10-16-25 DailyBriefs.info LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com 

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

The following discussion is drawn from the insights presented by Joachim Bartoll Official, a seasoned expert in health and nutrition who publishes his views and speculations based on his experiences and knowledge. These insights are rooted in an animal-based nutritional philosophy.

Discussion of "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota"

This source presents a comprehensive perspective on human nutrition, the definition of a species-appropriate diet, and the role of the gut microbiome, arguing that traditional nutrition science constitutes nutrition ideology.

The Foundational Identity and Expertise

The author, Joachim Bartoll, has an extensive background spanning over 35 years as an elite-level trainer/coach, nutritionist, and body transformation specialist, having worked with more than 1200 clients. He is also a prolific writer and author, responsible for over 600 officially published articles and more than 1800 self-published articles, as well as 8 books. After spending 17 years studying Western 'Modern' Medicine and Pharmacology, he shifted to becoming an animal-based nutritionist in 2018. His philosophy is informed by over six years of studying Human Physiology, Biology, Microbiology, Biochemistry, The Terrain Theory, and 3.5 years of studying German New Medicine. This extensive study helped him personally heal from cancer, failing organs, lifelong asthma, and allergies.

Human Species-Appropriate Diet

A central key takeaway is the assertion that humans are obligate hyper carnivores. Therefore, our species-appropriate, species-specific natural diet must be animal-based. For humans, the appropriate diet should dominantly consist of raw meat and organ meats. Animal-based foods are considered to provide all the nutrients we need.

The Essential Role of Fat

When considering animal products, fat is highly emphasized as the primary source of nutrition. Fat contains vitamins and essential fatty acids utilized by the body for energy, hormone production, and cellular repair through cholesterol. Consequently, fatty cuts of meat are much more nutritious than lean meat. For example, 150 grams of ribeye yields 36 grams of protein and 16 grams of nutritious fat. In comparison, 150 grams of lean beef yields about 32 grams of protein and only 3 grams of fat, while 150 grams of chicken breast offers 34 grams of protein and only 2 grams of fat. Choosing lean cuts, such as lean beef and chicken breast, means selecting a protein source that is low in crucial nutrients like vitamins, minerals, and life-giving animal fats.

The Role of the Gut Microbiome

A highly significant takeaway point challenges the utility of current gut microbiome research, describing it as one of the most useless, backwards, and pointless "fields of science". The underlying simplicity that is often missed is that the microbiome will always adjust to the food consumed. The bacteria adapt to whatever is available. If a component is decreased or removed from the diet, the bacteria feeding off it will decrease or be eliminated; conversely, if a component is added, that specific bacteria will multiply and increase.

Therefore, microbial diversity is deemed totally irrelevant as the gut adjusts to the diet. If the diet is species appropriate, there is no need to ever focus on the microbiome. When animal meats are consumed, bacteria assist the body by breaking down anything not absorbed, such as minerals, collagen, sulfated amino acids, and some fats and proteins that may be denatured from cooking. Any change in the gut microbiome resulting from an animal-based diet is seen as beneficial for the human host.

The Toxicity of Non-Species-Appropriate Foods

In sharp contrast to animal-based nutrition, the sources assert that plant-based edibles poison us. Plant-based or processed foods are extremely toxic and bad for us. These foods introduce a burden of substances including toxins, defense chemicals, antinutrients, heavy metals, pesticide residues, carbohydrate residues, and fiber, leading to the condition known as fermentation.

Because the human digestive system is not constructed to handle these toxic elements, consuming non-species-appropriate food requires bacteria and parasites to increase for the purpose of breaking down these toxins and chemicals. This is considered bad news and is responsible for causing a host of negative digestive outcomes, including bloating, gassiness, digestive problems, leaky gut, and colon cancer. The source material notes that subjects like "Nutrition Deficiencies, Hunger and Cravings" and "Fat Loss and Fasting" are also areas of discussion within this ideology.

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

The excerpt from Joachim Bartoll Official is an opinion piece titled "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota," which critiques a nutrition study that examined the effects of consuming lean beef versus chicken on the gut microbiota in young adults. Bartoll dismisses the study's findings as "useless" because he asserts that the microbiome will naturally adjust to any dietary change, emphasizing the more fundamental point that humans are obligate hyper carnivores. He argues that the only factor of real importance is consuming a species-appropriate diet—specifically, animal-based foods—and that analyzing microbial shifts is a distraction from this essential truth. Furthermore, Bartoll criticizes the study's methodology for using insufficient quantities of lean meat, which he considers less nutritious than fattier cuts and organ meats, reinforcing his central belief in a raw, animal-based diet. 

Discuss Gut Microbiota Research.

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

The discussion of Gut Microbiota Research is derived from the publication "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota" by Joachim Bartoll Official, which adopts an animal-based nutritional philosophy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of "Useless To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota" by Joachim Bartoll Official, which adopts an animal-based nutritional philosophy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota - Joachim Bartoll Official"

This source presents a highly critical view of current research into the gut microbiome, labeling it as one of the most useless, backwards, and pointless "fields of science" to date1. The core argument centers on the simplicity of the gut microbiome's function: it will always adjust and adapt based on the food consumed1....

The Fundamental Adaptability of the Microbiome

A key takeaway is the assertion that microbial diversity is totally irrelevant because the microbiome continuously adjusts to the food we eat2. The bacteria adapt to what is available3. If a particular component is reduced or removed from the diet, the bacteria that feed off it will decrease or be eliminated3. Conversely, if a component is added, the specific bacteria associated with it will multiply and increase3. Since the microbiome is constantly adjusting, the only factor of importance is whether the food consumed is species-appropriate for humans3.

The Role of Bacteria in a Species-Appropriate Diet

The source posits that humans are obligate hyper carnivores, meaning our species-appropriate diet should be animal-based, dominantly consisting of raw meat and organ meats13. Under this species-appropriate diet, there is no need to ever focus on the microbiome4.

When animal meats are consumed, the bacteria assist the body by breaking down anything that is not absorbed2. This includes, for example, minerals, collagen, sulfated amino acids, and some fats and proteins that may have been denatured (destroyed) by cooking the meat2. If the diet is animal-based, any resulting changes in the gut microbiome are considered beneficial for the human host3.

Gut Microbiome Changes in Response to Non-Species-Appropriate Foods

The only problems related to the gut microbiome occur when consuming plant-based or processed foods4. These non-species-appropriate foods are deemed extremely toxic and bad for us4. Since the human digestive system is not built to process these toxic elements, the consumption of plant-based or processed foods requires the increase of bacteria and parasites4. These increases are necessary to break down toxins, defense chemicals, antinutrients, heavy metals, pesticide residues, carbohydrate residues, and fiber, leading to a process called fermentation4. This is considered "really bad news" and is responsible for causing negative digestive outcomes, including bloating, gassiness, digestive problems, leaky gut, and colon cancer4.

Critique of Microbiota Research Studies

The source specifically critiques studies that focus on monitoring changes in microbial diversity and composition in response to dietary shifts, arguing that these studies are useless and contribute only to confusion25.

For instance, the source discusses a randomized crossover trial involving young adults who consumed 150 grams of lean beef or chicken three times weekly6. The study noted that both diets slightly increased Bacillota and decreased Chloroflexota and Synergistota phyla, and that the overall variety of gut bacteria decreased after both diets compared to baseline values23. The source dismisses these findings, stating, "Yes, so what?" because the bacteria are simply adjusting and adapting to what is available3.

The source criticizes the study design for several reasons:

• The study utilized very small amounts of meat (150 grams), suggesting young adults should consume 500 to 1000 grams of meat a day6.

• The study used inferior, non-nutritious cuts of lean beef and chicken breast, which are low in essential nutrients like vitamins, minerals, and life-giving animal fats, calling this choice "retarded"6....

• Referring to a consumption of a "puny 150 grams of inferior lean cooked beef" as a "beef-based diet" is refuted1.

The conclusion drawn is that this kind of research misses the simplicity of the gut microbiome—that it always adapts to assist the body with digestion and removal of toxins—and therefore, the focus should instead be on consuming the species-appropriate diet (raw meat and organ meats)1. The source mentions related discussions in other articles, such as "Backwards Thinking: Gut Microbiome 101 and Type 2 Diabetes," "FODMAP Nonsense And Microbiota Bollocks — And More On SCFAs," and "More Microbiome And “DNA” Nonsense: Links To Cancer"9.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Species-Appropriate Diet.

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

The following comprehensive narrative supporting the key takeaways regarding the species-appropriate diet is drawn from the material presented by Joachim Bartoll Official in "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota." This perspective is informed by an animal-based nutritional philosophy adopted by the author, who became an animal-based nutritionist in 2018 following years of study in areas like Human Physiology, Biology, and The Terrain Theory, which he credits with helping him heal from serious health conditions1.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of the Species-Appropriate Diet

The fundamental key takeaway presented is that Nutrition Science is, in fact, Nutrition Ideology2, and that the real, undeniable fact is that humans are obligate hyper carnivores3.... This classification dictates that our species-appropriate, species-specific natural diet must be animal-based2.

The appropriate diet for humans should dominantly consist of raw meat and organ meats5. The primary rationale is that animal-based foods provide all the nutrients we need6. When adhering to this species-appropriate diet, there is never a need to even contemplate the gut microbiome7.

A crucial component of this animal-based diet is fat, which is emphasized as the location of the core nutrition8. Fat contains essential vitamins and fatty acids that the body uses for various vital processes, including energy, hormone production, and cellular repair through cholesterol8. Therefore, selecting fatty cuts of meat is far more nutritious than selecting lean cuts of meat9.

To illustrate the nutritional difference, specific examples contrast lean meats often chosen in studies with fattier cuts10:

• A serving of 150 grams of lean beef yields approximately 32 grams of protein and only 3 grams of fat8.

• A comparable serving of 150 grams of chicken breast offers about 34 grams of protein and only 2 grams of fat8.

Choosing these lean cuts, such as lean beef and chicken breast, means selecting a protein source that is low in vital nutrients like vitamins, minerals, and the life-giving animal fats10.

In contrast, choosing fattier and more nutritious options dramatically increases the fat intake10:

• 150 grams of ribeye yields 36 grams of protein and 16 grams of nutritious fat10.

• 150 grams of chicken drumsticks with skin yields 30 grams of protein and a desirable 13 grams of fat10.

These fatty cuts are deemed to make much more sense from a nutritional perspective10.

When the species-appropriate diet (animal meats) is consumed, the bacteria in the gut assist the body by breaking down anything that is not fully absorbed6. This includes, for example, minerals, collagen, sulfated amino acids, and any fats and proteins that may have been denatured (destroyed) if the meat was cooked6. If the diet is animal-based, any resulting changes observed in the gut microbiome are considered to be good for us4.

Conversely, consuming non-species-appropriate food is defined as problematic7. Plant-based edibles are stated to poison us6, and both plant-based and processed foods are considered extremely toxic and bad for us7. The human digestive system is simply not constructed to handle these toxic elements7.

The consumption of these inappropriate foods necessitates an increase in bacteria and parasites to break down harmful components7. These toxic components include: toxins, defense chemicals, antinutrients, heavy metals, pesticide residues, carbohydrate residues, and fiber7. This breakdown process leads to fermentation7, which is characterized as really bad news7. This non-species-appropriate consumption is responsible for causing negative health outcomes, such as bloating, gassiness, digestive problems, leaky gut, and colon cancer7.

In summary, the key takeaway is that the only factor of importance for health is whether the food consumed is species-appropriate, meaning a diet dominantly based on raw, fatty animal meats and organs45.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Macronutrients.

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

The following discussion centers on the three principal macronutrients—Protein, Fat, and Carbohydrates—as interpreted through the strict animal-based nutritional philosophy championed by Joachim Bartoll Official, who views Nutrition Science as nutrition ideology1. This perspective is rooted in the belief that humans are obligate hyper carnivores2... whose species-appropriate diet is dominantly raw meat and organ meats5.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of Macronutrients as detailed in "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota - Joachim Bartoll Official"

The source materials structure the discussion of diet around the distinct categories of the macronutrients: Protein, Fat, and Carbohydrates1. Within this species-appropriate nutritional framework, the nutritional value and health implications of each macronutrient are dramatically contrasted.

The Macronutrient: Fat

The source places paramount importance on animal fats, asserting that fat is where the nutrition is6. Fat is considered the primary source of nutrition, supplying essential components used by the body for critical functions6. These components include vitamins and all the "extremely important fatty acids"6. Furthermore, fat is crucial for energy production, hormone synthesis, and cellular repair, which is facilitated through cholesterol6.

A core takeaway point emphasizes that fatty cuts of meat are much more nutritious than lean meat7. The source provides specific examples contrasting the fat content of various cuts of meat68:

• Choosing lean beef and "totally worthless" chicken breast is criticized because these choices represent protein sources that are low in nutrients, specifically lacking the essential "life-giving animal fats"68.

• When consuming 150 grams of lean beef, one would obtain approximately 32 grams of protein but only about 3 grams of fat6.

• Similarly, 150 grams of chicken breast is documented to yield about 34 grams of protein but only approximately 2 grams of fat6.

• In stark contrast, fattier cuts are demonstrated to be superior: 150 grams of ribeye yields 36 grams of protein and a substantial 16 grams of nutritious fat8.

• Similarly, 150 grams of chicken drumsticks with skin yields 30 grams of protein and a "lovely 13 grams of fat"8.

Based on this perspective, the question "What Is More Important Than Protein?" is answered explicitly: Animal Fats!9.

The Macronutrient: Protein

Protein is recognized as a necessary macronutrient1, but the emphasis on its role often serves to highlight the superiority of fat9. The source suggests that choosing lean cuts is fundamentally flawed because it prioritizes high protein-to-fat ratios over overall nutritional density68. For instance, the low fat content of 150 grams of lean beef (3 grams of fat) and 150 grams of chicken breast (2 grams of fat) is noted, even though their protein yields are reasonably high (32 grams and 34 grams, respectively)6.

The consumption of sufficient protein is important, with the source suggesting that young adults should consume at least 500 to 1000 grams of meat per day, a quantity far exceeding the 150 grams used in a critique of a research study7.

When meat is consumed, bacteria in the gut help the body by breaking down anything that is not absorbed10. This includes, for example, denatured proteins that may have been destroyed during the cooking process10. The source also refers to the focus on protein, perhaps through supplements, as a "Protein Fixation" and notes the existence of "New Marketing Gimmick[s]" related to products like protein powder and protein water9.

The Macronutrient: Carbohydrates

The source lists Carbohydrates as a macronutrient category1 but simultaneously adheres to the belief that plant-based edibles poison humans10. Since the appropriate human diet is animal-based510, non-species-appropriate foods such as plant-based items and processed foods are considered extremely toxic and bad for us11.

These toxic, non-species-appropriate foods introduce several problematic substances, including carbohydrate residues11. The source material asserts that because the human digestive system is not constructed for handling these elements, consuming them causes a process called fermentation11. This fermentation is described as "really bad news" and is responsible for causing negative digestive outcomes, including bloating, gassiness, leaky gut, digestive problems, and colon cancer11.

The narrative supporting this dietary philosophy is clear regarding carbohydrates: there are Zero Reasons to Consume Toxic Carbohydrates9.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Weight Management.

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

The following discussion addresses the principles and specific categories related to Weight Management and body composition as outlined by Joachim Bartoll Official, who approaches these topics through the lens of animal-based nutritional philosophy and an extensive background in coaching and training.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of "Useless Studies: Any Changes To Your Diet Changes The Gut Microbiota - Joachim Bartoll Official"

The source material organizes the topic of weight management into distinct areas of expertise and discussion, emphasizing various aspects of body composition and metabolic health, all within the framework of the author's unique animal-based diet ideology.

Weight and Body Composition Goals

Weight management, according to the structure of the sources, is categorized into two main directional goals:

1. Gaining Weight/Muscle Mass1.

2. Fat Loss and Fasting1.

These distinct categories suggest that the principles governing the addition of mass (including muscle) and the reduction of fat are treated separately, allowing for specialized coaching and content tailored to each objective1. Furthermore, the author specifically offers professional fat loss coaching services2.

Fat Metabolism and Hormones

A key component of weight management is the discussion centered around Fat Gain, Energy and Hormones1. This highlights the importance of animal fat in the body's energy regulation and hormonal balance.

The sources previously established that animal fat is where the critical nutrition is found, supplying vitamins and essential fatty acids necessary for energy and hormone production, as well as for cellular repair via cholesterol3. Therefore, understanding the interplay between dietary fat intake and hormonal response is central to managing fat gain or loss1.

Underlying Causes of Physical Changes

The sources address the causes of undesirable physical changes, attributing them to poor dietary choices rather than weight fluctuations alone:

• The source explicitly rejects the idea that common health problems are linked to weight, stating that obesity does not play a role in cancer4. Cancer is seen as rising in the young population4.

• When discussing aesthetic concerns resulting from body changes, the source asserts that sagging skin is not due to rapid weight loss4. Instead, it is attributed to Nutrient Deficiencies caused by a "Shitty Diet"4. This ties the body's ability to maintain skin integrity directly to the nutritional quality of the diet, which the author advocates should be animal-based to provide all necessary nutrients5.

Supportive Topics for Weight Management

The source material also addresses issues that influence adherence to and success in weight management efforts, regardless of whether the goal is fat loss or mass gain:

• The relationship between nutritional status and appetite is addressed in the category Nutrition Deficiencies, Hunger and Cravings1. The underlying idea is that true nutritional deficiency drives inappropriate hunger and cravings, issues that must be managed for successful weight control1.

• The author also provides guidance under the general heading of Diet-, Nutrition Information and Scams1, indicating an effort to clarify confusing or misleading information prevalent in the weight management and nutrition industry1.

All these concepts illustrate a systematic approach to weight management that focuses on an animal-based diet and recognizes the central roles of proper nutrient intake, specifically animal fats, and hormonal balance, all while dismissing mainstream explanations concerning obesity and rapid weight loss symptoms14.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Nutrition Scams.

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

The following discussion examines the concept of "Nutrition Scams" by drawing exclusively on the insights and published views of Joachim Bartoll Official, an animal-based nutritionist1. The sources frame general nutrition information and specific research as flawed or designed to deceive, contrasting them with the author's species-appropriate dietary philosophy23.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of Diet, Nutrition Information, and Scams

The source explicitly lists "Diet-, Nutrition Information and Scams" as a dedicated category of discussion within Joachim Bartoll Official's body of work2. This suggests that the author views much of the mainstream information related to diet and nutrition as deceptive or misleading.

Critique of Mainstream Nutrition and Research

A central theme supporting the idea of "scams" is the assertion that "Nutrition Science is Nutrition Ideology"2. This view immediately disqualifies conventional nutrition studies and advice from being viewed as objective science2.

This perspective is bolstered by the author's strong criticism of research studies, which are often utilized to generate diet and nutrition information3. Specifically, the source argues that most studies today are "totally useless, irrelevant and only contribute to confusion" among those who are not experts in the subject3. This confusion is suggested to be intentional, as the source states it is "by design — to confuse and to stall any real progress and hide real information"3. The source asserts that this stalling prevents the acknowledgment of the "undeniable fact that humans are obligate hyper carnivores"3.

The source specifically criticizes the food industry and "supplement shills at Examine.com" for summarizing studies that are deemed pointless and twisted34. This criticism of Examine.com and their interpretation of research results highlights a perceived mechanism of deception35.

Misleading Dietary Concepts and Products

The broader context of what the source considers flawed nutrition information includes several subjects listed that, when discussed by the author, are typically reframed as misguided or outright harmful, thus falling under the umbrella of "scams":

• Non-Species-Appropriate Diets: The source advocates for the animal-based diet as the only species-appropriate way of eating2. Conversely, other diets, such as Veganism, are specifically addressed and are asserted to be destructive2. The source also mentions the extreme dangers of a Fruitarian Diet6. These popular alternative diets are implied to be part of the pervasive, confusing nutrition ideology2.

• Sport- and "Health" Supplements: These products are listed separately, indicating they are another category the author views skeptically2.

• The Focus on Lean Meat: The source critiques a study that used lean beef and chicken breast, calling the choice of these low-fat cuts "retarded" because fat is "where the nutrition is"78. The implication is that conventional nutrition advice, which often favors lean protein, steers people away from the most nutritious parts of the species-appropriate diet (animal fats), which are essential for energy, hormone production, and cellular repair78.

• Gut Microbiome Research: The entire field of gut microbiome research is deemed "useless, backwards, and pointless" because it ignores the simple fact that the microbiome always adjusts to the food consumed59. The source argues that focusing on microbial diversity, as studies often do, is irrelevant when the only important factor is consuming the species-appropriate diet910. Studies that focus on the microbiome are criticized for missing the mark and being part of the "nonsense" surrounding nutrition45.

In summary, the key takeaway is that the existence of "Diet-, Nutrition Information and Scams" is supported by the author's fundamental belief that most mainstream nutrition science is an ideology designed to confuse the public and obscure the truth that humans should consume a diet dominantly based on raw meat and organ meats2....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

welcome to the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series.

Today, we delve into a critical analysis concerning how America’s current paper-money system and the policies implemented by the Federal Reserve result in the plunder and looting of American taxpayers. The core mechanism of this financial debasement is the simple inflationary expansion of the money supply.

The Federal Plunder Through Inflation

The Federal Reserve’s inflationary policy expands the amount of money in circulation, which simultaneously reduces the value of the money held by people in their savings accounts or received as income. As a result of the federal government’s inflationary policy, their income and savings buy less than before because the value of the money has been debased. This destructive process has been ongoing ever since the U.S. government shifted to a paper-money standard during the administration of President Franklin Roosevelt (FDR) in the 1930s.

Before the 1930s—a period spanning more than 125 years—the nation’s official money consisted of gold coins and silver coins. This reliance on metallic currency was mandated by the Constitution. Crucially, gold coins and silver coins cannot be printed in the way that paper money can be. FDR utilized the pretext of an economic "emergency" to declare a permanent cessation of the constitutional monetary system. This dramatic change was accomplished without even the pretense of a constitutional amendment. Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately upheld FDR's extraordinary "emergency" power, allowing the Constitution to be effectively amended via executive order and congressional law, despite the fact that the Constitution does not actually delegate "emergency" powers to either the President or Congress.

Since this foundational shift, the value of the paper dollar has declined consistently, year after year and decade after decade. The federal government has found that it is more convenient to fund its growing welfare-warfare-regulatory programs through newly printed money rather than by resorting to the unpopular measure of simply raising income taxes on the citizenry. Public officials understand that people become upset when income taxes are raised. In contrast, when rising prices occur due to inflation, most people are unaware that federal officials are the ones causing the price increases through the inflationary debasement of the value of their money. Consequently, the public tends to direct their anger toward individuals in the private sector who raise their prices to reflect the money’s lower value, rather than becoming angry at the government sector officials who are the true cause of the rising prices through the expansion of the money supply. Even when the inflationary rate is maintained at a relatively low 2 percent per year, the citizenry is still being plundered and looted by at least that amount annually. When this amount is compounded over many years, the total amount of plunder and looting increases substantially.

The State and Local Plunder Through Property Taxes

Beyond the federal level, the inflationary policy provides a significant benefit to state and and local governments, specifically in the form of increased property taxes on people’s homes. Over the course of years and decades, the Fed’s inflationary policies have been responsible for the soaring values of people’s homes. This phenomenon often gives people the impression that they are successfully increasing the equity in their homes. However, in reality, this increase in nominal value makes no actual difference. This lack of real benefit occurs because the values of all homes in the surrounding area have also increased.

Due to this widespread increase, homeowners quickly realize that attempting to sell their current home in the hope of purchasing a better home elsewhere does not work out financially. In order for people to actually benefit from the inflationary-induced increase in their home value, they would typically have to relocate to an entirely different part of the country where home values are comparatively lower.

The inflationary increase in home values is favored by state and local government officials. These officials rely heavily on property taxes to fund their operations, and those property tax revenues are determined, in part, by the assessed value of people’s homes. Therefore, as home values increase as a direct result of the Fed’s inflationary debasement policies, the real-estate taxes that state and local officials assess on those homes are constantly rising. While people receive no real benefit from the increase in their home values, they are placed in a constantly worsening financial situation regarding the real-estate taxes they must pay, which increase year after year and decade after decade.

According to information from ChatGPT cited in the source, a 2 percent inflation rate will cause the nominal value of a house, when compounded, to increase by 22 percent over a ten-year period. However, ChatGPT also states that the home’s "real purchasing power remains about the same".

It is important to notice a critical distinction: while the real purchasing power of the home remains the same, the same cannot be said for the amount of property taxes owed to state and local officials. The property tax burden increases continuously because the taxes are assessed based on the nominal value of the home, not its real purchasing-power value. Ultimately, the American paper-money monetary system, which FDR permanently imposed on the nation and which is constantly reinforced by the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve (established in 1913), results in the looting and plundering of citizens not just at the federal-government level, but also significantly at the state and local government level.

thank you for listening to another session of the LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com series produced and archived at the website LennyAndMariaPodcasts.com

This essay from LewRockwell.com asserts that America's paper-money system and the policies of the Federal Reserve systematically exploit the American people through inflationary practices. The author argues that by expanding the money supply, the government effectively devalues citizens' savings and income, a process that began when the constitutional standard of gold and silver coins was abandoned during the Franklin Roosevelt administration. Furthermore, this inflationary debasement of the currency unjustly benefits state and local governments because rising nominal property values lead to continuously increasing property taxes, even though the homeowner receives no actual increase in real wealth or purchasing power. Ultimately, the article contends that this unconstitutional monetary system is a mechanism for "looting and plundering" citizens at both the federal and local levels to fund government spending without directly raising income taxes.

Paper money system

Federal Reserve inflation

Taxpayer plunder

Property tax increase

Constitutional money

Discuss Paper money system.

The paper money system in America is discussed in the sources primarily in the context of inflation, monetary debasement, and the resulting economic harm (plunder and looting) to American taxpayers12.

Historical Shift to Paper Money

The current system originated when the U.S. government converted to a paper-money standard during President Franklin Roosevelt's administration in the 1930s3. This action declared a permanent end to the constitutional monetary system4.

1. Constitutional Money: For more than 125 years prior to the 1930s, the official money of the American people had been gold coins and silver coins, as mandated by the Constitution3.

2. The Shift: Paper money can be printed, but gold and silver coins cannot4. FDR used the excuse of an economic "emergency" to establish the paper-money system, doing so without a constitutional amendment4. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld this "extraordinary 'emergency' power"4.

3. Reinforcement: This paper-money monetary system, which FDR foisted upon the nation on a permanent basis, is reinforced by the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve (established in 1913)2.

Mechanism of Plunder and Debasement

The paper-money system and the Federal Reserve’s inflationary policies are asserted to plunder and loot the American people12. This occurs through the simple inflationary expansion of the money supply3:

• Devaluation: By inflating the amount of money in circulation, the Federal Reserve reduces the value of existing money3. This debasement means that the money sitting in people’s savings accounts or received as income buys less than before3.

• Government Funding: Ever since the shift, the value of the paper dollar has constantly gone down5. The federal government finds it more convenient to pay for its "out-of-control welfare-warfare-regulatory programs" through newly printed money rather than by simply raising income taxes5.

• Concealed Taxation: People often get angry when public officials raise income taxes5. However, with rising prices caused by inflation, most people do not realize that federal officials are the cause of the price increases through the inflationary debasement of the money's value5. Instead, they mistakenly direct their anger at people in the private sector who are raising prices5.

• Compounding Looting: Even at a 2 percent annual inflationary rate, the citizenry are still getting plundered and looted6. When this amount is compounded year after year, the overall plunder and looting increases substantially6.

Impact on State and Local Taxes

The inflationary policies connected to the paper-money system also result in looting and plundering at the state and local government levels2.

• Nominal Home Value Increases: Over the years and decades, the Fed’s inflationary policies have caused the nominal value of people’s homes to soar6.

• No Real Benefit for Homeowners: While this gives homeowners the feeling of increasing equity, it does not make any real difference because all home values in the surrounding area have also increased6. For a homeowner to truly benefit from the inflationary-induced increase in value, they would typically have to move to a part of the country where home values are relatively lower7.

• Increased Property Tax Burden: State and local government officials, who rely on property taxes partly based on the assessed value of homes, benefit from the inflationary increase in home values7. As home values increase due to the Fed’s debasement policies, the real-estate taxes assessed on people's homes constantly increase8.

• Taxation on Nominal Value: Although the home's real purchasing power may remain the same (e.g., a 22 percent increase in nominal value over ten years with 2 percent inflation, according to ChatGPT, means the real purchasing power remains about the same8), the property tax burden constantly increases because the taxes are assessed on the nominal value of the home, not its real purchasing-power value2.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Federal Reserve inflation.

The Federal Reserve's inflationary policies are presented in the sources as a critical component of America's paper-money system that actively plunders and loots the American people12.

Here is a discussion of Federal Reserve inflation, its mechanisms, and its effects, as described in the source:

Mechanism of Federal Reserve Inflation

The Federal Reserve causes inflation primarily through the simple inflationary expansion of the money supply34.

1. Money Debasement: By inflating the amount of money in circulation, the Fed reduces the value of existing money3. This process debases the value of the money held in people’s savings accounts or received as income3. As a result, their savings and income buy less than before3.

2. Funding Government Programs: The federal government uses this mechanism because it finds it more convenient to fund its "out-of-control welfare-warfare-regulatory programs" through newly printed money rather than by raising income taxes4.

3. Hiding the Cause of Rising Prices: Public officials avoid angering people, who usually get upset when income taxes are raised4. With the rising prices brought on by inflation, most people have no idea that federal officials are the ones causing the price increases through the inflationary debasement of the money's value4. Instead, the public often directs anger at people in the private sector who are raising their prices, when those price increases are merely reflecting the lower value of the money caused by the government sector's expansion of the money supply4.

Impact and Consequences

The sources emphasize that the consequences of Federal Reserve inflation are substantial and affect taxpayers at all levels of government:

1. Plunder at the Federal Level

• Looting and Plunder: The inflationary policy is explicitly characterized as plunder and looting of the American people1.

• Constant Devaluation: The value of the paper dollar has constantly gone down year after year, decade after decade, ever since the U.S. government converted to a paper-money standard during the 1930s34.

• Compounding Harm: Even if the inflationary rate is held to a seemingly low 2 percent per year, the citizenry are still being plundered and looted by at least that amount annually5. When this amount is compounded year after year, the total amount of plunder and looting increases substantially5. The Federal Reserve has also "obviously abandoned its 2 percent target" for the rise in prices1.

2. Plunder at the State and Local Level (Property Taxes)

The Fed’s inflationary policies benefit state and local governments by facilitating higher property taxes56:

• Soaring Nominal Home Values: Over the years and decades, the Fed’s inflationary policies have caused the nominal value of people’s homes to soar5.

• No Real Benefit for Homeowners: While this gives people the feeling of increasing equity, it does not make any real difference because home values across the surrounding area have increased as well5. To truly benefit from this "inflationary-induced value," a homeowner would typically have to relocate to a region where home values are relatively lower6.

• Increased Tax Burden: State and local officials rely on property taxes, which are based partly on the assessed value of homes6. As home values increase due to the Fed’s debasement policies, the real-estate taxes assessed on people's homes constantly go up7.

• Taxation on Nominal Value: The sources highlight that the property tax burden is constantly increasing because taxes are assessed on the nominal value of the home, not the real purchasing-power value2. According to a calculation cited (based on ChatGPT data), a 2 percent inflation rate results in the nominal value of a house increasing by 22 percent over ten years, while its "real purchasing power remains about the same"27. The constant increase in property taxes means that while people receive no real benefit from the increased home values, their situation worsens in terms of the taxes they must pay7.

Therefore, the paper-money system, which was established permanently by President Franklin Roosevelt and is reinforced by the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve, ends up looting and plundering people at both the federal-government level and the state and local government level2.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Taxpayer plunder.

The concept of taxpayer plunder is central to the discussion in the sources, which argue that the modern paper-money system and the Federal Reserve's policiesThe concept of taxpayer plunder is central to the discussion in the sources, which argue that the modern paper-money system and the Federal Reserve's policies result in the continuous looting and plundering of the American people1....

This plunder occurs at both the federal level (through the direct debasement of the currency) and the state/local level (through inflated property taxes)3.

Plunder Through Federal Reserve Inflation

The primary mechanism for the plunder of American taxpayers is the simple inflationary expansion of the money supply carried out by the Federal Reserve (the Fed)12.

1. Debasing Savings and Income: The Fed inflates the amount of money in circulation, which reduces the value of existing money2. This process debases the value of the money held in people’s savings accounts or received as income, meaning their money buys less than before2.

2. Funding Government Programs: The federal government utilizes this inflation-based system because it is more convenient to pay for its "out-of-control welfare-warfare-regulatory programs" using newly printed money rather than by directly raising income taxes4.

3. Concealed Plunder: This method of funding government operations serves as a concealed form of taxation. If public officials were to simply raise income taxes, people would get upset4. However, with rising prices caused by inflation, most people have no idea that federal officials are the ones causing the price increases through the inflationary debasement of the money's value4. Instead, people mistakenly direct their anger at the private sector, believing that businesses raising prices are the cause, rather than the government sector's inflationary expansion of the money supply4.

4. Compounding Harm: Even at a relatively low inflationary rate of 2 percent per year, the citizenry is still being plundered and looted to that tune annually5. When this rate is compounded year after year, the total amount of plunder and looting increases substantially5.

Plunder Through Increased Property Taxes

Beyond the federal level, the Fed's inflationary policies facilitate plunder at the state and local government levels through rising property taxes35.

1. Inflated Nominal Home Values: Over years and decades, the Fed’s inflationary policies cause the nominal value of people’s homes to soar5.

2. Lack of Real Benefit: While this gives homeowners the feeling of increasing equity, it does not make any real difference because all surrounding home values have also increased5. For example, a house whose nominal value increased by 22 percent over ten years due to a 2 percent inflation rate has its "real purchasing power remains about the same," according to a calculation from ChatGPT cited in the source6.

3. Increased Tax Burden: State and local government officials, who rely on property taxes based partly on the assessed value of homes, benefit from this inflation7. As the nominal value of homes increases due to the Fed’s debasement policies, the real-estate taxes constantly go up6.

4. Taxation on Nominal Value: The plunder occurs because the property tax burden is constantly increasing as taxes are assessed on the nominal value of the home, not the real purchasing-power value3. This means that while homeowners receive no real benefit from the increased value of their homes, they suffer a constantly worsening situation in terms of real-estate taxes paid6.

In summary, the sources assert that the paper-money monetary system, which originated during the Franklin Roosevelt administration and is reinforced by the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies, results in the continuous looting and plundering of people across all levels of government23.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Property tax increase.

The increase in property taxes is discussed in the sources as a direct consequence of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies and a mechanism by which state and local governments plunder and loot the American people1....

Here is a discussion of the property tax increase:

Cause: Federal Reserve Inflationary Policies

The underlying cause of the property tax increase is the Federal Reserve's inflationary debasement policies34.

• Over the years and decades, these policies have caused the nominal value of people’s homes to soar2.

• State and local government officials rely on property taxes to fund their operations, and these taxes are based partly on the assessed value of people’s homes5.

• As the nominal value of homes increases due to inflation, the real-estate taxes that state and local officials assess are constantly going up4.

The Illusion of Increased Home Equity

While the soaring nominal value of a home might cause people to feel like they are increasing the equity in their home, the sources argue that this phenomenon “doesn’t make any real difference at all”2.

• This is because all the home values in the surrounding area have increased too2.

• To truly benefit from the increased inflationary-induced value of their home, a person would generally have to move to a different part of the country where home values are relatively lower5.

The Plunder Mechanism

The constant increase in property taxes represents a worsening situation for homeowners because the taxes are based on the inflated nominal value, not the real purchasing power of the property34.

• Taxation on Nominal Value: The property tax burden is constantly increasing because the taxes are being assessed on the nominal value of the home, not the real purchasing-power value of the home3.

• Worsening Situation: Homeowners are receiving no real benefit from the increase in their home values but are suffering a constantly worsening situation in terms of the real-estate taxes they are paying, which are going up year after year, decade after decade4.

Example of Nominal vs. Real Value

The sources provide a specific calculation to illustrate this discrepancy:

• According to a calculation using ChatGPT (based on a 2 percent inflation rate), the nominal value of a house, given compound interest, will increase by 22 percent over a ten-year period4.

• However, as ChatGPT states, the house's real purchasing power remains about the same over that period4.

• The key point is that even though the real purchasing power remains the same, the amount of property taxes that must be paid to state and local officials is not the same; the tax burden increases based on the soaring nominal value3.

Therefore, the paper-money monetary system, reinforced by the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies, results in looting and plundering people at the state and local government level through ever-increasing property taxes3.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Constitutional money.

The sources discuss constitutional money in the context of the historical monetary system of the United States that existed before the transition to the current paper-money system.

Definition and Mandate

• Constitutional money refers to the official money of the American people, which, for more than 125 years prior to the 1930s, consisted of gold coins and silver coins1.

• The use of gold and silver coins as the official money of the nation was mandated by the Constitution1.

The End of Constitutional Money

The constitutional monetary system was declared to have a permanent end during the administration of President Franklin Roosevelt (FDR) in the 1930s12.

• The Difference: Constitutional money (gold and silver coins) cannot be printed, unlike paper money2.

• The Justification: FDR used the excuse of an economic "emergency" to declare an end to the constitutional monetary system2.

• Lack of Amendment: FDR enacted this change without the semblance of a constitutional amendment2.

• Judicial Upholding: The U.S. Supreme Court upheld FDR's action, validating his "extraordinary 'emergency' power" to effectively amend the Constitution through executive order and congressional law, even though the Constitution does not delegate such "emergency" powers to either the president or Congress2.

This permanent shift away from constitutional money established the current paper-money standard12, which, according to the sources, is reinforced by the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve and leads to the plunder and looting of American taxpayers34.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down