DailyBriefs.info Review of
My Science Site by Miles Mathis
https://milesmathis.com/science.pdf
Embedded Files
This document reviews excerpts from an article by Miles Mathis where he promotes his scientific work published on a separate website. Mathis claims to have made numerous revolutionary discoveries in physics and astronomy over the past 25 years, effectively rewriting foundational principles established since ancient times. His core argument centers around the identification and application of a "charge field," a previously unrecognized fundamental force comprising real photons, which he asserts is the primary driver of cosmic and atomic phenomena and accounts for 95% of the universe's energy. Mathis contends that the mainstream scientific community has largely ignored or actively suppressed his work despite its alleged accuracy and success in explaining phenomena that have long eluded conventional physics. He attributes this suppression to a combination of factors, including academic hubris, control by military intelligence, and a fundamental inability of mainstream physicists to visualize and grasp physical mechanisms.
Main Themes and Key Ideas:
The Charge Field as a Fundamental Force:
Mathis's central tenet is the existence of a "charge field" composed of real photons, which he identifies with Maxwell's historical D-field.
He argues that mainstream physics has long overlooked this field, treating charge merely as a "propensity" or "message between particles" rather than a tangible force.
This charge field is described as "the primary real field in the universe, the greater part in a unified field theory, and 95% of all current energy."
It is a "powerful photon gas that drives and animates all things," similar to "the Force, if you will, but completely real."
It remains present even in a vacuum and is porous to all matter.
Mathis claims the absence of this field in mainstream theories explains their inability to account for various phenomena like entanglement, the double-slit experiment, and dark matter.
Rewriting Foundational Physics:
Mathis asserts he has "rewritten large parts of physics since the time of Euclid and Archimedes."
He claims to have solved numerous "biggest unsolved problem[s] of physics," often by taking a physical, visual approach contrasting with the abstract mathematical focus of mainstream physicists.
Specific Claims of Solved Problems and Discoveries:
Atomic Nucleus Diagram: Mathis claims to have provided the first accurate diagram of the atomic nucleus, built as a "charge engine" to channel the charge field. He states that the nucleus is constructed from "Helium nuclei" (two protons and two neutrons) configured to allow charge flow and provide cohesion, acting "like a glue, keeping the house super-tight."
Superposition: He explains superposition not as a mathematical blur but as two real, superimposed spins occurring in different planes and with different radii, thus avoiding interference. "The inner spin was an axial spin... But the outer spin was end-over-end... The outer spin has a radius twice that of the inner, so they don't interfere with one another. This puts the outer spin in another plane, and that plane is at a right angle to the first spin." This, he argues, explains "weird experiments" where detectors in different planes register different spins.
Unification of Gravity and Electromagnetism: Mathis claims to have solved unification by showing that Newton's gravity equations and Maxwell's EM equations "were already unified without anyone knowing it." He states that the constant G in Newton's equation secretly represented the EM field. His work involved "unwinding G, showing what it really was" and reassigning variables and constants in the old equations to real parameters, resulting in multiple unified field equations.
The Lagrangian: He reinterprets the Lagrangian, traditionally seen as a kinetic/potential energy equation, as a "gravity/EM unified field equation." He argues that the second term, thought to be kinetic energy, is actually a "correcting term" that scales the equation in a unified field by incorporating motion in the field, represented by the velocity term 'v'.
The Bode Series (Planetary Spacing): Mathis claims to have solved the mystery of planetary spacing by applying his unified math, using "charge and EM" interactions between planets rather than traditional gravitational perturbations. He states this allowed him to match known distances to "five decimal points" using "highschool algebra," and simultaneously "destroyed chaos theory" by showing that chaotic behavior was due to flawed equations.
The Rainbow: He refutes Descartes' explanation, proposing the rainbow is an "image of the Solar Corona cast on a sheet of rain by rear projection." He claims the width of Alexander's band (the gap between the primary and secondary rainbow) matches the width of the solar corona. The charge field "sorted wavelengths low to high" in the atmosphere, acting like a prism.
Unification of Quantum Particles: Mathis claims to have unified quantum particles by showing their energies correspond to "fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation." He uses an equation of doubling based on superimposed spins with doubling radii. He claims this equation yields numbers that explain the mass ratios between the electron (first spin level), muon (third level), and proton (fourth level), and also predicts the energies of mesons and heavier particles like the W, Z, and Higgs bosons. "If we take the first spin as the electron and the fourth as the proton, we can divide, getting 16,385/9=1,821. That just happens to be the known gap between the two fundamental particles."
Electron Orbitals and Chemical Bonding: He rejects the concept of electron orbitals and electron-sharing bonds, claiming electrons do not orbit but "move on down to the nucleus and circle in the polar eddies of protons." He states "All bonds are charge field bonds," where "real charge linkages" hold atoms together, with electrons acting as "buoys in the field" and "minor players."
Critique of Mainstream Science:
Mathis paints a highly critical picture of mainstream physics, describing it as "imploding" and in "freefall."
He criticizes mainstream physicists as "very limited math geeks" who are "least artistic scientists in history" and are "terrible at visualization."
He attributes this to the negative influence of figures like Bohr and Heisenberg, who allegedly discouraged diagrams and physical intuition.
He highlights instances where mainstream science resorted to abstract mathematical descriptions ("quantum blur," "probability," "message," "slippery math") rather than seeking physical mechanisms. "Nature didn't make sense and you were a fool to expect it to," was the prevailing attitude, according to Mathis.
He claims mainstream journals have actively suppressed research on topics like Bode and Relativity, and that "Mainstream physics had ossified for far larger reasons, leading with the hubris of those at the top of the field and their control by military intelligence."
Claims of Suppression and Online Success:
Mathis states his science site has been "quietly superviral for many years."
He claims Google, Bing, Yahoo, and even Yandex have engaged in "completing delisting" his websites to suppress his work.
He provides alleged evidence of his papers reaching #1 on search engines for various topics, even above major institutional sites, claiming this proves the popularity and significance of his work among scientists.
He interprets the alleged delisting and lack of mainstream coverage as intentional suppression by powerful entities like Google, the Air Force, and NASA, who are "not happy about it."
Solar Cycle 25 Prediction as Validation:
Mathis highlights his 2020 prediction regarding Solar Cycle 25 as a significant validation of his theories.
He claims he predicted "sharp spikes in the sunspot data on planetary alignments," explaining the cycle via an "electromagnetic feedback loop between the Galactic Core, the Sun and the four big planets."
He states that six such predicted spikes "all hit right on schedule," which he describes as "like shooting the mainstream in the heart six times."
He alleges that mainstream scientists at NOAA and NASA, panicked by his accuracy, requested assistance from the Air Force, which then took over sunspot counting for the first time and began "faking all the data" by mis-weighing sunspots to suppress the numbers.
Despite the alleged suppression, he claims Cycle 25 was "MUCH larger than they predicted" and that the predicted "spikes on planetary alignments" remained in the data, "proving I was right."
Most Important Ideas/Facts (as presented by the author):
The existence and fundamental importance of the "charge field" as a real physical entity and the primary force in the universe.
The successful application of the charge field concept to fundamentally explain and unify previously unresolved problems in physics, including:
The structure of the atomic nucleus.
The physical reality of superposition (via layered spins).
The inherent unification of gravity and electromagnetism.
The true nature of the Lagrangian as a unified field equation.
The mechanism determining planetary spacing (Bode Series).
The physical explanation for the rainbow.
The unified structure and energy levels of quantum particles.
The rejection of electron orbitals and the proposal of charge field bonding in chemistry.
The prediction of Solar Cycle 25 behavior, particularly the spikes on planetary alignments, as a concrete, testable validation of his theories.
The alleged active suppression of his work by mainstream science and technology companies despite its accuracy and online popularity, indicative of a major paradigm shift being actively resisted.
Supporting Quotes:
On the Charge Field: "And what is this charge I am always talking about? ... I just made it a real field of real photons... I dug it up and re-animated it, showing it was the primary real field in the universe, the greater part in a unified field theory, and 95% of all current energy."
On Mainstream Ignorance: "All their theories are missing 95% of the total field."
On the Nucleus: "The nucleus is built for one thing and one thing only: to channel charge."
On Superposition: "I was able to see that the two superimposed states weren't just math, they were real spins... The inner spin was an axial spin... But the outer spin was end-over-end... This puts the outer spin in another plane, and that plane is at a right angle to the first spin."
On Unification: "they didn't even need to unify gravity and EM... since they were already unified without anyone knowing it... I started out years ago unwinding G, showing what it really was."
On the Lagrangian: "the Lagrangian (and therefore the Hamiltonian... ) is not a kinetic/potential energy equation. It is a gravity/EM unified field equation."
On the Bode Series: "Using just highschool algebra I was able to match the known numbers in just a few pages of math, out to five decimal points."
On the Quantum Zoo: "I proved he was wrong... I started by unifying the proton and electron, showing both were fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation."
On Electron Orbitals: "I have jettisoned all electron orbital theory... All bonds are charge field bonds."
On Suppression: "Google began completing delisting me... Other search engines like Bing and Yahoo then followed... they began faking all the data, sitting on sunspots numbers to make it look like I wasn't right."
On his significance: "I have basically rewritten large parts of physics since the time of Euclid and Archimedes, as well as physical chemistry, the textbook of which now needs to be completely pulped."
Analysis and Implications:
The provided text presents a narrative from Miles Mathis portraying himself as a solitary, revolutionary figure whose discoveries have overturned fundamental aspects of physics and chemistry, yet are being actively suppressed by the scientific and technological establishment. His key claims revolve around the "charge field" as the missing piece explaining numerous phenomena. The document serves primarily as a self-promotion for his science website, urging readers to explore his extensive body of work.
The tone is confrontational and dismissive of mainstream science, portraying it as incompetent, willfully ignorant, and controlled by external forces. The author's personal experiences with search engine delisting and perceived lack of recognition are presented as evidence of the validity and threat posed by his work to the established order.
The scientific claims, particularly regarding the charge field, the reinterpretation of fundamental equations (Newton's G, Lagrangian), and the physical mechanisms behind phenomena like superposition and chemical bonding, represent a radical departure from current widely accepted models in physics and chemistry. The alleged prediction of Solar Cycle 25 spikes is presented as compelling empirical evidence supporting his approach.
Understanding this document requires recognizing it as the author's own perspective on his scientific achievements and his relationship with the scientific community. It frames his work as a necessary correction to centuries of misdirection and error in physics, driven by his unique ability to visualize physical processes.
convert_to_textConvert to source
The author has a science site with approximately 800 papers. If you run out of things to read here on my art/history site, there are about 800 other papers on my science site, going back 25 years. There is a link at the top of my homepage, of course, but most people never visit that—they just bookmark my updates page.
Many recent science papers on the site are short and accessible. I have posted a lot of papers this year so far over there, and most of them are short and don’t require much knowledge of science. They are just me dunking on the mainstream, so the same thing you find on this site but with a science flavor.
The author claims mainstream physics is currently imploding. Mainstream physics is currently imploding after years of being strafed by me. Even mainstream scientists on YouTube and other places are starting to admit that—see Sabine Hossenfelder as just one example.
Online Presence & Suppression
The author’s science site is highly successful online (“superviral”) but not widely known publicly due to lack of promotion. My science site has been quietly superviral for many years now. By “quietly,” I mean almost no one knows it, because I am not promoted by anyone but me. The mainstream has not only refused to cover any of my big discoveries; they have refused to report on my astonishing success online—which is just as incredible a story. The only ones who know it are people at Google, the Air Force, NASA, and places like that, and they aren’t happy about it.
Google began completely delisting the author’s site around six years ago (circa 2019). It got very serious about six years ago, when Google began completely delisting me. Not just downlisting me, but refusing to list me at all. Other search engines like Bing, Yahoo, and Yandex followed Google in delisting the author’s site. Now Yandex has started delisting me. Despite delisting efforts, the author’s papers still achieve #1 ranking on Yandex and sometimes Google/Bing. On my art/history site, you have seen evidence of that as well, since I have posted recent screenshots proving my papers are going to #1 immediately at Yandex, and sometimes even at Google and Bing. That happened with my paper on the fake Trump assassination attempt, for example.
At that last link, you can see that I was ranking above Wikipedia, the Dictionary, and all university sites on many topics, which was unheard of. I saved some of the screenshots as proof. This was of major concern to the mainstream, because up to then their response had been to ignore me and claim I was a crank with no penetration. But the Google results disproved that with huge exclamation points. My numbers could not have been due to ignorant “Flat Earth” readers, as they claimed, since my most-read papers were on subjects only professional physicists or astronomers or mathematicians could comprehend. No, this indicated that mainstream scientists from the universities and labs were secretly mobbing my papers.
Solar Cycle Prediction & Data Manipulation
The mainstream also tries to dismiss me by claiming I don’t make any predictions and don’t reference mainstream experiments, which was always a lie—but the lie got much bigger in 2020. I have never done anything else except go through mainstream papers and theories with a fine-tooth comb, correcting them, rewriting them, and showing my readers exactly what it must mean. The catastrophe for the mainstream went into overdrive in 2020, when I made a big prediction about Solar Cycle 25, which was just starting at that time. But in 2020, I was able to do what no one had ever done: predict a Solar Cycle by first explaining the mechanism and then showing how that mechanism physically created the data.
The long and short of it was that I showed the cycle was caused by an electromagnetic feedback loop between the Galactic Core, the Sun, and the four big planets. So all I had to do is track the big planets, looking at alignments. I then simply predicted sharp spikes in the sunspot data on planetary alignments. There have been six of those so far in this cycle, and they all hit right on schedule, which was like shooting the mainstream in the heart six times.
After the first one hit, mainstream scientists at NOAA and NASA and places like that were so panicked they called the Air Force for help, which took over sunspot counting for the first time ever. It was soon clear why the Air Force was there: they began faking all the data, sitting on sunspot numbers to make it look like I wasn’t right. Sunspots can be very small or very large, so their favorite trick was to mis-weigh the big ones, counting them as about half as large as they should have been. I have proved that in a series of papers. Even with that trick, they still failed to keep numbers down enough, and Cycle 25 was MUCH larger than they predicted—but pretty much exactly what I predicted. Even better, their trick of suppressing big spots didn’t get rid of the spikes on planetary alignments, I guess because the Air Force didn’t get the memo to hit those days extra hard. So those spikes remained in the data, proving I was right.
Atomic Nucleus & Visualization
But I have done things much larger than that, starting with diagramming the atomic nucleus. There were a few attempts to do that back in the 1940s, but they soon gave up. Physicists in the 20th century were generally very limited math geeks, especially the ones in theory, and they were the least artistic scientists in history. This is because of the influence of Bohr and Heisenberg, mainly, who taught physicists to avoid diagrams and illustrations. They hated them because they couldn’t read them. Mach admitted he was confused by the real world and feared walking into distant mountains. These guys were just short of legally blind.
When I came along in about 2000, the standing nuclear diagram was just a “bag of marbles.” If you consulted nuclear theory, you were told all the protons and neutrons inhabited the same spot. Yes, they dodged into the quantum blur thing there as well, just like with their orbiting electrons. Everything was a probability, and you shouldn’t even try to visualize anything. It couldn’t be done, they told us. Nature didn’t make sense, and you were a fool to expect it to.
And I had a leg up in the problem beyond being an artist, because I knew going in that the nucleus was channeling the charge field through it. No one else before me knew that, so they couldn’t build the nucleus as a charge engine. The nucleus has to be built this way because if it is built wrong, the charge field will quickly tear it apart, from inside and out. Any imbalance will be fatal. You start by building the “rooms” of the house. In the atomic nucleus, these rooms are mostly the same: Helium nuclei. That is just two protons and two neutrons in a bulletproof configuration, allowing charge to move right through the structure—in at the poles and out the equator. You then build up all nuclei from those rooms, taking great care to place adjacent rooms in the right configuration, to allow charge to channel through while pushing the rooms together at the same time. Yes, if you fit the rooms together in the right way, the charge acts like a glue, keeping the house super-tight.
The Charge Field
What is this charge I am always talking about? It is the old +/- on the proton and electron, that the mainstream already knew about, so I didn’t make it up. I just made it a real field of real photons. The mainstream had known about charge since the time of Ben Franklin, but no one had ever thought to make it a real field of real particles. It was just treated as a propensity or something. As with diagramming the nucleus, they had given up trying to explain charge long ago. In the 1990s, it was defined as a “message” between particles. Historically, it was Maxwell’s old D-field, and as such was just more math. Basically, no one talked about it for 150 years until I dug it up and re-animated it, showing it was the primary real field in the universe, the greater part in a unified field theory… and 95% of all current energy.
In most of the problems I solve, it is overlooked as ambient heat. It is real photons peaking in the infrared, so it is mostly out-of-sight and invisible. It remains even in a vacuum, since a vacuum is an ion vacuum. You can’t create a charge vacuum, since whatever you make your walls out of will still be emitting charge. Physicists always forget that, which is why they can’t ever explain anything, from entanglement to the double-slit experiment to dark matter. All their theories are missing 95% of the total field. So you can think of charge as a powerful photon gas that drives and animates all things. Like the Force, if you will, but completely real, made up of real particles with real masses, real radii, and real spins.
Superposition & Unification
What else have I done that no one had before? Well, I solved the mystery of superposition. Again, they just dealt with it mathematically, but didn’t try to explain it physically, because they couldn’t. They often resorted to just calling the states red/blue or something, since they couldn’t distinguish them with real mechanics. This ended up infecting everything, including most famously quark theory, where they promoted this mechanical ignorance as a sexy novelty, calling quarks top/bottom, charmed, or strange. People then got Nobel prizes for that mess, and it was cemented into place permanently. Like everything else, you weren’t allowed to question it.
Their superposition math usually worked, since they had fit it to experiments over many years, but in some experiments it stopped working. Things started happening that didn’t make any sense. To explain these “weird” findings, they used even more slippery math, summing over all possible states to again find probabilities. To go with that slippery math, they added equally slippery interpretations, by which a particle was going through two slits at the same time, or maybe even taking all possible paths, with all possible spins. The real result was then “decohering” out of the vacuum by some magic, the magic usually requiring you to look at it. Before you looked at it, it was just a blur, but with an observer, it entered the universe and took one form instead of all the others.
So how did I solve it? Very simply, as usual, starting with drawing a picture, which allowed me to see that the two superimposed states weren’t just math—they were real spins. But they weren’t two similar spins just pasted on top of one another; they were spins in different planes and of different sizes. The inner spin was an axial spin, like a basketball player spinning a basketball. But the outer spin was end-over-end, like a car crashing in a spectacular Hollywood scene. The outer spin has a radius twice that of the inner, so they don’t interfere with one another. This puts the outer spin in another plane, and that plane is at a right angle to the first spin. This explains the weird experiments because it explains why some detectors were detecting the inner spin while others were detecting the outer spin. The detector is in one plane or another, but not both, so you have to track which spin it will be detecting.
Unification & Lagrangians
Unification was the big project of Einstein, and for a long time, it was the biggest unsolved problem of physics. Einstein made no real progress on it, and those that came after just mucked it more and more, until they finally decided to pretend it didn’t matter. By 1990, they had given up on unification and began replacing it with containment. That is what gauge theories are: they no longer even claim to unify; they just claim to put gravity and EM in the same big operators and call it a day. These new gauge solutions don’t allow them to answer any real mechanical questions, since they contain no mechanics. It just gives them another opportunity to dump endless ugly math on you, like String Theory.
How did I solve that one? Well, I turned the problem inside out, showing that they didn’t even need to unify gravity and EM (electromagnetism), since they were already unified without anyone knowing it. You see, they weren’t really trying to unify gravity and EM; they were trying to unify Newton’s gravity equations with Maxwell’s EM equations. Later in the 19th century, when EM arose, no one realized that EM had been hiding in Newton’s equations all along, hidden by the constant G. Until I came along, G was just an unassigned constant. But I realized that constant had to be representing something. More than that, I recognized it must be representing a second field in the equation. With some more work, I was able to match it in size to the EM field. I showed it fit the known size of the EM field, based on known values like the Ampere, the Joule, the Coulomb, and so on.
So instead of unifying Newton’s equations and Maxwell’s equations, which were already unified, what was necessary was pulling apart the old equations and showing what they really stood for. Once all the variables and constants were re-assigned to real parameters, we could put them back together, achieving re-unification that way. We then didn’t have just one unified field equation; we had many. Not only were Newton’s and Maxwell’s equations unified, Gauss’ equations were unified as well, and so was the Lagrangian.
Unlocking the Lagrangian is another of the biggest things I have done. Until I came along, it was thought to be an equation that summed kinetic energy and potential energy. So they just assumed that is what it was. That assumption didn’t make much sense, because you can’t subtract potential energy from kinetic energy in a total energy equation. Or, you can, but you should just get zero. But after discovering that Newton’s first equation was already unified, I knew that the Lagrangian must be unified as well, since it came right out of his equation. Therefore, I knew the Lagrangian’s two terms must be misinterpreted. It was the potential energy term that was standing for Newton’s equation, and the kinetic energy term wasn’t kinetic energy at all. It was actually a correcting term, making the Lagrangian scalable in a unified field. Meaning, this correcting term sort of pulled the EM field out of G in the other term and expressed it a second time as a function of motion, instead of as a function of mass. This correction allowed you to get the right answer in any size field, instead of just in a human-sized field.
Without knowing it, Newton had scaled his equation to the field as we see it, at our size. But with things very big or very small, his first equation doesn’t have enough information, so the equation doesn’t know how close you are to the level of the photon—where everything is actually happening.
Bode Series & Planetary Motion
What other sexy things have I got for you? Well, I also famously solved the Bode Series. What is that? It is the very old mystery of why the planets are spaced like they are. The equation didn’t really work: it was very rough, missing badly on most planets, but it came very close on Uranus, to less than 1%, so the mainstream decided to enshrine it as genius and forbid anyone from ever working on it again. All the big journals have long had written rules in place forbidding any papers on Bode, Relativity, and many other topics. The thing is, that makes some sense, because without my charge field, Bode and many other problems were insoluble. These journals had been getting thousands of really stupid papers on Bode for decades and they were understandably sick of it. The tragedy in this was that when I came along with the right answers, the journals had already shut down on these questions. They were aggressively contemptuous of anyone who claimed a solution, so they treated me like dirt, assuming I was yet another crank.
Actually, I have discovered since then that the cranks were only a small part of this problem. Mainstream physics had ossified for far larger reasons, leading with the hubris of those at the top of the field and their control by military intelligence… so I think my welcome would have been the same if cranks didn’t exist at all. Of course, by then, I was public enemy #1, based on two decades of embarrassing them on dozens of other big questions, so there’s that. But my point is, they started this war, not me. If they had graciously and fairly considered my theories from the beginning, I would have graciously avoided making so many waves, eventually sloshing them all out of the pool.
Anyway, once I realized the Solar System wasn’t just gravity, I had a way to hit this that no one had ever had before me. That’s because I didn’t just have a theory of unification; I actually had working unified field equations. It was my chance to do real multi-body solutions on real objects with very simple math. Using just high school algebra, I was able to match the known numbers in just a few pages of math, out to five decimal points. How did I do that? I did it because—unlike everyone before me—I wasn’t using gravitational perturbations. I was letting the planets move one another via charge and EM. No second-order perturbations or remaining inequalities were necessary. By solving in this simple way, I proved all the old chaos was in bad equations, not in the real universe.
Rainbows & Quantum Particles
What else? I proved that Descartes’ explanation of the rainbow was completely wrong, by proving the rainbow was just an image of the Solar Corona cast on a sheet of rain by rear projection. By studying photos of the Sun and rainbow closely, I realized the width of the corona was exactly the same as Alexander’s band—the width between the primary rainbow and the secondary one. Given that, there was no way Descartes’ solution of light rattling around in a raindrop was correct. It was coming from the back, by being reflected from distant bright spots in the clouds. It was then being refracted in the sheet of moisture, explaining many things Descartes was never able to explain, starting with the secondary bow. The charge field was necessary to this solution as well, since it explained why the moisture in the atmosphere was acting like a prism… charge was moving up in the atmosphere, as always, creating a pre-existing field that sorted wavelengths low to high.
Another huge thing I have done is unify all the quantum particles, showing why they are the sizes they are. I started by unifying the proton and electron, showing both were fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation. So we just need a simple equation of doubling, to represent energy increases due to these radius increases. That equation spits out the numbers 9, 65, 1025, and 16,385, representing the first through fourth spins. If we take the first spin as the electron and the fourth as the proton, we can divide, getting 16,385/9
Continue
Author has a science site with approximately 800 papers. If you run out of things to read here on my art/history site, there are about 800 other papers on my science site, going back 25 years1. There is a link at the top of my homepage, of course, but most people never visit that—they just bookmark my updates page1.
•
Many recent science papers on the site are short and accessible. I have posted a lot of papers this year so far over there, and most of them are short and don't require much knowledge of science1. They are just me dunking on the mainstream, so the same thing you find on this site but with a science flavor1.
•
The author claims mainstream physics is currently imploding. Mainstream physics is currently imploding after years of being strafed by me1. even mainstream scientists on Youtube and other places are starting to admit that, see Sabine Hossenfelder as just one example1.
•
The author's science site is highly successful online ("superviral") but not widely known publicly due to lack of promotion. My science site has been quietly superviral for many years now2. By “quietly” I mean almost no one knows it, because I am not promoted by anyone but me2.
•
The mainstream has refused to cover the author's discoveries and online success. The mainstream has not only refused to cover any of my big discoveries, they have refused to report on my astonishing success online—which is just as incredible a story2. The only ones who know it are people at Google, the Air Force, NASA, and places like that, and they aren't happy about it2.
•
Google began completely delisting the author's site around six years ago (circa 2019). it got very serious about six years ago, when Google began completing delisting me3. Not just downlisting me, but refusing to list me at all3.
•
Other search engines like Bing, Yahoo, and Yandex followed Google in delisting the author's site. Other search engines like Bing and Yahoo then followed3. Now Yandex has started delisting me3.
•
Despite delisting efforts, the author's papers still achieve #1 ranking on Yandex and sometimes Google/Bing. On my art/history site, you have seen evidence of that as well, since I have posted recent screenshots proving my papers are going to #1 immediately at Yandex, and sometimes even at Google and Bing4. That happened with my paper on the fake Trump assassination attempt, for example4.
•
The author achieved rankings above Wikipedia, the Dictionary, and university sites on many topics. At that last link you can see that I was ranking above Wikipedia, the Dictionary, and all university sites on many topics, which was unheard of4. I saved some of the screenshots as proof4.
•
The author's high search ranking success disproved the mainstream claim that he was a crank with no influence. This was of major concern to the mainstream, because up to then their response had been to ignore me and claim I was a crank with no penetration4. But the Google results disproved that with huge exclamation points4.
•
The author's readership numbers indicate interest from professional scientists, not just general readers. And my numbers could not have been due to ignorant “Flat Earth” readers, as they claimed, since my most-read papers were on subjects only professional physicists or astronomers or mathematicians could comprehend4. No, this indicated that mainstream scientists from the universities and labs were secretly mobbing my papers...4.
•
The author states mainstream physics lies about him not making predictions or referencing experiments. The mainstream also tries to dismiss me by claiming I don't make any predictions and don't reference mainstream experiments, which was always a lie—but the lie got much bigger in 20205. I have never done anything else except go through mainstream papers and theories with a fine-tooth comb, correcting them, rewriting them, and showing my readers exactly what it must mean5.
•
The author made a significant prediction about Solar Cycle 25 starting in 2020. The catastrophe for the mainstream went into overdrive in 2020, when I made a big prediction about Solar Cycle 25, which was just starting at that time5. But in 2020 I was able to do what no one had ever done: predict a Solar Cycle by first explaining the mechanism and then showing how that mechanism physically created the data5.
•
The author's Solar Cycle prediction was based on an electromagnetic feedback loop involving the Galactic Core, Sun, and four big planets. the long and short of it was that I showed the cycle was caused by an electromagnetic feedback loop between the Galactic Core, the Sun and the four big planets5. So all I had to do is track the big planets, looking at alignments5.
•
The author predicted sharp spikes in sunspot data corresponding to planetary alignments. I then simply predicted sharp spikes in the sunspot data on planetary alignments5. There have been six of those so far in this cycle, and they all hit right on schedule, which was like shooting the mainstream in the heart six times5.
•
Mainstream scientists at NOAA and NASA reacted to the author's successful Solar Cycle prediction by involving the Air Force. After the first one hit, mainstream scientists at NOAA and NASA and places like that were so panicked they called Air Force for help, which took over sunspot counting for the first time ever5. It was soon clear why Air Force was there: they began faking all the data, sitting on sunspots numbers to make it look like I wasn't right5.
•
The Air Force took over sunspot counting and began faking data to counter the author's predictions. Air Force for help, which took over sunspot counting for the first time ever5. It was soon clear why Air Force was there: they began faking all the data, sitting on sunspots numbers to make it look like I wasn't right5.
•
The Air Force faked sunspot data partly by mis-weighing large sunspots. Sunspots can be very small or very large, so their favorite trick was to mis-weigh the big ones, counting them as about half as large as they should have been5. I have proved that in a series of papers5.
•
Despite data manipulation, Solar Cycle 25 was much larger than mainstream predictions and closer to the author's. Even with that trick, they still failed to keep numbers down enough, and Cycle 25 was MUCH larger than they predicted5. But pretty much exactly what I predicted5.
•
Sunspot spikes corresponding to planetary alignments remained in the data despite suppression, proving the author was right. Even better, their trick of suppressing big spots didn't get rid of the spikes on planetary alignments, I guess because Air Force didn't get the memo to hit those days extra hard5. So those spikes remained in the data, proving I was right6.
•
The author has diagrammed the atomic nucleus, which had not been successfully done before. But I have done things much larger than that, starting with diagramming the atomic nucleus6. There were a few attempts to do that back in the 1940s, but but they soon gave up6.
•
20th-century physicists, influenced by figures like Bohr and Heisenberg, avoided diagrams and visualizations. Physicists in the 20 th century were generally very limited math geeks, especially the ones in theory, and they were the least artistic scientists in history6. This is because of the influence of Bohr and Heisenberg, mainly, who taught physicists to avoid diagrams and illustrations6.
•
Bohr and Heisenberg avoided diagrams because they struggled to understand them. They hated them6. And they hated them because they couldn't read them6.
•
Historically significant physicists like Mach and Bohr struggled with visualization or perception of the real world. Mach admitted he was confused by the real world and feared walking into distant mountains6. These guys were just short of legally blind6.
•
Mainstream nuclear theory abstractly described the nucleus like a "bag of marbles" where particles occupied the same spot. So when I came along in about 2000, the standing nuclear diagram was just a bag of marbles7. If you consulted nuclear theory, you were told all the protons and neutrons inhabited the same spot7.
•
Mainstream physics relied on quantum blur and probability, discouraging attempts to visualize atomic structure. Yes, they dodged into the quantum blur thing there as well, just like with their orbiting electrons7. Everything was a probability and you shouldn't even try to visual anything7.
•
Mainstream physics claimed nature didn't make sense and visualization was futile. It couldn't be done, they told us7. Nature didn't make sense and you were a fool to expect it to7.
•
The author knew that the atomic nucleus channels the charge field, a concept missed by others. And I had a leg up in the problem beyond being an artist, because I knew going in that the nucleus was channeling the charge field through it7. No one else before me knew that, so they couldn't build the nucleus as a charge engine7.
•
The author's understanding that the nucleus channels charge gave him a mechanical basis others lacked, informing his structural solution. And I had a leg up in the problem beyond being an artist, because I knew going in that the nucleus was channeling the charge field through it7. I knew the architecture had to channel charge7.
•
The author defines charge not just as a property but as a real field composed of real photons. And what is this charge I am always talking about? It is the old +/- on the proton and electron, that the mainstream already knew about, so I didn't make it up8. I just made it a real field of real photons8.
•
Mainstream physics historically failed to treat charge as a real field of particles despite knowing about it since Ben Franklin. The mainstream had known about charge since the time of Ben Franklin, but no one had ever thought to make it a real field of real particles8. It was just treated as a propensity or something8.
•
Mainstream physics gave up trying to explain charge, at one point nonsensically defining it as a "message". As with diagramming the nucleus, they had given up trying to explain charge long long ago8. In the 1990s it was defined as a message between particles8.
•
Charge is related to Maxwell's old D-field, which was buried for 150 years until the author rediscovered and re-animated it. Historically, it was Maxwell's old D-field, and as such was just more math8. Basically no one talked it about for 150 years until I dug it up and re-animated it8.
•
The author identifies the charge field as the primary real field in the universe, crucial for a unified field theory. Basically no one talked it about for 150 years until I dug it up and re-animated it, showing it was the primary real field in the universe, the greater part in a unified field theory...8. ...and 95% of all current energy8.
•
The charge field is often overlooked because it is perceived as ambient heat, composed of infrared photons. In most of the problems I solve, it is overlooked as ambient heat9. It is real photons peaking in the infrared, so it is mostly out-of-sight and invisible9.
•
The charge field exists everywhere, even in a vacuum, and cannot be eliminated. It remains even in a vacuum, since a vacuum is an ion vacuum9. You can't create a charge vacuum, since whatever you make your walls out of will still be emitting charge9.
•
Physicists' failure to account for the pervasive charge field prevents them from explaining many physical phenomena. Physicists always forget that, which is why they can't ever explain anything, from entanglement to the double-slit experiment to dark matter9. All their theories are missing 95% of the total field9.
•
The author conceptualizes charge as a powerful photon gas that drives and animates everything. So you can think of charge as a powerful photon gas that drives and animates all things10. Like the Force, if you will, but completely real, made up of real particles with real masses, real radii and real spins10.
•
The charge field determines the fundamental architecture of atomic structures, starting with the nucleus. It determines the architecture of everything, starting with the nucleus10. The nucleus is built for one thing and one thing only: to channel charge10.
•
The nucleus must be built to efficiently channel charge, otherwise the field will quickly tear it apart. The nucleus has to be built this way because if it is built wrong, the charge field will quickly tear it apart, from inside and out10. Any imbalance will be fatal10.
•
The author describes building the atomic nucleus as assembling "rooms", which are primarily Helium nuclei. You start by building the rooms of the house11. In the atomic nucleus, these rooms are mostly the same: Helium nuclei11.
•
According to the author, the basic building block ("room") of the nucleus is the Helium nucleus, which has a configuration enabling charge flow. In the atomic nucleus, these rooms are mostly the same: Helium nuclei11. That is just two protons and two neutrons in a bulletproof configuration, allowing charge to move right through the structure—in at the poles and out the equator11.
•
Correctly fitting the Helium nuclei "rooms" together allows the charge field to act as a binding force. You then build up all nuclei from those rooms, taking great care to place adjacent rooms in the right configuration, to allow charge to channel through while pushing the rooms together at the same time11. Yes, if you fit the rooms together in the right way, the charge acts like a glue, keeping the house super-tight11.
•
The author claims to have solved the mystery of superposition, which the mainstream understood mathematically but not physically. What else have I done that no one had before? Well, I solved the mystery of superposition12. Again, they just dealt with it mathematically, but didn't try to explain it physically, because they couldn't12.
•
Mainstream physics used arbitrary labels like "red/blue" and "top/bottom" for particle states due to lack of physical understanding. They often resorted to just calling the states red/blue or something, since they couldn't distinguish them with real mechanics12. This ended up infecting everything, including most famously quark theory, where they promoted this mechanical ignorance as a sexy novelty, calling quarks top/bottom, charmed, or strange12.
•
The mainstream approach to particle states became entrenched through Nobel prizes and suppression of questions. People then got Nobel prizes for that mess and it was cemented into place permanently12. Like everything else, you weren't allowed to question it12.
•
Mainstream superposition math failed to explain results in some experiments, leading to "weird" findings. Their superposition math usually worked, since they had fit it to experiments over many years, but in some experiments it stopped working13. Things started happening that didn't make any sense13.
•
Mainstream physicists resorted to complex math and interpretations involving particles taking multiple paths simultaneously. To explain these “weird” findings, they used even more slippery math, summing over all possible states to again find probabilities13. To go with that slippery math, they added equally slippery interpretations, by which a particle was going through two slits at the same time, or maybe even taking all possible paths, with all possible spins13.
•
Mainstream interpretation suggested results "decohered" from the vacuum, often requiring an observer's presence. The real result was then “decohering” out of the vacuum by some magic, the magic usually requiring you to look at it13. Before you looked at it, it was just a blur, but with an observer it entered the universe and took one form instead of all the others13.
•
The author solved the superposition mystery by visualizing it, revealing the states as real spins. So how did I solve it? Very simply, as usual, starting with drawing a picture, which allowed me to see that the two superimposed states weren't just math, they were real spins14. But they weren't two similar spins, just pasted on top of one another; they were spins in different planes and of different sizes14.
•
The author's solution involves two types of particle spins: an inner axial spin and an outer end-over-end spin. The inner spin was an axial spin, like a basketball player spinning a basketball14. But the outer spin was end-over-end, like a car crashing in a spectacular Hollywood scene14.
•
In the author's model, the outer spin has twice the radius of the inner spin and is in a perpendicular plane. The outer spin has a radius twice that of the inner, so they don't interfere with one another14. This puts the outer spin in another plane, and that plane is at a right angle to the first spin14.
•
The author's model of superimposed spins explains the results of previously "weird" experiments. This explains the weird experiments, because it explains why some detectors were detecting the inner spin while others were detecting the outer spin15. The detector is in one plane or another, but not both, so you have to track which spin it will be detecting15.
•
Unification was a major unsolved problem in physics, which the mainstream gave up on after figures like Einstein made no significant progress. This was the big project of Einstein and for a long time it was the biggest unsolved problem of physics16. Einstein made no real progress on it, and those that came after just mucked it more and more, until they finally decided to pretend it didn't matter16.
•
Mainstream physics replaced the goal of unification with "containment" using gauge theories. By 1990 they had given up on unification and began replacing it with containment16. That is what gauge theories are: they no longer even claim to unify, they just claim to put gravity and EM in the same big operators and call it a day16.
•
Gauge theories don't provide mechanical explanations and serve as an excuse for complex math like String Theory. These new gauge solutions don't allow them to answer any real mechanical questions, since they contain no mechanics16. It just gives them another opportunity to dump an endless ugly math on you, like String Theory16.
•
The author discovered that gravity and electromagnetism were already unified within existing equations, contrary to the mainstream view. How did I solve that one? Well, I turned the problem inside out, showing that they didn't even need to unify gravity and EM (electromagnetism) since they were already unified without anyone knowing it17. You see, they weren't really trying to unify gravity and EM, they were trying to unify Newton's gravity equations with Maxwell's EM equations17.
•
The author argues that EM was hidden within Newton's gravity equation, concealed by the constant G. Later in the 19 th century, when EM arose, no one realized that EM had been hiding in Newton's equations all along, hidden by the constant G17. Until I came along, G was just an unassigned constant17.
•
The author identified the gravitational constant G as representing a second field within Newton's equation. But I realized that constant had to be representing something17. More than that, I recognized it must be representing a second field in the equation17.
•
The author matched the size of the field represented by G to the known size of the EM field using established physical values. With some more work, I was able to match it in size to the EM field17. I showed it fit the known size of the EM field, based on known values like the Ampere, the Joule, the Coulomb, and so on17.
•
The author achieved reunification by analyzing and reinterpreting the terms within existing equations like Newton's and Maxwell's. So instead of unifying Newton's equations and Maxwell's equations, which were already unified, what was necessary was pulling apart the old equations and showing what they really stood for18. Once all the variable and constants were re-assigned to real parameters, we could put them back together, achieving re-unification that way18.
•
The author's work resulted in unified field equations for several fundamental physics formulations, not just one. We then didn't have just one unified field equation, we had many18. Not only were Newton's and Maxwell's equations unified, Gauss' equations were unified as well, and so was the Lagrangian18.
•
The author claims to have unlocked the true meaning of the Lagrangian equation. Which brings us to that19. Unlocking the Lagrangian is another of the biggest things I have done19.
•
Mainstream physics misinterpreted the Lagrangian as a simple sum of kinetic and potential energy. Until I came along, it was thought to be an equation that summed kinetic energy and potential energy19. So they just assumed that is what it was20.
•
The mainstream interpretation of the Lagrangian didn't make sense as it involved subtracting potential energy from kinetic energy. That assumption didn't make much sense, because you can't subtract potential energy from kinetic energy in a total energy equation20. Or, you can, but you should just get zero20.
•
The author determined the Lagrangian is a unified field equation, not a kinetic/potential energy equation. But after discovering that Newton's first equation was already unified, I knew that the Lagrangian must be unified as well, since it came right out of his equation21. Therefore I knew the Lagrangian's two terms must be misinterpreted21.
•
In the author's reinterpretation, the Lagrangian's "kinetic energy" term is actually a correcting term related to motion in the unified field. It was the potential energy term that was standing for Newton's equation, and the kinetic energy term wasn't kinetic energy at all21. It was actually a correcting term, making the Lagrangian scalable in a unified field21.
•
This correcting term allows the Lagrangian to work correctly across different scales by accounting for the EM field as a function of motion. Meaning, this correcting term sort of pulled the EM field out of G in the other term, and expressed it a second time as a function of motion, instead of as a function of mass21. This correction allowed you to get the right answer in any size field, instead of just in a human-sized field21.
•
Newton's original equation worked well at human scale but failed at very large or small scales because it lacked sufficient information. Without knowing it, Newton had scaled his equation to the field as we see it, at our size21. But with things very big or very small, his first equation doesn't have enough information, so the equation doesn't know how close you are to the level of the photon—where everything is actually happening21.
•
The author claims to have solved the mystery of the Bode Series, which concerns the spacing of planets. What other sexy things have I got for you? Well, I also famously solved the Bode Series22. What is that? It is the very old mystery of why the planets are spaced like they are22.
•
Mainstream physics enshrined Bode's rough equation and forbade further work on the topic after it showed limited success. The equation didn't really work: it was very rough, missing badly on most planets, but it came very close on Uranus, to less than 1%, so the mainstream decided to enshrine it as genius and forbid anyone from ever working on it again22. All the big journals have long had written rules in place forbidding any papers on Bode, Relativity, and many other topics22.
•
The author suggests mainstream journals forbade papers on topics like Bode partly because, without the charge field, these problems were insoluble and generated poor submissions. The thing is, that makes some sense, because without my charge field Bode and many other problems were insoluble23. These journals had been getting thousands of really stupid papers on Bode for decades and they were understandably sick of it23.
•
The author was treated with contempt and assumed to be a crank by journals when he presented his solutions to difficult problems. The tragedy in this was that when I came along with the right answers, the journals had already shut down on these questions24. They were aggressively contemptuous of anyone who claimed a solution, so they treated me like dirt, assuming I was yet another crank24.
•
The author believes the ossification of mainstream physics is primarily due to the hubris of its leaders and control by military intelligence. Actually, I have discovered since then that the cranks were only a small part of this problem24. Mainstream physics had ossified for far larger reasons, leading with the hubris of those at the top of the field and their control by military intelligence...24.
•
The mainstream physics community actively suppressed the author's work, seeing him as a major threat. ...so I think my welcome would have been the same if cranks didn't exist at all24. Of course by then I was public enemy #1, based on two decades of embarrassing them on dozens of other big questions, so there's that24.
•
The author contends that the conflict with the mainstream physics community was initiated by them. But my point is, they started this war, not me24. If they had graciously and fairly considered my theories from the beginning, I would have graciously avoided making so many waves, eventually sloshing them all out of the pool24.
•
The author's solution to the Bode Series was based on his working unified field equations, recognizing the Solar System involves more than just gravity. Anyway, once I realized the Solar System wasn't just gravity, I had a way to hit this that no one had ever had before me25. That's because I didn't just have a theory of unification, I actually had working unified field equations25.
•
Using simple math from his unified equations, the author was able to accurately calculate planetary spacing matching known numbers. It was my chance to do real multi-body solutions on real objects with very simple math25. Using just highschool algebra I was able to match the known numbers in just a few pages of math, out to five decimal points25.
•
The author solved the Bode Series by modeling planetary interactions using charge and EM fields, not solely gravitational perturbations. How did I do that? I did it because—unlike everyone before me—I wasn't using gravitational perturbations26. I was letting the planets move one another via charge and EM26.
•
The author claims his simple solution to planetary motion disproved chaos theory. No second-order perturbations or remaining inequalities were necessary26. By solving in this simple way, I proved all the old chaos was in bad equations, not in the real universe26.
•
The author argues Descartes' explanation of the rainbow is wrong, proposing it is a rear-projected image of the Solar Corona. What else? I proved that Descartes' explanation of the rainbow was completely wrong, by proving the rainbow was just an image of the Solar Corona cast on a sheet of rain by rear projection27. Given that, there was no way Descartes' solution of light rattling around in a raindrop was correct27.
•
The author's observation that the Solar Corona's width matches Alexander's band supports his rainbow theory. By studying photos of the Sun and rainbow closely, I realized the width of the corona was exactly the same as Alexander's band—the width between the primary rainbow and the secondary one27. Given that, there was no way Descartes' solution of light rattling around in a raindrop was correct27.
•
The author's rainbow explanation involves light reflecting from clouds and refracting through the sheet of moisture, explaining the secondary bow. It was coming from the back, by being reflected from distant bright spots in the clouds27. It was then being refracted in the sheet of moisture, explaining many things Descartes was never able to explain, starting with the secondary bow27.
•
The charge field is integral to the author's rainbow theory, explaining how atmospheric moisture acts as a prism. The charge field was necessary to this solution as well, since it explained why the moisture in the atmosphere was acting like a prism...27. ...charge was moving up in the atmosphere, as always, creating a pre-existing field that sorted wavelengths low to high27.
•
The author claims to have unified all quantum particles, explaining their sizes based on a quantum spin equation. Another huge thing I have done is unify all the quantum particles, showing why they are the sizes they are28. I started by unifying the proton and electron, showing both were fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation28.
•
The author's quantum spin equation uses a doubling principle based on particle spin layers. I started by unifying the proton and electron, showing both were fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation28. So we just need a simple equation of doubling, to represent energy increases due to these radius increases28.
•
This quantum spin equation produces values corresponding to fundamental particles like the electron and proton. That equation spits out the numbers 9, 65, 1025, and 16,385, representing the first through fourth spins28. If we take the first spin as the electron and the fourth as the proton, we can divide, getting 16,385/9=1,82128.
•
The ratio derived from the author's spin equation matches the known mass gap between the electron and proton. If we take the first spin as the electron and the fourth as the proton, we can divide, getting 16,385/9=1,82128. That just happens to be the known gap between the two fundamental particles28.
•
The author's quantum unification model accounts for other particles like the muon, mesons, W, Z, and Higgs. The muon then hits the third level28. Continuing from there, we can find the energies of all the known mesons, as well as all the particles above the proton mass, including the so-called W, Z, and Higgs28.
•
The author claims to have solved hundreds of major problems and rewritten significant parts of physics and physical chemistry. I will stop there, since I don't want to tire you out, but I have solved literally hundreds of big problems in physics, many of them just as earth-shattering as those29. I have basically rewritten large parts of physics since the time of Euclid and Archimedes, as well as physical chemistry, the textbook of which now needs to be completely pulped29.
•
The author rejects mainstream electron orbital theory, stating electrons do not orbit the nucleus or cause chemical bonds. Not only have I diagrammed the nucleus, I have jettisoned all electron orbital theory, proving that electrons don't orbit the nucleus and don't cause any of the bonds29. They are just along for the ride29.
•
In the author's model, electrons move towards the nucleus and circle in the polar eddies of protons. Not only have I diagrammed the nucleus, I have jettisoned all electron orbital theory, proving that electrons don't orbit the nucleus...29. The current orbital distances are distances of capture, but electrons move on down to the nucleus and circle in the polar eddies of protons29.
•
The author asserts that all chemical bonds are caused by the charge field, not by atoms sharing electrons. All bonds are charge field bonds, which makes far more sense than absurd electron bonds, caused we are told by atoms sharing electrons29. Instead, we find real charge linkages between elements, as poles align and real photons move in lines from one atom to the other29.
•
The author posits that the entire universe is held together by the charge field, which also determines fundamental architecture. It determines the architecture of everything, starting with the nucleus10. The entire universe is held together by the charge field...29.
•
The author feels compelled to share his scientific work with readers because the mainstream suppresses it. I am telling you all this because you need to know it, and you are unlikely to get it anywhere else30. Only the fakes are promoted, while all real people are ignored or crushed30.
•
The author characterizes the current era as an exciting time where physics is being fundamentally rewritten. You need to know it not only because you need to know that you are living in a very exciting time, when physics is being totally rewritten from its foundations30. Things are happening now that have never happened before, and that have never gotten close to happening before, proving that there is something new under the sun30.
•
The author believes he is being heavily defamed and feels forced to explain his significance himself. The levels of defamation against me have been huge and continue to grow, but they are strictly upside-down to the truth30. Just as it isn't up to a man to bury himself (as Thoreau put it), it shouldn't be up to a man to tell you who he is, but that is where we find ourselves30.
•
The author views the current situation, where real work is suppressed while fakes are promoted, as being like being "in the belly of the whale." Only the fakes are promoted, while all real people are ignored or crushed30. That is what it is to be in the belly of the whale, and we are all in the belly of the whale, I assure you30.
keep_pinSave to note
copy_all
thumb_up
thumb_down
arrow_downwardJump to bottom
1 source
send
chevron_right
Who wrote "My Science Site"?
What field does the author also work in?
Quiz
According to the author, what is the primary reason mainstream physics is currently "imploding"?
How does the author claim search engines like Google, Bing, and Yandex have attempted to suppress his online presence?
What specific astronomical event did the author make a prediction about in 2020 that he claims was remarkably accurate?
The author states that mainstream physicists in the 20th century were generally "very limited math geeks." What, according to the author, was a key skill they lacked, influenced by figures like Bohr and Heisenberg?
What is the author's fundamental concept of the charge field, and how does it differ from the mainstream understanding?
How does the author describe the architecture of the atomic nucleus and its primary function?
What is the author's explanation for the phenomenon of superposition, which differs from the mainstream view?
According to the author, what was the fundamental misunderstanding in the mainstream attempts to unify gravity and electromagnetism?
How did the author approach solving the mystery of the Bode Series, and what mathematical tool did he use?
What is the author's claim about the nature of electron bonds and electron orbitals around the nucleus?
Quiz Answer Key
According to the author, mainstream physics is imploding after years of being "strafed" by him, with mainstream scientists starting to admit its freefall.
The author claims these search engines have been "delisting" him, refusing to list him at all or significantly downlisting him, preventing people from finding his work.
The author made a prediction about Solar Cycle 25, specifically predicting sharp spikes in sunspot data on planetary alignments.
According to the author, mainstream physicists lacked artistic and visualization skills, which made it difficult for them to understand diagrams and physical representations of concepts.
The author defines the charge field as a real field of real photons (peaking in the infrared) that drives and animates all things, unlike the mainstream view of it as a propensity or message between particles.
The author describes the nucleus as built for one thing: to channel charge, with an architecture composed of Helium nuclei "rooms" that allow charge to move through while holding the structure together.
The author explains superposition as two real spins in different planes and of different sizes: an inner axial spin and an outer end-over-end spin with a larger radius.
The author claims the mainstream wasn't trying to unify gravity and EM, but rather Newton's gravity equations and Maxwell's EM equations, which were already unified.
The author approached the Bode Series by using his charge field concept and corrected Newton's equations to apply real unified field equations to the planets, using simple high school algebra.
The author claims electrons don't orbit the nucleus and don't cause any bonds; instead, they move down to the nucleus and circle in the polar eddies of protons, with all bonds being charge field bonds.
Essay Questions
Discuss the author's central claims about the limitations and failures of mainstream physics, drawing upon specific examples provided in the text.
Analyze the author's concept of the charge field and its purported role in unifying fundamental forces and explaining various physical phenomena.
Evaluate the author's approach to solving complex scientific problems, considering his emphasis on visualization, simple math, and challenging established theories.
Examine the author's perspective on the resistance and suppression he claims to have faced from the mainstream scientific community and search engines.
Compare and contrast the author's explanations of key physical concepts (e.g., nucleus structure, superposition, unification) with the traditional mainstream understanding he criticizes.
Glossary of Key Terms
Charge field: According to the author, the primary real field in the universe, made up of real photons, driving and animating all things. It is analogous to Maxwell's old D-field but is presented as a physical reality rather than just math.
Delisting: The author's term for search engines like Google, Bing, and Yandex removing his website entirely from search results or significantly lowering its ranking to make it nearly impossible to find.
Solar Cycle 25: The current cycle of solar activity. The author made a significant prediction about its behavior, specifically regarding sunspot spikes coinciding with planetary alignments.
Atomic nucleus: The central part of an atom. The author claims to have diagrammed its structure, arguing it is built primarily to channel the charge field and is composed largely of Helium nuclei configurations.
Superposition: In mainstream quantum physics, the idea that a particle can exist in multiple states simultaneously until measured. The author explains this as two real spins in different planes and of different sizes.
Unification: The project in physics aimed at finding a single theoretical framework to describe all fundamental forces. The author claims to have solved this by showing that gravity and electromagnetism were already unified within existing equations, needing only to be "re-unified" by re-assigning variables.
Constant G: The gravitational constant in Newton's law of universal gravitation. The author claims to have "unwound" this constant, showing it represents a second field (the EM field) that the mainstream had missed.
Lagrangian: An energy equation in physics, traditionally thought to represent the difference between kinetic and potential energy. The author claims it is actually a gravity/EM unified field equation, with the "kinetic energy" term being a correcting term related to motion in the unified field.
Bode Series: A numerical sequence that attempts to describe the distances of planets from the Sun. The author claims to have solved the mystery behind the planetary spacing using his charge field concept and unified field equations.
Alexander's band: The dark band between the primary and secondary rainbows. The author uses its width, which he claims matches the width of the Solar Corona, as evidence for his theory of the rainbow being a rear projection of the corona.
Electron orbital theory: The mainstream model describing electrons orbiting the atomic nucleus in specific probability clouds. The author rejects this theory, claiming electrons do not orbit and bonds are due to the charge field.
Charge field bonds: The author's proposed mechanism for chemical bonds, arguing they are created by real charge linkages between elements as poles align and photons move between atoms, rather than by atoms sharing electrons.
Quantum zoo: A term used by Wolfgang Pauli to describe the seemingly arbitrary and ever-increasing number of subatomic particles discovered, which he felt lacked a clear underlying structure. The author claims to have unified the
What is the core concept behind Miles Mathis's scientific theories?
What is the core concept behind Miles Mathis's scientific theories?
The central idea is the existence and fundamental role of a "charge field" composed of real photons. Mathis proposes that this field is the primary real field in the universe, constituting the greater part of a unified field theory and representing 95% of all current energy. Unlike mainstream physics which often treats charge as a "propensity" or "message," Mathis asserts it is a physical field with real particles driving and animating all things. He argues that many unsolved problems in physics, from atomic structure to celestial mechanics and quantum phenomena, can be explained by accounting for this pervasive charge field.
How does Miles Mathis's approach differ from mainstream physics?
How does Miles Mathis's approach differ from mainstream physics?
Mathis highlights several key differences. Firstly, he emphasizes the importance of visualization and diagrams, arguing that mainstream 20th-century physicists, influenced by figures like Bohr and Heisenberg, avoided illustrations and were "least artistic scientists in history." He believes this lack of visual understanding hindered progress. Secondly, he claims to prioritize finding physical explanations for phenomena rather than relying solely on mathematical descriptions without a clear mechanical understanding. He criticizes mainstream physics for often resorting to abstract mathematical concepts without a physical model. Lastly, he asserts that mainstream physics is fundamentally incomplete because it largely ignores the pervasive charge field, missing 95% of the total field when developing theories.
What is the significance of the "charge field" in understanding atomic structure according to Mathis?
What is the significance of the "charge field" in understanding atomic structure according to Mathis?
Mathis argues that the atomic nucleus is primarily built to channel the charge field. He envisions the nucleus as being constructed from "rooms," primarily Helium nuclei (two protons and two neutrons), arranged in configurations that efficiently channel charge. This channeling of charge, rather than abstract forces, is what he claims holds the nucleus together. He also states that electron orbital theory is incorrect; electrons do not orbit but rather are captured and circle in the polar eddies of protons, with all bonds being "charge field bonds" rather than electron sharing.
How does Mathis's view of superposition differ from the mainstream explanation?
How does Mathis's view of superposition differ from the mainstream explanation?
Mainstream physics describes superposition as a particle existing in two or more states simultaneously, often resorting to abstract mathematical concepts and interpretations like a particle passing through multiple slits at once. Mathis rejects this view, stating that the "two superimposed states" are not just mathematical constructs but "real spins." He describes these as an inner axial spin and an outer end-over-end spin, in different planes and of different sizes, designed to avoid interference. He claims this physical model explains why different detectors might register different "states" depending on the plane they are in.
How does Mathis claim to have achieved unification of fundamental forces, a problem Einstein worked on?
How does Mathis claim to have achieved unification of fundamental forces, a problem Einstein worked on?
Mathis argues that the mainstream physics failed to unify gravity and electromagnetism (EM) because they were attempting to unify Newton's gravity equations and Maxwell's EM equations, which he contends were already unified. He claims that Newton's equations, fitted to experimental results, implicitly contained the EM field, hidden within the constant G. His approach involved "unwinding" G to reveal this hidden EM component and then re-assigning variables and constants in both Newton's and Maxwell's equations to "real parameters." This process, he states, led to the re-unification of these equations and the development of multiple unified field equations, including a reinterpretation of the Lagrangian.
How does Mathis reinterpret the Lagrangian in physics?
How does Mathis reinterpret the Lagrangian in physics?
Mainstream physics traditionally views the Lagrangian as an energy equation representing the difference between kinetic energy and potential energy. Mathis asserts this is a fundamental misunderstanding based on a historical misassignment in Newton's work. He claims that the Lagrangian is actually a unified gravity/EM field equation. He argues that the term traditionally considered "potential energy" represents Newton's equation (which he sees as already unified), and the term considered "kinetic energy" is not kinetic energy at all, but a correcting term that makes the unified field equation scalable depending on the size of the object. This correction accounts for how the EM field affects objects of different sizes, which he claims is necessary in a unified field.
What are some other significant scientific problems Mathis claims to have solved?
What are some other significant scientific problems Mathis claims to have solved?
Beyond the atomic nucleus, superposition, and unification, Mathis lists several other major problems he believes he has solved. These include:
Explaining the spacing of planets in the solar system (the Bode Series) using his unified field equations and the charge field, achieving high accuracy with simple math.
Debunking Descartes' explanation of the rainbow, proposing it is an image of the Solar Corona projected onto a sheet of rain.
Unifying all quantum particles by showing their masses relate to a simple quantum spin equation involving doubling of spin radii, which he claims explains the mass ratios of particles like the electron, proton, and muon.
How does Mathis perceive the reception of his scientific work by the mainstream scientific community and institutions?
How does Mathis perceive the reception of his scientific work by the mainstream scientific community and institutions?
Mathis contends that his scientific work has been met with significant resistance and censorship from the mainstream. He describes his science site as "quietly superviral," indicating significant readership among professionals, but claims the mainstream has "refused to cover any of my big discoveries" and actively tries to suppress his online presence, citing delisting by search engines like Google, Bing, and Yahoo. He believes mainstream scientists read his work secretly while publicly dismissing him as a "crank." He attributes this suppression to the mainstream's hubris, control by military intelligence, and a general unwillingness to accept challenges to established theories, regardless of the validity of his work. He states this conflict began because they "started this war, not me," by ignoring and dismissing his initial theories.
convert_to_textConvert to source
Detailed Timeline of Main Events:
18th Century:Mainstream scientists develop the Lagrangian as a total energy equation, based on flawed assumptions about Newton's equations.
Late 18th Century:Bode records the spacing of the planets and attempts to fit it to a simple equation (Bode Series), which is later largely enshrined by the mainstream despite its inaccuracies.
Early 19th Century:Maxwell develops his equations for electromagnetism, but the connection to Newton's gravitational constant (G) remains unknown.
Goethe develops his theory of edges, which Mathis later re-animates using the charge field.
19th Century:Physicists bury Maxwell's D-field (the charge field) because they don't understand it.
1940s:Early attempts are made to diagram the atomic nucleus, but are soon abandoned due to limited data and poor visualization skills.
Late 20th Century (Specifically 1990s):Mainstream physics defines charge as a "message" between particles.
Mainstream physics gives up on the project of unification, replacing it with containment theories like gauge theories.
Mainstream journals implement rules forbidding papers on topics like Bode and Relativity, partially due to the influx of perceived "crank" submissions.
Murray Gell-Mann publishes "The Quark and the Jaguar," expressing the idea that even Mars is a probability until observed.
Physicists like Bohr and Heisenberg influence the field to avoid diagrams and illustrations in theoretical physics.
Around 2000:Miles Mathis begins working on diagramming the atomic nucleus, knowing that the nucleus channels the charge field.
Mathis begins the process of "unwinding G," aiming to understand what the constant in Newton's gravity equation represents.
Early 21st Century (Starting around 2000 onwards):Miles Mathis establishes his science site and begins publishing papers challenging mainstream physics and science.
Mathis solves the problem of unification by demonstrating that Newton's gravity and Maxwell's EM equations were already unified within their constants and variables.
Mathis unlocks the Lagrangian, proving it is a unified gravity/EM field equation, not a kinetic/potential energy equation.
Mathis solves the Bode Series mystery by applying his unified field equations and using charge and EM perturbations between planets. This is seen as destroying chaos theory as applied to planetary mechanics.
Mathis solves the mystery of superposition, explaining it as two real spins in different planes and of different sizes.
Mathis unifies all quantum particles by showing their sizes are fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation.
Mathis proves Descartes' explanation of the rainbow is incorrect, explaining it as an image of the Solar Corona projected on rain and refracted by the charge field.
Mathis jettisons electron orbital theory, arguing electrons don't orbit but move to the nucleus and bond via the charge field.
For many years prior to May 2025:Mathis' science site achieves "quietly superviral" status, despite lacking mainstream promotion.
People at Google, the Air Force, NASA, and similar institutions are aware of and unhappy about Mathis' success.
About six years prior to May 2025:Google begins "completing delisting" Miles Mathis' websites, preventing them from appearing in search results.
Other search engines like Bing and Yahoo follow Google's lead in delisting Mathis' sites.
Yandex initially lists Mathis' sites based on numbers but later begins delisting them.
Undated (Prior to May 2025):Mathis saves screenshots as proof of his papers ranking #1 at Yandex and sometimes even Google and Bing on certain topics.
Mainstream physics journals aggressively show contempt towards anyone claiming solutions to previously "insoluble" problems, including Mathis.
Miles Mathis becomes "public enemy #1" for mainstream science due to his challenges to existing theories.
2020:Mathis makes a "big prediction" about Solar Cycle 25, explaining its mechanism via an electromagnetic feedback loop involving the Galactic Core, the Sun, and the four big planets.
Mathis predicts sharp spikes in sunspot data on planetary alignments.
2020 onwards (During Solar Cycle 25):Six of Mathis' predicted sunspot spikes on planetary alignments occur as scheduled.
Mainstream scientists at NOAA and NASA become "panicked" after the first predicted spike.
The Air Force takes over sunspot counting for the first time ever.
The Air Force begins "faking all the data" to make it appear Mathis' predictions are incorrect, specifically mis-weighing large sunspots and generally suppressing numbers by about 75%.
Despite the data manipulation, Solar Cycle 25 turns out "MUCH larger" than mainstream predictions and "pretty much exactly" what Mathis predicted.
The suppressed data still shows the spikes on planetary alignments, proving Mathis' predictions were accurate.
May 16, 2025:Miles Mathis publishes the provided text on his art/history site, discussing the implosion of mainstream physics and highlighting his scientific work and the censorship he faces.
Mathis notes that mainstream scientists like Sabine Hossenfelder are admitting the struggles within physics and academia, even if they don't promote his work.
Cast of Characters:
Miles Mathis: The author of the source text and the central figure. A self-published artist and scientist who claims to have made groundbreaking discoveries in physics, chemistry, and astronomy. He asserts that he has rewritten large parts of physics since ancient times and faces significant censorship and defamation from the mainstream scientific community and institutions like Google, the Air Force, and NASA.
Sabine Hossenfelder: A mainstream scientist (implied to be a physicist) mentioned by Mathis as someone who is publicly admitting that physics, astronomy, and science academia are in a state of decline, even though she does not promote Mathis' work.
Isaac Newton: An influential historical physicist whose gravity equations and the Lagrangian are discussed. Mathis claims to have corrected Newton's misassignments and shown that his equations were already unified.
James Clerk Maxwell: A historical physicist whose equations for electromagnetism are discussed. Mathis claims that Maxwell's EM field was hidden within Newton's equations and that Maxwell's D-field (charge field) was buried by his students.
Galileo Galilei (Implied): One of the historical figures whose work is contrasted with later physicists' lack of visualization skills.
René Descartes: A historical philosopher and scientist whose explanation of the rainbow Mathis claims to have disproven.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: A historical figure whose theory of edges Mathis claims to have re-animated using the charge field.
Wolfgang Pauli: A historical physicist mentioned for his complaint about the "quantum zoo," which Mathis claims to have unified.
Albert Einstein: A historical physicist mentioned for his project of unification, which Mathis claims to have solved after Einstein made no real progress.
Niels Bohr: A historical physicist whose influence, along with Heisenberg, is cited as contributing to theoretical physicists' avoidance of diagrams and illustrations.
Werner Heisenberg: A historical physicist whose influence, along with Bohr, is cited as contributing to theoretical physicists' avoidance of diagrams and illustrations.
Ernst Mach: A historical physicist mentioned as an example of a scientist who was confused by the real world and feared walking into distant mountains, used to illustrate the non-visual nature of some physicists.
Murray Gell-Mann: A famous historical physicist whose idea that even Mars was a probability until observed is highlighted by Mathis as an example of the state of mainstream physics.
Stephen Hawking: A famous historical physicist mentioned for context alongside Feynman and Gell-Mann.
Richard Feynman: A famous historical physicist mentioned for context alongside Hawking and Gell-Mann.
Ben Franklin: A historical figure mentioned as someone who knew about charge, although it wasn't understood as a real field until Mathis.
Archimedes (Implied): One of the historical figures whose foundational work in physics and physical chemistry Mathis claims to have rewritten parts of.
Euclid (Implied): One of the historical figures whose foundational work in physics and physical chemistry Mathis claims to have rewritten parts of.
Bode: The figure who created the Bode Series concerning planetary spacing.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration): A U.S. government agency whose scientists were allegedly panicked by Mathis' Solar Cycle predictions.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration): A U.S. government agency whose scientists were allegedly panicked by Mathis' Solar Cycle predictions.
Air Force (U.S. Air Force): A U.S. military branch that allegedly took over sunspot counting and began faking data to counteract Mathis' Solar Cycle predictions.
Google: A major search engine company that Mathis claims has been actively delisting his websites for years.
Bing: A search engine that Mathis claims followed Google's lead in delisting his websites.
Yahoo: A search engine that Mathis claims followed Google's lead in delisting his websites.
Yandex: A search engine that initially listed Mathis' sites based on numbers but later began delisting them.
Thoreau (Henry David Thoreau): A historical writer quoted by Mathis regarding the idea that a man shouldn't have to bury himself, used to illustrate Mathis' need to explain his own identity due to defamation.
Pinocchio: A fictional character referenced by Mathis to represent his current situation and fight against the mainstream ("the belly of the whale").
Monstro: The whale from the Pinocchio story, used by Mathis to represent the mainstream establishment trying to suppress him.
convert_to_textConvert to source
Summary
This excerpt from "My Science Site" by Miles Mathis highlights his extensive work in physics, which he claims is more significant than his art/history research. Mathis asserts he has rewritten fundamental areas of physics, arguing that the mainstream science community has failed to address major problems like the structure of the atomic nucleus, the nature of charge, quantum superposition, and the unification of fundamental forces. He posits a pervasive, real charge field as the driving force behind many phenomena, presenting solutions for the spacing of planets, the rainbow, and the relationships between quantum particles, often by revisiting and correcting historical scientific assumptions. Mathis also laments the mainstream's alleged censorship and dismissal of his work despite its apparent online success and predictive power.
Key Shortcomings of Mainstream Physics:
Lack of Visualization and Diagrams:
Physicists in the 20th century are characterized as "limited math geeks" and "the least artistic scientists in history," influenced by figures like Bohr and Heisenberg who disliked diagrams and illustrations.
Mainstream physics is criticized for dismissing visualization, telling people that nature "didn't make sense" and that visualizing physical concepts "couldn't be done."
Over-reliance on Mathematics Without Physical Explanation:
Concepts like superposition were addressed purely mathematically, leading to interpretations such as particles existing as a "blur" until observed.
Described as relying on "slippery math" and ideas like particles taking all possible paths simultaneously.
Misunderstanding of the Charge Field:
The mainstream allegedly treated charge as a "propensity" or "message between particles," neglecting its role as a real photon field.
This oversight purportedly leaves mainstream theories missing "95% of the total field," hindering explanations of entanglement, dark matter, and other phenomena.
Failure in Unification:
Einstein’s unification project was abandoned by the 1990s, replaced by "containment" theories like gauge math or String Theory, which lack mechanical explanations.
Mainstream physics allegedly failed to recognize that Newton’s gravity equations already unified gravity and electromagnetism (EM) via the constant G.
Misinterpretation of Fundamental Equations:
Newton’s gravity equation is claimed to have hidden the EM field within G, a fact unrecognized for centuries.
The Lagrangian was misinterpreted for 300 years as a kinetic/potential energy equation rather than a unified field equation.
Stifling Research and Suppression:
Major journals reportedly forbade papers on topics like the Bode Series or Relativity, dismissing alternative solutions as "crank" work.
Theories like electron orbital bonding are described as "lame" and surviving due to institutional inertia.
Mainstream Reactions to the Author’s Work:
Refusal to cover discoveries or acknowledge the author’s "superviral" science site.
Alleged suppression via search engine delisting (Google, Bing, Yandex).
Dismissal of predictions as "lies" and panic-driven data manipulation (e.g., Air Force faking sunspot counts).
Control by "hubris" and "military intelligence," promoting "fakes" while crushing "real" innovators.
Charge Field Discussion
Charge Field Discussion
The "charge field" is central to the author’s work, redefining mainstream concepts of charge and electromagnetism.
Definition and Properties:
What It Is: A real field of real photons, historically linked to Maxwell’s neglected D-field. The mainstream allegedly reduced charge to a "propensity" or abstract "message."
Fundamental Nature:
Constitutes 95% of universal energy, described as a "powerful photon gas" peaking in infrared (often mistaken for ambient heat).
Ubiquitous and persistent, existing even in vacuums. Earth is immersed in a "heavy charge field" physicists allegedly ignore.
Roles and Implications:
Atomic Structure:
Nuclei are "charge engines" built to channel the field. Helium nuclei ("rooms") are arranged to allow charge flow (in at poles, out at equator), with the field acting as a "glue" binding the structure.
Chemical Bonding:
Replaces electron-sharing bonds with "charge linkages" where photons move between aligned atomic poles.
Unified Field Theory:
Reveals EM hidden in Newton’s gravity equations via constant G. The Lagrangian is reinterpreted as a gravity/EM equation, with a "correcting term" for scalability across scales.
Celestial Mechanics:
Explains planetary spacing (Bode Series) via charge/EM interactions, not gravity alone.
Optics and Perception:
Rainbows are rear-projected solar coronas, with atmospheric charge sorting wavelengths.
Unified Field Discussion
Unified Field Discussion
The author claims to have solved the "big project of Einstein" by showing gravity and EM were always unified.
Key Insights:
Hidden Unification in Newton’s Equations:
Newton’s constant G secretly represented the EM field. The author "unwound G" to show its equivalence to known EM values (Ampere, Coulomb).
Lagrangian Reinterpretation:
The Lagrangian’s "kinetic energy" term is actually a correction for EM effects in a unified field, enabling scalable solutions from subatomic to cosmic scales.
Working Unified Equations:
Newton’s, Maxwell’s, and Gauss’ equations were "re-unified" by reassigning variables to real parameters.
Impact:
Solved the Bode Series with "high school algebra," attributing planetary motion to charge/EM interactions.
Disproved chaos theory by showing "chaos" stemmed from flawed equations, not nature.
Solved Problems Discussion
Solved Problems Discussion
The author claims revolutionary solutions to longstanding physics puzzles:
Solar Cycle 25 Prediction
Predicted sunspot spikes via planetary alignments in an electromagnetic feedback loop (Galactic Core-Sun-planets).
Alleged data suppression by the Air Force failed to hide cycle magnitude or alignment spikes.
Atomic Nucleus Diagramming
Replaced the "bag of marbles" model with Helium-nucleus "rooms" channeling charge. Misalignment causes nuclear disintegration.
Superposition Mechanism
Solved via dual spins: inner axial spin (basketball-like) and outer end-over-end spin (2x radius, perpendicular plane).
Quantum Particle Unification
Unified electron/proton masses via a spin equation (9, 65, 1025, 16385), matching the 1,821:1 mass ratio.
Rainbow Explanation
Rainbow as a rear-projected solar corona; charge field sorts wavelengths in atmospheric moisture.
Electron Bonding Revision
Bonds are charge-field linkages, not electron orbits. Electrons are "buoys" recycling charge near proton "eddies."
Conclusion:
The author asserts having "rewritten large parts of physics" while facing institutional suppression. Their work is framed as crucial to understanding reality amid mainstream "defamation."
This formatting preserves the original claims while improving readability through section headers, bullet points, and logical paragraph breaks.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse