9-13-25 DailyBriefs.info archive  GoogleExplainer.com 

• The Alleged Murder as a Staged Event:

• Numerological Significance: The author notes the date 9/10/2025 as numerically similar to 9/11 ("both being ones and nines"), suggesting a deliberate choice by the orchestrators.

• Default Assumption of Staging: Mathis asserts that "It should be the default assumption of any current event," citing Alex Jones's admission that "many on the ground in Utah said the murder looked staged."

• Operation Chaos and Media Control: The event is framed within a larger context of intelligence agencies having "taken over the media decades ago" (Operation Mockingbird) to "manufacture all the news everyday, including multiple major tragedies each week, as part of Operation Chaos." The author dismisses claims these operations ended, stating they "just expanded and accelerated."

• Unconvincing Video Evidence: The author describes the "snuff film" as "CGI" and "not convincing at all." Criticisms include the filmer panning away at crucial moments ("they don't want you looking too closely at all this") and Kirk's unnatural collapse ("wouldn't just slouch to the left in his chair, he would collapse like a deer shot in the neck").

• Directorial Signals: A "damning evidence" cited is a video showing "CIA-looking dudes with earpieces directly behind Kirk on stage, making a series of elaborate arm and hand signs just before the shot," implying a "go" signal.

• Implausible Shooter Profile and Evidence:The supposed ditching of the gun "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology" is called "BS right out of Langley or Hollywood" and "scriptwriters with too much time on their hands."

• The shooter leaving fingerprints is deemed "not believable" ("He had never heard of gloves?").

• The quick capture and confession of the shooter, Tyler Robinson, is questioned, particularly his alleged online "chilling messages" while on the run.

• The description of the rifle (old bolt-action Mauser 30.06) is used to refute the possibility of it being broken down for transport, making its ditching illogical.

• Charlie Kirk's Background and Alleged Intelligence Connections:

• Sudden Rise to Prominence: Kirk "came out of nowhere at age 18 to found Turning Point USA, TPUSA," an act deemed impossible without "huge money and promotion" and indicative of being "just a front for Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery."

• Alleged Crypto-Jewish Identity: The author "would assume Charlie Kirk is also Jewish, since Wikipedia conspicuously fails to name his parents." This claim is further supported by the alleged Jewish lineage of his presumed in-laws (Heller family) and potential alternative family names (Aughenbaugh, which is described as "indeed Jewish").

• Inconsistencies in Public Records: People searches (Radaris, Instantcheckmate, Intelius) for Charlie Kirk and his reported parents (Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk) yield conflicting or absent results, leading the author to suggest aliases and scrubbing of information.

• Marriage to a "Jewish Cousin": The discovery that Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Frantzve, is related to the Heller family (described as Jewish and linked to "Hiller/Hitler connection") and that a Kimberly Kirk (potential mother) is also linked to Hellers, leads the author to conclude that Kirk "married a Jewish cousin. That would be par for the course."

• Foster Friess and the Alleged Crypto-Jewish Influence:

• Intelligence Background and Financial Power: Friess is identified as an "Army Intelligence officer, multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and crypto-Jew."

• Disguised Motives: Friess's support of "Christian causes" is presented as a façade, arguing that "those causes aren't really Christian, either, they just pose as Christian." This is attributed to a broader strategy of "blackwashing" Christian organizations by infiltrating them with agents.

• Evidence of Jewish Ancestry: The name "Friess" is identified as a "Jewish name." A poll asking if Foster Friess is Jewish (with over 88% affirmative) is cited, along with the example of "Constance Friess Holman, of the wealthy New York Friess clan," whose family is presented as Jewish. The name is linked to "Fries/DeVries" families, described as "All Jewish."

• Broader Conspiracy and Agenda:

• Inciting Civil War: The staged event is presented as a means to "start a civil war between red and blue, left and right, to take pressure off themselves." The author contrasts this with a revolution, stating that in a civil war, the "hoaxers and thieves" can "keep you targeting one another."

• Mormon Connections and Philosemitism: The location of the event in Orem, Utah, and Utah Valley University (UVU) is highlighted due to its "heavily Mormon" demographic. Mormons are described as "philosemitic, meaning they like Jews," because "LDS was founded by crypto-Jews," citing Joseph Smith's mother, Lucy Mack, as Jewish. The Sandy Hook event's Robbie Parker also being from Orem is noted as "not a coincidence."

• Propaganda and Emotional Manipulation:Trump declaring a "national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast" for Kirk is dismissed as "raw propaganda" and "makes no sense" given Kirk's perceived lack of significance.

• The constant stream of "CGI snuff films" is intended to "obliterate" "remaining sensibilities" and is "the visible acceleration of Operation Chaos."

• Comments by "conservative podcaster" Patrick Bet-David, interpreted as shifting blame to "a foreign nation, not the CIA or DHS" for potential civil war, are dismissed as Jewish propaganda.

• Telegraphing Events: Erika Kirk's "strange comments the day before in social media" that "now seem prescient" are presented as typical of "the Phoenicians [who] love to telegraph their events to eff with you further."

• Inconsistencies and Questionable Narrative Elements in Official Story:

• Shooter's Family Discrepancies: Extensive analysis of public records for the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, and his parents (Matt and Amber Robinson) reveals numerous inconsistencies in names, ages, locations, and relationships across different databases (Radaris, Instantcheckmate, Intelius, Truthfinder). This leads to the conclusion that "the computer thinks Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson" and suggests a "tranny thing."

• Conflicting Occupations of Shooter's Father: Matt Robinson is contradictorily described as working "construction," a "law enforcement veteran," and owning a "granite countertop business."

• Link Between Shooter and Victim: The author claims to have "found a link between the shooter and victim," asserting that "Tyler Robinson looks like a cousin of Charlie Kirk," which "blows the cover of the whole thing." This link is traced through the Kiser family, connecting Alexandria Kirk (Charlie's alleged sister) to Angel Kisor and then to the Kisers related to Thomas Robinson (a deceased relative of the Robinsons).

Important Ideas/Facts (as presented by the source):

• The alleged murder date (9/10/2025) is numerologically significant (9/11).

• Intelligence agencies (CIA, DHS) control media and stage events (Operation Mockingbird, Operation Chaos).

• Charlie Kirk's rise and the funding of Turning Point USA by Foster Friess point to intelligence backing.

• Foster Friess is identified as an "Army Intelligence officer, multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and crypto-Jew," who used Christian causes as a front.

• Kirk's and his wife Erika Frantzve's backgrounds are allegedly scrubbed and reveal crypto-Jewish connections (e.g., Heller family).

• The wedding photo with Jerusalem in the background and the "keeping the Sabbath" caption are presented as evidence of Jewish identity.

• The video of the shooting is deemed CGI, with visible "go" signals from agents behind Kirk.

• The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, and his family exhibit numerous inconsistencies in public records, and a familial link between Robinson and Kirk is claimed.

• The incident is part of a larger strategy to "start a civil war" and manipulate public opinion through propaganda.

• The location of Orem, Utah, and UVU is significant due to Mormon "philosemitism" and alleged crypto-Jewish founders of LDS.

convert_to_textConvert to source

welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series.

Today, we delve into an insightful examination of recent events, particularly focusing on the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk, an event that, according to our deep dive into the available information, raises significant questions about its authenticity.

Our first area of focus brings us to the very nature of the event itself. We've uncovered information suggesting that the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk, reported on September 10, 2025, was, in fact, staged. This date, 9/10/2025, surprisingly shares a numerological connection with 9/11, both sequences boiling down to ones and nines. This observation immediately flags the event for closer scrutiny, leading to the opinion that it was a carefully orchestrated scenario. It is also noteworthy that while some platforms like Yandex immediately brought this perspective to their front page, other major search engines, such as Google, appeared to be actively censoring it, hindering the widespread dissemination of alternative viewpoints.

Moving to our next point, a critical perspective on current events reveals that the default assumption for any major occurrence should perhaps be that it is staged. We have seen evidence, for instance, that even prominent figures like Alex Jones, in his own broadcasts, acknowledged that many individuals on the ground in Utah perceived the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk as staged, even as he was simultaneously presenting the event as genuine. This kind of dual messaging is certainly curious. Furthermore, our information indicates that intelligence agencies have exerted complete control over media for decades, a phenomenon that intensified after Watergate, with operations such as Operation Mockingbird and Operation Chaos. These operations, far from being concluded, are said to have expanded and accelerated, manufacturing daily news and multiple significant tragedies each week. It is suggested that we merely need to observe the world around us to recognize that Operation Chaos continues unabated.

Our third segment of discussion centers on Charlie Kirk's background and the founding of Turning Point USA, or TPUSA, which some have referred to as Toilet Paper USA. Kirk reportedly founded this organization at the remarkably young age of 18, seemingly "out of nowhere". Such an achievement at that age, without prior significant qualifications, and requiring immense financial backing and promotional efforts, raises immediate suspicions that he was merely a front for influential individuals like Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery. It is a critical reminder that billionaires do not typically establish organizations to genuinely assist the public; their motivations often revolve around self-interest. Therefore, if one considers joining or supporting such an organization, it is imperative to ask probing questions rather than blindly trusting individuals who may not be entirely trustworthy.

Continuing our examination, we turn our attention to Foster Friess, a figure whose profile reveals a complex and potentially contradictory background. Friess is identified not just as a multi-billionaire banker and money manager, but also as an Army Intelligence officer and a "crypto-Jew". This combination of roles immediately provides a foundational understanding for the critical assessment of his public persona and activities. Despite his carefully cultivated image as a "cowboy," Friess, a Wisconsin native and a Chi Phi fratboy, openly admitted to relocating to Jackson Hole specifically to avoid income taxes. He was apparently groomed by the wealthy Brittingham family in Delaware to become an investment banker, which is a stark contrast to the "cowboy" image he attempted to project. The Brittinghams, a family of billionaires from Wisconsin who initially made their fortune in lumber before venturing into banking, have had their records conspicuously scrubbed from Wikipedia. Friess, far from being a "Christian crusader" as he often portrayed himself, is described as using religious causes as a facade to conceal his true nature as a "crusading fascist". His notable actions include his efforts to block the recall of Governor Scott Walker, who is accused of dismantling unions in Wisconsin and negatively impacting the economy for the benefit of financial backers like Friess and David Koch.

In our fifth point, we address the prevailing narrative surrounding Foster Friess's religious affiliation. Mainstream sources often depict Friess as a Christian supporter of Christian causes. However, information suggests that this portrayal is questionable. A poll, similar to those found on celebrity gossip sites, specifically asked if Foster Friess was Jewish, and over 88% of respondents indicated they believed he was. This public perception stands in stark contrast to the readily available online information that asserts he was not Jewish and highlights a potential disconnect between public sentiment and mainstream reporting. The basis for this widespread suspicion is multifold: Friess possesses a name that is recognized as Jewish, he was a billionaire banker and money manager—a profession often associated with certain power structures—and he was extensively promoted as a great philanthropist and humanitarian, despite claims that his actions were often the opposite of altruistic. These factors, combined, suggest that the public may not be as easily misled as some might believe by the mainstream press.

Our sixth point takes us deeper into the alleged nature of the organizations that Foster Friess supported. It is suggested that many of the causes he championed, including those identified as "Christian," are not genuinely Christian in their core. Instead, these organizations are purportedly infiltrated and systematically corrupted, a process described as "blackwashing," where agents deliberately turn them to "crud". This infiltration strategy has been observed on numerous occasions, extending even to the highest echelons of religious institutions, such as the Vatican, where agents, including alleged "Jewish" Medici Popes and the current Pope, are said to have been placed. The Jesuits are also claimed to be Jewish, a fact allegedly admitted by historical figures like Disraeli. In the United States, this infiltration is primarily directed at Protestant denominations, given their majority status, with claims that Protestantism itself was intentionally constructed during the time of Luther to fragment Christianity. The overarching goal of such infiltration and the deliberate creation of schism is to instigate a civil war between ideological factions, such as "red and blue" or "left and right," thereby diverting public attention and pressure from those orchestrating these maneuvers. A civil war, from this perspective, is preferable to a revolution, as a revolution would likely target the instigators themselves, whereas a civil war encourages internal conflict.

Expanding on the theme of identity, our seventh point delves into the surname "Friess" itself. This name, along with its variant "Fries," is consistently asserted to be Jewish or "crypto-Jewish". Examples supporting this claim include figures like Constance Friess Holman, a member of the affluent New York Friess family, who was the personal physician to Georgia O'Keeffe (also identified as Jewish), and whose brother married the daughter of Felix Adler (also identified as Jewish). Constance Friess Holman's medical education was reportedly sponsored by Adolph Ochs, the Jewish publisher of The New York Times. Further research into the "Fries" surname reveals similar patterns, with individuals like billionaire industrialist Francis Henry Fries, whose family originated from Saxony and was associated with the Moravian Church. This connection to the Moravian Church is noted as a recurring theme in these discussions, and the DeVries family from Holland, prominent in the Dutch East/West India Company, is also cited, with "Fries/Friess" being a variant of "DeVries," all leading back to the same conclusion: these individuals and families are identified as Jewish.

Our eighth point shifts focus back to Charlie Kirk's own background, suggesting that he, too, is likely Jewish. This assumption stems partly from Wikipedia's conspicuous omission of his parents' names, a detail often present in public biographies. While his father is vaguely identified as an architect, the possibility of family connections to intelligence agencies is raised. Attempts to verify Charlie Kirk's identity through public record databases like Radaris, for a Charles/Charlie James Kirk of Chicago, age 31, yielded no results, leading to the suspicion that "Kirk" might be a fake name or an alias, perhaps chosen in homage to James T. Kirk of Starship Enterprise. Similarly, Instantcheckmate did not return results for Charles/Charlie J. Kirk in Arizona or Chicago, although it did find a Charles Kirk, 31, with locations in Floyd's Knob, IN, Lakeside, MI, and Chicago, listing relatives such as Chris, Evelyn, Hilbre Kirk, and Carey Griffin. Even with these three matches regarding name, age, and location, uncertainty remains, and the overall difficulty in locating clear information for him suggests that the "big computer" has no definitive record of him, a pattern observed with other public figures, including Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Continuing our genealogical investigation in our ninth point, the name Hilbre Kirk, identified as potentially a 34-year-old sibling, is suggested to sound Jewish. This connection leads to James Aughenbaugh, who is also known as James Kirk, aged 66, raising the possibility that he could be Charlie's father, and "Aughenbaugh" his actual last name. The Aughenbaugh family is traced to Massapequa, NY, and James is linked to Norma Aughenbaugh, aged 73 or 79, residing in Phoenix, MD. Norma, despite having a LinkedIn page, is linked through Winter Park, FL, to former Air Force Staff Sergeant George Stanley Aughenbaugh, whose Findagrave page connects him to the Hartmans and Hildebrands, also identified as Moravians, which could establish a link to Foster Friess. Furthermore, a search for the name Aughenbaugh confirms its Jewish origin, with examples such as Charlie Aughenbaugh working for Jewish Family Services, and the Aughenbaugh page on Wikitree reportedly filled with Jewish names.

In our tenth point, we confront further inconsistencies regarding Charlie Kirk's alleged family. While we were able to confirm that James Kirk is also James Aughenbaugh, the reason for this individual having two different last names remains unclear. Mainstream sources, such as Distractify, claim Charlie's parents are Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk. However, these names do not appear on his relatives list when searched via Instantcheckmate, Intelius, or Radaris, leading to the suggestion that "Distractify" lives up to its name by providing misleading information. Instantcheckmate does not list a Robert K. Kirk from Chicago related to a Charles/Charlie. We eventually locate a Robert Kelly Kirk, aged 53 and 76, twice, linked to a Kimberly Kirk in Dayton and Blacklick, Ohio, but notably, no Charles/Charlie appears on his list of relatives. Furthermore, none of the other Kirks found on Charlie's original list are on his father's list, which is deemed "very strange," introducing seven new Kirk names but excluding Chris, Evelyn, or Hilbre.

Moving to our eleventh point, we further explore the new Kirks identified in Robert Kelly Kirk's family. Among them, Alexandria Kirk, 25, is linked to Angel Kisor, a name that is synonymous with Kiser/Kizer/Kaiser and is identified as Jewish. Another individual, Zachary Kirk, appears to have all his information scrubbed, but his first name is said to confirm the "Jewish question," as the author claims Gentiles do not typically name their children Zachary. We then find Angelica Kirk, 51, who is finally related to a Charles Kirk. However, expanding our search for a Charles Kirk of the correct age (31 or close) in Ohio or Missouri, where Angelica also has locations, yields no success. Even taking this new information back to Radaris does not provide clarity. The computer suggests an Alexander Charles Kirk of Ogden, UT, but he is associated with unrelated individuals. Allison Kirk, 21, links to Craycrafts, and Steven Kirk, 50, links to Scott Cassady. Lastly, Laura Kirk, 76, is found with locations in Blacklick, OH, and Nacogdoches, TX.

In our twelfth point, we synthesize some of the findings regarding Charlie Kirk's family history. One key observation is that the Kimberly Kirk connected to the individuals we just discussed is 52 years old and from Ohio, with no recorded locations in or near Chicago. Her middle initial is K, not A, and she has also resided in Yucca Valley, CA, and Brunswick, ME. This information conflicts with the narrative that Charlie allegedly attended high school in Chicago (Wheeling), implying he should have been living with one of his parents there. A direct search for Kimberly Kirk of Chicago also yields no results at Radaris, a platform usually considered more reliable and less subject to manipulation by intelligence agencies. Instantcheckmate possibly lists her twice from Grayslake, IL, aged 61 or 63, with the second listing linking to Hellers. This connection to Hellers is particularly significant because Charlie's alleged wife, Erika Frantzve, is also linked to Hellers, suggesting this might be Erika's family rather than Charlie's mother. Crucially, neither of the Kimberly Kirks found in Chicago is linked to a Robert or a Charles/Charlie. The only Kim Kirk with a Robert on her Chicago list is 74, too old to be Charlie's mother. Given these inconsistencies, if Charlie is indeed a Kirk, the theory emerges that his mother's maiden name might be Heller, a detail that the author suggests would be purposefully scrubbed from public records.

Our thirteenth point focuses on Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Lane Kirk, nee Frantzve. Her maiden name, Frantzve, is identified as Jewish, despite public representations that she is Catholic. A significant red flag is the absence of any mention of her parents on her Wikipedia page. Furthermore, Erika is conspicuously missing from Charlie's Instantcheckmate page, which is unusual since a spouse should typically be listed as a primary relative. Intelius also fails to link him to an Erika Kirk or Frantzve, and intriguingly, lists his middle initial as R. not J., a discrepancy also found on Instantcheckmate. The name "Frantzve" itself is questioned as potentially being a fake, as no other search results for it appear beyond Erika and her immediate family. It is suggested that it is more likely a variant of "Frantzen," which is identified as Jewish.

Preparing for the next startling revelation in our fourteenth point, we investigate Erika's public records further. Her listing on Radaris shows her related to Charlynn Frantzve, who, in turn, is related to Brittany Heller, age 34, of Longview, WA. This name, Heller, is critically important, as it is linked to "Hitler" (Hiller/Heller) and is known to be Jewish, a variation of Hildesheim. Examining Brittany's Radaris page reveals a collation of surnames: Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and notably, Braun. All these names are identified as Jewish, and "Braun" strongly reinforces the Heller/Hiller/Hitler connection. The statistical improbability of these connections being coincidental is described as "astronomical". Through the Hoeppners, a link to the Lyons family is established, bringing to mind the King of England, a Bowes-Lyon. These Brauns also connect to Winter Park, FL, a location that previously emerged in discussions about the Aughenbaughs, strongly indicating that Charlie married a "Jewish cousin," a common occurrence in such circles.

Synthesizing our findings on individual identities, our fifteenth point summarizes the extensive "people search" conducted. It appears that Charlie Kirk's public profile has been meticulously "scrubbed" by an unknown entity, as his information does not appear as one would expect based on his mainstream biographies. While his parents are seemingly listed, they are reportedly from Ohio, not Chicago, and lack any direct link to Charlie himself in these records. The other Charlie Kirk/Aughenbaugh found during the search, though possibly not the correct individual, still provides significant insights into the Kirks of that region and the surname "Kirk" itself. A particularly significant discovery is the connection between Charlie's wife and the Heller family, and the additional finding of a Kimberly Kirk from Chicago also linked to Hellers. The statistical unlikelihood of these connections being mere coincidence suggests they hold crucial information.

Our sixteenth point brings us back to a striking visual clue: a photograph that appears to be from Charlie Kirk's wedding. This photo, placed prominently, is designed to leave an impression. Initially, it might seem they married at a construction site, but upon closer inspection, the background strongly suggests Jerusalem. This location is considered "strange" for individuals who are not Jewish to choose for their wedding ceremony. While one might argue they are simply very religious, alternative explanations arise, particularly when coupled with a subtext observed elsewhere stating, "Charlie Kirk and his wife begin keeping the Sabbath". This observance is traditionally associated with Jewish practice rather than Christian, further fueling questions about their true religious identity.

In our seventeenth point, we observe another key indicator of the staged nature of these events: the disproportionate reaction from public figures. Donald Trump, for instance, a known associate of Kirk, immediately declared a national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast in Kirk's honor, despite Kirk being a 31-year-old podcaster with no significant historical achievements. This extreme response is described as "raw propaganda". Similar instances are cited, such as Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer ordering flags at half-mast for what were described as "fake victims" in Allen, TX, in 2023, and Governor Roy Cooper of North Carolina doing the same for the "fake death" of George Floyd in 2020. The historical precedent of reserving flags at half-mast for deceased Presidents, House Speakers, and similarly impactful individuals has been eroded, now being extended to trivial events or, as suggested, to "fake deaths". This pattern is indicative of a broader strategy of emotional manipulation and propaganda.

Moving to our eighteenth point, we scrutinize the video footage purportedly showing Charlie Kirk's murder. This video is immediately characterized as a "snuff film," and its rapid release, even on the same day as the alleged event, is highly suspicious, given that such releases were historically forbidden. The question is raised as to why a family would not be notified before the world witnesses such a traumatic event, especially when the footage depicts a significant amount of blood. The entire video is dismissed as CGI, raising serious concerns about its authenticity and the motives behind its dissemination. This is interpreted as a visible acceleration of "Operation Chaos," wherein agencies like the CIA and DHS are employing a strategy of constantly bombarding the public with "CGI snuff films" depicting "fake heroes" meeting violent ends, designed to traumatize and obliterate remaining public sensibilities. The implication is that even if individuals choose not to watch these films, they will be forced upon them through various means.

Our nineteenth point further dissects the alleged "snuff films," revealing their lack of convincing realism. Much like the "911 fake films," the individual purportedly filming the event inexplicably pans away from the critical action, either to the crowd or to their own shoes, at moments when a real person would instinctively maintain focus. This deliberate camera work is intended to prevent viewers from examining the scene too closely and discerning its inauthenticity. The presence of numerous individuals in the crowd with cellphones is suggested to be a calculated plant of agents, creating the illusion of spontaneous citizen footage from college students who happened to be filming. However, these supposed citizen recordings are conveniently too far away and of insufficient quality to definitively confirm or deny the event, resembling footage of mythical creatures like Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster. Furthermore, Kirk's post-hit facial distortion and his unnatural slouching to the left in his chair, rather than a realistic collapse like a deer shot in the neck, further "nonconfirm" the authenticity of the films. The need for camera cuts is attributed to Kirk's reluctance to injure himself during the staged performance.

In our twentieth point, we uncover what is described as possibly the most damning evidence of staging: a video posted on X (formerly Twitter) that showed individuals, identified as "CIA-looking dudes" with earpieces, positioned directly behind Kirk on stage. This video reportedly depicted these individuals making a series of "elaborate arm and hand signs" just moments before the shot was fired. These gestures are likened to the signals coaches use in baseball to communicate plays. One individual is observed pulling on his ear and sliding his hand across his cap, while the other made very large arm gestures, interpreted as an unambiguous "go" signal. The fact that this specific video was age-restricted after being publicly available, while the graphic "snuff film" itself remained unrestricted, is highlighted as a clear instance of suspicious censorship, aimed at concealing evidence of the staging. Measures were taken to ensure this crucial evidence was saved should it be "memoryholed".

Our twenty-first point offers more indications that the crowd present at the event was deliberately "planted". Reports emerged that individuals in the crowd were chanting "kill Kirk" and similar phrases. Adding to the suspicious circumstances, Kirk was reportedly in the process of answering a question about shooting when he was "shot". Alex Jones, while acknowledging that the event appeared staged, attempted to frame it as Kirk being killed by the "deep state". However, a more logical interpretation, as presented, is that the event was entirely staged, not without Kirk's knowledge, but with his full participation. The implication is that Kirk faked his own death as a maneuver to integrate more deeply into intelligence operations. Furthermore, individuals were allegedly planted to cheer after the event, with the intention of creating a negative perception of "liberals".

In our twenty-second point, we examine the geographical context of the alleged event: Orem, Utah, described as a "very spooky place". The venue, Utah Valley University (UVU), which originated as an offshoot of Brigham Young in Provo and later moved to Orem, did not attain university status until 2008. Despite its relatively recent university designation, it has experienced explosive growth, now boasting approximately 46,000 students, making it the largest in Utah. This rapid expansion and the university's partnerships, such as UVU's theater program collaborating with Sundance and its heavy promotion by the Kennedy Center, are considered significant "red flags". Orem and UVU are noted for their substantial Mormon population, and Mormons are characterized as "philosemitic," meaning they have an affinity for Jewish people. This connection is attributed to the alleged founding of the LDS church by "crypto-Jews," citing Joseph Smith's mother, Lucy Mack, and the Mack family, as Jewish. Therefore, the choice of Orem for this event is deemed not to be coincidental. A further unsettling connection is made to the Sandy Hook event, where Robbie Parker was also reportedly from Orem, UT, suggesting a pattern.

Our twenty-third point addresses the specifics of the alleged assassination, questioning the method used. It is considered highly improbable that Kirk would be "sniped with a 30-06 from 200 yards on a rooftop". A more realistic scenario, if the event were genuine, would involve a lone individual in the crowd with a pistol. Similar to the alleged "fake assassination" attempt on Trump, reports surfaced that the shooter was visible to some in the crowd, who pointed him out and cried warnings, again pointing to a staged event. Such visibility would imply a profound failure by Kirk's security. Subsequent claims of finding the alleged gun and extra ammunition, supposedly "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology," which the shooter reportedly abandoned, are dismissed as completely unbelievable. A sniper skilled enough to execute such a shot would not leave behind the weapon or such obvious clues. This detail, particularly the "engraving BS," is attributed to "Langley or Hollywood" scriptwriters, reflecting a lack of realism observed in other recent events. The idea that the shooter left fingerprints or palm prints is also considered implausible, questioning why they would not wear gloves or simply leave a forwarding address. The entire narrative around the gun and shooter is presented as fundamentally flawed, implying the eventual capture of such a poorly planned perpetrator would further expose the story's artificiality.

Moving to our twenty-fourth point, we note peculiar online activity preceding the alleged event. Kirk's wife, Erika, reportedly posted "strange comments" on social media the day before, which in hindsight, appear "prescient". This type of pre-event "telegraphing" is described as characteristic behavior of what the author refers to as "Phoenicians," those orchestrating these events, designed to further manipulate public perception. Furthermore, "conservative podcaster" Patrick Bet-David, identified as Jewish, is criticized for an interview on Fox where he suggested that if a leftist figure were to be killed in the following week, it would indicate a foreign nation's attempt to instigate a civil war in the US. This statement is seen as a deliberate deflection, shifting blame away from entities like the CIA or DHS. The author questions why anyone would listen to such individuals, suggesting that their televised and YouTube promotions do not necessarily equate to genuine popularity or belief among the public. The numbers associated with these figures are believed to be fabricated, and their presence on major networks does not confirm their importance or influence on the general populace. This entire scenario is viewed as a "smokescreen" designed to ignite a civil war, and listeners are urged not to comply or engage in such a conflict, instead advocating for a "revolution against these hoaxers and thieves".

In our twenty-fifth point, we address the rapid apprehension of the alleged perpetrator. On the Friday immediately following the incident, it was announced that the supposed shooter, Tyler Robinson, had been caught. The official narrative claimed that Robinson then went online after the event and posted "chilling messages," an act deemed highly illogical for someone on the most-wanted list and on the run from the law. A search for "who is Robinson" quickly led to an article in the Daily Mail, notably written by Shawn Cohen, a name that, in this context, is suggested to fit a pattern the author has observed in such stories. The swiftness of the capture and the subsequent online activity attributed to Robinson further contribute to the perception of a fabricated narrative.

Our twenty-sixth point further unravels the narrative around Tyler Robinson and his family. Robinson was reportedly apprehended by his own father after confessing to him. Video footage of Robinson leaving the scene allegedly shows him wearing a black long-sleeved shirt with an American flag and eagle, along with a cap and sunglasses, raising questions about his choice of distinctive clothing for a fugitive. While his mother's workplace is mentioned, his father, Matt Robinson of Washington, UT, is vaguely described as working "construction," a detail difficult to research. However, public record searches for Matt Robinson reveal striking inconsistencies: he is not listed as related to his wife Amber or to Tyler in some records, and Amber herself appears on the search results for Matt as if she is "another name for him". This leads to further scrutiny of the Robinson family's public identity.

Expanding on the previous point, our twenty-seventh point delves into the strange discrepancies surrounding Matt and Amber Robinson. The computer records oddly suggest that "Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson," leading to speculation about a "tranny thing". Both Amber and one Matt Robinson are listed as 48 years old in Beaver, UT, adding to the intrigue. Even more perplexing are the multiple listings for "Matt Robinson" with different ages, all of whom appear to be the same person and share Saint George among their locations. Radaris, for instance, lists the 48-year-old as Matthew C., not Matthew Noal, and does not place him in Beaver, deepening the mystery. The correct spelling of "Noel," not "Noal," is also noted. Amber's presence in Delaware, alongside Utah, is also highlighted as significant, as Foster Friess, a central figure in the broader narrative, reportedly began his career with the Brittinghams in Delaware.

In our twenty-eighth point, we continue to explore the public record inconsistencies concerning Amber Robinson. While Radaris lists Amber Dawn Robinson as 44 and links her to Matthew Robinson, this information is not corroborated by Instantcheckmate, which shows no Amber Robinson of that age or connected to Matthew. Intelius also fails to confirm this link. Even Truthfinder, which is often linked from Radaris, does not confirm the information, instead showing all Amber Robinsons as 48 and none linked to Matthew. When attempting to view "all details" for Amber Robinson, 44, on Radaris, users are redirected to the listing for Amber Robinson, 48. The observation that Intelius, Instantcheckmate, and Truthfinder now appear identical in their format and content suggests they draw from the same source, leading to the conclusion that "CIA scrubbers" might be operating, albeit slowly, to control information.

Our twenty-ninth point reveals additional aliases and significant family connections. Radaris indicates that Matt C. Robinson, 48, is also known as Matt C. Devooght. The need for a "construction worker" to have an alias is questioned. Amber Robinson's list of relatives includes "Thomas Robinson" four times, but this name has been removed from other listings, suggesting its potential importance. A search for this Thomas Robinson reveals one from Saint George, listed as deceased, who is related to "Kisers" from Kansas City, MO, and Leavenworth. This is a crucial link, as Charlie Kirk's alleged sister, Alexandria Kirk, is related to Angel/Angela Kisor/Bridges, 48, from Ironton, OH, and Tallahassee, FL, according to Truthfinder. This Angel Kisor is also described as an "agent with multiple listings," and while Radaris does not show her in Ironton, it does link to Truthfinder, and provides a best result for Angel Kisor, aka Kiser/Kaiser and Prater, 52, of Hamden and Wellston, OH, related to Prater, Rhodes, and Staley/Stanley. The geographical proximity of both the Kisers and Kirks to the area of Ohio south of Columbus further strengthens this connection.

In our thirtieth point, we arrive at a significant conclusion, having established a direct link between the alleged shooter and the victim. Tyler Robinson, the supposed shooter, appears to be a cousin of Charlie Kirk, a discovery that fundamentally "blows the cover of the whole thing". Further investigation into "Robinson Kiser," 47, reveals various aliases and confirms his identity as a Kiser through his four Kiser relatives. His LinkedIn page, though scrubbed of Kansas City listings, suggests he is a dentist in Leavenworth, implying a deliberate effort to obscure his information in light of recent events. Links to the Kisers of Manti, UT, are found, and a crucial connection emerges through Ben Catlin on Melissa Kiser's page, linking to Candice Hancock, who then links to Patricia Berry of Delaware. This connection to Delaware is consistent with other findings, and the Devooghts are also linked to Berrys in Ohio, further solidifying the interconnectedness.

Continuing our investigation in our thirty-first point, we delve further into the "Matt Devooght" alias. While Instantcheckmate does not list him in Utah or as being synonymous with Robinson, it places him in Fairborn, OH, and Jersey City, NJ, only linking him to other Devooghts. However, the Fairborn, OH, listing is potentially confirmatory, as it is near Dayton, an area associated with the Kirks. This connection leads to an Albert Devooght, 74, of Findlay, OH, and Marana, AZ. Jessica Devooght from this family then links to the Berrys, including Chase Berry, who is connected to Morgan Chase Erwin, hinting at a wider network. Chase's father, Brice Berry, is linked to the Dillingers. The earlier discovery of Berrys in Utah reinforces that this line of inquiry is not a tangent but a relevant part of the larger web of connections.

Our thirty-second point takes us to another intriguing connection: Janae Quilter. Janae, 53, is employed as the front desk manager at a private airport in Heber City, UT, a location known for its Lear jet traffic, which is presented as a potential clue. Further verification of the Matthew Robinson listings is found by tracing connections to the Quilters via other Robinsons on Amber's list, confirming that the listing for Matthew Robinson, also known as Devooght, is the correct one. While "Devooght" could still be a computer error, there is now confirmation that Tyler Robinson's father is the Matt Robinson aged 48, not 59. Yet, despite this, the public records on Radaris and Instantcheckmate still do not consistently link Matt to his wife, Amber. Instead, they link him to Misty Jean Robinson, 49, who shares a P.O. Box in Beaver with Matthew, 48, suggesting a potential separation between Matt and Amber that is not reported in media outlets like the Daily Mail.

In our thirty-third point, we expose further inconsistencies in public reporting. Returning to an article in the Daily Mail, despite having previously stated that Matt Robinson "works construction," the publication later admits, in the subtext of a photograph, that he is a "law enforcement veteran". This contradictory information raises questions about his retirement at age 48 and strongly suggests a background in either military or law enforcement. Additionally, an article about Tyler Robinson's voting history, published just two days after the alleged event, is highlighted as an attempt to quickly sow division. At 22 years old, Tyler's voting history would likely be limited to a single election, and the implication is that he did not vote for a specific candidate. This rushed and superficial reporting is seen as a tool to polarize the public.

Our thirty-fourth point brings forth a display of what is characterized as "shamelessness" from Erika Kirk. Less than 48 hours after her husband's neck was allegedly "blown off," Erika delivered a 15-minute speech, even taking the opportunity to promote the Oregon Ducks. Such behavior, in the immediate aftermath of a deeply traumatic event, is presented as highly unusual and indicative of a lack of genuine grief. Further inconsistencies from the Daily Mail are highlighted: after previously stating that Matt Robinson "works construction" and was a "veteran law enforcement" officer, and that Amber worked for a state agency assisting the disabled, the newspaper then reported that the Robinsons own a "granite countertop business". These multiple, contradictory accounts of their employment are attributed to artificial intelligence systems struggling to maintain a coherent narrative.

Finally, in our thirty-fifth point, we examine a major continuity problem related to the alleged murder weapon. The official story claims the shooter, Tyler Robinson, used an old bolt-action Mauser 30.06 rifle and then ditched it in a field after the crime. However, such a rifle does not break down for easy concealment in a backpack, meaning Robinson would have had to carry it openly both to and from the scene. If it could be easily disassembled, there would be no need to abandon it. The act of wrapping a rifle in a towel and dumping it near a crime scene is considered amateurish and illogical, especially when numerous more effective methods for disposal or hiding exist, such as throwing it into a lake or concealing it in an abandoned structure. This glaring lack of common sense, even compared to scenarios depicted in "CIA movies," suggests that the entire narrative surrounding the gun, the shooter, and the death itself is fabricated. The "murder" is ultimately dismissed as a staged event, involving a blank fired or a shot into a wall, with Kirk merely pretending to die, accompanied by either fake blood effects akin to a Monty Python skit or digitally added CGI.

thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info.

This extensive analysis argues that the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk was a staged event, orchestrated by intelligence agencies, specifically the CIA. The author claims that all major media events, including tragedies, are manufactured as part of "Operation Chaos" to manipulate public perception and distract from deeper issues. The text asserts that Kirk, despite his public persona, was an intelligence asset from the start, a "front" for powerful, crypto-Jewish billionaires like Foster Friess, whose backgrounds are meticulously deconstructed to reveal their alleged true identities and motives. The author points to numerous inconsistencies in the official narrative, from the date's numerological significance to the implausible details of the shooting, the shooter's identity, and the media's reaction, all of which are presented as evidence of a carefully constructed hoax designed to sow discord and prevent a "revolution" against the true power brokers. The provided text argues that the reported murder of Charlie Kirk was a staged event, a part of a larger operation by intelligence agencies to control media and manufacture news. The author asserts that Kirk, along with figures like Foster Friess, was an intelligence asset from the start, as evidenced by his rapid rise and questionable background. The analysis questions the official narrative by scrutinizing inconsistencies in public records regarding Kirk's family and the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, suggesting familial ties between them. Furthermore, the author highlights suspicious elements surrounding the event, such as Kirk's alleged Jewish heritage, his wife's purported connections to known Jewish families, the timing of the "murder," and the implausibility of the shooter's actions and reported details. The author concludes that the incident is a hoax designed to incite a civil war and distract the public 

The alleged murder of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, is presented as a staged event. The author suggests this should be the "default assumption of any current event," citing the influence of Intel agencies over media through "Operation Mockingbird" and their continued manufacturing of news, including tragedies, as part of "Operation Chaos".

Several points are offered to support the claim of staging:

Charlie Kirk's Background and Identity:

• Suspicious Origins: Charlie Kirk "came out of nowhere at age 18" to found Turning Point USA (TPUSA), which is described as a front for Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery. The author states that "no one but agents founds big organizations like this at age 18" without "huge money and promotion".

• Foster Friess's Connections: Friess is identified as an Army Intelligence officer, a multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and a "crypto-Jew." He is portrayed as using Christian causes to "cloak the fact he was a crusading fascist". The name "Friess" is also identified as Jewish.

• Kirk's Alleged Jewish Background: The author speculates that Charlie Kirk is also Jewish, noting Wikipedia's failure to name his parents and the lack of consistent public record information for a "Charles/Charlie James Kirk" of his age and alleged locations. A surname "Aughenbaugh," which is linked to a possible father figure and identified as Jewish, is suggested as his real last name.

• Inconsistencies in Family Records: Discrepancies are found in people search results regarding Charlie Kirk's parents (Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk), their locations (Ohio, not Chicago), and their relation to him or other listed Kirks.

Erika Kirk (Wife) and Family Connections:

• Erika's Background: Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Lane Kirk (nee Frantzve), is also suspected of being Jewish, despite being presented as Catholic, and her Wiki page conspicuously lacks mention of her parents.

• Heller Connections: Erika is found to be related to "Hellers," a name identified as Jewish and linked to "Hiller/Heller/Hitler." Other related surnames like Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and Braun (as in Eva Braun) are also identified as Jewish. These connections, including a link to Winter Park, FL, previously seen with the Aughenbaughs, suggest Charlie married a "Jewish cousin," which is deemed "par for the course".

The Alleged Event Itself:

• Wedding Photo: A photo tagged as their wedding photo appears to show Jerusalem in the background, which is called a "strange place for people who aren't Jewish to get married". Another image mentions them "keeping the Sabbath," questioning whether Christians or Jews observe it.

• Disproportionate Reaction: Donald Trump's declaration of a national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast for Kirk is considered nonsensical and "raw propaganda" for a 31-year-old podcaster with "no education". This is compared to other instances of flags at half-mast for "fake victims" or "fake deaths".

• Problematic Video Evidence:

  • The "snuff film" video of the murder was released on the same day, which was previously "forbidden," and is described as CGI, traumatizing, and an "acceleration of Operation Chaos".

  • The films are considered unconvincing, with the filmer panning away at critical moments to prevent close examination.

  • Kirk's facial distortion after the "hit" and his slouching rather than collapsing are seen as evidence of acting.

  • A video allegedly shows "big CIA-looking dudes with earpieces" behind Kirk on stage making "elaborate arm and hand signs" just before the shot, which is interpreted as a "go" signal. This video was later age-restricted.

• Crowd and Location: The crowd was allegedly "planted," chanting "kill Kirk," and Kirk was conveniently "answering a question about shooting when he was shot". People were also supposedly planted to cheer afterward to "make 'liberals' look bad". The event's location in Orem, Utah – a heavily Mormon, "philosemitic" area linked to "crypto-Jews" and previous staged events (like Robbie Parker from Sandy Hook) – is deemed "no coincidence".

• Implausible Shooter Details:

  • The alleged method of assassination (sniped with a .30-06 from 200 yards) is considered unlikely, suggesting a "nut in the crowed with a pistol" would be more expected.

  • The claim of finding the gun and ammo "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology" is dismissed as "scriptwriters with too much time on their hands" and not something a real sniper would do. Leaving fingerprints or palm prints is also deemed "not believable".

The Alleged Shooter, Tyler Robinson:

• Conflicting Information: The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, was reportedly caught by his father after confessing, and then supposedly went online to leave "chilling messages," which is considered illogical for a most-wanted person. The writer of the "who is Robinson" article is noted as "Shawn Cohen".

• Father's Inconsistencies: The shooter's father, Matt Robinson, is described with conflicting occupations (construction worker, "law enforcement veteran," and owning a granite countertop business) and inconsistent ages across different public record searches. He is also noted to have an alias, "Devooght".

• Family Link to Kirk: A critical link is found between the alleged shooter and victim, suggesting Tyler Robinson is a "cousin of Charlie Kirk," which "blows the cover of the whole thing". Family names like Kisers and Devooghts are linked to both Kirk's alleged family (Alexandria Kirk) and the Robinsons.

• Gun Discrepancy: The alleged rifle (an "old bolt-action Mauser 30.06") is deemed unsuitable for being broken down into a backpack, and the idea of "ditching it in a field afterwards" wrapped in a towel is called out as illogical and contrary to common knowledge from "CIA movies". The conclusion is that "there was no gun, no shooter, and no death. Just a blank fired or a shot into a wall and Kirk pretending to die, with fake blood squirting... or CGI'ed in after the fact".

In summary, the author believes the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk was a fabricated event orchestrated by intelligence agencies, using actors, CGI, and planted narratives to achieve a specific goal, possibly to "spark a civil war".

Media manipulation, as described in the sources, is presented as a pervasive and deeply entrenched aspect of contemporary society, orchestrated primarily by intelligence agencies and their associates. The author states that it "should be the default assumption of any current event" that it is staged.

Entities Involved in Media Manipulation:

• Intelligence Agencies (CIA): These agencies are alleged to have completely taken over all media decades ago through "Operation Mockingbird" after Watergate. They are accused of manufacturing all news daily, including multiple major tragedies weekly, as part of "Operation Chaos". The author claims these operations did not end but expanded and accelerated.

• Billionaires and "Agents": Individuals like Foster Friess, described as an Army Intelligence officer and multi-billionaire, are portrayed as "agents" who found large organizations like Turning Point USA not to benefit the public but to serve their own interests. The author suggests that "good guys do not go to work for billionaires at age 18, with zero qualifications".

• Controlled Media Outlets: Media platforms, including Google, are accused of censoring information. Mainstream press is criticized for presenting narratives that lead people to believe they are "stupid and gullible". Fox and other channels are said to promote individuals whose "numbers are fake," implying their popularity is manufactured, and that being hired does not require genuine public support. News sources like the Daily Mail are highlighted for publishing inconsistent and rushed narratives.

• "They": A broad term frequently used to refer to the orchestrators of these manipulative acts, often implying a coordinated effort by those seeking to sow division and control.

Methods of Media Manipulation:

The sources detail numerous methods used to manipulate media and public perception:

1. Staging Events: The alleged murder of Charlie Kirk is presented as a staged event, a practice also attributed to Trump's "staged assassination attempts" and other "major tragedies". These events are claimed to be staged with the victim's knowledge and participation.

2. Manufacturing News and Propaganda:

   • Fabricated Narratives: Intelligence agencies "manufacture all the news everyday". This involves creating elaborate storylines, such as the claim of a shooter ditching an "engraved" gun with specific ideological messages, which the author dismisses as "scriptwriters with too much time on their hands".

   • Emotional Manipulation: Ordering flags at half-mast for events deemed disproportionate (e.g., for Charlie Kirk or specific victims) is labeled as "raw propaganda," "military propaganda and emotionalism". The release of "CGI snuff films" depicting violent deaths is intended to be traumatizing and to "obliterate your remaining sensibilities".

   • Biographical and Identity Manipulation: Public figures' biographies are allegedly scrubbed or fabricated, with details about parents or spouses often missing or inconsistent across different online databases. The author extensively researches names and family connections, often concluding that individuals are "crypto-Jewish" or using fake identities to conceal their true backgrounds or affiliations.

   • Numerology and Symbolism: Dates are sometimes chosen for their numerological significance, such as 9/10/2025 being linked to 9/11.

   • Prescient Social Media Posts: "Phoenicians" are said to "telegraph their events" through social media posts that appear prescient, to further psychologically impact the public.

3. Censorship and Control of Information:

   • Search Engine Censorship: Google is accused of censoring search results for critical information.

   • Information Scrubbing: Online public records (e.g., Radaris, Instantcheckmate, Intelius, Truthfinder) are believed to be "scrubbed" or "edited by Intel" to remove or alter information about individuals and their connections, leading to inconsistencies and difficulties in verification. Evidence that an event was faked can be age-restricted or "memoryholed".

4. Fabricated Evidence and Inconsistencies in Staged Events:

   • CGI and Fake Blood: The use of "CGI" and "fake blood" is cited in the context of violent event videos.

   • Planted Participants: Crowds are described as "planted," chanting slogans like "kill Kirk" and cheering afterward to make "liberals" look bad. Agents with earpieces are observed making "elaborate arm and hand signs" as "go signals" just before an alleged shooting.

   • Unrealistic Scenarios and Inconsistencies: Videos of staged events are critiqued for unrealistic camerawork, such as panning away during critical moments to prevent close scrutiny, and for the victim's unconvincing reaction to a gunshot. Details about a shooter's actions (e.g., leaving an engraved gun, fingerprints, immediately confessing or going online) are deemed unbelievable. Conflicting information about individuals' ages, occupations, and family relationships in official reports are presented as evidence of fabrication. "Continuity problems" like the absence of a rifle in a shooter's video footage are also highlighted.

Goals of Media Manipulation:

According to the sources, the ultimate goals of this widespread media manipulation are:

• Control Narratives: To dictate what the public believes by manufacturing news and controlling the flow of information.

• Sow Division and Incite Civil War: A primary objective is to "create schism on purpose" between political factions ("red and blue, left and right") to "take pressure off themselves". The orchestrators prefer a civil war over a revolution, as a revolution would target them directly, while a civil war makes the public target each other. This is evident in the rush to publish divisive narratives, such as a shooter's voting history.

• Traumatize and Desensitize the Public: Through a "constant stream of CGI snuff films," the goal is to "obliterate your remaining sensibilities".

• Maintain Power and Control: Billionaires are said to operate through these organizations to "help themselves". The extensive control by intelligence agencies suggests a broader aim to manage societal behavior and political outcomes.

The author urges readers to question all reported events, avoid participating in engineered conflicts, and disregard narratives propagated by these figures.

The provided source highlights numerous questionable biographical details concerning Charlie Kirk, his associates, and the alleged shooter, suggesting an orchestrated narrative rather than genuine events.

Questionable Details Regarding Charlie Kirk:

• Unusual Origins and Background: Charlie Kirk reportedly "came out of nowhere at age 18" to found Turning Point USA (TPUSA), an organization the source refers to as "Toilet Paper USA". The source questions how anyone, especially an 18-year-old with "zero qualifications," could found such a large organization without "huge money and promotion," suggesting he was a "front for Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery" and an "agent".

• Lack of Parental Information and Potential Aliases: Wikipedia's failure to name Kirk's parents is cited as suspicious, leading the source to "assume Charlie Kirk is also Jewish". Public record searches by Radaris for a "Charles/Charlie James Kirk of Chicago, age 31," returned no results, implying his name "may be a fake". While Instantcheckmate found a "Charles Kirk, 31," with various locations and relatives, the source states this "may not be the right guy," and if not, "the big computer has never heard of him". The name "Hilbre Kirk," a potential sibling from one of the search results, is noted as sounding Jewish.

• Conflicting Family Information:

  • The source "was able to confirm from other places that James Kirk is also James Aughenbaugh". This individual is possibly Charlie's father, making Charlie's real last name potentially "Aughenbaugh," which the source asserts is Jewish.

  • Distractify identifies Charlie's parents as Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk, but these names do not appear on Charlie's relatives list in other public record searches.

  • Robert Kelly Kirk (53 and 76) and a Kimberly Kirk were found in Ohio, but no Charles/Charlie was on Robert's list, and none of the Kirks on Charlie's separate list were on Robert's.

  • The Kimberly Kirk linked to Robert Kelly Kirk is 52, has a middle initial K (not A), and has no Chicago locations, raising questions about who Charlie lived with in high school, as he allegedly attended high school in Chicago.

  • A search for "Kimberly Kirk of Chicago" at Radaris yielded nothing. Instantcheckmate found two potential Kimberly Kirks in Chicago, ages 61 or 63, one related to "Hellers," but neither listed Robert or Charles/Charlie as relatives. The source speculates Charlie's mother's maiden name might be Heller.

• Wife's Background and Connections:

  • Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Lane Kirk, nee Frantzve, is described as Jewish despite being "sold as Catholic". Her Wiki page conspicuously omits mention of her parents, which is deemed a "red flag".

  • Erika does not appear on Charlie's Instantcheckmate page, and some listings show Charlie with a middle initial R, not J.

  • The surname Frantzve "may also be a fake name," possibly a variant of the Jewish name Frantzen.

  • Erika's Radaris listing connects her through Charlynn Frantzve to Brittany Heller, a name the source links to "Hitler" (Hiller/Heller) and identifies as Jewish. Brittany Heller's related surnames include Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and Braun (as in Eva Braun), all identified as Jewish by the source, strengthening the Heller/Hiller/Hitler connection. These connections also link to Winter Park, FL, which came up with the Aughenbaughs, leading the source to conclude that Charlie "married a Jewish cousin".

Questionable Details Regarding Foster Friess:

• Hidden Identity and Motives: Foster Friess, identified as a backer of TPUSA, is labeled an "Army Intelligence officer, multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and crypto-Jew".

• Contradictory Public Persona: Friess attempted to present himself as a cowboy despite being from Wisconsin and a Chi Phi fratboy, and he admitted moving to Jackson Hole to avoid income taxes. He was "groomed by the Brittinghams in Delaware to be an investment banker—the opposite of a cowboy". The source claims he was "not a Christian crusader" but used the issue to "cloak the fact he was a crusading fascist".

• Suspected Jewish Heritage: A poll on Jewscope showed over 88% of respondents believed Friess was Jewish, despite mainstream sources asserting he was Christian and his support for Christian causes. The source argues that "Friess is a Jewish name" and his background as a "billionaire banker/money manager" supports this. He was heavily promoted as a "great philanthropist and humanitarian," which the source claims was "just the opposite" of his true nature. The source suggests the "Christian causes" he supported were not genuinely Christian but "pose as Christian" as part of a larger infiltration strategy. The surname Friess/Fries/DeVries is extensively traced by the source as being Jewish or crypto-Jewish.

Questionable Details Regarding Tyler Robinson (Alleged Shooter) and His Family:

• Inconsistent Personal and Family Information:

  • The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, was reportedly caught by his father after confessing. However, public record searches for his father, "Matt Robinson," showed he "isn't related to his wife Amber and he isn't on her list either. Tyler isn't on her list".

  • The computer system reportedly "thinks Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson," and Amber is the same age (48) as a Matt Robinson in Beaver, UT, prompting the source to question if there is "some sort of tranny thing here".

  • Multiple listings for "Matt Robinson" appeared with different ages (48, 59, 31) but similar locations, leading the source to believe they are the "same person".

  • Radaris initially listed Amber Dawn Robinson as 44 and linked her to Matthew Robinson, but other services (Instantcheckmate, Intelius, Truthfinder) did not confirm this link, showing Amber Robinsons as 48 instead.

  • Matt C. Robinson, 48, is also known as "Matt C. Devooght," an alias that the source questions for a "construction worker".

• Conflicting Parental Occupations:

  • Tyler's father, Matt Robinson, was initially described as vaguely working "construction". However, the Daily Mail later "admit[s] he is a law enforcement veteran in the subtext to a photo," prompting the source to question if he's "retired at 48". The Daily Mail also reported that the Robinsons "own a granite countertop business," creating a contradiction with previous information. Tyler's mother, Amber, was said to work for "Intermountain Support, a state agency, helping the disabled".

• Direct Link Between Shooter and Victim: The discovery that "Thomas Robinson" (on Amber's list) is related to "Kisers," which links back to Charlie Kirk's alleged "sister" Alexandria, leads the source to claim a "link between the shooter and victim," suggesting Tyler Robinson "looks like a cousin of Charlie Kirk".

• Unbelievable Actions of the Alleged Shooter:

  • Tyler Robinson "allegedly went online after the event and left 'chilling messages'," which the source finds illogical for someone "on run from the law".

  • The alleged shooter was shown in video "leaving the scene, with an American flag and eagle on his black longsleeved shirt," and wearing a cap and sunglasses, a lack of disguise that the source finds unbelievable for a wanted criminal.

  • The alleged gun, an "old bolt-action Mauser 30.06," was supposedly "ditched in a field afterwards". The source argues such a rifle "doesn't break down like that" for easy concealment and questions why a "sniper savvy enough" to commit the act would "ditch the gun and leave clues all over it," including "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology". Leaving fingerprints or palm prints is also considered "not believable".

The alleged murder of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, is presented as a staged event, and a significant part of this claim involves the scrutiny of the family backgrounds of key individuals, particularly Charlie Kirk himself and the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. This scrutiny aims to uncover hidden connections and suggest that public narratives about these individuals are misleading.

Scrutiny of Charlie Kirk's Family Background

The author extensively questions Charlie Kirk's publicly presented identity and family connections:

• Suspicious Origins and Aliases: Charlie Kirk is said to have "came out of nowhere at age 18" to found Turning Point USA (TPUSA), leading to the suspicion that he was a "front for Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery" given that "no one but agents founds big organizations like this at age 18". The author suggests his name "Charles/Charlie James Kirk" might be a fake, possibly an alias.

• Alleged Jewish Background:

  • Wikipedia's "conspicuous failure to name his parents" is flagged as a red sign pointing to a hidden background.

  • The author speculates Charlie Kirk is Jewish, similar to Foster Friess, who is identified as a "crypto-Jew" and a "billionaire banker/money manager". The surname "Friess" itself is identified as Jewish.

  • "Aughenbaugh" is suggested as Charlie's real last name, linked to a potential father figure, James Aughenbaugh (aka James Kirk), and this surname is also identified as Jewish. A search for "Aughenbaugh" confirms it as Jewish, with examples like "Charlie Aughenbaugh at LinkenIN, a driver for Jewish Family Services," and a Wikitree page "filled with Jewish names". This family is also linked to "Moravians," which potentially connects to Foster Friess.

• Inconsistencies in Parental Records:

  • While "Distractify" names his parents as Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk, these names reportedly do not consistently appear on Charlie's relatives list in people search results like Instantcheckmate, Intelius, or Radaris.

  • Discrepancies in location are noted, with Robert Kelly Kirk and Kimberly Kirk appearing from Ohio, not Chicago, where Charlie allegedly went to high school.

  • The Kimberly Kirk related to Robert Kelly Kirk has the middle initial "K," not "A" as suggested by "Distractify," and has different residential history.

  • A search for "Kimberly Kirk of Chicago" (where Charlie lived for high school) yields no relevant results for parents, though one result for Kimberly Kirk from Grayslake, IL, is related to "Hellers".

• Spouse's Background (Erika Lane Kirk, nee Frantzve):

  • Similar to Charlie, there is "no mention of her parents on her Wiki page, which is a red flag".

  • Her maiden name, "Frantzve," is identified as Jewish, or a variant of "Frantzen," despite being presented as Catholic.

  • Erika is found to be related to "Hellers" through Charlynn Frantzve. The name "Heller" is specifically pointed out as being Jewish, a variation of Hildesheim, and historically linked to "Hitler" (Hiller/Heller). This connection is considered significant, with the author noting the "astronomically" low odds of it being a coincidence, and that it may indicate Charlie married a "Jewish cousin".

  • Further, Erika's relatives include names like "Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and . . . Braun," with "Braun" (as in Eva Braun) reinforcing the "Heller/Hiller/Hitler connection" and all being identified as Jewish. These connections also link to "Winter Park, FL," which previously came up with the "Aughenbaughs," suggesting a family network.

• Symbolic Clues: A wedding photo tagged as being from their wedding appears to have "Jerusalem in the background," which is deemed a "strange place for people who aren't Jewish to get married". Additionally, an image with the subtext "Charlie Kirk and his wife begin keeping the Sabbath" is presented as evidence, as the Sabbath is primarily observed by Jews, not Christians.

Scrutiny of Tyler Robinson's Family Background

The family background of the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is also heavily scrutinized for inconsistencies and hidden connections:

• Inconsistent Parental Information:

  • His father, Matt Robinson of Washington, UT, is initially vaguely described as working "construction". Later, the Daily Mail "admits he is a law enforcement veteran," which leads to questions given his age.

  • His mother, Amber Robinson, is said to work for "Intermountain Support, a state agency, helping the disabled". The Robinsons are also noted to own a "granite countertop business".

  • People searches for Matt and Amber Robinson show discrepancies, with Matt "not related to his wife Amber" in one search, and Amber not on his list either. One search even suggests "Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson," leading to speculation.

  • Amber's listed locations include Delaware, which is noted as an indicator of "outside influence" due to its connection to Foster Friess and the Brittinghams.

• Aliases and Hidden Connections:

  • Matt C. Robinson is also identified as "Matt C. Devooght," which raises questions about the need for an alias for a construction worker.

  • The "Devooght" name is found to link to "Berrys" and "Dillingers," suggesting a wider network.

• Link to the Victim: The most "damning evidence" from this scrutiny is the alleged familial link between the shooter and the victim.

  • A connection is found through "Kisers" (relatives of a deceased Thomas E Robinson) to Charlie Kirk's alleged sister, Alexandria Kirk, who is related to "Angel/Angela Kisor/Bridges".

  • Both the "Kisers" and "Kirks" are found to be from the area of Ohio south of Columbus, which further supports the connection.

  • This direct link between Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk as "cousins" is presented as "blow[ing] the cover of the whole thing," indicating that the event was staged with the victim's knowledge and participation.

Overall, the scrutiny of family backgrounds in the sources serves to highlight a perceived pattern of aliases, hidden Jewish heritage, interconnections between key figures, and inconsistencies in public records, all of which are used to support the claim that Charlie Kirk's alleged murder was a staged event orchestrated by intelligence agencies.

The author's primary argument that the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, was a staged event is heavily supported by numerous discrepancies found in the reported evidence, biographical details, and official narratives. These inconsistencies are presented as proof of manipulation by intelligence agencies.

Here are the key discrepancies highlighted in the sources:

1. Discrepancies in Charlie Kirk's Biography and Identity:

• Unusual Origins: Kirk "came out of nowhere at age 18" to found Turning Point USA, an organization the author claims only "agents" with "huge money and promotion" could establish at that age.

• Missing Parental Information: Wikipedia's "conspicuous failure to name his parents" is flagged as suspicious.

• Inconsistent Public Records:

  • Public record searches for "Charles/Charlie James Kirk of Chicago, age 31," returned no results on Radaris, suggesting his name "may be a fake".

  • While Instantcheckmate found a "Charles Kirk, 31," with various locations and relatives, the author states this "may not be the right guy," and if not, "the big computer has never heard of him".

  • "Distractify" identified Charlie's parents as Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk, but these names reportedly do not appear on Charlie's relatives list in other public record searches.

  • A "Robert Kelly Kirk, 53 and 76," was found related to a Kimberly Kirk in Ohio, but no Charles/Charlie was on his list. None of the Kirks on Charlie's separate list were on Robert's either.

  • The Kimberly Kirk related to Robert Kelly Kirk is 52, has a middle initial K (not A), and has no Chicago locations, despite Charlie allegedly attending high school in Chicago.

  • A search for "Kimberly Kirk of Chicago" at Radaris yielded nothing. Instantcheckmate found two potential Kimberly Kirks in Chicago, but neither listed Robert or Charles/Charlie as relatives.

2. Discrepancies Regarding Erika Kirk (Charlie's Wife):

• Missing Parental Information: Erika Lane Kirk (nee Frantzve) also has "no mention of her parents on her Wiki page, which is a red flag".

• Inconsistent Records: Erika is "not on Charlie's Instantcheckmate page" as a relative, which the author finds unusual for a spouse. Other listings show Charlie with a middle initial R, not J.

• Wedding Photo: A photo tagged as their wedding photo appears to show Jerusalem in the background, which the author calls a "strange place for people who aren't Jewish to get married".

• Religious Practice: An image mentions them "keeping the Sabbath," which the author questions, asking "Do Christians keep the Sabbath, or Jews?".

3. Discrepancies in the Alleged Murder Event and Video Evidence:

• Immediate Release of "Snuff Film": The "snuff film" video of the murder was released on the same day, which the author notes "used to be forbidden" and questions the lack of family notification.

• Unconvincing Camerawork: The films are deemed "not convincing at all," as the filmer "pans away to the crowd or to his shoe tops when no real person would do that" to prevent close examination.

• Unrealistic Victim Reaction: Kirk's face looks "distorted after the hit," and he merely "slouch[es] to the left in his chair" instead of collapsing "like a deer shot in the neck," which the author attributes to acting and cuts to avoid injury.

• Censorship of Evidence: A video showing "big CIA-looking dudes with earpieces" behind Kirk on stage making "elaborate arm and hand signs" (interpreted as a "go" signal) was later age-restricted, while the "snuff film" was not, which the author finds telling.

• Illogical Mourning: Donald Trump's declaration of a national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast for Kirk is considered "raw propaganda" and "military propaganda and emotionalism" for a 31-year-old podcaster with "no education". This is compared to other instances of flags at half-mast for "fake victims" or "fake deaths".

• Implausible Method of Assassination: Being "sniped with a .30-06 from 200 yards on a rooftop" is deemed unlikely; a "nut in the crowed with a pistol" would be more expected for a real event.

• Scripted Shooter Details: The claim of finding the gun and ammo "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology" and the shooter ditching it after leaving fingerprints or palm prints is dismissed as "scriptwriters with too much time on their hands" and "not believable" for a "savvy" sniper.

4. Discrepancies in the Alleged Shooter (Tyler Robinson) and His Family's Narrative:

• Illogical Post-Event Actions: Tyler Robinson "allegedly went online after the event and left 'chilling messages'" while being the "number 1 on the most-wanted list," which is deemed illogical for someone on the run.

• Lack of Disguise: Robinson was filmed leaving the scene wearing an "American flag and eagle on his black longsleeved shirt" and a cap and sunglasses, which the author finds unbelievable for a wanted criminal.

• Inconsistent Family Records:

  • Tyler's father, Matt Robinson, is reportedly "not related to his wife Amber" in one search, and Tyler is not on Amber's list either.

  • The computer system even suggests "Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson," and both are the same age (48), leading to speculation.

  • Conflicting ages are found for "Matt Robinson" (59, 48, 31) across different listings, despite the author believing them to be the "same person".

  • Radaris lists Amber Dawn Robinson as 44, not 48, and links her to Matthew, but other services (Instantcheckmate, Intelius, Truthfinder) do not confirm this link.

• Conflicting Parental Occupations: The Daily Mail provided three conflicting occupations for Tyler's parents: Matt "works construction", later "admit[s] he is a law enforcement veteran", and finally states the Robinsons "own a granite countertop business". Amber was said to work for "Intermountain Support, a state agency". The author notes that "AI needs to get its shite together" due to these inconsistencies.

• Continuity Problem with the Rifle: A "big continuity problem" is highlighted: despite claims that the rifle was ditched afterwards, no rifle is visible in the video of Robinson leaving the scene. The author argues that the alleged "old bolt-action Mauser 30.06" "doesn't break down like that" for easy concealment in a backpack, making its disappearance and "ditching" in a field (wrapped in a towel) illogical.

These pervasive discrepancies, from biographical details to the specifics of the alleged crime and the behavior of those involved, are consistently presented as evidence that the entire event was a fabrication designed to manipulate public perception.

I. The Murder of Charlie Kirk was of course STAGED by Miles Mathis The alleged murder of Charlie Kirk on 9/10/2025 is considered staged, a matter of numerology linking it to 9/11.

It should be the default assumption of any current event, as Intel agencies took over the media decades ago in Operation Mockingbird.

II. Manufactured News and Operation Chaos The Intel agencies now manufacture all the news everyday, including multiple major tragedies each week, as part of Operation Chaos.

These operations and projects, like Operation Chaos and Operation Cointelpro, did not end but just expanded and accelerated.

III. Suspicious Founding of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) Charlie Kirk came out of nowhere at age 18 to found Turning Point USA, which the author refers to as Toilet Paper USA.

No one but agents founds big organizations like this at age 18, as it takes huge money and promotion.

IV. Foster Friess's True Identity and Agenda Foster Friess was an Army Intelligence officer, multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and crypto-Jew.

He was groomed by the Brittinghams in Delaware to be an investment banker, the opposite of the cowboy image he tried to sell.

V. Infiltration and Blackwashing of Christian Causes Causes supported by Friess, though appearing Christian, are not truly Christian; they just pose as such.

These people infiltrate Christian organizations and turn them to crud on purpose, a process the author calls blackwashing.

VI. Charlie Kirk's Suspected Jewish Background The author assumes Charlie Kirk is Jewish because Wikipedia conspicuously fails to name his parents.

The surname Aughenbaugh, potentially Kirk's real last name through his father, is identified as Jewish.

VII. Discrepancies in Charlie Kirk's Family Records Public records, such as Radaris and Instantcheckmate, return no results for a Charles/Charlie James Kirk of Chicago, age 31, suggesting the name may be fake.

Neither of Charlie's alleged parents are from Chicago, despite him allegedly attending high school there.

VIII. Erika Frantzve Kirk's Jewish Connections Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Lane Kirk (nee Frantzve), is also identified as Jewish, despite being sold as Catholic, with no mention of her parents on her Wiki page.

Erika is related to Brittany Heller, a name known to be Jewish and a variation of Hildesheim, and also to other Jewish surnames like Braun.

IX. Symbolic Wedding Location and Practices A photo tagged as Charlie Kirk's wedding shows Jerusalem in the background, which is considered a strange place for people who are not Jewish to get married.

Another photo's subtext, "Charlie Kirk and his wife begin keeping the Sabbath," raises questions as Christians typically do not keep the Sabbath in the same way Jews do.

X. Trump's Exaggerated Response to Kirk's "Death" Donald Trump declared a national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast in honor of Kirk, which is deemed disproportionate for a 31-year-old podcaster.

This action is seen as "raw propaganda," similar to other instances where flags were ordered at half-mast for fake victims.

XI. Unconvincing "Snuff Film" Video Evidence The video of the alleged murder is described as a "snuff film" that is "CGI," and the author states it is not convincing at all.

The filmer pans away to the crowd or his shoe tops when no real person would do that, suggesting an intentional diversion from the staged event.

XII. Agents Signaling Before the "Shot" A video, which was later age-restricted, shows "CIA-looking dudes with earpieces directly behind Kirk on stage" making "elaborate arm and hand signs just before the shot".

These gestures are described as an obvious "go" signal, similar to signs coaches give to baseball players from the dugout.

XIII. Planted Crowd and Incitement of Division Indications suggest the crowd was planted, as they were chanting "kill Kirk" and similar things.

People were also planted to cheer afterwards, to make "liberals" look bad and further the goal of creating schism.

XIV. Strategic Location of the "Murder" in Orem, Utah The event took place in Orem, Utah, described as a "very spooky place" that is heavily Mormon and "philosemitic" (meaning they like Jews).

Utah Valley University (UVU), where the event occurred, is heavily promoted by the Kennedy Center and partners with Sundance, indicating potential intelligence ties.

XV. Implausible Shooter Profile and Evidence The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, was said to have ditched an engraved gun with "transgender and anti-fascist ideology" and left fingerprints, which is considered unbelievable.

A sniper savvy enough to take out Kirk with one shot would not ditch the gun and leave clues all over it.

XVI. Erika Kirk's Prescient Social Media Posts Charlie Kirk's wife, Erika, posted "some strange comments the day before in social media, that now seem prescient".

This practice is attributed to "the Phoenicians" (intelligence operatives) who "love to telegraph their events to eff with you further".

XVII. Patrick Bet-David's Narrative Control "Conservative podcaster" Patrick Bet-David, identified as Jewish, suggested on Fox that if a leftist figure is killed next, it would indicate a foreign nation trying to start a civil war.

This narrative is seen as an attempt to divert blame from internal agencies like the CIA or DHS.

XVIII. Suspicious Capture and Behavior of Tyler Robinson Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter, was reportedly caught by his own father after confessing and then allegedly went online to leave "chilling messages".

This behavior is highly improbable for someone on the most-wanted list and on the run from the law, who would not immediately get on a computer and start "yakking".

XIX. Inconsistencies in the Robinson Family's Background Public records for Tyler Robinson's father, Matt Robinson, show significant inconsistencies, including multiple ages, aliases like "Matt C. Devooght," and discrepancies in his relation to his wife Amber.

The computer records suggesting "Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson" further complicate the identity and raise questions about the information provided.

XX. Direct Familial Link Between "Shooter" and "Victim" A direct link was found between the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, and the victim, Charlie Kirk, through shared family names, specifically the Kisers/Kaisers.

Tyler Robinson is identified as likely being a "cousin of Charlie Kirk," which the author states "blows the cover of the whole thing".

Report: An Analysis of the Alleged Charlie Kirk Murder - A Staged Event

Date: September 13, 2025 (Based on source publication date) Prepared for: Inquisitive Public / Independent Researchers Prepared by: [AI Assistant, drawing on "The Murder of Charlie Kirk was of course STAGED" by Miles Mathis]

Executive Summary

This report presents a critical analysis of the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, asserting that the event was staged. Drawing on a "free internet research" methodology, the analysis identifies numerous inconsistencies, anomalies, and suspicious patterns across mainstream media narratives, biographical details, and public records. The core conclusion is that Kirk's "murder" is a fabricated event, part of a broader intelligence operation, potentially orchestrated with Kirk's knowledge and participation, to serve a larger geopolitical agenda, specifically to instigate a civil war and divert public attention.

Key findings supporting this assertion include:

• Staging Indicators: Suspicious timing, contradictions in mainstream reporting, immediate release of graphic "snuff films" with CGI and continuity problems, presence of apparent "agents" giving signals, and a seemingly "planted" crowd.

• Fabricated Identity: Charlie Kirk's rapid rise, lack of verifiable biographical details, and inconsistencies in public records suggest a constructed persona and potential intelligence connections.

• Interconnected Network: Key figures associated with Kirk, including his alleged wife Erika Kirk (nee Frantzve) and his political mentor Foster Friess, exhibit patterns consistent with intelligence ties, hidden Jewish heritage, and participation in orchestrated events.

• Shooter Linkages: The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, has familial connections to Charlie Kirk, suggesting a deep, pre-existing relationship that undermines the official narrative of a random act. Furthermore, the shooter's profile and actions, as reported, are highly implausible.

• Overarching Agenda: The event is framed as an acceleration of "Operation Chaos," a known intelligence program, designed to create societal division and prevent a "revolution" by turning the populace against itself.

The report urges a critical re-evaluation of current events, a rejection of mainstream narratives, and a call to recognize the ongoing manipulation of public perception.

1. Introduction & Background

On September 10, 2025, the alleged murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk unfolded, immediately drawing widespread media attention. This report posits that, contrary to the mainstream narrative, this event was not a genuine assassination but a meticulously staged operation. This opinion is based on "free internet research" accessible to anyone.

The alleged murder date, 9/10/2025, is numerically significant, echoing "9/11" through numerology, suggesting a deliberate symbolic choice. The assertion that this event was staged is presented as a "default assumption of any current event," given the pervasive influence of intelligence agencies over media. Decades ago, the CIA, through "Operation Mockingbird" and its successor, "Operation Chaos," reportedly gained complete control of all media, manufacturing daily news, including "multiple major tragedies each week". While these operations are often officially claimed to have ended, the source argues they have "expanded and accelerated". This alleged murder is presented as a prime example of such ongoing operations, serving to maintain control and manipulate public perception.

2. Key Finding 1: The Staging of the Event - Anomalies and Inconsistencies

The alleged murder of Charlie Kirk "screams fake from every pore". A detailed examination of the event's various facets reveals a consistent pattern of anomalies, implausibilities, and contradictory information, all pointing towards a staged narrative.

2.1 Suspicious Timing and Media Control

The timing of the alleged murder, 9/10/2025, is noted for its numerological connection to "9/11," suggesting a deliberate, symbolic orchestration. The immediate and widespread coverage of the event is attributed to the long-standing control of media by intelligence agencies. This control, initially established through "Operation Mockingbird" after Watergate, has reportedly evolved into "Operation Chaos," which actively "manufacture[s] all the news everyday". Even figures like Alex Jones, while promoting the event as real, reportedly admitted on his broadcast that "many on the ground in Utah said the murder looked staged," a contradictory stance that further highlights a managed narrative.

2.2 Pre-Event and Post-Event Discrepancies

Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika, reportedly posted "strange comments the day before in social media, that now seem prescient," a common tactic by those orchestrating such events to "telegraph their events". Following the alleged murder, former President Trump declared a national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast for Kirk. This level of honor is described as "disproportionate," comparing it to mourning "for Grover," given Kirk's relatively minor public role as a 31-year-old podcaster with no notable achievements or education. Such displays are characterized as "raw propaganda," akin to similar orders for flags at half-mast for alleged fake victims or military propaganda.

2.3 The "Snuff Film" and Video Inconsistencies

The immediate release of the video footage of Kirk's alleged death is described as a "snuff film," a practice previously "forbidden" and highly suspicious. The rapid dissemination of such graphic content is viewed as an "acceleration of Operation Chaos," designed to "obliterate" public sensibilities through a constant stream of "CGI snuff films". The films themselves are deemed unconvincing. Similar to "911 fake films," the filmer reportedly "pans away to the crowd or to his shoe tops" at critical moments, which is unnatural for a real person and suggests an attempt to hide details from close scrutiny. The footage is implied to be "citizen footage collected from some college students who just happened to be filming," but its low quality and distance prevent clear confirmation or non-confirmation, resembling films of mythical creatures. Specific details are critiqued: Kirk's face appeared "distorted after the hit," and his collapse was an unnatural "slouch to the left," rather than a realistic, immediate fall expected from a fatal neck shot, suggesting Kirk "didn't want to hurt himself in this acting".

2.4 Apparent "Agents" and "Go" Signals

Possibly the "most damning evidence" is a video on X (formerly Twitter) showing "a couple of big CIA-looking dudes with earpieces directly behind Kirk on stage, making a series of elaborate arm and hand signs just before the shot". These gestures are compared to coaching signals in baseball, explicitly identified as an "obviously a ‘go' signal". The fact that this video was subsequently "age restricted" further suggests a deliberate attempt to obscure evidence of staging.

2.5 Planted Crowd and Location Significance

Indications suggest the crowd itself was "planted," with individuals reportedly "chanting 'kill Kirk'" and cheering afterwards, intended to "make 'liberals' look bad". This behavior is interpreted as a pre-planned element of the staging. The location of the event, Orem, Utah, is deemed a "very spooky place" with significant ties to intelligence operations. Utah Valley University (UVU), where the event took place, began as an offshoot of Brigham Young University, experienced rapid growth, and has reportedly seen extensive CIA activity. UVU's theater program partnership with Sundance and promotion by the Kennedy Center are cited as "big red flag[s]". Orem and UVU are described as "heavily Mormon," with Mormons being "philosemitic" (liking Jews) because the Church of LDS was allegedly "founded by crypto-Jews" (Joseph Smith's mother, Lucy Mack, linked to Jewish Macks). This connection is considered "no coincidence," and is further linked to the Sandy Hook event, where Robbie Parker was also from Orem, UT.

3. Key Finding 2: Charlie Kirk's Background - A Fabricated Persona?

Charlie Kirk's public persona and biographical details exhibit significant inconsistencies and omissions, leading to the conclusion that he is likely a fabricated or deeply embedded asset within intelligence operations.

3.1 Unprecedented Rise and Lack of Qualifications

Kirk's emergence "out of nowhere at age 18 to found Turning Point USA (TPUSA)" is highlighted as highly improbable. Founding such a "big organization" requires "huge money and promotion," which an 18-year-old with "zero qualifications" would not possess. This suggests he was "just a front for Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery". The source warns that "no one but agents founds big organizations like this at age 18" and that "billionaires like Friess do not start organizations to help you, they start organizations to help themselves". This rapid, facilitated ascent strongly implies a manufactured career trajectory.

3.2 Scrubbed Biographical Information and Alias Hypothesis

Wikipedia "conspicuously fails to name his parents," a significant "red flag". While his father is identified as an architect, the source suspects "Intel connections in the family". Public record searches for "Charles/Charlie James Kirk of Chicago, age 31," yield "no results" from Radaris, suggesting the name "may be a fake". The possibility that he chose this alias in honor of "James T. Kirk, Starship Enterprise" is raised. Instantcheckmate also returns "no results" for Charles/Charlie J. Kirk from Arizona or Chicago, though it finds a Charles Kirk, 31, with locations in Floyd's Knob, IN, Lakeside, MI, and Chicago, and relatives Chris, Evelyn, and Hilbre Kirk, and Carey Griffin. The lack of a definitive match from prominent public record databases for a public figure of his alleged prominence is considered highly unusual.

3.3 Parental Background Discrepancies

Further investigation into his alleged parents, Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk, as named by Distractify, reveals more inconsistencies. These names do not appear on Charlie's relative list in Instantcheckmate, Intelius, or Radaris. While a Robert Kelly Kirk, 53 and 76, related to a Kimberly Kirk in Dayton and Blacklick, Ohio, is found, "no Charles/Charlie is on his list". None of the other Kirks on Charlie's initial list (Chris, Evelyn, Hilbre) are on his father's list, which is deemed "very strange". The Kimberly Kirk related to these individuals is 52 and from Ohio, with "no locations in or near Chicago," where Charlie allegedly attended high school. Her middle initial is 'K,' not 'A,' and she has lived in Yucca Valley, CA, and Brunswick, ME. A search for Kimberly Kirk of Chicago, where Charlie would have lived during high school, also yields "nothing at Radaris". Instantcheckmate suggests two possibilities in Grayslake, IL, ages 61 or 63, one related to Hellers. However, "neither Kimberly Kirk of Chicago has a Robert or a Charles/Charlie on her list". The only Kim Kirk with a Robert on her list in Chicago is 74, "too old to be Charlie's mother". These discrepancies lead to the speculation that "if Charlie is a Kirk at all, my guess is Charlie's mother's maiden name is Heller".

3.4 Indicators of Jewish Heritage

Several elements suggest a hidden Jewish heritage for Charlie Kirk. The name "Hilbre Kirk" (a potential sibling) is noted as sounding "Jewish". This Hilbre links to James Aughenbaugh, who is also known as James Kirk, 66, and is hypothesized to be Charlie's father, making "Aughenbaugh" his real last name. The Aughenbaugh name is identified as "indeed Jewish," with examples like "Charlie Aughenbaugh at LinkedIn, a driver for Jewish Family Services" and the "Aughenbaugh page at Wikitree, filled with Jewish names". Furthermore, George Stanley Aughenbaugh, linked to the family, connects to "Hartmans and Hildebrands, also Moravians," which may link to Foster Friess. Regarding other family members, Zachary Kirk, a relative, is mentioned, and his first name is said to "confirm the Jewish question, since no Gentiles are naming their children Zachary". These numerous connections to Jewish names and backgrounds, often obscured or not explicitly stated in mainstream biographies, are presented as strong indicators of a hidden identity.

4. Key Finding 3: The Network - Interconnected Figures and Hidden Agendas

The investigation reveals a tightly interconnected network of individuals around Charlie Kirk, whose backgrounds and relationships strongly suggest a coordinated agenda and a hidden, often Jewish, heritage. These connections challenge the authenticity of their public personas and the events they are associated with.

4.1 Foster Friess - The Architect of Influence

Foster Friess, identified as a key figure behind TPUSA, is central to this network. He is described as an "Army Intelligence officer, multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and crypto-Jew". Despite his public image as a "Christian crusader" or "cowboy" from Wisconsin, Friess was reportedly "groomed by the Brittinghams in Delaware to be an investment banker". The Brittinghams, billionaires from Wisconsin lumber and later banking, are said to have had their Wikipedia page "scrubbed". Friess openly admitted to moving to Jackson Hole to avoid income taxes. His philanthropy towards "Christian causes" is dismissed as a facade, as these causes are themselves described as "not really Christian, either, they just pose as Christian". This infiltration of Christian organizations and purposeful "blackwashing" is viewed as a common tactic, even extending to the Vatican and Protestant denominations, dating back to Luther, to "explode Christianity" and "create schism on purpose". Friess's true agenda is identified as that of a "crusading fascist". He notably helped block the recall of Governor Scott Walker, who "obliterated the unions in Wisconsin" and "trashed the economy," with David Koch also involved. The name "Friess" itself is identified as "Jewish". Public polls asking if he was Jewish showed "over 88% said they thought he was," despite mainstream sources claiming otherwise. This public perception, coupled with his background as a "billionaire banker/money manager" and "heavily promoted" but antithetical "philanthropist and humanitarian," solidified the assessment of his crypto-Jewish identity. Variants of the name, like "Fries" and "DeVries," are also traced to Jewish or crypto-Jewish families, including connections to the Moravian Church and the Dutch East/West India Company.

4.2 Erika Kirk (nee Frantzve) - The "Jewish Cousin" Connection

Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Lane Kirk (nee Frantzve), is also identified as "Jewish," despite being sold as "Catholic". Her Wikipedia page also "no mention of her parents," another "red flag". Public record searches for Erika are also problematic; she is not listed as a relative on Charlie's Instantcheckmate page, which is considered unusual for a spouse. Her middle initial is inconsistent, appearing as 'R' instead of 'J'. The name "Frantzve" itself may be a fake, possibly a variant of "Frantzen," which is "Jewish". Crucially, Erika's Radaris listing links her to Charlynn Frantzve, who is related to Brittany Heller, age 34. The name "Heller" is immediately flagged as "known to be Jewish," a variation of "Hildesheim," and notably linked to "Hitler was really a Hiller/Heller". Brittany Heller's Radaris page reveals a constellation of surnames – Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and Braun – all identified as "Jewish". The presence of "Braun" (as in Eva Braun) directly reinforces the "Heller/Hiller/Hitler connection". Furthermore, through the Hoeppners, there are links to the Lyons (connecting to the King of England, a Bowes-Lyon). These Brauns also link to Winter Park, FL, a location that previously appeared in connection with the Aughenbaughs (Charlie's possible real family name), leading to the conclusion that Charlie "married a Jewish cousin," which is described as "par for the course". Photographic evidence from their alleged wedding shows a background that appears to be Jerusalem, an "strange place for people who aren't Jewish to get married". An accompanying subtext, "Charlie Kirk and his wife begin keeping the Sabbath," further reinforces the assertion of their Jewish identity, as "Christians keep the Sabbath, or Jews?".

4.3 The Shooter (Tyler Robinson) - A Familial Link to the Victim

The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is discovered to have a direct familial connection to Charlie Kirk, blowing "the cover of the whole thing". Charlie Kirk's sister, Alexandria Kirk, is linked to Angel Kisor (also Kiser/Kizer/Kaiser), who is identified as "Jewish". This Kisor family is then linked to one of the Thomas Robinsons (a deceased member of the Robinson family from Saint George), who is related to "Kisers of Kansas City, MO, and Leavenworth". This establishes a direct genealogical connection between the "shooter and victim" through shared Jewish family lines. The shooter's father, Matt Robinson, is presented with inconsistent biographical details. Initially described as working "construction," a subtext to a photo later reveals him to be a "law enforcement veteran". The Daily Mail also claims the Robinsons own a "granite countertop business," creating "three things they have told us about that in the same series of articles," highlighting a "big continuity problem". Matt Robinson's public records are also muddled, with "Amber Robinson" (Tyler's mother) appearing on searches for Matt "as if it is another name for him," raising the possibility of a "tranny thing". Amber also has locations in Delaware, indicating "outside influence" and linking back to Foster Friess's origins with the Brittinghams in Delaware. Matt Robinson is also linked to the "Devooghts" (an alias), with an Albert Devooght in Findlay, OH, near the Kirks' Ohio origins. Jessica Devooght links to the Berrys, who also appear in Delaware connections and Ohio. The rapid capture and reporting of the shooter, Tyler Robinson, also raise suspicions. He was allegedly caught by his own father after confessing. The narrative claims he "went online after the event and left 'chilling messages'," an improbable action for a "most-wanted" fugitive. The writer of the "who is Robinson" article in the Daily Mail is identified as "Shawn Cohen," a name flagged as Jewish, suggesting another layer of narrative control. The alleged gun, an "old bolt-action Mauser 30.06," is said to have been "ditched in a field" after being "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology". This level of detail on the gun, combined with the claim of "fingerprints or palm prints," is deemed "not believable" and "scriptwriters with too much time on their hands". The idea that a savvy sniper would ditch such a weapon so carelessly is dismissed, as is the implausibility of the rifle being "broken down" for concealment. The absence of the rifle in video footage of Robinson "coming in or out on the day" further highlights continuity issues.

5. Conclusion: The Larger Agenda - Operation Chaos and Civil War

The alleged murder of Charlie Kirk is not an isolated incident but rather a component of a larger, ongoing operation designed to manipulate public sentiment and achieve specific geopolitical goals. The consistent pattern of fabricated details, interconnected actors, and strategic narrative control points to a sophisticated campaign orchestrated by intelligence agencies.

5.1 Acceleration of Operation Chaos

The event is characterized as a visible "acceleration of Operation Chaos," where the responsible agencies have decided that a constant stream of "CGI snuff films" and manufactured tragedies will be the new norm to "obliterate your remaining sensibilities". This tactic is aimed at desensitizing the public and further embedding the fabricated reality within the collective consciousness.

5.2 Instigating a Civil War to Divert Attention

The primary motivation behind such staged events is to "start a civil war between red and blue, left and right," as a means to "take pressure off themselves". From the perspective of these orchestrators, a "civil war is much preferable to a revolution, since in a revolution they would be the targets, while in a civil war they can keep you targeting one another". The narrative, including the "engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology" on the alleged shooter's gun, and the immediate focus on the shooter's voting history, are designed to "divide you" and fuel partisan conflict. Similarly, "conservative podcaster" Patrick Bet-David, identified as "Jewish," advanced a narrative that if a left-wing figure were killed, it would indicate a "foreign nation" trying to start a civil war, deflecting blame from the CIA or DHS. This is presented as a "smokescreen" to manipulate public opinion and push for internal conflict.

5.3 Call for Awareness and Resistance

The report implicitly calls for a fundamental shift in how individuals perceive and engage with current events. It urges the public to:

• Question everything: "It should be the default assumption of any current event" that it is staged.

• Mistrust mainstream narratives: "You just trusted these completely untrustworthy people". Recognize that "just because these people are promoted on TV and Youtube doesn't mean anyone watches them or believes them".

• Identify propaganda: Be aware of emotional manipulation, disproportionate displays of mourning, and inconsistent reporting.

• Resist engineered conflict: The attempt to spark a civil war is identified, but the public is urged, "you don't have to play along. If they start a war, don't show up for it".

• Focus on true targets: Instead of an internal civil war, the true objective should be "a revolution against these hoaxers and thieves" who are orchestrating these events.

The "murder" of Charlie Kirk, therefore, is not an act of violence but a theatrical production, a calculated maneuver within a much larger, ongoing campaign of deception and control aimed at shaping societal dynamics and diverting attention from the true orchestrators. The detailed analysis of inconsistencies in the narrative, the backgrounds of the individuals involved, and the explicit linkages between the "victim" and "shooter" all reinforce the assertion that this event was a staged operation, executed with the knowledge and participation of its central figures, to serve a predefined agenda.

The Murder of Charlie Kirk was of course STAGED by Miles Mathis
The Murder of Charlie Kirk was of course STAGED

by Miles Mathis

First published September 11, 2025 Just my opinion as usual based on free internet research anyone could do

[Within two hours this paper went to the front page at Yandex on a search for Charlie Kirk Murder Staged. Google is of course censoring it.]

Note the date, to begin with. The alleged murder was 9/10/2025, which is the same as a matter of numerology as 9/11, both being ones and nines. Why not ones and eights this time? I don't know. I guess they felt they had overused that.

How am I one of very few saying this was staged? It should be the default assumption of any current event. [Actually, Alex Jones admitted in his broadcast today that many on the ground in Utah said the murder looked staged, even while he was selling the event as real. Kinda weird. It's not really advisable to say the event was staged while you are selling it as real, though it does help me here.]

The Intel agencies took over the media decades ago. All media had been managed from the founding of the country, see my paper on Ben Franklin, but after Watergate the CIA took over all media completely in what has been called Operation Mockingbird. They now manufacture all the news everyday, including multiple major tragedies each week, as part of Operation Chaos. Not a conspiracy theory, they admit it, see Wikipedia, which has a page on it and Operation Cointelpro, which merged in the 1960s. They pretend these operations and projects ended at some point, but of course they didn't, they just expanded and accelerated. Just look around you: do you really believe Operation Chaos ended?

This current event screams fake from every pore. We will start with Kirk's bio, which I guess few people know. He came out of nowhere at age 18 to found Turning Point USA, TPUSA, which I have always called Toilet Paper USA. As such he was just a front for Foster Friess and Bill Montgomery. No one but agents founds big organizations like this at age 18. It takes huge money and promotion, so

you should have been suspicious from the start. Billionaires like Friess do not start organizations to help you, they start organizations to help themselves, so always remember that. And good guys do not go to work for billionaires at age 18, with zero qualifications. Once again, if you bought any of this it is because you forgot to ask any questions. You just trusted these completely untrustworthy people. When are you going to stop doing that?

Foster Friess was an Army Intelligence officer, multi-billionaire banker/money manager, and crypto-Jew, so our work is already done.

Yeah, he tried to sell himself as a cowboy, though he was from Wisconsin, a Chi Phi fratboy. He admitted he moved to Jackson Hole to avoid income taxes. Charming. He was groomed by the Brittinghams in Delaware to be an investment banker—the opposite of a cowboy—the Brittinghams being billionaires from lumber in Wisconsin. Wikipedia has scrubbed them completely, but Thomas Brittingham was once the richest man in that area. The family later got into banking and other forms of theft, as such people do. Friess was not a Christian crusader, he just used the issue to cloak the fact he was a crusading fascist. One of the most memorable things Friess did is help block the recall of governor Scott Walker. You remember him, right? The guy who obliterated the unions in Wisconsin and trashed the economy for his raiding backers like Friess, then stole the recall election. David Koch was another billionaire creep behind Walker.

You will say Friess was a supporter of Christian causes, so I send you first here, Jewscope, which repeats that mainstream talking point—that Friess was Christian—but then publishes a poll, kind of like the ones you see on sites asking if you think a certain celebrity is gay. The poll is, do you think Foster Friess is Jewish? As you see, over 88% said they thought he was. Why would they think that when every online source says he isn't, and when he gave money to all these Christian causes? Well, maybe because people aren't as stupid and gullible as you are led to believe by reading the mainstream press. Plus, Friess is a Jewish name, so it isn't that difficult. Plus, he was a billionaire banker/money manager, so again, it isn't that difficult. Plus, he was heavily promoted, as a great philanthropist and humanitarian, when he was just the opposite, so it isn't that difficult.

You will ask me, “But he did give money to these causes, as you admit, so why would he do that if he weren't a Christian?” Well, because those causes aren't really Christian, either, they just pose as

Christian. We have seen it thousands of times, as these people infiltrate Christian organizations and turn them to crud on purpose. I call it blackwashing. They have even done it to the Vatican, infiltrating it many times with their own agents, even as high as the Pope himself. See the Medici Popes, who were Jewish, or see the current Pope. The Jesuits are also Jewish, and Disraeli and other Jews have admitted it in print. In the US they have mainly infiltrated Protestant denominations, since that is the majority here. They built Protestantism from the ground up back in the time of Luther, to purposely explode Christianity. They infiltrate and create schism on purpose, which is the point of the current event as well. They are trying to start a civil war between red and blue, left and right, to take pressure off themselves. From their standpoint, a civil war is much preferable to a revolution, since in a revolution they would be the targets, while in a civil war they can keep you targeting one another. It's very simple, as you see.

But back to the name Friess being Jewish. See for example Constance Friess Holman, of the wealthy New York Friess clan. She was the personal physician of Georgia O'Keeffe, Jewish, and her brother Horace married the daughter of Felix Adler, Jewish. Constance was put through medical school by Adolph Ochs, the Jewish publisher of the New York Times. Friess is a variant of the more common Fries, so also search on that surname, where everyone is Jewish or crypto-Jewish. For example billionaire industrialist Francis Henry Fries, whose family came from Saxony as part of the Moravian Church. We have hit that many times. See Jan Hus, etc. Also see the DeVries family from Holland, big in the Dutch East/West India Company. Fries/Friess is a variant of DeVries. All Jewish.

I would assume Charlie Kirk is also Jewish, since Wikipedia conspicuously fails to name his parents. We are told his father is an architect, but I would assume he has Intel connections in the family. Radaris returns no results for a Charles/Charlie James Kirk of Chicago, age 31, telling me the name may be a fake. Maybe he chose this alias in honor of James T. Kirk, Starship Enterprise.

Instantcheckmate returns no results for Charles/Charlie J. Kirk of Arizona or Chicago, but it does return a result for a Charles Kirk, 31, with locations in Floyd's Knob, IN, and Lakeside, MI, as well as Chicago, and relatives Chris, Evelyn, and Hilbre Kirk, and Carey Griffin. Three matches there, with the name, age, and location, though this still may not be the right guy. But if this is not him, the big computer has never heard of him, something we have found with many other famous people, including Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Hilbre Kirk sounds Jewish, doesn't it? Hilbre, 34, may be a sibling, and he links us to James Aughenbaugh. He is aka James Kirk, 66, so this may be Kirk's father, and Charlie's real last name may be Aughenbaugh. These Aughenbaughs come from Massapequa, NY, and James links us to Norma Aughenbaugh, 73 or 79, also of Phoenix, MD. Why doesn't that surprise me? She has a LinkedIN page, so isn't dead, but we do link her through Winter Park, FL, to former Air Force Staff Sergeant George Stanley Aughenbaugh, who has a Findagrave page. He links us to Hartmans and Hildebrands, also Moravians, so that may be one of the links to Foster Friess. A search on the name Aughenbaugh finds it is indeed Jewish, see for example Charlie Aughenbaugh at LinkenIN, a driver for Jewish Family Services. Also see the Aughenbaugh page at Wikitree, filled with Jewish names.

I was able to confirm from other places that James Kirk is also James Aughenbaugh, though I couldn't find out why this guy has two different last names.

Distractify tells us Charlie's parents are Robert K. Kirk and Kimberly Ann Kirk, so again, why don't they come up on his relatives list at Instantcheckmate, Intelius, or Radaris? I guess that is why they are called Distractify. Instantcheckmate pulls up no one named Robert K. Kirk from Chicago related to a

Charles/Charlie. Finally, we do find him, twice, Robert Kelly Kirk, 53 and 76, related to a Kimberly Kirk in Dayton and Blacklick, Ohio, but no Charles/Charlie is on his list. None of the other Kirks on Charlie's list above are on his father's list, either, which is very strange. We get seven new Kirks, but not Chris, Evelyn, or Hilbre.

So let's follow some of these new Kirks in Robert Kelly Kirk's family. We find Alexandria Kirk, 25, related to Angel Kisor. That's same as Kiser/Kizer/Kaiser, and is Jewish. We find Zachary Kirk, scrubbed of all info, but his first name confirms the Jewish question, since no Gentiles are naming their children Zachary. We find Angelica Kirk, 51, and she is finally related to a Charles Kirk. So let's search on Charles Kirk of Ohio instead of Illinois. Nope, still no one 31 or close. The only other location Angelica has is Missouri, so let's try that. Again, no luck. Taking this new info back to Radaris still doesn't get us anywhere, either. The computer suggests Alexander Charles Kirk of Ogden, UT, but he is related to the wrong people. So let's return to the relatives of Robert Kelly Kirk of Ohio. We also find Allison Kirk, 21, linking us to Craycrafts. Next we find Steven Kirk, 50, of Galloway, who links us to a Scott Cassady. Finally, we find a Laura Kirk, 76, of Blacklick, OH, and Nacogdoches, TX.

One thing we got out of that is that the Kimberly Kirk related to these people is 52 and from Ohio, with no locations in or near Chicago. Her middle initial is K, not A, and she has also lived in Yucca Valley, CA, and Brunswick, ME. So who was Charlie living with in highschool? Neither of his parents are from Chicago.

To double-check that, now let's do a search on Kimberly Kirk of Chicago. Charlie allegedly went to highschool in Chicago (Wheeling), so he must have been living with one of his parents. Again, nothing at Radaris, which is curious. They are usually the most trustworthy, since they seem the least edited by Intel. We find her possibly listed twice at Instantcheckmate, from Grayslake, IL, ages 61 or 63, the second one related to Hellers. See below, where we find Charlie's wife Erika Frantzve is also related to Hellers, telling us this may be her, rather than the one in Ohio. But again, neither Kimberly Kirk of Chicago has a Robert or a Charles/Charlie on her list. The only Kim Kirk who has a Robert on her list in Chicago is 74, too old to be Charlie's mother. So if Charlie is a Kirk at all, my guess is Charlie's mother's maiden name is Heller, and I am about to remind you why they would wish to scrub it, if you don't already know.

Charlie Kirk's alleged wife, Erika Lane Kirk, is nee Frantzve, which is also Jewish, though they sell her as Catholic. Also no mention of her parents on her Wiki page, which is a red flag. You may have noticed that Erika is not on Charlie's Instantcheckmate page. Why not? His first relative should be his wife. Let's see what Intelius has to say about it. Also no link to an Erika Kirk or Frantzve, but they list him as middle initial R. not J. Same for Instantcheckmate, which I didn't notice the first time lists him as Charles R. Anyway, Frantzve may also be a fake name, since I find no results for it other than Erika and family. More likely it is Frantzen, or a variant of it, Jewish.

Prepare yourself for the next thing. Erika has a listing at Radaris, where she is related to Charlynn Frantzve, who is related to . . . Brittany Heller, age 34, of Longview, WA. I remind you that Hitler was really a Hiller/Heller, and that the name is known to be Jewish, a variation of Hildesheim. You will say I am way out on a limb, so let's look more closely at Brittany's Radaris page. This is public information, BTW, so I am not doxxing anyone or doing anything illegal.

Wow. Collate those surnames: Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and . . . Braun. As in Eva Braun. All Jewish, and of course Braun points us at the Heller/Hiller/Hitler connection again. The odds are astronomically against that being a coincidence. Through the Hoeppners, we link to the Lyons. I remind you that the King of England is a Bowes-Lyon. These Brauns also link us to Winter Park, FL, which I remind you already came up in the paper through the Aughenbaughs, indicating Charlie married a Jewish cousin. That would be par for the course.

So, to sum up on the people search, Charlie Kirk has been pretty well scrubbed by someone, not appearing as we would expect from his mainstream bios. His parents seem to be listed, but they are from Ohio, not Chicago, and don't link us to him. The other Charlie Kirk/Aughenbaugh I found may not be him, but even if it isn't it tells us a lot about the Kirks of that area, and the name Kirk. Finding Charlie's wife related to Hellers, and finding a Kimberly Kirk of Chicago also related to Hellers, is a gem even if that Kim Kirk isn't his mother. It is so unlikely as a matter of odds, it must be telling us something.

Which brings us back to the lovely photo under title. I have let it steep in your brain for a while.

It is tagged as a photo from their wedding. At first I thought they got married in a construction site, but then I looked closer. That's Jerusalem in the background, isn't it? Strange place for people who aren't Jewish to get married. You will say they are just that religious, but other explanations come to mind.

Next I found that one, with the subtext “Charlie Kirk and his wife begin keeping the Sabbath”. Do Christians keep the Sabbath, or Jews?

Then we come to Kirk being a buddy of Trump, who has had two staged assassination attempts already. Trump, who just declared a national day of mourning and a week of flags at half-mast in

honor of Kirk. Really? For Charlie Kirk? That's like flags at half-mast for Grover. I remind you, even if you liked Kirk, he was not Einstein or Mother Teresa. He was a 31-year-old kid who was a podcaster and never did anything memorable other than yap, like thousands of other self-appointed pundits. He had no education and was not even self-educated, just reading straight from scripts or teleprompters. So flags at half-mast for this guy makes no sense. It reminds us of governors like Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan ordering flags at half mast for the fake victims in Allen, TX, in 2023. It's just raw propaganda. Flags were already at half mast yesterday in Wisconsin, due to governor Tony Evers ordering it to honor the bones of Leon Karwacki, a WWII casualty whose remains were allegedly just returned to the States. Military propaganda and emotionalism. Governor Roy Cooper of North Carolina ordered flags at half-mast in 2020 for the fake death of George Floyd. Flags at half-mast used to be reserved for dead Presidents, House Speakers, and people like that, but they now do it every time someone's goldfish dies . . . or fakes his death.

Next we come to the video, which is as fishy as everything else. To start with, it is a snuff film, so why are these things being released same day? That used to be forbidden. Shouldn't the family be notified before the world watches a quart of blood squirt from his neck? It is CGI, but still. You should be very suspicious. Do you want your kids watching this? What is stopping them? You shouldn't be watching it, either, since it is traumatizing, but of course that is the whole point. It is the visible acceleration of Operation Chaos, and the CIA/DHS or whoever has decided that is the way it is going to be from now on. Your remaining sensibilities are going to be obliterated by a constant stream of CGI snuff films, as all your fake heroes have their heads explode. If you choose not to click on them, they will come to your house personally and project them on your walls and ceilings.

Even so, the films aren't convincing at all. As with the 911 fake films, the filmer pans away to the crowd or to his shoe tops when no real person would do that. Why? Because they don't want you looking too closely at all this. They want to whack you hard in the face and then pan away before you can figure out it is fake. They have obviously planted a bunch of agents in the crowd with cellphones, to make you think this is citizen footage collected from some college students who just happened to be filming, but they are conveniently too far away and of too low quality to confirm or nonconfirm, like films of Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster. That said, I would say the films nonconfirm, since Kirk's face looks distorted after the hit and a person shot like that wouldn't just slouch to the left in his chair, he would collapse like a deer shot in the neck, falling out of the chair hard immediately. But of course Kirk didn't want to hurt himself in this acting, so they had to cut away.

But possibly the most damning evidence is the video at X of agents behind Kirk, which wasn't age restricted yesterday but is now. Funny, Kirk having a quart of blood squirt from his neck isn't age restricted, but clear evidence it was faked now is. In case you can't sign in there, I will tell you what it is. It is a couple of big CIA-looking dudes with earpieces directly behind Kirk on stage, making a series of elaborate arm and hand signs just before the shot. You know the signs that coaches give to baseball players from the dugout, like “bunt”? Very much like that. One guy pulls on his ear and slides his hand across his cap. The other makes very large gestures with his arms, which are obviously a “go” signal. If it gets memoryholed I have instructed one of my readers to save it, which he has.

Today we are getting lots of indication the crowd was planted, since they were chanting “kill Kirk”, and things like that. Kirk just happened to be answering a question about shooting when he was shot. Alex Jones has admitted it, though he is spinning it as Kirk being killed by the deep state. It is far more logical to read it as what it was, staged. Not as in staged without the knowledge of Kirk, but as in staged WITH the knowledge and participation of Kirk, who faked his death to go deeper into Intelligence. They also planted people to cheer afterwards, to make “liberals” look bad. Remember,

this took place in Orem, Utah, a very spooky place. This Utah Valley University started out as an offshoot of Brigham Young in Provo, but later moved to Orem. It didn't become a university until 2008. It grew like wildfire and now has about 46,00 students, the largest in Utah. As with other universities, the CIA has been very busy there. UVU's theater program partners with Sundance, a big red flag. It is heavily promoted by the Kennedy Center, ditto.

Orem and UVU are heavily Mormon, I remind you, and the Mormons are philosemitic, meaning they like Jews. Why? Because LDS was founded by crypto-Jews. Joseph's Smith's mother was Lucy Mack, and the Macks were and are Jews. They still run Las Vegas, as we saw here. So it is no coincidence this event was run in Orem. If you will remember, the Robbie Parker from the Sandy Hook event was also from Orem, UT. Also not a coincidence.

You also wouldn't expect Kirk to be sniped with a 30-06 from 200 yards on a rooftop. In the remote event this had been real, you would expect some nut in the crowed with a pistol. As with Trump's fake assassination, apparently the shooter was visible to some in the crowd, who pointed at him and cried out, again indicating staging, since it would mean Kirk's security was blind and deaf.

They are now claiming to have found the gun and extra ammo, “engraved with transgender and anti-fascist ideology”, which the shooter ditched. That would never happen. A sniper savvy enough to take out Kirk with one shot would not ditch the gun and leave clues all over it. It would be so easy not to. Haven't you seen Leon: the Professional? C'mon! Plus, the engraving BS is right out of Langley or Hollywood. We saw the same thing in the recent Minnesota shooting, but nobody does that. This is scriptwriters with too much time on their hands. They must be charging by the hour. He also left fingerprints or palm prints, which is not believable. He had never heard of gloves? Why not just leave a forwarding address? You know they will find the guy and the story will go even more off the rails. I don't know why they bother.

Kirk's wife Erika posted some strange comments the day before in social media, that now seem prescient. This is also par for the course, since the Phoenicians love to telegraph their events to eff with you further.

To continue the hilarity, “conservative podcaster” Patrick Bet-David said in a Fox interview that if a figure on the left is killed in the next week, it will be indication a foreign nation was trying to start a civil war in the US. Yeah, right. A foreign nation, not the CIA or DHS. And of course Bet-David is Jewish. Why does anyone listen to these people? Or do they? Remember, just because these people are promoted on TV and Youtube doesn't mean anyone watches them or believes them. Their numbers are fake and you don't have to be popular to be hired by Fox or any other channel. They want you to believe these people are important and that your neighbors are following them, but I don't buy it. It is all the usual smokescreen. They are trying to spark a civil war, but you don't have to play along. If they start a war, don't show up for it. Don't believe anything these people tell you, about anything. It isn't time for a civil war against your neighbors, it is time for a revolution against these hoaxers and thieves.

Friday: Yep, they already caught the guy, Tyler Robinson, and he allegedly went online after the event and left “chilling messages”. Makes sense, right? If you are #1 on the most-wanted list, on run from the law, the first thing you want to do is get on a computer and start yakking. I did a search and the first thing that came up was this “who is Robinson” article at the Daily Mail . Guess who the writer is? Go on, you only need one guess. Shawn Cohen. As I say, you could win bets going in.

Robinson was caught by his own father, to whom he had just confessed. They have released video of Robinson leaving the scene, with an American flag and eagle on his black longsleeved shirt. Also wearing a cap and sunglasses. I guess this genius hadn't heard of a balaclava and not wearing clothes with distinguishing logos. We are told where his mother works, but are told his father Matt Robinson of Washington, UT, “works construction”. That's pretty vague, isn't it. Can't research that, can we? No, but we can do a people search on Matt Robinson. We find him, but he isn't related to his wife Amber and he isn't on her list either. Tyler isn't on her list. Even weirder is that Amber comes up on the search for Matt, as if it is another name for him:

The computer thinks Amber Robinson IS Matthew Robinson. So do we have some sort of tranny thing here? Have they published a picture of the father yet? Notice that Amber is the same age, 48, as the Matt Robinson in Beaver. The jokes write themselves. Also notice that Amber has locations in Delaware as well as Utah, indicating outside influence here. We saw above that Foster Friess got his start with the Brittinghams in Delaware. Also notice that all three Matts seem to be the same person, despite having three different ages. They all have Saint George on their locations. Radaris lists the one that is 48 as Matthew C. instead of Matthew Noal, and does not place him in Beaver, making the mystery even larger. And the name is Noel, not Noal.

Radaris tells us that Amber Dawn Robinson is 44, not 48, and does link her to Matthew Robinson. But Instantcheckmate does not confirm that, having no Amber Robinson of that age or related to Matthew. Intelius also does not confirm that. Even Truthfinder, which links out from that very page at Radaris, does not confirm it, with all Amber Robinsons being 48 not 44 and none being linked to Matthew. You click on the listing at Radaris which says “view all details” for Amber Robinson, 44, but are taken to the Amber Robinson, 48, we saw above. Intelius, Instantcheckmate, and Truthfinder all seem to come from the same place now, since they are identical and have the same form and page format. So the CIA

scrubbers seem to be moving slowly this week.

Radaris tells us this Matt C. Robinson, 48, is aka Matt C. Devooght. Why would he need an alias, as a construction worker?

Amber has Thomas Robinson on her list four times, but he has been scrubbed from the other listings, so he might be important. So let's look him up. Yep, one of these four of Saint George, deceased, is related to Kisers of Kansas City, MO, and Leavenworth. Do you remember where we saw them above? Charlie Kirk's sister Alexandria is related to Angel/Angela Kisor/Bridges, 48, of Ironton, OH, and Tallahassee, FL. That's according to Truthfinder. Unfortunately, this Angel Kisor also appears to be an agent with multiple listings, and Radaris has no record of her in Ironton, though it links to Truthfinder. Instead, the best result they return is Angel Kisor, aka Kiser/Kaiser and Prater, 52, of Hamden and Wellston, OH, and she is also related to Prater, Rhodes, and Staley/Stanley. That fits here, doesn't it? Both the Kisers and Kirks are from the area of Ohio south of Columbus.

What this means of course is that I have found a link between the shooter and victim. This Tyler Robinson looks like a cousin of Charlie Kirk, which of course blows the cover of the whole thing.

Clicking on that Robinson Kiser, 47, takes us to this at Radaris:

aka Robinson Melissa Kiser, Todd Robinson Kiser, Rt Kiser, Robersen T Kiser, Kiser T Robinson, Todd Kisser Robinson

But though he is not definitely a woman there, he is definitely a Kiser, since his relatives are four

Kisers. Radaris says he has a LinkedIN page under Robinson Kiser, so let's go there. They have no listing for him in Kansas City, but they do have a Robinson K. that the computer seems to think is him, a dentist in Leavenworth. So he has scrubbed his listing, possibly due to this current event. He is related to the Kisers of Manti, UT, and I clicked on all of them looking for further links to Kirk. I drew a blank until I clicked on Ben Catlin on Melissa Kiser's page. He links to Candice Hancock, who links to Patricia Berry of Delaware. See below where the Devooghts link us to Berrys in Ohio, and of course we have already linked to Delaware many times.

Let's also follow up on that Matt Devooght thing, which I did manage to grab before they deleted it, as you see above. Instantcheckmate doesn't list him in UT or as aka Robinson, instead listing him in Fairborn, OH, and Jersey City, NJ, only related to other Devooghts. However, the Fairborn, OH, listing may be confirming, since that is near Dayton, and the Kirks are from that area as well. He links us first to an Albert Devooght, 74, of Findlay, OH, and Marana, AZ. Finally, Jessica Devooght of this family links us to another name, the Berrys, including Chase Berry, who links us to a Morgan Chase Erwin. Starting to sound interesting, eh? Chase's father Brice Berry links us to Dillingers. Am I off on a tangent? Maybe, maybe not. The previous hit on Berrys in Utah indicates not.

But let's return and click on some of those other names, like Janae Quilter. There can't be too many of those. She is 53 and works at the private airport in Heber City, UT, as the front desk manager. This is where the Lear jets come in, so it may be a clue.

As a nod to fairness, let's click on some of the Robinsons given us in the listing of Amber, 44, at Radaris who is related to Matthew. They also link us to Quilters, proving the listing for Matthew Robinson aka Devooght is the right one. Devooght could still be a computer error, but we now have confirmation Tyler Robinson's father is the Matt Robinson, 48, not 59. So those listings at Radaris and Instantcheckmate should link us to Amber, his wife, but do not. Instead, they link us to a Misty Jean Robinson, 49, who is sharing a POBox in Beaver with Matthew, 48. The Daily Mail gives us no indication Matt and Amber are separated and living in separate towns, though the computer does.

Finally I went back to the article at the Daily Mail, and lo and behold, after having told us Matt works construction, they admit he is a law enforcement veteran in the subtext to a photo. What, retired at 48, is he? And we could have guessed he was military or a cop.

They also have an article about Tyler Robinson's voting history. Really, at age 22, just two days out from the event? According to my math, his voting history would be one election, the last one, and I am guessing he didn't vote for Trump. Not much of an article, but it tells you they are in a rush to divide you.

Erika made a 15-minute speech today after watching her husband have his neck blown off less than 48 hours ago. These people are shameless, as we know. She even took time to plug the Oregon Ducks. If you aren't sick you don't have a stomach. I guess the GoFundMe page is next.

Next the Daily Mail tells us the Robinsons own a granite countertop business. OK, that is now three things they have told us about that in the same series of articles. AI needs to get its shite together. They already told us Amber worked for Intermountain Support, a state agency, helping the disabled, sob sob, and Matt worked construction and was veteran law enforcement.

Here's a big continuity problem I noticed.

Robinson coming in or out on the day. But where is the rifle? We are told he ditched it in a field afterwards, so he should have it both coming and going. You will say he broke it down and was carrying it in the backpack. No, they tell us it was an old bolt-action Mauser 30.06:

It doesn't break down like that. If he could have broken it down into a small case, he wouldn't need to ditch it, would he? And what kind of moron wraps a rifle like that in a towel and dumps it in the woods near the crime scene? There are a million ways to dispose of or hide a rifle, starting with throwing it in a lake. But it is much simpler to hide it under the floor of some house or other structure you don't live in, like a barn or abandoned house or other structure. Millions of those around now, after several rounds of crashes. I say that not to give anyone tips, but to remind you of what we have all seen in movies. Even the stupidest of us has watched a thousand CIA movies, where they school you on these ideas. Best not to dump it at all: just put it back in Dad's gun rack, making up some lie about shooting deer. Then they can't trace it back to you. But this is all almost beside the point, since there was no gun, no shooter, and no death. Just a blank fired or a shot into a wall and Kirk pretending to die, with fake blood squirting like in an old Monty Python skit, or CGI'ed in after the fact.

This C&C News roundup from September 12, 2025, covers several significant political and social events, presented with a clear conservative perspective. The article highlights the GOP's new January 6th Reinvestigation Committee, suggesting its aim is to uncover previously unaddressed aspects like the pipe bomb case and Ray Epps' involvement. It also details the collapse of Democratic "redistricting revenge" plans, attributing it to internal party resistance and a reluctance among Democrats to sacrifice safe districts. A central and somber theme is the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which the author frames as the "death of dialogue" and a clash between American ideals of free speech and a growing philosophy that views certain speech as violence. Finally, the piece notes the Senate Republicans' use of the "nuclear option" to streamline the confirmation of Trump's nominees, a move presented as a counter to previous Democratic obstruction. 

Discuss Jan. 6 Reinvestigation.

A new January 6th Reinvestigation Committee has been formed by Republicans1. This committee has selected its members, consisting of five Republicans and three Democrats, and is being advised by Jamie Raskin (MD)2.

The Republican members of the committee include:

• Barry Loudermilk (Ga.) as chair2

• Morgan Griffith (Va.)2

• Clay Higgins (La.)2

• Troy Nehls (Tx.)2

• Harriet Hageman (Wy.), who reportedly replaced Liz Cheney2

The Democratic members are:

• Eric Swalwell (China)2

• Jared Moskowitz (Fl.)2

• Jasmine Crockett (Tx.)2

While Republicans have generally been reserved about the committee's full agenda, the only concrete topic identified for reinvestigation so far is the "unsolved 'pipe bomb case'"2. The source notes that the FBI was reportedly unable to solve this case and took almost three years to gather clear surveillance video2.

The author of one source also suggests additional subjects for the new committee's review, such as Ray Epps and the "unreleased deposition and Capitol security video files" that reportedly "magically disappeared" from the original committee3. The original committee was described by the Washington Post as "bipartisan," a characterization viewed with "stealthy bias" by the author4.

In a broader context, another source describes January 6th as "a short lived riot which was CAUSED by Capitol Police shooting peaceful protesters with rubber bullets and tear gas"5. This source uses January 6th as an example of political violence that it attributes to the left, claiming that "the only violence we have seen for the past decade has been from the political left"5. However, this reference is to the event itself, not the reinvestigation.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Democratic Redistricting Issues.

Democratic efforts regarding redistricting, described as a "redistricting crusade" and "redistricting-in-revenge" by some, are reportedly facing significant internal resistance and are ultimately collapsing12. This situation is highlighted in a Politico article that details the challenges encountered by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)13.

Key issues and observations include:

• The Collapse of "Redistricting Revenge" Plans Jeffries' plan, which was aimed at gathering "Blue States" to eliminate remaining Republican districts as a response to perceived gerrymandering in states like Texas, is reportedly "not happening"1. The distinction between merely "talking about redrawing maps and actually redrawing maps" has proven to be a major hurdle4.

• Internal Democratic Resistance The core problem stems from the "unavoidable mathematics" of redistricting4. When Democratic-leaning neighborhoods are moved to dilute a Republican district, the original Democratic district becomes "a bit redder," making incumbent Democrats feel insecure4. This has led to a "serious volunteer shortage" within the party, as "nobody’s lining up to donate chunks of their safely blue turf for 'the greater good'"4.

• Statements from Democratic Officials

    ◦ Former Illinois party chair Robin Kelly stated, "We have to look out and protect who we have, because we fought hard to get them in"4.

    ◦ Illinois State Rep. Lauren Underwood unequivocally said, "I don’t think redistricting is happening in Illinois"4.

    ◦ In Maryland, "top Democrats have yet to make any significant moves because not all in the party are comfortable with a scorched-earth redistricting strategy"5.

    ◦ Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.) offered a moral objection, explaining, "We’ve got to fight — I agree — but two wrongs don’t make it right"5.

• Leadership Challenges for Hakeem Jeffries Beyond the redistricting difficulties, Jeffries is also reportedly "pummeled by progressives at home for not backing democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani" and is "facing pressure on the Hill to show whatever backbone the minority party can muster in the next big fight over government funding"3. New York Democratic Chair Jay Jacobs suggested that Jeffries "shouldn’t be judged harshly for his inability to secure rapid map changes across the country"3.

• Conclusion of "Hot Air" The source concludes that the "disorganized Democrats’ redistricting-in-revenge threats were just that— hot air," highlighting the significant obstacles faced when trying to implement such strategies due to internal party dynamics and self-preservation instincts2.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Charlie Kirk Assassination.

The alleged assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, has generated significant discussion and conflicting narratives across various platforms1.... While some reports present it as a straightforward murder, other sources and commentators suggest it was a meticulously staged event with broader geopolitical implications.

The Reported Event and Initial Details

Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative podcaster and founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), was reportedly shot and killed on September 10, 2025, at a university campus event in Orem, Utah [Previous conversation, 279]. The shooting occurred on the eve of the 24th anniversary of 9/11, a detail noted for its symbolic significance1011. Following the event, his "mortal remains" were returned from Utah to Phoenix for burial, with the Vice President of the United States reportedly helping carry his coffin, and his widow, Erica, present12.

Authorities, including the FBI, released new footage and images of the suspect, described as a college-aged individual wearing a hat, sunglasses, Converse sneakers, and a black shirt with an American flag and eagle symbol12. The video purportedly showed the shooter jumping off a roof after the attack and fleeing12. A high-powered bolt-action rifle (not an assault rifle) was found discarded in nearby woods and was undergoing forensic analysis13. Unfired cartridges found at the scene were reportedly marked with pro-trans and anti-fascist slogans, though the ATF warned these could be misdirection or a false flag13. The FBI offered a $100,000 reward, and President Trump publicly mourned Kirk, announcing he would be posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom13. President Trump later announced that the assassin was in custody14.

The "Staged Event" Theory and Conspiracy Claims

A prominent theory circulating immediately after the event asserts that the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk was staged [Previous conversation]. This perspective suggests the event "screams fake from every pore" and aligns with the "default assumption of any current event" being a product of intelligence operations, specifically "Operation Chaos," which reportedly manufactures daily news and "tragedies" to maintain control and manipulate public perception [Previous conversation].

Key indicators of staging and inconsistencies cited include:

• Suspicious Timing and Symbolism: The 9/10/2025 date is noted for its numerological connection to "9/11" [Previous conversation].

• "Snuff Films" and Video Inconsistencies: The rapid release of graphic video footage is deemed suspicious, likened to "CGI snuff films" designed to "obliterate" public sensibilities [Previous conversation]. Critics note that the filmer reportedly "pans away to the crowd or to his shoe tops" at critical moments, suggesting an attempt to obscure details, and Kirk's collapse was an unnatural "slouch to the left" [Previous conversation]. Additionally, some reports indicate that the video of the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, jumping from the roof, does not show him carrying a rifle, raising questions about how the weapon was later found in the woods15....

• "Go Signals" from Apparent Agents: A video on social media reportedly showed "a couple of big CIA-looking dudes with earpieces directly behind Kirk on stage, making a series of elaborate arm and hand signs just before the shot," identified as an "obviously a ‘go' signal." The subsequent "age restricted" classification of this video is seen as an attempt to hide evidence [Previous conversation].

• Planted Crowd and Location: There are suggestions of a "planted" crowd, with some reportedly chanting "kill Kirk" and cheering after the shot, intended to "make 'liberals' look bad" [Previous conversation]. The location, Orem, Utah, and Utah Valley University (UVU), are described as "spooky" and "heavily Mormon," with alleged ties to CIA activity and "crypto-Jewish" foundations, connecting to other alleged staged events like Sandy Hook [Previous conversation, 134].

• Professional Hit vs. Amateur Shooter: The shot that killed Kirk was a single bullet to the neck18. While some argue this was a "lucky neck shot" by an amateur, others contend it suggests a "professional hit," given the difficulty of such a shot from 200 yards with a downward trajectory and potential wind18.... The alleged shooter's ability to make such a shot and escape without the rifle visible in footage further fuels the "professional hit" theory15....

Motives and Suspects in the "Staged Event" Theory:

• Kirk's Shifting Stance and "Silencing": Kevin Barrett suggests Kirk's death was a "politicized ritual sacrifice"10. He argues Kirk was "turning against the pro-Israel narrative he was being paid to parrot"24. Kirk had reportedly begun examining "October 7 and called it an inside job," complained about being unable to criticize Israel, and started revealing that "Jewish money is behind 'cultural Marxism'"24.... This shift made him a "threat" to his "likely killers," potentially leading to him being "silenced"11....

• Israel/Mossad Involvement: Israel is identified as a "top suspect" in political assassinations it might benefit from, with "Ron Unz's 'American Pravda: Mossad Assassinations'" making a case for this29. The timing of the event (eve of 9/11 anniversary) is seen as a "sacrificial false flag designed to unite conservative supporters of Israel behind the ever-accelerating genocide" and "shore up support for Israel's beleaguered genocide puppet, Donald Trump"30. Comments also highlight a private jet, allegedly owned by a "militant Zionist," that turned off its transponder after the shooting from a nearby airport21....

• Trump Administration/Epstein Files: Kirk's alleged refusal to "obey Trump's orders to 'forget Jeffrey Epstein'" is mentioned as a potential factor in his death, though it's suggested Trump would rely on "Mossad and its friends" for such actions29....

• Fabricated Identity: Charlie Kirk's rapid rise from age 18 to found Turning Point USA, with "zero qualifications," is considered improbable without significant backing, possibly from intelligence operations [Previous conversation]. His biographical details are reported to be inconsistent, with no parents named on Wikipedia and public record searches for "Charlie James Kirk" yielding "no results" or inconsistent information, leading to the hypothesis of a "fake" name or fabricated persona [Previous conversation]. Connections to "Jewish heritage" through his alleged family members (Hilbre Kirk, Zachary Kirk, Aughenbaugh) and his wife, Erika Kirk (nee Frantzve), whose family name "Heller" is noted as Jewish, further support this "fabricated persona" theory [Previous conversation]. Their wedding photo allegedly showing Jerusalem is also noted as "strange" for non-Jewish individuals [Previous conversation].

The Alleged Shooter, Tyler Robinson

The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is also subject to scrutiny. Reports claim he has a familial connection to Charlie Kirk through shared Jewish family lines, which is seen as "blowing the cover of the whole thing" [Previous conversation]. Inconsistencies surrounding his father's background (initially "construction," then "law enforcement veteran," then "granite countertop business") are highlighted as "a big continuity problem" [Previous conversation].

Despite the arrest, some commentators view Robinson as a "patsy"35.... Doubts are raised about his ability to execute a "professional" neck shot from 200 yards1921. The narrative of him ditching an "old bolt-action Mauser" engraved with "transgender and anti-fascist ideology" and then being caught by his own father after confessing and leaving "chilling messages" online is deemed "not believable" and characteristic of "scriptwriters" [Previous conversation].

Reactions and Broader Implications

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has been framed as a "watershed moment" in American history by some41. However, this designation is met with cynicism, particularly from those who point out that conservatives often downplay mass shootings of schoolchildren but "howl and wail with nauseating hypocrisy" when one of their "own icons is shot"41.

Left-Wing Response: Leftist journalists reportedly tried to "hide the event and bury the story" until social media forced coverage4243. When they did cover it, they allegedly "complained more about online treatment of the killer than they complained about the murder itself"4243. Many leftists online are reported to have "cheer[ed] for the death of Charlie Kirk," blaming him and his beliefs as the "catalyst," which some conservatives interpret as "gaslighting" and "terrorism"42.... This reaction is seen as representing the "death of dialogue," as Kirk was known for debating ideas, and his murder during such a debate is viewed as a "bloodstained stake" through hope for democratic resolution46. The leftist premise that "hate speech is violence," and religious speech is hate speech, is seen as inherently justifying a "violent response" and constituting a "clash of civilizations" with the American experiment of free speech47....

Right-Wing Response: From a conservative and libertarian perspective, Kirk's "crime" was "telling the truth without shame"50. His death is seen as further evidence that "total war has been declared against the west," and a call for a shift from "measured responses" to active engagement, even suggesting "widespread vigilantism" and "destroying all enemies, foreign and domestic"51.... The emphasis is on resisting the perceived "mind war" and "shooting war" orchestrated by globalists and progressives51. Vigils held for Kirk were noted for the "complete absence of burning buildings, molotov cocktails," contrasting them with earlier "mostly peaceful" protests54.

In summary, the alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk is presented not merely as a criminal act, but as a deeply contested event, viewed by some as a genuine tragedy and by others as a staged "ritual sacrifice" intended to sow division, create a martyr, or silence a dissenting voice, with complex and often conspiratorial narratives surrounding its execution and implications.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Speech as Violence.

The concept of "Speech as Violence" is presented as a fundamental ideological divide, particularly highlighted in the context of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk's alleged assassination. This perspective argues that the Left has adopted the premise that "hate" speech is violence, and religious speech is a form of hate speech1.

According to this view, this premise directly rejects the First Amendment ideals of religious freedom and freedom of speech1. A crucial implication of defining speech as violence is that it "inherently justifies violent response"2. Historically, deadly force has been recognized as justifiable in self-defense, meaning that if speech itself is considered violence, then physical violence becomes an appropriate, even legally defensible, counter-response2.

This idea is reportedly propagated by "experts in the academy"2. Examples cited include academic publications like a Georgetown Law Review article, and the theory's "dark companion," "microaggressions," which was explicated in a 2021 Scientific American article23. The sources claim that for two decades, college professors have been teaching students that "sticks and stones may break your bones, and trigger words can actually hurt you," leading many students to internalize this mantra3. However, the ideas of "microaggressions" and "violent speech" are also explicitly stated to be incompatible with the First Amendment, as argued in a 2008 Pace University Law Review3. Attempts by centrists to compare certain types of "hate speech" to "yelling 'fire!' in a crowded theater" are dismissed as an "unstable middle ground" that merely postpones an inevitable conflict34.

The sources contend that this notion is "unAmerican"4. They note that legal frameworks in European and many Islamic countries already "fundamentally reject the notion that speech is harmless," instead treating certain expressions as "inherently violent or as a triggering precursor to violence," which allows for speech restriction4. A specific example is provided from Germany, where a woman was sentenced to a weekend in jail for "criminal defamation" for calling her convicted rapist a "disgraceful rapist pig" via WhatsApp, even as her rapists received suspended sentences5. This demonstrates how speech is placed in a "special, dangerous category" in these legal systems5.

This philosophy, according to the sources, extends to a desire for government control over citizens' "very thoughts and ideas"5. It is suggested that this is why the Left believes that "questioning enforced masking literally kills people," and that "government must act quickly and decisively to shut that kind of talk down"6. The American Founders, in contrast, "utterly rejected that philosophy," accepting that some "bad speech" must be tolerated to prevent the "even worse outcome" of "enforced speech"6. James Madison is quoted as warning that there is "no middle ground between liberty and tyranny" on the issue of free speech6.

The sources conclude that this "tyrannical notion that 'speech can be violence'" must be "utterly destroyed" or "freedom and liberty are doomed to vanish"7. Those who hold this view are deemed "reprehensible" and should be "shunned by all right-thinking persons"7. In the context of the alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk, his death is framed as representing the "death of dialogue," signifying that the opposing side "don't want to debate. They want to end debate, with a bullet"18. It is also stated that "leftists across the web cheer for the death of that innocent girl," Iryna Zarutska, and for "trans mass shooters after they killed Christian kids, just as they now cheer for the death of Charlie Kirk"910. These groups reportedly "blame Kirk and his beliefs as the catalyst; as if he is being punished for a crime," and claim that "people are fed up with right wing violence," a claim that is dismissed as "gaslighting on an epic level"1011. Ultimately, Charlie Kirk's "real crime" is identified as having "told the truth without shame," and "For this, he was murdered"12.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Senate Rule Change.

Senate Republicans have recently enacted a significant rule change in the Senate, described as triggering the "nuclear option," to accelerate the confirmation of President Trump's nominees1.

Here are the key details of this change:

• Purpose: The new rule was specifically implemented to speed up the confirmation process for Trump's nominees1.

• Passage: It was established by the Republican Party, passing along party lines with a vote of 53-4512.

• Mechanism: This change now permits the Senate to confirm entire groups of nominees simultaneously, rather than requiring individual debates and votes for each1.

• Scope: The rule applies to subcabinet and ambassadorial positions, but notably does not affect judicial nominations2.

• Debate Limits: It also limits all debate on a group of nominees to just two hours, effectively removing the ability to filibuster these types of nominations2.

• Immediate Application: Following its passage, Senate Republicans quickly utilized the modified rule to advance a package of 48 previously delayed nominees, with the aim of confirming them all within the following week2.

The term "nuclear option" itself has historical precedent; it was first used twelve years prior by then-Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) when Democrats ended the filibuster for most judicial nominees, excluding Supreme Court appointments2. Now, any rule change that makes confirmations more efficient is generally labeled "nuclear"2.

The source indicates that Democrats had been employing "every trick in the book" to obstruct Trump's nominees, but with this rule change, the "Nevada River floodgates" have been opened3. It is noted that if Democrats regain power in the future, they would also be able to leverage this new rule to expedite their own confirmations3. The author also suggests that it is generally reasonable for any president to be permitted to appoint their preferred personnel3.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

I. The Perceived Decline of the American Republic

Several sources lament a significant deterioration of American society and governance since the turn of the 21st century, with 9/11 identified as a pivotal moment.

• Erosion of Freedoms and Constitutional Principles: The "Brief History of the 21st Century - LewRockwell" asserts that after 9/11, "The remnants of the U.S. Constitution went in the shredder, and the world we’d known was gone for good." This is attributed to government overreach, exemplified by the "pre-packaged 'Patriot' Act," which provided "unconstitutional tools it needed to wage perpetual war." This includes ubiquitous surveillance, mandatory identification, monitoring of communications, and confiscation of property, all under the guise of "For Our Protection." The article states, "To defeat 'the terrorists', the US government assumed all Americans were criminals."

• Perpetual War and Military Industrial Complex: The "Brief History of the 21st Century" describes a continuous "Terror Wars" fought on two fronts, domestically and abroad, costing "trillions of dollars, created millions of corpses, unleashed hordes of refugees, and (most lucratively) fresh enemies for the regime to fight." The "Close Ties Between Neo-Nazi Junta and Drug Cartels Uncover US/NATO Hypocrisy" article further criticizes the renaming of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War" under President Trump, viewing it as a clear signal of aggressive intent, especially with Trump's "belligerence" and contemplation of direct confrontation with Venezuela under false pretexts.

• Governmental Mismanagement and Lack of Accountability: The article on the Department of War heavily criticizes the Pentagon's unchecked budget, noting it "failed its seventh financial audit in 2024, with 63% of its $4.1 trillion in assets — approximately $2.58 trillion — untracked" and that it "failed to account for $21 trillion in spending from 1998 to 2015." The author asks, "Why would anyone want to hide such a mind-boggling amount of money and assets from public scrutiny unless the funds are being embezzled (or used for some other sinister purpose)?"

II. Deepening Societal and Political Polarization

A strong sense of cultural and political warfare permeates the discourse, with a focus on irreconcilable differences and the breakdown of civil dialogue.

• "Woke" Ideology as a Destructive Force: The "V.S. vs. Woke - LewRockwell" article explicitly critiques "woke morons who make the rules today," and "spotlight-craving fabulists who invent horror stories about their betters in order to be in the news," leading to the "canceling" of intellectual figures like V.S. Naipaul and George Bernard Shaw. The article "Men of the West: We Are at War" equates "woke cult" with "sabotage, mob violence, child grooming and assassination."

• Leftist Violence and Suppression of Dissent: "Men of the West: We Are at War" argues that "The only violence we have seen for the past decade has been from the political left." This is contrasted with the perceived peaceful nature of conservative movements. The assassination of Charlie Kirk is presented as an example of this, with "thousands of leftists across the web cheer for the death of that innocent girl. I have watched hundreds-of-thousands of them cheer for trans mass shooters after they killed Christian kids, just as they now cheer for the death of Charlie Kirk."

• "Speech is Violence" and the End of Dialogue: The "RISK TOLERANCE" article highlights the leftist premise that "hate" speech is violence, and religious speech is hate speech, directly rejecting the First Amendment. It argues this premise "inherently justifies violent response." The assassination of Charlie Kirk is portrayed as "the death of dialogue," signifying that "The time for debate died in a tent in Utah."

• Call for "Total War" against the Left: "Men of the West: We Are at War" concludes that "total war has been declared against the west and we must start acting like we are at war if our civilization is going to survive." The author states, "If they want to burn the west to the ground to usher in their own dystopian collectivist vision, then the only logical response is to burn THEM to the ground."

III. Charlie Kirk Assassination: A Catalyst for Conspiracy and Division

The recent assassination of Charlie Kirk is a central event, viewed through a lens of suspicion, conspiracy, and further confirmation of existing ideological battles.

• Ritual Sacrifice and Mossad Involvement: "Charlie Kirk and the Cult of Human Sacrifice" posits that Kirk's death was a "spectacular, politicized ritual sacrifice," drawing parallels to 9/11 and the JFK assassination, designed to "consecrate, in blood, a sacred bond between Americans and Israelis, and trigger the murder of millions whom Zionist Jews view as their enemies." The article strongly suggests Mossad involvement, citing Kirk's recent criticisms of Israel and Jewish influence in media and "cultural Marxism."

• Questioning the Official Narrative: Many comments within the "Charlie Kirk and the Cult of Human Sacrifice" and "RISK TOLERANCE" articles express skepticism about the quick capture and confession of the alleged assassin, Tyler Robinson. Doubts are raised about the professional nature of the shot, the absence of the rifle in escape footage, and the convenience of the narrative. One commenter states, "The killing was clearly professional. One shot, 200 yards, fatal neck shot, and a clean escape. Do you have any idea how difficult this is? NO WAY TYLER ROBINSON DID THIS." Another notes the "pre-prepared media story (complete with engraved bullets) that’s coming out too fast and complete and already being contradicted by the facts."

• Exploitation for Political Gain: Regardless of the perpetrator, Kirk's death is seen as a tool to further political agendas. "Charlie Kirk and the Cult of Human Sacrifice" suggests it was meant "to unite conservative supporters of Israel behind the ever-accelerating genocide—and to shore up support for Israel’s beleaguered genocide puppet, Donald Trump." "Men of the West: We Are at War" states, "Ultimately it doesn’t really matter if Kirk was killed by a 'lone nut' or an organized conspiracy, the end result is the same. The lefties are still applauding. They still want you dead."

IV. Disinformation, Censorship, and Control of Narrative

A persistent theme is the manipulation of public perception through censorship, propaganda, and the redefinition of language.

• PR as Propaganda: "Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism" argues that "public relations (propaganda) is one of the most powerful but invisible forces in our society," capable of creating narratives "most of the country believes (regardless of how much it goes against their self interests)." The article attributes many "cultural beliefs" to PR campaigns, explaining why "so many widely believed things are 'wrong'."

• Rewriting Medical Narratives: The "Erasing Encephalitis" article specifically details how the belief that "vaccines don’t cause autism" was implanted. It claims that previously recognized vaccine-induced neurological damage, including "mentally retarded," was "re-labeled as 'autism' and more importantly that autism was given an extremely broad and vague definition which swept over all the concurrently occurring neurological injuries." This re-labeling provides "easy mental escapes from an uncomfortable topic so people simply write it off and close their minds to it."

• Government and Media Collusion: "News stories from various sources (12.09.2025)" reports on "Ireland’s Communications Minister Stands by 'Disinformation' Plan, Citing Need to Tackle Online 'Gossip'" despite public resistance, and "How the EU Pays Mainstream Media to Promote Its Narratives," revealing that "the European Commission ('EC') runs a highly sophisticated 'EU media complex' through which it gets to shape media narratives about itself and its agendas."

• Censorship for "Self-Extermination": The "News stories from various sources (12.09.2025)" highlights a report titled "Why Censorship Is Used To Trick You Into Self-Extermination For Anti-Human Depopulation." This suggests a malevolent intent behind information control, aiming to manipulate the public into actions that are against their own survival.

V. Race and Social Unrest

Racial tensions and concerns about black-on-white crime are explicitly and frequently discussed, framed as a significant societal problem.

• "Antidote for the Poisoned Mind": This article directly addresses perceived racial disparities in crime, with the author stating he left the room in frustration during a TV crime drama featuring a "Black male actor lamenting white racism." The "antidote," he suggests, "lies in reality. Regular exposure to unfiltered data, like monthly reports comparing Black-on-White and White-on-Black homicides, serves as a powerful counter to the toxic narratives embedded in TV, ads, and censored social media."

• Extensive List of Black-on-White Homicides: A significant portion of "Antidote for the Poisoned Mind" is dedicated to detailing individual cases of black-on-white homicides in August 2025, often including specific details like "Driving while white" or "A twisted sense of social justice." This list includes names and ages of victims, alongside brief descriptions of the circumstances and the race of the alleged perpetrators. The article contrasts "twenty-six black-on-white homicides" with "7 white-on-black homicides reported in August, 2025."

• Criticism of "Progressive" Narratives: The author and commenters in "Antidote for the Poisoned Mind" accuse the "progressive" left of "subtly shap[ing] our perspectives—through small, repeated doses of multicultural ideology woven into entertainment," which is likened to "a slow drip of poison in our drinks." There's a strong sentiment that this narrative "vilif[ies] white males, falsely framing murder as a form of social justice."

• Racialized Solutions and Blame: Comments within "Antidote for the Poisoned Mind" express highly charged and racist views. For example, one comment states, "Africans are a Stone Age race of people with low I.Q.s and poor self-discipline. Africans do NOT belong anywhere white people." Another argues that "Every generation has to relearn the lesson that niggers are, by and large, stupid and violent and need to be sequestered from the general population."

This briefing reveals a consistent narrative across these sources that paints a picture of a society in crisis, driven by a perceived decline in traditional values, governmental corruption, ideological warfare, and a deep-seated racial conflict. The assassination of Charlie Kirk is treated not as an isolated incident, but as a symbolic event that underscores these overarching themes and further fuels calls for radical action.

convert_to_textConvert to source

welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series.

Today, we delve into a collection of profound insights and critical analyses from various contemporary sources, examining the intricate tapestry of our modern world. We will explore geopolitical shifts, societal narratives, public health controversies, and the ongoing cultural battles that define our era.

Let's begin by discussing "A Brief History of the 21st Century - LewRockwell". This thought-provoking piece posits that the true commencement of the 21st century was not January 1, 2000, or 2001, but rather the pivotal moment of the Twin Towers' collapse on 9/11. This event is presented as a fundamental catalyst that altered the course for the United States and the global landscape, marking the demise of remnants of the U.S. Constitution and the world as it was previously understood. The author argues that the 9/11 attacks, while shocking, were not surprising to those paying attention, as they were a foreseeable violent reaction to decades of U.S. government intervention and "mayhem" in Muslim countries. Instead of engaging in introspection about what "mischief" might have incited such aggression, our "leaders" responded by escalating their actions, stoking fear, intervening extensively, and consequently making everything worse.

The narrative highlights that Osama bin Laden's strategic aim with the 9/11 attacks was to elicit an overreaction, intending to transform Afghanistan into a "Vietnam" for the Soviets, and similarly, to draw Americans into a "desert Vietnam". The source claims this objective was achieved, pointing to the subsequent proliferation of Islamic radical groups, the destabilization of American "puppet regimes," the increasing isolation of Israel, and a significant surge in U.S. debt, which has reportedly more than doubled each decade since the "Terror Wars" commenced. Following these events, the "pre-packaged 'Patriot' Act" was swiftly implemented, providing the U.S. government with what are described as "unconstitutional tools" to wage perpetual war. This war, according to the source, was to be fought on two fronts: abroad by the Department of "Defense" against "nebulous menaces," and domestically by a new Department of "Homeland Security" targeting "terror" at home, specifically "Us". This dual approach led to a significant erosion of individual liberties, with ubiquitous surveillance and mandatory screenings becoming widely accepted in various public spaces.

A critical observation from this source is the State's consistent pattern of retaining illegal powers that it seizes during periods of "emergency," leveraging public fear to compel compliance. This tactic involves presenting a simplified, "dopey dichotomy" where individuals must align either "with us, or you’re with the terrorists," thereby eliminating neutrality. This approach, it is argued, is characteristic of "degenerate empires" seeking to consolidate control, as it profits various industries, such as bankers and weapons manufacturers, while those who remain neutral are deemed to not "fuel the gravy train" and are pressured to choose a side. The source further details how the U.S. government, in the aftermath of 9/11, engaged in military actions, including invasions, bombings, and regime changes, in countries that were not the origin of the attackers and, in many cases, were even enemies of the very jihadists who struck the United States. These "Terror Wars," spanning two decades, involved funding multiple sides of conflicts, supporting groups it previously formed, and even backing its "avowed enemies," such as al Qaeda and ISIS. Despite costing trillions of dollars, causing millions of casualties, generating vast numbers of refugees, and "most lucratively," creating new enemies for the regime, these wars often proceeded with little public awareness or complaint from most Americans.

The article concludes by highlighting a recurring and "predictable phenomenon": those who warned against the long-term consequences of relentless bombing, invasions, meddling, and coups were often "ridiculed" or worse, for not advocating a sufficient "response" to these "predictable attacks". Furthermore, it asserts that governments, after creating calamities, tend to blame others and exploit their failures to justify acquiring more power and resources for themselves. This cycle of generating catastrophes, misrepresenting their causes, and consolidating power is presented as a consistent and alarming pattern. The authors lament that the initial promise and strong position of America at the turn of the century – characterized by its status as the world's undisputed power, manageable debt, and a degree of internal unity – have significantly deteriorated. The 21st century is now metaphorically described as "riding down a one-way dead-end street," offering little to celebrate and much that resembles a "confession" rather than a "boast".

Next, we turn to "Antidote for the poisoned mind, by Kenn Gividen - The Unz Review". This article posits that our societal perspectives are subtly molded by the "progressive" left through consistent, small-scale infusions of multicultural ideology within entertainment. This process is likened to a "slow drip of poison" gradually altering public perception. The author proposes that the effective "antidote" to these pervasive and "toxic narratives" is a steady exposure to unvarnished data and reality, specifically mentioning regular reports that compare Black-on-White and White-on-Black homicides.

The source then provides numerous detailed examples of recent Black-on-White homicides to underscore this point. These cases illustrate a range of tragic circumstances:

• Iris Feliciano-Hernandez, 30, died when her vehicle was broadsided by 20-year-old Tremayne A. Brown, who was reportedly driving recklessly at 70 mph through downtown streets with a suspended license. Brown had a history of traffic citations and disregarded societal norms, which the article attributes to psychopathic tendencies.

• Stephen George Cox, 34, was fatally shot in Tulsa by Jovohn Blanke, 24, an acquaintance. The report underscores the dangers of casual friendships with inherently violent individuals.

• Mason Henry Doran, 26, was tragically killed in Syracuse, New York, by multiple gunshot wounds, with Mikel Hackett, 39, arrested for second-degree murder. The article asserts that "the hivemind of the intolerant left" fosters a harmful narrative by "vilifying white males," falsely framing such murders as a form of "social justice".

• Destiny "Dustin" C. Voss, 28, was fatally shot in Topeka, Kansas, with Avant Chambers, 18, charged with first-degree murder during an attempted aggravated robbery.

• Katelynn Strate, a pregnant 17-year-old, was fatally shot in Ponchatoula, Louisiana, in a road rage incident attributed to Barry West, 54, though her unborn baby miraculously survived. The source stresses vigilance while driving due to impulsive or reckless individuals.

• Rylee James Ferari, 24, was one of two individuals found fatally shot in a vehicle on Highway 85 in Colorado during an apparent robbery, leading to the arrest of Eddie Lacharles Jackson, 23, on second-degree murder charges.

• Kelly Black, 32, was fatally shot in Wichita, Kansas, with 31-year-old parolee Andrew Presley arrested and charged with second-degree murder and criminal possession of a firearm.

• Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee, was fatally stabbed on a Lynx Blue Line train in Charlotte, North Carolina, by Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, a tragic event that received less attention than other high-profile deaths.

• David Labrecque, 65, was fatally shot during a home invasion in Hartford, Vermont, with Demetrius Drew, 30, facing first-degree murder charges. The article suggests security measures like cameras, steel doors, and German Shepherds as deterrents.

• Holly Beth Hoover Hatcher, 62, mother of a country singer, was fatally stabbed during a home invasion in Virginia by Kevin Moses Walker, 41, who was then neutralized by her husband, Michael Hatcher.

• Jeffrey S. Matson, 43, a bar owner, was fatally shot in St. Paul, Minnesota, by Davarius L. Clark, 29, a bouncer, following an argument over Clark bringing his bicycle inside the bar.

• Timothy Kappenhagen, 28, was fatally shot by a carjacker in Cleveland, Ohio, while loading groceries. The article criticizes legacy media for implying the victim was "in the wrong place at the wrong time," asserting he was simply where he belonged.

• Stephanie Keeling, 48, was fatally shot during a home invasion in Marion County, Kentucky, with Joshua Spalding-Wells, 36, and Tyler Gunn, 32, arrested, and white females Faith Singer, 21, and Allison Lyvers, 18, charged with complicity. The source introduces the concept of "impaired executive function" to explain poor decision-making leading to violent acts or associating with criminals.

• John Byron Roulaine, 51, was fatally shot in Woodlawn, Alabama, by Harold Dailey, 35, during what appears to have been a robbery as Roulaine waited for work.

• Joseph Morris Hall, 43, a beloved charter-boat captain, was fatally shot in Sanford, Florida, during a minor traffic dispute by Jaden Alexander Harris, 24. The police chief called the fatality "preventable" due to the suspect's refusal to disengage.

• Taylor Dudley Stewart, 26, was fatally shot in Hamilton, Alabama, by her husband, Tristen Amani Stewart, 25, who also critically injured their nearly 2-year-old daughter. Tristen's father, Kenneth Stewart, 69, was also arrested for aiding and abetting. The article notes a lack of media focus on wife abuse and warns about the complexities of interracial relationships.

• Jamie Jones, 53, was fatally shot in his front yard in Fayetteville, North Carolina, by his black son-in-law, Calvin Foster Jr., 29, stemming from a domestic situation.

• Deegan Kirschke, 17, was fatally shot in a Hampshire, Illinois, apartment by Keyshaun D. Davis, 20, who claimed it was a mishap while disassembling a handgun.

• Braisen Cain, 42, a teacher, was run over and shot at least twenty times, with Arel Dawkins, 36, arrested. The author describes this as an unconscionable act, even for "notoriously bad fathers".

• John "Skip" Dove Jr., 78, was fatally stabbed in Soldotna, Alaska, by LaShaunda Lewis, 31, a nurse, in a domestic violence incident, despite declined offers for mental health assistance.

• Alexander Bloodworth, 21, was found with multiple gunshot wounds in Orangeburg, South Carolina, with Trivinci Mack, 19, arrested, though specific details about the motive were not released.

• David Lee, 44, and his 45-year-old black partner, Brandi Smith, were fatally shot in Middleburg, Florida, allegedly by their 14-year-old son, Trevor Lee, following a domestic dispute.

• Sharmaine Marlene Burke, 49, a grandmother, was fatally shot near Derby, Kansas, after calling 911 to report threats from her son-in-law, Stephen J. Rogers, 29, while her 8-year-old grandson was present. Rogers, described as white but appearing to have sub-Saharan African heritage, was charged with first-degree murder and aggravated child endangerment.

• Nicole H. Azzoto, 40, a respected cosmetologist, was found dead in Syracuse, New York, in what police described as a domestic shooting, with Anthony Price, 56, charged.

• Misty Dawn Guzman-Castro, 43, was found fatally shot in Columbia, Missouri, after a dispute in her vehicle with Isaiah Goins, 26, who allegedly shot her and fled. The article cautions against socializing with individuals with "low empathy".

• Richard Hawk, 64, was fatally shot in Troup County, Georgia, during a road rage incident involving Nytorian Allen, 23, who was arrested and charged with murder. The incident highlights the need for caution with individuals having "reduced emotional regulation and limited impulse control".

The article then contrasts these with 7 White-on-Black homicides reported in August 2025, compared to the 26 Black-on-White homicides. The White-on-Black cases included: Phillip Francis Jr., 44, killed in Lafayette, Louisiana, after an argument escalated; Dorian K. Thomas, 19, fatally shot in Minot, North Dakota, with a 19-year-old suspect arrested on manslaughter charges; Jamar Douglas, 26, found with multiple gunshot wounds in Owen County, Kentucky, leading to the arrest of Gary Bullion, 52; DeKalb County Police Officer David Rose, 33, shot and killed while responding to an active-shooter attack near Emory University; Savon Shabazz Miller, 30, fatally shot in Oklahoma City, with two brothers arrested; and Ashim Heanacho, 71, and Edward Van Bert Parker, 52, fatally shot outside a public library in Lexington, Kentucky, with a 69-year-old woman arrested.

Finally, we explore "Charlie Kirk and the Cult of Human Sacrifice, by Kevin Barrett - The Unz Review". This article dramatically frames Charlie Kirk's assassination on the eve of the 9/11 anniversary as a "spectacular, politicized ritual sacrifice". The author draws a parallel to the original 9/11 event, which is described as having been "scripted" to "consecrate, in blood, a sacred bond between Americans and Israelis" and to incite violence against those perceived as Zionist enemies. Kirk’s death, particularly the shot to the throat, is interpreted as having symbolic significance related to silencing a victim, a motif seen in Masonic oaths and even the assassination of JFK, who was also initially struck in the throat.

The source suggests that Kirk may have been targeted because he had reportedly begun to question pro-Israel narratives and reveal sensitive information, referred to as "secrets." These secrets included Israel's alleged involvement in monumental crimes such as the JFK assassination and 9/11, as well as the purported dominance of "Zionist Jews" in media censorship and their financing of "cultural Marxism". This shift in Kirk's public stance, especially his move away from the pro-Israel narrative that he was allegedly paid to promote, is presented as a compelling motive for his killing. The author speculates that Israel, potentially through an entity like "Mossad’s Journalist Assassination Bureau," might have orchestrated the assassination to transform Kirk into a "pro-Zionist martyr" before his increasingly critical views could gain further traction.

The article characterizes the shooting itself as displaying "signs of being a professional hit," noting the single, precise neck shot delivered from a distance. This is contrasted with the alleged amateur capabilities of the arrested suspect. The author draws a controversial comparison to Donald Trump's "lucky ear shot" in 2024, which is also described as an event designed to "anoint" him as "Israel’s genocide-puppet-in-chief". The piece references "American Pravda: Mossad Assassinations" to support the idea that Israel should always be the primary suspect in any political assassination from which it might benefit, recalling the historical activities of "the Old Man of the Mountains" and the origin of the word "assassin".

A significant portion of the article challenges the prevailing narrative that Judaism, through figures like Abraham, led humanity away from human sacrifice. Instead, the author argues that Jews are "the premiere practitioners of human sacrifice," who have historically "conjured up false or exaggerated images of outsiders (goyim) supposedly plotting to kill Jews" as a pretext to "kill the goyim first". In this context, the 9/11 attacks are described as a "fraud" engineered to manipulate Americans into fighting "the enemies of the Jews," a strategy that the author claims was successful in causing millions of deaths and destabilizing the Middle East.

Beyond Israel, the source also considers the Trump administration as a potential suspect, noting Kirk's refusal to "forget Jeffrey Epstein" and his demands for transparency regarding Epstein's files. Such actions, it is suggested, could have threatened Trump's base of support. However, the author quickly dismisses the idea that the Trump administration would directly run an assassination unit, implying they would delegate such tasks to Mossad and its "friends in the Jewish-dominated organized crime community".

The article also raises significant doubts about the official narrative surrounding the alleged assassin, Tyler Robinson. It highlights discrepancies, such as the absence of the rifle in video footage of his escape and the rapid emergence of media reports, suggesting a "pre-prepared media story". Further, it references theories about a private jet, reportedly owned by a militant Zionist and a friend of Israeli ministers, taking off from a nearby airport with its transponder turned off shortly after the shooting. Ultimately, the author suggests that the event fits into a broader pattern of myth-making and narrative control, where the objective is to achieve specific political outcomes, often at the expense of factual accuracy.

We now turn our attention to "Close Ties Between Neo-Nazi Junta and Drug Cartels Uncover US/NATO Hypocrisy - LewRockwell". This article highlights a significant and recent development: on September 5, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to officially rename the Department of Defense (DoD) to the Department of War (DoW). Trump justified this change by asserting that the founders had established the department as the DoW to "win wars, inspiring awe and confidence in our Nation’s military, and ensuring freedom and prosperity for all Americans". He controversially claimed that the US "won the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II". However, the article immediately challenges these historical assertions, noting that the War of 1812 ended in a "status quo ante bellum at best" with Washington DC being burned, and describing the idea of the US military alone "winning" WWI and WWII as "beyond ridiculous," pointing to Russia's far greater contribution, particularly in WWII.

The rebranding to the DoW, according to Trump, was intended to "signal our strength and resolve to the world" and ensure "peace through strength," demonstrating a "willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice". Trump also stated that this new name would "sharpen the Department’s focus on our own national interest and our adversaries’ focus on our willingness and availability to wage war to secure what is ours". The article expresses alarm at this notion, emphasizing that the idea of America "waging war to secure what is ours" is precisely what concerns sovereign countries globally, given Washington DC's tendency to "arbitrarily determine the 'ownership' of whatever it points its finger at".

The author contends that the American government, driven by "plutocrats, kleptocrats, warmongers and war criminals," has a vested interest in fostering global instability, conflicts, death, and destruction, either directly or through proxies. The Department's role in this, whether as DoD or DoW, remains unchanged. Despite Trump's rhetoric about "peace" and even aspirations for a "Nobel Peace Prize," his actions are presented as contradictory. For instance, an attack on Iran mere months into his administration and unfulfilled promises to "immediately end" the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, along with other pledges like the release of Epstein files and "no new wars," expose a disconnect between his words and deeds.

Crucially, the article highlights that Trump's stance on military spending shifted dramatically after he took office, with the Pentagon's official budget projected to reach a trillion dollars during his presidency and continue increasing. The promised reforms never materialized, and the DoW is effectively described as a "cash cow" for the corrupt elements within the US government. A stark point of criticism is that the Pentagon has failed all of its financial audits for decades, specifically failing its seventh financial audit in 2024, with 63% of its $4.1 trillion in assets untracked and an astonishing $21 trillion in spending unaccounted for between 1998 and 2015. This lack of oversight is seen as a violation of the US Constitution, which stipulates that the military budget should not be paid in such circumstances.

The formation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with Elon Musk was presented as a solution for budgetary oversight, but it is dismissed as a "red herring". Musk's subsequent departure and criticism of the administration underscore its failure to keep promises, with Washington DC continuing its controversial budgetary practices. The article concludes by noting the US's increasing belligerence, culminating in the attack on Iran and the current contemplation of a direct confrontation with Venezuela, based on a "false pretext" that its president is "running a narco cartel". This situation is framed as a potential "Noriega 2.0" moment, with the possibility of military strikes on Caracas, further demonstrating the government's hypocrisy regarding its "no new wars" pledge.

Now, we move to "Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism - LewRockwell". This article opens by emphasizing the profound yet often invisible influence of public relations, or propaganda, in shaping societal beliefs. It asserts that PR firms consistently craft narratives that a majority of the public believes, even when these narratives go against their self-interest. The author states that a primary goal is to expose this industry's playbook, revealing how "independent" experts are used to parrot carefully "sculpted language," which is then amplified by the media. This, according to the source, is evident in campaigns such as those for COVID-19 vaccines, described as the largest PR campaign of our lifetime. The article highlights that many widely held cultural beliefs actually originate from PR campaigns, explaining why so many accepted ideas are "wrong," as genuinely true beliefs would not require such extensive PR investment.

A central focus of this piece is the belief that "vaccines don't cause autism," which is identified as an "implanted belief" stemming from these very PR campaigns. The source discusses efforts by RFK Jr., supported by Trump, to reform America's vaccine program and restore public trust in medicine. These reforms aimed to uphold vaccine safety requirements, openly evaluate the risk-benefit ratio for each childhood vaccine, and mandate clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy for new vaccines before approval. However, these efforts were met with "a startling degree of hatred and fervor," with "vaccine zealots" within the government actively sabotaging attempts to make raw vaccine data accessible to the public.

The article details a significant incident where the new CDC director was asked to remove problematic CDC officials for obstructing these reforms; upon her refusal, she was fired. Immediately following her dismissal, these officials resigned. One such official, Demetre Daskalakis, who was in charge of vaccinations, then made a public scene, accusing RFK Jr. of waging a "war on science". The source points out that Daskalakis, also an advocate for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), had public photos showing him in various "fetish outfits," some with "satanic symbology". This led commentators to suggest that his personal preferences and those of others influenced the CDC's aggressive promotion of COVID vaccines.

The mass newborn Hepatitis B vaccination program is singled out as particularly controversial, described as being based on a "lie concocted to shield the actual reason" for its implementation, which was deemed "not palatable to the general public". This serves as an example of how "implanted beliefs" can be powerful, even leading medical professionals to reflexively believe in a "moral imperative" for such vaccinations. The article further critiques Daskalakis's "duplicitous" behavior, citing his "tone deaf resignation letter" which accused RFK Jr. of being a "menace" while repeatedly using the term "pregnant person". His subsequent media appearances, where he notably switched from "pregnant person" to "pregnant women" on a different network and used "unnatural sculpted phrases," suggest he was coached by a PR firm to manipulate the audience and present a polished, yet insincere, narrative.

According to RFK Jr., Daskalakis actively defied orders, blocked critical funding to Texas during a measles outbreak, and stonewalled attempts to access vaccine safety data, specifically the Vaccine Safety Data Link, for seven months. Daskalakis also oversaw the system that captured "fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries," described as "malpractice". This information leads the author to conclude that Daskalakis and others at the CDC intentionally sabotaged the Texas measles response, using measles as a "political tool" to further their agenda rather than out of genuine concern for public health. This, according to the source, exemplifies the "degree of duplicity" within CDC leadership.

The article draws parallels to George Orwell's "1984," suggesting that language can define a culture, and the absence of certain ideas in language can prevent a populace from conceiving them. It highlights the use of "ambiguous terms" that are not clearly defined, allowing PR firms to steer public interpretation toward a desired conclusion, even if contradictory, thus enabling them to "have their cake and eat it too". The phrase "safe and effective" for vaccines is cited as a prime example, allowing it to be interpreted as "100% safe and effective" without explicit lies, thus avoiding accountability. Fauci's congressional testimony on vaccine efficacy is provided as an illustration of this tactic.

Finally, the most critical point from this source is the assertion that neurological damage, particularly to the brain, was a widely recognized side effect of vaccination, with medical literature extensively reporting "vaccine brain and nerve injuries" such as encephalitis, many of which were "identical to what are seen in modern day autism". The article reveals that it was once widely accepted that vaccines could cause "mentally retarded" or "severely retarded" conditions. However, following campaigns by disability groups in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and particularly a 2008 campaign to end the "r-word," and a 2010 law signed by Obama, the term "mentally retarded" was effectively outlawed from federal statutes and replaced with "intellectual disability". The author states that upon learning this, they realized that vaccine brain injuries that caused "mental retardation" were "re-labeled as 'autism'," and autism was given an "extremely broad and vague definition" that encompassed various neurological injuries. This linguistic shift, the article argues, provided an "easy mental escape from an uncomfortable topic," allowing people to "write it off and close their minds to it".

We now turn to "Men of the West: We Are at War - LewRockwell". This article opens with the dramatic assertion that the assassination of Charlie Kirk serves as a stark indicator of a "total war" being waged against the West. The author attributes this conflict to "politically motivated leftists and globalists" who, he claims, actively "hate the west" and are intent on its destruction. The piece criticizes leftist journalists for their alleged attempts to suppress news of events like the murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska by a black man on a train, and for subsequently focusing more on the online treatment of the killer than on the murder itself when forced to cover the story. The author observes that thousands of leftists online expressed glee over the deaths of both Zarutska and Kirk, and also celebrated trans mass shooters who killed Christian children.

The article argues that leftists attribute Kirk's death to his beliefs, yet the author dismisses claims of "right-wing violence" as "gaslighting on an epic level." Instead, the author contends that the majority of violence over the past decade, including riots, assaults, attacks on Christian events, assassination attempts, and mass shootings, has originated from the political left. The January 6th Capitol riot is presented as an exception, with its immediate cause attributed to the Capitol Police shooting peaceful protesters. According to the author, Charlie Kirk's "real crime" was his unwavering commitment to "telling the truth without shame". The piece critiques conservative and populist movements for their excessive reliance on public debate, arguing that leftists are not concerned with being "right" but solely with "winning".

The author characterizes the existing system as "infected" and "infested by parasites," suggesting that constructive social discourse is impossible because "leftists and globalists" despise Western culture and aim to erase its history. From this perspective, the author concludes that "the left needs to go". The source posits that the traditional conservative approach of adhering to civics and law is being exploited by the political left, who rely on these limitations in how conservatives engage in conflict. The author advocates for abandoning this traditional approach, stating that the constitutional rights of those who have "declared war" on one's country and freedoms should not be respected.

The author reiterates past warnings about civil destabilization in 2025, anticipating "terror attacks" that could be either legitimate or "fabricated by covert interests" to generate public fear. He specifically warned about far-left groups resorting to "Weather Underground-like tactics" such as "infrastructure terrorism and political assassination," potentially guided by "calculating people behind the scenes". While acknowledging theories that Kirk's shooting might be a "false flag" operation designed to sow division among Americans, the author dismisses this, arguing that the nation is already divided, and the outcome—leftists applauding his death—remains the same regardless of who the killer is.

Regarding solutions, the article views "martial law" as merely a "stop gap" measure, akin to treating Stage 4 cancer with morphine, which fails to address the "root of the disease" – identified as "corrupt Democrat leaders in blue cities" who protect repeat offenders. The author asserts that the "time for measured responses is over" and openly welcomes "widespread vigilantism" as an "inevitable" and "natural alternative". The piece concludes with a powerful call for anger and vengeance to restore "balance" and "justice," urging "men of the west" to rise and defend their principles, ideals, and people by "destroying all enemies, foreign and domestic". This includes expelling those who harbor hatred for the West, forcibly shutting down NGOs and corporations that fund activists, and eliminating individuals and groups actively seeking to harm or kill Western citizens.

Moving to "News stories from various sources (12.09.2025) - The Expose", this source presents a compilation of recent reports covering a diverse array of topics, offering a snapshot of current events and concerns. Among these are discussions on growing skepticism towards climate change initiatives, proposals for digital ID schemes, reports of economic stagnation in Britain, and analyses of how censorship is allegedly employed for "anti-human depopulation" agendas. It also delves into "hidden mechanisms of unfreedom," Ireland's "disinformation" strategy, the European Commission's alleged funding of mainstream media for propaganda, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the perceived threats posed by Artificial Intelligence, the safety of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), the use of measles vaccine as a base for experimental COVID vaccines, and alarming health risks identified in vaccinated children.

The article highlights a notable trend in Britain: increasing public skepticism regarding climate change and net-zero policies, with voters reportedly turning against these initiatives due to perceived financial burdens and the notion of a "grift" associated with the cause. Concurrently, the UK government is exploring the implementation of a digital ID scheme, ostensibly aimed at addressing illegal immigration, prompting a historical review of ID cards in Britain. The British economy itself is reported to have stalled in July, exhibiting zero growth and a significant downturn in manufacturing output, a situation attributed to the Labour government leading the country towards "stagnation and decline".

A more insidious theme presented is the argument that censorship is being strategically utilized to manipulate individuals into "self-extermination for anti-human depopulation". This is connected to a series examining "The Hidden Mechanisms of Unfreedom," which exposes covert strategies undermining democracy and systematically transferring power and resources from ordinary citizens to a select elite. These strategies often involve "Trojan horse" policies, introduced under benign pretenses, which are later exploited for more nefarious purposes when public resistance becomes difficult. In Ireland, the Communications Minister is reportedly advancing a national "disinformation" strategy despite widespread public opposition, justifying it as necessary to combat online "gossip".

The source reveals that a June 2025 report from the European think tank MCC Brussels indicates the European Commission (EC) operates a "highly sophisticated 'EU media complex'" through which it influences media narratives and promotes its agendas. This system allegedly involves the EC literally paying numerous media entities, including news agencies, mainstream outlets, and public broadcasters, to disseminate its propaganda. In the context of the Charlie Kirk assassination, the article notes that leftist journalists initially attempted to suppress the story, and upon being forced to cover it, focused more on the online reactions to the killer than on the murder itself. It describes leftists as celebrating Kirk's death, attributing blame to his beliefs, dismissing claims of "right-wing violence," and labeling leftist violence as "terrorism".

The advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are portrayed as posing a significant threat to fundamental human dignity, rapidly reshaping law, ethics, and society. Current regulations are deemed insufficient to safeguard rights such as privacy, autonomy, and anti-discrimination. The "black box problem" of AI is highlighted, where individuals cannot trace or challenge decisions made by AI that may cause them harm. On the topic of public health, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), particularly GM corn and associated pesticides, are presented as carrying alarming health risks, including damage to multiple physiological systems, DNA damage from the genetic modification process itself, and the dangers posed by pesticides used on these crops. Molecular genetics expert Professor Michael Antoniou is cited on this matter.

Regarding vaccines, the source reports that the measles vaccine was employed as a foundation for an experimental COVID vaccine (rMeV-preS), which showed promising results in animal studies but was ultimately not approved. This raises questions about its selection, particularly given concerns that attenuated live virus vaccines, like the measles vaccine, possess a "viable residue of organisms" capable of multiplying and potentially reverting to their original virulence. The article also references European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's declaration of an impending "global health crisis," where she cited "disinformation" as a major threat to disease control. Furthermore, a "long-suppressed" Henry Ford Health study is highlighted, which reportedly found that vaccinated children exhibited "significantly higher rates of chronic health conditions," including asthma, autoimmune diseases, and neurodevelopmental disorders, when compared to unvaccinated children. Finally, the article identifies "dirty energy" emanating from cellphone and smart device radiation as a contributing factor to a "massive uptick in health atrocities," particularly among children, noting that this issue remains "off the radar" of America's "Chronic Sick Care Industrial Complex".

Finally, let us explore "V.S. vs. Woke - LewRockwell". This article critiques the contemporary practice of "canceling" writers, even highly acclaimed Nobel laureates like V.S. Naipaul, attributing this trend to "woke" individuals whom the author describes as possessing inferior talents. Naipaul himself faced condemnation for his views on Africa, which the author defends as "correct," characterizing the continent as "primitive and hidebound by superstition". The author suggests Naipaul had the courage to express uncomfortable truths, unlike many other writers who remain silent.

The critique extends to historical literary figures as well. The article points out that "woke phonies" have expanded their cancellation efforts to include figures such as George Bernard Shaw, who is now labeled a "Nazi-lover," and even Charles Dickens, despite his extensive writings in favor of the poor. These instances are presented as evidence of a failure to appreciate artistic merit independent of an artist's personal life or perceived moral shortcomings. The author dismisses cancellation as "utterly pointless" and driven by "spotlight-craving fabulists" who invent sensational stories about those they deem their "betters" solely to gain attention.

In a satirical vein, the author attempts to demonstrate the absurdity of "woke" language by adopting its terminology, using phrases like "birthing person" and "inseminated person" to highlight what is perceived as overly sensitive "gender-oriented correctness" and the emphasis on pronoun usage. Through this satirical lens, the author critiques various tenets of "woke" ideology, including the idea that parents have no right to bequeath wealth to their children, as the children have not "earned it". Similarly, the article suggests that unemployment benefits should be abolished because recipients "have done nothing to earn their keep". The author further asserts that, from a "woke" perspective, flying the Pride flag year-round should be compulsory for all nations. This entire section is framed as a critical observation of the demands and perceived irrationalities of the "woke crowd".

And finally, we analyze "☕️ RISK TOLERANCE ☙ Friday, September 12, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠". This report begins by announcing that Republicans have initiated a new January 6th Reinvestigation Committee, tasked with reviewing critical unresolved issues. Among their planned inquiries are the unsolved "pipe bomb case" and the mysterious disappearance of deposition records and Capitol security video files from the original committee's proceedings. In contrast to Republican actions, the report notes the failure of Democrats' "redistricting revenge" strategies, which reportedly collapsed due to internal resistance. Democratic incumbents proved unwilling to surrender their "safely blue turf" for what was termed the "greater good," highlighting a lack of internal consensus and a "serious volunteer shortage" within the party. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, in particular, is noted to have faced pressure from progressives for not supporting a democratic socialist candidate and from the Hill regarding government funding.

The tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk is a central focus, with the report stating that his "mortal remains" were returned to Phoenix for burial, and the Vice President of the United States participated in carrying his coffin. President Trump publicly mourned Kirk's death and announced that he would be posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Law enforcement had released new footage and enhanced images of the suspect, described as a college-aged individual, and Trump later announced the assassin's capture. A significant detail emerged with the discovery of a "high-powered bolt-action rifle (not an assault rifle)" discarded near the university, with unfired cartridges reportedly bearing pro-trans and anti-fascist slogans. However, authorities cautioned that these markings could be "misdirection or a false flag".

The report criticizes the far-left media for its response to Kirk's death, describing their pattern of condemning the killing while simultaneously justifying it by mischaracterizing or misquoting his views. This approach, the article argues, fundamentally "missed the point," as Charlie Kirk's death symbolized the "death of dialogue" itself. His assassination, occurring during a "reasoned debate," is presented as a "bloodstained stake" through any hope that democratic debate can resolve fundamental societal issues, suggesting that the left's true aim is to "end debate, with a bullet".

The report positions Charlie Kirk's vastly successful Turning Point movement as embodying two core American ideals enshrined in the First Amendment: religious freedom and freedom of speech. It asserts that the political left has "absolutely rejected" these ideals by equating "hate" speech with violence and religious speech with hate speech. The premise that "speech is violence" is identified as inherently dangerous, as it logically justifies "physical violence" in self-defense, a concept that the report claims has been taught by "experts in the academy" through theories such as "microaggressions". This, it argues, fundamentally conflicts with the First Amendment and traditional American constitutional standards.

A stark contrast is drawn between the American approach to free speech and the legal frameworks of European and many Islamic countries, which restrict certain expressions as inherently violent. This disparity is framed as a "clash of civilizations," where the "American experiment" of tolerating "bad speech" to prevent "enforced speech" is colliding with an "ancient pagan philosophy of mind control". The Founders' view, the report emphasizes, rejected the philosophy of "microaggressions" and "triggering," recognizing "no middle ground between liberty and tyranny" on free speech. Therefore, the report concludes that the "tyrannical notion that 'speech can be violence'" must be "utterly destroyed" to preserve freedom and liberty, and those who adhere to this view should be shunned.

In a significant political development, the report announces that Senate Republicans have triggered the "nuclear option," enacting rule changes to expedite the confirmation of Trump's nominees. This move allows for the confirmation of "entire groups" of subcabinet and ambassadorial positions simultaneously, with debate limited to "two hours" per nominee, effectively bypassing the filibuster. This action is described as a "twisted homage" to former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who first employed the "nuclear option" for judicial nominees years prior. The report concludes with a call to ensure that the Democrat party, characterized as a "vast criminal enterprise," becomes a "spent force and a historical footnote".

thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info

I. A Brief History of the 21st Century By JD Breen

1. The 21st Century as a Period of Decline: America was at its apogee when the century turned, but has since descended into a "one-way dead-end street".
   
   It can be argued that when the century turned, America was at its apogee.
   
   A quarter the way thru, the Twenty-First century is riding down a one-way dead-end street.
   
   

2. 9/11 as the Catalyst for Fundamental Change: The 9/11 attacks are identified as the precise moment when the US Constitution's remnants were discarded and the world as known was irrevocably altered.
   
   As last century was launched when the Maine sank in Havana harbor, this one turned when the Twin Towers were toppled.
   
   The remnants of the U.S. Constitution went in the shredder, and the world we’d known was gone for good.
   
   

3. Bin Laden's Strategic Success: Osama bin Laden's objective was to provoke an American overreaction, a mission that was "accomplished" as the US engaged in perpetual war, leading to increased debt and radicalization.
   
   The 9/11 attacks were meant to provoke an overreaction, akin to how the bin Laden-funded Mujahideen (which a couple US administrations supported) made Afghanistan the Soviets’ “Vietnam”.
   
   If anything, bin Laden got more than he could’ve wished. Since the Terror Wars started, Islamic radicals have proliferated, American puppet regimes have destabilized, Israel is ostracized, and U.S. debt has more doubled each decade.
   
   

4. Erosion of Civil Liberties and Rise of Surveillance: Following 9/11, the government implemented measures like the "Patriot" Act, leading to a significant loss of freedom and the normalization of ubiquitous surveillance under the guise of protection.
   
   The pre-packaged “Patriot” Act came off the shelf. This abomination gave the U.S. government the (unconstitutional) tools it needed to wage perpetual war.
   
   Americans’ bank accounts were scrutinized, transactions limited, identification digitized, communication monitored, travel tracked, and property confiscated.
   
   

5. Perpetual War and Unaccountable Military Actions: The US war machine ran wild, invading or overthrowing regimes that posed no threat to America, and engaging in conflicts where it often funded all sides.
   
   For twenty years, that pattern has repeated. In Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, Syria, and Somalia, the U.S. government invaded, bombed, or overthrew regimes that posed no threat to any American state.
   
   In many cases, it funded every side of conflicts it helped create, fought groups it previously formed or supported, and often backed its avowed enemies… including al Qaeda and ISIS.
   
   

6. Government Exploitation of Crises: A recurring phenomenon is that the government, after creating a calamity, blames others and uses the failure to justify gaining more power and resources.
   
   As usually happens when governments make a mess, the people who cause the calamity are entrusted to craft a solution.
   
   Almost without fail, government gets more resources after catastrophes it creates, then makes new ones and lies about how they were caused.
   
   

II. Antidote for the poisoned mind By Kenn Gividen

1. Subtle Indoctrination by Progressive Media: The "progressive" left subtly shapes public perspectives through small, repeated doses of multicultural ideology embedded in entertainment and media.
   
   This is how the “progressive” left subtly shapes our perspectives—through small, repeated doses of multicultural ideology woven into entertainment.
   
   It’s like a slow drip of poison in our drinks.
   
   

2. Reality as an Antidote to Propaganda: Unfiltered data and exposure to reality, such as crime statistics, serve as a counter to toxic narratives from media and censored social platforms.
   
   The antidote lies in reality.
   
   Regular exposure to unfiltered data, like monthly reports comparing Black-on-White and White-on-Black homicides, serves as a powerful counter to the toxic narratives embedded in TV, ads, and censored social media.
   
   

3. Disproportionate Black-on-White Homicides: The article highlights a significant disparity in homicide statistics, noting 26 black-on-white homicides compared to 7 white-on-black homicides reported in August 2025.
   
   7 white-on-black homicides reported in August, 2025.
   
   Compared to twenty-six black-on-white homicides.
   
   

4. Critique of Media Narratives on Crime: The author criticizes media for framing murder as social justice or subtly blaming victims, and for largely ignoring certain aspects of violence, particularly wife abuse in specific cases.
   
   The hivemind of the intolerant left, critics argue, fosters a harmful narrative by vilifying white males, falsely framing murder as a form of social justice.
   
   When the legacy media described Timothy Kappenhagen as being “in the wrong place at the wrong time,” their phrasing insidiously implied fault, subtly casting blame on him for merely existing in a moment and place where tragedy struck.
   
   

5. Behavioral Tendencies in Violent Crime: The source discusses psychopathic tendencies, disregard for laws, and impaired executive function as factors contributing to reckless and violent acts.
   
   Individuals with psychopathic tendencies often exhibit a blatant disregard for laws and societal norms.
   
   Some individuals exhibit impaired executive function, which can lead to poor decision-making.
   
   

6. Call for Self-Defense and Awareness: The article implicitly and explicitly suggests precautions and vigilance against potential threats, especially in the context of home invasions or interactions with violent individuals.
   
   Also, consider installing security cameras in obvious places. A well-secured door is a given.
   
   While driving, stay vigilant for those who may act impulsively or without considering the consequences of their actions.
   
   

III. Charlie Kirk and the Cult of Human Sacrifice By Kevin Barrett

1. Charlie Kirk's Assassination as a Ritual Sacrifice: The author suggests Charlie Kirk's death had "all the earmarks of spectacular, politicized ritual sacrifice," designed to maintain public myths and unite communities.
   
   The mass-mediated demise of Charlie Kirk had all the earmarks of spectacular, politicized ritual sacrifice.
   
   Most human beings are motivated by myths (sacred stories) not by facts, and one of the most powerful catalysts for mythmaking and myth-maintaining is ritual sacrifice.
   
   

2. Alleged Zionist Motivation for the Killing: Kirk's assassination is theorized to be a response to his growing criticism of Israel, its alleged role in genocide, and Jewish influence in media and "cultural Marxism".
   
   Worst of all, from the viewpoint of his likely killers, Kirk was turning against the pro-Israel narrative he was being paid to parrot.
   
   Kirk had also begun unveiling another awful secret: that Jewish money is behind “cultural Marxism”.
   
   

3. Comparison to Other Historical Assassinations: The author draws parallels between Kirk's death and other significant assassinations, like JFK and 9/11, suggesting a pattern of "Jewish-Zionist" involvement in politically motivated killings.
   
   Zelikow & Co. scripted 9/11 as a spectacular ritual sacrifice of thousands of Americans designed to consecrate, in blood, a sacred bond between Americans and Israelis, and trigger the murder of millions whom Zionist Jews view as their enemies.
   
   JFK, too, was initially struck in the throat, shortly before his brains were blown out the back of his head.
   
   

4. Professional Nature of the Hit and Patsy Theory: The single, precise neck shot and the subsequent narrative are presented as evidence of a professional hit, with the arrested suspect, Tyler Robinson, potentially serving as a "patsy".
   
   Only one bullet was fired at Kirk, hitting him in the neck. According to ChatGPT, “Trauma studies suggest mortality rates for penetrating neck injuries are around 10–15% overall.” So the gunman was either very lucky or, more likely, very skillful.
   
   NO WAY TYLER ROBINSON DID THIS.
   
   

5. Israel as a Primary Suspect in Political Assassinations: The article claims that Israel should always be considered the top suspect in any political assassination from which it might benefit, citing its historical use of such tactics.
   
   Ron Unz’s “American Pravda: Mossad Assassinations” makes a convincing case that Israel should always be the top suspect in any political assassination that it might benefit from.
   
   Their use of political assassination as a central tool of their statecraft even recalls the notorious activities of the Old Man of the Mountains of the 13th century Middle East, whose deadly techniques gave us the very word “assassin”.
   
   

6. The "Jew Cries Out as He Strikes You" Principle: This concept suggests that accusations of external threats are used by Jewish groups as a pretext to initiate violence against their perceived enemies, a pattern allegedly seen throughout history and in events like 9/11.
   
   Jews are actually the premiere practitioners of human sacrifice. They have been conjuring up false or exaggerated images of outsiders (goyim) supposedly plotting to kill Jews, as an excuse for Jews to rise and kill the goyim first, for millennia.
   
   Similarly, the alleged radical Muslim attack on Jew-heavy Lower Manhattan 24 years ago turned out to be a fraud whose real purpose was to trick the Americans into killing—you guessed it—“the enemies of the Jews”.
   
   

IV. Close Ties Between Neo-Nazi Junta and Drug Cartels Uncover US/NATO Hypocrisy By Drago Bosnic

1. Symbolism of Department of War Renaming: President Trump's renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War is presented as more than mere symbolism, reflecting a belligerent stance and signaling a willingness to wage war.
   
   On September 5, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to rename the Department of Defense (DoD) to the Department of War (DoW).
   
   He insists that the name DoW was chosen to “signal our strength and resolve to the world” and that “‘Department of War’, more than the current ‘Department of Defense’, ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend”.
   
   

2. US Foreign Policy Driven by Self-Interest and Instability: The American government, run by "plutocrats, kleptocrats, warmongers and war criminals," has a vested interest in creating instability, wars, and destruction globally, often under arbitrary claims of "ownership".
   
   The notion of America “waging war to secure what is ours” is precisely what worries all sovereign countries on the planet.
   
   The plutocrats, kleptocrats, warmongers and war criminals running the American government have a vested interest in instigating instability, wars, death and destruction all across the planet, whether directly or through proxies.
   
   

3. Trump's Unfulfilled Promises and Policy Shift: Despite promises of "no new wars" and reforms, Trump's actions demonstrated a shift towards aggression, including an attack on Iran and contemplation of direct confrontation with Venezuela.
   
   In fact, Trump hasn’t kept many (if not most) of the promises he made to his electorate, whether it’s the infamous Epstein files, gun control, “no new wars”, etc.
   
   In the next several months, Trump became increasingly aggressive, culminating with the aforementioned attack on Iran.
   
   

4. Lack of Oversight in Pentagon Budget: The Pentagon operates with an enormous, continually growing budget, projected to reach a trillion dollars during Trump's presidency, yet it consistently fails audits and lacks public scrutiny for its vast spending and assets.
   
   The Pentagon’s official budget is projected to reach a trillion dollars precisely during his presidency and is expected to continue growing afterwards.
   
   The Pentagon “failed its seventh financial audit in 2024, with 63% of its $4.1 trillion in assets — approximately $2.58 trillion — untracked” and warned that the DoW failed to account for $21 trillion in spending from 1998 to 2015.
   
   

5. False Pretexts for Military Intervention: The US is criticized for initiating potential conflicts, such as a direct confrontation with Venezuela, based on unverified or false pretexts like its president "running a narco cartel".
   
   On the contrary, the US is now seriously contemplating a direct confrontation with Venezuela, based on a false pretext that its President Nicolas Maduro is supposedly “running a narco cartel”.
   
   This is a potential “Noriega 2.0” moment for the US, with a strong possibility the Pentagon could launch at least limited long-range strikes on Caracas.
   
   

6. DOGE as a Distraction: The creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with Elon Musk was presented as a way to improve budgetary oversight but turned out to be a "red herring," serving primarily in an internal political struggle rather than genuine reform.
   
   Forming the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in cooperation with controversial billionaire Elon Musk was presented as a way to improve budgetary oversight.
   
   However, apart from scrutinizing the infamous USAID, the DOGE turned out to be a red herring.
   
   

V. Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism By A Midwestern Doctor

1. Public Relations as a Cultural Architect: Public relations is presented as a potent, invisible force that shapes widely held cultural beliefs and societal narratives, often instilling viewpoints that crowd out alternative truths.
   
   I have long believed that public relations (propaganda) is one of the most powerful but invisible forces in our society, as again and again, I’ve seen professional PR firms create narratives most of the country believes (regardless of how much it goes against their self interests).
   
   One of the least appreciated consequences of public relations…is that many of our cultural beliefs ultimately originate from PR campaigns.
   
   

2. Suppression of Vaccine Injury Data by CDC: CDC officials, like Demetre Daskalakis, are accused of actively sabotaging efforts to make raw vaccine safety data available to the public and concealing evidence of vaccine harm.
   
   Vaccine zealots within the government have actively sought to sabotage all of RFK’s efforts to make raw vaccine data available to the public.
   
   For seven months, he stonewalled us so we couldn’t get the data.
   
   

3. Duplicity and Manipulative Language in Public Health: Public health officials are shown to use duplicitous tactics and "sculpted language" in media appearances to manipulate public opinion and discredit critics, often avoiding unpopular positions.
   
   It illustrates how duplicitous these people are, as shortly after the initial interview, he went onto another friendly network (MSNBC) and gave a totally different interview where he spoke in a markedly differently manner and did not mention his unpopular positions (e.g., he said “pregnant women” instead of “pregnant persons”), Instead rolled out a long list of polished smears against RFK Jr. while simultaneously having the host (one of Biden’s Press Secretaries) repeatedly cast lavish praise upon him both him and his (ridiculous) letter.
   
   This segment was important to highlight as it was a textbook example of how these people lie to us. For example, it was full of unnatural sculpted phrases designed to manipulate the audience, including fairly over-the-top ones such as using “those images are burned in my mind” (to describe CDC workers…giving him a round of applause when he left).
   
   

4. Measles as a Political Tool: The CDC leadership is accused of using measles outbreaks as a political tool to fulfill an agenda and discredit critics like RFK Jr., rather than genuinely caring about preventing the disease.
   
   This is critically important, as it shows they never actually cared about measles and rather were just using it as a political tool to fulfill their agenda (as virtually all of RFK’s critics blamed both that measles outbreak and everything which went awry in it on RFK Jr).
   
   Likewise, it again illustrates how normal this degree of duplicity is within the CDC leadership.
   
   

5. Linguistic Manipulation to Obscure Vaccine Injuries: Ambiguous terms and linguistic changes are used to manipulate public perception, allowing contradictory interpretations and obscuring adverse events without accountability, such as the phrase "safe and effective".
   
   One of the most common ones is to use an ambiguous term which is not clearly defined, so that depending on the needs of the situation, the audience can be steered towards the desired interpretation of it, even if those interpretations sometimes overtly contradict each other ( effectively allowing the PR firm’s client to “have their cake and eat it).
   
   One of the best examples of this tactic is having everyone in lockstep assert vaccines are “safe and effective” without ever defining what that actually means, thereby allowing the meaningless statement to be treated as “vaccines are 100% safe and effective,” yet simultaneously, having no accountability for lying as those who repeat it never actually said “100% safe and effective”.
   
   

6. Rebranding of Vaccine-Induced Neurological Damage as Autism: Historically recognized vaccine-induced neurological damage, including "mental retardation" and encephalitis, was redefined and broadly swept under the ambiguous umbrella term of "autism" to make it easier to dismiss and manage public discomfort.
   
   Vaccine brain and nerve injuries (e.g., encephalitis) were extensively reported throughout the medical literature—including many identical to what are seen in modern day autism.
   
   The vaccine brain injuries which made children mentally retarded were re-labeled as “autism” and more importantly that autism was given an extremely broad and vague definition which swept over all the concurrently occurring neurological injuries.
   
   

VI. Men of the West: We Are at War By Brandon Smith

1. Charlie Kirk's Assassination as a Defining Moment: The assassination of Charlie Kirk is presented as a brutal event that leftist journalists attempted to suppress, and for which many leftists online reportedly cheered, highlighting a deeply divided society.
   
   I was writing today about the tests of brutality we endure in the western world in modern times, trying to explain why things cannot continue the way they have been for much longer, when the news hit the feeds on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
   
   I have watched thousands of leftists across the web cheer for the death of that innocent girl. I have watched hundreds-of-thousands of them cheer for trans mass shooters after they killed Christian kids, just as they now cheer for the death of Charlie Kirk.
   
   

2. The "Total War" Against the West: The author declares that a "total war" has been waged against the West by "leftists and globalists" who despise its culture and seek its destruction, necessitating a more aggressive response from Western defenders.
   
   Leftists and globalists HATE the west. They hate the US. They want to turn it to dust.
   
   We need to come to grips with the reality that total war has been declared against the west and we must start acting like we are at war if our civilization is going to survive.
   
   

3. Critique of Traditional Conservative Opposition: The article criticizes conservative and populist movements for clinging to public debate and legal frameworks, arguing that such "civics" are ineffective against a "woke cult" engaging in sabotage, violence, and assassination.
   
   The reliance on public debate is part of a deeper problem within conservative and populist movements; we tend to cling to the notion that we are fighting a political battle and that this battle can be won by being the most factual, the most reasonable, the most right.
   
   We have been engaging in civics while the woke cult engages in sabotage, mob violence, child grooming and assassination.
   
   

4. Left-Wing Violence and Hypocrisy: The author asserts that the past decade's violence has predominantly come from the political left, with claims of "right wing violence" being "gaslighting on an epic level," and points to their cheering for violence against perceived enemies.
   
   The only violence we have seen for the past decade has been from the political left. Normally this behavior would be called terrorism.
   
   They blame Kirk and his beliefs as the catalyst; as if he is being punished for a crime.
   
   

5. Anticipation of Civil Destabilization and Vigilantism: The article warns of an impending "civil destabilization" driven by terror attacks from far-left groups and predicts the inevitability of widespread vigilantism and "open season on leftist activists and the elites who fund them".
   
   There is a serious risk of civil destabilization in 2025 caused by a steady series of terror attacks.
   
   It’s going to be open season on leftist activists and the elites who fund them. It’s going to be widespread vigilantism. And, honestly I welcome it.
   
   

6. Call for Aggressive Defense of Western Principles: The author urges "Men of the West" to abandon "measured responses" and actively defend their principles and people by "destroying all enemies, foreign and domestic," and eliminating groups that seek to harm Western citizens.
   
   The time for measured responses is over.
   
   This means destroying all enemies, foreign and domestic. This means patriots going to war.
   
   

VII. News stories from various sources (12.09.2025) By Rhoda Wilson

1. Media and Government Propaganda: Reports reveal mechanisms where entities like the European Commission pay mainstream media to promote their narratives, and governments, like Ireland's, push "disinformation" plans to tackle online "gossip".
   
   A June 2025 report from the European think tank MCC Brussels shows that the European Commission (“EC”) runs a highly sophisticated “EU media complex” through which it gets to shape media narratives about itself and its agendas.
   
   Ireland’s government is pressing on with its national “disinformation” strategy... citing need to tackle online “gossip” circulating online.
   
   

2. Censorship and Depopulation Agendas: Censorship is alleged to be a tool for "self-extermination for anti-human depopulation," suggesting a deliberate control over information to advance detrimental agendas.
   
   Why Censorship Is Used To Trick You Into Self-Extermination For Anti-Human Depopulation.
   
   Health Ranger Report: Why censorship is used to trick you into self-extermination for anti-human depopulation, 10 September 2025 (15 mins).
   
   

3. Hidden Mechanisms Undermining Democracy: A series examines "Hidden Mechanisms of Unfreedom," describing a "Trojan horse mechanism" where policies are introduced under innocent pretenses but later used for less benign purposes.
   
   In ‘The Hidden Mechanisms of Unfreedom’ series, Alex Klaushofer has been examining various ways in which democracy is being covertly undermined, with power and resources being steadily transferred from ordinary people to a small elite.
   
   This strategy facilitates the introduction of a policy that would never gain public acceptance if described truthfully, presenting it in the most innocent of lights.
   
   

4. Rising Skepticism of Climate Change and Net Zero Policies: Research indicates a significant increase in public skepticism regarding climate change and a growing unwillingness among voters to support net-zero policies, particularly in Britain.
   
   Research for The Times has uncovered a huge rise in scepticism over climate change as voters turn against net zero policies.
   
   Thomas J Shepstone highlights and comments on some of the indicators in The Times article that “Brits are growing ever more sceptical of the global warming cause and ever less willing to pay for the grift that works off the cause”.
   
   

5. Health Risks of Vaccines and GMOs: Reports highlight health concerns related to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and pesticides, and suppressed studies revealing higher chronic health conditions in vaccinated children, alongside the potential risks of using attenuated live viruses in vaccines.
   
   A large body of evidence from well-controlled laboratory animal toxicity studies that show evidence of harm to multiple physiological systems” from toxic agents found in GM corn.
   
   A long-suppressed Henry Ford Health study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children found vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of chronic health conditions, including asthma, autoimmune diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders.
   
   

6. Threats from Artificial Intelligence: Artificial intelligence is seen as rapidly reshaping law, ethics, and society in ways that threaten fundamental human dignity, privacy, autonomy, and anti-discrimination rights, with current regulations failing to keep pace.
   
   Artificial intelligence is reshaping law, ethics, and society at a speed that threatens fundamental human dignity.
   
   The “black box problem” leaves people unable to trace or challenge AI decisions that may harm them.
   
   

VIII. V.S. vs. Woke By Taki Theodoracopulos

1. Prevalence and Pointlessness of "Cancel Culture": The article observes that "canceling writers" like V.S. Naipaul, George Bernard Shaw, and Charles Dickens has become common practice by "woke" individuals, despite their significant literary contributions, rendering such actions utterly pointless.
   
   Canceling writers is pretty common nowadays, the latest being an old friend of mine, V.S. Naipul.
   
   Cancellation is utterly pointless. Only a moron would follow suit, and morons don’t usually read good books.
   
   

2. Intellectual Decline and Moral Judgment: The author criticizes "intellectual midgets" for judging "intellectual giants" based on contemporary "woke" moral standards, lamenting the denigration of classic authors and their works.
   
   Such are the joys of today’s intellectual midgets judging intellectual giants.
   
   George Bernard Shaw is now considered a Nazi-lover, and his clever, socially minded books and plays are denigrated by those woke morons who make the rules today.
   
   

3. Dismissal of Unflattering Truths: V.S. Naipaul was condemned for his critical views on Africa, which the author describes as courageous truth-telling, highlighting a societal tendency to "keep quiet" rather than speak uncomfortable truths.
   
   Trinidad-born Naipul has been condemned for his views on Africa—he correctly saw the continent as primitive and hidebound by superstition.
   
   I’d say he hit the nail on the head and had the courage to write the truth rather than think it and keep quiet, as the rest of the scribes do.
   
   

4. Artists as Artists, Not Moral Guides: The author argues that artists should be appreciated for their art, not judged as moral guides, criticizing the "woke phonies" for retroactively imposing moral standards on historical figures.
   
   One doesn’t look to artists as moral guides, but as artists.
   
   The woke phonies have even included Charles Dickens among their baddies who should be canceled—Dickens of all people, who wrote nonstop in favor of the poor, but it is said he was a tyrant at home.
   
   

5. Satire of Woke Language and Concepts: The author employs satire to mock "woke" language and concepts, such as "birthing person," "chest-feeding," "inseminated person," and the compulsory use of pronouns, to highlight their perceived absurdity.
   
   The other day here in Gstaad I ran into a birthing person chest-feeding, and I exchanged ideas with that person.
   
   So from now on let us Takimag readers respect the woke and their pronouns. And never, ever offend nonbinary people.
   
   

6. Compulsory Progressive Ideals: The article satirizes the imposition of progressive ideals, suggesting that flying the Pride flag year-round should be compulsory and that traditional inheritance rights should be abolished, reflecting a perceived overreach of "woke" ideology.
   
   Flying the Pride flag year-round should be compulsory to all nations.
   
   Mummy and Daddy have no right to leave their money to you because you have done nothing to earn it.
   
   

IX. ☕️ RISK TOLERANCE ☙ Friday, September 12, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 By Jeff Childers

1. Charlie Kirk's Assassination as the "Death of Dialogue": Kirk's death, occurring during a reasoned debate, is presented not as a vindication against intolerance but as the symbolic "death of dialogue" and the end of hope for resolving issues through democratic debate.
   
   Charlie Kirk’s death did not represent any kind of vindication against “intolerance,” however attenuated. It represented the death of dialogue.
   
   But they killed him during just that kind of reasoned debate, driving a final, bloodstained stake through any shred of hope that democratic debate could resolve the issues separating the sides.
   
   

2. Clash of Civilizations: Free Speech vs. "Speech as Violence": Kirk's assassination highlights a "clash of civilizations" between American First Amendment ideals of religious freedom and freedom of speech, and a philosophy, propagated by the left and academia, that views "hate" speech as violence, thus justifying violent responses.
   
   The tyrannical notion that “speech can be violence” —in whatever form— must be utterly destroyed, wiped from the face of the Earth, and the fields salted, or else freedom and liberty are doomed to vanish from this mortal realm.
   
   If speech is violence, then physical violence is an appropriate response.
   
   

3. Leftist Academic Theories Justifying Violence: Academic theories like "microaggressions" and "violent speech" are cited as providing the philosophical basis for the belief that "trigger words can actually hurt you," leading to the justification of physical violence in response to speech.
   
   For two decades, college professors have been teaching mushy-skulled students that sticks and stones may break your bones, and trigger words can actually hurt you.
   
   Simply put, the ideas of “microaggression” and “violent speech” are incompatible with the First Amendment.
   
   

4. Senate Republicans' "Nuclear Option": Senate Republicans invoked the "nuclear option," changing rules to confirm Trump's subcabinet and ambassadorial nominees in groups and limiting debate to two hours, aiming to overcome Democratic obstruction.
   
   Senate Republicans trigger 'nuclear option,' changing rules to speed up Trump nominees.
   
   The new rule, established by the GOP on party lines, will enable it to confirm Trump nominees in groups, rather than individually.
   
   

5. Democrats' Failed Redistricting Strategy: Hakeem Jeffries' plan for "redistricting revenge" collapsed due to resistance from fellow Democrats unwilling to sacrifice safely blue districts, highlighting internal party selfishness and disorganization.
   
   Hakeem Jeffries’ redistricting crusade runs into resistance from fellow Democrats.
   
   Nobody’s lining up to donate chunks of their safely blue turf for “the greater good”.
   
   

6. Republicans' January 6th Reinvestigation: Republicans have formed a new January 6th Reinvestigation Committee, identifying the unsolved 'pipe bomb case' as a concrete topic for review, suggesting a renewed focus on aspects of the event previously unaddressed.
   
   Republicans name members to new Jan. 6 committee.
   
   So far, the only concrete topic they’ve identified for reinvestigation is the unsolved ‘pipe bomb case,’ which Biden’s hapless FBI was unable to solve and took them almost three years to scrape up clear surveillance video.
   
   

Executive Summary: Analysis of Western Decline and Societal Transformation in the 21st Century

This report synthesizes insights from various alternative media sources, presenting a critical perspective on the trajectory of Western civilization, particularly the United States, in the 21st century. It argues that the post-9/11 era marked a fundamental shift away from constitutional liberties and towards perpetual conflict and state overreach, accompanied by a profound deterioration in public trust and social cohesion. The analysis highlights how ideological warfare, governmental malfeasance, and the manipulation of information are perceived to be driving a systemic breakdown, manifesting in escalating political violence, racial tensions, and a perceived "war against the West".

Key findings include:

• The "War on Terror" as a strategic overreaction designed to expand governmental power and serve geopolitical interests, leading to immense debt and destabilization.

• A growing climate of political violence and ideological polarization, exemplified by the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which some sources interpret as a ritualistic act to silence dissent and reinforce specific narratives.

• Concerns about governmental and institutional corruption, particularly within the military and public health sectors, characterized by immense unaccounted spending, lack of oversight, and the use of propaganda to shape public beliefs, notably regarding vaccine safety.

• The erosion of free speech and critical thought, with "woke" ideologies labeling dissenting views as "hate speech" or "violence," thereby justifying suppression and physical responses.

• A deterioration of social order and increased racial tensions, fueled by media narratives and a perceived reluctance to address crime statistics honestly.

The report concludes that Western societies are at a critical juncture, facing an existential threat from internal and external forces seeking to undermine traditional values, freedoms, and national interests. Without a radical re-evaluation and decisive action, the current trajectory points towards further destabilization and the potential demise of Western civilization as understood by these sources.

1. Introduction: The Unraveling of the 21st Century - A Critical Juncture

The early 21st century, while still "marinating," is widely viewed as navigating a "one-way dead-end street". Once considered at its apogee with the U.S. as the undisputed global power, America has since witnessed a significant decline in public and private finances, escalating debt, and a pervasive corruption within its political class. The government, once at least pretending not to be at war with the world or its own citizens, is now perceived as overtly engaged in both. This report explores the various facets of this perceived decline, drawing upon critical analyses and recent events highlighted in the provided sources.

A key theme emerging from the sources is the erosion of foundational American ideals, including freedom and privacy. The societal landscape has transformed dramatically, with younger generations growing up in a world saturated with digital technology and social media, never knowing a time without constant connectivity and pervasive surveillance. This shift is not merely technological but deeply cultural and political, leading to a pervasive sense of unease and a growing call for radical change from various perspectives within the sources.

2. The Erosion of American Society: A 21st Century Retrospective

2.1. Post-9/11 Paradigm Shift: The Day Everything Changed

The 21st century, for many, fundamentally began not on January 1, 2000, or 2001, but on September 11, 2001, with the toppling of the Twin Towers. This event is depicted as the catalyst that "shredded" the remnants of the U.S. Constitution and ushered in a new, more authoritarian world. The attacks, while shocking, were not surprising to those paying attention, given decades of U.S. government "mayhem in Muslim lands".

Instead of introspection, U.S. leaders responded with more aggression, stoking fear, intervening globally, and stripping away civil liberties under the guise of safety. Osama bin Laden's stated goal of "bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy" through an overreaction to 9/11 is seen as having largely succeeded. The subsequent "Terror Wars" led to a proliferation of Islamic radicals, destabilized American puppet regimes, ostracized Israel, and doubled U.S. debt each decade.

Key legislative and institutional changes following 9/11 include:

• The "Patriot" Act, described as an "abomination" that granted the U.S. government unconstitutional tools for perpetual war, both abroad and at home.

• The creation of the Department of Homeland Security, which allegedly targeted American citizens as "the usual suspects" under the pretext of fighting terror.

• The normalization of ubiquitous surveillance, airport screenings, mandatory identification, and confiscation of property, all accepted "blithely" by Americans frightened by "imbecilic 'terror alerts'".

This period is characterized by a "dopey dichotomy" where citizens were forced to choose sides ("with us or with the terrorists"), eliminating neutrality and serving the interests of "bankers, weapons manufacturers, and other connected industries". The Fourth Amendment, protecting against unreasonable searches, was effectively discarded.

2.2. Economic and Governmental Decay: The Unaccountable War Machine

The sources paint a picture of a war machine unleashed and unaccountable, running wild after 9/11. Despite attacks by Shi'ite Saudi militants, the U.S. government invaded and destabilized countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, Syria, and Somalia, which posed no threat to the American state. In many instances, the U.S. government funded multiple sides of conflicts it helped create, fought groups it previously supported, and even backed its "avowed enemies" like al Qaeda and ISIS. These wars, costing trillions of dollars and millions of lives, are largely ignored by most Americans.

The Department of Defense, recently renamed the Department of War by President Donald Trump, is described as a "cash cow" for "plutocrats, kleptocrats, warmongers and war criminals". Critically, the Pentagon has failed every financial audit for decades, including its seventh in 2024, with 63% of its $4.1 trillion in assets untracked and $21 trillion in spending unaccounted for between 1998 and 2015. This lack of oversight is seen as deliberate, potentially concealing embezzlement or other "sinister purposes". Trump's promises of reform, including the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are characterized as unfulfilled or "red herrings," failing to address core budgetary issues.

The incumbent administration's policies, regardless of political party, are seen as consistently supporting the military-industrial complex and Israeli lobby, perpetuating "endless wars". "Terror" is presented as an ideal enemy—a tactic and emotion that can never be defeated, serving as a convenient excuse to "topple recalcitrant regimes" and justify continuous conflict.

2.3. Cultural and Social Fractures: The Poisoned Mind

American society is depicted as increasingly fractured and under ideological siege. The "progressive" left is accused of subtly shaping perspectives through "small, repeated doses of multicultural ideology woven into entertainment," likening it to a "slow drip of poison". This narrative is countered by calls for "reality" and "unfiltered data," such as reports on "black-on-white" homicides, to serve as an "antidote".

Specific cases are highlighted to underscore this point:

• Tremayne A. Brown, a 20-year-old from Milwaukee with a history of reckless driving, was reportedly responsible for the death of Iris Feliciano-Hernandez.

• Jovohn Blanke, 24, arrested for the fatal shooting of Stephen George Cox in Tulsa, with authorities confirming the victim and accused knew each other, leading to warnings about "casual friendships with inherently violent individuals".

• Mikel Hackett, 39, arrested for the murder of Mason Henry Doran in Syracuse, New York, with critics arguing the "hivemind of the intolerant left" frames such murders as "social justice".

• Avant Chambers, 18, charged with the murder of 28-year-old Dustin Voss in Topeka, Kansas, among other felonies.

• Barry West, 54, arrested for the road rage killing of 17-year-old Katelynn Strate, whose unborn baby survived.

• Eddie Lacharles Jackson, 23, arrested for the fatal shooting of 24-year-old Rylee James Ferari and a 16-year-old in Colorado, categorized as "driving while white" incidents.

• Andrew Presley, a 31-year-old parolee, charged with the murder of Kelly Black in Wichita, Kansas.

• Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, identified as the suspect in the fatal stabbing of 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte, North Carolina. This case drew comparisons to the global attention received by Heather Heyer's death, highlighting a perceived disparity in media coverage for white victims.

• Demetrius Drew, 30, faces murder charges for the killing of 65-year-old David Labrecque during a home invasion in Hartford, Vermont.

• Kevin Moses Walker, 41, fatally stabbed Holly Beth Hoover Hatcher, 62, during a home invasion in Virginia, before being neutralized by her husband.

• Davarius L. Clark, 29, a bouncer, charged with the murder of bar owner Jeffrey S. Matson in St. Paul, Minnesota, after an argument over bringing a bicycle inside.

• A carjacker fatally shot 28-year-old Timothy Kappenhagen in Cleveland, Ohio, while he was loading groceries, with media framing ("wrong place at the wrong time") criticized for subtly implying fault.

• Joshua Spalding-Wells, 36, and Tyler Gunn, 32, arrested for the murder of 48-year-old Stephanie Keeling during a home invasion in Kentucky, with two white women also charged with complicity, linked to "impaired executive function".

• Harold Dailey, 35, arrested for the fatal shooting of John Byron Roulaine, 51, in Woodlawn, Alabama, during an alleged robbery.

• Jaden Alexander Harris, 24, arrested for the fatal shooting of Joseph Morris Hall, 43, a charter-boat captain, during a minor traffic dispute in Key Largo, Florida.

• Tristen Amani Stewart, 25, charged with capital murder for fatally shooting his wife, Taylor Dudley Stewart, 26, and critically injuring their nearly 2-year-old daughter in Hamilton, Alabama, raising concerns about interracial relationships and media's lack of focus on wife abuse.

• Calvin Foster Jr., 29, son-in-law, arrested for the fatal shooting of Jamie Jones, 53, in Fayetteville, North Carolina, stemming from a domestic situation.

• Keyshaun D. Davis, 20, arrested for the fatal shooting of 17-year-old Deegan Kirschke in Hampshire, Illinois, during a handgun challenge.

• Arel Dawkins, 36, arrested for running over and shooting 42-year-old teacher Braisen Cain, who was pregnant with his child.

• LaShaunda Lewis, 31, a black nurse, charged with murder in the domestic violence death of John "Skip" Dove Jr., 78, in Soldotna, Alaska.

• Trivinci Mack, 19, arrested for the fatal shooting of Alexander Bloodworth, 21, in Orangeburg, South Carolina.

• Trevor Lee, 14, allegedly shot and killed his parents, David Lee, 44, and Brandi Smith, 45, following a domestic dispute in Middleburg, Florida.

• Stephen J. Rogers, 29, charged with first-degree murder and aggravated child endangerment for fatally shooting his mother-in-law, Sharmaine Marlene Burke, 49, near Derby, Kansas, while her 8-year-old grandson was present.

• Anthony Price, 56, charged with the murder of Nicole H. Azzoto, 40, in Syracuse, NY, described as a domestic shooting.

• Isaiah Goins, 26, charged with second-degree murder and armed criminal action in the death of Misty Dawn Guzman-Castro, 43, in Columbia, Missouri, who was shot during an argument after Goins brandished a firearm in her vehicle.

• Nytorian Allen, 23, arrested for the fatal shooting of Richard Hawk, 64, during a road rage incident in Georgia, highlighting concerns about "reduced emotional regulation and limited impulse control".

In August 2025, 26 black-on-white homicides were reported, compared to 7 white-on-black homicides. This numerical disparity is presented as a counter-narrative to mainstream media, which is accused of pushing "multicultural ideology" and "vilifying white males". Commenters on these articles express views ranging from frustration with "progressive" narratives to strong opinions on race, IQ, and the state of American society, suggesting a deep-seated racial conflict.

The concept of "cancellation" of writers like V.S. Naipaul and George Bernard Shaw by "woke morons" is also highlighted as a symptom of cultural decay, where "untalented" individuals denigrate "intellectual giants" based on perceived moral failings or politically incorrect views.

3. Political Violence and Ideological Warfare: The Battle for the West

3.1. The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: A Case Study in Political Sacrifice

The assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, is presented as a pivotal event, viewed by some as a "spectacular, politicized ritual sacrifice". Occurring on the eve of the 9/11 anniversary, his death is seen as symbolically linking his blood to the victims of 9/11, an event that Jewish-Zionist "myth-makers" allegedly orchestrated to solidify a bond between Americans and Israelis and justify the killing of millions of perceived Zionist enemies.

The manner of Kirk's death—a shot to the throat—is noted for its symbolic resonance with ritual sacrifice, echoing the initial injury of JFK and Masonic oaths involving throat-slashing for revealing secrets. Theories surrounding the assassination include:

• Mossad/Israel: Sources suggest Kirk was targeted because he was reportedly "turning against the pro-Israel narrative" he was paid to promote. He had begun to criticize Israel, question the October 7th events as an "inside job," and expose the dominance of "Zionist Jews" in media censorship and financing "cultural Marxism". This shift in stance, especially his public statements about Jewish financing of "left wing anti-white causes," is considered a motive for his elimination. Israel is often cited as the "top suspect in any political assassination that it might benefit from," with the shooting showing signs of a "professional hit" due to the single, precise neck shot from a distance. There are also claims about a private plane with its transponder off taking off from a nearby airport shortly after the incident, owned by a "militant Zionist".

• Trump Administration: Ricky Hale suggests the Trump administration might be implicated, as Kirk had started "joining the dots" on Jeffrey Epstein and resisting Trump's directive to "forget Jeffrey Epstein". A highly influential conservative turning against Trump on this issue could have been damaging to his political base. However, the sources ultimately lean towards Israel as the primary actor, with Trump being seen as "Israel's owner and handler".

• Lone Leftist/Antifa: The official narrative points to Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old, as the killer. However, many sources express skepticism, calling him a "patsy" given the "professional" nature of the hit and inconsistencies in the official story, such as the absence of a rifle in escape videos and the prompt confession. The narrative that a "brainwashed transtifa type" or "leftard yoof" was the shooter is questioned due to the skill required for the shot.

• Cultural Warfare: Brandon Smith frames Kirk's assassination within a broader "total war" declared against the West by "leftists and globalists" who "HATE the west" and want to "turn it to dust". Kirk's "crime" was "telling the truth without shame". Leftist journalists are accused of trying to bury the story or blaming Kirk for his own death, while many leftists "cheer" for his demise and for other acts of violence against conservatives and Christians.

The incident is seen as the "death of dialogue," signifying that reasoned debate is no longer viable for resolving deep societal divisions.

3.2. The "Speech is Violence" Doctrine and its Implications

A core tenet of the ideological conflict is the Left's adoption of the premise that "hate" speech is violence, and religious speech is "hate speech," thereby rejecting the First Amendment's protections for free speech and justifying "violent response" as self-defense. This idea is reportedly taught by academics through concepts like "microaggressions" and "violent speech".

This doctrine is fundamentally "unAmerican," contrasting sharply with the Founders' view that tolerating some "bad speech" is necessary to prevent "enforced speech" and tyranny. European and Islamic legal frameworks are cited as examples where speech is restricted, demonstrating an ancient "pagan philosophy of mind control" that the American experiment is now colliding with. The sources argue that this tyrannical notion must be "utterly destroyed" to preserve freedom and liberty.

3.3. Leftist Violence and the "War Against the West"

Beyond rhetorical warfare, sources assert that the only significant political violence over the past decade has originated from the political left, including "riots in the streets, innocent people assaulted, Christian events attacked, multiple assassination attempts and a slew of mass shootings". This behavior, normally deemed "terrorism," is often met with gaslighting by leftist journalists who blame "right-wing violence" that supposedly "doesn't exist". Examples include cheering for "trans mass shooters after they killed Christian kids" and for the death of Charlie Kirk.

The argument is made that conservatives and populists have mistakenly approached this as a mere "political battle" to be won by facts and reason, while the "woke cult" is engaged in "sabotage, mob violence, child grooming and assassination". This is described as a "total war, a shooting war and a mind war" against Western civilization. The left is seen as "managed by calculating people behind the scenes," using "far-left actors" to carry out "terror attacks" with only a "nudge". The call is for "men of the west" to "stand and defend themselves," to "destroy all enemies, foreign and domestic," and for "patriots going to war". Martial law is viewed as a "stop gap" measure, with widespread vigilantism seen as an "inevitable" next step.

4. Governmental Malfeasance and Systemic Corruption

4.1. Public Health Narratives and Linguistic Manipulation

Public relations is identified as one of the "most powerful but invisible forces in our society," constantly creating narratives that most people believe, even when against their self-interest. A critical example is the belief that "vaccines don't cause autism," which is presented as an "implanted belief" originating from PR campaigns.

The narrative around vaccine safety is heavily scrutinized:

• RFK Jr.'s efforts to reform vaccine programs and openly evaluate risk-benefit data, with Trump's support, were met with "hatred and fervor" and active sabotage from "vaccine zealots" within the government.

• The firing of a CDC director for refusing to remove "problematic CDC officials," who then resigned, brought to light figures like Demetre Daskalakis. Daskalakis is described as an "activist doctor" promoting DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) and having public photos in "fetish outfits" with "satanic symbology". His personal preferences are suggested as an explanation for why he and others at the CDC "directed the CDC to abuse America by relentlessly pushing COVID vaccines".

• Daskalakis's "tone deaf resignation letter," accusing RFK Jr. of being a "menace to science and society" and a "modern day Nazi and Eugenist," further inflamed public opinion, particularly his use of "pregnant person" instead of "pregnant women". His subsequent coached appearances on news networks, using "unnatural sculpted phrases" and avoiding unpopular language, are cited as a "textbook example of how these people lie to us".

• RFK Jr. accused Daskalakis of blocking funds for a measles outbreak response in Texas and stonewalling efforts to obtain Vaccine Safety Data Link for seven months, calling it "malpractice". This indicates that officials "never actually cared about measles" but used it as a "political tool" to advance their agenda.

• The CDC's surveillance system for vaccine injuries (VAERS) is noted for capturing "fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries," and a CDC leader who resigned reportedly felt "uncomfortable with the things he was being asked to do, including providing data for a new analysis of vaccine safety data for potential links to autism, even though dozens of studies have already examined that claim and not found a connection". The source implies this is why "no evidence of the link is ever found".

The concept of "linguistic determination" is highlighted, where ambiguous terms like "safe and effective" (for vaccines) are used to manipulate public perception without accountability, and "brain death" was created to facilitate organ donation. Historically, vaccine-induced neurological damage, including "mental retardation," was openly discussed, as seen in a 1983 Donahue Show debate. The shift away from terms like "mentally retarded" to "intellectual disability" is seen as a deliberate campaign that allowed vaccine brain injuries to be "re-labeled as 'autism'," a "broad and vague definition" that provides "easy mental escapes from an uncomfortable topic".

4.2. Censorship and Information Control

The issue of censorship and control over information is a recurring concern. The sources lament that alternative media outlets, such as The Exposé, are actively censored by "Government and Big Tech" to serve their own narratives. Ireland's Communications Minister is noted for supporting a national "disinformation" plan to tackle "online gossip," despite public resistance.

A June 2025 report by MCC Brussels revealed that the European Commission operates a "highly sophisticated 'EU media complex'" that pays mainstream media to promote its narratives, effectively putting news agencies, media outlets, and public broadcasters "in the pocket of the European Commission". This system ensures that official narratives are disseminated while dissenting information is suppressed.

Sources warn that censorship is used to "trick you into self-extermination for anti-human depopulation," manipulating the public through "deception and delusion" and controlling access to energy and resources. The need for "scepticism and independent research" is emphasized as an "antidote" to these controlled narratives.

5. Emerging Threats and Societal Vulnerabilities

5.1. Digital Control and AI Risks

The increasing reliance on digital systems and artificial intelligence is identified as a significant threat. There is "a lot of media talk about the UK government looking at introducing a digital ID scheme," supposedly to tackle illegal immigration. This is framed as a "Trojan horse mechanism" to introduce policies that would not gain public acceptance if described truthfully, later to be used for "less benign purposes" when people feel "it's too late to resist".

Furthermore, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is described as "reshaping law, ethics, and society at a speed that threatens fundamental human dignity". Concerns include:

• Lack of regulation: Current regulations fail to protect rights such as privacy, autonomy, and anti-discrimination.

• "Black box problem": Individuals are unable to trace or challenge AI decisions that may harm them.

• Threat to humanity: AI "has no idea what it's doing, but it's threatening us all".

5.2. Environmental Agendas and Economic Stagnation

Environmental policies, specifically the "Green New Deal" and "Net Zero" schemes, are criticized. A House Oversight Committee report alleged that the Biden administration funneled billions of taxpayer dollars to non-profits run by Biden allies through the Green New Deal, citing waste, abuse, and excessive executive salaries.

In Britain, there is a "huge rise in scepticism over climate change" as voters turn against "net zero policies," with some labeling it "climate change boll*cks" and a "grift". The UK economy is also reported to have stalled, with "zero growth" in July and a "sharpest collapse in manufacturing output for a year," leading to fears of stagnation and decline under the Labour government. New York's "climate madness" is also warned to "easily lead to blackouts".

5.3. Health and Environmental Concerns

Beyond vaccines, other health and environmental threats are highlighted:

• A "Landmark Study" from Henry Ford Health is reported to have exposed "alarming health risks in vaccinated children," finding significantly higher rates of chronic conditions like asthma, autoimmune diseases, and neurodevelopmental disorders compared to unvaccinated children, after years of suppression.

• Concerns are raised about the use of measles vaccines as a base for experimental COVID vaccines, with NIH reports from March 2021 describing this approach. While showing promising results in animal studies, the rMeV-preS vaccine was not approved. The sources warn that "live" attenuated viruses in vaccines "don't necessarily remain attenuated" and can revert to their original virulence, potentially inducing the disease they claim to prevent.

• "Dirty Energy From Cellphone Radiation" and smart devices is identified as "off the radar" of the "Chronic Sick Care Industrial Complex of America," contributing to a "massive uptick in health atrocities, including for children".

• A molecular geneticist, Professor Michael Antoniou, speaks out on the health risks of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), citing evidence of harm to multiple physiological systems from GM corn and associated pesticides. He argues that regulatory systems have failed to keep pace with these risks.

6. Conclusion and Recommendations

The sources collectively present a bleak outlook for the 21st century, characterized by a rapid decline in societal health, political integrity, and individual liberties. The perceived centralization of power, manipulation of public narratives, and deliberate erosion of constitutional principles are seen as driving forces behind this decline.

From the perspective of these sources, the implied recommendations for navigating this landscape include:

• Radical Skepticism and Independent Inquiry: Actively questioning mainstream narratives, governmental pronouncements, and media portrayals, and engaging in independent research to uncover "unfiltered data" and "reality".

• Rejection of "Woke" Ideologies: Actively opposing "multicultural ideology," "cultural Marxism," and the "speech is violence" doctrine, which are seen as undermining Western values, free speech, and social cohesion.

• Resistance to Governmental Overreach: Actively resisting expanded surveillance, digital identification schemes, and any measures that infringe upon personal freedom and privacy.

• Dismantling Corrupt Institutions: Demanding accountability for unaccountable spending within institutions like the Department of War/Pentagon and reforming or dissolving agencies perceived to be engaged in propaganda and the suppression of truth, such as certain elements of the CDC.

• Preparation for Conflict: Acknowledging the existence of a "total war" against the West and being prepared for various forms of resistance, including political action and, for some, even vigilantism, as "the time for measured responses is over".

• Reassertion of Traditional Values: Prioritizing principles of justice, balance, and the defense of Western civilization, its ideals, and its people, even if it means "destroying all enemies, foreign and domestic".

The current moment is viewed as a "deep crisis long in the making," demanding decisive action to prevent "freedom and liberty" from vanishing.