9-25-25 DailyBriefs.info archive
9-25-25 DailyBriefs.info archive
This online article from "Joachim Bartoll Official" contrasts muscle glycogen replenishment strategies following intense exercise, specifically comparing traditional carb-fed athletes against those who are fat adapted through an animal-based or carnivorous diet. The author argues that consuming carbohydrates is "toxic" and unnecessary, asserting that the body’s natural fat-adapted metabolism provides glucose through gluconeogenesis more effectively and less harmfully than external carbs. A key theme is that fat-adapted athletes require less total glycogen and recover significantly faster—in about 12 hours compared to 24 hours for carb-dependent individuals—making the species-appropriate, animal-based diet superior for athletic performance and overall health. The text serves to advocate for a carnivore diet while dismissing traditional sports nutrition science as "pseudo-science."
The provided text is an excerpt from an article by Joachim Bartoll Official, titled "Muscle Glycogen Replenishment After Exhaustive Exercise — Carb-Fed vs. Fat Adapted," which heavily promotes an animal-based, obligate hyper carnivore diet over carbohydrate consumption for athletic performance and general health. The author argues that being "fat adapted" allows the body to recover muscle glycogen much faster, potentially in 12 hours, compared to 24 hours needed by athletes reliant on "toxic" carbohydrates and a glucose metabolism. Bartoll critiques conventional sports nutrition studies, suggesting they are flawed because they focus on carb-dependent individuals who have lost their natural fat-adaptation ability and whose glycogen depletion is far greater than that of fat-adapted athletes. He asserts that carbohydrates are harmful because they cause toxic glucose elevation and damage (glycation), whereas fat-adapted individuals efficiently produce necessary glucose via gluconeogenesis. The source overall functions as an opinion piece based on the author's observations and theories, while referencing a summary of a study from Examine.com to support his contrasting viewpoint.
keepSave to note
copy_all
docsAdd note
audio_magic_eraserAudio Overview
flowchartMind Map
Discuss Glycogen Replenishment.
Glycogen replenishment is the process of restoring the body’s glycogen stores, which serve as the primary storage form of glucose in the liver and muscle tissues1. Glycogen acts as a readily mobilizable energy reserve crucial for meeting sudden energy demands, such as those encountered during physical activity or fasting1.
The total body glycogen stores are estimated to be approximately 100 grams in the liver and 400 grams in skeletal muscle1. Due to the significant mass of skeletal muscles, roughly 80% of total glycogen is stored there1. Glycogen is stored in a hydrated form, associating with about three to four parts water per part of glycogen1.
The efficiency and duration of glycogen replenishment depend greatly on an individual's diet and physiological state—specifically, whether they are "carb-fed" (dependent on glucose metabolism) or "fat adapted" (relying on fat metabolism, ketones, and gluconeogenesis)2.
Glycogen Replenishment in Carb-Fed Athletes
The source describes the state of being carb-fed as running on a toxic glucose metabolism that is dependent on unnatural exogenous carbohydrates23. Consuming carbohydrates is stated to be inferior and toxic, causing harm due to the release of uncontrollable amounts of glucose into the bloodstream, which is claimed to instigate glycation and soft tissue damage3.
Key aspects of glycogen replenishment in carb-fed athletes:
• Recovery Time: For those dependent on exogenous carbohydrates, 12 hours is insufficient for full muscle glycogen replenishment, which typically takes up to 24 hours1....
• Depletion and Requirement: Carb-fed athletes deplete approximately 60–80 mmol/kg (4200–5600 mmol total)6. They require roughly 10 grams of carbohydrates per kilogram of body mass over 24 hours (e.g., 700g or ~2800 kcal) to fully restore muscle glycogen67.
• Replenishment Rate: Restoration occurs at about 10–15 mmol/kg/h via insulin-driven GLUT46.
• Order of Restoration: Liver glycogen is replenished first, as it is vital for maintaining blood glucose levels for the central nervous system4. Muscle glycogen, which serves as a local energy source, replenishes slower4. A study involving carb-fed cyclists found that while liver glycogen levels were higher after 6 and 12 hours of recovery, muscle glycogen levels remained lower than before exercise after 12 hours4.
Glycogen Replenishment in Fat-Adapted Athletes
The source advocates that the natural state is fat adaptation, where the body utilizes fat and ketones as fuel, and relies on gluconeogenesis (GNG) to produce the exact necessary amounts of glucose23.
Key aspects of glycogen replenishment in fat-adapted athletes:
• Reduced Need: Fat-adapted individuals use significantly more fat and ketones for energy, resulting in less need for glucose and glycogen, especially during prolonged exercise8.
• Reduced Stores: Fat-adapted bodies typically store 20 to 40% less glycogen compared to carb-fed athletes (80–100 mmol/kg vs. 120–140 mmol/kg)8.
• Slower Depletion: Glycogen depletion during physical activity is much slower because the body relies more on fat and ketones, leading to less glycogen "wasted"6.
• Depletion and Requirement: Fat-adapted athletes deplete approximately 30–40 mmol/kg (2100–2800 mmol total)6. They require about 5–6 g/kg glucose equivalent (350–420g)6. GNG supplies approximately 200–300g of glucose over 24 hours, with ketones covering other energy needs6.
• Faster Recovery: Due to the lower absolute amount of glycogen that needs to be restored, the total recovery time is significantly shorter (e.g., 12–18 hours vs. 24 hours for carb-fed)6. The source concludes that a fat-adapted athlete can recover in 12 hours5.
• Dietary Implications: The author notes that athletes who switch to an animal-based or carnivore diet, especially one incorporating raw or minimally cooked meat and organ meats, have been observed to outperform their previous abilities and recover faster once they are fat adapted910. The process of becoming truly fat adapted and achieving superior performance is said to take at least 6 months or longer, with initial fat adaptation taking 12–18 weeks79.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Fat Adapted Metabolism.
The discussion of Fat Adapted Metabolism centers on the body's natural physiological state, contrasting it sharply with a metabolism dependent on consuming external carbohydrates12.
Core Mechanisms and Function
Fat Adapted Metabolism (FAM) is presented as our natural human state, relying on fat, ketones, and glucose produced internally through gluconeogenesis (GNG)1.
1. Fuel Utilization: When fat adapted, the body utilizes significantly more fat and ketones for energy3.
2. Glucose Regulation: A key component of FAM is gluconeogenesis (GNG), which produces the exact amounts of glucose the body needs at all times2. This regulated internal production is seen as superior to consuming exogenous carbohydrates2.
3. Contrast with Glucose Metabolism: The alternative, running on a glucose metabolism dependent on unnatural exogenous carbohydrates, is described as a toxic system12. When carbohydrates are consumed, they are broken down and released as uncontrollable amounts of glucose into the bloodstream2.
Health and Toxicity Implications
The sources emphasize that Fat Adapted Metabolism is the healthier, non-toxic way for the body to operate:
• Toxicity of Glucose: Any elevation of glucose above normal levels maintained by GNG is considered toxic2. This toxicity causes damage to soft tissues and organs2.
• Glycation: High glucose levels instigate glycation, where glucose binds to proteins and fatty acids, rendering them toxic and useless2.
• Superiority of FAM: Being fat adapted is considered superior to consuming carbohydrates for "fuel" because it is non-toxic and avoids causing great harm to the body24.
Dietary Requirements for Fat Adaptation
Achieving and maintaining a fat adapted state requires following the natural, species-appropriate human diet45:
• Required Diet: This diet is defined as an animal-based ketogenic diet or, more specifically, the obligate hyper carnivore diet67.
• Specific Foods: One should only consume animal-based foods, including meat, organ meats, and eggs, and possibly the occasional dairy47. It is suggested that food should be consumed as uncooked as possible, as raw meat is considered far superior to cooked meat47.
• Toxic Foods to Avoid: The sources strictly advise against consuming carbohydrates, as they are toxic and damaging2.... Furthermore, one must avoid any plant-based food or oils, such as seed/vegetable oils, as they are deemed extremely toxic and damaging to the body49.
Benefits for Athletic Performance and Recovery
Fat adaptation provides significant benefits for athletes, particularly concerning glycogen management and recovery time:
• Increased Performance: Athletes who have switched to a carnivore diet and become fat adapted have been observed to outperform their previous selves, achieving new personal records (PRs)67.
• Reduced Glycogen Need: Since the fat-adapted body uses more fat and ketones for energy, especially during prolonged exercise, less glucose and glycogen are required3. Fat-adapted athletes store 20% to 40% less glycogen (80–100 mmol/kg) compared to carb-fed athletes (120–140 mmol/kg)3.
• Slower Glycogen Depletion: Less glycogen is "wasted" during physical activity because the body relies more heavily on fat and ketones for fuel, resulting in a much slower depletion rate10.
◦ Fat-adapted athletes deplete approximately 30–40 mmol/kg (2100–2800 mmol total)10.
◦ Carb-fed athletes deplete approximately 60–80 mmol/kg (4200–5600 mmol total)10.
• Faster Recovery: Since fat-adapted athletes deplete and store less glycogen, they require less time for muscle glycogen replenishment3.
◦ A fat-adapted athlete can recover in 12–18 hours410.
◦ A carb-fed athlete requires 24 hours to fully restore muscle glycogen, needing an equivalent of 700g of toxic carbohydrates410.
Timeframe for Adaptation
The process of transitioning to FAM and achieving peak performance takes considerable time:
• Gluconeogenesis Reinstatement: The ability of GNG to function properly takes at least 6 weeks9.
• Fat Adaptation: Fat adaptation requires 12–18 weeks9.
• Superior Performance: Real fat adaptation and superior performance are generally first noticeable after 6 months or longer, taking 6 to 12 months for athletes who have fully switched to a carnivore diet69. Studies performed on people who are not fully adapted to utilizing fat and ketones may show poor performance because their GNG is impaired9.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Carbohydrate Toxicity.
Based on the provided sources, the concept of Carbohydrate Toxicity is central to the author's argument against consuming exogenous carbohydrates and in favor of a fat-adapted metabolism. The sources define this toxicity through several mechanisms related to elevated glucose levels and their effects on the body.
1. Elevated Glucose Levels are Inherently Toxic
The primary claim is that any elevation of glucose above the normal levels maintained by gluconeogenesis (GNG) is toxic1. GNG is presented as the mechanism by which a naturally "fat adapted" body produces the exact, necessary amounts of glucose at all times1.
When carbohydrates are consumed (i.e., when individuals are "carb-fed"), they are broken down and released as uncontrollable amounts of glucose into the bloodstream1. This process is contrasted with a fat-adapted state, where the body relies on fat, ketones, and GNG2.
2. Mechanisms of Damage
The toxicity of elevated glucose manifests through physical damage and chemical reactions in the body:
• Soft Tissue and Organ Damage: Elevated glucose levels are stated to cause damage to soft tissues and organs1.
• Glycation: High glucose levels are said to instigate glycation1. Glycation is defined as the process where glucose binds to protein and fatty acids, which renders these molecules toxic and useless1.
• Harmful Fuel Source: Consuming carbohydrates for "fuel" is deemed not only inferior to being fat adapted but also very toxic and causes great harm to your body1. The consumption of toxic carbohydrates is described as a "lose-lose scenario"1.
3. Carbohydrates in Diet and Athletic Performance
The author views the reliance on carbohydrates as running on a "toxic glucose metabolism"2. This dependence is seen as a result of "backwards pseudo-science of 'nutrition' and 'sports nutrition'" that has deceived people into consuming toxic and damaging carbohydrates1.
Specific examples of substances and diets are also labeled toxic:
• Consuming toxic carbs is required for glycogen replenishment in carb-fed athletes, which destroys the body3.
• Any substance containing carbohydrates or sugar is generally considered toxic4. Related posts include titles such as: "No! You Should Not ‘Eat’ Carbs Ever!"4, "Zero Reasons to Consume Toxic Carbohydrates"4, "All Sugars/Carbohydrates Turn into Toxic Glucose"4, and "Cyclic Dextrin is Toxic Crap"4.
• Even if following a ketogenic diet, the inclusion of plant-based food or seed/vegetable oils is described as extremely toxic and damaging to the body, causing cellular damage35.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Species Appropriate Diet.
The Species Appropriate Diet is presented in the sources as the natural human species-appropriate, species-specific natural diet1.... This dietary approach is considered essential for optimal health, superior athletic performance, and ensuring the body operates in its natural state of fat adaptation4.... The source also refers to this diet as the natural obligate hyper carnivore diet7.
Core Components and Composition
The Species Appropriate Diet is strictly defined by the exclusion of plant matter and the inclusion of specific animal-based foods38:
1. Animal-Based Focus: One should only be consuming animal-based foods8.
2. Specific Foods: The diet primarily involves consuming meat, organ meats, eggs3.
3. Optional Inclusion: Perhaps the occasional dairy may also be included3.
Preparation
A crucial aspect of the diet relates to how the food is prepared:
• Food should be consumed as uncooked as possible8.
• Raw meat is far superior to cooked meat because heat degenerates and destroys nutrients and also makes the food harder to digest8.
Exclusions and Toxicity
The sources emphatically warn against consuming anything outside of the animal kingdom, viewing these substances as toxic and damaging:
• Avoidance of Carbohydrates: The diet requires avoiding carbohydrates, as consuming them is defined as running on a "toxic glucose metabolism"4. Carbohydrates are considered toxic and damaging58.
• Avoidance of Plant-Based Foods: One must avoid any plant-based food8. The sources advise against following "stupid ketogenic diet[s]" that allow for any kind of plant-based food8.
• Avoidance of Oils: The diet strictly prohibits oils, especially seed/vegetable oils, which are described as extremely toxic and damaging to the body89.
Physiological Basis and Benefits
Following the Species Appropriate Diet allows the body to function as nature intended by promoting a fat adapted state36:
• Fat Adaptation: This diet facilitates the ability to utilize fat and ketones as fuel while producing necessary glucose via gluconeogenesis (GNG)5. This reliance on GNG is deemed superior because it produces the exact amounts of glucose that we need at all times, avoiding the toxicity caused by elevated glucose levels from consuming exogenous carbohydrates5.
• Superior Performance and Recovery: Once athletes become truly fat adapted (a process that takes 6 to 12 months for superior performance)79, they are observed to outperform their old selves with new PRs and recover faster than carb-fed individuals3....
• Non-Toxicity: Adhering to the Species Appropriate Diet allows for a faster recovery without any toxicity and prevents the damage caused by consuming toxic carbohydrates38.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Athletic Recovery Time.
Athletic recovery time, particularly in the context of restoring energy reserves after exhaustive exercise, is discussed extensively in the sources, with the necessary duration differing significantly based on whether an athlete utilizes a "carb-fed" or a "fat adapted" metabolism.
The recovery process primarily concerns glycogen replenishment, which is the restoration of glucose stored in the muscle tissues and the liver, serving as a readily mobilizable energy reserve1.
Recovery Time for Carb-Fed Athletes
Athletes running on a "toxic glucose metabolism dependent on unnatural exogenous carbohydrates" require a much longer recovery period for full muscle glycogen restoration2.
• Duration Required: For individuals dependent on consuming carbohydrates, 12 hours is insufficient for full muscle glycogen replenishment1.... It typically takes up to 24 hours to achieve full restoration1....
• Study Findings: A randomized crossover trial involving trained cyclists found that while consuming 10 grams of carbohydrates per kilogram of body mass over a 12-hour recovery period:
◦ Liver glycogen levels were higher after 6 and 12 hours of recovery than before exercise3. Liver glycogen is prioritized because it is crucial for maintaining blood glucose levels for the central nervous system3.
◦ In contrast, muscle glycogen levels remained lower than before exercise after 12 hours of recovery3.
• Depletion and Restoration Rate: Carb-fed athletes deplete approximately 60–80 mmol/kg (4200–5600 mmol total)5. To replenish this, they require roughly 10 grams of carbohydrates per kilogram of body mass over 24 hours (e.g., 700g)4.... Restoration occurs at a rate of approximately 10–15 mmol/kg/h, driven by insulin and GLUT45.
• The Cost of Recovery: This slower recovery mandates consuming "a shit-ton of toxic and damaging carbohydrates," which is stated to destroy the body6. Consuming toxic carbs is a "lose-lose scenario"8.
Recovery Time for Fat-Adapted Athletes
In contrast, athletes who follow a natural, species-appropriate diet (animal-based ketogenic or obligate hyper carnivore diet) and are truly fat adapted experience significantly faster recovery times2....
• Duration Required: A fat-adapted athlete can recover in 12 hours6. The total time for muscle glycogen restoration is estimated to be 12–18 hours5.
• Reasons for Faster Recovery:
1. Lower Glycogen Stores: Fat-adapted individuals utilize fat and ketones as energy and, therefore, require less glucose and glycogen10. They store 20 to 40% less glycogen than carb-fed athletes (80–100 mmol/kg vs. 120–140 mmol/kg)10. This lower absolute storage means less glycogen needs to be replenished after exhaustion10.
2. Slower Depletion: During physical activity, fat-adapted athletes rely more on fat and ketones, leading to a much slower rate of glycogen depletion5. They typically deplete only about 30–40 mmol/kg (2100–2800 mmol total)5.
• Recovery Mechanism: The necessary glucose equivalent (350–420g, or 5–6g/kg) is primarily supplied by gluconeogenesis (GNG), which provides approximately 200–300g of glucose over 24 hours, while ketones cover non-glucose energy needs5.
• Superiority: Fat-adapted athletes achieve faster recovery without causing any toxicity or damage to the body, making it a "win-win" scenario69.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
This extensive article from The Unz Review presents a furious and highly critical indictment of conservative activist Charlie Kirk following his death, characterizing him as a "traitor to patriots" and a false opposition figure. The core argument accuses Kirk of being an agent for "organized Jewish power" and Jewish billionaires, claiming he promoted ideas like Christian Zionism and a "proposition nation" view of America to facilitate the "Great Replacement" of the nation's European-descended population with cheap foreign labor. Furthermore, the author condemns other nationalists for mourning Kirk, viewing such sentiment as a "feminine reaction" that wastes political energy and demonstrates a failure to distinguish between true friends and enemies within the political landscape, particularly the "center-right" establishment that works against genuine nationalist interests. The piece advocates that nationalists should "take the win" from his demise, as it serves as a consequence for his perceived betrayal, while simultaneously dismissing the importance of non-violent political action in the face of a perceived, unchangeable "downward trajectory" for Western democracies.
Charlie Kirk Traitor
Nationalist Perspective
Jewish Influence
Discuss Charlie Kirk Traitor.
The query regarding Charlie Kirk being labeled a "traitor" draws from an article titled "Charlie Kirk Was A Traitor to Patriots and Karma Hurts" by Rob Crease, which comprehensively outlines the author’s perspective on Kirk's alleged betrayals across ideological, racial, and religious lines12. The article argues that nationalists should "take the win" following Kirk's death, seeing it as the removal of a political enemy and a traitor13.
The accusations of treason leveled against Charlie Kirk can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Betrayal of Race and National Identity
Kirk is explicitly labeled a "traitor against his own race"1. This accusation stems from his view of America and his alleged political actions:
• Proposition Nation Theory: Kirk argued that America was "just an idea," a set of "values" that could allow foreign "hordes of cheap labour" to come and replace the existing population14.
• Racial Replacement: He was accused of being paid by Jewish billionaires to "sell-out his own nation and replace its European foundational stock with the third world"1. Some believe this stance affirms the "constitutional magic dirt theory"—the belief that all people are interchangeable if they follow the constitutional foundation of government56.
• Compensation for Treason: As a traitor, Kirk was allegedly compensated greatly, receiving millions of dollars, three mansions, and free travel to "subvert your religion, cripple your economy, and aid your racial genocide"7. At the time of his death, his estimated net worth was $12 million, accumulated largely through his work as founder and CEO of Turning Point USA, real estate, and speaking engagements89.
2. Betrayal of Christian Faith (Christian Zionism)
Kirk is also accused of being a "traitor to his supposed Christian faith"1.
• Promoting False Doctrine: He promoted the false doctrine of dispensationalism and "Christian Zionism," a term hardly used before 1990, which the author claims has led to white countries fighting and dying in various wars for Israel1.
• Paid Israeli Agent: He was described as a "paid Israeli-agent" funded by the very people Christ threw out of the temple1.
• Defense of the Talmud: Kirk defended the Talmud, the Jewish "Book Of The Rabbis," which the source claims blasphemes Christ and states that all non-Jews shall be slaves1....
• Market as God: His God was reportedly "not Jesus Christ but the market itself," making him an apologist for plutocratic capitalism12.
3. Role as False Opposition and Gatekeeper
The source argues that Kirk was not a true patriot but rather an establishment tool designed to control dissent:
• Center-Right Traitor: The biggest enemy of real patriots is identified as "not the left, but is instead the center-right," including "phonies, fakes, traitors and false opposition bought and paid for by our enemies"13.
• Working for Organized Jewry: The biggest enemy of nationalism is considered "organised Jewish power"14, and Kirk worked on their behalf to "lie and cover up Jewish war crimes in Gaza," diminishing atrocities like the worst killing of women and children seen since WW214. He was a "paid agent" working for "The Jewish Lobby"14.
• Dissent Pressure Valve: Kirk was allegedly put forward by "the system" as a "sort of pressure valve for dissent" to prevent nationalists from regaining sovereignty15. His primary role on college campuses was to prevent conservatives from being radicalized into true nationalists16.
• Embracing Degeneracy: Kirk embraced the LGBTQ agenda, appearing live on stage at Turning Point USA events with drag-queen "Lady MAGA" and a black homosexual influencer12. Nationalists, conversely, were excluded, and those asking "serious question[s]" were removed12.
Counter-Arguments and Nuance from Commenters
While the main article is definitive in its condemnation, several commenters presented views suggesting Kirk might have been changing or was being unfairly judged:
• Evolving Views: Some asserted that Kirk was "changing, he was learning more and getting based"16. It was noted that he had started using vague nationalist talking points as his young followers were leaving him, suggesting a moderating of his message to contain dissent16. Others claimed he had "come around on immigration" and was moving away from Christian Zionism17....
• Positive Contributions: Some argued that Kirk was better than 90% of popular conservatives because he had featured Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith at his TPUSA conference, went totally against the GOP establishment on the Ukraine issue, and was friends with Candace Owens20.
• Age and Indoctrination: Some suggested that Kirk, dying at age 31, was merely a product of the political milieu and was "roped into GOP politics"21. It was argued that he was recruited right out of school and was just beginning to wise up and form his own opinions when he was killed22....
Regardless of whether he was changing, the sources note that his death is being exploited by the system. The Israeli military has reportedly exploited his death by scrawling his name on Merkava tank shells to be used in Gaza25. Furthermore, American Attorney General Pam Bondi announced she would crack down on "hate speech" (specifically antisemitism) in response to the shooting, leading to accusations that his "manufactured martyrdom" is being used by the system to take away political energy and agency26....
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Nationalist Perspective.
The Nationalist Perspective discussed in the source views the current political landscape as a struggle for sovereignty against established powers, emphasizing racial identity, anti-Zionism, and antagonism toward the "false opposition" on the center-right.
Core Identity and Goals
Nationalists are urged to seek "real change"1 and focus on "regaining sovereignty"1 by dismantling the existing system2.
• Racial Identity: The nationalist view strongly asserts that America was not "just an idea" or a set of "values," but was defined by its "European foundational stock"3. Traitors, like Charlie Kirk, are accused of working against their own race by arguing that "foreign hoards of cheap labour could come and replace" this foundational stock3.
• The Revolutionary Path: Nationalists are encouraged to be revolutionaries who seek to take the system down and "take power at almost any cost," as opposed to reformers who attempt to fix a "rigged system" by negotiating with the "occupying enemy"2.
Identifying the Primary Enemy
A central tenet of the perspective outlined in the source is the clear identification of the enemy, maintaining "friend/enemy distinction"4:
• Organized Jewish Power: The "biggest enemy of nationalism is organised Jewish power"5. The focus for nationalists should be directly challenging this power67. The author states that organized Jewry works to sell out the nation, replace the European foundational stock with the third world3, and promotes Zionism globally8.
• The False Opposition (Center-Right): The true enemy of "real patriots" is identified as "not the left, but is instead the center-right"4. This group consists of "phonies, fakes, traitors and false opposition bought and paid for by our enemies"4—derisively termed "cuckservatives"4. The center-right is seen as a "pressure valve for dissent" put forward by the system to prevent citizens from regaining sovereignty1.
• Charlie Kirk as a Traitor: Charlie Kirk is identified as a "traitor to Patriots"3, a paid Israeli-agent3, and a traitor against his own race3. He allegedly worked on behalf of organized Jewry to lie and cover up Jewish war crimes in Gaza, which are called a genocide5. He was accused of subverting religion, crippling the economy, and aiding "racial genocide"2.
Strategy and Political Dynamics
The nationalist perspective advocates specific responses to political events and analyzes ideological co-option:
• "Take the Win": Nationalists are advised that if the radical left takes actions that benefit the nationalist movement (e.g., the killing of traitors), they should "take the win"39.
• Avoiding Emotional Manipulation: Nationalists should avoid the "feminine reaction" of defending traitors like Kirk4 and should not be emotionally manipulated by the "slop-machine"2. Mourning Kirk is viewed as a sign that the right-wing lacks distinction and are "stone cold losers"4.
• Co-option of Nationalist Talk: The establishment attempts to appropriate nationalist talking points (e.g., Kirk vaguely moderating his message on immigration) as a form of "containment" to keep young conservatives from being radicalized into "true nationalists" and to keep them invested in the political system6.
• The Left as a Partial Ally: The sources note that when elements of the left protest Israel, they are "half right" and are often doing a "better job of challenging Jewish power than the right"7. It is suggested that many nationalists were once leftists and young people are fluid and have potential for radicalism once they realize the entire West is "occupied"7.
Related Ideological Concepts
Some comments elaborate on the meaning of nationalism:
• True Political Nationalism: This is described as seeking the best solution for "the nation" as a whole, regardless of whether the solution is traditionally "left" or "right" (e.g., nationalizing the Fed)10.
• Racialism: One commenter self-identifies as a "racialist" rather than a "nationalist," stating that a post-WW2 American has "no nation"11.
• Kosher-Antisemitism: The perspective warns of the system offering a "safe and controlled antisemitism" (called "kosher-antisemitism") to divert political energy away from real nationalism12. This strategy allegedly involves pushing figures who offer controlled opposition (like Dave Smith or Darryl Cooper) that ignores Jewish subversion1213.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Jewish Influence.
The provided source, an article titled "Charlie Kirk Was A Traitor to Patriots and Karma Hurts," extensively discusses the perceived role and influence of Jewish power and finance across various spheres, particularly politics, media, and global conflict. The author and several commenters argue that this influence is a major impediment to nationalist goals and Western sovereignty.
Here is a discussion of Jewish influence as presented in the sources:
1. Political and Ideological Control (Organized Jewish Power)
The sources consistently identify "organised Jewish power" as the "biggest enemy of nationalism"1. This power is allegedly exerted through funding, lobbying, and controlling political narratives:
• Funding and Gatekeeping: Individuals like Charlie Kirk are accused of being "paid by Jewish billionaires" to promote specific agendas2. Kirk’s donors were reportedly "largely Jewish billionaires and the Koch brothers"34. It is claimed that the ability to achieve success or advance a career in the political and media sphere requires working for Jewish interests and "never oppos[ing] them and never say[ing] anything bad about them"5.
• Controlling Dissent: Kirk was allegedly put forward by the system as a "pressure valve for dissent" to prevent genuine nationalists from regaining sovereignty6. His job on college campuses was to "keep conservatives from being radicalised into true nationalists"7.
• Lobbying Power: Charlie Kirk was considered a "paid agent working on behalf of the biggest lobby in Washington – The Jewish Lobby"1. The Israeli military reportedly exploited Kirk’s death by scrawling his name on tank shells for use in Gaza8. Israel is said to pay for "2 lobbyist[s] for each Congress-man we have"9. The power is so absolute that some feel it seems "Jews are all powerful and there is nothing they don’t control"10.
• Media and Social Media Control: Jewish investors are described as poised to take an 80% stake in TikTok's new American entity because young people are challenging Jewish power, indicating a desire to control the narrative7. The system also pushed Charlie Kirk as an "e-celeb pushed by the algorithm"11.
2. Influence on Global Conflict and Zionism
The influence is seen as driving destructive foreign policy, primarily benefiting Israel:
• Christian Zionism: Kirk promoted "Christian Zionism," a doctrine described as leading white countries to fight and die in various wars "for Israel"2. Kirk himself was called a "paid Israeli-agent"2.
• War Crimes and Cover-Ups: Organized Jewry allegedly worked to "lie and cover up Jewish war crimes in Gaza, a genocide and the worst killing of women and children we seen since WW2"1. Kirk covered up and diminished these atrocities because he was a paid agent1.
• Sabotage of Anti-War Movements: It is claimed that Jews "fund and organise most left-wing activity" and have intentionally sabotaged the anti-war movement by combining pro-Palestinian marches with LGBTQ issues and Aboriginal activism (in Australia’s case), making it "red-meat for any smooth-brained Tommy Robinson-tier patriot to get angry about"12.
3. Racial and Demographic Policies
Jewish power is accused of actively working to undermine the foundational racial composition of Western nations:
• Racial Replacement: Kirk was accused of being paid by Jewish billionaires to "sell-out his own nation and replace its European foundational stock with the third world"2. This is linked to the "proposition nation" theory—the idea that America is just an "idea" or set of "values" allowing "foreign hoards of cheap labour" to replace the existing population213.
• Open Borders: A major donor to a supposed right-wing opposition party in Australia, Harry Triguboff (who is Jewish), is cited as an "advocate for open boarders" because he profits as a housing developer from third-world immigration, and he "enjoys whites becoming a minority in their own country"14.
4. Ideological Flexibility and Manipulation
The sources argue that Jewish influence transcends typical left/right political divides, focusing solely on ethnic benefit:
• Lack of Ideology: Jews are described as "not ideological beyond doing whatever benefits them at any given time"12. They don't believe in left/right divisions but "only believe in their race and that’s why they succeed"12.
• Neoconservatism: Neo-conservatism, the political force behind the Iraq War and attempts to push war with Iran, is highlighted as being composed of people who were "Jewish, but also Trotskyist leftists who suddenly called themselves “conservatives” to exploit American support for Zionism14.
• "Kosher-Antisemitism": It is proposed that as the world challenges Jewish power, the system will offer a form of "safe and controlled antisemitism" (or "kosher-antisemitism") to divert political energy from real nationalism815. This includes figures who appropriate nationalist aesthetics to sell degeneracy and Zionism15.
5. Religious Influence (Christianity and Judaism)
Jewish influence is also described as dominating religious thought in the West:
• Christianity as a Jewish Tool: Non-Jews have been indoctrinated into a "Jewish Simulacrum of holy deceit," especially Christian Zionists16. Christianity and Judaism are portrayed as "JOINED AT THE HIP SEAMLESSLY," and challenging Jewish influence requires destroying Christianity17.
• Talmudic Authority: Kirk was criticized for defending the Talmud, which the author claims "blasphemed Christ and said all non-Jews shall be slaves"2. Furthermore, it is asserted that Talmudists believe Christianity is idolatry punishable by decapitation, and the destruction of white Christians is part of their "end game" before the arrival of their Moshiach18.
• Control Through Scripture: The Christian Bible is described as a "perfect mind control tool for making the enemy of Jews (the Goyim) submissive pawns" by making non-Jews non-critical of Jews19. So long as one believes the Holy Bible, one will be the "pawn of the Jews"20.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Christian Zionism.
Based on the provided sources, Christian Zionism is discussed as a false and damaging theological and political doctrine heavily promoted within certain conservative and evangelical circles, often serving the interests of Israel and organized Jewish power.
Here are the key points of discussion regarding Christian Zionism:
1. Definition and Historical Context
• False Doctrine: Christian Zionism is specifically labeled a "false doctrine of dispensationalism and 'Christian Zionism'"1.
• Recent Term: It is described as a term that was "hardly used before 1990"1.
• Theological Blindness: Adherents are characterized as being indoctrinated into a "Jewish Simulacrum of holy deceit" and believing in a Jewish savior and afterlife, causing them to "vigorously defend the criminal occupiers thinking they were god’s chosen people"2. A modern Zionist Christian is seen as "willfully blind to reality to Jewish treachery"3.
2. Political and Military Consequences
The central critiqueRecent Term: It is described as a term that was "hardly used before 1990"1.
• Theological Blindness: Adherents are characterized as being indoctrinated into a "Jewish Simulacrum of holy deceit" and believing in a Jewish savior and afterlife, causing them to "vigorously defend the criminal occupiers thinking they were god’s chosen people"2. A modern Zionist Christian is seen as "willfully blind to reality to Jewish treachery"3.
2. Political and Military Consequences
The central critique is that Christian Zionism leverages Christian devotion to benefit Israeli political and military objectives, often at the expense of white countries and American interests:
• Driving Foreign Wars: This doctrine has allegedly "led to white countries fighting and dying in various wars for Israel"1.
• Agent Status: Individuals promoting this view, such as Charlie Kirk, are labeled a "paid Israeli-agent funded by the very people Christ whipped and threw out of the temple"1.
• Military Exploitation: The deep indoctrination of Christians into supporting Israel is seen as a mechanism the Pentagon can tap into to get more "Goyim meat for the upcoming Jewish instigated world wars"4. Commenters suggest slogans for military recruitment, such as "Onward Christian soldiers! Fight and die for people who hate you!"5.
• Lack of Deep Belief (Contradiction): While the movement is powerful, some sources suggest that Christian Zionism was never a belief that average evangelical folks cared about in a deep way or as a central tenet of their religion6. However, others strongly counter this, claiming that many evangelicals are "obsessed with Jews and with Israel"7.
3. Connection to Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk is frequently cited as a major promoter and example of Christian Zionism and its negative implications:
• Traitor to Faith: Kirk was accused of being a "traitor to his supposed Christian faith" for promoting Christian Zionism1.
• Motivation: His stalwart Christian Zionism was derived from his "faith in Jewish gods and his salvation plan through the Jew Jesus"3.
• Defending Jewry: Kirk was "defending Jewry and Israel to his last breath"3 and worked to "lie and cover up Jewish war crimes in Gaza"8.
• Gatekeeper: Kirk was described as a "Kosher approved gatekeeper of the Christian Zionist cult on behalf of ZOG" (Zionist Occupied Government)9.
4. Ideological Conflict with Nationalism
From the Nationalist Perspective, Christian Zionism is incompatible with true patriotic goals:
• Zionist Co-option: There is a concern that Jews are "working hard to turn every patriotic movement into a Zionist one"10.
• Worshiping the Enemy: A Christian who is a Zionist is effectively following the religion of their enemy and worshiping one of their own as their god2. This belief system makes Christians "willing slaves of Jewish supremacists"4.
• Rejection of "Judeo-Christianity": The concept of "Judeo-Christianity" is rejected as a "Judaizing lie"11 and "nonsense"11. It is argued that the two religions are joined "seamlessly," meaning that destroying Judaism would require destroying Christianity12. The Talmudists (Pharisees) are seen as the ones Christ spoke against, and their modern end game aims to destroy White Christians13.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Political Manipulation.
The sources describe political manipulation as a pervasive strategy employed by established powers—primarily organized Jewish power and the wealthy elite (plutocrats)—to control dissent, maintain division among citizens, and advance specific foreign and domestic agendas1....
The mechanisms of political manipulation discussed include controlling political discourse, exploiting tragedy, manufacturing false opposition, and using social divisions to distract the public3....
1. Controlling and Co-opting Dissent
A major form of political manipulation is managing and containing opposition so that it never becomes a true threat to the ruling structure410.
• Manufacturing False Opposition: Figures like Charlie Kirk are identified as part of the "false opposition" and "center-right" who are "bought and paid for by our enemies"8. Kirk was allegedly put forward by "the system as a sort of pressure valve for dissent and to prevent you from regaining sovereignty"4. His primary role on college campuses was to prevent conservatives from being "radicalised into true nationalists"10.
• Co-opting Nationalist Talk: Kirk was accused of only "moderating his message as a form of containment" by using vague nationalist talking points when his young followers began leaving him. This is seen as the establishment "appropriating nationalist talking points to keep people invested in the system"10.
• The Left/Right Dialectic: The sources claim that the political system maintains power by manufacturing a "false left/right dialectic"11. The ruling elites continuously stir the pot and "manufactur[e] crisis after crisis" (e.g., Covid, George Floyd, BLM, LGBTQ, Russiagate, Ukraine) to ensure citizens are "fighting each other, at each other’s throats" instead of realizing they are embroiled in a class war against the wealthy elites79. This division expends "Political energy... with nothing left for the real enemy"11.
2. Emotional Manipulation and Exploiting Tragedy
The system uses emotional tactics, especially following a high-profile event like the death of Charlie Kirk, to manipulate public opinion and advance existing agendas36.
• Creating Manufactured Martyrdom: Kirk's death is described as "manufactured martyrdom" used by the system to "take away your political energy and agency"6. Nationalists are warned not to be "emotionally manipulated by the slop-machine into caring about one of your political enemies being snuffed-out"3.
• Weaponizing Death for Policy: American Attorney General Pam Bondi explicitly announced she would crack down on "hate speech" (specifically antisemitism) in response to Kirk's shooting612. This is seen as exploiting the incident to roll out "tougher Orwellian Palantir surveillance on its citizens"6.
• Military Exploitation: Pentagon leaders were reportedly considering a new recruiting campaign to encourage young people to join the military to "honor the legacy of assassinated conservative activist Charlie Kirk"13. The Israeli military also reportedly exploited Kirk’s death by scrawling his name on tank shells to be used in Gaza14. This demonstrates the system using a tragedy to generate support for military recruitment and foreign policy (Zionist wars)1315.
3. Jewish Influence and Sabotage
Organized Jewish power is alleged to use manipulation to serve ethnic and geopolitical interests, often through financial control and strategic sabotage2....
• Financial Leverage: Kirk was reportedly "paid by Jewish billionaires" and the Koch brothers to "sell-out his own nation" and promote the replacement of the European foundational stock with the third world17. His net worth of approximately $12 million at age 31, largely derived from Turning Point USA and speaking, is framed as "compensation" for treason used to "subvert your religion, cripple your economy, and aid your racial genocide"318.
• Sabotaging Anti-War Movements: Jewish entities are accused of "fund[ing] and organis[ing] most left-wing activity"16. They allegedly intentionally sabotage the anti-war movement by combining pro-Palestinian marches with "LGBTQ issues and... Aboriginal activism," making the movement "red-meat" for the "Tommy Robinson-tier patriot to get angry about," thereby confusing and neutralizing political energy against Israel16.
• Kosher-Antisemitism: The system is prepared to offer a form of "safe and controlled antisemitism" (called "kosher-antisemitism") to divert political energy from real nationalism and challenge to Jewish power1419. This manipulation involves promoting controlled opposition figures who criticize Jewish actions only superficially or ignore Jewish subversion1920.
4. Ideological Flexibility of Elites
The source claims that the manipulators, particularly Jewish power, are not bound by typical political ideologies and shift their stance as needed for ethnic benefit:
• Non-Ideological Focus: Jews are stated to be "not ideological beyond doing whatever benefits them at any given time"16. They do not believe in left/right divisions, but "only believe in their race and that’s why they succeed"516.
• Historical Examples: Neo-conservatism is cited as an example, where Jewish Trotskyist leftists "suddenly called themselves 'conservatives'" to gain from exploiting American jingoism for their Zionist cause5. Similarly, major donors to "right-wing" parties, like Harry Triguboff in Australia, are described as advocates for open borders because they profit from mass immigration and enjoy "whites becoming a minority in their own country"5.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
This extensive article, "Jew versus Jew versus Jew versus Jew," by Marc Sills, explores the deep divisions and tribal conflicts within the Jewish community, particularly among American Jews in the political sphere. The central purpose is to delineate various factions—such as Trump’s Jews, Biden’s Jews, Neocon Jews, Criminal Jews, Elected Jews, Mainstream Influencer Jews, and Dissident Jews—to illustrate that "the Jews" are not a monolith, despite common generalizations. The text achieves this by providing lists of prominent figures associated with each political or moral "tribe," ranging from high-profile politicians and donors like Jared Kushner and Miriam Adelson to controversial figures like Jeffrey Epstein and outspoken critics like Noam Chomsky, primarily focusing on their stance regarding Zionism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Ultimately, the article suggests that a crucial "inter-tribal power struggle" is underway, largely driven by the Dissident Jews' anti-Zionist resistance against policies linked to the "genocide and ethnic cleansing" in Palestine, which they believe is betraying core Jewish ethical values.
Discuss Jewish Political Factions.
The Jewish population is characterized as historically very tribal, making the generalization of "The Jews" a common mistake12. It is frequently noted that "if you put two Jews together, you get three opinions"13.
The source material identifies several distinct political and social "tribes" or factions, particularly focusing on American Jews in political life2:
1. Trump's Jews
This faction is generally comprised of white MAGA Republicans and arch-Zionists who are openly supportive of Palestinian genocide4. Many in this group are billionaires or multi-millionaires exhibiting authoritarian, plutocratic, oligarchic, and even fascist tendencies, displaying "undying obedience and fealty to Trump"4.
Key individuals identified with this tribe include:
• Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka (practicing Modern Orthodox Jews), who spearheaded the Abraham Accords5.
• Charles Kushner, Jared’s father, who was pardoned by Trump and became US Ambassador to France6.
• Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff, described as the venomous architect of border and deportation policy6.
• Sheldon (RIP) and Miriam Adelson, Las Vegas casino tycoons and major financiers of Trump's campaigns, ensuring U.S. policy aligned with Likud's agenda7....
• Larry Ellison (Oracle founder) and his son David Ellison, prominent billionaires who supported Trump and pro-Israel hawkish causes10....
• David Friedman, 1st term ambassador to Israel, who rubber-stamped the settler agenda and dismissed the two-state solution1314.
• Other members include Gary Cohn (chief economic advisor), Carl Icahn (economic adviser), Alan Dershowitz (legal adviser), and figures like Jeffery Epstein (financier and sex criminal)7....
2. Biden's Jews
Most members of this tribe are Democrats and are often in conflict with Trump’s MAGA Republicans16. They tend to be "social liberals," advocating for policies like diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI), voting rights, and the welfare state institutions (Social Security, Medicare)16.
However, the source notes they are not true Socialists or Communists, mostly adhering to the Clintonian "centrist" path that moved the Democratic Party hard to the right17. Despite their domestic liberalism, Biden’s Jews largely share militant Zionism with Trump’s Jews and are complicit in Israel’s policies of military occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide18.
Key individuals include:
• Doug Emhoff, husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, who embodies the comfortable assimilation of establishment Jews1920.
• Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, described as an "unabashed enabler of Israeli aggression"1921.
• Janet Yellen (Treasury Secretary) and Merrick Garland (Attorney General)19.
• George Soros, philanthropist and financier, who is often a target of MAGA and Q-Anon smears19.
3. Neocon Jews
This tribe, prominent during the George W. Bush years, consists of Cold Warrior and Zionist imperialists who gained control of U.S. foreign policy22. Their core philosophy, rooted partly in thinkers like Irving Kristol and Leo Strauss, centers on achieving "Full Spectrum Dominance" and preventing the emergence of "peer rivals" globally2324.
They share objectives with Trump’s and Biden’s Jews, including Russophobia, Sinophobia, Islamophobia, corporate capitalism, and nationalist Zionism25.
Key Neocon Jewish figures include:
• Paul Wolfowitz (Deputy Secretary of Defense)25.
• Victoria Nuland (Deputy Secretary of State), noted for orchestrating the 2014 coup in Ukraine25.
• Richard Perle, known as the "Prince of Darkness," and Douglas Feith, co-architects of the 2003 Iraq invasion2526.
• David Frum, who coined the phrase "Axis of Evil"2527.
• Carl Gershman, president of the National Endowment for Democracy25....
• Madeleine Albright (RIP), Secretary of State, who defined the US as an "indispensable nation"2530.
• The neocon movement is currently diminished but its central tenet of Full Spectrum Dominance remains a core U.S. foreign and military policy principle24.
4. Elected Jews
While Jews hold a somewhat greater proportion of elected offices compared to their percentage of the population, claiming "collective control" is considered hyperbolic3.
• Political Affiliation: Almost all elected Jews are Democrats, adhering to Clintonian "centrist" policies31.
• Zionism: Most are arch-Zionists who support Israel’s actions in Palestine31. They may fear that criticizing Israel will result in being labeled "bad" Jews and losing office3233.
• Examples: There are six Jewish governors (all Democrats, e.g., Jared Polis, JB Pritzker, Josh Shapiro)34. In the Senate, there are ten Jews (e.g., Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, Richard Blumenthal), all Democrats except Bernie Sanders (I-VT)3435.
• Dissenters: Very few speak out against Israel’s campaign. Senators Sanders, Schatz, and Rosen, and Representatives Becca Balint and Jamie Raskin are noted as exceptions32....
• Republicans: The small Republican contingent includes Randy Fine (FL), who has loudly cheer-leaded for Israel’s genocide and ethnic cleansing3738.
5. Mainstream Influencer Jews
These sub-tribes wield influence largely in support of Zionism and tacitly back ethnic cleansing in Palestine37.
• Lobby/Advocacy Groups: The most significant organization is AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), with about five million members39. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations includes groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), led by Jonathan Greenblatt, who insists that anti-Zionism is antisemitism3940.
• Media: Jewish individuals often hold prominent roles in media. Examples from the New York Times include publisher AG Sulzberger and writers like Thomas Friedman and Paul Krugman41. Well-known broadcast figures include Wolf Blitzer, Rachel Maddow, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin42.
• These media figures are typically constrained by corporate masters and tend to avoid covering Israel and Zionism critically43.
6. Criminal Jews
This tribe consists of Jewish malefactors44.
• Historical Crime: The source recalls the National Crime Syndicate during the Great Depression, including notorious mobsters like Meyer Lansky and Bugsy Siegel45.
• Financial Criminals: More recent examples include con-men and rip-off artists like Michael Milken, Bernie Madoff (RIP), Jack Abramoff (convicted felon and ardent Zionist lobbyist), and Sam Bankman-Fried (crypto fraudster)46....
• Sexual/Violence Criminals: These include mass murderer Baruch Goldstein (who massacred Palestinians in Hebron), serial killer David Berkowitz (Son of Sam), and Jeffery Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell15....
• Israeli War Criminals: This sub-tribe includes Israeli officials who stand indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes and crimes against humanity, such as Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant5051. Other figures mentioned are Benny Gantz, Itamar ben Gvir (ultranationalist National Security Minister), and President Isaac Herzog50....
7. Dissident Jews
The source suggests a "new (or revindicated) tribe" of Dissident Jews is emerging, galvanized by horror and disgust at Israel’s actions, which they see as turning the former victim into a "fascist oppressor regime"55.
• Motivation: They are motivated by traditional Jewish values of conscience, truth, and justice, and refuse to have their religious values hijacked by a "deranged mob of thugs, goons, murderers, war criminals and genocidaires"56.
• Anti-Zionism: Anti-Zionist Jews have existed since the 19th century, regarding a nationalized Jewish state as a bad idea57.
• The Tribe's Model: They are referred to as "Noam Chomsky’s tribe," with Chomsky standing as a stellar example of those who have challenged Zionism and imperialism for decades5859.
• Examples: The list of dissidents includes historical figures like Albert Einstein (who warned against the fascist tendencies of Menachem Begin's party in 1948) and Daniel Ellsberg, as well as contemporary figures like Norman Finkelstein, Naomi Klein, Max Blumenthal, Peter Beinart (who advocates a single binational state), Medea Benjamin (co-founder of CodePink), Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield (Ben & Jerry’s co-founders), Glenn Greenwald, and journalist Amy Goodman58....
• Organizations: U.S. groups include Jewish Voice for Peace, If Not Now, and Code Pink. Israeli groups include Gush Shalom, B’Tselem, and Breaking the Silence6566.
The conclusion highlights that a serious inter-tribal power struggle is underway because many Jews reject a program based on genocide and ethnic cleansing67.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Trump's Jewish Circle.
Donald Trump's Jewish circle, referred to in the sources as "Trump’s Jews," constitutes a significant minority contingent of his entourage1. This group is generally characterized as politically aligning with white MAGA Republicans and arch-Zionists2.
General Characteristics and Political Alignment
The source defines Jewish identity broadly in this context, based partly on genealogical descent, ethnic tradition, or lived experience, rather than strictly on denomination or religious observance1.
1. Ideology and Wealth: Trump’s Jews are overwhelmingly arch-Zionists who are "just fine with Palestinian genocide"2. Many are billionaires or multi-millionaires, often exhibiting aristocratic, plutocratic, oligarchic, authoritarian, and even fascist tendencies2. They are described as shameless, full of superiority, and showing contempt for those who are less fortunate. They are portrayed as "cult devotees," professing "undying obedience and fealty to Trump"2.
2. Militant Zionism: Trump's relationship with Israel is defined by "grand collusion with his bestie Bibi Netanyahu"3. Trump fully supports Zionism, including complicity in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza3. This militant Zionism is largely shared with "Biden’s Jews" and "Neocon Jews"45.
3. Inconsistency Regarding Antisemitism: Trump receives "a lot of heat for being antisemitic," an allegation he denies3. However, his behavior is described as inconsistent, suggesting "cognitive dissonance"1. Examples include:
◦ Launching libelous smears and financial assaults against student protesters and universities he falsely accuses of antisemitism3.
◦ Dropping antisemitic tropes, such as a reference to "Shylock," and later claiming ignorance6.
◦ Denouncing the majority of Jews who voted Democratic for showing a "total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty"6.
◦ Threatening to blame "the Jews" (all Jews) if he were to lose an election6.
◦ Stating he only wanted "short guys that wear yarmulkes every day" counting his money, rejecting Black people as accountants6.
◦ Arguing there were "very fine people on both sides" after the 2017 Charlottesville riot where neo-Nazis and Klansmen chanted against being replaced by Jews6.
◦ Insinuating that Jews in government and finance, like former Federal Reserve Board Chair Janet Yellen and Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, "control the levers of power in Washington" and "don’t have your good in mind"6. Despite this, his alliance with wealthy Jews like Blankfein illustrates an "alliance of convenience" between plutocrats and nationalists7.
Key Figures in Trump's Jewish Circle
The source provides an extensive, though incomplete, list of individuals categorized as "Trump's Jews"1....
Family and Close Advisors
• Jared Kushner (Son-in-law) and Ivanka Trump (Daughter): They are practicing Modern Orthodox Jews8. In Trump’s first term, Kushner was the architect of the Abraham Accords, which aimed to "normalize" relations between Israel and several Arab nations, securing a $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia for his project8.
• Charles Kushner (Jared’s daddy): A real-estate tycoon who was convicted of corruption and served prison time before being pardoned by Trump. He now serves as US Ambassador to France9.
• Stephen Miller: Deputy Chief of Staff, described as a "venomous and odious architect" of border, deportation, and immigrant family separation policy9. He advocates for a nationwide purge of "leftists"9.
• Boris Epshteyn: Trump’s personal senior counsel, White House puppet master, and first-term adviser10. He orchestrated schemes around the 2020 election subversion16.
• David Friedman: Trump's first-term Ambassador to Israel and election campaign adviser12. He was a staunch Zionist who supported the settler agenda, helped move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, and cut off aid to Palestinians17.
Legal and Financial Associates
• Roy Cohn (RIP): Trump’s early mentor and anti-communist crusader who prosecuted Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, leading to their executions9. Cohn coached Trump in the arts of smear and intimidation18.
• Alan Dershowitz: Legal adviser and lawyer for Trump’s first impeachment, as well as Jeffery Epstein’s lawyer11. He provided "intellectual cover for authoritarianism" while insisting he was protecting the Jewish people19.
• Allen Weiselberg: Trump Organization accountant who served time for Trump’s financial crimes10.
• Steve Mnuchin: First-term Treasury Secretary, a Goldman Sachs bankster and hedge fund billionaire12.
• Gary Cohn: Chief economic advisor and former Goldman Sachs executive12.
• Carl Icahn: Economic adviser, billionaire hedge fund corporate raider, and major donor11.
Donors and Business/Tech Figures
• Sheldon (RIP) and Miriam Adelson: Las Vegas casino tycoons, mega-donors, and financiers to Trump11. They poured unprecedented sums into Trump's campaigns, demanding "absolute fealty" to Israel's right-wing policies in return2021. Sheldon Adelson was a "one-issue ideologue whose issue was Israel"21.
• Larry Ellison: Oracle founder, who is one of the world's richest men14. He is a close Trump ally who funds Israeli tech and defense projects, and reportedly offered a "blank check" to help overturn the 2020 election22.
• Sam Altman: Co-founder of OpenAI/ChatGPT, who "cozied up to the Trump circle" and was floated as a tech advisor1423.
• Alex Karp: CEO of Palantir (mass surveillance)14.
• Paul Singer: Trump mega-donor12.
Controversial Former Associates
• Michael Cohen: First-term fixer, imprisoned for Trump’s crimes, who later became a "turncoat" and enemy14.
• Jeffery Epstein (RIP): Financier, convicted sex trafficker, and rapist. He was Trump’s former "wingman" and alleged to be a Mossad and/or FBI/CIA asset1424.
• Ghislaine Maxwell: Convicted and imprisoned sex-trafficker who was Epstein’s accomplice and recruited underage girls at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property15.
• Robert Maxwell (RIP): Ghislaine’s father, a Mossad agent or asset, and Trump’s one-time "business associate"15.
In summary, Trump’s Jewish circle consists predominantly of ultra-wealthy, fiercely pro-Israel, and politically conservative figures who often hold key positions of influence or finance2....
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Biden's Jewish Circle.
Joe Biden’s Jewish circle, identified as a "tribe of Jews," constitutes a significant minority element within his entourage during his presidency12. This group is primarily composed of Democrats who align with the political "center" defined by former President Bill Clinton13.
Political Profile and Ideology
Biden’s Jews are characterized largely as "social liberals"1. They advocate for several progressive domestic policies, including:
• "Diversity, equality and inclusion" (DEI)1.
• Voting rights1.
• Equitable taxation1.
• Environmental protection1.
• "Democratic socialism," particularly as it applies to welfare state institutions like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and marginally "progressive" policies like Obama’s healthcare program1.
Despite support for some "democratic socialism" (as advocated by figures like Bernie Sanders), the source clarifies that Biden’s Democrats, including his Jewish circle, are "most definitely not real Socialists, much less Communists," contrary to smears launched by Donald Trump13. They adhere to Clintonian policies, having dragged the Democratic Party hard to the right, embracing right-wing concepts like anti-socialist privatization ("free trade"), abolition of key welfare programs (like AFDC), and strict "law and order" regimes (e.g., War on Drugs, punitive incarceration)3.
Foreign Policy and Zionism
On foreign policy, Biden’s Jews are described as "never peaceniks"4. They have fallen in line with:
• Cold War militarism4.
• Russophobia and Sinophobia4.
• Continuation of wars initiated under Obama (Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya)4.
• Military base expansion, airstrikes, drone warfare, and "kill lists"4.
Of particular note, Biden’s Jewish circle, along with the non-Jewish Democratic majority, shares militant Zionism with Trump’s Jewish circle4. They are cited as being "complicit in Israel’s campaign of military occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide"4.
There is also a "substantial overlap" between Biden’s Jews, Trump’s Jews, and the "Neocon Jews," sharing common objectives such as Cold War strategies, Russophobia, Sinophobia, corporate capitalism, and nationalist Zionism5.
Key Members of Biden’s Jewish Circle
The source provides an incomplete list of individuals identified as part of Biden’s Jewish entourage:
Individual
Role/Affiliation
Description & Context
Antony Blinken
Secretary of State
Described as the polished face of U.S. foreign policy and an "unabashed enabler of Israeli aggression"6. He vigorously defended Israel’s actions in Gaza in 2023, blocking UN ceasefire efforts and rearming the IDF6. Blinken's "establishment liberal persona masks a hard-line Zionist loyalty," which greenlights apartheid and slaughter abroad in the name of realpolitik6. He is a second-generation Holocaust survivor6.
Merrick Garland
Attorney General
A moderate judge and son of Jewish refugees, he represents the quiet, technocratic side of the cohort7. He focuses on domestic issues, such as prosecuting January 6th insurrectionists and defending the rule of law7. His Zionist alignment is described as "unexamined and reflexive"; his DOJ has shown no interest in enforcing laws against Israeli settlement funding or prosecuting Americans who commit war crimes for the IDF7.
Avril Haines
Director of National Intelligence
The first woman in this post and part of the administration's Jewish brain trust on security8. She is a hyper-competent technocrat whose loyalty to the U.S. security state and the Israeli alliance are noted as being "one and the same"8. She helped oversee Obama’s drone strike "kill list"8 and directs apparatus that supports Israel’s military dominance behind the scenes8.
Doug Emhoff
Second Gentleman (Kamala Harris' husband)
The first Jewish spouse of a president or VP, he is showcased leading initiatives against antisemitism9. He is primarily a symbolic presence and a mainstream liberal9. His Zionist alignment is "boilerplate Democratic"—generic support for Israel's security, but he remains silent on Israel's human rights abuses9.
Janet Yellen
Treasury Secretary
Listed as a key official in Biden’s Jewish circle2.
Ron Klain
Chief of Staff
Listed as a key official in Biden’s Jewish circle2.
Victoria Nuland
Deputy Secretary of State
Listed as a key official in Biden’s Jewish circle2. She is also identified as a Neocon Jew and the wife of propagandist Robert Kagan5. Her notable role includes orchestrating the 2014 coup in Ukraine5.
Wendy Sherman
Deputy Secretary of State
Listed as a key official in Biden’s Jewish circle2.
Alejandro Mayorkas
Homeland Security Secretary
Listed as a key official in Biden’s Jewish circle2.
Eric Garcetti
Ambassador to India
A former Los Angeles mayor who aligns with the Obama-style liberal profile10. He is solidly pro-Israel and promotes cooperation between the U.S., India, and Israel, sticking to the party script without criticizing Israeli abuses10.
Ned Price
White House Spokesman
Listed as a key official in Biden’s Jewish circle2.
George Soros
Philanthropist and Financier
Listed as part of Biden’s Jewish circle2. He is noted as a key figure who is a frequent scapegoat for MAGA and Q-Anon followers2.
Melissa Cohen
Hunter Biden's wife
A South African-born Jewish activist and filmmaker, her inclusion is symbolic rather than influential, underscoring the administration's comfort with Jews in its inner circle via personal ties211.
Hallie Olivere
Beau Biden's wife
Listed as a member of Biden’s Jewish circle through family ties2.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Neoconservative Jewish Identity.
The Neoconservative Jewish identity, often referred to as the "Neocon Jews" tribe, is characterized by its origins in the Cold War era, its zealous support for militarism and American global dominance, and its foundational adherence to hardline Zionism1....
Origins and Core Ideology
The Neocon movement gained political traction during the presidency of George W. Bush (2001–2009), where they came to dominate U.S. foreign policy, particularly surrounding the Global War on Terror (GWOT)1.
1. Political Roots: The roots of this movement can be traced back to the 1970s when Democrats, led by U.S. Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, split from the anti-war New Left Democrats and aligned with militarist Cold War Republicans, such as Ronald Reagan1.
2. The Unipolar Moment: The neocon movement achieved critical mass following the Soviet collapse in 1991, which led to the proclamation of a “New World Order” or the “Unipolar Moment”4. Neocons believed that military superpower endowed the U.S. with primacy over the whole world and a mission to prevent the emergence of any “peer rivals”4.
3. Global Goals: Their central objective was “Full Spectrum Dominance”45. This agenda was embodied in the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) during the Clinton years6. This agenda led to Pentagon documents advocating for global military base expansion, preemptive or “preventive” wars, "regime change" operations, and "nation-building" programs4.
4. Zionist Imperialism: Neocon Jews are defined as Cold Warrior and Zionist imperialists1. They advocated for war in Iraq for years, a war that Israel was also demanding6. The GWOT became a cover story for the continuation of the Cold War and a containment strategy directed against Russia, China, and regional enemies, especially Iran2.
5. Shared Characteristics: While distinct from "Trump’s Jews" and "Biden’s Jews," Neocon Jews share substantial overlap with these tribes regarding core objectives, including Cold War policies, Russophobia, Sinophobia, Islamophobia, corporate capitalism, and nationalist Zionism2.
Key Individuals and Intellectual Foundation
The identity of Neocon Jews is often understood through its leading figures and philosophical influences, many of whom merged a commitment to American hegemony with an unquestioning loyalty to Israeli interests:
• Policy Architects and Officials:
◦ Douglas Feith (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy) was a key strategist and an architect of the 2003 Iraq invasion7. His hardline Zionism is "legendary", highlighted by his co-authoring of the 1996 paper “A Clean Break” which urged Israel to abandon land-for-peace and called for regime change in Iraq and Syria7. Feith is cited as demonstrating the deadly results when "extremist Zionist visions meld with American imperial hubris"7.
◦ Paul Wolfowitz served as Deputy Secretary of Defense2.
◦ Victoria Nuland (Deputy Secretary of State, Robert Kagan’s wife) was noted for orchestrating the 2014 coup in Ukraine2.
◦ Richard Perle (co-architect of the 2003 Iraq invasion) was known as the “Prince of Darkness” for his opposition to arms control2.
◦ Elliott Abrams (veteran Cold Warrior and operative) has long intertwined U.S. policy with hardline pro-Israel agendas3. He is a staunch nationalist Zionist who champions aggressive U.S. military action abroad "in lockstep with Israel’s interests"3.
◦ Madeleine Albright (Secretary of State and UN Ambassador) was a Cold War hawk and staunch defender of U.S. militarism and Israeli security8. She famously defended the lethal sanctions on Iraq, saying the killing of Iraqi children was “worth it”8.
◦ Carl Gershman (President of the National Endowment for Democracy) weaponized human-rights rhetoric against anti-U.S., anti-Israel governments9. He warned that a Palestinian state would “unleash a drive to destroy Israel”9.
• Writers and Propagandists:
◦ David Frum (Bush’s speechwriter) coined the phrase “Axis of Evil” to help sell the Iraq invasion10. He remains committed to the pro-Israel status quo, attacks BDS, and portrays anti-Zionism as hostility to Jews10.
◦ David Horowitz (writer and propagandist) transitioned from the New Left to become a rabid right-wing figure embracing reactionary Zionism, pushing Islamophobic and anti-Black screeds11.
◦ Ben Shapiro is listed as a writer, radio host, podcaster, and propagandist2.
• Intellectual Forefathers: The philosophical roots of the neocon movement are traced to figures such as:
◦ Irving Kristol (“godfather of neoconservatism”)5.
◦ Norman Podhoretz (PNAC co-founder)5.
◦ Milton Friedman (conservative economist) whose free-market fundamentalism provided the economic rationale for the movement512.
Status of the Movement
Today, the neocon movement is described as diminished and has been widely repudiated, particularly by Trump’s "America First" followers, primarily due to the obvious failures and disasters of the GWOT in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the failure of "nation-building" policies5. Nevertheless, the main pillar of neocon ideology—Full Spectrum Dominance—remains fully embraced as the central organizing principle of U.S. foreign and military policy5.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Jewish Criminality and Dissent.
Based on the provided sources, the discussion of Jewish political and social life includes two distinct and often conflicting categories: Jewish Criminality and Dissident Jews1....
I. Jewish Criminality
The sources identify a category of "Criminal Jews" who have been involved in various unlawful, immoral, and violent activities1.... The text posits that no group is free of malefactors and suggests the need for honesty about the wrongdoing of one's own people4.
Historical and Contemporary Criminal Figures
The text lists individuals and groups involved in criminality, divided into organized crime figures, financial criminals, and those accused of war crimes:
A. Organized Crime (National Crime Syndicate) Dating back to the Great Depression, the National Crime Syndicate included Jewish mobsters involved in bootlegging, drug dealing, protection rackets, sex trafficking, bank robbery, and murder1. Notable figures associated with this dark era include:
• Meyer Lansky1
• Bugsy (Benjamin) Siegel1
• Dutch Schultz (Arthur Simon Flegenheimer, aka Abraham Landau)1
• Lefty (Frank) Rosenthal (portrayed as Sam “Ace” Rothstein in Casino)1
• Arnold “The Brain” Rothstein1
• Abraham “Kid Twist” Reles1
• Abner “Longie” Zwillman1
More recent Jewish mafia groups cited include Jewish Underground, Kach, Jewish Defense League, and Sicarii5.
B. Financial and White-Collar Criminals Several Jewish figures are noted for notorious financial crimes and "rip-off artistry"5:
• Michael Milken5
• Bernie Madoff (RIP)5
• Jack Abramoff: A former powerhouse lobbyist convicted for bribing politicians and defrauding clients, he funneled illicit funds to support Israeli settlements and military programs. He is described as an ultra-Orthodox Jew and ardent Zionist56.
• Sam Bankman-Fried ("SBF"): A disgraced crypto-billionaire who was convicted of massive fraud following the collapse of his FTX empire. He joins the "pantheon of notorious Jewish financial criminals"57.
• Allen Weiselberg: The Trump Organization accountant who was imprisoned for Trump's financial crimes8.
• Leon Black: A Wall Street billionaire and co-founder of Apollo Global Management, noted for his ties to Jeffrey Epstein and payments made to him. His fall from grace "underscores how wealth and pedigree can shield monstrous acts"9.
C. Sex Criminals and Associates A specific focus is placed on Jewish figures involved in sex crimes and related scandals:
• Jeffrey Epstein (RIP): A financier, money-launderer, extortionist, blackmailer, rapist, and convicted sex trafficker of underage girls. He was Donald Trump's former wingman in the female "model" trade and was alleged to be a Mossad, FBI, and/or CIA asset5.... His death in prison was suspicious10. Epstein is called the "ultimate Chillul Hashem (desecration of God’s name)" for bringing shame and suspicion upon the Jewish community11.
• Ghislaine Maxwell: Convicted and imprisoned sex-trafficker of underage girls and Epstein's accomplice, who recruited underage girls for Epstein’s perversions at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property512. Her father, Robert Maxwell (RIP), a publishing baron and alleged Mossad agent, was Trump's one-time "business associate" and an embezzler who died suspiciously at sea12.
• Harvey Weinstein5
• Joel Greenberg: A minor Florida official turned major felon who was busted for sex trafficking of a minor and cryptocurrency fraud. He was active in his local Chabad, proving that "yarmulke-wearing scoundrels exist"513.
D. Mass Murder and War Criminals The source states that "Jewish criminals" also include those whose malicious offenses are defined by mass murder14.
• David Berkowitz (aka Son of Sam): The serial killer who terrorized New York in the 1970s515.
• Baruch Goldstein: An American-born Israeli settler and follower of the Kach movement who massacred 29 Palestinian worshippers in Hebron’s Ibrahimi Mosque in 1994. He became a martyr-figure for Jewish extremists and a symbol of genocidal hatred516.
• Meir Kahane (murderer)5.
• Israeli War Criminals: This tribe includes Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, both of whom stand indicted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes and crimes against humanity1417. Others mentioned are current Defense Minister Israel Katz, former Defense Minister Benny Gantz, National Security Minister Itamar ben Gvir (a disciple of the terrorist rabbi Meir Kahane), Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, and President Isaac Herzog14....
The sources argue that American Jews across different political tribes—including Trump’s Jews, Biden’s Jews, Neocon Jews, Elected Jews, and Mainstream Influencer Jews—are accomplices to these war criminals due to their complicity in the Zionist project and the violation of Palestinian human rights2.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Dissident Jews
In contrast to the political and criminal factions, the source identifies a tribe of Dissident Jews galvanized by a "growing resistance movement" against Israel's actions, particularly since the Hamas breakout of October 7, 20233.
Motivation and Core Beliefs
Dissident Jews are motivated by traditional Jewish values of truth, justice, conscience, and moral clarity21.... They:
• Recoil in horror and disgust at Israel, viewing it as a "fascist oppressor regime" and an "unrestrained victimizer with an insatiable blood-lust"3.
• Are outraged that their religious values are being hijacked and violated in their names by a "deranged mob of thugs, goons, murderers, war criminals and genocidaires"21.
• Refuse to be associated with genocide and ethnic cleansing, recognizing the "cognitive dissonance" this creates25.
• Reject the labeling of anti-Zionism as antisemitism2426.
• Are coming together from every corner of the Jewish population (young and old, Reform, Conservative, Orthodox, American, and Israeli)21.
• Historically, anti-Zionist Jews have existed since the 19th century, regarding a nationalized Jewish state as a "very bad idea"27.
Reportedly, since the genocide began, two-thirds of American Jews (and a similar percentage of Democrat voters) now oppose the displacement and genocide of Palestinians3. This tribe often challenges their own community out of profound moral conviction28.
Key Dissident Figures
The source lists many prominent individuals associated with the Dissident Jews, sometimes referred to as "Noam Chomsky's tribe"29:
• Noam Chomsky: Described as the "dean of Jewish dissidents," he has spent decades critiquing U.S. and Israeli crimes with relentless logic and moral clarity, inspiring generations of activists2229.
• Albert Einstein (RIP): A moral voice who was wary of nationalism and chauvinism. He declined to be Israel’s president and warned in 1948 about the "fascist" tendencies of Menachem Begin’s Herut party29....
• Daniel Ellsberg (RIP): Famous for leaking the Pentagon Papers, he was a model of Jewish ethical dissent against government wrongdoing, consistently opposing U.S. militarism and questioning Israel’s nuclear arsenal2932.
• Norman Finkelstein: An academic who denounces the "Holocaust industry" and unequivocally supports Palestinian resistance. He is described as uncompromising and a modern-day Jeremiah2329.
• Richard Falk: A scholar of international law who has been a tireless critic of Israel’s human rights violations, meticulously grounding his legal arguments2933.
• Amy Goodman: Host of Democracy Now!, she provides more airtime to Palestinian voices and anti-occupation activism than perhaps any other U.S. journalist. She is considered perhaps the most impactful Jewish journalist for Palestinian rights in the world2629.
• Medea Benjamin: Co-founder of CodePink and a lifelong peace activist who protests U.S. military aid to Israel2934.
• Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield: The co-founders of Ben & Jerry’s who took a stand against the Israeli occupation by halting sales in Israeli-occupied territories29....
• Max Blumenthal: An investigative journalist who labels Israel's actions as genocide and apartheid2937.
• Uri Avnery (RIP): An Israeli iconoclast and journalist who spent decades opposing the occupation and founded the Gush Shalom peace movement2829.
• Omer Bartov: An Israeli-born historian and Holocaust scholar who draws uncomfortable parallels between historical atrocities and Israel’s treatment of Palestinians2938.
• Peter Beinart: A journalist who moved from liberal Zionism to advocating for a single binational state with equal rights for all2939.
• Yuval Noah Harari: An Israeli historian who gently but firmly challenges Zionist dogma and warns against repeating history’s darkest chapters2940.
Dissident Organizations
The resistance movement has led to a significant coalescence and explosion of smaller organizations, particularly in the two years following 10/7/2341. These groups include:
• In the US: Jewish Voice for Peace, If Not Now, Not In Our Name, New Jewish Narrative, Code Pink, Peace Action, and T’ruah (formerly Rabbis for Human Rights – North America)41.
• In Israel: Peace Now, Gush Shalom, B’Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights, Breaking the Silence, Looking the Occupation in the Eye, and the Israeli-Palestinian Bereaved Families Forum41.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
This exposé details the alarming suggestion from a senior Russian advisor that the USA is planning a deliberate $37.5 trillion financial reset to escape its overwhelming national debt, primarily through the adoption of crypto, stablecoins, and gold reserves. The central argument is that this controlled reset, dubbed the "largest wealth transfer in history," will drastically enrich asset holders while pushing wage workers into poverty, mainly by weaponizing inflation and instituting stricter monetary controls like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). The article emphasizes the unsustainability of the current U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio and suggests that the only viable solution is to leverage stablecoins to create a constant, automated demand for U.S. government bonds, thereby stabilizing the country’s debt funding as foreign demand dwindles. Ultimately, the piece warns that the plan is not intended to help ordinary citizens but rather to ensure government self-preservation by making the public absorb the costs through inflation and financial repression.
Discuss USA debt crisis.
The sources provide a detailed discussion of the USA's debt crisis, outlining its staggering scale, historical context, and an alleged plan for a financial "reset" leveraging new digital currencies to manage the debt burden.
The Scale of the Crisis
The United States is currently facing a debt crisis of shocking scale1.
• Total Debt and Interest: The US debt stands at $37.5 trillion12. The interest bill alone is a staggering $882 billion per year12, which surpasses the amount spent annually on both Medicare and Defense1. Daily interest payments are over $2 billion, and this interest must be paid before funding services like schools, roads, or NASA1.
• Per Capita Burden: This debt amounts to an average of $110,000 per person in the US, or $280,000 per household1.
• Debt-to-GDP Ratio: America's debt-to-GDP ratio is currently 119%1 and is projected to reach 156% by 20553. This measure is critical because it reveals how much economic output supports debt service3.
Historical Context and Unsustainability
Historically, major powers that surpassed the critical 100% debt-to-GDP mark have not survived without a hard financial reset34. Examples include Ancient Rome, which debased its currency; Britain, which lost its reserve-currency status after World War II; Greece in 2010; and Japan in the 1990s, which experienced "lost decades" of zero growth4.
To sustain the current debt levels, the US would require decades of 6% real growth, which the sources state has never happened and never will4. Even implementing a 100% tax rate would reportedly still be insufficient to service the current debt4.
The US dollar remains the world's reserve currency, which has kept the financial system functioning, but this fact alone is considered insufficient to stop the inevitable consequences of the debt3. Foreign buyers who previously purchased US debt and dollars (such as China, India, and Japan) are reducing their purchases of US treasuries and instead buying gold5. This shift is partly due to how these countries viewed the US's economic isolation of Russia, prompting them to offload the risk of being similarly targeted6.
Monetary Complications and the Shift to Fiat Currency
The sources note that the complication of money in a system requiring "growth" often leads to dependence on credit and asset bubbles, which are inherently self-liquidating7. Authorities originally embraced fiat currencies, moving away from gold-backed systems, because the system demanded credit expansion89.
• Credit Creation: In fractional reserve banking, most money in circulation is created through originating credit (like mortgages), not by adding tangible assets like gold10. If credit were limited to cash deposits, credit would become scarce, leading to the collapse of "growth" and a depression10.
• Trade Deficits: When imports and exports do not balance, the difference is historically paid in gold11. The US faced this in the late 1960s and early 1970s, running sustained trade deficits with allies (often for geopolitical reasons to counter the USSR)11. Once a nation runs out of gold, trade deficits are no longer possible, potentially causing catastrophic outcomes for both importers and exporters12. This context led to President Nixon suspending the dollar's gold convertibility in 19715.
The Alleged Financial Reset Plan
A senior Russian presidential advisor, Anton Kobyakov, suggested that the USA is planning a quiet but catastrophic escape route from its debt crisis by leaning on crypto, stablecoins, and gold213. This strategy, described as a "controlled reset," is considered the only viable option among several alternatives, which include:
• Debt jubilee or blanket forgiveness (which would collapse bond markets)14.
• Returning to an asset-backed currency (impossible in a modern, levered economy)14.
• De-dollarization (too costly)14.
Mechanism of the Reset
The suggested plan involves increasing demand for government bonds by holding crypto and stablecoins at scale in national reserves5.
1. Stablecoins as Debt Conduits: A stablecoin issuer sells a token for $115. Since idle cash earns nothing, the issuer buys US Treasury bills (US debt) as a safe investment15.
2. Automatic Demand: At scale, these stablecoins generate automatic, non-stop demand for Treasuries, helping fund Washington even as foreign demand declines1315.
3. Digital Control: Stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) could serve as the bridge from the paper dollar system to a programmable financial system that directly connects to US debt16. While CBDCs may offer faster payments and reduced fraud, they carry risks of government control, including the ability to seize or "switch off" personal funds, or imposing spending controls6....
Inflation and Wealth Transfer
The alleged plan utilizes inflation as a "secret weapon"18. Inflation erodes the real value of the debt pile1718.
This controlled inflation diminishes the real value of wages, causing wage workers to lose purchasing power and fall into poverty, while simultaneously increasing the value of financial assets (like stocks and real estate) held by the rich18.... This process would constitute the largest wealth transfer in history1920, ensuring that the asset-rich—who often hold positions in government—escalate their net worth, while everyone else absorbs the cost through inflation, taxation, and tighter monetary control20.
Because the US dollar is the global reserve currency, this alleged reset and associated volatility and inflation would ripple into economies worldwide, affecting European stocks, Asian export cycles, and commodity prices13.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Financial reset plan.
The discussion of the "Financial reset plan" centers primarily on allegations made by a senior Russian presidential advisor regarding the USA's strategy for escaping its massive debt crisis, with the projected outcome being a significant redistribution of wealth12.
The US Debt Crisis and the Need for a Reset
The sources outline the staggering magnitude of the US debt, which necessitates a fundamental change3:
• The US debt stands at $37.5 trillion, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 119%3.
• The interest bill alone is a shocking $882 billion per year, exceeding what is spent on Medicare and Defense3. Daily interest payments surpass $2 billion3.
• The debt is growing much faster than the economy, increasing by $2.09 trillion between 2024 and 20253.
Historically, no country or empire that has surpassed the critical 100% debt-to-GDP ratio has survived without some form of hard financial reset4. Examples cited include Ancient Rome, which debased its currency, and Britain, which lost its reserve-currency status after World War II4. Sustaining the current US debt levels is considered impossible, as it would require decades of 6% real growth or even a 100% tax rate just to service the debt4.
The Alleged Financial Reset Plan
Anton Kobyakov, a senior Russian presidential advisor, suggested that the USA is planning a quiet but catastrophic escape route from this debt crisis, relying on crypto, stablecoins, and gold1.
Viable Options and the Crypto Strategy
According to this theory, there are five potential solutions to a crisis of this scale, but only one is deemed viable5:
1. Non-viable options include debt jubilee (which would destroy bond markets and pensions), returning to an asset-backed currency like gold (impossible in a modern, leveraged economy), or de-dollarization (too costly)5.
2. The Viable Option is to increase demand for government bonds by holding crypto and stablecoins at scale in national reserves, while secretly managing a controlled reset5.
This strategy aims to use stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) as a bridge from the existing paper dollar to a programmable financial system that directly supports US debt6. A stablecoin issuer receives cash for tokens, and then uses that cash to buy US Treasury bills (US debt)7. At scale, this mechanism creates automatic, non-stop demand for Treasuries, helping to fund Washington as foreign demand for US debt fades7.
Foreign bulk buys of US debt are already slowing, as countries like China, India, and Japan are turning to gold instead of Treasuries8. This reduction in demand is partly due to how the US handled the economic isolation of Russia, making other countries wary of holding significant US dollar and debt reserves9.
Inflation and Wealth Transfer
A central element of the reset plan is the weaponization of inflation10. Inflation erodes the real value of the debt pile10. The ultimate goal is not just rising consumer prices (like milk and eggs) but the growing cost of financial assets (stocks and real estate) held by the rich10.
The result of this alleged plan is characterized as the largest wealth transfer in history2. While inflation and financial repression boost the balance sheets of asset owners, wage workers lose purchasing power and fall further behind1011. Citizens, particularly the lower earners and middle class, would absorb the cost through inflation, taxation, and tighter monetary control, while the asset-rich (who may also sit in government) escalate their net worth11.
Financial Control through Digital Currencies
The reset theory also includes the use of digital currencies to increase governmental control9.
• CBDCs are described as the government’s next idea for monitoring how people live9.
• These currencies carry overarching risks of seizure, spending controls, and geofenced payments7.
• A major crisis, such as bank outages or a foreign hack, could serve as a justification for the "emergency" roll-out of a digital wallet, forcing citizens to accept it to pay for food and fuel69. This would lead to tracking cash and increasing governmental control612.
Some people do support CBDCs, citing faster and smoother payments and reduced fraud, but others oppose them, referring to them as "programmable, controllable money"7.... The Russian advisor's predictions about this financial reset overlap with the reality of foreign buyers becoming less eager to purchase America’s debt, central banks buying gold at high rates, and CBDCs providing an effective, albeit controlling, fix12.
In the context of this alleged reset, asset accumulation is suggested as the only means to escape the inevitable decline in living standards, particularly through owning productive or scarce assets such as broad-market ETFs, high-quality equities, real estate, or gold14.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Wealth transfer.
The concept of wealth transfer is extensively discussed in the context of the alleged plan by the USA to execute a financial reset to manage its staggering debt crisis12. This proposed reset is suggested to result in "the largest wealth transfer in history"2.
Key aspects of this projected wealth transfer include:
Mechanism of Transfer
The primary tools for achieving this wealth transfer are inflation and financial repression34.
1. Inflation as a Secret Weapon: Inflation is described as a "secret weapon" for the wealthy because it erodes the real value of the $37.5 trillion US debt pile in real terms3. While milk and egg prices increase, the real goal is the growing cost of financial assets like stocks and real estate held by the rich3.
2. Asset Boost: Inflation and financial repression are expected to boost the balance sheets of those who own assets34. As governments continue to print more money and cut interest rates (which results in inflation), the true cost of the debt is eaten away, and wealth inequality worsens35.
Who Gains and Who Loses
This massive transfer is structured to benefit the asset holders at the expense of wage earners24.
• The Gainers: The plan is expected to cause the asset-rich to gain extreme wealth2. If individuals own productive or scarce assets, such as broad-market ETFs, high-quality equities, real estate, or gold, inflation boosts their balance sheet36. The asset-rich, who are stated to also happen to sit in governments, will escalate their net worth4.
• The Losers: Wage workers are plunged into poverty2. Those who live on a paycheck lose purchasing power and fall further behind, as their wages are worth less in real terms34. Citizens generally will absorb the cost of this financial remedy through inflation, taxation, and tighter monetary control4.
The conclusion of this suggested plan is that "The Biggest Ever Wealth Transfer" will take place, moving wealth from lower earners and the middle class toward asset holders4.
Broader Context of Wealth Extraction
Beyond the specific financial reset plan, the sources link immense wealth accumulation and transfer to the actions of powerful elites:
• Billionaires and Conflict: The sources suggest that the "permanent-war economy" that has existed since 1945 is costly to everyone except the profiteers, who are U.S. billionaires7.
• Global Wealth Extraction: It is claimed that America took over the world after WWII to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires, whose cartels extract the world’s wealth8.
• Political Enrichment: President Donald Trump is cited as having the most profitable year of his life in 2025, increasing his net worth from $4.3 billion to a record $7.3 billion, exploiting his position of power for immense profits, largely through cryptocurrencies910.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Digital currencies.
Digital currencies are discussed in the sources primarily in the context of a potential US financial "reset" plan designed to manage the country's massive national debt, as well as their role in personal finance and political activity1....
The discussion covers several types of digital currencies, including cryptocurrencies, meme coins, stablecoins, and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
Role in the Alleged Financial Reset
A senior Russian presidential advisor, Anton Kobyakov, suggested that the USA is planning an escape route from its $37.5 trillion debt crisis by leaning on crypto and stablecoins1. This plan is seen as a way to conduct the largest wealth transfer in history4.
Stablecoins as a Treasury Conduit: Stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are theorized to act as a bridge from the current paper dollar system to a programmable financial system that directly supports US debt2.
The operational mechanism involves:
1. A stablecoin issuer sells a token for $15.
2. The issuer buys US Treasury bills (US debt), utilizing the cash because holding idle cash earns nothing5. US Treasury bills are considered the safest form of investment5.
3. The issuer profits by earning interest (e.g., 4%) on someone else’s money, while the US successfully sells some of its debt5.
4. If implemented at scale, stablecoins would generate automatic, non-stop demand for Treasuries5. This helps fund Washington as foreign demand for US debt fades5.
In this framework, stablecoins are viewed as conduits for Treasuries that ultimately serve the existing system, rather than disrupting it6.
Types of Digital Currencies
The sources differentiate between various forms of digital currency:
• Bitcoin: Bitcoin is mentioned as the equivalent use of a gold standard, serving as an alternative currency backed by tangible value7. It is also characterized as a speculative, digital-scarcity asset6.
• Cryptocurrencies (General): The expected demise of fiat currencies motivates calls for a return to asset-backed currencies like gold or the use of Bitcoin7. Cryptocurrencies have also been identified as the main tool for enrichment for Donald Trump, who had his most profitable year in 20253. In September 2024, Trump, in collaboration with his three children, announced a cryptocurrency initiative called World Liberty Financial8.
• Meme Coins: Trump launched a meme coin in January, just before returning to the White House8. A meme coin is defined as a cryptocurrency that changes its value in relation to its popularity among social media users8.
Concerns Regarding Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are described as the next idea governments have for monitoring how citizens live9. They are viewed by some as allowing the government to seize or "switch off" personal funds and divert people from traditional banking or physical cash9.
The introduction of CBDCs might occur during a crisis, such as bank outages, a major hack by a foreign country, or ATM networks going offline2. Such an "emergency" could necessitate the "emergency" roll-out of a digital wallet, which people would accept quickly out of convenience to pay for essentials like food and fuel2. This implementation would lead to increased control and the tracking of cash2.
While some support CBDCs due to potential benefits like reduced fraud and faster, smoother payments5, the overarching risks cited are seizure, spending controls, and geofenced payments5.
There is political resistance to this technology, with mentions of the imperative to "Stop Digital Currency Tyranny — Enact H.R. 1919"10.... Some believe that CBDCs will not work because the masses are too tied to fiat currency14.
The Network Effect of Currencies
Currencies, like online platforms, manifest "The Network Effect," meaning their usefulness and value increase with the size of their global circulation15. The utility of a currency relies on several factors, including:
• Trust in the currency as a reliable store of value over the duration of a trade16.
• Its status as a commodity of known value that everyone will accept in payment16.
• Its liquidity (ease of converting it to another currency or commodity)16.
• The "backing" of the currency, specifically the central bank and national economy that issues it16.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
Discuss Reserve currency status.
The discussion of reserve currency status, according to the sources, focuses primarily on the role of the US dollar globally, its inherent value and utility, and the implications of this status amid the ongoing American debt crisis and alleged financial reset plans.
The Status of the US Dollar
The US dollar is currently the reserve currency of the world1. This status is cited as the simple fact that has kept the financial machine running despite the shocking scale of the US debt crisis1.
However, the sources note that the US dollar's reserve status alone is not going to stop the inevitable consequences of the massive debt1.
The Value and Utility of a Currency
A currency's value and utility are complex and are determined by several factors beyond just the quantity in global circulation2:
• Trust: The currency must be a reliable store of value over the duration of trade2.
• Acceptance: Its status must be that of a commodity of known value that everyone will accept in payment2.
• Liquidity: The ease of converting the currency into some other currency or commodity2.
• Backing: The central bank and national economy that issues the currency provides its backing2.
Currencies also manifest the Network Effect3. This means that the greater the total sum of the currency in global circulation, the more valuable and useful the currency becomes3.
Historical Context and Loss of Status
Historically, reserve currency status is not permanent, as demonstrated by the example of Britain:
• Britain lost its reserve-currency status after World War II4.
• As a result, the pound fell in value by 50% as the baton passed to the US dollar4.
• Looking further back, Ancient Rome debased its currency, leading to inflation and the fracturing of the empire4.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the US ran sustained trade deficits with its allies, partly for geopolitical reasons to counter the USSR5. Trade deficits are historically paid in gold, and once a nation runs out of gold, trade deficits are no longer possible, which can be catastrophic for both importers and exporters56. This context led to President Nixon suspending the dollar's gold convertibility in August 19717. Despite this move, the dollar remained the reserve currency of the world7.
Implications for the Debt Crisis
In addressing the USA's current $37.5 trillion debt crisis, the option of de-dollarization, or surrendering the dollar's reserve status, is considered too costly and is dismissed as a non-viable solution8.
However, the sources indicate that the stability afforded by the reserve status is being challenged by declining foreign confidence:
• Countries that were previously big buyers of dollars and US debt, such as China, India, and Japan, are reducing their purchases of US treasuries and instead turning to gold7.
• This reduction in foreign bulk buys is partly due to how these nations viewed the US’s economic isolation of Russia, making them wary of risking a similar situation by holding large US debt or dollar reserves9.
Despite these trends, the sources suggest that the US dollar is likely to continue as the reserve currency for decades to come10.
Global Spillover of the Reserve Status
Because the US dollar is the global reserve currency, any alleged financial reset or associated volatility and inflation generated by the US debt solution would ripple into economies worldwide10. These global effects would impact European stocks, Asian export cycles, emerging-market funding, and commodity prices10.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
5 so
welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series
Source 1: Excerpts from "Are U.S. Attacks on 'Drug Boats' a Precursor to Regime Change in Venezuela? - LewRockwell"
The Trump administration has been claiming that its attacks on civilian boats traversing the Caribbean Sea, after leaving Venezuela, are intended to stop drug trafficking. However, the level of military force deployed suggests a much larger objective, potentially regime change against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. In a three-week period, the US military, acting under President Donald Trump’s orders, sank three civilian boats, resulting in 17 deaths by the administration’s count, with officials claiming those killed deserved summary execution. However, the President and administration officials have reportedly offered no evidence to support these drug trafficking claims, even in congressional briefings.
The military assets sent to the region are considered far more than necessary for small drug operations. Specifically, the US has deployed eight warships, several Navy P-8 surveillance planes, and one attack submarine, along with F-35 fighter jets positioned in Puerto Rico. Military officials, diplomats, and intelligence officers indicate that fighting drugs is merely the pretext for the recent US attacks, and the true goal is to drive Maduro from power. A former head of the Pentagon’s Southern Command, Admiral James Stavridis, described the naval flotilla and F-35 movement as "operational overkill" with little to do with actual drug interdiction. Instead, the deployment is interpreted as a clear signal that the administration is serious about achieving either regime or behavioral change from Caracas.
The desire to overthrow Maduro dates back to Trump’s first term. The Biden administration previously raised a bounty on the Venezuelan leader to $25 million, which the Trump administration subsequently doubled to $50 million in August. Maduro was also charged in 2020 in federal court with drug trafficking and "narco-terrorism". Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a long-time opponent of Maduro, insists that Washington will not allow a cartel, operating or masquerading as a government, to function in the hemisphere, claiming that much of the drugs are aimed at reaching the United States.
Venezuelan President Maduro denies these charges, noting that data from the UN and other organizations suggests only five percent of illegal drugs produced in Colombia attempt to be transported through Venezuela, and only a fraction of that small percentage evades his government’s interdiction efforts. Furthermore, while Trump alleged the boats were carrying fentanyl, reports indicated that Venezuela plays virtually no role in the fentanyl trade.
The sources suggest Trump has larger aims than sinking drug boats, indicating he is intent on getting the US embroiled in the type of "forever war" he campaigned against. In July, Trump reportedly signed a still-secret order directing the Pentagon to begin using military force against certain Latin American criminal gangs and drug cartels. Draft legislation is reportedly circulating that would grant Trump broad powers to wage war against drug cartels deemed "terrorists," as well as against any country accused of harboring or helping them. This type of open-ended authorization has been used by presidents since George W. Bush to justify invasions and unconstitutional foreign interventions. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has used similar language to excuse foreign excursions, stating that narco-terrorists are enemies of the United States and that the US will track, kill, and dismantle their networks throughout the hemisphere. In response to these significant military movements, Maduro has recently negotiated a defense pact with Russia, one of America’s major rivals.
Source 2: Excerpts from the transcript of the video "Classified WMD Docs Discovered In John Bolton’s Office & Deadly Dallas ICE Shooting"
Newly unsealed court filings revealed that the FBI discovered classified material in the Washington office of former National Security Adviser John Bolton. During a search on August 22nd, agents found documents marked with "secret" classifications. The inventory of seized documents referenced weapons of mass destruction, US diplomatic communications at the UN, and federal strategic communications. The "secret" classification is tiered below "top secret" but still indicates that disclosure could cause serious damage to national security.
On the same morning of the office search, agents also searched Bolton's home in Bethesda, Maryland, seizing multiple computers and electronic devices for forensic review, though the inventory there did not list classified markings. The investigation is tied to evidence related to three felony offenses, including the unauthorized retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act. This is the same law utilized in the case against Donald Trump concerning documents at Mara Lago, and the same law considered during the probe into Joe Biden’s documents.
Investigators also uncovered evidence that Bolton’s AOL email account had been compromised by a foreign entity. Heavily redacted reports suggest US officials may have intelligence indicating that Bolton transmitted sensitive information to close associates using unclassified systems already in the hands of hostile foreign services. This investigation is still active, and Bolton faces similar legal risks as both President Trump and former President Biden.
Moving to domestic security events, a mass shooting occurred at an ICE field office in Dallas, Texas. A sniper identified as 29-year-old Joshua John perched on a rooftop across from the facility and opened fire on an unmarked detainee transport van. The attack resulted in the death of one detainee and serious injury to two others. The shooter used a high-powered rifle and turned the weapon on himself as FBI agents closed in on his rooftop location.
Although a definitive motive has not been confirmed, police reported that the words "anti-ice" were scrolled on an unspent round found next to the deceased sniper. The Dallas police chief stated that early evidence points to ideology. The head of the FBI's Dallas field office called the incident a "targeted incident". Political commentary swiftly followed, with Texas Senator Ted Cruz labeling the attack as another case of politically motivated violence, citing the killing of Charlie Kirk as proof that the problem is spiraling. Vice President JD Vance posted on X, tying the Dallas sniper attack to what he called a broader campaign of violence aimed at immigration enforcement as the Trump administration carries out its mass deportation initiative. This incident marks the third major attack on immigration enforcement in Texas this year.
Source 3: Excerpts from "European Commission’s war mongering against Russia is to distract from its crumbling empire - The Expose"
The European Union is reported to be confronting a significant crisis rooted in the lack of a clear strategy among its elite leaders, such as Ursula von der Leyen, Kaja Kallas, and Roberta Metsola. The EU’s intense focus on waging war against Russia is alleged to be a tactic to distract from its serious internal problems, including economic decline, corruption scandals, and internal tensions. The European Union and the European Commission are accused of having become enemies of their own citizens through tyrannical laws, idiotic rules, rampant corruption scandals, and belligerent posturing. The assertion is made that the European Union must either be dissolved or undergo a new beginning.
The ruling politicians are described as incapable of making sound decisions and steering Europe toward war with Russia as a symptom of the continent’s dire straits, which include rampant crime fueled by economic refugees and resulting economic decline. History suggests that financially distressed nations often stumble into war over trivial pretexts.
The EU and the Commission have been speaking almost exclusively about war, as demonstrated by the informal meeting of EU defense and foreign ministers in Copenhagen in late August 2025. Brussels and most member states are preparing for a protracted conflict rather than peace between Russia and Ukraine. Hungary’s Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó wrote that the European Commission is effectively acting as the "Ukrainian Commission" by prioritizing Kiev’s interests, citing intentions to send billions of euros to Ukraine for soldier salaries, weapons, and government operation, alongside immense pressure to accelerate Ukraine’s accession to the EU.
Examples of radical statements from EU figures are cited, revealing alleged ignorance in politics. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen claimed her plane's GPS was disrupted while traveling in late August 2025 and immediately pointed the finger at Russia. This claim was later refuted with evidence. Von der Leyen also echoed the French President’s rhetoric by calling President Putin a "predator," leading other EU leaders to follow suit with hostilities. Vice President Kaja Kallas, from Estonia, is characterized as highly Russophobic and having grown up steeped in propaganda, reportedly demonstrating ignorance of World War II history by doubting the roles of the Soviet Union (Russia) and China in the Allied victory.
Former European Parliament President Roberta Metsola has been embroiled in a string of scandals, including allegations of influence peddling and conflicts of interest. For example, Metsola appointed her brother-in-law as head of her cabinet, earning a substantial monthly salary. Her husband was appointed head of lobbying for a major cruise line, which critics note is among the most polluting, despite the EU promoting sustainable energy initiatives. Metsola was also accused of complicity and accepting bribes from Qatar in the "Qatargate" scandal, yet she remains in her role, allegedly supported by her "elite club".
These corruption scandals, coupled with economic downturns in key European powerhouse economies like Germany, France, and the Netherlands, exacerbate the crisis. These countries, once the economic heart of Europe, are now allegedly collapsing. The war rhetoric acts as a smokescreen, or distraction, for their populations. The EU is reportedly squandering money on defense, pilfering €300 billion in frozen Russian assets, and using them to purchase €800 billion worth of US weapons to funnel to Ukraine. The conclusion is that empires, like the European Union, are collapsing, and the global hegemony of the West, including the US, is crumbling.
Source 4: Excerpts from the transcript of the video "Fuel Shortages In Russia Threaten Putin’s Grip & Iran’s Missile Trouble"
Ukraine’s campaign of drone strikes deep inside Russia, hitting oil refineries, is triggering fuel shortages across the country, with gas lines now appearing in major urban centers like Moscow. This strategy targets the infrastructure that fuels Russia's economy and its war machine. Over several days, Ukrainian drones struck facilities across Russia, including one of the largest, the Salivat Prochemical Complex in the Bash Cordistan region, approximately 930 miles from the front lines. The attack on Salivat, run by Gazprom, caused a massive blaze.
In recent weeks, at least 10 major Russian refineries have been targeted. Reports suggest that Russian refining capacity has dropped by as much as 20% on certain days, resulting in shortages of common types of gasoline. Shortages initially appeared in the Far East and Crimea, but are now spreading westward into central Russia and the Volga region. Crimea has been hit particularly hard, with gas stations closing their doors entirely. The Russian government has resorted to instituting a temporary gasoline export ban to combat the shortages and is considering extending that ban through the end of October, possibly adding diesel to the list. These disruptions are significant because Vladimir Putin built his political legitimacy on stability, and the shortages are now affecting ordinary Russians directly at the pump in their daily lives.
Turning to the Middle East, Iran is scrambling to rebuild missile factories that were reportedly flattened by Israeli strikes in June. Satellite imagery reviewed by the Associated Press shows patchwork repairs at sites like Parchin, Shahude, and Kojier, which were targeted three months ago. The critical missing component crippling the Iranian regime is the industrial mixers, known as planetary mixers, required to manufacture solid rocket propellant. The Israeli strikes targeted the mixing halls where these planetary mixers operated.
Solid fuel missiles are highly valued because they can be stored ready to fire, unlike liquid fuel rockets that require pre-launch loading. This readiness shortens launch windows and aids in disguising missile locations. During the 12-day war in June, the Mullahs fired over 570 ballistic missiles at Israel, and an additional 330 missiles were fired during earlier flare-ups. This meant Iran blew through approximately a third of its estimated 2,500-missile arsenal in just 90 days. Before the Israeli strikes, Iran's factories were on track to produce over 200 solid fuel missiles monthly, but that pipeline is now reportedly frozen without the planetary mixers. Experts suggest Beijing remains the likeliest source for propellant mixers.
Finally, the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown has reported a "new milestone," claiming that approximately 2 million illegal immigrants have been removed from the country in under 250 days. This figure includes 1.6 million voluntary departures and 400,000 deportations by federal agents. Administration officials assert that the era of open borders is over. A UN study reportedly acknowledged the deterrence effect of Trump’s policies, reporting a 97% drop in northbound illegal migration from Central America. ICE is surging manpower, and detention capacity is being expanded with new facilities given snappy nicknames. Furthermore, over 1,000 new agreements have been signed with DHS, empowering state and local law enforcement across 40 states to arrest illegal criminals for removal. The Department of Homeland Security’s assistant secretary stated that stepped-up enforcement targets "the worst of the worst".
In a related move, the US State Department added the Bario 18 gang to its list of foreign terrorist organizations, or FTOs. Bario 18, which originated in Los Angeles, is one of the largest gangs in the northern hemisphere and is known for extreme violence, drug trafficking, and control of neighborhoods in Central America. This FTO designation places Bario 18 on the same list as MS-13 and major drug cartels. This shift in strategy means treating organized crime as a national security threat on par with terrorism, which is used to justify lethal military strikes, such as those against suspected drug smuggling boats off Venezuela's coast.
Source 5: Excerpts from "Money, Credit, Growth and Depression: It's Complicated - LewRockwell"
A financial system that makes "growth" its central focus inevitably leads to dependence on credit and asset bubbles, which are described as being inherently self-liquidating. The fundamental complication regarding money arises in a system that demands constant growth.
The source asks why authorities embraced fiat currencies in the first place, moving away from gold-backed systems. The core reason is that the system demanded credit expansion. In the fractional reserve banking system, most of the money in circulation is created through the origination of credit, such as mortgages and commercial loans, rather than by adding tangible assets like gold or Bitcoin. If credit were restricted to loaning out a percentage of cash deposits, credit would become scarce. This scarcity would cause assets to collapse in value and employment to shrink, leading to the collapse of "growth," which is commonly termed a depression. Credit-money is considered money, period, meaning that when banks issue loans far exceeding their gold or Bitcoin backing, the backing per circulating dollar is dramatically reduced.
A separate complication involves foreign trade. If a nation's imports and exports do not balance, the difference must historically be paid in gold, meaning nations running persistent trade deficits eventually deplete their gold reserves. The US faced this situation in the late 1960s and early 1970s, running sustained trade deficits with allies for geopolitical reasons, as propping up those economies was deemed essential to counter the USSR and the appeal of Communism. Once a nation runs out of gold, trade deficits become impossible, which can be catastrophic for both the importer and the exporter.
Currencies also operate according to the Network Effect. This phenomenon dictates that the usefulness and value of a network—such as an online platform like Meta/Facebook, or a currency—increase as the number of users or the quantity of global circulation expands. The utility and value of a currency are determined not solely by the quantity in circulation, but also by public trust in the currency as a reliable store of value, its universal acceptance as a known commodity, its liquidity (ease of conversion), and the backing provided by the issuing central bank and national economy.
Source 6: Excerpts from "Recent summit in China signals a shift in global energy politics to the East - The Expose"
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit, held between August 31st and September 1st, 2025, in Tianjin, China, marked a profound shift in global energy geopolitics, establishing a new energy alliance among India, Russia, and China. The public optics of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Chinese President Xi Jinping sharing warm camaraderie signaled a major realignment.
A cornerstone of this global energy realignment is the "binding memorandum" for the Power of Siberia 2 (POS-2) pipeline. This 50 billion cubic meter pipeline is designed to deliver Russian natural gas from the Yamal fields to China via Mongolia. Critically, POS-2 taps into the same Arctic reserves that historically fueled Germany’s industrial might for half a century under the premise of Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik. The permanent deflection of Russia’s Yamal gas supply to China reflects Brussels’s decline into geopolitical irrelevance and Germany’s status as a "vassalage to US interests".
This pivot to Asia by Russia, accelerated by sanctions imposed since 2014 and intensified after 2022, is now consolidating. While Russia will supply China with significantly less gas than it previously exported to Europe, and at materially lower prices, this re-orientation significantly alleviates Russia’s economic security concerns, particularly following the Nordstream pipeline sabotage. For China, this reduces reliance on seaborne liquefied natural gas, which is typically two to four times more expensive, and reduces vulnerability to US naval dominance in critical chokepoints like the Straits of Malacca.
India’s attendance at the summit asserted its defiance. India is reeling from the Trump administration's decision to double trade tariffs on its exports from 25% to 50%, a punitive measure targeting India’s purchase of Russian crude oil. India has signaled a shift by deepening diplomatic ties with Russia and China and is set to increase its imports of Russian oil in defiance of US secondary sanctions. India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar highlighted the hypocrisy of US policy, noting that China imports significantly more Russian oil and Europe remains the largest buyer of Russian gas, yet India alone faces draconian tariffs.
The sanctions regime intended to cripple Russia has boomeranged, instead crippling Europe’s economic vitality. Germany, once the engine of European growth, now faces deindustrialization and relies on costly US and Qatari LNG. The German ruling class was already pursuing economic suicide through its Energiewende policies, but the loss of cheap Russian gas is a major contributing factor to the declining living standards and rising debt.
The US pursuit of Eurasian hegemony is seen as having failed, unraveling the vision of Zbigniew Brzezinski, which relied on severing the economic complementarity between Germany and Russia to prevent a challenge to US dominance. By weaponizing the US dollar and SWIFT system, the West incentivized Russia, China, India, and others in the Global South to diversify their financial systems. By alienating India with hypocritical tariffs, the US risks pushing a key ally toward its adversaries. The Tianjin summit and the POS-2 memorandum signify the start of a global realignment in energy flows, where the West's hubris has sown the seeds of its own marginalization.
Source 7: Excerpts from "Russia Exposes USA’s $37 Trillion Financial Reset Plan: Here’s How It Will Make You Poor"
The United States is facing a debt crisis of shocking scale, with $37.5 trillion in debt, resulting in a debt-to-GDP ratio of 119%. The debt is projected to hit 156% by 2055, and the annual interest bill alone is $882 billion, which surpasses the amount spent on both Medicare and Defense. Historically, every major power that has surpassed the critical 100% debt-to-GDP mark, such as Ancient Rome, Britain, and Japan, failed to survive without some kind of hard financial reset. Sustaining current US debt levels is considered impossible, requiring decades of 6% real growth or even an impractical 100% tax rate just to service the debt.
A senior Russian presidential advisor, Anton Kobyakov, suggested that the USA is planning a quiet but catastrophic escape route from this crisis, leaning on crypto, stablecoins, and gold. Among five theoretical solutions, the only viable option remaining is to increase demand for government bonds by holding crypto and stablecoins at scale in national reserves, while managing a controlled reset.
This proposed reset would constitute the largest wealth transfer in history. The mechanism relies on inflation being weaponized to erode the real value of the $37.5 trillion debt pile. While inflation is commonly associated with rising consumer prices, the real goal is the growing cost of financial assets like stocks and real estate held by the rich. This process causes wealth inequality to worsen, resulting in the asset-rich gaining extreme wealth while wage workers lose purchasing power and fall into poverty. Citizens will absorb the cost through inflation, taxation, and tighter monetary control.
The mechanism involves stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies, or CBDCs, which could serve as a bridge to a programmable financial system that directly supports US debt. A stablecoin issuer sells a token, and since idle cash earns nothing, the issuer buys US Treasury bills (US debt) as the safest form of investment. At scale, this generates automatic, non-stop demand for Treasuries, helping to fund Washington as foreign demand for US debt fades. Foreign buyers are already reducing their purchases of US Treasuries and turning to gold, largely due to concerns over the US economic isolation of Russia.
CBDCs are described as governments' next idea for monitoring citizens, carrying risks of seizure, spending controls, and geofenced payments. It is speculated that a crisis, such as bank outages or a foreign hack, could serve as the "emergency" justification for the quick roll-out of a digital wallet, which people would accept to pay for food and fuel, leading to cash tracking and increased governmental control. Because the US dollar is the global reserve currency, this alleged reset and associated volatility would ripple into economies worldwide.
Source 8: Excerpts from "Evidences Charlie Kirk’s Killing Was a Professional Hit-Job - LewRockwell"
The murder of Charlie Kirk is generating an emerging and credible narrative that suggests the killing was a professional hit-job. This narrative might reveal the true enemies of the American people and could potentially unite conservatives and progressives in an effective mass-movement to reverse the "permanent-war economy" that has existed since 1945. This war economy, characterized by hundreds of US coups and invasions, is costly to everyone except the US billionaires who profit from them.
The emerging narrative suggests that Benjamin Netanyahu should be investigated for the crime, along with the billionaires who had been funding Kirk’s operation. Allegations state that Netanyahu controls Trump and controlled Kirk through Zionist billionaires.
In the final three months of his life, Kirk reportedly "woke up to the truth," questioning the October 7th events and citing evidence that Netanyahu was lying about them. Kirk’s base was turning against Israel because of the "Gaza genocide," and his billionaire funders, who provided hundreds of millions of dollars to his organization, allegedly threatened to pull their funding if he continued this line of criticism. Kirk’s death is viewed by some as an assassination intended to serve as a deterrent, sending a message to anyone who might follow in his anti-Israel footsteps.
The broader context asserts that America took over the world after World War II to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires, whose cartels extract the world’s wealth.
Source 9: Excerpts from the transcript of the video "The ELITE Just Got Conservatives to OPENLY Embrace PDF-Files Through Charlie Kirk's "Prayer""
The memorial service for Charlie Kirk is characterized as a psychological operation designed to unite the world's most powerful richest private civilian, Elon Musk, with the world's most powerful public figure, Donald Trump. This occurred despite Musk's past criticisms of Trump.
Just months earlier, Elon Musk had tweeted that Donald Trump was on the Epstein file list and that this was the real reason the files had not been made public. Musk even stated that Trump had seen to it that a massive PDF file ring was being covered up by the Trump administration. Musk urged followers to mark his post for the future, claiming "the truth will come out," and called Trump a "PDF file enabler".
Musk himself is criticized as a "transhumanist hypocritical corporate welfare queen" who supports carbon taxes, universal basic income, the "CLOT shots," and a brain chip technology aimed at merging human biology with technology. He is also accused of wanting a one-world government while claiming to oppose it.
At the memorial, Musk accepted Trump's invitation, sat with him for the majority of the event, and embraced Kirk’s widow. Musk referred to Trump as "my president" and stated, "If we don’t hang together we will surely hang separately so let us unite," suggesting a political reconciliation. This unity is viewed as profoundly perverse and disgusting, using the tragic event to psychologically manipulate individuals and providing cover for those allegedly involved in criminal activity. The unity fulfilled Kirk's wish, which he expressed in a clip that went viral, hoping that Musk and Trump would reconcile.
Source 10: Excerpts from "The WHO/UNICEF DTP vaccination programme throughout the developing world is a crime against humanity - The Expose"
Dr. Toby Rogers asserted in 2022 that the WHO/UNICEF DTP vaccination program in the developing world is a "crime against humanity that must be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court". This statement is based on research findings showing that the DTP shot kills five times more children than it saves from the three diseases it is designed to protect against.
This data comes from the Bandim Health Project (BHP) in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, which monitors the health of over 200,000 people and possesses decades-long datasets on long-term health outcomes based on vaccination status. Dr. Peter Aaby, who founded BHP, is noted for his research on the non-specific effects of vaccines. This research demonstrates that vaccines can change the immune system in unexpected ways, with positive effects providing protection against other diseases, or negative effects making one more vulnerable to other diseases. For example, after the WHO introduced a new measles vaccine in 1989, Dr. Aaby’s team discovered negative non-specific effects, finding that girls vaccinated with the new formulation died at twice the rate of unvaccinated girls.
Dr. Aaby and Dr. Christine Stabell Benn, who co-runs the project, found that children vaccinated with DTP had five times higher all-cause mortality than children who were not injected with DTP. Their findings also noted sex effects, with girls being more likely to die following DTP vaccination than boys. Despite Dr. Aaby and Dr. Benn sharing these findings with the WHO on multiple occasions, the organization has done nothing. Furthermore, the WHO, allegedly under pressure from the Gates Foundation, uses high DTP vaccination coverage rates to determine a country's eligibility for additional funding.
According to the BHP research, only three live attenuated vaccines (oral polio, measles by itself, and tuberculosis/BCG) appear to offer more benefits than harms. However, none of these specific live vaccines are available on the US schedule because live vaccines eventually "revert to virulence," meaning the virus evolves and can cause an outbreak of the very disease they were meant to eliminate. Based on the BHP data, all of the vaccines on the current US schedule objectively produce more harms than benefits.
It is also claimed that a strong case can be made that the three largest epidemics of the last 100 years—the 1918 Spanish flu, HIV/AIDS, and the Coronavirus—are all connected with the vaccine program in some way, such as a military vaccine campaign, a clinical trial, or gain-of-function research. Vaccine failure and harms reportedly constitute the business model of the pharmaceutical industry, generating billions in revenue for vaccines and hundreds of billions for treatments for vaccine injury. The Covid-19 injections are specifically called "objectively the most dangerous injections ever produced".
Finally, the Biden Administration’s September 2022 Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology is highlighted, proposing to develop genetic engineering technologies to "write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers".
Source 11: Excerpts from "WFT?! Candace Owens OUTS Charlie Kirk! and Michael Savage Calls Hannity a "GOVT AGENT""
Questions are being raised about the official narrative of Charlie Kirk's shooting, particularly focusing on the use of the number 33 in the timeline, which is described as a "total Freemason number".
Candace Owens, a close associate of Kirk, publicly asserted that Charlie Kirk was a "friend of the feds". The speaker questions whether a person who befriends federal agents—who incessantly spy on citizens and trample liberties—can be truly viewed as a hero. Owens’ investigative reporting allegedly clashes with the government’s official story, particularly concerning the timeline and whereabouts of the suspect, Tyler Robinson. Owens questioned the lack of drone footage showing the suspect’s movements, especially since Kirk was identified as a friend of the feds.
Another diehard influential Trump supporter, Michael Savage (Michael Allen Weiner), is now publicly criticizing the Trump administration for lying about the official story of Kirk’s death. Savage asserted that Sean Hannity is a "government agent" and that "everyone knows this," characterizing him as a "whore in a brothel" for repeating the government lie. Savage claimed he is risking an awful lot going up against the "MAGA FBI" and the current administration.
Savage, like Owens, questions the official narrative, specifically the claim that the shooter removed the barrel from the Mauser rifle, fitted the receiver and stock in his backpack, and then reassembled the barrel and left the weapon in the woods for the FBI to find. He stated that something is "very wrong" with what he heard and that they are "not hearing or seeing reality". Savage claimed the entire official story is a "giant deep state cover up from the top to the bottom". He speculated that the killing might have been orchestrated to get the Epstein scandal off the news cycle. Savage pointedly asked why they would kill Charlie Kirk, noting that he was not a radical figure.
Source 12: Excerpts from "What Is the Final Solution to the Gaza War? - LewRockwell"
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, during a visit to Israel, confirmed the Trump administration’s full political and military support for the war in Gaza. Rubio claimed that a diplomatic solution may not be possible because Hamas is a barbaric terrorist group whose stated mission is the destruction of the Jewish State. The war is reportedly being intensified under the false motivation of eliminating Hamas, which is allegedly no longer capable of fighting, in order to implement the "final solution" for Palestine.
President Donald Trump reportedly had the most profitable year of his life in 2025, increasing his net worth from $4.3 billion in 2024 to a record $7.3 billion. The documentation suggests no US president in history has exploited their position of power to make such immense profits as Trump.
Trump’s primary vehicle for this enrichment was cryptocurrencies. After he announced a cryptocurrency initiative called World Liberty Financial in collaboration with his children in September 2024, and subsequently won the presidential election, a crypto entrepreneur invested $75 million, triggering a snowball effect. Trump also launched a meme coin just before returning to the White House.
The connection between political power and the economic interests of the ruling class is also seen in Trump's foreign policy actions. Upon taking office, Trump launched a military operation against Venezuela under the guise of combating drug cartels. The actual reason cited is Venezuela’s massive oil reserves, which the country controls after freeing itself from US domination. Secretary Rubio classified drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations thanks to President Trump and claimed that the regimes of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela are intentionally amplifying chaos, with China opposing the US through diplomatic and economic influence.
In Europe, Trump stated that he is prepared to impose severe sanctions on Russia once all NATO countries stop buying Russian oil. He presented NATO as an equal alliance, although it has always been an organization under US command used by Washington to provoke and wage war against Russia via Ukraine. Following an alleged staging of Russian drone launches against Poland, US General Grynkewich, appointed by Trump, launched a major military operation called Eastern Sentry to further strengthen NATO deployment against Russia in Europe. The US is deploying intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Germany capable of reaching Moscow, while Poland is calling for US nuclear weapons on its territory.
thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info
I. Geopolitical Realignment and Escalating Conflicts
A. U.S. Military Posture and Foreign Policy
The Trump administration is engaged in multiple theaters, employing military force and aggressive rhetoric to achieve its objectives.
Venezuela: A significant U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean is ostensibly aimed at drug interdiction but is widely interpreted as a precursor to regime change in Venezuela.
• Military Assets Deployed: The force includes eight warships, Navy P-8 surveillance planes, an attack submarine, and F-35 fighter jets in Puerto Rico.
• Recent Actions: In the last three weeks, the U.S. military has sunk three civilian boats departing from Venezuela, resulting in 17 deaths, according to President Trump. The administration has offered no evidence to support its claim that the boats were trafficking drugs.
• Expert Analysis: Admiral James Stavridis, former head of U.S. Southern Command, described the deployment as "operational overkill" with "little to do with actual drug interdiction." He stated, "they are a clear signal to Nicolás Maduro that this administration is growing serious about accomplishing either regime or behavioral change from Caracas."
• Stated Pretext vs. Real Goal: Multiple military, diplomatic, and intelligence officials assert that fighting drugs is a pretext, and the true goal is to oust President Nicolás Maduro.
• Political Rhetoric: Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated, "we’re not going to have a cartel, operating or masquerading as a government, operating in our own hemisphere."
• Historical Context: The Trump administration previously placed a $15 million bounty on Maduro, which was increased to $25 million by the Biden administration and doubled again to $50 million by Trump in August. Maduro was also indicted in a U.S. federal court in 2020 for "narco-terrorism."
Russia and NATO: Tensions with Russia are escalating, with significant military posturing in Europe.
• Military Operations: The U.S. has launched a major military operation, "Eastern Sentry," to strengthen NATO's deployment against Russia.
• Missile Deployments: The U.S. is deploying intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Germany capable of reaching Moscow. Poland has requested U.S. nuclear weapons be deployed on its territory.
• Russian Response: Russia has conducted large-scale joint exercises with Belarus, including nuclear missile tests.
• Sanctions: President Trump has stated he is prepared to impose "severe sanctions on Russia" once all NATO countries stop buying Russian oil.
Israel and the Middle East: The U.S. provides full political and military support for Israel's war in Gaza.
• U.S. Position: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, visiting Israel, stated that a diplomatic solution may not be possible because "Hamas is a terrorist group, a barbaric group, whose stated mission is the destruction of the Jewish state." This is seen as U.S. backing for Israel to implement a "final solution" for Palestine.
• NATO Expansion: NATO has opened a liaison office in Amman, Jordan, through its Mediterranean Dialogue, which includes Israel among its seven partners.
• Iran: There is evidence of a sustained Israeli campaign to degrade Iran's missile capabilities, with strikes hitting key factories in June and October 2024. Despite this, Iran is attempting to rebuild, potentially with Chinese assistance, having expended an estimated third of its 2,500-missile arsenal in recent conflicts.
B. The Rise of a New Eurasian Energy Axis
A significant shift in global energy geopolitics is underway, centered on a new alliance between Russia, China, and India, solidified at the 2025 Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin, China.
• Power of Siberia 2 (POS-2) Pipeline: A "binding memorandum" was signed for this pipeline, which will deliver 50 billion cubic meters (bcm) of natural gas annually from Russia's Yamal fields—the same reserves that once supplied Germany—to China via Mongolia.
• Strategic Impact:
◦ For Russia: The pivot to Asia provides alternative markets after the loss of European customers and the Nordstream pipeline sabotage. Russia could supply China with up to 100 bcm annually after 2030.
◦ For China: It reduces reliance on more expensive seaborne LNG and mitigates vulnerability to U.S. naval power in key chokepoints like the Straits of Malacca.
◦ For the U.S.: It represents a failure of Zbigniew Brzezinski's "Grand Chessboard" strategy to prevent a Germany-Russia axis and undermines U.S. LNG export ambitions.
• India's Defiance: Alienated by the Trump administration's decision to double trade tariffs to 50% over its purchase of Russian crude, India is deepening ties with Russia and China. Prime Minister Modi has reportedly refused phone calls from President Trump, and India is set to increase its Russian oil imports in defiance of U.S. sanctions.
C. The Decline of European Influence
The European Union is depicted as a "crumbling empire" whose leadership is using war mongering against Russia to distract from severe internal problems.
• Economic Crisis: Powerhouse economies like Germany, France, and the Netherlands are collapsing or in crisis. Germany has 3 million unemployed, and the Netherlands faces a severe housing crisis. The loss of cheap Russian gas has led to deindustrialization in Germany.
• Leadership and Corruption: The EU leadership, particularly Ursula von der Leyen, Kaja Kallas, and Roberta Metsola, is described as "stupidly radicalised" and incompetent. They are embroiled in scandals including Qatargate (influence peddling involving Qatar) and Pfizergate.
• Vassalage to U.S. Interests: The EU's decision to sever ties with Russian gas is portrayed as a "great self-own" that has crippled its economic vitality for the benefit of U.S. interests. This reflects a decline into "geopolitical irrelevance."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Domestic Turmoil and Institutional Distrust in the U.S.
A. The Killing of Charlie Kirk: Competing Narratives and Political Fallout
The death of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk has become a flashpoint for widespread distrust in official government narratives.
The "Professional Hit-Job" Narrative: A credible counter-narrative suggests Kirk was assassinated, possibly by Israeli intelligence, due to a significant shift in his political positions.
• Motive: In the last months of his life, Kirk turned against Israel. He questioned the official account of the October 7th event, called the Israeli operation in Gaza a "genocide," and labeled Jeffrey Epstein an "Israeli Mossad agent."
• Threats: His billionaire Zionist funders, who supported his Turning Point USA organization, had threatened to pull funding. It is alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was actively involved in pressuring Kirk.
• Evidence Scrutiny: Commentators like Candace Owens and Michael Savage have publicly questioned the official police and FBI evidence against the suspect, Tyler Robinson. Owens highlighted inconsistencies in the timeline and demanded the release of drone and surveillance footage. Savage called the FBI's story about the rifle being disassembled and reassembled "bullshit" and stated, "We are not hearing or seeing reality."
The "Friend of the Feds" Revelation: Candace Owens stated on her show that Charlie Kirk "has been a friend of the feds," raising questions about his loyalties and whether such a person can be considered a hero by anti-government conservatives.
Psychological Operation at Memorial: Kirk's memorial service is being framed as a psychological operation.
• Trump-Musk Reconciliation: The event was used to stage a public reconciliation between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Musk was quoted backstage saying, "If we don't hang together we will surely hang separately so let us unite."
• Silencing Dissent: The emotional nature of the event, combined with Kirk's past "prayer" for Trump and Musk to reconcile, is used to make questioning the new alliance seem disrespectful to Kirk's legacy, thereby providing "additional cover for pedophiles" by burying Musk's previous claim that Trump is on the Epstein client list.
B. Trump Administration's Second Term: Key Policies and Actions
Immigration and Border Enforcement: The administration is carrying out a massive immigration crackdown.
• Deportations: Approximately 2 million illegal immigrants have been removed in under 250 days (1.6 million voluntary departures, 400,000 deportations).
• Policy: For four consecutive months, Customs and Border Protection has released "zero illegal aliens into the interior of the country." A UN study reported a 97% drop in northbound illegal migration from Central America.
• Detention: New detention facilities are being opened with nicknames like "Speedway Slammer," "Corn Husker Clink," and "Louisiana Lockup."
Counter-Terrorism Designations: The administration is expanding the definition of terrorism to include criminal organizations.
• Secret Order: In July, Trump signed a secret order directing the Pentagon to use military force against certain Latin American drug cartels.
• Draft Legislation: Legislation is circulating that would grant broad powers to wage war against cartels deemed "terrorists" and any country harboring them.
• Barrio 18: The State Department has designated the Barrio 18 gang (or 18th Street Gang) as a foreign terrorist organization. This follows similar designations for MS-13 and major drug cartels. This label justifies lethal military strikes, like those off the Venezuelan coast.
Legal Issues Involving Officials:
• John Bolton: Unsealed court filings reveal the FBI found materials with "secret" classifications in former National Security Advisor John Bolton's Washington office. The documents relate to weapons of mass destruction and diplomatic communications. Bolton is under investigation for potential violations of the Espionage Act. Evidence suggests his AOL email account was compromised by a foreign entity.
• Donald Trump: According to Forbes, Trump had the "most profitable year of his life" in 2025, with his net worth increasing from $4.3 billion to a record $7.3 billion, largely through cryptocurrency initiatives launched around his election.
C. Incidents of Political Violence
A sniper attack occurred at an ICE field office in Dallas, Texas.
• The Attack: 29-year-old Joshua John opened fire on a detainee transport van from a rooftop, killing one detainee and wounding two before killing himself.
• Motive: The attack is considered a "targeted incident" with an ideological motive. The words "anti-ICE" were found scrolled on an unspent round.
• Political Reaction: Senator Ted Cruz called it "politically motivated violence," and Vice President JD Vance tied it to a "broader campaign of violence aimed squarely at immigration enforcement." This was the third major attack on immigration enforcement in Texas in 2025.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. The Looming Financial Reset and Economic Instability
A. The U.S. Debt Crisis
The United States faces an unprecedented debt crisis, forming the backdrop for a potential systemic reset.
Metric
Figure
Total National Debt
$37.5 trillion
Debt-to-GDP Ratio
119% (projected to hit 156% by 2055)
Debt Per Person
$110,000
Debt Per Household
$280,000
Annual Interest Payments
$882 billion (more than Medicare and Defense)
Daily Interest Payments
Over $2 billion
Historically, no major empire has recovered from a debt-to-GDP ratio over 100% without a major financial reset.
B. A Proposed "Great Reset"
According to Russian presidential advisor Anton Kobyakov, the U.S. is planning a "quiet" escape from its debt crisis, which would constitute the "largest wealth transfer in history."
• The Mechanism: The plan involves leveraging stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) to create systemic, non-stop demand for U.S. Treasury bonds, stabilizing government funding as foreign buyers (like China and Japan) reduce their purchases.
• How It Works: A stablecoin issuer takes in $1 of cash and, to earn a yield, buys a U.S. Treasury bill. At scale, this becomes a massive, automated pipeline for funding U.S. debt.
• The Consequence: This system weaponizes inflation to erode the real value of the debt. While wage earners lose purchasing power, asset holders (stocks, real estate) see their net worth escalate. This widens the wealth inequality gap, transferring wealth from the working and middle classes to the asset-holding elite.
• Implementation: A crisis, such as a major bank hack or ATM network outage, could be used as an "emergency" pretext to roll out a mandatory digital wallet system, giving the government unprecedented control over personal funds.
C. The Debate on Fiat vs. Asset-Backed Currency
The move to fiat currencies was driven by the need for "growth," which depends on abundant credit.
• Credit Creation: In a fractional-reserve banking system, most money is created as credit (e.g., mortgages), not by adding physical assets like gold. A system strictly limited by gold reserves would be "starved for credit," leading to depression.
• Trade Deficits: Under a gold standard, nations running persistent trade deficits eventually run out of gold, forcing a catastrophic halt to trade. The U.S. faced this in the late 1960s, leading to the suspension of dollar-gold convertibility in 1971.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Critiques of Global Health and Vaccine Policies
A. The DTP Vaccine Controversy
Research from the Bandim Health Project (BHP) in Guinea-Bissau, led by Dr. Peter Aaby and Dr. Christine Stabell Benn, presents a stark challenge to the global vaccination consensus.
• Core Finding: Across multiple studies, children vaccinated with the Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) vaccine were found to have 5 times higher all-cause mortality than unvaccinated children.
• Non-Specific Effects: The research shows vaccines have "non-specific effects," altering the immune system in unexpected ways. While some live attenuated vaccines (measles, oral polio, BCG) show net positive effects, the DTP vaccine has profoundly negative non-specific effects, particularly for girls.
• Global Implications: The WHO and UNICEF use DTP coverage rates as a key metric for funding developing nations. Given the BHP's findings, this program is described as a potential "crime against humanity." To date, the WHO has taken no action on these findings.
B. Alleged Links Between Vaccines and Major Pandemics
A case is made that the three largest epidemics of the last century are connected to the vaccine program or related research.
1. 1918 Spanish Flu: Evidence suggests it may have originated from a bacterial meningitis vaccination campaign at Fort Riley, Kansas, before vaccinated U.S. soldiers were deployed to Europe for World War I.
2. HIV/AIDS: The book The River argues that clinical trials for the oral polio vaccine in the Congo may have introduced a simian retrovirus into humans that became HIV.
3. SARS-CoV-2: The Lancet commission chair, Jeffrey Sachs, states that evidence points to the virus originating from a U.S. bioweapons lab involved in gain-of-function research.
C. Expansion of Bio-Engineering Technology
A recent White House executive order is framed as a dystopian expansion of the gene-modifying strategy seen in mRNA injections.
• Executive Order: The "Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation" explicitly states the goal is to "develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers." This signals an intent to create an entire economy based on bio-engineering.
thumb_upGood report
thumb_downBad report
I. ARE U.S. ATTACKS ON “DRUG BOATS” A PRECURSOR TO REGIME CHANGE IN VENEZUELA? BY MICHAEL TENNANT
The Trump administration’s claim that US attacks on civilian boats in the Caribbean are merely anti-drug trafficking operations is questioned due to the level of military assets deployed.
The Trump administration claims its attacks on civilian boats in the Caribbean Sea are intended to stop drug trafficking.
But the amount of firepower the United States has sent to the region suggests something much bigger — possibly even an attempt to oust Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
The actual goal of the massive U.S. military deployment near Venezuela is suspected to be regime change, not drug interdiction.
“Several current and former military officials, diplomats and intelligence officers say that while fighting drugs is the pretext for the recent U.S. attacks, the real goal is to drive Mr. Maduro from power, one way or another,” wrote the Times.
The massive naval flotilla off the coast of Venezuela and the movement of fifth-generation F-35 fighters to Puerto Rico has little to do with actual drug interdiction — they represent operational overkill.
The physical positioning of the deployed forces suggests that they are not optimally located for a major drug interdiction operation.
In fact, the paper pointed out, the deployed forces are in the wrong place “to carry out a major drug interdiction operation”.
Rather, they are a clear signal to Nicolás Maduro that this administration is growing serious about accomplishing either regime or behavioral change from Caracas.
The Trump administration has taken significant steps over time to pressure Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, including issuing bounties for his capture.
Trump’s desire to overthrow Maduro goes back to his first term, during which he placed a $15 million bounty on the Venezuelan leader.
The Trump administration also secured an indictment against Maduro in federal court in 2020, charging him with drug trafficking and “narco-terrorism”.
Senior US officials have used harsh rhetoric and imagery suggesting violence against Maduro.
Back in 2019, when the first Trump administration attempted to back a coup against Maduro, [then-Senator] Rubio posted a photo on Twitter of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in the moment he was being brutally murdered in an apparent threat to the Venezuelan leader.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, too, has long been on the warpath against Maduro.
Maduro disputes the claims that Venezuela is a major hub for illegal drug transit destined for the U.S.
In a September 6 letter to Trump, he cited “data from the UN and other organizations” showing that only five percent of illegal drugs produced in Colombia, primarily cocaine, “attempt to be transported through Venezuela”.
Maduro claimed that only a fraction of this small percentage evades his government’s interdiction efforts.
There are contradictions regarding claims that the boats sunk by the U.S. were carrying fentanyl.
Moreover, while Trump has also alleged the boats he blasted were carrying fentanyl, the Times reported earlier this month that “Venezuela plays virtually no role in the fentanyl trade”.
— a point echoed by Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) in criticizing Trump’s actions.
Recent actions by the Trump administration indicate a broader shift toward open-ended military conflict against drug cartels and associated countries.
Indeed, recent moves in Washington indicate that the president is bent on getting the United States embroiled in the type of “forever war” he campaigned against.
In July, noted the Times, Trump “signed a still-secret order directing the Pentagon to begin using military force against certain Latin American criminal gangs and drug cartels”.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used language commonly associated with foreign excursions to justify actions against "narco-terrorists."
Narco-terrorists are enemies of the United States — actively bringing death to our shores.
We will track them, kill them, and dismantle their networks throughout our hemisphere — at the times and places of our choosing.
The U.S. attacks and rhetoric have prompted Venezuela to negotiate a defense pact with Russia.
Maduro certainly isn’t blind to the significance of all this, which is why he’s just negotiated a defense pact with one of America’s biggest rivals: Russia.
II. CLASSIFIED WMD DOCS DISCOVERED IN JOHN BOLTON’S OFFICE & DEADLY DALLAS ICE SHOOTING BY MIKE BAKER (Implied Author)
Classified materials, including documents tied to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), were found in the Washington office of former National Security Adviser John Bolton.
The inventory shows documents tied to US diplomatic communications federal strategy and even weapons of mass destruction.
FBI agents found materials marked with secret classifications during an August 22nd search of John Bolton's downtown Washington DC office.
The classification system places "secret" documents in the middle tier, meaning their disclosure could cause serious damage to national security.
Documents that are classified secret sit right in the middle of the hierarchy.
it's below top secret but it still means disclosure could cause serious damage to national security.
Bolton is being investigated for felony offenses, including unauthorized retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act.
The warrant applications made clear what agents were hunting for evidence tied to three felony offenses including the unauthorized retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act.
that's the same law used in the Justice Department's case against Donald Trump over his Mara Lago documents.
Investigators uncovered evidence suggesting John Bolton's AOL email account had been compromised by a foreign entity.
according to these filings investigators also uncovered evidence that Bolton's AOL email account what had been compromised by a foreign entity.
Details are heavily redacted but reports suggest that US officials may have obtained intelligence showing that Bolton sent sensitive information to close associates through unclassified systems that were already in the hands of hostile foreign services.
The optics of the investigation are complicated because Bolton was a harsh critic of Trump regarding the handling of classified information.
bolton was one of Trump's harshest critics still is when the FBI raided Mara Lago he accused the former president of not caring about classification rules.
what today he finds himself under investigation for the same statute.
A mass shooting occurred at an ICE facility in Dallas, Texas, targeting a detainee transport van.
a sniper perched on a rooftop across from an ICE field office in Dallas Texas opened fire on a detainee transport van before turning the rifle on himself leaving one detainee dead and two seriously wounded.
The shooter has been identified as 29-year-old Joshua John.
Evidence points to ideology being the motive for the Dallas ICE shooting.
police report that the words anti- ice were scrolled on an unspent round found next to the now deceased sniper as agents closed in on the shooter's rooftop location he turned the rifle on himself.
early evidence points to ideology as mentioned unspent rounds recovered at the scene were inscribed with a message anti-ICE.
Texas politicians quickly characterized the ICE shooting as politically motivated violence, linking it to broader campaigns.
Texas Senator Ted Cruz called the shooting yet another case of quote politically motivated violence and pointed to the killing of Charlie Kirk as proof that the problem is spiraling.
vice President JD Vance went further posting on X tying the Dallas sniper attack to what he called a broader campaign of violence aimed squarely at immigration enforcement isis border patrol.
The Dallas ICE shooting is cited as the third major attack on immigration enforcement in Texas this year.
This is the third major attack on immigration enforcement in Texas this year alone.
In late August for example a 36-year-old man walked into the very same Dallas ICE office claiming to have a bomb in his backpack triggering a lockdown until his arrest.
III. EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S WAR MONGERING AGAINST RUSSIA IS TO DISTRACT FROM ITS CRUMBLING EMPIRE BY RHODA WILSON
The European Union is facing a crisis due to the lack of a clear strategy among its elite leaders, such as Ursula von der Leyen, Kaja Kallas, and Roberta Metsola.
The European Union is facing a crisis due to the lack of a clear strategy among its elite leaders, such as Ursula von der Leyen, Kaja Kallas, and Roberta Metsola.
The EU’s focus on war with Russia is a distraction from its economic decline, corruption scandals and internal issues.
The European Union and the European Commission are characterized as enemies of their own citizens due to their actions and policies.
The European Union and the European Commission have become enemies of their own citizens, with their idiotic rules, tyrannical laws, the death of press freedom, rampant corruption scandals and belligerent posturing, Sonja van den Ende writes.
The European Union must be dissolved, or a new beginning forged.
The author suggests that the EU elites' push toward war with Russia may be a symptom of Europe's dire economic and internal straits.
One might argue that, in their folly, they are steering toward war with Russia.
Yet I see it more as a symptom of the dire straits afflicting Europe: rampant crime fuelled by economic refugees (since 2015) and the resulting economic decline.
The European Commission is accused of prioritizing Ukraine’s interests over those of its own member states.
“The European Commission is effectively acting as the Ukrainian Commission, putting Kiev’s interests above those of its own member states,” Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó wrote on X (formerly Twitter).
Brussels and most member states are preparing for a protracted war rather than peace between Russia and Ukraine.
EU leaders have engaged in inflammatory rhetoric and made claims against Russia that were later refuted.
Take Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, who was en route from Warsaw to Bulgaria in late August 2025 when she claimed that the GPS on her plane had been disrupted.
This claim was later refuted with various pieces of evidence, proving it false.
The EU leadership, particularly Kaja Kallas, is accused of having profound ignorance regarding historical events like World War II.
Hailing originally from Estonia in the Baltic States, where the population has yet to fully process the history of World War II, she grew up steeped in propaganda and ignorance.
In a video, the EC vice president revealed her ignorance of World War II history, showing a lack of respect for the victims – and for the contributions of China and Russia.
A prominent EU figure, Roberta Metsola, has been linked to allegations of corruption and conflicts of interest, including Qatargate.
As former president of the European Parliament (until 2024), she was embroiled in allegations of influence peddling and conflicts of interest.
Metsola, in particular, was accused of complicity and accepting bribes from Qatar.
Corruption scandals and economic downturns in major EU economies are exacerbating the crisis facing the EU.
All this corruption – not to mention Ursula von der Leyen’s Pfizergate scandal – could spell the downfall of the European Union.
The distraction from these scandals, coupled with the economic downturn in many European countries – particularly powerhouse economies like Germany, France and the Netherlands (among the richest) – only exacerbates the crisis.
The current war rhetoric propagated by EU leaders serves as a smokescreen to distract their populations from crumbling economic realities.
The smokescreen is war rhetoric and propaganda, laying the groundwork for conflict with Russia.
They’re squandering money on defence, pilfering frozen Russian assets (worth €300 billion, seized by the EU), and using them to buy €800 billion worth of US weapons – another nation on the verge of bankruptcy – to funnel to Ukraine.
The author concludes that the decline of the EU is part of a broader collapse of Western hegemony and the birth of a multipolar world.
Empires are collapsing – like the European Union – and the global hegemony of the West, including that of the US, is crumbling.
The worse it gets, the more radically and deranged their leaders and politicians will react.
IV. EVIDENCES CHARLIE KIRK’S KILLING WAS A PROFESSIONAL HIT-JOB BY ERIC ZUESSE
The emerging narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk’s murder suggests that enemies of the American people, possibly connected to the permanent-war economy, are behind the killing.
Apparently, the blowback from the murder of Charlie Kirk is exposing what quite possibly, if not probably, are evidences that are forming themselves into a very credible narrative — not only about that killing, but about who the actual enemies of the American people are that are behind this murder.
This highly credible narrative is one that (which is the surprise here) both conservatives and progressives can accept.
Charlie Kirk’s influential position among young conservatives meant that his shift in views on Israel posed a significant threat to powerful figures.
Charlie was the most influential man in America for young conservatives and arguably all conservatives.
When he woke up to the truth and turned on Israel, conservative America would have turned on Israel with him.
Kirk began questioning the official narrative surrounding the October 7th events and Israeli military actions.
In the last 3 months of his life, Charlie woke up to the truth.
He questioned October 7th and how it took 24 hours to even begin to help people in a country the size of New Jersey that were being murdered on live stream.
Max Blumenthal suggested that Netanyahu controlled Kirk through Zionist billionaires who funded his organization.
Blumenthal: Netanyahu controls Trump, and controlled Kirk, via Zionist billionaires.
Kirk’s billionaire funders (who had funded his Turning Point USA organization) threatened to pull the plug on him if he continued doing that, and Netanyahu was in the thick of all this.
The narrative suggests that Israel needed to assassinate Kirk to prevent him from damaging support for their agenda among U.S. conservatives.
Israel [Netanyahu] had to kill him, there was no other option.
An assassination with a statement [a message] to anyone who would follow in his footsteps.
The evidence presented, while credible, is deemed not conclusive enough to warrant a formal investigation in the current American political climate.
What those presenters have offered is a credible but not conclusive case that Netanyahu should be investigated for this crime in America, and that the billionaires who had been funding Kirk’s operation ought also to be.
Of course, since America is a dictatorship not a democracy, that won’t happen.
V. FUEL SHORTAGES IN RUSSIA THREATEN PUTIN’S GRIP & IRAN’S MISSILE TROUBLE BY MIKE BAKER (Implied Author)
Ukraine's drone campaign targeting Russian oil refineries is identified as one of Kyiv's most effective tools in the war.
ukraine's drones are striking deep inside Russia hitting refineries and triggering fuel shortages across the country.
this has become one of Kev's most effective tools in the war striking not just military targets but the very infrastructure that keeps Russia's economy running and its war machine fueled.
Ukrainian drone strikes are reaching deep into Russia, causing significant damage to major industrial facilities.
for those of you keeping score that's about 930 m from the front lines showing just how far Ukraine's reach has extended.
all told at least 10 major Russian refineries have been targeted in recent weeks and the impact is beginning to show.
The consistent attacks have significantly reduced Russia's refining capacity, leading to widespread fuel shortages.
Russian refining capacity has dropped by as much as 20% on certain days.
that's begun creating shortages of the most common types of gasoline used in the country.
The spread of fuel shortages into major urban centers, including Moscow, threatens Vladimir Putin’s political stability.
the fuel shortages are no longer limited to the Russian hinterlands they're creeping westward and once they reach the Moscow region that's Putin's stronghold the core of his political base that could begin to erode his support for the first time.
in a country where Vladimir Putin has built his political legitimacy on the promise of stability those disruptions could become significant.
Iran is struggling to rebuild its solid-fuel missile production capabilities following Israeli strikes.
iran is picking up the pieces scrambling to rebuild missile factories that Israel flattened in June.
The Mulla's rush to rebuild underscores how central these machines are to the regime's deterrent.
The key missing link crippling Iran’s missile production is the industrial planetary mixers needed to create solid rocket propellant.
but the Islamic regime remains crippled by one missing link the industrial mixers needed to again make solid rocket propellant.
For the Islamic regime's missile industry the planetary mixers are irreplaceable without them the Iranians can patch concrete and rewire casting halls all they want but high volume production remains dead in the water.
Iran rapidly depleted its estimated missile arsenal during the 12-day war with Israel.
the Mullas fired more than 570 ballistic missiles at Israel during that 12-day war alone.
it's clear Iran blew through a third of its arsenal of an estimated 2500 missiles in just 90 days.
The Trump administration is reporting record numbers of illegal immigrant removals from the U.S.
President Trump's immigration crackdown is showing results with the administration reporting that approximately 2 million illegal immigrants have been removed from the country in under 250 days.
1.6 million illegals have voluntarily left the country while another 400,000 were deported by federal agents.
The strict enforcement policies have reportedly led to a massive reduction in migration attempts from Central America.
A new UN study reported a staggering 97% drop in northbound illegal migration from Central America since Trump's policies roared back into effect.
in the study nearly half of the wouldbe illegal migrants admitted that they abandoned their journey because they knew they couldn't breach Trump's US border enforcement.
The U.S. is expanding the use of Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) designations to include violent gangs and drug cartels in the Western Hemisphere.
The U.S. has just added another name to its list of foreign terrorist organizations and that would be Bario 18.
The label once reserved for terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS is now being applied to violent gangs and cartels in the Western Hemisphere.
VI. MONEY, CREDIT, GROWTH AND DEPRESSION: IT'S COMPLICATED BY CHARLES HUGH SMITH
The pursuit of economic "growth" leads to reliance on credit and asset bubbles, which are inherently self-liquidating.
If “growth” is all that matters, that leads to depending on credit and asset bubbles, which are self-liquidating in ways few see because, well, it’s complicated.
Many people anticipate the demise of fiat currencies, for good reasons.
Fiat currencies arose because a gold-backed system limited credit expansion necessary for growth, potentially causing depressions.
What prompted them to replace a gold-backed monetary system with a fiat currency system?
Without credit, assets collapse in value, savings are depleted to pay bills as employment shrinks, and so on.
In a fractional reserve banking system, most money in circulation is created through the origination of credit, which dilutes the backing of the currency.
if banks are allowed to originate loans based on reserves–fractional reserve banking–then most of the “money in circulation” is created not by adding gold or bitcoin to the system but by originating mortgages, commercial credit, etc.
Every dollar that was backed by X quantity of gold or BTC is now backed by 1/10th of X.
Trade deficits under a gold standard necessitate payment in gold, leading nations running persistent deficits to eventually run out of reserves.
If imports and exports don’t zero out–$1 billion in imports is balanced by $1 billion in exports–then the balance is paid in gold.
Nations running trade deficits eventually run out of gold.
The U.S. ran sustained trade deficits in the late 1960s and early 1970s for geopolitical reasons, eventually leading to the inability to maintain the gold-backed system.
This was the case for the US in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the US ran sustained trade deficits with its allies for geopolitical reasons.
The problem is that sometimes trade deficits make economic or geopolitical sense, and so ending trade deficits is catastrophic for both importer and exporter.
Currencies benefit from "The Network Effect," where increased circulation enhances their utility and value.
Currencies also manifest The Network Effect.
the greater the sum in global circulation, the more valuable the currency becomes.
The utility of a currency is determined by factors beyond just the quantity in circulation.
a currency’s value is based on trust in the currency as a reliable store of value over the duration of the trade, its status as a commodity of known value that everyone will accept in payment, its liquidity, i.e. the ease of converting it into some other currency or commodity, and the “backing” of the currency: the central bank and national economy that issues it.
VII. RECENT SUMMIT IN CHINA SIGNALS A SHIFT IN GLOBAL ENERGY POLITICS TO THE EAST BY RHODA WILSON
The 2025 Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin, China, signaled a profound shift in global energy geopolitics towards the East.
The 2025 Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit was held between 31 August and 1 September in Tianjin, China.
It marked a significant shift in global energy geopolitics, with India, Russia and China forming a new energy alliance.
A critical component of this realignment is the binding memorandum for the Power of Siberia 2 (POS-2) pipeline.
The agreement between two of the world’s five largest economies for a pipeline to deliver gas from Russia’s Yamal fields to China via Mongolia is a cornerstone of this global energy realignment.
The “binding memorandum” for POS-2, a 50 billion cubic meter pipeline to deliver gas from Russia’s Yamal fields to China via Mongolia, is a cornerstone of this realignment.
The deflection of Russia's Yamal gas supply, originally intended for Western Europe, reflects Europe's decline in geopolitical relevance.
“The permanent deflection of Russia’s Yamal gas supply – which was meant for Western Europe under Ostpolitik – to China reflects Brussels’s decline into geopolitical irrelevance and Germany’s vassalage to US interests,” Tilak Doshi writes.
Unlike the existing Power of Siberia 1, which draws gas from Irkutsk (north of Mongolia), POS-2 taps into the same Arctic reserves in Yamal that once fuelled Germany’s industrial might for half a century.
The shift to Asia by Russia, accelerated by Western sanctions, alleviates Russia’s economic security concerns, despite potentially lower prices and volumes.
Russia’s pivot to Asia – accelerated by Western sanctions since 2014 (after the annexation of Crimea) and intensified after the 2022 Ukraine invasion – is now consolidating.
But this re-orientation, while costing Russia lost revenues from lower prices and volumes, significantly alleviates Russia’s economic security after the Nordstream pipeline sabotage.
The POS-2 pipeline reduces China’s reliance on seaborne LNG, decreasing its vulnerability to U.S. naval dominance.
It also reduces China’s reliance on seaborne liquefied natural gas (“LNG”), which is typically two to four times as expensive as piped gas.
Critically, this reduces China’s vulnerability to US naval dominance in chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz and Straits of Malacca through which all Middle East gas exports to China must pass.
The U.S. policy of imposing tariffs on India for buying Russian oil is seen as a major diplomatic blunder that is pushing India toward adversaries.
Reeling from the Trump administration’s decision to double trade tariffs from 25% to 50% – a punitive measure targeting India’s purchase of Russian crude oil – Prime Prime Minister Modi has signalled a shift.
The US risks pushing India – a democracy of 1.4 billion people and a rising economic power – into the arms of Russia and China.
The sanctions regime intended to cripple Russia has instead boomeranged, crippling Europe's economic vitality.
Western sanctions intended to cripple Russia have instead crippled Europe’s economic vitality.
Germany, once the engine of European growth, now faces deindustrialisation and rising unemployment.
The shift in energy focus signals the failure of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s vision of US strategic supremacy over Eurasia.
At the heart of the geopolitical shifts signified in the Tianjin summit lies the failure of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s vision articulated in his 1997 book ‘The Grand Chessboard’.
Brzezinski argued that US hegemony over the Eurasian landmass required severing the natural economic complementarity between Germany and Russia.
The weaponization of the US dollar and SWIFT has prompted powers in the Global South to diversify their financial systems.
By weaponising the US dollar and SWIFT, the West incentivised Russia, China, India and others in the Global South to diversify their financial systems as much as possible.
The BRICS grouping is gaining momentum with its focus on reducing dependence on the US dollar and the US-dominated SWIFT inter-bank payments system.
VIII. RUSSIA EXPOSES USA’S $37 TRILLION FINANCIAL RESET PLAN: HERE’S HOW IT WILL MAKE YOU POOR BY G. CALDERON
A senior Russian advisor suggested the U.S. is planning a quiet financial reset using crypto, stablecoins, and gold to escape its debt crisis.
A senior Russian presidential advisor, Anton Kobyakov, has suggested that the USA is planning a quiet but catastrophic escape route from its debt crisis, leaning on crypto, stablecoins, and gold.
Currently $37.5 trillion in debt and paying $882 billion per year in interest alone, the US relies on financial engineering to keep the machine running.
The proposed reset is predicted to be the largest wealth transfer in history, benefiting the asset-rich while plunging wage workers into poverty.
The reset suggested by Kobyakov would be the largest wealth transfer in history.
with the asset-rich gaining extreme wealth while wage workers are plunged into poverty.
The scale of America's debt crisis is immense, with the annual interest bill exceeding $882 billion.
$37.5 trillion in debt,
The global system is currently defined by converging crises spanning geopolitical power shifts, imminent financial collapse, escalating military interventions, and deep-seated internal political discord within Western nations. This report synthesizes findings across five critical domains—Geopolitical Realignment, Security Escalation, Financial System Vulnerability, Domestic Political Integrity, and Bio-Technological Risk—to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current environment.
Key Findings:
Eurasian Power Shift: The 2025 Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit marked a profound shift in global energy geopolitics with India, Russia, and China forming a new energy axis, symbolized by the binding memorandum for the Power of Siberia 2 (POS-2) pipeline. This pivot has been accelerated by Western sanctions and reflects Europe’s decline into geopolitical irrelevance, particularly Germany’s deindustrialization following the loss of cheap Russian gas. The aggressive posture of the US/EU has incentivized BRICS nations to diversify away from the US dollar and SWIFT system, leading to the unravelling of the post-WWII US strategic legacy.
US Interventionism and Regime Change: US military actions in the Caribbean, including the sinking of civilian boats after leaving Venezuela, are framed by the Trump administration as drug interdiction efforts. However, the deployment of "operational overkill," including eight warships, P-8 surveillance planes, an attack submarine, and F-35 fighter jets, strongly suggests the real goal is regime change or behavioral change in Caracas. This aligns with a broader US strategy of designating drug cartels and gangs (like Bario 18 and Sinaloa) as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) to justify lethal military strikes in the hemisphere.
Impending US Financial Reset: The US faces a catastrophic debt crisis with $37.5 trillion in debt and a debt-to-GDP ratio of 119%, levels historically associated with the failure of empires. A senior Russian advisor has suggested the US is planning a controlled financial reset that utilizes cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins acting as non-stop demand conduits for US Treasuries, to stabilize funding as foreign buyer demand fades. This mechanism, coupled with inflation, is projected to cause the largest wealth transfer in history from wage earners to asset holders.
Erosion of Political Trust: High-profile political events, notably the killing of conservative figure Charlie Kirk, are surrounded by narratives of a "professional hit-job" linked to his recent critiques of Israel and Netanyahu, and allegations of a massive government cover-up concerning the Epstein files. Furthermore, investigations into former National Security Advisor John Bolton uncovered classified material, including documents tied to Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and US diplomatic strategy, found in his Washington office.
Rising Bio-Technological Risk: Scientific data from the Bandim Health Project suggests the WHO/UNICEF DTP vaccination program in the developing world constitutes a "crime against humanity" because the shot allegedly kills five times more children than it saves. Simultaneously, the Biden Administration has advanced an Executive Order promoting a bioeconomy focused on genetic engineering to "write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers," signaling a transhumanist trajectory.
Strategic Outlook and Implications:
The current trajectory points toward continued global conflict driven by shifting economic power and the internal financial desperation of the West. Nations and individuals must prioritize asset accumulation (gold, real estate, equities) to counter weaponized inflation and financial repression associated with the impending US debt reset. Geopolitical tensions are likely to intensify as the US leverages FTO designations for military force against Latin American groups and countries, while the EU faces systemic collapse due to elite corruption and economic decline exacerbated by anti-Russia posturing.
1.1 The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit and the New Energy Axis
The SCO summit held in Tianjin, China, between August 31 and September 1, 2025, represented a significant moment in the shift of global energy geopolitics to the East. The summit showcased the growing alignment and warm camaraderie among the leaders of India, Russia, and China—three of the world’s five largest economies—signaling tangible energy partnerships beyond rhetoric.
The cornerstone of this realignment is the "binding memorandum" for the Power of Siberia 2 (POS-2) pipeline. This 50 billion cubic meter (bcm) pipeline will deliver gas from Russia’s Yamal fields to China via Mongolia. This is a strategic deflection of Yamal gas supply, which was originally intended for Western Europe under Ostpolitik. Once operational after 2030, this deal, combined with existing pipelines, could see Russia supplying China with up to 100 bcm of gas annually.
This pivot significantly alleviates Russia’s economic security concerns following the Nordstream pipeline sabotage and Western sanctions. For China, this reduces reliance on expensive seaborne liquefied natural gas (LNG)—which is typically two to four times costlier than piped gas—and lessens vulnerability to potential US naval dominance in chokepoints such as the Straits of Malacca or Hormuz.
1.2 The Decline of European Relevance
The redirection of Yamal gas to China reflects Brussels’s decline into geopolitical irrelevance and Germany’s alleged vassalage to US interests. Europe’s actions, driven by a zeal to punish Russia, are characterized as "one of the greatest self-owns you could ever imagine".
Economic Consequences: Germany, once Europe's economic heart and manufacturing export powerhouse due to cheap Russian gas, now faces deindustrialization and rising unemployment. The loss of competitively priced Russian gas forces reliance on costly US and Qatari LNG, severely eroding economic competitiveness and contributing to declining standards of living, alongside burgeoning debt and an overstretched welfare state.
Failed Strategy: The sanctions regime intended to cripple Russia has boomeranged, instead crippling Europe’s economic vitality and creating an energy crisis that has hit the continent hardest. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s earlier claims that the Russian industry was "in tatters" are now being refuted as Russia successfully pivots East.
Internal EU Crisis: The European Union is further weakened by a lack of clear strategy among its elite leaders and is facing internal issues, corruption scandals (like Pfizergate and Qatargate), and economic decline in major economies like Germany, France, and the Netherlands. The EU’s belligerent posturing and focus on war with Russia are seen as a smokescreen to distract from these internal failures.
1.3 US Miscalculation and the Alienation of India
The US pursuit of Eurasian hegemony has been hampered by diplomatic blunders, particularly the alienation of India, a critical ally intended to counter China’s rise. Despite decades of warming US-India relations and strategic partnership deepening since 2014, the Trump administration’s decision to double trade tariffs (from 25% to 50%) on Indian exports was a punitive measure targeting India’s purchase of Russian crude oil.
India views this US policy as hypocritical, noting that Europe and China import significantly larger volumes of Russian energy without facing similar draconian tariffs. Indian Prime Minister Modi’s presence at the Tianjin summit, coupled with reports of him repeatedly refusing phone calls from President Trump, signals India's refusal to be bullied. By increasing Russian oil imports, India is directly defying US secondary sanctions and aligning closer with the BRICS framework, risking pushing a rising economic power into the arms of Russia and China.
The overall strategic failure highlights the unraveling of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s vision—which aimed to sever the economic complementarity between Germany and Russia to maintain US dominance over Eurasia. The weaponization of the US dollar and SWIFT, combined with sanctions, has ironically spurred the Global South (including China, India, and Russia) to diversify their financial systems and forge closer ties.
2.1 US Military Operations in the Caribbean and the Venezuela Regime Change Hypothesis
The Trump administration’s attacks on civilian boats in the Caribbean, purportedly to stop drug trafficking, have been questioned due to the disproportionate military force deployed. In three weeks, the US military has reportedly sunk three civilian boats that had departed Venezuela, leading to 17 reported deaths, which President Trump described as deserving of summary execution.
Operational Overkill: The U.S. has dispatched military assets far exceeding the needs of small drug interdiction operations. Deployed assets include eight warships, several Navy P-8 surveillance planes, an attack submarine, and F-35 fighter jets placed in Puerto Rico. Admiral James Stavridis described this deployment as "operational overkill" with little to do with actual drug interdiction.
Regime Change Intent: Current and former military officials, diplomats, and intelligence officers suggest that while fighting drugs is the pretext, the real goal is to drive Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from power. The deployed forces are in the wrong location for a major drug interdiction operation, and the presence of elite Special Operations forces suggests clandestine raids or strikes inside Venezuela may be planned.
Political Framing: Secretary of State Marco Rubio asserts that Maduro is empowering instruments of government to operate a drug cartel aimed at the US, arguing Washington cannot permit a cartel "masquerading as a government" in the hemisphere. This stance is despite Venezuelan claims, citing UN data, that only five percent of illegal drugs from Colombia attempt transport through Venezuela, and that Venezuela plays virtually no role in the fentanyl trade.
Escalation History: Trump placed a $15 million bounty on Maduro, which the Biden administration upped to $25 million, and Trump later doubled to $50 million in August 2025. Maduro has responded by negotiating a defense pact with Russia.
2.2 Broadening the War on Terror: FTO Designation and Military Force
The Trump administration is advancing a strategy to expand the use of military force against criminal organizations by labeling them as "narco-terrorists".
New Legislative Powers: Draft legislation is circulating that would grant President Trump broad powers to wage war against drug cartels deemed "terrorists," as well as against any country harboring or aiding them. This open-ended authorization is the same kind used by previous administrations to justify invasions and regime-change operations.
FTO Designations: The State Department recently added Bario 18 (also known as the 18th Street Gang) to the list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs). Bario 18 joins MS-13, Trendoroagua (TDA), and major cartels like Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation on this list. This designation justifies lethal military strikes, such as those used against suspected drug smuggling boats off Venezuela's coast. The shift signals a broader operational strategy treating organized crime as a national security threat on par with terrorism.
DHS Deportation Surge: Concurrently, the Trump administration has launched a mass deportation initiative, reporting the removal of approximately 2 million illegal immigrants in under 250 days. This surge includes 1.6 million voluntary departures and 400,000 deportations by federal agents, leading to a reported 97% drop in northbound illegal migration from Central America since Trump’s policies were implemented. Detention capacity is being expanded with new facilities nicknamed "Speedway Slammer" and "Louisiana Lockup".
2.3 Targeting Iran’s Missile Infrastructure
Israel has conducted a sustained campaign to degrade Iran's solid fuel missile capabilities. Satellite imagery reviewed by the Associated Press shows Iran is scrambling to rebuild missile factories (Parchin Shahude and Kojier) flattened by Israeli strikes in June.
The Missing Link: The regime remains crippled by the absence of industrial planetary mixers, which are irreplaceable for blending volatile ingredients into the stable solid rocket propellant needed for high-volume production.
Arsenal Depletion: During a 12-day war in June, the Mullahs reportedly fired over 570 ballistic missiles at Israel, and an estimated 330 missiles were fired in earlier flare-ups. This expenditure blew through about a third of Iran’s estimated arsenal of 2,500 missiles in 90 days, freezing the production pipeline that was previously on track to turn out over 200 solid fuel missiles monthly.
Shadow Supply Chain: Experts suggest Beijing is the likeliest source for propellant mixers. Satellite evidence hints at this shadow supply chain, with a planetary mixer reportedly shifted to a subterranean facility in Syria. Iran continues to signal defiance, focusing activity on rebuilding missile sites while facing looming UN snapback sanctions.
3.1 The Staggering Reality of US Debt
The United States is currently facing an economic situation characterized by overwhelming debt that threatens the stability of the global financial system.
Debt Metrics: The US is $37.5 trillion in debt, resulting in a debt-to-GDP ratio of 119%. This debt accrues at $2.09 trillion annually (2024–2025), outpacing economic growth. The annual interest bill alone is $882 billion, exceeding expenditures on Medicare and Defense.
Historical Precedent: Historically, major powers that surpassed the critical 100% debt-to-GDP mark—including Ancient Rome, post-WWII Britain, and Greece (2010)—have failed without undergoing a hard financial reset. Sustaining current US debt levels would require decades of unprecedented 6% real growth.
Reserve Currency Risk: While the US dollar remains the world's reserve currency, this alone will not stop the inevitable collapse. Foreign bulk buyers, including China, India, and Japan, are slowing their purchases of US Treasuries and increasing gold reserves. This behavior is partially attributed to countries seeking to offload the risk of economic isolation, having observed the US response to Russia.
3.2 The Russian Blueprint: A Controlled Financial Reset
Russian presidential advisor Anton Kobyakov suggested the US is planning a quiet but catastrophic escape route from its debt crisis, leveraging crypto, stablecoins, and gold for a controlled reset. Only one viable option is seen to solve a crisis of this magnitude: increasing demand for government bonds while secretly managing a controlled reset.
The Stablecoin-Treasury Mechanism: This theory posits that stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) will serve as a bridge to a programmable financial system plugged directly into US debt. Stablecoin issuers, instead of holding idle cash, would buy US Treasury bills, generating a profit (e.g., 4% interest). At scale, stablecoins become an automatic, non-stop source of demand for Treasuries, helping fund Washington as foreign demand fades.
Weaponized Inflation: Inflation is identified as the "secret weapon" for the wealthy, as it erodes the real value of the $37.5 trillion debt. By cutting interest rates and printing more money, inflation is created, which diminishes the real value of wages while financial assets (stocks, real estate) held by the rich become more valuable.
Wealth Transfer: The execution of this plan would result in the largest wealth transfer in history, shifting purchasing power from lower earners and the middle class to asset holders. Citizens would absorb the cost through inflation, taxation, and tighter monetary control.
3.3 The Complications of Credit and Fiat Currency
The inherent complications of a system demanding "growth" led authorities to embrace fiat currencies initially.
Credit Creation: In a fractional reserve banking system, most money is created through originating mortgages and commercial credit—credit-money is money. Limiting credit to physical asset backing (like gold or Bitcoin) would lead to credit scarcity, asset collapse, and depression. Fiat currency was adopted to allow credit expansion beyond the limits of gold, thus preventing such a depression.
The Network Effect: Currencies, like online platforms, exhibit the Network Effect: the greater the sum in global circulation, the more valuable the currency becomes. A currency’s utility is based on trust as a reliable store of value, its status as an accepted commodity, liquidity, and the backing of the central bank/national economy.
The Role of CBDCs: CBDCs are government proposals to monitor how citizens live. The ability to seize or "switch off" personal funds, especially during a manufactured crisis (like a bank outage or major hack), could force an emergency rollout of digital wallets. The overarching risk is that this technology steers the system toward programmable, controllable money.
4.1 The Assassination of Charlie Kirk and Allegations of a Hit-Job
The killing of conservative figure Charlie Kirk has generated a credible narrative suggesting it was a professional hit-job orchestrated by elite interests.
Motive: Anti-Israel Stance: Kirk allegedly "woke up to the truth" in the last three months of his life. He began questioning the official October 7th event narrative, suggesting the Israeli military was ordered to stand down to create "martyrs and more victims" to justify the Gaza campaign. He also called out the genocide being conducted in Gaza and Syria and claimed that Epstein was an Israeli Mossad agent blackmailing American elites.
Threat to Funders: Kirk’s shift threatened his success, which depended on hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from Zionist billionaires. It is argued that Israel (Netanyahu) "had to kill him" to send an "assassination with a statement" to anyone who might follow his anti-war, anti-Israel path.
Official Narrative Discrepancies: Key figures are questioning the official government story surrounding the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. Concerns include discrepancies regarding the timeline (a mysterious reference to the "33rd hour" after the shooting, tied to Freemasonry) and the physical logistics of the weapon. Michael Savage highlighted that the alleged Mauser rifle does not break down easily, questioning how the shooter could have reassembled it while on the run and then left it conveniently for the FBI to find.
Kirk’s Ties to the Feds: Candace Owens publicly asserted that Charlie Kirk was a "friend of the feds". This revelation is presented as a "massive deal," raising questions about whether a friend of the government agents who "incessantly spy on us and trample on our liberties" can be seen as a hero.
4.2 The Trump/Musk PSYOP and the Epstein Files
The memorial service for Charlie Kirk is characterized as a "psychological operation" (PSYOP) designed to unite two previously conflicted powerful figures: Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
The Reconciliation: Musk accepted Trump’s invitation and sat with him during the majority of the event. Musk reportedly told a small group that "If we don't hang together, we will surely hang separately, so let us unite," framing the union as honoring Kirk’s prayer for their reconciliation.
The PDF/Pedophile Allegation: This unity is seen as highly questionable given that Musk had previously tweeted, shortly before the event, that "Donald Trump is in the Epstein files" and was the reason they had not been made public. Musk accused Trump of overseeing the cover-up of a "massive PDF file ring". Critics argue that the funeral was used to mask these severe allegations and lay cover for "pedophile-protecting charlatans".
4.3 High-Level Classified Information Exposure
The handling and security of classified documents among high-ranking US officials remains a serious issue.
Bolton Investigation: Newly unsealed court filings reveal that the FBI found classified material, marked as Secret classification, during an August 22nd search of former National Security Advisor John Bolton's downtown Washington DC office.
Nature of Documents: The seized inventory included documents referencing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), US diplomatic communications at the UN, and federal strategic communications.
Security Breach: Investigators also uncovered evidence suggesting that Bolton's AOL email account had been compromised by a foreign entity. Reports suggest Bolton may have sent sensitive information to close associates via unclassified systems already in the hands of hostile foreign services. Bolton now faces potential legal risks under the Espionage Act, similar to those confronted by both President Trump and former President Biden.
5.1 DTP Vaccine Program: A Crime Against Humanity
The sources present a severe critique of the global vaccine regime, particularly the WHO/UNICEF DTP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis) program in the developing world.
DTP Mortality Findings: Research from the Bandim Health Project (BHP) in Guinea-Bissau, led by Dr. Peter Aaby and Dr. Christine Stabell Benn, found that children vaccinated with DTP have five times higher all-cause mortality than unvaccinated children. Dr. Benn publicly stated in a TEDx Talk that the DTP shot kills five times more children than it saves from the three diseases it targets.
WHO Complicity: Despite decades of sharing these findings, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has done nothing and, under pressure from the Gates Foundation, continues to use DTP vaccination coverage rates to measure country eligibility for funding. This practice is labeled a "crime against humanity" that should be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court.
Non-Specific Effects: Dr. Aaby's research focuses on the "non-specific effects" of vaccines—how they change the immune system in unexpected ways, potentially leading to increased vulnerability to other diseases (negative non-specific effects).
US Vaccine Schedule Critique: According to the BHP data, only three live attenuated vaccines (oral polio, single-measles, and tuberculosis/BCG) appear to offer more benefits than harms; however, none of these are available on the US schedule. The US uses inactivated, adjuvanted, recombinant, or genetically engineered protein subunit vaccines, which BHP research indicates cause more harms than benefits.
5.2 Vaccine Programs and Historical Epidemics
It is argued that the three largest epidemics of the last century may be connected to vaccine initiatives.
Spanish Flu (1918): Evidence suggests the pandemic may have begun with a bacterial meningitis vaccination campaign on a US army base in Kansas, spreading globally when vaccinated soldiers were shipped to World War I.
HIV/AIDS: The clinical trials for the oral polio vaccine in the Congo may have introduced a simian retrovirus into humans that became HIV.
COVID-19: Jeffrey Sachs, who chaired the Lancet commission on origins, suggests the evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 originating from a US bioweapons lab involved in gain-of-function research.
5.3 Advancing the Bioengineering and Transhumanist Agenda
Western and Eastern powers are accelerating initiatives focused on merging human biology with technology.
US Bioeconomy Executive Order: The Biden Administration’s September 2022 Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation proposes developing genetic engineering technologies to "write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers". This strategy, based on bioengineering, is viewed as an expansion of the "failed gene-modifying public health strategy" of recent years.
Russian Neurotechnology Focus: Russia is heavily investing in neurotechnologies. At the Eastern Economic Forum 2025, officials discussed neuroprosthetics and cybernetic medicine, noting the importance of these technologies for veterans of the Special Military Operation (SMO). Russia’s Neuronet 2035 map includes the influence of neurotechnologies on cognition, emotions, sensory, and motor skills, aiming for "seamless communication of man with technology, nature, animals".
Military Integration: Russia explicitly links technological advancement to conflict, noting that "Armed conflicts bring two waves of technology: military and medical". Neurotechnology stacks used for rehabilitation are planned as the basis for civilian and defense Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) solutions, including the creation of "fundamentally new neural interfaces for controlling UAVs". Furthermore, Russia's Roscongress Foundation highlighted that the creation of "super soldiers" through genetic modification to improve physical and cognitive abilities can provide a strategic battlefield advantage, noting that the US DARPA and China’s National Defense Technology University are already funding similar biotechnology programs.
The current global landscape (Q3 2025) is characterized by a rapid acceleration toward a multipolar world order and intense systemic stress within the US and EU. Western nations are grappling with the consequences of self-defeating geopolitical strategies, evidenced by Europe’s economic contraction following the loss of Russian gas, and the US’s alienation of strategic allies like India.
Simultaneously, the US political and financial structures appear to be undergoing extraordinary internal turbulence. The convergence of a paralyzing national debt crisis and the potential implementation of a controlled financial reset using digital currencies threatens to destabilize domestic society further by intensifying wealth inequality. This financial maneuvering occurs alongside a visible expansion of US military and foreign policy into aggressive interventionism, using the designation of "narco-terrorist" FTOs to justify lethal force and possible regime change operations in Venezuela.
Underlying these geopolitical and financial crises are significant questions concerning the integrity of Western governance, highlighted by the high-level cover-up allegations surrounding the Kirk assassination and the exposure of classified WMD documents in private possession. These factors, combined with the rapid push into bioengineering and neurotechnology—whether through the US bioeconomy executive order or Russia’s military-focused neuroprosthetics research—suggest that future conflict and control mechanisms will increasingly be fought on technological and biological frontiers.
The path ahead signals continued instability, requiring both national and individual strategies focused on mitigating the impact of financial repression and navigating intensified global conflict. The prevailing sentiment across multiple sources is that empires are collapsing, and the current radical reactions from leaders are symptomatic of a deeper, inevitable systemic shift.
An Analysis of Evolving U.S. Foreign Policy Under the Trump Administration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0 Introduction: A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Global Strategy
The second term of the Trump administration has initiated a significant departure from previous American foreign policy doctrines. This new strategic posture is marked by a pivot towards assertive unilateralism, the increasing militarization of diplomatic and economic tools, and a fundamental re-evaluation of traditional alliances. The administration is operationalizing a strategy that treats economic competition and regional crime as existential national security threats, thereby justifying the application of military force in previously diplomatic or economic theaters. This document will analyze the strategic motivations, key actors, and potential global consequences of these shifts across critical geopolitical theaters, from the Western Hemisphere to Europe, the Middle East, and the geoeconomic landscape. The analysis will conclude by examining how profound domestic political volatility intersects with and complicates the execution of this new global strategy. This examination begins with the administration's new doctrine in the Western Hemisphere.
2.0 The 'Narco-Terrorism' Doctrine in the Western Hemisphere: The Case of Venezuela
The Trump administration has strategically reframed the challenge of organized crime in Latin America as a "narco-terrorist" threat. This legal and rhetorical shift is a critical component of its new foreign policy, providing a pretext for expanded military intervention and direct action in the Western Hemisphere. This reclassification is a critical legal maneuver, as it formally permits the use of military force under Title 10 authorities against entities previously considered civilian law enforcement targets, thereby justifying the deployment of assets like F-35s and attack submarines. This doctrine is being most acutely applied to Venezuela, which serves as the primary case study for this new, more bellicose approach to regional security.
Military Posturing vs. Stated Objectives
The stated objective of the administration's recent military deployment in the Caribbean is drug interdiction. However, the scale and composition of the force suggest a much broader strategic aim. The U.S. has dispatched a formidable military contingent to the region, including eight warships, several Navy P-8 surveillance planes, one attack submarine, and F-35 fighter jets stationed in Puerto Rico.
This level of military power is inconsistent with the mission of intercepting small civilian boats. Admiral James Stavridis, former head of the Pentagon’s Southern Command, provides a more candid assessment of the deployment's true purpose, stating that "the massive naval flotilla off the coast of Venezuela and the movement of fifth-generation F-35 fighters to Puerto Rico has little to do with actual drug interdiction—they represent operational overkill. Rather, they are a clear signal to Nicolás Maduro that this administration is growing serious about accomplishing either regime or behavioral change from Caracas." This strategy, which relies on overwhelming military presence to coerce a foreign government, marks a deliberate return to what Admiral Stavridis calls "gunboat diplomacy."
Key Actors and Political Motivations
This assertive policy is driven by a small circle of influential figures within the administration, each with a history of advocating for a more confrontational stance in the region.
• President Donald Trump: The President has a long-standing objective of overthrowing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This policy began in his first term with the placement of a $15 million bounty, was increased by the subsequent Biden administration, and has since been doubled to $50 million by President Trump. The administration also secured a 2020 indictment against Maduro on charges of "narco-terrorism."
• Secretary of State Marco Rubio: A long-time hawk on Latin America, Secretary Rubio has been instrumental in shaping this policy. He has officially classified drug cartels as "foreign terrorist organizations" and has consistently accused the "illegitimate regimes of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela" of intentionally amplifying chaos to undermine U.S. interests.
• Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: Secretary Hegseth articulated the operational endgame of this doctrine, declaring that the U.S. will "track them, kill them, and dismantle their networks throughout our hemisphere—at the times and places of our choosing."
Official Justifications and Rebuttals
The administration's official justification for recent military strikes, which have sunk three civilian boats and resulted in 17 deaths, is that the vessels were transporting illegal drugs. This claim remains unsubstantiated. According to reporting from The New York Times, "neither the president nor any other official has offered any evidence to support these claims," even in confidential congressional briefings.
President Maduro has directly rebutted these accusations, citing UN data indicating that only 5% of Colombian drugs attempt to transit through Venezuela, with his government interdicting a fraction of that. This challenges the administration's premise that Venezuela is a primary node in the drug trade targeting the United States.
Enabling Frameworks and Geopolitical Consequences
This new doctrine is being codified through both executive and legislative action. President Trump has signed a "still-secret order" that directs the Pentagon to use military force against specific Latin American cartels. Concurrently, draft legislation is being prepared that would grant the president "broad powers to wage war" against these groups and any nation deemed to be harboring them.
The immediate geopolitical consequence of this heightened pressure has been to push Venezuela closer to U.S. adversaries. In response to what he perceives as a direct threat of U.S. military action, President Maduro has negotiated a defense pact with Russia, further internationalizing the conflict and entrenching great-power competition in the region. This dynamic of direct military pressure is also being applied in the European theater.
3.0 European Theater: NATO Escalation and Alliance Cohesion
In Europe, the Trump administration is pursuing a strategy of renewed confrontation with Russia, leveraging the NATO alliance as the primary vehicle for applying direct military pressure along Russia's western flank. This approach has moved beyond deterrence to active military posturing, significantly raising the temperature of a security environment already strained by the war in Ukraine.
The 'Eastern Sentry' Operation
The centerpiece of this strategy is a major new military operation dubbed "Eastern Sentry," launched by the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, U.S. General Grynkewich. This operation entails significant changes to the U.S. and NATO force posture in the region, including two highly escalatory developments:
1. Deployment of U.S. intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Germany. This move places nuclear-capable systems within striking distance of Moscow and reintroduces a class of weapons that had been banned by the now-defunct INF Treaty.
2. Poland's formal request for U.S. nuclear weapons to be deployed on its territory. This would further extend NATO's nuclear footprint eastward, directly on Russia's border.
European Union's Position and Internal Pressures
While the U.S. pushes for military escalation, the European Union is contending with severe internal crises that challenge its capacity to act as a cohesive and effective partner. Key powerhouse economies, including Germany and the Netherlands, are experiencing significant economic decline and deindustrialization. This economic malaise is compounded by high-profile political corruption scandals, such as "Qatargate" and "Pfizergate," which have eroded public trust in EU institutions. From this perspective, the "war mongering" and intense focus on the Russian threat by the EU leadership serves as a "smokescreen" and a "distraction" from these pressing domestic issues.
The convergence of these dynamics suggests the EU's economic and political fragility makes it a more compliant, yet less capable, partner for U.S. confrontational policies. This creates a dangerous imbalance where U.S. strategic aims outstrip the alliance's collective resilience, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of the current strategy. This pattern of supporting an indefinite conflict is also central to the administration's policy in the Middle East.
4.0 Middle East Policy: Unwavering Support for Israeli War Aims
U.S. policy in the Middle East under the Trump administration is characterized by unequivocal political and military support for Israel's ongoing war in Gaza. The administration has aligned itself completely with Israel's strategic objectives, providing diplomatic cover and forgoing any public pressure for a negotiated settlement.
Diplomatic Stance and Justification
During a recent visit to Israel, Secretary of State Marco Rubio articulated the administration's position, stating that "a diplomatic solution to the Gaza war may not be possible." He justified this stance by characterizing Hamas as a "barbaric group, whose stated mission is the destruction of the Jewish state."
This rhetoric effectively dismisses the possibility of a political resolution and endorses a purely military approach to the conflict. The administration's justification—the complete elimination of Hamas—serves as the rationale for its full support of the war's intensification. This policy is interpreted within the source analysis as tacit support for an effort to "implement the 'final solution' for Palestine," signaling a belief that the conflict can only end with the total defeat of Palestinian militant factions.
Expanding NATO's Regional Footprint
In parallel with its support for the Gaza war, the U.S. is expanding NATO's presence and influence in the broader region. The alliance has opened a new liaison office in Amman, Jordan, as part of its Mediterranean Dialogue partnership framework. This initiative formalizes deeper security cooperation with a group of seven regional partners:
• Algeria
• Egypt
• Israel
• Jordan
• Mauritania
• Morocco
• Tunisia
This expansion indicates a broader strategy to integrate key Middle Eastern and North African states into a Western-led security architecture, extending NATO's operational reach beyond its traditional European focus. As these regional conflicts escalate, they are intersecting with profound shifts in the global economic landscape.
5.0 Geoeconomic Realignment and the U.S. Financial Position
The Trump administration's foreign policy is unfolding against a backdrop of significant shifts in global energy markets and economic alliances. A rising Eastern economic bloc, led by China and Russia, is actively challenging the Western-dominated financial order. These external pressures are compounded by severe domestic financial vulnerabilities within the United States, creating a complex geoeconomic environment that shapes and constrains American strategy.
The Eastern Energy Axis
The recent Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin, China, crystallized the formation of a new energy alliance between Russia, China, and India. The cornerstone of this partnership is the "binding memorandum" for the Power of Siberia 2 (POS-2) gas pipeline. This project is strategically significant as it creates a direct route to supply China with natural gas from Russia's Yamal fields—the same reserves that historically supplied Germany—representing a permanent deflection of Russia's primary gas supply away from Europe and toward Asia. This cements Russia's economic pivot to the East and reduces China's reliance on seaborne Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), which is more vulnerable to disruption in maritime chokepoints controlled by the U.S. Navy.
Alienating a Critical Partner: The Case of India
The Trump administration's geoeconomic policy has alienated India, a critical potential ally in Asia. In response to India's purchase of Russian crude oil, the administration imposed punitive tariffs, a move that has pushed New Delhi to deepen its diplomatic and energy ties with Moscow and Beijing. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's prominent presence at the SCO summit, alongside Presidents Putin and Xi, was a clear signal of this realignment. The U.S. has thus inadvertently strengthened the very coalition of Eurasian powers it has sought to contain.
Domestic Economic Pressures
These external challenges are magnified by the precarious state of U.S. domestic finances. The national debt has reached $37.5 trillion, creating immense pressure on the federal budget. This vulnerability has not gone unnoticed by strategic competitors. According to Russian presidential advisor Anton Kobyakov, the U.S. is planning a "financial reset" to manage this unsustainable debt load. This alleged plan involves three key components:
1. Forced Demand for U.S. Bonds: The use of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and stablecoins would be leveraged to create automatic, built-in demand for U.S. government bonds, helping to fund the deficit as foreign demand wanes.
2. Weaponized Inflation: Deliberately allowing inflation to run high would erode the real value of the national debt over time, effectively devaluing what is owed.
3. Massive Wealth Transfer: The combined effect of these policies would result in what Kobyakov describes as "the largest wealth transfer in history," shifting wealth from wage workers to the owners of financial assets.
The administration's aggressive unilateralism is likely a direct response to these vulnerabilities—a high-stakes attempt to disrupt the formation of a rival geoeconomic bloc before domestic financial pressures render such actions impossible. This external pressure is mirrored by growing instability within the U.S. domestic political system.
6.0 The Impact of Domestic Political Volatility on U.S. Strategy
The execution and international perception of U.S. foreign policy are being shaped and complicated by significant domestic political turmoil. This instability is not confined to partisan debate but extends to social unrest directly linked to administration policies and deep, public fissures within the conservative movement itself. This internal disarray threatens the coherence and credibility of America's actions on the world stage.
Immigration Policy and Domestic Security
The administration's "mass deportation initiative" has become a major flashpoint for domestic conflict. The policy has resulted in the removal of approximately 2 million undocumented immigrants. However, this hardline stance is linked to rising political violence. A recent sniper attack on an ICE facility in Dallas, which left one detainee dead, has been framed by administration allies as a direct consequence of heated political rhetoric. Senator Ted Cruz labeled the incident "politically motivated violence," while Vice President JD Vance tied the attack to a "broader campaign of violence aimed squarely at immigration enforcement." These events highlight how a cornerstone policy issue is fueling violent conflict within the United States.
Elite Conflict and Narrative Contention
A more significant indicator of strategic instability is the narrative warfare occurring within the administration's own political base, particularly following the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The official investigation into his killing has been met with widespread skepticism and public accusations from prominent conservative figures.
A narrative, promoted by commentators such as Eric Zuesse, Max Blumenthal, and Candace Owens, has emerged claiming Kirk's killing was a professional "hit-job," potentially orchestrated by Israel in retaliation for his increasingly critical stance on the Gaza war. Public trust in the official story has been further eroded by figures like Michael Savage, who has called the investigation a "government coverup." The reconciliation of President Trump and Elon Musk at Kirk's memorial, framed by critics as a "psychological operation" to distract from Musk's prior accusations of Trump's implication in the "Epstein files," has amplified these dynamics.
This narrative warfare has revealed a profound internal contradiction. Candace Owens, a close associate of Kirk, has publicly stated that he was a "friend of the feds." This assertion creates a near-total collapse of narrative coherence, as the same movement alleging a "deep state" cover-up is being told by a prominent voice that the victim was collaborating with federal agencies. This disarray has the potential to seriously undermine the coherence and international credibility of U.S. foreign policy.
7.0 Conclusion: Strategic Consequences and Outlook
The analysis of the Trump administration's second term reveals a foreign policy defined by an aggressive, often militarized, unilateralism. From leveraging the "narco-terrorism" doctrine in Latin America to forcing a military escalation with Russia in Europe and providing unconditional support for an indefinite war in Gaza, the U.S. has embarked on a high-risk strategy that is reshaping the global order. The primary consequences of this strategic shift are already becoming apparent.
• Strengthening of Adversary Blocs: U.S. policies have inadvertently accelerated the formation of a closer geoeconomic and strategic alignment between Russia, China, and a newly alienated India, creating a more formidable Eurasian coalition.
• Weakening of Traditional Alliances: Key European partners are grappling with severe economic headwinds and internal political instability, diminishing their capacity to serve as effective and reliable allies in confronting shared challenges.
• Escalation of Regional Conflicts: Rather than resolving conflicts, U.S. policy is directly contributing to the escalation of military tensions with Russia in Europe and is enabling an indefinite continuation of the war in Gaza, increasing the risk of wider regional conflagrations.
• Erosion of Domestic Cohesion: This assertive foreign policy is intertwined with—and arguably exacerbated by—profound political division, elite infighting, and a deep crisis of trust in government institutions within the United States, which compromises strategic consistency and international standing.
Ultimately, the administration's strategy is not merely risking but actively engineering the erosion of the unipolar order it seeks to preserve. By alienating partners, emboldening adversaries, and operating from a position of domestic instability, these policies are challenging the global hegemony the United States has maintained since 1945. The pursuit of dominance through unilateral force may ultimately hasten the decline of the unipolar moment and give rise to a more contested and unpredictable international system.
thumb_upGood report
thumb_downBad report