3-10-25 DailyBriefs.info    MP3 OF BRIEF  PDF OF BRIEF  PODCAST REVIEW OF ARTICLES  
Briefing Document: Review of Recent Articles

This briefing document synthesizes the main themes, important ideas, and facts presented across the provided sources. Quotes from the original sources are included where appropriate to illustrate key points. The sources cover a diverse range of topics, including geopolitics, technology, economics, health, and societal issues, often framed from a critical or dissenting perspective.

I. Geopolitical Landscape and International Relations:

• The "UK-U.S. Empire" and Shifting Power Dynamics: One source ("An Accurate Description of the UK-U.S. Empire") posits the existence of a UK-U.S. empire focused on controlling Russia, tracing its origins back to Cecil Rhodes. It critiques the integration of foreign and domestic intelligence operations in the UK, citing the Services Act 1994 and the domestic retasking of 77 Brigade during COVID as potentially problematic. The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 amendments are also highlighted as enabling "all kinds of unpleasant things," urging readers to examine the document.

• Ukraine Conflict and Western Influence: Jeffrey Sachs ("Negotiating a Lasting Peace in Ukraine") argues that a lasting peace in Ukraine was within reach in April 2022 but was derailed by the U.S. and U.K. He suggests the Istanbul Process framework remains a basis for peace. Sachs emphasizes that Russia initially did not have territorial demands before the "violent overthrow" of Yanukovych in 2022 and that the subsequent annexation of Crimea was to prevent the naval base from falling into NATO hands. He criticizes Ukraine's resistance to autonomy for the Donbas (as outlined in Minsk II) and the U.S.'s backing of this resistance. Sachs believes that Ukraine will likely cede territory in future negotiations and calls for security guarantees under the UN Security Council.

• Israeli-Lebanese Tensions: One article ("Hundreds of Israeli settlers pour into south Lebanon under army protection") reports an incursion of Israeli settlers into south Lebanon, condemned by the Lebanese army as a "blatant violation' of the ceasefire agreement."

• Trump's Foreign Policy Stance: The "Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering" compilation mentions Trump threatening tariffs on Russia and his offer of a "rapid pathway to Citizenship" for farmers from South Africa seeking safety.

II. Erosion of Rule of Law and Societal Order:

• Consequences of Anarchy: An excerpt from "Five Things You Need to Do When There’ll Be No Rule of Law" uses the 1969 Montreal police strike as a cautionary tale, detailing rapid escalation into looting, arson, and violence ("By 11:20 A.M. the first bank was robbed. By noon most downtown stores had closed because of looting."). The author suggests that police strikes are increasingly likely and emphasizes the importance of self-defense and preparedness, including planning a "safe room" in case of home invasion or riot.

• Questioning Institutions and Bureaucracy: The "SANITY DAY" newsletter reflects on the rapid societal shifts since March 2020, questioning the competence and trustworthiness of "bureaucrats who rubber-stamped giveaway loans" and are now assuring the public about elections and institutions.

III. Technology, Control, and the "Technate":

• Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and Control: The "Technocracy Mass Resistance Starts with Swap Out of Smart Phones for Privacy Phones" article raises concerns about CBDCs, quoting Augustin Carstens of the Bank of International Settlements as stating, "the central bank will have absolute control of rules and regulations over use of CBDG and the authority to enforce those rules'." Catherine Austin Fitts is cited asserting that reserve banks will control fiscal policy at the individual level through AI, potentially leading to "a policy of austerity." The article also discusses the potentially high energy cost of CBDC transactions compared to current systems.

• "Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate": This source explores the concept of a "Technocracy," linking figures like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel to this idea. It highlights Musk's grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, as a leader in Technocracy Incorporated in Canada, which was deemed an "illegal organisation" in 1940. The article points to Musk's statements about a "Mars Technocracy" and suggests his actions, including chairing a new temporary agency, indicate a move towards implementing this vision. The "DOGE" (Decentralized Government in Exile) is presented as a "formal shift in political power from the public to the private sector," with private sector leaders empowered to "restructure federal agencies."

• Privacy Concerns and Technology: The article on technocracy also advocates for switching from smartphones to "privacy phones" like the "Unplugged © Privacy Weave cell phone" to counter data tracking and surveillance. It highlights features like custom operating systems, advanced encryption, and the ability to disable 5G.

IV. Health and Medical Freedom:

• Concerns about Fluoride: The "SANITY DAY" newsletter reports on Utah's Governor signing a bill to ban fluoride from public water systems, citing medical freedom and questioning the necessity of forced medication when fluoridated toothpaste is readily available. Judge Edward Chen's ruling suggesting fluoride as a possible neurotoxin is also mentioned. The "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk" article strongly criticizes the use of commercial mouthwash containing fluoride and alcohol, suggesting it causes tissue damage that can accumulate and potentially lead to cancer, especially with frequent use. The author recommends focusing on diet for oral health.

• IVF and the Right to Life: The "Life Trumps All" excerpt argues for legal measures to prevent the deprivation of life starting at fertilization, implying a critique of current practices in IVF.

V. Critique of Societal Trends and Ideologies:

• "Woke Madness" and Social Engineering: The "Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering" compilation, through a quoted reader comment, suggests that the rise of "Gay Pride" was a creation of "the kabbalists of Judaism" to promote degeneracy and ultimately lead to a populist (Zionist) savior. The article also links "Women's Day" to a communist agenda aimed at destroying the family, citing historical connections and contemporary examples. It argues that "feminist" politicians and media are "useful idiots" in this agenda.

• Conspiracy Theories and Dismissal of Mainstream Narratives: Ron Unz's article critiques Candace Owens and Ryan Dawson, questioning Dawson's self-proclaimed expertise on certain topics and dismissing some of his 9/11 theories (e.g., explosives-laden vans in the basement).

• Inbreeding in Elite Families: The "Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering" section on the Rothschild family highlights their history of "copious amounts of incest," arguing that this practice, whether intentional or not, served as an "economic mechanism" to prevent wealth from leaving the family.

• Skepticism and Intellectual Freedom: The "An Accurate Description of the UK-U.S. Empire" excerpt emphasizes the importance of constant skepticism and questioning everything, warning against absolute trust as a form of "mental slavery." It posits that "Intellectual freedom pre-supposes a constant skepticism about everything — absolute (100%) certainty about nothing."

VI. Libertarian and Anarcho-Capitalist Perspectives:

• Murray Rothbard's Philosophy: The "The Great Murray Rothbard" article celebrates Rothbard as the "chief architect of modern anarcho-capitalism," emphasizing his vision of a stateless society based on private property and voluntary association, rooted in classical liberalism and Austrian economics. His critique of statism and his argument that all governmental functions could be provided by the market are highlighted. The article also mentions his contributions to Austrian economics and his historical analysis. The paleo-libertarian movement, which Rothbard co-founded, aimed to fuse libertarian principles with a conservative social outlook. The piece concludes with a strong personal tribute to Rothbard's intellect and influence.

• Critique of the State: Rothbard's view of the state as "nothing but a criminal gang writ large" is mentioned, highlighting the radical nature of his political philosophy. The inherent limitations of constitutions to restrain state power are also discussed.

VII. World Economic Forum (WEF) and Globalist Concerns:

• Davos 2025 Security Measures: Peter Koenig's article portrays the WEF Davos meeting as increasingly grotesque, focusing on heightened security measures, including armed fighter jets, thousands of soldiers and police, and a no-fly zone. The author suggests this level of security reflects the WEF's fear of resistance from the "collective power of eight billion people."

• Critique of WEF Agenda: The article implies a critical view of the WEF's goals, mentioning "robotizing and depopulating" in the title and questioning why people worldwide allow organizations like the UN to decide their fate. The environmental impact of attendees traveling to Davos via private jets and helicopters is also highlighted.

• 
  

In conclusion, these sources present a collection of critical perspectives on various global issues. Key themes include the nature of geopolitical power, concerns about eroding individual liberties and the rule of law, the potential for technology to be used for control, skepticism towards mainstream narratives and institutions, and the advocacy for alternative philosophies like anarcho-capitalism. The sources often express a sense of unease about current trends and potential future developments, urging readers to be vigilant and question prevailing assumptions.

This collection of articles presents a range of critical perspectives on global issues as of March 2025. Several pieces focus on allegations of Zionist power and its negative consequences, including claims of Israeli complicity in the October 7th attacks and the supposed manipulation of antisemitism narratives. Other articles address domestic US issues, such as Elon Musk's warnings about financial graft, Trump's policies on college protests and South Africa, and concerns about bank losses. Furthermore, the sources touch upon social and cultural commentary, discussing the origins of International Women's Day, the mainstreaming of pornography, and rising depression among young adults. Finally, geopolitical tensions are highlighted through topics like European views on Gaza reconstruction and Trump's stance on nuclear weapons. 

Based on the information in the sources, particularly the article "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk"1 ..., the author suggests that the best solution for mouth health and hygiene is to return to nature and adopt foods that cannot cause damage or any kind of toxic build-up15 .

The author specifically recommends a natural carnivore diet, stating that on such a diet, you do not really need to brush your teeth, much less "wash your mouth"15 .... This suggestion is based on the premise that processed and plant-based foods, especially those with carbohydrates and seed oils, are detrimental to oral health and contribute to problems like bad breath5 .

The author has also covered this topic in more detail in other articles mentioned in the text: "Oral Health: A Toothpaste Containing Curcumin And Melatonin Will Kill Cells In Your Mouth", "Malnutrition And Poor Oral Health — And How To Easily Spot Nutrient Deficiencies," "The Dark Truths About Fluoride," and "Dental Health — Cavities: Why we get them and how to repair them"16 . While these articles are not provided in the sources, their titles suggest a focus on natural approaches, the negative impacts of certain ingredients like fluoride, and the role of nutrition in oral health.

In essence, the alternative to using mouthwash proposed in the source is a dietary shift towards natural, animal-based foods, which the author claims can eliminate the need for conventional oral hygiene product

An Accurate Description of the UK-U.S. Empire - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The UK and U.S. governments are controlled by their armaments manufacturers and 'national-security' industries, prioritizing increased sales volumes and profits1 ....

•

The website "UK Column" provides news reports on the inner workings and mass-mind-control methods of the UK and U.S. governments1 ....

•

Individuals should not blindly trust any media organization, including UK Column, but instead critically evaluate information and check primary sources whenever possible3 ....

Key words:

•

Military-industrial complex: The U.S. and UK are controlled BY their “military-industrial complex,” instead of controlling it like an authentic democracy WOULD2 .

•

Deep State: It’s the interest of the Deep State [the billionaires] to keep us all divided [against one-another so as NOT to be fighting against the Deep State itself]6 .

•

Fact-check: UK Column advises viewers to fact-check any ALLEGATION3 .

Candace Owens, Ryan Dawson, and Other Conspiracy Podcasters, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

Candace Owens, initially known as a right-wing influencer, gained attention for questioning Israeli actions in Gaza and exploring controversial historical topics like the 9/11 Attacks and World War II7 ....

•

Ron Unz initially suspected Owens might be "promoted opposition" but later acknowledged her potential impact in bringing attention to topics like the U.S.S. Liberty attack10 ....

•

Ryan Dawson, another conspiracy podcaster focusing on subjects like the JFK Assassination and 9/11 Attacks, has faced censorship and is criticized for a lack of thorough documentation and disorganized presentations13 ....

Key words:

•

Conspiracy theorist: Transgressive individuals who adhere to some heterodox beliefs are also usually willing to accept many others as well, and are often quite eager to do so, sometimes exhibiting the troubling lack of logical thinking and careful analytical judgment that may taint their entire community17 ....

•

Mainstream media: Owens began her important podcast interview by explaining that it had been prompted by a recent letter she received from Tourney bringing that remarkable story to her attention for the first time, declaring that the letter had changed her life, Promoting the U.S.S. Liberty story to her millions of committed followers represented the ideal use of her extremely powerful media footprint, I naturally hoped that it would become the first of many such breakthroughs she might be able to achieve on topics long banned and blacklisted by our dishonest mainstream media12 ....

•

Israel Lobby: That killing in Dallas had suddenly halted President Kennedy’s efforts at breaking the growing power of the Israel Lobby and blocking the Jewish State from developing nuclear weapons, very important historical facts today unknown to the overwhelming majority of ordinary Americans20 .

Five Things You Need to Do When There’ll Be No Rule of Law - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

In a situation where the rule of law breaks down, individuals should prioritize blending in to avoid attracting unwanted attention21 .

•

Staying at home as much as possible with adequate supplies ("bugging in") is a crucial strategy to avoid confrontations and the chaos of panic buying22 ....

•

Being prepared for self-defense, including planning a safe room and escape routes, is essential if confrontation becomes unavoidable24 ....

Key words:

•

Dystopia: Mention a dystopia to most people and they’ll probably think of Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Thought Police and Big Brother26 .

•

Prepper: Another good way to avoid confrontations is to just stay at home as much as possible while the crisis is going on, This is one of the best arguments for being a prepper – you should already have the food supplies and other resources you need for this22 .

•

Lawless elements: That means your aim is to avoid confronting the lawless elements, but be ready to defend yourself if a confrontation is forced on you21 .

Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering: March 2025

Key Takeaways :

•

Elon Musk suggested that fully revealing graft would endanger him and highlighted the vast national debt and unaccountable US Treasury spending27 .

•

Kevin Barrett describes an "Antisemitism Tsunami" that he believes ignores the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza28 .

•

The article references George Orwell's "1984" in the context of dishonest language leading to a breakdown of independent reasoning29 .

Key words:

•

Graft: Elon Musk- "If I Fully Revealed the Graft, they would kill me"27 .

•

Antisemitism: Kevin Barrett--Antisemitism Tsunami! It's an "explosion," a "deadly plague," a "virulent pestilence"...28 .

•

Social engineering: Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering: March 2025 [Title of the source, implying the manipulation of social structures].

Life Trumps All - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The author argues that the protection of life is the most important function of government, trumping even liberty and property30 .

•

The article proposes numerous actions for a freer nation, including repealing national-government regulations and emergency powers, ending involvement in war without proper congressional approval, and respecting the Constitution's protection of life31 ....

•

The author advocates for a strict interpretation of the Constitution, limiting the powers of the national government and emphasizing individual control over health products35 ....

Key words:

•

Enumerated powers: constitutional only if it passes all of the following simple pass/fail tests: (2) only uses powers enumerated for the national government35 .

•

Regulations: Stop enforcing and formally repeal all national-government regulations, Outlaw and enforce against all regulations in other jurisdictions32 .

•

Constitutional rules: Executively allocate budgets as appropriate to enforce the constitutional rules and sanctions32 .

Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk - Joachim Bartoll Official.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

Frequent, long-term use of commercial mouthwash is associated with an increased risk of oral cancer due to the damaging and toxic effects of its ingredients37 ....

•

Common mouthwash ingredients like solvents, anti-bacterial compounds, sweeteners, preservatives, colorants, flavoring agents, fluoride, and alcohol can cause tissue damage in the mouth40 ....

•

The author suggests that natural foods and a carnivore diet are the best solutions for mouth health and hygiene, potentially eliminating the need for brushing or mouthwash45 ....

Key words:

•

Oral cancer: This meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies involving 23,552 participants investigated long-term mouthwash use and a possible association with an increased risk of developing oral cancer37 ....

•

Toxic: Active ingredients that are frequently found in therapeutic mouthwash include peroxide, fluoride, essential oils, and chlorhexidine (anti-bacterial and highly toxic and damaging compounds.)41 ....

•

Tissue damage: Even using mouthwash a few times a week or perhaps once daily will cause some tissue damage, but likely not enough to cause the body to protect itself by developing cancer — unless you’re very unhealthy to begin with, as in having several nutrient deficiencies and thus not be able to heal properly38 .

Negotiating a Lasting Peace in Ukraine, by Jeffrey D. Sachs - The Unz Review.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

A lasting peace in Ukraine could be established based on the framework of the April 2022 Istanbul peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, which the U.S. and U.K. reportedly discouraged Ukraine from signing47 .

•

The article highlights the need for Ukraine to commit to neutrality and for security guarantees to be provided by other nations47 .

•

The importance of respecting the rights of the ethnic Russian population in Ukraine and the Baltic states is emphasized as a security-enhancing measure48 .

Key words:

•

Peace agreement: In April 2022, Russia and Ukraine were on the verge of signing a peace agreement in Istanbul, with the Turkish Government acting as mediator47 .

•

Neutrality: Peace requires Ukraine’s commitment to neutrality47 .

•

Minority rights: Security for the Baltic States should be achieved through security-enhancing measures taken on both sides, including the respect for minority rights of the ethnic Russian populations48 .

Technocracy Mass Resistance Starts with Swap Out of Smart Phones for Privacy Phones - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The author argues that abandoning "smart" devices is a powerful act of resistance against technocracy and the control grid, as these devices collect vast amounts of personal information49 ....

•

The emergence of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is presented as a move towards a totalitarian system of controlled transactions, potentially replacing cash and traditional banking51 ....

•

Alternatives to standard smartphones, such as privacy phones with kill switches and dumbed-down smartphones, are suggested as ways to regain digital privacy54 ....

Key words:

•

Technocracy: “A simple but extremely powerful tactic – a mass disabling event from the perspective of technocracy – would be for a new social norm to cascade, whereby as many people as possible, got rid of their ‘smart’ (slave) devices and stopped voluntarily hooking themselves up to the control grid and feeding it information on all areas of their lives49 .

•

CBDC: Moreover, German banking economist, Dr. Richard Werner, reports the eventual goal of CBDC is the replacement of all brick and mortar banks with a world bank and the implanting a chip under the skin, to exert total control over everyone except a tiny fraction of elite controllers worldwide52 .

•

Privacy phone: Privacy Smart Phones have no 32-digit alphanumeric code for tracking and have a real kill-switch rather than the existing off button that nonetheless allows listening and visual reconnaissance54 ....

The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The article explores the meaning of "dark MAGA" in the context of Elon Musk's statements, connecting it to the ideologies of the Dark Enlightenment and Technocracy57 ....

•

Technocracy, as promoted by figures like Musk, aims for a system of totalitarian continental control led by technical experts, potentially involving a social credit system60 ....

•

The DOGE project, with Musk as a key figure, is described as having the goal of restructuring the federal government for efficiency, aligning with principles of Technocracy and the Dark Enlightenment62 ....

Key words:

•

Dark MAGA: What did Elon Musk mean when he said he was “dark MAGA?” Exploring this question will certainly take us to a very dark conclusion57 .

•

Technocracy: Musk is one of a cadre of technocrats behind the Trump presidency who promote the ideas encapsulated by the Dark Enlightenment58 ....

•

Technate: But when we are invited to discuss Technocracy in reference to Mars, we are of course asked to ignore all the evidence that exposes Musk’s and his fellow oligarchs’ attempts to establish a “Technate”—a system of technocratic, totalitarian continental control—here on Earth60 ....

The Great Murray Rothbard - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

Murray Rothbard was the principal architect of anarcho-capitalism, advocating for a stateless society based on private property and voluntary association, drawing from classical liberalism, individualist anarchism, and the Austrian School of economics64 ....

•

Rothbard was a staunch critic of statism, rejecting the idea of a minimal state and arguing that all governmental functions could be provided through the free market66 .

•

He was a significant figure in the resurgence of the Austrian School of economics and a revisionist historian who offered libertarian perspectives on American history and foreign policy67 ....

Key words:

•

Anarcho-capitalism: Murray Rothbard was the chief architect of modern anarcho-capitalism, an uncompromising vision of a stateless society rooted in private property and voluntary association64 .

•

Praxeology: His magnum opus, Man, Economy, and State (1962), initially conceived as a textbook on Austrian economics, evolved into a groundbreaking treatise that systematically laid out the principles of praxeology—the science of human action, as developed by Ludwig von Mises65 .

•

Statism: Additionally, Murray was a fierce critic of statism and political compromises that diluted libertarian principles66 .

Tradition or Annihilation - LewRockwell.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The article discusses the severe decline of the Catholic Church in America, with a significant number of people leaving compared to new members70 .

•

The author agrees with the need for radical changes in practice within the Church, such as reinstating traditional practices71 .

•

Some parishes are attempting to blend old and new traditions, performing new things in the manner of the old ways72 .

Key words:

•

Catholic Church: Recently, Crisis Magazine Editor in Chief Eric Sammons published an article outlining the dire state of the Catholic Church in America70 .

•

Radical changes: In any event, Sammons is correct that radical changes are needed71 .

•

Old Rite: They do things the old way, and when they do certain new things, they do them like they do the old things72 .

WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating. Peter Koenig - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The World Economic Forum (WEF) Davos 2025 forum, themed ‘Collaboration for the Intelligent Age’, is interpreted by the author as a plan to robotize and control humanity, excluding the elite73 ....

•

The author views the WEF's agenda as leading to a "Digital Gulag" characterized by depopulation, robotization, enslavement, and digital control75 .

•

The article calls for resistance against the WEF's agenda, urging people to ignore their actions, shed fear, and ultimately exit the UN system, which the author believes would undermine organizations like the WEF75 ....

Key words:

•

WEF: The 2025 Davos Forum will run under the theme of ‘Collaboration for the Intelligent Age’, which will encompass five “distinct but highly interconnected thematic priorities”, the WEF says on its website73 .

•

Robotize: All of that could easily be summarized in how to robotize humanity – except, of course, the crème of the crop74 .

•

Digital Gulag: Do not be fooled, ‘Collaboration for the Intelligent Age’ is code lingo for Digital Gulag75 .

☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf

Key Takeaways :

•

The author reflects on March 10th, 2020, as the "Last Day of Normal Life" before the significant changes brought by the pandemic, contrasting it with the events that unfolded afterward, such as mass mail-in voting and vaccine mandates77 ....

•

A Boston Globe article criticizing Anthony Fauci and the broader failures of American science and politics during the COVID-19 pandemic is highlighted as a sign that the "conspiracy theory has gone mainstream" and a potential start to accountability80 ....

•

Significant cuts to USAID programs (83%) and the cancellation of "kiddie loans" are presented as positive developments under "DOGE scrutiny," suggesting a move away from wasteful spending and progressive agendas84 ....

Key words:

•

Pandemic: To commemorate the Last Day of Normal Life, I present you with the capstone to five years of madness as today’s first story, The Boston Globe is slowly recovering its senses79 ....

•

Lockdowns: The article described how then-NIH director Frances Collins orchestrated a “devastating takedown” of the Great Barrington Declaration, the open letter published by three gold-standard health experts arguing against broad lockdowns and advocating for “focused protection” of our most vulnerable citizens82 ....

•

Accountability: But in another sense, the pandemic is not over, Trust in the institutions lies in ruin, where it belongs, The perpetrators of a historically destructive fraud have — so far — escaped punishment, While the media is starting to come around, the so-called experts — the architects of this disaster — are still clinging to their fictions, investing their ill-gotten pandemic proceeds, and hoping the public forgets before they’re ever held to account87 ....

• The incompatibility arises because the Services Act 1994 designates GCHQ as foreign-focused, while the UK's integrated operating concept, a military doctrine, eliminates the distinction between foreign and domestic focus. Additionally, the retasking of the supposedly foreign-operating 77 Brigade domestically during COVID raises doubts about the initial claim.

• Unz expresses skepticism because, despite his extensive reading on the topic, Dawson's name had never appeared as a significant contributor. Dawson's suggestion that explosives-laden vans in the basement of the WTC towers caused the collapses is considered extremely implausible because the collapses clearly began closer to the top of the buildings.

• When Montreal police went on strike, widespread looting began quickly, followed by taxi drivers burning a competitor's garage, a sniper killing a police officer, and rioters breaking into hotels and restaurants. By day's end, numerous banks were robbed, shops looted, fires set, and significant property damage occurred. The author suggests planning a safe room with solid walls and a single entrance as a crucial element of self-defense.

• Initially, the rise of "Gay Pride" in the 90s and early 2000s seemed harmless. However, by 2014, it was perceived as a "primer" for the "woke madness" that subsequently spread rapidly.

• The Rothschild family extensively practiced inbreeding, with many marriages occurring between first cousins and other close relatives. The primary economic rationale was to prevent wealth from being inherited outside the family, as women rarely produced heirs for non-Rothschilds. The article references Numbers 36:8, which directs daughters inheriting land to marry within their father's family.

• The Henry Makow article links the celebration of International Women's Day to the historical communist movement, citing its origins in the demands of working women in communist countries. The author concludes that the continued promotion of this day by mainstream media proves that the West is a de facto communist society, with a hidden elite controlling government and subverting nations.

• Before Russia made territorial demands in February 2022, the violent overthrow of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych occurred. The Minsk II agreement was intended to implement political autonomy for the ethnic Russian regions of eastern Ukraine (Donetsk and Luhansk). It failed primarily due to Ukraine's strong resistance to granting autonomy and the United States' support of this rejection, while Germany and France, the guarantors, remained largely silent.

• Carstens states that with cash, the central bank doesn't know who is using it, whereas with CBDCs, the central bank will have absolute control over their use and the authority to enforce those rules. A significant concern is the dramatically higher energy consumption of a bitcoin transaction (used as an example of the energy intensity of some digital currencies) compared to a credit card transaction, potentially costing significantly more per transaction.

• Joshua N. Haldeman, Elon Musk's maternal grandfather, was the research director and leader of the Regina branch of Technocracy Inc. in the late 1930s and early 1940s. His involvement with this organization, which promoted a technocratic system, indicates a long-standing family interest in such political philosophies that Elon Musk appears to share.

• Rothbard's core vision of anarcho-capitalism was a stateless society based on private property and voluntary association, where all functions, including law and security, would be provided by the market. He viewed the state as nothing but a criminal gang writ large. He was a pivotal figure in the resurgence of the Austrian School of economics in the 20th century, building upon the work of Ludwig von Mises.

• Anarcho-capitalism: A political philosophy that advocates for the elimination of the state in favor of a system of private property, free markets, and voluntary association, where all services, including law enforcement and defense, are provided by private companies.

• Austrian School of Economics: A heterodox school of economic thought that emphasizes methodological individualism, subjective value, and the importance of free markets with minimal government intervention. It is known for its theories on money, capital, and the business cycle.

• Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): A digital form of a country's fiat currency, issued and controlled by the nation's central bank.

• Praxeology: The deductive study of human action, based on the fundamental axiom that humans act consciously to achieve chosen ends, as developed by Ludwig von Mises and central to Austrian economics.

• Technocracy: A form of governance where scientists, engineers, and other technical experts, who possess specialized knowledge and skills, would be in control of decision-making in their respective fields.

• Statism: The belief that the state should control economic and social policy to a significant extent.

• Oligarchy: A small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution.

• Accelerationism: A political philosophy that argues for accelerating existing societal tendencies or contradictions to bring about radical social change.

• Universal Basic Income (UBI): A social welfare system in which all citizens or residents of a country or region regularly receive an unconditional sum of money from the government, regardless of their income, employment status, or wealth.

• Minsk II Agreement: An agreement reached in 2015 aimed at resolving the conflict in eastern Ukraine. It included provisions for a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons, and constitutional reforms granting autonomy to the Donbas region.

• KYC (Know Your Customer): A set of procedures used by financial institutions and other regulated companies to verify the identity of their clients, often seen by privacy advocates as a form of surveillance.

• Aesopian Language: Communication that conveys an unconventional or controversial message through indirect, allegorical, or coded means, often to avoid censorship or persecution.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What are the concerns raised about the integration of UK intelligence agencies with military doctrine? The concern is that the integration of GCHQ, a foreign-focused signals intelligence agency as defined by the Services Act 1994, with the UK's integrated operating concept (a military doctrine removing the distinction between foreign and domestic focus) potentially blurs the lines of operation. This raises questions about the domestic application of what was intended to be foreign intelligence gathering, especially given instances like the domestic retasking of the 77 Brigade during COVID-19 and the implications of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 amendments, which are seen as permitting extensive surveillance capabilities.

2. What is the perspective presented regarding the start of the conflict in Ukraine? The perspective offered is that Ukraine's "colonization" began on February 20, 2014, with alleged actions by the Obama administration that initiated a "civil war." This conflict is then portrayed as escalating to a point that threatened Russia, ultimately precipitating Russia's intervention a decade later. The breakaway of Crimea is specifically linked to the events of that day. The historical roots of a UK/U.S. effort to control Russia are also traced back to Cecil Rhodes.

3. What happened in Montreal when the police went on strike, and what broader point does this illustrate? In Montreal on October 17, 1969, when the police went on strike, the city quickly descended into chaos. Within hours, banks were robbed, stores were looted, property was damaged, and violence erupted, including arson and a rooftop sniper incident. This event is used to illustrate the author's belief, contrary to his earlier anarchist ideals, that the absence of government authority can rapidly lead to a breakdown of order and widespread crime, highlighting the perceived necessity of law enforcement.

4. What is "astroturf activism" as described in the context of "Gay Pride," and what broader agenda is it linked to by one reader's comment? "Astroturf activism," in this context, refers to the idea that the rise of "Gay Pride" in the 1990s and early 2000s was not organic but rather orchestrated by the U.S. government and NGOs as a primer for later "woke madness." A reader's comment further alleges that Kabbalists within Judaism created "Gay Pride" to provoke a backlash against globalist degeneracy, leading to a turn towards a populist "savior" (Zionism) and their "Nohaide laws."

5. What historical practice did the Rothschild family engage in, and what reasons are suggested for this practice? The Rothschild family historically engaged in a significant amount of inbreeding and incestuous marriages, with many family members marrying first cousins or other close relatives. The primary reason suggested for this practice is economic: to prevent wealth from being inherited outside the family, as women in such marriages often produced heirs who were also Rothschilds. Additionally, a reference is made to a passage in Numbers 36:8, which directs daughters inheriting land to marry within their father's family to preserve ancestral inheritance within Israelite families.

6. According to one source, what are the dangers associated with using mouthwash? The source argues that using mouthwash, which often contains toxic chemicals like alcohol and fluoride compounds, can cause tissue damage in the mouth. While infrequent use might result in minor damage that the body can heal, frequent use (twice or more daily), especially long-term use exceeding 40 years, is associated with a higher risk of developing oral cancer. The author suggests that this could be the body's way of protecting itself from accumulated toxins. Instead of mouthwash, dietary changes to remove processed and plant-based foods high in carbohydrates and seed oils are recommended for better oral health and breath.

7. What were the key points of the potential peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine in April 2022, and why did it not materialize? In April 2022, Russia and Ukraine were reportedly close to a peace agreement in Istanbul, mediated by Turkey. The framework involved Ukraine adopting neutrality, likely similar to countries like Austria or Sweden, and receiving security guarantees from several countries. A key point of contention was the mechanism for these guarantees, with Ukraine wanting the guarantors to be able to act without Russia's approval, while Russia sought to prevent manipulation of the agreement to justify renewed force against it. Ultimately, the U.S. and U.K. are said to have dissuaded Ukraine from signing the agreement. The issue of the final status of borders, including Crimea and the Donbas region, was also central to the negotiations.

8. What are Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and what are the potential concerns associated with their implementation? Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are envisioned as a digital form of a nation's fiat currency, issued and controlled by the central bank. Concerns associated with their implementation include the potential for central banks to have "absolute control of rules and regulations over use of CBDC and the authority to enforce those rules," as stated by an official from the Bank of International Settlements. This raises fears of increased surveillance and restrictions on individual spending. Additionally, the energy consumption of CBDC transactions, particularly if based on blockchain technology similar to Bitcoin, could be drastically higher than current electronic payment methods, leading to potentially significant costs. There are also concerns that central banks might take over fiscal policy, imposing spending limits and potentially leading to austerity measures.

The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate 

This article from LewRockwell.com delves into the author's interpretation of "Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate," dissecting each term to warn readers about a perceived political philosophy embraced by powerful individuals. It centers on Elon Musk's declaration of being "dark MAGA" and suggests this aligns with a movement towards a "Technate" administered by a "gov-corp" structure, seemingly evidenced by the creation of the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The author argues that this shift, influenced by figures like Musk and rooted in ideas like Technocracy and the Dark Enlightenment, represents a transfer of power to unelected private sector elites and risks the imposition of a new world order. 

Discuss Dark MAGA concept.

The concept of "Dark MAGA" is discussed in the source titled "The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf"1 .

Here's a breakdown of the concept based on the information provided:

•

Shortly before the November 2024 election, Elon Musk announced at a Trump rally, "I'm not just MAGA, I'm dark MAGA"2 .

•

Various explanations for Musk's "dark MAGA" declaration have been proposed, including Musk pushing a Dark MAGA meme coin, casting himself as a super-antihero, or advocating for a violent fascist takeover of the US3 .

•

However, the article suggests that Musk's reference is more likely to the ideas of the Dark Enlightenment, with Musk being a key proponent of Technocracy4 .

•

Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal with Musk, is identified as a well-known proponent of the Dark Enlightenment4 .

•

The article states that these two sociopolitical theories, Dark Enlightenment and Technocracy, have considerable overlap and are mutually reinforcing4 .

•

Musk's "Technocratic Heritage" is highlighted by his and Tesla's then-Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn officially changing their working titles to "TechnoKings" of Tesla in a 2021 SEC filing4 .... This choice of words is deemed significant, indicating Musk's understanding of Technocracy5 .

•

The article posits that Musk desires Technocracy and a social credit system, aligning with the political philosophy of his grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, who was involved with Technocracy Incorporated6 ....

•

The ultimate aim of this Technocracy, according to the source, is to establish a "Technate", described as a system of technocratic, totalitarian continental control here on Earth8 .

•

Musk's involvement in the newly established US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which he chairs, is presented as a move towards this Technocracy9 .... The DOGE is described as a nascent Technocracy with the stated purpose of restructuring the federal government to reduce expenditures and maximize efficiency, aligning with Taylorism, a foundation of Technocracy11 .

•

The author notes parallels between the ambitions of DOGE and Curtis Yarvin's "RAGE" (Retire All Government Employees) acronym11 .

•

Despite not being an official executive department, DOGE will operate as a Federal Presidential Advisory Committee with close ties to the political process, including a "DOGE" subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform12 .... This structure is seen as a way for technical "experts" to effectively control related political policy decisions, which is central to Technocracy13 ....

•

The article emphasizes that the DOGE represents a formal shift in political power from the public to the private sector, being a private sector-dominated think tank openly empowered to "restructure federal agencies"15 . This is seen as aligned with Technocracy, affording privileges to the technocrats who seek to control a Technate16 .

Discuss Gov-Corp Technate.

The concept of the "Gov-Corp Technate" is the central theme of the article titled "The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf"1 . According to this source, a "Gov-Corp Technate" is a form of governance where the state ("gov") and corporations ("corp") are deeply intertwined and administered based on the principles of Technocracy2 .

Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of the Gov-Corp Technate as described in the source:

•

The author suggests that the election of Donald Trump to his second non-consecutive term has led the US towards living in a Technate administered by "gov-corp"2 .... The millions of US citizens who voted for Trump were, according to the article, unaware that they were voting to live under such a system2 .

•

The term is connected to the "Dark MAGA" concept, particularly through Elon Musk's declaration of being "dark MAGA"2 .... The article argues that Musk, as a prominent proponent of Technocracy, is one of the key figures behind this shift4 ....

•

The source posits that this Gov-Corp Technate is another step towards a "multipolar world order," also referred to as the "New World Order"2 .

•

The US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), chaired by Elon Musk, is presented as a "nascent Technocracy" and a manifestation of the move towards a Gov-Corp Technate6 .... The stated goal of DOGE to restructure the federal government for efficiency aligns with the principles of Taylorism, a foundation of Technocracy8 .

•

The article highlights the shift of political power from the public sector to the private sector embodied by the DOGE. As a private sector-dominated think tank empowered to restructure federal agencies, it signifies the growing influence of corporations and technocrats in governance9 .

•

The author notes the welcoming of the DOGE plan by figures like Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of J.P. Morgan Chase, suggesting that financial elites are supportive of this move towards a less regulated, more centrally controlled system10 .

•

The involvement of individuals with strong corporate ties, like Musk and Howard Lutnick (CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald), in DOGE, points to the "corp" aspect of the Gov-Corp Technate7 . Lutnick's connection to Peter Thiel's Palantir Technologies further emphasizes the link between corporate surveillance technology and this emerging governance model11 .

•

Ultimately, the Gov-Corp Technate represents a system where technical "experts" and powerful corporations wield significant influence over policy decisions, potentially eclipsing the role of elected representatives12 .... This concept is central to the definition of Technocracy discussed in the article10 ....

In essence, the "Gov-Corp Technate" described in the source represents a future where governance is increasingly driven by the collaboration between powerful corporations and a technocratic elite, prioritizing efficiency and control, as opposed to traditional democratic processes2 ....

Discuss Elon Musk's Technocracy.

Based on the source titled "The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf" and our previous conversation, here's a discussion of Elon Musk's Technocracy:

Elon Musk is identified in the source as a key proponent of Technocracy1 . This is highlighted by several points:

•

"Dark MAGA" and Technocracy: Musk's declaration of being "dark MAGA" is interpreted by the article not merely as support for a political movement, but as an alignment with the ideas encapsulated by the Dark Enlightenment, a sociopolitical theory with considerable overlap and mutual reinforcement with Technocracy1 ....

•

"TechnoKings" of Tesla: In a 2021 SEC filing, Musk and Tesla's then-Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn officially changed their working titles to "TechnoKings" of Tesla1 .... The article emphasizes that this was a careful choice of words, indicating Musk's understanding and embrace of the concept of Technocracy4 .

•

Family History: The source reveals that Musk's maternal grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, was deeply involved with Technocracy Incorporated in Canada, even being arrested for violating Defence of Canada regulations due to the organization being deemed "illegal"5 .... Musk is said to have become intimately familiar with his grandfather's political philosophy while growing up7 .

•

Vision for Mars: Musk has explicitly stated his preference for a technocratic system for future Martian colonies, writing in 2019 about "Accelerating Starship development to build the Martian Technocracy"8 . This demonstrates his clear preference for this form of governance8 .

•

Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal High Income: Musk's advocacy for UBI, or as he later termed it in an AI-dominated future, "universal high income," aligns with technocratic ideas of managing resources and distributing wealth through a system potentially controlled by technology and experts9 ....

•

The US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): Musk's current role as chair of the newly established DOGE is presented as a significant step towards implementing Technocracy on Earth11 .... The stated purpose of the DOGE, to restructure the federal government for reduced expenditures and maximized efficiency, is consistent with Taylorism, a foundational principle of Technocracy13 .

•

Shift of Power: The article argues that the DOGE represents a formal shift in political power from the public sector to the private sector, with a private sector-dominated think tank being empowered to restructure federal agencies. This centralization of authority in the hands of technical "experts" and those with corporate ties is a key characteristic of the envisioned Gov-Corp Technate14 ....

In essence, the source portrays Elon Musk as a committed advocate for Technocracy, viewing it as a more efficient and perhaps inevitable form of governance, both on Earth and potentially on Mars. His actions, from his company titles to his involvement in governmental initiatives like DOGE, are interpreted through the lens of this technocratic vision10 .

Discuss DOGE agency.

Based on the source titled "The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf" and our previous discussion, here's a discussion of the DOGE agency:

The US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is a newly established temporary agency in Washington, D.C., chaired by Elon Musk1 . It was announced by Donald Trump in November 2024 and created on his first day in office, with a supposed mission to be completed by the summer of 20261 ....

Here are the key aspects of the DOGE agency as described in the source:

•

Purpose: The stated purpose of the DOGE is to restructure the federal government to reduce expenditures and maximize efficiency3 . This goal aligns with Taylorism, a foundational principle of Technocracy3 .

•

Leadership: The DOGE is chaired by Elon Musk, a prominent proponent of Technocracy2 .... Initially, venture capitalist Vivek Ramaswamy and Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick were also handpicked to run DOGE, but Ramaswamy has since departed, and Lutnick was recently confirmed as the US Secretary of Commerce2 . This leaves Musk as the apparent sole "CEO"5 .

•

Structure: The DOGE will reportedly operate as a Federal Presidential Advisory Committee, supposedly outside of the government6 . However, it will be closely tied to the political process, with its employees housed in the former offices of the United States Digital Service, and Musk reportedly having a personal office in the West Wing of the White House6 .

•

Influence on Policy: The efficiency ideas generated by experts within DOGE, starting with Musk, will be given political influence through a new "DOGE" subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, chaired by Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)7 . The article argues that in practice, this structure will allow technical "experts" to effectively control related political policy decisions, a central concept of Technocracy7 ....

•

Shift of Power: The source emphasizes that the DOGE represents a formal shift in political power from the public to the private sector9 . It is described as a private sector-dominated think tank openly empowered to "restructure federal agencies"9 . This is seen as a key aspect of the move towards a Gov-Corp Technate, where corporate influence in governance increases significantly [151, our conversation history].

•

Potential Conflicts of Interest: The author points out a massive conflict of interest at the heart of the DOGE project, given that Musk and other supporters like Bezos have long profited from huge government contracts, and individuals like Jamie Dimon will likely be asked to "advise" the DOGE10 . This conflict is seen as aligned with Technocracy, affording privileges to the technocrats seeking to control a Technate11 .

•

Actions and Impact: The source "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf" mentions specific actions attributed to DOGE, including the cancellation of 83% of USAID programs12 and the discovery of $312 million in loans given to children during the COVID pandemic13 . These examples are used to highlight the agency's scrutiny of government spending and efficiency14 .... The cancellation of USAID programs is also framed as a potentially positive development for the rest of the world, reducing progressive influence14 .

In the context of the "Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate" theory, the DOGE agency is portrayed as a crucial instrument for implementing a technocratic system of governance in the United States, where efficiency and corporate expertise take precedence over traditional political processes [132, our conversation history].

Discuss Technocracy Inc.

Based on the source titled "The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf" and our conversation history, here is a discussion of Technocracy Inc.:

Technocracy Inc. was an organization in which Elon Musk's maternal grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, was actively involved1 . He served as a research director and leader of the Regina branch of this entity1 .

Here are the key points about Technocracy Inc. mentioned in the source:

•

Legal Issues in Canada: In 1940, while serving in his leadership role, Joshua Haldeman was arrested by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). This arrest was due to violating Defence of Canada regulations, under which Technocracy Inc. was deemed an "illegal organisation"1 .

•

Consequences of Legal Trouble: As a result of being the head of this controversial organization and his subsequent conviction in 1941, Haldeman faced several consequences. He was denied entry into the US, where he had planned to deliver a speech promoting Technocracy, and he was also fined and given a suspended sentence1 ....

•

Philosophical Underpinnings: The source indicates that Technocracy, the ideology promoted by Technocracy Inc., was based upon the "industrial efficiency" ideas of engineer Frederick Winslow Taylor (Taylorism)2 . It also dovetailed with the "conspicuous consumption" economic theories of Thorstein Veblen2 .

•

Connection to Social Credit: Following his conviction, Haldeman joined the Canadian Social Credit Party (Socred) in 19412 . Socred aimed to implement the "social credit" economic theory of British engineer and economist C. H. Douglas2 .... The source notes that both Socred and Technocracy shared a foundation in the industrial efficiency ideas of Taylor2 .

•

Family Involvement: Elon Musk's mother, Maye Haldeman, recalled that as a child, she and her siblings were involved in her parents' political activities, which included Technocracy Inc. They would work on "monthly bulletins and photocopy newsletters" and prepare them for mailing4 .

•

Influence on Elon Musk: Although Elon Musk's grandfather passed away when Musk was an infant, the source suggests that Musk "learned about and became intimately familiar with his grandfather’s political philosophy" while growing up4 . This implies that the ideas of Technocracy, as promoted by Technocracy Inc., were likely part of the intellectual environment in which Musk was raised and may have influenced his own views on governance and technology [135, our conversation history].

In summary, Technocracy Inc. was an organization active in Canada, led in part by Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman. It was based on principles of industrial efficiency and faced legal repercussions in Canada, being deemed an illegal organization during wartime. The ideas associated with Technocracy Inc. appear to have had a lasting impact on Elon Musk's family and potentially influenced his own technocratic inclinations1 ....

SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 

This Coffee & Covid newsletter edition, dated March 10, 2025 and titled "Sanity Day," reflects on the fifth anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic's disruption, viewing that prior date as the "last day of normal life." The author critiques the actions and pronouncements of experts and institutions during the pandemic, highlighting a perceived shift in mainstream media with an article questioning Anthony Fauci. The newsletter also covers other topics including the downsizing of USAID, questionable pandemic-era loans, a puzzling Alzheimer's case, and Utah's ban on water fluoridation, framing these as evidence of broader failures in governance and expertise. 

Discuss Pandemic anniversary.

Based on the sources, the anniversary of the pandemic is a significant point of reflection in March 20251 .

Here are some key discussion points regarding the pandemic anniversary:

•

Two Anniversaries: There is a distinction being made between March 10th, 2020, which is considered the last day of normal pre-pandemic life by one source, marking the calm before the storm2 , and March 11th, 2020, the day the WHO issued its pandemic declaration, considered by some as the "pandemic's true anniversary"2 ....

•

Retrospection and Discrediting of NPIs: The fifth anniversary of the COVID outbreak has prompted a look back at the events. A Boston Globe article titled "The case against Anthony Fauci" critiques where American science and politics went wrong4 . This article was based on the upcoming book "In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us," scheduled for release on the pandemic's true anniversary5 . The article highlights the WHO's early warnings against non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) like contact tracing, lockdowns, and border controls, and the scant evidence for masking6 .

•

Criticism of Experts and Media: There is a strong sentiment that "science followers" ridiculed those who asked questions during the pandemic4 . The Boston Globe article is seen as a harsh but belated acknowledgment of elite failure, although it is criticized for not admitting the Globe's own role in promoting the "approved lie"7 . The so-called experts are accused of clinging to their fictions while the public is not forgetting8 .

•

Erosion of Trust: The pandemic is seen as having ruined trust in institutions9 . The focus is shifting towards holding the "perpetrators of a historically destructive fraud" accountable8 ....

•

Government Actions Retrospectively:

◦

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has cancelled a vast majority (83%) of USAID programs10 .

◦

DOGE also discovered that $312 million in forgivable loans were given to children during the pandemic, raising questions about the competence of federal workers11 ....

•

Lasting Impacts: The pandemic is described as having changed everything, leading to the rise of previously unthinkable measures like mass mail-in voting and extended lockdowns2 ....

•

Alternative Perspectives: One source suggests that the liberty to use existing safe treatments could have prevented most deaths from the virus, lockdowns, and mRNA therapies14 . Another source likens the war in Ukraine to "covid 2.0" in its impact on social division15 . The pandemic is also viewed by some as part of a larger "global technocratic attack"16 . The economic impact includes the wiping out of a significant number of small businesses17 .

In summary, the pandemic anniversary in March 2025 is a time for critical reflection on the responses, the roles of experts and media, and the lasting consequences on trust in institutions and government actions1 ....

Discuss Anti-Fauci article.

The source "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf"1 discusses an "astonishing" article that ran in the far-left Boston Globe headlined, “The case against Anthony Fauci”2 . The sub-headline of this Boston Globe article explained that a new book examines where American science and politics went wrong on the fifth anniversary of the COVID outbreak2 .

The author of the "☕️ SANITY DAY" news roundup expresses that for five years, those who asked questions were "mocked, gaslit, canceled, hounded, ostracized," and ridiculed by "science followers"2 . The author sees the publication of this anti-Fauci article as a sign that "we were right" and "Conspiracy theory has gone mainstream"3 . However, the author does not expect an apology3 .

The Boston Globe article reportedly originates from a new book titled, “In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us,” written by two Princeton University political scientists, scheduled for release on the anniversary of the pandemic3 . The "☕️ SANITY DAY" article highlights several key points from the Boston Globe piece:

•

In January 2020, before the WHO's pandemic declaration, the international health agency published a report that designated several non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as "not recommended in any circumstances," including contact tracing, lockdowns, and border controls. The report also noted that the evidence for masking's effectiveness was scant4 .

•

The article described how then-NIH director Frances Collins orchestrated a "devastating takedown" of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for "focused protection" of vulnerable citizens instead of broad lockdowns. The Boston Globe admitted that "Banishing the Declaration from the realm of acceptable debate was a pretty stunning betrayal of scientific and democratic ideals"5 .

•

The Boston Globe also acknowledged that the banishment of any inquiry into the Wuhan lab origin of the virus "not only clouded judgment on public policy, it also did enormous damage to public trust"5 .

The author of the "☕️ SANITY DAY" roundup notes that while this isn't the first acknowledgement of elite failure during the pandemic in corporate media, it stood out because it was the "harshest, least apologetic takedown to date" and appeared in the Boston Globe, which was previously an enthusiastic defender of "science" during the pandemic6 . The author criticizes the Boston Globe for not acknowledging its own role as a "gatekeeper, enforcer, and cheerleader of the approved lie"6 .

The author concludes that while the tangible pandemic is over and many NPIs are being discredited, trust in institutions is ruined, and the "experts" who were the "architects of this disaster" are still avoiding accountability7 .... The author hopes the new book, and by extension the Boston Globe article, signifies a coming "long overdue accounting"8 .

Discuss USAID shutdown.

The source "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf" discusses the shutdown of a significant portion of USAID programs.

According to the article, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that 5,200 USAID contracts were cancelled, with only about 1,000 surviving DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) scrutiny1 . This means that 83% of USAID programs are being cancelled1 . The author of the "☕️ SANITY DAY" news roundup states that the "quasi-independent" USAID agency is "done"1 .

The remaining "aid" contracts will now be administered directly by the State Department, where they will be subject to FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests and normal government transparency1 . The author expresses thanks to DOGE for this development2 .

The article goes on to suggest that this shutdown is "much bigger than saving money, axing graft, and ditching wasteful" projects2 . USAID, according to its charter, aimed to transform the rest of the world into a progressive utopia, regardless of the desires of the citizens of those countries2 . Therefore, the cancellation of 83% of USAID is seen as "encouraging news for the rest of the world who might now get 83% more sanity and peace"2 .

This development was also briefly mentioned in our previous discussion about the pandemic anniversary, where the cancelling of a large percentage of USAID programs by DOGE was noted as one of the government actions taken retrospectively [your previous turn].

Discuss Kiddie loan scandal.

The source "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf" discusses a "Kiddie loan scandal" that was uncovered by DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency)1 .

According to the article, DOGE announced the discovery that in 2020 and 2021, the SBA (Small Business Administration) awarded over 5,600 forgivable loans totaling $312 million to "extraordinary borrowers" whose only listed owner was 11 years old or younger at the time of the loan1 . The author of the "☕️ SANITY DAY" news roundup sarcastically refers to these as "Kiddie loans" and notes that these "immature borrowers" all used social security numbers with the wrong names1 .

Furthermore, DOGE also reported that the SBA issued another 3,095 loans totaling $333 million to borrowers over 115 years old2 . The author questions how many "small business owners" over 80 years old received these forgivable SBA COVID loans and whether they were even aware of it2 .

The article raises several critical questions regarding this scandal:

•

Competence of the SBA: The author wonders if there is a "single functioning neuron" in the SBA and questions if the same federal workers who approved these loans to children and the very elderly are the ones who cannot be bothered to report five weekly accomplishments2 .

•

Oversight and Transparency: The author questions if this is why DOGE is not allowed to examine Treasury or Social Security2 .

•

Broader Implications: The author believes the story is "much bigger than savings" and asks "what the Hades is going on?"3 . The author points out that the same bureaucrats who approved these questionable loans are now assuring the public that elections, the economy, and institutions are in capable hands and should not be questioned3 . This leads the author to doubt their competence3 .

This "Kiddie loan scandal" highlights potential waste, fraud, and mismanagement within government agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly concerning the distribution of SBA loans1 .... It also contributes to the theme discussed in our previous conversations regarding the failures and questionable actions of institutions and experts during the pandemic [your previous turns]. The discovery of these irregular loans by DOGE further underscores the agency's role in scrutinizing government spending, as also seen in the large-scale cancellation of USAID programs [your previous turn].

Discuss Water fluoridation ban.

The source "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf" discusses Utah becoming the first state to ban fluoride in public water systems.

Here are the key points from the article regarding this ban:

•

The Wall Street Journal ran a story highlighting this development. While the author of the "☕️ SANITY DAY" news roundup admits to having been a doubter, they have now become convinced of the need for this ban1 .

•

While Florida had previously recommended against county-level fluoridation, Utah is taking a stronger stance by implementing a statewide ban1 .

•

Utah Governor Spencer Cox (R) stated his intention to sign a bill banning fluoride, emphasizing the high bar for government-mandated medication1 . He said, "It’s got to be a really high bar for me if we’re going to require people to be medicated by their government"1 . This highlights the principle of medical freedom1 .

•

Governor Cox noted that half of Utah already does not fluoridate its public drinking water, and dentists in those counties reported no higher levels of tooth decay compared to fluoridated counties2 . The availability of fluoridated toothpaste is also mentioned as an alternative for those who desire fluoride2 .

•

The article references an 80-page ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen from the previous September, which found that evidence from 72 studies suggested that fluoride was possibly a neurotoxin associated with IQ loss in children2 .

•

The author notes that the EPA, corporate media, and dental associations reflexively dismissed this finding as a conspiracy theory without further investigation3 .

•

This ban is linked to the surging rates of Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases, prompting the question of whether it's time to re-evaluate the safety of substances that "experts" have assured the public are "safe and effective"3 .

•

The author speculates whether this anti-fluoride trend and no-mandate momentum could be a "pandemic silver lining", suggesting that the forced medication policies during the pandemic may have led to greater scrutiny of government-mandated health interventions4 .

This discussion aligns with our previous conversations regarding the questioning of expert opinions and the re-evaluation of public health measures in the wake of the pandemic [your previous turns]. The ban on water fluoridation reflects a growing skepticism towards previously accepted health interventions and a prioritization of individual medical freedom, themes that have emerged in discussions about the pandemic response and the critique of figures like Dr. Fauci. Additionally, the mention of potential neurotoxic effects connects to the broader concern about public health and environmental factors potentially contributing to neurological issues, as also touched upon with the "record-setting Alzheimer’s case" discussed in the same source5 .

Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk By Joachim Bartoll

This online article from bartoll.se, written by Joachim Bartoll, argues that frequent, long-term use of commercial mouthwash may elevate the risk of oral cancer due to common ingredients that can cause tissue damage. The author critiques a meta-analysis for not explaining the underlying biochemical reasons for this potential link, asserting that ingredients like solvents, antibacterial compounds, and preservatives can harm oral tissues with repeated exposure. Bartoll contends that this accumulated damage and potential toxic buildup, especially with very frequent use (three or more times daily or over many years), could force cells to mutate as a protective mechanism, possibly leading to cancer. Ultimately, the article suggests that natural approaches, particularly diet, are superior for oral health, contrasting them with the damaging effects of chemical-laden mouthwash. 

The sources discuss a potential link between long-term or frequent mouthwash use and an increased risk of oral cancer1 .... According to a meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies, long-term mouthwash use (over 40 years) was associated with a 44% higher risk of developing oral cancer1 .... Furthermore, participants who used mouthwash three or more times daily had a 158% higher risk3 . However, the study found no association between oral cancer risk and mouthwash use once or twice daily3 .

The author of the article argues that this increased risk is likely due to the common ingredients found in commercial mouthwash, such as solvents, anti-bacterial compounds, sweeteners, preservatives, colorants, and flavoring agents4 . Specific ingredients highlighted include:

•

Ethanol (alcohol), which is a known carcinogen and can cause deeper-layer cell damage, potentially increasing the risk of malignant transformation5 .

•

Phenolic compounds, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, and chlorhexidine, which can contribute to cell damage and kill all kinds of bacteria, potentially increasing oral cancer risk as bacteria are needed for removing damaged cells and debris5 ....

•

Glycerine, used as a moisturizer, is also anti-bacterial, which can be problematic when combined with tissue-damaging chemicals as bacteria aid in healing and repair6 .

•

Fluoride compounds (e.g., sodium fluoride) are described as extremely toxic and causing a lot of damage and toxic build-up in tissues7 .

•

Essential oils like eucalyptol, menthol, and methyl salicylate can be very toxic to skin cells, including the squamous epithelial cells of the mouth8 .

The author suggests that even infrequent use might cause some tissue damage, but likely not enough to lead to cancer in healthy individuals2 . However, frequent use leads to accumulated damage and toxicity, hindering the body's ability to heal properly, especially as mouthwash can kill beneficial bacteria needed for the healing process2 .... The development of oral cancer in response to repeated exposure to these toxins depends on other stressors on the body and the duration of exposure10 .

The article concludes that while the study shows an association, it cannot definitively prove that mouthwash use directly causes oral cancer due to its reliance on observational data11 . Nevertheless, the author asserts that repeated exposure to toxins will cause damage, and cancer might develop as a protective mechanism in the long term12 . The author recommends focusing on the damage caused by these products with each use and the potential for accumulated harm if the body cannot heal effectively9 .... The best solution for oral health, according to the author, is to return to a natural diet, suggesting that a carnivore diet eliminates the need for brushing or mouthwash13 ....

Discuss Common mouthwash ingredients.

Based on the sources, particularly the article "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk"1 , common ingredients found in commercial mouthwash products include:

•

Solvents, such as glycerine2 .... Glycerine is present in 96.7% of mouthwashes3 .

•

Anti-bacterial compounds, such as chlorhexidine2 ....

•

Sweeteners, such as saccharin, sorbitol, and xylitol2 .... Sweeteners are found in 96.7% of mouthwashes, often alongside glycerine3 .

•

Preservatives, with sodium benzoate being the predominant type2 .... Preservatives are found in 82.2% of mouthwashes3 .

•

Colorants, added to 66% of mouthwashes2 ....

•

Flavoring agents, included in 99.2% of mouthwashes2 ....

Therapeutic mouthwashes also frequently contain active ingredients such as:

•

Peroxide3 .

•

Fluoride, often in the form of sodium fluoride, present in 86.9% of aqueous solutions or concentrates3 ....

•

Essential oils, like eucalyptol, menthol, and methyl salicylate3 ....

•

Chlorhexidine, which is described as an anti-bacterial and highly toxic and damaging compound3 .

The author of the mouthwash article raises concerns about these ingredients, suggesting they can cause tissue damage and may contribute to an increased risk of oral cancer with long-term or frequent use6 .... They highlight the potential dangers of ethanol (alcohol), phenolic compounds, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, glycerine, fluoride compounds, and essential oils5 ....

Discuss Tissue damage from mouthwash.

Based on the information in the sources, particularly the article "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk"1 ... and our previous discussion [Me, You], mouthwash can cause tissue damage due to its common ingredients6 . The author argues that rinsing with a "toxic cocktail of chemicals" can lead to harm5 .

Here's a breakdown of how specific ingredients are implicated in causing tissue damage:

•

Ethanol (alcohol) is a known carcinogen that can cause deeper-layer cell damage, increasing the risk of malignant transformation as cells try to protect themselves8 .

•

Phenolic compounds, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, and chlorhexidine can contribute to cell damage9 . Notably, chlorhexidine is described as a highly toxic and damaging compound3 .

•

Glycerine, while used as a "moisturizer," is also anti-bacterial. When combined with other tissue-damaging chemicals, its anti-bacterial properties can be detrimental because bacteria are needed for the healing and repair process of tissues9 .

•

Fluoride compounds, such as sodium fluoride, present in a high percentage of mouthwashes4 , are described as extremely toxic, causing a lot of damage and toxic build-up in tissues4 .

•

Essential oils like eucalyptol, menthol, and methyl salicylate are very toxic to skin cells and especially the squamous epithelial cells of the mouth, which are similar to the outer layer of the skin10 .

The author suggests that while infrequent mouthwash use might cause some tissue damage that the body can likely heal, using mouthwash frequently (twice or three times a day) can lead to accumulated damage and toxicity6 . This repeated exposure makes it harder for the body to heal properly14 .

Furthermore, because many mouthwash ingredients have anti-bacterial properties, they can kill all kinds of bacteria in the mouth, altering the diversity of oral bacteria9 . This is problematic because bacteria are needed for the removal of damaged cells and debris and aid in the healing and repair processes9 .... If there aren't enough bacteria present during repair, healing may not be completed, leading to an accumulation of debris and toxic compounds in the tissues14 . This can potentially increase the risk of developing oral cancer in the long term6 ....

The author concludes that damage occurs every time mouthwash is used, and this damage can accumulate if the body cannot heal between exposures. Even if healing occurs, it may lead to the formation of scar tissue and toxic residues14 .

Discuss Frequency of mouthwash use.

Based on the information in the sources, particularly the article "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk"1 , the frequency of mouthwash use is a significant factor in its potential association with oral cancer risk and tissue damage. Here's a breakdown:

•

Long-term use (over 40 years) was associated with a 44% higher risk of developing oral cancer in the meta-analysis cited2 . This suggests that the cumulative effect of prolonged exposure to mouthwash ingredients can increase the risk over time3 .

•

Frequent use (three or more times daily) was linked to a 158% higher risk of oral cancer4 . The author of the article strongly criticizes this level of usage, considering it "insane" and directly contributing to a significantly elevated risk due to repeated exposure and damage3 ....

•

Less frequent use (less than once daily, or once or twice daily) showed no association with a higher risk of oral cancer overall in the analyzed studies4 .... However, the author posits that even using mouthwash a few times a week or once daily will likely cause some tissue damage, though perhaps not enough to cause cancer in individuals who are otherwise healthy and can heal properly2 .

The author emphasizes that the potential for harm is related to the accumulated damage and toxicity from the chemicals in mouthwash, as well as the body's ability to heal between exposures4 .... Frequent use may overwhelm the body's repair mechanisms and could also disrupt the oral microbiome by killing beneficial bacteria needed for healing8 ....

In summary, while infrequent mouthwash use may not show a direct link to increased oral cancer risk according to the cited study, long-term daily use, and especially use three or more times a day, appears to substantially increase the risk2 .... The author advises caution with any frequency of use due to the potential for tissue damage from the chemical ingredients7 .

Discuss Oral health alternatives.

Based on the information in the sources, particularly the article "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk"1 ..., the author suggests that the best solution for mouth health and hygiene is to return to nature and adopt foods that cannot cause damage or any kind of toxic build-up15 .

The author specifically recommends a natural carnivore diet, stating that on such a diet, you do not really need to brush your teeth, much less "wash your mouth"15 .... This suggestion is based on the premise that processed and plant-based foods, especially those with carbohydrates and seed oils, are detrimental to oral health and contribute to problems like bad breath5 .

The author has also covered this topic in more detail in other articles mentioned in the text: "Oral Health: A Toothpaste Containing Curcumin And Melatonin Will Kill Cells In Your Mouth", "Malnutrition And Poor Oral Health — And How To Easily Spot Nutrient Deficiencies," "The Dark Truths About Fluoride," and "Dental Health — Cavities: Why we get them and how to repair them"16 . While these articles are not provided in the sources, their titles suggest a focus on natural approaches, the negative impacts of certain ingredients like fluoride, and the role of nutrition in oral health.

In essence, the alternative to using mouthwash proposed in the source is a dietary shift towards natural, animal-based foods, which the author claims can eliminate the need for conventional oral hygiene products15 ....

AI REVIEW OF LM AI PODCAST ARTICLE REVIEW
Discuss Deep state control.

The sources discuss the concept of "Deep state control" in various contexts, suggesting a hidden network of powerful individuals influencing governments and societal structures for their own benefit1 ....

Here are some key aspects of "Deep state control" as depicted in the sources:

•

Definition and Composition: The "deep state" is described as being composed of billionaires whose primary interest is enriching themselves, sometimes through war and manipulative schemes1 .... These elites, a "wealth-elite" of roughly a thousand individuals in the US and UK, are routinely in contact to negotiate deals that benefit them, regardless of public or competitor impact4 .

•

Mechanisms of Control: The sources suggest several mechanisms through which the "deep state" exerts control:

◦

Profiteering from Conflict: The war in Ukraine is presented as an example where taxpayer money is funneled to defense contractors (like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Boeing, General Dynamics) and financial giants (like BlackRock), who are seen as major beneficiaries3 .... BlackRock is also noted to have agreements to advise on post-war reconstruction, giving them control over how rebuilding funds are spent4 ....

◦

Influence over Government: The UK and US governments are portrayed as being controlled by their "military-industrial complex" rather than controlling it8 . This control extends to prioritizing weapons manufacturers' sales and profits9 .

◦

Suppression of Dissenting Voices: Claims are made that the mainstream media actively suppresses voices critical of the "deep state narrative"10 . The example of Candace Owens is brought up, questioning whether her platform is genuine criticism or a way to discredit alternative viewpoints11 .

◦

Social Engineering: The argument is made that society is becoming a de facto communist state where events like International Women's Day are tools of social engineering used to undermine traditional values and family structures to push a specific agenda12 .... Concepts like feminism and diversity initiatives are framed as part of this control effort13 ....

◦

Technological Control: Concerns are raised about the "technocratic age," particularly the potential dangers of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)17 . A CBDC could give central banks unprecedented control over finances, tracking every transaction and potentially limiting or blocking spending based on behavior or political views, raising significant privacy and freedom concerns17 .... The idea of a "biodigital goolog" is mentioned18 .... Smartphones are described as "slave devices" used for surveillance and control24 ....

◦

Blurring of Lines: The "integrated operating concept" is highlighted as a military doctrine that blurs the lines between foreign and domestic intelligence operations, raising questions about surveillance within national borders6 ....

◦

Control of Information: The "regime" is said to control "fact-checking" non-profits to censor dissenting sites like UK Column, emphasizing that individuals must police truthfulness themselves and be skeptical of all sources28 ....

•

Examples and Connections:

◦

The situation in Ukraine is repeatedly cited as a manifestation of "deep state" interests in profit and control1 ....

◦

The rise of a "gov corp technate" is discussed, with the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chaired by Elon Musk being seen as a potential "Trojan horse" for technocracy, shifting power from elected officials to unelected technocrats and corporate elites who may have conflicts of interest21 ....

◦

The historical perspective of Murray Rothbard, an advocate for anarcho-capitalism and a critic of state power, resonates with concerns about the "deep state" and the concentration of wealth and influence39 .... He viewed the state as inherently coercive42 ....

◦

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is portrayed as a platform where elites discuss dehumanizing, robotizing, and digitizing the common people for better control, leading to a "Digital Gulag"45 .... The UN is described as corrupt and sold to the "Deep State"5 .

•

Resistance: The sources suggest potential resistance to this control, including:

◦

Vigilance and Critical Thinking: Being aware of how power is concentrated and abused, critically evaluating information, and challenging the status quo are emphasized as crucial47 .

◦

Technological Disengagement: Swapping smartphones for privacy phones is presented as a simple but powerful act of rebellion against surveillance and data collection24 ....

◦

Embracing Tradition: Some advocate for a return to traditional values and practices (like within the Catholic Church) as a way to counter negative aspects of modern society and technocratic control49 ....

◦

Financial Alternatives: The resurgence of paper checks is seen as a small sign of pushing back against the digital takeover of finance52 .

It is important to note that the sources present these ideas as claims and concerns, and they often encourage critical evaluation of the information presented10 .... Some sources express strong opinions and use charged language (e.g., "slave devices," "biodigital goolog") to convey their perspective18 ....

Discuss Social engineering.

Based on the sources, social engineering is presented as a set of manipulative techniques used by powerful entities to control populations, shape beliefs, and undermine traditional structures for their own benefit1 .... Several sources highlight different facets and examples of this concept:

•

One perspective, presented in the "3-10-25 Daily Brief.wav" podcast, argues that we live in a "de facto communist society" where methods similar to those used in the USSR are employed for population control1 . According to this viewpoint, even seemingly normal events and holidays like International Women's Day are actually "tools of social engineering" used to undermine "traditional values and family structures" and push a specific agenda1 .... This perspective claims that feminism and diversity initiatives are part of a larger effort to exert control, potentially connected to the idea of a "deep state"2 . The implication is that our choices, beliefs, and values are being shaped by forces beyond our awareness2 .

•

The "An Accurate Description of the UK-U.S. Empire - LewRockwell.pdf" also touches upon methods of control, referring to "mass-mind-control methods being imposed by, the UK and U.S. armaments-manufacturers’-controlled government"3 . This source suggests that the "regime itself controls the ‘fact-checking’ ‘non-profits’ in order to censor-out sites such as UK Column," and this "technique of mass-deceit is an important part of how the U.S./UK regime controls the empire"6 . This can be seen as a form of social engineering by manipulating information access and what is considered "truthful."

•

The article "Candace Owens, Ryan Dawson, and Other Conspiracy Podcasters, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review.pdf" echoes the idea of social engineering, stating that "feminism is designed to undermine Western society by breaking up the family"7 . It further suggests that "diversity, migration, miscegenation, pornography and gender dysphoria are designed to destroy the West" and that the "goyim are oblivious to this relentless occult attack because the MSM portrays it as 'progressive' instead of 'suicidal'"7 . This source also references Norman Dodd's claim that the Ford Foundation's agenda in 1954 was to "socially engineer' US life so that 'that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union' as part of banker-controlled world government"5 . The continued celebration of International Women's Day is presented as evidence of this ongoing social engineering5 .

•

In "Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering: March 2025," a reader's comment posits that "the kabbalists of Judaism created the utter filth that is 'Gay pride'" as a form of social engineering. The alleged goal is to make the West appalled by increasing degeneracy and turn to Zionism and "Nohaide laws"8 .

•

The "WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating. Peter Koenig - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization.pdf" describes the World Economic Forum's agenda as aiming to "robotize humanity" (excluding the elite) and control the remaining population through "fully biometric control with digital ID’s and digital vaxx certificates"9 .... This is framed as leading to a "Digital Gulag", suggesting a technologically enforced system of social control11 . The theme of "Collaboration for the Intelligent Age" is interpreted as "code lingo for Digital Gulag"11 .

In summary, the sources present social engineering as a deliberate manipulation of societal norms, values, information, and even biological processes to achieve control and advance specific agendas, often attributed to a "deep state," global elites, or hidden forces2 .... The examples range from the promotion of certain ideologies and holidays to the development of surveillance technologies and the alleged creation of social movements1 .... These perspectives generally view social engineering negatively, seeing it as a threat to individual autonomy and traditional societal structures2 ....

Discuss Central bank digital currency.

Based on the sources, a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is raising significant concerns regarding power, control, and individual liberties1 .... Here's a breakdown of the key points:

•

Unprecedented Control: A major concern with a CBDC is that it could grant central banks unprecedented control over individuals' finances2 . Every transaction could be tracked, and spending could potentially be limited or blocked based on behavior or political views, raising huge questions about privacy and freedom2 . One source even quotes Augustin Carstens of the Bank of International Settlements stating that with a CBDC, "the central bank will have absolute control of rules and regulations over use of CBDC and the authority to enforce those rules"4 .

•

Tool of the "Deep State": Some sources suggest that a CBDC would be a key tool for financial manipulation and control used by central banks and influenced by a "shadowy elite" or "deep state" of billionaires who prioritize enriching themselves3 .... This elite could use a CBDC to enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else5 .

•

Technocratic Age and Surveillance: The development of CBDCs is seen by some as part of a broader "technocratic age" where technology is increasingly used for surveillance and control2 . One source even uses the stark warning of being "herded into a biodigital goolog" in the context of CBDCs and surveillance7 . The transition to an all-digital crypto system could replace free market currency with an "electronic totalitarian system of controlled transactions by central banks"8 .

•

Loss of Anonymity: Unlike cash transactions, which offer privacy, a CBDC would mean the loss of private or anonymous financial transactions3 . Every purchase would be tracked and potentially controlled3 .

•

Energy Consumption Concerns: While not directly about CBDCs, one source highlights the massive energy consumption of Bitcoin transactions compared to credit card transactions (a million times more)5 . This raises questions about the environmental impact of a potential widespread shift towards digital currencies authorized by central banks5 ....

•

Historical Parallels: One source draws a parallel between a CBDC and the "mark of the beast" in ancient Rome, where citizens were required to have a mark to buy or sell10 . The COVID-19 vaccination certificate is also mentioned as a modern analog, suggesting a system where access to essential commodities or activities could be tied to digital credentials controlled by authorities10 .

•

Reversal of Marxism: It's argued that a CBDC system would be the "reverse of Marxism" by robbing the value of money from the labor of the working class and replacing it with "global banker Fascism and a new feudalistic caste system"11 .

•

Resistance to CBDCs: Resistance to this technocratic control is seen as crucial, and understanding the motivations behind the push for CBDCs is important12 .... One suggested form of resistance is a "mass disabling event" from the perspective of technocracy, which involves people getting rid of their smartphones14 ....

•

Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): The source mentions the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), chaired by Elon Musk, as potentially being a "nascent Technocracy"16 . There are concerns that DOGE's focus on technology and data-driven solutions could lead to a more centralized system and that individuals like Musk, who advocate for technocratic ideas, have profited from government contracts, creating conflicts of interest17 ....

•

Libertarian Critique: The ideas of libertarian thinker Murray Rothbard, a fierce critic of state power and central banking, resonate with the concerns about CBDCs19 .... His advocacy for minimal government intervention and a return to sound money aligns with skepticism towards centralized digital currencies19 ....

In conclusion, the sources paint a concerning picture of CBDCs as a technology with the potential for significant government and elite control over finances, potentially leading to a loss of privacy, freedom, and economic autonomy2 .... The push for CBDCs is linked to broader narratives of a "deep state" and a "technocratic age," prompting calls for vigilance and resistance2 ....

Discuss Reclaiming tradition.

The sources discuss "reclaiming tradition" primarily in the context of resisting modern societal trends and within the specific example of the Catholic Church1 ....

One source, "3-10-25 Daily Brief.wav," notes that one of the last sections covered in their podcast focuses on reclaiming power and embracing tradition as a way to resist technocratic control1 . They specifically mention a movement within the Catholic Church that advocates for a return to traditional values and practices as a counter to some of the negative aspects of modern society1 . However, they also acknowledge the challenges the church faces, such as a crisis of faith and membership, raising the question of how to adapt traditional values to the 21st century while preserving their essence4 .

The article "Tradition or Annihilation - LewRockwell.pdf" provides a more in-depth discussion of reclaiming tradition within the Catholic Church3 .... It argues that the Church in America and abroad is in a "super crisis" with a significant number of people leaving5 . The author contends that to avoid "annihilation," there must be a full return to the old ways in everything from liturgy to catechesis to public morals and even modesty in dress3 . This is presented as a necessary "about-turn" to get back on the "right road," drawing a parallel to C.S. Lewis's idea that progress requires returning to the correct path if a wrong turn has been made3 ....

The article addresses potential objections, acknowledging that the pre-Vatican II era wasn't perfect and that returning to tradition won't make everyone a saint8 . However, it emphasizes the severity of the current crisis, with a 700 percent negative ratio between new and former Catholics, suggesting that the current approach is not working and must be stopped8 . The author argues that the embrace of novelty has led to decay and destruction, while the only healthy parts of the Church are those where traditional liturgy and catechesis thrive11 . Examples are given of parishes that are thriving because they offer the Old Rite, celebrate the New Rite in a traditional way, and incorporate other traditional practices11 ....

In contrast, "Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering: March 2025" presents a perspective where certain modern observances might be viewed as a departure from tradition13 . It notes that International Women's Day originated in the USSR, linking it to communist ideology and suggesting that its widespread celebration in the West indicates a "de facto Communist society"13 .... This could be interpreted as a concern about the erosion of traditional Western values through the adoption of practices with non-Western or anti-traditional origins.

Therefore, the idea of reclaiming tradition in the sources is primarily presented as a means of resisting perceived negative modern trends, whether those are seen as technocratic control or a decline in religious faith and traditional values1 .... Within the context of the Catholic Church, it is argued as a necessary step to revitalize the institution and counter the negative consequences of embracing novelty3 .... However, the concept of "tradition" itself can be subject to interpretation and debate, as illustrated by the different perspectives on International Women's Day13 .

Discuss Oral health insights.

Based on the sources, there are a couple of key insights related to oral health: the potential risks associated with mouthwash and the move by Utah to ban fluoride in public water.

Regarding mouthwash, one source, "Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk - Joachim Bartoll Official.pdf," delves extensively into this topic1 .... The source argues that many common ingredients in commercial mouthwash products, such as solvents, antibacterial compounds, sweeteners, preservatives, colorants, and flavoring agents, can damage oral tissues with frequent use2 .

Key points made in this source include:

•

Frequent use of mouthwash (three or more times daily) was found in a meta-analysis of 15 studies to be associated with a significantly higher risk (158%) of developing oral cancer1 .... Long-term use for over 40 years was also linked to a 44% higher risk6 ....

•

The source suggests that even less frequent use can cause some tissue damage, and the risk of cancer depends on the accumulation of damage and overall health6 ....

•

Mouthwash with alcohol (ethanol) is highlighted as a carcinogen that can cause deeper cell damage, increasing the risk of malignant transformation8 .

•

Other ingredients like phenolic compounds, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, and chlorhexidine can also contribute to cell damage and may disrupt the balance of oral bacteria needed for healing and repair8 ....

•

The source criticizes the "healthcare" and "scientific" community for not recognizing these risks, attributing it to "dumbed-down and indoctrinated" education15 .

•

The advocated solution is a return to a natural approach to oral health, primarily through diet, particularly a carnivore diet, which the source claims may even negate the need for brushing or mouthwash15 ....

The other oral health insight comes from "Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering: March 2025" and "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf," which both report on Utah becoming the first state to ban fluoride in public water systems18 ....

Key points related to this:

•

Utah Governor Spencer Cox stated his intention to sign a bill banning fluoride, emphasizing that requiring people to be medicated by the government should have a "really high bar"19 . This aligns with the concept of medical freedom19 .

•

The governor noted that half of Utah already does not fluoridate its water, and dentists in those areas reported no higher levels of tooth decay compared to fluoridated areas, especially with the widespread availability of fluoridated toothpaste19 ....

•

The "☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf" source mentions a 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, which found evidence from 72 studies suggesting that fluoride is possibly a neurotoxin associated with IQ loss in children20 . This finding was reportedly dismissed by the EPA, corporate media, and dental associations21 .

•

The article questions whether the anti-fluoride movement is a "pandemic silver lining" related to forced medication policies during that time22 .

In summary, the sources raise concerns about the potential harm of frequent mouthwash use due to its chemical ingredients and highlight a move towards ending mandatory fluoride in public water in Utah, citing concerns about its effectiveness and potential health risks.

1.An Accurate Description of the UK-U.S. Empire - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/no_author/an-accurate-description-of-the-uk-u-s-empire/

2.Candace Owens, Ryan Dawson, and Other Conspiracy Podcasters, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review.pdf https://unz.com/runz/candace-owens-ryan-dawson-and-other-conspiracy-podcasters/

3.Five Things You Need to Do When There’ll Be No Rule of Law - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/no_author/five-things-you-need-to-do-when-therell-be-no-rule-of-law/

4.Global Power, Geopolitics, and Social Engineering: March 2025 https://henrymakow.com/2025/03/march-9---israeli-guilt-stalls.htmlArticles

5.Life Trumps All - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/james-anthony/life-trumps-all/

6.Mouthwash Will Cause Tissue Damage And It Will Increase Oral Cancer Risk - Joachim Bartoll Official.pdf https://bartoll.se/2025/03/mouthwash-oral-cancer/

7.Negotiating a Lasting Peace in Ukraine, by Jeffrey D. Sachs - The Unz Review.pdf https://unz.com/article/negotiating-a-lasting-peace-in-ukraine/

8.Technocracy Mass Resistance Starts with Swap Out of Smart Phones for Privacy Phones - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/wayne-lusvardi/technocracy-mass-resistance-starts-with-swap-out-of-smart-phones-for-privacy-pho

9.The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/no_author/the-dark-maga-gov-corp-technate/10.

The Great Murray Rothbard - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/lew-rockwell/the-great-murray-rothbard/

11.Tradition or Annihilation - LewRockwell.pdf https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/no_author/tradition-or-annihilation/

12.WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating. Peter Koenig - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization.pdf https://www.globalresearch.ca/wef-davos-2025-more-grotesque-than-ever/5877695

13.☕️ SANITY DAY ☙ Monday, March 10, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠.pdf https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/sanity-day-monday-march-10-2025-c

TRANSCRIPT OF LM AI PODCAST REVIEW OF ARTICLES

Welcome to the Lenny and Maria March 10th deep dive podcast show. This podcast is produced by the website dailybriefs.info. I'm Lenny and with me today is Maria, our expert, as we take a deep dive into power, control, and all those forces shaping our world. We've got a really interesting mix of articles and reports today. We're going to be looking at everything from government influence, the financial system, and uh even some kind of surprising health and tech insights.

It is a real mixed bag. Um and yeah, by the end of this, you'll definitely have a lot to think about in terms of you know the systems we live in and and how to navigate them.

Definitely. So let's jump right in. Our first section is focused on this idea of the UK US as an empire controlled by a deep state.

Right. And this deep state according to some of the stuff we've been reading is uh composed of billionaires and their primary interest is enriching themselves and sometimes that means engaging in war or other manipulative schemes.

So they're saying things like the war in Ukraine which is often you know portrayed as this fight for democracy is actually uh more about profit.

Yeah, exactly. One of the sources points to defense contractors and financial institutions like BlackRock as major beneficiaries. They say that taxpayer money is essentially being funneled into the pockets of these powerful entities.

And they bring up this thing called the integrated operating concept. This seems a little concerning.

Yeah, it's a military doctrine that basically blurs the lines between foreign and domestic intelligence operations. So, it does raise questions about surveillance and control. Maybe even within our own borders.

Yeah, that definitely makes you think about things like transparency and accountability, right? If these lines are so blurred, how can we be sure that these agencies are operating ethically and within the law?

Yeah. I mean, it's a valid concern. I mean, it kind of echoes some of the debates we saw around Edward Snowden's revelations about the NSA.

Right. Right. Okay. So, now we have some sources claiming that the mainstream media is actively suppressing voices, especially those that are critical of this whole deep state narrative. Right? And this is where I think critical thinking is so important. We have to be able to evaluate these claims of censorship and figure out are they valid or are they just attempts to discredit certain viewpoints. It's all about looking at the evidence and you know what's the motivation behind the claims.

And they bring up Candace Owens as an example. She's uh a pretty controversial figure who's made some pretty bold statements.

Yeah. I mean she's argued that Israel was involved in 9/11 and even, you know, critiqued parts of World War II. to history. So, her case is really interesting because it brings up this question of promoted opposition. You know, is she a genuine critic who's being silenced or is her platform actually a way to make alternative viewpoints seem less credible? It's really complex. There are no easy answers.

Yeah, definitely something to think about. And this kind of leads into the next section which is all about this illusion of choice and social engineering,

right? And this is where things get even more controversial. So, the argument here is that we live in a deacto communist society where techniques similar to those used in the USSR are now being used to control the population.

Wo. So they're saying that events and holidays that we consider normal, like International Women's Day, are actually tools of social engineering.

That's the argument. They claim these events are used to undermine traditional values and family structures and ultimately to push a very specific agenda.

So they're saying that things like feminism and diversity initiatives are all part of this bigger effort to control it. Right? And if you connect it back to the idea of the deep state, it paints a picture of a society where our choices, beliefs, and even our values are being shaped by forces beyond our control. Pretty chilling stuff when you think about it.

It really is. Now, let's move into the world of health and tech, what one source calls the technocratic age. They're raising some concerns about the potential dangers of a central bank digital currency or CBDC, and how technology is being used for surveillance.

Yeah. The big concern with a C BDC is that it could give central banks unprecedented control over our finances. Right? Imagine a world where every single transaction is tracked and your spending could be limited or even blocked based on your behavior or your political views. It raises huge questions about privacy and freedom.

And they even give some practical tips like swapping your smartphone for a privacy phone to reduce your digital footprint. I mean, they actually say we're being herded into a biodigital goolog.

Yeah, it's a stark warning. It really forces us to think about that. trade-off between convenience and privacy. I mean, smartphones have become so essential for a lot of people, but they also collect a ton of data about us. So, the question is, are we willing to give up some of that convenience for more control over our personal information?

One thing that really stood out to me was that fact about the energy consumption of Bitcoin transactions compared to credit card transactions. I had no idea that a single Bitcoin transaction uses a million times more energy.

It's a pretty huge difference that highlights the environmental concerns around cryptocurrencies. especially Bitcoin. So, it begs the question, are the benefits of decentralized finance worth the potential cost to the environment?

Right? And they connect this back to the deep state by saying that a CBDC would basically be a tool for financial manipulation and control used by central banks and influenced by this, you know, shadowy elite to enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else.

It's a pretty serious claim. I think we need to really understand the motivations behind this push for a CBDC and ask ourselves, is it really a solution to existing financial problems or is it just another way to consolidate power?

Okay, so the last section we'll cover in this part focuses on reclaiming power and embracing tradition as a way to kind of resist this technocratic control.

And they specifically point to the Catholic Church as an example. There's a movement within the church that's advocating for a return to traditional values and practices as a way to counter some of the negative aspects of modern society.

But they also acknowledge that there are some pretty big challenges, right? I mean, the church itself is facing a crisis of faith and membership.

Yeah, it's complex. How do you adapt these traditional values and institutions to meet the challenges of the 21st century, but at the same time preserve their essence? I mean, that's the big question. It requires a lot of thought and you know, open dialogue.

Absolutely. So, we've covered a lot here already. This deep state, the dangers of a CBDC and the role of social engineering. Maria, before we move on to the next part, is there one key takeaway from this section that you think people should really think about?

I think um the biggest takeaway is vigilance. We just need to be aware of the ways in which power can be concentrated and abused. We need to be critical of the information we're given. And I think most importantly, we need to be willing to challenge the status quo. That's the only way we're going to be able to create a more just and equitable world.

I love that.

Okay, so let's take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to dive into some specific examples of how these forces are playing out in different areas of our lives. So this next source kind of takes a deep dive dive into something that um I honestly hadn't given much thought to before. Mouthwash. It turns out there might be more to it than just that, you know, minty fresh feeling.

It definitely challenges, you know, conventional thinking when it comes to oral health. The source argues that a lot of the common ingredients in mouthwash, like the solvents and antibacterial compounds, the sweeteners and preservatives, they can actually damage your oral tissues if you use them too much.

Really? They even link frequent mouthwash use to a higher risk of oral cancer.

Yeah. Exactly. They cite this one metaanalysis of 15 different studies and it found a significantly higher risk for people who used mouthwash three or more times a day. The argument is that you know you have this repeated exposure to these chemicals and that combined with other lifestyle factors like diet could lead to cellular damage and potentially even cancerous mutations.

Interesting. So they seem to advocate for a more natural approach to oral health, focusing on things like diet and avoiding processed foods.

Right. And they suggest that what we eat plays a huge role in oral health. And they even make this kind of bold claim that if you're on a carnivore diet, you barely even need to brush your teeth.

Wow, that's a pretty big statement. It definitely makes you question all the marketing and messaging around all these oral hygiene products we're bombarded with.

Absolutely. It really encourages us to think critically about what we actually need for good oral health. And you know, maybe we've been led to believe we need way more products than we really do.

So, circling back to the whole technocratic age thing and this idea of mass resistance, this source we're looking at at now suggests a surprisingly simple act of rebellion, ditching your smartphone.

Yeah, it's a pretty bold proposition. Their argument is that smartphones are essentially tools of surveillance and control. They're constantly feeding data about our lives into the system. And they say that swapping your smartphone for a privacy phone is a powerful way to push back.

They even call smartphones slave devices, saying they keep us tethered to the control grid. I mean, that's some pretty strong language. But it does highlight how strongly they feel about this. Like we need to break free from this digital leash,

right? They believe that what's really needed is a collective shift in social norms. They think if enough people ditch their smartphones, it could actually disrupt those data collection efforts by tech giants and governments.

Yeah. I mean, they envision this mass disabling event that would be like a major blow to the technocrats who are trying to control our lives through technology. Of course, it's a lot easier said than done, right? I mean, smartphones are so integrated into to our lives. Now,

it's true. It's a real challenge. But the source does offer some alternatives. Privacy focused smartphones, dumb phones, even going back to flip phones. They also talk about privacy focused carriers and apps that can help to minimize your digital footprint.

I find it interesting that they point to the resurgence of paper checks as evidence that people are starting to push back against this kind of digital takeover of finance.

Yeah, it's a small sign, but it might suggest that there's a growing awareness of the trade-offs between convenience and privacy. People are starting to question this assumption that more technology is always better.

And this ties back to what we were talking about earlier with the deep state and their supposed interest in a central bank digital currency or CBDC. This source sees a CBDC as a key tool for control in this technocratic system.

Exactly. The concern is that a CBDC would give central banks and by extension the deep state elite that's supposedly influencing them complete control over our finances. No more private or anonymity of cash transactions. Every purchase you make would be trapped and potentially even controlled.

It's kind of a bleak picture, isn't it? They suggest that a CBDC could be used to force people to comply, to restrict their access to goods and services, and even to punish disscent.

It's a sobering thought, and it really underlines how important it is to understand the implications of a CBDC before it becomes a reality. We need to have open and honest discussions about the potential benefits and the risks and make sure that any implementation puts individual rights and freedoms first.

So now the source also gets into this idea of a gov corp technate. Basically this idea that power is shifting away from elected officials and towards unelected technocrats and corporate elites.

And they use the US Department of Government Efficiency or DOE as an example. This is the agency that's chaired by Elon Musk. They're tasked with restructuring federal agencies and basically streamlining government operations.

And the source sees DOGE as kind of a Trojan horse for this whole technocracy idea.

Exactly. They argue that Musk and other technocrats are using DOGE to push their own agenda, which is all about control and efficiency, but potentially, you know, at the expense of democratic processes.

So, they're suggesting that DOG's focus on technology and datadriven solutions could actually lead to a less democratic, more centralized system.

Right? And they also bring up the issue of conflicts of interest given that, you know, Musk and other tech billionaires have profited from government contracts.

That's a valid point. This blurring of lines between and corporate interests in government definitely raises some serious questions about accountability and transparency.

Who's really in control here and whose interests are actually being served?

It's a good question.

So for a different perspective, let's look at this source that dives into the work of Murray Rothbart who was a really prominent libertarian thinker.

Yeah, Rothbart was a huge advocate for individual liberty and a really fierce critic of state power. He believed that a truly free society requires minimal government intervention and that pretty much all government functions could be provided through the free market.

So he was a proponent of anarcho capitalism.

Yeah, exactly. The source highlights his contributions to Austrian economics, his critiques of central banking and fractional reserve banking and even his historical analysis of American history.

They really emphasize his belief that government is inherently coercive and that individual freedom can only thrive in a system with very little government interference.

Right? And they discuss his views on the Constitution, arguing that it ultimately led to a more centralized government and kind of a departure from that more decentralized system of the Articles of Confederation.

They even touch on Rossbard's skepticism about the American Revolution. They say he believed that it basically just replaced British tyranny with a new kind of domestic tyranny. That's a pretty radical perspective. It really makes you think about our assumptions about the role of government and what freedom really means.

Yeah. It's all about understanding that historical context and recognizing that even systems that start out with good intentions can fall prey to power dynamics and you know unintended consequences

and I think his ideas kind of resonate with the concerns we've been talking about regarding the deep state and the technocratic age his critiques of government power central banking and this concentration of wealth and influence in the hands of a few it all echoes the arguments we've been exploring

it's a good reminder that the debates about the role of government the balance between individual liberty and collective action ction and how power is distributed are still very relevant today. These are complex issues and there aren't easy answers. We have to continue engaging with these ideas.

It's interesting how all these different perspectives kind of converge on this idea of, you know, the struggle between individual autonomy and these forces that are trying to control us. And this next source takes us right into a real world example of this, the crisis within the Catholic Church.

Yeah, it's a really powerful illustration of how these forces of change and control are affecting even these institutions that seem so, you know, immutable. The source paints a pretty stark picture. They're talking about a mass exodus from the church and they cite this crazy statistic. For every 100 new Catholics, over 800 are leaving.

Wow, those numbers are pretty alarming. What do they attribute this decline to?

Well, they suggest that at least part of it is this rejection of traditional values and practices and instead there's this embrace of novelty and what they call renewal. But they argue that embracing the new has actually led to a weakening of faith and a loss of meaning for a lot of people.

So, they're saying the church needs to return to tradition to revitalize itself.

Exactly. They're proposing this pretty radical return to tradition, almost like hitting the reset button as the only way to prevent the church from completely collapsing. And it's interesting, they highlight the success of parishes that have stuck with traditional liturgy, catechizus, and practices. Those parishes are actually thriving according to this source.

That makes sense. I mean, tradition provides that sense of grounding and continuity, especially in a world that feels so chaotic and unpredictable right now. But can the church really turn back the clock that far?

I mean, it's a huge undertaking. And the source does acknowledge that they would face a lot of resistance. But it does raise this important question. How do you balance preserving tradition with staying relevant in the modern world? It's not just a challenge for the church, but for any institution that's trying to navigate these really complex times.

You know, we've covered a lot of pretty heavy stuff in this deep dive, Maria, but I think it's really important for people to understand that these aren't just some abstract debates. These ideas have real world consequences for all of us. They affect the kind of world we live in and the choices we make.

I completely agree. These are fundamental questions about the kind of future we want to create. Do we want a world where power is concentrated in the hands of just a few? Where our choices are limited and we're constantly being monitored and controlled? Or is there a different path?

Right? Do we want a world where individual liberty is actually valued, where we have agency over our own lives and we can pursue our own paths without interference.

Those are big questions and I don't think there are any easy answers. But I think the most important thing is to engage with these ideas to not shy away from them. We have to be willing to think critically about the world around us.

Absolutely. And as we wrap up this deep dive, I want to leave our listeners with a thought. If you're feeling overwhelmed by these forces that seem to be shaping our world, Remember that you're not alone. There are a lot of people out there who share these concerns and are looking for solutions.

Yeah. And don't be afraid to question the status quo, seek out different perspectives, and engage in dialogue. I think it's important to remember that the future isn't predetermined. It's something that we create together through our actions and our choices.

I love that. Well, thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Deep Dive podcast show.

AI REVIEW OF PODCAST