5-31-25 DailyBriefs.info PODCAST
Source Title: Chromium Is Needed For Insulin Function But Supplemental Chromium Will Damage The Liver
Author: Joachim Bartoll
Chromium is an essential trace element needed for insulin function and metabolizing protein, glucose, and fats. Providing energy to muscles and the brain are also roles of chromium.
Overweight or obese people often have severe nutrient deficiencies, including chromium, due to diets high in plant-based and processed foods and low in unprocessed animal foods. Adding chromium to their diet can improve functions where it is crucial.
A meta-analysis found that chromium supplementation decreased insulin, HOMA-IR, and weight in overweight/obese people, but increased ALT (a liver enzyme). It also potentially increased HDL and blood pressure according to a pre-published paper.
Manufacturing chromium supplements involves converting chromite ore into compounds using processes like roasting with soda ash/lime to produce sodium dichromate, which is then processed further. Chromium picolinate is produced by combining chromium with picolinic acid.
The absorption of chromium picolinate from the intestines is very low, around 2%. This means 98% or more must be neutralized and expelled by the body.
The literature doesn't provide specific information on how much absorbed chromium picolinate is converted into bioactive chromium. It is suggested that likely only 1% of consumed chromium can actually be used by the body, leading to significant waste management.
Supplemental chromium increased ALT, indicating the liver had to deal with extra stress from the low bioavailability and potential toxic load from unused chromium and bioconversion residues. The increase in ALT and other markers like HDL and blood pressure are seen as signs of increased toxicity and possible tissue damage.
The author considers using supplements as a "band-aid" to be "extremely stupid". Supplements introduce another toxic factor while the unhealthy diet that caused deficiencies is continued.
Improving the overall diet is presented as a much better, healthier, and safer approach than using supplements.
Adopting a "species-appropriate and species-specific natural human diet" is recommended as the only way to get all needed nutrients and minimize toxic load. Humans are described as obligate hyper carnivores.
Animal-based foods are presented as providing all necessary nutrients in the right form and ratios.
Superior food sources for chromium are listed as beef, oysters, chicken breast, turkey breast, shrimp, mussels, ham, and haddock. However, the author suggests that fatty beef, some eggs, and occasional organ meat are sufficient to thrive.
Source Title: Donald Trump’s Lack of Critical Thinking Skills with Respect to Russia and Ukraine
Author: Larry C. Johnson
Donald Trump made statements criticizing both Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy regarding the conflict. Trump described Putin as having "gone absolutely CRAZY" and "needlessly killing a lot of people".
Trump claimed that the war "would never have started if I were President". He attributed the war to Zelenskyy, Putin, and Biden, not himself.
The author questions Trump's statement that Russian missile and drone strikes on Ukrainian cities were for "no reason whatsoever".
Massive Ukrainian drone attacks preceded the Russian strikes Trump criticized. Between May 19 and May 25, 2025, Ukraine allegedly launched over 700 drones across various Russian regions, including targeting the Moscow region.
The author argues that Trump's failure to acknowledge Ukraine's preceding actions shows he is "driven by emotion, not thought or reason". He calls Trump's outburst "a disgrace".
The author contrasts Trump's reaction with the Russian response, which he describes as playing it cool. Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, acknowledged the start of negotiations facilitated by the American side, while stating Putin makes decisions for Russia's security.
It is suggested that if Trump speaks with Putin, Putin would remind him he was responding to the massive Ukrainian drone attack.
The author claims that unlike Ukrainians who allegedly targeted civilians, Russians hit military targets. Evidence cited is the low number of civilian casualties (only 30) despite Russia launching a large number of drones and ballistic missiles over a weekend.
The author believes Trump's outburst inflames US public opinion against Russia and Putin.
This type of rhetoric is seen as feeding the "neocon" narrative and likely to generate pressure for more sanctions on Russia and its trading partners.
Source Title: Easily accessible online pornography is pushing users to increasingly extreme content
Author: Rhoda Wilson
Easily accessible online pornography is contributing to the normalization of sexual violence. It is argued that children and teenagers are increasingly exposed to deviant and violent sexual practices online.
Reports highlight a growing problem of men viewing child abuse material after becoming desensitized by regular pornography. Addiction escalation and spiraling out of control can lead individuals to view child pornography.
Over 850 men are arrested monthly in England and Wales for "online child abuse offences". Similar trends are observed elsewhere.
Experts consistently point to the "explosion" of free and easily accessible online pornography over the past 10-20 years as fueling demand and pushing users toward increasingly extreme content.
Pornography addiction starting in preadolescence is highlighted as a pervasive problem, leading to an inability to engage in or even understand healthy intimacy.
Users crave the dopamine hit from pornography and must escalate their usage to achieve consistent arousal. Algorithms allegedly deliver a constant digital diet of depravity.
Most men who encountered child pornography did not actively search for it. A study found over 50% first saw child abuse material when they were not seeking it.
Pornography is identified as a key "facilitating factor" for anonymous child sexual abuse offenders. The ease of finding child abuse material has increased significantly.
Law enforcement officers are finding young people viewing abhorrent material, including child abuse imagery. The situation is described as feeling "completely out of control".
Internal documents from Pornhub allegedly reveal knowledge of "very, very obvious and disturbing CSAM" on the site. One document noted 706,000 videos flagged for depicting rape, assaults on children, or other problems as of May 2020.
Pornhub allegedly did not necessarily review a video for removal until it had been flagged at least 16 times. Some videos with apparent child sexual abuse were viewed millions of times before removal.
Internal discussions at Pornhub allegedly involved managers recommending that disturbing words like "brutal," "childhood," "minor," and "unwilling" be permitted in video descriptions. One note allegedly stated a user who posted a sexual video of a child shouldn't be banned because "the user made money".
Lawmakers are starting to address the social costs of pornography through proposed legislation like age verification and redefining "obscenity".
The author questions if society wants to live in a world where children are exposed to extreme porn, libidos are wired to violence, underage users abuse other children, and men are transformed into sex offenders by pornography that is hard to avoid.
The current state is presented as the result of prioritizing "sexual liberty" over the safety and innocence of women and children.
There is a growing consensus across various fields that pornography is a "tremendously destructive force". Digital pornography is described as "lethal poison" in the cultural groundwater and should be treated as such.
Source Title: Here’s How a Cashless Society Will Impact the World
Author: Clark Barnes
Many countries are moving towards eliminating physical cash and coins, requiring reliance on electronic, government-based cryptocurrency accounts for purchases.
A cashless society could lead to situations where individuals cannot access their money or purchase goods/services despite having funds in their account.
Attacks sponsored by foreign governments could affect banks or clearinghouses, potentially preventing individuals from making purchases for hours or days.
It is recommended to have enough essential supplies to last at least two weeks to manage during potential system downtime caused by cyberattacks.
Attacks by non-government groups could lead to money being stolen, potentially taking weeks or years to recover.
Merchant Category Codes (MCCs) allow banks and clearinghouses to identify the types of goods purchased, even without a detailed receipt.
Data from all banks and clearinghouses could potentially be pooled into a central government computer.
Social credit scores, similar to financial credit scores, evaluate how individuals act in society and can be used to reward or punish behaviors deemed beneficial or not.
Social credit scores could be linked with cashless systems to block individuals from purchasing specific goods or services by restricting access to certain MCCs.
This could include denying access to essential items like food or gas if individuals do not comply with certain mandates, such as vaccination recommendations.
Without cash, pressure campaigns linked to electronic payment systems could be nearly 100% effective, forcing compliance.
Having a stockpile of food and essentials is suggested as the only way to survive such pressure campaigns until they stop.
Modern electronic networks are vulnerable to hackers, including hacktivist groups seeking to disrupt trade for ethical reasons.
Hacktivists could potentially target granular data in bank/clearinghouse systems, causing transactions to be declined based on their own criteria, potentially masked as government action.
In a cashless society, the option to use physical cash to bypass issues with electronic payment systems is eliminated.
The author warns that regardless of potential government imposition, any group with sufficient hacking skills and interest could cause serious problems in a cashless system.
Source Title: Jesus Called People Morons: The Sacred Insult That Could Save a Civilization
Author: Greg Schlueter
Christ referred to the most religious men of his time as "μωροί" (moroi), translated as "fools" or "morons," particularly in Matthew 23:17.
This term was not intended as a critique of their intelligence, as they were educated, but rather a judgment on their deliberate detachment from reality.
The Greek word moros means "dull," "insipid," or "without savor," akin to salt that has lost its saltiness, and points to moral decay rather than intellectual deficiency.
Spiritual blindness is characterized not as an inability to perceive truth, but as a conscious refusal to acknowledge it.
The author contends that this spiritual condition has become the organizational principle of contemporary culture, marked by pervasive moral inversion.
Modern public discourse is saturated with oxymorons, which function as systemic doctrines rather than occasional ironies. Examples include defining abortion as "health care" or indicting political rivals as "justice".
These contradictions are attributed to moros logic, which disconnects language from reality and equates blind adherence with enlightenment.
Donald Trump is presented as a figure who has revealed this contradiction. The author notes that under his first term, groups often labeled as oppressed experienced economic improvements.
It is observed that those who most loudly accuse others of "tyranny" are often the ones implementing various forms of control, mandates, and cultural erasures.
The author, writing from a Catholic perspective, emphasizes the importance of affirming truth in political figures or policies without elevating the individuals themselves to an infallible status.
Trump is acknowledged for his publicly pro-life stance and appointing justices who contributed to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, as well as engaging in private acts of charity.
However, the author also calls for holding Trump accountable for stances like supporting IVF and not fully addressing the commodification of early human life, arguing that a culture of life requires consistency.
Catholics are advised to support Trump when his actions align with truth but to challenge him prophetically when they do not, emphasizing that worship is reserved for God, who is Truth.
Source Title: Look at These Shameless Grifters
Author: Spencer J. Quinn
The author operates from a rightist, pro-white perspective. He describes a pattern where Donald Trump's actions, framed by fair principles, lead to an overreaction from his opponents, revealing their underlying hostile principle, which then serves as justification for pro-whites to adopt that same principle for survival.
A recent instance of this "Trumpian phenomenon" is the United States admitting 59 white, South African Afrikaner refugees.
The author claims Afrikaner farmers and their families in South Africa face violence, chaos, and explicit racial oppression from the government.
He argues that Afrikaners qualify as refugees, potentially more so than many others, because they are specifically targeted based on their race.
Trump's executive order in February reportedly stopped foreign aid to South Africa and offered resettlement to Afrikaners suffering unjust racial discrimination. This order followed South Africa's Expropriation Act of 2024, which grants the government broad power to seize property without compensation.
The author views the Expropriation Act as a mechanism for the "corrupt, anti-white government of South Africa" to unlawfully take land from white citizens.
The author interprets the outrage from the left, accusing Trump of being pro-white, as proof that the left is inherently anti-white.
The author criticizes the justification for land expropriation as fixing a "h istorical injustice" or achieving "equity". He argues that black South African leaders selectively address historical injustices.
He disputes the narrative of historical injustice regarding land ownership, asserting that Afrikaner ancestors settled in the Cape region before the Bantu arrived there and that blacks later sought refuge with whites during tribal wars like the Mfecane.
The author controversially claims that sub-Saharan black populations, due to genetic ancestry from archaic hominids, generally lack the cognitive capacity needed to manage large farms or perform complex tasks essential for modern civilization.
He cites the economic failure in Zimbabwe after white farmland was appropriated by the government and given to blacks as evidence for this claim.
He argues it is "right and good" that Afrikaners own the majority of arable land in South Africa, as they have successfully managed farms for centuries and their ancestors acquired the land rightfully before permanent settlements existed in the area.
He concludes that the opposition to Afrikaners seeking refuge is driven by anti-white hatred and a desire by blacks to "get something for nothing from whites," viewing the Afrikaners' success as interference in this "grift".
Source Title: On the Gross Fiscal Negligence of the Washington GOP
Author: David Stockman
The author strongly criticizes the Washington GOP for its "gross fiscal negligence" and failure to act as the "Watchdog of the US Treasury".
He highlights the projected $22 trillion in baseline deficits over the next decade, adding to the existing $36 trillion public debt.
An honest conservative party should aim to significantly cut these deficits, not add to them, yet the GOP is debating how much new debt to incur.
Federal outlays increased substantially in the first seven months of FY 2025 (+9%), more than double the revenue gain.
The Trump administration is criticized for not proposing rescission packages to curb departmental spending.
Trump reportedly took Social Security, Medicare, Veterans' benefits, defense spending, and mandatory debt payments off the table for cuts.
Trump also discouraged cuts to Medicaid, echoed by some Republican politicians, despite the need for reforms due to massive growth in recipients and spending.
The GOP is blamed for creating a future "due bill" of $4 trillion in tax increases over the next decade by allowing most of the 2017 TCJA tax cuts to expire.
Any spending cuts achieved by the GOP are likely to be used to pay for extending these tax cuts, rather than reducing the baseline deficit.
Extending the TCJA (the OBBB) is projected to cost $3.8 trillion, with over half benefiting the top 5% of households.
The author argues that the GOP's approach sets them up for political attacks by appearing to take from the poor to fund tax cuts for the rich.
The Republican argument that tax cuts pay for themselves through economic growth ("grow your way out") is called a "bogus theory" that has never been proven in practice.
Federal revenues are driven by nominal GDP, not real GDP, meaning even increased real growth due to tax cuts doesn't guarantee significantly higher revenues for the Treasury.
Higher economic growth is largely irrelevant to the massive Welfare State budget (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.), which is the dominant component of federal spending and is mostly unaffected by the state of the economy.
The nation's catastrophic fiscal path can only be addressed by painful spending cuts, including entitlements and defense, or by forcing higher taxes.
The 2017 Trump tax cut did not stimulate main street investment; net business investment relative to GDP actually declined afterward.
Increased corporate cash flow resulting from the tax cuts primarily went to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks, not into productive investment.
Both real economic growth (measured by real final sales) and real wage growth slowed after the 2017 tax cut.
Any underestimation of revenue by the CBO after the TCJA was due to higher inflation, not higher real growth. This higher inflation also caused increased government spending and interest payments.
Source Title: The American Pravda Sues the Trump Administration
Author: Thomas DiLorenzo
President Trump issued an executive order proposing to end taxpayer funding for NPR and PBS.
The author characterizes NPR and PBS as government-subsidized propaganda outlets, not independent news sources.
NPR filed a lawsuit claiming Trump's order violates their employees' freedom of speech, implying government subsidies are necessary for free speech.
The author counters that free speech and criticism of the government are possible without taxpayer funding, referencing the Mises Institute.
He argues that the existence of NPR and PBS is unconstitutional, as government-subsidized media is not among the powers delegated to Congress in the Constitution.
Government-funded propaganda is described as aligning with the sixth plank of The Communist Manifesto, which advocates for state centralization of communication.
The author alleges that the FCC under the FDR administration suppressed criticism of FDR by denying or revoking radio licenses.
Government-funded propaganda is described as immoral, tyrannical, and un-American.
A quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson states it is "sinful and tyrannical to compel a man to contribute to ideas with which he disagrees." The author believes at least half of Americans disagree with NPR/PBS's "leftist propaganda".
The author suggests Trump's executive order reflects an assertion of presidential power in constitutional interpretation, similar to actions by some predecessors before the Supreme Court claimed a monopoly on interpretation.
The historical example of President Andrew Jackson vetoing the Bank of the United States recharter despite a Supreme Court ruling is provided.
The author supports Trump's apparent instinct that government-funded state propaganda has no place in a free society.
Government-funded state propaganda is identified as a characteristic feature of oppressive and totalitarian regimes throughout history.
Source Title: The Big Mistake They Made
Author: Eric Peters
The article discusses the conflict between the federal government (under Trump) and California's Air Resources Board (CARB) regarding vehicle emissions standards.
CARB functions as a de facto national regulatory body because its emissions standards are adopted by numerous other states, compelling manufacturers to produce vehicles compliant with California's rules for the entire market.
Manufacturers find it economically impractical to produce separate vehicle lines for CARB-compliant states versus others.
The author argues that the significant error made by vehicle manufacturers was initially agreeing to comply with CARB's regulations decades ago.
CARB's early regulations mandated additional equipment on vehicles and restricted certain models or engine/transmission combinations from being sold.
Manufacturers absorbed the cost of making all vehicles "California compliant" and passed these expenses onto consumers nationwide. This also resulted in fewer choices for buyers outside California.
The author asserts that yielding to demands from perceived "bullies" like CARB inevitably leads to increased demands.
CARB has since enacted mandates for "zero emissions" vehicles (effectively electric vehicles), aiming to ban the sale of conventional vehicles by 2035, thus creating a de facto national electric vehicle mandate.
The author criticizes the "zero emissions" definition for focusing solely on tailpipe emissions while ignoring environmental impacts from EV manufacturing and electricity generation.
The author believes that the majority of consumers outside California neither want nor can afford electric vehicles.
Manufacturers have trapped themselves into a difficult situation by complying with CARB's escalating demands.
The author metaphorically compares the manufacturers' predicament to being in a regrettable marriage that they knew was problematic from the start.
Source Title: Traders Are “Selling America”
Author: SchiffGold.com
The article reports on comments suggesting that financial markets are currently experiencing a trend of "selling America".
According to the source, this trend was predicted based on the expected consequences of Trump's policies.
In a recent week, gold was noted as a strong performer, rising by more than 5%, while US financial markets experienced broad selloffs.
The source's commentator describes US government bonds (treasuries) not as a safe haven, but as risky assets or even "junk bonds".
It is argued that investors buying US treasuries are guaranteed to lose money, either through a potential government default or through the government printing money to pay its debts.
This perception shift, where treasuries are seen as risky, is highlighted as a significant development in global markets.
Gold is presented as the only asset that has consistently rallied and serves as a true safe haven during market downturns.
The commentator criticizes both major political parties for their fiscal policies, stating that regardless of who is in power, America's national debt continues to grow.
Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" is seen as accelerating the nation's trajectory towards a debt crisis and a crisis for the US dollar.
Tariffs are described as directly harming American consumers, who ultimately pay the increased costs.
The weakness of the US dollar is said to exacerbate the negative impact of tariffs on consumers.
The belief held by some "experts" that tariffs would strengthen the dollar and offset costs is dismissed, as the opposite effect has allegedly occurred.
Source Title: Why Are Western Leaders Such Deranged Clowns?
Author: Kevin Barrett
The author claims people are increasingly observing the "Gaza genocide" and the complicity of Western leaders in enabling it.
There is a perceived link between enabling genocide and the poor quality of leadership prevalent in Western nations.
The author discusses assessments of President Biden ("Dementia Joe" or "Genocide Joe") and President Trump ("President Sybil" or "Genocide Don"), characterizing their leadership through the lens of perceived mental or behavioral issues.
It is suggested that a president perceived as "brain-dead" and controlled by a "neocon cabal" is advantageous for the cabal, potentially facilitating events like the Gaza conflict.
Trump’s leadership is characterized by seemingly erratic and contradictory statements on various foreign policy issues, including relations with Russia/Ukraine and the use of tariffs.
The author argues that the leadership across Western nations exhibits a "clownish level," with Israeli PM Netanyahu labeled as the "evilest clown" due to actions in Gaza.
The overturning of election results in Romania is discussed, allegedly to ensure a government favorable to positioning European troops near Ukraine and potentially provoking Russia.
Macron is mentioned in the context of the Romanian situation and subject to various personal accusations and theories regarding his relationships.
An alleged scandal involving UK PM Keir Starmer, Ukrainian "escort services," and fires at his house is reported, framed as a possible message or attempt at political undermining.
The author suggests that Western leaders might be "clownish perverts" by design.
A central claim is that "Jewish-Zionist oligarchs who rule the West specialize in political blackmail". This blackmail is presented as a method used to control Western leaders.
The author controversially suggests that individuals with compromising secrets, like child-molester Dennis Hastert, are promoted to high office because they can be blackmailed by Zionist Jews, implying this is a selection process.
The perception of "evil clownery" in high places, linked to figures like Jeffrey Epstein and the Gaza conflict, is becoming more widely noticed.
It is noted that "noticing" these issues is allegedly being labeled as antisemitism.
Source Title: A Mainstream Response
Author: Miles Mathis
The author received an anonymous email purporting to be from "mainstream physics" in response to his extensive critiques.
The email contained significant personal insults and accusations, calling the author's work the "product of a diseased mind" and describing him as a "disturbed, poorly adjusted malcontent".
The anonymous sender, who signed off as "Friedrich," also accused the author of "jealous blathering about other physicists," specifically mentioning Sabine Hossenfelder.
The author characterizes this anonymous message as the only type of response he receives from the mainstream, describing it as lacking substance and bravery due to the sender's hidden identity.
The author speculates that the anonymous sender might actually be Sabine Hossenfelder herself.
Reasons for this speculation include the specific mention of Hossenfelder as the "most sinned against" physicist and the inclusion of the term "misogynist" among the insults, which the author believes a man would not typically add.
The author perceives the message as stemming from "desperation and raw undisguised hatred".
He likens the tone of the email to the "death-throes chatterings of someone cut down on a battlefield," attempting to deliver a final weak curse.
Source Title: Two More Fakes from England
Author: Miles Mathis
The author analyzes the "Southport attacks" in England and the case of Lucy Connolly, who was sentenced for a tweet related to the events.
The author asserts that both the Southport attacks and the case against Lucy Connolly were "fake" events.
He questions the severity of Lucy Connolly's sentence (2.5 years in prison) for a short tweet that was only online for four hours and subsequently removed.
The author argues that Lucy Connolly's tweet, which expressed she wouldn't care if certain events happened and would be glad, constitutes opinion, not incitement to racial hatred according to typical US free speech standards.
Axel Rudakubana, the teenager allegedly responsible for the attacks, is described as a black Rwandan. The author notes he pled guilty, which the author finds suspicious.
The author lists numerous details about the Southport events that he finds questionable and indicative of a staged event.
The alleged attacker, Axel, being "detained at His Majesty's pleasure" instead of receiving a standard sentence is interpreted by the author as evidence of a "fraud" or "fake-detention by MI5".
The mention of an Al Qaeda manual found on Axel is highlighted as a "huge red flag," as the author views Al Qaeda and similar groups as "CIA-front pretend organization[s]".
The author finds it suspicious that Axel was arrested at the scene quickly, questioning why he would remain there.
The lack of a clear motive for the attacks is noted.
The timing of the dance class, having just started the week of the attack, is seen as potentially suggestive that the event was created for the attack.
The specific length of the alleged attacker's knife (8 inches) is viewed suspiciously by the author.
The explanation that the front door was unlocked for fire safety reasons is dismissed as illogical and proof the event narrative is false.
The author questions the survival and ability of the teacher, Leanne Lucas, to call emergency services after allegedly being stabbed multiple times with an 8-inch knife.
The author presents two different images allegedly of Leanne Lucas as photographic evidence that the event is fake.
The name of one of the victims, Bebe King, is noted with suspicion by the author ("Nuff said").
The decision by local police to impose an Emergency Restriction of Flying over the area is viewed as an unusual measure that would require national security involvement (MI5), suggesting an undisclosed reason beyond the reported crime.
Axel Rudakubana is claimed to be an actor with theatre training and prior appearances on BBC, suggesting he was not a typical disadvantaged individual.
The author claims the official narrative about Axel's history contains mathematical errors regarding his age and school attendance, further suggesting it is fabricated.
The author criticizes Matt Walsh for accepting and reporting on these events as real without conducting research.
Source Title: ☕️ LITERALLY ☙ Thursday, May 29, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Author: Jeff Childers
A federal court, the U.S. Court of International Trade, issued a unanimous decision striking down all of Trump's tariffs on various countries.
The court's ruling required the US to pay back all collected tariffs.
The decision was based significantly on the court's interpretation of the word "regulate" in the IEEPA statute, concluding that it does not grant the President the power to "levy tariffs".
The court also cited the Supreme Court's "major questions" doctrine as an additional basis for its decision.
The author argues that the court's interpretation of "regulate" defies dictionary definitions and precedent from a predecessor statute. He believes the decision will likely be overturned on appeal.
RFK Jr. publicly criticized major medical journals (The Lancet, NEJM, JAMA) as being "corrupt" and influenced by the pharmaceutical industry.
RFK Jr. announced that the NIH is considering ceasing publication in these journals and creating its own scientific publications unless they make "radical" changes.
The author notes former Lancet editor Richard Horton's prior statement that a significant portion of scientific literature may be untrue.
RFK Jr. also referred to federal health agencies (NIH, CDC, FDA, CMS) as "sock puppets" for Big Pharma.
The Trump Administration's DOJ is reportedly re-opening or directing resources towards several high-profile investigations, including the Michigan Governor Whitmer alleged kidnapping plot, the COVID-19 origin cover-up, the leak of the Supreme Court Dobbs opinion, and the Jan 6 pipe bomb incident.
Trump suggested he would look into pardons for the men convicted in the Whitmer case, describing it as appearing to be a "railroad job".
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino confirmed these investigations via posts on X, stating progress is being made.
The investigation into the Supreme Court Dobbs leak is highlighted as particularly significant and unprecedented, potentially implicating SCOTUS insiders.
The author notes the irony of the phrase "no one is above the law" potentially applying to individuals who previously used the legal system against others.
Secretary Rubio announced the implementation of visa restrictions targeting foreigners "complicit" in censoring Americans.
These visa restrictions could affect foreign officials, NGO members, and potentially national leaders involved in global censorship efforts.
Being placed on this visa restriction list is described as publicly branding individuals as enemies of American liberty and potentially damaging to their careers and international standing.
This action is presented as the first time foreign individuals might face personal diplomatic consequences for participating in censorship against Americans.
These moves by the Trump administration are viewed as part of a broader effort to reverse power dynamics related to censorship, lawfare, and institutional corruption.
The author cites an article in The Nation titled "The Democratic Party Is Literally Dying," which discusses the deaths of multiple Democratic House members.
Eight Democratic House members have died since the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Despite The Nation's headline stating the party is "literally dying" and the number of recent deaths, the author notes that mainstream media outlets are not mentioning the potential connection to the COVID-19 vaccine.