DailyBriefs.info archive  GoogleExplainer.com 

Utah: Ground Zero for the Health Freedom Movement

https://substack.com/@utahhealth/p-172035393 

text

Utah: Ground Zero for the Health Freedom Movement

Also how doctors and nurses globally became foot soldiers of the military complex

HEALTH INDEPENDENCE ALLIANCE

AUG 28, 2025

Utah has been at the epicenter of the health movement in a number of different ways, and the most recent way was through the high profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, which was dropped by Pam Bondi on July 12, 2025.

While the press has mostly moved on from this event, there are several details that got revealed in the process that are very important to note and not miss. It shed light not only on the inner workings of the government, but also the horrific role of the military in the COVID-19 Project. Let us look at these details one at a time, with the help of publicly available documents on PACER.

Dr. Kirk Moore’s Case revelations

For those (like the present writers) who had direct knowledge of the events of July 7 – 11, 2025 at the Federal Courthouse in Salt Lake City, and who were present throughout the court proceedings, the unraveling that took place in the court was quite a jolt. In the first place, there was the absurd situation where Dr. Moore and his co-defendants could not speak about the medical damage of the vaccines, in a case where they were accused of handing out vaccination cards to those who did not wish to get vaccinated. This is like preventing a bus driver from bringing up the semi-truck that swerved into his lane when he tries to defend against his alleged violation of road rules to protect his passengers. The US DOJ pushed to exclude this, and the Judge Howard Nielsen Jr agreed. According to the hyperbolic straw-man arguments set up by the prosecutors (PACER document 148):

“No one was standing next to the unvaccinated card-seekers ready to imminently and forcibly inject them with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will. Defendants were not swooping in at the last minute or second to swat an arsenic-filled syringe out of the hand of a government agent attempting to forcibly inject an unwilling and helpless unvaccinated card-seeker.”

Todd Bouton, Prosecutor, DOJ and Judge Howard Nielson Jr.

In other words – forget the long list of coercions from almost every institution who forced the populace to get the vaccine in a hundred different carrot-and-stick ways, including job loss. They didn’t break down the door and stick the syringe into your arm, so it is all a-okay. The judge was particularly callous regarding job loss (PACER document 273-1):

“Further, I conclude that the consequences of rejecting vaccination were not so unthinkable as to render Dr. Moore's patients' choice illusory. At worst, these patients faced a potential loss of employment or the inability to attend school in person.”

Job loss, or career loss for those in the medical field, is “not so unthinkable” for Nielson Jr. as seen from his cushiony job. Just flip burgers, doc!

When the subject of requiring vaccines for a kidney transplant was brought up, the Department of “Justice” had this to say (PACER document 273):

“However, even if true, anyone in need of a medical procedure—including even an organ transplant—could have sought legal relief in court for access to such a procedure, without resorting to obtaining a fraudulent vaccination card.”

In other words, if you needed a transplant and didn’t want to get vaccinated – good luck running around with the court system buddy. We don’t care if you die in the meantime.

Military used weapons’ pathway for vaccines

Another important aspect of the case came to the surface during the testimonies of two witnesses of the prosecution – Chris Duggar (ex. CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA).

Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA)

They explicitly clarified something that Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have been hollering about for years now: the military was in complete control of the entire project to create a kill box. To start with, we should remind ourselves that the Commander-in-Chief of the military, Trump, issued an Executive Order 13887 which Fauci gleefully attended, on September 19, 2019 which set up the basis for Operation Warp Speed.

So the operation ‘coincidentally’ kicked off right in time for COVID-19. In the court, according to questions to Duggar:

Q. Operation Warp Speed actually involved the military, right?

A. Very much so.

Q. It was run by a general?

A. Yes, ma'am.

Q. So is it fair to say that you knew that human beings, being who human beings are, there was going to be a significant percentage, turned out to be around 25 percent, that wasn't ever going to be used because people were going to decline the vaccine?

A. I'll say our original plan, which never survives encounter with the enemy, wasn't expecting a 25 percent decline.

Q. You said something to the effect of "a plan never survives an enemy." Sounds like a military term. What did you mean by that?

A. It is an old military term, apparently. You can write your best plan with all of your assumptions and known challenges, but then when you start your activity or combat, the plan usually goes out the window. You're going to have to adjust to what's really happening on the ground. The military has an even bigger mentality of buying more than enough. And theirs is based on the fighting soldier. The soldier can't operate in the field if they run out of bullets, food, gas for their truck.

In no uncertain terms, human beings who declined the vaccine were seen as the enemy, and the bullets were the analog of vaccines. Furthermore, in his role as lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, Duggar likened his team’s efforts to fast-track vaccines to the public as “the best war game scenarios.” The revelations from Gary Disbrow made the connection to the military and surveillance even more explicit:

A. The distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir, to track hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines as well as the ancillary kits.

Q. Interesting. Okay. But you're relying on what the manufacturer is telling you about what they did in the manufacturing process because you don't have people on the ground at Moderna, right?

A. No, we did have people in plant.

Q. Military people?

A. Correct.

Disbrow also testified to the presence of Department of Defense personnel in the facilities of all six of the vaccine manufacturers with whom BARDA was contracted. And then the discussion amongst the attorneys and the judge (in-court document 335) regarding a document redacted by the DOJ showed what was the real worry:

Attorney: It’s the Department of Defense that entered into the contract with the pharmaceutical companies, it was the military.

Court: Where are you getting that from?

Attorney: At the very top of the contract, at the top of it.

Court: Which one? The Pfizer one? These three.

Attorney: I think its on all of them… these are military contracts. Which is one of the reasons they want this confidential, because I don’t think they want people to know that, for whatever reason, … I don’t think military documents are even covered by FOIA as far as I understand it.

Court: So, there’s an attempt to redact, for sure.

Attorney: So, I think that even the Government’s motion conceded it, because that’s one of the things did not want to come out in trial. I mean maybe it was on an email that I got or on the motion, but the Government’s specifically trying to protect that from disclosure, so I think they would concede it.

Attorney 2: Your honor, I can point to page 5 of the Janssen contract, it’s the first one I pulled up. Page 5 identifies the agreement is entered into between the United States of America, represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, Advanced Technology International as a consortium managements firm of the …

Court: Yes, I see that. Yeah, OK. Thank You.

For those keeping track, Advanced Technology International is involved in “WMD Countermeasures”. The entire Covid-19 operation (see all the contracts here, reaching back to 2018) has hence been under military command, from the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents. While the medical system believed the CDC and the FDA, the CDC and FDA were following military orders, and the whole project had nothing to do with science.

Doctors and nurses became military foot soldiers in what was indeed World War III, waged against the citizens of the world.

This is one significant reality that came to the surface through this Utah trial, where one doctor simply said NO.

Laws passed and Real Solutions from Utah

Other significant developments in Utah are the laws that have been passed, which have gained national recognition. The bill banning fluoride in water got a lot of press, but there are even more significant bills that have passed that are hidden gems.

Want that genuine alternative treatment, but no doctor dares to prescribe something non-standard? In Utah, a doctor can privately contract with their patient to give them a much wider selection of treatments than the straitjacket of ‘standard of care’. This is much better than most of the sanctuary laws in other states.

Want to protect your body from further unleashing of genetically modified products like the Covid vaccine? Try Utah’s SB144 that prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, with a $100,000-per-violation penalty! This law was pioneered in Utah, and protects from any and all mRNA based mandates.

Want to make sure that immunity never becomes a basis for discrimination ever again? Once again, Utah has passed a law that prevents such discrimination from the government or an employer.

Utah has a number of organizations supporting health freedom, such as the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition and Defending Utah, who have actively worked on these bills. HIA in particular has spent more than $40,000 on educating Utahns about the vaccines:

In addition, HIA has also created a documentary – Utah: Safe and Effective? – with full documentary evidence, clearly stating the long-term solution for treating our toxic health system: a separation of powers between medicine, state and industry:

Following these strategies has made Utah Ground Zero for the Health Freedom movement. Please let people know about the military project that has unleashed World War III, and about these measures that can actually resolve them. Please support the organizations (HIA, We Are the People, Your Health Freedom) involved, including Dr. Kirk Moore. It will make sure that the work put in to create these solutions can continue on.

Briefing Document: Utah - Ground Zero for Health Freedom

This document provides a detailed briefing on the main themes and most important ideas and facts presented in the source "Utah: Ground Zero for Health Freedom" from Health Independence Alliance, published on August 28, 2025. The source focuses on the state of Utah as a pivotal location for the health freedom movement, drawing heavily on revelations from the dropped prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore and recent legislative actions.

I. The Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Case: Exposing Government and Military Involvement in the COVID-19 Project

The high-profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, which was dropped on July 12, 2025, served as a "jolt" for those with direct knowledge of the proceedings and revealed critical insights into governmental and military operations related to COVID-19.

A. Restrictions on Defense Arguments and Judicial Callousness:

• Suppression of Vaccine Damage Discussions: Dr. Moore and his co-defendants were "prevent[ed]... from bringing up the medical damage of the vaccines" despite being accused of providing fraudulent vaccination cards to those who wished to avoid vaccination.

• DOJ's Hyperbolic Arguments: Prosecutors argued that no one was "standing next to the unvaccinated card-seekers ready to imminently and forcibly inject them with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will," dismissing the widespread coercion.

• Judge's Dismissal of Coercion: Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. deemed job loss or inability to attend school "not so unthinkable" as consequences of rejecting vaccination, implying that patients' choices were not illusory.

• Court's Stance on Medical Procedures: Regarding vaccine requirements for organ transplants, the Department of Justice suggested that individuals could "have sought legal relief in court," disregarding potential fatal delays.

B. Military Control of the COVID-19 Project (Operation Warp Speed): Testimonies from Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA) explicitly clarified the military's pervasive role in the "entire project to create a kill box."

• Executive Order 13887: Issued by then Commander-in-Chief Trump on September 19, 2019, this order "set up the basis for Operation Warp Speed" "right in time for COVID-19."

• Military Leadership and Terminology: Operation Warp Speed was "run by a general," and Duggar, as lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, likened his efforts to "the best war game scenarios."

• "Enemy" Analogy: Duggar confirmed the use of military terms, stating, "a plan never survives an enemy," and explicitly viewed human beings who declined the vaccine as "the enemy," with vaccines acting as "bullets."

• Department of Defense (DoD) Logistics and Presence:Disbrow testified that the "distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir" to track "hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines."

• DoD personnel were present "in plant" at the facilities of "all six of the vaccine manufacturers" contracted with BARDA.

• Redacted Military Contracts: Discussions in court revealed an attempt by the DOJ to redact documents showing that the contracts with pharmaceutical companies were "military contracts," entered into by "the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey."

• Advanced Technology International (ATI) Involvement: ATI, a consortium management firm involved in "WMD Countermeasures," was a party to these contracts, further solidifying the military's role.

• Conclusion on Military Control: The source concludes that the "entire Covid-19 operation... has hence been under military command, from the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents." It asserts that "doctors and nurses became military foot soldiers in what was indeed World War III, waged against the citizens of the world."

II. Utah's Legislative Achievements for Health Freedom

Utah has passed several "hidden gems" of legislation that have garnered national recognition and provide significant protections for health freedom.

• Banning Fluoride in Water: While gaining press, this is presented as one of several important bills.

• Private Doctor-Patient Contracts for Alternative Treatments: Utah allows doctors to "privately contract with their patient to give them a much wider selection of treatments than the straitjacket of ‘standard of care’." This is deemed "much better than most of the sanctuary laws in other states."

• SB144 - Prohibition of Forced Genetic Treatments: This law "prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, with a $100,000-per-violation penalty!" It "protects from any and all mRNA based mandates."

• Protection Against Immunity-Based Discrimination: Utah has "passed a law that prevents such discrimination from the government or an employer."

III. Health Freedom Advocacy in Utah

Various organizations in Utah are actively supporting the health freedom movement and advocating for legislative change.

• Key Organizations: The Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah are all noted for their active work on these bills.

• HIA's Educational Efforts: HIA has "spent more than $40,000 on educating Utahns about the vaccines" and produced a documentary, "Utah: Safe and Effective?", which proposes "a separation of powers between medicine, state and industry" as a "long-term solution for treating our toxic health system."

Conclusion

The source portrays Utah as a critical hub for the health freedom movement, driven by significant legal revelations and proactive legislative measures. The Dr. Kirk Moore case is presented as a crucial turning point, unmasking a "horrific role of the military in the COVID-19 Project" and illustrating how medical professionals were "foot soldiers of the military complex." Concurrently, Utah's pioneering laws demonstrate a commitment to individual medical autonomy and protection against various forms of health-related coercion.

convert_to_textConvert to source

welcome to the lenny and Maria sanchez PODCAST AND VIDEO show.

Here are the key takeaways from the provided sources:

• Utah has been identified as a central hub for the health freedom movement, notably due to the high-profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, which concluded when the case was dropped on July 12, 2025. This legal event brought to light significant details about government operations and the role of the military in the COVID-19 Project.

• During Dr. Kirk Moore’s court proceedings in Salt Lake City from July 7-11, 2025, Dr. Moore and his co-defendants were prevented from discussing the medical damage of vaccines. This prohibition occurred in a case where they were accused of distributing vaccination cards to individuals who sought to avoid vaccination, a motion pushed by the US DOJ and agreed upon by Judge Howard Nielsen Jr..

• The prosecution argued that no one was being forcibly injected with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will, framing the defendants' actions as not protecting against imminent, physical force.

• Judge Howard Nielson Jr. concluded that the consequences of refusing vaccination, such as potential job loss or inability to attend school in person, were not "unthinkable" enough to invalidate patients' choices.

• The Department of Justice suggested that individuals needing medical procedures, including organ transplants, who did not wish to be vaccinated, could have pursued legal relief in court rather than obtaining a fraudulent vaccination card.

• Testimonies from Chris Duggar (formerly of the CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA) explicitly revealed that the military maintained complete control over the entire COVID-19 project. This effort was established through Executive Order 13887, issued by Commander-in-Chief Trump on September 19, 2019, which laid the groundwork for Operation Warp Speed.

• Chris Duggar affirmed in court that Operation Warp Speed was heavily involved with the military and overseen by a general. He also indicated that initial plans did not foresee a 25% decline in vaccine acceptance.

• Duggar elaborated on the military term "a plan never survives an enemy," explaining that plans must be adaptive in real-world situations, and the military's approach involves procuring more than enough supplies, likening it to a soldier needing sufficient "bullets, food, gas for their truck".

• Within this military context, individuals who declined the vaccine were regarded as "the enemy," with vaccines serving as an analog to "bullets". Duggar, leading the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, characterized his team's efforts to rapidly deploy vaccines as akin to "the best war game scenarios". Gary Disbrow's testimony further underscored the military's involvement, extending to surveillance.

• Gary Disbrow testified that the Department of Defense logistics personnel, in collaboration with Palantir, developed the distribution plan for tracking hundreds of millions of vaccine doses and associated kits. He also confirmed the presence of military personnel within the facilities of all six vaccine manufacturers contracted by BARDA.

• During court discussions, an attorney highlighted that the Department of Defense was the entity contracting with pharmaceutical companies for the vaccines, making them military contracts. The attorney suggested a governmental desire to keep this information confidential, noting that military documents might not be subject to FOIA requests.

• The court acknowledged an effort to redact these details, and an attorney pointed out that the government's motion appeared to concede this point by explicitly seeking to protect this information from disclosure.

• An attorney referenced page 5 of the Janssen contract, which identified the agreement as being between the United States of America, represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, and Advanced Technology International. Advanced Technology International is involved in "WMD Countermeasures". This led to the conclusion that the entire Covid-19 operation, initiated as early as 2018, was under military command, framing the vaccine program as a "war-like 'solution'" with "vaccine 'weapons'" against the populace. The source suggests that the CDC and FDA were operating under military directives, not scientific principles.

• The Utah trial revealed a significant reality: doctors and nurses effectively became "military foot soldiers" in what was described as "World War III," waged against global citizens.

• Utah has enacted several important health freedom laws, including one that permits doctors to privately contract with patients to offer a broader range of treatments beyond standard care. Additionally, SB144 prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, carrying a $100,000-per-violation penalty, thereby safeguarding against mRNA-based mandates.

• Another Utah law aims to prevent discrimination based on immunity status by either the government or employers. Organizations such as the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah actively campaigned for these legislative changes. The HIA specifically invested over $40,000 in educating Utahns about vaccines.

• The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) produced a documentary, "Utah: Safe and Effective?", which advocates for a long-term solution to the health system: a fundamental separation of powers between medicine, the state, and industry.

thank you for listening to another session of the lenny and Maria sanchez PODCAST AND VIDEO show produced and archived at the website dailybriefs.info

Detailed Timeline of Main Events

September 19, 2019:

• President Trump issues Executive Order 13887, setting the foundational basis for Operation Warp Speed. Fauci is noted to have attended this event.

Coinciding with COVID-19 (Exact date unspecified, but post-Sept 2019):

• Operation Warp Speed is initiated, explicitly involving the military in the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.

• The Department of Defense (DoD) enters into contracts with pharmaceutical companies for vaccine production. These are identified as "military contracts" and are initially sought to be confidential.

• DoD logistics personnel and Palantir develop the distribution plan for hundreds of millions of vaccine doses and ancillary kits.

• DoD personnel are present in the manufacturing facilities of all six vaccine manufacturers contracted by BARDA.

Undated, but occurring prior to July 2025:

• Dr. Michael Kirk Moore and co-defendants are accused of handing out fraudulent vaccination cards to individuals who did not wish to get vaccinated.

• Utah health freedom organizations, including the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah, actively work on and advocate for health-freedom-related bills.

• Utah passes laws:

• Allowing doctors to privately contract with patients for a wider selection of treatments beyond the "standard of care."

• Prohibiting forced genetic treatments (like mRNA-based mandates) by employers and insurers (SB144), with a $100,000-per-violation penalty.

• Preventing discrimination based on immunity status by government or employers.

• Banning fluoride in water.

• The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) spends over $40,000 educating Utahns about vaccines and creates the documentary "Utah: Safe and Effective?".

July 7 – 11, 2025:

• Court proceedings take place at the Federal Courthouse in Salt Lake City for the prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore and his co-defendants.

• During the trial, the US DOJ, represented by Prosecutor Todd Bouton, successfully pushes to exclude testimony regarding the medical damage of vaccines, arguing it is irrelevant to the charge of distributing fraudulent vaccination cards.

• Judge Howard Nielson Jr. agrees with the prosecution's arguments and dismisses job loss and inability to attend school as "not so unthinkable" consequences for refusing vaccination. He also suggests that individuals needing transplants could seek legal relief rather than obtain fraudulent cards.

• Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) testifies, confirming the military's significant involvement in Operation Warp Speed, which was run by a general. He likens fast-tracking vaccines to "the best war game scenarios" and refers to vaccine decliners as "the enemy."

• Gary Disbrow (BARDA) testifies about the military's role in vaccine distribution and the presence of DoD personnel in vaccine manufacturing plants.

• Attorneys in court discuss the confidential nature of the DoD contracts with pharmaceutical companies, noting an attempt by the government to redact this information from public disclosure.

July 12, 2025:

• The high-profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore is dropped by Pam Bondi.

August 28, 2025:

• The article "Utah: Ground Zero for Health Freedom" is published by the Health Independence Alliance, detailing the revelations from Dr. Moore's case and other health freedom developments in Utah.

Cast of Characters

Principle People Mentioned:

• Dr. Michael Kirk Moore: A central figure in the health freedom movement, prosecuted in Utah for allegedly handing out fraudulent vaccination cards. His high-profile case was ultimately dropped.

• Pam Bondi: The individual who dropped the prosecution against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore on July 12, 2025.

• Todd Bouton: A prosecutor from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) involved in Dr. Moore's case. He argued to exclude testimony about vaccine damage and used "hyperbolic straw-man arguments" according to the source.

• Judge Howard Nielson Jr.: The judge presiding over Dr. Moore's trial in Salt Lake City. He agreed with the DOJ to exclude testimony on vaccine damage and made statements downplaying the impact of vaccine mandates on individuals, such as job loss.

• Chris Duggar (ex-CDC): A prosecution witness who previously served as lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force. He testified about the significant military involvement in Operation Warp Speed and referred to vaccine decliners as "the enemy."

• Gary Disbrow (BARDA): A prosecution witness who testified about the military's role in vaccine distribution and the presence of Department of Defense personnel in vaccine manufacturing facilities.

• President Trump: Issued Executive Order 13887 on September 19, 2019, which laid the groundwork for Operation Warp Speed.

• Dr. Anthony Fauci: Attended the issuance of Executive Order 13887.

• Sasha Latypova: Mentioned as someone who, along with Katherine Watt, has been "hollering about" the military's complete control over the COVID-19 project for years.

• Katherine Watt: Mentioned as someone who, along with Sasha Latypova, has been "hollering about" the military's complete control over the COVID-19 project for years.

Organizations/Entities:

• Health Independence Alliance (HIA): A Utah-based organization supporting health freedom. They published the source article, spent over $40,000 educating Utahns about vaccines, and produced the documentary "Utah: Safe and Effective?".

• Your Health Freedom: A Utah organization supporting health freedom.

• We Are the People: A Utah organization supporting health freedom.

• Utah Freedom Coalition: A Utah organization supporting health freedom.

• Defending Utah: A Utah organization supporting health freedom.

• US Department of Justice (DOJ): The prosecuting body in Dr. Moore's case, which pushed to exclude certain evidence and sought to protect information about military contracts from disclosure.

• Department of Defense (DoD): Identified as being in complete control of the COVID-19 project, including vaccine development, manufacturing oversight, and distribution through Operation Warp Speed.

• Palantir: Collaborated with DoD logistics personnel to develop the vaccine distribution plan.

• Advanced Technology International: A consortium management firm involved in contracts related to "WMD Countermeasures," identified as a party in the Janssen contract.

• CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention): Its former lead for the Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, Chris Duggar, testified in the trial. The source claims the CDC was following military orders.

• FDA (Food and Drug Administration): The source claims the FDA was following military orders during the COVID-19 project.

• BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority): Its representative, Gary Disbrow, testified about military involvement in vaccine production and distribution.

convert_to_textConvert to source

Utah: Ground Zero for Health Freedom – Study Guide

I. Summary of Key Revelations from Dr. Michael Kirk Moore's Case

• Exclusion of Medical Damage Arguments: The court, specifically Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. and Prosecutor Todd Bouton, prevented Dr. Moore and his co-defendants from presenting evidence about the medical damage caused by vaccines. This was deemed irrelevant to the charge of handing out fraudulent vaccination cards, despite the defendants arguing they were protecting patients from vaccine harm.

• Dismissal of Coercion Concerns: The prosecution and judge minimized the impact of various forms of coercion (e.g., job loss, inability to attend school) used to compel vaccination. Judge Nielsen Jr. characterized job loss as "not so unthinkable" and suggested individuals needing medical procedures like organ transplants could seek "legal relief" rather than obtain a fraudulent card, disregarding potential delays or fatalities.

• Military Control of COVID-19 Project (Operation Warp Speed): Testimonies from Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA) explicitly revealed that the military, not health agencies like the CDC or FDA, was in "complete control" of the COVID-19 vaccine project.

• Executive Order 13887: Issued by President Trump in September 2019, this order laid the groundwork for Operation Warp Speed.

• Military Terminology and Mindset: Duggar referred to unvaccinated individuals as "the enemy" and vaccines as "bullets," using military terminology like "a plan never survives an enemy" and "war game scenarios."

• Department of Defense (DoD) Presence: Disbrow confirmed DoD logistics personnel (including Palantir) developed the vaccine distribution plan and that military personnel were present in the facilities of all six contracted vaccine manufacturers.

• Military Contracts: Court discussions revealed that vaccine contracts were directly with the Department of Defense (specifically the Army Contracting Command New Jersey, through Advanced Technology International), with efforts to redact this information due to its sensitive nature (e.g., military documents not being covered by FOIA and ATI's involvement in "WMD Countermeasures").

• Doctors and Nurses as "Military Foot Soldiers": The overall implication is that the medical system was following military orders, and the entire operation, framed as a "war-like 'solution'," had nothing to do with traditional science, effectively making healthcare professionals unwitting participants in what the source terms "World War III against citizens."

II. Significant Health Freedom Laws and Solutions in Utah

• Banning Fluoride in Water: A widely publicized bill in Utah.

• Private Doctor-Patient Contracts for Alternative Treatments: Allows doctors to contract privately with patients to offer a broader range of treatments beyond standard-of-care guidelines, providing more flexibility than many "sanctuary laws" in other states.

• SB144 – Prohibition of Forced Genetic Treatments: This law prohibits employers and insurers from mandating genetic treatments (including mRNA-based mandates) with a $100,000-per-violation penalty. It's noted as a pioneering law from Utah.

• Prevention of Immunity-Based Discrimination: A law passed to prevent government or employers from discriminating based on an individual's immunity status.

• Proposed Long-Term Solution: The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) documentary, "Utah: Safe and Effective?", advocates for a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry" to treat the "toxic health system."

III. Key Organizations Supporting Health Freedom in Utah

• Health Independence Alliance (HIA)

• Your Health Freedom

• We Are the People

• Utah Freedom Coalition

• Defending Utah

IV. Quiz: Short-Answer Questions

• What was the primary charge against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore that led to his high-profile prosecution in Utah? Why was the prosecution dropped?

• Explain why Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. and the US DOJ prevented Dr. Moore's defense from discussing the medical damage of vaccines in court. What analogy did the source material use to illustrate this perceived absurdity?

• How did the court, specifically Judge Howard Nielsen Jr., respond to concerns about job loss as a consequence of vaccine mandates? What did he suggest was an alternative for individuals needing medical procedures like organ transplants?

• According to Chris Duggar's testimony, what was the military's perspective on human beings who declined the COVID-19 vaccine? What analogy did he use for vaccines in this context?

• What specific details did Gary Disbrow reveal about the Department of Defense's involvement in the distribution and manufacturing of COVID-19 vaccines?

• Explain the significance of the court's discussion regarding redacted documents, particularly concerning the contracts with pharmaceutical companies for COVID-19 vaccines.

• Beyond the ban on fluoride, name two other "hidden gem" laws passed in Utah that support health freedom, as described in the source.

• Describe Utah's SB144. What does it prohibit, and what is its stated penalty for violations?

• What is the long-term solution proposed by the Health Independence Alliance (HIA) for addressing the "toxic health system," as presented in their documentary?

• Identify three of the organizations mentioned in the source that actively support health freedom initiatives and legislation in Utah.

V. Quiz Answer Key

• Dr. Michael Kirk Moore was prosecuted for allegedly handing out fraudulent vaccination cards to individuals who did not wish to get vaccinated. The prosecution was dropped by Pam Bondi on July 12, 2025.

• The judge and DOJ prevented this discussion, arguing that no one was being forcibly injected, so the medical damage was irrelevant to the charge of fraud. The source compared it to preventing a bus driver from mentioning a swerving semi-truck when defending an alleged road rule violation.

• Judge Nielsen Jr. considered job loss "not so unthinkable" and suggested that individuals needing medical procedures could seek "legal relief in court" instead of obtaining a fraudulent vaccination card, dismissing the urgency and potential life-or-death situations.

• Chris Duggar stated that human beings who declined the vaccine were seen as "the enemy." He likened vaccines to "bullets" in a military context, emphasizing a war-like approach to the vaccine rollout.

• Gary Disbrow testified that Department of Defense logistics personnel, along with Palantir, developed the vaccine distribution plan. He also confirmed the presence of military personnel within the manufacturing facilities of all six vaccine manufacturers contracted by BARDA.

• The court discussion revealed that the contracts between pharmaceutical companies and the government for COVID-19 vaccines were actually military contracts, entered into by the Department of Defense. The government attempted to redact this information, potentially because military documents are often not covered by FOIA.

• Two other "hidden gem" laws include: allowing doctors to privately contract with patients for a wider selection of alternative treatments beyond standard-of-care, and preventing discrimination based on immunity status by government or employers.

• Utah's SB144 prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, specifically targeting mRNA-based mandates. It carries a significant penalty of $100,000 per violation.

• The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) proposes a long-term solution of "a separation of powers between medicine, state and industry" to address what they describe as a "toxic health system."

• Three organizations supporting health freedom in Utah are: Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah (any three are acceptable).

VI. Essay Format Questions (No Answers Provided)

• Analyze how the Dr. Michael Kirk Moore case in Utah served as a "ground zero" for the health freedom movement, particularly in revealing the underlying structures and mindsets behind the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Discuss at least three specific revelations from the court proceedings.

• Critically evaluate the judge's and prosecution's arguments for excluding discussions of vaccine harm and minimizing the impact of vaccine coercion (e.g., job loss, organ transplant requirements). How do these arguments, as presented in the source, reflect a particular judicial and governmental perspective on individual autonomy and medical freedom?

• Discuss the evidence presented in the source that suggests the military was in "complete control" of the COVID-19 project (Operation Warp Speed). How did the testimonies of Chris Duggar and Gary Disbrow, along with the nature of the contracts, support this claim, and what are the broader implications of such military oversight for public health policy?

• Compare and contrast Utah's legislative approach to health freedom with "sanctuary laws" in other states, specifically focusing on the bills regarding private doctor-patient contracts and the prohibition of forced genetic treatments (SB144). What makes Utah's efforts stand out, according to the source?

• The source claims that "doctors and nurses became military foot soldiers in what was indeed World War III, waged against the citizens of the world." Based on the information provided, argue whether this statement is a hyperbolic exaggeration or a justifiable conclusion, drawing upon specific details from the Dr. Moore case and the military's alleged role.

VII. Glossary of Key Terms

• BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority): A U.S. government agency responsible for the advanced development and procurement of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, against public health emergencies.

• CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention): The national public health agency of the United States, typically responsible for protecting public health and safety through the control and prevention of disease.

• Department of Defense (DoD): The executive branch department of the U.S. federal government charged with coordinating and supervising all agencies and functions of the government directly related to national security and the United States Armed Forces.

• DOJ (Department of Justice): The federal executive department of the U.S. government responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice.

• Executive Order 13887: An order issued by President Donald Trump on September 19, 2019, which the source claims set the basis for Operation Warp Speed.

• FOIA (Freedom of Information Act): A federal law that grants the public the right to request access to records from any federal agency. The source implies military documents may not be covered by FOIA.

• Health Independence Alliance (HIA): A Utah-based organization actively supporting health freedom, involved in educating the public and advocating for related legislation.

• Operation Warp Speed: A public-private partnership initiated by the U.S. government to facilitate and accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.

• PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records): An electronic public access service that allows users to obtain case and docket information from federal appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts. The source uses PACER document numbers to cite court records.

• Palantir: A data analytics company that, according to the source, was involved with Department of Defense logistics personnel in developing the distribution plan for COVID-19 vaccines.

• SB144: A Utah Senate Bill that prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, with a $100,000-per-violation penalty, pioneering protection against mRNA-based mandates.

• Standard of Care: The degree of care that a reasonably prudent professional should exercise under the same or similar circumstances. Utah's new law allows doctors to privately contract beyond this for alternative treatments.

• WMD Countermeasures: Measures or strategies designed to protect against or respond to the use of Weapons of Mass Destruction (chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons). Advanced Technology International, involved in military vaccine contracts, is also associated with WMD Countermeasures.

convert_to_textConvert to source

1. What was the significance of the Dr. Michael Kirk Moore case in Utah for the health freedom movement?

The Dr. Michael Kirk Moore case, though ultimately dropped, is highlighted as a pivotal event for the health freedom movement in Utah. The court proceedings revealed crucial details about the government's approach to vaccine mandates and the unexpected role of the military in the COVID-19 project. Key revelations included the court's refusal to allow discussion of vaccine-related harm as a defense for distributing fraudulent vaccine cards, despite widespread coercion like job loss. Prosecutors and the judge dismissed concerns about job loss as "not so unthinkable" and suggested that individuals facing vaccine requirements for critical medical procedures, like organ transplants, should pursue legal relief rather than seeking alternatives.

2. How did the Dr. Moore case shed light on the military's involvement in the COVID-19 project?

Testimonies from Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA) in the Dr. Moore case explicitly confirmed the military's deep and pervasive control over the entire COVID-19 project, starting with Executive Order 13887 and Operation Warp Speed. Witnesses described the project in military terms, referring to unvaccinated individuals as "the enemy" and vaccines as "bullets" in a "war game scenario." Disbrow further revealed that Department of Defense logistics personnel, alongside Palantir, developed the vaccine distribution plan, and military personnel were physically present in the facilities of all six vaccine manufacturers. Court discussions also brought to light that contracts with pharmaceutical companies were entered into by the Department of Defense, specifically the Army Contracting Command New Jersey, with Advanced Technology International (involved in "WMD Countermeasures"). This suggests the entire operation was under military command, with medical systems effectively following military orders rather than purely scientific directives.

3. What specific arguments did the DOJ and Judge Nielson Jr. use to dismiss concerns about vaccine coercion?

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. employed highly dismissive arguments regarding vaccine coercion. They argued that because no one was "forcibly inject[ing] them with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will" by breaking down doors, the defendants' actions were not justified. The judge characterized the consequences of rejecting vaccination, such as potential loss of employment or inability to attend school in person, as "not so unthinkable." For individuals needing medical procedures like organ transplants, the DOJ suggested they "could have sought legal relief in court" instead of obtaining fraudulent vaccination cards, effectively downplaying the urgency and potential life-threatening implications of such situations.

4. How were those who declined vaccination perceived within the context of Operation Warp Speed, according to court testimonies?

According to testimonies from Chris Duggar (ex-CDC), individuals who declined the vaccine were explicitly viewed as "the enemy." He used military terminology, likening the effort to fast-track vaccines to "the best war game scenarios" and comparing vaccines to "bullets" in a combat situation where the "plan never survives an enemy." This framing suggests a hostile perception of vaccine hesitancy and a military-style approach to public health, where civilian populations who did not comply were considered adversaries.

5. What new "health freedom" laws has Utah passed that are gaining national recognition?

Utah has passed several significant "health freedom" laws. One notable bill bans fluoride in water. More impactful laws include one that allows doctors to privately contract with patients for a wider range of treatments beyond the "standard of care." Additionally, Utah's SB144 prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, carrying a substantial $100,000-per-violation penalty, specifically protecting against mRNA-based mandates. The state has also passed a law preventing discrimination based on immunity status by the government or employers.

6. What organizations are active in promoting health freedom in Utah, and what are some of their initiatives?

Several organizations are actively supporting health freedom in Utah. These include the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah. The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) has been particularly active, spending over $40,000 on educating Utahns about vaccines. HIA also produced a documentary titled "Utah: Safe and Effective?" which presents evidence and advocates for a long-term solution of separating power between medicine, the state, and industry to address perceived issues in the health system.

7. What is the "long-term solution" proposed for the "toxic health system" according to the Health Independence Alliance?

The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) proposes a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry" as the long-term solution for treating what they describe as a "toxic health system." This suggests a belief that the current intertwining of these sectors leads to detrimental outcomes and that disentangling them would foster a healthier and more independent medical landscape.

8. How did the Utah court case reveal the nature of contracts between the Department of Defense and pharmaceutical companies regarding COVID-19 vaccines?

During the Utah court case, discussions among attorneys and the judge, alongside redacted documents, revealed that the contracts for COVID-19 vaccines were explicitly military contracts. An attorney pointed out that documents, including the Janssen contract, identified the "United States of America, represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, Advanced Technology International" as the parties entering into these agreements. The government's attempts to redact and keep this information confidential suggested a desire to prevent public knowledge of the military's direct contractual role with pharmaceutical companies, possibly due to the implications for FOIA requests and public perception. This underscored that the entire COVID-19 operation, from a contractual standpoint, was under military command.

convert_to_textConvert to source

I. Utah: Ground Zero for Health Freedom HEALTH INDEPENDENCE ALLIANCE

Utah served as the epicenter for the health freedom movement, notably through the high-profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore.

Utah has been at the epicenter of the health movement in a number of different ways, and the most recent way was through the high profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, which was dropped by Pam Bondi on July 12, 2025.

It shed light not only on the inner workings of the government, but also the horrific role of the military in the COVID-19 Project.

II. Dr. Kirk Moore's trial notably restricted discussion on the medical damage of vaccines.

In the first place, there was the absurd situation where Dr. Moore and his co-defendants could not speak about the medical damage of the vaccines, in a case where they were accused of handing out vaccination cards to those who did not wish to get vaccinated.

The US DOJ pushed to exclude this, and the Judge Howard Nielsen Jr agreed.

III. Prosecutors employed "hyperbolic straw-man arguments" to dismiss claims of vaccine coercion.

According to the hyperbolic straw-man arguments set up by the prosecutors (PACER document 148): “No one was standing next to the unvaccinated card-seekers ready to imminently and forcibly inject them with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will.”

Defendants were not swooping in at the last minute or second to swat an arsenic-filled syringe out of the hand of a government agent attempting to forcibly inject an unwilling and helpless unvaccinated card-seeker.

IV. Judge Howard Nielson Jr. deemed job loss due to vaccine refusal as "not so unthinkable."

The judge was particularly callous regarding job loss (PACER document 273-1): “Further, I conclude that the consequences of rejecting vaccination were not so unthinkable as to render Dr. Moore's patients' choice illusory.”

At worst, these patients faced a potential loss of employment or the inability to attend school in person.

V. The Department of Justice suggested seeking legal relief through courts for vaccine mandates related to essential medical procedures like organ transplants.

When the subject of requiring vaccines for a kidney transplant was brought up, the Department of “Justice” had this to say (PACER document 273): “However, even if true, anyone in need of a medical procedure—including even an organ transplant—could have sought legal relief in court for access to such a procedure, without resorting to obtaining a fraudulent vaccination card.”

In other words, if you needed a transplant and didn’t want to get vaccinated – good luck running around with the court system buddy.

VI. Testimonies from prosecution witnesses revealed the military's complete control over the entire COVID-19 project.

Another important aspect of the case came to the surface during the testimonies of two witnesses of the prosecution – Chris Duggar (ex. CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA).

They explicitly clarified something that Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have been hollering about for years now: the military was in complete control of the entire project to create a kill box.

VII. Operation Warp Speed was established via an Executive Order and heavily involved the military.

To start with, we should remind ourselves that the Commander-in-Chief of the military, Trump, issued an Executive Order 13887 which Fauci gleefully attended, on September 19, 2019 which set up the basis for Operation Warp Speed.

In the court, according to questions to Duggar: Q. Operation Warp Speed actually involved the military, right? A. Very much so.

VIII. Individuals who declined the vaccine were explicitly viewed as "the enemy" from a military perspective.

Q. You said something to the effect of "a plan never survives an enemy." Sounds like a military term. What did you mean by that? A. It is an old military term, apparently.

In no uncertain terms, human beings who declined the vaccine were seen as the enemy, and the bullets were the analog of vaccines.

IX. The military applied a strategy of over-procurement, buying more than enough vaccines, akin to ensuring supplies for a fighting soldier.

The military has an even bigger mentality of buying more than enough.

And theirs is based on the fighting soldier.

X. The CDC’s efforts to fast-track vaccines were likened to "the best war game scenarios" by a lead official.

Furthermore, in his role as lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, Duggar likened his team’s efforts to fast-track vaccines to the public as “the best war game scenarios.”

In no uncertain terms, human beings who declined the vaccine were seen as the enemy, and the bullets were the analog of vaccines.

XI. The Department of Defense logistics personnel and Palantir were responsible for the vaccine distribution plan and tracking.

The distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir, to track hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines as well as the ancillary kits.

The revelations from Gary Disbrow made the connection to the military and surveillance even more explicit.

XII. Department of Defense personnel were present within vaccine manufacturing facilities.

No, we did have people in plant.

Military people? A. Correct.

XIII. Contracts with pharmaceutical companies for vaccines were identified as military contracts.

Attorney: It’s the Department of Defense that entered into the contract with the pharmaceutical companies, it was the military.

Attorney: I think its on all of them… these are military contracts.

XIV. The government attempted to redact and protect from disclosure the military’s involvement in vaccine contracts.

Which is one of the reasons they want this confidential, because I don’t think they want people to know that, for whatever reason, … I don’t think military documents are even covered by FOIA as far as I understand it.

So, I think that even the Government’s motion conceded it, because that’s one of the things did not want to come out in trial.

XV. Specific military entities, including the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, and Advanced Technology International, were identified in vaccine contracts.

Attorney 2: Your honor, I can point to page 5 of the Janssen contract, it’s the first one I pulled up.

Page 5 identifies the agreement is entered into between the United States of America, represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, Advanced Technology International as a consortium managements firm of the ….

XVI. Advanced Technology International, involved in "WMD Countermeasures," played a role in the COVID-19 operation, linking it to military command and a "war-like solution."

For those keeping track, Advanced Technology International is involved in “WMD Countermeasures”.

The entire Covid-19 operation (see all the contracts here, reaching back to 2018) has hence been under military command, from the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents.

XVII. The medical system, including the CDC and FDA, was following military orders, indicating the COVID-19 project was not primarily science-based.

While the medical system believed the CDC and the FDA, the CDC and FDA were following military orders, and the whole project had nothing to do with science.

Doctors and nurses became military foot soldiers in what was indeed World War III, waged against the citizens of the world.

XVIII. Utah has passed a law enabling doctors to privately contract with patients for a wider selection of alternative treatments beyond standard care.

In Utah, a doctor can privately contract with their patient to give them a much wider selection of treatments than the straitjacket of ‘standard of care’.

This is much better than most of the sanctuary laws in other states.

XIX. Utah's SB144 prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, protecting against mRNA-based mandates with a significant penalty.

Try Utah’s SB144 that prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, with a $100,000-per-violation penalty!

This law was pioneered in Utah, and protects from any and all mRNA based mandates.

XX. Utah enacted a law to prevent discrimination based on immunity status by the government or employers.

Want to make sure that immunity never becomes a basis for discrimination ever again?

Once again, Utah has passed a law that prevents such discrimination from the government or an employer.

This article from the Health Independence Alliance argues that Utah has become "Ground Zero" for a health freedom movement, primarily highlighted by the recent, high-profile case of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore. The authors contend that the legal proceedings of Dr. Moore, who was accused of providing fraudulent vaccination cards, revealed deeply concerning government and military involvement in the "COVID-19 Project," portraying vaccine refusers as an "enemy" in a "World War III" scenario. The piece emphasizes how military personnel were embedded in vaccine manufacturing and distribution, bypassing traditional public health agencies like the CDC and FDA, and how courts dismissed the severe consequences of vaccine mandates, such as job loss. Furthermore, the article celebrates Utah's proactive legislative efforts, citing new laws that safeguard patient choice, prohibit forced genetic treatments, and prevent discrimination based on immunity status, positioning the state as a leader in protecting individual health autonomy. 

The health freedom movement, as highlighted in the provided sources, views Utah as its "Ground Zero". This movement gained significant attention and insights through the high-profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, which was dropped on July 12, 2025. The revelations from this case shed light on the inner workings of the government and, notably, the role of the military in the COVID-19 Project.

Key aspects and concerns of the health freedom movement, derived from the sources, include:

• Judicial Stance on Vaccine Coercion: During Dr. Moore's trial, the court prevented discussions about the medical damage caused by vaccines, despite the case revolving around accusations of distributing vaccination cards to those who wished to avoid vaccination. Prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) used "hyperbolic straw-man arguments" to exclude this information. Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. deemed consequences like job loss or the inability to attend school in person as "not so unthinkable" for those rejecting vaccination. The DOJ also suggested that individuals needing medical procedures, such as organ transplants, could seek legal relief in court rather than obtaining fraudulent vaccination cards.

• Military Control of the COVID-19 Project: A significant revelation from the trial, particularly from the testimonies of Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA), was that the military was in "complete control of the entire project to create a kill box".

  • Operation Warp Speed was explicitly stated to involve the military and was run by a general.

  • Human beings who declined the vaccine were regarded as "the enemy," and vaccines were analogized to "bullets" in a military context. Duggar, as lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, described efforts to fast-track vaccines as "the best war game scenarios".

  • The distribution plan for hundreds of millions of vaccine doses and ancillary kits was developed by Department of Defense (DoD) logistics personnel and Palantir.

  • DoD personnel were present in the facilities of all six vaccine manufacturers contracted by BARDA.

  • Contracts with pharmaceutical companies for vaccines were identified as "military contracts," entered into by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, and Advanced Technology International. Advanced Technology International is involved in "WMD Countermeasures".

  • This suggests the entire Covid-19 operation was under military command, from problem creation to the "war-like 'solution' with vaccine 'weapons' against all residents," implying that the medical system was following military orders rather than science. The movement asserts that doctors and nurses became "military foot soldiers" in what was essentially "World War III, waged against the citizens of the world".

• Legislative Achievements in Utah: Utah has passed several laws that are considered "hidden gems" and significant victories for health freedom:

  • A bill banning fluoride in water.

  • Allows doctors to privately contract with patients to offer a wider range of treatments beyond the "standard of care".

  • SB144 prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, with a $100,000-per-violation penalty, protecting against "any and all mRNA based mandates".

  • A law that prevents discrimination based on immunity status by the government or an employer.

• Organizations and Solutions: A number of organizations in Utah actively support health freedom, including the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah. HIA has invested significantly in educating Utahns about vaccines and produced a documentary, "Utah: Safe and Effective?". The long-term solution proposed by HIA for addressing the "toxic health system" is a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry".

The sources indicate that the military was in complete control of the entire COVID-19 vaccine project, from its inception to its distribution. This control was a significant revelation that emerged during Dr. Michael Kirk Moore's high-profile prosecution in Utah.

Here are the key details regarding the military's involvement:

• Operation Warp Speed (OWS) Foundation and Leadership
  
  

  • Executive Order 13887, issued by Commander-in-Chief Trump on September 19, 2019, set the basis for Operation Warp Speed, with Fauci attending. This operation "coincidentally" started just in time for COVID-19.

  • Operation Warp Speed involved the military "very much so" and was run by a general.

  • Chris Duggar, formerly of the CDC and lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, likened his team’s efforts to fast-track vaccines to the public as "the best war game scenarios".

• Perception of the Unvaccinated as "Enemy"
  
  

  • In court, during questions to Chris Duggar, it was stated that a plan "never survives an enemy," which is an old military term.

  • Duggar explained this military mentality, stating that a plan often goes out the window during "combat" and requires adjustment, much like a soldier needing enough "bullets, food, gas for their truck".

  • Human beings who declined the vaccine were explicitly seen as the enemy, and vaccines were analogous to bullets.

• Military Involvement in Logistics, Surveillance, and Manufacturing
  
  

  • Gary Disbrow from BARDA testified that the distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir, to track hundreds of millions of vaccine doses and ancillary kits.

  • Disbrow also confirmed the presence of military personnel in the manufacturing plants of all six vaccine manufacturers with whom BARDA was contracted. This meant they "did have people in plant," specifically "Military people".

• Military Contracts and Secrecy
  
  

  • Discussions among attorneys and the judge in court revealed that the Department of Defense (DOD) entered into contracts with pharmaceutical companies. These were identified as "military contracts".

  • The government actively sought to redact and protect this information from disclosure, indicating a desire to keep the military's role confidential, possibly because military documents are not typically covered by FOIA (Freedom of Information Act).

  • An attorney pointed to page 5 of the Janssen contract, which identifies the agreement as being entered into by "the United States of America, represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, Advanced Technology International".

  • Advanced Technology International is involved in "WMD Countermeasures".

• Overarching Conclusion
  
  

  • The entire COVID-19 operation, reaching back to 2018, was under military command, from "the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents".

  • The sources conclude that while the medical system believed the CDC and FDA were in charge, these agencies were actually following military orders, and the entire project "had nothing to do with science".

  • Doctors and nurses ultimately became "military foot soldiers in what was indeed World War III, waged against the citizens of the world".

Dr. Michael Kirk Moore's case was a high-profile prosecution in Utah that became a significant event at the epicenter of the health freedom movement. The case, which was dropped by Pam Bondi on July 12, 2025, revealed important details about the inner workings of the government and the role of the military in the COVID-19 Project.

Key aspects and revelations from Dr. Moore's case include:

• The Charges and Court Proceedings
  
  

  • Dr. Moore and his co-defendants were accused of handing out vaccination cards to individuals who did not wish to get vaccinated.

  • A notable "unraveling" occurred in court where Dr. Moore and his co-defendants were prevented from speaking about the medical damage of the vaccines. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) pushed for this exclusion, and Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. agreed.

  • Prosecutors presented "hyperbolic straw-man arguments," stating that "No one was standing next to the unvaccinated card-seekers ready to imminently and forcibly inject them with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will". They argued that since there wasn't a direct physical threat, the defendants' actions were not justified, essentially dismissing the "long list of coercions" like job loss.

  • Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. was described as "callous" regarding the consequences of rejecting vaccination, stating that at worst, patients faced "a potential loss of employment or the inability to attend school in person," which he deemed "not so unthinkable".

  • Regarding the requirement for vaccines for medical procedures, such as a kidney transplant, the DOJ suggested that individuals could seek "legal relief in court" rather than obtaining a fraudulent vaccination card.

• Revelations Regarding the Military's Role in the COVID-19 Project
  
  

  • During the testimonies of prosecution witnesses Chris Duggar (ex-CDC) and Gary Disbrow (BARDA), it became clear that the military was in complete control of the entire project.

  • Operation Warp Speed, which set the basis for the COVID-19 response, was established by Executive Order 13887 on September 19, 2019, by Commander-in-Chief Trump.

  • Duggar confirmed that Operation Warp Speed "very much so" involved the military and was run by a general.

  • Human beings who declined the vaccine were referred to as "the enemy," and vaccines were analogized to "bullets". Duggar, as lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, likened his team’s efforts to "the best war game scenarios".

  • Gary Disbrow explicitly linked the military and surveillance to the operation, testifying that the distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel and Palantir to track vaccine doses and ancillary kits.

  • Disbrow also testified to the presence of Department of Defense personnel in the facilities of all six vaccine manufacturers contracted by BARDA.

  • Court discussions between attorneys and the judge revealed concerns about redacted documents confirming that the Department of Defense entered into contracts with pharmaceutical companies for vaccine development and distribution. Attorneys highlighted that these were "military contracts," which might explain the attempts to keep them confidential, potentially outside the scope of FOIA.

  • Page 5 of the Janssen contract, for instance, identified the agreement as being between the United States of America, "represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, Advanced Technology International".

  • Advanced Technology International is involved in "WMD Countermeasures," leading to the conclusion that the entire Covid-19 operation was under military command, from problem creation to the "war-like 'solution'" using vaccine "weapons".

  • The source explicitly states that doctors and nurses became "military foot soldiers" in what was essentially "World War III, waged against the citizens of the world," acting on military orders rather than solely based on science from the CDC and FDA.

Dr. Moore's case brought to light the significant reality of the military's deep involvement in the COVID-19 response and the treatment of vaccine refusers as an adversarial force.

Utah has been at the forefront of the health freedom movement, enacting several significant laws that have gained national recognition. These legislative developments offer real solutions for protecting health independence:

• Freedom in Alternative Treatments: In Utah, doctors can privately contract with their patients to offer a much wider selection of treatments than what is typically allowed under the strict "standard of care". This allows for genuine alternative treatments that might not be prescribed in other states.

• Protection Against Forced Genetic Treatments (SB144): Utah's SB144 prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers. This law is particularly significant as it offers protection from any and all mRNA-based mandates, carrying a substantial $100,000-per-violation penalty. This was a pioneering law in Utah.

• Prohibition of Immunity-Based Discrimination: Utah has also passed a law that prevents discrimination based on immunity by the government or an employer. This ensures that an individual's immunity status cannot be used as a basis for discrimination.

• Ban on Fluoride in Water: While not detailed in its provisions, the sources mention that a bill banning fluoride in water in Utah received considerable press.

These legislative efforts are supported by various health freedom organizations in Utah, including the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah, who have actively worked on these bills. The HIA, for example, has invested over $40,000 in educating Utahns about vaccines. They also produced a documentary, "Utah: Safe and Effective?", which advocates for a long-term solution to the health system: a separation of powers between medicine, state, and industry.

The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) is one of several organizations in Utah that actively support the health freedom movement.

Key aspects of HIA's work and proposed solutions include:

• Advocacy for Health Freedom Legislation: HIA has actively worked on various health freedom bills in Utah. These efforts have contributed to the passage of significant laws, such as:

  • Allowing doctors to privately contract with patients for a wider range of treatments beyond the "standard of care".

  • SB144, which prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers, protecting against mRNA-based mandates with a $100,000-per-violation penalty.

  • A law that prevents discrimination based on immunity status by the government or employers.

• Public Education on Vaccines: HIA has made substantial investments in educating Utahns about vaccines, spending more than $40,000 on these efforts.

• Documentary Production: HIA has produced a documentary titled "Utah: Safe and Effective?", which provides full documentary evidence.

• Long-Term Solution for the Health System: The documentary "Utah: Safe and Effective?" also articulates HIA's proposed long-term solution for addressing the "toxic health system": a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry".

Executive Summary: Unveiling the Nexus of Military Command, Judicial Inertia, and Health Freedom Advocacy in Utah

This report details critical revelations emerging from Utah, a state identified as a "Ground Zero" for the health freedom movement. The high-profile prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, though ultimately dropped, inadvertently exposed the profound and overarching control of the United States military over the entire COVID-19 vaccine project. Court testimonies from key government witnesses revealed that Operation Warp Speed, initiated by Executive Order 13887 in September 2019, was military-led and viewed the unvaccinated as "the enemy," with vaccines conceptualized as "bullets". Department of Defense personnel were embedded in vaccine manufacturing plants, and military logistics, supported by Palantir, managed distribution and tracking of doses. This strategic military command, stretching back to 2018, transformed the COVID-19 response into a "war-like 'solution'" waged against citizens, with medical professionals acting as "military foot soldiers".

Concurrently, Utah has pioneered significant health freedom legislation. These laws allow for private contracts between doctors and patients for alternative treatments, prohibit forced genetic (mRNA-based) treatments by employers and insurers with substantial penalties, and prevent discrimination based on immunity status. Organizations like the Health Independence Alliance (HIA) have been instrumental in these legislative successes and advocate for a long-term solution: a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry" to address the "toxic health system". This report synthesizes these interlocking narratives, highlighting the systemic implications of military medical governance and the critical need for legislative and structural reforms to safeguard health independence.

1. Introduction: Utah as the Epicenter of the Health Freedom Movement

Utah has emerged as a crucial focal point for the health freedom movement, experiencing significant developments that have reverberated across the nation. This prominence is rooted in a confluence of factors, including high-profile legal proceedings and pioneering legislative efforts. At the core of recent disclosures is the prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, a case that, despite its eventual dismissal, acted as a conduit for revealing critical insights into government operations and the unprecedented role of the military in the COVID-19 response. The public availability of court documents from PACER has facilitated the examination of these details, shedding light on a governance model where conventional medical authorities, like the CDC and FDA, were operating under military directives, ultimately divorcing the entire project from scientific autonomy.

This report aims to meticulously dissect these revelations, beginning with the intricacies of Dr. Moore's case, which brought these hidden dynamics to the surface. It will then expand to detail the extensive military command over the COVID-19 vaccine program, outlining the operational, logistical, and conceptual frameworks that defined it as a military endeavor. Subsequently, the report will highlight Utah's proactive legislative responses, which have established safeguards for individual health autonomy. Finally, it will discuss the role of key advocacy groups, such as the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), and their proposed structural reforms for a more independent and ethical healthcare system. Understanding these interwoven narratives is essential for comprehending the current landscape of health governance and the ongoing struggle for health freedom.

2. The Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Case: A Landmark Disclosure

The prosecution of Dr. Michael Kirk Moore and his co-defendants in Utah became a high-profile event within the health freedom movement, offering a rare glimpse into the judicial and governmental approach to vaccine mandates. The case, which was ultimately dropped by Pam Bondi on July 12, 2025, served as an unexpected platform for uncovering significant details about the operation of government agencies and the military's deep involvement in the COVID-19 Project.

2.1. Case Background and Judicial Posture

Dr. Moore and his co-defendants faced accusations of distributing vaccination cards to individuals who sought to avoid vaccination. A critical and "absurd situation" arose during the court proceedings between July 7 and July 11, 2025, in the Federal Courthouse in Salt Lake City: the defense was explicitly barred from discussing the medical damage caused by the vaccines. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) successfully pushed for the exclusion of this crucial evidence, a motion that Judge Howard Nielsen Jr. upheld. This judicial decision effectively prevented a comprehensive defense, likened by the source to preventing a bus driver from mentioning a swerving semi-truck when defending against a road rule violation aimed at protecting passengers.

2.2. Prosecution Arguments and Judicial "Callousness"

Prosecutors from the DOJ presented what were characterized as "hyperbolic straw-man arguments" to dismiss the defense's position. They contended that no one was facing an imminent and forcible injection of a COVID-19 vaccine, stating: "No one was standing next to the unvaccinated card-seekers ready to imminently and forcibly inject them with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will". This argument sought to downplay the "long list of coercions" that compelled individuals to get vaccinated, including the threat of job loss. The prosecution's stance implied that since there was no direct physical assault with a syringe, the defendants' actions were unwarranted.

Judge Howard Nielsen Jr.'s comments further underscored this perspective, revealing a "callous" disregard for the real-world consequences faced by those who resisted vaccination. He concluded that "the consequences of rejecting vaccination were not so unthinkable as to render Dr. Moore's patients' choice illusory," characterizing "a potential loss of employment or the inability to attend school in person" as "not so unthinkable". This dismissal of severe economic and social repercussions highlights a judicial detachment from the lived experiences of many citizens.

Moreover, the DOJ's position on individuals needing vaccines for critical medical procedures, such as a kidney transplant, was equally dismissive. They suggested that anyone in such a predicament "could have sought legal relief in court for access to such a procedure, without resorting to obtaining a fraudulent vaccination card". This advice was presented without apparent concern for the time-sensitive nature of such medical needs or the practical difficulties of navigating the court system while potentially facing life-threatening health issues.

2.3. Significance of the Case

Despite the limitations placed on the defense regarding vaccine harm, Dr. Moore's case proved pivotal. It was during the testimonies of key prosecution witnesses, Chris Duggar (formerly of the CDC) and Gary Disbrow (from BARDA), that the profound and unexpected military control over the entire COVID-19 vaccine project came to light. The case inadvertently served as a "ground zero" event, peeling back layers of official narratives to expose a deeply militarized approach to public health. This aspect of the trial is discussed in detail in the following section.

3. Unveiling the Military's Command of the COVID-19 Project (Operation Warp Speed)

A staggering revelation from Dr. Michael Kirk Moore's trial was the unequivocal evidence confirming the military's complete and overarching control of the entire COVID-19 vaccine project. This control extended from the foundational planning stages through to manufacturing and distribution, fundamentally reshaping the understanding of the pandemic response.

3.1. Genesis of Military Involvement: Operation Warp Speed

The groundwork for this military-led operation was laid well before the official onset of the pandemic. Commander-in-Chief Trump issued Executive Order 13887 on September 19, 2019, an event notably attended by Fauci. This order established the basis for Operation Warp Speed (OWS), an initiative that "coincidentally" kicked off precisely "in time for COVID-19". The court proceedings explicitly affirmed the military's central role in OWS:

• During questioning, former CDC official Chris Duggar confirmed that Operation Warp Speed "Very much so" involved the military.

• Duggar further testified that OWS "was run by a general", underscoring its command-and-control structure.

3.2. The "War Game" Mentality and the Unvaccinated as "Enemy"

The military's influence permeated not just the organizational structure but also the conceptual framework of the COVID-19 response. Chris Duggar, who served as the lead for the CDC’s Covid-19 Response Vaccine Task Force, described his team’s efforts to accelerate vaccine deployment as akin to "the best war game scenarios". This analogy was further elucidated through his testimony regarding military planning:

• Duggar explained the military term, "a plan never survives an enemy," detailing how plans must constantly adapt in "combat" situations.

• He elaborated on the military's mentality of acquiring "more than enough" resources, referencing a soldier's need for sufficient "bullets, food, gas for their truck".

Crucially, in this military framework, "human beings who declined the vaccine were seen as the enemy, and the bullets were the analog of vaccines". This perspective recontextualizes the public health campaign as a military operation against a segment of the population, using vaccines as "weapons".

3.3. Military Logistics, Surveillance, and Manufacturing Presence

The military's operational control was not limited to strategic planning; it extended to the practical aspects of vaccine deployment and oversight:

• Gary Disbrow from BARDA testified that the "distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir". This partnership was tasked with tracking "hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines as well as the ancillary kits", indicating a sophisticated, military-grade surveillance and logistical network.

• Even more significantly, Disbrow confirmed the "presence of Department of Defense personnel in the facilities of all six of the vaccine manufacturers with whom BARDA was contracted". When directly asked, "Military people?", Disbrow unequivocally answered, "Correct". This implies direct military oversight and involvement in the vaccine production process, not merely distribution.

3.4. Military Contracts and Efforts to Ensure Secrecy

The contractual agreements underpinning the vaccine project further solidified the military's central role:

• Discussions among attorneys and the judge in court explicitly addressed the nature of these agreements. An attorney stated, "It’s the Department of Defense that entered into the contract with the pharmaceutical companies, it was the military".

• These were identified as "military contracts," explaining why there was a strong desire to keep this information confidential. An attorney posited, "I don’t think military documents are even covered by FOIA as far as I understand it," suggesting that concealing the military's involvement might have been an attempt to circumvent public disclosure through the Freedom of Information Act.

• The court confirmed "an attempt to redact, for sure" these documents. The government's motion to protect this information from disclosure at trial was noted, indicating a deliberate effort to prevent this truth from emerging publicly.

• Specific evidence was provided, with an attorney pointing to page 5 of the Janssen contract, which "identifies the agreement is entered into between the United States of America, represented by the Department of Defense, Army Contracting Command New Jersey, Advanced Technology International".

3.5. Advanced Technology International and WMD Countermeasures

The mention of Advanced Technology International (ATI), as the consortium management firm involved in the Janssen contract, adds another layer of critical context. ATI is known to be involved in "WMD Countermeasures". This association reinforces the interpretation that the entire COVID-19 operation was framed as a response to a threat akin to a Weapon of Mass Destruction, further embedding it within a military, defensive paradigm.

3.6. Overarching Implications: A Global Military Operation

The cumulative evidence presented in Dr. Moore's trial leads to a profound conclusion: "The entire Covid-19 operation (see all the contracts here, reaching back to 2018) has hence been under military command, from the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents".

• This revelation fundamentally challenges the perception that traditional public health agencies like the CDC and FDA were leading the response. Instead, "While the medical system believed the CDC and the FDA, the CDC and FDA were following military orders, and the whole project had nothing to do with science".

• The sources conclude that in this context, "Doctors and nurses became military foot soldiers in what was indeed World War III, waged against the citizens of the world". This reframing highlights a significant shift in the governance of public health, transforming medical professionals into operatives within a global military strategy.

This "significant reality" underscores that the COVID-19 response was not merely a public health initiative but a comprehensively orchestrated military campaign, utilizing medical interventions as strategic assets against a perceived internal "enemy".

4. Utah's Pioneering Role in Health Freedom Legislation

In stark contrast to the centralized, militarized approach to public health revealed through Dr. Moore's case, Utah has simultaneously distinguished itself as a "Ground Zero" for the health freedom movement through its proactive legislative efforts. The state has enacted several significant laws aimed at safeguarding individual health independence, establishing precedents that have garnered national recognition.

4.1. Expansion of Alternative Treatment Options

One of Utah's innovative legislative achievements addresses the limitations often imposed by the "standard of care" in conventional medicine. In Utah, a doctor now has the ability to privately contract with their patients to offer a much wider selection of treatments than what is typically allowed under rigid conventional guidelines.

• This legal provision represents a significant departure from the restrictive norms found in many other states, where doctors are often constrained to prescribing only "standard" or officially approved treatments.

• By enabling genuine alternative treatments through private agreements, Utah has created a more flexible and patient-centered environment, empowering individuals and their healthcare providers to explore broader therapeutic options without the strictures of institutional control. This is regarded as "much better than most of the sanctuary laws in other states".

4.2. Protection Against Forced Genetic Treatments (SB144)

Perhaps one of the most groundbreaking pieces of legislation passed in Utah is Senate Bill 144 (SB144), which specifically prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers.

• This law is particularly impactful as it provides comprehensive protection against "any and all mRNA-based mandates".

• To ensure compliance and provide a strong deterrent, SB144 carries a substantial penalty of "$100,000-per-violation".

• The pioneering nature of this law in Utah sets a significant benchmark for other states seeking to protect their citizens from coercive medical interventions, especially those involving novel genetic technologies.

4.3. Prohibition of Immunity-Based Discrimination

Further solidifying its commitment to health freedom, Utah has also enacted a law that prevents discrimination based on immunity status.

• This legislation ensures that neither the government nor employers can use an individual's immunity status as a basis for discriminatory practices.

• The intent is to prevent scenarios where individuals might be penalized or disadvantaged in employment, access to services, or public life based on their vaccination status or presumed immunity, aiming to ensure that "immunity never becomes a basis for discrimination ever again".

4.4. Other Notable Legislative Efforts

While specific details were not provided, the sources mention that a bill banning fluoride in water in Utah "got a lot of press," indicating a broader legislative trend towards greater autonomy in health and public services. Although less detailed than the other health freedom laws, its mention signifies the diverse scope of Utah's legislative pursuits in this arena.

4.5. Advocacy and Support for Legislative Initiatives

These legislative successes are not accidental but are the result of concerted efforts by various health freedom organizations within Utah. Groups such as the Health Independence Alliance (HIA), Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah have actively collaborated and campaigned for these bills. Their collective work underscores a vibrant and organized movement dedicated to expanding and protecting individual health rights within the state.

Utah's legislative landscape, therefore, presents a powerful counter-narrative to the centralized control revealed in the COVID-19 response. By empowering individuals and physicians, and by legally safeguarding against coercive medical practices, Utah is actively building a framework for greater health independence and autonomy.

5. The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) and its Vision for Systemic Reform

The Health Independence Alliance (HIA) stands out as a pivotal organization within Utah's thriving health freedom movement. It plays a crucial role alongside other advocacy groups like Your Health Freedom, We Are the People, Utah Freedom Coalition, and Defending Utah, all actively working on legislative initiatives aimed at expanding individual health autonomy. HIA's contributions extend beyond lobbying, encompassing public education and a clearly articulated vision for fundamental systemic change within the healthcare landscape.

5.1. Advocacy and Legislative Contributions

HIA has been deeply involved in the legislative processes that have positioned Utah as a leader in health freedom. Their efforts have directly contributed to the enactment of several significant laws:

• Facilitating Alternative Treatments: HIA supported the legislation that enables doctors to privately contract with their patients. This allows for a much broader array of treatments beyond the conventional "standard of care," a notable improvement over "sanctuary laws" in other states. This empowers patients to seek genuine alternative treatments in collaboration with their physicians.

• Pioneering Protection Against Forced Genetic Treatments (SB144): HIA played a role in the passage of SB144, which prohibits forced genetic treatments by employers and insurers. This groundbreaking law, pioneered in Utah, provides robust protection against "any and all mRNA-based mandates" and includes a substantial "$100,000-per-violation penalty" to deter non-compliance.

• Safeguarding Against Immunity-Based Discrimination: HIA also contributed to the passage of a law that prevents discrimination based on an individual's immunity status by the government or employers. This ensures that personal health decisions do not become a basis for unfair treatment or disadvantage.

These legislative achievements reflect HIA's commitment to tangible, actionable solutions that protect citizens from medical coercion and expand their choices in healthcare.

5.2. Public Education and Awareness Campaigns

Beyond legislative advocacy, HIA recognizes the critical importance of public awareness and education. The organization has made a substantial financial investment in this area, having spent "more than $40,000 on educating Utahns about the vaccines". This commitment to informing the public underscores their belief that an educated populace is essential for making informed health decisions and for supporting health freedom initiatives.

5.3. "Utah: Safe and Effective?" Documentary and Proposed Systemic Reform

A significant output from HIA's educational efforts is the documentary titled "Utah: Safe and Effective?". This film is presented as containing "full documentary evidence" pertaining to the issues at hand. More critically, the documentary also serves as a platform for HIA to articulate its long-term solution for addressing what it describes as "our toxic health system".

HIA's proposed long-term solution is a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry". This framework suggests a fundamental restructuring of how healthcare is governed, aiming to decouple the influence of governmental bodies and powerful pharmaceutical/medical industries from the practice of medicine itself.

• Critique of the Current System: The proposal implicitly critiques a system where the state and industry exert undue influence over medical practice, potentially leading to conflicts of interest, suppression of alternative treatments, and a lack of patient autonomy. The revelations from Dr. Moore's case, particularly the military's command over the COVID-19 project and the subjugation of the CDC and FDA to military orders, illustrate the depth of this "toxic health system" and underscore the urgency for such a separation.

• Vision for an Independent Medical Sphere: By advocating for a separation of powers, HIA envisions a medical sphere where clinical decisions are driven purely by patient well-being and scientific integrity, free from political mandates or commercial pressures. This would empower doctors and patients to make choices based on comprehensive medical knowledge and individual circumstances, rather than being dictated by external, non-medical authorities or corporate interests. Such a separation aims to prevent the recurrence of scenarios where medical professionals become "military foot soldiers" in a "World War III waged against the citizens of the world".

In summary, the Health Independence Alliance is not merely reacting to current health mandates but is actively pursuing both immediate legislative victories and a profound, structural transformation of the healthcare system to ensure genuine health independence and prevent future abuses of power.

6. Conclusion and Strategic Implications

The investigation into Dr. Michael Kirk Moore's case and Utah's legislative responses reveals a complex and critical juncture in the global discourse surrounding health and governance. The insights gleaned from these events underscore a profound shift in the oversight and execution of public health initiatives, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6.1. The Pervasiveness of Military Control and its Systemic Impact

The most startling revelation is the unequivocal evidence of the military's complete command over the entire COVID-19 vaccine project. This was not a partnership or support role but a full operational takeover, rooted in Executive Order 13887 and executed through Operation Warp Speed. The implications are far-reaching:

• Redefinition of Public Health: What was presented as a public health crisis and a medical response was, in essence, a "war-like ‘solution’" orchestrated by the military.

• Weaponization of Vaccines and Demonization of the Unvaccinated: The classification of unvaccinated individuals as "the enemy" and vaccines as "bullets" fundamentally alters the ethical landscape of medical intervention and highlights a deeply adversarial stance against a segment of the population.

• Subordination of Civilian Agencies: The CDC and FDA, traditionally seen as apex health authorities, were demonstrated to be following military orders, with the entire project detached from scientific autonomy. This reveals a critical vulnerability in civilian oversight of public health.

• Medical Professionals as Operatives: Doctors and nurses, often viewed as independent practitioners, were unknowingly transformed into "military foot soldiers" in a global conflict, operating under a command structure rather than solely clinical judgment.

• Undermining Public Trust: The deliberate efforts to redact and conceal the military's contractual involvement erode public trust in governmental transparency and the integrity of public health campaigns.

This militarized approach suggests a paradigm where national security imperatives can override traditional medical ethics, individual autonomy, and established scientific processes, transforming public health into a domain of national defense.

6.2. Utah's Proactive Stance on Health Freedom

In stark contrast to this centralized control, Utah has emerged as a beacon for health freedom, implementing pioneering laws that empower individuals and restrict governmental and corporate overreach.

• Empowerment of Patient-Doctor Relationship: Laws enabling private contracts for alternative treatments restore agency to patients and physicians, moving beyond the restrictive "standard of care."

• Protection Against Coercive Medical Interventions: SB144's prohibition of forced genetic treatments and mRNA mandates with severe penalties is a critical safeguard against future technologically-driven medical coercion.

• Safeguarding Against Discrimination: The law preventing immunity-based discrimination is vital for protecting civil liberties and ensuring equal treatment regardless of medical choices.

These legislative achievements, championed by organizations like the Health Independence Alliance, offer a tangible pathway for other jurisdictions to protect their citizens' health independence and uphold foundational liberties.

6.3. The Call for Systemic Reform: Separation of Powers

The Health Independence Alliance's proposed long-term solution – a "separation of powers between medicine, state and industry" – resonates deeply with the revelations from Dr. Moore's case. This radical but necessary structural reform aims to dismantle the "toxic health system" by:

• Ensuring Medical Autonomy: Isolating medical practice from governmental influence, preventing situations where public health decisions are dictated by political agendas or military directives.

• Mitigating Corporate Influence: Severing the financial and regulatory ties that allow pharmaceutical and other industries to unduly shape medical research, practice, and policy.

• Restoring Patient Sovereignty: Creating an environment where healthcare decisions are truly a partnership between informed patients and ethical practitioners, free from external coercion or conflicts of interest.

This proposed separation of powers is not merely an ideological stance but a strategic imperative to prevent future abuses of authority and to ensure that healthcare truly serves the well-being of individuals, rather than becoming a tool for state control or corporate profit.

6.4. Implications and Future Outlook

The findings from Utah and Dr. Moore's case illuminate a critical tension between national security frameworks and individual health autonomy. They demand a re-evaluation of how public health crises are managed and regulated, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties. The path forward requires:

1. Increased Public Awareness: Greater dissemination of information regarding the military's role in public health initiatives.

2. Legislative Replication: Encouraging other states and nations to adopt similar health freedom protections as those pioneered in Utah.

3. Advocacy for Structural Reform: Supporting movements like HIA that seek fundamental, systemic changes to disentangle medicine from undue state and industrial influence.

Ultimately, Dr. Moore's case, combined with Utah's legislative leadership, provides a crucial blueprint for understanding the challenges to health freedom and for charting a course towards a more ethical, transparent, and independent healthcare future. The revelations serve as a potent reminder that eternal vigilance is required to safeguard liberties, even in the realm of health.