6-28-25 DailyBriefs.info podcast brief mp3 1 brief mp3 2
6-28-25 DailyBriefs.info podcast brief mp3 1 brief mp3 2
welcome to the lenny and Maria sanchez deep dive podcast show.
Today, we're diving deep into a complex web of geopolitics, public health, and power structures, drawing insights from a variety of sources. We'll be exploring the undercurrents shaping our world, from military strategies in the Middle East to shifts in U.S. vaccine policy.
Our first source provides a "Realpolitik Analysis of the Russia-China Commitment to Iran," viewing international relations primarily through the lens of power and self-interest. A core tenet of this framework is that "actions transcend words", meaning concrete military or economic moves are more significant than joint statements or condemnations. The analysis suggests viewing the current geopolitical landscape through a "controlled chaos lens," where seemingly chaotic events might be market manipulation or part of a strategy to maintain a profitable "petrodollar Ponzi scheme".
The source highlights the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire's strategy in Iran, which is seen as part of a larger "Greater Israel Project" moving "at gas pedal to the floor speed". It is proposed that attacks on Iran could be a "Wall Street/Tel Aviv insider trading scam," profiting from market spikes and dips while simultaneously damaging Iran. Crucially, the analysis emphasizes that Israel "can’t defeat Iran without the US," suggesting Mossad holds significant influence over US politicians through blackmail and bribery. A full-scale US-Israeli war with Iran is predicted to resemble the "Libya-Syria-Gaza playbook," involving saturation bombing, missile attacks, and the use of "CIA-Mossad rent-a-jihadis" to "break up Iran along ethnic lines" into a "failed and wrecked nation-state". The ultimate goals extend beyond the "Greater Israel Project" to maintaining "petrodollar hegemony and the security and longevity of international techno-banker rule".
Iran possesses various means to retaliate, including massive missile strikes on US military installations, Houthi attacks on shipping, and shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, which could "cripple the global energy supply" and initiate a "severe economic catastrophe". The author rejects the term "Axis of Resistance," preferring "Triad Alliance" (Russia, China, Iran) to avoid negative historical connotations. Factors influencing weak support from Russia and China include Russia's strain from Ukraine, potential financial gain from a Strait of Hormuz closure, China's historical non-involvement in foreign wars, and protection of Belt and Road Initiative supply chains. Reasons for moderate-strong support include accelerating US collapse, protecting Iran's energy supply to China, preventing sequential targeting ("Today Iran, tomorrow China, the day after Russia"), and safeguarding the BRICS and BRI initiatives. The author predicts that if US-Israeli actions are limited to bombing and proxy warfare, China-Russia support would be "weak to weak/moderate," but could rise if "boots on the ground" are deployed. A unified front is advocated, as a fragmented resistance would empower the US-led order.
Moving to a summary of key geopolitical insights, the potential escalation of the US-Israeli conflict with Iran carries significant global implications, affecting the future of BRICS, the Belt and Road Initiative, and the multi-polar order. The current conflict dynamics might be a deliberate financial manipulation, with global finance turning chaos into a profitable machine, possibly involving a "Wall Street/Tel Aviv insider trading scam". Recent Israeli actions strongly suggest the advancement of a "Greater Israel Project", evidenced by the Gaza conflict and assassinations of Iranian, Hamas, and Hezbollah leaders. It is believed that Israelis, with US help, were responsible for the helicopter crash that killed Iranian President Raisi, leading to a "more Western-friendly" replacement, and that the current Syrian President is a suspected Jewish-Israeli Mossad agent. These events indicate Iran faces a significant challenge with Mossad infiltration.
Israel's ability to defeat Iran is said to be dependent on direct US military involvement, and Mossad is alleged to have extensive influence over US politicians through blackmail and bribery, which would ensure a "quick US rubber stamp" for any Zionist war. Despite this, there is perceived internal disagreement within the US oligarchy, Deep State, and Pentagon regarding war with Iran, with some factions wanting to save resources for a confrontation with China. This is indicated by a lack of widespread "Ayatollah=Hitler" propaganda in mainstream media. While a Mossad-orchestrated "blame Iran" false flag on US soil would signal full US entry, it's suggested the public may be too disengaged for such a tactic to be necessary. The current global "insanity" and chaos are linked to the continuation of the "petrodollar Ponzi scheme".
A US-Israeli war with Iran is anticipated to primarily involve bombing and missile attacks, rather than a large ground invasion, aiming to destroy infrastructure and turn Iran into a "failed and wrecked nation-state" using proxy armies and ethnic divisions. Iran, however, possesses the capability to launch significant retaliatory strikes, including massive missile attacks on US military installations, Houthi attacks on shipping, and shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, which could "cripple the global energy supply". A prolonged conflict in Iran could "drain the American-Zio empire". Russia's potential "zero-weak" support for Iran is influenced by its Ukraine commitments and potential economic benefits from a Strait of Hormuz shutdown. Russia's policy is also complicated by dual-national Zionist oligarchs and a large Russian-Jewish population in Israel. China's traditional non-interventionist foreign policy influences its likelihood of offering only "zero-weak" support, as a strategy to safeguard BRI supply chains and prevent internal interference. Both Russia and China might offer stronger support to Iran to accelerate the US-Anglo Zionist Empire's collapse, prevent sequential targeting, and protect BRICS and BRI initiatives. The ongoing conflicts led by the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire are fundamentally about maintaining petrodollar hegemony and international banker control. The destruction of Iran would significantly undermine BRICS and the development of alternative currency systems. A fractured "Triad Alliance" would force its members to face the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire individually, weakening their collective stand.
Shifting our focus to domestic policy, the "Coffee & Covid 2025" newsletter primarily discusses a significant shift in U.S. vaccine policy, spearheaded by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.. His administration's newly reconstituted ACIP vaccine committee is undertaking a comprehensive review of the entire childhood vaccine schedule, examining not only individual shots but also their cumulative effects. A major related development is the U.S. decision to cease funding Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, a move framed as part of a larger strategy to dismantle globalist influence and "drain the swamp". These actions are presented as a deliberate "plan" to challenge established power structures, suggesting a new, more aggressive phase in political and public health reform.
Delving deeper into vaccine policy, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) vaccine committee has been "flushed and reconstituted" in a "surprise coup". This newly formed committee met publicly for the first time on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in what was called a "remarkable and fraught moment in public health". The new chair, Martin Kulldorff, a former professor of medicine at Harvard University, immediately invited people to share "any and all criticisms of vaccines" and criticized the media for using "anti-vaxxer" labels. Dr. Robert Malone serves as the vaccine-injured co-chair and considers the "anti-vaxxer" label "high praise".
A key development is Dr. Kulldorff's announcement that the panel will soon review the "entire childhood vaccine schedule," encompassing all 72 shots, assessing not only individual vaccines but also their "combined effects" and "cumulative effect". This move has been met with significant concern from figures like Dr. Richard Besser, former CDC acting director, who worried it would "cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines". The American Academy of Pediatrics pre-emptively boycotted the ACIP meeting, stating they would not "lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children’s health". The new panelists posed "unanswerable queries" to agency representatives, who appeared unprepared for skeptical inquiry. This meeting represents a historical shift in federal vaccine committee scrutiny, marking a "new, more health-focused day in Washington". Kennedy's actions are viewed as a decisive step, "burning the ships" with no retreat.
A significant action highlighted is the United States' decision to stop funding Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Gavi is described as a "shadowy-sounding, feel-good global 'public-private partnership' NGO" involving Bill Gates and the World Health Organization, which claims to save the world by buying vaccines in bulk for poor countries. However, the source suggests Gavi primarily functions to funnel billions through an international bureaucracy with "zero voter oversight" and "very cozy ties to vaccine makers".
The U.S. previously contributed 12% of Gavi’s total funding, amounting to billions over the years, which Secretary Kennedy referred to as an "$8 billion 'investment'". Kennedy explained that the U.S. will not contribute more "Until Gavi considers the best science available," accusing Gavi of "brushing off safety concerns" and treating vaccine safety issues as a "public relations problem" rather than a "patient health problem". He specifically cited a "gold-standard study linking the DTP shot to increased childhood mortality" that Gavi allegedly ignored. This decision triggered a "media meltdown," with the Washington Post framing it as a "moral catastrophe" and prominent figures like Atul Gawande and Bill Gates lamenting "devastating consequences". The source interprets this "hysteria" as a "tell" that "money and control, not medicine," are what's truly at stake. Gavi's defense implies that safety monitoring is not their direct responsibility. Gavi is seen as a "strategic soft-power amplifier" for Western bureaucracy, and the funding cut is viewed as slicing "straight into the wiring of the deep state’s influence grid".
The sources present "draining the swamp" not merely as a slogan, but as a methodical, piece-by-piece dismantling of what is referred to as "the whole damnable machinery" of elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and left-wing ideological graft. This process is portrayed as a strategic and rapid-fire offensive, carefully calibrated and coldly executed, aimed at dismantling the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control. This signifies a shift where "unelected networks of champagne-swilling technocrats and robot-loving global managers" who have shaped public life are now being challenged with a definitive "no more".
Key actions associated with "draining the swamp" include the reconstitution of the ACIP Vaccine Committee and the halting of funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The "swamp" is being "starved" by financial cuts across various sectors, including USAID, NGOs, DEI programs, and NIH "transgender rodent grants," with Harvard's funding also affected. The source states that Big Pharma is "suddenly playing defense in every direction" and NATO's finances are strained. This "draining" is presented as a deliberate logic hiding behind frantic scramble, a plan to dismantle "the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control". The reaction from affected institutions, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics boycotting meetings, and Gavi's "political" and "hysterical" response to the funding cut, is seen as confirmation that "money and control, not medicine," are what is truly at stake. The "swamp" is characterized as a "whole rotting continent of political disease".
In a surprising economic turnaround, the sources indicate a surge in investor confidence and a stock market on the verge of an all-time record, described as a "stunning turnaround". This positive economic news contradicts prior media predictions of "nascent doom". Investors are described as feeling "Confident – Record-setting confident". The sources suggest that the "invisible intelligence of the markets," representing the aggregate self-interested decisions of millions of buyers, sellers, investors, and speculators, is at play. The overall message conveyed is that "The market is optimistic. You should be, too".
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s influence, as the current Secretary, is presented as a pivotal force behind significant and rapid policy shifts, particularly in public health and global initiatives. His actions are interpreted as a "stunning turnaround" and a "declaration of war" against established systems, part of the broader strategic effort to "drain the swamp" and dismantle "the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control". His influence is seen in the reconstitution of the ACIP Vaccine Committee, the appointment of new leadership, and the comprehensive review of the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Kennedy also announced the halt of U.S. funding for Gavi, citing the alliance's failure to consider "best science available" and accusing them of treating safety issues as public relations problems. This decision, impacting billions in funding, triggered a "media meltdown," which the sources interpret as a "tell" that "money and control, not medicine," are truly at stake. Kennedy's approach is characterized as a "strategic, rapid-fire offensive" against "elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and leftwing ideological graft".
Continuing our focus on public health and the MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) movement, this section highlights that MAHA is experiencing a significant breakout moment, with a long-awaited, big event unfolding. Kennedy's thimerosal essay is considered a "formal declaration of war" in public health. Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s newly reconstituted ACIP vaccine committee has convened, marking a "remarkable and fraught moment" in public health, with new chair Martin Kulldorff inviting any and all criticisms of vaccines. The ACIP committee's actions signify the beginning of a "war" in public health, leading to a new, more health-focused day in Washington. The ACIP panel will review the entire childhood vaccine schedule, all 72 shots, for their combined and cumulative effects. Former CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser expressed deep concern that the new chair immediately sought to "cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines". The American Academy of Pediatrics boycotted the meeting, citing politicization of children's health.
The new ACIP panelists posed hard, "unanswerable queries" to agencies and industry groups, who appeared unprepared for skeptical inquiry. Dr. Robert Malone demonstrated significant value by applying deep scientific expertise to topics like spike protein persistence and adverse-event clusters. The initial ACIP meeting focused on questioning and listening, not voting, representing a historical shift in federal vaccine committee scrutiny. Kennedy's actions are viewed as a decisive step, "burning the ships" with no retreat. The U.S. has ceased funding the global vaccine alliance, Gavi, with Kennedy stating the U.S. will not contribute more "Until Gavi considers the best science available". Gavi is described as a shadowy global "public-private partnership" NGO that operates as a middleman, distributing vaccines without transparent oversight. Gavi's true purpose is allegedly about funneling billions through a bureaucracy with "zero voter oversight" and "very cozy ties to vaccine makers". The Washington Post framed the Gavi funding cut as a "moral catastrophe," and prominent figures like Atul Gawande and Bill Gates condemned it. Kennedy accused Gavi of treating vaccine safety issues as "public relations problems". Critics note a lack of evidence for Gavi's focus on mitigating or tracking vaccine injuries. Gavi's defense implied that safety monitoring is not their direct responsibility. Gavi is described as a strategic soft-power amplifier for Western bureaucracy, and the U.S. funding cut is seen as disrupting the "deep state's influence grid". Gavi's reaction to the funding cut was political and hysterical, not clinical, indicating that "money and control, not medicine," were the true stakes. This is characterized as a methodical dismantling of elite global influence, with financial pressures being applied to various institutions like USAID, NGOs, NIH, and Harvard. The current offensive aims to dismantle unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control, seen as "starving the beast" of political disease. The stock market is nearing an all-time record, reflecting strong investor confidence.
Our next source, "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes," delves into the alleged ancient and Satanic origins of the Rothschild family, claiming their involvement in the creation of MI6 and their descent from "Satanic Babylon". The source asserts that the "Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschilds" are central to the Zionist movement and the creation of Israel, with the goal of establishing an empire – the "Greater Israel Project" – to control global trade routes from China and India to Europe. The Rothschild family has been significantly involved in funding Israeli government buildings, including the Knesset, and is alleged to have total control over the Israel Supreme Court, which is described as a "Temple of Masonic Mystery Religion" built for the elite.
The "Greater Israel" project is presented as an expansionist ideology that envisions a Rothschild Jewish state extending "from the Nile to the Euphrates," encompassing territories beyond current Israeli borders. Critics argue this project has strained regional tensions and violates international law. The source suggests the project is not just historical but is actively pursued through Israeli government policies and actions, including the creation of a "Vassal USA and Vassal Europe through the creation of World Wars 1 and 2". Israel is seen as playing a strategic role in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a vital stopover for trade and energy routes. China has established significant economic ties with Israel, with Israel being the largest recipient of Chinese investment in the Middle East between 2015 and 2018. Donald Trump's financial indebtedness to the Rothschilds, through Wilbur Ross, is also alleged.
From Satchidanand, we hear an analysis asserting that "Satanic Rothschild Zionism" is China's greatest threat, not from external armies but "internally from Satanic Rothschild Zionist controlled sleeper cell traitors". The source claims that the "City of London/Wall Street financial parasites" financed global conflicts like the Opium Wars and European colonization projects. It is alleged that the "Satanic Phoenician Rothschilds" gained total control of America's financial system through the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, assisted by figures like the Rockefellers, Woodrow Wilson, and Senator Nelson Aldrich.
The source links JFK's assassination to his strong opposition to Israel's acquisition of nuclear weapons, suggesting Mossad partnered with the CIA and the Military Industrial Complex in his murder. It further claims Israeli gunships attacked the USS Liberty, killing 34 crew members, and that President Johnson, allegedly bribed, covered up the incident and showered Israel with taxpayer money. Rothschild Zionist Jews are said to have replaced Anglos in key US institutions, leading to a "corporate Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist uniparty". Rothschild Zionists like George Soros are also alleged to control major "left" organizations. The 9/11 attacks are described as an "Israeli/neocon/Deep State false flag" that led to "endless wars for the bankers and Israel". The COVID pandemic and its mRNA vaccines are presented as the "most stunning and audacious false flag attack in human history," a "bioweapon attack" that has sterilized and killed millions, and part of a "globalist 'problem-reaction-solution' agenda" for digital biometric IDs. The US-instigated Russia-Ukraine War is also labeled a "Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist operation," with Ukraine's President Zelensky openly stating his desire to turn Ukraine into a "big Israel" and his ties to an Israeli-Ukraine dual national oligarch. The impunity enjoyed by Rothschild financiers virtually guarantees they will continue their actions. The source concludes that Satanism is gradually being instituted as the New World Order, defined by "Satanic Ritual".
Drawing on Nick Fuentes' perspective, we learn that for Israel, the conflict with Iran is not primarily about Iran's nuclear weapons but rather about seeking "regime change," a goal pursued for years. Israel needs the Iranian regime gone, and to achieve this, it needs to involve the United States because only the U.S. can allegedly take out Iran's nuclear capabilities. Fuentes suggests that what many perceive as unintended consequences like destabilization and quagmire in Middle Eastern conflicts are actually "not a bug. It's a feature".
The Israelis have promulgated a doctrine, known as the Oded Yinon plan, which posits that the only way for Israel to be safe is to "destabilize and dismember every one of their neighboring states into what they call statelets, a mosaic of tiny states". This strategy allows Israel to be stronger relative to other countries through a policy of "divide and conquer". Fuentes asserts that Israel is the "driver of the conflict" in the Middle East and, therefore, the power that needs to be restrained. He speculates that Donald Trump's policy shift towards supporting this conflict might be due to coercion, such as blackmail involving the Epstein files. This play for superpower status, with the U.S. doing whatever Israel dictates, is seen as potentially paving the way for the annexation of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the rebuilding of a "third temple".
Finally, from G. Edward Griffin's "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom," we understand that wars and the threat of wars have always been the favorite means to "divide and conquer" and keep populations controlled. The threat of atomic war, in particular, is described as more of a "psychological weapon" than a military one. Griffin highlights technocracy's role in mass psychological manipulation, enabling the reaching of minds, fears, and hopes of every human being through technical advancements, making modern warfare more invisible. He questions the Israeli lobby's influence on conservatives, who might otherwise oppose foreign wars and aid.
Propaganda is defined as "training of the mind," conditioning humans like "little AI computers". Griffin emphasizes the incredible importance of personal preparedness and self-sufficiency to avoid dependence on the system, urging listeners to secure long-term storable food, water solutions, and natural meat products. He notes the recurring pattern of war promotion, from Iraq to Iran, with Israel allegedly playing a role in global blackmail and financing propaganda campaigns. Griffin describes a "cabal" interested in world domination that uses division to overcome its numerical disadvantage. Modern warfare is primarily a "propaganda war," and the fear of atomic war is used as a tool to elicit the surrender of liberty. The repetitive nature of propaganda is noted, akin to the "Nazi version of you tell a big a lie that's big enough and tell it often enough, everybody will believe it".
The new dimension of warfare includes biological and psychological manipulation, with technocratic tactics extending to drugs, water supply, and fertility control. The public is being conditioned to accept conventional warfare as the only solution. Griffin observes a shift in conservative stances towards war intervention. He cites the concept of "The Best Enemy Money Can Buy," suggesting that enemies are often built and financed. Propaganda's efficacy lies in convincing people to surrender liberties for "survival," feeding them one-sided arguments in news and schools. The difficulty in separating governments from peoples is also noted. Warfare is portrayed as a strategic chess game waged by "masters". The military has a dual role: providing a basis for fear of annihilation and controlling populations. The convergence of global crises, from health hoaxes to supply chain issues and wars, is designed to bring in "AI digital ID infrastructure" and "global technocracy," involving powerful figures like Sam Altman, Larry Fink, and Elon Musk. Totalitarian plans are often concealed by positive-sounding vocabulary like "unified world". The term "conspiracy theorist" is used as a weapon to dismiss truth. Governments and powerful institutions are magnets for the "predator class". Klaus Schwab's vision of "multiple crises" and Yuval Noah Harari's ominous dream of "a world where people are placated on drugs playing video games" are cited as open statements of future control. Griffin concludes that purely defensive survival strategies are inadequate, and the ultimate legacy is the restoration of freedom for humanity.
thank you for listening to another session of the lenny and Maria sanchez deep dive podcast show produced and archived at the website daily briefs dot info.
This extensive online article from The Unz Review presents a "Realpolitik Analysis of the Russia-China Commitment to Iran," arguing that recent US-Israeli actions against Iran are part of a larger "Greater Israel Project" aimed at maintaining petrodollar hegemony and the US Anglo-Zionist Empire's global power. The author details a timeline of Israeli provocations and speculates on potential US military strategies in Iran, suggesting a preference for saturation bombing and proxy warfare over ground invasion. Crucially, the piece explores the complex motivations for Russia and China to either support or refrain from intervening in an Iran conflict, highlighting their strategic interests in weakening the US empire, protecting energy supplies, and safeguarding the BRICS and Belt and Road initiatives. Ultimately, the author advocates for a unified "Triad Alliance" between Russia, China, and Iran to counter Western aggression, emphasizing that a fragmented resistance would empower the US-led order.
"Realpolitik Analysis" is a foreign policy framework that views international relations primarily through the lens of power, self-interest, and practical considerations, rather than ideology or moral concerns. The provided sources apply this framework to the geopolitical landscape involving Russia, China, Iran, and the "US Anglo-Zionist Empire".
Here's a breakdown of the Realpolitik analysis presented in the sources:
Core Tenets of Realpolitik Analysis
Actions Over Words: A central principle is that "actions transcend words". This means that joint statements or condemnations are less significant than concrete military or economic moves.
Focus on Risks and Rewards: The analysis prioritizes the high stakes, risks, and rewards for all involved parties, including the survival of nation-states, the future of economic blocs like BRICS and BRI, and global security and stability.
"Controlled Chaos": The author suggests viewing the current geopolitical landscape through a "controlled chaos lens," where seemingly chaotic events, such as conflicts, might actually be market manipulation or part of a strategy to maintain a profitable "petrodollar Ponzi scheme".
The US-Anglo-Zionist Empire's Strategy in Iran
"Greater Israel Project": The sources suggest that the ongoing Israeli actions, including the Gaza conflict, assassinations of Iranian and Hezbollah leaders, and attacks on Iran, are part of a "Greater Israel Project" moving "at gas pedal to the floor speed".
Market Manipulation: It is proposed that the attacks on Iran could be a "Wall Street/Tel Aviv insider trading scam," profiting from market spikes and dips while simultaneously damaging Iran. This aligns with the "controlled chaos" theory.
US Involvement: The analysis emphasizes that Israel "can’t defeat Iran without the US". Mossad is described as having significant influence over US politicians through blackmail and bribery, suggesting that any "Zionist war would receive a quick US rubber stamp".
Disunity within US Leadership: Despite apparent US support, there is a perceived "ruling class difference of opinion" within the US oligarchy, Deep State, and Pentagon, with some factions wanting to save resources for a confrontation with China or fearing a loss of interest in Ukraine. The lack of widespread "Ayatollah=Hitler" propaganda in mainstream media is cited as an indicator of this disunity.
Proxy Warfare and Destabilization: A full-scale US-Israeli war with Iran is predicted to be less like an Iraq-style ground invasion and more like the "Libya-Syria-Gaza playbook," involving saturation bombing, missile attacks to destroy infrastructure, and the use of "CIA-Mossad rent-a-jihadis" and fomenting rebellion along ethnic lines to "break up Iran along ethnic lines". The goal is to turn Iran into a "failed and wrecked nation-state" rather than occupying it.
Ultimate Goals: Beyond the "Greater Israel Project," the overarching goals are identified as maintaining "petrodollar hegemony and the security and longevity of international techno-banker rule". If Iran is "wrecked," it is suggested that BRICS could sink, and alternative currency systems would become less likely.
Iran's Potential Responses
Iran possesses various means to retaliate, including:
Massive missile strikes from Iraq on US military installations in the Middle East.
Houthis attacking US and Western commercial and naval shipping.
Shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, which could "cripple the global energy supply" and initiate a "severe economic catastrophe".
Missile attacks on Israeli cities and ports, and US naval vessels/military outposts.
The author believes Iran would not attack the US mainland, as it would "only galvanize the American public against Iran".
The "Triad Alliance" (Russia, China, Iran)
The term "Axis of Resistance" is rejected by the author, who prefers "Triad Alliance" to avoid negative historical connotations.
Factors for Zero-Weak Support to Iran:
For Russia: Already strained by Ukraine, potential for US collapse without Russian involvement, financial gain from Strait of Hormuz closure, potential "extended breather" if China is the next target, favorable Ukraine deal, and the presence of dual-national Zionist oligarchs and a large Russian-Jewish population in Israel.
For China: Historical non-involvement in foreign wars, weakening the US without direct Chinese support, protection of BRI supply chains from sabotage, avoidance of CIA/Mossad terror attacks within China, and perceived high Mossad infiltration in Iran. Some sources suggest China might placate the US to buy time for a future confrontation or ease trade wars.
Factors for Moderate-Strong Support to Iran:
For Russia: Accelerated US collapse with Russian support, financial gain from Strait of Hormuz closure, "payback" for past grievances, and the imperative to "Save BRICS" and prevent sequential targeting ("Today Iran, tomorrow China, the day after Russia").
For China: Accelerated US weakening with Chinese support, protection of Iran's energy supply to China, preventing sequential targeting ("Today Iran, tomorrow China"), and protecting the confidence in BRICS and BRI partnerships.
Projected Support Levels: The author predicts that if US-Israeli actions are limited to bombing and proxy warfare, China-Russia support would be "weak to weak/moderate". However, if the US puts "boots on the ground," commitment could rise to "weak/moderate-moderate". Stronger commitment would only occur if US-Zio actions trigger a chain reaction forcing serious measures, implying a potential World War 3 scenario, which Russia and China seek to avoid.
Unified Front: The author argues that breaking the "Triad Alliance" would dissolve trust and force members to fight the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire "as a solo entity in sequential order," making a unified front preferable.
Alternative Interpretations and Criticisms within the Sources
Some commenters suggest the entire conflict is a "Kabuki theater act" or a "one-world Kabuki show" for insider trading or other hidden agendas.
One perspective suggests Israel is merely a "proxy" for US imperialism, which is the true "most genocidal state in the history of the planet".
Conversely, some argue that Russia has an "extreme aversion to acting against Jews" and would not sign a mutual defense pact with Iran due to its ties with Israel.
The "BRICS is a hoax" sentiment is also expressed, doubting its ability to replace the USD or the "globo homo order".
Some sources claim Iran was the "winner" of the recent conflict, having forced Israel's retreat and leading to a lifting of some US sanctions.
There's also a view that China and Russia will prioritize domestic stability and allow the US to weaken itself through global overreach, rather than engaging in direct conflict.
The possibility of Iran developing nuclear weapons as a deterrent is discussed.
A critical view from outside the main article suggests that China would strategically prefer a "final showdown" with the US "at its own doorstep" rather than in the Middle East.
One commenter posits that these wars are "a little fake" due to alleged Jewish finance and other ties, suggesting that countries like Russia, China, and Iran might be aligned with New World Order plans but also seek political independence.
The sources discuss the potential commitment of Russia and China to Iran in the event of a protracted conflict with the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, particularly in the context of the "Greater Israel Project" and its implications for global order. The author, Richard Solomon, reframes the "Axis of Resistance" as the "Triad Alliance" (comprising Russia, China, and Iran), emphasizing that if this alliance is broken, trust dissolves, and each member would have to confront the US-Anglo Zionist Empire individually.
Factors Influencing Russia's Commitment to Iran:
Russia's potential support for Iran ranges from "zero-weak" to "moderate-strong," influenced by various strategic considerations.
Reasons for Zero-Weak Support from Russia:
Strain in Ukraine: Russia is already heavily involved and "stretched out" in the conflict in Ukraine.
Accelerating US Collapse: An Iranian quagmire without Russian involvement could hasten the collapse or reduction of the US Anglo-Zionist Empire, thereby lessening a major existential threat to Russia.
Economic Gain from Oil: If the Strait of Hormuz is shut down, Russia, as a major energy exporter, stands to make "an incredible fortune".
Extended Breather: If US-Israeli forces defeat Iran, China would likely be the next target, providing Russia with an extended period of relief.
Favorable Ukraine Deal: Russia might secure a more favorable deal in Ukraine if it avoids involvement in Iran.
Dual-National Oligarchs: Russia has a high percentage of dual-national Zionist oligarchs, though not as many as the US.
Russian-Jewish Population in Israel: Approximately 1.3 million Russian-Jews reside in Israel, which is cited as a factor influencing Russia's neutrality. A comment notes that Putin stated around 2 million people from the former USSR and Russia live in Israel, making Israel "practically a 'Russian speaking country'". Another comment suggests Russia would not sign a mutual defense pact with Iran, given these ties and Iran's regional actions.
Reasons for Moderate-Strong Support from Russia:
Accelerating US Collapse (with involvement): An Iranian quagmire with Russian support could also hasten the collapse of the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, eliminating a major existential threat to Russia.
Economic Gain from Oil: Similar to zero-weak support, Russia could still profit significantly from increased energy prices if the Strait of Hormuz is closed, even with involvement.
Retaliation: This could be seen as "payback" for past events like Afghanistan, the post-Soviet collapse "Wall Street raiding party," and Ukraine.
Protecting BRICS: Supporting Iran would help "Save BRICS," as Iran's defeat could undermine confidence in its future prospects.
Preventing Sequential Targeting: The belief that "Today Iran, tomorrow China, the day after Russia" suggests a need for a united front.
Factors Influencing China's Commitment to Iran:
China's commitment to Iran also spans from "zero-weak" to "moderate-strong" based on its own strategic calculations.
Reasons for Zero-Weak Support from China:
Historical Non-Intervention: China has a long cultural history of not getting involved in foreign wars.
Accelerating US Weakening: An Iranian quagmire without Chinese support could greatly weaken or lead to the collapse of the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, reducing a major existential threat to China.
Protecting BRI: Avoiding direct involvement helps keep Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) supply chains and business operating without fear of Mossad or CIA sabotage.
Preventing Internal Attacks: To deter the CIA/Mossad from launching terror attacks and "color revolutions" within Chinese territory.
Assessment of Mossad Infiltration: China may have assessed the high level of Mossad infiltration in Iran, highlighted by the assassinations of Iranian political and military leadership, and concluded that it's too risky to take chances.
Trade War Concessions: The US agreeing to ease the trade war could be an incentive for China to placate the US-Anglo Zionist Empire in the short term, buying time to prepare for a future confrontation.
Reasons for Moderate-Strong Support from China:
Accelerating US Weakening (with involvement): Similar to Russia, Chinese support could also hasten the collapse or weakening of the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, eliminating a major existential threat.
Energy Supply: Iran is a significant energy supplier to China; its destruction would reduce China's energy supply, giving the US-Anglo Zionist Empire a tactical advantage.
Preventing Sequential Targeting: The concern that "Today Iran, tomorrow China" drives the need for solidarity.
Protecting BRICS and BRI: Supporting Iran is crucial to "Protect BRICS" and "Protect BRI," as Iran's downfall would negatively impact confidence in future Sino-based business partnerships and the overall confidence in BRICS.
Scenarios for Russia-China Support Levels:
Weak to Weak/Moderate Support: If the US-Israelis primarily conduct a "bombing/missile nation-state wrecking campaign" using CIA-Mossad jihadis and ethno-color revolutions.
Weak/Moderate-Moderate Support: If the US deploys "boots on the ground" in Iran.
Moderate/Strong-Strong Support: This level of commitment would only be reached if US-Zio actions trigger a chain reaction that forces China and Russia to take serious measures.
Strategic Outlook of China and Russia: From the author's observation, the primary strategy of China and Russia is to avoid direct conflict with the "Evil Empire" (US-Anglo Zionist Empire) and instead allow it to "hollow itself out through corruption and global overreach until crash day comes". The author suggests that if Iran needs to be "sacrificed to accomplish that, so be it". However, the author disagrees with this strategy if it exists, believing that disassembling the "Triad Alliance" fortification could expose vulnerable inner structures. An alternative view expressed in comments is that China and Russia would prefer to watch America weaken from domestic deterioration rather than spill their own nations' blood.
The author posits two "distillate possibilities" for modern geopolitics:
A one-world government run by a transnational cabal using wars, fake countries, genocides, poverty, and pandemics to achieve dystopian goals like the "1984 East Asia-Eurasia-Oceania model," global population culling, or other nightmares.
Independent nation-states still exist, with Russia, China, and Iran being the last strong ones, making them targets of the "international banker-controlled US Anglo-Zionist Empire".
The author sides with the second possibility, stating there is "enough evidence to keep the second door open". The author further asserts that the US-Anglo Empire cannot be reasoned with, as its post-9/11 wars, including the "Greater Israel Project," are driven by "petrodollar hegemony and the security and longevity of international techno-banker rule". If Iran is "wrecked," BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) would likely "sink," and other alternative currency systems would become less probable. The "bankers need to keep the chaos rolling until they can pressure China into passing the Chinese version of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act".
Comments by other contributors to the source also touch upon the Russia-China commitment:
One commenter suggests that if Iran had been attacked solely by America, Russia might have deployed SAMs (Surface-to-Air Missiles) quickly, but due to Israel's involvement, Russia did nothing, indicating an "extreme aversion to acting against Jews". This commenter also suggests "Multipolarity is a joke, all the supposed poles support the Jews".
Another comment indicates that Russia asked Iran for a mutual defense pact, but Iran declined, though recent events might lead to reconsideration.
A commenter argues that China is unlikely to offer more than weak material support because Iran does not want to get too close to China and wants to maintain its own dominance in the Middle East. This commenter also suggests Iran is not afraid of Israel but is wise not to get between the US and China to avoid becoming a proxy battlefield.
One comment speculates that Russia will offer "zero-weak" resistance, China "zero-weak" resistance, the US will bomb without invading, Iran's government will be overthrown, and BRICS will be discredited, with no alternative to the US dollar or a multi-polar order.
Some comments suggest that these wars are "a little fake" due to alleged Jewish finance and other ties in Russia, Iran, and China, implying a shared alignment with New World Order plans but a desire for political independence.
A comment argues that China is better off fighting the US "at its own doorstep" and will pick the time and place for a "final showdown," while advocating against China fighting the US in the Middle East. However, this commenter also states that talk of future military confrontation with China might be a "smokescreen or nonsense" and that China might become more openly involved in supporting Iran.
The sources extensively discuss US-Israeli attacks, presenting them as part of a larger geopolitical strategy, particularly the "Greater Israel Project". The author, Richard Solomon, analyzes these actions from a "realpolitik" perspective, also noting that such events might be part of a "kabuki theater" or "market manipulation" scheme.
Here's a breakdown of the US-Israeli attacks as discussed in the sources:
Nature and Scope of Attacks and Related Actions:
Condemnation by China and Russia: Joint statements from China and Russia have condemned what are referred to as "US-Israeli attacks on Iran".
Gaza Genocide: Following a Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which the Israelis allegedly had foreknowledge of, the Zionists initiated the "Gaza genocide".
Assassinations and Sabotage:
On May 19, 2024, the sources suggest that Israelis, with US assistance, "took out Iranian President Raisi and his inner circle in a helicopter sabotage crash," leading to a more "Western-friendly" replacement.
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated by Mossad in Tehran on July 31, 2024.
Mossad launched an "exploding pager attack" on September 17, 2024, causing severe damage to Hezbollah’s officer corps.
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and his inner circle were assassinated by Mossad on September 27, 2024.
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and his inner circle were killed by Mossad/IDF on October 16, 2024.
Syria Conquest: On December 8, 2024, "US-Zio forces" conquered Syria, leading to President Assad's flight to Russia. He was replaced by President al-Sharaa Alsah, whom the author believes with "reasonable degree of certitude" is a Jewish-Israeli Mossad agent.
Bombing Campaigns in Iran:
On June 13, 2025, Israelis bombed Iran, targeting air defense systems, political and military leaders, and scientists. This suggests a significant "Mossad infiltration problem" in Iran, according to the author.
On June 22, 2025, President Trump "ordered" the bombing of Iran’s nuclear enrichment facility.
False Flag Concerns: There's a concern that Mossad might launch a "blame Iran" false flag operation on American soil to instigate full-scale US involvement, although it is also suggested that the US public might be too "checked out, dumbed down, or caught up in the struggle to pay the bills" for such an operation to be necessary. One source claims Iran uncovered and prevented an Israeli plot to detonate explosives on US soil and blame Iran.
Ceasefire and Market Manipulation: After Iranian missiles hit a US military base in Qatar, President Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israeli forces on June 23, 2025. This action, along with Trump's "pendulum swing" policy statements, is questioned as potentially being part of a "MIC-Wall Street-Tel Aviv insider trading scheme" or "theater of the insane-or insanely greedy," where "global finance turned chaos into a profitable well-oiled machine".
Underlying Motivations and Strategies:
"Greater Israel Project": The "flurry of activity" preceding these attacks suggests that the "Project Greater Israel" is moving "at gas pedal to the floor speed," indicating the Israelis are serious. The goal is to achieve "Regime change in Teheran" and create "Greater Israel". Some argue that the ultimate goal is "Pax Judaica or World Domination" and that World Wars were started to legitimize the creation of Israel.
US Hegemony and Petrodollar: The conflicts are seen as being "bigger than the 'Greater Israel Project'," fundamentally tied to "petrodollar hegemony and the security and longevity of international techno-banker rule". The chaos generated is seen as necessary to maintain the "petrodollar Ponzi scheme". If Iran is "wrecked," BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) would "sink," and alternative currency systems would become less likely, benefiting the bankers.
Proxy Warfare and Destabilization: The US and Israeli forces are seen as employing a strategy derived from the "Libya-Syria-Gaza playbook," focusing on saturation bombing and missile attacks to destroy infrastructure necessary for a functioning society (schools, hospitals, energy grids, etc.). The aim is not necessarily occupation but to turn Iran into a "failed and wrecked nation-state". This also involves using "proxy armies," such as "CIA-Mossad rent-a-jihadis," and fomenting rebellion in Iran's minority regions (Azerbaijani Turkish, Kurdish) to "break up Iran along ethnic lines, similar to Iraq and the former Yugoslavia".
Israeli Dependence on US: The sources suggest that Israel "can’t defeat Iran without the US" and would appear "crazy and pathetic if the US left them hanging". However, there is a belief that Mossad has most major US politicians "blackmailed and bribed," ensuring US support. The corporate media's reporting, lacking "Ayatollah=Hitler" propaganda, suggests some disunity within the US "oligarchy, Deep State, and Pentagon" regarding full US commitment to Iran, with some factions preferring to save "stamina for a China confrontation" or fearing "loss of interest in Ukraine".
Israel as a US Proxy: Conversely, several commentators argue that Israel is not the primary driver but rather a "proxy" created and used by the US-UK empire to maintain its hegemony and expand its influence, especially towards its "main enemy, China". Some argue that "US imperialism" is "the one in the driving seat". Others suggest that while Jewish interests are predominant in Middle East foreign policy, "America behaves like a regular great power" in other regions.
Post-Conflict Actions: It is suggested that Israel paused the war to "reverse-engineer Iranian missiles" that were fired during the conflict.
Consequences and Reactions:
High Stakes: The conflict's stakes are described as high, impacting not just Iran and the "Axis of Resistance" (now called the "Triad Alliance" by the author) but also the future of BRICS, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the multi-polar order, and the security of Russia and China.
Iran's Retaliatory Capabilities: Iran possesses the capability to launch massive missile strikes on US military installations in the Middle East, attack US and Western shipping via the Houthis, and shut down the Strait of Hormuz, which could cripple the global energy supply and initiate a severe economic catastrophe. Iranian missile attacks could also "light up Israeli cities and ports" and target US naval vessels. Iran successfully imposed "heavy destruction" on Israel's spying and military centers and its economy, showcasing that its advanced missiles were effective against Israel's "Iron Dome" defense system.
Drain on Empire: An "extended Iranian quagmire" would "drain the American-Zio empire," potentially making the "graveyard of empires" saying come true.
Russia-China Commitment: While China and Russia have condemned US-Israeli attacks, their commitment to Iran in a protracted conflict is debated.
Weak Support: Reasons for weak support include Russia being stretched in Ukraine, a non-involved quagmire hastening US collapse, Russia profiting from higher energy prices if the Strait of Hormuz closes, and Russia gaining a breather if China is the next target. For China, reasons include a history of non-involvement in foreign wars, the desire for the US empire to weaken without Chinese involvement, protecting BRI from sabotage, avoiding terror attacks in China, and high Mossad infiltration in Iran.
Moderate-Strong Support: Reasons for stronger support include hastening US empire collapse, Iran supplying significant energy to China (a disruption would harm China), the fear that Iran's fall would make China the next target, and the need to protect the credibility of BRICS and BRI partnerships.
Predicted Manifestation: The author predicts that if the US-Israelis limit actions to bombing and proxy warfare, China-Russia support would be "weak to weak/moderate". If US boots are on the ground, commitment might rise to "weak/moderate-moderate". Stronger commitment would require a chain reaction forcing serious measures, but the primary strategy observed is to avoid direct conflict and let the US empire "hollow itself out".
Disunity and Alliance: The sources emphasize the importance of the "Triad Alliance" (Russia, China, Iran), stating that if it's broken, trust dissolves, and members would face the US Anglo-Zionist Empire individually. Some argue that Russia and China "cannot stand idly by and let their Iranian ally be carved up" and should take serious action, such as sinking US carriers. However, some commenters express skepticism about Russia's willingness to act against Israel due to "deep ties with both nations," including a large Russian diaspora in Israel.
The "Greater Israel Project" is presented in the sources as a significant geopolitical initiative, seemingly moving forward at an accelerated pace, driving conflicts in the Middle East. The author, Richard Solomon, analyzes the potential commitment of Russia and China to Iran within the context of this project and its broader implications for global order.
Key Aspects of the "Greater Israel Project" as described in the sources:
Definition and Scope: The sources do not explicitly define "Greater Israel Project" but describe it through a series of aggressive Israeli and US actions. It appears to encompass more than just Israel's survival, extending to a broader regional reordering. The phrase "Greater Israel" is directly linked to the idea of a territorially expanded or dominant Israel.
Driving Force Behind Conflicts: The Iranian phase of the "Greater Israel Project" is seen as a high-stakes conflict, impacting not only the "Axis of Resistance" and Iran's nation-state survival but also the future of BRICS, BRI (Belt and Road Initiative), the multi-polar order, and the security of Russia and China. It's also tied to the petrodollar hegemony and the very existence of the US Anglo-Zionist Empire. Some commentators suggest it's a tool for "international banker-controlled US Anglo-Zionist Empire" to maintain power.
Recent Actions Attributed to the Project: A series of events are cited as evidence that "Project Greater Israel" is "moving ahead at gas pedal to the floor speed," indicating seriousness on the part of the Israelis. These include:
Gaza Genocide (Oct 7, 2023): Initiated after a Hamas attack that Israelis allegedly had foreknowledge of.
Assassination of Iranian President Raisi (May 19, 2024): Believed to be carried out by Israelis with US help, replacing him with a "more Western-friendly President and cabinet".
Assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh (July 31, 2024): Allegedly by Mossad in Tehran.
Hezbollah Attacks (Sept 17, 2024): Mossad's "exploding pager attack" severely damaging Hezbollah's officer corps.
Assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah (Sept 27, 2024): By Mossad.
Killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar (Oct 16, 2024): By Mossad/IDF.
Conquest of Syria (Dec 8, 2024): US-Zio forces conquer Syria, leading to President Assad fleeing to Russia and being replaced by a suspected Jewish-Israeli Mossad agent, President al-Sharaa Alsah.
Bombing of Iran (June 13, 2025): Israelis bomb Iranian air defense systems, political and military leaders, and scientists, suggesting a "Mossad infiltration problem" in Iran.
Bombing of Iran's nuclear enrichment facility (June 22, 2025): Ordered by President Trump.
US Involvement and Control: The project is characterized as a joint US-Anglo Zionist effort. It's strongly implied that Mossad has significant influence over US politicians through blackmail and bribery, suggesting that "any Zionist war would receive a quick US rubber stamp". The "US 'Israel-First' Iranhawks" faction appears to be steering the ship. The US is viewed as an "evil empire" and the "most genocidal state in the history of the planet," with Israel serving as a "proxy injected in Palestine as foothold" for US imperialism.
Proposed Strategy Against Iran: If a full US-Zio vs. Iran war occurs, it's anticipated to be a "Libya-Syria-Gaza playbook" strategy:
Chaos through saturation bombing and missile attacks: Destroying infrastructure like schools, hospitals, energy grids, water/waste treatment, food production, supply chains, and factories. Weapon systems, uranium enrichment sites, and military organs would also be targeted.
Limited US casualties: A bombing/missile/drone-focused campaign aims to mitigate negative US public opinion by limiting American body bags.
Proxy armies and ethnic breakup: Importing "CIA-Mossad rent-a-jihadis" and fomenting rebellion in Iran's minority regions (Azerbaijani Turkish, Kurdish) to break up Iran along ethnic lines, similar to Iraq and former Yugoslavia. Türkiye is expected to assist, hoping for territorial gains, despite a later potential betrayal by the US-Zio Empire using Kurds to break up Türkiye.
Goal: Failed Nation-State: The objective is not necessarily to occupy Iran, but to turn it into a "failed and wrecked nation-state".
Resistance and Counter-Actions: Iran could retaliate by:
Launching massive missile strikes on Middle East-located US military installations from Iraq.
The Houthis attacking US and Western commercial and naval shipping.
Shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, crippling global energy supply and causing a severe economic catastrophe.
Launching missile attacks on Israeli cities and ports, and blowing up US naval vessels and military outposts.
An extended "Iranian quagmire" could "drain the American-Zio empire," potentially making it a "graveyard of empires".
Strategic Disunity and Deception: Some elements within the US oligarchy, Deep State, and Pentagon may have differing opinions on focusing resources on Iran vs. China or Russia. The corporate media's lack of strong "Ayatollah=Hitler" propaganda is seen as an indicator of this disunity. The possibility of "Wall Street/Tel Aviv insider trading scam" or "theatrical chaos distraction" is raised, where chaos is a "profitable well-oiled machine". Trump's "pendulum swings" and "flip-flopping" on Iran policy are seen as "theater of the insane- or insanely greedy," potentially stemming from oligarch/Deep State disunity or a strategy of "controlled chaos" for financial gain.
"Triad Alliance" as Counterbalance: The author renames the "Axis of Resistance" to the "Triad Alliance" (Russia, China, Iran) to avoid negative connotations and emphasize the need for a unified front. The breaking of this alliance is seen as disastrous, as it would lead to trust dissolution and each member fighting the US Anglo-Zionist Empire individually and sequentially. A unified front is deemed "Better to stand as a unified front. Once the alliance goes, it’s not coming back".
Overall, the "Greater Israel Project" as discussed in the sources is framed as a persistent and aggressive imperialistic endeavor, largely driven by US-Israeli interests, aiming to destabilize and control the Middle East, with Iran as a primary target, and potentially leading to a broader confrontation with Russia and China.
The "Triad Alliance" is a term coined by the author, Richard Solomon, to reframe what was previously known as the "Axis of Resistance". This alliance is described as comprising Russia, China, and Iran.
Solomon explicitly states his dislike for the term "Axis of Resistance," primarily because the "Axis" lost World War II and is generally perceived as the "bad guy coalition" in popular culture, although he notes this view might be shifting post-Gaza genocide. He suspects the name "Axis of Resistance" might even have originated from a "Mossad marketing firm". Thus, to avoid planting a "losing mental seed from the get-go," he proposes the new term "Triad Alliance".
Strategic Importance of the Triad Alliance:
According to the sources, the Triad Alliance is critical for its members in the face of the "US Anglo-Zionist Empire".
The author argues that the US-Anglo Empire "can't be reasoned with" as the post-9/11 conflicts, including the "Greater Israel Project," are tied to petrodollar hegemony and the longevity of "international techno-banker rule".
If Iran is defeated, it is believed that BRICS would "sink" and the emergence of other alternative currency systems would become less likely, serving the bankers' goal of maintaining chaos until China can be pressured into passing a "Chinese version of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act".
The author emphasizes the necessity for these nations to "stand as a unified front".
Consequences of a Broken Triad Alliance:
A central tenet of Solomon's analysis is that if the "Triad Alliance" is broken, trust between the remaining partners would dissolve, leading to each member having to "fight the US Anglo-Zionist Empire as a solo entity in sequential order". The author stresses that "Once the alliance goes, it’s not coming back". This division would then place a heavy reliance on the US-Zio Empire "bleeding out in Iran," which is possible but "not guaranteed". Disassembling this "Triad Alliance fortification" could expose "vulnerable inner structures to fierce elements".
Reactions to the Term:
While the author proposes "Triad Alliance," some commenters in the sources offered alternative views:
One commenter, katzenellenbogen, doubts the term "Triad Alliance" is a good substitute because "Triad" is "associated with Asian/Chinese criminal gangs," making the association "unwelcome" given China is one of the three members. This commenter suggests "Trinity" as a possibility, noting Russia's cultural conservatism and production of "holy icons with the theme 'Trinity'".
Another commenter, Avery, also states that "Triad" is a "bad name" due to its association with "Asian/Chinese criminal gangs" and suggests the need for a "positive connotation".
Here are 60 key takeaway points from the sources, presented in a jotform manner:
The potential escalation of the US-Israeli conflict with Iran carries significant global implications.
If the US goes beyond a foot dip and cannonball dives into the Iranian pool, the stakes of this conflict will be high, going beyond the survival of the so-called “Axis of Resistance” and Iran’s survival as a nation-state.
Also at stake would be the future of BRICS, BRI, the multi-polar order, and the security and stability of Russia and China.
The current conflict dynamics might be a deliberate financial manipulation.
Global finance turned chaos into a profitable well-oiled machine, so what often looks like chaotic insanity is really market manipulation.
This could all be a Wall Street/Tel Aviv insider trading scam with foreknowledge of the spikes and dips and the added plus of damaging Iran.
Recent Israeli actions strongly suggest the advancement of a "Greater Israel Project."
Following a Hamas attack the Israelis had foreknowledge of, the Zionists started the Gaza genocide.
Based on the aforementioned flurry of activity and the short period in which it occurred, “Project Greater Israel” appears to be moving ahead at gas pedal to the floor speed.
Israel is suspected of assassinating Iranian President Raisi and his inner circle.
I believe with a reasonable degree of certitude that the Israelis (with US help) took out Iranian President Raisi and his inner circle in a helicopter sabotage crash.
President Raisi was replaced with a much more Western-friendly President and cabinet.
Key leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah were assassinated by Mossad.
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh is assassinated by Mossad in Tehran.
Mossad assassinates Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and his inner circle.
The current Syrian President is believed to be a Jewish-Israeli Mossad agent.
US-Zio forces conquer Syria, and President Assad flees to Russia.
Similar to Eli Cohen, the Mossad agent who penetrated deep into the Syrian government in the 1960s, I believe with a reasonable degree of certitude that the current Syrian President is a Jewish-Israeli Mossad agent.
Iran faces a significant challenge with Mossad infiltration.
The Israelis bomb Iran, taking out air defense systems, political and military leaders, and scientists.
I think it’s fair to say that Iran has a Mossad infiltration problem.
Israel's ability to defeat Iran is dependent on direct US military involvement.
However, even with all that prep work, the Israelis can’t defeat Iran without the US.
Would the Israelis undertake such a high-stakes move sans a solid guarantee of American entry into the fray?.
A nuclear strike by Israel on Iran would generate severe global anti-Zionist backlash.
However, an Israeli nuclear attack, even a limited one, would unleash incredible anti-Zionist global blowback.
Then again, the world watched the live steam Gaza genocide and did nothing, I’m not sure the PR repercussions would be unsurvivable.
Mossad is alleged to have extensive influence over US politicians through blackmail and bribery.
With maybe 2 or 3 exceptions, Mossad has every major politician in the United States blackmailed and bribed, so one would assume that any Zionist war would receive a quick US rubber stamp.
And while bribery is quicker, easier and less messy, even those who are not susceptible to blackmail are easy to threaten.
There is internal disagreement within the US oligarchy, Deep State, and Pentagon regarding war with Iran.
While the Trump/ultra-Zionist faction is super hot for Iran, other sectors likely want to save the stamina for a China confrontation, while those who see Russia as the big prize, fear a loss of interest in Ukraine.
To support the “ruling class difference of opinion” theory, notice how the corporate media is reporting on Iran.
The lack of "Ayatollah=Hitler" propaganda in mainstream media suggests disunity on Iran policy.
Before invading a country, the US government primes the public with a steady diet of X=Hitler, X being the leader of the target country.
I haven’t heard a lot of Ayatollah=Hitler propaganda from the mainstream media.
A Mossad-orchestrated "blame Iran" false flag on US soil would be a strong indicator of full US entry into war.
If Mossad launched a “blame Iran” false flag on American soil, it would be a good indicator that the US is going all the way into Iran.
However, the Zionists-neocons may feel that the US public is so checked out, dumbed down, or caught up in the struggle to pay the bills, that false flags are no longer needed to generate mass support for Zionist military adventures.
US "Israel-First" Iranhawks appear to be currently dictating US policy.
Based on recent events, the US “Israel-First” Iranhawks appear to be steering the ship.
This is perhaps with a conciliatory salve for the US “war with China” faction, believing a destroyed Iran hurts China’s energy supply and provides a future invasion launch point.
President Trump's public statements and actions regarding the conflict are often seen as inconsistent or theatrical.
After some Iranian missiles hit a US military base in Qatar, President Trump announced on June 23, 2025, a ceasefire between Iran and Israeli forces.
What Trump says is meaningless.
The current global "insanity" and chaos are linked to the continuation of the petrodollar Ponzi scheme.
The current state of insanity works because the petrodollar Ponzi scheme can only continue through chaos.
If controlled chaos is the game, then every lunatic act makes sense.
A US-Israeli war with Iran is anticipated to primarily involve bombing and missile attacks, rather than a large ground invasion.
I doubt there’d be a huge Iraq-style ground invasion.
Rather, US-Israeli forces would take their strategy from the Libya-Syria-Gaza playbook, i.e., produce chaos through saturation bombing and missile attacks that destroy the infrastructure necessary for a functioning society.
The US would likely employ proxy armies and ethnic divisions to destabilize and break up Iran.
The US would also employ proxy armies.
In the case of Iran, that means importing CIA-Mossad rent-a-jihadis and fomenting rebellion in Iran’s Azerbaijani Turkish, Kurdish, and other minority regions.
Türkiye is expected to align with US-Israeli forces against Iran due to potential territorial gains and NATO membership.
Because Turks make up Iran’s largest minority, Türkiye would assist Israeli-US forces against Iran, as Türkiye stands to gain territory and a friendly population.
Türkiye is also a NATO member, and until that changes, it will always side with the Israelis and Americans in the final round, as it did in Syria.
The US strategy in Iran aims to create a failed state, not an occupation.
The US doesn’t need to occupy Iran.
It just needs to turn it into a failed and wrecked nation-state.
Iran possesses the capability to launch significant retaliatory strikes against US and Israeli targets.
Iraq is a Shiite majority “nation.” It could launch massive missile strikes on Middle East-located US military installations.
Iranian missile attacks could light up Israeli cities and ports.
Iran could severely disrupt the global energy supply by closing the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran could shut down the Strait of Hormuz, crippling the global energy supply, which could initiate a severe economic catastrophe.
If the Strait of Hormuz shuts down, as a major energy exporter, Russia stands to make an incredible fortune.
A prolonged conflict in Iran could weaken the American-Zionist empire.
An extended Iranian quagmire would drain the American-Zio empire, possibly making that “graveyard of empires” saying come true.
An Iranian quagmire with Russian support hastens the collapse of the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, eliminating a major existential threat to Russia.
Any attacks on US mainland soil are unlikely to originate from Iran and would more probably be false flags by Mossad-Deep State.
I don’t think Iran would launch an attack against the US mainland.
If any US soil attacks took place, they’d likely originate from the Mossad-Deep State.
Russia's potential "zero-weak" support for Iran is influenced by its Ukraine commitments and potential economic benefits from a Strait of Hormuz shutdown.
Russia is already stretched out in Ukraine.
If the Strait of Hormuz shuts down, as a major energy exporter, Russia stands to make an incredible fortune.
Russia's policy towards the conflict is complicated by the presence of dual-national Zionist oligarchs and a large Russian-Jewish population in Israel.
While not as bad as the US, Russia has a high percentage of dual-national Zionist oligarchs.
1.3 million Russian-Jews reside within the “Zionist entity”.
Russia might offer stronger support to Iran to accelerate the US-Anglo Zionist Empire's collapse or as retribution for past events.
An Iranian quagmire with Russian support hastens the collapse of the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, eliminating a major existential threat to Russia.
Payback for Afghanistan, the post-Soviet collapse Wall Street raiding party, and Ukraine.
China's traditional non-interventionist foreign policy influences its likelihood of offering only "zero-weak" support to Iran.
China has a long cultural history of not getting involved in foreign wars.
An Iranian quagmire without Chinese support hastens the collapse of or greatly weakens the US-Anglo Zionist Empire, eliminating or reducing a major existential threat.
China's "zero-weak" support for Iran could be a strategy to safeguard BRI supply chains and prevent CIA/Mossad interference within its own territory.
To keep BRI supply chains and business going without fear of Mossad or CIA sabotage.
To keep the CIA/Mossad from launching terror attacks and color revolutions within Chinese territory.
China's assessment of high Mossad infiltration in Iran might deter strong support.
China assessed the recent Iran-India port deal, which also alienated Pakistan, a Chinese ally, as well as the ease in which Mossad assassinated Iran’s political and military leadership, and concluded the level of Mossad infiltration in Iran was too high to take chances.
China might temporarily appease the US-Anglo Zionist Empire to gain time for future confrontations.
US agrees to ease up on trade war.
To placate the US-Anglo Zionist Empire for the short term to buy time to prepare for a future US confrontation.
China's motivation for "moderate-strong" support to Iran stems from energy supply security and protecting key international initiatives.
Iran supplies China with a lot of energy.
Protect BRICS.
The alliance between Russia, China, and Iran, termed the "Triad Alliance," is presented as critical for opposing the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire.
Remember the “Axis of Resistance?” We need to factor in Russia and China.
I’m henceforth calling it the “Triad Alliance”.
The ongoing conflicts led by the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire are fundamentally about maintaining petrodollar hegemony and international banker control.
The US-Anglo Empire can’t be reasoned with, because these post-9/11 wars are bigger than the “Greater Israel Project”.
It comes down to petrodollar hegemony and the security and longevity of international techno-banker rule.
The destruction of Iran would significantly undermine BRICS and the development of alternative currency systems.
If Iran is wrecked, BRICS sinks and other alternative currency systems become less likely.
Protect BRICS.
A fractured "Triad Alliance" would force its members to face the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire individually, weakening their collective stand.
If the “Triad Alliance” is broken, trust between the remaining partners dissolves, and then each member must fight the US Anglo-Zionist Empire as a solo entity in sequential order.
Better to stand as a unified front.
Modern geopolitics is simplified into two fundamental possibilities: a one-world government or independent nation-states under attack.
A one-world government run by a small super-rich transnational cabal already exists, and it’s playing kabuki theater using wars, fake countries, genocides, poverty, and pandemics to a) build George Orwell’s 1984 East Asia-Eurasia-Oceania model, b) incrementally cull the global population, or c) create some other dystopian nightmare.
Independent nation-states still exist, with Russia, China, and Iran being the last strong ones, and thus are on the hit list of the international banker-controlled US Anglo-Zionist Empire.
The author personally leans towards the theory of independent nation-states being targeted by the US-Anglo-Zionist Empire.
I’m going with door number 2.
I concede door number one is possible, but I see enough evidence to keep the second door open.
China and Russia's primary strategy appears to be avoiding direct conflict and allowing the US Empire to decay from within.
From my observation, their primary strategy is to avoid direct conflict with the Evil Empire, and let the empire hollow itself out through corruption and global overreach until crash day comes.
If Iran needs to be sacrificed to accomplish that, so be it.
The term "Axis of Resistance" is criticized for its negative historical associations and potential strategic disadvantage.
I never liked the name “Axis of Resistance” because the Axis lost WW2, and in popular culture, the Axis is perceived as the bad guy coalition, although that view might be shifting somewhat post-Gaza genocide.
In any case, why plant a losing mental seed from the get-go?.
The "Axis of Resistance" name is speculated to be a product of Mossad marketing.
I suspect the “Axis of Resistance” name originated from a Mossad marketing firm.
The alternative name "Triad Alliance" is also deemed problematic due to its association with criminal organizations.
I doubt that the term “Triad Alliance” might be a good ersatz for “Axis of Resistance”, especially when China is one of the three, and many critics of that nation consider the CCP as the world’s biggest gangster syndicate.
So the association with the word “triad” seems unwelcome….
The recent conflict events are perceived by some as "Kabuki theater" with underlying insider trading motives.
It was a Kabuki theater act between the three in order to feign some big action and save faces, possibly with some insider trading intentions added in.
Which is the ultimate confirmation that it was just a Kabuki theater act.
The Israel/Iran conflict is viewed as an ongoing "game" with a goal of creating "Greater Israel."
Yes, this episode may be over but the game is not.
Israel did not decimated Hames, Hezbollah and Assad just for fun. They did it because these are proxies of Iran. They see the current situation literally as a once in a lifetime opportunity to create Greater Israel.
The Israeli operation "Rising Lion" is interpreted as signifying a desire to replace Iran's current leadership with a monarch.
It is not a coincidence that Israel named its operation “Rising Lion”.
The lion is the symbol of the Iranian Sha who they wish the current Ayatollah should be replaced with.
Some believe Trump strategically manipulated Netanyahu's desire for US involvement in Iran.
I think Trump played Satanyahoo, since Satanyahoo’s goal was to get the US to fight Iran for it.
Still, soon Israel is going down.
Both Israel and Iran are likely using the ceasefire period to resupply their forces.
Both Israel & Iran are surely using the truce for resupply.
Now talk is that nuclear ballistic missile development time is 3 years.
There is speculation that Iran could acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan or North Korea.
Or the Iranians may be receiving off the rack nukes from Pakistan or North Korea.
Nukes Ready to Launch (NRLs).
The Trump administration reportedly lifted sanctions allowing Iran to ship oil to China, leading to Iran being seen as the "winner" of the conflict.
In a CNBC interview, Trump’s personal envoy Steve Witkoff confirmed that the Trump administration lifted some of the sanctions on Iran on June 24, 2025, enabling the Iranian regime to ship oil to China.
With concessions to Iran now confirmed and it clear Israel failed in its stated objectives, it seems Iran is unambiguously the winner of the conflict.
Trump's claims of destroying Iran's nuclear facilities are equated to George W. Bush's "mission accomplished" speech, suggesting disbelief.
Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear facilities were destroyed reminded me of the ‘mission accomplished’ speech by George W Bush after the invasion of Iraq.
Not many believed Bush back then, and not many believe Trump today.
Russia's neutral stance in the Iran-Israel conflict is attributed to its deep ties with both nations, including a large Russian-speaking population in Israel.
Russia’s neutrality in the Iran-Israel conflict is shaped by deep ties with both nations, citing Israel’s large Russian diaspora and Muslim population at home.
Do you really think Russia would sign a ‘mutual defense pact’ with Iran, a country that stirs up tension in the region by e.g. supporting Hezbollah, and wants to see the destruction of Israel? — a treaty that would in some way either obligate Russia to engage in hostilities on behalf of Iran, likely against Israel, maybe also the US, or provide military aid to Iran during such a conflict?.
The recent conflict has led to questions about the long-term viability of Zionism.
The big question is whether Zionism is still viable.
Israel got an unprecedented shellacking from Iran, pride going before a fall and all that.
Mossad is described as a criminal and terrorist organization that employs varied and layered methods for espionage and covert operations.
Mossad, the Israeli intelligence is truly a criminal and terrorist organization, is known for using various and multi-layered methods to gather information and advance its goals.
One of these tactics is to drain information through espionage, infiltration of societies, and the use of psychological operations.
Mossad utilizes specialized units like "Kidun" for sensitive missions, deploying advanced technology.
Special units such as “Kidun” are used to carry out sensitive missions and utilize advanced tools, including drones and modern weapons, in this regard.
Iranian security agencies have demonstrated success in disrupting Mossad's espionage and sabotage networks.
However, Iranian security agencies, including the Ministry of Intelligence and the IRGC Intelligence Organization, have repeatedly thwarted Mossad’s espionage and sabotage networks by closely monitoring its activities.
The arrest of infiltrators and the discovery of smuggled equipment indicate Iran’s successful efforts to counter these threats.
Mossad's offer of "TELEMEDICINE" assistance to injured Iranians during a ceasefire is viewed as a manipulative and deceptive tactic.
The statement by terrorist organization Mossad states: “Dear people of Iran A ceasefire has been implemented. We are with you and have formed a team of specialist doctors, including specialists in cardiology, diabetes, pulmonary diseases, infectious diseases, oncology, as well as support for pregnant women and psychological support.”.
Now, this rotten rat wants to help the Iranian people with their injuries where he injected on them.
The United States is considered the primary imperialist power, using Israel as a proxy to achieve its expansionist goals.
The one in the driving seat is US imperialism, genocidal, terrorist, using assassination to remove whoever is an obstacle against their expansionist plan in the West Asia to reach their main enemy, China.
Israel is useful for the evil US empire to keep his hegemony, when Israel’s usefulness is over, then it can be discarded like a rotten rat.
The ultimate objective of the US-Israeli conflict with Iran is seen as the partition of Iran through "regime change."
This is exactly their plan to create CHAOS to activate, the ethnic divide, the Kurd and Azari, to break up Iran to control the region and its resources.
Their end game is partition of Iran as Prof. John Mearsheimer and others have said.
The "Iron Dome" air defense system, despite its perceived success, created a "false sense of calm" and is financially unsustainable against repeated attacks.
The advanced defense systems created a false sense of calm and prevented a sense of urgency in addressing the root of the problem.
The cost of Israel’s defense on the night of the drone attack is estimated at between 2 billion and 5 billion shekels.
China's strategic preference is to confront the US on its own territory, rather than engage in conflicts in the Middle East.
China is much better off to fight the US at its own doorstep. It will win such a contest without doubt.
However, fighting the US in the middle east, 5,300 or 7,200 kilometers away (the distance between Beijing and Tehran/Tel Aviv), where the US has numerous military bases and local lackeys while China has none, is a losing proposition.
This "Coffee & Covid 2025" newsletter primarily discusses a significant shift in U.S. vaccine policy, emphasizing that Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s newly reconstituted ACIP vaccine committee is undertaking a comprehensive review of the entire childhood vaccine schedule, examining not only individual shots but also their cumulative effects. A major related development highlighted is the U.S. decision to cease funding Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, a move framed as part of a larger strategy to dismantle globalist influence and "drain the swamp" by cutting financial support to organizations perceived as lacking transparency and accountability. The author presents these actions as a deliberate "plan" to challenge established power structures, suggesting a new, more aggressive phase in political and public health reform.
Based on the sources, significant vaccine policy changes are underway, largely spearheaded by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his administration, marking a shift in approach to public health and global vaccine initiatives.
Here are the key vaccine policy changes and related developments:
Reconstitution of the ACIP Vaccine Committee: Within the last two weeks, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) vaccine committee has been "flushed and reconstituted" in what is described as a "surprise coup". This newly formed committee met publicly for the first time on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in what the New York Times health columnist Apoorva Mandavilla called a "remarkable and fraught moment in public health".
New Leadership and Openness to Criticism:
Martin Kulldorff, a former professor of medicine at Harvard University, has been appointed as the new chair of the ACIP committee. Kulldorff immediately invited people to share "any and all criticisms of vaccines". He also criticized the media for using "anti-vaxxer" labels for the new panelists, noting he was fired from Harvard for refusing a COVID-19 shot due to natural immunity.
Dr. Robert Malone serves as the vaccine-injured co-chair of the panel and stated he considers the "anti-vaxxer" label to be "high praise". Dr. Malone has proven his value by engaging agency heads with "unanswerable queries," speaking in deep scientific terms, and citing research on topics like spike protein persistence, adverse-event clusters, and lot-to-lot variability.
Review of the Entire Childhood Vaccine Schedule: Dr. Kulldorff announced that the panel will soon review the "entire childhood vaccine schedule," encompassing all 72 shots. This review will not only assess individual vaccines but also their "combined effects" and "cumulative effect". This move has been met with significant concern from figures like Dr. Richard Besser, former CDC acting director, who expressed worry that the new chair immediately sought to "cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines".
Boycotts and Resistance: The American Academy of Pediatrics pre-emptively boycotted the ACIP meeting, their first absence in decades, stating they would not "lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children’s health". Other organizations, such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "whined about their new inability to unmute their microphones without being called on".
Future Votes: The ACIP meeting was set to continue, with a public agenda disclosing plans to vote on thimerosal in flu vaccines in the following week.
Halting U.S. Funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance: The United States will stop funding Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, as announced by RFK Jr.. The U.S. previously contributed 12% of Gavi's total funding, amounting to billions over the years. Kennedy explained that the U.S. will not contribute more "Until Gavi considers the best science available". He accused Gavi of brushing off safety concerns and treating vaccine safety issues as a "public relations problem" rather than a "patient health problem," citing a study linking the DTP shot to increased childhood mortality.
This decision has triggered a "media meltdown," with the Washington Post framing it as a "moral catastrophe" and quoting public health figures, including Atul Gawande and Bill Gates, who lament "devastating consequences" and warn of "more sick kids" and "overcrowded hospitals". The sources describe Gavi as a global "public-private partnership" NGO involving Bill Gates and the World Health Organization, funneling billions through an international bureaucracy with "zero voter oversight" and "cozy ties to vaccine makers".
Broader Context of "Draining the Swamp": These actions are presented as part of a larger strategy to "drain the swamp" and methodically dismantle the "whole damnable machinery" of "elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and leftwing ideological graft". The withdrawal of Gavi funding is seen as a strategic move that "sliced straight into the wiring of the deep state’s influence grid," impacting the "Democrats’ NGO scaffolding" and potentially disrupting "global progressive power". This is viewed not as chaos or payback, but as a "strategic, rapid-fire offensive... aimed at dismantling the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control". The overall sentiment is that a "war has begun" for a "more health-focused day in Washington".
The United States has announced it will stop funding the global vaccine alliance, Gavi, a decision made by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.. Kennedy stated that the U.S. will not contribute more "Until Gavi considers the best science available".
Here's a breakdown of the Gavi funding cut and related information from the sources:
What is Gavi?
Gavi, full name Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, is described as a "shadowy-sounding, feel-good global 'public-private partnership' NGO".
It typically involves Bill Gates, the World Health Organization (WHO), and substantial taxpayer money.
Founded in 2000, Gavi's stated purpose is to save the world by buying vaccines in bulk and shipping them primarily to children in poor countries.
It functions as a middleman: donors (like the U.S., U.K., and Gates) provide money, pharmaceutical companies supply vaccines, and Gavi ensures delivery, regardless of local desire.
While Gavi claims to be about access and equity, the source suggests it is actually about funneling billions through an international bureaucracy with "zero voter oversight, ironclad PR, and very cozy ties to vaccine makers". It is likened to "the UN met Big Pharma in a dark Davos bathhouse".
U.S. Funding and its Withdrawal
Prior to this decision, the U.S. contributed 12% of Gavi’s total funding, amounting to billions over the years.
The source states there has been "almost nothing to show for it in terms of transparency, safety audits, or public debate".
Kennedy described the U.S. contribution as an "$8 billion 'investment'".
Reasons for the Funding Cut
Kennedy praised Gavi for its efforts to help poor populations.
However, he accused Gavi of "brushing off safety concerns".
His most pointed criticism was, "When vaccine safety issues have come before Gavi, Gavi has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem".
He specifically cited a "gold-standard study linking the DTP shot to increased childhood mortality" that Gavi allegedly ignored.
The source notes that the Washington Post's report on the controversy cited no evidence that Gavi spends money on mitigating vaccine injuries, tracking them, or on adverse event compensation or injury rates.
Reactions to the Funding Cut
The Washington Post framed the funding cut as a "moral catastrophe," quoting "aghast public health mandarins" who declared that "children will die" and "RFK Jr. will be personally responsible".
Atul Gawande called the move a "travesty" and a "nightmare".
Bill Gates lamented "devastating consequences," warning of "more sick kids," "overcrowded hospitals," and "grieving parents".
The source characterizes these reactions as "Wild, hysterical emotion," noting a lack of evidence or logical defense from Gavi's proponents.
The "closest WaPo got to mounting any kind of logical defense" was stating that "Gavi’s decisions are guided by recommendations from World Health Organization experts who review all available data through a ‘rigorous, transparent, and independent process,’" which the source interprets as an admission that Gavi doesn't care about safety because it's "not their job".
Broader Implications and Interpretation
The source posits that this isn't merely a victory for public health or relief for vulnerable populations, but "much bigger".
Gavi is described as a "crown jewel in the Gates-WHO nexus" and a "strategic soft-power asset" that helps Washington exert quiet pressure abroad and financially supports the domestic activist class.
By yanking U.S. funding, Kennedy is seen as not just disrupting the vaccine pipeline but "slic[ing] straight into the wiring of the deep state’s influence grid".
The source suggests this move will leave the "Democrats’ NGO scaffolding —their off-the-books field army— even more cash-strapped and scrambling" ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The "hysteria" from Gavi and its allies is seen as a "tell" that "money and control, not medicine," are what's truly at stake. They "circled the wagons" and declared "jihad" rather than offering dialogue or improvements.
This funding cut is presented as a crucial part of a larger "plan" to "dismantle[] the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control," which the source refers to as "draining the swamp".
It is seen as a methodical, piece-by-piece dismantling of "the invisible gears of elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and leftwing ideological graft". Other examples cited include cuts to USAID, NGOs, DEI programs, NIH transgender rodent grants, Harvard's funding, and strain on NATO finances.
The author believes this action signifies a new, faster phase in this strategic offensive against the "unelected networks of champagne-swilling technocrats and robot-loving global managers".
The sources describe "draining the swamp" not merely as a slogan, but as a methodical, piece-by-piece dismantling of what is referred to as "the whole damnable machinery" of elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and left-wing ideological graft. This process is portrayed as a strategic and rapid-fire offensive, carefully calibrated and coldly executed, aimed at dismantling the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control. It represents a shift where "unelected networks of champagne-swilling technocrats and robot-loving global managers" who have shaped public life, from global vaccine policy to domestic identity politics, are now being challenged with a definitive "no more".
Key aspects and actions associated with "draining the swamp" include:
Vaccine Policy Overhaul:
Reconstitution of the ACIP Vaccine Committee: Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s administration "flushed and reconstituted" the ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) vaccine committee in a "surprise coup". The new committee, chaired by Martin Kulldorff and co-chaired by Dr. Robert Malone, publicly invited criticisms of vaccines and torched the media for using "anti-vaxxer" labels. This new panel plans to review the entire childhood vaccine schedule, all 72 shots, not just individually, but also for their combined effects. This is seen as the "war" beginning, marking a new, more health-focused day in Washington, with Trump's HHS emerging onto the battlefield.
Halting Funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance: The U.S. has announced it will stop funding Gavi, a global vaccine alliance, with Secretary Kennedy stating that the U.S. will not contribute more "until Gavi considers the best science available". Gavi is described as a "shadowy-sounding, feel-good global 'public-private partnership' NGO" that funnels billions through an international bureaucracy with "zero voter oversight, ironclad PR, and very cozy ties to vaccine makers". Kennedy accused Gavi of brushing off safety concerns and treating vaccine safety issues as a "public relations problem" rather than a patient health problem. This withdrawal of funds is seen as cutting into "the wiring of the deep state’s influence grid" and affecting the financial life support of the "Democrats’ NGO scaffolding".
Broader Financial and Political Cuts: The sources state that the "swamp" is being "starved" by financial cuts across various sectors. Examples given include:
USAID being "scalped".
NGOs being put on a "starvation diet".
"DEI bloodletting".
The NIH closing the spigot for "transgender rodent grants".
Harvard's "gravy train" going into the culvert.
Big Pharma "suddenly playing defense in every direction".
NATO's finances being strained to their limits, evaporating "dark budgets".
ActBlue investigations and DNC checks "bouncing".
The "draining" is presented as a deliberate logic hiding behind frantic scramble, a plan to dismantle "the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control". Trump is described as "carpet bombing the deep state’s entire territory," not just draining the swamp but "rerouting the rivers, building dams, and exterminating the alligators". The reaction from the affected institutions, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics boycotting meetings and Gavi's "political" and "hysterical" response to the funding cut, is seen as confirmation that "money and control, not medicine," are what is truly at stake. This "budget battle" is identified as what "draining the swamp" actually looks like.
Regarding market confidence, the sources indicate a surge in investor confidence and a stock market on the verge of an all-time record. This positive economic news is presented as a "stunning turnaround".
Key points from the sources about market confidence include:
Stock Market Performance: The stock market is described as being near record levels. This contradicts CNN's "constant predictions of nascent doom".
Media Interpretation: The sources highlight how CNN and other corporate media outlets are "forced to report" on the rising market, but they attribute the gains to "armchair quarterbacking" and "Just So Stories". For example, a "relief rally" was cited as a reason for market calm following a purported cease-fire. The sources criticize the media for being "just as bad at explaining market moves after they happen as they are at predicting them beforehand".
Investor Sentiment: Despite media "blackpilling," investors are described as feeling "Confident" – "Record-setting confident" – rather than "cautiously optimistic," "clinging to hope," or "nervous about the future".
"Invisible Intelligence of the Markets": The sources suggest that if the political polarity were reversed, the media would likely discuss the "invisible intelligence of the markets". This concept refers to the aggregate self-interested decisions of millions of buyers, sellers, investors, and speculators, which organize without explicit orders, similar to a murmuration of starlings.
Optimism: The overall message conveyed is that "The market is optimistic. You should be, too".
This discussion of market confidence is presented in the broader context of significant political and policy shifts, implying a connection between the administration's actions (such as the Gavi funding cut and vaccine policy changes) and a resulting positive economic sentiment.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s influence, as the current Secretary, is presented in the sources as a pivotal force behind significant and rapid policy shifts, particularly in public health and global initiatives, marking what is described as a "stunning turnaround" and a "declaration of war" against established systems. His actions are interpreted as part of a broader, strategic effort to "drain the swamp" and dismantle what the sources refer to as "the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control".
Key aspects of RFK Jr.'s influence include:
Reconstitution of the ACIP Vaccine Committee: Within the last two weeks, Secretary Kennedy's ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) vaccine committee has been "flushed and reconstituted" in a "surprise coup". This newly formed committee met publicly for the first time, marking a "remarkable and fraught moment in public health".
New Leadership and Openness to Criticism: Kennedy's influence is seen in the appointment of Martin Kulldorff, a former Harvard professor, as the new chair, who immediately invited "any and all criticisms of vaccines" and challenged media labeling. Dr. Robert Malone, described as vaccine-injured, serves as the co-chair and has demonstrated his value by posing "unanswerable queries" to agency heads and discussing complex scientific topics like spike protein persistence and adverse-event clusters.
Comprehensive Vaccine Schedule Review: Dr. Kulldorff announced that the panel will soon review "the entire childhood vaccine schedule," encompassing all 72 shots, not only individually but also for their "combined effects" and "cumulative effect". This move has drawn concern from figures like former CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser, who worried that the new chair immediately sought to "cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines".
Resistance from Medical Organizations: The American Academy of Pediatrics pre-emptively boycotted the ACIP meeting, their first absence in decades, stating they would not "lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children’s health". Other organizations also expressed frustrations over new procedural controls. The sources characterize this as a "glorious fusillade of hard questions" being posed for the first time in U.S. history to the federal vaccine committee.
Halting U.S. Funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance: Kennedy announced that the United States will stop funding Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, stating, "Until Gavi considers the best science available," the U.S. "won’t contribute more".
Reasons for the Cut: Kennedy praised Gavi's efforts to help poor populations but accused them of "brushing off safety concerns" and treating vaccine safety issues as a "public relations problem" rather than a "patient health problem". He cited a study linking the DTP shot to increased childhood mortality that Gavi allegedly ignored.
Significant Financial Impact: The U.S. previously contributed 12% of Gavi’s total funding, amounting to billions over the years, which Kennedy referred to as an "$8 billion 'investment'".
Widespread "Media Meltdown": This decision triggered a significant media backlash, with the Washington Post framing it as a "moral catastrophe". Public health figures like Atul Gawande called it a "travesty" and a "nightmare," and Bill Gates warned of "devastating consequences". The sources interpret this "hysteria" as a "tell" that "money and control, not medicine," are truly at stake.
Broader "Draining the Swamp" Strategy: The sources present Kennedy's actions as an integral part of a larger, methodical "plan" to "dismantle[] the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control".
Impact on Global Influence and NGOs: The withdrawal of Gavi funding, described as a "crown jewel in the Gates-WHO nexus" and a "strategic soft-power asset," is seen as "slic[ing] straight into the wiring of the deep state’s influence grid". This move is predicted to leave "the Democrats’ NGO scaffolding —their off-the-books field army— even more cash-strapped and scrambling".
Systemic Disruption: Kennedy's approach is characterized as a "strategic, rapid-fire offensive" against "elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and leftwing ideological graft," affecting various entities from USAID to NIH grants and NATO finances. The overall sentiment is that "the war has begun" for a "new, more health-focused day in Washington".
Influence on Market Confidence: While not directly attributed solely to RFK Jr., the sources note a surge in investor confidence and a stock market "on the verge of an all-time record," which is presented as a "stunning turnaround" that contradicts prior media predictions of "nascent doom". This positive market sentiment is implicitly linked to the broader, positive political shifts underway, suggesting the market recognizes the administration's strategic actions.
Here are 40 key takeaway points from the sources, presented in a structured manner with supporting sentences:
MAHA is Experiencing a Significant Breakout Moment:
"A MAHA surge, as wonderful as it is by itself, provides some astonishing new dots to connect."
"You’re going to love it." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
A Long-Awaited, Big Event is Unfolding in MAHA History:
"Today is the day."
"Something big." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Kennedy's Thimerosal Essay Signaled a "Formal Declaration of War":
"I may be misreading the political entrails, but I’m starting to think the thimerosal essay Kennedy tweeted yesterday (with footnotes!) was a formal declaration of war."
"The meeting continues today, and a public agenda disclosed plans to vote on thimerosal in flu vaccines next week (hence Kennedy’s missive)." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New ACIP Vaccine Committee has Convened:
"Today’s news was that Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s new ACIP vaccine committee —flushed and reconstituted within the last two weeks in a surprise coup— met yesterday in public for the first time."
"It was everything you’d have hoped it would be." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The ACIP Meeting Marked a "Remarkable and Fraught Moment" in Public Health:
“The meeting on Wednesday,” reported Times health columnist Apoorva Mandavilla, “marked a remarkable and fraught moment in public health.”
“It’s deeply concerning to me that — within minutes of the meeting starting — the new A.C.I.P. chair immediately sought to cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines.” [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
New ACIP Chair Martin Kulldorff Initiated a Challenging Stance on Vaccines:
"Martin Kulldorff, former professor of medicine at Harvard University and the committee’s new chair, sounded the battle trumpet by immediately inviting people to share any and all criticisms of vaccines, and torched the media for “fanning the flames of vaccine hesitancy” with lazy “anti-vaxxer” labels for the new panelists."
"Kulldorff reminded everyone he’d been fired from Harvard for refusing to get a covid shot because he already had natural immunity." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The ACIP Committee's Actions Signify the Beginning of a "War" in Public Health:
"The war has begun."
"It’s a new, more health-focused day in Washington, and Trump’s HHS has emerged from the shadows of controversy and marched onto the battlefield." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The ACIP Panel Will Review the Entire Childhood Vaccine Schedule for Combined Effects:
"Dr. Kulldorf then announced the panel will soon review the entire childhood vaccine schedule, all 72 shots, not just individually, but also for their combined effects".
“In addition to studying and evaluating individual vaccines, it’s important to evaluate the cumulative effect of a recommended vaccine schedule,” he said. [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Former CDC Acting Director Dr. Richard Besser Expressed Deep Concern about the ACIP's Direction:
"Surly Dr. Richard Besser, former CDC acting director, sourly told the Times, “It’s deeply concerning to me that — within minutes of the meeting starting — the new A.C.I.P. chair immediately sought to cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines.”"
“I’m worried that this is a harbinger of even worse things to come,” he added gloomily. [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
A Stark Contrast Exists Between Public Health Officials' Concerns and the Author's Interpretation of Events:
“It’s deeply concerning to me that — within minutes of the meeting starting — the new A.C.I.P. chair immediately sought to cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines.”
"Translation: “even worse things” means, even better things." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The American Academy of Pediatrics Boycotted the ACIP Meeting, Citing Politicization of Children's Health:
"The American Academy of Pediatrics pre-emptively rage-quit, boycotting the meeting —its first absence in decades— sneering that, “we won’t lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children’s health.”"
"Okay (cough, school closures, cough)." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The New ACIP Panelists Posed Hard, "Unanswerable Queries" to Agencies and Industry Groups:
"What followed was a glorious fusillade of hard questions."
"The panelists probed representatives from various agencies and industry groups with unanswerable queries that echoed through the conference room’s hallowed walls." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Agency Representatives, Including the CDC, Appeared Unprepared for Skeptical Inquiry:
"The panelists probed representatives from various agencies and industry groups with unanswerable queries that echoed through the conference room’s hallowed walls."
"The CDC’s representatives were tense and even shell-shocked, apparently unprepared by their prior professional careers for responding to any skeptical inquiry." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Dr. Robert Malone Demonstrated Significant Value by Applying Deep Scientific Expertise:
"Dr. Robert Malone immediately proved his value, speaking soberly in deep scientific terms, invoking volumes of vaccine terminology, and citing research studies by name, on topics like spike protein persistence, adverse-event clusters, and lot-to-lot variability".
"Dr. Malone presses agency heads about “unprecedented” characteristics of covid jabs (3:30)." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The Initial ACIP Meeting Focused on Questioning and Listening, Not Voting:
"The new committee members didn’t vote on anything yesterday."
"They just asked questions and listened carefully." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The ACIP Meeting Represents a Historical Shift in Federal Vaccine Committee Scrutiny:
"This is the first time in U.S. history that the federal vaccine committee threw anything but weak softballs or theatrical skepticism."
"The war has begun." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
A New, More Health-Focused Day has Emerged in Washington:
"It’s a new, more health-focused day in Washington, and Trump’s HHS has emerged from the shadows of controversy and marched onto the battlefield."
"In other words, Kennedy just burned the ships." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Kennedy's Actions are Viewed as a Decisive Step, "Burning the Ships" with No Retreat:
"In other words, Kennedy just burned the ships."
"It’s on. There’s no way out but through." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The U.S. has Decided to Cease Funding the Global Vaccine Alliance, Gavi:
"Yesterday, the Washington Post ran a related story headlined, “RFK Jr. says U.S. will stop funding global vaccine alliance Gavi.”"
“Until Gavi considers the best science available,” Kennedy said, “the United States won’t contribute more.” [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi is Described as a Shadowy Global "Public-Private Partnership" NGO:
"Gavi — full name Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance — is one of those shadowy-sounding, feel-good global “public-private partnership” NGOs that always seem to involve Bill Gates, the World Health Organization, and a firehose of taxpayer money."
"Founded in 2000, Gavi claims to be saving the world by buying vaccines in bulk and shipping them off to poor countries — mostly for kids." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi Operates as a Middleman, Distributing Vaccines Without Transparent Oversight:
"It acts as a kind of middleman: donors give money (like the U.S., the U.K., and Gates), pharmaceutical companies supply vaccines, and Gavi makes sure shots get delivered — whether the locals want them or not."
"Until now, the U.S. kicked in 12% of Gavi’s total funding — billions over the years — with almost nothing to show for it in terms of transparency, safety audits, or public debate." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi's True Purpose is Allegedly About Funneling Billions, Not Just Access and Equity:
"Gavi claims it’s about access and equity."
"In reality, it’s about funneling billions through a slick international bureaucracy with zero voter oversight, ironclad PR, and very cozy ties to vaccine makers." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The Washington Post Framed the Gavi Funding Cut as a "Moral Catastrophe":
"The Washington Post framed it as a moral catastrophe."
"It quoted a gallery of aghast public health mandarins declaring that “children will die” and “RFK Jr. will be personally responsible.”" [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Prominent Figures Like Atul Gawande and Bill Gates Condemned the Gavi Defunding:
"They trotted out Atul Gawande to call the move a “travesty” and a “nightmare.”"
"Gates himself crawled out into the light of social media to lament “devastating consequences,” warning of “more sick kids,” “overcrowded hospitals,” and “grieving parents.”" [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Kennedy Accused Gavi of Treating Vaccine Safety Issues as Public Relations Problems:
"Kennedy praised Gavi for trying to help poor folks, but then promptly accused Gavi of brushing off safety concerns and, in his best line, explained, “When vaccine safety issues have come before Gavi, Gavi has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.”"
"He cited a gold-standard study linking the DTP shot to increased childhood mortality — a topic corporate media won’t touch with a ten-foot hypodermic — and accused the “alliance” of ignoring inconvenient science." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Critics Note a Lack of Evidence for Gavi's Focus on Mitigating or Tracking Vaccine Injuries:
"None of WaPo’s hysterical experts bothered to cite any evidence that Gavi spends a single dollar on mitigating vaccine injuries or even troubling itself to track them."
"No quotes about surveillance systems. No mention of adverse event compensation. No data on injury rates." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi's Defense Implies that Safety Monitoring is Not Their Direct Responsibility:
"The closest WaPo got to mounting any kind of logical defense was this soggy biscuit: “Gavi’s decisions are guided by recommendations from World Health Organization experts who review all available data through a ‘rigorous, transparent, and independent process.’”"
"In other words, they admitted Gavi doesn’t care about safety— but that’s okay, since it’s not their job." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi is Described as a Strategic Soft-Power Amplifier for Western Bureaucracy:
"Gavi mostly functions as a soft-power amplifier for the West’s permanent bureaucracy: a well-padded pipeline where money, influence, and ideology flow downstream to a chorus of shady, aligned nonprofits, murky international development outfits, and politically connected “civil society” operations."
"But if you cut through the squishy branding layer, you find a core of steel: a strategic soft-power asset — one that both helps Washington exert quiet pressure abroad while keeping the domestic activist class on financial life support at home." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The U.S. Funding Cut to Gavi is Seen as Disrupting the Deep State's Influence Grid:
"By yanking U.S. funding, Kennedy didn’t just disrupt the vaccine pipeline — he sliced straight into the wiring of the deep state’s influence grid."
"Gavi isn’t just about shots. It’s about control, narrative harmonization, and greasing the gears of global progressive power." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi's Reaction to the Funding Cut Was Political and Hysterical, Not Clinical:
"If this Gavi controversy were really about health policy and the concerns of a major donor, you’d expect Gavi’s board to react with a sober, diplomatic response."
"Instead, they poured gas on their head and lit their hair on fire." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The True Stakes of the Gavi Controversy are Identified as Money and Control, Not Medicine:
"Their reaction wasn’t clinical. It was political."
"That’s how you know money and control, not medicine, are what’s really at stake." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Gavi's Response Indicates a Desire to Protect the System, Not Improve It:
"Because if this were really only about safety protocols, Gavi could have said, “Let’s sit down and figure out what our biggest departing donor wants us to do better.”"
"They’re not trying to fix or even “improve” the system. They’re trying to protect it." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
"Draining the Swamp" is Characterized as a Methodical Dismantling of Elite Global Influence:
"Is this what “draining the swamp” actually looks like in real life?"
"Not as a slogan or a rally chant. But as a methodical, piece-by-piece dismantling of the whole damnable machinery — the invisible gears of elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and leftwing ideological graft." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Specific Entities are Being Financially Targeted as Part of "Draining the Swamp":
"First, USAID got scalped."
"Then NGOs were put on a starvation diet." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Financial Pressures are Being Applied to Various Institutions:
"Then, the NIH closed the spigot for transgender rodent grants."
"Harvard’s gravy train went into the culvert." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The Gavi Funding Cut is Seen as a Crucial Step in a Deliberate Plan:
"And now Gavi —the crown jewel of global health virtue signaling— just had its funding rug (a delightful 4000-thread-count Turkish classic) yanked right out from under it."
"Piece by piece, dollar by dollar, what we’re witnessing is not chaos. Please. It’s not even payback. It’s a plan." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The Current Offensive Aims to Dismantle Unaccountable Infrastructure of Elite Global Control:
"It’s a strategic, rapid-fire offensive —carefully calibrated and coldly executed (cue Nessum Dorma)— aimed at dismantling the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control."
"For the first time in decades, or maybe ever, the unelected networks of champagne-swilling technocrats and robot-loving global managers who quietly shaped public life —from global vaccine policy to domestic identity politics— are being told: no more." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
"Draining the Swamp" Involves "Starving the Beast" of Political Disease:
"Folks — this ugly and seemingly disconnected budget battle is what draining the swamp actually looks like."
"Starve the beast." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The "Swamp" is Defined as a Vast, Rotting Continent of Political Disease:
"Turns out, the swamp was bigger and fatter than we’d ever imagined."
"It’s not just a fetid marsh behind the Capitol — it’s a whole rotting continent of political disease, a Marxist wasteland crawling with globalist malaria, about the size of Greenland." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
The Stock Market is Nearing an All-Time Record, Reflecting Strong Investor Confidence:
"Yesterday, CNN ran a delightful story headlined, “Stunning turnaround: The stock market is on the verge of an all-time record.”"
"Investors are feeling confident. Not “cautiously optimistic.” Not “clinging to hope.” Not “nervous about the future.” Confident." [☕️ DRAINING ☙ Thursday, June 26, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AND Jeff Childers]
Here are 50 key takeaway points from the sources, formatted as requested:
1. Rothschilds' Ancient & Satanic Origins by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
MI6 Secret services was created from the Satanic 10,000 years old Phoenician Empire Rothschild Secret Services based upon Satanism of the Satanic Phoenician Empire and it’s Satanic Sodomy Rituals.
For 10,000 years the Satanic Phoenician Empire Rothschild Elite families descended from Satanic Babylon, those families descended from Satanic Nimrod, those with the mark of Cain upon them, those perverted by Satanic black energy blockages such that the normal functions of the Heart and the Conscience have been blocked so as to create what they call a new species of humanity, stronger than the rest, those able to take those decisions necessary, total Psychopaths!!.
2. Balfour Declaration and Israel's Creation by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The "Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Balfour plan" typically refers to the Balfour Declaration, a pivotal document in modern Middle Eastern history.
The declaration expressed British support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, then under Ottoman rule.
3. Rothschilds' Central Role in Israel's Founding by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschilds are one of the originators of the Zionist movement and the most active actors in the creation of the state of Israel.
Israel was created so the Rothschilds could found an Empire - The Greater Israel Project - in the World Island of Mackinder with all roads from China and India to Europe passing through it.
4. Rothschild Funding of Israeli Government Buildings by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschild family has been significantly involved in funding the Israeli Parliament, known as the Knesset.
James "Jimmy" de Rothschild, son of Lord Edmond James de Rothschild, was an extremely generous philanthropist who contributed six million Israeli pounds (then called "lira") toward the building of a permanent home for the Knesset in Jerusalem.
5. Rothschild Control Over Israeli Supreme Court by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The Israel Supreme Court is the creation of one elite family: the Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschilds.
In their negotiations with Israel, they’ve agreed to donate the building under three conditions: the Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschilds were to choose the plot of land, they would use their own architect and no one would ever know the price of its construction.
6. Symbolic Nature of the Supreme Court Building by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The Supreme Court building is a Temple of Masonic Mystery Religion and is built by the elite, for the elite.
A journey through the Supreme Court is, in fact, a symbolic course towards Illumination.
7. The "All-Seeing Eye" in Supreme Court Architecture by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
One source mentions a pyramid with the "Satanic all Seeing Eye".
On each side of the pyramid’s apex is a hole representing the “All-Seeing Eye” of the Masonic Great Architect (see the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States).
8. The "Greater Israel" Project: An Expansionist Ideology by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The "Greater Israel" project refers to an expansionist ideology that envisions a Satanic Rothschild Jewish state extending from the Nile to the Euphrates, encompassing territories beyond the current borders of Israel, including parts of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia.
Critics argue that the "Greater Israel" project is an expansionist ideology that has strained regional tensions and is often seen as a violation of international law.
9. Historical Roots and Active Pursuit of Greater Israel by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
This concept has historical roots in the writings of Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, who envisioned a Satanic Rothschild Jewish state stretching from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.
Sources suggest that the project is not just a historical concept but is actively being pursued through policies and actions by the Satanic Rothschild Israeli government.
10. Greater Israel Project's Role in World Wars and US Vassalization by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
Sources suggest that the project is not just a historical concept but is actively being pursued through policies and actions by the Satanic Rothschild Israeli government, including the creation of a Vassal USA and Vassal Europe through the creation of World Wars 1 and 2.
The project has also been linked to the 2018 "Nation State Law," which affirms the Jewish people's "exclusive and inalienable right" to all parts of the land, including the West Bank.
11. Israel's Strategic Role in Global Trade Routes by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
Israel plays a strategic role in the BRI as a vital stopover connecting trade and energy routes from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea.
Israel's strategic location, developed economy, and secure environment make it an attractive partner for both BRI and IMEC projects, enhancing its role as a regional hub for trade and infrastructure development.
12. China's Deep Economic Ties with Israel by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has established significant cooperation with Israel, particularly in infrastructure and technology sectors.
Despite political differences, economic ties have deepened, with Israel being the largest recipient of Chinese investment in the Middle East between 2015 and 2018.
13. Donald Trump's Financial Indebtedness to Rothschilds by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
The Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschild family paid Donald Trump's debts.
Wilbur Ross, who has been associated with the Satanic 2000 Trillion Dollar Phoenician Rothschild family, played a significant role in helping Trump restructure his debts during his financial troubles in the 1990s.
14. Allegations of Trump's Presence in Epstein Files by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
Elon Musk made a significant claim regarding Donald Trump and the Epstein files, asserting that Trump is mentioned in these files, which he suggested is the reason they have not been fully released to the public.
This claim was made on X, where Musk posted, “Time to drop the really big bomb:@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”.
15. Satanic Rothschild Zionism as China's Internal Threat by Satchidanand
To ensure its cultural and existential survival, China must fathom Satanic Rothschild Zionism like the woodsman in his sleeping bag fathoms the viper coiled around his ankle.
With its vast might, China’s greatest threat comes not from the US Empire and vassal armies that amass outside its gates, but internally from Satanic Rothschild Zionist controlled sleeper cell traitors who patiently wait for the opportune moment to strike.
16. Rothschilds' Role in Financing Global Conflicts by Satchidanand
The murderous Opium Wars, European colonization projects, and other “thousand natural shocks” of foreign origin that China endured during the 19th and 20th centuries received their financing from the City of London/Wall Street financial parasites.
Just like almost every other evil venture of global finance over the past five centuries, Anglos (Europeans) acted as international banking’s soldiers.
17. Rothschilds' Infiltration of America During Civil War by Satchidanand
It was during the US Civil War that the Satanic Phoenician Rothschilds locked their fangs into America’s soft underbelly.
Both North and South borrowed heavily from the Satanic Phoenician Rothschild bankers.
18. Rothschild Total Control of US Financial System by Satchidanand
Once the Satanic Phoenician Rothschilds established their beachhead, it took less than fifty years for the international bankers to gain total control of America’s financial system through the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
With the help of the eugenics obsessed Rockefellers... and traitor politicians like President Woodrow Wilson and Senator Nelson Aldrich, the financial coup d’état was complete.
19. JFK's Assassination Linked to Israel's Nuclear Program by Satchidanand
JFK had strongly opposed Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.
The Mossad likely partnered with the CIA and the Military Industrial Complex in Kennedy’s murder, as all three entities harbored a deep hatred for the President.
20. Israeli Attack on USS Liberty and US Cover-up by Satchidanand
Israeli gunships, fighter jets, and torpedo boats pounded the crippled and fully identified ship for over an hour. 34 crew members were killed and 171 were wounded.
Quisling President Johnson, bribed (and blackmailed?) US politicians, and Pentagon bigwigs not only covered up the incident, but showered Israel with fantastic sums of taxpayer money.
21. Rothschild Zionist Takeover of Key US Institutions by Satchidanand
Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist Jews replaced the Anglos in key positions in universities, courts, government agencies, the Deep State, presidential cabinets, and big business.
Many on the reactionary right understand that the “liberal” Democrats and “conservative” Republicans are a corporate Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist uniparty.
22. Rothschild Zionist Control Over "Left" Organizations by Satchidanand
Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionists like George Soros also control the major “left” organizations.
At one time the left (many of them Jews) championed the working man by pushing for the 5 day work week, 8 hour work day, overtime pay, and workers compensation.
23. 9/11 as an Israeli/Neocon/Deep State False Flag by Satchidanand
With the 9/11 Israeli/neocon/ Deep State false flag, the US Anglo-Zionist Empire devoured, digested, and excreted the last pieces of living flesh that clung to the bones of the former US republic.
Endless wars for the bankers and Israel became the new normal.
24. Covid Pandemic as a False Flag Bioweapon Attack by Satchidanand
About twenty years after 9/11 came the most stunning and audacious false flag attack in human history- the covid pandemic.
Covid and it’s MRNA Spike Protein Turbo Cancer, Myocarditis Bioweapon started as a neocon Deep State bioweapon attack which has Sterilized Millions, killed 35 million in it’s first years and is now exponentially murdering thousands of millions more.
25. mRNA Vaccines and Digital IDs as Globalist Agenda's Second Phase by Satchidanand
I would only add to Mr. Unz’s excellent journalism by hypothesizing that the mRNA vaccines and their accompanying digital biometric IDs are the second phase of the globalist “problem-reaction-solution” agenda.
Please China, don’t let Pfizer and its Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist CEO Albert Bourla breach the Great Wall.
26. US Instigated Russia-Ukraine War as Zionist Operation by Satchidanand
The US instigated Russian-Ukraine War is another Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist operation.
All the key Biden Administration members behind NATO’s encroachment into the Ukraine are hardcore neocon Israel firsters.
27. Zelensky's Vision for Ukraine as "Big Israel" by Satchidanand
Ukraine’s comedic actor President Zelensky openly bragged that he wanted to turn Ukraine into a “big Israel”.
Satanic Phoenician Rothschild Zionist Zelensky came to power through Israeli-Ukraine dual national oligarch Igor Kolomoisky.
28. Israel's True Strategic Objective: Iran Regime Change by Nick Fuentes
For Israel, it is not about Iran's nukes.
They have sought regime change, which is distinct, for years.
29. US Coercion into Iran War as an Orchestrated Plan by Nick Fuentes
Israel needs the Iranian regime gone.
But to get Iran to denuclearize, they need to involve the United States because only the United States can take out the nukes.
30. Middle Eastern Conflicts as Features, Not Bugs by Nick Fuentes
A lot of people look at these Middle Eastern conflicts and they talk about unintended consequences like destabilization.
Well, and quagmire is sort of it's not a bug. It's a feature.
31. The Oded Yinon Plan for Regional Dismemberment by Nick Fuentes
The Israelis have been writing about this for years. In the s, they promulgated a doctrine. It's the Oded Yunon plan for the s.
They said the only way for Israel to be safe is is if they destabilize and dismember every one of their neighboring states into what they call statelets, a mosaic of tiny states.
32. Israel's Strategic Use of Divide and Conquer by Nick Fuentes
The Israelis want it to be destabilized because the smaller the states are, the more division there is in these countries, the stronger Israel is relative to to every other country.
And that's the official policy of the British Empire and the Israelis and everything is divide and conquer the great game.
33. Israel's Role in Creating Radical Groups by Alex Jones
Israel created Hamas because they... The Muslims were choosing rock and roll in bikinis.
You created Hamas down the line, down the line.
34. Imminent Threat of World War III by Nick Fuentes
They're playing with World War III.
It's gonna end in some kind of ultimate conflict that like World War II, on the other side of it will be a new world order.
35. Israel as the Driver of Conflict in the Middle East by Nick Fuentes
The biggest threat is not necessarily Iran, even though I am concerned about them.
Israel is the one that is driving the conflict. Therefore, they are the power that needs to be restrained in the Middle East.
36. Trump's Policy Shift Attributed to Coercion by Nick Fuentes
You have to wonder... was he coerced into supporting this, either because of a threat against his life and family, some sort of blackmail situation, or strategically, the United States was backed into a corner and our window of options has just shrunk.
It's the least conspiratorial. It's maybe the Occam's razor simplest explanation.
37. Allegations of Blackmail with Epstein Files Influencing Trump by Nick Fuentes
Mark Levin and Miriam Adelson pulling the strings behind the scenes, reminding him maybe there’s something in those Epstein files or something could be fabricated.
I mean, you just never know.
38. US Involvement: Already at War with Iran by Alex Jones
I can tell you right now, barring a miracle, we are already at war with Iran.
We have air superiority. We're already at war with Iran.
39. Netanyahu as the "King Neocon" Driving Global Policy by Alex Jones
Netanyahu was the king neocon with the neocons that were heavily involved in - fingerprints all over.
He gets to essentially rule global policy and play God with all of this.
40. Israel's Pursuit of Superpower Status by Nick Fuentes
I mean, it's not far-fetched to say this is like a play for superpower status.
If you've got the U.S. doing whatever you say, you are the superpower.
41. Rebuilding the Third Temple as a Biblically Significant Goal by Nick Fuentes
You almost wonder then, is the next step a play for the temple?.
Does this pave the way for an annexation of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the rebuilding of a third temple?.
42. Christian Zionist Deception Regarding the Antichrist by Alex Jones
The Bible says the fake Messiah comes and does this and rebuilds the temple.
They're all saying, this is great. They're going to worship. And Christian Zionists worship Israel and whoever's in charge, they will then worship whoever the leader of Israel is, the Antichrist.
43. America's Loss of Sovereignty to Israel by Nick Fuentes
If you care about America, you have to care about our sovereignty and our independence.
It ends years later with it being official. We are slaves to Israel. Our country is now a vassal and a suzerain of Israel.
44. The World on the Precipice of Dangerous Conflict by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
We are on the real precipice of some stuff that is the most dangerous point in modern history because of the weapon systems we've got.
This is just off the charts dangerous.
45. Pakistan as a Critical Nuclear Wild Card by Colonel Gannon Burton (Ret.)
I think we've handed the fate of the world over to uh and how this thing ends up over to pakistan right now i think they are the critical element in this.
I assume that Iran has nuclear weapons already. However, we know that Pakistan does. And so if it was to go nuclear and it was to go that way, then Pakistan's obviously a ready supply for that.
46. AIPAC's Controlling Influence on US Foreign Policy by Colonel Gannon Burton (Ret.)
One other thing I deeply resent in my country is AIPACs.
I deeply resent AIPAC driving our foreign policy and having so much influence.
47. Trump's Failures and Disappointments from the Populist Perspective by Excerpts from "Whispers of the Heart: An Anthology of Love's Echoes"
We have been disappointed by Trump because he said he would stop the Russia war by taking America out of NATO, but USA created NATO, USA funds NATO, USA gives all the weapons to Ukraine, USA gives all satellite targeting to Ukraine.
We are disappointed in Trump to fail to prosecute anyone, from Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton on down for their many crimes against the American people.
48. Impunity of Rothschild Financiers Ensuring Continued Actions by Satchidanand
The fact that no Satanic Phoenician Empire Rothschild high-level banker was criminally prosecuted for any of this suggests that the perpetrators and their enablers who walked away with a colossal loot were never subject to law enforcement in the same way that the rest of us are.
The impunity the Satanic Phoenician Empire Rothschilds enjoy under our magnificent democracies virtually guarantees that they will keep on doing it.
49. Satanism as the New World Order and Religion by Satchidanand
Satanism is gradually being instituted as the New World Order.
The New World Religion, defined by Satanic Ritual.
50. Energy Enhancement as the Sole Solution to Evil by Satchidanand
Only Energy Enhancement can Annihilate Evil on Earth and change this Planet into a Planet of Love and Light in this Place, for You, for Me, for the Entire Human Race.
With Energy Enhancement Remove All these Evil Subpersonalities within you whilst you have the chance.
Here are 40 key takeaway points from the sources, presented in a JotForm manner:
Wars as a Fundamental Means of Control Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "We know that wars and the threat of wars has always been the favorite means, to divide and conquer and keep conquered the people that that they now control or want to control". "So wars are naturally we always are facing wars".
The Psychological Nature of Atomic War Threat Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "The threat of atomic war is more of a psychological weapon than it is a military weapon". "And in that sense, the the threat of atomic war is more of a psychological weapon than it is a military weapon".
Technocracy's Role in Mass Psychological Manipulation Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "For the first time in history as I see it, this is something that never happened before, never could happen before because of technocracy, because of the technical advancement of the means the technical means of reaching the minds and the fears and the hopes and, all the base instincts of every human being". "So now the war is much bigger and much more invisible to the to the eye of the person who's not studying it".
Israeli Lobby's Influence on Conservative Ideology Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "What do you think about the Israeli lobby and the poll that they seem to have on conservatives who would otherwise be against giving all their money to foreign countries, otherwise be against, international war with Iran, which is a major ally of Russia and China, or who would otherwise be against, a country that blackmails people with Mossad agents like Jeffrey Epstein?". "What's going on among conservatives that they're so dead set in favor of Israel?".
Propaganda as Mind Training for Control Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "It's propaganda". "It's training of the mind".
Humans as Conditioned "Little AI Computers" Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "It's in a way, we're all kind of little AI computers". "And you notice when they talk about, development of AI and going into new areas, they always talk about training the system".
Necessity of Personal Preparedness and Self-Sufficiency Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Incredibly important to make sure that you aren't dependent on the system that enslaves us for help later on down the road". "Hey. If you guys don't prepare yourself, you will have to succumb to their rations".
Sources for Long-Term Storable Food and Water Solutions Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "I urge you to check out heavensharvest.com for long term stormable foods that are non GMO". "There's organic kits, heirloom seeds, water filtration and storage, and books on how to get started".
Availability of Freeze-Dried, Natural Meat Products Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Also, check out whambeef.com for ten plus year shelf life freeze dried steak". "There's, 12 servings per bag, and there's freeze dried chicken and ground beef as well".
Assurance of Whambeef's Natural and Unmodified Composition Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "And, of course, this is guaranteed non mRNA, no lab grown meat, all American beef that's 100% natural". "Stock up on this before you're not allowed to before you are stuck in that soil and green type system because it is happening, and we cannot ignore it any longer".
G. Edward Griffin's Decades-Long Warnings About Current Events Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "g Edward Griffin, author, extraordinaire of many things, and someone that we've been talking to for over a decade here at World Alternative Media and has about sixty five, sixty six years really getting that message out to the public that we all should have been listening to many decades ago". "because we're witnessing the effects of many of the things that mister Griffin has been warning of for for many decades".
The Red Pill Expo as a Gathering for Awareness and Preparation Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "And I wanna get into many of these issues that we talk about, but I want to also mention that the Red Pill Expo is coming up". "It's gonna be happening in Tulsa, Oklahoma, from July on stage, and, of course, you could get a free livestream by going to redpilluniversity.org or redpillexpo.org".
Notable Speakers and Community at the Red Pill Expo Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Mister Griffin will be there". "People like Alex Newman, Michael Yawn, Michelle Melendez, Carrie Rivera, doctor Brian Artis, and the list goes on and on and on. Richard Grove, many amazing faces that you will recognize and amazing people that you can hang out with afterwards, of course, in the audience".
The Recurring Pattern of War Promotion: Iraq to Iran Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "We We are in for, unfortunately, something that we have seen before with the Iraq war in that we're seeing a push towards the Iran war". "Israel, this country that has essentially blackmailed every major political, leadership in the world and, of course, financed so many, propaganda campaigns over the years".
Israel's Alleged Role in Global Blackmail and Propaganda Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Israel, this country that has essentially blackmailed every major political, leadership in the world and, of course, financed so many, propaganda campaigns over the years". "Like, Israel has been lobbying the US Congress for decades now on this new enemy in their area that we all need to defend them from".
The "Cabal" and its Pursuit of World Domination Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "It seems to me, Josh, that this is what you might call same old same old. We've been down this path before". "Because we do know that there is a very small group of people, and they're not they're not, restricted to any particular nationality or any race or any ethnic background".
The Cabal's Strategy of Division to Overcome Numerical Disadvantage Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "They are interested in in world domination". "And so the, the secret to their success, they know, is to divide us, to make sure that we don't all get together".
Modern Warfare Primarily as a Psychological Battle Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "So it's not that anymore. It's a propaganda war". "This cabal is in charge of of the, firing power of the greatest nations in the world, and they have weaponry that would just make our little pistols and rifles look, terribly sick by comparison".
Fear of Atomic War as a Tool for Surrendering Liberty Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "And in that sense, the the threat of atomic war is more of a psychological weapon than it is a military weapon". "And if we can fear the atomic war and do anything, anything, I mean, anything to avert it, including surrender our liberty and and give power more and more power to our our own national version of the cabal or turn it over to some international version like the United Nations or something like that".
The Repetitive Nature of Propaganda Justifying War Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "This mentality of people just repeating the same metric over and over again and trying a a new way to justify it". "It's the old, Nazi version of you tell a big a lie that's big enough and tell it often enough, everybody will believe it".
The New Dimension of Warfare: Biological and Psychological Manipulation Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "For the first time in history, as I see it, this is something that never happened before, never could happen before because of technocracy Mhmm. Because of the technical advancement of the means the technical means of reaching the minds and the fears and the hopes and, all the base instincts of every human being, hatred, envy, anger, and they also now can reach the physical and psych the physical side of psychology". "So now the war is much bigger and much more invisible to the to the eye of the person who's not studying it".
Technocratic Tactics Extending to Drugs, Water, and Fertility Control Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "They give us drugs. They get us doped up. They get us dependent". "They they put stuff in our water supply, telling us it's good for our teeth. And, and, it's, they're they're trying to reduce the population by reducing fertility rates and all the all of it".
Public Conditioning to Accept Conventional Warfare as the Only Solution Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "And they're trying to condition us now to think we've got to get into it because it's for our own best our own best interest". "You know, we've got to do this before they come and bomb our cities or whatever. And, so we're being conditioned to accept war, the old fashioned style, as the only solution".
Shift in Conservative Stance Towards War Intervention Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "I've never seen so many people on the conservative and libertarian side so convinced of war in a way that in the past they would not be". "And now people that were supporting doctor Ron Paul are now saying, well, if we don't do that, all these Muslims in The Middle East will come over here".
The Concept of "The Best Enemy Money Can Buy" Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "First of all, you mentioned, Anthony Sutton, and, that reminds me of one of his books called The Best Enemy Money Can Buy". "We have been building our own enemies, financing them, giving them the technology to have we've been sending them the airplanes and the ammunition so they could become our enemy more effectively".
Propaganda's Efficacy in Eliciting Surrender of Liberties for "Survival" Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "We've got to have an enemy if we're going to be willing to surrender our liberties and do things that are against our prime principles". "Survival is the most prime principle. So if we can be convinced through propaganda, there's the key, through propaganda in our news and schools and everywhere you look, we're getting fed one side of an argument only, then the mind can be, if it's not aware, can be easily moved to surrender their principles in order to survive".
The Propaganda-Induced Difficulty in Distinguishing Governments from Peoples Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "I'm talking about a state, a government". "We're living in a strange time where we can't seem to separate governments. Same goes for Iran, by the way".
Warfare as a Strategic Chess Game Waged by Masters Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "So we're in a a chess game, and, we don't know the rules of the game". "So a chess master, which the cabal is made up of chess masters, they know all the the finite rules of the game. They know some trick moves that we never even heard about".
The Dual Role of the Military in Modern Control Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Military is a function of it, but it's primarily as I see it, it has two primary uses". "One is to to provide a basis for fear of military annihilation... And the other thing is once they get a population maneuvered into the corner and has no place else to go and it's too late to turn around, then they use the military to control the population".
The Misleading Portrayal of AI as a Human Parallel Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "They want us to eventually think that AI is going to be some kind of a, a human parallel". "And they're con you see how you they're conditioning our thinking just by the use of the word training. They're just just programming us what they're talking about".
The Convergence of Global Crises for Digital ID and Technocracy Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "You mentioned AI and technocracy, and I think that's one of the most important issues for someone to know today because if you look at the background of all issues, whether it be bird flu, hoaxes or COVID hoaxes, whether it be a supply chain issue, whether it be the economy, whether it be war, civil war, or, global war, what you end up with is emergency orders and then in comes the AI digital ID infrastructure that many of us have been warning about for so long". "So we have AI robots, Skynet, if you will. They've, they were meeting with, Sam Altman of OpenAI, Larry Fink of BlackRock, all the players, Elon Musk who wants to put chips in your brain attached to a Pentagon funded mesh network, all the people necessary to bring in this global technocracy".
Totalitarian Plans Concealed by Positive Vocabulary Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "I mean, they're pretty open, but they use vocabulary, words that sound good". "You can there's gonna be a a a unified world, they'll say. Oh, that's nice. But they could have said, it will control you all".
The Professionalization and Scientific Advancement of Propaganda Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "They're it's a profession now". "You can even go to most major universities and take courses on propaganda or advertising or or attitude manipulation and so forth".
"Conspiracy Theorist" as a Weapon to Dismiss Truth Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Well, that's just proof that they have been already they have been won over. Their minds are already closed to the the only possible explanation for everything that we're talking about". "And that's what the conspiracy theory is supposed to equate anyway".
Government and Powerful Institutions as Magnets for Predators Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "Governments and any institutions, which have a lot of power and money, they're magnets to the predator class". "And all the all the Sui Shu con artists of the world want to go into government".
The Importance of Preparing for Deliberate Shortages and Societal Breakdown Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "What are your thoughts on just prepping in in general, having the basics ready for a few months?". "Obviously, it's a good idea to prepare for shortages, especially when we know. I mean, we know that they are planning to cut off all the conveniences of civilization, to thrust us in a position of total panic and total despair and total dependency on the government to provide us with everything".
Klaus Schwab's Vision of "Multiple Crises" Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "And as Klaus Schwab would say, when he was asked, what does the future look like? He said over and over again, multiple crisis. Mhmm. Multiple crisis". "He's And and to to intervene just for a moment here, I I also wanna point out Yuval Noah Harari's quote".
Yuval Noah Harari's Ominous Future of Placated Humanity Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "He says, I and I quote, I dream of a world where people are placated on drugs playing video games, which is an incredibly ominous thing to openly say and no one calls him on it". "He's probably laughing because he he found himself saying it on camera".
The Inadequacy of Purely Defensive Survival Strategies Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "There's an old, there's an old, saying that the purely defensive is doomed to defeat, ultimately". "All of that is good. I'm Paul Ford, and I've tried to do something in all of those categories. But I know that none of that is gonna be in the long run of any it's not gonna solve the problem".
The Ultimate Legacy: The Restoration of Freedom for Humanity Excerpts from "The Psychology of Control: Wars, Propaganda, and Freedom" by G. Edward Griffin "And what I see in that future would really be my legacy, and that is freedom restored". "All I know is that every time I think about it, of me and all fellow human beings, being free to do what they want to do, to be creative or not to be creative, to being free to do so, to face their own consequences or their own actions, to not look to others, to to tell them what to do in return for food and shelter and all that kind of thing. It just feels good".
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the "Triad Alliance," a term coined by Richard Solomon to describe the strategic alignment of Russia, China, and Iran. Replacing the "Axis of Resistance" to mitigate negative connotations, this alliance is presented as a crucial bulwark against the perceived expansionist agenda of the "US Anglo-Zionist Empire" and its "Greater Israel Project". The alliance's cohesion is deemed vital for the survival of its members, the future of the BRICS economic bloc, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and the emergence of a multi-polar global order. A breakdown of this alliance is anticipated to lead to a sequential targeting and weakening of each member, with severe implications for global stability and the existing financial order.
The "Triad Alliance" is an analytical framework proposed by Richard Solomon to categorize the strategic relationship between Russia, China, and Iran. Solomon intentionally renames the "Axis of Resistance" to "Triad Alliance," positing that the former name carries negative historical baggage (association with WWII losers and "bad guys") that could undermine its perceived strength. The new nomenclature aims to establish a more neutral or even positive mental framing for this geopolitical alignment.
This alliance is positioned as a direct counter-force to the "US Anglo-Zionist Empire," which is seen as pursuing a "Greater Israel Project" in the Middle East. The author contends that the US-Anglo Empire is driven by the need to maintain petrodollar hegemony and the longevity of "international techno-banker rule," viewing post-9/11 conflicts, including those related to the "Greater Israel Project," as serving these ends.
The existence and cohesion of the "Triad Alliance" are presented as paramount for its constituent nations and the broader global order they seek to foster. Key strategic imperatives include:
Survival of Nation-States: The primary stake in the ongoing conflicts, particularly the "Iranian phase of the 'Greater Israel Project'," is the survival of Iran as a nation-state. The alliance is crucial for protecting the sovereignty and existence of its members against external aggression.
Future of BRICS and BRI: The success of the BRICS economic bloc and China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is explicitly linked to the Triad Alliance's strength. If Iran is "wrecked," it is believed that BRICS would "sink," and the emergence of alternative currency systems would be severely hampered. A strong alliance protects these economic and developmental initiatives.
Emergence of a Multi-Polar Order: The alliance is seen as fundamental to establishing a global order that is not dominated by a single hegemon, contrasting with the current unipolar system.
Security and Stability of Russia and China: The expansionist actions attributed to the "US Anglo-Zionist Empire" in the Middle East are viewed as direct threats to the security and stability of Russia and China. A unified alliance acts as a deterrent and a mechanism for collective security.
Countering Petrodollar Hegemony: The long-term goal of the "international techno-banker rule" is believed to be the maintenance of the petrodollar system. By supporting the alliance and alternative currency systems, Iran, Russia, and China challenge this financial dominance.
The core belief is that it is "Better to stand as a unified front," as a broken alliance "is not coming back".
The author highlights the severe ramifications should the "Triad Alliance" falter or dissolve:
Dissolution of Trust: A critical consequence of the alliance breaking would be the dissolution of trust between the remaining partners.
Sequential Targeting: Without a unified front, each member would be forced to "fight the US Anglo-Zionist Empire as a solo entity in sequential order". This implies a "divide and conquer" strategy by the opposing empire, making each nation more vulnerable.
Reliance on Adversary's Bleeding Out: If the alliance members are divided and fight solo, "much rests on the US-Zio Empire bleeding out in Iran," which, while possible, is "not guaranteed". This suggests a less controlled and riskier path for the individual nations.
Exposure to "Fierce Elements": Disassembling this "Triad Alliance fortification" could "expose vulnerable inner structures to fierce elements," implying greater instability and threats for the individual states.
The level of commitment from Russia and China to Iran, especially in the event of a "full-on US-Zio vs Iran war," is a critical factor analyzed by the author. The analysis explores various reasons for both "zero-weak" and "moderate-strong" support:
4.1. Russia's Commitment to Iran
Reasons for Zero-Weak Support:
Resource Strain: Russia is currently "stretched out in Ukraine," potentially limiting its capacity for further military engagement.
Accelerated US-Zio Collapse: An Iranian "quagmire" without Russian involvement could still "hasten the collapse of the US Anglo-Zionist Empire," reducing a major existential threat to Russia.
Economic Opportunity: A shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, caused by conflict, could significantly increase energy prices, allowing Russia to "make an incredible fortune" as a major energy exporter.
Strategic Breather: If US-Israeli forces defeat Iran, China is seen as the "next target," potentially giving Russia "an extended breather".
Favorable Ukraine Deal: Russia might secure a more favorable resolution in Ukraine if it avoids involvement in Iran.
Internal Influences: The presence of a "high percentage of dual-national Zionist oligarchs" within Russia, and the significant population of "Russian-Jews" residing in Israel (1.3 million), could influence Russia's neutrality or discourage direct intervention against Israel. A commenter notes Russia previously declined a mutual defense pact with Iran. Another commenter observes Russia's "extreme aversion to acting against Jews," citing its actions in Ukraine.
Reasons for Moderate-Strong Support:
Hastened US-Zio Collapse: Conversely, an Iranian "quagmire with Russian support" could also "hasten the collapse of the US-Anglo Zionist Empire," directly eliminating a major existential threat to Russia.
Economic Opportunity: Similar to weak support, a Strait of Hormuz shutdown still offers a lucrative financial opportunity for Russia.
Historical Payback: Opportunity for "payback" for past grievances such as the Soviet-Afghan War, the "post-Soviet collapse Wall Street raiding party," and the Ukraine conflict.
Preserving BRICS: Direct support for Iran would "Save BRICS" by demonstrating alliance strength and reliability.
Preventing Sequential Targeting: The understanding that "Today Iran, tomorrow China, the day after Russia" would compel Russia to defend Iran to avoid becoming the next target.
Author's Assessment of Russia's Support:
If the US-Israelis primarily conduct a bombing/missile "nation-state wrecking campaign" with proxy forces, Russia's commitment to Iran would likely be "weak to weak/moderate".
If the US deploys "boots on the ground," Russia's commitment could rise to "weak/moderate-moderate".
Reaching "moderate/strong-strong commitment levels" would require US-Zio actions that "forced China and Russia to take serious measures".
The overall strategy of Russia and China is observed to be an effort to "avoid direct conflict with the Evil Empire, and let the empire hollow itself out through corruption and global overreach until crash day comes," even if it means "Iran needs to be sacrificed to accomplish that".
4.2. China's Commitment to Iran
Reasons for Zero-Weak Support:
Cultural History: China has a "long cultural history of not getting involved in foreign wars".
Accelerated US-Zio Weakening: An Iranian quagmire without Chinese support could still "greatly weaken the US-Anglo Zionist Empire," reducing a major existential threat.
Protecting BRI and Preventing Sabotage: Avoiding involvement would help "keep BRI supply chains and business going without fear of Mossad or CIA sabotage".
Preventing Internal Attacks: To "keep the CIA/Mossad from launching terror attacks and color revolutions within Chinese territory".
Assessment of Iranian Infiltration: China might assess the "Mossad infiltration problem" in Iran, evident in the assassinations of Iranian leadership, as too high a risk for strong commitment.
Trade War Concessions: The US might agree to "ease up on trade war" tensions in exchange for China's non-involvement.
Buying Time: To "placate the US-Anglo Zionist Empire for the short term to buy time to prepare for a future US confrontation".
Reasons for Moderate-Strong Support:
Hastened US-Zio Weakening: An Iranian quagmire with Chinese support could also "greatly weaken the US-Anglo Zionist Empire".
Energy Supply Security: Iran is a significant energy supplier to China; its destruction would "reducing China’s energy supply" and give the US-Anglo Zionist Empire a "tactical advantage".
Preventing Sequential Targeting: Similar to Russia, the understanding that "Today Iran, tomorrow China" would necessitate intervention.
Protecting BRICS and BRI: Supporting Iran would "Protect BRICS" and the credibility of "Sino-based business partnerships" under BRI, demonstrating reliability to future partners.
Author's Assessment of China's Support:
Similar to Russia, China's commitment would likely be "weak to weak/moderate" if the conflict remains primarily a bombing/missile campaign with proxies.
If the US deploys "boots on the ground," China's commitment could rise to "weak/moderate-moderate".
China and Russia "don’t want WW3," despite believing it's "already here," and their strategy is to let the "Evil Empire" (US) "hollow itself out".
A commenter adds that China is "unlikely to offer more than weak material support" due to Iran's potential desire for dominance among ME nations, its willingness to act against Chinese interests, and the wisdom of not becoming a "proxy battlefield" between the US and China. This commenter also highlights Israel's effective operations against Iran in the "12-day" conflict, suggesting Iran suffered more relative destruction, though it inflicted harm that would make Israel "think twice".
While the author strongly advocates for the "Triad Alliance," some commenters offer differing views and skepticism:
Name Association: The term "Triad Alliance" itself drew criticism. One commenter noted that "Triad" is "associated with Asian/Chinese criminal gangs," making it an "unwelcome" association, especially for China. "Trinity" was suggested as an alternative, given Russia's cultural conservatism and "holy icons with the theme 'Trinity'".
"Kabuki Theater" and Hoax Narratives: Several commenters suggest that the entire geopolitical conflict, including the actions of the "Triad Alliance" members, is a "Kabuki theater act" or part of a "one world Kabuki show," with hidden agendas like "insider trading intentions" or a deep-seated control by a "One World Monarchy" or "Jewish" interests. One comment even suggests that BRICS itself is a "hoax" that "Will never replace the USD or the globo homo order".
Skepticism on Russian/Chinese Resolve: Some express doubt that Russia and China would offer substantial support, arguing they would prefer to "watch domestic deterioration in America to weaken her than for their nations’ blood to be spilled". Another commenter asserted that Russia has an "extreme aversion to acting against Jews" and that "Multipolarity is a joke, all the supposed poles support the Jews".
Iran's Agency and Internal Issues: One perspective highlights that "Iran actually collaborates with Israel" and has "the Jew problem," suggesting Iran is "totally jewed" and "fake". The high degree of alleged Mossad infiltration in Iran is also mentioned.
Trump's Role and Market Manipulation: Trump's "pendulum swings" and "flip-flopping" on Iran policy are viewed as "theater of the insane- or insanely greedy," potentially stemming from oligarch/Deep State disunity or a strategy of "controlled chaos" for financial gain, possibly linked to "Wall Street/Tel Aviv insider trading scam".
Richard Solomon's "Triad Alliance" concept underscores the critical importance of unity between Russia, China, and Iran in the face of what he perceives as a relentless "US Anglo-Zionist Empire" driven by a "Greater Israel Project" and the preservation of petrodollar hegemony. While joint statements exist, the author stresses that "actions transcend words". The future of this alliance, and indeed the broader multi-polar world order, hinges on the willingness of Russia and China to move beyond limited support to stronger, more decisive action should the conflict with Iran escalate significantly. The high stakes involve not only the survival of individual nations but also the global economic and political landscape for decades to come. The various internal and external pressures, along with differing perspectives on the true nature of the conflicts, continue to shape the dynamics and ultimate trajectory of this pivotal alliance.