DailyBriefs.info                              MP3  PDF  PODCAST
Creative Transformation: The Evolution of Life and Ethics pgs210-310 by John David Garcia
Briefing Document: Key Themes and Ideas from Provided Text

This briefing document summarizes the main themes and important ideas presented in the provided excerpts. The text appears to outline a personal intellectual journey and the development of a comprehensive philosophical and ethical framework centered around the concept of maximizing creativity. It draws connections between physics, mysticism, ethics, societal structures, and education.

Main Themes:

Important Ideas and Facts:

Quotes for Emphasis:

This briefing document provides a comprehensive overview of the complex and interconnected ideas presented in the provided text. The central theme revolves around an evolutionary ethic driven by the maximization of creativity, explored through the lenses of physics, mysticism, social organization, and education.

he provided text, seemingly from a book exploring creativity and societal progress, introduces a "new synthesis" integrating science and mysticism, exemplified by thinkers like Teilhard de Chardin. The author then presents their own theories in "The Moral Society," focusing on a quantum connection influencing evolution and the importance of ethics and love in fostering creativity. A key concept is "autopoiesis," or self-creation, applied to individuals and groups within an "octet" structure designed for "creative transformation." Finally, the text outlines an "Educational Alternative" based on these principles, emphasizing a fear-free, love-driven learning environment to maximize individual and collective creativity, ultimately suggesting a path toward a libertarian society as a natural outcome. 

takeaway points from the source material, with a supporting sentence for each:

•

The book aims to synthesize rational scientific thinking with diffused mystical thinking. "If we are to be maximally creative we must learn to combine rigorous scientific thinking with diffused mystical thinking."1

•

Creative transformation is not derived linearly but subjectively. "However, it would be misleading to give a linear, logical derivation of Creative Transformation when the linear logic of the process occurred to me only after I derived it."2

•

The new synthesis involves the convergence of all fields of knowledge. "The new synthesis is a twentieth-century phenomenon by which all fields of knowledge are converging to show that physical, biological, and ..."2

•

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a full scientific and artistic mystic. "Part of the problem is that as a total generalist, i.e., a full scientific and artistic mystic, he was misunderstood by both the scientific and the humanistic communities."3

•

Scientists can be prejudiced against mysticism. "Scientists are also highly prejudiced against the introduction of any form of mysticism to any scientific discussion."4

•

Specialists can discredit generalists by focusing on minor errors. "Specialists in any field always try to discredit generalists by latching onto any error they make in the former’s specialized fields."4

•

Fear of error hinders creativity. "We cannot create when we fear error."4

•

Science can help eliminate errors. "Science can always eliminate our errors."4

•

Teilhard's value lies in the beauty and completeness of his synthesis. "The major value of Teilhard, as with Spinoza and other scientific mystics, is not that he is correct in all his details but that the beauty and completeness of his synthesis can stimulate the imagination of others to perfect his vision in an unending process."5

•

Teilhard's vision was not practical. "The tragedy of Teilhard is that his vision was not practical—indeed, less so than that of Spinoza."5

•

A cult of self-deluded mystics took over the Teilhardian movement. "What happened was that eventually a cult, dominated primarily by self-deluded, mystical specialists, took over the Teilhardian movement and further alienated the scientific community."6

•

The author's first book, The Moral Society, aimed to perfect and make practical Teilhard's vision. "In this book it was my twofold objective (a) to perfect the vision of Teilhard by amplifying it through my presumably more extensive and deeper knowledge of mathematics, physical science, and technology, and (b) then to make it practical both through my knowledge of the real world and by purging it of all mysticism, ideology, and sentimentality."7

•

The author intended The Moral Society to be a highly influential book. "My intent was no less than to write a book that would replace the Bible, the Koran, and Das Kapital as motivating factors in human history."7

•

The author's associates reacted negatively to The Moral Society. "All of my senior coworkers claimed I had personally betrayed them."8

•

Fear can induce self-deception and misunderstanding. "I did not yet understand the nature of fear or how fear induces self-deception and misunderstanding of significant negative feedback."9

•

The author sold his stock to pursue his evolutionary ethic. "Therefore, in order to fulfill my fiduciary obligations, I sold all my stock in my company to my employees for whatever they wished to pay me, under any terms they wished, feeling very noble in the process, and set forth to conquer the world for the evolutionary ethic."9

•

The author's vision of the Moral Society was a super-metazoan collective moral intelligence. "My vision of the Moral Society was that of a super-metazoan, collective moral intelligence that would have the same relationship to us as individuals that we have to an amoeba."10

•

The author had a practical plan to transform society into the Moral Society. "Furthermore, I had a completely practical, rational, scientific, step-by-step program of how to transform our current society into the Moral Society."10

•

The author's initial attempts to implement his vision failed. "Yet everything I tried failed. We could not even take the first step."11

•

The author emphasized that his ideas could be wrong and should be modified by feedback. "Therefore, I constantly stated that my ideas, just like Teilhard's and Spinoza’s ideas before me, might be partially wrong and should be modified whenever scientific feedback so indicated."11

•

A proton and an electron form a complementary pair. "A proton and an electron are a complementary pair that together make the simplest atom—hydrogen."12

•

The human brain consists of four complementary pairs of subbrains. "Furthermore, the human brain consists of four complementary pairs of subbrains."13

•

The neocortex is the center of ethics and imagination. "This is the center of ethics and imagination."13

•

The limbic system is the center of love and higher biological drives. "The next or third brain is the mammalian cortex, or the limbic system, the center of the emotion of love and its variants plus the higher biological drives."13

•

The reptilian complex is the center of fear, rage, and aggression. "The next or second brain is the reptilian complex, the center of fear, rage, and aggression plus intermediate biological drives."14

•

The fish brain controls primitive biological drives and basic physiology. "The first and oldest brain is the fish brain, i.e., the rest of the nervous system, which is the basis for the most primitive biological drives and the automatic control of our basic physiology."14

•

Male and female brains are complementary pairs. "At the human level the male and female brains are complementary pairs."15

•

Homo sapiens is the first species with a fully developed set of four paired, complementary brains. "Until the advent of Homo sapiens no species had a fully developed set of four paired, complementary brains."15

•

Eight ethically integrated persons could represent a new order of sovereignty. "It might require only the ethical integration of four men and four women to achieve a higher-order autopoiesis never achieved before."15

•

The objective test of the Ethical State is radically new creativity. "The only objective test of our success in creating the Ethical State is that a new order of objective creativity is produced which leads to radically new scientific discoveries, inventions, and works of art that are not possible for persons who are not in an Ethical State."16

•

Mysticism stimulates the imagination but is ethically neutral. "What mysticism seems to do is to stimulate the imagination. But as we saw in Chapters 3 and 4, the imagination is capable of generating false as well as true information. Mysticism is ethically neutral."17

•

Scientific method is an antidote to self-delusion within mysticism. "Scientific method is an antidote to self-delusion within the mystical process."17

•

Objectively creative persons are sometimes mystics. "Then in late 1983 I noticed that some objectively creative persons were also mystics."18

•

The scientific community largely rejected the author's Moral Society. "But the scientific community as a whole rejected me as much as they had rejected Teilhard and Spinoza in their day."19

•

The most support for The Moral Society came from mystical psychiatrists and psychologists. "The most support I had was from mystical psychiatrists and psychologists, who seemed unscientific to me."19

•

The author wrote Psychofraud and Ethical Therapy as an antimystical tract. "I therefore tried to compensate for this “embarrassment” by writing an antimystical tract called Psychofraud and Ethical Therapy  in which I debunked traditional psychiatry, psychotherapy and mysticism in general and put in their place a rigorous, austere ethical way of life..."20

•

The author still regards Psychofraud as a worthwhile guide to personal ethics. "However, I still regard it as a worthwhile guide to personal ethics and a much needed expose of psychofraud; I am glad I wrote it and still recommend it, in spite of its errors."20

•

Mystical specialists who reject science are destructive and self-deluded. "Mystical Specialists— i.e., mystics who are antiscientific and reject science as having any relevance to their mysticism—are as destructive and self-deluded as I had previously seen them."21

•

Mystical scientists can also be destructive and self-deluded. "Mystical Scientists are also destructive and self-deluded in propor¬"21

•

Scientists who are also mystics tend to be minimally creative in their specialty. "...tion to how unethical and unintelligent they are, even if they are nor¬mally creative in their specialty, although they may do useful work."22

•

Artists' creativity is directly proportional to their ethics and intelligence. "Artists are creative in direct proportion to how ethical and intelli¬gent they are."22

•

Artists may not need conventional scientific knowledge for creativity. "They, apparently, have no essential need of conven¬tional scientific knowledge."22

•

Objective artistic creations link artists to objective truth. "Their objective artistic creations are their link to objective truth."22

•

Mysticism enhances ethical artists' creativity when integrated with their art. "Mysticism enhances their creativity when they are ethical and they integrate mysticism with their art, e.g., J.S. Bach, Michelangelo, Penderecki, and Dali."22

•

Mandalas incorporate four paired components within a circle. "At the same time that I came to these five conclusions I observed a recurring pattern that incor¬porates four paired (bilaterally symmetrical) components within a circle."23

•

Jung noticed that fully individuated persons spontaneously produce mandalas. "Jung had noticed that when persons achieved full individuation they would spontaneously produce a mandala."24

•

Mandalas are archetypes representing transcendence across cultures. "Indeed, mandalas are archetypes which occur in all cultures as a symbol of transcendence, although the concept of transcendence might be quite different in the various cultures."24

•

There is a parallel tradition in art and mysticism to the scientific pattern of evolutionary progress. "Therefore, there is an independent tradition in art and mysticism which parallels the scientific pattern of evolutionary progress through quan¬tum leaps of four complementary pairs integrated into a coherent whole."25

•

The "New Physics" is a movement begun by Einstein. "The “New Physics” is a movement begun by Einstein in the early 1900s..."25

•

Quantum mechanics has overwhelming evidence. "Therefore, the evidence in favor of quantum mechanics is overwhelm¬ing."26

•

Einstein and associates showed that quantum mechanics may be self-contradictory. "However, in 1935, Einstein and two young associates of his used quantum mechanics and relativity to show that quantum mechanics may be self¬contradictory."26

•

Creative persons may be wrong but usually make a worthwhile contribution. "It is unreasonable to expect creative persons to always be right. Creative persons, however, usually make a worthwhile contribution even when they are wrong, e.g., EPR."27

•

Amit Goswami believes the human brain has two distinct modes of processing information. "Amit Goswami  believes that the human brain has two distinct modes..."27

•

Punctuated equilibrium suggests new species arise suddenly by quantum leaps. "The evolutionary school of punctuated equilibrium, associated with Stephen Jay Gould, has gathered considerable evidence that neither Dar¬winism nor neo-Darwinism is in accordance with the evolutionary fossil evidence indicating that new species often arise all of a sudden by radical quantum leaps, and not by gradual changes that slowly consolidate them¬selves by natural selection."28

•

There must be a feedback mechanism to evolution beyond natural selection, the quantum connection. "Therefore, there must be another feedback mechanism to the evolutionary process in addition to natural selection. This additional feedback mecha¬nism, I postulate, is the quantum connection."29

•

Fred Hoyle proposed that quantum leaps in evolution are caused by extraterrestrial bacteria and viruses. "Furthermore, he has mounted a theoretically brilliant, experimentally falsifiable argument since the early 1970s to show that the quan¬tum leaps in evolution are caused by the infections of our animal bodies by bacteria and viruses from outer space."30

•

The scientific community is biased in favor of purposeless, blind forces at work. "The scientific community is absolutely biased in favor of purposeless, blind forces at work."31

•

Innovative behavior can lead to extinction, mutations for intelligence, or genetic drift. "Innovative behavior, on the other hand, leads either (1) to extinction or (2) to mutations conducive to a continued increase in generalized intelli¬gence, or if they are trivial, (3) to “genetic drift," which are mutations that neither help nor harm the organism initially, but contribute to its genetic variability and eventual evolutionary potential."32

•

Species with more complex brains evolve more rapidly. "Species that have more complex brains—evolve more rapidly than mollusks and other invertebrates that have simpler brains."33

•

Hominids with a generalized neocortex evolve more rapidly than other mammals. "Finally, hominids (with a generalized neocortex and four coherent autopoietic paired brains) evolve more rapidly than all other mammals."33

•

Our true differential complexity comes primarily from the quantum field and the infinite implicate order. "Our true differential complexity comes primarily from the quantum field and the infinite implicate order."34

•

Each brain leading to Homo sapiens represents a dimensional quadrature over the previous neural structure. "Each of the four brains leading to Homo sapiens represents a dimensional quadrature over the previous neural struc¬ture."34

•

At each point of dimensional quadrature, there is the choice of specializing or not specializing. "At each point of dimensional quadrature, there is the choice of spe¬cializing or not specializing."35

•

Trivial innovations produce genetic drift. "Remember, trivial innovations produce genetic ..."35

•

Homo sapiens evolved through innovative behavior modifying brain structure and quantum connection. "...tools, social organization, and language repeatedly modified the genes that determine brain structure, as well as their quantum connection, and evolved into modern Homo sapiens."36

•

Specialized species with closed quantum connections become extinct. "By contrast those that became stuck in a rut of repetitive, conservative behavior patterns specialized their brains, closed their quantum connection, and became extinct."36

•

Highly ritualized human societies can turn off their collective quantum connection, leading to uncreativity. "Some highly ritualized human societies are still trying to turn off their collective quantum connection; they pay for it by being uncreative."37

•

Human evolution since Homo sapiens is primarily due to subtle brain changes affecting behavior. "Since the advent of Homo sapiens human evolution has been determined primar¬ily by subtle changes in the brain which predispose the species to innovative or repetitive behavior."37

•

Repeating successful past behavior reinforces that behavior and closes the quantum connection. "If it repeats the successful behavior of the past, it predisposes a mutation which will even further reinforce that behavior, close its quantum connection, and make its prog¬eny still more specialized."38

•

All species lose the ability to innovate as they specialize due to ancestral choices. "All species lose their ability to innovate behavior as they specialize because of the choices of their ancestors."38

•

Destructive innovative behavior can manifest as insanity. "There is the much larger, non-zero measure, set of behavior that is destructive innovative behavior, which can manifest itself as insanity in all species."39

•

Destructive innovations are quickly eliminated by natural selection. "Destructive innovations are quickly eliminated by natural selection."39

•

Ethical species with a moral sense consciously choose. "Other species choose, but do not know they choose. We choose and know we choose. That’s what it means to be an ethical species with a moral sense."40

•

Ethics is a preprogrammed desire for truth in the neocortex. "Ethics is a preprogrammed desire for truth built into the neocortex."41

•

Ethical choices aim to maximize truth or creativity. "When we make an ethical choice we choose what we believe will maximize truth or creativity."41

•

Species with a neocortex have some level of ethics. "All species with a neocortex seem to have a modicum of eth¬ics, although it is much less developed in other species than in our own."41

•

The hundredth-monkey syndrome might be a quantum effect of critical mass of innovation. "The hundredth-monkey syndrome  reported among them—indicating that as soon as about 100 monkeys on one island had learned this innovation, monkeys on other islands began inventing it on their own—could be a quantum effect of a critical mass of innovative behavior trigger¬ing similar innovations through their quantum connections with the other monkeys on the other islands."42

•

Morphogenetic fields might correspond with the quantum theory of innovative behavior. "I suspect that the theory of morphogenetic fields of Sheldrake  is valid only insofar as it corresponds with the quantum theory of innovative behavior."43

•

The choice to innovate is self-catalyzing. "The choice to innovate, like the evolutionary process itself, is self-catalyzing."43

•

Ethical choices might have led to upright walking in hominids. "Indeed, it may have been a series of ethical choices that first punctuated the equilibrium of our prehominid ancestors and then led to upright walking as the major anatomical mutation below the neck in the last 20 million years."44

•

Early hominoidea might have been ethically driven but biologically disadvantaged short-term. "Because it was an ethically driven species without culture, it was at a short-term biological disadvantage and left few progeny and fossils."45

•

Ethical choices give long-term genetic advantage at the cost of short-term risk. "Ethical choices are like generalizations; they give long-term genetic advantage to the interbreeding group at the cost of short-term risk and ..."46

•

Cultural evolution started when ethical behavior had clear value for group survival. "Cultural evolution started when ethical behavior had clear value to group survival, since the ethical values are passed on in the cultural tradi¬tion."47

•

Fear is the belief we cannot create. "Fear is the belief we cannot create."48

•

Fear has been hard-wired into the reptilian complex for survival. "Fear has been hard-wired into the reptil¬ian complex for over 250 million years as a mode of survival."48

•

More than half of all innovative behavior historically led to disaster. "For hundreds of millions of years our ancestors saw at least half of all innovative behav¬ior lead to disaster."48

•

Fear makes established elites conservative and uncreative. "That is why the ruling elite in every country, once estab¬lished, whether leftist or rightist, become conservative and uncreative."49

•

Fear destroys ethics by blocking the quantum brain and classical brain connection. "Ultimately the end result of fear is to destroy ethics by putting an absolute block between our quantum brain and our classical brain. Fear ..."49

•

Fear distorts quantum information into self-delusion. "Whatever information comes through our quan¬tum connection is distorted so as to help us maintain our illusions."50

•

The only antidote to fear is love. "The only antidote to fear is love."50

•

Love and fear are the only emotions that exist. "Love and fear are the only emotions that exist."50

•

Manifestations of hate can only be overcome by loving others, especially enemies. "The many manifestations of hate can never be overcome alone. We can only overcome them by loving others, particularly our enemies."51

•

An enemy is anyone destructive to us or those we love. "An enemy is any person who is destructive to us or to those we love."51

•

To love an enemy is to help them overcome fear to become less destructive and more creative. "To love an enemy is to help that person overcome his/her fear so that he/she may become less destructive and more creative."51

•

Creativity (C) equals Intelligence (I) times Ethics (E): C = IE. "Because C = IE (and so long as E < 1 we ..."51

•

Increasing ethics increases imagination and will directly, and memory indirectly. "Furthermore, I is itself dependent on E. Increasing E increases Imagination (G) and Will (W) directly plus Memory (M) indirectly."52

•

The soul is our true self, identified by quantum connection, ethics, and creativity. "The soul is our true self, which takes its identity from our quantum connection to God, our ethics, and our creativity."52

•

The ego is our false self, identified by memory, intelligence, and happiness. "The ego is our false self, which takes its identity from the persistence of our Memory (M), our intelligence, and our happiness."52

•

Communists who believe in deterministic history destroy negative feedback and creativity. "These delusions also include the beliefs of those communists who teach that they have discovered the ultimate deterministic laws of human history and how to control it."53

•

Fear and lack of love between East and West threaten humanity. "It is fear and lack of love between East and West that now threaten to destroy humanity and perhaps the biosphere."54

•

Loving from the soul involves feeling love and acting accordingly. "To love from our soul is to convince the persons who are destroying ..."54

•

The creative act of loving is its own reward. "When we love from the soul, the creative act of loving is its own ..."55

•

Evolution depends on choice, and the most important choice is to love rather than fear. "All evolution depends on choice. The most important choice we ever make is to love rather than to fear."56

•

Creative transformation begins with four essential steps. "Creative transformation begins with four essential steps."56

•

The first step is choosing to live by the evolutionary ethic and maximize creativity. "1. Deliberately choose to live by the evolutionary ethic and make every decision on the basis of what will maximize creativity for ourselves and others; make a commitment to play the Game of Life."57

•

The second step is to love others, including enemies, by helping maximize their creativity. "2. Do our best to love others, including our enemies, by interacting with them on the basis of what, in our best judgment, will help maximize their creativity, and by opening our soul to them, while respecting their freedom of will; make an unconditional commit¬ment of love to others, focusing on those groups of eight to which we belong. We choose to love rather than to fear."58

•

The third step is learning the nature of fear and overcoming it by identifying with the soul. "3. Learn the nature of fear and how it manifests itself in everyone’s destructive behavior, including our own. Then focus on how we can learn to overcome fear through taking our identity from our soul instead of our ego, and by doing our best to maximize creativ¬ity, without any other considerations; we choose to reject fear as a motivator of our actions. Only humans can do this."59

•

The fourth step is engaging in autopoiesis. "4. Engage in autopoiesis as best we can."59

•

Creative transformation is a self-catalyzing process based on ethical love. "Creative transformation is therefore a self-catalyzing process based on ethical love; its spirit is communicated in these four steps, but its prac¬tice transcends any given technique."60

•

Never turn a technique into a ritual. "Never turn a technique into a ritual."60

•

Each person has the same quantum connection to God. "Remember, each person has the same quantum connection to God."60

•

A group of eight equal partners may maximize creativity. "We may each need a group of eight equal partners to maximize our creativ¬..."60

•

Brain synchronization involves ethics, love, and lowering fear. "The crucial goals are synchronization of the four brains through eth¬ics, love, lowering fear, and whatever form of autopoiesis is best for you."61

•

The synchronization of the neocortex (ethics) is achieved by a common ethical system. "The synchronization of the highest brain, the neocortex, which is the center of ethics, is achieved by having a common system of ethics derived from the evolutionary ethic."62

•

Synchronizing the mammalian cortex involves learning the ethical meaning of love. "After the exercises for ethical synchronization of the neocortex by learning to practically apply the evolutionary ethic, we went on to try to synchronize the mammalian cortex by learning the ethical meaning of love."63

•

We are helped more by the love we give than the love we receive. "We, and all subsequent groups, concluded that we are all helped more by the love we give than the love we receive."63

•

True love must be unconditional and selfless. "For love to be meaningful it must be unconditional and selfless."64

•

True love requires giving negative feedback with love and humility. "At the same time, true love requires that we give negative feedback to persons we love when they are destructive."64

•

The contract for creative transformation outlines promises to help maximize creativity. "After extensive discussions among ourselves we all signed the contract for creative transformation (see page 256)."64

•

Fear is the major reason octets fail in creative transformation. "In the many hundreds of persons who have participated in the crea¬tive transformation experiments, the only apparent common denominator in the octets that failed, or in individuals who dropped out of the octets that succeeded, was fear."65 ...

•

The greatest fears involve giving up delusionary belief systems (false paradigms). "The greatest fears have been in giving up appar¬ently rigid, delusionary belief systems, i.e., false paradigms, which seem to help orient the person while giving his/her ego a seemingly false sense of self-worth and personal identity."66

•

Persons taking identity from beliefs rather than ethical actions have too much fear for creative transformation. "It seems that persons who take their identity from their beliefs (paradigms) rather than from their objective ethical actions always have too much fear to succeed in creative transformation."67

•

Fear causes persons to bring about what they fear most. "Fear always causes persons to bring about that which they fear most."68

•

The creative transformation process works for everyone who is not too afraid. "The experimental evidence, so far, is that the creative transformation process will work for everyone who is not too afraid."69

•

About 80% of the general population seems too afraid to try the process. "At this time, based on my personal observation in the West, about 80 percent of the general popu¬lation seems so afraid of the process that they will not even try it."69

•

The most pernicious fear is of giving up false, ego-based models of personal identity. "The most pernicious fear seems to be fear of giving up false, ego-based models of one’s personal identity."69

•

Our quantum connection projects random images through imagination onto intelligence. "Our quantum brain uses our quantum connection to project through the lens of our imagination a finite random image onto our intelligence (our classical brain) from an infinite source of information."70

•

Ethics determine the relevance, coherence, and fidelity of the quantum projection. "Our intelligence determines the size and depth of the projection; our ethics determine the relevance, coherence, and fidelity of the projection."70

•

Autopoiesis involves collective quantum information projection within an octet. "In autopoiesis we do this collectively within the octet and project, the quantum information more accurately and deeply than is possible or comprehensible for any individ¬ual."71

•

In autopoiesis, distinguish between quantum information and memory-based information. "In autopoiesis we must distinguish between information that is coming from our quantum brain and information that is coming from our memory."71

•

We cannot be creative without using our quantum brain. "We cannot be creative without using our ..."71

•

We cannot entirely depend on imagination without increasing ethics and intelligence. "However, we can never depend entirely on our Imagination (G) because we cannot increase Ethics (E) unless we also increase Intelligence (I) by doing our best to learn, teach, and create."72

•

Autopoiesis can involve each person asking questions and receiving quantum answers. "The simplest way to begin autopoiesis is by having each subset of seven ask any question they wish, one at a time, of each person in the octet, so that eventually each person asks at least one question of each of the seven other persons and each person gives at least seven quantum answers."73

•

Quantum answers are often the second thought that comes to mind. "It is essential that each person make a choice to set aside the first answer that comes to mind, and deliberately choose the very next thought or image that comes to mind, whatever it may be, as the quantum answer."73

•

Autopoiesis is a coordinated, focused Quantum Octologue. "Autopoiesis is a coordinated, focused Quantum Octologue in which the quan¬tum thoughts are not necessarily the second thoughts."74

•

Quantum thoughts are short, energetic bursts of original information. "We can distinguish quantum from classical thoughts because the lat¬ter flow smoothly and quickly in extended sentences and clearly reflect our memories, while the former are short, energetic bursts of original informa¬..."74

•

Real-time sharing of quantum thoughts is central to autopoiesis. "The real-time sharing of these thoughts is central to autopoiesis."75

•

Autopoiesis is a mystical, loving type of brainstorming without judgment. "Autopoiesis is a mystical, loving type of brainstorming where no one judges another, and all speak about their insights without fear of being wrong or considered stupid."76

•

Fear in autopoiesis can manifest as drowning quantum thoughts in classical verbiage. "During autopoiesis one of the manifestations of fear is to drown our and others’ quantum thoughts in classical verbiage."77

•

Silence is better than letting the classical brain take over in autopoiesis. "In autopoiesis it is better to be silent than to let our classical brain take over."78

•

The goal of speaking in autopoiesis is to help increase others' creativity. "The ethical commitment to others helps liberate the quantum brain. The quantum thoughts, images, and questions will eventually come to us if ... We should speak not to show how clever or “deep” we are, but only to communicate an important, original thought that we believe will help increase the creativity of others in the group."78

•

Autopoiesis is powerfully felt the first time by about 75% of those who try it with brain synchronization. "Autopoiesis will be powerfully felt the very first time by about 75 percent of the persons who try it and who have successfully gone through the previ¬ously described brain synchronization with the octet."79

•

Meaningful experiences in autopoiesis are trivial side effects; the goal is creative action. "Remember, we seek only creative action; meaningful experiences are merely trivial side effects."79

•

Some individuals feel no effects from autopoiesis even after repeated trials. "Approximately 25 percent of those who try autopoiesis feel no effects even after repeated trials. For them it is a neutral experience."79

•

Physical touching in an octet synchronizes the fish brain. "This synchronizes the most primitive of the four brains, the fish brain, in an eight-way flow of information through touch."80

•

Touch is the primary modality for the fish brain. "The primary modality for the exchange of information for this brain is the sense of touch."81

•

Touch does not seem to produce incoherence in simultaneous communication. "Touch is also the only modality of communication which does not seem to produce incoherence and confusion when eight persons simultane¬ously communicate with one another in real time."81

•

Soft music, like Bach's Art of the Fugue, can enhance autopoiesis. "Autopoiesis is enhanced (although this is not essential) by producing further coherence with music played softly during the process. The Art of the Fugue is the ideal music since it expresses the process of evolutionary autopoiesis, leading to ever newer and greater hierarchies of evolution through quantum leaps of four complementary pairs."81

•

Focusing on a single problem and classical brainstorming beforehand can enhance coherence. "Additional coherence is produced when (1) all participants con¬sciously decide by mutual consent to focus on a single problem during the autopoiesis, and (2) prior to beginning the autopoiesis all participants brainstorm the same problem classically until no one in the octet has any more classical ideas on the subject."82

•

Autopoiesis becomes easier with practice. "Autopoiesis becomes increasingly easy with practice, requiring ever less effort for the octet to achieve coherent quantum thoughts."83

•

Fear triggers the classical brain, not the quantum brain. "Fear always triggers the classical brain, never the quantum brain."84

•

Quantum thoughts will persist until expressed. "When you get quantum thoughts you will not be able to keep them to yourself. They will come back stronger and stronger until you express them."85

•

The objective of autopoiesis is to help the other seven maximize their creativity, not just to talk. "The objective is not to talk but to do your best to help the other seven in the octet to maximize their creativity."85

•

Simply participating in autopoiesis without fear contributes to creative transformation. "By simply participating in the auto¬poiesis without fear, you are contributing to the creative transformation of others and yourself."86

•

Conscience, not fear, should guide participation in autopoiesis. "You will always succeed in this if you let your con¬science rather than your fear guide you."86

•

Focus on helping others be more creative and forget the ego in autopoiesis. "Resist this. Focus on what you can say or do to help the other seven be more creative. Forget about your ego."87

•

Autopoiesis works at all levels through touch and focused attention. "The other seven will be focused on you, communicating through touch; this is how autopoiesis works at all ..."87

•

The specific arrangement of physical touch in autopoiesis facilitates communication of sexual complementarity. "By everyone touching four persons of the opposite sex simultaneously, this complementarity of sexually-related mental differences is communicated1 . For the first time most persons experience that they can develop the perspective of the opposite sex1 . This clearly does not happen outside of autopoiesis when we touch only one or two persons of the opposite sex2 . Persons rarely touch three or four persons of the opposite sex simultaneously in an ethically loving context2 . 


This duality of perspective by which each person, at the mental level, becomes both male and female at the same time (a quantum concept) enhances the autopoiesis and the creativity of the group2 . It may be that we need to touch one person of the opposite sex for each of the four brains2 . Each cell in our body reflects our sexual differences as well as our complementarity3 .


This arrangement, with each of the eight participants (four men and four women) touching four persons of the opposite sex and the hands of the persons next to them, while also touching with each foot one of the feet of the two persons opposite them of the opposite sex, synchronizes the most primitive of the four brains, the fish brain, through an eight-way flow of information via touch4 .


 Since men and women have complementary brains, this simultaneous contact with multiple individuals of the opposite sex allows for a unique communication of these sexually-related mental differences and helps individuals to understand the perspective of the opposite sex in a way not typically experienced outside of autopoiesis1 . This dual perspective, at a mental level, is seen as a "quantum concept" that boosts both autopoiesis and the overall creativity of the group2 . The author even speculates that the need to touch one person of the opposite sex for each of the four brains might underlie this effectiveness2 .


Four Steps to Creative Transformation1 ...:

•

Deliberately choose to live by the evolutionary ethic and make every decision on the basis of what will maximize creativity for ourselves and others; make a commitment to play the Game of Life1 .

•

Do our best to love others, including our enemies, by interacting with them on the basis of what, in our best judgment, will help maximize their creativity, and by opening our soul to them, while respecting their freedom of will; make an unconditional commitment of love to others, focusing on those groups of eight to which we belong. We choose to love rather than to fear2 .

•

Learn the nature of fear and how it manifests itself in everyone’s destructive behavior, including our own. Then focus on how we can learn to overcome fear through taking our identity from our soul instead of our ego, and by doing our best to maximize creativity, without any other considerations; we choose to reject fear as a motivator of our actions. Only humans can do this3 .

•

Engage in autopoiesis as best we can. This feeds back to the previous three steps and helps us better achieve them; those steps


keywords from the source material, each with a supporting sentence that defines, explains, and characterizes the term:

•

Synthesis: The new synthesis is a twentieth-century phenomenon by which all fields of knowledge are converging to show that physical, biological, and psychosocial evolution are different facets of a single cosmological process1 .

•

Evolution: In Part I of this book I developed a rational, evolutionary perspective of the universe and our place in it, basing my exposition on generally accepted, well-understood facts with logical, speculative extrapolations from these facts2 .

•

Mystical Thinking: We create through diffused, intuitive, mystical thinking3 .

•

Scientific Thinking: If we are to be maximally creative we must learn to combine rigorous scientific thinking with diffused mystical thinking3 .

•

Creative Transformation: In this chapter—and to a lesser extent in the chapters that follow—I shall try to bring about a synthesis between these two types of often antagonistic mental processes by deriving the Creative Transformation process not linearly and logically, as I derived the evolutionary perspective, but rather subjectively and personally, as the process actually became understood by me4 .

•

Teilhard de Chardin: The thinker who most exemplifies the new synthesis is Pierre Teilhard de Chardin5 .

•

Generalist: Part of the problem is that as a total generalist, i.e., a full scientific and artistic mystic, he was misunderstood by both the scientific and the humanistic communities6 .

•

Specialist: Specialists in any field always try to discredit generalists by latching onto any error they make in the former’s specialized fields7 .

•

Moral Society: My vision of the Moral Society was that of a super-metazoan, collective moral intelligence that would have the same relationship to us as individuals that we have to an amoeba8 .

•

Fear: Fear is the belief that we cannot create9 .

•

Love: Love is the desire to help and act of helping another person increase his/her creativity9 .

•

Autopoiesis: An Ethical State is therefore a new state of mind that comes to exist among four men and four women who simply make a commitment to maximize each other’s creativity by engaging in a new form of autopoiesis10 .

•

Ethical State: Within this context an Ethical State is a new level of moral consciousness and collective ethical intelligence10 .

•

Quantum Leaps: The evolutionary school of punctuated equilibrium, associated with Stephen Jay Gould, has gathered considerable evidence that neither Darwinism nor neo-Darwinism is in accordance with the evolutionary fossil evidence indicating that new species often arise all of a sudden by radical quantum leaps, and not by gradual changes that slowly consolidate themselves by natural selection11 .

•

Quantum Connection: Fred Hoyle has come up with a mechanism just as radical as the quantum connection12 .

•

Quantum Mechanics: Quantum mechanical phenomena occur because there is a possibility of choice which is not predetermined13 .

•

Uncertainty Principle: The uncertainty principle says there is an irreducible error...13 .

•

Neocortex: The highest and most recent brain is the neocortex, the fourth brain14 .

•

Ethics: Ethics is a preprogrammed desire for truth built into the neocortex15 .

•

Moral Sense: We choose and know we choose. That’s what it means to be an ethical species with a moral sense16 .

•

Hundredth-Monkey Syndrome: The hundredth-monkey syndrome  reported among them—indicating that as soon as about 100 monkeys on one island had learned this innovation, monkeys on other islands began inventing it on their own—could be a quantum effect of a critical mass of innovative behavior triggering similar innovations through their quantum connections with the other monkeys on the other islands17 .

•

Morphogenetic Fields: I suspect that the theory of morphogenetic fields of Sheldrake  is valid only insofar as it corresponds with the quantum theory of innovative behavior18 .

•

Cultural Evolution: Cultural evolution started when ethical behavior had clear value to group survival, since the ethical values are passed on in the cultural tradition19 .

•

Ego: The ego is our false self, which takes its identity from the persistence of our Memory (M), our intelligence, and our happiness20 .

•

Soul: The soul is our true self, which takes its identity from our quantum connection to God, our ethics, and our creativity20 .

•

Self-Delusion: All others will compensate for their fear and attachment to ego through self-delusion21 .

•

Game of Life: The most important choice we ever make is to love rather than to fear. This is the only choice by which we never lose. It is a choice to play the Game of Life22 .

•

Ethical Love: Creative transformation is therefore a self-catalyzing process based on ethical love23 .

•

Brain Synchronization: The next five days were spent on brain synchronization24 .

•

Evolutionary Ethic: The synchronization of the highest brain, the neocortex, which is the center of ethics, is achieved by having a common system of ethics derived from the evolutionary ethic25 .

•

Ethical Principles: To enhance their sense of the evolutionary ethic and to synchronize the neocortex between them, I had them apply the evolutionary ethic together with the Eight Ethical Principles to solve three ethical problems by consensus over the next three days26 .

•

Quantum Octologue: Autopoiesis is a coordinated, focused Quantum Octologue in which the quantum thoughts are not necessarily the second thoughts27 .

•

Classical Thoughts: We can distinguish quantum from classical thoughts because the latter flow smoothly and quickly in extended sentences and clearly reflect our memories, while the former are short, energetic bursts of original information which we feel absolutely compelled to communicate to the other persons in the octet27 .

•

Quantum Thoughts: In autopoiesis it is better to be silent than to let our quantum thoughts be drowned out by classical thoughts28 .

•

Art of the Fugue: The Art of the Fugue is the ideal music since it expresses the process of evolutionary autopoiesis, leading to ever newer and greater hierarchies of evolution through quantum leaps of four complementary pairs29 .

•

Libertarian Society: Extend the protection of the self-sufficiency networks in the form of a libertarian society to any person who wishes to join it on equitable terms30 .

•

Democracy: The democratic ethic says that that which makes for the greatest liberty for the greatest number is the greatest good31 .

•

Socialism: This thinking leads inevitably to socialism and the destruction of individual liberty and creativity31 .

•

Ethical Commitment: The first step you must take is, therefore, a commitment to the evolutionary ethic that is more than lip service32 .

•

Creativity: When we make an ethical choice we choose what we believe will maximize truth or creativity15 .

•

Intelligence: We must also maximize our intelligence, because C = IE33 .

•

Learning: Only the act of learning is a reward34 .

•

Generalize: It must at all times provide the opportunity, not the obligation, for the student to generalize in all fields of knowledge, including the arts, rather than specialize in a single field34 .

•

Specialize: Conversely, a student must always be free to specialize by choice while being told the consequences of those actions34 .

•

Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny: The entire program integrates knowledge by having ontogeny recapitulate phylogeny at the psychosocial level35 .

•

Teaching Octet: At each level the students are taught by at least one teaching octet that splits the four primary areas of study among them, with one male-female pair team-teaching each of the four areas36 .

•

School for Evolutionary Education (SEE): SEE is what we will call all schools which follow the spirit of the preceding curriculum and refuse to use fear to control their students and their faculty37 .

•

Truth: Ethics is a preprogrammed desire for truth built into the neocortex15 .

•

Imagination: What mysticism seems to do is to stimulate the imagination38 .

•

Will: Our Will (W) is then entirely driven by our soul39 .

•

Memory: Our memory is part of our ego and our classical brain40 .

•

Ethical: If the mystic is ethical, his/her mysticism will make him/her more creative38 .

•

Unethical: If the mystic is unethical, his/her mysticism will make him/her more destructive38 .

•

Objectivity: Eventually, this type of thinking and perceiving must become focused and subject to objective, rational analysis, or it is very likely to lead to self-deception3 .

•

Subjectivity: In this chapter... I shall try to bring about a synthesis between these two types of often antagonistic mental processes by deriving the Creative Transformation process not linearly and logically... but rather subjectively and personally, as the process actually became understood by me4 .

•

Reason: We create through ethics, we reason through intelligence41 .

•

Consensus: All participants should feel free to experiment with the process through consensus42 .

•

Communication: Touch is also the only modality of communication which does not seem to produce incoherence and confusion when eight persons simultaneously communicate with one another in real time29 .

•

Complementarity: A proton and an electron are a complementary pair that together make the simplest atom—hydrogen43 .

•

Dimensional Quadrature: The reptilian brain was a dimensional quadrature over the fish brain44 .

•

Innovation: Species that innovate cultural, as opposed to genetically determined, behavior clearly have some ethical capacity15 .

•

Choice: All evolution depends on choice22 .

•

Radical Quantum Leaps: Yet recent evidence indicates that one of the main examples used by Gould, the panda’s thumb, was possibly not a consequence of radical quantum leaps11 .

•

Super-Metazoan: My vision of the Moral Society was that of a super-metazoan, collective moral intelligence that would have the same relationship to us as individuals that we have to an amoeba8 .

•

Spinoza: The new synthesis begins in this century with Einstein, who through his understanding of the ethical teachings of Spinoza was able to get new insights into how the universe is structured5 .

•

Einstein: The new synthesis begins in this century with Einstein, who through his understanding of the ethical teachings of Spinoza was able to get new insights into how the universe is structured5 .

•

Quantum Entity: Whether we are going to observe the quantum entity as a wave or as a particle...13 .

•

Classical Brain: Our memory is part of our ego and our classical brain40 .

•

Quantum Brain: It is essential that each person make a choice to set aside the first answer that comes to mind, and deliberately choose the very next thought or image that comes to mind, whatever it may be, as the quantum answer45 .

•

Ritual: Never turn a technique into a ritual46 .

•

Network: If you wish to participate in creative transformation and you cannot begin the process by yourself, there is a growing network of persons who might help you begin by finding the right octet for you47 .

•

Self-Sufficiency: Become self-sufficient in education, economics, health, defense, and everything else, in this order of priority48 .

•

Bureaucracy: Almost all of them were banned by the Catholic bureaucracy49 .


The author's twofold objective in The Moral Society was (a) to perfect Teilhard's vision by expanding it with his own presumably more extensive and deeper knowledge, and (b) to transcend his own belief that he could not love creatively.

Frequently Asked Questions Based on the Provided Text

1. What is the central driving force or ethic proposed in the text, and how does it relate to the evolution of individuals and societies? The central driving force proposed is the "evolutionary ethic," which prioritizes the maximization of creativity. This ethic is seen as the fundamental force behind progress at all levels, from the atomic to the cosmic. Individuals and societies evolve by increasing their "generalized intelligence," with creativity being its highest form. The text posits a hierarchical evolution where more creative entities, such as "Ethical States" and "Moral Societies," emerge from the integration of less complex beings, leading to potentially unlimited creativity and even the creation of new universes.

2. What are "Ethical States" and "Moral Societies" as described in the text, and what is the process for their creation and growth? An "Ethical State" is defined as a new state of mind arising among four men and four women who commit to maximizing each other's creativity through a new form of "autopoiesis." A "Moral Society" is envisioned as a higher-order autopoietic entity formed by the voluntary integration of many highly creative and sovereign Ethical States. This integration further amplifies individual human creativity, with the Moral Society eventually having a relationship to an individual similar to that of a human to an amoeba. The growth of Moral Societies is hierarchical and potentially infinite, driven by the evolutionary ethic to maximize creativity.

3. How does the text reconcile or relate mysticism and scientific thought, particularly quantum physics? The text initially presents a skeptical view of mysticism but later acknowledges the mystical inclinations of many highly creative scientists, including Einstein and Planck. It proposes that mysticism, at its core, involves a belief in a moral force with greater knowledge than humanity, with which individuals can communicate. The text suggests that this "higher moral force" is connected to the evolutionary drive towards greater generalized intelligence and creativity. Furthermore, it hints at a potential unification of physics and psychology through quantum physics, with the quantum realm potentially underlying phenomena like intuition and creativity.

4. What is "autopoiesis" as described in the text, and what are some of its key characteristics and practices within an "octet"? In the context of the text, "autopoiesis" seems to refer to a self-generating and self-maintaining process for enhancing creativity and ethical development, particularly within a group of eight people (an "octet" of four men and four women). Key characteristics include a commitment to maximizing each other's creativity, engaging in a new form of communication that values "quantum thoughts" (intuitive, potentially unconventional insights) over classical verbiage, and practicing non-judgmental sharing of insights. Physical touch, specifically everyone touching four persons of the opposite sex simultaneously, is considered a crucial element for facilitating a dual (male and female) perspective at the mental level and enhancing the group's creativity. Overcoming fear, particularly the fear of expressing unconventional thoughts and giving up limiting belief systems, is also essential for successful autopoiesis.

5. How does the text define the "soul" and the "ego," and what is their relationship to creativity and morality? The text defines the "soul" as our true self, taking its identity from our quantum connection to God, our ethics, and our creativity. The "ego," in contrast, is our false self, identified with our memories, intelligence, and desire for happiness. The soul seeks to maximize creativity, while the ego seeks to maximize happy experiences. The text suggests that prioritizing ego over soul leads to fear, as the ego is mortal. Morality is linked to valuing creativity over happiness, and as we become more ethical, we are guided by our soul, and the negative influence of the ego diminishes.

6. What is the "victim paradigm" and the "savior delusion" as discussed in the text, and why are they considered detrimental to personal growth and creativity? The "victim paradigm" is a belief system where individuals see themselves as victims of external forces and avoid taking responsibility for their lives. The "savior delusion" is a related tendency to believe that a "savior" will resolve all of life's problems upon acceptance. Both are seen as detrimental because they prevent individuals from assuming responsibility for their own lives and hinder their ability to overcome fear and become creatively effective. The text argues that choosing to play the "Game of Life" and rejecting fear as a motivator are essential steps towards breaking free from these paradigms.

7. What kind of societal structure does the text envision as a natural outgrowth of ethically aligned and creative individuals and groups (octets)? The text envisions a libertarian society arising from networks of self-sufficient "octets." In this model, individual liberty is paramount, and political choice operates through unanimous consensus among octets. These octets would be self-governing and autonomous, capable of providing for most of their members' needs. The role of central governments would diminish, replaced by voluntary cooperation among octets for larger projects. The ethical foundation of this society is libertarianism, where each individual owns their life and property, and harm is defined as anything that decreases another's creativity.

8. How does the provided excerpt on a "Lifetime Curriculum" connect to the main themes of creativity, evolution, and personal development discussed elsewhere in the text? The "Lifetime Curriculum" excerpt provides a concrete example of how individuals can progressively develop knowledge and skills across physical, biological, and psychosocial dimensions, fostering a holistic form of personal evolution. The curriculum emphasizes hands-on learning, experimentation, and the integration of different fields of knowledge, aligning with the text's emphasis on active engagement and the interconnectedness of reality. By progressing through these levels, individuals would ideally develop a broad understanding and the capacity for creative innovation, preparing them to contribute to the evolution towards Ethical States and Moral Societies. The curriculum implicitly supports the idea that continuous learning and the development of diverse skills are crucial for maximizing individual and collective creativity.


This excerpt from a work exploring creativity and ethics outlines a "New Synthesis" that integrates rational, scientific thought with intuitive, mystical thinking, exemplified by the life and ideas of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. It proposes that true creativity arises from combining these seemingly disparate modes of thought, with science acting as a corrective against self-deception in mystical insights. The text then delves into the author's personal journey and the development of the concept of "autopoiesis" or self-creation at various levels, from biological to social, culminating in the idea of a "Moral Society" driven by an "evolutionary ethic" focused on maximizing creativity. Finally, it introduces a radical educational model, the "School for Evolutionary Education (SEE)", designed to cultivate creativity and ethical behavior by rejecting fear and embracing a holistic, lifelong learning approach organized around collaborative "octets" of students and teachers. 


Discuss The New Synthesis.

The "New Synthesis" is presented as a twentieth-century phenomenon characterized by the convergence of all fields of knowledge1 . This convergence reveals that physical, biological, and psychosocial evolution are not separate entities but rather different facets of a single, unified cosmological process1 .

The author states that the genesis of this new synthesis can be traced back to Einstein, who, through his understanding of Spinoza's ethical teachings, gained novel insights into the structure of the universe2 . Following Einstein, many others have contributed to this evolving perspective2 . However, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is identified as the thinker who most clearly exemplifies the "New Synthesis"2 .

Teilhard, born in 1881, is described as a unique individual, a "total generalist," embodying both the scientific and the artistic mystic2 .... Despite his significance, the author notes that Teilhard's popularity is decreasing, partly because his holistic approach led to misunderstanding from both the scientific and humanistic communities who held prejudices against a "full scientific and artistic mystic"3 . The scientific community, in particular, tends to dismiss entire arguments based on perceived errors and is often prejudiced against the inclusion of mysticism in scientific discussions3 .... Specialists, focusing on narrow fields, often discredit generalists, overlooking the broader implications and hindering creativity, which thrives when the fear of error is overcome4 . Ironically, the author mentions that a cult dominated by self-deluded mystical specialists eventually took over the Teilhardian movement, further alienating the scientific community5 .

Inspired by Teilhard and Spinoza, the author wrote The Moral Society in 1970, aiming to perfect and amplify Teilhard's vision through presumably more extensive knowledge5 .... The author personally found meaning in the vision of Teilhard and Spinoza6 . In this book and subsequent chapters, the author endeavors to synthesize the often conflicting mental processes of rigorous scientific thinking and diffused mystical thinking7 . This involves a departure from a purely linear and logical derivation, instead incorporating subjective personal experiences alongside objective facts7 . The author acknowledges the risk in this approach, as a linear logic of the Creative Transformation process only became apparent after its derivation1 .

A crucial aspect of the "New Synthesis" involves the understanding of evolutionary progress through quantum leaps of four complementary pairs integrated into a coherent whole, a pattern the author sees paralleled in art and mysticism8 . This holistic view is further supported and expanded by the revolutionary "New Physics," a movement initiated by Einstein8 . The "New Physics" explores the interconnectedness of quantum objects9 and posits a "quantum connection" that existed before the brain and plays a role in both evolution and creativity10 . The author personally subscribes to this "quantum connection" and believes in God as the universe's creator, influencing evolution through it11 .

The concept of autopoiesis, meaning "self-creation," is central to the "New Synthesis"12 . It describes the tangled hierarchical processes by which life arises, the brain produces consciousness, and, fundamentally, how God creates everything as everything creates God, resulting in the epiphenomenon of evolution12 .... This is seen as a holographic process where each part reflects the whole13 . The author proposes that the next stage of evolution involves creating a new, higher order of autopoietic interactions within a group of four complementary pairs of men and women, leading to an "Ethical State" and eventually a "Moral Society," characterized by amplified individual and collective creativity14 .... The author envisions the Moral Society as a super-metazoan entity with a relationship to individuals similar to that of individuals to amoebae17 ....

The "New Synthesis" also addresses the role of mysticism. While acknowledging that mysticism alone can be destructive, the author distinguishes between "Mystical Specialists," "Mystical Scientists," and "Scientific Mystics." The latter are seen as creative in direct proportion to how ethically they integrate mysticism and science20 ....

The principles of the "New Synthesis" have practical implications, particularly in the realm of education. The author proposes the School for Evolutionary Education (SEE), an alternative educational system grounded in the "New Synthesis"22 . This system aims to maximize creativity and intelligence by fostering a love of learning without the use of fear as a control mechanism, integrating ethics, evolution, history, and art in its curriculum22 ....

In essence, the "New Synthesis" as presented in these excerpts is a comprehensive worldview that seeks to unify science and mysticism, understand evolution as a holistic and creative process driven by a quantum connection and autopoiesis, and ultimately lead to higher levels of ethical consciousness and creativity in humanity through concepts like the Ethical State and the Moral Society.


Discuss Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955) is presented in the sources as "The Epitome of a Creative Scientific and Artistic Mystic, a Spiritual, Scientific Generalist"1 and as a thinker who most exemplifies the "new synthesis" of the twentieth century2 . This new synthesis is characterized by the convergence of all fields of knowledge to show that physical, biological, and psychosocial evolution are different facets of a single cosmological process2 .

Teilhard, born into an aristocratic family in France, was ordained a Jesuit priest in 19123 . He also served as a stretcher-bearer in World War I, was decorated for valor, and received the Legion of Honor3 . Furthermore, he became a world-famous paleontologist and was one of the discoverers of Peking Man in the 1930s3 .

Beyond his conventional scientific work, Teilhard was a philosopher of evolution who made the first complete, modern synthesis of science, evolution, ethics, art, and mysticism4 . The source notes that Spinoza had made a more rigorous but less complete synthesis 300 years earlier4 . Teilhard wrote many books on these subjects, almost all of which were banned by the Catholic bureaucracy but published after his death in 1955 while he was in “exile” in New York City4 . The author of the current book had a brief encounter with Teilhard in Berkeley, California, around 1953, an incident that profoundly affected him5 .

Teilhard's best-known book is The Phenomenon of Man (Le Phenomene Humain)6 . In this book, he speculated that evolution is a process leading us toward convergence with God at a point he called Omega6 .... Many individuals, including the author, were deeply moved by Teilhard's work, even those who were initially anticlerical agnostics6 .

Despite his impact, Teilhard's popularity is noted to be decreasing6 . This is partly attributed to his being a "total generalist" who was misunderstood by both the scientific and the humanistic communities because he violated some of their prejudices8 . The source explains that the scientific bureaucracy tends to discard entire arguments for any apparent error, and scientists are highly prejudiced against the introduction of mysticism into scientific discussions8 . Specialists often discredit generalists by focusing on minor errors in their specialized fields, thus missing the broader significance and being minimally creative themselves8 . The source argues that creation requires a lack of fear of error, as science can always correct them8 .

The author suggests that the major value of Teilhard, similar to Spinoza, lies not in the absolute correctness of his details but in the beauty and completeness of his synthesis, which can stimulate the imagination of others to further develop his vision9 . However, the source points out a tragedy in Teilhard's vision: it was not practical, especially compared to Spinoza's10 . While he indicated the direction of evolution, he did not provide clear steps for taking the next leap10 . This eventually led to a cult dominated by self-deluded, mystical specialists, which further alienated the scientific community10 .

Nevertheless, Teilhard's work inspired others to explain and amplify his vision, which led the author to write his first book, The Moral Society (1970)10 .... The author's objective was to perfect Teilhard's vision by incorporating more extensive knowledge of mathematics, physical science, and technology, and to make it practical by removing mysticism, ideology, and sentimentality11 . The author initially viewed Teilhard as someone who overcame the handicap of religious practice but was limited in effectiveness by his religious beliefs12 .

The source also categorizes Teilhard as one of the highly creative persons who followed the evolutionary ethic13 and whose ideas should be given attention due to his objective creativity, regardless of how strange they might seem14 . The author notes Teilhard's concept of worship for a modern person being through research and development15 . In summary, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is portrayed as a significant figure who attempted a grand synthesis of science and spirituality, profoundly influencing many despite facing criticism and practical limitations in his vision2 .


Discuss Mysticism and Science.

The relationship between Mysticism and Science is a central theme in the "New Synthesis" as presented in the sources1 .... The author initially views them as often antagonistic mental processes but ultimately argues for their potential for a powerful synthesis that can enhance creativity2 ....

Here's a breakdown of the discussion on mysticism and science:

Definitions of Mysticism:

•

For the author, mysticism is "a state of mind in which we believe that in the universe there is a moral force with greater knowledge than humanity and that we as individuals can, in some way, communicate with that force"5 . This communication is believed to be enhanced by our ethics5 .

•

The author notes that this "higher moral force" can be perceived differently by individuals, ranging from a personal God to a more abstract force5 .

•

Subjective experiences associated with this force often include a sense of inner peace and oneness with others, and a feeling of love longing to express itself by enhancing the creativity of others6 . However, it also manifests as self-delusion6 .

The Role of Science as an Antidote to Self-Delusion:

•

The author emphasizes that mysticism by itself gives no advantage7 . While it can stimulate the imagination, the imagination can generate both true and false information7 . Mysticism is ethically neutral; its impact depends on the ethic of the mystic7 .

•

Scientific method is presented as an antidote to self-delusion within the mystical process8 . The primary function of science is to help distinguish between imagined information that is true and that which is false8 .

•

Science doesn't directly generate new ideas but provides experimental results from experiments designed by imagination and carried out by ethical will8 . Only ethical mystics subject their mysticism to science8 .

The Author's Evolving Views on Mysticism:

•

Until late 1983, the author viewed mysticism as a form of "intellectual degeneracy" leading to self-delusion9 . This view was partly influenced by the association of mysticism with organized religions, which the author perceived as destructive to the creative process10 .

•

The author's perspective shifted when he observed that some objectively creative persons were also mystics, citing the work of Ken Wilber who showed that many great 20th-century scientists were highly mystical9 ....

•

This observation led the author to reconsider his earlier skepticism and to recognize that when personal mysticism or belief in God is combined with objective science, it enhances objective creativity12 . Therefore, under certain circumstances, mysticism can be ethical12 .

•

The author's experience with the reception of his book The Moral Society, which was positively received mainly by mystics (including some scientists) but rejected by the broader scientific community, further influenced this evolution13 .

•

The author's subsequent attempt to write an antimystical tract, Psychofraud and Ethical Therapy, proved even less effective, leading him to explore how "scientific" mysticism could be integrated14 ....

Different Types of Mystics and Their Relationship with Science:

•

Mystical Specialists: These are antiscientific mystics who reject science as relevant to their mysticism. They are considered destructive and self-deluded16 .

•

Mystical Scientists: These individuals compartmentalize their science and mysticism, not applying scientific tests to mystical insights nor using mysticism to generate scientific ideas. They are seen as unscientific in their mysticism and unmystical in their science, and thus also destructive and self-deluded to a degree16 .

•

Scientific Mystics: These are individuals who ethically integrate mysticism and science. They are described as fully scientific in their mysticism and fully mystical in their science. This integration is termed the "Holistic Paradigm" and is associated with creativity3 .

•

The author also mentions Scientific Specialists, who are narrow scientists rejecting the Mystical Paradigm and often being minimally creative17 .

The Synthesis of Mysticism and Science:

•

The author proposes that to be maximally creative, we must learn to combine rigorous scientific thinking with diffused mystical thinking4 .

•

We create through diffused, intuitive, mystical thinking, but this type of thinking can lead to self-deception. We separate truth from illusion through science2 .

•

The "New Synthesis" itself aims to bring about a synthesis between these two often antagonistic mental processes2 .

•

The author's personal journey involved moving from a purely scientific perspective to recognizing the importance of integrating ethical personal mysticism with objective science to enhance creativity1 ....

Mysticism, Science, Creativity, and the Quantum Connection:

•

The author posits the equation C = IE (Creativity = Imagination x Ethics)18 . Mysticism, when ethical, stimulates the imagination (G in an earlier formulation), thus contributing to creativity7 .... Ethics (E) is crucial for guiding this imagination and preventing self-delusion, and science helps in refining the resulting ideas through intelligence (I)19 ....

•

The concept of a "quantum connection" between the human mind and quantum reality is introduced, with some physicists postulating its existence21 . The author links this to the idea of a collective unconscious and suggests that it played a role in evolution even before the development of the brain21 ....

•

The author's belief in God as the creator of the universe is intertwined with the "quantum connection", suggesting a form of intelligence at work influencing evolution23 .

In conclusion, the sources advocate for a harmonious and ethical integration of mysticism and science as a pathway to maximizing creativity and understanding the fundamental processes of the universe. While acknowledging the historical tensions and the dangers of unscientific mysticism, the author champions the "Scientific Mystic" who uses the strengths of both approaches to gain deeper insights and foster innovation3 .


Discuss The Moral Society.

The Moral Society is presented in the sources as the author's first book on the subjects of the "new synthesis," written in 19701 . It represents a significant step in the author's intellectual journey, directly inspired by the vision of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Spinoza2 .

The author's twofold objective in writing The Moral Society was:

•

(a) to perfect the vision of Teilhard by amplifying it through presumably more extensive and deeper knowledge1 . This suggests the author aimed to build upon Teilhard's broad synthesis of science and spirituality with a more comprehensive understanding of various scientific and technological fields1 .

•

(b) to make Teilhard's vision practical by removing the elements of mysticism, ideology, and sentimentality that the author perceived as limitations in Teilhard's work1 .

The central concept of the book was the vision of a "Moral Society", which the author describes as a "super-metazoan, collective moral intelligence that would have the same relationship to us as individuals that we have to an amoeba"3 . Furthermore, the author claimed to have developed a "completely practical, rational, scientific, step-by-step program of how to transform our current society into the Moral Society"3 . The "Ethical State" was conceived as a "transition state between our current society and the Moral Society"4 .

Upon completion of the manuscript, the author shared it with close associates, expecting a positive reception given his efforts to make the book clear and accessible2 .... However, the results were astonishingly negative. His senior coworkers felt personally betrayed, fearing government reprisal and the destruction of their company due to the book's content. They largely refused to discuss the book's merits and seemingly misunderstood its core message2 .... This experience highlighted to the author the profound nature of fear and its role in inducing self-deception and misunderstanding5 ....

When The Moral Society was published, a graphic symbol, the Moral Society Mandala, was created to represent the forceful, simultaneous expansion of the eight collective components of intelligence envisioned in the book7 . Interestingly, the author was unaware of the concept of a mandala at the time of its creation7 . The book also referenced J.S. Bach’s Art of the Fugue as the art form that most clearly expresses the evolutionary process7 .

Despite the author's intention for The Moral Society to be a "purely scientific, albeit simplified, book, intended to appeal to and mobilize the scientific community"8 , its reception was quite different. The author realized that almost all the people who responded positively to his book were mystics, including some scientists8 . The scientific community as a whole largely rejected it, mirroring their earlier rejection of Teilhard and Spinoza8 . The most support came from mystical psychiatrists and psychologists, whom the author initially viewed as "unscientific"9 . This unexpected reception partly motivated the author to write Psychofraud and Ethical Therapy as an "antimystical tract"9 .

Despite the initial setbacks and misunderstandings, the vision of The Moral Society, along with that of Teilhard and Spinoza, is described as what moved the author and gave meaning to his life2 . The book served as a foundation for the author's subsequent exploration of ethics, creativity, and the possibility of a higher level of social organization, as evidenced by its role in prescreening participants for his experiments in creating an Ethical State10 ... and as a basis for understanding the evolutionary ethic12 . Although the practical implementation of the Moral Society as initially envisioned faced significant challenges, the book remains a crucial artifact in understanding the development of the author's ideas on the "new synthesis"4 ....

Creative Transformation is presented in the sources as a process designed to help individuals and groups maximize their creativity and ultimately lead to the creation of an Ethical State and a Moral Society1 .... It is described as a self-catalyzing process based on ethical love4 .

Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of Creative Transformation discussed in the sources:

Goal:

•

The ultimate goal of Creative Transformation is to create a collective creative intelligence that is greater than the sum of its parts, where each individual becomes more creative than they would be alone2 .

•

The intermediate stage of this process is called the Ethical State2 . An Ethical State is described as a new state of mind that comes to exist among four men and four women who make a commitment to maximize each other's creativity5 . It can also refer to any octet or network of octets actively engaged in creative transformation6 .

•

The final stage is the Moral Society, which is envisioned as a higher-order autopoietic entity created by voluntarily integrating many highly creative, sovereign Ethical States. The Moral Society would have a significantly amplified level of individual human creativity2 ....

The Four Essential Steps to Begin:

Creative transformation begins with four essential steps, some of which can be taken individually, but the process is completed within a group of four men and four women (an octet)1 :

1.

Deliberately choose to live by the evolutionary ethic and make every decision based on what will maximize creativity for ourselves and others; make a commitment to play the Game of Life8 . This step involves a fundamental shift in values and priorities.

2.

Give and receive ethical feedback on fears within the octet9 .... This step aims to identify and address the fears that inhibit creativity.

3.

Choose not to act out of fear, but rather do what you sincerely believe will maximize creativity no matter how much fear you feel9 .... This requires a conscious rejection of fear as a motivator.

4.

Engage in autopoiesis as best we can9 . This feeds back to the previous three steps and enhances the overall process4 .

The Octet (Group of Eight):

•

The sources emphasize that four men and four women are the optimal number for beginning autopoiesis at the super-metazoan level1 .

•

Within the octet, each member makes a personal commitment to the other seven to do their best to maximize each person's creativity12 .

•

The process aims to synchronize the four complementary pairs of brains within the octet to produce autopoietic coherence13 .

Brain Synchronization:

•

The first stage of creative transformation is brain synchronization, which involves the establishment of quantum coherence within the octet2 .

•

This synchronization of the neocortex (the center of ethics) is achieved by having a common system of ethics derived from the evolutionary ethic and the Eight Ethical Principles14 ....

Techniques to Facilitate Creative Transformation:

•

Quantum Dialogue: This exercise encourages participants to use their quantum brain by inventing original responses to questions rather than relying on memory16 . It helps synchronize the quantum brains of the octet17 .

•

Autopoiesis (Quantum Octologue): This is a coordinated, focused communication within the octet, described as a direct, real-time (almost simultaneous) synchronization of the quantum brains18 . Quantum thoughts are distinguished from classical thoughts by being short, energetic bursts of original information18 . The focus is on communicating important, original thoughts that will increase the creativity of others in the group19 . Touch is considered a primary modality of communication during autopoiesis20 .

•

Common Focus: Enhancing coherence in autopoiesis involves the octet consciously deciding by mutual consent to focus on a single problem and brainstorming that problem classically beforehand21 ....

The Contract for Creative Transformation:

•

Successful octets have signed a contract promising to do their best to help one another maximize creativity23 ....

•

Refusal to sign or extensive modification of the contract has been associated with failure in creative transformation, possibly due to the fear underlying such resistance12 ....

Overcoming Fear:

•

Fear is identified as the primary obstacle to creative transformation24 . It stems from the belief that we cannot creatively cope with a situation25 .

•

The process helps members face and overcome their fears25 .

•

The "victim paradigm" (believing oneself to be a helpless victim) is seen as a major impediment to success in creative transformation26 .... Overcoming this paradigm and making a sincere commitment to play the Game of Life are crucial27 .

Timeframe and Effects:

•

A significant, irreversible, creative effect from autopoiesis is estimated to take about two years of engaging at least twice a month, with a maximum of four years likely28 . "Irreversible" means that fear will no longer dominate ethics29 .

•

The effects of autopoiesis are often powerfully felt the very first time by a majority of participants who have gone through brain synchronization29 .

Self-Selective Process:

•

Creative transformation is described as a self-selective process that drives away unethical persons and attracts more ethical persons30 .

•

Persons who are too afraid of the process may not even try it31 .

Relationship to a Libertarian Society:

•

The creative transformation process is seen as leading automatically and inexorably toward a libertarian society32 ....

•

This is because creativity can only be maximized under maximum individual liberty33 .

The Next Four Steps:

Beyond the initial four steps to begin creative transformation, there are four more steps aimed at optimizing the process:

•

Step 5: Become self-sufficient in education, economics, health, defense, and everything else, in that order34 .

•

Step 6: Form larger networks of octets while preserving individual liberty and maximizing creativity35 .

•

Step 7: Develop the capacity for nonlocal communication and cooperation among networks35 .

•

Step 8: Strive to understand and participate in the evolution of creativity throughout the universe36 .

Creative Transformation in Education and Economics:

•

The sources propose integrating creative transformation into educational systems to maximize creativity alongside intelligence37 . The curriculum outlined emphasizes ethical growth, love, and cooperative learning without the use of fear38 .... Autopoietic octets are suggested as a potential structure for learning40 .

•

The author also mentions integrating the educational system with an economic system that supports and enhances creativity, aiming to make this type of education available to everyone regardless of economic means41 ....

Connection to The Moral Society:

The concept of Creative Transformation can be seen as a practical and refined evolution of the ideas presented in The Moral Society. While The Moral Society outlined the vision of a Moral Society and a rational program for achieving it, Creative Transformation provides a more specific, experience-based methodology centered on the octet and autopoiesis for fostering individual and collective creativity as a pathway to this larger societal transformation. The challenges faced by the author with the reception of The Moral Society, particularly the role of fear, likely informed the emphasis on addressing fear within the Creative Transformation process.

____________________________________________________________________________
PODCAST REVIEW


This audio excerpt is a podcast reviewing John David Garcia's book, which offers a unique approach to unlocking creative potential by blending scientific concepts like quantum physics with mystical ideas and building upon the philosophy of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. The discussion explores Garcia's framework for achieving personal "creative omega," which involves understanding and overcoming fear, practicing love, and engaging in a four-step process centered on an "evolutionary ethic." Furthermore, the review delves into Garcia's vision of a "moral society" that fosters collective intelligence and his practical techniques, including "autopoiesis" in group settings and confronting fear, aimed at facilitating individual and societal creative transformation. 


Discuss Creative potential unlock.

Both "The New Synthesis"1 ... and the podcast review of "Creative Transformation"216 ... offer insights into unlocking creative potential. A central theme across both sources is the interplay between science and mysticism, the crucial role of ethics and love, and the need to overcome fear to tap into our innate creativity3 ....

According to "The New Synthesis," true creativity arises from a combination of rigorous scientific thinking and diffused mystical thinking3 . While traditional scientific discourse often excludes mystical components, the author argues for their harmonious integration with scientific facts to achieve maximal creativity2 . This involves using diffused, intuitive, mystical thinking for creation and science to separate truth from illusion4 . The podcast review echoes this by stating that the book blends science and mysticism, even incorporating quantum physics, to help us unlock our creative potential216 .

Ethics is presented as a crucial element in channeling mystical thinking towards creative ends16 . Mysticism itself is ethically neutral, stimulating the imagination which can generate both true and false information16 . Therefore, an ethical mystic will be more creative, while an unethical one will be more destructive16 . This aligns with the concept of the "evolutionary ethic," which involves making every decision based on what will maximize creativity for ourselves and others72 .... Committing to this ethic is the first essential step in the process of Creative Transformation72 .

Fear is identified as a major impediment to creativity, described in the podcast as "the main villain"219 and in "The New Synthesis" as "the belief that we cannot create"7 .... This fear can lead to limiting beliefs and the "victim paradigm," where individuals feel powerless to change their circumstances90 .... The podcast review highlights that fear often blocks our ability to access a "quantum connection," believed to be essential for tapping into our full creative potential220 ....

Love is presented as the antidote to fear and a powerful force for unlocking creativity7 .... "The New Synthesis" defines love as "the desire to help and act of helping another person increase his/her creativity"7 . Practicing love, even towards those who are difficult or considered enemies, is the second step in Creative Transformation, as it helps break down fear226 . The podcast review emphasizes that focusing on love and nurturing creative potential in ourselves and others naturally diminishes fear234 .

"The New Synthesis" introduces the concept of an "Ethical State," a new level of moral consciousness and collective ethical intelligence among four complementary pairs of men and women committed to maximizing each other's creativity9 .... This is achieved through a new form of autopoiesis (self-creation) at a higher order, leading to a quantum leap in individual and collective creativity9 .... The podcast review describes autopoiesis as a powerful way to tap into self-creation by interacting with different elements within us, including the connection to a creative force222 .

To facilitate this process, "The New Synthesis" outlines four essential steps for Creative Transformation71 ...:

•

Deliberately choose to live by the evolutionary ethic, making decisions based on maximizing creativity for oneself and others, and commit to playing the Game of Life72 ....

•

Learn to overcome fear by taking identity from the soul instead of the ego and striving to maximize creativity without other considerations, choosing to reject fear as a motivator72 ....

•

Choose not to act out of fear, but to do what one sincerely believes will maximize creativity, regardless of the fear felt127 .

•

Engage in autopoiesis as best as possible, recognizing it as an ongoing, self-catalyzing process based on ethical love72 ....

The process often begins with brain synchronization within a group of eight (an "octet"), aiming to establish quantum coherence and create a collective creative intelligence greater than the sum of its parts75 . Techniques like the Quantum Dialogue, where individuals invent original responses rather than relying on memory, can help open the connection to the "quantum brain" responsible for creativity100 .... Autopoiesis itself involves a coordinated, focused communication of quantum thoughts within the octet106 .

The podcast review also highlights the importance of a contract for creativity within a group, serving as a shared commitment to the process and fostering trust and accountability231 .... It emphasizes that the journey of creative transformation is as important as the outcome, finding joy in the act of creating itself235 ....

In conclusion, unlocking creative potential, according to these sources, involves a conscious effort to integrate scientific and mystical thinking under an ethical framework driven by love. Overcoming fear through self-awareness and a commitment to the evolutionary ethic, along with engaging in collaborative processes like autopoiesis within supportive groups, are presented as key practical steps in this transformative journey3 ....


Discuss Science and mysticism blend.

The provided sources extensively discuss the blend of science and mysticism, particularly within the context of understanding creativity and the evolutionary process.

The author explicitly states the intention to deviate from the purely rational, evolutionary perspective developed in the first part of the book by introducing mystical components that are in harmony with scientific facts1 . This is presented as something generally unacceptable within scientific discourse1 . The author's rationale for this blend stems from personal experience, which suggests that the creative process is not purely logical or linear but involves irrational, nonlinear, and diffused thinking – what might be termed "mystical thinking"2 . To be maximally creative, one must learn to combine rigorous scientific thinking with diffused mystical thinking2 .

The author emphasizes that creation occurs through diffused, intuitive, mystical thinking, but truth is separated from illusion through science3 . The book aims to bring about a synthesis between these often antagonistic mental processes3 . This synthesis involves deriving the Creative Transformation process subjectively and personally, sharing subjective experiences alongside objective facts3 . The author believes this approach, though risky, is necessary because a linear, logical derivation would be misleading, as the logic only became clear after the derivation4 .

The concept of a "new synthesis" is introduced as a twentieth-century phenomenon where all fields of knowledge are converging to show that physical, biological, and psychosocial evolution are different facets of a single cosmological process5 . This new synthesis includes a mystical element, with Einstein being cited as an early figure who gained insights into the universe's structure through the ethical teachings of Spinoza5 . Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is presented as the thinker who most exemplifies the new synthesis, being described as the "epitome of a Creative Scientific and Artistic Mystic, a Spiritual, Scientific Generalist"5 .... However, Teilhard's generalist approach led to misunderstanding and rejection from both scientific and humanistic communities, with scientists often prejudiced against any form of mysticism in scientific discussions7 .... Despite this, the author values Teilhard's synthesis for its beauty and completeness in stimulating the imagination9 .

The author's personal journey involved an initial view of mysticism as "intellectual degeneracy"10 . However, this perspective shifted after observing that objectively creative persons, including great scientists like Einstein, Planck, and Heisenberg, were also highly mystical10 . This led to the realization that when personal mysticism or the belief in God is combined with objective science, it enhances objective creativity, making mysticism ethical under certain circumstances11 .

The author further categorizes different approaches to science and mysticism:

•

Mystical Specialists: Antiscientific mystics who reject science as relevant to their mysticism, seen as destructive and self-deluded12 .

•

Mystical Scientists: Those who compartmentalize science and mysticism, not applying scientific tests to mystical insights or using mysticism to generate scientific ideas, also seen as destructive and self-deluded in proportion to this compartmentalization12 .

•

Scientific Mystics: Individuals who ethically integrate mysticism and science, being fully scientific in their mysticism and fully mystical in their science. This is termed the "Holistic Paradigm" and is associated with creativity13 .

•

Scientific Specialists: Narrow scientists who reject the Mystical Paradigm as superstitious and antiscientific, usually minimally creative in their specialty14 .

The author observes a pattern unifying science, mysticism, and art through the theme of ascendance through four complementary pairs15 . This is linked to concepts like Jung's studies on mandalas, which are seen as symbols of transcendence incorporating paired components15 ....

The "New Physics" is also presented as aligning with this synthesis, with some forms of mysticism implying a "quantum-connection" mechanism at work in all facets of evolution and individual acts of creativity17 .... This quantum connection is further explored as a potential link between the human mind and quantum reality, influencing creativity and evolution19 .... The author proposes that God is a creative process and that a "quantum intelligence" might be at work using the quantum connection to influence evolution22 .

In essence, the author argues for a synergistic relationship between science and mysticism, where mystical intuition provides the initial creative spark and science offers the rigorous framework for testing and refining these insights to avoid self-deception and foster genuine creativity2 .... The most creative individuals and advancements, according to this perspective, arise from a conscious and ethical integration of both scientific and mystical modes of thinking13 .


Discuss Spiritual evolution concept.

The concept of spiritual evolution is central to the ideas presented in the sources. It's a perspective that blends scientific understanding with mystical or spiritual components to describe the unfolding of the universe and humanity's place within it1 .

According to the excerpts, the thinker who most exemplifies this "new synthesis" of science and mysticism is Pierre Teilhard de Chardin2 . A priest and paleontologist, Teilhard believed that evolution is not solely a physical process but also has a spiritual dimension, leading towards a point of convergence with God, which he called Omega3 .... This suggests a directedness in evolution, moving towards a higher state of spiritual unity4 ....

The author of the book being reviewed, John David Garcia, builds upon Teilhard's foundation4 .... While deeply moved by Teilhard's vision, Garcia felt it lacked a practical "how-to guide" for achieving this spiritual evolution or our own "creative omega"6 .... Thus, Garcia's work attempts to provide these practical steps for unlocking creative potential through a blend of science and mysticism, including quantum physics1 ....

A key aspect of this spiritual evolution is the idea of a "new synthesis," a 20th-century phenomenon where all fields of knowledge converge to show that physical, biological, and psychosocial evolution are different facets of a single cosmological process2 . This synthesis, initiated by thinkers like Einstein, aims to harmonize scientific facts with mystical components, though this is often not accepted within scientific discourse1 .... Garcia believes that maximal creativity requires combining rigorous scientific thinking with diffused mystical thinking9 .

The sources present a unique perspective on God, not necessarily as a personal being in the traditional sense, but as an infinite process of expanding creativity that drives evolution forward10 .... This "higher moral force" manifests in subjective experiences like inner peace, oneness, and a feeling of love that longs to enhance the creativity of others10 .... Our communication with this force is enhanced by our ethics10 .

The concept of a "quantum connection" also plays a role in this spiritual evolution11 .... It is described as our opening to a universe of infinite information beyond time, matter, and space21 . This connection is linked to our creativity and moral sense24 .

Ethics is presented as crucial for spiritual evolution. An ethical mystic becomes more creative, while an unethical one becomes more destructive25 . Ethics is a preprogrammed desire for truth built into the neocortex, and ethical choices aim to maximize truth or creativity26 . The evolution of ethics is seen as intertwined with the overall evolutionary process, potentially even driving quantum leaps in evolution27 .

To practically engage in this spiritual evolution, the sources outline a four-step process of "creative transformation":

•

Deliberately choosing to live by the evolutionary ethic and maximizing creativity28 .

•

Practicing love, even towards enemies29 .

•

Conquering fear, which is seen as a block to creativity and our connection to God29 ....

•

Engaging in "autopoiesis"32 .

Autopoiesis, meaning "self-creation," is described as the tangled hierarchical process by which God creates everything as everything creates God, producing the epiphenomenon of evolution17 .... It's a collective process, from the interaction of our brain components to the interconnectedness of all beings in the universe37 .... Love is defined as the extension of all autopoietic quadratures36 ....

Fear is identified as a major impediment to spiritual evolution, blocking our ability to access the quantum connection and hindering creativity16 .... Overcoming fear by identifying with our soul (our connection to God, ethics, and creativity) rather than our ego is crucial48 ....

The ultimate goal of this individual and collective spiritual evolution is envisioned as a "Moral Society," a super-metazoan, collective moral intelligence that has a higher level of moral consciousness and collective ethical intelligence6 .... This society would transcend biological limitations and continuously expand creativity62 .

In summary, spiritual evolution as presented in these sources is a process of integrating scientific understanding with a mystical perspective, guided by an evolutionary ethic and driven by a God-as-creative-process accessible through a quantum connection. It involves personal transformation through ethical commitment, love, overcoming fear, and engaging in collective self-creation (autopoiesis), ultimately aiming towards a higher state of collective moral intelligence and boundless creativity.


Discuss Moral society vision.

The vision of the Moral Society is a central concept discussed in "The New Synthesis" and touched upon in the podcast review of "Creative Transformation." It represents a highly evolved state of being characterized by collective moral intelligence and maximized creativity1 . The author of "The New Synthesis" envisioned the Moral Society as a "super-metazoan, collective moral intelligence that would have the same relationship to us as individuals that we have to an amoeba"1 . This suggests a hierarchical evolution where the Moral Society operates at a much higher level of complexity and intelligence than individual human beings1 ....

Here are key aspects of the Moral Society vision derived from the sources:

•

Ultimate Goal of Evolution: The Moral Society is presented as the next logical step in human evolution, following the development of individuals and the potential formation of "Ethical States"3 .... It is the "final stage" of creative transformation4 .

•

Amplified Creativity: The integration of numerous highly creative and sovereign "Ethical States" into a higher-order autopoietic entity is expected to further amplify individual human creativity2 . The Moral Society's creativity would transcend biological limitations and grow into new dimensions5 .

•

Potential for Cosmic Evolution: The vision extends to the possibility of the Moral Society eventually evolving to the point where it can integrate distinct universes and create new universes, leading to a hierarchical evolution with no upper limit5 ....

•

Connection to God: The Moral Society is described as being created by and part of an infinite process that is God8 .... The ever-expanding creativity of the universe is seen as the glory of God, and humanity contributes to this by striving to learn, teach, and create8 .

•

Practical Challenges: Despite the grand vision, the author initially struggled to find a practical, step-by-step program to transform current society into the Moral Society1 . Early attempts to create "embryonic Ethical States" instead led to bureaucracies that had to be aborted10 .

•

Overcoming Fear and Bureaucracy: The podcast review highlights the author's realization that early attempts were hindered by fear, which led to rigid structures (bureaucracy) that stifled creativity11 . Overcoming fear through love and ethical commitment is crucial for progressing towards a Moral Society12 ....

•

Libertarian Society as an Intermediate Stage: The creative transformation process is expected to lead automatically and inexorably towards a libertarian society15 . This is because creativity can only be maximized under maximum individual liberty16 . The society evolving from "octets" (groups of eight engaged in creative transformation) will be based on love and the recognition that increasing the creativity of others is the most creative act17 ....

•

Finite Being, Not Ultimate God: It's important to note that the Moral Society, no matter how evolved, is considered a finite being, a "god" in the Greek sense, akin to how a human being is a god to an amoeba7 . There is no "greatest" Moral Society, as the process of evolution and creation is infinite7 .

•

Evolutionary Ethic as Foundation: The Moral Society is fundamentally driven by the "evolutionary ethic," which prioritizes maximizing creativity9 .... This ethic guides the development and interactions within the Moral Society.

In essence, the Moral Society is a utopian vision of a future where humanity has overcome its limitations, particularly fear, and has embraced an ethical framework that allows for the continuous expansion of creativity on a cosmic scale. While the path to achieving this society is acknowledged as challenging, the concept serves as a guiding principle for the process of creative transformation20 .


Discuss Fear as obstacle.

Fear is presented as a significant obstacle in the sources, hindering creativity, ethical development, and the realization of a Moral Society1 ....

Fear as a Barrier to Creativity: The sources state that fear is the belief that we cannot create3 .... This belief can paralyze the "quantum brain," which is considered a random generator of true information essential for creativity9 .... When we mistrust our imagination due to fear, we also mistrust our ethics9 . Consequently, individuals may become destructively conservative and avoid innovation, even when necessary for survival11 . Specialists, driven by the fear of error, are described as "minimally creative"12 . Furthermore, fear can lead to the establishment of bureaucracies, which instill fear in their members by suggesting they cannot create but must rely on the creativity of others4 .... The fear of making an error in front of peers is also identified as a major inhibitor of original thinking within academic communities14 ....

Fear and Self-Deception: Fear induces self-deception and misunderstanding of significant negative feedback9 .... The greater our intelligence, the greater our capacity to deceive ourselves and maintain our delusions out of the fear of losing them9 . In this state, our quantum connection is distorted to support our illusions9 . Mystical thinking, when not balanced by scientific analysis, is also likely to lead to self-deception18 .

Fear and the Brain: Fear has been hard-wired into the reptilian complex as a survival mechanism5 . It can put an "absolute block" between our quantum brain and our classical brain19 . The classical brain, which includes the reptilian complex and is subject to fear, tends to produce repetitive, uncreative behavior20 . During "autopoiesis," fear can manifest as drowning out quantum thoughts with classical verbiage21 . Therefore, it is advised to remain quiet until one can distinguish between quantum and classical thoughts, as fear always triggers the classical brain, not the quantum brain22 .

Love as the Antidote to Fear: The only antidote to fear is love, which is defined as the desire for and the act of helping another person increase their creativity4 .... Creative love involves helping someone overcome their fear and become more creative23 . Even anger is seen as a manifestation of the unconscious belief that we cannot love creatively23 .

Fear and Resistance to Creative Transformation: Many individuals are so afraid of the creative transformation process that they will not even try it29 . This fear is often rooted in the reluctance to give up false, ego-based models of personal identity30 . The "victim paradigm," the belief that one is a hapless victim of circumstance and cannot be creative without external opportunities, is a common and destructive false belief system associated with fear25 ....

Fear and Ethics: Fear can destroy ethics by blocking the connection between the quantum and classical brains19 . Many adults disregard their ethical nature and live only to increase happiness due to fear5 . Unethical innovations, driven by fear and self-deception, often promise happiness32 .

Fear in Collective Settings: Fear usually divides people and only unites them in collective destructiveness2 . Even in the context of creative transformation octets, fear is the apparent common denominator in groups that fail or individuals who drop out17 . The fear of giving up delusionary belief systems can hinder success in creative transformation33 .

Overcoming Fear: Overcoming fear involves taking identity from the soul (our quantum connection to God, ethics, and creativity) instead of the ego34 . Choosing to play the "Game of Life," which involves a commitment to the evolutionary ethic and maximizing creativity, can lower fear31 .... The creative transformation process is designed to help individuals face and overcome their fears, but those who cannot do so often leave the process3 ....

In summary, fear is portrayed as a pervasive and detrimental force that obstructs individual and collective creativity, hinders ethical development, fosters self-deception, and impedes the journey towards a Moral Society. The sources emphasize that overcoming fear through love, ethical commitment, and a focus on maximizing creativity is essential for personal and societal advancement4 ....



PODCAST TRANSCRIPT