6-30-25 DailyBriefs.info     audio

Welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast Show.

First, let's delve into the article "The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II" by Larry Romanoff. This piece claims that the genuine origins of both World Wars have been removed from history books and replaced with a narrative that solely blames Germany. The author asserts that neither war was initiated or desired by Germany, but rather were orchestrated by "a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany". According to the article, these Zionist Jews betrayed Germany, where they had previously found a "happy home," in exchange for gaining control of Palestine. It is further alleged that before World War II, Jewish communities openly declared a global economic war on Germany, aiming to destroy its economy and cause one-third of its population to starve. This was reportedly in response to Germany's refusal to comply with an ultimatum to remove Hitler and restore Jews to their former government positions. The article highlights Lord Beaverbrook, a prominent UK newspaper magnate, who reportedly expressed concern in a 1938 private letter that powerful Jewish influences were determined to push Britain into war with Germany. He stated that "20,000 German Jews in England" were working against reconciliation with Germany and that "The Jews have got a big position in the press here" and "may drive us into war". The source cites Benjamin Freedman, who claimed that Germany offered England a negotiated peace in 1916, but Zionists intervened, promising to bring the United States into the war as an ally in exchange for Palestine. The Germans, according to Freedman, only realized at the Treaty of Versailles that they had been betrayed and defeated due to the Zionist quest for Palestine. This alleged betrayal, and the subsequent discriminatory actions by Germans, were presented as the reason for German resentment against Jews. The article claims that in July 1933, a global meeting of Jews in Amsterdam issued an ultimatum to Germany, and upon its rejection, initiated a worldwide boycott of German goods, effectively declaring economic war. Chaim Weizmann, then president of the International Jewish Agency and World Zionist Organisation, is quoted stating in a 1939 letter that Jews supported Great Britain against Germany and intended to "starve them into surrender" through a global boycott. Given that two-thirds of Germany's food supply was imported and relied on exports, such a boycott was portrayed as devastating. The piece emphasizes that this boycott began even before German Jews experienced any significant "unpleasantness" and was the catalyst for the subsequent backlash. Hitler, for his part, attributed Germany's woes to a global conspiracy involving Marxists and Capitalists, specifically accusing "Jewish bankers" of orchestrating Germany's defeat in World War I, the Russian revolution, the Treaty of Versailles, and the resulting hyperinflation. The author concludes that this history would naturally lead to significant resentment against Jews by the start of World War II, linking the Holocaust to the German perception of the Bolshevik revolution as being Jewish-dominated and part of a plan for "Jewish world supremacy". Furthermore, the sinking of the Lusitania in World War I is described as a deliberate "false flag" operation designed to pull the United States into the war. It is claimed that Edward Mandell House, a "Jewish 'advisor'" to the US President, believed that luring Germany into sinking a British ship with Americans aboard would achieve this. The Lusitania was reportedly loaded with military cargo, and the German Embassy's warnings to American travelers were allegedly suppressed by "Jewish-owned media". The article states that Winston Churchill purposefully ordered the Lusitania to reduce speed, cease defensive maneuvers, and had its military escort withdraw, leaving it vulnerable to German U-boats, knowing they were in the vicinity. The subsequent sinking was then used to "vilify Germany," while the presence of illegal munitions and German warnings were suppressed by "Jewish media". Post-war, the UK military allegedly tried to destroy the Lusitania's wreckage to prevent the truth from emerging, but failed. The source concludes that the US government deliberately loaded the ship, ensured German awareness, and sent unwitting passengers to their deaths to justify entering World War I. It further claims that this was not the first or last time the US government sacrificed its own citizens for war pretexts, drawing parallels to the USS Maine and Pearl Harbor attacks, where intelligence was suppressed to create an excuse for war.

Next, we turn to "Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order According to Viganò" from LewRockwell.com. This article begins by stating a quote attributed to David Spangler, suggesting that participation in the "New World Order" or "New Age" requires an "act of worship to Lucifer" or "Luciferian initiation". The author observes a "succession of incongruent events" over the past year and a half, especially during the "pandemic emergency," where measures like lockdowns and curfews lacked plausible justification and were contradicted by evidence of ineffectiveness. The piece argues that medicine has transformed from an art to a "religion of science" characterized by "dogmatism bordering on superstition," with its "ministers" (virologists and scientists) being immune to criticism, despite their "conflicts of interest or by the substantial financial benefits received by pharmaceutical companies". The author highlights inconsistencies, such as Sweden's lack of lockdowns not resulting in higher infection rates than countries with strict measures, or mass vaccination campaigns in Israel and Great Britain leading to increased infections, yet other nations are still pushed towards mandatory vaccination. The article asserts that "we are faced with a colossal deception, based on lies and fraud," and that failure to recognize this conspiracy stems from mistakenly believing rulers are honest. The "Great Reset" is portrayed as a "criminal plan, conceived for decades and aimed at establishing a universal dictatorship" where a wealthy minority aims to "enslave and subjugate the whole of humanity to the globalist ideology". The author states that policies such as the formation of the United States of Europe, uncontrolled immigration, wage reduction, the elimination of trade union guarantees, the abandonment of national sovereignty, a single currency, and population reduction through new vaccine technologies are all part of this "planned, organized and coordinated action". These "events have been artfully created and magnified with the sole purpose of legitimizing a revolution," which Klaus Schwab identifies as the "fourth industrial revolution". Civil authority is depicted as serving "economic and financial potentates, of the international oligarchy of bankers and usurers, of multinationals and pharmaceutical companies," all belonging to a few wealthy families. Journalists are accused of prostituting themselves to the powerful, censoring truth, and spreading "shameless lies," such as misrepresenting Covid deaths or denying links between vaccine administration and fatalities. The piece quotes banker James Warburg from 1950, who stated that a "world government" would be established either "by consensus or by force". David Rockefeller is also quoted from 1991, saying that the world is ready for a "world government" and that a "global crisis" would make nations accept the "New World Order," identifying the "pandemic emergency" as this crisis. The author concludes that a "false problem" was created to impose population control measures, benefit large international corporations, disrupt education, lower labor costs, privatize public health for "Big Pharma," and enable governments to use emergencies to impose "so-called vaccines" for population control and potential health issues. The article expresses concern that no legal action has been taken against these global leaders for what is deemed a "terrible crime against humanity," and that dissenters are censored and labeled "public enemies". It suggests that leaders of the Catholic Church, including Bergoglio (Pope Francis), are complicit, acting as "zealous executors" of this globalist plan, making the "deep state" and "deep church" "two sides of the same coin" instrumental to the "New World Order". This alliance is framed within a spiritual conflict waged by Lucifer against God. The infiltration of the Catholic Hierarchy allegedly began in the late 1950s, leading to the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which is seen as the beginning of a "Revolution" within the Church. Msgr. Hélder Câmara, a "ultra-progressivist" bishop, is mentioned as having met with Klaus Schwab, and his participation in the "Pact of the Catacombs" is linked to the establishment of a "new social order" based on justice and equality, a plan that Bergoglio is said to support. The Pontifical Academy for Life was reportedly altered by Bergoglio to include "supporters of depopulation, contraception, and abortion". The Holy See's support for vaccines is tied to a "depopulation through forced vaccination" agenda, citing Bill Gates's 2011 statement about vaccines potentially reducing population. The article also notes the Holy See's financial investments in contraceptive drug companies and a "Geo-Risk" fund that profited from pandemic crises. Furthermore, it suggests that a secret accord between the Vatican and Beijing may involve significant funding from the Chinese communist regime in exchange for the Vatican's silence on the persecution of Catholics and human rights violations. "Deep state" interference in the Church is further evidenced by emails from John Podesta and Hillary Clinton indicating a desire to remove Benedict XVI and usher in a "progressivist and globalist" Church, realized with Bergoglio's election. The B'nai B'rith's influence on the Church's "renewal" is also mentioned. The author concludes that Bergoglio is fulfilling a mandate from the "globalist elite" to dismantle the Catholic Church and establish a "philanthropic and ecumenical sect of Masonic inspiration" to serve as a universal religion for the "New Order".

Moving on, we discuss the article "The correlation between the covid death “peak” in 2020 and midazolam use is truly damning" by Rhoda Wilson, featuring Dr. David Cartland. Dr. Cartland observed that many patients in 2020 classified as "covid cases" were actually suffering from other conditions, raising concerns about how deaths were categorized. He asserted that the practices of the NHS, rather than the disease itself, led to increased mortality. These practices included the widespread issuance of "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" (DNAR) orders, often without discussion. There was also premature and excessive use of end-of-life medications like midazolam and diamorphine, which are typically reserved for symptom management in the final hours of life. Dr. Cartland notes that high doses and rapid titrations of these drugs were common, hastening death in individuals who were not in the dying phase. Treatment escalation plans set limits on care for elderly and co-morbid patients, often precluding hospital admission, which was part of preparation for an expected surge in patients that did not materialize. Additionally, mass discharges of patients who were not medically fit were carried out to free up beds for anticipated Covid admissions. The article highlights that, following the introduction of the "jab," drugs such as remdesivir were used as Covid therapy, contributing to mortality through side effects like acute renal failure. Safe and natural treatment options were reportedly avoided to maintain the emergency use authorization for the "jab". Furthermore, pre-emptive invasive ventilation was performed on patients with clear airways as a precautionary measure, and high ventilation pressures led to complications like lung collapse. The use of high-dose synergistic respiratory depressants and immunosuppressants, such as midazolam, diamorphine, and dexamethasone, in intensive care units was observed despite patients needing their respiratory drive for a supposed respiratory illness. Ventilator-acquired bacterial pneumonias also contributed to the mortality figures. Dr. Cartland concludes that there is a strong argument for "iatrogenic harm," meaning harm caused by medical treatment, across various aspects of the pandemic response and medical approach. He recounted instances of complete withdrawal of care, including food, hydration, and basic oral care. A critical observation made by Dr. Cartland is that "the correlation between covid death “peak” and midazolam use is truly damning". The article also states that basic treatments for alleged coronavirus symptoms, such as steroid inhalers, vitamin D, and hydroxychloroquine, showed rapid improvement in patients with respiratory issues, but were suppressed to preserve the emergency use authorization for the "vaccine".

Fourth, let's discuss "False flags are occurring almost daily now," also by Rhoda Wilson, quoting Dr. Vernon Coleman. The term "false flag" is defined as originating from sailing ships using deceptive flags to trick opposing vessels. Dr. Vernon Coleman explicitly states that "False flag operations are occurring almost daily now". The article provides historical examples, including the Reichstag fire in 1933, which Hitler allegedly used to blame communists and consolidate power. It is also claimed that Hitler orchestrated attacks on German targets in 1939 to justify invading Poland and starting World War II. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor is presented as a false flag operation, with President Roosevelt allegedly knowing about the impending attack but allowing it to proceed to create a pretext for the United States to enter World War II. Other historical instances mentioned include a faked document by the Church of Rome to claim rights over European kings, the invention of "Prester John" to deceive Europeans into an unwinnable war, blaming societal problems on "witches," and the sinking of the USS Maine, initially blamed on Spain to start the Spanish-American Civil War, but later attributed to an internal explosion. Operation Ajax in 1953, where the UK and US allegedly overthrew an Iranian regime, is also cited. Modern examples include the 9/11 attacks, which the article states are widely believed to have been arranged or known about by Americans. The claims of "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq by US and British politicians are labeled a "massive false flag operation" used to justify the invasion. "Global warming" is described as a "huge confidence trick designed to control the people of the world and prepare them for Net Zero, the Great Reset and the new Agenda". The Y2K scare is also listed as a "fraud or false flag operation". Finally, the "covid pandemic" is characterized as "the biggest false flag of all time," beginning in 2020.

Our fifth source is "Good Moneys: 100%-Reserve Gold, Stock-Based Money" by James Anthony from LewRockwell.com. The article argues that monetary inflation caused by politicians has led to economic depressions. It states that "fractional-reserve gold standards" and subsequent fractional-reserve dollars granted bankers an "unconstitutional privilege" to create and loan money not fully backed by saved assets. This system, the author claims, produces boom-bust cycles where bankers inflate the money supply, leading to booms, followed by busts when unsustainable investments fail, and banks collapse, destroying created money. Politicians are criticized for allowing this inflation and then enforcing changed loan contracts, thereby unfairly depriving borrowers of property. The article asserts that fractional reserves enabled "crony-socialist politicians" to increase spending, offer favors to allies, and secure more donations, with economic booms buying votes and busts expanding government power. In contrast, the author proposes "100%-reserve gold" money, which would provide "constitutional money" that historically increased in purchasing power by 2.1% to 2.4% annually and eliminates "boom-bust government money error cycles". The Dutch Republic's use of 100%-reserve gold from 1609 to the late 1770s is cited as a historical example of a successful system that helped free the English and Americans. Other "good moneys" suggested include transactional gold, which state politicians could create (already implemented in Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas, and being considered in 21 other states), or by repealing legal tender laws to allow competing 100%-reserve moneys. The article dismisses Bitcoin as a viable alternative, noting its lack of historical use as economy-wide money, legal support, and specific lessons learned compared to gold, and its lower initial asset value. "Stock-based money" is presented as another option that would eliminate error cycles and lead to the fastest increase in purchasing power. Under this system, stocks would be purchased with actual savings, not "bank-created money" or "broker-created money" through margin buying, which would prevent investors from artificially inflating stock prices. The author suggests that nations limiting the use of stock-based money would attract less investment. This approach, it is argued, would "roughly double" the proportion of global assets invested in productive properties, initiating a "new most-'golden' age".

Sixth, we look at the article "How the Fed Made Housing Unaffordable" by Ryan McMaken, published on LewRockwell.com. The article points out that Donald Trump and his associates, like Bill Pulte, head of the Federal Housing and Finance Administration, criticize the Federal Reserve for not inflating the money supply enough and for not forcing down interest rates sufficiently. Pulte is depicted as adhering to the "standard Yellen-Bernanke inflationist model of monetary policy," which posits that the central bank's role is to constantly push down interest rates, generate easy money, and devalue currency. While Pulte claims this policy makes homes more affordable, the article contends that the Fed's easy-money approach over recent decades has, in fact, relentlessly increased home prices through its asset purchases, interest rate policies, and monetary inflation. Lower interest rates are shown to lead to more home purchases and higher prices, which benefits real estate agents through increased commissions. There is a clear inverse relationship where falling interest rates coincide with, and often precede, rising home prices, suggesting a causal link. The author explains that lower interest rates are driven by "new money creation," and this "monetary inflation often shows up as asset price inflation," including in the housing market. The Federal Reserve has been directly involved in manipulating home prices since Alan Greenspan, as Fed Chairman, intentionally sought to create a housing bubble to recover from the 2001 recession. This intervention significantly escalated in 2009 when the central bank purchased trillions of dollars worth of "mortgage-backed securities" (MBSs) to reduce mortgage rates and inflate MBS prices, thereby bailing out major commercial banks. The Fed's substantial holding of MBSs is described as artificially inflating home prices by generating artificial demand for mortgages. The article notes that when the Fed allowed some MBS assets to mature and roll off its balance sheet in 2019, home prices stabilized, but when the Fed initiated a new buying spree in response to the "covid panic," home prices surged at an unprecedented rate. The Fed is accused of deliberately slowing the rate at which these assets are allowed to roll off its balance sheet to prevent any significant fall in home prices, prioritizing the concerns of "Wall Street". Consequently, housing affordability has reached a multi-decade low, and the average age of homeowners has risen sharply. Affordability declined by 45% since 2012, with a sharp drop in the first quarter of 2021, even before price inflation compelled the Fed to allow interest rates to rise from historical lows. Despite the Fed's efforts to consistently lower mortgage rates, the homeownership rate has fallen by six percent since 2004, and the money supply has increased by 231% since the Fed began buying mortgages in 2009. The author argues that monetary inflation is constrained by the "political realities of price inflation," as people eventually recognize the devaluation of their wealth. Simply driving down mortgage rates incurs other costs, such as higher down payments, property taxes, and insurance, which cannot all be absorbed into mortgages. This dynamic leads to declining homeownership rates and increased debt burdens, making home ownership increasingly unattainable for ordinary people.

Seventh, we examine "Our People or 'America'?: Looking Beyond Trump" by Mark Weber from The Unz Review. The article posits that Donald Trump's ascent to power is a reflection of profound and growing dissatisfaction among Americans, particularly White middle-class and working Americans, who feel marginalized and alienated in their own country. Trump's success is attributed to increasing disillusionment and anger with the perceived failures of established political parties and their leaders, as well as their supporters in media, Hollywood, business, and educational institutions. The author credits Trump with "shaking things up" and forcing Americans to confront "uncomfortable realities" and issues like birthright citizenship and "affirmative action" policies that are seen as discriminatory against White citizens. The Trump-MAGA movement is criticized for lacking a "coherent, self-consistent worldview or historical outlook" that could replace the dominant ideology of the past 80 years. It is suggested that Trump and MAGA Republicans primarily focus on identifying and removing perceived enemies, rather than articulating a clear vision for the future beyond a vague notion of an "America that, once again, is 'great' and 'winning'". The movement is also accused of engaging in "identity politics" by appealing to Black, Hispanic, and Jewish voters, despite simultaneously denouncing "identity politics" as "divisive" and "racist". Trump's "Platinum Plan" for Black voters in 2020, which promised to make Juneteenth a national holiday and establish federal programs to boost capital in Black communities, is cited as an example. While rejecting "anti-White policies," the article states that Trump and MAGA Republicans do not openly espouse a "pro-White outlook," instead asserting or pretending that race "does not matter" and that America is somehow immune to the "realities of biology, of history, and of life itself". The article notes that the US population was approximately 90% European American after World War II, but is now, or soon will be, predominantly non-White, a result of a drastic "racial-cultural transformation" since the 1950s. The author argues that even if all illegal immigration ceased and every illegal immigrant were deported, the racial "third-worldization" and "de-Europeanization" of the US would persist, albeit at a slower pace. Trump's public expressions of gratitude to "African Americans, Hispanic Americans, [and] Asian Americans" while omitting White Americans are highlighted, attributed to a "delusional assumption" that White America inherently is America. The article contends that for over 80 years, White Americans have been subjected to a "systematic, organized campaign of social conditioning" through media and education, which promotes a "poisonously distorted portrayal of life and history" and convinces them that race "does not or should not matter". The author believes that the "MAGA vision of a “Golden Age” for America is delusional" and that demographic realities will force White Americans to recognize their diminishing influence and status as a shrinking minority. This, it is posited, will eventually lead to large numbers of White Americans organizing to advocate for their rights and interests. The article advocates for "pro-White candidates" who can effectively appeal to a sense of justice and fairness, presenting positive imagery for their people. It also identifies "neo-Marxists or dreamy utopians" and "neo-conservative and neo-liberal apologists" for the "prevailing democratic-capitalist order" as primary adversaries in the battle of ideas, arguing that this order is clearly failing. These alleged "champions of “free speech” and “tolerance”" are accused of banning books, websites, and podcasts they deem offensive, and of denouncing ethno-nationalism in some countries while defending it in Israel, thereby appearing as "ineffectual hypocrites". The author urges a primary focus on the "well-being and future of our people" (White people) rather than attempting to salvage the "multi-cultural, multi-racial U.S.A.".

Eighth, we analyze "Trump’s ‘Antiwar’ Myth and the Zionist Reality" by Jose Alberto Nino from The Unz Review. The article argues that Donald Trump's "America First" promise of ending foreign entanglements is contradicted by his aggressive Iran policy, including airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025. It asserts that Trump's "antiwar rhetoric" has served as a "smokescreen," particularly concerning Iran, which has been the "singular focus of Trump’s most aggressive, interventionist actions". Trump's animosity towards Iran's nuclear ambitions is described as long-standing, with a quote from his 2011 book, Time to Get Tough, advocating that Iran's nuclear program "must be stopped–by any and all means necessary". He consistently criticized the Iran nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA, calling it a "disaster" that could lead to "a nuclear holocaust". The article highlights Trump's "maximum pressure" sanctions campaign, launched after the US unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA in May 2018, which targeted Iran's energy, petrochemical, and financial sectors, aiming to eliminate its oil exports. Trump designated Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization, marking the first time the United States had labeled another nation's military as such, a move intended to isolate Iran and pave the way for military escalation. The assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in January 2020, ordered by Trump, is cited as a dramatic example of his hawkishness, bringing the US and Iran "to the brink of open war". During his first term, Trump reportedly explored options for military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, with such actions only averted by the intervention of military leaders like Mark Milley. His second term has seen a return to this pattern, with sanctions reimposed and expanded, and military strike plans against Iran privately approved. The author concludes that this behavior reflects the "playbook of a hawk," not an antiwar president. Trump is described as increasingly favoring "hawkish voices" advocating action against Iran over his initial isolationist advisors. Despite Trump's public statements emphasizing peace, the article suggests his administration is preparing for war, influenced by the "pro-Israel lobby," which has contributed over $230 million to his support since 2020. His cabinet is characterized as being "stacked with figures who see Israeli interests and U.S. military intervention as inseparable," naming Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth as examples. Ultimately, Trump's Iran policy is presented as the "reality behind the illusion" of his antiwar stance, serving as a "smokescreen for a pro-Zionist, hawkish agenda" that has brought the Middle East closer to conflict.

Our ninth source is "Babylonian London Continues to Rage Against the Sovereignty of God" by Jeremy James. This article opens by referencing Psalm 2 to frame its discussion of human opposition to God's plan. It claims that Satan's "thronos," or throne, was historically located in Pergamum, now Bergama in Turkey. The author suggests that many believe Satan's throne is currently in one of three locations: the Vatican in Rome, the "Square Mile" in London, or the "district of Columbia" (Washington D.C.), all noted for their significant global power and autonomy from their host nations. London is presented as the most likely candidate for Satan's seat, due to its pervasive occult symbolism and esoteric iconography, being seen as the modern equivalent of Heliopolis, the Egyptian "City of the Sun". John Todd, who is identified as a former high-ranking member of the Illuminati, is quoted as stating that the Rothschild Tribunal in London takes orders directly from Lucifer, and they reside there because they believe London is where "Lucifer is most fluent" and can communicate with them personally. The article claims that "the Christ-hating elite who rule London" have imposed a "sun-centered, materialistic model of the universe" upon all nations, propagating lies such as a ball-shaped Earth, an infinitely expanding black vacuum, particle physics, the concept of gravity, and the existence of dinosaurs, all designed to discredit the Bible and present Creation as random events. Evolution is dismissed as an "absurd parlor game" contrived by the London elite and their Masonic counterparts to deny creation and promote belief in a "Great Architect of the Universe" instead of the deity of Christ. London is also identified as the global center of Freemasonry, described as a "Luciferian cult". The "central bank" is presented as another "sinister innovation" exported from London, a private institution used by the elite to control financial liquidity and ruin those they choose. The establishment of the Bank of England in 1694 and the Grand Lodge of England in 1717 are cited as evidence of London being the center where Satan "planted the poisonous hydra". The author concludes that Satan's "thronos" has likely been in London since the early 18th century, with secondary offices in the Vatican and D.C., the latter's name linked to the goddess Ishtar or Isis. London is portrayed as the global headquarters for a group of "rebels" who coordinate their plan for a "new world order," suggesting that even seemingly "rogue" countries like North Korea or Iran are part of this network and follow instructions from London. Post-World War II, London is alleged to have initiated extensive preparations to impose a more effective system of "social control" on the population, including a "program of demoralization" aimed at overturning the pre-war, Biblically-based mindset. Examples of this demoralization include legal changes such as the abolition of the death penalty in 1965, the decriminalization of homosexuality in 1967, and the legalization of abortion in 1967. The article suggests that "rebel music" promoted by the Tavistock Institute, notably The Beatles and The Rolling Stones, had a "disorienting effect" on public morality, making these changes seem inevitable and opposition futile. The legalization of "after-birth abortion" or infanticide in the UK in June 2025, awaiting House of Lords approval, is highlighted as a shocking example of the state asserting its right to determine who lives and dies, denying the "intrinsic humanity" of the unborn child. The name "London" itself is given occult significance, interpreted as "El On Dione," linking it to Sumerian and Ugaritic deities and the "City of the Sun". The strategy for removing laws is described as creating "tragic cases" to persuade a "gullible public" to accept changes, such as legalizing "post-partum abortions". The author warns that "Satanism is being legalized" and that this "new morality" originating from London will spread globally, possibly through a broader interpretation of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The planned introduction of "assisted dying" in the UK is also viewed as accelerating this descent into Satanism. The article criticizes pastors and preachers for their decades of silence, predicting they will continue to justify their inaction by elevating "tolerance," "diversity," and "inclusiveness" to Christian virtues and reinterpreting the Ten Commandments.

Tenth, we have "UNIVERSAL DISJUNCTION," a "Coffee & Covid 2025" report by Jeff Childers. This report highlights three significant Supreme Court decisions from June 28, 2025. First, the Supreme Court limited "national injunctions," which is described as a major victory for President Trump's agenda. Previously, over 40 national injunctions, mostly from a few federal districts, had halted Trump policies. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not grant district courts the authority to issue nationwide injunctions, effectively ending the practice. This decision is seen as providing "mid-flight refueling" for Trump's agenda. While activist lawyers can still seek injunctions for specific parties or pursue class actions, the latter is noted as being significantly more challenging. States can still seek injunctive relief limited to their own jurisdictions. The decision is framed as "watering down the power of federal courts to check government misconduct". Justice Barrett's opinion included strong criticism of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissenting arguments, labeling her reasoning as "illogic". Second, the Court ruled in favor of parental rights, allowing parents in Maryland (including Muslim, Catholic, and Ukrainian Orthodox families) to opt their elementary-school-aged children out of lessons involving LGBTQ+ themes, affirming their right to free exercise of religion. This decision is described as addressing "LGBT indoctrination itself," asserting that schools cannot "indoctrinate" children in "socially experimental ideologies inconsistent with parents’ religious beliefs". Third, the Supreme Court upheld a Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic websites. Advocates for the "adult entertainment industry" argued this law violated First Amendment rights, but Justice Barrett, drawing on her experience as a mother of seven, noted that content-filtering software is "far from foolproof" and that the "explosion of addiction to online porn has shown that content filtering isn’t working". This ruling is seen as a significant blow against porn addiction, establishing that regulating porn is not inherently unconstitutional and opening a "new Overton window" for further regulation based on consent, mental health, and childhood protection, rather than religious grounds. The report also discusses cultural shifts, highlighting a Washington Post op-ed by MIT professor Alex Byrne, who co-authored an anonymous HHS report on pediatric gender medicine. Byrne, while identifying as a progressive, admits that "medical transition for minors is not empirically or ethically justified," and states that "cancel culture" contributed to the failure of medical safeguarding. He criticizes the "euphemistic and often misleading" language used in gender treatments, noting its "Orwellian effect of making plain truths impossible to state," and points out that gender dysphoria is uniquely treated with permanent interventions despite lacking observable clinical signs. This op-ed is presented as evidence that censorship is failing and a "progressive purity spiral is spiraling out of control". Finally, the report mentions a significant technological breakthrough: Tesla completed its first fully autonomous Model Y delivery, meaning the car drove itself to its buyer without human intervention, a "major milestone" for self-driving technology.

Eleventh, we examine "Feminists Are Begging for Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them for Everything" by Brandon Smith from LewRockwell.com. The article opens by stating a perceived generational rule: "men are held accountable for everything, women accept accountability for nothing". It claims that modern Western women struggle with taking responsibility due to being raised to believe they are "victims" of men, society, patriarchy, religion, and biology. The author asserts that "feminism is built entirely around the notion that women can weaponize their victimhood as a means to control society". Feminism is identified as the "KEY movement that has undermined the success of western culture," leading to the "destruction of the nuclear family" and contributing to the "near collapse of the west". The article cites a New York Times piece titled "Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back," written by a 50-something woman who nostalgically recalls a past era when men were "easy targets for exploitation" for "easy money and easy sex". This dynamic, it is suggested, has "quietly collapsed," as men no longer seek women for social validation or connection, but instead pursue activities "Alone". This past era, attributed to the "sexual revolution of second wave feminism," allegedly glorified "female promiscuity and greed" as expressions of women's empowerment. The author argues that women are on a "biological clock," making promiscuity in their 20s "unthinkable insanity" that leads to "decades of misery as lonely old maids". A "sense of panic" is reportedly emerging among women who "bought into the feminist con game" as men are "not chasing them anymore". Statistical data is presented showing high percentages of single young men (63% of 18-29 year olds), and a significant decline in marriage rates by age 25 (from 60% in 1980 to 20% today). Men are described as "exiting relationships and marriage at record pace," causing women to "feel the pinch" because men are traditionally the initiators of relationships. Predictions are cited that 45% of women aged 25-44 will be single and childless by 2030, "not necessarily by choice," leading to a "female loneliness epidemic" in Western society. Despite lamenting the lack of connection, the New York Times article is criticized for continuing to blame men, suggesting they "retreated" due to "Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair" and needed to be taught "how to stay". The author of this source challenges feminists to consider whether "men ghost you and will not commit to you because YOU are the problem". Several reasons for men "walking away" are proposed: (1) modern women's "obliviousness" and desire to live life on "their own schedule"; (2) men's wariness of women with "baggage," noting that feminism has made divorce "easier and more lucrative" for women, leading them to enter the relationship market when their "marriage value is lowest"; (3) men's rejection of the "sexual revolution," avoiding promiscuous women whom they believe "lack discernment, the ability to connect, self respect and mental stability"; (4) the impact of Third-Wave Feminists telling men they were "pure evil for being masculine," leading men to stop chasing women and focus on other pursuits, with a suggestion that an apology from feminists might be warranted; (5) modern women's overestimation of sex as a "bartering tool," asserting that men require "love and respect" beyond physical intimacy; (6) men's greater conditioning to be alone compared to women, who are described as communal creatures reliant on social interaction; (7) the claim that men are "weak" and "afraid of approaching" women is refuted, with the author stating that men value "Peace" above all, which feminists do not offer; and (8) the assertion that feminism, like "all Marxist movements," is "obsessed with power and control," and that "Feminist empowerment is a fantasy based on institutional leverage which men ALLOW them to have," concluding that women "have no power and you never will". The article concludes by stating that if feminists desire men's attention, "they will have to stop being feminists".

Finally, our twelfth source is "FoI confirms that Police Scotland were directed to refuse any complaints from the public about covid" by Rhoda Wilson from The Expose. This article reveals that a Freedom of Information Act request to Police Scotland uncovered a directive from January 2022 that explicitly instructed police and staff not to accept complaints or reports related to "covid vaccinations". The directive specifically referenced a criminal complaint filed by Mark Sexton, for which he had received a crime reference number, and falsely asserted that "no such investigation is taking place". This statement contradicted evidence, including a Member of Parliament confirming that an active investigation was indeed ongoing at the time. The directive stated that requests from the public regarding alleged crimes about the vaccine, including attempts to "serve papers" or "shut down facilities," "should be rejected". Mark Sexton, a retired police officer, had submitted criminal complaints against the government for "misconduct and misfeasance in public office" in June and December 2021, receiving a crime reference number for the latter. All Chief Constables in England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales were informed of this "live criminal investigation" and an International Criminal Court application. The author notes that it is "curious, if not deliberately misleading," that Police Scotland's Assistant Chief Constable Alan Speirs would issue a directive denying an investigation while an MP confirmed one was active. The article reminds ACC Alan Speirs of citizens' rights to contact the police and be informed about investigations, and of police officers' oath to serve with "fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people," and to "protect the public and their property from harm, which includes protecting the public from a tyrannical government’s diktats".

Thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast Show produced and archived at the website dailybriefs.info.

Here are the key takeaway points from the provided sources, presented in a jotform manner:

I. CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 犹太人对德国的背叛与第二次世界大战的起因 –The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II by Larry Romanoff

• The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from history books and replaced with mythology blaming Germany. This article is a minor attempt to set straight part of the record.

• Neither of the two World Wars were started or desired by Germany, but were the creation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. This is portrayed as a secret, though it shouldn't be.

• The article claims that the treachery of Zionist Jews in betraying Germany involved scheming to obtain Palestine in trade for that betrayal. Germany had been a rather happy home for the Jews.

• Few people seem aware that Jews openly declared a worldwide war on Germany well before World War II. The economic consequences of this declaration were quite severe.

• The stated intention of the worldwide boycott of German goods was to destroy Germany's economy and starve to death one-third of Germany's population. This was punishment for Germany's refusal to bow to a Jewish ultimatum to fire Hitler and reinstate all Jews to their former government positions.

• Jewish people are accused of being responsible for the resentment within Germany against their own people. This resentment arose after Germans realized they had been betrayed by Jews, leading to discriminatory action and shunning.

• Lord Beaverbrook, a prominent UK newspaper magnate, expressed concern in a private letter in 1938 that powerful Jewish influences were determined to push England into a war with Germany. He stated that 20,000 German Jews in England were working against an accommodation with Germany, and that Jews had a "big position in the press".

• Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish individual high in the US structure, stated that Germany was offering England a negotiated peace in the summer of 1916. England had no choice but to accept this peace or face total defeat.

• Zionists in Germany went to the British War Cabinet and offered to get the United States into World War I as Britain's ally. The price demanded was Palestine after Britain won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

• The US, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally shortly after this promise was made in October 1916. The source states that it is "absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war".

• At the peace conference, Germans first realized why the United States came into the war and that they had been defeated and suffered terrific reparations because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. Mr. Freedman claimed that up to that time, Jews had never been better off in any country than in Germany.

• In July 1933, the Jews of the world held a meeting in Amsterdam and issued an ultimatum to Germany: fire Hitler and reinstate all Jews to their former positions, regardless of their background. When Germany refused, the International Jewry organized a worldwide boycott of all German goods.

• Chaim Weizmann, president of the International Jewish Agency and World Zionist Organisation, confirmed to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in 1939 that "the Jews stand behind Great Britain" and that they would "starve them [Germany] into surrender" using a worldwide boycott. Germany was dependent on its export business, and two-thirds of its food supply had to be imported.

• The Jewish boycott of Germany and German goods was so effective that soon no German goods could be found in shops anywhere, largely because Jews controlled much of the importing, wholesale, retail, and advertising businesses. This included incidents like Woolworth Company having to dump millions of dollars worth of goods.

• The source alleges that the anti-Nazi boycott of 1933, which Wikipedia describes as a response to "anti-Semitism," actually began long before German Jews experienced any unpleasantness. It asserts that the boycott and economic war prompted the backlash against Jews within Germany.

• Hitler blamed Germany's condition on a global conspiracy of Marxists and Capitalists, directed by Jewish bankers. He accused this conspiracy of engineering Germany's loss in World War I, the Russian revolution, the Versailles Treaty, and the resulting hyperinflation.

• Hitler accused elite Marxist Jews of Germany of controlling newspapers and banking, fomenting wars, and corrupting Europe's art, culture, and morality. The same feelings existed in all countries where Jews attempted similar revolutions.

• After rising to power, Hitler implemented policies such as pulling Germany out of the League of Nations, banning the Communist Party, replacing national Marxist Trade Unions with company unions, establishing the NSDAP as Germany's only political party, and refusing to make further reparations payments from the Versailles Treaty. He also took control of Germany's Reichsbank from Warburg/Rothschild bankers and issued debt-free currency.

• According to Benjamin Freedman, Jews had been treated well in Germany until immediately prior to World War II, and it was the combined actions of Jews during the preceding two decades that turned the country and Hitler against them.

• The sinking of the Lusitania was depicted as a pretext for the US entry into World War I. The US government allegedly loaded the passenger liner with munitions for use against Germany, ensured Germans were aware of the cargo, making it a legal military target.

• The German Embassy in Washington warned American travelers about the Lusitania's military cargo, but Jewish-owned media refused to publish the warnings. The US then deliberately sent the ship with around 2,000 unwitting passengers to their death.

• The Lusitania was ordered to reduce speed, cease its zigzag defensive course, and its military escort vessel, Juno, was ordered to withdraw as it approached the Irish coast. Churchill knew German U-Boats were nearby but purposely slowed the Lusitania and called off the Juno, leaving the ship vulnerable.

• The Jewish media is accused of vilifying Germany after the Lusitania sinking, while suppressing any mention of the illegal munitions that caused the secondary explosion and Germany's efforts to warn civilians.

• The UK military allegedly launched a secret expedition to find and destroy the remains of the Lusitania beyond recognition after the war, out of fear the wreckage would reveal the truth. While they located it and dropped explosives, they failed to destroy it.

• Jim Jarrat discovered the location of the Lusitania in 2015 and found a large number of unexploded munitions surrounding the wreckage, and lockers labeled "butter" or "cheese" still full of munitions.

• The source states that the US government willingly sacrificed the lives of its own citizens and military personnel on multiple occasions to obtain justification for declaring war, citing the USS Maine, Pearl Harbor, and the Lusitania. It claims the US had complete intelligence on the Japanese fleet at Pearl Harbor but refused to warn its base, sacrificing thousands of American lives to enter WWII on behalf of European Jewish Zionists.

• The Bolshevik revolution being dominated by Jews and part of a plan for Jewish world supremacy is linked to the Holocaust. The Jewish Holocaust is described as one of the unintended consequences of the Russian Revolution.

II. Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order According to Viganò by John Clark Conspiracy Forever

• For over a year and a half, there has been a succession of incongruent events that most people cannot plausibly justify. These include the illogical measures taken during the pandemic emergency, which are disavowed by conflicting voices and evidence of ineffectiveness.

• An Oxford University study published in The Lancet stated that the viral load of those vaccinated with a double dose is 251 times greater than the first strains of the virus. This contradicts proclamations from world leaders that vaccination leads to life, while non-vaccination leads to death.

• The art of medicine is described as having renounced its prudence in the name of an emergency that has become the "priesthood" of a "religion of science", characterized by dogmatism bordering on superstition. The "ministers" of this cult are portrayed as an untouchable caste, exempt from criticism even when evidence contradicts their claims.

• The principles of medicine, considered universally valid until February 2020, have given way to improvisation, including advising vaccination at the pandemic's peak, imposing useless masks, mandating bizarre distances, prohibiting effective treatments, and imposing experimental gene therapies in violation of normal safety protocols.

• The source highlights the inconsistency between stated aims and the constantly changing means adopted to achieve them in relation to pandemic measures. For example, the absence of lockdowns and masks in Sweden did not lead to higher infection rates, and mass vaccination in Israel or Great Britain increased infections, yet these elements are not considered proof of ineffectiveness by rulers.

• The situation is described as a "colossal deception, based on lies and fraud", stemming from the premise that authorities' justifications are sincere and that rulers are honest. The mistake is in believing they do not lie, leading people to close their eyes to reality and believe "shameless lies".

• The "Great Reset" plan is presented as "crude evidence of a criminal plan," conceived for decades and aimed at establishing a universal dictatorship. This dictatorship intends for a minority of immensely rich and powerful people to enslave humanity to a globalist ideology.

• Denying what the elite has planned since the 1950s is deemed unjustifiable, as information from figures like Kalergi, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Klaus Schwab, Jacques Attali, and Bill Gates has been published and adopted by international bodies and governments. The plan includes the United States of Europe, uncontrolled immigration, wage reduction, cancellation of trade union guarantees, renunciation of national sovereignty, a single currency, control of citizens under the pretext of a pandemic, and population reduction through vaccines.

• The events are asserted to have been "artfully created and magnified with the sole purpose of legitimizing a revolution". This revolution, identified by Schwab as the "fourth industrial revolution," is intended by the elite to the detriment of all humanity.

• The enslavement of authority is seen as a process that began with the French Revolution, making the political class servants of "economic and financial potentates, of the international oligarchy of bankers and usurers, of multinationals and pharmaceutical companies". These subjects are said to belong to a small number of well-known very rich families.

• Journalists are accused of prostituting themselves to the powerful, censoring truth, and spreading lies without attempting credibility. They are said to have twisted the truth "with impunity when it does not confirm their narrative, bending it to fit their purposes".

• Banker James Warburg stated in 1950 that "We will have a world government, whether you like it or not. The only question that arises is whether this world government will be established by consensus or by force".

• David Rockefeller wrote in 1991 that the world is ready for a world government, preferring "the supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers" to national self-determination. He added that a "right global crisis" is needed for nations to accept the New World Order.

• The current "right crisis" is identified as the pandemic emergency and the "lockstep" outlined since 2010 by the Rockefeller Foundation document "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development," which anticipated the events now being witnessed.

• A "false problem" was created to impose population control measures as an "apparent solution," benefiting international groups by canceling small and medium-sized businesses with lockdowns and green passes. Other goals include demolishing education with distance learning, lowering labor costs with "smart working," privatizing public health for Big Pharma, and allowing governments to use emergency states to legislate away rights and impose vaccines, making citizens traceable, chronically ill, or sterile.

• The leaders of almost the whole world are seen as accomplices and traitors in this premeditated crime against humanity, yet no magistrate opens a file against them. Those who disagree are censored and pointed out as public enemies, without recognized rights.

• The source alleges an alliance between civil and religious power, with the "deep state" (corrupt civil authority) and the "deep church" (corrupt ecclesiastical authority) being "two sides of the same coin", instrumental to the establishment of the New World Order.

• The infiltration operation in the Catholic Church is said to have begun at the end of the 1950s, when the New World Order project was taking shape, and intensified with the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council.

• Msgr. Hélder Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife in Brazil, met with a young Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, who recognized Câmara's opposition to the traditional Church and invited him to Davos. Câmara was among the organizers of the "Pact of the Catacombs," which advocated for a "new social order" based on justice and equality.

• Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis) is presented as perfectly coherent with the New World Order plan, collaborating with Malthusian environmentalism and participating in the Council for Inclusive Capitalism with Rothschilds, the Rockefeller Foundation, and large banks.

• The world depopulation plan is mentioned, with members of the Pontifical Academy for Life replaced by supporters of depopulation, contraception, and abortion. The Holy See's support for vaccines is linked to a 2011 headline "Depopulation Through Forced Vaccination: The Zero Carbon Solution!".

• Bill Gates is quoted as saying that with new vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive services (abortion and contraception), the world population could be lowered by "perhaps 10 or 15 percent". Gates is described as a shareholder in Black Rock, which finances pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines, and a main sponsor of the WHO.

• The Holy See reportedly held shares in pharmaceutical companies producing contraceptive drugs and invested in a fund that guaranteed high profits in geopolitical or pandemic crises. There are also claims of substantial funding from the communist regime in Beijing to the Vatican in exchange for silence on the persecution of Catholics and human rights violations.

• Emails from John Podesta and Hillary Clinton allegedly show an intention to oust Benedict XVI from the papacy to initiate a "new springtime of the Church" that would be progressivist and globalist, which happened with Benedict's resignation and Bergoglio's election. The B'nai B'rith is also implicated in dictating the direction of the Church's "renewal".

• Jorge Mario Bergoglio is described as "carrying out the task entrusted to him by the globalist elite, which wants him to be the liquidator of the Catholic Church and the founder of a philanthropic and ecumenical sect of Masonic inspiration" to constitute a Universal Religion supporting the New Order.

III. Dr. David Cartland: The correlation between the covid death “peak” in 2020 and midazolam use is truly damning by Rhoda Wilson

• Dr. David Cartland: The correlation between the covid death “peak” in 2020 and midazolam use is truly damning by Rhoda Wilson Dr. David Cartland observed that many patients labeled as "covid cases" in 2020 were not suffering from the disease but rather other conditions, leading to concerns about how deaths were classified. He stated that his daily experience contradicted BBC footage of fear and exaggeration, as his GP service was often at 50% capacity and a pop-up hospital received no patients at the alleged peak.

• Cartland asserted that certain NHS practices, rather than the alleged disease itself, contributed to increased mortality. These practices included blanket "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" (DNAR) orders and premature use of end-of-life medications.

• Blanket "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" notices were often issued without discussion for elderly, co-morbid patients and those deemed "not for admission". Mass discharges of patients not medically fit were rapidly performed to clear beds for expected Covid admissions that never came.

• There was a "disturbing gung-ho practice" of writing patients up for end-of-life medicines prescribed in advance, "just in case". These drugs, normally for distressing symptom management in the last hours of life, were used prematurely and over-zealously, "hastening death in people who weren't in the dying phase".

• High doses and rapid titrations of end-of-life drugs were the norm, often given secondarily to treatment-escalation plans issued by doctors for those deemed "not for admission". This led to a low ceiling of care, including withdrawal of fluids, nutrition, and basic oral care.

• Drugs like remdesivir were used as therapy for covid patients soon after the "jab roll-out," adding to mortality due to acute renal failure and other issues. This occurred despite the availability of safe and natural options that were shunned to maintain the validity of emergency use authorization.

• Pre-emptive invasive ventilation was carried out on people with patent airways as a precautionary measure, along with non-invasive ventilation. High ventilation pressures were used, leading to pneumothorax (lung collapse), and high-dose synergistic respiratory depressants and immunosuppressants (midazolam/diamorphine and dexamethasone) were administered in ICUs, leading to iatrogenic harms.

• The correlation between the "covid death peak" and midazolam use is described as "truly damning". The cocktail of midazolam and diamorphine, and the timing of syringe driver set-ups, were administered as people succumbed to various illnesses, even if they were not in the dying phase.

• Many basic treatments for alleged coronavirus symptoms, such as steroid inhalers, vitamin D, and hydroxychloroquine, had a strong evidence base and showed rapid improvement in patients, but were shunned. The "vaccine" was used under emergency-use authorization, and to maintain this, no other treatments (new or repurposed) could be available, or the EUA would be invalid.

• This policy led to the quashing and censorship of cheap, natural, or repurposed supplements or medicines for their efficacy. There is considered to be a strong case for iatrogenic harm in a number of areas due to the pandemic policy and medical approach.

IV. False flags are occurring almost daily now by Rhoda Wilson

• False flags are occurring almost daily now by Rhoda Wilson The term "false flag" originates from sailing ships flying a fake flag to deceive opposing navies, and has been used throughout history in various forms. Dr. Vernon Coleman states that "False flag operations are occurring almost daily now".

• History is full of false flag operations, including the Trojan horse and ancient Egyptian deceptions. In Rome, the church faked a document to gain the right to create European kings.

• The Spanish-American Civil War began after President McKinley lied that the USS Maine was sunk by a Spanish mine, when investigations later showed it was an internal explosion.

• Hitler was a "great believer in false flag operations", using the Reichstag fire in 1933 to blame communists and establish control, and in 1939, arranging attacks on German targets to blame Poland and start World War II.

• President Roosevelt allegedly lied about the Pearl Harbor attack being unprovoked, knowing about the attack but wanting Japanese ships to sink and Americans to die to create an excuse for US entry into World War II.

• In 1953, the UK and US used "Operation Ajax" to overthrow an Iranian regime that had nationalized oil fields, involving machine-gunning civilians and attacking a mosque.

• Declassified files show the US tried to provoke a war with Cuba in 1962. In 1967, the CIA ship Liberty was bombed by unmarked Israeli planes, an attack that President Johnson is now accepted to have ordered, designed to look like an Egyptian attack to kill American sailors.

• President Clinton launched missile attacks against Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998, widely alleged to be a distraction from the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

• The attacks on American targets on September 11, 2001, are "very widely believed" to have been arranged or known about by Americans. Both Americans and British leaders are accused of lying about "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq as an excuse for invasion, calling it a "massive false flag operation".

• Global warming is described as a "huge confidence trick" designed to control people and prepare them for Net Zero, the Great Reset, and a new Agenda.

• The Y2K "fraud or false flag operation" was allegedly created and maintained by software promoters who sold solutions and made $6 billion from the "nonsense" that computers would stop functioning.

• The Covid pandemic is presented as the "biggest false flag of all time", beginning in 2020.

V. Feminists Are Begging for Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them for Everything by Brandon Smith

• Feminists Are Begging for Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them for Everything by Brandon Smith A rule that has remained true for generations regarding the division between sexes is that men are held accountable for everything, while women accept accountability for nothing. Modern Western women are described as having a serious problem taking responsibility when things go wrong.

• The feminist movement is said to be built entirely around the notion that women can weaponize their victimhood as a means to control society. Women are taught from an early age that they are victims of men, society, patriarchy, religion, biology, and circumstance.

• Feminism is identified as the "KEY movement that has undermined the success of western culture". It is blamed for leading to the destruction of the nuclear family, which is considered the most important factor in a healthy nation.

• The article references a New York Times essay titled 'Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back', which the author finds both hilarious and depressing in its explanation of the decline in Western relationships. The NYT author recalls a time when men were "easy targets for exploitation," and describes the dynamic as having "quietly collapsed".

• The author states that the "Sex And The City" era, born from the sexual revolution of second-wave feminism, glorified female promiscuity and greed as the ultimate expression of women's empowerment. The idea was to turn women's early adult years into a "Dionysian orgy," giving away sex to men with looks and money in hopes of trapping a "lifetime pay-pig".

• Women are said to be on a "biological clock," which is why marriage was historically the primary concern for them. The idea of "wasting their 20s giving away their bodies for nothing" was unthinkable insanity, leading to decades of misery as "lonely old maids".

• A "sense of panic" is emerging among women who "bought into the feminist con game," as they realize men are no longer chasing them. The trend of single men refusing to enter the dating world has skyrocketed.

• Recent surveys show that 63% of young men ages 18-29 are single, and around 30% of men have not been sexually active for a year or more. In 1980, 60% of adults were married by age 25, but today, only 20% are.

• Men are exiting relationships and marriage at a record pace, and since men are the initiators of relationships, women are starting to "feel the pinch". The latest data predicts that 45% of women ages 25 to 44 will be single and childless by 2030, "and not necessarily by choice".

• The author argues that the New York Times continues to blame men for the "female loneliness epidemic" and relationship decline, while never asking why men are exhausted or what they think or feel. This demonstrates feminism's tendency to blame men while simultaneously asking them to return.

• Men are described as especially wary of women with "baggage" because women initiate 70% of breakups and divorces, and feminist influence has made divorce easier and more lucrative for women. Older women tend to have more baggage, making men less likely to pursue serious relationships with them.

• Western women have been taught to "party in their 20s" and pursue serious relationships in their 30s or 40s, meaning they ignore their best prospects for at least a decade and enter the relationship market when their "marriage value is lowest".

• Men are "no longer tolerating the concept of the sexual revolution" and do not want to take chances on women who believe promiscuity is a virtue. Statistically, women who are promiscuous are said to lack discernment, connection ability, self-respect, and mental stability.

• Third-Wave Feminists are accused of spending the last 20 years telling men they are "pure evil for being masculine and wanting to chase women," leading men to stop chasing them and find other endeavors like careers and hobbies. If women want men to return, they should "APOLOGIZE for all those years of slander".

• Modern women have "greatly overestimated the usefulness of sex as a bartering tool for securing a man". To make a man stay, women need to show love and respect, "not just what's inside your pants".

• Men are "far more conditioned to be alone than women are," as women are "communal creatures" who rely on constant interactions and group inclusion. In a "battle of who can endure loneliness longer, men will win".

• Modern women's claims that men are afraid of approaching them or are "weak" are described as "jabs at the male ego designed to make men feel ashamed for distancing themselves from feminists". In reality, men value peace above all else, and since feminists offer the opposite, they have no value to men.

• Feminism, like all Marxist movements, is "obsessed with power," driven by a desire for control over their own lives and the world. The author asserts that feminist empowerment is a fantasy based on institutional leverage that men allow them to have, and women "have no power and you never will".

• If feminists want men's attention again, they "will have to stop being feminists".

VI. Good Moneys: 100%-Reserve Gold, Stock-Based Money by James Anthony

• Good Moneys: 100%-Reserve Gold, Stock-Based Money by James Anthony From July 1921 to July 1929, politicians caused "Great Depression I" by inflating money by 62%. From August 2008 through April 2022, they caused "Great Depression II" by inflating money by 303%.

• Under fractional-reserve gold standards, politicians granted bankers an unconstitutional privilege to create and loan out money not 100% backed by saved assets. This practice led to booms followed by busts, where producers made unsustainable investments.

• When busts occurred, more people would not pay back loans, or withdraw savings, causing banks to fail and rapidly destroying some of the created money. This led to crisis deflation, where money bought more but borrowers earned less, and loan contracts didn't adjust.

• Fractional-reserve dollars allowed "crony-socialist politicians" to spend more, give cronies more favors, and rake in more donations. These booms bought votes, and busts enlarged governments.

• While fractional reserves caused deprivations, gold standards brought helpful natural deflation. Gold's purchasing power gradually increased, allowing people to save gold-backed money and later purchase more products.

• For many decades, gold-backed money increased in value 2.1% to 2.4% per year. The author proposes that congressmen and presidents could immediately set the value of the dollar equivalent to a fixed weight of gold.

• Alternatively, state politicians could create gold moneys by offering gold warehousing and transaction processing, which has been enacted in Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. Private companies should also be free to compete to provide these services more efficiently.

• Another option is to immediately repeal legal tender laws, tax laws, and other laws interfering with 100%-reserve moneys, allowing producers to develop competing moneys.

• 100%-reserve gold is presented as a constitutional money that will no longer deprive people of property. It is also suitable to be coined and have a regulated weight.

• This system worked well in the Dutch Republic from 1609 through the late 1770s, eliminating boom-bust government money error cycles and increasing purchasing power.

• Bitcoin as money would lack gold's history of use, legal support, and the specific lessons learned from using gold, starting out behind gold in asset value.

• Stock-based money is proposed to eliminate error cycles and increase purchasing power the fastest. Stocks, representing ownership of businesses, would determine all assets' potential value.

• Under a stock-based money system, stocks would be bought with stock-based money, not bank-created money or "on margin" using broker-created money. This would prevent borrowers from taking other investors on "wild rides up and down" and reduce stock price inflation.

• If a nation's government limited the use of stock-based money, its people would attract much less investment, thereby limiting the government's own power.

• When money is made of stocks, the proportion of world assets invested in productive properties would roughly double, ushering in a "new most-'golden' age". The author concludes that people would do "far better when we use our money for ourselves" instead of politicians.

VII. How the Fed Made Housing Unaffordable by Ryan McMaken

• How the Fed Made Housing Unaffordable by Ryan McMaken Donald Trump and his allies complain that the central bank is not inflating the money supply enough, with Bill Pulte (Trump’s appointee to the Federal Housing and Finance Administration) urging the Fed to force down interest rates. Pulte's comments demonstrate adherence to the standard inflationist model of monetary policy.

• Pulte publicly claims that lowering interest rates makes homes more affordable, but the source argues that the Fed’s easy-money policy of recent decades has relentlessly increased home prices. This is attributed to the Fed’s asset purchases, interest rate policy, and monetary inflation.

• There is a clear inverse relationship between interest rates and home prices. Falling interest rates lead to more home purchases and higher prices, which benefits real estate agents through higher commissions.

• Falling interest rates slightly precede rising home prices, suggesting a causal relationship. When mortgage rates are low, it is easier to afford monthly payments, leading to more potential buyers for a house.

• In the modern context of inflationary fiat currency, lower interest rates are typically fueled by new money creation, and this monetary inflation drives more asset price inflation. Central banks "set" lower interest rates through open market operations that increase the money supply.

• Falling interest rates are a manifestation of monetary inflation, which often shows up as asset price inflation, especially in home prices. This also reflects in consumer price inflation, which rose to forty-year highs in 2022.

• The Federal Reserve has been deliberately and specifically meddling with home prices since Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan sought to inflate a housing bubble to exit the 2001 recession. This intervention reached "never-before-seen levels" in 2009 when the central bank directly bought trillions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities (MBSs).

• The Fed bought MBSs to force down mortgage rates and inflate MBS prices as a bailout for major commercial banks facing catastrophic declines in their mortgage portfolios. The Fed's stockpile of mortgage assets continues to inflate home prices by creating artificial demand for mortgages.

• When the 2007 housing crash began, the Fed acted to bail out Wall Street by buying MBS assets, which turned around the downward trend in housing prices. The Fed bought more MBSs in 2013 and 2014 to further "stimulate" asset prices and force down mortgage rates.

• When the Fed allowed some assets to roll off its balance sheet in 2019, home prices moderated, but a new buying frenzy in response to the Covid panic led to historic speed in surging home prices. The rate at which the Fed allows assets to roll off is purposely slow to prevent significant drops in home prices, prioritizing Wall Street's concerns.

• Housing affordability hit a multi-decade low, and the average age of homeowners surged. According to the Atlanta Fed’s affordability index, affordability fell 45 percent since 2012, with a precipitous decline starting in early 2021.

• The homeownership rate has fallen by six percent since 2004, despite the Fed's inflation-fueled efforts to drive down mortgage rates. The money supply has increased by 231 percent since the Fed began buying mortgages in 2009.

• Central bankers cannot simply inflate nonstop to please real estate agents and politicians without imposing the devastating economic effects of price inflation, as monetary inflation is limited by the political realities of price inflation.

• Rising home prices come with higher down payments, property taxes, and insurance costs, which cannot all be rolled into mortgages. For many, monthly payments rise even in a low-interest-rate environment.

VIII. Our People or 'America'?: Looking Beyond Trump by Mark Weber

• Our People or 'America'?: Looking Beyond Trump by Mark Weber Donald Trump's rise to power is primarily an expression of deep and growing unhappiness among Americans with the state of the country. The Trump-MAGA movement voices the "pent-up rage of millions — above all, White middle class and working Americans — who have been ignored and belittled by their political leaders, and who have been made to feel like strangers in their own country".

• Trump is credited with shaking things up and pushing Americans to acknowledge uncomfortable realities that those in power wished to ignore. He has prompted reconsideration of issues like birthright citizenship and "affirmative action" policies that discriminate against White citizens.

• Trump and MAGA movement leaders believe that "Making America Great Again" does not require a revolution but only getting rid of "bad people" who have wrecked the country. As a reactionary protest movement, they focus on identifying and removing enemies from power and influence.

• The source argues that the Trump-MAGA movement "has no coherent, self-consistent worldview or historical outlook of its own" to replace the prevailing ideology of the past 80 years. This results in a vague vision of a "great" and "winning" America.

• MAGA Republicans complain about "identity politics" as "divisive" and "racist," but Trump's own campaign routinely practiced "identity politics" with appeals to Blacks, Hispanics, and Jews promising benefits to those groups.

• For example, Trump's 2020 "Platinum Plan" promised making "Juneteenth" a national holiday and federal programs to increase capital access and create businesses in Black communities. During the 2024 election cycle, both Trump and Harris campaigns made "identity politics" appeals to Jews.

• While Trump and MAGA Republicans reject anti-White policies, they do not have an explicitly pro-White outlook. Instead, they believe or pretend to believe that "race does not matter" and that America is immune from biological and historical realities.

• The author states that the drastic racial-cultural transformation of the US over the past 80 years has "profoundly changed everything". In the years after WWII, the US population was 90% European American, and Whites were a majority in every large city. Today, only a handful of large US cities retain a White majority, and the US population is, or soon will be, majority non-White.

• Many White Americans and conservatives placed hope in Ronald Reagan's "Let's Make America Great Again" slogan in the 1980s. Like Trump, Reagan ignored race, and the country's "demographic and cultural de-Europeanization continued during the Reagan years at a brisk pace".

• The author argues that "what's important is not victory for a candidate or a party, but solid, purposeful policies for our people based on a coherent worldview grounded in reality".

• Even if all illegal immigration stopped and every illegal immigrant were deported, the racial "third-worldization" of the US, or its "de-Europeanization," would continue.

• Trump thanked "African Americans, Hispanic Americans, [and] Asian Americans" for their support in his inaugural address, but made no mention of the "much more important, indeed, decisive support he received from White Americans". This "oversight" is attributed to the "delusional assumption" that White America is America.

• For over 80 years, White Americans have been subjected to a "systematic, organized campaign of social conditioning that promotes a poisonously distorted portrayal of life and history" through media and education. This campaign has succeeded in persuading most White Americans, including Trump supporters, that "race does not or should not matter".

• The author believes that the real-life consequences of the US's racial, cultural, and social transformation impose "unequivocal limits on the actual, lasting achievements of a Trump government". Within ten years, it will be obvious that the MAGA vision of a "Golden Age" for America is delusional.

• As White Americans become an ever smaller part of the US population, they will be "increasingly forced to acknowledge their declining influence and status," and will be compelled to face the consequences of living as a dwindling minority in their former country. Only then will large numbers of White Americans begin to organize to battle for their rights and interests.

• A "great change in attitudes among White Americans is coming," which can happen quickly if it aligns with dormant sensibilities. The example of the American Revolution is given, where colonists' identity shifted from British subjects to a new identity as White people of the 13 colonies.

• Despite decades of egalitarian propaganda, most White Americans still have an "instinctive sense of 'Whiteness'" and realize, however unclearly, that there is no secure and hopeful future for them in a non-White, Third-World society. Their behavior shows they prefer to live and associate with people like themselves.

• The author notes that no openly pro-White public figure holds elected office at the federal level, because most White Americans accept that "forthrightly affirming our heritage and identity is somehow shameful or embarrassing".

• For the foreseeable future, pro-White candidates must be careful how they express themselves, not alarming voters afraid of "racism" but also not betraying communitarian interests. However, Trump-MAGA shows millions of White Americans will vote for candidates rejecting anti-White egalitarian policies.

• As demographic trends continue, more White Americans will support candidates who appeal with a "White version of 'identity politics'," highlighting the harm of DEI and "affirmative action" policies to White American interests.

• The most pressing task is to "awaken the suppressed but slumbering self-awareness, confidence, and latent strength of our people". The focus should be on the well-being and future of "our people," not on propping up the multi-cultural US.

• The author believes "we are already prevailing" on the intellectual front. Adversaries are "neo-conservative and neo-liberal apologists for the prevailing democratic-capitalist order," who are on the defensive because their system is "ever more obviously failing".

• These "champions of 'free speech' and 'tolerance'" are accused of banning books, websites, and podcasts they deem offensive, and denouncing ethno-nationalism in Hungary and Poland while defending it in Israel. Their slogans are seen as "lackluster and uninteresting," making them appear as "ineffectual hypocrites" to younger generations.

• The rise of "capable, smart, and articulate younger White activists, publicists, writers, and organizers" is cited as an encouraging reason for hope. These individuals are producing ever more and better quality videos, podcasts, websites, essays, and books.

• The guiding spirit in this struggle should be "abiding loyalty, love and devotion for the heritage and future of our own people," sustained by a vision of a secure future for children and unborn generations, rather than loathing or hatred of others.

IX. Trump’s ‘Antiwar’ Myth and the Zionist Reality by Jose Alberto Nino

• Trump’s ‘Antiwar’ Myth and the Zionist Reality by Jose Alberto Nino Donald Trump’s "America First" message promised an end to foreign entanglements, but his aggressive Iran policy tells a different story. His administration's airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21, 2025, further underscore this contradiction.

• Trump's claim to be an antiwar president has been a cornerstone of his political brand, repeatedly stating, "Great nations do not fight endless wars" and promising to stop wars, not start them. However, this rhetoric is presented as a "smokescreen," especially regarding Iran, which has been the "singular focus of Trump’s most aggressive, interventionist actions".

• Trump's hostility toward Iran's alleged nuclear ambitions is well-documented, making his opposition clear before his 2016 campaign. In his 2011 book, Time to Get Tough, Trump wrote that "Iran’s nuclear program must be stopped–by any and all means necessary. Period".

• Trump consistently criticized the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, describing it as "a disaster" that could lead to "a nuclear holocaust".

• Trump's actual policy toward Iran was one of "relentless escalation," with the "maximum pressure" sanctions campaign launched after his unilateral withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018. He called the deal "the worst deal ever" and ordered the immediate reimposition of sanctions targeting Iran’s energy, petrochemical, and financial sectors.

• These sanctions were among the harshest in modern history, designed to "bring Iran’s oil exports to zero," denying the regime its principal source of revenue. Trump's administration continued adding sanctions, targeting Iran’s central bank, space program, and the Supreme Leader’s inner circle.

• In October 2019, Trump sanctioned the Iranian construction sector, linking it to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which he designated as a foreign terrorist organization. This was the first time the US labeled another nation’s military as an FTO.

• The most dramatic example of Trump’s hawkishness was the January 2020 assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani via drone strike in Baghdad, which brought the US and Iran "to the brink of open war". Iran responded with missile strikes on US bases.

• Even after this near-miss, Trump reportedly sought options for military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities in the final months of his first term, prevented only by the intervention of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley and other senior advisers. Milley warned, "If you do this, you’re gonna have a f***ing war".

• Trump's second term has seen a return to this pattern, with the resurrection of the "maximum pressure" campaign and a memorandum to reimpose and expand sanctions on Iran.

• As tensions with Iran and Israel escalated, Trump privately approved plans for US military strikes on Iran, moving carrier strike groups, bombers, and advanced fighters into position. He informed aides he approved attack plans but was holding off for Iran to abandon its nuclear program.

• This behavior is described as the "playbook of a hawk," not an antiwar president. A report by The Independent states Trump has been "increasingly shunning the isolationist advisers...in favor of a trio of hawkish voices" arguing for action against Iran.

• Trump broke his silence after Iran’s missile strike on a US base in Qatar on June 23, 2025, signaling he did not intend to retaliate, calling it a "very weak response" and portraying it as a step toward de-escalation. However, it is stated that Israel is still carrying out strikes in Iran, and its escalations may be the "first act of a broader regime change campaign".

• The author concludes that Trump's antiwar messaging is designed to win votes, not guide policy. The "real story is told by his actions, his appointments, and his donors".

• The pro-Israel lobby has spent over $230 million supporting Trump since 2020. His cabinet is "stacked with figures who see Israeli interests and U.S. military intervention as inseparable," such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

• Trump's Iran policy is portrayed not as an exception but as the "reality behind the illusion" of his antiwar brand. His presidency is described as a "smokescreen for a pro-Zionist, hawkish agenda that has brought the United States and the Middle East closer to war, not peace".

X. Babylonian London Continues to Rage Against the Sovereignty of God by Jeremy James

• Babylonian London Continues to Rage Against the Sovereignty of God by Jeremy James The author raises the question, "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?" (Psalm 2:1), stating it is of paramount importance to consider God's plan for mankind. This is interpreted as men rejecting God's authority and scheming against Him and His Son.

• The Psalm describes God's intention to give humanity a world ruler, a king, who will reign forever in Jerusalem, and states that pathetic attempts to oppose God will be laughably ineffective. Those who continue to oppose God's holy will "will be destroyed".

• The document asserts that the spirit of Nimrod rules London, and that from Nimrod's time, men have sought a world ruler imbued with Satan's spiritual power and character. This desire, put into hearts by Satan, is said to be used to prepare for the Antichrist's arrival.

• The author states that while Satan can only be in one place at a time, many believe his "thronos" (throne) today is in one of three locations: the Vatican in Rome, the 'Square Mile' in London, or 'the district of Columbia' (Washington D.C.). All three are said to have exerted considerable power and enjoy complete independence from their host nations.

• London emerges as the strongest candidate for Satan's seat due to its extensive occult symbolism and esoteric iconography. The city is considered the modern counterpart of Heliopolis, the Egyptian 'City of the Sun'.

• John Todd, a former high-ranking member of the Illuminati, claimed to only take orders from the Rothschild Tribunal in London, who believe they receive orders directly from Lucifer. He stated that they live there because they believe "Lucifer is most fluent" in England.

• The "Christ-hating elite who rule London" are accused of imposing a sun-centered, materialistic model of the universe on all nations. This includes promoting a ball-shaped earth, particle physics, the notion of "smashed" atoms, gravity as "false notion that matter attracts matter," and dinosaurs.

• These ideas (e.g., dinosaurs and an ancient Earth) were designed to undermine trust in the Bible's veracity and portray creation as the outcome of "countless existential accidents and random events". Evolution is described as another "absurd parlor game" devised by the London elite.

• London is described as the worldwide center of Freemasonry, a "Luciferian cult which rejected the deity of Christ and taught men to believe that the world had always existed". Freemasonry is said to obviate the need to account for creation, requiring only a "Great Architect of the Universe".

• The ruling elite in London exported Freemasonry and the "sinister innovation" of the "central bank" to all corners of the Empire and the world. The central bank, a private institution, enabled the rich and powerful to channel liquidity and credit selectively to those they chose or ruin those they opposed.

• The Bank of England (1694) was the first central bank, and the Grand Lodge of England (1717) was the first centralized governing body of Freemasonry, leading the author to conclude that Satan located his "thronos" in London by the 18th century.

• After World War Two, the "London headquarters" made extensive preparations to impose a more effective system of social control, including a program of demoralization to overthrow the pre-war, Biblically-based mindset and social conventions.

• This demoralization included the Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Act 1965, decriminalization of homosexuality (Sexual Offences Act 1967), and termination of unborn children (Abortion Act 1967). These changes occurred with little public opposition.

• The Tavistock Institute is claimed to have created "good rebels" (The Beatles, 1960) and "bad rebels" (The Rolling Stones, 1962) rock groups to disorient the public's perception of right and wrong. This music, with provocative lyrics, made the public believe that changes were inevitable and futile to oppose.

• The strategy for removing "just and equitable laws" involves creating "tragic cases" to persuade a gullible public that changing the law would avoid such "tragedies". This is seen in the context of legalizing abortion up to birth.

• The British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an article in its Journal of Medical Ethics in 2013 showing the establishment's willingness to permit the "Satanic argument" that "after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled".

• London, as "custodian of the new morality," is telling the world that the state must assert its right to decide who lives and who dies. All rights are said to be bestowed by the state, and individual utility is determined solely by the state.

• The author states that "Satanism is being legalized," and that "young witches of England" will now be able to sacrifice their first child under 'Reproductive Health' legislation. This "right" is expected to find its way into the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

• The author concludes that the world is at a stage similar to the time of Noah's Flood, where murder and violence are endemic, and humanity's heart is continually fixed in opposition to God's law. This "descent into Satanism" is catalyzed by the planned introduction of "assisted dying" in the UK.

• The "gang of Satanic pedophiles who control our modern democracies" are accused of aiming to "completely subvert everything that the LORD God has given us for our benefit". The author expresses doubt that most pastors and preachers will take a stand against this "fresh wave of wickedness," instead excusing their silence by elevating "tolerance," "diversity," and "inclusiveness" to Christian virtues.

XI. ☕️ UNIVERSAL DISJUNCTION ☙ Saturday, June 28, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 by Jeff Childers

• ☕️ UNIVERSAL DISJUNCTION ☙ Saturday, June 28, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 by Jeff Childers The article celebrates three "blockbuster" Supreme Court decisions, including one that is expected to change the legal landscape for generations, as a "magnificent triumph". The author expresses pleasure in stating "I told you so!".

• The Supreme Court decision on national injunctions is presented as a "bunker-buster" that limits their use, described as a "victory for President Trump". This decision means Trump's "entire agenda just received a mid-flight refueling".

• The majority's core holding was that the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not authorize district courts to issue nationwide injunctions because such relief lacks any founding-era analogue. Justice Barrett's opinion was deliberately maximalist, "burying it under two feet of British jurisprudence".

• Congressional Democrats, who previously complained about Biden-era national injunctions, called yesterday's holding "deplorable" and "a vile betrayal of our Constitution," which the author highlights as a double standard.

• Unhinged "BlueSkiers" reacted by profanely fantasizing about armed rebellion and screaming about red-state kidnappings. Yale Professor Mike Nitabach's post is cited as an example of this "decidedly non-professorial take".

• The decision means activist lawyers can no longer get midnight orders on behalf of all illegal aliens, but can still seek temporary deportation relief for specifically named individuals. They can also still litigate the merits of their cases and seek to certify class actions to get a national injunction for a certified class, though class certification is "much harder and more demanding".

• ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project deputy director Cody Wofsy stated that this will make it "more challenging, more complicated, potentially more expensive to seek orders that more broadly stop illegal government action" and "is watering down the power of federal courts to check government misconduct".

• The Supreme Court also sided with parental rights in a 6-3 decision, allowing Maryland parents (Muslim, Catholic, Ukrainian Orthodox) to opt their elementary-school-aged children out of instruction involving LGBTQ+ themes. This decision went "far beyond gross, pornographic artwork in library books" and targeted "LGBT indoctrination itself".

• Justice Alito wrote that the school board required teachers to instruct young children with storybooks explicitly contradicting parents' religious views and encourage teachers to correct children for "religious confusion". The holding was clear: schools cannot "indoctrinate" kids in socially experimental ideologies inconsistent with religious beliefs and "must provide notice and opt-outs".

• Justice Sotomayor complained that the majority's decision would lead to banning books on evolution or interfaith marriages, and possibly history itself. The author states that "A nation slowly regained its sanity".

• In another major First Amendment case, the Supreme Court upheld a Texas porn age verification law, despite "smut-peddlers" arguing it violated their First Amendment right to publish "perverted 'adult' material" and would "chill" adults' access.

• Justice Barrett, with seven children, rejected the argument that content-filtering software was sufficient, stating it was "far from foolproof" and that the "explosion of addiction to online porn has shown that content filtering isn’t working".

• The decision upholding Texas's age-verification law is seen as one of the "most consequential developments in the battle against porn addiction in decades". It implicitly validates the idea that porn is not neutral and can be harmful, shifting the argument to consent, mental health, and childhood protection rather than religion.

• An op-ed in the Washington Post by MIT professor Alex Byrne revealed that he co-wrote an anonymous HHS report on pediatric gender medicine that found "medical transition for minors is not empirically or ethically justified". He admitted that "cancel culture" contributed to the "collapse of medical safeguarding in the United States".

• Byrne noted the "euphemistic and often misleading" language used by the gender team, such as "gender-affirming top surgery" meaning radical body modification and patients regretting surgeries described as having "dynamic desires". This "linguistic circus" has the "Orwellian effect of making plain truths impossible to state".

• He pointed out that gender dysphoria is one of the only psychological diagnoses treated with permanent surgery and chemical interventions despite having "no observable clinical signs" and relying only on the patient's say-so. This op-ed, published in the WaPo, and Byrne's willingness to "out himself" are seen as evidence that the "censorship apparatus is failing" and the "progressive purity spiral is spiraling out of control".

• Tesla completed its first fully autonomous Model Y delivery ahead of schedule, meaning a new car delivered itself to its buyer for the first time in human history, without remote operators or road rage. This is described as a "major milestone" and a sign that "now we’re finally getting somewhere".

• The author highlights other significant events from the week: a 12-Day Middle East War ceasefire, a historic NATO defense spending agreement, a Rwanda-Congo peace deal, SCOTUS greenlighting third-country deportations and pinching LGBT school propaganda, a record-high stock market, new lower-court wins for the Trump Agenda, and Trump ending protected status for Haitians.

• A comment by "TriTorch" suggests that the heart is not merely a "crude mechanical device" or "pump" as taught, but a "single continuous muscle band, folded into a spiral" that works like a "vortex generator, creating suction and torque, not pressure". The actual movement of blood comes from "pressure differentials, electromagnetic flow, and coherent resonance".

• The heart creates a toroidal electromagnetic field that radiates six meters from the body, syncing with Earth, Sun, and living beings, acting as a "resonator," "tuner," and "conductor" that aligns cell rhythm, feels, remembers, emits, and responds to emotion, thought, light, sound, and breath.

• The HeartMath Institute has measured these fields for decades and knows the heart has more neuronal cells than parts of the brain, acting as a "second brain" where coherence transforms the nervous system. The author suggests that institutions teach the 400-year-old "fake heart pump lie" because if people knew the truth, they "would never accept statins or beta blockers again" and would understand that trauma, emotion, and disconnection break the heart field, not cholesterol.

• The current "business model" relies on "disrupted, inflamed, fragmented people who rely on drugs to survive," with the "fake heart pump lie" being central to it. The heart is described as "the instrument of your soul," which has been "hijacked by science that refuses to evolve".

XII. http://zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Babylonian%20London%20Continues%20to%20Rage%20Against%20the%20Sovereignty%20of%20God.pdf

• The author raises the question, "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?" (Psalm 2:1), stating it is of paramount importance to consider God's plan for mankind. This is interpreted as men rejecting God's authority and scheming against Him and His Son.

• The Psalm describes God's intention to give humanity a world ruler, a king, who will reign forever in Jerusalem, and states that pathetic attempts to oppose God will be laughably ineffective. Those who continue to oppose God's holy will "will be destroyed".

• The document asserts that the spirit of Nimrod rules London, and that from Nimrod's time, men have sought a world ruler imbued with Satan's spiritual power and character. This desire, put into hearts by Satan, is said to be used to prepare for the Antichrist's arrival.

• The author states that while Satan can only be in one place at a time, many believe his "thronos" (throne) today is in one of three locations: the Vatican in Rome, the 'Square Mile' in London, or 'the district of Columbia' (Washington D.C.). All three are said to have exerted considerable power and enjoy complete independence from their host nations.

• London emerges as the strongest candidate for Satan's seat due to its extensive occult symbolism and esoteric iconography. The city is considered the modern counterpart of Heliopolis, the Egyptian 'City of the Sun'.

• John Todd, a former high-ranking member of the Illuminati, claimed to only take orders from the Rothschild Tribunal in London, who believe they receive orders directly from Lucifer. He stated that they live there because they believe "Lucifer is most fluent" in England.

• The "Christ-hating elite who rule London" are accused of imposing a sun-centered, materialistic model of the universe on all nations. This includes promoting a ball-shaped earth, particle physics, the notion of "smashed" atoms, gravity as "false notion that matter attracts matter," and dinosaurs.

• These ideas (e.g., dinosaurs and an ancient Earth) were designed to undermine trust in the Bible's veracity and portray creation as the outcome of "countless existential accidents and random events". Evolution is described as another "absurd parlor game" devised by the London elite.

• London is described as the worldwide center of Freemasonry, a "Luciferian cult which rejected the deity of Christ and taught men to believe that the world had always existed". Freemasonry is said to obviate the need to account for creation, requiring only a "Great Architect of the Universe".

• The ruling elite in London exported Freemasonry and the "sinister innovation" of the "central bank" to all corners of the Empire and the world. The central bank, a private institution, enabled the rich and powerful to channel liquidity and credit selectively to those they chose or ruin those they opposed.

• The Bank of England (1694) was the first central bank, and the Grand Lodge of England (1717) was the first centralized governing body of Freemasonry, leading the author to conclude that Satan located his "thronos" in London by the 18th century.

• After World War Two, the "London headquarters" made extensive preparations to impose a more effective system of social control, including a program of demoralization to overthrow the pre-war, Biblically-based mindset and social conventions.

• This demoralization included the Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Act 1965, decriminalization of homosexuality (Sexual Offences Act 1967), and termination of unborn children (Abortion Act 1967). These changes occurred with little public opposition.

• The Tavistock Institute is claimed to have created "good rebels" (The Beatles, 1960) and "bad rebels" (The Rolling Stones, 1962) rock groups to disorient the public's perception of right and wrong. This music, with provocative lyrics, made the public believe that changes were inevitable and futile to oppose.

• The strategy for removing "just and equitable laws" involves creating "tragic cases" to persuade a gullible public that changing the law would avoid such "tragedies". This is seen in the context of legalizing abortion up to birth.

• The British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an article in its Journal of Medical Ethics in 2013 showing the establishment's willingness to permit the "Satanic argument" that "after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled".

• London, as "custodian of the new morality," is telling the world that the state must assert its right to decide who lives and who dies. All rights are said to be bestowed by the state, and individual utility is determined solely by the state.

• The author states that "Satanism is being legalized," and that "young witches of England" will now be able to sacrifice their first child under 'Reproductive Health' legislation. This "right" is expected to find its way into the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

• The author concludes that the world is at a stage similar to the time of Noah's Flood, where **murder and violence are endemic, and humanity's heart is continually fixed in opposition to to Christian virtues.

Here are 40 key takeaway points from the sources, formatted as requested:

1. Babylonian London Continues to Rage Against the Sovereignty of God by Jeremy James: The author's central premise is that London is the modern epicenter of a spiritual war against God. This war is described as a raging by the heathen and people imagining a vain thing, as questioned in Psalm 2:1.

2. God's Plan vs. Human Rebellion: Psalm 2 outlines God's plan, stating that men will reject His authority and scheme against Him and His Son. Despite these efforts, God will install Jesus Christ as a world ruler in Jerusalem, who will put down all opposition.

3. Satan's Nature and His Servants: Satan is presented as a created being, lacking divine attributes, who has tricked his servants with lies. These servants, infatuated with Satan, exult in their alienated state and challenge God's will.

4. The Spirit of Nimrod in London: Since the time of Nimrod, men have desired a world ruler imbued with Satan's spiritual power and character. This desire, implanted by Satan, is used to prepare for the Antichrist's arrival.

5. Satan's Earthly Thronos: Jesus confirmed Satan's throne was in Pergamum in western Turkey. Today, many believe Satan's thronos is in the Vatican, London's 'Square Mile', or Washington D.C., all enjoying independence from their host nations' authority.

6. London as Satan's Primary Seat: London emerges as the strongest candidate for Satan's seat due to its extensive occult symbolism and esoteric iconography. John Todd, a former Illuminati member, stated that the Rothschild Tribunal in London, which he took orders from, believes Lucifer is most fluent there.

7. London as Modern Heliopolis: London is concluded to serve as the modern counterpart of Heliopolis, the Egyptian 'City of the Sun', also known as On or Beth-Shemesh. This is supported by London's topographical features and monuments alluding to Osirian mythology and Babylonian astrology.

8. London's Occult Dedications: London is covered with monuments ritually dedicated according to the occult principle "As above, so below," meaning they are made to reflect the heavens on earth. The city's esoteric iconography includes a massive 'Solar Barque' formed from nine designated sacred monuments.

9. London's Role in Shaping the Modern World: London's prominence in shaping the modern world is attributed to a "Christ-hating elite" who rule the city. This elite imposed a sun-centered, materialistic model of the universe and a ball-shaped earth on all nations.

10. Scientific Deceptions from London: Lies such as particle physics, the "smashed" atom, and gravity were developed in London and imposed globally. The British Museum's dinosaur claims were devised to support the "bogus notion" of an earth millions or billions of years old.

11. Undermining Biblical Truth: A major goal of the London elite is to undermine trust in the Bible's veracity. They aim to portray Creation as an inexplicable outcome of countless existential accidents and random events.

12. The Deception of Evolution: The "absurd parlor game known as 'Evolution'" was another lie devised by the London elite to assert that man evolved from a simian ancestor. This charade was concocted in London, with assistance from Masonic colleagues in France, Germany, and the Netherlands.

13. Freemasonry as a Luciferian Cult: London was the worldwide center of Freemasonry, which is described as a Luciferian cult that rejected the deity of Christ. This cult taught men to believe that the world had always existed, thereby obviating the need to account for creation.

14. Export of Luciferian Cult and Central Banks: The ruling elite in London exported this highly secretive cult to all corners of the Empire and eventually to every country on earth. They did this in tandem with "central banks," which are private institutions masquerading as impartial brokers to channel liquidity and credit.

15. London as the Root of "Poisonous Hydra": The first central bank, The Bank of England, was founded in London in 1694, and the Grand Lodge of England, the first centralized Masonic body, was founded there in 1717. This established London as the center where Satan planted the "poisonous hydra" destined to control the entire earth.

16. London as the World Headquarters for Rebellion: The rebels in the "secret war" against God appear to have established their world headquarters in London. From this location, they coordinate their programs for imposing a "new world order".

17. Global Control from London: London dictates instructions to various regions, ensuring its plan unfolds as intended, even for countries perceived as "rogue" like North Korea or Iran. The rebels intend to keep their hand hidden until the Antichrist is installed, to avoid provoking a mass awakening.

18. Post-WWII Social Control Programs: After World War Two, London made extensive preparations to impose a more effective system of social control on the general population. This included a program of demoralization aimed at thoroughly overthrowing the pre-war mindset and Biblical social conventions.

19. Demoralization through Legal Changes: This program led to remarkable changes in legal provisions, such as the abolition of the death penalty (1965), decriminalization of homosexuality (1967), and abortion (1967). These changes occurred with little public opposition.

20. Demoralization through Rebel Music: The Tavistock Institute created "good rebels" rock group The Beatles (1960) and "bad rebels" rock group The Rolling Stones (1962), introducing "rebel music". This music, with provocative lyrics, had a disorienting effect on the public's perception of right and wrong, tricking them into believing changes were inevitable.

21. Formula for Implementing Societal Change: The British public's failure to say 'No' to these changes proved to be the formula for implementing similar changes in other countries. This formula included inducements like promiscuous sex and drug-induced euphoria, designed to break down resistance.

22. Ongoing Demoralization Program: The program of demoralization has been running continuously since the late 1950s, with Europe and North America as chief targets. The pace of change accelerates as citizens gradually surrender their ability to oppose this rampant decay.

23. Decriminalization of Infanticide in the UK: The UK recently demonstrated this "rampant decay" by becoming the first country in modern history to decriminalize, in principle, the murder of a full-term baby. The House of Commons voted to approve the "abortion" of an unborn child up to the moment of birth, an act regarded as the defining trait of a depraved society.

24. Abolition of "Reproductive Rights" Pretense: Masonic lawmakers in Westminster decided to entirely dispense with the legal fiction of "reproductive rights," under which abortion up to 24 weeks had been legalized. They now simply allow a woman, at any time and for any reason, to kill her unborn child, even at the moment of birth.

25. State Authority Over Life and Death: This horrifying development is an example of the Babylonian belief that the state alone, as the supreme ruler, has the moral authority to decide who lives and who dies. All rights are bestowed by the state, and an individual's utility is determined solely by the state.

26. Etymology of 'London': The name London is believed to hold special esoteric significance, interpreted as "El On Dione". This associates the city with El, the highest male god, and Dione, the goddess par excellence, in conjunction with On, the City of the Sun.

27. Precarious "Right to Life" Post-Birth: The "right to life" of an infant immediately after birth is considered just as precarious as its non-existent right before birth. An article published by the British Medical Journal in 2013 showed the establishment's willingness to permit this "Satanic argument" in a professional journal.

28. London as Custodian of "New Morality": London, acting as the custodian of a "new morality," is telling the world that the state must now assert its right to decide who lives and who dies. Other countries are expected to follow London's example, as they did with the legalization of abortion and homosexuality and the abolition of the death penalty in the 1960s.

29. Strategy of "Tragic Cases": A simple strategy for removing just and equitable laws involves creating "tragic cases" and persuading a gullible public that such "tragies" could be avoided by changing the law. This is used to lobby for amendments to allow things like "post-partum abortions".

30. Legalization of Satanism: The author asserts that Satanism is being legalized, allowing "young witches of England" to sacrifice their first child under "Reproductive Health" legislation. Infanticide is expected to become a "woman's right" and find its way into the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

31. Spread of Babylonian "New Morality": This "dreaded 'new morality,' the morality of Babylon," is being spread across the earth, with London leading the way. This aligns with the author's view of London as "Babylonian London".

32. Societal Descent into Satanism: The current societal state is described as a "downward spiral" where the human mind and heart are continually opposed to God's law, reflecting a "vile condition" similar to that described in Genesis 6:5 before the Flood. This descent into Satanism, where the state decides who lives and who dies, is being catalyzed by the planned introduction of "assisted dying" in the UK.

33. "Assisted Dying" as Satanic "Right": "Tragic cases" are being highlighted to convince the public that existing legal protections against "assisted dying" are untenable. The author argues that if there are "rights" in any of these new policies, they are rights to do what is most pleasing to Satan.

34. Control by "Satanic Pedophiles": The author claims that "Satanic pedophiles" control modern democracies and intend to completely subvert everything God has given for humanity's benefit. This aligns with the idea of a "rebellious people" described in Isaiah 30:9.

35. Criticism of Christian Leadership: The author criticizes pastors and preachers for their silence on these issues for decades. They are accused of likely continuing to excuse their silence by elevating "tolerance," "diversity," and "inclusiveness" to Christian virtues, thereby disguising and reinterpreting the Ten Commandments.

36. Lack of Opposition from the Church: The author believes it is "very unlikely" that the "so-called Christian church" will take a stand against this "fresh wave of wickedness". The vast majority are expected to continue doing "absolutely nothing".

37. The 'Canis Major' Asterism over London: A 'Canis Major' asterism, or star pattern, is depicted spanning central London. Its nodes consist of obelisks and prominent spires, suggesting an esoteric alignment.

38. The 'Orion [Nimrod] The Hunter' Asterism: An 'Orion [Nimrod] The Hunter' asterism is also depicted over central London. This visual representation is part of the "As above, so below" principle applied in London.

39. The 'Planets' Orbiting 'The Sun' in London: St Paul's Cathedral is identified as 'The Sun' in a map depicting 'The Planets' orbiting it in London. These 'planets' are represented by columns at various locations like Seven Dials (Saturn), Temple Church (Jupiter), Paternoster Square (Venus), and St Paul's (Mercury), and 'Seven Ages of Man' (Mars).

40. Geometrical Alignments in London: The text refers to specific distances and triangles formed by landmarks, such as a triangle connecting St Pancras Clock Tower, Holy Trinity Marylebone, and St James Clerkenwell. These geometrical alignments are presented as part of the deeper occult symbolism within London.

Here are 40 key takeaway points from the sources, formatted as requested:

1. ☕️ Universal Disjunction ☙ Saturday, June 28, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 by Jeff Childers: Three blockbuster Supreme Court decisions were released, one of which is predicted to change the legal landscape for generations. These decisions were part of a "week-ending wrap-up" that also included historic tech breakthroughs and purity spiral news.

   • "Turns out my predictions bore fruit, and today we dig into three blockbuster Supreme Court decisions, including the one that will change the legal landscape for generations".

   • "Plus, even more in the roundup: historic tech breakthroughs, purity spiral news, and a week-ending wrap-up".

2. The Supreme Court limited national injunctions, a decision hailed as a "magnificent triumph" for President Trump. This ruling ended the practice of judges "blasting back" with pseudo-presidential orders to countermand Trump's executive actions.

   • "All that fretful waiting and wondering whether SCOTUS would do the right thing or keep letting judges savage Trump’s agenda ended yesterday in magnificent triumph".

   • "Since Trump signed his very first executive order, judges have been blasting back with their own pseudo-presidential orders promptly countermanding him".

3. Prior to this Supreme Court decision, over 40 national injunctions were in place, freezing various Trump policies. A significant majority of these injunctions "were excreted from five blue federal districts (out of 90+)".

   • "There are currently over 40 national injunctions stopping that many Trump policies —a historic record— and nearly all of them were excreted from five blue federal districts (out of 90+)".

   • "Here, courtesy of Bloomberg News, is a small sample of Trump policies currently frozen solid by so-called national injunctions".

4. Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered the Supreme Court’s decision on national injunctions, an opinion described as "one of the most irascible, testy, and scolding decisions that ever emitted from the Court’s dark bowels". Her opinion was "deliberately maximalist," not merely reining in but burying the practice.

   • "And yesterday, the Supreme Court dropped its own bunker-buster, in the form of one of the most irascible, testy, and scolding decisions that ever emitted from the Court’s dark bowels, delivered unsweetly in her Mom Voice by no other than one Justice Amy Coney Barrett".

   • "Barrett’s opinion was deliberately maximalist — not just reining in the practice, but burying it under two feet of British jurisprudence and one of Justice Story’s discarded wigs".

5. The ruling has vast implications, providing a "mid-flight refueling" for Trump’s entire agenda. President Trump quickly promised that his administration would "promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis".

   • "The implications are vast; Trump’s entire agenda just received a mid-flight refueling".

   • "At yesterday’s impromptu press conference, President Trump promised that the administration will “promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis.”".

6. The majority opinion held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not authorize district courts to issue nationwide injunctions. This is because such relief "lacks any founding-era analogue".

   • "The majority’s core holding was crystalline, originalist, and nuclear: the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not authorize district courts to issue nationwide injunctions because such relief lacks any founding-era analogue".

   • "In yesterday’s order, the Supreme Court ended for all time one of the most abusive (or helpful, depending on your point of view) quasi-legal tools that district judges had in their judicial tool bags: the national injunction".

7. Congressional Democrats, who had previously complained about Biden-era national injunctions, called yesterday’s ruling "deplorable" and "a vile betrayal of our Constitution". This reaction was noted as an example of "double standards" by the author.

   • "Congressional Democrats, who ten minutes ago were complaining about Biden-era national injunctions, called yesterday’s holding overthrowing them “deplorable” and “a vile betrayal of our Constitution.”".

   • "If it weren’t for double standards, et cetera".

8. The Supreme Court affirmed that nothing in the Constitution or federal statute empowers district courts to override the Executive Branch through national injunctions. Justice Thomas further observed that even within the same district, one judge's orders do not bind other judges.

   • "As Justice Barrett observed from the first sentence of her order, nothing in the Constitution or federal statute empowers district courts to override the Executive Branch in this particular way".

   • "In concurrence, Justice Thomas pointed out that, even in the same district, one judge’s orders are not binding on any other judge in that district— so how could national injunctions magically bind judges in other districts?".

9. While the decision unleashes Trump’s policies, national injunctions also previously halted "most of Biden’s worst excesses," such as COVID mandates and student loan forgiveness. Justice Alito concurred, stating that if Congress desired courts to have this power, it could pass an authorizing law.

   • "As we celebrate the victorious unleashing of scores of Trump’s pent-up policies, we must also count the cost".

   • "National injunctions halted most of Biden’s worst excesses, like covid mandates, student loan forgiveness, and so on".

10. The ruling is not a complete ban on injunctions, as activist lawyers can still seek temporary deportation relief for specific "criminal" individuals. However, they can no longer obtain "midnight orders" on behalf of all other individuals nationwide who are not parties to their lawsuits.

    • "It isn’t a ban on injunctions, per se".

    • "Activist lawyers can still haul their wife-beating illegal aliens into court and get temporary deportation relief for that criminal. But they can no longer get midnight orders on behalf of all the other illegal aliens around the country who aren’t parties to their lawsuits".

11. Activists can still pursue litigation to get final decisions that a particular executive order or statute is unconstitutional, but the ruling limits the scope of temporary freezes. Freezes are now only applicable "as to the specifically named parties".

    • "They can still litigate the merits of their cases, seeking final decisions that a particular executive order or statute is unconstitutional— but they can’t get it frozen nationwide while the case unfolds".

    • "Just frozen as to the specifically named parties".

12. Activists can still seek to certify class actions to obtain national injunctions for a certified class. However, class certification is described as "much harder and more demanding" than obtaining a straight injunction.

    • "Activists can also still seek to certify class actions. If they can certify a class —and a slew of those types of emergency motions were filed yesterday in the wake of SCOTUS’s decision— then they can still get a national injunction for their certified class, which in many ways is similar to a regular nationwide injunction".

    • "The problem —and the reason why they haven’t tried it so far— is that class certification is much harder and more demanding even than getting a straight injunction".

13. Cody Wofsy of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project stated that the decision will make it "more challenging, more complicated, potentially more expensive to seek orders that more broadly stop illegal government action". He also remarked that it "is watering down the power of federal courts to check government misconduct".

    • “This is going to make it more challenging, more complicated, potentially more expensive to seek orders that more broadly stop illegal government action,” Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, correctly said".

    • “It is watering down the power of federal courts to check government misconduct”.

14. Despite criticisms, the author asserts that yesterday's decision did not "bestow imperial powers on the presidency". States retain the ability to bring cases seeking injunctive relief that is limited to their respective states.

    • "With all these other possible remedies, despite the lunatic ramblings of moronic Yale professors on BlueSky, yesterday’s decision did not bestow imperial powers on the presidency".

    • "States can still bring cases seeking injunctive relief for their states, limiting the effect to a patchwork legal quilt around the country".

15. Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s majority decision included unprecedentedly harsh criticism of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent. Barrett explained in "painful detail" why Jackson's arguments were flawed.

    • "But maybe the best part of yesterday’s majority decision was that six justices endorsed taking one of their comrades to the woodshed".

    • "Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, explained in painful detail that: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is a dum-dum".

16. Justice Jackson initiated her dissent by describing the majority opinion as "obsequious" and "an existential threat to the rule of law". Justice Barrett, in response, stated she wouldn’t "dwell" on Jackson’s "silly logic" after dedicating two full pages to rebuttal.

    • "She began her dissent by describing the majority opinion as essentially obsequious and calling the decision “an existential threat to the rule of law.”".

    • "Having spent over two full pages tearing Justice Jackson a new alimentary canal, Justice Barrett primly summed it up in two sentences, saying she wouldn’t dwell on Jackson’s silly logic".

17. Five additional justices formally signed on to Justice Barrett’s opinion, thereby "silently but formally endorsing her smackdown of Justice Jackson". This is noted as an unusually public display of judicial disagreement.

    • "Remember — five more justices signed on to Barrett’s opinion, silently but formally endorsing her smackdown of Justice Jackson".

    • "I cannot recall ever seeing anything like it in a Supreme Court majority decision before".

18. For readers concerned about Justice Barrett’s credentials, the author suggests it might be time to reconsider, as this decision is seen as a major boost for President Trump's agenda. The author states that there is "no other single decision that SCOTUS could have handed President Trump to put jet fuel in his agenda".

    • "For readers concerned about Justice Barrett’s bona fides, it might be time to reconsider".

    • "There is no other single decision that SCOTUS could have handed President Trump to put jet fuel in his agenda".

19. In another 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with parental rights, allowing parents to opt their children out of school lessons involving LGBTQ+ themes. This case involved a group of Maryland parents (Muslim, Catholic, and Ukrainian Orthodox).

    • "Yesterday, in another terrific 6-3 decision, the Court sided with parental rights".

    • "The Supreme Court held that a group of Maryland parents (Muslim, Catholic, and Ukrainian Orthodox) may opt-out their elementary-school-aged children from any instruction that includes LGBTQ+ themes".

20. The Court agreed that the Montgomery County school board’s refusal to provide an opt-out violated the parents’ free exercise of religion. The decision extended beyond merely addressing "inappropriate images" to confronting "LGBT indoctrination itself".

    • "The majority agreed with parents that the Montgomery County school board’s refusal to provide them with an opt-out violated their free exercise of religion".

    • "The majority squared off —not just against inappropriate images— but against LGBT indoctrination itself".

21. The Supreme Court’s holding was "clear and stark": schools cannot "indoctrinate" children in "socially experimental ideologies inconsistent with parents’ religious beliefs". Instead, schools "must provide notice and opt-outs" for such instruction.

    • "The holding was clear and stark: schools cannot ‘indoctrinate’ kids in socially experimental ideologies inconsistent with parents’ religious beliefs".

    • "Period. They must provide notice and opt-outs".

22. Justice Sotomayor’s dissent in the parental rights case warned that the majority’s decision could soon lead to banning books on evolution or interfaith marriages, and potentially "history itself". The author suggests this ruling signifies "a nation slowly regained its sanity".

    • "An overwrought Justice Sotomayor complained the majority’s decision will soon lead to banning books on evolution (!) or interfaith marriages — “and history may be next,” she warned darkly".

    • "A nation slowly regained its sanity".

23. The Supreme Court also upheld a new Texas law requiring age verification for porn sites, a major First Amendment case. This decision rejected arguments from "smut-peddlers" who claimed the law violated free speech by "chill[ing] adults’ access to that content".

    • "Justice Thomas wrote for the majority in another major First Amendment case published yesterday".

    • "CNN ran the story headlined, “Texas porn age verification law upheld by Supreme Court.” Smut-peddlers argued that a new Texas law requiring age verification (and therefore, proof of identity) violated their First Amendment right to publish whatever perverted ‘adult’ material they wanted".

24. Justice Barrett, drawing on her experience as a mother of seven, stated that content-filtering software is "far from foolproof" for protecting children from online porn. She added that "the explosion of addiction to online porn has shown that content filtering isn’t working".

    • "Justice Barrett —who has seven children— called the software “far from foolproof.”".

    • "“And I think that the explosion of addiction to online porn has shown that content filtering isn’t working,” Barrett added".

25. The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Texas’s age-verification law for porn sites is considered one of the "most consequential developments in the battle against porn addiction in decades". It sets a "stellar legal precedent that says regulating porn is not inherently unconstitutional".

    • "The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Texas’s age-verification law for porn sites — though this flew right under media’s radar — could be one of the most consequential developments in the battle against porn addiction in decades".

    • "First of all, it’s a stellar legal precedent that says regulating porn is not inherently unconstitutional".

26. Age verification for porn sites "shatters anonymity" and introduces a "moment of indecisive friction" for users. This brief delay and the potential for "mild shame" can "break the dopamine loop" and reduce compulsive use.

    • "Having to verify your age with ID shatters anonymity, and that moment of indecisive friction — even just 10–15 seconds — has a profound psychological effect".

    • "It breaks the dopamine loop".

27. Age-verification laws implicitly validate the idea that porn is not neutral and can be harmful, particularly to "developing brains". This shifts the public conversation from simply "don’t be a prude" to a discussion about society's "duty to prevent digital self-harm".

    • "Age-verification laws like Texas’s implicitly validate the idea that porn is not neutral, it can be harmful, particularly to developing brains, and society has a legitimate interest in reducing exposure".

    • "That opens a new Overton window, moving the conversation from “don’t be a prude” to “what’s our duty to prevent digital self-harm?”".

28. With this ruling, the argument against porn has shifted from critics being dismissed as "moralists or theocrats" to concerns about consent, mental health, and childhood protection. The Court has "cleared a legal and cultural path to push back against one of the most addictive, exploitative, and socially corrosive industries in modern life".

    • "Until now, porn’s critics have been airily dismissed as moralists or theocrats".

    • "But with this ruling and its constitutional legitimacy, the argument has shifted to consent, mental health, and childhood protection, rather than religion".

29. The HHS published a comprehensive review of treatments for gender dysphoria in minors, which was "savagely and immediately criticized" partly due to the authors' anonymity. MIT professor Alex Byrne later revealed he helped draft this skeptical study.

    • "Last month, HHS published a comprehensive review of treatments for gender dysphoria in minors that was savagely and immediately criticized, in largest part because the authors were anonymous".

    • "But MIT professor Alex Byrne has decided to come out, and admitted he helped draft the skeptical study".

30. Alex Byrne, despite his self-described progressive credentials, concluded that "medical transition for minors is not empirically or ethically justified" after reviewing the evidence and applying medical ethics. He attributed the initial anonymity and the continuation of "horrific 'gender' treatments" to "cancel culture".

    • "“After surveying all the evidence,” Alex wrote, “and applying widely accepted principles of medical ethics, we found that medical transition for minors is not empirically or ethically justified.”".

    • "Explaining his initial anonymity, and why horrific “gender” treatments were allowed to continue so long, Alex admitted it was cancel culture".

31. Byrne criticized the "gender team’s" use of "euphemistic and often misleading" language, noting that "gender-affirming top surgery" is actually "radical body modification". He also pointed out that patients who regret their surgeries are described as having "dynamic desires for gender-affirming medical interventions".

    • "He complained about what we’ve long mocked: the gender team’s use of “euphemistic and often misleading” language".

    • "“Gender-affirming top surgery” is really radical body modification".

32. Byrne admitted that this "linguistic circus" has the "Orwellian effect of making plain truths impossible to state". He observed that gender dysphoria is unique among psychological diagnoses in being treated with permanent interventions based solely on "the patient’s say-so".

    • "This linguistic circus, Alex admitted, catching up to the rest of us, “has the Orwellian effect of making plain truths impossible to state.”".

    • "He correctly pointed out (as we have, many times) that gender dysphoria is one of the only psychological diagnoses treated with permanent surgery and chemical interventions, even though it has no observable clinical signs".

33. Byrne expressed that the "progressive embrace of this regressive practice is one of the great ironies of the modern age". He highlighted that "modern medicine makes lots of mistakes" and has a history of regrettable practices.

    • "“Speaking for myself, the progressive embrace of this regressive practice is one of the great ironies of the modern age,” Alex wrote".

    • "modern medicine makes lots of mistakes".

34. The author suggests that the publication of Byrne's op-ed in the Washington Post and his decision to reveal his identity indicates that "the censorship apparatus is failing". This is viewed as a sign that "the progressive purity spiral is spiraling out of control".

    • "The fact that this op-ed was published at all, in the WaPo no less, and that Alex was willing (or probably forced) to out himself as an author, and that he’s directly confronting cancel culture, is all evidence that the censorship apparatus is failing".

    • "The progressive purity spiral is spiraling out of control".

35. Tesla completed its "first fully autonomous Model Y delivery ahead of schedule" in Austin, a development considered by the author as "the most important tech news in decades, or maybe our lifetimes". This means a car "delivered itself to its buyer" without any remote operators.

    • "Reuters ran the remarkable story below the headline, “Tesla completes first fully autonomous Model Y delivery ahead of schedule.”".

    • "To put it bluntly, for the first time in human history, a new car delivered itself to its buyer".

36. This historic self-driving car delivery was "muted" news, possibly due to "frenetic times" and the ongoing "AI revolution". The author suggests people might be "immune to viral outbreaks of breakthrough technology".

    • "It is, perhaps, a sign of our frenetic times that this wasn’t bigger news".

    • "Maybe, amidst the AI revolution, we’ve become so immune to viral outbreaks of breakthrough technology that these kinds of announcements seem bland and inevitable".

37. The development of self-driving car deliveries implies significant changes for car dealerships, as parking lots filled with inventory could become "archaic relics of the ancient past". The author envisions a future where cars might even have "saucy, crime-fighting personality" like KITT.

    • "For just a tiny sliver of implication, imagine what this means for car dealers. All they need now is a showroom".

    • "Soon, parking lots packed with car inventories will become archaic relics of the ancient past, like record players or corded telephones, something else for our kids to doubtfully question and dismiss".

38. The week included a 12-Day Middle East War ceasefire, "WWIII aversion," and a "historic NATO defense spending agreement". A "Trump butt-kissing contest" was also mentioned in relation to NATO.

    • "A 12-Day Middle East War ceasefire and WWIII aversion, putting the pundits in their places".

    • "A historic NATO defense spending agreement and a Trump butt-kissing contest".

39. Among other significant events of the week were a "historic Rwanda-Congo peace deal," a "record-high stock market" that "beclown[ed] the experts and media tools," and the "first self-driving car delivery". The author also noted "more Democrat purity spirals".

    • "A historic Rwanda-Congo peace deal".

    • "A record-high stock market beclowning the experts and media tools".

40. A commenter named TriTorch argued that the heart is not a pump, contrary to conventional teaching, citing Dr. Francisco Torrent-Guasp's discovery that it is a "single continuous muscle band, folded into a spiral". According to this theory, the heart "works like a vortex generator, creating suction and torque, not pressure".

    • "Dr Francisco Torrent-Guasp, a Spanish cardiac researcher, discovered what the textbooks refuse to acknowledge, that the heart is not a pump".

    • "He proved the heart works like a vortex generator, creating suction and torque, not pressure".

Welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast Show.

Today, we're delving into insights from "The Unseen Architects: Navigating the Global Control Grid," exploring the complex landscape of global power dynamics and societal control as discussed by Jeffrey Peele of thenewera.uk and the podcast host.

https://rumble.com/v6urazd-jeffrey-peel-compromised-alt-media-internecine-globalism-and-false-scarcity.html 

Jeffrey Peele's Background and the Genesis of The New Era Jeffrey Peele, who joins us for the first time on Geopolitics and Empire, began his platform, thenewera.uk, as an act of "expediency" during the COVID era, which he identifies as "the great awakening call for many". Prior to this, Peele worked as an "ordinary jobbing consultant" in business, with his most recent experience being a consultant for the UK government's Department of Trade, helping US, Australian, and New Zealand companies enter the UK market, with a focus on technology. This background became particularly ironic when, during the COVID event, he realized that technology was "right at the center of this new world order," or "new era". His initial writing for The New Era focused on "nefarious technology players" like Palantir, and the increasing involvement of the "PayPal mafia" in these companies. His scope later widened to include broader "agenda" topics, such as "Agenda 2030," inspired by other thought leaders. Peele's "output" on The New Era aims to provide airtime to "thought leaders" who have been deplatformed, acknowledging that he has interviewed many individuals also featured by the host. He also revealed that he is currently writing a novel to encapsulate his "thoughts and perspectives relating to the agenda" in a different format.

The Evolving Media Landscape and the Rise of "Limited Hangouts" A significant theme addressed is the growing fatigue with both mainstream media and what's termed "mainstream alternative media". Peele noticed an "agenda" within some alternative media, suggesting that intelligence agencies might be using "controlled, alternative media organizations to get their message out". This has led him to become "more of a lone wolf," as he finds it difficult to trust organizations or individuals who have achieved significant reach, questioning how they attained such platforms when he himself has experienced challenges in growing his own following on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). He specifically noted a decline in his traction on X after discussing Linda Yaccarino's "freedom of speech but not freedom of reach" comment, indicating that certain topics are restricted "outside the Overton window".

Peele asserts that X and Twitter are "one and the same organization," citing the continued employment of Nick Pickles, who served as head of government affairs for Twitter and remained in post after Musk's acquisition, even when it was known that the FBI and CIA were actively involved in content censorship. This illustrates his view that many high-profile figures, including CEOs and politicians, are merely "actors mouthing the words that they're told to mouth," lacking genuine "agency".

This perspective extends to the concept of "limited hangouts" and "fake heroes" within alternative media, where some individuals may have started genuinely but become narcissistic or engage in self-censorship to maintain their following and financial support. The discussion highlights figures like Robert Malone, whose accounts "blew up" during the COVID era, suggesting he and others were "positioned" to "insidiously advance the agenda". Similarly, the Great Barrington Declaration is brought up, with scrutiny on its authors, such as Jay Bhattacharya, who reportedly went "strangely quiet" on the vaccine debate and has connections to figures like Peter Thiel, leading to questions about their interconnectedness. A key insight from blogger Mary Finch is cited: "if you know their name, they're in the game," implying that well-known figures in alternative spaces might be part of a controlled opposition. Those who challenge the core narrative, such as stating "COVID was a scam" or "there was no virus," are actively ignored because they step "outside of the Overton window".

Understanding the Global Control Grid and the Agenda The discussion defines the looming threat as a "totalitarian world state". It is portrayed as a highly complex system, not attributable to a single entity like the WEF or Bilderberg alone, but rather an "organized testosterone fueled mess" driven by competing interests, money, and Wall Street.

Key constituencies driving this agenda include:

• Corporates: Many have origins traced back to entities like the British East India Company, historically involved in slavery and the opium trade, and now deeply invested in pharmaceuticals and the arms trade. Their major investors are often individuals with vast "intergenerational wealth".

• The Five Eyes Network (Intelligence Agencies): These agencies are deeply "entwined into those corporates," with Palantir cited as an example, initially funded by the CIA, becoming a contractor to the CIA and later to the UK's NHS, and now creating a master database for US citizens. The Five Eyes nations, created after WWII, were notably "the most fascist" during the COVID era, suggesting their collaborative role in defining the "Western agenda".

• Financial Control: A critical component is the drive towards digital control of money. Howard Lutnick's ambition to establish "dollar stablecoins" as the "defining digital architecture" for a "new era of money" is highlighted, with the CIA and intelligence agencies actively involved. It's argued that if they control the "issuance of money digitally," they will achieve "domination of the entire planet".

The "number one threat" is identified as the "algorithm ghetto" or "digital electronic concentration camp," a system that unifies digital ID, digital currencies, and digital passports, preventing individuals from functioning without compliance. Examples include BritCard and Real ID. Smart cities and "fifteen-minute cities" are part of this, with organizations like the WEF providing "vouchers" to city authorities to develop such infrastructure, mandating that the money be spent on WEF partner companies, including non-Western firms like Huawei and Infosys. There's also a strategy involving organizations like BlackRock and individuals such as Bill Gates to "clawing all of these assets from national governments," as seen with proposals for inheritance tax on farms in the UK. The "doomsday scenario" involves mandated use of biometrics to track individuals and grant permission to use services, leading to "full blown totalitarian" control and an "Orwellian nightmare". Historical parallels are drawn between the COVID-era push for QR codes and digital health passports and Nazi passes for "biological purity," noting that IBM assisted both the Nazi regime and the development of COVID passports, and the Rockefellers advised both Nazi and COVID policies.

The Role of Cryptocurrencies and the Multipolar World Illusion The view is presented that Bitcoin was "planned by them to sort of whet our appetites to bring in CBDCs" (Central Bank Digital Currencies). The escalating transaction charges on Bitcoin's core network have pushed users towards "custodians," making transactions traceable and controllable. It's noted that Tether, a dollar stablecoin, is working in partnership with the CIA, allowing them to "sequester" or "take away" wallets on suspicion. The strong connections between Tether, its peg to US Treasury stock, and high-level government appointments (e.g., the Commerce Secretary formerly being CEO of Tether's custodian) indicate that Bitcoin and dollar stablecoins are becoming part of the same "nefarious surveillance network".

Regarding the "multipolar world" and the East (Russia and China), the belief is that they are "on board with the same agenda" of global government, and their perceived rivalry is merely a struggle "for the biggest slice of the pie". Putin, for example, "doubled down on the narrative" during COVID, promoting his own Sputnik vaccine. The ongoing "fear of scarcity," whether in oil, gas, or even toilet paper during COVID, is described as "orchestrated nonsense" used as a justification for "land grabbing" and advancing the "technocratic argument" that energy is in short supply, despite being plentiful. This ultimately leads to ordinary people paying exorbitant prices and is seen as driving "neo-feudalism" and the "erasing the middle class" through agendas like "death zero" (Net Zero).

The End Game and Paths Forward The perceived end game is a "world without people, without children," where elites reside in "soulless," often empty, billionaire communities, while traditional community spaces like pubs are shut down, and small businesses fail. This vision is likened to "Elysium," with walled-off city-states for the elite and the rest in a "Mad Max world".

Despite this bleak outlook, some "chinks of light" are identified:

• The "death of politics" and mainstream media: There's a declining trust in political parties and leaders, and mainstream media is increasingly seen as propped up propaganda.

• The "era of the individual": Individuals are now producing more compelling content.

• Speaking truth to power: It's crucial to challenge authority, embrace free thinking, and continue airing dissenting views despite deplatforming. Non-compliance with the "madness" is emphasized.

• Financial independence: A significant challenge is the vast number of people dependent on the state for employment (directly or indirectly, including contractors like Palantir), creating a "social credit system" where they are unwilling to speak out. However, this system of "bribes" and guaranteed pensions is not sustainable, as global currencies will likely crash under immense debt. The goal is to make people realize that these unsustainable practices will not continue indefinitely, encouraging them to question the narrative.

Jeffrey Peele can be found on X (Twitter) as Jeffrey Peel and on his blog thenewera.uk on Substack, and he anticipates publishing his novel around September.

Thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast Show produced and archived at the website dailybriefs.info.

Here are 50 key takeaway points from the sources, presented in a structured format as requested:

1. The Unseen Architects: Navigating the Global Control Grid Support for Geopolitics and Empire Podcast
   
   

   • "As always, I'm in need of your support, and the best best way you can do that is by becoming a paid subscriber".

   • "You can also donate through the website, purchase a consult".

2. Introduction of Jeffrey Peele of New Era
   
   

   • "And joining us for the very first time on Geopolitics and Empire is Jeffrey Peele of thenewera.uk".

   • "Well, you know, the New Era was a sort of active expediency, a bit like you".

3. Jeffrey Peele's Professional Background and "Great Awakening"
   
   

   • "My most recent experience prior to the COVID event, was ironically working for the government as a consultant".

   • "I think the COVID era was the, you know, the great awakening call for many of us".

4. Technology's Central Role in the New World Order
   
   

   • "And suddenly, I I kind of realized that perhaps, tech was right at the center of this new world order this new era".

   • "And when I first started out, I was writing particularly about how sort of nefarious technology players were very active".

5. Focus on Specific Tech Companies and Networks
   
   

   • "I started noticing companies like Palantir and so on entering The United Kingdom market, and, you know, the the mafia, the the the PayPal mafia getting involved increasingly in a lot of these companies".

   • "And, and as a result, I started work focusing particularly on technology markets and and, some of these technology companies".

6. New Era's Mission to Platform Deplatformed Thought Leaders
   
   

   • "But the new era was an attempt to interview some of the people who were, you know, thought leaders, to use that awful term, but, you know, who were looking in-depth at what was going on and and trying to give them some airtime because a lot of them have been, deplatformed".

   • "I think I've interviewed many people that you have also interviewed, and so that's where it kinda came from".

7. Jeffrey Peele's Novel Project on the Agenda
   
   

   • "I'm also writing a book at the minute as well, a novel, because I thought I would like to sort of shrink-wrap an awful lot of the of my thoughts and and perspectives relating to the agenda, if you if you call it that, into a novel format".

   • "So I've been working on that for the last few months as well".

8. Growing Disillusionment with Mainstream and Alternative Media
   
   

   • "And we know people are tired of mainstream media, but I'm sensing now people are getting tired of mainstream alternative media as well".

   • "And so I'm I'm going forward. I'm gonna take a cue from folks, and and talk, thinking I'm talking more with people such as yourself, people who really understand the conspiratorial nature of things, so to speak".

9. Intelligence Agencies' Use of Controlled Alternative Media
   
   

   • "But it's it's not a great leap to realize that perhaps some of these same agencies have also been using controlled, alternative media organizations to get their message out".

   • "And to some extent, it's a theme, an underlying theme of the book I'm writing at the minute, you know, because you I got to a stage where I didn't know who I could trust".

10. Freedom of Speech vs. Freedom of Reach on X (formerly Twitter)
    
    

    • "You know, when, Linda Yaccarino was appointed, you know, to Twitter, you know, she made that famous comment, you know, it's about freedom of speech, but not freedom of necessarily freedom of reach".

    • "So it's clear that on the on x, there are certain people I like to think refer to them as sort of sycophants, you know, Musk sycophants, who will will go with they'll keep everything within the Overton window, but they won't, you know, look outside that window at a at a at a vista of control and coercion".

11. Experience with Account Suspension and Follower Manipulation
    
    

    • "I think I've been at at 29,700 followers on Twitter for two years now".

    • "And as soon as I get up to, you know, 29,800, I magically lose 50 again".

12. Impact of Linda Yaccarino's Appointment on Online Traction
    
    

    • "I think I made a video for the new era where I I specifically focused on Linda Yaccarino's appointments, you know, because she obviously she came from the the world of advertising".

    • "And it was from that point on that I noticed that my traction just disappeared".

13. Twitter/X as "One and the Same Organization" with Government Ties
    
    

    • "I don't really see any difference between x and Twitter. I think they're one and the same organization".

    • "His name was Nick Pickles. And he, he spoke at the event. He said all the right things on the panel. But then a few months later, he was appointed as head of government affairs for Twitter".

14. Continuity of Personnel in Government Affairs Postings
    
    

    • "But the interesting thing was that Nick Pickles remained in post. He remained in post during that whole Twitter period when he knew that the FBI and the CIA were actively involved in censoring content".

    • "I thought, how strange that somebody could have worked in both Twitter and x in a government affairs role".

15. Perception of Leaders as "Actors" Lacking Agency
    
    

    • "That's that's all they are. They are actors mouthing the words that they're told to mouth".

    • "And, of course, they can never go off script because, actually, they have no agency".

16. "Limited Hangout" and "Fake Heroes" in Alternative Media
    
    

    • "And you guys were basically talking about this, idea of limited hangout, these fake heroes".

    • "And this is something that, as you said earlier, is making us, some of us unpopular because there's this there's this grift in alternative media".

17. Spectrum of Alternative Media Motivations
    
    

    • "Number one, you've got people that maybe started out as genuine, but they're narcissistic, so they'll do anything to get, you know, following and and and money".

    • "And then, you know, there there's this grift. So as you said earlier, if you go outside outside the bounds of the mainstream alternative media, you'll start losing money".

18. Politicians Implementing the "New World Order"
    
    

    • "I argue that Trump is he's effectively implementing the the the new world order".

    • "RFK junior is has done a one eighty. I just saw this week he hired Robert Malone, on the vaccine committee".

19. COVID "Heroes" as "Pied Pipers" for the Agenda
    
    

    • "It's almost like these people were positioned during the COVID for this moment now to be put into place to further more insidiously advance the, agenda".

    • "And he's going he's going off on his ex account on Brownstone and Jeff Tucker because in a way, a lot of these folks who you who were COVID heroes have become pied pipers".

20. Questioning Interconnectedness of Public Figures (e.g., Jay Bhattacharya and Peter Thiel)
    
    

    • "But but now, of course, it's come out that Jay Bhattacharya was a good friend. I think he was a college friend or a school friend of Peter Thiel".

    • "And could it be that that that they're they're all interconnected in in some ways?".

21. The "If You Know Their Name, They're in the Game" Principle
    
    

    • "She runs a a blog called Mary AF, and she may makes the point that if you know their name, they're in the game".

    • "Because what they do is they will ignore anybody who, for example, says COVID was a scam".

22. Controlled Narratives and the Overton Window
    
    

    • "If you say that, you've gone a step too far. Once again, you've looked outside of the Overton window".

    • "And and that's what they do. They will ignore anybody who has an alternative view and says what we're not supposed to say".

23. The Absurdity and Nonsense of the COVID Narrative
    
    

    • "It's all nonsense. Everything about COVID was nonsense".

    • "And, of course, they had a captured media. And and and they will continue having a captured media, controlled media, because they cannot let us have any airtime or any visibility".

24. The Innate Human Desire for Free Thinkers
    
    

    • "But but I think, actually, there is there is cutthroat because people yearn for free thinkers".

    • "We seek them out. If if everybody becomes a yes man or woman, we we have to in our very maybe it's only a certain percentage of society, but we have to in our very nature seek out the thinkers, seek out people who have an alternative view".

25. The Value of Questioning Authority and Embracing Uncertainty
    
    

    • "I always have to I often use the quote from, I think it was Professor Richard Feynman who said, it's much more interesting not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong".

    • "And I think that's why we do need these free thinkers. Okay. They might be niche audiences, and we might be called conspiracy theorists".

26. Symbolic Gestures as Superficial Change
    
    

    • "RFK Jr. And Jaypah Ducharia coming out and saying, oh, we've ended the recommendation for the COVID vaccine for children. And I'm like, really? That's the best? That that's the best you can do?".

    • "And, you know, Christy Noem, the or is it South Dakota former governor comes out Yeah. Yeah. And she's like, don't delay. Get your Real ID".

27. Real ID as an Advanced Control Mechanism
    
    

    • "She says, oh, TSA has ended the guy the the the Quiet Skies program. And I'm like, who cares? Because Real ID is Quiet Skies on steroids".

    • "It's just kind of like it's it's the the the they're they've been put in place to sort of calm us down, to inject the morphine as we're gonna go go under the the the knife".

28. The Nuanced and Complex Nature of the Totalitarian World State
    
    

    • "Well, it it's it's clear that there are a number of kind of I I don't think it's as simple as is presented, and I haven't watched the full movie".

    • "I tend to think it's slightly more nuanced. I think I think human beings, and particularly those people who are appointed to be leaders, have difficulty with complexity".

29. Interlocking Interests: Corporates, Wall Street, and Intergenerational Wealth
    
    

    • "On the one hand, we've got the corporates. And, you know, you mentioned in one of your other interview, I think, again, it was with with Phil. You mentioned Gillette Corporation, for example".

    • "And of course then their major investors and shareholders tend to be those people who have vast amounts of intergenerational wealth".

30. Historical Roots of Corporate Power in Organized Crime
    
    

    • "And and it's kind of emerged from from what essentially was organized crime".

    • "Whitney Webb writes a lot about this, you know, about the fact that you can trace the origins of many of the people now who are on Trump's frontbench team, all the way back to the sort of nefarious organizations and, and people who kind of, you know, own things literally, physically own an awful lot of the world's resources and supply chains".

31. Entanglement of Five Eyes Network and Corporates
    
    

    • "But then there's the the kind of the Five Eyes network, the intelligence agencies".

    • "But they're they tend to be sort of entwined into those corporates in many ways".

32. Palantir as a Model of Corporatized Agency Relationships
    
    

    • "If you take Palantir as an example, Palantir was initially funded by the CIA, then became a contractor to the CIA, then became a contractor, for example, in The United Kingdom to the NHS".

    • "Now, of course, the announcement that they're going to be creating this master database for every US citizen".

33. Five Eyes Nations' Role in Defining the Western Agenda
    
    

    • "The Five Eyes network, which was created after the second World War, was about collaboration between those nations that during the COVID era were the most fascist".

    • "And that sort of rings alarm bells for me. And it implies that there is a kind of collaboration between the Five Eyes nations, and they kind of define the the Western agenda to to a great extent".

34. The Global Control Grid as an "Organized Testosterone Fueled Mess"
    
    

    • "I think it is an organized testosterone fueled mess, and and, of course, it involves money and Wall Street as well".

    • "I think it is an organized testosterone fueled mess, and and, of course, it involves money and Wall Street as well".

35. Digital Currency (Stablecoins) as a Tool for Global Control
    
    

    • "Howard Lutnick, for example, is, you know, he wanted to be treasury secretary, but his agenda is to drive dollar stablecoins as the the sort of defining digital architecture, private sect supposedly private sector digital architecture for the new era of money".

    • "And, of course, if they own money and and and dollar hegemony, then they they have cracked this particular knot. They will have global control".

36. CIA and Intelligence Agencies' Involvement in Stablecoins
    
    

    • "And, of course, the CIA and the intelligence agencies are all over stablecoins".

    • "So it's an extraordinarily difficult thing to, you know, to say it's those guys and not those guys. I think it's all in the mix".

37. Peter Thiel's De Facto Presidency and Trump as Hired Help
    
    

    • "You you you commented on Peter Thiel is the de facto president. Trump is a mere hired help from central casting".

    • "You've you've also, a new era, written about from MAGA to Technocracy and Stargate Derangement Syndrome".

38. The Threat of the "Algorithm Ghetto" and Social Credit Systems
    
    

    • "And then my biggest fear is, you know, to take from my past guest, Edwin Black's term, the algorithm ghetto, the social credit system".

    • "I mean, you can call it whatever you want. Digital, electronic concentration camp where they're unifying a digital ID".

39. The Inescapable Nature of Digital Control
    
    

    • "And then you won't be able to function".

    • "You can you can flee, Gaza. You can flee Ukraine. You can flee, you know, war zones, but you can't flee the fifteen minute I live in a smart city".

40. WEF's Strategy for Smart City Development through Vouchers
    
    

    • "You've got within WEF, a number of, chapters or interest groups that are specifically focused on smart city developments".

    • "They're essentially giving them vouchers. So they're saying, if you deliver a sort of smart city or or if you announce that you're gonna deliver smart city infrastructure, we'll give you a slug of money".

41. WEF Funding Directed to Partner Companies
    
    

    • "But what they expect, however, is that that that money all be spent on WEF partner companies".

    • "So they will, nominate Huawei".

42. BlackRock and Bill Gates' Influence on National Governments
    
    

    • "But the same thing is happening in terms of organizations like BlackRock as well".

    • "I think one of the first things that Keir Starmer did when he became prime minister was to invite Bill Gates, and Larry Fink to down Downing Street to have a a chinwag about what they were gonna be doing in The United Kingdom".

43. Digital ID as the Key to Totalitarian Coercion
    
    

    • "But even then, I think we we could all see, those of us who were sufficiently awake, that digital ID, was going to be the means by which they would implement full play totalitarian coercion".

    • "And, of course, they attempted it during the COVID era by, by, you know, using the track and trace technologies and so on, interestingly sourced from the big tech companies in The United States, notably Google".

44. Biometrics as the "Doomsday Scenario" for Totalitarianism
    
    

    • "So I think the doomsday scenario would be that there there would be a mandated use of biometrics".

    • "But if they start using biometrics to track us and, or give us permission to use services, then they've got us. That's that's full blown totalitarian".

45. COVID's Role in Normalizing Digital Control
    
    

    • "I I stated that COVID was about bringing in global algocracy rule by algorithm and AI, and the principal purpose was what you just described to normalize QR codes, digital passports".

    • "With the COVID, it's like to prove your biological purity that you took the test or you got the vaccine. You're biologically pure".

46. Historical Parallels in Corporate and Elite Involvement in Totalitarianism
    
    

    • "You come to realize IBM was helping the Nazi regime develop this totalitarianism".

    • "Who was helping build out the COVID passports? IBM? You know? Who was advising policy COVID policy? The Rockefellers".

47. Cryptocurrencies as a Precursor to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
    
    

    • "I kind of think it was planned by them to sort of Yeah. Totally agree. Yeah. Totally agree. To whet our appetites to bring in CBDCs".

    • "But to be honest, that's just one and the same, you know, as as as buying any asset on any exchange or or any share or or or or share in a in a commodity, for example".

48. Bitcoin's Traceability and Sequestration by Agencies
    
    

    • "The CIA clamped down on the, Silk Road network that, of course, on a whim, the CIA can sequester Bitcoin".

    • "They can observe all of the transactions. It's highly traceable".

49. Tether's Partnership with the CIA and Surveillance Implications
    
    

    • "And, of course, now Tether has announced that they're working in partnership with the CIA".

    • "So if there's any trading of dollar stablecoins on the Tether network that's of a of a suspicious nature, they can go in and sequester or or or, take away organizations or individuals' wallets".

50. Eastern and Western Powers Pursuing a Shared Global Government Agenda
    
    

    • "I've been arguing that I don't really see them doing anything different. If you look at Russia and and and China, they're with the same agenda".

    • "So I think I think you're right to hint at the fact that perhaps Putin and the rest of them and China are all playing the same game, which would imply, of course, that the ultimate agenda is global government".

This transcript features an interview from "Geopolitics and Empire" with Jeffrey Peele of thenewera.uk, exploring alternative perspectives on global events and power structures. Peele, a former government technology consultant, discusses how the COVID-19 era served as a "great awakening" for him, shifting his focus to the "nefarious" influence of technology companies and an overarching "agenda" like Agenda 2030. A central theme revolves around the skepticism towards both mainstream and alternative media, suggesting that even seemingly independent sources might be "controlled opposition" or influenced by external forces, leading to a need for "lone wolf" journalists who challenge official narratives. The conversation also delves into the concept of a "totalitarian world state," driven by a complex interplay of corporate power, intelligence agencies (like the "Five Eyes" network), and financial mechanisms, particularly the push for digital currencies and IDs, which could lead to an "algorithm ghetto" and widespread social control.

The concept of a "Global Control Grid" is discussed as a complex, multifaceted threat leading towards a totalitarian world state. It is seen as an "organized testosterone-fueled mess" involving various interconnected interests rather than a simple, single entity like the WEF or Bilderberg alone.

Here are the key aspects of the global control grid as described in the sources:

• Interconnected Power Structures:
  
  

  • Corporates: Companies like Unilever, Palantir, BlackRock, and entities associated with figures like Bill Gates, are described as pulling strings at a corporate level. Many of these entities, like Unilever, are said to have origins tracing back to "organized crime" such as the British East India Company, involved in historical activities like slave trading and the opioid trade, and now heavily invested in pharmaceuticals and the arms trade. Their major investors often possess "vast amounts of intergenerational wealth".

  • Intelligence Agencies (Five Eyes Network): Networks like the Five Eyes (created after WWII by nations that were "most fascist" during the COVID era) are deeply "entwined into those corporates". Palantir, for instance, was initially CIA-funded, then became a CIA contractor, and subsequently a contractor for the UK's NHS, and is now creating a master database for US citizens. The CIA and intelligence agencies are also noted to be "all over stablecoins".

  • Wall Street and Financial Control: Figures like Howard Lutnick are mentioned for their agenda to establish dollar stablecoins as the "defining digital architecture" for a new era of money, aiming for "global control" through owning money and dollar hegemony. This is seen as critical because if they control the issuance of money digitally, it leads to the "domination of the entire planet".

• Technological Control and Surveillance:
  
  

  • Central Role of Tech: Technology is viewed as being "right at the center of this new world order".

  • Nefarious Tech Players: The speaker started noticing companies like Palantir and the "PayPal mafia" becoming increasingly involved in technology markets, particularly in the UK.

  • Digital IDs and Currencies: The agenda includes unifying digital IDs, digital currencies (CBDCs and PBDCs), and digital passports. This is seen as the primary threat, as it would create an "algorithm ghetto" or "digital, electronic concentration camp," making it impossible to function or escape. The historical parallel to Nazi passes used to prove "biological purity" during COVID (via tests or vaccines) is drawn, noting IBM's involvement in both historical totalitarianism and modern COVID passport development.

  • Biometrics and Brain Chips: The "doomsday scenario" involves a mandated use of biometrics (fingerprints, etc.) or embedded chips in brains, which would grant or deny permission to use services, leading to "full blown totalitarian" control, an "Orwellian nightmare".

  • Smart Cities: Organizations like the WEF have "chapters or interest groups" focused on smart city developments, including "fifteen-minute cities." These are being implemented through "voucher systems" where governments receive funds (e.g., billions for London, Leeds, Belfast) on the condition that the money is spent on WEF partner companies, including non-Western ones like Huawei and Infosys.

• Agenda and Goals:
  
  

  • Agenda 2030: This agenda is a key piece being put together.

  • Totalitarian World State/Global Government: The ultimate aim is a "totalitarian world state" or "global government," where existing geopolitical rivalries (e.g., East vs. West) are perceived as different factions "fighting for the biggest slice of the pie" within the same overarching agenda. Even leaders like Putin are seen as "doubling down on the narrative" and peddling their own vaccines, suggesting they are "all in the same game".

  • Trade-off for "Peace": The increasing reliance on digital technologies is likened to "trading off our freedoms in favor of convenience or comfort." The narrative pushed is that allowing these powers to control will lead to an "end to all of these wars" and a "peaceful environment".

  • Depopulation: Depopulation is mentioned as being on the Bilderberg Group agenda.

  • Neo-feudalism and Erasing the Middle Class: The current economic trends, such as soaring housing, food, and energy costs while salaries stagnate, are seen as intentional, leading to "neo feudalism" and "erasing the middle class".

  • A "World Without People": The speaker questions the end game, citing examples of vast, empty housing developments for billionaires (like Souta Grande in Spain) and the closure of traditional social spaces like pubs in the UK. This suggests a desired "utopia" that is a "world without people, without children," devoid of human comfort and socializing.

• Methods of Implementation and Control:
  
  

  • Controlled Media and Censorship: Psychological operations are conducted using both mainstream media and "controlled, alternative media organizations". There's a distinction between "freedom of speech but not freedom of reach," where certain individuals or outlets ("Musk sycophants") stay within the "Overton window" and avoid subjects that challenge the established narrative, leading to self-censorship. Those who "say what we're not supposed to say" are ignored or deplatformed.

  • Limited Hangouts/Fake Heroes: There is a "grift in alternative media" where some individuals, initially genuine or those positioned by the "security state," become "pied pipers" to "insidiously advance the agenda". Examples include figures lauded as "COVID heroes" like Robert Malone and the Brownstone Institute, whose accounts "blew up" and are now seen as potentially controlled opposition.

  • Creation of Scarcity: Fear of scarcity (e.g., in oil, gas, vaccines, food) is artificially created to justify "land grabs" and increased control. The "net zero" or "death zero" agenda is cited as a justification for this scarcity.

  • Dependency on the State: A tactic involves increasing the money supply, printing money, and expanding state employment (directly or indirectly, through contractors like Palantir). This creates a population "so dependent on the state that they're not prepared to say anything".

• Response and Resistance:
  
  

  • Truth-Telling and Non-Compliance: The importance of "speaking truth to power" and "not comply[ing]" is emphasized.

  • Rise of Individuals: The "death of politics" and mainstream media means "whole new vistas will open up," with individuals putting out more interesting content.

  • Free Thinkers: There is a human yearning for "free thinkers" who challenge authority and offer alternative views, even if they are seen as "conspiracy theorists".

  • Financial Reality: A key challenge is convincing people that the current system of state dependency and "bribes" is unsustainable, as "many of our supposed global currencies will crash" and governments will "not be able to pay the pensions".

  • The Light of Truth: The belief is that even a small "light of the truth," if continually repeated, can eventually turn the tide, drawing a parallel to early Christians in the Roman Empire.

Based on the sources, several critical issues and characteristics define the landscape of alternative media today:

• Controlled Opposition and Lack of Trust:
  
  

  • A significant concern is the presence of "controlled, alternative media organizations" potentially used by intelligence agencies for "psychological operations" to disseminate specific messages.

  • This leads to a pervasive feeling of not knowing "who I could trust" within the alternative media sphere.

  • The speaker, Jeffrey Peele, describes becoming "more of a lone wolf" because he "just can't trust, organizations or media entities or spokespeople or thought leaders" who have achieved significant reach, questioning how they gained such prominence.

  • An example is given of Nick Pickles, who held a government affairs role at both Twitter and X, remaining in post even when the FBI and CIA were actively involved in content censorship. This suggests "a lot of controlled, opposition is going on," with CEOs and politicians seen as mere "actors mouthing the words that they're told to mouth".

• "Limited Hangout" and "Fake Heroes" (The Grift):
  
  

  • There is a recognized "grift in alternative media" involving the concept of a "limited hangout" and the emergence of "fake heroes".

  • This spectrum includes individuals who may have started genuinely but become narcissistic, doing "anything to get, you know, following and and and money". It also includes individuals seemingly "positioned during the COVID for this moment now to be put into place to further more insidiously advance the, agenda". Robert Malone is cited as an example, whose accounts "blew up" and who had a background in the "security by biotech state".

  • The discussion highlights how "COVID heroes" like Jay Bhattacharya, a co-signer of the Great Barrington Declaration, have been perceived as "pied pipers". His association with Peter Thiel is noted as a potential connection.

  • These entities often "create a straw man" and "laud people" who stay within the "Overton window" of acceptable discourse, while ignoring those who challenge the core narrative, such as claiming "COVID was a scam" or "there was no virus". This implies a form of self-censorship driven by financial incentives, as going "outside the bounds of the mainstream alternative media" can lead to losing money.

• Censorship and Suppression of Reach:
  
  

  • Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) are seen as not truly upholding freedom of speech, adhering instead to "freedom of speech, but not necessarily freedom of reach".

  • The speaker personally experienced a significant decline in "traction" on X after critiquing this policy. He also noted being algorithmically suppressed, where his follower count "magically" reverts to a certain number.

  • The sources suggest a "captured media" that prevents genuine alternative views from getting "any airtime or any visibility".

  • Mainstream media, such as the BBC in the UK, is described as being "propped up by governments" and acting as a "censorship organization" through initiatives like the "Trusted News Initiative". An example is given where the speaker was cut off during a BBC program for advising against COVID testing.

• Financial Dependence and Compliance:
  
  

  • A significant challenge is that many individuals, particularly those "employed directly or indirectly by the government," are effectively on a "social credit system". Their financial dependence, often through "huge pensions," makes them unwilling to speak out or challenge the state narrative.

  • The speaker notes his own ability to be "mouthy" due to being "financially independent enough," highlighting this as a privilege not afforded to many. The goal is to make people understand that this state dependence is not sustainable in the long term.

Despite these issues, there is a sentiment that people are increasingly "tired of BS" and "yearn for free thinkers" and "unbridled truth," leading to a potential "death of mainstream media" and a shift towards individuals producing more interesting content. The importance of continually challenging the narrative and speaking truth to power is emphasized.

Digital totalitarianism, as discussed in the sources, refers to a future where global control is achieved through advanced technology and integrated digital systems, leading to a loss of freedom and agency for individuals. It is described as an "algocracy," or rule by algorithm and AI, ultimately creating what is likened to a "digital, electronic concentration camp".

Key components and mechanisms of this emerging digital totalitarianism include:

• Digital Identification and Control
  
  

  • The unification of digital IDs, digital currencies, and digital passports is seen as a primary threat, making it impossible to function or escape if fully implemented.

  • Digital ID is identified as the means by which "full play totalitarian coercion" would be implemented, building on attempts during the COVID era with track and trace technologies.

  • The mandated use of biometrics, such as fingerprints, for accessing services would signify "full blown totalitarian" control and an "Orwellian nightmare".

  • Efforts to embed chips in brains by figures like Elon Musk are also highlighted as part of this doomsday scenario.

• Digital Currencies and Financial Control
  
  

  • The integration of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and the push towards Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) or Private Bank Digital Currencies (PBDCs) are seen as steps towards this control.

  • It is suggested that Bitcoin was a planned mechanism to "whet appetites" for CBDCs.

  • The drive to establish dollar stablecoins as the defining digital financial architecture, led by figures like Howard Lutnick, aims to achieve global control through ownership of money and "dollar hegemony".

  • The CIA and other intelligence agencies are noted to be "all over stablecoins," with networks like Tether partnering with the CIA to police and sequester suspicious transactions and wallets. This indicates a highly traceable and controlled financial system.

• Smart Cities and Surveillance Infrastructure
  
  

  • "Fifteen-minute cities" are explicitly mentioned as part of smart city developments being driven by World Economic Forum (WEF) interest groups.

  • This involves a "voucher system" where WEF provides funds to cities for smart infrastructure, but the money must be spent on WEF partner companies, including non-Western entities like Huawei, which develop surveillance technologies.

  • Companies like Palantir, initially funded by the CIA, are building master databases for citizens, demonstrating a corporatized agency-entwined relationship in surveillance.

• Information Control and Controlled Opposition
  
  

  • The concept of "freedom of speech but not freedom of reach" is highlighted as a method of control on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), where certain content is suppressed or traction is removed.

  • The continued presence of individuals like Nick Pickles in government affairs roles across Twitter and X, even when the FBI and CIA were involved in content censorship, suggests "controlled opposition".

  • There's a concern about a "grift in alternative media" where security states work within these organizations, or individuals become "fake heroes" who self-censor to maintain their reach and income, staying within a narrow "Overton window" of acceptable discourse.

  • Politicians like Trump and RFK Jr. are seen as "actors mouthing the words they're told to mouth," effectively implementing the "new world order" or "insidiously advanc[ing] the agenda". Certain COVID-era figures are described as "pied pipers" positioned to further the agenda.

• Economic Manipulation and Scarcity
  
  

  • The creation of "fear of scarcity" (e.g., toilet paper, vaccines, oil) is a tactic used to justify control and a "land grab".

  • The "net zero" or "death zero" green agenda is viewed as a mechanism for neo-feudalism and the erasure of the middle class, where ordinary people suffer from inflated prices despite actual declines in global demand.

The ultimate goal of this "totalitarian world state" is described as a "global government". This entails a world where individuals trade their freedoms for perceived convenience or comfort, leading to a soulless society lacking human interaction and vitality, exemplified by empty "billionaire-zoned" housing developments and the closure of traditional community spaces like pubs. There's even a concern about a depopulation agenda.

In terms of resistance and countermeasures, the speakers suggest:

• Speaking truth to power and "not comply[ing]" with the imposed systems.

• Challenging authority and seeking out "free thinkers" who are willing to voice alternative views outside the established "Overton window".

• Recognizing that mainstream media and politicians cannot be trusted, as they are often propped up by or are part of the state and act as "actors".

• Continuing to "air these views" through individual efforts and alternative platforms, despite potential censorship or limited reach.

• Encouraging people to question and think critically, especially those dependent on the state, by highlighting the unsustainability of current financial systems.

• Making preparations to survive the changes being implemented.

• Maintaining optimism that the "light of the truth," even if small, can eventually lead to a turning of the tables, referencing historical examples like Christians in the Roman Empire.

The concept of "geopolitical power" as discussed in the sources centers on a complex and intertwined network of entities aiming towards a totalitarian world state, often referred to as a "Global Control Grid". This is described not as a simple, single-source evil, but rather an "organized testosterone fueled mess" involving multiple competing interests and actors.

Key Actors and Networks of Geopolitical Power: The sources identify several key groups and organizations that exert geopolitical power:

• Corporates and Organized Crime: Many powerful corporations, such as Unilever, are said to have origins traceable to entities like the British East India Company, and are now heavily invested in sectors like pharmaceuticals and the arms trade. These corporations are often influenced by major investors holding vast intergenerational wealth. Some narratives suggest a link between current power players and "nefarious organizations" that physically control global resources and supply chains.

• Intelligence Agencies (Five Eyes Network): Intelligence agencies, particularly those within the Five Eyes network (which includes nations described as "most fascist" during the COVID era), are deeply entwined with corporate entities. For example, Palantir, a significant technology player, was initially funded by the CIA, became a CIA contractor, and then expanded to provide services to national health systems (like the NHS in the UK) and is now developing a master database for US citizens. The CIA's involvement extends to digital currencies, actively policing networks like Tether to extend the control grid.

• Wall Street and Financial Control: The control over the issuance of digital money, specifically through dollar stablecoins, is viewed as a critical step toward achieving global control and "dollar hegemony". Figures like Howard Lutnick are pushing for these private sector digital architectures for money.

• Globalist Organizations and Their Partners: Organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) are involved through various "chapters or interest groups" focused on smart city developments. They use a "voucher system" to incentivize city authorities and local politicians to adopt smart city infrastructure (like "fifteen-minute cities"), with the condition that money is spent on WEF partner companies, including non-Western ones like Huawei and Infosys.

• Influential Individuals and Investment Firms: Figures such as Bill Gates and Larry Fink of BlackRock are seen to influence national governments, as evidenced by meetings with political leaders and policies that consolidate assets, such as the proposed inheritance tax on farms in the UK.

The Agenda: Towards a Totalitarian World State: The ultimate aim of these power structures is described as a "totalitarian world state". This vision is to be achieved through:

• Digital Control: The implementation of a unified digital ID, digital currencies (CBDCs/PBDCs), and digital passports is seen as a means to prevent individuals from functioning outside the system, creating an "algorithm ghetto" or "digital, electronic concentration camp". The COVID era is highlighted as a period used to normalize QR codes and digital passports, drawing parallels to historical totalitarian regimes.

• Biometric Control: The "doomsday scenario" involves a mandated use of biometrics for accessing services, which would represent "full blown totalitarian" control, as individuals cannot shed their unique biological identifiers.

• Control over Information and Discourse: There's a concern that even alternative media can be "controlled" or used for "limited hangouts" to keep discussions within an "Overton window," preventing deeper examination of the "conspiratorial nature of things". Leaders and public figures are often viewed as "actors mouthing the words that they're told to mouth," indicating a lack of genuine agency.

The East vs. West Dynamic: A significant point of discussion is whether the geopolitical rivalry between the East (e.g., Russia and China) and the West is genuine opposition or part of the same overarching agenda. The sources suggest it may be a "stitch up," with both sides ultimately playing "the same game" towards global government.

• Shared Objectives: China's credit scoring systems, digital IDs, and digital currencies are viewed as aiming for the same kind of societal control seen in Western proposals.

• Consistent Narratives: Neither Putin nor China significantly challenged the core COVID narrative, instead promoting their own vaccines, which supports the idea of a shared agenda rather than a fundamental ideological conflict.

• Conflict as Power Struggle: Any apparent rivalry is considered a fight for "the biggest slice of the pie" among powerful groups, rather than a genuine ideological opposition to the concept of global control.

Manipulation Tactics and Consequences: Geopolitical power is also maintained through various tactics:

• Creating Scarcity and Fear: A common tactic is to generate a "fear of scarcity" (e.g., in oil, gas, food, or even vaccines), which then justifies control measures and "land grabs". This is argued to be a central part of the technocratic argument, even when resources are plentiful.

• Trading Freedom for Convenience: The move towards digital technologies is seen as a trade-off where populations sacrifice freedoms for perceived convenience or comfort. This dynamic could be leveraged geopolitically to gain control by offering "peace and comfort" in exchange for submission.

• Erosion of Traditional Structures: The agenda is described as leading to "neo-feudalism" and the "erasing the middle class," with intentional increases in living costs while salaries stagnate. This can manifest in the closure of small businesses and traditional social venues, like pubs in the UK.

• Depopulation and a Soulless Future: Some interpret the agenda as potentially involving depopulation, leading to a world where elites live in isolated, "soulless" communities, devoid of social interaction and traditional human comfort.

• Death of Democracy and Mainstream Media: The concentration of geopolitical power is seen as leading to a loss of public trust in political parties and leaders, as well as mainstream media, which is perceived as propped up by governments and functioning as a "censorship organization".

The sources suggest that scarcity, or the fear of scarcity, is a fundamental tool used by those in power to exert control and advance their agenda towards a totalitarian world state. This strategy is seen as a deliberate manipulation to justify various measures and consolidate power.

Here's how scarcity and control are discussed:

• Creation of Fear and Justification for Control:
  
  

  • The creation of a "fear of scarcity" is a recurring tactic. For instance, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, there was significant discussion, particularly from Republicans, about the Nord Stream pipeline and the fear that Russia would have a direct supply of gas into Europe, implying scarcity for others. Donald Trump even suggested that the pipeline being blown up was a "good thing," which aligns with this narrative of controlling energy supply.

  • This tactic was also evident during the COVID era, where there was a manufactured fear of scarcity around essential goods like toilet rolls, and then later, a squabble over vaccine supply, creating anxiety about not receiving the vaccine. This "orchestrated nonsense" aimed to generate a feeling of scarcity.

  • The "net zero nonsense" is another example, leading to a decline in global demand for fossil fuels but still resulting in ordinary people paying more at retail for gasoline, even as crude oil prices slump. This is described as creating "false scarcity when there is no such thing".

• Land Grabs and Wealth Consolidation:
  
  

  • The discussion highlights that scarcity is used as a "justification for the land grab that's going on". Despite plentiful supply, the narrative of energy being in "short supply" is central to the "technocratic argument".

  • An example given is BlackRock and Bill Gates "clawing all of these assets from national governments," as seen with the proposed inheritance tax on farmers' land in the UK, which is viewed as a means to seize assets.

• Impact on Ordinary People:
  
  

  • The ultimate consequence of this manufactured scarcity is that "the only people who suffer from all of this are the ordinary ordinary people who have to pay through the nose". They face increasing costs for essentials like food and energy, while their salaries remain stagnant. This is seen as an intentional effort to erase the middle class and implement "neo feudalism".

• Control over Resources and Infrastructure:
  
  

  • The "voucher system" implemented by organizations like the WEF is a form of control through resource allocation. Instead of giving governments money directly for smart city developments, they provide vouchers that must be spent on WEF partner companies, like Huawei. This ensures that the money circulates within their network, extending their influence and control over infrastructure and technology.

  • The objective of achieving "global control" through owning the issuance of digital money (dollar stablecoins, CBDCs, PBDCs) is presented as a critical aspect of this control grid. If they control digital money, it leads to the "domination of the entire planet". This financial control ties into the broader agenda of unifying digital IDs, digital currencies, and digital passports, which would make it impossible to function outside the system.

In essence, the sources portray scarcity as a deliberately orchestrated condition or narrative used by interconnected power structures—corporates, intelligence agencies, and financial entities—to manipulate populations, justify their interventions, consolidate assets and wealth, and ultimately establish a totalitarian global control grid.