8-13-25 DailyBriefs.info archive

This text from The Unz Review, titled "World War VII," redefines historical global conflicts as a continuous struggle orchestrated by a "small hostile elite" against the majority of the world's population, labeling these events as distinct "World Wars." The author argues that major conflicts from the 18th century onward, including familiar events like the Seven Years' War and the American Revolutionary War (reclassified as World War II and World War III respectively), were not isolated occurrences but rather interconnected episodes driven by this elite's desire for "globalization" and "world domination," often with England and later the United States at the center. The article posits that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic represent the opening stages of "World War VII," illustrating how this alleged elite employs various methods, beyond direct warfare, such as "culling the population" through "gender lunacy," "unhealthy food," and "lab-engineered diseases," to achieve its ultimate goal of a centralized "world government" and a compliant populace.

These sources collectively argue that a powerful global elite, driven by financial interests and a desire for control, is orchestrating a series of conflicts and societal changes. They contend that recent events like the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic are phases of a larger, ongoing "World War VII" designed to reshape the world order, potentially reducing global populations and increasing centralized control. The texts highlight how governments, particularly the U.S. and European Union, are perceived as tools of this elite, with policies like increased tariffs, military spending, and surveillance laws serving their agenda. Furthermore, the authors suggest that Donald Trump, despite his populist rhetoric, is ultimately serving the interests of these billionaires, particularly those in the arms industry, and that traditional democratic processes are being subverted.

The sources present globalization and multipolarity as opposing forces in an ongoing, centuries-long struggle that is currently manifested as "World War VII".

Globalization Globalization is defined as "the efforts of a small hostile elite to impose its will on the world and to reduce all people but themselves to the status of obedient slaves". This elite is characterized by strong bonds of blood relationship, financial interests, and blackmail, and is deeply intertwined with powerful banking circles. Historically, this struggle has been aimed at establishing a unified central world government, with past attempts including the League of Nations and the United Nations.

Modern manifestations and alleged mechanisms of this drive towards globalization include:

Secret Societies and Influential Groups: The Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers, and the Club of Rome are accused of promoting a global government, a global monetary system, and a global tax policy. These groups allegedly aim to achieve world peace and prosperity through world government, sometimes by regionalizing and unifying the world into political and economic regions. They are reportedly funded by major banks and tax-exempt foundations and include prominent figures.
Economic Control: Billionaires, particularly those controlling defense contractors, are described as controlling the U.S. government to maintain their market. This is achieved by creating artificial threats, such as "the Russian threat" and "the Chinese threat," to justify continuous military spending, even after the Cold War. The U.S. shaping the post-war order through economic terms, like the British loan of 1944, forced countries to capitulate to U.S. demands for free trade and blocked protective tariffs and capital controls.
Political Manipulation: The European Union's political structure is seen as being shaped by the United States, transferring negotiating power from individual nations and voters to the European Commission, which acts as a public relations and negotiating arm for NATO. This is perceived as serving the interests of "neocon cold warriors" who aim for a more intense war with Russia. The current economic deal where Europe accepts increased U.S. tariffs while abolishing its own is seen as Europe's economic surrender in exchange for U.S. support in a military buildup against Russia.
Social Control and Depopulation: The ongoing "World War VII" includes efforts to cull the population through various means, such as "gender lunacy" that attacks family cohesion, unhealthy food, lab-engineered diseases, and mandatory vaccinations. The World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" and the World Health Organization's demands for global policy submission are presented as contributions to establishing world government.
Surveillance and Censorship: The UK's Online Safety Act and similar global initiatives are seen as kick-starting a "frenzy of online censorship and surveillance" by governments and Big Tech, using measures like digital ID checks, bank account surveillance, and facial recognition technology on passport databases. These efforts are framed as controlling all internet content and suppressing lawful speech.

Multipolarity In contrast to globalization, multipolarity is described as the inherent nature of the world: "variegated and diverse". Historically, the American Revolutionary War is cited as an example of a struggle for an independent, federal, and thus "multipolar" political organization.

Current events suggest a shift towards multipolarity as a response to globalization efforts:

Reorientation of Trade: Despite U.S. tariff policies and attempts to isolate certain nations, countries like Brazil are reorienting their trade towards China and other East Asian markets, as they are unable to export to the United States. This movement eastward also includes Russia turning away from Europe to forge harmony with China, Eurasia, BRICS, and the global South.
Challenges to U.S. Hegemony: The U.S. is seen as pursuing a strategy to maintain its position as a "global Hegemon". However, the sources suggest that U.S. military and economic policies are weakening its standing. The depletion of U.S. military supplies and economic policies that are projected to increase U.S. inflation and lead to consumer defaults are seen as signs of vulnerability. Trump's tariff policies are described as economically detrimental, pushing other nations away from the U.S. orbit.
Rise of Nationalist Sentiment: The economic pressures and perceived imposition of policies by a ruling elite are leading to increased nationalistic feelings in Europe. Populist nationalism globally is noted as being "middle-class centered," offering a potential alternative political vehicle in contrast to the U.S. where such a vehicle is seen as lacking.
Resistance to Global Governance: Organizations and individuals are pushing back against increased government surveillance and control, viewing it as an erosion of free expression and privacy. There is also a strong critique of the left's perspective on the family, which advocates for its abolition and state control over children, seen as an obstacle to state power.

The current geopolitical landscape, marked by conflicts like the war in Ukraine and economic shifts, is framed as a critical phase in this long-standing conflict between the forces pushing for a unified, controlled global system (globalization) and the inherent diversity and nationalistic tendencies pushing for a world with multiple centers of power (multipolarity).

The sources you provided offer extensive perspectives on the concept of "elite control," detailing how various groups and individuals allegedly exert influence over governments, economies, media, and even social structures.

Here's a discussion of elite control based on the sources:

Defining Elite Control

Elite control, as described in the sources, refers to the domination of society by a small, hostile elite who aim to impose their will on the world and reduce the general population to "obedient slaves". This elite is often characterized by strong bonds of blood relationship, financial interests, and even blackmail. It is seen as a centuries-long struggle between this elite and the rest of the world's population, framed as a conflict between globalization and multipolarity, evil and good, darkness and light.

Mechanisms and Manifestations of Elite Control

The sources highlight several alleged mechanisms through which this elite control is exercised:

Financial and Corporate Influence:
- Billionaire Control of Government: Billionaires who control firms selling to the U.S. government (especially defense contractors) are asserted to need to control the government to control their market. The war business is presented as the most profitable sector for these contractors, who are said to control the U.S. government. Defense stocks have significantly outperformed the overall stock market during conflicts like the Afghanistan War, indicating financial success for those involved.
- Massive Arms Deals: The sources cite examples like Trump's record-high $350 billion arms deal with the Saud family, which allegedly cements mutual dependency between the U.S. and Saudi aristocracies. These deals, often hidden from mainstream media, are presented as boosting the fortunes of billionaires controlling armament manufacturers and mercenary contractors.
- Philanthropy as a Racket: Billionaires are accused of using "philanthropic" non-profit organizations as tax-avoidance strategies to increase their profits, acquiring control over entire sectors like seed banks (e.g., Bill Gates). It is suggested that such charities should be prohibited if backed by billionaires and replaced by taxpayer-funded entities accountable to the public.
- Targeted Funding and Lobbying: Specific powerful figures like Leonard Leo, Charles Koch, Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, Stephen Schwarzman, Harlan Crow, Ken Griffin, Rupert Murdoch, and Barre Seid are identified as key "elite funders" who reshape democracy. They are described as using vast networks of "dark money" trusts, foundations, and PACs to design policy, groom candidates, and capture institutions. Their goals include remaking the judiciary, shrinking government, promoting technocratic nationalism, weaponizing media for culture wars, protecting financial profits, and shaping judicial rulings.
Secret Societies and Global Governance:
- Intertwined Networks: Various alleged secret societies are mentioned, including the Freemasons, Templars, Rosacrucians, Illuminati, Maltese Knights, and Skull and Bones, often intertwined with powerful banking circles. While direct documentary evidence is stated to be impossible, much evidence suggests a base in London and involvement of Zionist members.
- Trilateral Commission: This group is described as promoting world government and economic interdependence among "superpowers" (North America, Europe, Japan), with alleged ties to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Bilderbergers. It is even suggested they funded Jimmy Carter's presidency to steer political outcomes.
- Bilderbergers: Characterized as a highly clandestine European organization sponsored by major banks (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, National City Bank, Morgan Trust, Standard Oil, Ford, DuPont). Its alleged goal is world government, leading to initiatives like the European Economic Community (EEC).
- Club of Rome: With fewer than a hundred members, many also allegedly CFR members, this group claims to understand world problems (pollution, war, overpopulation) and purportedly holds keys to global peace through world government. It is suggested its purpose is to oversee the regionalization and unification of the world into 10 political and economic regions.
- Skull and Bones: This exclusive Yale society is described as a "stepping stone" to the CFR, Bilderbergers, and Trilateral organizations. Its graduating members allegedly form a "clo and dagger inner circle" within the CFR that controls it. Prominent family networks (Harriman, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Lord, Taft, Bundy, Rockefeller, Perkins, Stimson, Morgan) are heavily represented, with an emphasis on family heritage and "bloodlines" to maintain dominance.
Political and Economic Control:
- Manipulation of Elections: "Democracies" are seen as "billionaires' rackets," where competing political parties backed by billionaires deceive voters to elect their preferred candidates.
- Direct Presidential Actions: Trump's "Liberation Day" takeover of Washington D.C., where he federalized the city's police force and deployed National Guard troops, is cited as an unprecedented executive action aiming to assert control over urban areas despite falling crime rates. This action could set a precedent for similar federal interventions in other major U.S. cities.
- Trade Policy and Tariffs: Trump's tariff policies, described as "history as farce," involved imposing extremely high, seemingly arbitrary tariffs, bypassing congressional legislation. These rapid and drastic policy shifts created immense economic uncertainty. The practice of extorting companies to pay taxes on exports is deemed highly unusual and illegal.
- War as a Tool: Wars are explicitly described as a "powerful tool in the hands of elites with which to keep the population subdued" and to "cull the population". This includes the current "World War VII" which allegedly started with the U.S.-organized "color revolution" in Ukraine in 2014 and includes the engineered COVID-19 "pandemic" as a means to reduce "useless eaters".
Information Control and Surveillance:
- Mainstream Media Manipulation: The "billionaires-controlled 'news'-media" is accused of hiding important historical facts and promoting specific narratives. Mainstream media is also seen as stirring up backlash against actions like Trump's D.C. takeover.
- Online Censorship and Surveillance: The UK's Online Safety Act, enforced in July 2025, is presented as a catalyst for a global "frenzy of online censorship and surveillance". Governments in Europe, the USA, and Russia are actively controlling internet content. Big Tech companies are deemed complicit in obtaining and controlling user data, with examples including leaked ChatGPT chats, Microsoft Recall logging sensitive data, payment processors acting as "chokepoints," and Instagram's live location tracking.
- Biometric Data Usage: The UK government has allegedly secretly allowed police to search over 150 million passport and immigration database photos using facial recognition technology, raising concerns about privacy invasions, misidentifications, and injustice.
Social and Cultural Control:
- Dismantling Traditional Family: A radical ideological argument from the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) conference in 2025 proposes "family abolition," viewing the nuclear family as a repressive institution that reinforces capitalism. The goal is for the state to manage and control the rearing of children, replacing biological bonds with a "child collective relationship," as the family is seen as an obstacle to state power.
- "Woke and Gender Lunacy": This is described as a slogan used by the "hostile elite" to "accelerate humanity's descent into slavery" and as an "outright attack on family cohesion".

Consequences of Elite Control

The pervasive nature of elite control, as described, leads to several negative outcomes:

Undermining Democracy: The system is portrayed as one where voters are merely "deceived" by competing billionaire-backed parties, leading to a loss of the "democratic facade".
Economic Impoverishment and Instability: Europe's economic "surrender" to the U.S. is seen as disastrous, with increased tariffs and energy costs potentially breaking up the European Union. Within the U.S., tariffs are predicted to lead to increased inflation and shrinking markets, causing a "real squeeze" on the economy and labor force.
Perpetual Warfare and Danger: The profitability of the war business ensures continuous conflict, with Europe committing to buy American arms that "don't work" for a "disastrous" fight with Russia. The U.S. is seen as depleting its military supplies by supporting Ukraine and Israel, raising concerns about its ability to fight a serious war without weapons. The actions of leaders like Trump are deemed "crazy," risking atomic war.
Social Division and Unrest: The D.C. takeover and similar potential interventions are seen as setting the stage for "widespread civil unrest," with emotions running high. The alleged efforts to reduce population through engineered diseases and vaccinations are presented as leading to a "giant concentration camp" world.

Counter-Efforts

Despite the grim picture, some counter-efforts are mentioned:

Public Exposure: Investigating and highlighting lavish perks and self-dealing, partnering with watchdog groups, and "naming and shaming" are suggested to expose the wealth and influence of elite funders.
Transparency and Legislation: Calls for enacting laws like the DISCLOSE Act to mandate disclosure of large donations, banning dark-money interchanges, and requiring donor disclosure for legal briefs are proposed to increase financial transparency.
Ethics and Anti-Corruption: Passing acts to limit gifts from billionaires and mandating disclosure for public officials are suggested to combat transactional influence.
Strategic Disinvestment and Boycott: Mobilizing shareholder resolutions in financial institutions tied to elite funders and launching public boycotts of media outlets promoting disinformation are presented as ways to cut their power.
Campaign Finance Reform: Expanding public financing and de-gerrymandering redistricting are seen as ways to empower grassroots campaigns over billionaire-backed ones.
Civic Media: Funding "truth-based 'dark money tracker' media" and supporting local fact-checking are proposed to counter disinformation.

Overall, the sources portray a world increasingly under the sway of powerful, often secretive, elites who manipulate global events, economies, and public perception for their own benefit, leading to widespread negative consequences for the general population.

The sources present a unique and expansive perspective on historical "World Wars," re-categorizing global conflicts stretching back centuries and linking them to a continuous struggle driven by a "small hostile elite" and financial interests.

Definition and Underlying Themes of World Wars According to the "World War VII" source, what constitutes a "World War" is a long-lasting duel involving the world's leading powers, with fighting occurring across the globe, significantly impacting populations and geopolitics. These wars are presented as episodes in an age-old struggle between globalization, defined as the efforts of a small hostile elite to impose its will and reduce others to obedient slaves, and multipolarity, representing the variegated and diverse nature of the world. This struggle is also framed as one between evil and good, darkness and light, death and life, and between stupidity and intelligence.

A key aspect highlighted is the role of a "small elite," bound by "blood relationship, financial interests and blackmail," which has been attempting to reorganize the world according to its wishes for several centuries. This elite is often associated with powerful banking circles and groups like the Freemasons, Jesuits, Illuminati, Rosicrucians, Maltese Knights, and Skull and Bones. The establishment of central banks, such as the Bank of England (1694) and the U.S. Federal Reserve (1913), is noted as preceding these world wars, suggesting a connection to financial motivations and strategies for conflict.

Another recurring theme is the culling of the population. Wars are seen as a tool for elites to keep populations subdued by instilling fear. This goal is explicitly linked to "World War VII," encompassing the COVID-19 "pandemic" and the efforts of "globalist outfits" like the World Economic Forum and World Health Organization.

Categorization of Historical World Wars The "World War VII" source redefines and numbers historical conflicts as follows:

World War I (1700-1721): This period includes the Great Northern War between Russia and Sweden, and the War of the Spanish Succession. It involved most great powers across Europe and at sea, leading to over two million deaths, primarily soldiers and sailors. This war established Great Britain's hegemony and Russia's dominance in the East.
World War II (1756-1763): Known as the Seven Years’ War, this conflict involved most of the world's great powers. It resulted in approximately one million deaths, mostly non-civilians, and further solidified English power. This war is characterized as one of the "cleanest" and "civilized" in history due to disciplined armies and minimal impact on civilians.
World War III (1775-1826): This extensive period encompasses the American Revolutionary War, the French Revolutionary Wars, the Napoleonic Wars, and the Wars of Independence in the Americas. All major powers participated, and the total number of deaths could be as high as seven million.
World War IV (1848-1871): This war includes the 1848 revolution, the First and Second Italian Wars of Independence, the Crimean War, the Sepoy Rebellion in India, the Second Opium War, the American Civil War, and the Paraguayan War. It is described as a comprehensive English effort to consolidate power and eliminate rivals, resulting in at least three to four million deaths.
World War V (1904-1922): This period began with the Russo-Japanese War and included the Balkan Wars, what is traditionally known as World War I, and the Greco-Turkish War. It involved all six European great powers, Japan, and the United States, taking about 20 million military victims. Including the Spanish flu "pandemic," the total could reach 120 million. This war consolidated the British Empire and spectaculary grew the power of the United States, leading to the creation of the League of Nations.
World War VI (1935-1962): This war encompasses the Second Italo-Ethiopian War, the Spanish Civil War, Japan's invasion of China, and what is commonly known as World War II (which included Germany and the Soviet Union invading Poland, and England and France declaring war on Germany). It also extended to post-war civil and anti-colonial conflicts in Greece, Indonesia, Indochina, and Algeria. World War VI is estimated to have killed at least 80 million people, mostly civilians. The United States benefited most, and the League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations.
World War VII (2014-present): This ongoing "world war" is said to have begun in 2014 with the U.S.-organized "color revolution" in Ukraine, which led to a shooting war against the Russian-speaking population in Eastern Ukraine and Russia's "Special Military Operation" in 2022. The second phase of this war is identified as the engineered COVID-19 "pandemic" launched in 2019, which is estimated to have caused at least 20 million deaths worldwide due to the disease, vaccinations, and mandatory treatments. This phase is characterized by efforts from "globalist outfits" to impose a world government and reduce the population.

Current Geopolitical Landscape and Perspectives Several sources touch on the contemporary global situation, often viewing current conflicts as extensions of these historical patterns:

The War in Ukraine is seen not just as a conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but as a broader war between Western Europe and Russia, with Ukraine serving as a battlefield. The "Europe's Surrender" source highlights European economic concessions to the U.S. as a price for locking the U.S. into a more intensive war with Russia.
The U.S. Role: The U.S. is described as focusing its attention on a "coming war with China" in the Pacific, attempting to promote conflict between China and Taiwan, and trying to convince NATO to shift its focus from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Michael Hudson notes that Trump's policies, including increased tariffs on Europe, are seen as a disaster, aimed at impoverishing European industry and driving Europe eastward towards China and Russia. This reorientation is already happening, with Brazil and Mexico shifting trade towards China and other Asian countries.
Military Capabilities and Strategy: The sources discuss the depletion of U.S. and European military supplies due to aid to Ukraine and Israel, suggesting that any serious future military war would rely on long-distance missiles, where Russia, Iran, and China have a technological lead. Old-fashioned land wars with tanks are considered obsolete due to new weaponry like drones.
Billionaire Influence and Deception: The concept of "people of the lie" is introduced, suggesting that those in leadership positions often mask ruthless ambitions in language of benevolence and virtue. Billionaires who sell to the U.S. government are accused of controlling it to secure their market, making the war business highly profitable. These billionaires allegedly fund political campaigns and "charities" that serve their interests rather than the public's.

Alternative Views on "World Wars" While "World War VII" presents a specific classification, some commentators within the sources offer alternative perspectives:

Some suggest the Seven Years War (1756-1763) was the first true world war because it was fought on every continent except Australia and Antarctica.
Others argue that the Cold War and subsequent conflicts, like the Vietnam War or the Iraq Wars, mean that what is classified as World War VI never truly ended, but morphed into continuous conflict.
There's also a view that the current conflicts, including the war in Ukraine and events in Gaza, are leading to or are already part of a "World War III" in the more conventional sense.

The sources indicate that population control is considered a core objective of a "small hostile elite" in an ongoing, centuries-long struggle identified as "World War VII". This elite's ambition is to impose its will globally and reduce the general populace to "obedient slaves". This goal is intertwined with establishing a unified central world government.

The mechanisms and manifestations of this alleged population control include:

Wars and Conflict as a Culling Mechanism: World wars are presented as instruments to "cull the population," leaving survivors "meek and weak" and thus more subdued to government policies. The current "World War VII" is said to include the ongoing conflict in Ukraine (starting 2014) and the COVID-19 "pandemic" (starting 2019) as phases designed to reduce the population. The "Covid operation" is explicitly stated to have been "intended to kill off people and to keep killing them piecemeal every year, in order to reduce the number of 'useless eaters'". It is further alleged that "research is being carried out for more of such centrally coordinated killing sprees in the future". The Georgia Guidestones' first commandment, "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature," is referenced in comments discussing this goal.
Social and Family Disintegration: A direct "attack on family cohesion through imposed gender lunacy" is highlighted as a method. More broadly, some ideological positions, particularly from certain discussions at a Democratic Socialists of America conference, advocate for "family abolition". The nuclear family is described as "inherently repressive, racist, and heterosexist" and a reproducer of capitalism. The proposed alternative involves the collective or the state managing and controlling the rearing of children, replacing the parent-child bond with a "child collective relationship". This includes pushing for widespread surrogacy to "break biological bonds" and dismantle traditional gender and family concepts. The core argument against the family is its role as an "obstacle to state power," aiming to reduce individuals into "impotent, isolated units" who primarily interact with state agents, replacing natural loyalties with a direct state-citizen relationship.
Manipulation of Food and Health Systems: The elite's efforts to cull the population also involve "poisoning and killing off the population with unhealthy food," specifying elements like "sugar, nanoplastics, agricultural chemicals, [and] mRNA-manipulated meat". The use of "lab-engineered diseases" and "mandatory vaccinations" are also cited as tools for population reduction. Furthermore, billionaires are accused of controlling global seed banks, exemplified by Bill Gates' alleged influence over the Svalbard seed bank, and promoting patenting technologies to effectively become a "new Monsanto on a global scale," thereby exerting control over the world's food sources.
Global Governance as a Pretext: Organizations like the Club of Rome, while claiming to address global issues such as "overpopulation," are suggested to have a "stealthy purpose" to divide and unify the world into 10 political and economic regions under a world government. The World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" and the World Health Organization's demands for global policy submission are presented as contributing to this establishment of world government. This indicates that perceived global problems like overpopulation might serve as pretexts for implementing global governance structures that could then enforce population control measures.

This overarching agenda is attributed to an elite held together by "blood relationship, financial interests, and blackmail," deeply connected with powerful banking circles. They are described as "kakistocrats"—governing by being the "worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous people"—who systematically engage in nepotism, favoritism, and criminal practices, all while masking their "ruthless ambitions" with "benevolence and virtue signaling".

Geopolitical conflicts, as presented in the sources, are not merely isolated events but are deeply interconnected, forming part of a centuries-long struggle between forces of globalization and multipolarity. This struggle is characterized as a conflict between an alleged "small hostile elite" seeking global control and the inherent diversity of the world. These conflicts are portrayed as driven by a complex interplay of economic interests, political manipulation, and a broader agenda, often leading to devastating human costs.

Here's a detailed discussion of geopolitical conflicts:

Overarching Framework: "World War VII" and Elite Agendas

The sources propose a revisionist history of "World Wars," asserting that the world is currently in "World War VII," which began around 2014. This conflict, like previous ones, is attributed to the efforts of a "small hostile elite" that is allegedly bound by "blood relationship, financial interests and blackmail" and deeply intertwined with powerful banking circles. A primary goal of these wars, according to the sources, is to "cull the population".

This elite's long-term objective is to establish a "unified central world government", with past attempts including the League of Nations and the United Nations. Modern globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) are seen as contributing to this goal, with the WEF's "Great Reset" aiming for a future where "We shall own nothing and be happy".

Key Drivers of Conflict

Economic and Financial Control:
- Profiteering from War: The war business is described as the "most profitable sector" for billionaires who control defense contractors. Defense stocks significantly outperformed the S&P 500 during the Afghanistan War, indicating "extraordinary success" for powerful individuals.
- Market Control: Billionaires who sell to the U.S. government "need to control the U.S. Government, in order to control their market". This is allegedly achieved by creating "artificial threats" like "the Russian threat" and "the Chinese threat" to justify continuous military spending, even after the Cold War.
- Arms Deals: Trump's record $350 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia is cited as cementing mutual dependency between the U.S. and Saudi aristocracies and boosting fortunes of arms manufacturers and mercenary contractors.
- "Philanthropy" as a Racket: Billionaires like Bill Gates are accused of using "philanthropic" non-profits as tax-avoidance strategies to increase profits and gain control over entire sectors, such as seed banks.
Political Manipulation and Subversion of Democracy:
- "Billionaires' Rackets": "Democracies" are seen as "billionaires' rackets" where political parties, funded by billionaires, deceive voters to elect their preferred candidates.
- Influence of "Elite Funders": Individuals like Leonard Leo, Charles Koch, Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, Stephen Schwarzman, Harlan Crow, Ken Griffin, Rupert Murdoch, and Barre Seid are identified as key "elite funders" who "design policy, groom candidates, and capture entire institutions". Their goals include remaking the judiciary, shrinking government, promoting technocratic nationalism, weaponizing media, and protecting financial profits.
- European Union Structure: The U.S. is accused of shaping the EU's political structure, transferring negotiating power from individual nations and voters to the European Commission, which acts as a "public relations arm and negotiating arms of NATO". This is seen as serving "neocon cold warriors" who aim for an "intensive war" with Russia.
Ideological Warfare and Societal Control:
- "Gender Lunacy": The ongoing "World War VII" includes outright attacks on family cohesion through "imposed gender lunacy".
- Family Abolition: A panel at the Democratic Socialists of America conference in 2025 reportedly advocated for "family abolition," viewing the nuclear family as a repressive, racist, and heterosexist institution that reinforces capitalism. They proposed state control over the rearing of children and the replacement of parent-child bonds with a "child collective relationship". This aligns with Marx's view and is seen as an attempt to dismantle the family as an "obstacle to state power".
- Censorship and Surveillance: The UK's Online Safety Act and similar initiatives are described as a "global frenzy of online censorship and surveillance" by governments and Big Tech. This includes using digital ID checks, bank account surveillance, and facial recognition on passport databases, posing risks of profound privacy invasions and misidentifications. Efforts to ban private messaging and hack devices without suspicion are also mentioned.

Current Geopolitical Conflicts ("World War VII")

Ukraine Conflict:
- Described as beginning with the U.S.-organized "color revolution" in Ukraine in 2014, followed by a "shooting war" against the Russian-speaking population.
- Russia's "Special Military Operation" in February 2022 is portrayed as a response, costing approximately 1.5 million Ukrainian soldiers' lives without a clear end.
- The war is framed as being "between Western Europe and Russia," with Ukraine serving only as a battlefield.
- European "surrender" to Trump's economic demands (increased U.S. tariffs, abolished European tariffs, agreeing to pay higher prices for U.S. energy) is explicitly linked to securing U.S. support for a more "intensive war" with Russia.
- U.S. military aid to Ukraine has allegedly depleted U.S. missile, tank, and arms supplies.
- Russia is said to have developed a technological lead in "hypersonic missiles," which can penetrate European defenses, making Western military tactics like using tanks "no longer the means of warfare".
Israeli Conflict in Gaza:
- Referred to as a "televised Israeli holocaust" and part of the opening stages of "World War VII".
- The U.S. has reportedly spent 25% of its air defense system (missiles) sent to Israel in just 12 days of war.
- Reports of Israeli gunfire killing people seeking aid in Gaza highlight the severe humanitarian crisis.
Economic Warfare (U.S. Tariffs):
- Trump's "Liberation Day" declaration in April 2025 introduced "sweeping new set of tariffs" (average rates from 2.5% to 29%), which caused markets to panic.
- These tariffs led to a tit-for-tat exchange with China, raising tariffs against Chinese goods to 145%.
- Despite initial high tariffs, Trump drastically reduced them for other countries, leading to suspicions of insider trading.
- This aggressive tariff policy is seen as economically detrimental to the U.S., potentially increasing inflation and consumer defaults, and driving nations like Brazil and India to reorient their trade towards China and East Asia.
U.S. Internal Actions and Potential Civil Unrest:
- Trump's "Liberation Day" takeover of Washington D.C. in August 2025, federalizing the police force and deploying National Guard troops, is cited as an unprecedented executive action. This was done under the pretext of fighting crime, despite falling crime rates, and sparked protests.
- This action could set a precedent for similar federal interventions in other major U.S. cities like New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago, raising concerns about civil liberties and potential widespread civil unrest.
COVID-19 Pandemic:
- The "engineered COVID-19 'pandemic'" launched in 2019 is considered the "second phase" of the new world war.
- It is alleged to have caused at least 20 million deaths worldwide from the disease, vaccination, and mandatory treatments.
- The "Covid operation" is seen as being "intended to kill off people and to keep killing them piecemeal every year, in order to reduce the number of 'useless eaters'".

Future Outlook and Risks

The sources suggest that the current geopolitical landscape is more dangerous due to the perceived "craziness" of leaders like Trump, which could lead to an atomic war. The U.S. is seen as pursuing a strategy to maintain its "global Hegemon" status, but its military and economic policies are weakening its standing, potentially leading to its isolation. There is a rising "nationalistic feeling" globally, particularly in Europe, as a response to economic pressures and perceived elite impositions. The conflict between Russia and Western Europe is not expected to be won by the latter. The world is heading towards "some degree of anarchy and chaos".

lm podcast text

Welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez deep dive podcast show and welcome to the deep dive. So what we do here is uh we dig into some really fascinating sources,

right? And pull out the key stuff, the really important bits of knowledge and insight.

Exactly. The mission is, you know, to give you that shortcut to being truly wellinformed, maybe with a few surprising facts,

but hopefully just enough humor to keep you hooked.

Yeah. Keep things interesting. Today, we're plunging into a whole collection of materials. It touches on, well, everything from alleged secret societies in influencing global events.

Uh-huh. All the way to shifts in political power, modern surveillance, even hidden meanings in literature.

It's a real deep dive into the forces, you know, shaping our world,

and some perspectives you might not always notice.

Get ready for some serious aha moments, maybe.

Let's hope so. Okay, let's start things off. Gary Wayne's 2014 book, The Genesis 6 Conspiracy. What's the big idea here?

What's really fascinating or maybe provocative is Wayne's core claim. Yeah.

The existence of uh modern day descendants of the Nephilim.

Nephilim like from the Bible.

Exactly. In connecting this to the bigger picture, he argues these bloodlines are absolutely central to Satan's scheme to install the Antichrist, you know, at the end of days.

Wow.

Okay.

A plan he says started right after Lucifer got kicked out of heaven.

So, what's the implication then for us now?

Well, Wayne suggests that to keep this plan going, Satan has basically recruited secret societies. He named the Freemasons, the Templars, uh the Rosacrruian

to promote a theology and a history that actually runs counter to the biblical narrative. It sets up this really dramatic foundation for a huge conspiracy theory.

The listener takeaway here is insight into a pretty provocative theory connecting ancient lore to modern secret societies

and their alleged roles in this uh grand overarching plan.

Okay, let's zoom in a bit. One of those alleged societies, the Trilateral Commission. What's their deal? according to the source.

Right? So this group it specializes in promoting world government. The idea is encouraging economic interdependence between well what it sees as the superpowers. It's described as a derivative of the Council on Foreign Relations, the CFR. And it started apparently with the blessing of the CFR and the Bilderberers.

When was this?

July 23, 1972 at the Rockefeller estate up in Terrytown, New York.

Okay. And here's where it gets really interesting, right? It was formed by Rockefeller himself. Henry Kissinger and Carter's future national security adviser, Zigneu Brzinski.

Yeah. Drawing inspiration from Brzinsk's book, Between Two Ages.

And the source even suggests the commission actually funded and popularized Jimmy Carter specifically to ensure he won the presidency,

which really points to how these influential groups, often operating behind the scenes, are accused of steering political outcomes.

So, who are the members?

They're drawn from North America, Europe, and Japan. The idea is to foster cooperation between in these regions

and their belief system.

Reportedly, they believe in a global government, a global monetary system and a global tax policy. The source mentions they advocate for global socialism where Western nations might effectively be uh enslaved is the word used to support have not nations. It definitely raises questions about what that would actually mean for global economic equity.

So, the takeaway learning about a specific influential group accused of working towards a global economic and governmental system

and its alleged behind-the-scenes influence on political figures.

All right, next up, another name that gets whispered about a lot, the Bilderberers.

What does this source say about them?

This is described as a European organization also sponsored by major banks, Rothschilds, Rockefellers again, and other sort of globalist forces.

Apparently, some powerful Freemasons consider it the most clandestine, even sinister secret society out there.

Wow.

It's about 100 or so power elites from NATO countries and its leadership seems to come from within the CFR members

and its origins funding.

It was initially funded by big names National City Bank, Morgan Trust, Standard Oil, Ford, DuPont, Big Money. Founded back in 1954 by Prince Bernard apparently at the urging of Lord Victor Rothschild. The goal was to bring together the world's most powerful people once a year for secret meetings, secret agendas.

Okay. And what's the funding source now?

It's funded by the tax exemp Rockefeller and Ford foundations. And according to one researcher Neil Wilggas, it's basically nothing more than an unofficial CFR expanded for international scale.

So similar goals to the CFR.

Exactly. The cause, like the CFRs, is supposedly bringing about world government, and it's noted as leading to the European Economic Community, the EEC.

Any famous attendees mention?

Oh yeah. Nelson Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Steven Spielberg. Quite the list.

Which really makes you wonder doesn't it? How does the secrecy of meetings like that influence public trust and maybe global policy itself?

Absolutely. So, the takeaway is discovering the alleged workings of another powerful secretive group.

Bringing together global elites with reported aims to, you know, unite nations under a single world government model. Let's keep moving through these organizations. The Club of Rome, formed in 1968, renowned, but what's the story here?

Well, this group has fewer than aundred members. And again, they're all apparently also CFR members.

H noticing a pattern,

right? And some allege it reports to this little known committee of 300, sometimes called the snake committee.

They claim to understand the problematic, you know, the big tangled mess of world problems, pollution, war, industrial development, overpopulation,

and they hold the keys.

They purport to hold the keys to world peace and global prosperity achieved through world government.

And there was a specific report.

Yes. In 1973, they commissioned a report that the source describes as complete with contrived and anticipated apocalyptic problems. Things like peak oil, population explosions, global warming disasters,

and offered solutions

and offered ingenious resolution models.

So connecting this to the bigger picture,

the source suggests this organization's stealthy purpose is really to oversee the regionalization and then the unification of the entire world

by dividing it supposedly deviously into 10 political and eomic regions. Gary Ka who cited actually rates it as even higher classificationwise than the Bilderberers.

So it raises that question. How do these claims of global problem solving get tangled up with goals of global governance?

Exactly. The takeaway is understanding a group allegedly focused on global problems but maybe with a hidden agenda to unify the world

into these distinct regions potentially using controversial methods. Okay, next up, skull and bones. Ultra secretive Yale University exclusive. George Bush Senior was famously a member. What's the alleged power here?

Yeah, its power is described as pretty significant. Graduating members are said to make up the clo and dagger inner circle within the CFR that actually controls the CFR.

Controls it.

That's the claim. Researchers apparently call it the stepping stone to get into the CFR, Bilderbergers, and the trilateral organizations.

What about its symbols?

Its emblem is described as the crest for the Illuminati, and its insignia is the flag of the night. Templar members are even called Knights

and its origins

imported from Germany 1832 by William Huntington Russell and Alfonso Taft.

You mentioned prominent members Bush Senior of course. Yeah. Any others?

Oh yeah. Henry Stimson, Avil Haramman, Jay Richardson Dworth who managed the Rockefeller fortune for a long time.

So big names, big money connections.

Definitely the source points to this network of prominent families. Haramman, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Lord, Taft, Bundy, Rockefeller, Perkins, Stimson, Morgan, all well represented.

Wow.

And George W. Bush supposedly appointed 11 Skull and Bones members to his administration.

How exclusive is it?

Very only 15 members initiated per year. That limits active membership to maybe 500 600 at any given time.

And what are they like?

Described as political dynamos and corporate juggernauts. They socialize with the world's elite. There is an explicit emphasis on their family heritage and bloodlines.

Bloodlines again.

Yeah. Arranging marriages to protect and advance their genetic pseudo blue bloods and supporting each other in quests for dominance.

So, it really makes you ask to what extent do these intergenerational family connections influence leadership nationally and globally?

A key question. The takeaway here is delving into the alleged deep familial and political influence of this secret Yale society

and its reported role shaping the highest levels of government and finance.

Okay, let's shift from these uh alleged long-standing secret societies to to something very public, very current. Tommy Robinson's planned free speech festival in London.

Right. So Tommy Robinson announced plans for a national protest in London September 13, 2025. He's calling it a free speech festival and a Uniting the Kingdom event. This is following his recent release from prison.

And the source claims the establishment is trying to stop him.

Yeah. It states they're doing whatever they can pursuing people who talk about perpetrators and their crimes rather than the perpetrators themselves. That's the claim.

Robinson himself ET. He asserted, "Our biggest weapon is free speech. On 13th September, we will celebrate it like never before. The plan is to march past Parliament to Trafalgar Square."

And the reaction,

well, it's definitely polarizing. Multiple anti-racist groups are organizing counterprotests. One mentioned is Stand Up to Racism or SUTR.

Described how?

Described by the source as a fringe communist organization which stokes racism and xenophobia to overthrow parliamentary democracy. See quite strong language.

Others involved.

Yes. The Public and Commercial Services Union, PCS, that's the UK's largest civil service trade union, is also calling for a counter demonstration.

And there was a recent incident.

Yeah. The source mentions Robinson was attacked while handing out flyers. Police are making inquiries. And Brian Rose from London Real connects the pressure on Robinson to his efforts to expose rape gangs. He stated, "The media and the government institutions and the police, they do not want this story out. out because they were all complicit in suppressing these stories.

Okay. And there's a point about language, about labels. Yes. The source highlights how corporate media often labels Robinson hard right or faright. It argues that the left-wright spectrum is really about economics. Yeah.

Whereas Robin sees campaigns for freedoms and for the safety and justice of Britain's white working-class children are presented as moral and social issues, not far-right economic ones.

So, the takeaway here is understanding a contemporary flashoint point around free speech, government response, media labeling,

and the whole debate over defining political terms all happening around a public demonstration.

Okay, let's unpack this next source. It focuses on a major federal intervention by President Trump in Washington DC. Quite aggressive, it sounds like.

Yeah. Trump described August 12, 2025 as Liberation Day in DC. He seized control of the city's police force, which is apparently the first time that's ever happened in its history.

Wow. And deployed troops.

An additional 800 National Guard troops. He vowed to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedum, and squalor, and worse.

His description of DC,

he cited the city as being taken over by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, and mentioned drugged out maniacs and homeless people.

What was his justification?

He claimed DC's murder rate was higher than some of the most dangerous places on Earth, like the capitals of Colombia and Mexico. And he stated police would be allowed to do whatever the hell they want.

How long is this takeover set for? initially 30 days with the police reporting to Attorney General Pam Bondi.

But what's fascinating here is the different reality presented on the ground. Right.

Exactly. Mayor Muriel Bowser and city officials argue their crime reduction strategies are working. They noted violent crime had actually returned to a 30-year low by the time Trump was inaugurated in 2025.

And homicides had fallen another 26% just since January. So quite a contrast.

How did Bowser describe it

as unsettling and unprecedented. and politically motivated.

And the political reaction nationally,

well, House Minority Leader Jeff called Trump a wannabe king. Civil rights leaders like El Sharpton suggested it might be a distraction from other issues like the Jeffrey Epstein files handling.

So what are the broader implications here? What does this mean for residents and maybe other cities?

Residents are seeing a big influx of armed troops, a federalized police force. And this could potentially set a precedent, couldn't it? Where other cities, maybe Chicago, San Francisco, New York, could face similar federal takeovers based on claims about public safety risk

even if crime stats are falling.

Right? So the takeaway is exploring a direct example of federal intervention in local affairs, examining these conflicting claims about crime

and considering the potential precedents and importantly the civil liberty implications. All right, here's where it gets really interesting, perhaps a bit chilling. A deep dive into digital surveillance and privacy in the UK. What's happening?

Well, the UK government has secretly appar ly allowed police forces to search over 150 million passport and immigration database photos using facial recognition technology

secretly. So people didn't know their photos were being used this way

exactly. The source describes it as the equivalent of the police secretly putting everyone into a criminal lineup without their knowledge.

That's quite a statement. Are the numbers significant?

They're escalating rapidly. Searches of the passport database apparently jumped from just two in 2020 to 417 in 2023.

Huge increase.

And searches of the immigration database saw an almost sevenfold increase just between 2023 and 2024 from 16 searches to 102.

What are the concerns here?

Well, the practice obviously poses risks of profound invasions of privacy, but also crucially misidentifications and injustice.

Right. Facial recognition isn't perfect.

Far from it. As one member of the public is quoted saying, "We're not far off from people being dragged out of their beds in the middle of the night because the computer has said they've done something, which they haven't.

So, what's being done about this? Any push back?

Yes, organizations like Big Brother Watch and Privacy International are calling for these searches to be suspended immediately, and they're preparing legal action against the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police.

So, the takeaway for you is uncovering the extent of this covert government surveillance using biometric data in the UK,

understanding the rapid increase in its use and the really profound privacy the injustice concerns it raises.

Okay. Next, let's unpack President Donald Trump's tariff policies. One source we looked at strikingly calls this history as farce. What happened?

Right. So, on April 2, 2025, Trump declared Liberation Day, and he unveiled the sweeping new set of tariffs described as extremely high and seemingly arbitrary against global trade goods.

How high?

Raising average rates from around 2.5% up to 29%. It was called one of the largest tax increases in all of human history.

Wow. Compared to what?

Compared to the infamous 1930 Smoot Holly tariff and even uh Mao's disastrous great leap forward. Strong comparisons.

And what's fascinating here legally speaking is how he did it.

Yeah. Trump claimed the unilateral power to set these rates himself using a 1977 law. Basically bypassing congressional legislation,

which led to concerns

concerns that he'd proclaimed yourself a reigning, empowered American autocrat.

How did the markets react? They completely panicked. But Trump initially said he'd stay the course. Then China retaliated.

And this tit fortat exchange apparently raised tariffs against Chinese goods to an astonishing 145%.

145%. Good grief. But then

but then just a week after that initial declaration, Trump drastically reduced tariffs on other countries down to 10% for 90 days.

That's a huge swing back.

Exactly. Described as a Bugs Bunny cartoon policy change. And it led to dark suspicions of insider trading as the markets then recovered.

So what did this mean for daily life for businesses, consumers?

Well, such rapid sudden changes in national financial policy, apparently unseen before in major nations, created immense uncertainty. Business investment froze up. Consumer sentiment hit the worst level since recordeping began.

But employment stayed strong.

Surprisingly, yes, employment numbers held up.

And there's another controversial aspect here involving exports.

Right. The source details how Trump extorted That's the word. Used companies to pay taxes on exports.

Exports. Isn't that unusual?

Highly unusual and described as highly illegal under the US Constitution, which explicitly prohibits taxes or duties on articles exported from any state. Section 9 clause 5.

So, an example,

Nvidia and AMD apparently agreed to give 15% of their China chip sale revenues to the US government in return for export licenses.

And experts saw this as

as bribery or blackmail.

So, the listener takeaway is gaining a deep understanding of these highly unconventional controversial executive actions in trade policy.

Yeah, their immediate economic and legal impacts and just the unprecedented nature of such rapid policy shifts.

Right. Shifting gears quite dramatically now. A profound social and ideological discussion, the left's perspective on the family. What's being argued here?

Okay, so at the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA socialism conference in 2025, there was a panel discussion

and they discussed how the nuclear family form is an inherently repressive, racist, and heterosexist institution that functionally reinforces and reproduces capitalism.

That's a strong critique.

Very panelists argued for family abolition, meaning essentially all material needs would be taken care of by the collective. They viewed the family institution itself as part of the carceral system, like prisons.

Does this connect to older ideas?

Yeah, it aligns pretty closely with Marx's view of the family as a bourgeoa institution that needed dismantling. And this source mentions something about sex.

It highlights what it calls a bizarre preoccupation with commodifying sex, seeking to normalize sex work and even viewing marriage itself as a type of sex work. Saying sex work and marriage can't exist without each other. They're two sides of the same coin.

Okay. And what about children in this view?

They believe the rearing of children should be managed and controlled by the state. Collectivized the parent child bond replaced by a child collective relationship.

There's a specific author mentioned Sophie Lewis's book is cited as pushing for widespread surrogacy as a tool specifically to break biological bonds and destroy traditional ideas of gender and family.

So what does this all mean? What's the core reason for this opposition to the family?

At its core, the argument presented is that the family is an obstacle to state power. It's an institution that actually predates all states. And historically, the source points out advocates of state building like Ottovon Bismar creating the welfare state. So to end people's financial independence from the state and basically circumvent the family unit as this kind of institutional buffer.

And the ultimate outcome, according to the source,

the reduction of individuals into impotent, isolated units who interact primarily with state agents, replacing natural loyalties with a direct state citizen relationship,

which raises a huge question.

What are the long-term societal implications of fundamentally redefining family and individual autonomy like this?

Indeed, the takeaway is exploring these radical ideological arguments for dismantling the traditional family unit,

understanding its proposed replacement by collective and state control and the historical and philosophical roots of this uh very controversial stance. Okay, now for something completely different and maybe quite practical. Timeless money-saving tips glean directly from survivors of the Great Depression. What can we learn?

Yeah, this is fascinating. It shows how families adapted during one of the absolute toughest economic periods in US history. First off, the idea of live as a family.

Meaning,

well, today there's often encouragement for early independence, right? But during the depression, families really stuck together. They cut costs on rent, utilities, food, travel, simply by living under one roof. Makes sense.

Simple but effective. What else?

Insulate the home using whatever spare materials they could find. Old clothes, blankets to block drafts, and save on heating fuel, especially in winter. Very resourceful.

Okay. And for summer, how do they keep Cool.

Wet sheets over entryways. Literally hanging damp sheets over doors and windows. As the water evaporated, it cooled the air coming inside. A low tech way to reduce strain on well, if they even had AC, but just to cool the house.

Clever. And here's one that gets really interesting for shoppers today. Maybe.

Yeah. Buy produce that is close to spoiling. Apparently, stores back then would slash prices on Saturday evenings to get rid of produce before closing on Sunday and before it spoil. Ah, so families could grab bargains.

Exactly. Eat much cheaper the following week. Savvy shopping.

What about cleaning supplies? Those can be expensive.

Totally. They learned to create your own cleaning supplies. Mixing things like hot water and vinegar, which is still effective today instead of buying costly store products.

Good tip. And food, especially protein.

Yeah, consider cheaper protein options. When beef and chicken were scarce or too expensive, things like rabbit, eggs, even squirrels or fried balani became staples. helped feed entire families on a very tight budget. It really makes you ask, doesn't it, how many of these seemingly old-fashioned methods are still incredibly relevant and valuable today?

Absolutely. So, the takeaway is learning concrete, time-tested strategies for financial resilience and frugality,

straight from those who navigated extreme economic hardship. Really practical lessons for managing personal finances, whatever the era.

All right, our final deep dive today takes us to a major geopolitical event. The proposed meeting between Putin and Trump in Alaska set for as soon as August 15th, 2025. Lots of potential interpretations here.

Definitely. While the US media tends to frame it mostly as negotiations to end the war in Ukraine,

the source we looked at offers several other potential reads on the situation.

Like what?

Well, one idea is that it gives Trump cover to finally start a US withdrawal from the conflict. He might need a justification right after months of continuing US military aid to Ukraine.

Okay, makes sense politically. What else? Another interpretation is that it's about restarting US-Russia economic relations, particularly thinking about Russian commodities like rare earths. And maybe it's also a message to China trying to split Russia away from them.

Interesting angle. A third idea.

A third one suggests it's about getting Putin to agree to a general ceasefire. Maybe by conceding Ukrainian provinces like Luhansk, which Russia already took, and Donetsk, which is partially captured.

H But there's a more cynical view, too.

Yes. What's Fascinating is the fourth interpretation that this could just be another clever ruse by NATO in the west.

A ruse how

to lull Russia into a ceasefire without any actual withdrawal happening. Similar, the source suggests, to the 2015 Minsk agreement, which arguably just bought time for Ukraine to rebuild its military.

So, what does the source think is the most likely scenario?

The most likely interpretation presented is that it's basically just a lastminute maneuver by Trump to stage a grand PR event.

Uh, optics,

right? followed by some agreements in principle that neither side really expects to actually take effect. Trump gets a media win. But the situation on the ground doesn't really change.

Why would Putin agree to that then?

Well, Putin might go along with a PR event like this because it puts pressure on the Zalinski government in Ukraine and on European allies.

How so?

If they reject concessions, it makes Russia look like the one willing to negotiate while Ukraine and Europe aren't. That could potentially weaken support among US neoonservatives for continuing the war

and have Zalinsky and European allies responded.

The source states they've already rejected the idea of making any concessions.

So it really raises the question if political leaders are seen prioritizing PR over actual substantive peace talks.

Yeah. How does that impact international trust and the real chances of resolving conflicts?

The listener takeaway then is getting multiple perspectives on the alleged underlying motives and likely outcomes of a highstakes international meeting,

highlighting the complexities of geopolitical strategy, public perception, and maybe even political maneuvering.

Wow, what a deep dive we've had today, uncovering layers of insight from, well, alleged global conspiracies and the workings of power

all the way to profound social shifts and even the resilience of the human spirit during tough times like with those depression era tips. Exactly. And if we connect all this back to the bigger picture, I mean, the sheer variety of these sources we touched on, secret societies, economic policies, social dynamics, it really underscores is that our world is just far more complex than it often appears on the surface, doesn't it?

It certainly does.

Which raises, I think, an important question for you, the listener. How might understanding these diverse, often hidden influences actually empower you to critically assess the narratives that are shaping all our lives.

That is a powerful thought to leave everyone with. Thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez deep dive podcast show produced and archived at the website dailybriefs.info.

The "Lenny and Maria Sanchez Deep Dive Podcast" explores various complex and often controversial topics, aiming to provide listeners with "key stuff" and "important bits of knowledge and insight" to become "truly well-informed." The podcast covers a wide range of subjects, from alleged secret societies like the Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers, and Skull and Bones, and their purported influence on global governance and politics, to more current events such as Tommy Robinson's free speech festival, Trump's federal intervention in Washington D.C., and UK's secret digital surveillance. It also delves into ideological discussions, specifically the left's critique of the traditional family unit, and offers practical life lessons like money-saving tips from Great Depression survivors, concluding with an analysis of the geopolitical implications of a proposed Trump-Putin meeting. The overarching goal is to encourage listeners to critically assess the narratives shaping their lives by examining diverse and often hidden influences.

Discuss Secret Societies.

The sources discuss several alleged "secret societies" and influential groups, detailing their purported origins, goals, and influence on global events and political structures.

Here's an overview of these groups and their alleged activities:

• Nephilim Descendants and Satan's Scheme

◦ A provocative theory suggests the existence of modern-day descendants of the Nephilim as central to Satan's scheme to install the Antichrist, a plan believed to have begun after Lucifer's expulsion from heaven12. These bloodlines are allegedly supported by secret societies2.

◦ Freemasons, Templars, and Rosicrucians are named as societies purportedly recruited by Satan to promote a theology and history that contradict the biblical narrative2.

• Trilateral Commission

◦ This group is described as specializing in promoting world government and encouraging economic interdependence among what it considers the superpowers34.

◦ It is seen as a derivative of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and was reportedly initiated with the blessing of both the CFR and the Bilderbergers3.

◦ Formed on July 23, 1972, at the Rockefeller estate in Tarrytown, New York, by Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, and Zbigniew Brzezinski5. Brzezinski's book, Between Two Ages, is cited as an inspiration for the commission5.

◦ The source alleges that the commission funded and popularized Jimmy Carter to ensure his presidency, indicating its alleged behind-the-scenes influence on political outcomes5.

◦ Its members are drawn from North America, Europe, and Japan4.

◦ Their belief system reportedly includes advocating for a global government, a global monetary system, and a global tax policy, suggesting a form of global socialism where Western nations might become "enslaved" to support "have-not" nations4.

• Bilderbergers

◦ Described as a European organization, the Bilderbergers are sponsored by major banks, including Rothschilds and Rockefellers, and other globalist forces6.

◦ Some powerful Freemasons reportedly consider it the most clandestine and sinister secret society6.

◦ It consists of about 100 power elites from NATO countries, with its leadership reportedly stemming from within the CFR7.

◦ Initially funded by significant entities such as National City Bank, Morgan Trust, Standard Oil, Ford, and DuPont, it was founded in 1954 by Prince Bernard at the urging of Lord Victor Rothschild7.

◦ Its objective was to convene the world's most powerful individuals annually for secret meetings with secret agendas7.

◦ Currently, it is funded by the tax-exempt Rockefeller and Ford foundations8.

◦ Its overarching goal, similar to the CFR's, is to bring about world government, and it is noted for leading to the formation of the European Economic Community (EEC)8.

◦ Notable alleged attendees include Nelson Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Steven Spielberg8.

• Club of Rome

◦ Formed in 1968, this group has fewer than a hundred members, many of whom are also allegedly CFR members910.

◦ It is alleged by some to report to a lesser-known group called the "Committee of 300" or "snake committee"10.

◦ The Club of Rome claims to understand complex global problems like pollution, war, industrial development, and overpopulation, presenting itself as holding the keys to world peace and global prosperity through world government10.

◦ In 1973, they commissioned a report which the source describes as featuring "contrived and anticipated apocalyptic problems," such as peak oil, population explosions, and global warming disasters, along with proposed "ingenious resolution models"1011.

◦ Its "stealthy purpose" is suggested to be the oversight of the regionalization and eventual unification of the entire world by dividing it into 10 political and economic regions11. One researcher ranks it as even higher in classification than the Bilderbergers11.

• Skull and Bones

◦ This is an ultra-secretive society exclusive to Yale University12.

◦ Graduating members are said to comprise the "cloak and dagger inner circle" within the CFR, allegedly controlling the CFR itself1213.

◦ It is considered a stepping stone for entry into the CFR, Bilderbergers, and Trilateral Commission13.

◦ Its emblem is described as the crest for the Illuminati, and its insignia is the flag of the Night Templar, with members even being referred to as Knights13.

◦ Its origins trace back to Germany in 1832, imported by William Huntington Russell and Alfonso Taft13.

◦ Prominent alleged members include George Bush Senior, Henry Stimson, Averell Harriman, and Jay Richardson Dilworth (who managed the Rockefeller fortune)13.

◦ The society is linked to a network of influential families, including Harriman, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Lord, Taft, Bundy, Rockefeller, Perkins, Stimson, and Morgan14.

◦ George W. Bush reportedly appointed 11 Skull and Bones members to his administration14.

◦ It is highly exclusive, initiating only 15 members per year, limiting active membership to around 500-600 individuals at any given time14.

◦ Members are characterized as "political dynamos and corporate juggernauts" who socialize with the world's elite, with an explicit emphasis on their family heritage and bloodlines. They allegedly arrange marriages to protect and advance their "pseudo blue bloods" and support each other in pursuits of dominance1415.

General Observations on Elites and Control

The sources collectively suggest the existence of a "small hostile elite" that aims to impose its will globally and reduce populations to "obedient slaves" through "globalization"16. This elite is reportedly bound by blood relationships, financial interests, and blackmail, with the "Epstein Show" cited as a recent manifestation17. While specific documentary evidence for these claims is said to be elusive, there is much evidence pointing to their base in London and a significant presence of members who identify as Jewish or Zionist1718. They are also described as deeply intertwined with powerful banking circles17.

Furthermore, wars are presented as a powerful tool utilized by these elites to subdue populations19. One source asserts that "every existing ‘democracy’ is a billionaires’ racket," suggesting that governments, regardless of their declared form, primarily represent the interests of billionaires rather than the public20.The sources discuss several alleged "secret societies" and influential groups, detailing their purported origins, goals, and influence on global events and political structures.