DailyBriefs.info LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com Jacob Nordangård: ROCKEFELLERS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QhZ_K5LRzY 

https://archive.org/details/jacob-nordangard-rockefellers-0-qh-z-k-5-lrz-y 

At the beginning of the overview state explicitly “ welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series”. Do not duplicate statements . DO NOT DISCUSS COMMENTS from source material  .discuss each OF THE  sourceS separately. Create the longest podcast possible. Create a  narrative exclusively in support of the Key take away points from each OF THE  sourceS. At the end of the state explicitly “ thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com” 

The source presents an alternative narrative claiming that the Rockefeller family, whose fortune originated from Standard Oil, has secretly funded and directed the climate change agenda since the mid-20th century, not to solve an environmental crisis, but to achieve a long-sought goal of global governance and a "new world order." The speaker, a PhD in science and technology studies, details the Rockefeller network’s influence through various institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Club of Rome, and alleges they used a Hegelian "problem-reaction-solution" tactic to frame climate change as the perfect global problem demanding an international, technological solution. Ultimately, this narrative suggests that climate action, fueled by fear and supported by both oil interests and environmental groups that were co-opted, is a pretext for implementing technological totalitarianism through initiatives like the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the concept of "The Great Transformation."

Rockefeller influence

Climate change agenda

Global governance

Discuss Rockefeller influence.

The Rockefeller family's influence, as described in the sources, is characterized by its immense scope, strategic philanthropic endeavors, and deliberate efforts to shape global systems across politics, economy, environment, and culture1. Their influence stemmed primarily from the vast wealth generated by Standard Oil, which made the world reliant on fossil fuels and made John D. Rockefeller the wealthiest man globally2.

Core Areas of Influence and Control

The Rockefellers sought to "control the game" across various key aspects of society1. Their vision, which they shared with elites in the United States and Britain, was to achieve an "efficient world" and shape a new international order in all its spiritual, economic, political, and social dimensions3.

The specific areas of influence included1:

• Energy and Natural Resources: This was the foundation of their business, starting with Standard Oil1. They sought control over these resources, which tied into their conservation efforts (Lawrence Rockefeller) and global planning goals14.

• Business and Economy: They established the Chase Manhattan Bank (known as the oil bank), which was headed by David Rockefeller, allowing them control over finance and oil15.

• Population and Human Capital: John D. Rockefeller III was deeply involved in population control, founding the Population Council to implement measures like fertility reduction, sterilization, and contraception, which also had business implications1.... They saw humans as "human capital"1.

• Education and Research: Key to controlling knowledge and minds, they founded institutions like the University of Chicago (1890) and Rockefeller University8. The University of Chicago became a major center for the Manhattan Project, the Doomsday Clock, the Chicago School of Economics, and neoliberal thought8.

• Culture and Media: After being despised and seen as ruthless in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they deliberately sought to create a better image by buying newspapers and supporting journalism, aiming to ensure no one spoke ill of John D. Rockefeller again9.

• Global Politics and Planning: Their ultimate goal was a global framework, an "efficient world," often pursued through world governance ideas1....

Methodology and Strategic Tools

The Rockefellers utilized sophisticated methodologies to achieve their goals, often focusing on creating problems and then selling the solutions37.

1. Hegelian Tactics and Control: They employed Hegelian tactics (thesis, antithesis, synthesis) or "problem, reaction, solution" (as described by Noam Chomsky), believing that to shape society, they had to be on both sides of dichotomies (e.g., left and right) simultaneously310.

2. Philanthropic Foundations: They leveraged their wealth through powerful foundations:

    ◦ The Rockefeller Foundation (founded 1913): Its mission was to promote the well-being of humanity globally, functioning like Standard Oil but aimed at "changing the world"11.

    ◦ The Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF, founded 1940): Focused on advancing social change toward a "more just, sustainable and peaceful world"12. The RBF sponsored meetings in the 1980s that became the foundation for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)13.

3. Controlling the Opposition (Co-option): The family famously co-opted opponents by providing funding for their studies or movements. Examples include Margaret Sanger, urban planning critic Jane Jacobs, environmentalist Rachel Carson, and climate activist Naomi Klein, all of whom received Rockefeller money despite having previously criticized the family or their associated industries1415.

4. Controlling Fear: A crucial strategy involves maintaining public fear, as this makes people easier to control and manipulate toward desired outcomes, such as a world rule of law or global governance9. Henry Kissinger later connected economic crises and fear of terrorism with new issues like climate change to argue that only international solutions were viable16.

Influence on Global Governance and Climate Policy

A major area of Rockefeller influence has been the establishment and support of international organizations promoting world governance and managing global crises:

• United Nations (UN): They were hugely supportive of the UN, with the Council on Foreign Relations (an organization they were involved in) promoting the idea after the failure of the League of Nations17. The Rockefellers donated the land where the UN headquarters stands18.

• Think Tanks and Commissions: They founded or were heavily involved in several major international organizations, including the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission (founded by David Rockefeller in 1973)4....

• Climate Change as the "Perfect Problem": The Rockefellers have funded climate change research since the 1950s and helped shape climate policy since the 1980s22. They defined climate change as the "perfect problem" because it is a universal issue that touches every facet of human existence—energy, security, agriculture, religion, and business2324. They saw this as their "current opportunity" to drive international action24.

• The Policy Cycle: The RBF explicitly sought to move the climate discussion from the scientific community into the policy arena (part of their "One World Program")25. They funded key organizations (like the IPCC foundation meetings) and reports (like Our Common Future by the Bruntland Commission) to put climate action on the global agenda1326.

• Environmental Activism and Divestment: The Rockefellers attacked their own oil business in 2014 by announcing divestment from fossil fuels, calling continued investment "morally hypocritical and unacceptable"22. They also funded climate activism, including the People’s Climate March and the creation of the organization 350.org27.

• Future Planning: Through figures like Steven Rockefeller, they were central to discussions defining the values and principles for a new sustainable future, leading the Earth Charter Commission and holding meetings at the Pocantico estate outside New York2829. This planning has been connected to the concept of "technocracy," where technology and experts manage the world, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution (World Economic Forum) as the solution to climate issues3031.

Ultimately, the source portrays the Rockefellers' influence as driving a plan for total world planning32, using crises (like the oil crisis) and global threats (like climate change) to push for global solutions that require nations to surrender some of their sovereignty to international institutional administration33....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Climate change agenda.

The discussion of the climate change agenda, according to the provided material, centers on a "peculiar story" detailing how powerful elite interests, particularly the Rockefeller family (the heirs to Standard Oil), have allegedly funded, shaped, and controlled the environmental discourse and resulting policy measures for decades12.

The underlying goal of this long-term agenda is claimed to be the achievement of a new international order or global governance, viewing climate change as the optimal vehicle for this transformation3....

The Role of the Rockefeller Network

The Rockefellers, despite their wealth originating from oil, are claimed to have funded climate change research since the 1950s, helped shape policy measures since the 1980s, and supported climate activism since the 1990s2. The family’s objective was to "control the game," focusing on areas like natural resources, energy, human capital (population), research, education, global politics, and planning7.

Their methodology to achieve their vision of an efficient world—which they saw as a "technological perfection of mankind"—involved Hegelian tactics: problem, reaction, and solution38.

Key organizations and funding mechanisms include:

• Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF): The RBF sponsored meetings in the 1980s that became the foundation for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)910.

• Controlling the Policy Cycle: The RBF had two major goals in the 1980s: distilling concepts on climate science and moving the climate change discussion from the scientific community into the policy arena11.

• Influential Think Tanks: Organizations founded or heavily supported by the Rockefellers, such as the Club of Rome (founded 1968) and the Trilateral Commission (founded 1973), have been crucial vehicles for shaping climate policy12.... David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission, which focused on cooperating on global issues and finding solutions1314.

• Co-opting Opposition: The Rockefeller network provided funding to prominent environmental figures like Rachel Carson and climate activist Naomi Klein, effectively including and co-opting opposition into the agenda15. They also funded the organizations behind the 2014 People's Climate March16.

Climate Change as the "Perfect Problem"

The climate change issue is considered the "perfect problem" because it necessitates international action and global planning17. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund annual report in 2005 stated that climate change is no longer merely an environmental issue; it is a global concern that touches "every conceivable facet of human existence"18.

According to the RBF, defining the issue so broadly—as an energy, business, moral, security, agricultural, religious, and urban issue—presents a "current opportunity" for action18.

The connection between environment, resources, and governance was evident in early discussions:

• Malthusian Ideology: Early efforts, heavily involving Lawrence Rockefeller and John D. Rockefeller III, were influenced by Malthusian ideology, arguing that food supplies could not meet the demands of a growing population19.

• Seeking a Common Enemy: A 1991 report by the Club of Rome claimed that in searching for a common enemy against whom humanity could unite, they identified the threat of global warming, pollution, and famine. They concluded: "The real enemy is humanity itself"20.

Policy Formulation and Implementation

The agenda has been advanced through major international conferences and reports:

1. Our Common Future (Bruntland Commission): The RBF provided money to ensure the climate issue was included in this crucial 1987 report, which discussed the interdependence of nations and the need for addressing environmental degradation on a global basis1011.

2. UN Rio Conference (1992): This conference, led by Maurice Strong (a friend of the Rockefeller family and member of the Club of Rome and Trilateral Commission), shaped much of modern environmental politics and resulted in Agenda 21 and the establishment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)21.... The ultimate objective of the UNFCCC is to prevent "dangerous anthropogenic human-induced interference with the climate system"23.

3. The Earth Charter (2001): Steven Rockefeller was one of the main architects of the Earth Charter, which created 16 principles for the future world and is likened to a "new earth religion" or new commandments2425.

4. Paris Agreement (2015): The RBF supported the Paris Agreement, seeing it as the foundation for beginning the work to implement legislation26.

The Ultimate Solution: Technocracy and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

The solution proposed to resolve these global problems is the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), which was introduced by Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 201626. This 4IR is claimed to be an economic system called technocracy, where technology solves everything, and governance is run by engineers, scientists, and experts27.

Key components of the 4IR agenda include28:

• Digital Technologies: Extending digital technologies like the Internet of Things, connecting every device and even humans.

• Physical World Reform: Reforming the physical world connected with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robots.

• Altering the Human Being: Altering the human being using bio- and neurotechnology2829.

• Geoengineering: Integrating the environment with geoengineering and space technology, essentially making the globe a "big experiment"2830.

This technological focus is integrated into the Global Goals (Sustainable Development Goals), connecting AI and technology to every goal (e.g., AI-enabled digital footprint for credit for Goal 1: No Poverty), potentially leading to a system of "social credits" and citizen obedience16....

Proponents of this agenda argue that this path can lead to a "zero carbon future"30. However, critics warn that this leads toward technological totalitarianism and requires 200 nations to "surrender some of their decisionmaking sovereignity to a global institutional administration," specifically the UN6. Warnings about these technologies suggest that "all the features of fascism have been implemented digitally or are currently being implemented"29.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Global governance.

Global governance, in the context presented, describes the pursuit of a planned and controlled global system promoted by influential elites, notably the Rockefeller family, utilizing global issues like climate change to necessitate international control1....

The overall aim of those promoting global governance is to shape a "new world order" across all its dimensions: spiritual, economic, political, and social2. This vision is based on achieving an efficient world, rooted in the values of efficiency that characterized Standard Oil2.

Driving Principles and Motivation

The push for global governance is often motivated by the idea that international problems require international solutions, a concept frequently reiterated in reports supported by the Rockefellers3.

1. Total Planning: Advocates explicitly promote the necessity of comprehensive, centralized planning. Nelson Rockefeller, upon becoming Vice President, stated: "I'm a great believer in planning economic social political military total world planning"4.

2. Interdependence: The ideology supporting global governance stresses that nations have become economically and ecologically interdependent5. Therefore, international security, resource consumption, and environmental degradation must be addressed on a regional and global basis6. A report commissioned by the Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind, proposed a new global system that is highly interdependent, with specialized and specific tasks assigned to each region for common survival7.

3. Using Fear and Crisis: A key tactic to achieve global governance is keeping people in fear, which makes them easier to control8. Eugene Rabinovich, involved in the Manhattan Project, emphasized that to establish a world government, people must be made to feel that their security, freedom, prosperity, and survival depend on the creation of a "world rule of law"8.

4. The "Perfect Problem": The climate issue has been defined as the "perfect problem" because it is a global issue that touches every conceivable facet of human existence, cutting across party lines, class divisions, and religious affiliations9. Problems that transcend national boundaries must be handled on an international basis3. Henry Kissinger affirmed this perspective in 2009, stating that issues like energy and climate change "permit no national or regional solution," linking this discussion directly to a new world order10.

Organizations and Mechanisms

The promotion of global governance has been institutionalized through several major organizations and initiatives, often initiated or heavily supported by the Rockefeller family:

• Philanthropy: Philanthropic efforts, such as the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, are cited as a major means to achieve world governance811. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund launched the "one world program" in the 1980s to combat nationalism and promote global cooperation5.

• Council on Foreign Relations (CFR): Co-founded among elite interests, the CFR has promoted the necessity of world governance to solve international global problems12. A study conducted by the CFR helped form the idea of creating the United Nations (UN)13. The Rockefellers have been hugely supportive of the UN, even donating the land for the UN headquarters1314.

• The Trilateral Commission: Founded by David Rockefeller in 1973, this body was created to foster cooperation among the brightest minds in the United States, Europe, and Japan on global issues15. A report written for the Commission in 1991, Beyond Interdependence, asserted that climate change challenges old forms of government and that international law and global institutions are needed16.

• Club of Rome: Founded in 1968 and supported by David Rockefeller and Fiat boss Gianni Agnelli, this think tank promotes scientific analysis, communication, and advocacy to propose solutions to global challenges1718. The Club of Rome’s reports, echoing earlier conservation ideas, spurred debates about population and the need for global resource planning19.

Implementation and Sovereignty

The policy life cycle for implementing global governance moves from the recognition of a problem to the ultimate goal of control20.

Achieving this required international agreements and structures:

1. International Frameworks: The UN Rio conference in 1992, which was a follow-up to the Stockholm conference, shaped much of modern environmental politics and led to documents like Agenda 21 and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)1621. The UNFCCC aims to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations to prevent dangerous human-induced interference with the climate system21.

2. Surrender of Sovereignty: A key component of achieving this global administration is the centralization of authority. It has been argued that 100 nations must "surrender some of their decisionmaking sovereignty to a global institutional administration," with the UN being identified as the necessary existing global institution22.

3. Technocracy and Global Goals: The global goals decided in 2015 define the objectives for this future society, covering every issue related to humans, the environment, and the economy23. The resulting solution being implemented is often described as technocracy, an economic system run by engineers, scientists, and experts, utilizing the Fourth Industrial Revolution24. This system combines global goals with technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to establish solutions, including mechanisms like social credits to ensure citizen obedience2425. Warnings have been raised that all features of fascism are being implemented digitally and could be used on a society-wide scale26.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Population control.

Population control was identified by the Rockefellers as one of the major areas they wished to control, alongside natural resources, energy, education, and global politics, referred to as "population or human capital"1.

Rockefeller Involvement and Philosophy

John D. Rockefeller III was particularly devoted to "population and population control," believing that having "too many people in the world" constituted a significant problem that needed management2.

The ideology underpinning these concerns was Malthusian, suggesting that food supplies and financial resources could not meet the demands of a growing global population2.

The source suggests a curious paradox: the family that drove the modern population explosion by making the world dependent on fossil fuel oil—which spurred the population boom—subsequently created the problem they sought to solve34.

Population Council and Specific Measures

John D. Rockefeller III founded the Population Council, which began planning a "global plan for population control"2.

The goals included reducing fertility and developing ideas for the relocation of populations worldwide to curb the "population bomb"2. The council aimed to bring down the overall population2.

Specific early solutions discussed included fertility reducing measures, sterilization, and contraceptives4. It is noted that these solutions were good for the Rockefellers' business, as they could sell the products needed to implement these measures4.

Connection to Eugenics and Elites

There was a strong link between population control efforts and eugenics5. Almost everyone involved in the Population Council and the Conservation Foundation was also involved in eugenics, an idea that had garnered a "very bad reputation" after the Second World War5. The aim of eugenics was to "create a better man" and manage what some elites referred to as "useless eaters"5.

The figures involved in these efforts spanned powerful networks:

• Margaret Sanger, associated with population issues, initially described the Rockefellers as "the most evil and ruthless family in the world," but later collaborated with them after they provided her with funding6.

• The President of the Population Council, Frederick Osborne, was also the president of the American Eugenic Society5.

• Roger Revelle, a scientist who became a major promoter of carbon dioxide theory in the 1950s and 60s, was present at the first Population Council meeting discussing a global plan to curb population growth78.

Population Control as a Global Issue

The early debate about population in the 1950s was spurred by those involved in the Conservation Foundation, founded in 19482. The conclusions drawn from this foundation were later reflected in reports by the Club of Rome2.

The linking of population issues, natural resources, and the fear surrounding them led to the formulation of climate change as a perfect problem that could unify global agendas59. Population matters were central to the concerns of the radical environmentalist movement when it became radicalized around Earth Day in 197010.

Decades later, population goals were still being explicitly discussed in the context of creating a perfect world and sustainable future. A report commissioned by the Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind, stated that the "ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than 1 billion"11.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Technological future.

The technological future, as presented in the source material, is viewed not as a spontaneous outcome but as a deliberately planned objective driven by powerful global elites, often intertwined with the Rockefeller network, aiming for a "new international order"1. This vision is characterized by extensive global planning and the implementation of technologies designed to solve global problems and enforce a new societal structure.

The Vision of Technological Perfection

The Rockefellers and associated elite groups shared a vision for an "efficient world" and the "technological perfection of mankind and the world," which they sometimes described using religious language, envisioning a "techno-spiritual utopia"12.

During the 1970s, key organizations like the World Future Society debated how to create a "future utopia" and the "perfect world"3. These discussions formalized the concept of a "new global system" that is "highly interdependent," much like a human body where each region is assigned specific tasks and is dependent on others for common survival4. This planning was highly ambitious, with Nelson Rockefeller stating, "I'm a great believer in planning—economic, social, political, military, total world planning"5.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)

The implementation of this technological future is largely articulated through the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), which was launched at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 20166. Klaus Schwab, the head of the WEF, presented this revolution as the major solution to global challenges67.

The 4IR outlines an "extreme view" of how to solve global issues, integrating technology into four main areas8:

1. Extending Digital Technologies: This includes the "Internet of Things," designed so that everything should be connected to everything else, even humans89. Technology is viewed as the solution for every global goal, leading to AI-enabled systems for tracking and credit10.

2. Reforming the Physical World: This realm involves the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robots, with AI being connected to every one of the established global goals810. This system is intended to create obedience among citizens through a technology-based system, often resulting in what is described as "social credits"10.

3. Altering the Human Being: Drawing on perceived historical eugenic roots, this aspect explicitly involves the use of bio and neurotechnology to modify the human being811.

4. Integrating the Environment: This includes large-scale environmental interventions such as geoengineering and space technology, essentially turning the globe into a "big experiment"812.

However, the head of the WEF also presented a warning regarding the 4IR, stating that in its "most pessimistic dehumanized form, the fourth industrial revolution may indeed have the potential to robotize humanity and thus to deprive us of our heart and soul"7. Furthermore, implementing this technology requires significant energy and resources, potentially leading to the construction of more coal-powered plants, raising questions about its counter-productive nature regarding the environment10.

Technocracy and Global Governance

The overarching system intended to run this future is described as technocracy, where "Technology will solve everything and everything will be run by the engineers, the scientists and the experts"13.

To achieve this level of control and system implementation, global governance is seen as essential. Experts associated with the agenda argue that the 200 nations of the world will have to "surrender some of their decisionmaking sovereignity to a global institutional administration," specifically the UN14.

Warnings have been raised that the digital implementation of this data-collecting technology and its associated control measures resemble features of "technological totalitarianism" that "could be used on a societywide scale at any time"15.

Technological Integration of Humanity

A significant feature of this future involves the blurring of lines between human biology and technology. Some futurists involved in these discussions, such as James Lovelock (behind the Gaia theory), suggest that merging humans with electronic creations in a "larger scale endo symbiosis" could provide "a better next step in the evolution of humanity"15.

Practical examples of this movement, often called "biohacks" or the "internet of us," include entrepreneurs starting businesses to ship people with microchips in their hands9. More extreme proposals involve Elon Musk's discussions about "neural link" technology to place brain chips into people and connect them to a global database9. This merging of the biological and technological is seen by some involved as creating a form of control, stating, "You will be assimilated... We will have your biological and technological witness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us"16.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

TRANSCRIPT

Tonight you're going to hear a very peculiar story about how big oil funded climate change but not the story that you're used to. This is another story. Um first some um things about myself. Uh I have a PhD in science and technology studies from Lin Sharpening. university. Uh I'm also a geographer and that's the kind of a science of everything. Uh I have a a mastery in culture and media production. Um I'm a senior lecturer and also a musician and this is things that I combine. I have um written four books. Uh the first one one was my doctor thesis written in 2012 called order up cowo uh about the political history of bofules in the European Union. Uh and as I am a musician um I thought have anyone published a doctor thesis with a soundtrack? I guess probably or maybe not. Uh Uh so I decided I had to to actually do that. I had a band at the time. So to my um doctor thesis I have a soundtrack uh with uh songs about the content. So I have kind of combined science with uh my musical work. The second book I wrote was called Doom Dog's Clock Gun or the Doomsday Clock. Uh I wrote this uh together with uh Finnish uh journalist Svenul of Carlson and then a Swedish uh economist uh called Mor Roetski. Um and um in this book I I wrote about uh uh actually how the climate issue uh had evolved. I had uh also written about it in my my doctoral thesis. Um and um when I started to investigate this, I found out about one name. Um, but it was kind of surprising to find that name. Uh, because um, yeah, as you may know about this lecture, it was the Rockefellers. Um, one day when I were started to investigate this, I I uh went into one of my colleagues. Uh, I was at the climate policy center in North sharping uh and uh because I wanted some background as I as I wrote about biouels. I wanted to know why do we uh uh what is the motivation for this bofuel boom and climate change was one of those reasons. Um so I asked him why um um have you any idea of how this u issue evolved and and from where and he said to me no uh I just know about about this uh intergovernmental panel on climate change and and I mean the the years yes previous and afterwards but not the long story I have no idea but I have I have some papers here uh that you can uh look into uh and I I I look into that that paper and uh uh that got kind of strange because it was a couple of meetings in the 80s that were the foundation for the intergovernment panel on climate change and uh one of the sponsors were the Rockefeller brothers fund and that I found very strange. I mean this is the Rockefeller is the oil family number one uh and um I wrote about this in in the my thesis and also in Doomog's lock gun and um in this new book I tried to I wanted really to dig into it and uh understand uh what was behind this. Uh and also like in the uh with my doctor thesis, I also made a soundtrack for for this book as well. Um the Rockefellers one some years after this, I mean the year after Doom Dog Gun was released, uh the Rockefellers uh went out And I mean they weren't just behind this uh uh science and uh supporting uh this science and and and IPCC. They they actually said that now is the time to devest um from the oil that made them rich. Uh and uh it was very very peculiar. Uh And this quote that you can read, I can read it for you. For a fund that is so devoted to fighting climate change and helping to prevent climate catastrophe to continue to be invested in fossil fuels that are actually causing climate change just was morally hypocritical and unacceptable. Uh I mean what are their motivations? Why have the heirs to the standard oil for uh fortune attacked their own business? And why have the Rockefellers funded climate change research since the 1950s, helped shape climate policy measures since the 1980s, and supported climate activism since the 1990s? Um, it really blew my mind. Why? Uh I mean if you go back to history um the standard oil the standard oil um fortune the standard oil trust I mean the Rockefellers were ones that actually made the world more or less dependent on oil. Uh and we see in this uh uh picture um John D. Rockefeller like an octopus um reaching out to control all of all the globe uh with his tentacles. Um they control more or less uh a major part of the oil business uh in the late uh 19th century and uh as and in the 20 20th century as well and John D. Rockefeller became the wealthiest man in the world. all because of the oil. So it's very very strange that uh a family would attack their core business. John D. Rockefeller said one in one famous quote, "Good leadership consists in showing average people how to do the work of superior people." And that is something what we going to talk about. John de Rockefeller. He had two holy books. The first thing he was a religious man. He was a Baptist. He read the Bible every day. It was very important for him. Uh he had inherited those traits from his uh mother. that was a devoted Christian. Um so he took these words uh it was very uh important for for him to give something to the world but he also wanted to gain things. And the other thing the other holy book uh was his ledger. John D. Rockefeller started as a book accountant. So he loved counting money that went in and he protected this. He had this holy Bible and his ledger and a ledger he he had like more like a relic and uh the practice of counting money. Um he gave to his children. Uh everything would be counted. He loved money more than anything else. Uh but he he made it made the money but he thought he had the protection from God to do it. Uh and all this money went into the bank. Um he created together with his son John D. Rockefeller Jr. Uh what became the Chase Manhattan bank. A bank uh worldwide uh in its scope it was known as the oil bank and uh John Rockefeller's grandson David Rockefeller was heading uh the Chase Manhattan bank and these things the oil and the money made the family able to do things uh because they just didn't want only to to collect the money. They wanted to do something with it. They wanted to control the game. Controlling the game. Uh and one thing of course was the natural resources and energy. That was what everything started with. Uh another thing was population or human capital. Humans, humans is important. Education and research uh is another uh and the agriculture They were behind the green revolution. Culture and media, business and economy of course uh that goes through everything. Uh technology we will come to that that's an important part. Religion and evolution And the last thing global politics and planning. Um what was in mind from from uh for the Rockefellers was they wanted to um standard oil was the perfect business. Uh and was built on efficiency and their vision was an efficient world. We can do the world better. And uh one goal they had, this quote is from um the special studies project from the 1950s, a new international order. Uh in this I quote they said We cannot escape and indeed should welcome the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions spiritual, economic, political and social as a with religion with them. They had a vision a new Eden uh or a technological perfection of mankind and the world. They weren't alone on this. This was a project that they shared together with elites in uh United States and Britain and some other parts as well. Methodology to achieve this Edom their own Edom They have used hygielian tactics, feces, antithesis and synthesis. Uh or one could say like Noam Schomsky says uh problem, reaction, solution. Uh in order to get the society you want, you have to be on both sides all the time. uh you have to control the dotomies left and right and play with left and right to get to what you want. Uh and one more thing is to control the policy cycle, control politics. This is from a theory of Peter V. Seamius uh and a book called beyond interdependence written for Rockefeller's trilateral commission in 1991. Uh this book is how to control politics and to achieve what you want. Uh a kind of a handbook. Uh number one you have to do recogn definition of a problem. And as we're going to talk about climate today, a potential environmental problem is acknowledged, often led by think tanks. Activists draw public attention to the problem. This in some cases followed by a trigger event that spurs direct action. Policy for formulation. A debate starts about how to solve the issue. Environmentalists think that proposes are too weak and late while business interests lobby try to delay the game. In the end, an agreement is reached. Implementation. The legislation is implemented. NOS's draw attention to non-compliance or neglect. And last, control. The environmental problem has been solved and put under control. And as we have both thesis and antithesis controlling the opposition. Here are some examples on on uh uh opposition that has been included um and more or less co-opted in in the Rockefellers where we have Margaret Sanger with population issues. She hated the Rockefellers before uh in um like 10 years before they gave gave her money. Um she was very harsh against she she called them the most evil and ruthless family in the world more or less. Uh but later they joined forces. Jane Jacobs uh a very important uh figure in city planning and and a critic to the treatment on cities uh especially in the United States when they tore down all the old city centers in the states. She didn't like the Rockefellers because the Rockefellers were the ones that actually had huge projects in especially New York that they tear down uh old neighborhoods. Um but late they gave her money for studies. Rachel Carson. Many knew about Rachel Carson. She was the one that more or less uh started the uh environmentalism in the 60s and the more popular environmentalism. Uh she talked about DDT. She talked about pesticides and and and uh and and the things that pollutes from the fossil fuel industry. She got money from the Rockefellers as well. And last, Naomi Klene, very well known today as a climate activist. She talked about uh how the Rockefellers and especially their henchmen Kissinger uh started the neoliberal wave in the 70s and and corrupted Latin America and overthrow U democratically elected leaders and uh uh instead supported Pinoet and uh these dictatorships. Now she also got money from the Rockefellers. How do they do it? Controlling research and education. This is a very key thing. Uh one of the first things that the Rockefellers did or John D. Rockefeller. Uh it was the um founding of the University of Chicago in 1890 because in no one thing because uh with a university you bring in all the great knowledge, all great minds and you can do this things with this and they did uh University of Chicago where we had the Manhattan project was one of the major center one of the major centers was was the University of Chicago. The University of Chicago we also find the doomsday clock that always ticking for doom and the Chicago school of economics the neoliberals the neoconservatives a lot of schools come from University of Chicago and in New York the Rockefeller University. This is a medical uh university medicine uh and also population issues and this has ve been very important for for the Rockefellers uh with the health issues controlling culture and media. Uh that was one of the important things that uh they talked about uh a lot after Brockfelds was so hated in the late 19th century and the early 20th century. They were despised, seen as evil, ruthless. So they decided they had to do something about it. They have to create a better image for the family. So they bought the newspapers and they also supported uh journalism because John Rockefeller didn't want anyone to talk anything bad about him ever again. Controlling fear. This is important. Controlling fear. One thing to achieve uh change in the world you have to keep people in fear because that will be much easier to control and get them where you want them. This is a quote from uh Eugene Rabinovich. Um he was the editor of a bulletin of atomic scientist. He he had been involved in the Manhattan project at the University of Chicago. He said if a world government calls This is triumph. It will need more than a sympathetic endorsement by the majority. People must be made to feel that their own security, freedom, and prosperity, yes, their very own survival depend on the creation in our time of a world rule of law. Yes. World governance and how to achieve this. What have the means been? One major thing, philanthropy. Bar Rockefeller started uh philanthropic um endeavors in the late uh 19th century and they started a foundation called Bar Rockefeller Foundation in 1930. Their mission was to promote the well-being of humanity throughout the world and it was led by John D. Rockefeller's son John D. Rockefeller Jr. and they said this going to we going to have this foundation at and it will function the same way as Standard Oil but with giving to the world or more I would say changing the world. Rockefeller Foundation support a lot of uh research on universities that has been important in um the climate change issue. Next thing, the Rockefeller brothers fund. Rockefeller um Junior, John D. Rockefeller Jr., he got five sons. uh but got famous and well known. Um the first was John D. Rockefeller III, the second was Nelson, third Lawrence, the fourth Winthrop and the last one was David. They started this their own foundation uh in 1940. And their mission has been to advance social change that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful world. Uh, and they went into areas uh all over the world. Uh, they more or less divided the world between them. Uh, John was into Asia. and population issues. Nelson took Latin America and also politics. He wanted to be the president of United States. Lawrence, he was into environmental issues or conservation and more or less was uh involved very much in America. uh and Europe as well. David I will mention win for the last one for one reason David he was all over the world a banker everywhere in Middle East and Europe and yeah he was very uh very high profile and he was uh treated like a statesman. Um had an airplane that he could flow to Moscow if he wanted and and was treated like a king when he came there. Uh the last one, Winfrop um the other brothers they fought a uh Winthrop um ah he can get or cancel that but was he was a governor in Arkansas but he never want went into the world and tried to change anything but the other brothers were all over the globe. And they have used another tool as well because these brothers and the fathers as well uh started a lot of organizations, influential organizations, big organizations. Uh that has had a huge influence on events in the world after especially the Second World War. One of them was the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. This wasn't created directly by the Rockefellers. It was created but they were among one of the founders but among elite interests in the United States. The Council on Foreign Relations was a sister institute to the London Roy Institute in International Affairs and this organization has uh promoted the idea to that we need uh world governance uh to solve international global problems. Uh and they have uh been very influential in some things especially uh among the members. Of course we we have a lot of secretary of state and security advisors and important people uh from the U administration or the I mean the president administrations in the United States but they they were al also involved in another project or two projects. The first one uh was the League of Nations uh but especially the League of Nations was u very promoted by the Rockefellers but the United States actually have never uh went into the organization. It was blocked. So um but they wanted they they liked the idea of an international organizations to to to work with uh um global problems all over the world. Uh so Council on Foreign Relations we actually made a study uh in the late 30s but came up with the idea of creating the United Nations. Uh the Rockefellers have been hugely supportive of of United Nations. Very supportive. Uh here's a quote from Bankmoon. Um he was the June general secretary before the ant Antonio Guterres. That's the previous one. Um Bankyoon said, "I am deeply grateful to the esteemed members of the Rockefeller family and the Rockefeller Foundation for continuing the noble tradition of supporting international organizations devoted to peace. Uh and actually this um building the UN headquarters it has hadn't been for the uh it it was the Rockefellers that actually donated the land where the uh UN headquarters are. And uh they also commissioned uh the the group of architects uh that made this drawings to this project in the from their perspective perfect international style of architecture. Another infamous organization uh that they have been all involved in uh concerning uh international cooperation is the Bilbo group. Um a long time it was very secretive. Uh now we're actually one can row write can read about what they u discuss on their meetings uh but only the topics not what they actually say or do at the meetings. Uh This was founded by Prince Bernard of the Netherlands in the uh in 1954 and David Rockefeller uh was also uh in the steering committee early on. Um and contemplate issue. Uh the Club of Rome is one of the major organizations or think tanks. The Club of Rome was uh founded in 1968 and it was one of the the the most important meetings was at the Belio Center at the Rockefeller Foundation. And behind this organization we also find Giani Aneli uh the boss of Fiat and uh a good friend of David Rockefeller uh industrialist and uh it was headed by Ariel Pache uh the second man at Fiat uh and also one of the founders of Alitalia and I mean it's very interesting this is a one of the major um environmental think tanks and there were industrialists behind this uh that actually worked with uh the auto industry and uh also oil as well. Uh their mission was to promote understanding or is their mission is is to promote understanding of the global challenges facing humanity and to propose solutions through scientific analysis, communication and advocacy. Uh and another very very important organization. It's the trilateral commission founded in 1973. Uh and this was an um we can say an offshoot of the Bilderberg group uh the the trial commission. The idea was to to take the brightest minds in the United States, in Europe and Japan to start to cooperate about global issues and uh find come up with uh solutions and this has been a very important vehicle uh especially regarding how climate policy has evolved. Um founder was David Rockefeller and we also find Bashinsky what was an American security advisor uh uh to Jimmy Carter in the 70s and he has been a scientific or an geopolitical advisor after that as well. to ad uh certain administrations often to the democratic party that was organizations. Now we come to the policy life cycle recognition of the problem. Uh what was the problem that the Rockefeller brothers uh talked about? Uh, one of the brothers, Lawrence, he was into conservation efforts and natural resources. Um, we saw problems with um too many people uh and how can we uh better use our resources? And uh they said we need some kind of global planning of the resources. Uh they supported um uh world government ideas. Uh and the um ideology was malfusian. Um that meant that um money uh uh food supplies uh can't meet the demand of a growing population. Uh and the modern environmental discourse uh was kind of born with uh those involved uh together with Lawrence in in the conservation foundation founded in 1948 uh with Fairfield Ospawn Jr. as uh president and chairman. Um he wrote a book uh called our planet planet. Um but and the uh conclusions were later echoed in in reports by the club of Rome. Uh but this spurred a debate in the 50s about population. Uh the other brother um one of the other brothers John D. Rockefeller III he was is very much into to population and population control. If you have uh you have too many uh people in the world, this is a problem. How shall we manage this? Um population council uh that he founded they um started planning for a a global plan for uh population control um to reduce fertility uh and also ideas of relocate uh populations in the world. Uh in order to bring down the population, the population bomb the population problem. Um and the funny thing with this, I mean, why did we have this population explosion? Um It was the fossil fuel oil. So more or less the Rockefellers created this problem in the beginning and and what they did uh after this was I mean um the solutions at this time was about um uh um fertility reducing measures uh sterilization and uh uh contraceptives and and but all these things were uh were gaining I mean it was u very good for their business they could because they could sell the solutions to this so they had this problem but they also had the solutions to it and also we have the green revolution u but they said it's a problem of this fossil fuel thing but we uh they changed the um I mean agriculture revolution but so that we used even more fossil fuels not less. Um but one thing that ties together this also is that almost everyone involved in population council and conservation foundation they were into something um but was I mean it had a very bad reputation after the second world war and that was eugenics. Um the president of u the population council later on after y the third was Frederick Osborne. He was also um the president of the American eugenic society and their idea a was to create a better man and to uh they didn't want this one could say useless eaters uh something that um Henry Kissinger a lady was uh famous to have said uh and in this time something was combined an idea was formed for what was could combine the population, natural resources and the scare of this into something um climate change in 1955. Uh this is uh a quote from John Fonoman is he's a very famous mathematician or was at the institute for advanced study uh one of the most famous institutes in in uh United States uh only top scientists were there. He said this in 1955. Intervention in atmospheric and climatic matters will unfold on a scale difficult to imagine at present. This will merge each nation's affairs with those of every other more thoroughly than the threat of a nuclear or any other war would have done. Very prophetic of him. In 1955, uh climate became an issue in the 50s. Uh and it was much because of uh the American military um had large funds to use to I mean military was interested in uh climate and weather. It's important in war. more to know uh how I mean we have uh examples with that a Swedish example for example with uh when we when we I say we because I'm from Sweden uh beat the the Danes uh in the six 17th century uh we had the eyes to walk over and take co Copenhagen from behind and that made the Swedish Empire happy for a while. But so weather and climate is important for the military and at this time they had also started to uh come up with a computer and uh they could calculate things and one thing that they started to calculate was um how carbon d dioxide could uh eventually um uh make uh the weather or the climate change. Um the climate models that we use today uh have a a long background and and and a history and it comes from from the 50s. And one of the scientists that were uh around at the founding of population council. He was called Roger Revel um and he was became interested in the carbon dioxide issue suant's old theory and he became uh one of the major uh promoters of his theory in the 50s and 60s. Uh and we also have Kusta Rosu um but was um educated at uh I mean he he was in the United States and uh he built up um u materology at the University of Chicago and the Rockefeller founded institute Woods Hole ographic institute and we also have a another scient Walter or Roberts uh but also very important in the 60s and 70s uh talking about how carbon dioxide can change things. Uh this with changing things was uh of course very interesting for those people that actually funded this. The Rockefeller brothers fund in 19 late 1950s wrote a report called the special study this project it was a very very ambitious work uh they uh they had every more or less every smart uh man I was said I think it's only were male males involved in this report uh but the smartest guys they could bring in the United States uh to discuss problems global problems and how to solve them these problems uh and issues that would be important for the United States in the 60s and 70s and uh it was more actually this was Nelson Rockefeller's project because he wanted to be the president of the United States uh and this was kind of a manual for becoming president administration Nelson wanted to to take care of that himself, but he never got that far. He became the vice president. Uh but the one who actually headed the project was uh the Rockefellers. Um one of their most important uh figures that had been cooperating with them uh ever since Henry Kissinger, he was leading this uh u project in the beginning and they said they had a chapter about the climate where they said if it becomes possible to interfere actively in the big processes with the atmosphere the results are likely to transcend national boundaries the problems that will then arise must be handled on an international basis repeated all over all all over the time when u when I've studied uh their papers and and uh uh and your reports and everything always this this has to be handled on an international level these problems because this has been defined as the perfect problem. This is from an annual report in as late as 2005 where Rockefeller brother said the warning of the climate is no longer merely or primary an environmental issue. It is an energy issue a big business issue, an investor issue, a moral issue, a security issue, an agricultural issue, a coastal issue, a religious issue, an urban issue. In short, a global issue that touches every conceivable facet of human existence. It is a matter of universal concern that cuts across party lines, religious affiliations, class divisions, and demographic distinctions and they say therein lies our current opportunity. They said that in 2005 and here's a shot of uh funding of climate change ever since the 50s the very rich oil family behind on mobile and the funding of climate research and climate activism since the late 1950s and I would me I will mention some of this. In 1965 the climate first uh was discussed at the presidential level in the United States. states. It was President Lyndon Johnson and remember now this special studies project was uh kind of a handbook for the presidents at that time. Um Lindon Johnson he said in a speech this generation has altered the composition of atmosphere on a global scale through radioactive materials and a steady increase in carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels. The one behind this report that uh wrote the chapter about carbon dioxide and and climate matters was Roger Revel. Roger Revel that was present on the first population council meeting on uh the discussion on a global plan to curb population growth. The second thing Lawrence Lawrence Rockefeller was a a very very good friend of Lady B Johnson the president's wife and he was on almost every commission on on environment um in the 50s and 60s and he was involved in this speech that the president gave in 1971. Uh this is uh before the Stockholm conference on the environment, the United Nations conference. Uh they did two studies about climate before that meeting. Um the one was responsible for this uh was Carol Louie Wilson. Carol Louie Wilson uh was a personal friend of Nelson Rockefeller and hadn't been involved in this special studies project in um in the late 50s. Uh he was in the steering committee of the club of Rome and he became a member of trilateral commission and he was also together with David Rockefeller director of um council on foreign relations. Uh they had actually conference about this in um V outside in Sweden. Uh and um the Royal Academy of Sciences was involved with this. Uh and this report was very important because it take took every aspect of how uh humans can uh actually intervene in the climatic systems. Um and uh carbon dioxide was just one of the problems. Uh another was um u how the release of aerosols in the atmosphere could block the sun and uh make the the climate uh become colder instead. But the thing uh with this report was that it was humans that caused this. It was human intervention. Uh and that's one of the reasons that uh Club of Rome later said that this was kind of their problem that they had searched for. Uh this is a very famous quote I would say. I don't know if every everybody here has seen it but uh this is from a Club of Rome report from 1991 and it says in searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite We came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions, these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. The real enemy is humanity itself. Um, Most people think that uh if you talk to young people today, I mean they they think I mean it was the environmentalist movement that created this and and uh and made or companies think about what we did and everything and u it's not kind of that case u if we uh talk about the radical environmentalist uh that movement more or less uh became radicalized in 1970. Uh they arranged something that called the Earth Day and in this they took all these u problems that had been discussed in the 50s and 60s especially about population matters. Um we can see in this uh picture uh how they uh demonstrates and and uh about uh population issues. Uh this was wasn't entirely a grassroot movement. The thing is you both uh we mentioned friends of the earth here uh friends of the earth and earth day was actually had got money from a guy called Robert Oerson. He was a friend of David Rockefeller sat on the board of Chase Manhattan. He was an operator of oil company. Atlantic Ritual Corporation. Um and um he has been um it is a very interesting book that has been uh written about him um called Oilman Environmentalist and his leading role in the international environmentalist movement. And it's very funny because um he first talks about drilling for oil and uh he was in Texas. I mean, you can see his uh uh typical Texan hat. And um he she did and he he said, "Oh, I love this drilling for oil. That's the thing that I love." And the next chapter, he's uh at the Stockholm conference and talking about environment and he tells about everybody about oh, I was one of the first that talked about global warming and yeah got environmental crisis. And my next chapter he's um um um he's standing with a a big big ship that ships oil and uh yeah um brags about the oil again. And in the last chapter he uh uh it's when when he has done all these environmentalist things uh what do does he do? he uh starts a new oil business in Texas uh for the last days of his life. So I mean we can say I mean they created they're not lying uh when we say that um uh the the humans and but they the humans were them actually uh in 1972 the big environmental meeting in Stockholm uh the conference only one earth uh this was one of the biggest uh conference that the UN had had uh and and very influential for for the environmental agenda. The man behind it or the general secretary of of the conference was Moraurice Strong. Um Mory Strong was a friend of the Rockefeller family. Um he was on the board of Rockefeller Foundation. Uh he was uh in the club of Rome and became a member of the trilateral commission. Um it was a very very uh a lot of uh Rockefeller involvement in in uh that conference in 1973. I mean the Stockholm conference they had talked about these environmental issues, all these problems that the our civilization had created uh or maybe the civilization that the oil man had created for us. But it was all our fault. In 1973, it came a trigger event that highlighted all the problems that had been uh u discussed. in the 50s, 60s and the early 70s, the first oil crisis. Um, and this was a major blow for the for the western economy created huge problems. Um, but this um problem wasn't a really real shortage of oil. It was actually uh a political crisis. Um and it was because of uh Jeeper war u between the Arab states that suddenly attacked Israel. Um Israel won this war uh after a couple of days but it uh it started a shock wave and um we had to do something something had to be done. Uh the interesting thing with this Um if we go a couple of decades later, uh one of the actors involved in this, Shik Ahmed Shaki Jamani from Saudi Arabia, he said, "H this isn't the problem that we actually made." Uh he said this, this is a quote. I'm 100% sure that the Americans were behind the increase in the price of oil. The oil companies were in real trouble at the times. They had borrowed a lot of money and they needed a high oil price to save them. King Fisal sent me to the Shaw of Iran who said, "Why are you against the increase in the price of oil? That is what we want." Ask Henry Kissinger. He is the one who wants a higher price. Uh and the thing is they actually talked about uh a possible energy crisis uh the year year before in at the Aspen Institute in USA. Uh a report commissioned by the Rockefeller Bravis Fund uh talked about this and uh it was also a a discussion point at the Bilderberg meeting in um Salt Bordon in Sweden um some months before uh the actual crisis happened. Next pos policy formulation we had the oil crisis. A debate starts about how to solve the issue. Total world planning. Uh here's a quote by Nelson Rock. feller uh he became the vice president of the United States uh in uh 19 late 1974. He said I'm a great believer in planning economic social political military total world planning. Um a lot of things started uh in the middle of of the 70s. Um Nelson he was was a opening speaker at the conference uh that the white house um had commissioned with a organization called the world future society. This is an organization with uh uh futurists famous futurist in in the United States that uh debated and talked about how can we create a future utopia a future world uh that is better than the one that we have. today. Um uh invited to this was u um Irvin Lasslo from the club of Rome. Um and um also an important futurist called Barbara Marx Hubard. She was a founding member of the world future society and very important for the new age movement later on. But this in this context they talked about the future society and how to create the perfect world. Uh all these things that had been discussed uh came into this meeting um and a lot of very important players uh were at the this conference um and became members of the world future society. Uh llo wrote a report called goals for mankind commissioned by the the club of Rome. U he said in this this proposed new global system is highly interdependent as in the same manner that the human body assigns to different tasks to its v war various organs. Each region is assigned specialized and specific and specific tasks and is each is dependent on the others for the common survival. The interdependent system that we actually see today we have an interdependent system. And he said one quot uh one other But must be mentioned. The resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than 1 billion because population and sustainability was a big issue and uh all these things that actually was uh discussed at the population council in 52. Yeah. Lasslo had been an an editor of a book book that talked about this sustainable utopia uh a plan actually a plan for it. I have this book at home and it's very interesting uh called cosmic humanism and world unity by philosophy uh professor Oliver Riser uh from University of Pittsburgh. Uh he talks in this book about creating something a perfect society and he used religious language and talks about the rebuilding of Solomon's temple, a technosspiritual utopia because one of the thing that they decided the future is was they had to combine science with religion. Uh and that has a huge influence on on the new age movement that came after this. In the 1980s, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund started something called the one world program. Uh and here we talk about this interdependence. One world was a response to the global situation was which the committee observed had become dangerously nationalistic, isolic and heavily armed and destructive of natural resources. It recognized that nations had become economically and ecologically interdep dependent and resource consumption, environmental degradation and international security must therefore be addressed on a regional and global basis. Yeah, that's the same thing. It's a kind of a mantra and they decided uh that the time for climate action was now. We had to bring up the climate change to the international agenda. Uh and they had two goals in the 80s. Distilling concept ES on climate science and number two moving the discussion of climate change from the scientific community into the policy area arena. And um the chairman of the Rockefeller brothers fund at this time was David Rockefeller. Uh and also on the board was Henry Kissinger. So uh kind of the same people from the 50s at the same time as one world program a similar uh program or uh initiative was uh uh unleashed. Uh it was led by Gruhalam Brunland. Um she was uh the prime minister of Norway. Um and it talked about exactly the same things. Um they wrote a report called our common future. uh and Drew Halen Bonutland she was a member of the trilateral commission Rockefeller's trilateral commission Mory Strong was also a member of this um has been been involved in very very much things uh to this report uh our common future the Rockefeller brothers fund had one goal they wanted the climate issue to be in the report so they gave uh money uh for this to um uh the head of the Swedish Bayer Institute to include it in the the report. Um they also had I mean it was trilateras that headed this uh project uh and also the uh actual main author uh was very in connected to to the Rockefeller network. Um so it was the easy to to get into uh uh the climate issue. Uh in the report uh the year after Bruntland Commission report was released, the IPCC came about and this I talked about before IPCC um uh the founding that the Rockefeller brothers fund had been uh kind of involved in this. Uh the thing this this is a uh an American uh issue. Um because Mustafa Tolba uh the head of United Nations environmental program, he asked George Schulz uh the US Secretary of State uh for uh for these organizations to be organized and uh take uh I mean create what it should do actually. So this was uh the presidential administration of Ronald Reagan uh that actually was behind uh what became the IPCC. So they wrote uh what it was supposed to to work with uh that was to analyze the scientific basis of risk of humaninduced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaption and mitigation. ation. Um just one year after um um climate activists uh started to talk about this. The thing at this time climate wasn't a big thing uh at the uh uh environmental movement. Uh at this time we had um other issues. It was more um uh we had had Harrisburg and Chernobyl and Um so um it was nuclear power that was seen as the problem and a lot of environmentalists at this time they they said that this climate thing it's more like a conspiracy of the nuclear industry because they want it they say that it's needed because the climate problem is so much worse than any radiation. So they wanted to save uh nuclear after um Chernobyl accident u but Eventually they started to talk about uh climate as well. At the same time uh another coalition started and it was the uh oil companies that started something that's called the global climate coalition. And here we see Exxon and ARCO for example um I mean uh where we find people that actually was involved early on uh in the climate issue in 1991. uh a report was released uh by the triological commission called beyond interdependence. Uh and now uh they started um talk about the global action plan to achieve what was decided uh in the Brontan report our common future and it said climate change challenges old forms of government international law and global institutions are needed. And uh we have uh both David Rockefeller and Morris Strong involved in this report. Uh in 1992 um the Bruntland Commission was kind of a stepping stone to to the UN uh Rio conference. This was the follow-up conference uh to Stockholm. Uh and this was a very very very very important meeting. Um but it has shaped much of what we see today in environmental politics. Here uh we have uh the opening speech from war strong. He says you are called upon to rise to your historic responsibility as custodians of a planet in taking the decisions here that will unite rich and poor north, south, east and west in a new global partnership to ensure our common future. uh it's always the same global agenda, global problems that need to be solved and this came in a in in the document agenda 21. Uh some other thing that also came from this conference was the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change uh that started yearly conferences uh to um negotiate about what to do about the climate. How can we uh manage this problem? The ultimate objective of the convention is to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic humaninduced interference with the climate system. So uh and this was also a part of uh this beyond the independence report from trilateral commission. Uh after the meeting, another thing was important because we started to talk about uh this uh new future society and that they needed values. They needed principles for this uh new sustainable future. So they started a a commission, the Earth Short Commission um to discuss how uh what kind of values we should live under in the future. The interesting thing in this commission it was that uh behind this we see uh Queen Beatatrix of uh Netherlands. Um she actually asked uh Michelle Gorbachov and Morris Strong to um to lead this Um but um the one that was actually one of the main architects was Steven Rockefeller. Uh and it was uh actually uh he took um he was u um had a had meetings on the Pocantu estate that is the Rockefeller estate uh outside of New York and they had the meetings there and and he was the chairman holding it together uh and they wrote uh 16 prison principles for the future world and Steven Rockefeller was a son of Nelson Rockefeller uh and uh Queen Beatics uh the daughter to Prince Bernard. So uh and and one thing we have a leader of Standard Oil Exon family and the leader of the Shell Oil. Shell Oil is called the royal Dutch well. So the great great oil families behind pure charter in 2001. They took the uh herb charter. We wrote it down on papurus uh and put it in this new uh covenant, the ark of hope. Um not very well known that they actually created this uh but it's more here we can see the biblical proportions of this and more or less new commandments for the world. We abandoned the uh the old ones and now we have this new earth religion. Um, and it's very funny to to actually read about this arc of hope because it's claimed that the handless is made of unicorn horns. So I don't know what where we have gotten them but and uh the thing this this arc of hope um it was um ready in 2001 and they had this um u um meeting in the 9th of um September 2001 and um everyone knows what happened the 11th um this um was um yeah the two towers collapsed and what they did uh this ark it was in Vermont um it's uh on the east coast of United States and they decided to have a procession to walk with is um for what had happened and to to talk about I mean it was to highlight this global problems this global terrorism everything we need to cooperate and come together so they they carried this to to uh United Nations headquarters yeah and put it in on display there uh the following years in 2002 Steven Rockefeller he started another he gave seed money to another project um but actually had some connections all also to Sweden or or the Stockholm Environmental Institute. Uh it was a uh a plan for the world in the future. Uh the great transition or one can say the great transformation uh that's usually used today. Uh the promise and lure of the times ahead. And here we can see a globe that is in pieces put together. And that's kind of a thing that we can see um a world in problems but we can put it together and make it better. In 2005 climate became came up and became a major major thing with Katrina especially in the United States. And with Katrina, the climate prophet arrived. Al Gore in 2006 and uh his very very famous movie and inconvenient truth. Um Al Gore had been a member of or is a member of World Future Society and very much into this um futuristic solutions on on on on the climate issue. It was also part of a think tank called the Congressional Institute for the Future. Um and uh another organization called Globe, but one can read about in my book. It's a it's a it's very interesting to see this connections with uh this futuristic thinking and the climate. In 2009, Henry Kissinger, he never dies. He lives I I don't know what what he eats or what he's made of. Uh I think it's like 95 now. Somebody who knows. Um he said in New York Times in 2009, this is a quote, "The ultimate challenge is to shape the common concerns of most countries and all major ones regarding the economic crisis together with a common fear. of jihadist terrorism into a common strategy reinforced by the realization that the new issues like pro proliferation, energy and climate change permit no national or regional solution. That's very familiar. It's kind of like from the special studies project in the 50s. Uh and this he said in New York Times talking about new world order. Um some years later we arranged a new meeting in in uh in Rio Rio um called Rio plus 20 20 years after the first meeting. Uh it was called the future we want. Whose future? Who is we in we? The thing is that this moto came from meetings that was held at uh the Pontiko estate at the Rockefeller's estate outside New York uh and they had a meeting with a lot of futurists and visionaries and they wanted to uh because it was very depressing with all this talk about doomsday all the time uh but everything runs out, everything gets bad. So they wanted to have a better I mean formulate it in another way uh that made the poison taste more good. One can say and we had this meeting decided on uh how can we u create this future and uh and uh u they uh went to um uh bank Banky Moon at the United Nations uh and gave him a report and and Bankyoon said, "Thank you. Thank you very much. Oh, I love this moto. I think we should have it on the next UN conference on the environment. Um he took a lot of ideas from it as well. In 2014, the glo people's climate march in New York Uh that was the same year that uh the Rockefeller said now we going to devest from uh the fossil fuel that made us stinkingly rich. Um and the thing is they actually also funded the people's climate march and more or less created the organization 300 50 or uh that now are behind a lot of uh climate uh activism uh in the world and now Klein is uh part of his organizations. Uh the year after this in 2015, not that it not talked about a lot but it was the year that the global goals was decided the global goals for this future society um and um it is goals that spans it uh goes into everything just like the quote uh about the Rockefeller brothers fund and the climate it's is in every issue in the world uh but has to do with humans, environment, economy, everything uh very important goals uh for what we see today. And the same year in 2015, the great Paris agreement was finally agreed. I mean this was the United Framework Convention of Climate Change. Um but arranged meetings for this was meeting number 21. So it was a long long neg negotiation to to get uh this to be achieved. Uh environmentalists said that they they were disappointed with this. It was no binding. It was uh I mean some polluters uh would be allowed to to build no uh coal powered power plants and And uh they they thought it was not a very good deal but Rockefeller brothers found they loved it. They thought it was the best they could achieve because now they should uh start to to work on it and make it uh give you and more muscles, give more money to organizations to implement the legislation. And what was this all about? What was the implementation about? What was the solution to all these problems? It came just one month later, the fourth industrial revolution uh at the divorce meeting, World Economic Forum in 2016. Claus Schwab, the head of World economic forum, the chairman uh he had a new testament uh with a big solutions and he said in at this meeting about the revolution in its most pessimistic dehumanized form, the fourth industrial revolution may indeed have the potential to robotize humanity and thus to deprive us of our heart and soul. H does this sound like a good revolution for us? Here's the board of um World Economic Forum. Uh World Economic Forum is extremely powerful and we have all the leading banks from the world. Bank of England, Bank of America, Russian Spear Bank, and uh World Bank, IMF and big corporations. Every big corporation in the world loves economic forum and are part of it. They love this revolution. It creates money and opportunities. So what is this shape uh fourth industrial revolution? Two years later uh a new book was presented by Klaus Schwab, not written by him by but all the working groups of World Economic Forum and it had a very one can say I think an extreme view of how to solve this uh global issues. Number one extending extending digital technologies but is internet of things but everything should be connected to everything um every device we have and even humans reforming the physical world uh and that this would be connected with an artificial intelligence taking care of everything and robots and Number three and this you can think about the eugenic roots of uh how this issue began altering the human being. They say this at this meeting altering the human being. It sounds like more like Nazis I would say. Altering the human being with bio and neuroto technology and the last integrating the environ with geo engineering and space technology. Okay. So now we have created problems and now we going to uh come with solutions and uh make the globe to some big uh experiment with geoengineering. And who likes this? Here's another Swede. Um he was at Stockholm University just like me. Yuan Rostrom he's a uh very high highly acclaimed now he's the the the the boss of the Pam Institute in Berlin he says this the fourth industrial revolution can lead us to a zero carbon future if we act now and together with Cristiana Figues she is the was the head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change an also an old friend of the Rockefellers. Yeah, she said they said with divorce 2018 as the launchpad, we will bring together a coalition of a leading tech companies to launch a disruptive road map in San Francisco to change the course of history. Our goal is to turn 10 millions entrepreneurs and engineers and others working in the tech sector into to planetary stewards. Whatever these great minds are working on, the stability and resilience of our climate for human regeneration must be the compass course. H have we actually voted for this? Um this is a system. This is a new economic system that they actually are talking about uh called technocracy. Technology will solve everything and everything will be run by the engineers, the scientists and the experts. Uh and this came up at the G20 level. The G20 is another goal that came into fruition. in 2008, a new global forum to change the world and to address this uh emerging global issues that needs to be solved. The G20 took this fourth industrial revolution and combined it with the global goals. The global goals that spans into everything. Uh and this is about tech Technology all about technology. This year World Economic Forum this is uh some examples. We connect technologies to every goal. Goal one no poverty AI enabled digital footprint for credit mobile money access. Uh this is actually a system of social credits. And let me say this in this report, social credits and to create uh obedience uh by the citizens for the system. It's a very interesting report and it's uh freely to download from the internet. Uh and every every goal is connecting to AI AI and technology. That's the solution. Uh and one thing one uh should ask about this how can this actually solve this problem that they talk about how uh they actually say that this system may have some problems I mean to build up all this technology it takes a lot of energy uh you have to start up a lot of coal plants powered plants to to actually achieve this uh and all the main all the resources you have to use. So it's a oh uh when you start looking into it it's it's a almost feels diabolical I would say global governance comes into this as well and here we have Yuan Rostrom as well u he says I cannot see any other way than 200 100 nations having to surrender some of their decisionmaking sovereignity to a global institutional administration. We have to work with the institutions we have and there is only one institution that is global the UN technological totalitarianism. Um it has come warnings about this years before. Um this is Dirk Helping his head of U research project called Futur Future ICT. Uh he actually works with these technologies and has worked with uh how to collect information from every citizen, every process, everything that's happening. And this is connected to um and uh European Union funded project um and he actually I mean he's working with this and he says this he warns about it what have you created a monster it becomes increasingly evident that all the features of fascism have been implemented digitally or are currently being implemented they could be used on a societywide scale at any time And the last thing altering the human being or they're out of their mind. Uh James Lovelock says this, the man behind the Gaia theory, how to save the planet. If we somehow merge with our electronic creations in a larger scale endo symbiosis. It may provide a better next step in the evolution of humanity. And Gaia, what is he talking about? Um, but some people they take this very very seriously. Here we have uh a Swedish tech entrepreneur and a piercing guy called Janund he has started a business called biohacks. He's talking about the internet of us and he has actually started to shipping people with micro ship in their hands. Now we're talking biblical proportion as well. Uh I think like two thou two 3,000 people in Sweden has uh have this uh microchips. uh as for now um and uh we have had a lot of u especially in the Nordic countries. I I mean it has been some conference here in Finland as well about this uh with a biohacker movement but talk about going together with the technology uh and The most outrageous stuff comes from Elon Musk um with his talk about the narrow link uh to actually put brain ship into people and connect us to the global database. Uh I mean this is science fiction and they are talking about it. and and Elon Musk um I don't know where what he what he has gotten all his money from but it's invested in so much in these technologies now in a very very high speed um so what is all this about the control controlling the game um and the thing is to solve a problem. It's like we have created a problem. You will be assimilated your ships. We will have your biological and technological witness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Is this the future we want? I say no. Um and then that's one of the reasons that I have uh uh I'm standing here today and talk about these things because very few do very few understand this uh and um I think it's a responsibility if you know something about it. Uh and uh everything I have talked about is in my book. It's a scientific book. It's very very well documented. Um it's um it may sound very outlandish, but I'm sorry to say that this is a true story. Uh I have started a foundation called the Forest Foundation um to speak out about this and um now we are trying to build networks in the world uh to to warn about this uh what I say real threats against humanity uh the solutions um on global climate change and uh the environment um that seems so uh contra productive um and you can go into my uh foundation um I have a website um stiffness and far.org and uh also a mail address and um one can also support me and our work with uh buying uh my book uh that also comes with this soundtrack because I want to I mean this is serious uh this is serious talk. This is a serious future. But I and the forest foundation want to talk about uh humanity and and what's good with humanity and human creativity and and the uh and the love of creating things. So and I want to to make things. We also also talk about making a more beautiful world and and actually do a change for real that is but it's a positive change uh and come together and I mean we don't need all this technology um and and I can agree one thing as uh we as a human family has to come together and cooperate to actually get out of this mess. Um and that's all for me. Thank you. 

The source provides a summary of Dr. Jacob Nordinguard's controversial book, The Global Coup, which argues that major world events are not random crises but rather part of a deliberate long-term plan aimed at achieving complete control of the whole planet. This alleged plan, framed as a "global coup d'état," centers on the Great Reset, defined as the merging of humanity with a global technological system powered by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The book traces the supposed history of this agenda through a continuous chain of powerful organizations, starting over a century ago with groups like the Carnegie Endowment and culminating in the 2019 partnership between the UN and the World Economic Forum, which the book presents as the handing over of power to unelected global corporations. Crucially, the plan is purportedly advanced using a strategy of crisis, where existential events—like terrorism, climate change, or the COVID-19 pandemic—are used as catalysts to implement radical changes that promote centralized global governance, ultimately shifting power from national sovereignty and individual liberties to collective control through a complete digital transformation of society.

Global coup d'etat

Great Reset plan

Crisis strategy

TRANSCRIPT OF EXPLAINER

Today we are digging into a really provocative book called The Global Coupet by Dr. Jacob Nordinguard. He's a Swedish scholar with a PhD in technology and social change. And his book puts forward a pretty controversial idea that major world events aren't happening by chance, but are actually part of a deliberate long-term plan. So, let's break down the book's core claims straight from the source. Right from the start, the book hits you with its central thesis. It says that recent events aren't just a series of unfortunate crises. Instead, it claims they look more like moves in a well-directed chess game, which it calls a global coup d'etata, with the end goal being complete control of the whole planet. That's a huge claim. So, let's see how the book tries to back it up. So, what does a global coup d'etata actually mean in this context? Well, according to the book, it all centers around a term you've probably heard bouncing around, the Great Reset. The book defines the Great Reset as this grand plan to basically merge humanity with a global technological system. And the tools for this are all the new technologies of what's called the fourth industrial revolution. The whole thing, the book argues, is being sold to us as the only solution for keeping everyone safe and well. Okay. So, if there's a plan, you've got to ask who's behind it. To understand the argument, we need to look at who the book identifies as the key players, the architects, if you will, of this very long game. The book's historical trail starts more than a hundred years ago. It points to what it claims are minutes from one of the first meetings of the endowment back in 1908. In those meetings, the trustees apparently asked this jaw-dropping question. Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people? The book presents this as some of the earliest evidence of intent. From that starting point, the book traces what it calls a direct line of influence through some of the world's most powerful organizations. It starts with the Carnegie Endowment in 1910, moves through the creation of the UN after World War II, then the World Economic Forum in ' 71, and It all leads up to a partnership they signed in 2019. The argument is that this isn't a random collection of groups, but a continuous chain pushing a single vision for global governance. And that 2019 partnership between the UN and the World Economic Forum is presented as a huge deal. According to the book, this agreement, which was designed to speed up the UN's 2030 agenda, was the moment that power over our future was effectively handed over to a group of unelected global corporations. All right, so let's get into the mechanics of it. How does the book claim this agenda actually gets pushed forward? Well, the key, it argues, is something it calls the strategy of crisis. The core idea here is that these huge existential crises, you know, the kind that scare everyone. They're not just tragedies that happen to us. The book alleges they are used as catalysts, as opportunities to bring in radical pre-planned changes that people would never ever accept under normal circumstances. For prime example, the book points to 9/11. And it highlights this quote from a report written a year before the attacks by a think tank called the project for the new American century. They wrote that the transformation they wanted would take a very long time unless there was a catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor. The book is quick to point out that many members of that group went on to serve in the Bush administration. And this is where the author highlights a pattern. The book argues that it doesn't matter what the crisis is, terrorism, climate change, or a global pandemic. The solution that's always put on the table is the exact same more centralized global governance. So how would you actually build this new system of global governance? Well, the book claims the toolkit is already here and it's called the fourth industrial revolution. The World Economic Forum itself talks openly about these massive technological shifts. The book argues that these things from implantable tech and AI making decisions for us to designer beings and neurochnologies aren't just cool gadgets. They are the actual building blocks of a new global society built on control. You know, this leads to one of the most mind-bending concepts in the book, the internet of bodies or IoB. It's described as a network where our own bodies become data points. Information is collected through devices we implant, swallow, or wear. And the goal to monitor, to analyze, and maybe even to modify our behavior. It really blurs the line between being human and being technology. And that brings us what the book presents as the grand finale of its argument, the CO 19 pandemic. It's framed as the ultimate catalyzing event they were waiting for. The book lays out this timeline and the speed of it is pretty remarkable. In October 2019, you have event 2011, a pandemic simulation of a global coronairus outbreak. Just 2 months later, the first real cases are reported. By March 2020, it's a global pandemic. And just 4 months after that, the WEF publishes its book COVID 19 the Great Reset. The text argues that timing is just too perfect to be a coincidence. And they didn't exactly hide it. The book CO 19 the Great Reset says right there in black and white that the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world. So according to Nord's analysis, the crisis was immediately seized upon as that long awaited chance to push through these massive global changes. So what's the bottom line. What does this all add up to? Well, the book's central argument is that we are in the middle of a planned coup to replace our current world system. The goal is to shift from national sovereignty to global governance, from individual liberties to collective control, from free markets to something called stakeholder capitalism. All of it powered by a complete digital transformation of society. The global coup d'eta makes the incredible claim that this whole plan is unfolding right out in the open through official reports, documents, and public partnerships. And So, it leaves us, the reader, with one final really provocative question. How do we tell the difference between mere coincidence and actual intent? That's a challenging thought to leave you with. 

Discuss Global coup d'etat.

The concept of the "Global coup d'etat" is the central and controversial thesis put forth by Dr. Jacob Nordinguard, a Swedish scholar with a PhD in technology and social change, in his book The Global Coupet1. The book alleges that major world events are not random occurrences or unfortunate crises, but rather deliberate moves in a well-directed "chess game" aimed at achieving complete control of the entire planet1. The author argues that humanity is currently in the middle of a planned coup designed to replace the existing world system2.

The Goals and Transformation

According to the book, the "global coup d'etat" seeks a fundamental restructuring of society2:

1. Shift from National Sovereignty to Global Governance2.

2. Shift from Individual Liberties to Collective Control2.

3. Shift from Free Markets to "Stakeholder Capitalism"2.

This transformation is intended to be powered by a complete digital overhaul of society2.

The Great Reset and Technological Tools

The purported coup centers around the concept of the Great Reset1. The book defines the Great Reset as a massive plan intended to merge humanity with a global technological system3. This plan is presented to the public as the only viable solution for ensuring everyone's safety and well-being3.

The toolkit for constructing this new system of global governance is identified as the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)4. These technological shifts, which are openly discussed by organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), are argued to be the actual building blocks of a new global society based on control4. Examples of these technologies include implantable tech, AI making decisions for humans, designer beings, and neurotechnologies4.

A particularly crucial concept is the Internet of Bodies (IoB)4. This system is described as a network where human bodies serve as data points, with information collected via devices that people wear, swallow, or implant4. The ultimate purpose of the IoB is to monitor, analyze, and potentially modify human behavior, effectively blurring the line between being human and being technology4.

The Strategy of Crisis

The central mechanic claimed to push this agenda forward is the "strategy of crisis"5. The core idea is that massive, scary, existential crises are not merely tragedies, but are used as opportunities or catalysts to introduce radical, pre-planned changes that the public would never accept under normal circumstances6.

The book argues that it is irrelevant what the nature of the crisis is—whether it is terrorism, climate change, or a global pandemic—because the resulting solution proposed is always the same: more centralized global governance46.

• The source highlights the example of 9/11, pointing to a quote written a year prior by the think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The report stated that the desired transformation would take a very long time unless there was a "catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor"6. The book notes that many members of PNAC later served in the Bush administration, highlighting this as a pattern6.

• The CO 19 pandemic is framed as the "ultimate catalyzing event" that the alleged planners were waiting for7. The book highlights the remarkable timing, noting that a pandemic simulation (Event 2011) occurred in October 2019, followed shortly by the first real cases7. By July 2020, the WEF published its book, COVID-19 The Great Reset, which explicitly stated that the pandemic offered a "rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world"7. Nordinguard's analysis concludes that the crisis was immediately seized upon as the long-awaited chance to implement massive global changes7.

The Architects and Historical Trail

The book traces the historical influence behind this long-term plan back over a century3. It identifies a continuous chain of powerful organizations pushing a singular vision for global governance5:

1. The Carnegie Endowment (starting 1908/1910): The book claims that minutes from one of the Endowment's first meetings in 1908 show trustees asking if there was any known means more effective than war for altering the life of an entire people, which is presented as early evidence of intent35.

2. The UN: Influence is traced through the creation of the UN after World War II5.

3. The World Economic Forum (WEF): Created in 19715.

The 2019 partnership between the UN and the World Economic Forum is presented as a critical moment5. This agreement, which aimed to speed up the UN's 2030 agenda, is described as the effective moment when control over the future was handed over to a group of unelected global corporations5.

The book's incredible claim is that the entire plan for the "global coup d'eta" is unfolding openly through official documents, reports, and public partnerships2. The work concludes by challenging the reader to determine how to distinguish between mere coincidence and actual intent2.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Great Reset plan.

The discussion of the Great Reset plan, primarily drawn from the analysis presented in the book The Global Coup d'état by Dr. Jacob Nordinguard, frames it as the central element of a controversial idea: that major world events are not random crises but moves in a deliberate, long-term plan aiming for complete control of the planet1.

Core Definition and Goals

The book defines the Great Reset as a grand plan to merge humanity with a global technological system2. According to this analysis, the plan is unfolding openly through public partnerships, official reports, and documents3.

The overarching goal of this "global coup d'état," centered on the Great Reset, involves several critical societal shifts3:

• Shifting from national sovereignty to global governance3.

• Moving from individual liberties to collective control3.

• Transitioning from free markets to stakeholder capitalism3.

• The entire process is powered by a complete digital transformation of society3.

The plan is allegedly marketed to the public as the only solution available for ensuring everyone remains safe and well2.

The Technological Toolkit

The primary instruments for achieving the Great Reset are the new technologies associated with the Fourth Industrial Revolution2. The World Economic Forum (WEF) openly discusses these massive technological shifts, which the analysis argues are not merely gadgets but the actual building blocks of a new global society built on control4.

Key technologies involved include4:

• Implantable technology4.

• Artificial intelligence (AI) making decisions for people4.

• Designer beings and neurotechnologies4.

This vision culminates in the concept of the Internet of Bodies (IoB)4. The IoB is described as a network where human bodies become data points, collecting information through devices that people swallow, wear, or implant4. The purpose of the IoB is to monitor, analyze, and potentially modify human behavior, effectively blurring the distinction between being human and being technology4.

Strategy and Execution

The architects of this plan allegedly use a method referred to as the strategy of crisis5. This core idea asserts that huge existential crises (such as a global pandemic, terrorism, or climate change) are used as catalysts and opportunities to introduce radical, pre-planned changes that the public would never consent to under normal circumstances5. According to the analysis, regardless of the specific crisis, the solution always presented is the same: more centralized global governance4.

The COVID-19 pandemic is framed as the ultimate catalyzing event that the architects were anticipating6. The speed of the events is highlighted:

1. In October 2019, a simulation called Event 201 was held, simulating a global coronavirus outbreak6.

2. Just two months later, the first real cases were reported6.

3. By March 2020, the situation became a global pandemic6.

4. Only four months later, the WEF published its book, COVID 19 the Great Reset6.

The analysis notes that the timing is allegedly too perfect to be coincidental6. The WEF book itself stated that the pandemic represented a "rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world," suggesting the crisis was immediately used as the long-awaited chance to implement massive global changes6.

Architectural Chain of Influence

The book traces what it calls a continuous chain pushing a single vision for global governance, starting over a century ago27. This historical trail points to organizations that allegedly serve as key players7:

1. The Carnegie Endowment (starting around 1910)7.

2. The creation of the United Nations (UN) after World War II7.

3. The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 19717.

A major milestone in this chain is presented as the 2019 partnership between the UN and the World Economic Forum7. This agreement, designed to speed up the UN's 2030 agenda, is viewed as the moment when power over the future was effectively transferred to a group of unelected global corporations7.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Crisis strategy.

The discussion of "Crisis strategy" centers on a core claim made in the book The Global Coupet by Dr. Jacob Nordinguard, which analyzes major world events as part of a deliberate, long-term plan called a global coup d'état12.

The mechanism by which this agenda is allegedly pushed forward is specifically referred to as "the strategy of crisis"2.

Core Function of Crisis Strategy

The central idea of this strategy is that massive, existential crises—the kind of events that frighten the public—are not merely tragedies that occur randomly3. Instead, the book alleges that these crises are used as catalysts and opportunities3. Their purpose is to enable the introduction of radical, pre-planned changes that the public would generally reject under normal circumstances3.

The strategy posits that regardless of the nature of the crisis—whether it involves terrorism, climate change, or a global pandemic—the consistent solution proposed is always the same: more centralized global governance34. This response aims to shift the world system from national sovereignty to global governance and from individual liberties to collective control5.

Examples of Crisis Utilization

The sources highlight two major events that The Global Coupet points to as examples of this strategy in action:

1. 9/11: The book uses the attacks of September 11, 2001, as a prime example3. It highlights a report written a year before the attacks by the think tank known as the Project for the New American Century3. This report stated that the transformation the group desired would require a "very long time unless there was a catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor"3. The author notes that many members of this think tank later served in the Bush administration3.

2. The CO 19 Pandemic: The pandemic is framed as the ultimate catalyzing event that the alleged architects of the coup were awaiting6. The book emphasizes the highly suggestive timing of events surrounding the outbreak6:

    ◦ In October 2019, Event 201 was a simulation of a global coronavirus outbreak6.

    ◦ Just two months later, the first real cases were reported6.

    ◦ By March 2020, it was declared a global pandemic6.

    ◦ Only four months after that, the World Economic Forum (WEF) published its book, COVID-19 the Great Reset6.

According to this analysis, the crisis was immediately seized upon as the long-awaited chance to push through massive global changes6. The book COVID-19 the Great Reset openly supports this, saying the pandemic represents a "rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world"6.

The core argument suggests that the speed and timing of the response and the subsequent push for "The Great Reset" indicate that the crisis was used intentionally to accelerate the agenda toward complete control of the planet16.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Global governance.

The concept of global governance is presented in Dr. Jacob Nordinguard's book, The Global Coup d'état, as the ultimate objective of a controversial, deliberate long-term plan12. The book argues that humanity is in the middle of a planned coup designed specifically to replace the current world system with this centralized form of control2.

The Core Goal and Necessary Shift

The establishment of global governance is identified as the paramount goal of the alleged "global coup d'état"2. Achieving this requires a fundamental restructuring of society, specifically a shift from national sovereignty to global governance2.

The Strategy of Crisis and Centralization

According to the analysis, the transition toward global governance is largely powered by what the author terms the "strategy of crisis"3. The claim is that large, frightening, existential crises—whether related to terrorism, climate change, or a global pandemic—are deliberately used as opportunities or "catalysts" to introduce radical, pre-planned changes34.

Crucially, the book argues that regardless of the nature of the crisis, the resulting solution always advanced is the exact same: more centralized global governance34.

The Institutional Architecture

The vision for global governance is traced through a "continuous chain" of influence by some of the world's most powerful organizations, which are argued to be pushing a single vision5. This chain begins historically with organizations like the Carnegie Endowment, moves through the creation of the UN after World War II, and includes the World Economic Forum (WEF)5.

A pivotal moment for furthering global governance, according to the book, was the 2019 partnership agreement between the UN and the World Economic Forum5. This agreement, which was designed to speed up the UN's 2030 agenda, is presented as the moment when power over the future was "effectively handed over to a group of unelected global corporations"5.

The Building Blocks of the New System

To actually construct this new system of global governance, the book claims that the necessary toolkit is already available: the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)4. The massive technological shifts openly discussed by organizations like the WEF, such as implantable technology, artificial intelligence (AI) making decisions for humans, and neurotechnologies, are argued to be the actual building blocks of a new global society built on control4. These technologies are used to merge humanity with a global technological system, which is part of the Great Reset plan that facilitates global governance6.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Digital transformation.

The sources present digital transformation as an indispensable component of the alleged "Global coup d'état" and the Great Reset plan, serving as the essential infrastructure for achieving global control.

Role in the Global Coup D'état

The core objective of the purported global coup d'état, as discussed by Dr. Jacob Nordinguard in The Global Coupet, is to fundamentally replace the current world system1. This ambitious restructuring is designed to shift society in several ways: from national sovereignty to global governance, from individual liberties to collective control, and from free markets to "stakeholder capitalism"1.

Crucially, the book asserts that all of this transformation is powered by a complete digital transformation of society1.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) as the Toolkit

The specific technological mechanisms driving this digital shift are grouped under the banner of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)2. The book claims that the 4IR technologies, which the World Economic Forum (WEF) openly discusses, are not merely advanced innovations but are the "actual building blocks of a new global society built on control"2.

These technologies, which constitute the digital transformation, include:

• Implantable technology2.

• Artificial intelligence (AI) used to make decisions for humans2.

• Designer beings and neurotechnologies2.

The Great Reset plan is defined as a "grand plan to basically merge humanity with a global technological system," which relies on these tools3. This plan is allegedly presented to the public as the only way to ensure everyone's safety and well-being3.

The Internet of Bodies (IoB)

A key concept arising from this digital transformation is the Internet of Bodies (IoB)2. The IoB is described as a comprehensive network where human bodies function as data points2. Information is collected from individuals using devices that they either wear, swallow, or implant2.

The ultimate purpose of the IoB within the digital transformation framework is stated to be monitoring, analyzing, and potentially modifying human behavior2. This integration of the physical body into a massive digital network fundamentally blurs the line between being human and being technology2.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down