Here are 40 key takeaway points from the sources, formatted as requested:
CIVIL WARS ☙ Friday, June 27, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 by Jeff Childers: A new vaccine safety committee voted against injecting babies with mercury, signaling the start of a "medical civil war".
The new ACIP vaccine committee voted to recommend against vaccines with mercury in them.
This action is described as the "first shot fired at pharma’s Fort Sumter".
The Washington Post initially downplayed the significance of the ACIP vote regarding thimerosal, despite previous "hysterical predictions".
WaPo’s story reported that hardly any vaccines include thimerasol anyway, so the decision barely moves the needle.
They characterized the vote as "nothing but a symbolic victory for anti-vaxxers".
The ACIP vote is merely a recommendation and lacks binding authority, requiring adoption by the CDC.
The vote, merely a recommendation by the advisory committee, has no binding authority.
It must be adopted by the CDC.
The final decision on the thimerosal recommendation rests with Secretary Robert Kennedy, as the CDC currently has no confirmed director.
The CDC currently has no confirmed director, leaving the final decision up to Secretary Robert Kennedy.
Robert Kennedy had previously edited an anti-thimerosal book in 2015.
Cody Meissner, the sole panel member to vote against the thimerosal recommendation, argued it would limit flu shot availability.
The only panel member to vote no, Cody Meissner, argued it would limit the availability of flu shots.
The efficacy of last year’s flu shots was noted as a "woeful 33%".
Despite dismissing the thimerosal change as having limited impact, media outlets continued to criticize the new ACIP committee.
Even after dismissing the change as “likely to have limited impact,” the article continued for about ten more pages quoting so-called experts.
These experts basically accused the new ACIP committee of being "neanderthals".
A "biomedical civil war" is underway, marked by patients arriving with better information than their doctors.
The entire medical-industrial apparatus faces civil war, via a new threat: patients armed with better information than doctors.
This "biomedical civil war" is described as having "just won the Battle of Bull Run against the scientific-medical establishment".
Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) has sued all federal judges in Maryland for interfering with executive foreign policy authority.
Trump’s DOJ sued the entire Maryland bench for interfering with executive foreign policy authority.
This suit was in response to the Chief Judge for the District of Maryland entering a standing order granting automatic deportation stays for new immigration cases.
Suing every judge in a district is considered an unprecedented action and a "doctrinal civil war".
Every single judge was named as an individual defendant.
The source notes uncertainty as to whether such an action has ever happened before.
The lawsuit against Maryland judges argues that certain judicial practices, like the standing order, constitute unlawful executive interference beyond constitutional authority.
Beyond legal positioning, it argues that certain judicial practices themselves are unlawful executive interference and beyond the courts’ constitutional authority.
The lawsuit focuses on the legality of the standing order, which grants relief to unknown future parties before their cases are filed.
The lawsuit against Maryland judges has provoked strong reactions, being labeled "reckless and irresponsible" and an "assault on the federal courts".
Retired Judge J. Michael Luttig complained, “It is reckless and irresponsible and yet another direct frontal assault on the federal courts of this country”.
Maryland’s Governor Wes Moore called it an "unprecedented action" and a "transparent effort to intimidate judges and usurp the power of the courts".
Judge J. Michael Luttig admitted that the Administration is "winning their war" against the federal Judiciary.
Judge Luttig admitted the Administration is winning: “The president and his attorney general will continue their ruthless attack on the federal Judiciary and the Rule of Law until the Supreme Court of the United States at least attempts to stop them, because they are winning their war”.
Carl Tobias, a U. Richmond law professor, called the lawsuit "mind-boggling".
The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is expected to rule on Trump v. CASA, Inc. today, a case that could impact nationwide injunctions and "birthright citizenship".
SCOTUS is expected to rule in Trump v. CASA, Inc. about whether district judges can issue nationwide injunctions.
The electrifying case is also about ‘birthright citizenship’.
Today is anticipated to be a significant legal day, with six critical SCOTUS decisions scheduled for publication.
Today will be a huge legal day.
The Trump v. CASA, Inc. case is just one of six critical decisions scheduled for publication today.
A "new summer offensive" against ivermectin has commenced, marked by critical articles in major media outlets.
Last week, the Atlantic ran an arrogant article headlined, “How Ivermectin Became Right-Wing Aspirin”.
The Washington Post ran a Leana Wen op-ed headlined, “Red states are making it easier to access ivermectin. Here’s why that matters,” with a sub-headline sneering at "unproven treatments".
The author personally experienced a noticeable improvement in earache symptoms after self-prescribing ivermectin.
I am currently taking the Nobel-prize-winning drug (self-prescribed) after a painful earache and three prescriptions including antibiotics ($185).
On the third day, my symptoms are noticeably improved.
Anecdotal evidence from various individuals suggests ivermectin is being used successfully for diverse conditions, including skin issues and cancer.
Another friend told me he’d recently and successfully treated an irritating and resistant patch of dry skin on his forehead with veterinary ivermectin.
My Twitter timeline is packed with anecdotes from folks who claim to have treated their cancers with the drug.
Mel Gibson claimed on Joe Rogan's podcast that three of his friends had eliminated advanced tumors with ivermectin and fenbendazole.
In January, on Joe Rogan’s podcast, Mel Gibson claimed that three of his friends had eliminated advanced tumors with ivermectin and fenbendazole.
This attention on ivermectin is driving "the medical fetishists at the Atlantic totally insane".
The Atlantic, despite its overall critical stance, was "forced to admit" that ivermectin could have "some modest basis in reality" as a cancer-fighting agent.
“The idea that ivermectin could be a cancer-fighting agent does have some modest basis in reality,” the Atlantic stingily allowed.
“Preliminary studies have suggested that antiparasitic medications might inhibit tumor growth”.
Ivermectin has been "unfairly targeted for reputational destruction," notably by the FDA's social media campaigns.
No drug in history has been more unfairly targeted for reputational destruction than ivermectin.
The FDA ran a "smirking negative public relations campaign" against the medication, not in science journals, but on social media.
The FDA's infamous "You are not a horse" tweet against ivermectin was later forced to be deleted by the courts.
Its efforts were crowned with the infamous folksy tweet that finally broke the legal straw: “You are not a horse,” it said. “You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it”.
Two years later, the courts forced the FDA to delete that tweet.
Ironically, FDA lawyers argued in court that the "horse tweet" was not medical advice, a claim dismissed by the judge.
Ironically —and tellingly— the FDA’s lawyers rode into court arguing the horse tweet was not medical advice [1.
The judge gave that claim the old horse’s laugh.
Ivermectin is available over the counter in most of the "third world," a fact "glaringly conspic. by its a. from the Atlantic’s story".
Ivermectin is available over the counter in most of the third world, a fact glaringly conspic. by its a. from the Atlantic’s story.
The source suggests the government views Americans as less trustworthy in making health decisions than people in sub-Saharan Africa and rural India.
India's government failed to move ivermectin behind the counter during the pandemic due to public resistance, indicating a "quiet rebellion".
During the pandemic, India’s government tried to move ivermectin behind the counter, but gave it up as a lost cause after irate citizens grabbed pitchforks and began melting tar.
A quiet rebellion is underway.
Several Republican governors have signed bills allowing over-the-counter ivermectin, with other red states following suit.
Just this year, Republican governors in Idaho, Arkansas and Tennessee signed bills allowing over-the-counter ivermectin.
Lawmakers from other red states, like West Virginia, South Carolina and Louisiana, are following the trail.
Interest in over-the-counter ivermectin has spread to sixteen states, including some not typically considered GOP-friendly.
Interest in OTC ivermectin has climbed to sixteen states —nearing the halfway point.
Not all of them are GOP-friendly (e.g., Pennsylvania and New York).
Media articles blame "MAHA" (Make America Healthy Again) and a "deep distrust of public health" for the rising interest in ivermectin.
Both articles —the Atlantic’s news piece and WaPo’s high-profile op-ed— blamed MAHA.
Ms. Wen labeled it as a “deep distrust of public health that resides at the heart of” that movement.
The anti-ivermectin articles are characterized as "ideological containment operations" aimed at marginalizing dissent, rather than medical critiques.
The avalanche of anti-ivermectin articles are not medical critiques.
They’re ideological containment operations — an attempt to mock, marginalize, and deter through scorn what legal and scientific argument no longer forbids.
A growing number of states are "flatly rejecting" the "scientific-medical establishment" by using legislative authority to regain control over pharmaceutical access.
A growing group of states are flatly rejecting the scientific-medical establishment.
States are using their legislative authority to claw back control over pharmaceutical access— bucking FDA orthodoxy and the entire pandemic-era narrative.
This rebellion against medical orthodoxy is being led by "sober, straight-laced state legislators" rather than typical activist groups.
The rebellion isn’t found amongst hemp-clad mushroom circles or barefoot health-retreat crowds storming the Capitol with peace signs.
It’s sober, straight-laced state legislators — churchgoers, Rotarians, small-town mayors turned senators — who now don’t trust the FDA even to regulate a generic anti-parasitic.
The movement is primarily against "unaccountable bureaucracies" and is not broadly defined as "anti-government" sentiment.
To be clear, this is not anti-government sentiment.
It’s a movement against unaccountable bureaucracies.
Many red-state lawmakers have personally tried ivermectin and found it effective, contributing to public recognition of critical media as "unreliable narrators".
The problem that Wen faces, that the entire medical establishment faces, is that, like me, most red-state lawmakers have tried ivermectin for themselves— and found it effective.
The more the Atlantics and the Leana Wens screech in horrified protest, the more the public recognizes them as unreliable narrators.
Doctors' public trust and perception as an "irrefutable" source of advice have significantly declined since the pre-pandemic era.
Cast your mind back to the halcyon, carefree, pre-pandemic days.
Doctors enjoyed the highest ratings in surveys of trusted professions.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is posing a threat to the medical profession, with primary care physicians likely to be replaced first.
The Observer fretted that doctors in general practice might be in the first tranche of jobs obsoleted by AI.
“As AI progresses in an unregulated market, primary care physicians will likely be replaced first,” a doctor quoted for the story predicted.
AI chatbots like ChatGPT are being used by patients for medical advice and diagnosis, sometimes with life-saving outcomes.
A viral story on Reddit featured a man who said ChatGPT saved his wife’s life by advising her to immediately go to the ER, where she was diagnosed with sepsis.
ChatGPT also accurately diagnosed a rash from a cell-phone picture and recommended an effective over-the-counter treatment.
Doctors themselves are increasingly relying on AI for diagnoses, with a significant number already using tools like ChatGPT and OpenEvidence.
“Two-thirds of doctors now reportedly use ChatGPT to help them home in on a diagnosis, often with good results”.
A new AI healthcare startup called OpenEvidence reported that 350,000 U.S. doctors were already using its product by mid-June.
Medical experts express concerns about AI, citing issues such as patients' inability to ask the right questions and the potential for AI systems to perpetuate biases from historical data.
“The biggest issue is that people can't ask the right questions,” said Dr. Yee.
“When historical data carry biases — such as underrepresentation of certain groups or gender biases in treatment — AI systems inevitably absorb and perpetuate these biases,” complained Dr. Ted James.
A main complaint from medical experts against AI is that it "did not take the Hippocratic oath," which the author counters by arguing doctors "nuked their own credibility" during the pandemic.
“AI did not take the Hippocratic oath,” Dr. Yee insisted.
The author argues that, absent the healthcare profession’s "awful pandemic excesses," AI would not pose such a threat, stating doctors "nuked their own credibility, en masse".
The author suggests that the "entire industrial-institutional healthcare model" is becoming obsolete due to AI, rather than individual doctors.
It’s not so much that doctors are becoming obsolete, but that the entire industrial-institutional healthcare model is becoming obsolete.
ChatGPT doesn’t replace the doctor. It replaces rushed 7-minute visits, long wait times, and expensive co-pays for minimal information.
AI's impact on the medical profession is compared to the printing press's impact on organized religion, as it "shatters the monopoly on closely guarded knowledge" and empowers the "laity".
AI is to the medical profession as the printing press was to organized religion.
It shatters the monopoly on closely guarded knowledge.
Here is a comprehensive list of key takeaway points from the provided sources, formatted as requested:
I. A Bit of Autocracy By Taki Theodoracopulos
Democracy was originally conceived by the Greeks, specifically the Athenians, with "Demos" meaning "people," leading to the definition "rule of the people". Taki Theodoracopulos expresses a preference for a "selective kind" of democracy, such as that practiced in Britain until the late 19th century, which required property ownership to vote, and ancient Athens, which mandated an obligatory education before being allowed to cast a ballot.
The author asserts that in the modern era, "fake news" is often accepted as truth, particularly when disseminated by media described as "experts at disinformation". As an example, he points to a columnist from the Bagel Times who made an allegedly childish and idiotic comparison between Hitler in 1935 and Trump in 2025.
Taki criticizes what he perceives as challenges to American democracy, including charges of corruption and weakening democracy against Trump by "paper of disinformation" without proof. He also highlights the issue of 10 to 12 million foreign nationals reportedly entering the United States during Biden's time, adding to an existing 12 to 20 million illegal aliens.
A disparity is noted between travel requirements for American citizens, who must present multiple forms for domestic travel, and illegal entrants, who are allegedly flown across the nation "stealthily without any valid ID at all". This situation leads Taki to conclude that "democracy is not working" if such practices are considered part of it.
The author expresses concern over instances of public disorder, such as foreign flags being displayed and rioters burning down the "City of Angels" (Los Angeles) in protest of the arrest and deportation of illegal aliens who have committed crimes. He is critical of the city's black female mayor and the California governor for allegedly siding with "the criminals" in these events.
Taki advocates for the immediate implementation of "a bit of autocracy" as a solution to what he believes ails the United States. He identifies "egalitarianism" and the "passions of the mob" as culprits, contrasting them with what was once known as "civil disobedience".
He provides graphic examples of what he considers the "passions of the mob," including an illegal migrant allegedly lighting a sleeping American woman on fire and watching her burn, and another instance of an illegal migrant raping a dead man in a New York subway. These incidents are presented as evidence of societal decay and a justification for autocracy.
Taki perceives a major threat to Western security stemming from its "pusillanimity," where "global elites and immigrants are stacked against good middle-class and working-class guys". He highlights the "great replacement theory," which posits a conspiracy by liberal elites to replace white Europeans with migrants, and laments that few politicians seem concerned by it.
Drawing on the ideas of German academic Hans Hoppe, Taki argues that "universal suffrage has supplanted rule by the natural elite". This, in their view, results in foreign criminals having "as many or more rights than the law-abiding citizen".
Both Hoppe and Taki suggest the need for a "benevolent strongman" who would rule efficiently and prioritize the well-being of his subjects. Taki also expresses a desire for journalists to report "the truth, not their truth," and for the state to prevent them from acting as informants like the East German Stasi.
The author contends that "liberalism has trampled traditional values underfoot," leading to widespread frustration. He characterizes "egalitarianism" as the "bad guy" and an "autocratic strongman" as the "good one," arguing that American individualism has come at the expense of families and communities, leaving people isolated and controlled by "left-wing puppeteers".
II. Foulism: Foul Play replaces Fair Play, Re-moralization follows Demoralization, and the True Failure of Imagination By Jung-Freud
The author posits that it is a natural human inclination for a people to "prefer and favor their own side," whether this is labeled tribalism, ethnocentrism, or nationalism. However, to enable this "my-side-ism" within the context of larger humanity, there must be established ground rules acknowledging the validity of such preferences for all groups.
The concept of "tribal supremacism" arises when one group favors its own side but denies other peoples the reciprocal right to do likewise, contrasting with "sane and sound universal nationalism" which respects the national identities and interests of all peoples. The latter requires negotiation and compromise based on mutual respect and give-and-take, recognizing that what benefits one nation may not benefit others.
The essence of fair play is illustrated through athletics, where despite passionate loyalty to one's team, competition occurs within a framework of equally governing rules and agreed-upon penalties for fouls. A "fair loss" is deemed more honorable than a "foul win" among the civilized, where the principle of fair play is the "immutable champion" of the "Good Game".
When fouls are not acknowledged or penalized by the legal system, fair play is abandoned, leading to degradation and potential collapse of the system. This environment incentivizes foulness, as there is no reason to play fair when it is tolerated and even rewarded, as seen in "gangsterism" which disregards rules in favor of taking what others have created.
The decline of the West is presented as paradoxical, given that Northern Whites are credited with creating social, political, and economic orders that were particularly conducive to the Rule of Law and Fair Play. The author questions why this ostensibly "fairest and most legal-bound system in the world" became vulnerable to "Jewish corruption".
The source suggests that Jews, initially accepted as "fellow whites," leveraged meritocracy to "out-compete and gain advantage over the Northern Whites". However, it is claimed that despite this initial success through meritocracy, Jews "lacked an honor culture," held "extreme tribal-supremacist views," harbored "contempt toward goyim," and used their advantages with "little regard for rules".
The author presents Jewish behavior as an "outlier" that violates the stereotypical formula of success, wherein smart and capable groups are expected to favor meritocracy. Instead, an "objective onlooker" would have expected Jews, having demonstrated superior abilities, to be more fair-minded upon achieving a dominant position, but the "opposite turned out to be the case".
A striking metaphor is used to describe Jewish actions: they "earned like super-Episcopalians but acted like the ultra-Sicilians". They are depicted as having thrived in a meritocratic system only to behave like "termites devouring the system from within," leaving an "empty husk that was only good for gangsterism".
The concept of "re-moralization" is introduced as a mechanism to offset the demoralization that results from the rise of foulness and the breakdown of fair play. This involves a concerted effort to justify special treatment for a privileged group, persuading others that adhering to rules for the sake of this special group's happiness is the "most moral thing in the world".
Jewish exceptionalism is identified as a source of societal demoralization in the West, prompting questions about why foulest actors appear to gain all wealth and power. This "Jewish Specialness" is then "re-moralized" and justified on various grounds, including "higher Jewish intelligence & drive" or spiritual imperatives.
The author raises questions about whether the significant wealth and power of Jews in the current West are genuinely deserved based on talent alone, citing concerns about insider trading, large-scale financial fraud like Bernie Madoff's, the role of Jewish financiers in economic bubbles, and Wall Street bailouts. The lack of "colorblind meritocracy" is also questioned in the context of success for zealous Zionists versus blacklisting for those protesting Israeli actions.
The phenomenon of "merito-excess" or "merito-ecstasy" is described, where even "deserving Jews seem to be rewarded far beyond what is merited," suggesting a strategy to create an "elite bulwark community of like-minded Jewish Zionists". This disproportionate rewarding of intelligence and ingenuity is characterized as another form of foulism.
It is asserted that American elites and many ordinary citizens have not only accepted but "totally embraced the foulism of Jews-Zionists-Israel as the New Normal". This is interpreted as a belief that Jews and Israel "can never do wrong" and that their "low-blows are always justified as 'self-defense'".
The source claims that "Jewish Power has targeted and corrupted just about every institution in the West" to advance the agendas of "Jewish Supremacism". This alleged corruption extends across various sectors including academia, media, legal institutions (described as "Jewish Lawfare"), politics, entertainment, finance, and technology firms like Palantir.
This infiltration and corruption are said to lead to institutions being "filled with Jews or total cuck to Jews," with goy elites often appointing "shabbos goyim" (non-Jews subservient to Jewish interests) to leadership positions. Most goyim in elite circles allegedly remain silent due to fear of career repercussions or being labeled "Anti-Semitic".
The case of Jonathan Pollard, described as the "biggest traitor in US history" who received a hero's welcome in Israel from Netanyahu, is presented as deeply problematic for the US-Israel relationship. The author suggests that the West has become like the "1919 World Series fixed by Arnold Rothstein," where no one has an issue with the fix.
Donald Trump is characterized as a "gangsta-president" whose MAGA movement has been "utterly debased into MAGANGSTER-ism". Despite initially presenting as a nationalist, his past career dealing with "gangsters" leads the author to question his authenticity as a patriot or statesman.
Trump is accused of exploiting Americans' vulnerabilities with "false bravado and muscle-flexing," misdirecting the "rightful anger" of "MAGA-tard types" towards external enemies "always chosen by the Jews". This prevents the addressing of underlying problems like Zionist Neocon foreign policy draining US coffers.
The source suggests that Jews, initially wary of Trump's "America First" slogan, have now come to value his utility by conflating American Nationalism/Patriotism with Zionist-globalism. This strategy, termed "Amerisrael First," is seen in Trump's public alignment with Netanyahu and actions like bombing Iran.
The author introduces the concept of a "failure of imagination," arguing that people (including Iran) are unable or unwilling to grasp the boundless "foulness of Jewish Power" and their capacity for extreme actions. This "Jewish Madness" is deemed "even harder to appease than Adolf Hitler".
A Jewish personality trait is likened to Barbara Streisand's obsessive need for things to go "her way even if everything goes to hell," a trait that is endearing in comedy but "isn’t funny at all when it plays out in the real world". This behavior is seen as Jewish Power pushing "O’Neal-like white cucks".
The "Anglo brand," once admired globally for its integrity and "Fair Play" ideal, is now seen as having "lost their way and caved to Jews as the new elites of Anglosphere". This transformation has resulted in Anglos becoming "nothing but enablers of Jewish supremacist foulness".
The current state of Western leaders like Lindsey Graham and Keir Starmer is described as "utterly cucked and sheepish in its servility to Zion," indicating a dramatic shift from tempering Jewish excesses to appeasing and indulging their "absolute worst impulses". This is presented as a "total regime-change in the Collective West".
A commenter, ThreeCranes, describes a process where Jews allegedly create "phony crises" (e.g., climate change, transgenderism) which are then "drummed about by the Jewish-owned media". This allows for the creation of tax-exempt non-profit groups, staffed by Jews, to "suck up" taxpayer money through government grants, with wealthy Jewish donors reducing their tax burdens.
This system reportedly extends to Jewish entrepreneurs creating businesses to address these crises, which then receive direct government grants and contracts, with politicians being "beholden to the Jewish lobby for re-election funds". This "manifold, integrated, interrelated Grift" sees the same Jewish individuals serving on the boards of various entities.
One commenter, BrooLidd, challenges Jung-Freud's assertion of Jewish "higher IQ" as the primary reason for their dominance, suggesting that their small population size means their success must stem from other factors, such as "Jewish fealty to Satan". Another commenter, Annacath, agrees that Jewish success is more due to "sticking together/promoting their own than being equipped with higher IQ".
The Holocaust is critically analyzed by a commenter, Priss Factor, who argues it is often viewed as a "stand-alone event without any context," unlike German and Japanese suffering which is contextualized within their aggression. The commenter suggests the Holocaust is not contextualized as "an extreme reaction to Jewish perfidy in Weimar Germany, Jewish role in radical movements, Jewish role in turning the Anglo world against the Germanic world".
A commenter, The Germ Theory of Disease, critiques the Jewish influence on Western culture, arguing that they culturally "gravitate to the 'if it plays, then it pays' school of artistic thought," preferring "mediocre stuff that appeals to stupid people" for financial gain rather than nourishing high culture. This is seen as "flooding the cultural blood system with Jewish sugar" and "blocking out and locking out the white Christian Europeans who know what really nourishes the Western soul".
The author's premise of Jewish power is likened by a commenter, Miro23, to "evolved parasitism," where a parasite weakens its host, usually not fatally, and then seeks a new host. The US is described as a "perfect" host with its "Anglo ethos and hopeless Bill of Rights," while Russia and China are seen as having largely resisted this "organized Jewish parasitism".
The source explains that Jews allegedly believe their "Big Brain superiority" over "goyim" exempts them from rules, leading them to view their actions as a "different kind of fair play" or "cosmically ordained". This perspective, likened to Hannibal Lecter or Harry Lime, justifies their "cheating and swindling" the "dimwit goyim".
A commenter, James J. O'Meara, proposes that Jewish success is due to a "1-2 punch": first, using "high IQ/drive to gain positions in the meritocratic system," and then, once in, switching to "ethnic networking, aka nepotism," to fill positions with "one of the Tribe". He suggests the re-implementation of quotas to prevent this.
III. Hey, POTUS, America First Ain’t Got No Beef With Iran And Don’t Need No Bunker Busters, Neither By David Stockman
David Stockman contends that the US President's ultimatum to Iran lacks any basis in "homeland security," asserting that Iran possesses "no military capacity whatsoever to harm any American". He emphasizes that a peaceful republic focused on its own affairs would not consider bombing a nation 10,000 kilometers away, regardless of its leadership or regional hostilities.
Iran's military capabilities are described as insignificant, with no blue water navy, air, or sealift capacity to deploy troops to US shores, and its longest-range missile reaching only a fifth of the way to Washington D.C.. Its defense budget of $12 billion is a "pittance," equating to just 1.2% of the Pentagon's annual budget.
Stockman criticizes the idea of dropping 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs on Iran's nuclear site as "purely a stratagem of Empire," serving as another intervention in the Middle East on behalf of Israel, an "ally" that has done "precious little to enhance America’s Homeland Security". He argues that this action disregards the War Powers exclusively reserved for Congress.
James Madison's warning against war is quoted, stating it is "the most to be dreaded" enemy of public liberty, leading to armies, debts, taxes, and the "domination of the few". Madison's counsel highlights the founders' deep skepticism about engaging in continuous warfare, fearing its corrosive effects on freedom and morals.
The presence of approximately 51,000 US troops in the region surrounding Iran is solely attributed to "contingencies of Empire," rather than genuine homeland security necessities. These illicit reasons include the defense of Israel, protection of Persian Gulf oil supplies, and acting as a global gendarme.
Stockman outlines that a complete defense of the American homeland only requires an "invincible nuclear deterrent" and an "ironclad Fortress America defense" of US shorelines and airspace. These requirements do not necessitate "entangling alliances abroad, foreign military bases or intervention against states like Iran".
The justification for massive US military intervention in the Middle East based on Persian Gulf oil security is refuted, as any regime controlling oil reserves, whether friendly or hostile, will produce them to maximize revenues. Historical data indicates that trillions of US military spending and interventions have had no discernible effect on global oil prices over five decades.
The argument that US military intervention combats terrorism is characterized as "upside down," as previous terrorist attacks on the US homeland were attributed to Sunni militants, not Iranian Shiites, and are seen as "blow-back for massive and multiple US incursions in the middle east". These interventions have resulted in an estimated 1.8-2.7 million Middle Eastern deaths since 1990.
Washington's self-appointed role in preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, even denying its NPT-guaranteed right to uranium enrichment, is questioned. Stockman asserts that Iran has a "religious edict against nuclear weapons" and is being pushed towards weaponization by "relentless pressures, demonizations and attacks" from Washington and Israel.
Donald Trump's "reckless" repudiation of the 2015 JCPOA (nuclear deal) in 2018 is criticized, noting that it was cancelled because Obama negotiated it and because Bibi Netanyahu and neocons demanded its cancellation. This action led Iran to restart its uranium stockpiling, effectively negating the deal's successes.
Trump is portrayed as an "unhinged, egomaniacal Caesarist" who believes himself to be the "CEO of the world". His "unjustified rampage against Iran" is driven by his "egomaniacal satisfaction and no reason of homeland security whatsoever".
Trump's "ALL CAPS" warning to global oil producers to "KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN" is cited as an example of him acting as the "petroleum czar of the planet," despite his actions putting 25 million barrels per day of global supply from the Strait of Hormuz "in harms’ way". Any serious supply disruption could cause oil prices to soar to over $100 per barrel.
The author argues that Trump's bombing campaign had minimal impact on Iran's nuclear program, as satellite photos suggest Iran moved its 60% enriched uranium stockpiles to safe sites before the attack. This indicates that the bombing failed to achieve the desired reduction in Iran's nuclear material or centrifuges.
The 2015 JCPOA is highlighted as a "workable" arrangement that peacefully reduced Iran's enriched uranium stockpile by 97% and eliminated enrichment at the hardened Fordow site. In contrast, Trump's bombing left the stockpile at essentially the same level and did not achieve the centrifuge reductions gained by the prior deal.
Stockman criticizes the US military's focus on "kill them from the sky warfare" using offensive weapons like bunker busters, arguing they are mainly designed for "the pursuit of Empire, not the maintenance of Homeland Security". He warns that using bunker busters as "counter-force weapons" destabilizes nuclear deterrence (MAD).
IV. Huawei is transforming and building an unparalleled AI tech stack By Hua Bin
Despite "unprecedented sanctions" imposed by the US regime in 2018 to destroy Huawei, banning sales of telecom gear and denying chip/software access, the company has successfully transformed and expanded its footprint. After five years of revenue decline, Huawei has rebounded with historical sales and profits since 2023.
Today, Huawei maintains its position as the No. 1 global telecom market leader, has reclaimed the lead in China’s smartphone market, and is a world leader in the wearables market. The company has diversified significantly, entering the electric vehicle market, developing its own operating system (Harmony OS), and investing in chipmaking technologies.
Huawei has reportedly built an "unparalleled AI tech stack," a feat that no other company, including Nvidia or TSMC, has achieved. Its R&D budget in 2024 reached $25 billion, representing 21% of its revenue, with over 110,000 engineers and scientists dedicated to research.
The company's chip design division, HiSilicon, is a global leader that competes with Nvidia and Qualcomm, and Huawei has developed its own software platform called CANN (compute architecture for neural networks). It has also rolled out its marquee AI chip, Ascend 310B, and the advanced data center architecture, CloudMatrix 384.
The CloudMatrix 384 system, comprised of 384 Ascend 910C neural processing units (NPUs) and 192 Kunpeng server central processing units (CPUs), has outperformed Nvidia's H800 GPU-based systems in tests for large language models (LLMs). This highly efficient architecture is projected to reshape AI infrastructure.
Despite its chip technology lagging slightly behind Nvidia's top offerings, Huawei's "scale-up solution" is considered "arguably a generation ahead of Nvidia and AMD’s current products on the market" through methods like stacking and clustering. Huawei's expertise in complex networking, gained as a top telecom equipment provider, is a key secret to its superior performance in data center environments where combined chip power matters more than individual chip performance.
China holds a key advantage in AI development due to its power generation capacity, which is "more than twice that of the US". Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, suggested that China can simply "add more computers" to overcome individual chip limitations given their abundant energy.
The US ban on Nvidia AI chips to China has paradoxically accelerated China’s drive to "indigenise every step of advanced AI chipmaking". As a result, Nvidia is no longer considered a "reliable source of AI chips" in China, and its CEO has acknowledged that "export controls were a failure".
Huawei has become "China’s most important company," ranked as the No. 1 most valuable brand in China, largely due to the "short-sighted belligerent US regime's" sanctions. The brand is strongly associated with national pride and technological confidence, prompting many Chinese to buy Huawei products as a default choice.
A commenter, Notsofast, observes that the "ratfuckery, dirty tricks and double dealing" by "rules based on our orders, shysters" inevitably backfire, noting that both Huawei and Russia have emerged stronger from illegal sanctions, tariffs, and bans. This has driven both entities towards greater self-sufficiency in their supply chains, further harming the companies and countries that initiated the trade wars.
Another commenter, Bumpkin, expresses skepticism about Huawei's investment in AI, predicting that the "AI bubble is going to come crashing down" due to limited uses, leading to wasted billions. This commenter also argues that software, being more about ideas and having low capital costs, is fundamentally unsuited for large corporate conglomerates like Huawei, predicting their eventual failure against "guerrilla competition" from open-source software.
The US is reportedly forcing China to become vertically integrated in the chip-making process through sanctions, which will eliminate China's need to outsource or smuggle components from abroad. This strategy is also driven by the US's anticipation that Taiwan will eventually rejoin mainland China, thereby cutting off US access to TSMC's technology.
A commenter asserts that "copying tech" is a "pretty much standard business practice," citing Microsoft as an example of a company that built its success by leveraging ideas and products from elsewhere. The key, according to this view, is "not so much who came up with the first idea, but who makes the best use of it".
China is reportedly undertaking the "most ambitious space-based computing project in human history," the "Three-Body Computing Constellation," which is a massive AI supercomputer in orbit made of 2,800 interconnected satellites. This revolutionary project promises to redefine data processing, Earth observation, and AI capabilities.
A commenter expresses a "European soul" that "cries for individuality," lamenting the "monotonous sameness of the mass consumer culture" evident in designs like Huawei's new car, which is seen as lacking imagination, individuality, and soul. The commenter suggests that this uniformity, whether created by the US or China, results in a world where "you can have any color as long as it’s black".
A commenter attributes the current decline of the US economy to "hapless US Elites" who, over the past 50 years, "shipped operations jobs overseas" and "financialized the US economy" to become billionaires. This is evidenced by the stark contrast in engineering degrees awarded annually: 136,233 in the US compared to 1,600,000 in China.
V. Iran-Israel Conflict: Will It Mark the End of American Hegemony? By Doug Casey
Doug Casey views the "unprovoked US attack on Iran" as a situation with highly unpredictable outcomes but one "totally predictable" consequence: it pushes the world closer to an "all-out in WW3". He questions whether Iran will close key waterways, attack US bases, or acquire nuclear weapons in response.
Iran is portrayed as unjustly labeled a "terrorist state," as its conflicts are primarily with Israel, supporting groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis solely in their attacks against Israel. Casey asserts that Iran has "never attacked the US or anyone else" since 1979, dismissing its "Death to America" rhetoric as "stupid".
Casey controversially suggests that, from an objective viewpoint, the US can be seen as a "terrorist state" due to its history of constantly invading countries, overthrowing regimes, and assassinating leaders since WWII. He highlights Trump's violent threats and Israel's actions, such as injuring 3400 Lebanese with pager bombs and killing 60,000 in Gaza, as examples.
Public opinion in the US has noticeably shifted, with support for Israel declining, particularly among younger Republicans. An informal poll by Rep. Thomas Massie indicated 85% opposition to US weapons aid for Israel, which Casey attributes to Americans disapproving of "putting a foreign government on welfare" with annual billions in aid to Israel and Egypt.
Casey critically questions the US-Israel relationship, asking if Israel is the "51st state of the Union" and labeling it an "extremely costly liability" that prioritizes its own interests, using the US as a "patsy and playing it for a sucker".
He notes that Kanye West's "antics" have underscored the public perception that Jews "seem to control politics, business, finance, law, academia, entertainment, and the media". This, along with the growing visibility of other small groups, contributes to a resentment among the majority, referred to as "black fatigue" in relation to African Americans.
The author addresses the use of "false flag operations" to justify unpopular wars, stating it's "always better to fabricate an atrocity so you can play the victim". He cites historical examples such as Japan before invading China and Germany before invading Poland, and raises the possibility of "un-uniformed but well-organized armies" of migrants within the US launching attacks and falsely claiming Iranian responsibility.
The geopolitical implications of the conflict, should it not unfold as intended, include a "gigantic embarrassment" for the US, akin to Vietnam or Afghanistan, potentially accelerating the decline of US hegemony and the rise of a multipolar world. If the US "wins," Iran could devolve into civil war, with regions like Iranian Kurdistan potentially seeking to form a new nation-state.
Casey points out a disconnect regarding US intelligence on Iran's nuclear program, noting that Tulsi Gabbard (head of US intelligence) found no indication of Iran having or moving towards a nuclear weapon, yet Trump dismissed this, apparently trusting "his buddy Bibi" (Netanyahu). This underscores a perceived unreliability in official information and decision-making.
The consistent historical pattern of US interventions abroad ending badly is highlighted, citing Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan as examples where unprovoked attacks transformed states into "chaotic failed states" or left previous regimes in power after immense cost and destruction.
The potential economic and financial consequences include the US being "on the hook" to rebuild Iran if chaos is created, or to relocate and rebuild Gaza after its destruction by Israel. Casey also speculates about a potential US invasion of Saudi Arabia if its alignment with Israel destabilizes the region.
The Muslim world's deep-seated "dislike, fear, and distrust" of "the Zionist entity" is noted, stemming from the perception that Palestine was "invaded by Zionists" and "conquered demographically, economically, politically, and militarily" over 125 years.
Casey concludes by advocating for "complete non-intervention by the US" in the conflict, likening it to a "massive replay of the feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys". He expresses a desire for "a pox on both their houses" and avoids taking sides.
VI. Is Trump the Greatest Knuckleballer of All Time? By J.B. Shurk
J.B. Shurk metaphorically characterizes President Trump as potentially "the greatest knuckleballer of all time," likening his approach to domestic and foreign policy to the unpredictable pitch that zigs and zags without spin. This style leaves adversaries baffled and even allies confused, similar to how a knuckleball frustrates hitters and catchers.
The author notes a "tenuous ceasefire" between Iran and Israel after two weeks of conflict, which Trump has already branded "The 12 Day War". This unexpected turn of events is presented as a testament to Trump's unpredictable "knuckleball" strategy.
The success of "The 12 Day War" is attributed to a "daring mission" codenamed "Midnight Hammer" to "obliterate Iran’s nuclear facilities," which included "multiple head fakes". Decoy B-2s were sent to Guam to divert attention, while stealth bombers from Missouri undertook an 18-hour journey to strike Iran's nuclear capabilities before anyone realized the true target.
Reactions to Trump's Iran strike were varied and frantic: those against Mideast wars feared prolonged conflict, advocates for regime change hoped for ground troops, and Democrats who previously criticized Trump's leniency now condemned the attack and called for impeachment. This rapid reversal of positions highlights the unpredictable nature of Trump's actions.
Trump's strategy involves rhetorical shifts and unexpected moves, keeping all parties off balance; for example, he might "rhetorically spank both countries" even as his administration works for peace. Pundits who initially praised his attack might be angered by subsequent peace efforts, while those who deemed it unconstitutional might reconsider, illustrating the chaotic "knuckleball" still "rolling".
The author uses the analogy of a knuckleball pitcher's performance ebbing and flowing, sometimes giving up runs, but still having the potential for a "lights-out complete game". This implies that patience is crucial when observing Trump's seemingly inconsistent actions, as they can lead to surprising turnarounds.
Trump is depicted as effectively using "crazy pitches" to "strike out the Democrat party" by making them defend controversial positions, such as "Hamas baby-killers, Iranian 'Death to America' terrorists, violent illegal aliens, child castration, and men beating up women in competitive sports". Despite Democrats' furious reactions and name-calling, they consistently strike out against his slow-moving "pitches".
Even Trump's supposed allies ("players supposedly on his team") are shown to be frustrated by his "knuckleballer" approach. Neocons demand "endless war," "free traders" disparage tariffs, and the Establishment Old Guard yearns to return to "real war in Ukraine," all wondering why Trump cannot "pitch like a normal Republican".
VII. Jeffrey Peel: In their attempts to control everything, political parties are dying, corporate media is dying – but individuals are rising to take their place By Rhoda Wilson
Jeffrey Peel suggests that the global control network is a complex web of "competing interests," involving corporations and intelligence agencies, making it difficult to identify a single primary threat. He describes the overall situation as an "organised testosterone-fuelled mess" driven by diverse motivations.
Peel asserts that the ultimate goal of world leaders, including those in Russia and China, is a "global government," which they aim to achieve through digital technologies and the manipulation of public opinion via "fear of scarcity". He views apparent geopolitical rivalries as a struggle for power within this overarching agenda.
Despite these attempts at global control, Peel identifies a "chink of light": the "death of politics" and the "death of corporate media," as individuals independent of the state are rising to fill the resulting void. He sees this decline in trust in state-run media and politicians as a positive development.
Peel claims that intelligence agencies are involved in psychological operations not only through corporate media but also by utilizing "controlled alternative media organisations" to propagate their messages. He cites examples like Linda Yakarino's appointment to X (Twitter) and the continued presence of figures with ties to intelligence agencies as evidence of controlled opposition.
He criticizes the concept of "freedom of speech, not [freedom of] reach" on platforms like X (Twitter), asserting that it reflects ongoing censorship and control. Peel believes X and Twitter are the "one and the same organisation," and that his own reach was deliberately limited after he exposed this perceived hypocrisy.
Peel and Hrvoje Morić discuss the "grift" within alternative media, where some figures may prioritize self-censorship to maintain followership rather than fully exposing the truth. They raise questions about the motivations and connections of well-known alternative figures, suggesting that their prominence might indicate they are "in the game" of controlled narratives.
Peel emphasizes the critical importance of challenging authority and seeking out alternative views, especially since mainstream media is "captured and controlled". He aligns with Richard Feynman's view on the value of uncertainty, arguing that free thinkers are necessary to prevent coercion and control, even if labeled "conspiracy theorists".
Many corporations, particularly those headquartered in London or the United States, have a historical involvement in "organised crime," including the slave trade and opioid trade. Companies like Unilever are presented as having a direct lineage from such nefarious origins to current investments in pharmaceuticals and arms trade.
The global agenda is heavily influenced by corporations with major investors and shareholders possessing "vast amounts of intergenerational wealth". This corporate power is intertwined with intelligence agencies, such as the Five Eyes Alliance, with Palantir (initially CIA-funded) serving as a contractor for these agencies and even national health services.
The "smart city agenda," including "15-minute cities," is being driven by organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), which provides financial assistance to governments on the condition that funds are spent on WEF partner companies like Huawei and Infosys. The proposed UK "BritCard" (a mandatory digital ID system) is seen as a key component of this agenda, facilitating totalitarian coercion through biometrics and control over services.
Crises are intentionally used to introduce "Orwellian control tools"; for instance, digital ID was attempted during the Covid era through "track and trace technologies". The normalization of digital passports and QR codes during the pandemic is chillingly compared to Nazi "Ahnenpasses" used for "biological Aryan purity," with IBM's historical aid to the Nazi regime highlighted.
The trend towards a "highly controlled and policed financial system" is evident in the promotion of digital currencies. Bitcoin, for example, is described as having become "highly traceable and controllable," with entities like Tether partnering with the CIA to monitor transactions, leading to a perceived loss of freedom and autonomy.
Peel expresses skepticism about the "multipolar world" narrative, believing that leaders in Russia and China are pursuing the "same agenda" as Western nations, ultimately aiming for a "global government". He suggests that conflicts like the Israel-Iran situation are "staged events" designed to manipulate public opinion and justify increased control.
The creation of "fear of scarcity" is identified as a primary strategy to manipulate public opinion, as seen with concerns over Nord Stream pipelines or perceived shortages during the Covid pandemic. This manufactured fear is then used to justify "land grabs" and manipulate markets, exemplified by rising prices for housing, food, and energy under "Net Zero" policies despite abundant resources.
The "green agenda" or "Net Zero" is framed as an intentional effort to "reimplement feudalism and erase the middle class" by increasing essential costs (housing, food, energy) while salaries stagnate. Morić cites examples like rising housing prices in Mexico and Japanese citizens queuing for rice as evidence of this intentional agenda.
Peel highlights the unsustainability of the current system, where many individuals, particularly public sector workers and contractors, are dependent on the state through "bribes and financial incentives" like guaranteed pensions. He warns that this system is not sustainable and that these dependent individuals are unknowingly aiding a plan to replace them with technology like AI and Robocops.
VIII. Quick Guide To Peptides And How To Handle, Store And Administer Them By Joachim Bartoll
Joachim Bartoll, a former elite athlete coach with extensive experience in health and fitness, shifted his focus to health, longevity, and quality of life after experiencing cancer and organ damage in 2017-2018, which he attributes to plant-based foods, supplements, and medications. He claims to have reversed these issues within months by adopting a "natural species-specific and species-appropriate obligate hyper carnivore diet in combination with dry fasting".
He notes that "biohackers" and those interested in life-extension often begin incorrectly with nutrition, frequently turning to "toxic diets, toxic dietary supplements, sketchy and mostly damaging habits". Peptides have gained popularity in recent years, potentially offering beneficial effects with minimal side-effects, provided proper nutrition is in place.
Bartoll states that many peptides are "very poorly researched," with advancements often driven by scientists and sport specialists who prescribe them to elite athletes years before the broader medical community catches up. These peptides are commercially available online for "research studies" at high prices, or more affordably from "underground labs" via forums or chat groups.
Peptides are defined as "short chains of amino acids" and are "extremely fragile," with their stability being sensitive to factors such as temperature, pH, light, and oxygen. Once the peptide powder is dissolved in bacteriostatic water, the peptides immediately begin to degrade, emphasizing the importance of proper handling and injection protocols.
Peptides perform various biological functions, including acting as signaling molecules, hormones, neurotransmitters, and growth factors. Examples include Ipamorelin and Tesamorelin, which stimulate growth hormone release for skin health, muscle growth, and fat loss, and BPC-157 and TB-500, known for promoting the healing of tissues by enhancing blood vessel formation.
Injectable peptides are often preferred because they bypass the digestive system, ensuring higher bioavailability and more predictable effects by reaching target tissues directly. Subcutaneous injections slow absorption, while intramuscular injections deliver compounds more quickly and result in higher peak concentrations.
Peptides work by mimicking natural bodily peptides, binding to specific receptors to trigger physiological responses, meaning their effects are "limited by your body’s existing biological capabilities and potential". They can maximize one's natural potential, for example, by stimulating growth hormone release up to about 1 IU a day, which aids in recovery and anti-aging but differs from the higher dosages of synthetic growth hormone used by athletes.
For optimal results, Bartoll advises starting with the lower end of recommended peptide doses and increasing only if further beneficial effects are noted, as exceeding physiological limits will waste peptides. He also stresses the importance of cycling most peptides on and off to prevent "wear and tear" from continuously maximizing physiological capacity.
The author strongly emphasizes that for peptides to be effective, especially for healing or improving skin and reducing wrinkles, one's diet must be "on point" to provide all necessary nutrients. He specifically recommends a ketogenic diet based on "animal-based foods" (carnivore diet) as essential.
Peptides are manufactured through chemical synthesis (joining amino acids in a lab), biological production (using genetically engineered living organisms), and enzymatic hydrolysis (breaking down proteins with enzymes).
Unreconstituted peptide powder vials should be stored in a "cold and dark place for maximum longevity," with a refrigerator preserving them for at least 3 months and a freezer (at least -20 C/-4 F) extending shelf life up to a year or more. Using a freezer bag with a desiccant packet provides additional protection against moisture.
When reconstituting peptides, it is crucial to gently dissolve the powder in bacteriostatic water using single-use insulin syringes, letting the water slowly drip onto the inner side of the tilted vial, never directly onto the powder. Vigorous movements like shaking should be avoided to prevent damage to the fragile peptides.
For precise dosing, particularly with low peptide amounts, Bartoll suggests adding more bacteriostatic water to the vial to make it easier to draw exact quantities. He recommends using online peptide calculators for dosage uncertainties and advises thorough research on dosages and injection protocols.
Given that peptide products are unregulated and sellers have no formal obligations, the author suggests that buying from "underground labs" with positive feedback on encrypted, members-only forums can help ensure quality due to competition and the labs' desire to maintain customer satisfaction.
Reconstituted peptide solutions remain stable for up to 30 days if stored in a "dark and cold place" (maximum 4 degrees Celsius/39 F), preferably at the back of a refrigerator shelf. They should never be refrozen, stored at room temperature, or exposed to light, as this significantly reduces their shelf life.
To prevent oxygen damage to peptides, one should avoid drawing air into the syringe and releasing it into the vial before withdrawing the solution. Instead, the vial should be gently tilted upside down after needle insertion, and the plunger slowly pulled to draw the required amount, ensuring the peptides remain intact.
For injecting peptides, the skin area should be cleaned with an alcohol swab, and for subcutaneous injections, the fat/skin gently pinched. The syringe should be injected quickly, the plunger pushed until all contents are administered, and the syringe held in place for 3 seconds before removal to ensure the full dose is delivered and minimize leakage.
Bartoll emphasizes that individuals are "self-govern human[s]" and are responsible for their own decisions regarding peptide use. He offers consultation for guidance and caution but stresses that he will not create protocols or encourage use, as the ultimate decision rests with the individual after their own research.
IX. The Hidden Tragedy of Neurological Vaccine Injuries By A Midwestern Doctor
The author argues that vaccine mandates are based on ACIP's (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) assessment that benefits outweigh risks, but he alleges that ACIP members have "massive conflicts of interest favoring vaccination". This bias supposedly leads to nearly every vaccine being added to the schedule, contributing to "sicker" children.
A central critique is that only a limited number of vaccine injuries (typically minor or very rare) are officially acknowledged, while a much broader range of "neurological injuries" are "swept under the rug". The author claims that the "solution" to producing unsafe vaccines was to insist they were safe and suppress any memory of past vaccine disasters, allowing for the gaslighting of injured individuals.
The author asserts that the widespread belief in vaccine safety is a "mythology," and that brain injuries from vaccination have been a "longstanding problem". He cites a 1982 NBC news program that revealed "post-pertussis encephalopathy" from the DPT vaccine and doctors' refusal to report it, with medical knowledge of such reactions dating back to the 1930s.
The reclassification of "mentally retarded" to "intellectual disability" in the 1990s is deemed significant for masking vaccine injuries. This "diagnostic obfuscation" allows for the argument that increases in autism are merely due to reclassification, not environmental toxins like vaccines, by blending "profound autism" with "autistic traits".
The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act acknowledged specific neurological injuries, such as encephalopathy from MMR (now often labeled "autism" and denied as vaccine-caused). However, despite decades of scientific advancement and new vaccines, "almost no additional neurological injuries have been added to the table," due to a perceived "massive conflict of interest" in acknowledging injuries that would necessitate government compensation.
Research into vaccine neurological injuries has been "systematically prevented," with placebo-controlled trials deemed "unethical" and studies showing harm dismissed as "junk science". Researchers who conducted such studies reportedly faced retaliation, including an Oregon pediatrician who lost his license, and large databases containing vaccinated/unvaccinated data were illegally deleted when RFK's team gained access.
The 1966 book "The Hazards of Immunization" by an "eminent bacteriologist" is highlighted for disclosing a large number of "forgotten vaccine disasters" and devastating injuries, many of which occurred in soldiers. The author of that book hoped that acknowledging these risks would lead to safer vaccines, as the same disasters kept repeating.
Key themes from "The Hazards of Immunization" include how many vaccines cause immune suppression and activate latent infections, how vaccine manufacturing often leads to "hot lots" (batches with higher adverse effects) that were "solved" by granting manufacturers immunity from lawsuits, and that a wide range of autoimmune and neurological injuries were caused by each vaccine.
Specific neurological injuries from the Typhoid Vaccine are detailed, including polyneuritis, blindness, convulsions, seizures, and widespread nerve damage, with some cases diagnosed as polio and one autopsy showing "widespread brain destruction". Many of these conditions are now classified as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
The author suggests that Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is "massively unreported," despite being commonly taught as a rare complication of influenza vaccination. He cites his colleague's experience where roughly 6% of patients developed GBS from the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine, which was pulled after causing it in 1 in 100,000 recipients.
"Hot" Yellow Fever vaccines were associated with neurological injuries, including a fatal 1934 case with myelin degeneration and brain cell changes, and a 1936 case involving acute meningitis, seizures, and mental confusion. Reports from 1943 and 1953 documented significant percentages of recipients developing encephalitis, with high fatality rates in some outbreaks.
The Pasteurian method for rabies vaccine led to neuroparalysis, but a "conspiracy of silence" among directors of Pasteur Institutes aimed to prevent discrediting the method. Rabies vaccine injuries had an average fatality rate of 10-16.85% and included dorsolumbar myelitis, encephalomyelitis, GBS (with a 30% fatality rate), and peripheral neuritis affecting cranial nerves.
A specific case from 1966 is recounted where a 14-month-old developed encephalitis 11 days after Measles vaccination, exhibiting symptoms like facial twitching, fever, semi-consciousness, left-sided weakness, and severe seizures, resulting in possible mental impairment. This illustrates a documented neurological injury linked to the measles vaccine.
X. The Kosovo War Was a Controlled Demolition Project By Donny Ahzmond
Donny Ahzmond proposes that the Kosovo War was a "Controlled Demolition Project," orchestrated to serve as a cover for demolishing "blighted and unprofitable areas" in Pristina and rebuilding them. The "NEWBORN" sculpture, symbolizing Kosovo's independence, is reinterpreted as a symbol of the region being "reborn" in the image of "moneyed interests".
Photographic evidence of Pristina's destruction during the war suggests that only older, smaller buildings were targeted, while newer, taller, and more modern structures remained untouched. This selective destruction is framed as consistent with a "Modernization Project" aimed at urban renewal, similar to historical instances in the city from the 1950s.
The author argues that wars serve as a faster and cheaper method for urban modernization than traditional means, by leveraging insurance payouts for demolition and attracting foreign investors who capitalize rebuilding in exchange for control over the city's economy. This suggests an "ulterior motive" behind wars, which is to "open up" countries to "transnational banks and corporations" for exploitation.
The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) is presented as "controlled opposition," citing the "obviously staged" nature of a photo of its leader, Hashim Thaci, holding a war meeting in pink plastic chairs. The KLA's emblem, featuring a double-headed eagle also present on Serbia's flag, further suggests that both sides of the conflict were manipulated by the same controlling entities.
The source claims that the US was effectively "equipping both sides of the war" in Kosovo, with the KLA reportedly receiving arms from the US, while Serbia's armed forces were funded by Israel. This arrangement is viewed with suspicion given the close alliance between the US and Israel.
Switzerland's involvement in arming the KLA, despite its traditional neutrality, is highlighted as significant because Switzerland is identified as the "top banking capital of the world". The secrecy of the Swiss banking system reportedly allowed funds to be directly transferred for military equipment, implying a deeper role in fomenting "humanitarian crises".
The author speculates that the KLA's battles were "mostly staged" because they were supplied with "shoddy" and "useless weapons," and reportedly won very few battles. The refugee crisis is described as "by design," intended to "clear the low-income sections of Pristina before demoing it" to avoid dealing with dead bodies during reconstruction.
KLA leaders like Kadri Veseli and Hashim Thaci are suggested to have alleged Jewish ties, with Veseli's name being "often a Jewish name" and Thaci's father's nose being pointed out as a "Kosovo version of 'Jew in a turban'". These perceived ethnic connections are used to support the claim of controlled leadership in the war.
The film "Wag the Dog" (about creating a fake war to distract from a presidential sex scandal) is presented as having an "uncanny similarity" to the Kosovo War and the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, suggesting both were "eyes-off projects". The author concludes that these events were designed to divert public attention from "what the banks are doing".
The timing of the Kosovo War and the Lewinsky scandal is linked to the Clinton administration's repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, through the Financial Services Modernization Act. This act is described as "skullduggery under the guise of 'modernization'," allowing the merger of banks, insurance companies, and investment houses into "super-banks" that were "above government regulation," which then "precipitated the 2008 financial crisis".
The author identifies Robert Rubin (Clinton's Treasury Secretary) and John Podesta (Clinton's Chief of Staff) as the "consummate Jewish scumbags" who concocted the Financial Services Modernization Act. These individuals are portrayed as manipulating public attention away from their "nefarious deeds" towards "endless parade of fake people, fake scandals, and fake wars".
Welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast Show.
First up, let's explore "A Bit of Autocracy" by Taki Theodoracopulos. This source posits that the original concept of democracy, as envisioned by the Greeks, was a "selective kind," requiring either property ownership or an obligatory education before one could cast a ballot. The author argues this kept "demagogues in their place". However, in contemporary times, the article suggests that "fake news is now believed to be the truth," particularly when disseminated by the media. The author also contends that the American emphasis on individual freedom has come at the expense of families and communities. Instances like millions of foreign nationals entering the U.S. without valid identification, as well as rioters in cities, are presented as evidence of democracy not working. The piece calls for "a bit of autocracy," asserting that egalitarianism is the "culprit of what ails these United States," leading to "passions of the mob". It states that the West's security is threatened by its "pusillanimity," with global elites and immigrants supposedly "stacked against good middle-class and working-class guys". There's a concern that in some places, like the UK, whites may become a minority, potentially leading to the prevalence of Sharia law. Citing Hans Hoppe, the article suggests that universal suffrage has replaced rule by a "natural elite," resulting in foreign criminals having more rights than law-abiding citizens. The author advocates for a "benevolent strongman" who would rule efficiently, prioritize subjects' well-being, compel journalists to report truth, and abolish things like Pride Month. Ultimately, the article views liberalism as having "trampled traditional values," leaving individuals feeling controlled by "left-wing puppeteers".
Moving on to "Foulism: Foul Play replaces Fair Play, Re-moralization follows Demoralization, and the True Failure of Imagination" by Jung-Freud. This article introduces the concept of "Foulism," where fair play is superseded by foul play, particularly in service to "Zion". It asserts that while national preference is natural, "tribal supremacism" is problematic, as it denies other groups the same right, leading to hegemony. The author argues that the decline of the West is linked to its vulnerability to "Jewish corruption". It is claimed that Jews, after gaining wealth and power through meritocracy, subsequently used "foulest means" to expand their influence without adhering to rules. The piece controversially suggests that Jews, despite high intellect, behave like "termites devouring the system from within," which is unexpected for a capable group that should favor meritocracy. A "Talmudic Jerk Ethic" is proposed as a counterpart to the Protestant Work Ethic, where a perceived "Big Brain superiority" allows Jews to feel they are "above the law" and that cheating "goyim" is a "different kind of fair play". The article claims that this "superiorist view" can transform objectionable actions, like genocide against Palestinians, into something "moral" or "transmoral". It critiques the West as "schizophrenic," noting that Jewish power simultaneously champions equality and presents itself as a victim. The source introduces "White Submissivism" as a contributing factor to the current state, where whites have allegedly "abnegated their agency to the Jews as their masters". The strategy for Israel's security, known as the "Clean Break Strategy," is described as being viable only due to a "Jewish takeover of the US" and the subjugation of white "goyim". The concept of "re-moralization" is presented as a mechanism to justify "Jewish exceptionalism" and foul play by portraying it as "totally justified" and the "highest good". The article questions whether Jewish wealth and power in the West are solely merited by talent, citing examples like Bernie Madoff, dot-com and real estate bubbles, and Wall Street bailouts, suggesting preferential treatment for Zionists. It argues that the US, acting as the "world's policeman," loses credibility by embracing "foulism" and tolerating "Jewish low-blows" as "self-defense". The source alleges that "Jewish Power has targeted and corrupted just about every institution in the West" to serve its "Supremacist Zionist line". It claims that those who defy Zion face "character-and-career-assassination" in the West. The article concludes that the "Anglosphere" has become "cucked and sheepish in its servility to Zion," enabling "Jewish supremacist foulness". This is presented as a "total regime-change in the Collective West," transforming Anglos and Northern Whites into "pathetic, servile, and groveling cucks".
Next, let's turn to "Hey, POTUS, America First Ain’t Got No Beef With Iran And Don’t Need No Bunker Busters, Neither" by David Stockman. This article strongly asserts that Iran poses no military threat to the US homeland, highlighting its limited military capacity, lack of long-range missiles capable of reaching the US, and a defense budget that is minuscule compared to the Pentagon's. The author argues that any US military action against Iran, such as dropping "bunker buster bombs," is a "purely a stratagem of Empire" and not a necessity for legitimate homeland security. He contends that the significant US military presence in the Middle East is attributable to the "contingencies of Empire," including the defense of Israel and acting as a "global gendarme," rather than actual homeland security needs. Stockman argues that a truly effective homeland defense only requires an invincible nuclear deterrent and a robust conventional defense of US shorelines and airspace, without relying on foreign bases or entangling alliances. He dismisses the idea that US intervention is needed for Persian Gulf oil security, stating that any regime controlling oil will produce it and global markets will naturally adjust to supply disruptions. The article claims that US military interventions in the Middle East have caused a "staggering level of death and destruction," and that Sunni-based terrorism is a "blow-back" from these incursions. The campaign against Iran is described as irrational, especially given that Iran allegedly has a "religious edict against nuclear weapons" and was a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). The author severely criticizes Donald Trump's "reckless" repudiation of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) and subsequent bombing campaigns. He explains that Iran had used enriched uranium as a bargaining chip, and the JCPOA was a "workable arrangement" that significantly reduced Iran's stockpiles and enrichment capacity, and eliminated activity at the hardened Fordow site, all under "rigorous international inspection". Stockman concludes that "kill them from the sky warfare" and the use of weapons like bunker busters primarily serve the "pursuit of Empire," destabilizing international relations rather than ensuring homeland security.
Next, we analyze "Huawei is transforming and building an unparalleled AI tech stack" by Hua Bin. This source highlights that the US sanctions imposed on Huawei, which aimed to destroy the Chinese tech giant, have "completely failed". Instead, Huawei has significantly recovered from revenue decline and has "vastly expanded its footprint" into numerous new technological sectors. The company maintains its leading position in the global telecom market, has reclaimed the top spot in China's smartphone market, and is a world leader in the wearables market. A significant achievement noted is Huawei's development of its own Harmony OS, designed to replace Android and Windows, now running on over a billion devices globally. Huawei has also entered the electric vehicle market, engaging in research for batteries and autonomous driving technologies, and has launched its own "ultra high-end" electric vehicle. The company's investments extend to Chinese firms specializing in lithography machines, chip making, and EDA software, alongside building AI data centers and providing AI applications across various industries. The author states that Huawei has effectively merged the functionalities of multiple leading tech companies, becoming "Apple, Nvidia, Ericsson, TSMC, ASML, Qualcomm, Google, and Tesla rolled into one". Most impressively, Huawei has successfully built a "full AI stack," a feat that "no company in the world has achieved," including tech giants like Nvidia or TSMC. Its chip design division, HiSilicon, is a global competitor to Nvidia and Qualcomm, with its Ascend AI chip and CloudMatrix data center architecture demonstrating superior performance in certain tests compared to Nvidia's GPU-based systems for large language models. The article attributes Huawei's strong data center performance to its "complex networking expertise" and "scale-up solution," despite its core chip technology potentially lagging behind Nvidia's top offerings. A key advantage for China in AI development is its power generation capacity, which is "more than twice that of the US," along with its "deep pool of AI talents". The source concludes that US export controls on Nvidia AI chips have paradoxically "accelerated China’s push to indigenise every step of advanced AI chipmaking". Huawei is now lauded as "China’s most important company," with its brand symbolizing national pride and technological confidence, largely due to the "short-sighted belligerent US regime" and its sanctions.
Next up, let's discuss "Iran-Israel Conflict: Will It Mark the End of American Hegemony?" by Doug Casey. This article frames the recent Israel-US attack on Iran as an "ultra-fluid situation" with highly unpredictable consequences, such as Iran potentially closing the Straits of Hormuz or attacking US bases. It argues that Iran's conflict has been exclusively with Israel, with its supported groups only attacking Israel, and that Iran posed "absolutely zero threat to the US" prior to the unprovoked attack. The author controversially suggests that the US government itself can be seen as a "terrorist state" due to its history of invading, overthrowing regimes, and assassinating leaders, actions that could provoke retaliatory attacks on US officials or bases. Public opinion in the US is noted to be shifting, with declining support for Israel and opposition to US military aid. The US relationship with Israel is characterized as a "costly liability," implying Israel acts solely in its own self-interest and exploits the US. The article highlights resentment towards the perceived disproportionate influence of a small group, American Jews, in US politics, business, and media, leading to "anti-Jewish sentiment". The Israeli justification for attacking Iran over nuclear weapons is dismissed as a decades-old claim, especially given that Israel is believed to possess around 200 nuclear bombs itself and many other countries have developed them. The use of false flag operations to justify wars is called a "reliable gambit," and the article raises the possibility of internal attacks on the US by military-age migrants being falsely attributed to Iran. Casey suggests that if the war goes unfavorably for the US, it could result in a "gigantic embarrassment" comparable to Vietnam or Afghanistan, potentially accelerating the decline of US hegemony and the rise of a multipolar world. Past US interventions in countries like Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan are cited as examples of consistent failures that transformed nations into chaotic states. Economically, the war could lead to the US bearing the costs of rebuilding war-torn regions like Gaza. The author concludes by stating that taking sides in the Israel-Iran conflict is "idiotic" and advocates for "complete non-intervention by the US" as the only viable solution.
Let's discuss "Is Trump the Greatest Knuckleballer of All Time?" by J.B. Shurk. This article uses the metaphor of a "knuckleball" pitch in baseball to describe President Trump's unique political style, characterizing it as unpredictable, disorienting to his adversaries, and often effective despite appearing slow or erratic. The author points to Trump's unexpected announcement of an end to the "12 Day War" between Iran and Israel, following a "daring mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear facilities" called Operation Midnight Hammer. This operation is described as involving "multiple head fakes" and the use of stealth bombers to strike Iran's nuclear capabilities before it was widely anticipated. The article highlights the "frantic" and contradictory reactions to Trump's actions: those typically against new wars feared prolonged conflict, proponents of regime change hoped for ground invasion, and Democrats who had called Trump "chicken" for being lenient on Iran then condemned his attack. It notes that Trump's special envoy was simultaneously working for a peaceful solution behind the scenes. The "knuckleball" analogy is extended to domestic policy, suggesting Trump causes Democrats to defend controversial positions like "Hamas baby-killers," "Iranian 'Death to America' terrorists," "violent illegal aliens," or issues related to gender identity. The piece also observes that Trump's own "team"—including neoconservatives, free-trade advocates, multinational corporations, and the Establishment Old Guard—are "freaking out" because he doesn't "pitch like a normal Republican," advocating for different approaches such as endless war, criticizing tariffs, or prioritizing making money from the war in Ukraine.
Now, we shift our focus to "Jeffrey Peel: In their attempts to control everything, political parties are dying, corporate media is dying – but individuals are rising to take their place" by Rhoda Wilson. Jeffrey Peel argues that global control is not governed by a single entity, but by a "complex web of competing interests" involving corporations, intelligence agencies (like the Five Eyes Alliance), and groups such as the World Economic Forum. He believes that world leaders, including those in Russia and China, are working towards a common goal of a "global government," utilizing digital technologies and fear of scarcity as key tools. Peel's experience as a UK government consultant led him to realize that technology is central to the "New World Order agenda". He points to positive developments he calls "chinks of light," specifically the "death of politics" and the "death of corporate media," as independent individuals rise to fill the void, and public trust in state-run media and politicians erodes. Peel suggests that intelligence agencies may be involved in psychological operations, potentially using controlled alternative media to shape narratives. He notes the persistence of censorship on social media platforms, where only "appropriate" topics, or those within the "Overton window," are discussed by certain "sycophants". The article claims that corporations, many with historical ties to organized crime like the slave and opioid trades, are now heavily invested in sectors like pharmaceuticals and arms, with powerful investors wielding significant global influence. The Five Eyes Alliance, formed after WWII, is noted for its members being among the "most fascist countries" during the COVID era, suggesting a collaborative effort to define the Western agenda. Peel emphasizes that control over digital money, such as Stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies, coupled with the implementation of digital IDs and social credit systems, is seen as leading to "unprecedented domination" and the creation of a "global electronic concentration camp". The "smart city agenda" and "15-minute cities" are identified as initiatives driven by the WEF, which provides conditional financial assistance to governments requiring them to use WEF partner companies like Huawei and Infosys. The "green agenda" or "Net Zero" is characterized as a means to "reimplement feudalism and erase the middle class" by increasing essential costs like housing, food, and energy while salaries stagnate. The creation of fear of scarcity is highlighted as a primary manipulation strategy, evidenced by narratives surrounding Nord Stream pipelines and the COVID pandemic. Finally, Peel suggests that the current system of "bribes and financial incentives" for public sector workers is unsustainable and that these workers are unknowingly contributing to their own replacement by technology, such as Robocops and AI.
Let's discuss the "Quick Guide To Peptides And How To Handle, Store And Administer Them" by Joachim Bartoll. The author, Joachim Bartoll, states his extensive background in health, fitness, elite sports, and the medical industry, having shifted his focus to health, longevity, and quality of life after a personal health crisis in 2017 caused by plant-based foods, supplements, and medications. He criticizes "biohackers" and life-extension enthusiasts who often begin their journey with misinformation about nutrition, leading to "toxic diets" and "sketchy" habits. Peptides, he notes, have gained popularity and may offer beneficial effects with minimal side effects, provided proper nutrition is maintained. Bartoll points out that much of the research on peptides is nascent and often driven by scientists and sports specialists working with elite athletes, ahead of the medical community's slower pace. He highlights that peptides are available online for research or from "underground labs," which are often cheaper and competitive. A critical takeaway from the article is the "extreme fragility" of peptides, emphasizing that they can lose potency if mishandled, and that many discussions by influencers neglect crucial information on how to handle, reconstitute, and store them. Peptides are defined as short chains of amino acids that function as signaling molecules, hormones, neurotransmitters, or growth factors, interacting with cell receptors to produce targeted physiological responses. Injectable forms are preferred as they bypass the digestive system, ensuring higher bioavailability. The article clarifies that peptides work by maximizing the body's existing biological capabilities, rather than replacing or suppressing natural production like synthetic hormones, thus preventing "shut down" effects and making excessive doses wasteful. Cycling peptides on and off is advised to prevent "wear and tear" from continuously stimulating physiology to its maximum capacity. Peptides such as MOTS-c and SS-31 are noted for their ability to rejuvenate mitochondria and cellular function, especially when combined with fasting, while BPC-147 and TB-500 aid injury healing by enhancing blood vessel formation. A correct and optimal diet, specifically a ketogenic, animal-based carnivore diet, is emphasized as "extremely important" for achieving the best results from peptide use. The article provides detailed guidance on handling and storage:
Unreconstituted peptide powder vials should be kept in a cold and dark place, preferably a freezer at -20°C (-4°F) for up to a year, or a refrigerator at 4°C (39°F) for up to three months.
When reconstituting, bacteriostatic water should be gently dripped down the inner side of the tilted vial, never directly onto the powder, to avoid damage.
Single-use fixed insulin needle syringes are recommended for both reconstitution and injection.
When drawing the solution, the vial should be gently inverted, and the plunger pulled slowly without injecting air into the vial to prevent oxygen damage.
Once reconstituted, peptide solutions remain stable for up to 30 days when stored cold and dark in a refrigerator and should not be refrozen or exposed to light.
Starting with lower doses is suggested, and online peptide calculators can assist with dosage accuracy.
Now, to "The Hidden Tragedy of Neurological Vaccine Injuries" by A Midwestern Doctor. This source challenges the widely accepted narrative of vaccine safety and effectiveness, stating it is a "mythology" and that "vaccine disasters occur every few decades". The author contends that the current system deliberately overlooks a broad spectrum of vaccine injuries, "sweeping them under the rug" through practices like official denial and "gaslighting" injured individuals. A significant point raised is the historical connection between vaccines and brain injuries, asserting that "brain injuries were a longstanding problem of vaccination". The article cites a 1982 NBC news program that discussed "post-pertussis encephalopathy" from DPT vaccines, which doctors often failed to report. The author attributes this suppression of information to a "massive conflict of interest" within the system, where acknowledging injuries would lead to government payouts. The source discusses "diagnostic obfuscation," specifically the reclassification of "mentally retarded" children as "autistic" in the 1990s, which allegedly served to obscure the true increase in severe autism cases by blending them with milder "autistic traits". It is claimed that research into vaccine neurological injuries has been "systematically prevented", with legitimate studies being dismissed or blocked from publication, and researchers facing retaliation. The article refers to a 1966 book, "The Hazards of Immunization," by an eminent bacteriologist, which exposed numerous "forgotten vaccine disasters" and devastating injuries, many affecting soldiers. Key themes from this book included:
Vaccines causing immune suppression and making latent infections severe.
Manufacturing issues leading to "hot lots" of vaccines and subsequent disasters, which were "solved" by granting vaccine manufacturers immunity from lawsuits.
A wide range of autoimmune and neurological injuries caused by various vaccines and antisera. Specific examples of neurological injuries detailed from various vaccines include:
Typhoid Vaccine: Caused polyneuritis, blindness, convulsions, seizures, paralysis, widespread nerve damage, and even fatal brain destruction, with some cases misdiagnosed as polio.
Yellow Fever Vaccine: Linked to fatal neurological symptoms, paralysis, myelin degeneration, acute meningitis, seizures, and encephalitis, with high fatality rates in some outbreaks.
Rabies Vaccine: Known to cause neuroparalysis, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and suffered from a "conspiracy of silence" among Pasteur Institutes directors to avoid discrediting the method.
Measles Vaccine: A 1966 case described encephalitis, facial twitching, fever, seizures, and mental impairment in a vaccinated child.
Finally, let's turn to "The Kosovo War Was a Controlled Demolition Project" by Donny Ahzmond. This source argues that the Kosovo War was not a genuine conflict for liberation, but a "controlled demolition project". The author asserts that the true purpose was to "demo all the blighted and unprofitable areas" of Pristina and rebuild them according to evolving business and governance schemes. The monument "NEWBORN" in Pristina is interpreted as symbolizing the city's rebirth into a "soulless modern image" controlled by "moneyed interests," rather than political independence. Photographic evidence is presented to show that aerial bombings predominantly targeted older, smaller buildings, while newer, taller structures remained untouched, suggesting selective destruction. This rapid modernization, which would typically take a century, was allegedly accelerated by using insurance to cover demolition costs and by pre-arranged foreign investment, granting investors majority control over the city's economy. The author broadly claims that "every war waged in the last century in the name of democracy and 'opening up' the country was indeed for opening it up…to the transnational banks and corporations". The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) is depicted as "controlled opposition," with its leader's photo appearing "obviously staged" and the shared use of the double-headed eagle emblem by both the KLA and the Serbians implying control by the same entities. The article highlights that the KLA received significant funding from drug trafficking and weapons from the US, while Israel armed the Serbians, suggesting the US was "equipping both sides of the war". Switzerland, a major banking capital, is noted for facilitating the transfer of funds for arms. The KLA's weapons were described as "shoddy" and "practically worthless," leading to the inference that the battles themselves were "mostly staged" and the weapons were merely "stage props". The refugee crisis resulting from the war is stated to have been "by design" to clear low-income areas before demolition, simplifying the process by avoiding dealing with dead bodies. The war is also presented as an "eyes-off project" to distract the public from other major events, specifically the Clinton administration's repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999. The repeal of Glass-Steagall, orchestrated by Robert Rubin and John Podesta, allowed banks, insurance companies, and investment houses to merge into "super-banks" largely exempt from government regulation, an action that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. The author concludes that powerful figures use "fake people, fake scandals, and fake wars" to divert public attention from their "nefarious deeds".
Thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast Show produced and archived at the website daily briefs dot info.