3-24-25 DailyBriefs.info     PODCAST 

"America’s New Free Speech Enemies List Is Getting Longer, by Philip Giraldi - The Unz Review"

•

The United States appears to be developing an "enemies list" targeting individuals, particularly foreigners, based on their perceived political beliefs or criticisms, potentially infringing on free speech principles1 . This is evidenced by the alleged denial of entry to a French scientist due to messages critical of the Trump administration's research policies1 .

•

European countries like Britain and Germany are reportedly warning their citizens about potential detention upon traveling to the US, suggesting concerns about these new policies2 .


"Evidence of a Famine Plan.pdf"

•

There is an alleged "sinister agenda," purportedly progressing for decades, centered on food control as a weapon to create mass starvation3 . This agenda is linked to Agenda 21, which the author claims aims to transfer control of all earth's resources, including agriculture and food production, to a central authority4 .

•

The author expresses concern over the addition of toxic material to agricultural soil through "biosludge," suggesting this is a deliberate act to pollute the food chain and enable future government control over farms5 .... The EPA's alleged failure to adequately assess the safety of pollutants in biosolids is highlighted as evidence of this issue7 ....


"James Corbett: They don’t want your genes in the pool - The Expose"

•

The history of eugenics, despite being discredited, persists in modern society under the guise of "population control" and "carbon reduction," influencing the worldview of the wealthy and powerful9 . The core motivation of eugenics is the belief in "good" and "bad" genes and the desire to exclude "undesirable" genes from the gene pool10 .

•

A corollary of eugenics is the idea that dominant groups have the right and even obligation to exert their power to improve the species, leading to a "might makes right" mentality10 .


"Nanotechnology terrifies me and it should terrify you too - The Expose"

•

Nanotechnology and the "Internet of Nano-Things" are presented as terrifying developments with potential for misuse. The author, Dr. Vernon Coleman, expresses fear about these technologies11 .

•

Comments on the article suggest concerns about nanotubes being included in COVID patents and their potential use in controlling neurons12 . There's also worry about the deployment of "smart" devices and their implications12 .

"No-virus: a contagious disease that may kill you!"

•

The belief that viruses do not exist is warned against as a dangerous notion that can lead to harmful actions. The author uses the example of discussing anti-viral medicine like ivermectin as contradictory for those who deny viral existence13 .

•

The effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing death from COVID-19, particularly when administered early, is mentioned, contrasting with the rejection of viruses by some14 .


"Online Safety Act: The truth behind one of UK’s most authoritarian pieces of legislation yet - The Expose"

•

The UK's Online Safety Act, intended to make the internet safer, has evolved into an authoritarian piece of legislation that introduces a new criminal offense for "knowingly sending false information" that causes harm and criminalizes "seriously threatening messages" online for both adults and children15 . This is seen as a potential threat to online speech16 .

•

Despite initial recommendations for a voluntary code, the Act now mandates compulsory content risk assessments for technology companies, with potential for significant fines for non-compliance16 ....


"henrymakow.com - Exposing Feminism and The New World Order"

•

The author posits that a "Jewish egregore" is behind the New World Order, viewing non-"believers" as animals to be exploited or slaughtered19 . This is supported by interpretations of the Talmud and Old Testament19 ....

•

The article claims that "anti-Semitism" is used by Jewish leaders to manipulate Jews, while the real reasons for it are hidden, stemming from the "egregore"21 . The Holodomor in Ukraine is presented as an example of a mass slaughter linked to this alleged long-standing feud and the actions of "Bolshevik Jews"22 .


"“Children should have sex partners” – The UN agenda to normalize pedophilia"

•

The UN and WHO are accused of sexualizing young children through education programs that allegedly aim to normalize pedophilia. This includes teaching young children about masturbation, sexual behaviors, and encouraging them to have sexual partners23 ....

•

The Rutgers Foundation is highlighted as a key organization funded by the UN and WHO, responsible for publishing "comprehensive sexuality education" materials worldwide, including content described as child pornography25 .... This organization is linked to individuals and groups with a history of promoting pedophilia27 ....


"“Jesus is Hermaphrodite” (op. cit., page 51) - THE GOVERNMENT RAG INTELLIGENCE REPORT"

•

The article discusses Helena Petrowna Blavatsky's "The Secret Doctrine," highlighting its claim that "Jehovah is androgynous" and "Jesus is hermaphrodite," suggesting that Judeo-Christian mythology is based on androgyny29 .

•

Blavatsky's view of Lucifer as Satan, sacrificed to a new dogma, is mentioned, distinguishing it from the author's interpretation of Satan as one who transforms earthly humans into divine beings29 . The author disagrees with the assessment that Blavatsky was merely an occultist and not a Satanist29 .

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

I. Allegations of Elite Control and Hidden Agendas:

A dominant theme across multiple sources is the assertion that a shadowy elite, often linked to specific groups (e.g., Jewish financiers, Zionists, globalists), secretly controls world events for their own nefarious purposes.

II. Concerns about Free Speech and Censorship:

Several sources express concerns about the erosion of free speech, often linking it to the alleged agendas of the controlling elites.

III. Fears and Suspicions Regarding Technology:

Concerns about the potential misuse of technology for control and harm are evident in some sources.

IV. Conspiratorial Interpretations of Global Events:

The sources frequently interpret current events through a conspiratorial lens, often linking them to the overarching themes of elite control and hidden agendas.

•

Eugenics: The study of how human evolution could be directed to improve “the racial quality of future generations”1 . This ideology has been used to advocate for the forced segregation, sterilisation, and death of those deemed unfit to breed by a self-appointed “elite”2 .

•

Population control: A modern guise under which eugenics persists3 ....

•

Carbon reduction: Another term used as a cover for eugenics3 ....

•

Biosludge: Human sewage rendered into a form after treatment. If it meets certain environmental standards, it can be applied to land as fertilizer5 . However, the EPA has been found to lack sufficient data on the safety of many pollutants found in biosludge6 ....

•

Agenda 21: A detailed action plan, published in 1992, to transfer complete control of all of the earth’s resources, including agriculture and food production, to a central governing authority9 ....

•

Food security: A concept emphasized in Agenda 21, referring to the centrally managed aspects of food including supply, demand, safety, production, and availability11 .

•

Food self-sufficiency: Another aspect of food management under Agenda 2111 .

•

Internet of Nano-Things: The concept of connecting bodily cells to the internet, raising concerns about control and tampering with the human body at a cellular level12 .

•

Online Safety Act: A piece of UK legislation that came into force in March 2025, introducing new criminal offenses for knowingly sending false information that causes harm and for sending seriously threatening messages online. It also requires technology companies to complete compulsory content risk assessments13 ....

•

Recognised news publishers: Under the Online Safety Act, these (i.e., “mainstream” or corporate media) are exempt from fines for potentially harmful material, and online platforms are not obligated to apply their new safety duties to their content15 .

•

Egregore: An occult concept representing a “thought form” or “collective group mind”, an autonomous psychic entity made up of, and influencing, the thoughts of a group of people16 . It is speculated that elite Jews created the Jewish God as their "egregore"16 .

•

Talmud: A central text of Rabbinic Judaism17 . The ethnocentric hostility found in the Talmud is cited as a potential origin of conflict between Jews and non-Jews18 .

•

Holodomor: The greatest mass slaughter in history, referring to the Ukrainian famine in which millions died, largely attributed to Bolshevik policies19 .

•

Noachide Law: The legal system under which it is claimed the completed New World Order, termed the Judaic Anti-Christ World Soviet (JAWS), will operate20 .

•

Prophetic Dispensationalism: A theological viewpoint held by many evangelicals who see figures like Donald Trump as harbingers of their eschatology, potentially leading them to overlook negative actions21 .

•

Rutgers Foundation: A worldwide publisher of “comprehensive sexuality education,” based in the Netherlands and funded by entities like Bill Gates, Planned Parenthood, and the UN22 . It is involved in creating sex education materials for children globally22 ....

•

Comprehensive Sexuality Education: The type of education promoted by Rutgers and the UN, which critics argue aims to sexualize young children and encourage them to start having sex sooner22 ....

•

International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education: A United Nations document that instructs on sexuality education for children, including topics like romantic or sexual partners, kissing, touching, and sexual behaviors from a young age25 ....

•

NIKS: A Dutch abbreviation for "Towards Integration of Child Sexuality," the name of a magazine published by a pedophilia working group that featured explicit content involving children27 ....

•

FWOS (Fund for Scientific Research on Sexuality): The successor organization to the pedophile organization led by Brongersma. It manages Brongersma's child pornography collection and finances projects of Rutgers23 ....

•

Theosophical Society: An organization founded in 1875 to gather and disseminate knowledge and laws that govern the universe30 .

•

Kali-Yuga: In Hindu cosmology, the fourth and final age in a cycle, considered the dark age. It is stated that it began in 188831 .

•

Hermaphrodite: Having both male and female sex organs or characteristics. Helena Petrowna Blavatsky, in The Secret Doctrine, reportedly stated that “Jesus is hermaphrodite”32 .

•

Unz Review: An alternative media selection featuring a collection of interesting, important, and controversial perspectives largely excluded from the American mainstream media33 .... Philip Giraldi's article appears on this platform33 ....

•

Council for the National Interest: A 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Philip M. Giraldi is its Executive Director36 .

•

MICIMATT: An acronym for the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-Media-Academia-Think-Tank complex, used in the context of censorship and authoritarianism37 .

•

BRICS nations: An association of emerging economies (originally Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), mentioned in the context of global shifts and the need for Americans to understand related concepts38 .

•

ZOG: An acronym for Zionist Occupied Government, used to describe the US government as being under the control of certain groups39 ....

•

Khazarian dynastic families: Refers to powerful banking families who are believed to own the Revolution, the UN, and related global entities20 .

•

Mainstream Media (MSM): The dominant mass media, often contrasted with alternative media sources like The Unz Review and The Expose15 ....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

9 sources

send

chevron_right

How does Agenda 21 relate to food control?

What was the stated purpose of eugenics?


•

America’s New Free Speech Enemies List Is Getting Longer by Philip Giraldi - The Unz Review https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-new-free-speech-enemies-list-is-getting-longer/

•

Evidence of a Famine Plan by Jeremy James Evidence of a Famine Plan.pdf (Note: This is a PDF file and does not have a traditional website URL.)

•

James Corbett: They don’t want your genes in the pool by Rhoda Wilson - The Expose https://expose-news.com/2025/03/23/james-corbett-they-dont-want-your-genes-in-the-pool/

•

Nanotechnology terrifies me and it should terrify you too by Rhoda Wilson - The Expose https://expose-news.com/2025/03/23/nanotechnology-terrifies-me-and-it-should-terrify-you-too/

•

No-virus: a contagious disease that may kill you! by Mees Baaijen https://meesbaaijen.substack.com/p/no-virus-a-contagious-disease-that

•

Online Safety Act: The truth behind one of UK’s most authoritarian pieces of legislation yet by Rhoda Wilson - The Expose https://expose-news.com/2025/03/22/online-safety-act-the-truth-behind-one-of-uks-most-authoritarian-pieces-of-legislation-yet/

•

John Coleman - Globalists Want You Dead by Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea (Abridged by henrymakow.com) - henrymakow.com https://henrymakow.com/2025/03/john-coleman---globalists-want.html

•

“Children should have sex partners” – The UN agenda to normalize pedophilia https://stopworldcontrol.com/children (The author is not explicitly stated in the excerpt, but the website suggests it is from "Stop World Control".)

•

“Jesus is Hermaphrodite” (op. cit., page 51) by Andronis Dionyso - THE GOVERNMENT RAG INTELLIGENCE REPORT https://thegovernmentrag.com/2025/03/23/jesus-is-hermaphrodite-op-cit-page-51/

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

9 

TRANSCRIPT OF PODCAST

Welcome to the Lenny and Maria March 24th deep dive podcast show produced by daily briefs.info. You know, um, diving into these materials you've shared, they really got me thinking. There's a lot to unpack here.

It's true. This collection really brings up some pretty big questions about the direction things might be going both in the US and on a global level,

right? We're talking about free speech, fundamental rights, really the foundations of how we live in society. And from what I'm seeing in these sources, there's a sense of unease, maybe even alarm about where things stand. We see claims about an enemy's list targeted at those who descent, some pretty uh intense allegations about a planned famine, worries about the implications of new online safety laws in the UK, and then these controversial agendas being attributed to international organizations. It's a lot.

Yeah, it does feel like a lot to grapple with. And honestly, some of it's pretty unsettling, especially when you see the potential for overreach, the influence of certain lobbies, and maybe even a shift away from the norms we're used to. So, our goal today in this deep dive is to really get into the nitty-gritty of each of these sources, try to tease out what's important and help you make sense of it all.

All right, so let's start with this article from the UN review by Philip Geraldi. America's new free speech enemies list is getting longer. Right off the bat, he throws out this idea that the rule of law in the US is being replaced by a more arbitrary system centered on the whims of the chief executive. It's pretty stark.

It is. And he doesn't just leave it at that. He claims that even some of America's closest allies like Britain and Germany are supposedly warning their citizens about the possibility of being detained when traveling to the US. And this is even if their travel is completely legal,

right? Really, even with valid visas and everything.

That's what the article suggests. He even points to specific examples like Germany looking into cases where its citizens were apparently denied entry at the southern border and detained. And then there's a similar inquiry from Britain regarding one of their citizens who was trying to enter through Mexico. So, it's not just some abstract war. It seems like there might be actual events driving these warnings.

That's wild. It makes you wonder like what kind of information are these governments getting? What are their citizens experiencing that's prompting these warnings?

Exactly. And then the article gets even more specific with this case of a French scientist, Philippe Baptist. He was supposedly barred from entering the US because of messages on his phone criticizing the Trump administration's policies on research. The French Minister for Higher Education actually got involved. emphasizing the importance of freedom of opinion and academic exchange. It raises concerns about how political views could impact international scientific collaboration.

It definitely does. It makes you think like how far does this go? But, you know, the same article also presents a totally different side to the story. It mentions that the Department of Homeland Security uh specifically Assistant Secretary Trish Mclofflin came out and called the initial story completely false. They said the denial of entry was actually because the scientist had confidential information from Los Alamos National Laboratory on him, you know, violating a non-disclosure agreement and he apparently admitted to it.

Right. And that's crucial. It highlights how important it is to consider all sides of a story. How the first version you hear might not be the whole picture.

Totally. It's so easy to run with a narrative, but digging deeper and finding alternative explanations and official responses is essential. Okay, so moving on. The article then shifts its focus to universities, basically calling them out as hot beds of anti-semitism. It's pretty mysterious charge implying a crackdown on pro Palestinian demonstrations on campuses. It specifically mentions places like Colombia and UCLA claiming they're showing allegiance to a new order by kicking out students and faculty, even taking back degrees.

Yeah, that's a heavy accusation and it brings up a really tricky question about the balance between protesting and expressing political views, which is a right, and the responsibility of these institutions to address and prevent anti-semitism. The article even goes so as far as to say that Homeland Security agents have been interrogating and detaining students at Colombia without warrants. If that's true, it would definitely raise some red flags about civil liberties.

And adding to that, there's a report that a ton of incoming freshmen at Colombia are actually cancing their enrollment, maybe because of all this stuff going down. It suggests a real sense of fear, you know, about the campus climate and what might happen if you express certain views.

And then there's this really detailed account of Mimmude Khalil's case. He was arrested by IC his green card and visa revoked though a federal judge initially blocked his deportation but he's still being held in Louisiana and there allegations that he can't even talk to his lawyers it raises questions about due process and access to legal representation

and then there's that truth social post from President Trump celebrating Khalil's arrest talking about more arrests to come calling the protesters pro-terrorist anti-semitic anti-American agitators it kind of feeds into that whole enemies list fear that the article is talking about. And it doesn't stop there. Secretary of State Marco Rubio supposedly invoked the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act to target people whose presence could be bad for foreign policy.

Right. And that act, which by the way comes from a time when there was a lot of paranoia about foreign influence, gives a lot of power to the executive branch. Using it to target people based on their political activities, that's pretty concerning. And the article brings up more examples like Momadu Tal from Cornell and Dr. Vadar Kansuri from George. account. Both were apparently detained after participating in pro Palestinian protests, their visas revoked, and they ended up detained in Louisiana with limited access to family and lawyers. It definitely adds to the article's argument that there's this growing trend of people facing consequences for their views.

The article also claims that violence from pro-Israel groups against student protesters has been basically ignored. They give this example of skunk bombs being used against peaceful demonstrators in New York, possibly by former Israeli soldiers funded by Israeli consulate officials and they specifically say that skunk bombs are a weapon developed in Israel. That's a pretty disturbing image.

If true, it would definitely raise questions about whether different protest groups are being treated equally and whether outside actors are influencing protests within the US. The article then connects all of this to the influence of the pro-Israel lobby in the US.

One thing that really stood out to me was the mention of Dr. Karen Yarimo, who heads Colombia's School of International and Public Affairs. The article points out that she's a former Israeli military intelligence officer and worked as an official at Israel's mission to the UN. They emphasize her role in raising concerns about anti-semitism on campus, suggesting a possible link to the actions taken against those pro Palestinian protests.

Right. Her background definitely adds another layer to the situation at Colombia and feeds into the article's broader argument that the close relationship between the US and Israel might actually be impacting civil liberties within the US, especially when it comes to freedoms of speech. each and association and how they intersect with views on Israeli policy. The article ends by asking what other actions might be taken in this perceived erosion of fundamental rights. It leaves you wondering what might be next.

Okay, so let's switch gears now and look at something completely different. This is a PDF document called Evidence of a Famine Plan by Jeremy James. This document takes a pretty specific interpretation of biblical prophecy, claiming that massive death from starvation and disease is predicted in the end time. The author uses passages from Revelation, Lamentations, Zephaniah, and the Psalms to support his view.

It's important to remember that this interpretation is coming from a particular theological perspective. He makes a distinction between what he calls the great day of the Lord and the day of Christ, seeing a period of divine judgment and wrath after a separate event. This theological framework then becomes the basis for his claims about a planned famine.

He then goes on to say that the wicked have been planning a great set for centuries, believing they'll somehow survive the return of Jesus. This introduces a whole conspiratorial element, tying these alleged long-term plans to what's happening in the world right now. He even cites reports of billionaires building underground shelters because they're afraid of social unrest with hunger being the main trigger. He specifically mentions Mark Zuckerberg's supposed underground shelter.

And to add to that, there's the reference to the Georgia Guidestones and their call for a drastically reduced global population of 500 million. will supposedly worship the antichrist and take the mark of the beast. This fits right into the apocalyptic and conspiratorial worldview the author is building. He also talks about these extensive underground tunnels and caverns built by the elite all over the world, furthering this idea of a hidden group operating in secret.

One of the more uh interesting claims in this document is his interpretation of a 5-hour ritual that happened at the opening ceremony of the Gothood Base Tunnel. He suggests it wasn't just a ceremony, but a celebration on ing demonic entities who supposedly helped build the tunnel and other similar mega projects.

Right? That shows how the author sees symbolic or occult meaning in major world events, interpreting them through this lens of a spiritual battle between good and evil. Then he moves on to the idea that this elite has a detailed plan to enslave all of humanity, which leads to a discussion of the UN's agenda 21 or agenda 2030 as it's now called.

He describes Agenda 21 as this big plan signed by loads of countries to transfer control of all Earth's resources, including food, to a central authority, which he equates to Marxist goals. It's important to remember that the UN presents Agenda 2030 as a framework for achieving sustainable development. So, there's a pretty big difference in perspective there.

Exactly. What one person or group sees as a necessary step towards global sustainability, another might interpret as a power grab or a move towards centralized control, especially if they're looking at it through a more conspiratorial lens. Another good example of this is his analysis of the Hunger Games. He calls it predictive programming, supposedly conditioning people to accept a dystopian future where everyone is starving.

He keeps bringing up the word food, pointing out how many times it appears in the Agenda 21 text. He lists all these different aspects of food management and talks about food security. Then he asks this question like, "Will these regulations actually increase the global food supply or will they decrease it?" He's clearly skeptical.

And then he uses all these historical examples of famine being used used for political purposes like the Holodomore in Ukraine, the Cambodian famine under pole pot, the Irish famine, the Bengal famine and the great Chinese famine. By talking about the huge numbers of people who died, he wants to show how easily food scarcity can be created or exploited for political reasons.

Right? That historical context adds another dimension to his argument, even if his take on current events is very much grounded in a conspiratorial worldview. Then he gets into a whole list of alleged modern methods meths for controlling the world's food supply. And I mean, he covers a lot of ground.

Yeah. He throws out all kinds of claims, many of which are still being debated and don't have scientific consensus behind them. He talks about restrictions on farmland ownership in places like the Netherlands in the UK, concerns about biosudge being used as fertilizer and potentially contaminating the soil, the promotion of GMOs, and worries about nutritional deficiencies and corporate control of food, and the growing power of a few big corporations in the food industry.

He doesn't stop there. He brings up environmental regulations, calling them part of a global warming scam to reduce food production, and then talks about wilding programs that take land out of agricultural use. And then, of course, he has to mention chemtrails and the supposed toxins they contain, the emergence of livestock diseases, and the possibility of vaccines like the one for bird flu being used for mass culling, weather manipulation technologies, cyber attacks on food distribution systems, and even the idea of replacing traditional food with things like insect protein. It's a pretty wide-ranging though often conspiratorial view of what he sees as threats to our food system.

Right. And it's important to remember that a lot of what he's saying here isn't backed up by mainstream science or governments, but it does show a perspective that sees a deliberate multifaceted effort to control the global food supply.

Next up, we have a very short Substack post by Mi's Vision. It has this attention-grabbing title, No Virus, a contagious disease that may kill you. But here's the thing, there's actually no content beyond on the title,

which is kind of interesting in itself. It shows the huge range of perspectives out there and how important it is to think critically about every source, even if they don't give you a lot to go on. Sometimes a thought-provoking title is all it takes to get people thinking.

Okay, now let's look at an article from the expose. The title is Online Safety Act, the truth behind one of UK's most authoritarian pieces of legislation yet. This focuses on the UK's Online Safety Act, which became law in October 2023. One of the main points they emphasize is the potential for massive fines for companies that don't follow the rules like up to 18 million or 10% of their global revenue.

What's really interesting is that the law initially had this harmful but legal provision, but it was taken out because of pressure from campaigners. It shows the constant back and forth over how to regulate online speech and how hard it is to define what's actually harmful online.

The article raises some serious concerns though about new criminal offenses in the act, specifically section 179. which deals with knowingly sending false information that's likely to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm. They worry that this could be used to arrest people just for expressing opinions that go against the grain, even speculation. They mention a Bernie's case and some arrests that happened after protests in Southport.

That really gets at the core tension with these kinds of laws. Governments want to stop the spread of harmful misinformation, but there's always the danger that these laws could be used to silence legit speech, debate, or even satire. The whole idea of what's considered non-trivial harm is pretty subjective, which leaves a lot of room for interpretation and abuse.

But the article does acknowledge that the act has some good intentions. They mention targeting things like child sexual abuse material, terrorism related content, revenge p***, non-consensual intimate images, and material that promotes self harm or suicide. So, it's not all bad. They're definitely trying to address online harms that everyone agrees are unacceptable.

It highlights how tricky it is to write these online safety laws. You're trying to protect vulnerable people from truly harmful stuff, but you also don't want to restrict freedom of expression too much. Different societies and people will always have different ideas about where the line should be drawn.

All right. Finally, we have a bunch of uh let's just say provocative viewpoints from henry manco.com, a website that's all about exposing feminism and the new world order. One comment that really jumped out was this idea that Bob Dylan's, you know, messianic phase was actually caused by Shabbad, which they describe as a Jewish supremacist cult with a plan for a nuclear apocalypse to bring about the Jewish Antichrist. It's a pretty wild claim,

right? It's important to remember that this is a fringe perspective. There's no evidence to back it up. The website also provokes this whole concept of the Jewish God being an egregor, basically a collective mind created by elite Jewish families like the Rothschilds and Warbergs they used to control the world. And they link this egregor to Lucifer and the new world order. That idea of a hidden hand controlling everything through a secret egregor is a common thread in a lot of conspiracy theories often with anti-semitic undertones about some shadowy global power structure. Then they claim that Bolshevik Jews were responsible for the holodomore acting within their egregor. This is not only untrue but also incredibly dangerous in terms of historical revisionism.

It's really important to understand that blaming the hollow on any specific ethnic or religious group is a huge oversimplification of a very complex and tragic historical event. And frankly, it's a dangerous distortion of history. And then the website goes even further, claiming that big names like Trump, Putin, and Netanyahu are members of Shabbad and part of a satanically possessed organized jury trying to start World War II.

It's another completely baseless conspiracy theory trying to lump together different political figures and say they're all part of this evil plan. They also mentioned that case of the French scientist being denied entry to the US for criticizing Trump, which we saw in the first It shows how different sources, even ones that promote conspiracy theories, can pick up on the same news stories, but interpret them in wildly different ways, fitting them into their own belief systems.

The henryo.com site also mentions a bunch of Congress members, urging Trump to appoint an envoy on Jew hatred, links to a Natural News article that says violence against Tesla cars is now considered domestic terrorism, and questions whether switching to electric vehicles is even possible.

All of these different topics are woven into this bigger narrative about a secret global power structure controlling everything. And then they say organized jury orchestrates WW3 like WW2 and WW1 linking to an article about increasing anti-Russia rhetoric in Europe. They're really pushing this conspiratorial view of global politics.

Attributing the incredibly complex causes of global conflicts to the actions of a single vaguely defined group is a hallmark of anti-semitic conspiracy theories. It's just not supported by facts or history. They also call Mark Carney a globalist lick spittle and an enemy of freedom because of what he said about the freedom convoy in Canada. They linked to a YouTube video called Israel's second 9/11, how Zionism conquered JFK, America and Palestine, and to Candace Owens's views on AIPAC.

Yeah, it's clear that the website is heavily focused on anti-ionism, anti-globalism, and distrust of institutions and politicians. They even mentioned the civil war in Myanmar and the fact that Greenpeace had to pay a ton of money in a lawsuit related to the Dakota pipeline protests. It's not entirely clear how those fit in, but it adds to this overall sense of global conflict and injustice.

And then there's a critique of Trump from Pastor Chuck Baldwin accusing him of being two-faced about wars in the Middle East and saying that evangelicals are being tricked by prophetic dispensationalism. It's an interesting contrast, a critical view of Trump coming from a religious perspective, which is different from the website's usual portrayal of him as part of this big conspiracy.

Our last source has a very alarming title, Children Should Have Sex Partners: The UN Agenda. normalized pedophilia. This document makes some really serious and disturbing accusations against the World Health Organization and the UN. It claims that a WHO document on sexuality education actually tells kindergartens and elementary schools to teach young kids about masturbation, sexual intercourse, online pornography, the idea of having a secret love, and self-stimulation. They even say that the goal is for 9 to 12 year olds to have their first sexual experiences and use pornography.

We need to be very clear here. These claims are a complete misrepresentation of what's actually in that WH document. The WHO does support age appropriate comprehensive sexuality education, but the accusations in this document are baseless and misleading. They don't reflect the actual recommendations from the WHO, which are based on evidence.

They claim this supposed agenda is part of the UN's agenda 2030 sustainable development goals and that the Biden administration is planning to implement this pedophilia normalization agenda in the US.

Again, this is a total misinterpretation of the UN's goals. They focus on things like reducing poverty, improving health and education, gender equality, and sustainable economic growth. The idea that there's a hidden agenda to normalize pedophilia is a dangerous and unfounded conspiracy theory that's been debunked many times.

The document then focuses on the Ruters Foundation in the Netherlands, saying it's a major publisher of comprehensive sexuality education materials that's closely tied to the WHO and gets funding from Bill Gates, Planned Parenthood, and the UN. They show what they claim are cute illustrations supposedly used to indoctrinate toddlers about masturbation and sexual partners and they give translations of the curriculum for different age groups that fit their earlier claims.

You have to be extremely skeptical about their interpretations of those educational materials. Comprehensive sexuality education when done right is about giving kids accurate information about their bodies, relationships, and sexual health in an age appropriate way. The goal is to promote well-being, prevent abuse, and foster healthy attitudes towards sexuality. It's not about sexualizing children or encouraging harmful behaviors.

They say that Rutgers has published guides for training teachers to indoctrinate kids about sex from a very young age. And they talk about alleged sex games in Dutch elementary schools. They claim there's a global effort to sexualize children through the media and school curriculums, all driven by the WHO and the UN.

These are serious accusations, but there's no credible evidence to back them up. It's important to get your information from reliable sources, especially with such a sensitive topic. The document then makes all sorts of shocking accusations against Ruters, saying they published a report by a known pedophile, worked with a foundation that owns c****************, signed a petition to legalize sex with children, had former politicians who lobbyed for pedophilia legalization in leadership positions, had a director who taught kids to masturbate to develop lust, are financed by someone connected to a pedophile, published material showing child masturbation in oral sex, tell teachers to make sure kids start having sex as soon as possible, recommend a children's book that encourages oral sex, and have curriculum stating that kids should know all about lust in intimacy.

Those are extremely serious accusations. If there were any truth to them, it would warrant a full investigation by law enforcement and child protection agencies. They also talk about an alleged 1,000page manual for pedophiles that was supposedly allowed to exist for years by the Dutch Minister of Justice. It supposedly details how to groom manipulate and avoid the police. They even claim that judges in the Netherlands have called for decriminalizing pedophilia.

The very idea of such a manual officially sanctioned is just horrific and would need immediate investigation by the authorities. Any claims about judges wanting to decriminalize pedophilia need to be carefully examined in the full context of Dutch law and society. You need to rely on official legal records and reputable news sources for that kind of information.

They go on to say that the news media is part of a global effort to normalize pedophilia, giving examples of articles that they say are sympathetic to pedophiles and ignore victims. They accuse the WHO of having criminal agendas like hiding cures for COVID and pushing dangerous experimental injections. They claim Bill Gates controls the WHO and has ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

These are all conspiracy theories that have been debunked. Unfortunately, the COVID pandemic was a breeding ground for misinformation. So, you have to be very careful with these kinds of claims.

The document ends with so-called testimony from a former UN executive director, Kalin Georgesco, who says the UN is a platform for criminals including pedophiles. They reference a documentary called Secrets of the United Nations and a series called Fall of the Cabal. They also include alleged testimony from Natalie Austinina and An Marie Van Bllyenberg who claimed they saw CIA mind programming for elite sex trafficking and the rape and murder of children with officials present. The document finishes with worries about drag queens in schools and calls for people to share it widely.

Child sexual abuse is a real and devastating problem worldwide that needs to be addressed seriously. But the claims in this document rely heavily on misinformation, distortions, and conspiracy theories. You absolutely have to be cautious and only trust information from reliable sources when dealing with such a sensitive issue. Spreading false claims can actually hurt efforts to protect children.

Well, we've definitely covered a lot today. We went from worries about free speech being shut down and disscent being branded as terrorism to these really alarming claims about planned famine and truly disturbing accusations about efforts to sexualize children.

It's a lot to absorb. Your sources try to connect government actions, international organizations, and powerful individuals to threats against our freedoms and well-being. But it's important to remember that these connections are often presented from very different perspectives, and some of them depend on claims that haven't been proven or outright conspiracy theories.

The disagreements we saw, like the DHS pushing back against that story about the French scientist, showed just how important it is to think critically and get information from different sources before making up your mind. And that's something you clearly do as a learner.

All the details we went over, like the cases of people being detained, what was supposedly in those policy documents, and the historical comparisons, those concrete examples can help you make sense of these complicated issues.

So, what's the main takeaway? I think it's that we always need to be vigilant, question what we're told, and keep searching for the truth. And that means looking at a wide range of sources, even if they present conflicting or unusual views. Here's something to think about as you keep processing this information. If the things described in these sources continue, what will happen to individual freedoms, trust in society, and the future of our world? It's a big question worth pondering.

Thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Deep Dive podcast show.