really dumb questions. Okay. I hope you'll indulge me.
What's the difference? Taxation without representation. But between fiscal and monetary policies. Okay. Monetary policy is I control the process by which currency is issued, including through credit.
So so I generally govern and control credit issuance. Yes. And and and from that, the currency, the creation and management of the currency. Fiscal policy is when I control the taxes and the borrowing of the US government. Now because the central bank basically operates the borrowing, you know, it's the the borrowing shared, but this comes down as the you know, this is the Boston Tea Party moment.
Can they tax without representation? So I'll give you a little story. During the Biden administration, Biden nominated somebody for control of currency who was ultimately not approved. The Republicans in the senate killed, the nomination. Before she was nominated, three weeks before, she wrote an article in the Vanderbilt Law Review that said the great thing about central bank digital currency, in other words, an all digital currency system, is you have the perfect tool to deal with inflation.
If inflation gets out of hand, you just freeze everybody's bank accounts. Nice. Right. Right. Right.
You know? So it it's it's, so Inflation is a creation of monetary. It's the effect of monetary policy. It's like something that somebody did to you. Well, there are two things that cause inflation.
So one is monetary policy, managing monetary policy in a way that creates monetary inflation. But you also have, and we're going through it now, what I call deglobalization, where you have real increases in the cost of goods. So my cost of goods are going up, and it's not because they're issuing, you know, too much currency relative to growth. It's because we are reversing globalization. Globalization created a whole lot of lower costs for a variety of reasons.
So if you had severing of supply chains, for example, that would cause inflation because it just cost more to get the materials and the goods. Right. And and it's not just higher prices. It's, you know, some products a lot of products stop being economic and just go away. So, you know, when you hiccup supply chains, especially if you do it by shock doctrine or shock and awe, which is what we're watching now, You know, it wreaks havoc.
So think of it like as a flotilla of ships that need to turn. If the aircraft carrier doesn't let everybody know they're turning, then the the boats aren't ready to turn, and you have boats smashing into each other. You sink a lot of ships doing that. You sink a lot of ships. So leaving aside whether that was wise or not, that's what we're doing.
Right. So you get inflation out of that. Of course. You're absolutely right. If if oil prices go up, you get inflation because Right.
And that deglobalization started in the financial crisis. So, you know, so it's accelerating now, but it's not that we just started it. How did it start during in 02/2008? Yes. Yes.
Because why? Because for several reasons, but one is we were trying to exercise more and more control through the dollar system. And we've always exercised a lot of power and control and and extracted a subsidy from the dollar system. But you have more and more people trying to get out of the system. And, the financial crisis the first, the Asian crisis in '97 was a real wake up to Asia.
You know? You you need to create more resiliency. But more and more things happened, and then in 02/2008, it started to accelerate with the creation of the you know, as the bricks started to organize and work to sort of pull out of the dollar. So the idea was you've got a world economy based on the dollar. The people who issue and administer the dollar are not running things responsibly.
Therefore, we need a separate safe haven? There the people running the dollar system want a unipolar model. Yeah. The US wants a unipolar model, and we don't wanna be part of a unipolar model because we don't want if you look at the level of subsidy they're extracting, we don't want that level of of subsidy extracted. And if you look at some of the rules and regulations, we don't wanna be a part of it.
So we in India, the the I don't know if you ever saw one of the greatest explanations of globalization ever given. Sir James Goldsmith came to The United States in 1994, and he did an interview with Charlie Rose. And he described why we should never approve the Uruguay round of GATT and institute the WTO. And he, to this day, he nailed nailed it perfectly. If you could summarize his argument, what would it be?
He said, we are going to hollow out the middle class in the West, and we are going to devastate our culture. Automate Our culture? Yes. Our culture. We're gonna devastate our culture, and we're gonna devastate the quality of the food supply.
He said that? Yes. So now those are my words of way of saying it. You should watch it. And I I think to this day, I think it's the best description.
And and if you read my online book and you listen to sir James Goldsmith, what they both describe is the fact we knew. We knew what we were in other words, the leadership knew that this would destroy or devastate the West. So why'd they do it? That's the $64,000 question. Well, they think They hate the West.
Defenders of the West. No. I don't think you are. I think one of the reasons they did it is I think they wanted to create the capacity and centralize the capital they needed to go into space. And I think they knew that they would need every hundred or so years, the central bankers do a reset, and I think they knew they were coming into a reset.
And and they felt with this technology that they, you know, if they didn't globalize, someone else would, and and they wanted to control the process. They needed the money to go into space? Mhmm. The capital. Well, I don't even know what that means.
So I think they wanted to build the capacity to become a multiplanetary civilization. Really? Yeah. Spring and summer are here. That's good news.
It means you get to go outside and frolic in the sunshine. Unfortunately, there's a downside. Burglars are psyched for the longer days. It means fewer people are home, and that gives them more chances to break in and steal your stuff. This is not our imagination.
FBI crime data backs it up. More daylight means more burglaries. That's bad. But there is a solution. You can leave your house feeling secure with SimpliSafe.
This is a really cool idea. Millions of Americans use this. It's the highest standard in home security. You get peace of mind every time you leave. So traditional burglar alarm system, the kind maybe you already have, only sets off when someone has already broken into your house.
That's not good. Smash the window, come through the basement door, whatever. SimpliSafe prevents intrusions before they happen. It does it with AI powered cameras and live professional agents monitoring. It leaves nothing to chance.
Plans for SimpliSafe start around a dollar per day, so it's not crazy expensive at all. Visit SimpliSafe, that's simplisafe,.com/tucker and get 50% off a new system with professional monitoring. You get your first month for free. That's simply safe.com/tucker. There is no safe like SimpliSafe.
Man, I was caught up in such minutia in 1994. I never heard anybody say that. I had no idea that was happening. So I became I didn't become convinced of that in 1994. I became convinced Were you still working for the federal government in '94?
My company was the lead financial adviser for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and I was trying to clean up the mortgage corruption. And what I ran smack into is that they were clearly and intentionally setting up the infrastructure to dramatically increase mortgage fraud intentionally. Mortgage fraud is a public private partnership between the New York Fed member banks and the and the federal government. So so the treasury and the fed were clearly engineering a massive new mortgage bubble. And, essentially, I was doing a series of things, and and that mortgage bubble was gonna centralize capital.
And I was working on a whole plan coming out of the Bush administration. We were taking all our profits and investing in building a software infrastructure that would help communities decentralize political and economic power, but in a way that would create new great wealth. And one of the projects we had was we were working with, I had a subsidiary that had a a project working with the top pension fund leaders in the country. And and, essentially, our job was to figure out how the pension funds could invest so that they could handle this baby boomer demographic going through the pension and retirement system and, and and how we could do it, how they could invest their money because they're operating at such a size that it would be good for America. You know?
How do you build a stronger America in a way that helps the baby boomers, you know, live in retirement. And, I made a presentation in the spring of nineteen ninety seven to we were at a big money management firm outside of Pennsylvania, and one of the board members was a money manager who worked with a lot of the pension funds. And so we had all these top corporate and state pension fund leaders, and I made a presentation. We had done a simulation of reengineering the Philadelphia economy to achieve this. And, the top pension fund leader looked at me and he said, oh my god.
You know, this is very similar to what we tried long ago, and it didn't work. And I said, you didn't have the Internet. You didn't have the tools to get the average person's learning metabolism high enough, you know, on an economic basis to do that. We had built a data servicing company in low income communities, and we were able to show how easily we could get the labor force or people on welfare off of welfare and make making lots of money and being very productive at high speed. And and he looked at me and he said, you don't understand.
It's too late. I said, what do you mean it's too late? He said, they've given up on the country. They're moving all the money out starting in the fall. He said, you've gotta get to Nick Brady.
Nick had been my I had been a partner at Dillon Read, and Nick had been the chairman of Dillon Read before he became secretary of treasury. And at that point, Nick is out, but, you know, sort of involved. Anyway, he said you you've gotta get to Nick and let him know it's not hopeless. This can all be turned around. And, and I thought he meant we, the pension funds, have been instructed to reinvest equity and reallocate our equity into the emerging markets, which made sense because they had a much higher growth rate.
What I didn't realize then was, and I realized shortly thereafter, in October of nineteen ninety seven, that's the beginning of the 1998 fiscal year, huge, enormous amounts of money started go started disappearing from the US government. And, literally, by the time of nine eleven, there was 4,100,000,000,000.0 missing from DOD and HUD. And if you remember, the day before nine eleven, Donald Rumsfeld stood up and and basically said he he did a press conference, and he said, there's 2,300,000,000,000 in undocumentable adjustments last year at DOD, and we're missing money, and it's, you know, it's worse than terrorism. And then, of course, I was working with a reporter on a huge story that would have published that Friday after 09:11 about the missing money. We've been working on it for over a year, and she'd done nine stories.
I'd helped her do nine stories because we were trying to get the general accounting office, now that now they call it the general accountability office. But we we were trying to get both congress and the GAO GAO to do something about it and to try and stop it. And, anyway, as you know Yeah. Priorities changed. Right.
For reasons that we still don't understand. And there's Oh, I understand. Yeah. Well Well I don't think the average person the average person, I think, sort of thinks, well, maybe there were 19 guys from Well, but here's Saudi or something. I call the Patriot Act the the Control and Concentration of Cash Flow Act.
Because what one of the things that happened after nine eleven, if you if you look at the history of the black budget and sort of secret financing that the government uses for secret and classified projects, that pot of money had grown and grown and grown, and it it had become very dysfunctional to try and get that money. Mortgage fraud to I believe was one of the biggest sources, and that's why what I was doing sort of went to the heart of the problem. But, the Patriot Act and that whole process was very successful at moving a lot more money onto the budget. In other words, it made it much easier to get enormous amounts of money for the national security state, as a result of what happened. Now, you know, whenever you do an operation like this, you stack functions, so it's only one of many goals.
But it was very successful. Well, it went all went right over my head. I thought it was all about Muhammad Ali. I had no idea. I know you're laughing.
I wanna tell you my church story. Wait. Hold on. There's so many threads here. Yeah.
There's a lot of threads. Yeah. There's a lot of threads. I just wanna I don't want to let it continue to hang in the air of this question of space. You sort of threw that out parenthetically, but, like, well, I've never heard that before.
So you believe going back thirty years that people in the US government and in the finance world wanted money for Yeah. It wasn't US government. It was the central banking. If you look at the center if you look at the group of people who meet through the BIS What's that? The bank the BIS is the Bank of International Settlements, and it's the Central Bank of Central Banks.
Where is that located? It's in Basel, Switzerland, and, it has 63 of the most powerful, central banks as its members, and the New York Fed and the Fed are both shareholders. They became shareholders in 1994. In what sentence? What's the what's the purpose of the Bank of International Settlements?
Okay. So there are two things you need to know about the Bank of International Settlements. I'm not sure my brain's big enough for this, but keep going. It is. Okay.
It has sovereign immunity. What does that mean? It's above the law. It's its own country. Right.
It's its own country. It has its own police force. And, essentially, other than one of its staff being in a car accident or, you know, minor things, no one has the legal authority to move against it. K? And a sovereign immunity.
That's number one. Number two, it can move money and hold it on its bank, on its balance sheet and manage money secretly. So if I wanna I'm and I'm grossly oversimplifying. If I wanna steal 21,000,000,000,000 from the US government and park it on the balance sheet of the BIS, it can move it anywhere in the world, and it can keep it on its balance sheet secretly. Why would there be an organizational?
But first of all, where does its power like, who empowered it to have sovereign immunity in the right It was created after World War one and and and sort of collected its powers and got going in the thirties. And it was created in theory to manage the reparations of the German government. But if you read the real history, it was because the Bank of England and the central bankers wanted an entity that had sovereign immunity. They wanted to be able to move money secretly. So, for example, if you look at what happened during World War two and all the money that was moving back and forth between the Germans and Americans, you know, Dulles was over in Switzerland helping to match these all these transfers back and forth.
So there's a wonderful book called The Tower of Basel by a wonderful Hungarian journalist where he documents and describes the whole history of the Bank of International Settlements. And if you wanna understand power in this world, understanding the how the Bank of International Settlements and the and the plumbing of the central banking system works is very, very important. I've always been worried that if I knew more, that I would become mentally ill. No. No.
So I just have to say that reality is sort of the door that you open to find real solutions. So there are real solutions, and and the biggest obstacle to implementing them is nobody wants to face it. So I used to have a pastor who Nobody wants to face the truth of how things actually work. Face the truth. And I understand that because the hardest thing I ever had to do, Tucker, was look in the mirror and say, I'm the patsy.
I was the assistant secretary of housing. I didn't know, and I went along, and I didn't face this. I should have seen this faster. I should have say, I'm the patsy. And it was it it's sometimes it's harder than facing death to admit that you've been part of, you know, a big lie and you've been tricked.
As someone who advocated for the Iraq war on television, I I've lived this to some extent. Oh, no. Yes. I did. Well, you know, you part of facing this is you have to forgive yourself.
You really have to but I used to have a pastor who would say, if we can face it, god can fix it. Because you have to understand, we can't fix it. There are many, many things we can do to change the course, and I believe, ultimately, freedom can prevail. And there's many things we can do to help that happen. But, ultimately, this is a spiritual war, and you have to call on God.
You have to call on the divine, and that's where the battle is ultimately gonna be decided. And that means, literally, I believe this is true, the divine intelligence cannot go to work unless we're willing to face it. You know, we have to look at it. We have to pray. We have to ask for help, and we have to deal with it.
And the solutions the real solutions will be cultural. There'll be millions of people acting in their own life refusing to be controlled, you know, individually. So Very, very wise what you just said. I think it's true, and and thank you for saying that. I wanna just go one more time to the space question.
So you said that, people with power, at the central banks decided that we need to sort of colonize space or move towards space. Did that happen? So here's what happened, and we have two wrap ups, and I think I sent them to you. One is, we published in 02/2015 called Space Here We Go, and it's got a picture of a businessman, you know, taking off in a spaceship. And then we in 02/2017, after a couple of the big investment banks wrote big things about space investment, we wrote one called the space based economy.
And then we we tracked space on Solaire reports, so I would refer you to that. But I think I think, you know, first of all, you've seen a lot of capital centralized into, a few billionaires who then reinvest that money in space. So Musk, Bezos. You know? So clearly, there's a centralization of capital and a reinvestment.
So the idea of space is what I mean, just biggest possible picture. Why would you be interested in space? I say this is someone who's not. Right. So so let me give you a couple reasons why.
First of all, you're looking for the miners are looking for a variety of different resources. So there are practical reasons if you can get the cost down that you would wanna do asteroid mining. The big one the big economic one is control is most easily implemented by satellites. So you wanna put up a whole ring of satellites that combined with telecommunications can basically help run the control grid. And not just the control grid in the West, the control grid.
If you're gonna shift huge amounts of money globally, how are you going to track and enforce that your money is being properly invested? Well, you need a control grid globally. So I I think that's part of it. The last thing, and I don't know the answer to this, is I think there is real concern about geophysical risks. Yeah.
And one way to deal with that is to make sure we don't bet the ranch on one planet. So to that, if we could just linger on that thank you for that. That'll make sense. If we just linger on one question. So geophysical risks.
So we've been lectured for, I don't know, thirty years now about climate change. Climate change is obviously an ongoing feature of life on this planet. The glaciers just an op. So well, of course, it's an op. And I think we you know, people have figured that out.
Yeah. But but that doesn't mean that smart, highly informed people aren't worried about geophysical risks. They are. And I know some of them. Right.
So what do you think those risks are that that honest, smart people who are interested in self preservation and thriving? Like, what are the risks they're worried about? So I think I think the first is a solar minimum, where you get big drops in the economy and the agriculture, and you can't feed the population. Right. So Because there are changes in climate because of the distance of the Earth from the sun.
Right. And that changes. Right. So we know throughout history, we go through periods of solar minimum. Solar minimum is the name?
I think it's called solar minimum. I'm not an expert in any of this. So, So they are worried about climate change, but they don't think it's coming from your suburban. Right. It's not coming from human behavior.
Now there there are environmental problems coming from human behavior For sure. And those That's for sure. Right. So so so so that's one. And do you think that risk is real?
I don't know. For the record, I I I have one friend who's very well informed who has convinced me that that is real, that they're that they're very concerned about water. If if you look at the history, you know, of solar minimums and you look at what it does to you know, there was a Russian I I can't remember if he's an economist or science that did a lot of research on the stock market and solar activity. You know? And the the if you're the central bankers and you're in charge of managing the financial system, that that reality would make me very nervous.
So Okay. So I think I, you know, I think there's something there worth understanding. The other thing is every it appears to me, if you go back through history, every ten thousand, twelve thousand years, we have, you know, some kind of huge disaster. An extinction event. An extinction a near extinction event.
So I don't know if you've ever read the science fiction book Three Body Problem. No. It's fascinating. It's a one of the tops Chinese science fiction, and and it's about, a plot. No Chinese science fiction.
Okay. I'm I'm feeling very ignorant this morning. No. No. No.
No. Because I here's the thing. I'm just trying to figure out what in the world's going on. Yeah. Amen.
We'll stay. I'm in the same place. And so that always as you know, that always leads you to the most It does. Right. It does.
Right. So in one I think it was I think the thing that got me to read Three Body Problem was, Obama made some cryptic comment about people ought to read this book. It was like, hint hint. You know? Here are the problems I'm dealing with.
And the Three Body Problem is about, other bodies that come into the solar system, and you it's there it's impossible to predict their trajectory. And then when they do, they create this catastrophic flooding and earthquakes and all this other stuff. Anyway but but I think that they're whether it's a pole shift, magnetic pole shift is one of the, you know, theories of what causes these events, but there is a history of near extinction events. And one of the things that I've looked at because I'm trying to figure out, you know, when between '19, fiscal nineteen ninety eight and fiscal two thousand fifteen, there were 21,000,000,000,000 of undocumentable adjustments in the US government. If you go to our website, missingmoney.solaire.com, we have years and years of documentation, including the government financials that show this.
And so the question is, where is all this money going? And one of the things I've looked at in the process of looking at where all this money is going is the underground base and city infrastructure and transportation system that's been built. And I'm sorry? Yes. So so we have built an extraordinary number of underground bases and supposedly transportation systems.
Some of these are a record of some of these are documented as part of the national security infrastructure. I think there are many more. So, In The United States? In The United States, on all over the world. But, in, from 2021 to 2023, I took one of the smartest subscribers in the Salir Report network, And he and I spent two years collecting all the data and all the allegations on underground basis.
And then we, we systematically went through and tried to estimate our guess. This is totally a guess of how many underground bases both underground in The United States, but also underground under the ocean around The United States. And our estimate was a 70 with the transportation network connecting them. And what would be the purpose? The purp if you thought you were gonna get a near extinction event so so there to me, there are two purposes.
You have so many activities going on that you need to keep secret that you're basically building the capacity to for example, if you're doing a secret space program, you need to platform it from, you know, things that can't be seen. But I think if you're worried about a near extinction event, you know, that's So I know nothing about this other than my only window into it. I knew a contractor who worked on one in Washington in the city of Washington, DC. And, I remember him telling me about a power box, like a transformer box on Constitution Avenue that he told me because he worked on it personally, was actually the exit, the egress from White House. That was kind of by vehicle.
I thought that was I was like, really? He goes, oh, yeah. No. I I installed it. I know.
And I thought, well, that's kind of crazy than the middle of this big city where I live. I lived in that was on Constitution Avenue every day that you could build something like that without me knowing it under the VP's house at the Right. Naval Observatory, same thing. I think most people know that next to my brother's house on, Macomb Street in DC. So Also.
So, like but that's I always thought that was, like, preparation for nuclear war. Like, I didn't really think about it that much. It yeah. It's it's preparation for catastrophe. So but you think that there are, facilities like that in other places outside DC?
Oh, yeah. So if you're interested, we have a great interview. I did an interview of Richard Dolan on underground bases on the Solari Report, and it's sort of an introduction to the topic. And it's based on a lot of the research of a guy named Richard Souder, who is very hard to interview. So Richard kind of went through all the material.
And and, you know, clearly, it's I don't know if you ever saw Washington Post did a a project. It was in 02/2012 called Top Secret America. And one of the reporters, it was a team of two reporters, one of them put together a database of all the different top secret installations that had been built in the country, including since the Patriot Act. And what you saw was just this explosion of money in building so many both underground and above ground facilities. Not all sleep aids are made by pharmaceutical companies.
You probably heard about Eight Eight Sleep by now. They developed the country's most innovative products for sleep. Almost everybody in our office uses something they make called the pod, and they love it. And there's a reason that professional athletes and lots of other smart people do too. You add the pod to your mattress like a mattress cover, and it helps you get a better night's sleep and fill with vitality at the start of each day in an intimidating way almost.
It's amazing. How does it do it? Well, it uses advanced technology to track your sleep and automatically adjust the temperature of your side of the bed to what's perfect for sleep, and temperature makes all the difference. It's backed by over six hundred million hours of data. They've also used those insights to create their new product, Sleep Elixir, to help you get quiet before you go to bed, fall asleep faster, and stay knocked out longer.
No grogginess, no weird side effects, just better deep sleep. So if you're ready to take sleep and recovery to the next level, go to 8sleep.com/tucker to get $350 off your pod four ultra full refund for thirty days if you don't love it. It works. Just as a theological matter, I hate to say this, but I think it's true. If you're building a lot underground, you're on the wrong side.
I just don't I don't think that's a good sign. So I'll tell you a very funny I mean, right? I mean, like, I just like let's just the obvious first. That's not good. So I'll tell you a very funny story.
So in, after I left the administration, after I left the Bush administration, I went on the border of Sallie Mae. And, I'm on the border of Sallie Mae. And after one of the first meetings, there's a wonderful stop. I don't I you've been talking about underground bases and colonizing space, and you clearly seem totally sane, but I'm sure some people are like, well, she's obviously crazy. I should have set the stage at the beginning with your biography, like, you're as mainstream.
You're on the board of Sally Sallie Mae. You're a partner at Dylan Reed. It's like Right. You're not just, like, on the Internet. Right.
I'm sorry. I just wanna say that. I just wanna say that. This is like a former high level federal official who's on the board of Sallie Mae and a partner of Dillon Read. Okay?
Just wanna say it out loud. Okay. So so I'm on the board, and there is a lovely chairman, a really lovely guy. And he comes up. He he says, can I talk to you after the meeting?
And I said, sure. And he pulls out this big glossy brochure for the Council on Foreign Relations, and he said, the time has come for you to join. And he said, we want you to ask Nick, Nick Brady, to sponsor you. And I said to him, you know, Sam, I just don't wanna do this. I I just I I really don't wanna do this.
And he looked shocked, and he said, you don't understand. If you don't do this, you're out forever. And just at that moment just at at that moment, you know, it's it's these moments when things come to you. I saw in my mind I'm very pictorial. I saw in my mind a locker in the underground base, and they were taking my name off of the locker.
And I thought I thought, you know, if it comes to that, I'll take my chances upstairs in the white boy. Yeah. Me too. And I said and but it's this it's a you know, something it's at the deepest root, it's a spiritual and cultural question. Totally agree.
Who who's cowering underground, like, in the dark places? No. There's but to to me, there's nothing wrong with going into a bunker if they're bombing. Okay? Yeah.
You know, I I don't have a problem with that. But I I really didn't wanna be with all of them in a concentrated space. I was like, no. I'd rather And you know them. This is you're not guessing at this.
Like, you know a lot of these people. I know a lot of these people. And the one thing I will have to say, if there's anything I learned from my history, the problem is not they are bad and we are good. That's not how this works. The evil and the good is threaded at every level of society, every community, every enterprise.
It it doesn't work like that. Well, I'm not especially good. I know that. I know that for a fact. So I think you're pretty good.
Yeah. But, of course, you know more about yourself than anyone else does, and I know that what a flawed person I am. So I'll never declare myself on Right. On, you know, I'll never say God's on my side. I'll say I wanna be on God's side.
But Right. Exactly. It's an open question. Well, it's a journey. It's never over.
Right. And and we're not perfect, and it's you try every day to do as good as you can. You know? And it's like baseball. You get some hits some days, and some days, you strike out.
So, but you believe that there's a whole constellation of underground bases built by the US government, in The United States. Like, that fact alone just the physical infrastructure of it, because normally we talk about what are they doing today? Expensive. Well, it's unbelievable. And, like, it raises lots of practical questions.
How do you ventilate them? What about food and water supply? You know? Where's the energy? Are we using breakthrough energy?
Or Where's the energy come Right. Right. Because I'm sure that we have the ability to to produce breakthrough energy at very low cost. You know, if you go back Why are you of that. My Dutch partners, I met because they were doing a series of conferences on breakthrough energy, and they brought together breakthrough energy inventors from around the world.
And, you know, you can see all the videos up on the Internet and and really went through the history from Tesla on of different inventors who have discovered and claimed different innovations with breakthrough energy. And I'm convinced that this energy exists, and I'm also convinced if you look at a lot of the really fast ships, you know, flying around the planet, you know, that they, you know, they're not using classical electricity. They're not using Right. You see. So so, you know They're not running on diesel.
Right. Exactly. Right. So Yeah. So we know that these I'm sorry to I get so caught up in the details, but we know that there are quite a number of large underground bases in The United States.
We can state that as fact. Right. And then the question becomes, of course, like, if they're connected to the power grid, you know, if they're pulling off just a conventional natural gas electricity generation station, you could, like, know that and measure it, but you think they have independent energy sources. Of course, they do. So one of the one of the questions I have that I think is really important is when you look at breakthrough energy, if you are running the planet so I have this nickname for the committee at the top, mister Global.
If you were mister Global, you would not wanna implement breakthrough energy on a widespread basis for a variety of reasons. One of which is everybody got a hold of it and weaponized it. It could be very dangerous. Why? My understanding is that, literally one small group of people could take this, you know, with no sovereign powers or, you know, just organize crime and use it in a way that could weaponize it and make it very dangerous.
I don't I I'm not a scientist. I don't really understand. But energy by definition is dangerous. You know, gasoline's dangerous. Right.
Right? Electricity is dangerous. Of course, nuclear energy is dangerous. Right. But if you're if you're if you're the risk manager and you're in charge of managing the planet, you know, this has more disruption capability, both weaponization, economic.
You know, suddenly, everybody's free to do whatever they want, and so they're much harder to control. So so if you're mister global and you have the capacity dramatically lower the energy cost, the other danger is then population skyrockets, and you you're concerned about that. So if you're mister global and you're worried about what will happen if you bring this technology out, it's very convenient to get complete control. If you don't trust the population to be environmentally responsible or politically responsible, then complete control. So I have a we have a good mutual friend who's been bothering me for years to interview you.
You've gotta interview her. Why? Well, just because she's, he said, this is, like, the best informed, smartest, most reasonable mainstream sane person I know of you. He said this, and I was like, yeah. Okay.
Anyway, and we're just really glad we did this interview because you're blowing my mind up and down. So how convinced are you that breakthrough energy, alternate forms of energy, non publicly disclosed forms of energy are in use by the US government? I think there's a very high chance that that they're in some kind of use in a very controlled secret way. Yeah. Well, there are tons of indications, and you've had Right.
A number of people, like, at the contractor level. Like, I'm a federal contractor electrician or a, you know, concrete guy or whatever, and I was working on this underground facility. There are a number of people who come forward to say this, and I saw appeared to be some brand new form of energy I didn't understand. Right. Insane people too.
Sean Ryan, who's a friend of mine, wonderful guy, honest man, who's a podcaster, interviewed did an interview with this guy who was just like a just a random blue collar guy. Right. I think he was a concrete guy. You know? And he got a call for a million yards of concrete or whatever and went to this underground facility, DOD facility and saw clearly signs of some energy source that was, you know, defied the laws of known physics.
So, I and there are a bunch of people who have said stuff like that. So I don't think it's crazy. I have a one of I have two businesses. One is the Solari Report. The other is Solari Screens.
I do an investment screen. And I think, you know, a lot has to shift in investment if we're gonna have a real civilization and not misallocate I think we're misallocating capital terribly. Anyway, but he he, for thirty years, has been an investor in a breakthrough energy company. So when you know has been? Yeah.
Yeah. And and it's called Brilliant Light. You can go look at their website. You know? And and they're really you know, they swear they've got it.
And what is it? Don't ask me. Yeah. You gotta get him on and So, you think this money has been taken by people who've really thought through the future and are determined to survive it? So I think I call it a financial coup.
I think what happened was when the budget deal busted in 1995, they gave up on the government. They just said, you know, this form of government will not work as a governance structure to manage the dollar system. They're right about that. And and, you know, they just felt it was impossible. If you're a risk manager, you gotta turn the aircraft carrier before you hit the iceberg, and that could be twenty years before.
Do you know what I mean? And they just felt that the system wasn't working, and it required to get consensus. You just had to dumb people down and buy them off, and it just wasn't working. So I think they decided, okay. We're gonna reengineer government on the just do it method.
The first thing we're gonna do is we're gonna pull all the money out. We're gonna put the government in a debt trap, and then we'll squeeze it and shift to the control model. And it was a financial coup, and it started in fiscal nineteen ninety eight. So it started literally 10/01/1997. By 02/2015, they had had 21 we had reports in their financials of 21,000,000,000,000 of undocumentable adjustments.
From a cash standpoint, you know, that could be 50 it could be 50,000,000,000,000 or 10,000,000,000,000. There's no way to tell unless you can get access to the bank records. And then what happened was doctor Mark Skidmore of Michigan State University and I published a study, sort of a survey we had done, thanks to him and his students, that announced that we were up to the 21,000,000,000,000. At that point, then the next step that happened remember the Kavanaugh hearings? Very well.
Okay. What you don't remember is during the Kavanaugh hearings, the White House, the Senate, the, House Republican and Democrat, all of them together, instituted, issued an administrative policy called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board statement 56. Yeah. I did miss that. I'll just say.
You did miss that. I I was busy watching Kavanaugh yell about his teenage drinking or whatever. And what that policy said is as a matter of administrative policy, we do not have to bathe the constitutional provisions related to financial budgeting and disclosure. We do not have to obey the laws, and we do not have to obey the regulations. What we can do is appoint a secret group of people by a secret process to move money out of the financial disclosures of The United States and a 50.
So it's the 24 covered agencies plus approximately a 50 governmental entities. And when you throw in the classification laws and the, the national security laws, it also applies to the big banks and contractors working for the US government. Now let me explain what this means as a matter of investment. When I look at The US large cap stock market or The US bond market, the treasury market, I have no financial disclosure that has any meaning. Everything's secret.
I have no idea what it means. If I pick up the financials of a New York Fed member bank that is running the New York the US Treasury Department's bank accounts, or if I pick up the Treasury financial statements, they're meaningless. They don't mean anything. What's missing? You can't know.
All you can know is a secret group of people can move whatever make whatever they want go missing, and you can't know what it is. It's all secret. So I'm I'm looking at half the cake, but I don't know what what part of the cake is missing. So it it's meaningless. You don't even know if it is half.
Right. I don't it it's you know, it it has reached a level of absurdity where and but but the absurd thing is as a legal matter to take the position that an administrative policy agreed upon by the Uniparty can overrule the constitution, can overrule the laws, and can overrule the regulations simply by, you know, like, the you know, you you wave the wand, and suddenly, magically, law doesn't matter. I mean, now you're talking, and and you also saw this in in the financial crisis. A decision was made by Eric Holder in the Department of Justice to not prosecute HSBC. There's a wonderful, video on the best evidence channel by John Titus about this whole thing.
And, basically, what they said is a systemically important this is under the BIS. There's a definition under the BIS, under the Financial Stability Board of a financially systemically important institution. Right. These institutions are free to break the law with no they're free to break the law. At most, all they have to do is kick back a piece of the profits to the Department of Justice.
So it's like a a formal kickback system. And what you're saying is that you're taking the sovereign immunity of the BIS and through the New York Fed, extending it to the banks that are running these operations. With JPMorgan and the rest Bank of America. Yeah. Right.
So so what you're what you've done with the BIS, the IMF, the World Bank, the UN, you've created all these different organizations. And if you look at we we did, like, 40 in Latin America. You've created an international overlay of organizations that have various forms of sovereign immunity, of course, the big one being the BIS. And so if they are free to break the law I mean, if you if you look at the financial crisis, what you're saying is these companies can lose trillions of dollars, have it replaced by the taxpayer, and keep on going. So now is the point of the conversation where I have to ask the obvious question, which is, who are these people?
So can you name some of the people who you believe are making these decisions whose whose decisions are effectively, as you just said, above the law, have effective immunity? Right. So so that's the question, sort of who is mister Global? Yeah. And and my experience is the bureaucracy that that sort of runs things is the central banking bureaucracy.
So we've described the BIS and the central bankers. So think of the planet as a house. So you have the house, then you have financing the house. That's the mortgage. Then you have the insurance, and you know if you don't have the insurance, then you're then you have the equity in the house.
Right? And and the insurance layer is very, very important to make sure that the equity is protected. Right? Okay. So you got the real assets.
You've got the banking system. You've got the insurance system, and then you've got the owners. So in my experience, if you go to the BIS and you look at the systemically important institutions and the members, you know, that's the bureaucracy that runs the debt and the transaction system, so the, you know, the transactions. Because the whole thing depends on being able to swap and and transact. The insurance group is very important for the reasons you just described, same as on your house.
And then the question is, who are the real owners? And that's the mystery, and I've spent my whole life trying to figure out who are the real owners. And, basically, from what experience I've had, if you know their name, they're not one of the important owners. Do Do you know what I mean? It's it's intergenerational pools of capital.
Now here's what's interesting. One of the most powerful pools of intergenerational capital that I've ever dealt with is the Harvard endowment. And if you look at the squabble going on over who controls the Harvard Endowment right now, it's a very interesting squabble. What can you summarize it? Well, you have you have the Trump administration and the Department of Justice now in a lawsuit with Harvard over who has what powers over Harvard's policies.
But I think the big the big fight is not the, you know, an asymmetrical warfare. The fight is never what the fight's really about. The real fight is about who controls the so Harvard corporation, the university is only a portion of the Harvard Corporation. The Harvard Corporation runs the university, and it runs the endowment. Okay?
And the Harvard Corporation, in my experience, is one of the most important investment syndicates in the world. And because they have a tax exemption, they don't have to pay taxes. They spin off I think the last time I looked, I don't know what it is currently, but they spin off about 4% a year for the university, which is a lot cheaper than paying taxes, and it's a great investment because the university provides all sorts of intellectual and human capital to the provides all sorts of intellectual and human capital to the investment syndicate. You know? So it's a very brilliant, elegant model.
And my theory is it was the model that was really created to sort of compete with the the Vatican and the Catholics who had two thousand years of, you know, diplomatic immunity and no taxes. Anyway, so so but it is the Harvard Corporation is run by a perpetuating board. So so the board members if board member leaves, they pick a new board member. So it's a perpetuate self perpetuating board. And my guess is behind the scenes, if there's a fight, one of the fight is who gets on that board because then you control a $50,000,000,000 plus endowment, and a $50,000,000,000 plus endowment, which now is has a 39% private equity portfolio.
And these are you know, I I said to on money and markets, which is our weekly show, I said the other week, you know, if this is a monopoly board, that would be Park Place because it's such a flagship in the world of investment. It's such a major leader. What would happen if the congress decided to the new tax bill to tax university endowments, which they should do. I don't know because because that will happen at the same time something else is gonna happen, and these things are gonna happen at the same time. The thing that's gonna rock the universities is if you look at how much money it cost you as a father to put put one child through college, you know, you're talking about enormous bills.
And if you look at how far the universities have gotten away from providing a great education, it's not a good investment. So when I was an investment adviser, I used to work with my clients' kids, and we would literally do something. We have a learning plan on Solari now that came out of this. I would literally make them price time and money for each course they took by course. And I would basically make them say, look.
What do you wanna do in this life, and what are the skills and tools you need to do it? And how are we gonna go get those tools with the least amount of your time and the least amount of your parents' money? How are we gonna really and we would come up with these wild education plans where they would, like, you know, go to San Francisco for this audio video course, and then they would be next year in Budapest studying at the university. You know? Because you wanna you wanna you you want kids to learn about the world, and and you want them to be, you know, not provincial stuck in You want them to be educated.
Yeah. You want them to be educated. Anyway but we would come up with these very creative things, and what you discover is net in a world of YouTube University and access to extraordinary, you know, resources all around the world to get a great education, the the universities in The United States have gotten unbelievably bloated and unbelievably off track. I I think everyone senses that. Right.
And they're they're a terrible if you're a if you're a loving parent, they're a terrible investment. You love your children. You want your children to be successful. If I want my child to be successful in the world we're going into, you know, whether it turns into a control grid or the control grid, as I believe, will fail, you know, you want them to have an outstanding education. And and I will tell you bluntly, the reason the unipolar model failed is because we don't have a culture that can field and manage unipolar.
That's exactly right. We we don't we don't have We don't have human capital to run the world. We don't have the human capital, but we're teaching our human capital to adopt a culture that that cannot succeed. Exactly right. Right.
Right. So if you're gonna run the world, you need Eaton and Sandhurst to to to provide an administrative class that's tough, clear thinking, has a a well defined mission I don't start are sacrificing. You need Christianity. Well, it's well, both of those, you know, certainly, Eden was a Christian school. Right.
You you if you if you're gonna be part of a project that is longer than a lifetime, then you have to understand that this is about you know, at the root, this is about your immortal soul, and your soul is immortal. And that that triggers a very different way of looking at the world and a very different way of thinking. And then you have to be able to collaborate across time and space in very powerful ways. That takes trust and faith. You have to be agreement capable, and you can't run a a unipolar model, let alone a successful multipolar model unless you're agreement capable.
So this is Lavrov's term, and this is what the Russians understood, and this is why they whooped our ass in Ukraine. They are agreement capable, and we are not. Now we're sure you've heard plenty of those free phone promises from America's biggest wireless carriers. If those deals sound too good to be true, it's probably because they are very often too good to be true. They come with layers of fine print requiring you to sign up for four lines, plus activation fees, plus, plus, plus, this, that, the other thing.
You don't even understand what you're signing up for. And by the time you're done, you've paid for that free phone three x. It was a pretty expensive free phone. It's kind of a scam, honestly. Our wireless company is called PureTalk, and and it's got a much better and much more straightforward offer, and it comes with no strings whatsoever attached.
With a qualifying plan of just $35 a month, you get legitimately the brand new Samsung Galaxy a 26 for free. It's actually free. There aren't hidden costs. You're not signing up the rest of your life or promising to name your kid after them or something. From virtually indestructible gorilla glass to next generation camera lenses, the phone has basically everything that you want.
All you need to do is switch to PureTalk. $35 a month for unlimited talk, text, and 15 gigs of data with mobile hotspot, all on America's most dependable five g network. Go to puretalk.com/talker to claim your free Samsung Galaxy with qualifying plan when you switch to PureTalk wireless by Americans for Americans. Man, there's, there's absolutely so much. Let me just move back once again to, something that you said, about policymakers, the Congress, the central banks, the White House, giving up on the American model in the mid nineties when the budget deal failed.
I think you said '9 it was '95. I vaguely remember that. The, you know, this this democratic system or whatever version of a democratic system we have, our system is incapable of self perpetuating long term. It's just too dysfunctional, and that's obviously true. It's too corrupt.
It's too corrupt. It's too corrupt. Clearly true. Everyone senses that. This isn't working.
We're gonna get a new system. They figured that out thirty years ago. The one kind of brick wall that is looming right in the windshield is the debt is the debt meltdown. I mean, Ray Dalio talks about it every single day. Like, we have too much debt.
People are gonna stop buying our debt because it's clearly a bad deal. And, like, what happens then? And you suggested the control grid is in part designed to manage the population during that moment, maybe? Or Yeah. In part.
Yeah. So so if you wanna move people to a much lower economic footprint, let alone do it on a shocking basis, having complete control is obviously very confusing. So the bottom line is everybody's about to get a lot poorer. Not everybody, but a lot the majority is about to get a lot poorer. Depends on how they do that.
If you bring out breakthrough energy, you can soften the blow. There are many things you can do to soften the blow. It doesn't have to be like Russia in 9091. That's exactly what I'm saying. To be.
Can they do it that way? Yes. So it comes down to who governs, and and do they wanna do it? You know, one of my favorite lines is from Tina Turner. She says we can do this nice or rough.
Yeah. And we could do it nice, and we can do it rough. There there are ways of doing the control grid nice, and we can do it rough. And what are they planning? I don't know.
To a certain extent, remember, the way in my experience, the way they govern is they have targets and goals, and then, you know, you sort of make it up as you go. And sometimes it works and say it's very fluid. So I wonder if the AI if the data center boom, which really is the only sort of crackling sparkling piece of the real estate market right now, I think it's building data centers, development market. Just call them control grids. Control grids.
Control I mean, look. I'm They're control nodes. I'm totally opposed to it. But massive bets, economic bets on the success of AI. Right?
And the missing piece is energy, and how do you power all that? And we're already, as as you pointed out in analysis I read You have to you have to bring out the breakthrough. That's what I'm saying. So, like, either they're gonna build it on coal deposits in Wyoming or which is gonna be kinda hard because they're gonna have to say all that climate stuff we've been yelling at you about for thirty years is total bullshit. Now we're burning coal.
I don't know if they could. It was just an article in Bloomberg that Texas needs 30 new nuclear plants, and the Chinese are building enormous numbers of nuclear plants. Yeah. And there are risks in nuclear. I mean, never I'm a right winger, and I've always defended nuclear, but let's be totally honest.
Like, it's not risk free big time. Well, here's the thing. How do you how do you govern and manage nuclear plants with leadership that's not agreement capable? Completely. And and also, like, in a country that's not turning out enough people in the heart, not enough engineers.
Right. Right. So, no, I there are huge problems with that. And, but that's, like, that question is being forced on policymakers. Like, what do you do about energy?
What do you do about energy? What do you do in wind and solar? Like, we're gonna be laughing about that in five years because it's just silly. Well, one of the things you can do about energy is depopulate. Right.
Right. I'm and I know for a fact, I'm not guessing at this, that there are people running countries around the world who've thought about, like, what does AI mean for my population means I've got too many people. So this is something I know this for a fact, I'm not guessing, that leaders of countries are talking about between each other. Like, I know that. And I'm not saying they're committing genocide or whatever, but they know that they're about to They're just looking at hard statistics.
They are. That's exactly right. So there's another thing that I don't understand very well. I've just listened to people. But if you listen to Sean Parker saying, I'm gonna live to a 45, where there's an interview where the president's son-in-law says, you know, we're gonna be the last generation to die or the first generation to live forever.
So you clearly have a group of people biohacking who think they can engage in massive longevity. It makes me wanna start smoking again. I'm just being honest. I don't wanna be I just wanna move I wanna pivot away from that level of soul destroying hubris Right. Because that's what that is.
I'm God. No. You're not. And you're gonna find out the hard way that you're not. So it does make me wanna Right.
But what I'm saying is if you if you truly believe you can do that and you're not gonna allow the general population to do it for environmental reasons, then you would be for depopulation. Of course. Right. No. That's totally true.
So This is, again, Farfield. Do you think there's evidence that people will be living to a hundred and 40 five? I have no idea. I don't either. I don't really care.
In other words, there's a whole set of scenarios I don't care about. I'm interested in freedom, and I believe that the only way we can be free is through a culture that embraces the divine and builds true wealth, enduring wealth, and and living wealth, not just financial wealth. What is true wealth? True wealth? Well, you know, because I would say you're truly truly wealthy.
I feel I am. Right. I don't have that much money, but I feel that way. Well, it's an integration of living equity with financial equity. And what I learned being a financial advisor is that everyone had been taught to build financial equity, and they couldn't integrate it with living equity.
So you'd you'd work with somebody who's, you know, worth millions of dollars who said they couldn't afford organic food. I was like, are you crazy? You know, the the number one thing that causes a diminution of family wealth is health problems and and, you know, health care fraud and health care bankruptcy. It's like, you know, please take a million dollars out of your bank account and start investing in really build you know, doing everything you and your family need to be really healthy, you know, to have perfect water, to have great food, etcetera. The other thing I discovered was, you you know, everybody was trained to put their money in the national security state instead of helping their kids buy homes and and integrating with, you know, building the living equity.
So my mother's family were Quakers, and you didn't even think about buying stock until you sent all your kids to the best Quaker schools. You know, that was, like, that was first. That's what happened. It's a you're dropping so much here. I'm just trying to pause, like, tease out certain themes, but you think it's wiser, you know, if you have children, you care about them to help them buy homes than it is to Absolutely.
Who who's so can I there are two stories I'm trying to tell you? Please. Okay. During the litigation, you know, you get in the situation What litigation? So I litigated with the Department of Justice for eleven years.
Or, actually, it it was it was some of that was fisticuffing with the tax guys. But, anyway so so I had the sort of, enemy, the state process of I had 18 audits and investigations, 12 tracks of litigation, a smear campaign, and physical harassment. Oh, so they didn't like what you were saying? They didn't like the idea that I would try and stop the mortgage bubble. They really wanted to have a mortgage bubble.
And and we were doing things to bring disclosure to, to play it's called place based financials. I really believed that if local communities could see how all the money worked in their neighborhood, that we could change things. So, for example, I would constantly when I was at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, I would find neighborhoods where we were spending 250,000 per unit to build public housing, and $50,000 would buy and rehab a defaulted a foreclosed property in the FHA inventory. And so, literally, if you could just within a four or 10 block area, you know, take that 250,000 and and and spend it in the way that was most efficient in that place, you could get four or five homes for the price of one. And it was really amazing.
When I took those numbers, we did all sorts of due diligence. This is when I was a contractor, to the woman who worked for the guy who ran the $250,000 program. And I showed it to her, and I said, look. We could you know, New Orleans, Chicago, LA, we could get four or five homes for the price of one. And she turned bright red, and she said, but how would we generate fees for our friends?
Exactly. Right. Or how would we, you know, pay off foreign countries who flutter our political system with donations if, you know, if we're actually spending it to, like, build nice houses for Americans Well, but like, repair Redding, Pennsylvania, we could be spending it in wherever disgusting Middle Eastern place. So so if you look at place based financial statements, there's extraordinary opportunity to just reengineer what's already there Yeah. Of course.
Without taking money from anybody else and and making it. So I really thought if you if you create so we created a software tool called Community Wizard that would allow everybody on the Internet to just come and download the data and start looking at how the money worked in their places in way that you could see real opportunities. Okay. So let me tell you two stories. The the, the litigation starts, and literally, you go from being very wealthy and very trusted and very respected to being an enemy of the state.
No one will talk to you. Don't even know it's your phone. And suddenly, all your income stops. All your income stops. Your credit stops.
You're just frozen. And by yours, you mean yours. Yeah. Yeah. So so, anyway, so, you know, you you have the assets that you have.
Luckily, they never turned off my bank account, so I was lucky that way. But one of the things that happened was they started. I'd had a farm in New Hampshire, and I sold my share to my uncle. I had a wonderful and very wealthy uncle who was, like, the patriarch. And and he bought my and I warned him, if you buy this, you know, they may come after you too.
And he was a very stand up guy, very fearless, and he said, you know, I'll deal with that. So sure enough, I sell him the farmland. They call him, and they say, you know, your niece is a criminal, and you shouldn't be doing this blah blah blah blah. And, and they said, we want the financial records from the farm. We want all the financial records of the farm.
And he said, well, send me a letter so I can give it to my lawyer, and I'm happy to send them to you. So they you know, and this is the summer farm where all the family goes. Anyway, so so instead of sending him a letter, they show up at his house in Portsmouth, New Hampshire at 9PM at night, three FBI guys and a HUD IG guy with a subpoena, and it was designed to scare him. So the family had a big powwow. Should they drop me?
Because they don't wanna be targeted. And, and he said, well, you know, she always helped us. So it turned out, I counted it up. At that point, I had lent or given to family and friends $250,000. Just I made a lot of money.
I loved making money, and people needed help, and that's what money's for. So That is what to restate, that is what money is for. So I just always don't I hadn't even thought about it. By the way, your average, like, 23 year old NBA player who's floating all of his cousins and single mom Right. He understands that better than your average rich person.
Your obligation is to your family and including with money. Sorry. Right. Some of us are lucky, some not. Amen.
Right. So so he said she helped everyone, so I'm gonna help her. And it took eleven years, but at the very no. It was 02/2006, so that was about nine years. At at the end of the process, when I won the litigation, I got a I we got money coming in.
I sat down to either repay everybody who loaned me or gifted me money and, almost everybody. Someone just gifted. And I I counted it up, and what I realized is I had come into the litigation having loaned a quarter of a million, and then over the next nine years, exactly a quarter of a million had come back. And it it wasn't tit for tat. I mean, it was different people, different thing.
You know, some had gotten said, well, I guess she needs it back and repaid it, or some had just gifted it because they knew I'd gifted. And, literally, I put a quarter of a million out, and a quarter of a million came back. And, Tucker, if it wasn't for that money, I wouldn't be here. I would never have made it through. And it was because it was the in the People Bank, and they couldn't shut the People Bank off.
You know, they could they could do all sorts of things to shut off all all sorts of resources and income. But if it's in the people bank and the people you love and trust, you know, it comes back. So when I love that. Yeah. It's great.
So when I finished when I when I finished the litigation, I'd had a four zero one k that I'd had to bust. It had 500,000 in it. I paid 225,000 in fines and taxes to get it out. Well, the I don't think they thought they put my four zero one k under audit so I couldn't use it to finance the business. It was dirty tricks.
Anyway, so so I take the money out. So my accountant, when we get the settlement money, she said, let's fund up the $4.00 1 k. I said, no. I'm never going into business with the US government again. No way.
I I don't I don't want any of those vehicles. I'm I'm out. And I said, but the other thing is I'm taking that 500,000, and I'm bonusing it out on the People Bank. And I'm gonna start a new business, and I think that business will be successful. So I don't need that 500,000.
It'd be nice, but I don't need it. But I need to get that money back at People Bank because that is the only bank in this world I trust. And so yeah. That's like a beautiful story. Well, here's the question.
And I used to always say this with my clients. Who's gonna be there for you? Right? Who's gonna be there for you? That that's the People Bank, and you wanna invest in the People Bank.
Now, it may not be money. It may be time. It may be help. It may be there's a a wonderful book called Family Wealth by a guy named James Hughes. I don't know if you've ever heard of it or seen it.
And, basically, what he does my great uncle didn't like the book so much. He said, you're trying to turn our family into a corporation. I said, no. I'm not. But it basically teaches a family how to conspire together.
Basically, have a dinner once a month or once a whatever and talk about what's in your heart to do. You know? This person wants to do this. This person wants to do this. Some things make money.
Some things don't. But but but help each other be successful at whatever your passion is and and work as a family. You know, I always at Solari, we say don't worry about if there is a conspiracy. If you're not in one, you need to start one. And a great family should be a a conspiracy where you're trying to help each other succeed.
I love that. Yeah. I mean, these are ancient and with respect, very obvious points. Exactly. But I I don't think I've heard someone say them in a long time.
Well, but if we're gonna build a successful culture, that culture has to be good at building wealth, living wealth and financial wealth, both on an integrated basis. So if you come to Solaire, we have a curriculum called building wealth, and it has six pillars. And we organize all of our content into and around building wealth and, because it's it's part of what you have to build to build a culture that can really be part of real solutions. So the first pillar is free and inspired life. And so, you know, our theory is you have a goal, you have a relationship with the creator, and you decide.
You know, what's what's your free and inspired life? Everybody's unique. And in a decentralized world, everybody is unique. You you know, there's no there's no formula, so to speak. The second one is navigation tools, and that's where people get burned.
So we say in navigation tools, there's an official reality and then there's reality, and you need to know both. And reality is for the management of your time and money, and the official reality is for the cocktail party. And you need to not get those. Don't use the official reality to manage your time and money because then you're gonna get I mean, I clean so many people up from financial fraud and health care fraud because they believe the official reality. So you you can't do that.
The third is risk management because in this kind of dangerous environment, everything's about keeping your risk Exactly. Down. And that's more important than making money. It's more important to lower risk than make money. So in a in a in a well governed world, we'd all be, you know, focused on outside.
Growth, but now we're just We've got to be focused on risk. Loss. Right. And then the fourth is living equity, and that's all living things. That's people, that's family, that's culture, that's education, you know, all the things that go into that, and then financial equity, all the things you know.
And then the last one is, to me, the most important. It's called turtle fourth. So did you get the hat, the turtle fourth hat? I did. Yeah.
Okay. Turtle fourth is about never quitting. You must never ever quit. And the whole goal of the people who are trying to centralize is to get you to think it's hopeless. And John Rapoport used to always say, hopelessness is an op, and it's planet wide.
Well, because I am I am actually struck by, well, by everything that you've said. I think this could be, like, a nine hour conversation if we let it. But I have one more story. But I am struck also by your tone. I don't think I've ever heard someone describe dark deeds with more cheerfulness.
Like, how do you how do you not go crazy? So you have to keep a state of amusement. I mean, it's I really you know, I one of the most breakthrough moments for me in the last twenty years was when I I realized that it was okay to be happy no matter what was going on. And sometimes you can't be. It's so horrible what's going on, but I'll tell you exactly what had happened.
I had a wonderful church where I studied spiritual warfare for two and a half years at the beginning of the litigation, and it was that training that saved my life. And, but I was at a sermon, and there was a co pastor who had very long fingernails. And she was very angry, and she was shaking her hands with her long fingernails. And, you know, sometimes when you're in a big church and they point right at you, and she said she said she said, the devil can have my house and the devil can have my car, but the devil cannot have my joy. And it was like, I exploded in my head, and I said, that's it.
That is it. That is it. Hey. It's Tucker Carlson. You may have noticed that the companies whose products you buy tend to kind of hate you.
They're controlled by massive multinational corporations, and they have all kinds of weird agendas that you're supporting when you buy their products. We didn't realize that nicotine pouches, which we've used for years, were in this category. We just want a nicotine pouch. And then they lecture you and take the money you give them to support things that you hate. So we decide we're gonna make our own, and we did.
And it is, we can say, not bragging here, just stating fact, the single best nicotine pouch in the world. It's called ALT, and it comes in all kinds of excellent flavors. Wintergreen, tropical fruit, chilled mint, refreshing chills, sweet nectar, and a bunch of others that we're rolling out. By the way, there are 20 per tin, not 15 like some of our competitors will not be named. Zen.
And they're in three, six, and nine milligrams. It is the single best nicotine pouch ever made. You will not regret it. So it's a conscious decision not allow that to allow that joy to be stolen from you. Right.
And it's sometimes, it's hard. Did you ever did you ever see The Neverending Story, the movie, The Neverending Story, read the book? So so it's a wonderful child's story where, the child is the protagonist, and he's fighting a force in the universe called the nothing. And the nothing is running around the universe sucking meaning out of everything, and it's hard when you're dealing. And if you look at this digital control, it comes with an energy that's very demonic and and sucking meaning out of everything.
And they're very good. They're masterful at turning, you know, turning allies against each other. The divide and conquer thing is really heartbreaking. It's happening right now. I'm right.
I see. Yeah. And, so you're up against the nothing. And so sometimes we'll come together in a team meeting, and somebody will say, I've lost my state of amusement. And then the team's job is to help them to get a I've lost my state of I've lost my state of amusement.
And it happens. I can't you know? But it is I think of this of myself where, you know, I've had my amusement taken from me a number of times. But I always think to myself, like, if you're perennially shocked by evil in the world, like, you're a child. You're an idiot.
Like, what did you think this was? Like, don't be naive. There's a lot of evil in the world. There always has been. Don't be shocked by it.
Laugh in its face. I think You're always gonna be shocked by it. Oh, I am. You're always gonna be shocked by it. I'll tell you why you're gonna be shocked by it.
If you understand if you understand love, you can't fathom why anyone would would reject that Yes. And embrace evil because it's so stupid. It's so wasteful. It's so as my mother used to say, it's so unnecessary. You know?
It's just like it's, you just can't fathom why anybody would do it. I, you know, I I I watch the folks who are in the financial system, who are deeply corrupt and just constantly take and take and take, you know, the the plunder team. And I think, how is that to me, what they're doing is not fun. I love, you know It's not fun. It's not fun.
When when so I will tell you, I would my gift everybody has a gift. My gift was an investment bank. I was absolutely fantastic. I was just really, really good at it. And the heartbreak for me was when I got had to leave the establishment, I lost the ability.
You know, it's like a painter and you lose your ability to paint. You can't get access to colors anymore. So but I loved it. And when you do it in the right way, two plus two equals 20. And it's so exciting.
Yes. It's the best feeling in the world. It's like, Oh, I've lived it. Yeah. Yeah.
So when Van Gogh it's my theory when Van Gogh finished a painting that that's what he pow. It's like, wow. You know? It's great. And and you watch these guys do the fraud and destroy, you know, all the mortgage fraud, and it destroys neighborhoods, and it destroys family.
And it's just it's just it's like a lose lose lose, and you think, that's no fun. No. And and they're not happy. I I know a number of them, and, I had a conversation with Ray Dalio, who I do like. I don't agree with him and everything, but I I do like Ray Dalio, and he's got more perspective on life.
He had lost a child. I think he was forced to kind of think through what matters. And I asked him off camera recently, like, do you know what I know a lot of miserable billionaires. I know a couple happy billionaires, but how many happy billionaires do you know? And he's like, I know a few.
Like, I'm I'm actually pretty happy, but not that many. And that that's a tell. Right. That's a tell, and I I will tell you the debt is a symptom. It's not the problem.
The what's a symptom? The debt. Yeah. The debt. The The debt is a simple yeah.
It when there was 21,000,000,000,000 missing as of 02/2015, when we published that study in 02/2017, there's 21,000,000,000,000 of debt. Now first of all, remember, the treasury can just issue currency. They don't need debt to create the currency. And in fact, I would say historically, the greatest currencies are fiat currencies that are not debt based. So our problem is the debt basing.
But but let's just grossly oversimplify and talk about what that means with the 21,000,000,000,000. So the treasury sells pension sells treasury bonds to our pension funds, moves 21,000,000,000,000 into the bank accounts at the New York Fed member banks for the treasury. They're the depository, And then the 21,000,000,000,000 disappears out of the backdoor. So it's just a straw that's sucking our pension fund money into I call it the breakaway civilization. And meantime, we as taxpayers are now obligated to pay the debt into that we owe our pension funds, and the money is gone.
Why do you call it the breakaway civilization? Breakaway civilization was a term made famous by Richard Dolan, and it simply described a decision to create a parallel system. You know, first, it started with a black budget, but it grew, you know, call it the national security state. But but to build a civilization that literally was separate and not subject to the laws of the existing ones. So if I'm running a company and I wanna bring up new systems, I'll bring up the new systems while I'm running the old, and I'll run them in parallel, and I'll move things over slowly.
And then at some point, I bring the current thing down. And to me, that's what the financial coup was. You're moving the money out of one system and and putting it in another. So in theory, 21,000,000,000,000 is enough at a 5%, you know, interest rate to basically finance a a private government, if you will. Right?
I'm not saying that's what happened, but in theory. Do you think it did? So when I was at HUD in 1989, it was '80 late eighty nine or early ninety, I was in a meeting with the secretary, and we had brought all the regional administrators in for a meeting with the secretary. And, he was very upset because the regional administrator from California had implemented something in response to a court decision. There was a court case in the Court of Appeals, and they decided, okay.
You gotta go to the right, and so he had implemented that. And, the secretary was having literally, like, a manic episode screaming at a huge temper tantrum screaming at him. And finally, this guy said, but, mister secretary, it's the law. And he just exploded with fury, and he said, the law? The law?
I don't have to obey the law. I report to a higher moral authority. And just at that moment, it was like remember the scene in Eyes Wide Shut when you first walk in on the, you know, the secret society doing their occult ritual? You know, you had this image of, oh, you know, he literally he he doesn't have to obey the laws of The United States. He's operating under a different governance structure.
People feel that way. Right. And that you know, there there are many there's a very famous story of Lincoln, when he's talking about his what he wants to do to implement the Reconstruction policies. And he tells a story about a young child saying, you know, if I throw the fish back, dad will get mad at me. But if I, if I, if it slips from my hand accidentally and you grab it, then dad won't be mad at me.
And the implication of the story is that Lincoln has a dad that he he can't fuck. And and, you know, we're back to the question, who's dad? It's the same question as who's mister Global. And you've never gotten closer to the answer? Or you never settled on an answer?
I here's my guess. So we did I once did a two hour interview on the Salieri Report on who is mister Global where we go through all the different theories. So I think, literally, you have intergenerational pools of capital, which meet and work by consensus. You know, it's a committee system, and they do have a set of rules. And what I don't understand, I think their challenge is their risk managers.
And they're they're constantly pulling out a lot of money, and they always need to get that dividend. And the question is, why do they need the dividend? Where's the money going? Because they're constantly running the financial system to extract extra money. There's always disappearing money, and the question is why, and where is this going?
And you think it's going to infrastructure projects? I think it's going to infrastructure projects. I think it's going to big investments like, you know, building the control grid is a big one. And one of my questions on the financial coup is are they literally setting up an endowment so they can run, you know, the world on a global governance that's a dictatorship with an endowment. So it's the, you know, it's it's a bigger endowment than anybody else's.
You said a couple minutes ago that the debt, the our the US government's debt, which I think even people are not interested in this stuff are aware that it's it's it's there and that it's a problem, is not the problem. It's a symptom. What did what did you mean? We if you look at our current model, it is not being run on an economic basis, and it's getting much worse, and it's getting worse steadily. So let me give you an example.
Our military budget this year is approximately 850,000,000,000, and the president wants to take it or the secretary of defense is saying we've gotta take it to a trillion. Our HHS budget is 1,800,000,000,000.0. Doctor Skidmore just did an analysis. If we went back to 2,010 levels of disability, we would lower that by half a trillion dollars. Half a trillion?
Half a trillion. So America is I call it the great poisoning. We've poisoned ourselves, and it's blowing the budget. And it's not just blowing the budget of the federal government. If you look at family budgets, it's blowing their budgets.
You know, poison people are not productive, and and their health care costs can be very expensive. And you see that at the federal level, and you see that at the state level, local level, and the family level. That's gotta be dealt with. But, you know, if if you look at the budget right now, it's expenses are skyrocketing, and and it's skyrocketing because the fundamental model of what we do and how we do it, it helps to centralize, but it's not economic. And so you gotta change that.
Now the What we do and how we do it are do you mean how we live? Right. So now I get to tell you my last story. Okay? I can't wait.
Okay. This is called the red button story. And if you put my name in on the Internet, you'll get, you know, a copy of this story because it happened to me in February. I was asked by a health care practitioner to give a presentation called how the money works on organized crime, and it later became a very famous article called narcodollars for beginners. And it was meant to be a light, funny description of the intersection of organized crime flows with Washington and Wall Street.
So my book I have an online book called Dylan Reed and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits that is a case study that teaches people it's designed to be like a business school's case study that shows you that intersection between illegal cash flows and Wall Street and Washington. Anyway, so I'm in the middle of the speech, and I'm describing the congressional testimony on the dark alliance allegations that happened in 1998. And at the time, I was helping a reporter, do research, and she was covering the hearings. And a spokesperson for the Department of Justice told her so I'm in the middle of the speech, and there are about a hundred people. And we're the conference that where I'm speaking is, a conference that happens once a year by this group, and the focus is on how we evolve our society spiritually.
So this is a very spiritually committed group of people who wanna evolve our society spiritually. Okay. So I'm describing the, the fact that a spokesperson for the Department of Justice told this reporter I was helping that The US economy launders 500,000,000,000 to a trillion dollars a year of all illegal money. So that's narcotics trafficking. That's financial fraud.
That's, you know, everything. It's human trafficking. And, and the number is now much much bigger, but they were describing the fact that The US economy and financial system is the leader globally in laundering dirty money. So I said to this wonderful group of spiritually evolved people, what would happen if we stopped being the global leader in money laundering? And we had a little conversation.
They said, well, you know, the money would leave the New York Stock Exchange and go to Singapore or Zurich or London, and and we'd have we might have trouble financing the government deficit because we, you know, now we borrow over half of the money currently. And and so we we you know, our taxes might go up or our government checks might stop. So I said, okay. Let's pretend there's a big red button up here on the lectern. And if you push that button, you can stop all hard hard narcotics trafficking in your town, your county, your state tomorrow, thus offending the people who control 500,000,000,000 to a trillion dollars a year of all dirty money in the accumulated capital they're on.
Who here will push the button? And out of a hundred people dedicated to evolving our society spiritually, guess how many would push the button? I don't know. One. The other 99 would not push the button.
So I said keep all those kids from dying? Yeah. It would. So wait. So so I said to them I said, why would you not push the button?
So we had a little conversation. They said, we don't want our taxes to go up. We don't want our government checks to stop, and we don't want our four zero one k's and IRAs to go down. So if I had voted, there would have been two pushing the red button. So what I discovered that day, the problem was that not that they wouldn't push the red button, but they wouldn't go into the Invention Room and have a an honest conversation about what the real problem was and how I call it how we turn the red button green, how we make money pushing the red button because then we can push the red button.
And you have to push the red button because you cannot become wealthy liquidating your children. You cannot become wealthy by poisoning your children and your people. And yet that's what we've been doing in America for decades now. And now here's the political problem. If you're the new president of The United States and you walk into the Oval Office, your political guy is gonna say to you, mister president, the American people just spent billions getting you voted in as president, and now they want payback.
They want their government contract. They want their privatization. They want the COLA increase on Social Security. They want a community block development grant. And you're gonna turn to your secretary of treasury, and he says, well, you better be nice to the people who control 500,000,000,000 to a trillion dollars and the accumulated capital they're on.
And, of course, the number is much bigger now. Now how are you gonna press the red button? You can't. And if you look at the history of politics in America, the history is everybody wants their check, and they want the story of I am good. I'm a good Christian.
I'm not doing any of this corrupt organized crime stuff. You know? I'm just voting. You know? So so I say it this way.
When Goldwater the end of World War two, George Keenan said, we got 6% of the people and 50% of the resources, and we're gonna have to be tough if we keep this going. So Goldwater ran for president. He said, we're gonna have to drop a lot of bombs, and the American people said, oh, no. We don't wanna do that. We're good Christians.
So Jimmy Carter came along, and he shivered in front of the fireplace, and Americans said, oh, no. We don't wanna do that. We don't wanna cut back. And so the Bushes came along and said, you know something? You all are good Christians.
Here's your check. Don't ask questions. And that's where we've been. Everybody wants the story of I am good. And the problem, you can you can push the red button.
You can turn it green, but it has to be done one neighborhood at a time. You need to take all the money in a place, and instead of spending the government money to centralize control and on the control grid, you need to reengineer it to build real wealth. And and you've gotta decentralize the economic power. If you centralize and you create lots of billionaires, you're gonna shrink the pie, and that's what we've been doing. And we've been making money from poisoning each other.
If people want to learn more about your research and your views on things, if they wanna know about the eleven years you spent fighting the feds for, blowing a whistle on them, where do they where do they get that information? So we publish the Solari report. It's solari.com, s 0 l a r I Com, and we have a subscription service. And we have a lot of free you know, so if you wanna get to know us, you can come in and you can learn tremendous amounts from the free stuff. We'd love to have you as a subscriber.
And, we have a great group of subscribers. We have what happened to me was I I fell into this because I had terrible, terrible experiences with the corporate media, And, and so I just started doing shows and giving out my email and saying, if you have a question, ask me. And over many years, the questions would come in, and we'd publish the answers and, you know, go on and on. It went on for free for a long time. And then finally, I got so many questions that I would just you know, I finally said I need to hire people.
But we have this global network of subscribers and audience who get on the site, share comments. They're brilliant, and we help each other figure figure things out. And we've literally become an intelligence network. You know? And it's all people who wanna be free, and they all understand one can't be free unless we're all free.
You know, this is an all or nothing thing. They either get the control grid or we're free, and the only way we're gonna be free is if everybody's free. It's an all or nothing deal. And there are a lot of people now who understand this and are gathering. And, you know, so I have many subscribers.
I I just know from what they say. I have many subscribers who are your subscribers because they feel and I feel you're on the same journey. Yeah. I'm just not a very systematic thinker. So, a lot of my instincts tell me that you're telling the truth, and, of course, I agree completely with your orientation.
I just my brain doesn't work that way. So it's been a a true pleasure to hear all of this. Thank you. Well, thank you. I I love your work.
So Thank you. I've been a I've been a subscriber from the very beginning. Underground bases. You're blowing my mind. Catherine Austin Fisk, thank you very much.
Thank you. So it turns out that YouTube is suppressing this show. On one level, that's not surprising. That's what they do. But on another level, it's shocking.
With everything that's going on in the world right now, all the change taking place in our economy and our politics with the wars we're on the cusp of fighting right now, Google has decided you should have less information rather than more, and that is totally wrong. It's immoral. What can you do about it? Well, we could whine about it. That's a waste of time.
We're not in charge of Google, or we could find a way around it, it, a way that you could actually get information that is true, not intentionally deceptive. The way to do that on YouTube, we think, is to subscribe to our channel. Subscribe. Hit the little bell icon to be notified when we upload and share this video. That way, you'll have a much higher chance of hearing actual news and information.
So we hope that you'll do that.
